Clean Room Technology

A project report submitted to the Department of Pharmacy, University of Asia

Pacific in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of
Science in Pharmaceutical Technology

Submitted By:

Registration No.: 17107030

Semester: Fall 2017

Submission Date: 22 February 2018

Department of Pharmacy
University of Asia Pacific
 Summary of Study

The clean room is a modern phenomenon. Although the roots of clean room design and
management go back for more than 100 years and are rooted in the control of infection in
hospitals, the need for a clean environment for industrial manufacturing is a requirement of
modern society. A clean room is an environment, typically used in manufacturing, including
of pharmaceutical products or scientific research, as well as aerospace semiconductor
engineering applications with a low level of environmental pollutants such as dust,
airborne microbes, aerosol particles, and chemical vapors. More accurately, a cleanroom has
a controlled level of contamination that is specified by the number of particles per cubic
meter at a specified particle size. Clean rooms are needed because people, production
machinery and the building struck generate contamination. Clean rooms are now used in a
variety of industries, including microelectronics, nanotechnology, defense, pharmaceuticals
and biotechnology. This review covers the basic concept of clean room technology.

ii
 Table of Contents

SI No. Topics Page

Summary of Study ii
Table of Contents iii-v
Lists of Tables v

Lists of Figures v-vi

1 Introduction 1
2 Clean Room 1
2.1 Clean Room Technology 1-2
3 The History of Clean Room 2
3.1 The Early Years 2
4 Clean Room Classification Standards 2
4.1 The History 2-3
4.2 The Basis of Clean Room Standards 3-4
4.2.1 Federal Standard 209 4
4.2.2 IS0 Standard 14644-1 4-7
4.3 Pharmaceutical Clean Room Classification 7
4.3.1 European Union Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice 8-10
4.3.2 Guideline on Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic
10
Processing
4.3.2.1 Critical Areas 10-11
4.3.2.2 Controlled Areas 11
5 The Design of Turbulently Ventilated Clean Room 12
5.1 Turbulently Ventilated Clean Room 12
5.2 Air Supply 12-13
5.3 High Efficiency Air Filters 13-14
5.4 Air Movement Within a Turbulently Ventilated Clean Room 14-15
5.5 Room Pressurization and Air Movement Control Between Room 16-17
5.6 Construction Materials and Finishes 17
6 Design of Unidirectional Clean Room and Clean Air Devices 17
6.1 Unidirectional Clean Room 17-19
6.2 Vertical Flow Unidirectional Clean Room 19

iii
6.3 Horizontal Flow Unidirectional Clean Room 19-20
7 Construction Materials and Surface Finishes 20
7.1 General Requirements 20-21
7.2 Conventional Building Techniques 21-22
7.3 Modular Construction 22
7.3.1 Studless wall systems 23
7.3.2 Framed wall systems 23-24
7.4 Doors and Windows 24-25
7.5 Floors 25
7.6 Ceilings 25-26
7.7 Outgassing and Electrostatic Properties 26
8 Air Filters Used in Clean Room 26-27
8.1 The Construction of High Efficiency Filters 27-28
8.1.1 Sodium Flame Test (Euro vent 4/4) 28
8.1.2 Institute of Environmental Sciences (IEST) Recommended 28
8.1.3 European Standard (EN 1822) 29
9 Probe (Scan) Testing of High Efficiency Filters 30
9.1 Filter Housings for High Efficiency Filters 30-31
10 Principles of Clean Room Testing 32
10.1 Clean Room Tests 32
10.1.1 Air Supply and Extract Quantities 32
10.1.2 Air Movement Control Between Areas 32
10.1.3 Filter Installation Leak Test 32
10.1.4 Containment Leak Testing 33
10.1.5 Air Movement Control Within the Clean Room 33
10.1.6 Airborne Particles and Microbial Concentrations 33
10.1.7 Additional Tests 33
10.2 Re-testing to Demonstrate Compliance 33-34
11 Personnel Contamination of Clean Room 34
11.1 HVAC (Heating Ventilating and air Conditioning System) 35
11.2 Air Handling Units 35
11.3 Filtration (HEPA and ULPA Air Filters) 35

iv
 11.4 Measurement of Airborne Contamination in Clean Room 35-36
11.5 Rapid Transport and Contamination of Clean Room 36
12 Conclusion 37
References 38-39

List of Tables

SI No. Title Page

1. Federal Standard 209 E Class Limits 4
2. Federal Standard 209 E Class Limits 5
3. Selected IS0 14644-1 Airborne Particulate Cleanliness Classes for
6
Clean Room and Clean Zones
4. Airborne Classification in the EU cGMP 8
5. Examples of Clean Room Conditions Required for Different Operations 9
6. Recommended Limits for Microbial Contamination 9
7. Classification of Filters According to the EN 1822 29
8. Schedule of Tests to Demonstrate Continuing Compliance 34

List of Figures

SI No. Title Page

1. The IS0 Classification Equation 4
2. Graphical Representation of ISO-class Concentration Limits for Selected 6
IS0 Class
3. A Turbulently Ventilated Clean Room 12
4. Air Flow Conditions Produced by a Ceiling Diffuser 14
5. Air Flow Conditions Produced by a ‘Dump’ System 15
6. Vertical Unidirectional Flow Clean Room 18
7. Vertical Unidirectional Clean Room with Exhausts in the Wall 19
8. Horizontal Unidirectional Flow Clean Room 20
9. Cross-section of Ceiling and Floor Details of High Quality Modular 23
System

v
10. Cross-section of Less Expensive Ceiling and Floor Details Used in a 24
Modular Construction System
11. Deep-pleated High Efficiency Filter with Separators 27
12. Section of a Mini-pleated Filter 28
13. Traditional Neoprene Gasket Sealing Method 30

vi
1. Introduction

Clean room is a controlled placement where different products are manufactured. And
concentration of airborne particles is controlled to specified limits. So we need to control
process of killing ultra fines airborne contaminants. The contaminations are generated by
people, processes, facilities, and equipment. They must be continually removed from the air.
The level of air cleanliness in the room must be regulated by standards. The most frequently
used standard is the ISO 14644. It is document that establishes standard classes of air
cleanliness in terms of airborne particulate levels in clean rooms and clean zones. The basic
function of a clean room is to protect the manufactured product from contamination. In the
pharmaceutical production economic survival of the manufacturer depends on the safety of
the finished product. So, it is needed to know a potential source of contamination, which
could include the working environment itself. Requirements of the quality of supply air have
increased due to development of new high technologies in different sectors of human
activities. Main operation factors which characterize air quality are temperature, humidity,
pressure, and cleanness. Settings are chosen on conditions to support every individual
technological process. Maximum requirements for air quality are concentration of suspension
particles per unit of air capacity and maximum permissible quantity of viable microorganisms
per unit of air capacity (Kapoor and Gupta, 2003).

2. Clean Room

A clean room is a room that is clean. However, a clean room now has a special meaning and
it is defined in the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) standard 14644-1 as.
A room which the concentration of airborne particles is controlled, and which is constructed
and used in a manner to minimize the introduction, generation, and retention of particles
inside the room and in which other relevant parameters, e.g. temperature, humidity, and
pressure, are controlled as necessary (Sanjay and Powar, 2013).

2.1 Clean Room Technology

Clean room technology can be divided into three broad areas. These areas can also be seen to
parallel the use of the technology as the clean room user moves from firstly deciding to
purchase a room to finally operating it. Various parts of clean room technology and their inter
connections.

1|Page
a. Clean room design and construction

 Standards
 Layout
 construction materials
 services - water gases
 the setting clean room to work

b. Clean room testing and monitoring

 testing that the new room performs as designed

 testing to ensure that the room continues to perform as designed

c. Clean room operations

 monitoring the room conditions

 entry of people, machines and materials
 clean room disciplines to avoid contaminating the product
 Clean room garments including gloves, masks, etc.
 Clean room cleaning and cleaning equipment

(Sanjay and Powar, 2013).

3. The History of Cleanrooms

3.1 The Early Years

It is clear that the first cleanrooms were in hospitals. Lord Lister’s contribution to history was
his realization that bacteria caused surgical wound infection. He thought that the elimination
of bacteria from the operating room should prevent infection. This was the scientific basis for
the first cleanrooms. In the 1860s, Lister dramatically reduced infection in his operating room
at the Royal Infirmary, Glasgow by use of an antiseptic solution (carbolic acid) that killed
bacteria. He used this on the instruments, the wound and the surgeon’s hands, and he
attempted to prevent airborne infection by spraying it into the air (Basak et al., 2011).

4. Clean Room classification standards

4.1 The History

It can be argued, with justification, that the first standard written for cleanrooms was
published by the American Air force on March 1961 and known as Technical Manual (T.O.).

2|Page
This considered cleanroom design and airborne particle standards, as well as operating
procedures such as: entry procedures; clothing; restriction of certain articles; cleaning of
materials; procedures for cleaning the room. However, the standard that had the most
influence on the design and operation of cleanrooms, and is the basis of most world
cleanroom standards, including IS0 standard 14644-1, was Federal Standard 209.The Sandia
Corporation team that invented the unidirectional concept, aided by others from the US A
military, industry and governmental agencies, produced the first Federal Standard 209 in
1963. This standard discussed both conventional and unidirectional clean rooms. In the
standard there is the first suggestion of measuring particles of ≥ 0.5 micro miter by means of
optical particle counters; these instruments had just become commercially available. It often
asked why 0.5 micro miters were adopted as the standard size on which the Federal Standard
was based. The answer is that it was the ‘art of the achievable’; as this was the smallest size
that was easily measured by the particle counters available at that time (Kapoor and Gupta,
2003).

4.2 The Basis of Cleanroom Standards

It is best to start this section of the book by giving some indication of the size of particles
used in cleanroom standards. The unit of measurement is a micrometer, one micrometer (1
micro miter) being one millionth of a meter. A human hair, a size that can be readily
appreciated, is approximately 70-100 pm in diameter. Another size that helps to put particle
sizes into perspective is the size of particle that can be seen on a surface. This is
approximately 50 micro miters in diameter, although this varies quite considerably depending
on the acuteness of sight of the person, the color of pathetical and the color of the
background. Clean rooms are classified by the cleanliness of their air. The most easily
understood classification of clean rooms is the one used in the earlier versions (A to D) of
Federal Standard 209 of the USA. This classification has been superseded by the last version
of the Federal Standard (E) and now by the International Standard IS0 14644-1. However,
this old classification is still widely used. In the older Federal Standards (A to D), the number
of particles equal to, and greater than, 0.5 micro miters were measured in one cubic of air and
this count used to classify a room. The most recent Federal Standard209 (E version) accepted
a metric nomenclature, but in 1999, IS014644-1 was published. This standard has been
adopted by all countries in the European Union and is now being adopted by other countries.
In this book, cleanroom classifications are given according to IS014644-1, with the Federal

3|Page
Standard 209 classification given in parentheses, e.g. IS0 Class 5 (Class 1.00) (Kapoor and
Gupta, 2003).

4.2.1 Federal Standard 209

The earlier Federal Standards 209 (A to D), the first Federal Standard 209 was published in
1963 in the USA and titled “Clean room and Work Station Requirements, Controlled
Environments”. It was revised in 1966 (209A), 1973 (B), 1987 (C), 1988 (D) and 1992 (E).

The cleanroom class limits, given in the earlier 209 A to D versions, are shown in Table 1.
The actual class of a clean room is found by measuring the number of particles 0.5 micro
miter in one cubic foot of room air, and determining which class limit is not exceeded; this is
the cleanroom classification (Sanjay and Powar, 2013).

Table 1: Federal Standard 209 D Class Limits

Class Particle/ft3
≥ 0.1μm ≥0.2μm ≥0.3μm ≥0.5μm ≥5.0μm
1 35 7.5 3 1 NA
10 350 75 30 10 NA
100 NA 750 300 100 NA
1,000 NA NA NA 1000 7
10,000 NA NA NA 10000 70
100,000 NA NA NA 100000 700

4.2.2 IS0 Standard 14644-1

The International Organization for Standards (ISO) is developing a series of cleanrooms

standard. These cover a wide variety of important cleanroom issues such as design, testing,
operation and bio-contamination. The first document, published in 1999, is IS0 14644-1 and
entitled ‘Classification of Air Cleanliness’. This gives the clean room classification method.

Figure 1: Equation of the IS0 Classification

4|Page
Where:
Cn is the maximum permitted concentration (in particles/m3 of air) of airborne particles that
are equal to, or larger, than the considered particle size.
Cn is rounded to the nearest whole number, using no more than three significant figures.
N is the IS0 classification number, which shall not exceed the value of 9.Intermediate IS0
classification numbers, may be specified with 0.1 the smallest permitted increment N.
D is the considered particle size in pm.
0.1 is a constant with a dimension pm.

From above equation 4, the maximum permitted airborne concentration of particles, i.e. the
class limit can be located for any given particle size. Shown in Table 3 are the classes
selected by IS0 14644-1 to illustrate class limits. It should be noted that there is a crossover to
the Federal Standard 209 classes. If the particle concentration/m3 in the IS0 standard is
divided by 35.2 the count is converted to counts/ft3. The equivalent Federal Standard209
classification is then found in Table 3 at the 0.5 micro miter size, e.g. an IS0 Class 5 is
equivalent to Federal Standard 209C lass 100 or M 3.5 (Whyte, 2001).

Table 2: Selected IS0 14644-1 Airborne Particulate Cleanliness Classes

ISO Maximum Concentration limits (particles/m3 of air) for particles equal

Classification to and larger than the consideration size shown below
Number
≥ 0.1μm ≥ 0.2μm ≥ 0.3μm ≥ 0.5μm ≥ 1μm ≥ 5.0μm
ISO Class 1 10 2 - - - -
ISO Class 2 100 24 10 4 - -
ISO Class 3 1000 237 102 35 8 -
ISO Class 4 10000 2370 1020 352 83 -
ISO Class 5 100000 23700 10200 3520 832 29
ISO Class 6 1000000 237000 102000 35200 8320 293
ISO Class 7 - - - 352000 83200 2930
ISO Class 8 - - - 3520000 832000 29300
ISO Class 9 - - - 35200000 8320000 293000

5|Page
 Table 3: Comparison Between Selected Equivalent Classes of F S 209 and IS0 14644-1

ISO Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 Class 8

14644-1
Classes

FS-209 Class Class Class Class Class Class

Classes
1 10 100 1000 10000 100000

Given in IS0 14644-1 is the same information in a graphical form. This is shown in Figure 2.
It should be appreciated that the airborne particle concentration of a given clean room is
dependent on the particle generating activities going on in the room (Sanjay and Powar,
2013).

Figure 2: Graphical Representation of ISO-class Concentration Limits for Selected

IS0 Class

If a room is empty, a very low particle concentration can be achieved, this closely reflecting
the quality of air supplied. If the room has production equipment in it that is operating, there
should be a greater particle concentration, but the greatest concentration occurs when the
room is in full production.

6|Page
The classification of the room may therefore be carried out in these different occupancy
states.
The occupancy states defined in IS0 14644-1 are as follows:
As built: the condition where the installation is complete with all services connected and
functioning, but with no production equipment, materials or personnel present.
At-rest: The condition where the installation is complete with equipment installed and
operating in a manner agreed between the customer and supplier, but with no personnel
present.
Operational: The condition where the installation is functioning in this pacified manner, with
the specified number of personnel present and working in the manner agreed upon.
The IS0 14644-1 standard also gives a method by which the standard of a clean room may be
ascertained by measuring particles at various sampling locations. The method for determining
the number of sampling locations, the sampling volume and counting the number of airborne
particles is similar to Federal Standard 209 E. IS0 14644-1 also includes a method for
specifying a clean room using particles outside the size range given in Table 2. Smaller
particles known in the standard as ‘ultrafine’ (≤ 0.1micro meter) are of particular importance
in these misconduct or industry and the large ‘macro particles’ (≥ 5 micro meter) are of use in
industries, such as parts of the medical device industry, where small particles are of no
practical importance. Fibers can also be specified. The Descript or method employed with
macro particles uses the format:
“(a; b); c’
Where
a is the maximum permitted concentration/m3
b is the equivalent diameter.

c is the specified measurement method. An example would be: “(1000; 10 micro meter to 20
micro meters); cascade impact or followed by microscopic sizing and counting’. A similar
classification methods used with ‘ultrafine’ particles (Kapoor and Gupta, 2003).

4.3 Pharmaceutical Clean Room Classification

Cleanrooms used for pharmaceutical manufacturing have their n standards. The two most
widely used are those published by the European Union and the USA.

7|Page
4.3.1 European Union Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice

The most recent pharmaceutical standard used in Europe came into operation on January
1997. This is called ‘The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union
pharmacopoeia Volume 4. Good manufacturing practices -Medicinal products for human and
veterinary use’. It is often called the European Union Guide to Good Manufacturing Products
(EU GGMP). This is available in various languages of the EU. For the manufacture of sterile
medicinal products four grades of airborne cleanliness are given. The airborne particulate
classification for these grades is given in Table 4.

Table 4: Airborne Classification in the EU cGMP

Maximum permitted number of particles/m3 equal to or above

Grade At rest(b) in operation
0.5μm 5μm 0.5μm 5μm
A 3500 0 3500 0
B(a) 3500 0 350000 2000
C(a) 350000 2000 3500000 20000
D(a) 3500000 20000 not defined(c) not defined(c)

(a) In order to reach the B, C and D air grades, the number of air changes should be related to
the size of the room and the equipment and personnel present in the room. The air system
should be provided with appropriate filters such as HEPA for grades A, B and C.

(b) The guidance given for the maximum permitted number of particles in the ‘at rest’
condition corresponds approximately to the US Federal Standard 209 E and the IS0
classifications as follows: grades A and B correspond with class 100, M3.5, IS0 5; grade C
with class 10 000, M5.5, IS0 7 and grade D with class 100000, M 6.5, IS08.
(c) The requirement and limit for this area will depend on the nature of the operations carried
out. The particulate conditions given Table 4for the ‘at rest’ state should be achieved after a
short ‘clean up’ period of 15-20 minutes (guidance value),after the completion of operations.

Examples of operations to be carried out in the various grades are given in the Table 6. The
particulate conditions for a grade A zone that is in operation should be maintained in the zone
immediately surrounding the product whenever the product or open container is exposed to
the environment. It is accepted that it may not always be possible to demonstrate conformity

8|Page
with particulate standards at the point of fill when filling is in progress, due to the generation
of particles or droplets from the product itself.

Table 5: Cleanroom Conditions Required for Different Operations

Grade Examples of operations for terminal sterilized product

A Filling of products, when usually at risk
C Preparation of solutions, when usually at risk, Filling of products
D Preparation of solutions and components for subsequent filling
Grade Examples of operations for Aseptic Preparation
A Aseptic preparation and filling
C Preparation of solutions to be filtered
D Handling of components after washing

Microbiological monitoring is also required to demonstrate the microbiological cleanliness of

the cleanroom during production. The recommended limits are given in Table 6.

Table 6: Recommended Limits for Microbial Contamination

Grade Air sample Settle plate Contact plate Glove print

cfu/m3 (diam. 90mm) (diam. 55mm) 5 fingers
cfu/4hrs. (b) cfu/plate cfu/glove
A <1 <1 <1 <1
B 10 5 5 5
C 100 50 25 -
D 200 100 50 -

(a) These are average values.

(b) Individual settle plates may be exposed for less than 4 hours.

(c) Appropriate alert and action limits shoulder set for the results of particulate and
microbiological monitoring. These limits are exceeded; operating procedures should
prescribe corrective action. The air classification required for a cleanroom that has an isolator
used to protect against contamination depends on the design of the isolator and its
application. It should be controlled and for aseptic processing be at least grade D.
Blow/fill/seal equipment used for aseptic production, which is fitted with an effective grade

9|Page
A air shower, may be installed in at least a grade C environment, provided that grade A/B
clothing is used. The environment should comply with the viable and non-viable limits ‘at
rest’, and the viable limit only when in ‘operation’. Blow/fill/seal equipment used for the
production of products for terminal sterilization should being stalled in at least grade D
environment (Whyte, 2001).

4.3.2 Guideline on Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing

This document is produced by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the USA and
published in 1987.

The FDA defines two areas in aseptic processing that are of particular importance to drug
product quality. These are the ‘critical area’ and the ‘controlled area’. A ‘critical area’ is
described in the FDA document as: ‘one in which the sterilized dosage form, containers, and
closures are exposed to the environment. Activities that are conducted in this area include

Manipulations of this sterilized materials/product prior to and during filling/closing

operations’. The ‘controlled area’ is described as: ‘an area in which it is important to control
the environment, is the area where unsterilized product, in-process materials, and
container/closures are prepared. This includes areas where components are compounded, and
where components, in-process materials, drug products and drug product contact surfaces of
equipment, containers, and closures, after final rinse of such surfaces, are exposed to the plan
environment.

The environmental requirements for these two areas given in the Guide areas follow:

4.3.2.1 Critical Areas

The FDA guidelines give the following information: liar in the immediate proximity of
exposed sterilized containers/closures and filling/closing operations is of acceptable
particulate quality when it has a per-cubic-foot particle count of no more than 100 in a size
range of 0.5 micron and larger (Class 100) when measured not more than one foot away from
the work site, and upstream of the air paw, during filling/closing operations. The agency
recognizes that some powder filling operations may generate high levels of powder
particulates which, by their nature, do not pose a risk of product contamination. It may not, in
these cases, be feasible to measure air quality within the one foot distance and still
differentiate" background noise'' levels of powder particles from air contaminants which can
impeach product quality. In these instances, it is nonetheless important to sample the air in a
manner, which to the extent possible characterizes the true level of extrinsic particulate
10 | P a g e
contamination to which the product is exposed. Air in critical areas should be supplied at the
point of use as HEPA $1-treed laminar flow air, having a velocity sufficient to sweep
particulate matter away from the $ling/closing area. Normally, a velocity of 90 feet per
minute, plus or minus 20%, is adequate, although higher velocities may be needed where the
operations generate high levels of particulates or where equipment configuration disrupts
laminar flow. Air should also be of a high microbial quality. An incidence of no more than
one colony forming unit per IO cubic feet is considered as attainable and desirable.

Critical areas should have a positive pressure deferential relative to adjacent less clean areas;
a pressure differential of 0.05 inch of water is acceptable (Shivhare et al., 2009).

4.3.2.2 Controlled Areas

The FDA Guidelines give the following information: ‘Air in controlled areas is generally of
acceptable particulate quality if it has a per-cubic-foot particles out of not more than 100,000
in a size range of 0.5 micron and larger (Class 100,000) when measured in the vicinity of the
exposed articles during periods of activity. With regard to microbial quality, an incidence of
no more than 25 colony forming units per 10 cubic feet is acceptable. In order to maintain air
quality in controlled areas, it is important to achieve a sufficient air flow and a positive
pressure differential relative to adjacent uncontrolled areas. In this regard, airflow sufficient
to achieve at least 20 airs changes per hour and, in general, a pressure deferential of at least
0.05 inch of water (with all doors closed), are acceptable. When doors are open, outward
airflow should be sufficient to minimize ingress of contamination.

The definition of clean room has been expanded in the ISO 14644 compared to FS
209E, the definition has include the specific internal environmental conditions. The
definitions for both FS 209E and ISO 14644 are as follow; FS 209E, Define clean room as, A
room in which the concentration of airborne particles is controlled and which contains one or
more clean zones.

ISO 14644-1 expanded the definition of a clean room to A room in which the
concentration of airborne particles is controlled, and which is constructed and used in
a manner to minimize the introduction, generation, and retention of particles inside the
room and in which other relevant parameters, e.g. temperature, humidity and pressure are
controlled as necessary (Shivhare et al., 2009).

11 | P a g e
5. The Design of Turbulently Ventilated Clean Room

5.1 Turbulently Ventilated Clean Room

The ventilation principles of turbulently ventilated clean rooms are similar to those found in
most air conditioned rooms, such as office’s shop. The air is supplied by an air conditioning
plant through diffusers in the ceiling. This type of cleanroom is called a ‘turbulently
ventilated’ clean rooming this book as the air moves in a turbulent-random way within the
room. This distinguishes it from a unidirectional flow clean room, where the air enters
through filters across the whole ceiling, or wall, and flows in a unidirectional manner across
the clean room. A turbulently ventilated room is also known as a ‘non unidirectional’
cleanroom; however, this does not describe the air flow wells. The design of a turbulently
ventilated cleanroom differs from an ordinary air conditioned room in a number of ways.
These are: The air supply volume is much greater. High efficiency air filters are used and
normally fitted where the air enters the cleanroom. The air movement within the clean room
assists in the removal of contamination. The room is pressurized so that air flows out to less-
clean adjacent areas. Construction material and finishes are of a high standard. These
attributes of a turbulently ventilated clean room are now discussed in more detail (Bhatia,
2012).

Figure 3: A Turbulently Ventilated Clean Room

5.2 Air Supply

A normal air conditioned room, such as an office or shop, will be supplied with just sufficient
air to achieve comfort conditions; this may be in the region of 2- 10 air changes per hour.
However, a typical turbulently ventilated clean room is likely to have between 10 and 100 air

12 | P a g e
changes per hour. This additional air is required to dilute the contamination dispersed into the
room and to reduce it to a concentration specified in a clean room standard. Clean rooms
require large quantities of air that is air conditioned and filtered to a very high standard. To
ensure an economic design, it is essential that the clean room air is recalculated back through
the air conditioning plant. However, it is also necessary to provide fresh outside air for the
health of personnel working in the clean room and to pressurize the clean room against
outside contamination. Normally between 2% and 10% of the total air supply is fresh air;
large airtight rooms require a lower percentage than small less-airtight rooms. If air extract
systems are used to remove contamination from around machinery or processes, then the
percentage of fresh air will have to be increased to compensate. When designing a ventilation
system for a room like an office, it is necessary to calculate the amount of air required to keep
the room cool; this is dependent on the heat generated in the room. In cleanrooms it is quite
common to find that production equipment produces large quantities of heat. It is therefore
unusual to find that the amount of air required to cool the room is similar to that required to
achieve the correct clean air standard. Air changes per hour are a common way of expressing
air dilution in the room and give an indication of the cleanliness of a room. However, the
airborne cleanliness of a turbulently ventilated clean room is really dependent on the volume
of air supplied to the room in a given time. The airborne cleanliness is also related to the
generation of contamination from production machinery and personnel working in the room.
If the air supply remains constant the clean room is dirtier if there are (a) more people in the
clean room, (b) more activity from people, (c) clean room garments that are less effective in
preventing dispersion of contamination, and (d) more contamination coming from production
machinery and processes (Appa et al., 2010).

5.3 High Efficiency Air Filters

A cleanroom uses air filters that are much more efficient than those used in offices etc.
Cleanroom filters would be normally better than 99.97% efficient in removing particles
greater than about 0.3 micrometers from the room’s air supply.

These filters are known as High Efficiency Particle Air (HEPA) filters, although Ultra Low
Penetration Air (ULPA) filters, which have an even high inefficiency, are used in
microelectronic fabrication and similar areas.

Most cleanrooms use HEPA or ULPA filters, but in the lowest standards of cleanrooms they
are not essential. In an IS0 Class 8 (Class 100 000) room, bag-type filters, with an efficiency

13 | P a g e
near to 90% against particles ≥ 0.5 micro miter, are often used. In most clean room, HEPA or
ULPA filters are installed at the point where the air is discharged into the room Figure 5. In
air conditioning systems in offices and the like, the filters are placed directly after the air
conditioning plant and the filtered air distributed by air ducts to the air supply diffusers.

However, particles may be drawn into the air supply ducts, or come off duct surfaces and
hence pass into the room. The filters in cleanrooms are therefore placed in a terminal position
in the air supply duct. In lower standards of cleanroom, such as IS0 Class 8(Class 100 000),
the particles that could enter, or come from, the ducts will be a smaller proportion of the total
count; filters are often installed in the traditional position, just after the central air
conditioning plant (Tinglay et al., 2003).

5.4 Air Movement within a Turbulently Ventilated Clean Room

The type, number and placement of air supply diffusers, as well as the extract grilles, is an
important consideration in a turbulently ventilated cleanroom. It is possible to supply the air
to a cleanroom with, or without, a diffuser. Air diffusers are used in many air conditioned
rooms and situated where the supply air enters a room; they are designed to minimize the
draught caused by high air velocities and ensure good air mixing. This is illustrated in Figure
4.

Figure 4: Airflow Conditions Produced by a Ceiling Diffuser

In some conventionally ventilated cleanrooms, diffusers are not used and the supply air is
‘dumped’ down directly from the air filter into the cleanroom (Chandiran et al., 2010).

14 | P a g e
 Figure 5: Air Flow Conditions Produced by a ‘Dump’ System

It is my opinion that the use of diffusers is best in conventionally ventilated cleanrooms.

‘Dump’ methods will give enhanced conditions below the supply area, but must therefore
give poorer conditions elsewhere in the room. If enhanced conditions are required at critical
areas, then it is better to ensure good air mixing in the cleanroom by means of diffusers, and
use unidirectional cabinets or workstations at the critical areas. Diffusers should, however, be
selected so that there are a sufficient number and size to give good mixing and draught free
conditions. If the ‘dump’ method is chosen then the filters should preferably be distributed
evenly about the room. There may be an advantage in grouping the filters together to protect
an area that must be kept clean. However, if grouping is employed, it should be remembered
that the standard of the cleanroom is determined by the dirtiest part and this may give a lower
classification.
It is normal practice in cleanrooms to site the air extract grilles at a low level around the
walls; it is thought that high-level extracts cause a short circuiting of air from the air supply
and hence the room is not swept by clean air. This will happen in a unidirectional flow, as the
air moves in lines. However, in turbulently ventilated cleanrooms when diffusers are used,
the air supply is quickly and thoroughly mixed with the rest of the room; this is the function
of a diffuser.

If diffusers are not used, the airflow from the filters is more unidirectional and short-
circuiting to an extract is more likely to occur. Where the air extract is positioned is likely to
be of little consequence if diffusers are used; in this situation any small advantage in using
low level extracts is unlikely to be significant enough to require low level extracts if the
design is more logical with high-level wall extracts (Tingley et al., 2013).

15 | P a g e
5.5 Room Pressurization and Air Movement Control Between Rooms

A cleanroom must be designed to ensure that contaminated air does not come in to the room
from dirtier adjacent areas. Air should therefore always move from the cleanroom to less-
clean adjacent areas. However, although this method is satisfactory when setting up a
cleanroom prior to hand-over, it is not a long-term monitoring possibility. To monitor a
cleanroom, it is normal practice to check that the cleaner areas are more positively
pressurized than less-clean adjacent areas. If a cleanroom is at a higher pressure than an
adjacent area then air will flow from the cleanroom to the adjacent area. Differential
pressures of 10 Pa between two cleanrooms, and 15 Pa between a cleanroom and an
unclassified area, are reasonable design pressures (12 Pa = 0.05 inch water gauge). Where
practical difficulties arise in achieving these pressures, e.g. where there is a supply tunnel
connecting the two areas, a minimum pressure differential of 5 Pa may be acceptable.

In a cleanroom suite, the air pressures should be set up so that the air moves from clean to the
less-clean areas. This means that the highest pressure should be in the production area. This is
necessary to give a 10 Pa pressure difference between the production room and the clothing
change room, a 10 Pa difference between the change room and locker room and 15 Pa
between the locker room and the outside approach corridor; this gives a total of 35 Pa.
Because a 35 Pa pressure difference is established between the production room and the
outside corridor, the same pressure is available across the material transfer room. The
material transfer area can therefore be 15 Pa less than the production area and 20 Pa greater
that the outside corridor; this pressure differential is greater than required but quite
acceptable. However, if too large a pressure difference is used; extra energy costs will be
incurred. Problems may also be experienced when trying to open and close doors, as well as
‘whistling ‘through cracks. It must be decided what type of air movement control scheme
between rooms in the cleanroom suite should be used.

Two adjacent rooms, with their door closed can be set up with just sufficient air flowing
through the gaps to give the correct, differential pressure between them. This is known as the
‘closed door ‘solution. However, the air flowing through the doorway may be quite small
(especially if the door is a tight fit). The consequence of this is that when the door is opened
little air is available to pass out through the doorway. There can then be an exchange of air
across the open doorway caused by the air turbulence and an air temperature difference
between the rooms. This may be acceptable and many cleanrooms are set up in this way. To
minimize this unwanted air transfer it is normal to use an air lock, e.g. the materials transfer,

16 | P a g e
or clothes changing areas. These air locks should be ventilated so that the contaminated air
from the outside corridor, and any contaminants generated within the air lock can be diluted.

It may not be possible to provide an airlock between each cleanroom area, or it may be
considered that the airborne contamination within an air lock is too high and should not be
allowed to flow into the production area. It will then be necessary to provide an ‘open door’
solution, in which a system of cascading air passes through the open doorway in sufficient
volume to prevent contaminated air entering. The design used to ensure the correct airflow
between rooms when the doors are open can be quite complicated (Whalley, 2011).

5.6 Construction Materials and Finishes

Another indication that a room is a clean room is its construction method. Clean room should
be constructed to minimize air leakage out of the room. The internal surface finishes should
also be sufficiently tough to resist chipping or powdering when impacted, or abraded. The
surface finish should also be smooth, easy-to-clean and not harbor dirt in cracks (Whalley,
2011).

6. Design of Unidirectional Clean Rooms and Clean Air Devices

Clean rooms that are ventilated in the turbulent manner described in the previous chapter may
achieve conditions as low as IS0 Class 6 (Class 1000) during manufacturing, but this is more
likely to be IS0 Class 7 (Class 10000). To obtain rooms better than IS0 Class 6 (Class 1000)
during operation, greater dilution of the generated particles is required. This can be achieved
by a unidirectional flow of air (Whalley, 2011).

6.1 Unidirectional Clean Room

Unidirectional airflow is used in cleanrooms when low airborne concentrations of particles or

micro-organisms are required. This type of cleanroom was previously known as ‘laminar
flow’, both names describing the flow of air. The airflow is in one direction, either horizontal
or vertical, at a uniform speed that is normally between 0.3 and 0.5 m/s (60 ft/min to 100
ft/min) and throughout the entire air space. It may be seen that air is supplied from a complete
bank of high efficiency filters in the roof of the clean room. The air then flows down through
the room like an air piston, thus removing the contamination. It then exits through the floor,
mixes with some fresh air brought in from outside, and re circulates back to the high
efficiency air filters

17 | P a g e
 Figure 6: Vertical Unidirectional Flow Clean Room

Airborne contamination from people and processes can be immediately removed by this flow
of air, whereas the turbulently ventilated system relies on mixing and dilution. In an empty
room with no obstructions to the unidirectional airflow, contamination can be quickly
removed by air velocities much lower than those mentioned above. However, in an operating
room there are machines causing obstructions to the airflow, and people moving about it.
Obstructions may cause the unidirectional flow to be turned into turbulent flow and local air
recirculation to be established round the obstructions. Movement of people will also turn the
unidirectional flow into turbulent flow. With lower air velocities and air dilution, higher
concentration of contamination can be established in these turbulent areas. A velocity in the
region of 0.3 m/s to 0.5 m/s (60 ft/min to 100 ft/min) is necessary so that disrupted
unidirectional flow can be quickly reinstated and the contamination in turbulent areas round
obstructions adequately diluted. I have studied the effect of velocity in a variable-velocity
unidirectional flow room that was operational. The velocity could be varied from 0.1 m/s to
0.6 m /s (20 ft/min to 120 ft/min). The results showed that a velocity of 0.3 m/s (60 ft/min)
was required to give stable unidirectional flow and low particle and bacterial concentrations.
Increasing the air velocity, in stages up to 0.6 m/s (120 ft/min) gave lower airborne counts,
but this worked on the ‘law of diminished returns’. The information obtained can be
interpreted as suggesting that a velocity of 0.3 m/s (60 ft/min) gives the best returns for effort,
but if a clean roam has a high density of machinery, or personnel, a higher velocity would
give lower airborne contamination. Unidirectional airflow is correctly defined in terms of air
velocity as the higher the velocity the cleaner the room. Air changes per hour are related to
the volume of the room, e.g. ceiling height and are therefore incorrect units of measurement.

18 | P a g e
The air supplied to unidirectional flow rooms is many times greater than that supplied to a
turbulently ventilated room. These clean rooms are therefore very much more expensive to
build and run. Unidirectional flow rooms are of two general types, namely horizontal or
vertical flow. In the horizontal system, the airflow is from wall to wall and in the vertical
system it is from ceiling to floor (Michael, 2010).

6.2 Vertical Flow Unidirectional Clean Room

A vertical flow unidirectional clean room is shown in Figure 7. This shows the air flowing
through the complete area of a floor. However, unidirectional flow rooms are also designed
so that air is returned through extract grilles distributed around the wall at floor level. This
type is illustrated in Figure 7. This design can only be used in rooms that are not too wide,
and6meters (20 ft) has been suggested as a maximum width.

Figure 7: Vertical Unidirectional Clean Room with Exhausts

Care must be taken with this design. The route that the supply air takes to get to the air
exhausts is the reason for the problem. Airflow of the type shown in Figure 8, gives poor
unidirectional flow in the center of the room and a flow of air that is not vertical in the rest.
Personnel may therefore contaminate the product if they are positioned between the air
supply and the product (Yuebin et al., 2014).

6.3 Horizontal Flow Unidirectional Flow Rooms

In this design, the air is supplied through a wall of high efficiency filters and flows across the
room and exits on the other side. The air is then returned to a ventilation plant and back
through the air filters. The area of a wall in most rooms is usually much smaller than the
ceiling, and hence a cross flow room will cost less in capital and running costs than a down

19 | P a g e
flow one. The horizontal flow type of cleanroom is not as popular as the vertical type.
(Yuebin et al., 2014).

Figure 8: Horizontal Unidirectional Flow Clean Room

7. Construction Materials and Surface Finishes

7.1 General Requirements

A clean room requires a higher standard of construction than many other buildings.
Construction materials used to build clean rooms differ from those used in non-clean room
construction for the following reasons: clean room should be built with an airtight structure.
The internal surface finish should be smooth and suitable for cleaning. The internal surface
finish should be sufficiently tough to resist chipping or powdering when impacted or abraded.
Some process chemicals, cleaning agents, disinfectants and water may attack or penetrate
conventional finishes. In some clean rooms, electro-dissipative construction materials will be
required.

In some clean rooms, construction materials that give a minimum of ‘out gassing’ will be
required. Clean rooms are maintained at a positive pressure with respect to adjacent areas. If
the construction is poor and the joints not well sealed, then the structure may leak too much.
It may then be necessary to pressurize the room by excessive amounts of ‘make up’ outside
air. It is not good economic sense to waste air that has to be expensively filtered and air-
conditioned. Attempting to seal up the structure during the ‘snagging’ part of the construction
will not be as successful as making it airtight during construction. Containment rooms that
are maintained at a negative pressure must be airtight, as dirty unfiltered air will be drawn

20 | P a g e
into the room through cracks, joints and at service penetration points in the fabric. The
materials that are used for the construction of a clean room should be smooth on the surface
facing the inside of the clean room. There should be no pores or roughness that will retain
contamination. The surface should be free of ledges and easily wiped free of any
contamination that is deposited. The butts and joints, as seen from the inside of the clean
room, should not show openings that may harbor, and then disperse, dirt. The surface finish
in a clean room must not break up easily and disperse chips or particles of material. A
conventional material that is often used in houses and offices is plasterboard that is nailed to
stud partitions and then painted. If this material is struck heavily the plaster powder will be
released. This is unacceptable in a clean room and surface finishes must be suitably resistant
to impact. Clean room surfaces, especially floors, should be able to withstand liquids used in
clean rooms. Some processes use strong acids or solvents that will attack surfaces. Clean
rooms, where micro-organisms cause contamination, will require disinfection. Disinfectants
are in an aqueous solution and to correctly disinfect the surface the contact time should be
several minutes; water penetration can occur if construction materials are not suitable.
Similar problems can occur when cleaning the clean room with surfactant solutions. It is
therefore necessary to ensure that penetration of water does not occur, as this can produce
conditions that are suitable for microbial growth. It should, however, be noted that it is
incorrect to suggest that micro-organisms sitting in dry conditions in cracks and pores will
multiply. Micro-organisms are aquatic in nature, and unless free water is available, or the
relative humidity is very much higher than found in a clean room, growth will not occur. An
electrostatic charge can be generated by rubbing two dissimilar surfaces together and can
give two problems. Firstly, the charge will attract particles from the air and those deposited
particles may give a contamination problem. Secondly, electrostatic discharge can cause
some components to fail. Construction materials that minimize this problem may be
necessary in some clean rooms (Sanjay and Powar, 2013).

7.2 Conventional Building Techniques

Conventional building techniques, suitably modified, can be used in clean room construction.
The building used to house the clean room suite will be conventionally constructed with
floor, ceiling and external walls. Inside that structure, internal walls will become the various
rooms of the clean room suite. These are constructed using conventional techniques
employing bricks or blocks and finished using wet plastering or dry lining methods. The dry
finishing method is the most popular method as this employs less site time, is more easily

21 | P a g e
repaired and allows the electricity, and other services such as air ducts to be run behind. At its
simplest, wall studs are used and these are lined with plasterboard. The boards are taped,
primed and painted. The paint is sprayed on and will be chosen to give good impact
resistance, e.g. epoxy-based types. To assist cleaning, wall-to-wall comers are best
constructed with 25 mm (l inch) to 50 mm (2 inch) diameter curves. The corner where the
wall meets the floor would normally be finished with a 100 mm (4 inch) quarter-round
coving. If this method issued, it would only be suitable for lightly-used clean rooms of about
IS0 Class 8 (Class 100 000), or for approach corridors or controlled areas outside the clean
room. A considerable improvement in the quality of the clean room can be achieved by lining
the frames with various sheets of clean room-compatible material; this will also enhance the
look of the clean room. The panels will be thinner - from about 3mm to 12 mm (1/8 inch to
'/zincs) depending on their strength and rigidity - than the stud less system used in modular
construction because the frames will give additional rigidity. The following wall panels can
be used: Panels laminated with an outer clean room-compatible surface and an inner-
strengthening core. Outer surfaces can be (a) mild steel that is galvanized and powder coated
or enameled, (b) plastic sheets or(c) aluminums that is either anodized, powder coated or
enameled. Inner core materials can be plaster, composite board, plywood, honeycombing,
etc.; Glass-reinforced epoxy sheets; Mild steel sheets that are galvanized and either powder
coated or enameled; Aluminum sheets that are anodized, powder coated or enameled; 0
Stainless steel sheets, with or without a suitable paint finish. Many other combinations and
materials can be used, as long as they fulfill the criteria (John and Murphy, 2010).

7.3 Modular Construction

Modular construction is the type of construction where components are delivered ready-made
and assembled on site. A large variety of modular components are available from firms who
specialize in manufacturing such systems. Inevitably, the most easily assembled, best looking
and most robust system, with the least likelihood of contamination problems, will be the most
expensive. It is therefore necessary to choose wisely, balancing the quality and cost of the
products with the advantages they bring. The two principal ways a modular system is
assembled are:
1. Stud-less wall systems
2. Framed wall constructions.
(Powar and Daihong, 2007).

22 | P a g e
7.3.1 Stud-less Wall Systems

These are normally assembled from wall panels that are about 50 mm (2inch) thick for
rigidity; these are slotted into ceiling and floor mounted tracks. These tracks are usually
anodized aluminum extrusions and the wall panels are butted together. Figure 9 shows a
drawing of the ceiling and floor details of a high quality system of this type. Figure 11 shows
ceiling and floor details of a less expensive system of this type. The wall panels are laminated
from an outer clean room compatible surface and inner-strengthening core. Outer surfaces
can be plastic sheets, aluminum that is either anodized, powder coated or enameled, and
suitably treated mild steel. Inner core materials can be plaster, composite board, plywood,
honeycombing, etc (Powar and Daihong, 2007).

Figure 9: Cross-section of Ceiling and Floor Details of High Quality Modular System

7.3.2 Framed Wall Systems

These systems are built from joined aluminum extrusions. If this method is issued for a room,
the studs and cross members are clad with wall panels either on one side or on both (double
shells). Wall panels used in this type of construction will be made of the same types of
materials as discussed above, although they will be thinner.

23 | P a g e
 Figure 10: Cross-section of Less Expensive Ceiling and Floor Details Used in a

Modular Construction System

Framed systems are also used where process machinery is isolated from the rest of the room.
Isolators or minienvironments, as well as safety screens round machinery, are examples of
this use. Lightweight aluminum extrusions are connected together to give a framework round
the machinery and panels made of aluminum sheet, glass or clear plastic are glazed into the
frames by use of special easy-to-clean gaskets (Powar and Daihong, 2007).

7.4 Doors and Windows

Probably the most popular types of clean room doors are made either from plastic covered
wood, or faced with mild steel that is suitably treated and painted. To assist cleaning and
minimize hand contamination, door fittings such as door addles should be dispensed with
where possible. Doors would usually be hung so they would be kept closed by the positive
pressure of the clean room. However, exceptions may be required so that personnel can pass
through by pushing the door with their body. In that case, a self-closer should be fitted. Doors
are often manufactured with fine tolerances to minimize air leakage.
This is a particularly useful property in a negatively pressurized containment room to
minimize the entry of contamination from outside the room. However, in positively

24 | P a g e
pressurized rooms this may be unnecessary, especially if the design requires air to flow
through the doorway when open.

Doors may be glazed, which is particularly useful in the materials transfer airlock to see if it
is occupied. If glazing is required, the method of glazing (i.e. gaskets) should allow easy
cleaning. Doors that are completely made of glass are also available. Windows are fitted to
clean rooms. These are useful in dissuading visitors who have come to see the clean room
from entering; they are also necessary to allow management to see what is going on in the
room without having the bother of changing into clean room clothing. Their number should,
however be kept to a minimum. Windows should be glazed using easy-to-clean gaskets
(Powar and Daihong, 2007).

7.5 Floors

Concrete would be used as a common floor foundation in almost all clean rooms. A smooth,
impervious and durable surface would then beaded. This should be resistant to spilled
chemicals and be slip resistant. It may also be necessary in some situations to use materials
that have good electrostatic or minimal out gassing properties. A commonly used method of
covering the floor is with vinyl sheeting that is welded together. A less common surface
covering is terrazzo, which is very durable and is suitable in some situations. Vinyl sheeting
can be manufactured to be electrically conductive for use where this is desirable. In
unidirectional flow rooms, where the air passes through the floor, it would be comment to
find that the floor is made of tiles placed on pedestals. If the room is used for semiconductor
manufacturing, vinyl may not be an acceptable surface material because of the problem of
‘out gassing’. The floor-to-wall joints would normally be coved with some type of corner
profile. An exception to this requirement may be where machines are used to clean the floor
(Powar and Daihong, 2007).

7.6 Ceilings

It would be unusual to have anything but a false ceiling in a clean room. The need for access
to air conditioning ducts and other gas and electricity services, and the use of terminal filters
and recessed lights that are integrated with the ceiling, dictates the use of a suspended or
supported ceiling. In conventionally ventilated clean rooms the ceiling would be either of the
suspended or self-supported type. Into the space between the support channels, the light
fittings and air filter housings would be placed, the remaining areas being fitted with blank
panels. All of the light fittings filter modules and blank panels must be well fitted to ensure a

25 | P a g e
minimum of air leakage. If top-quality components are not used, mastic or other means can
be used to bed down the various components. In unidirectional flow clean rooms, most of the
ceiling is covered with filters. In that case, the ceiling is built of aluminum extruded channels
and the filters are inserted into the channels (Powar and Daihong, 2007).

7.7 Outgassing and Electrostatic Properties

In semiconductor and similar areas, the use of construction materials that allow chemicals to
‘outgas’ can give contamination problems. Clean room flooring will often be plastic sheeting.
Vinyl flooring is made of PVC with other materials added, one of these being a plasticizer to
make it flexible. These plasticizers will outgas and are therefore not a good choice for
semiconductor clean rooms, especially as the floor has a large surface area. Some types of
wall and ceiling panels may also be considered a risk. Another material that is considered a
risk is silicon sealant used for sealing various joints. More suitable sealants can be purchased.
Adhesives may also be a problem. Test methods are available to ascertain the out gassing
properties of materials. These can accelerate the ‘out gassing’ of contamination and assess the
amount that will condense onto a surface. If static charge is considered a problem, then the
construction materials should be conductive and earthed to dissipate the electrostatic charge.
However, if there is no electrical resistance there will be a danger to personnel through an
electrical accident. It has been suggested that the electrical resistance should therefore be
between l06 and l09 ohms (Power and Daihong, 2007).

8. Air Filters Used in Clean Room

The air supplied to a clean room must be filtered to ensure the removal of particles and
micro-organisms. Until the early 1980s, High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters
filtered clean room air, as these were the most efficient air filters available. A HEPA filter has
a minimum efficiency in removing small airborne particles, approximately equal to 0.3micro
miter, of 99.97%. Today; HEPA filters are still used in most clean rooms to remove the
microorganisms and inert particles in the supply air. The production of integrated circuits has
now evolved to a level where more efficient filters than HEPA filters are required to ensure
that fewer and smaller particles pass through the air filters and into the clean room. Better
filters are used and these are known as Ultra Low Penetration Air (ULPA) filters. An ULPA
filter will have an efficiency greater than 99.999% against 0.1-0.2 pm particles. These filters
are constructed and function in the someway as a HEPA filter.

26 | P a g e
For clean rooms of IS0 Class 6 (Class 1000) and poorer quality, HEPA filters are used with
turbulent ventilation to meet the clean room classification. For IS0 Class 5 (Class l00), HEPA
filters that completely cover the ceiling are used to supply unidirectional flow down through
the clean room. For IS0 Class 4 (Class 10) or lower, ULPA filters should be used with
unidirectional flow (Kapoor and Gupta, 2003).

8.1 The Construction of High Efficiency Filters

High efficiency filters are usually constructed in two ways, i.e. deep-pleated or mini-pleated.
In a deep-pleated filter, which is the more traditional construction method, rolls of filter paper
are folded back and forward, side by side, either in 15 cm (6 inches) or 30 cm (12 inch)
widths. To allow the air to pass through the paper and give the filter strength, a crinkled sheet
of aluminum foil is often used as a separator. This pack of filter media and separators is then
glued into a frame of a plastic, wood or metal. A cross-section of this traditional construction
is shown in Figure 11.

Figure 11: Deep-pleated High Efficiency Filter with Separators

High efficiency filters are now most commonly available in a mini-pleat form. Aluminum
separators are not used in this method of construction but the paper medium is folded over
ribbons, glued strings, or raised dimples in the media and assembled into a frame. This
method of assembly allows 2.5 to 3 times more pleats than the deep-pleated filters and can
therefore be made more compact. Mini-pleated construction is the most widely used method
of construction for unidirectional flow clean room because the larger media area yields a
lower pressure drop than deep-pleated construction. Such a method of construction is shown
in Figure 12.

27 | P a g e
 Figure 12: Section of a Mini-pleated Filter

The pressure drop across a filter is dependent n the air velocity through the filter media and
its type of construction. The nominal air velocity through a filter is usually considered to be
0.5 m/s. At this velocity the pressure drop is likely to be between 120 Pa and 170 Pa. When
the pressure drop reaches 2.5 to 3 times the original pressure, the filters are normally replaced
(Jankle, 1997).

8.1.1 Sodium Flame Test (Euro vent 4/4)

This European test method for HEPA filters uses an aerosol of particles of sodium chloride
that have a mass median size of 0.6 pm. The test aerosol is sprayed into the air as an aqueous
solution and the dry particles that are formed are used to determine the filter’s efficiency
(Tinglay et al., 2003).

8.1.2 Institute of Environmental Sciences (IEST) Recommended

The Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (IEST) has developed a

Recommended Practice for testing ULPA filters (IEST-RPCC007).An optical particle counter
is used to measure particles, although a condensation nuclei counter can be used to extend the
lower range. The choice of the aerosol material is left to the user, but must meet certain
optical properties. This test system provides a particle size efficiency in size ranges from
around 0.07 micro miter to 3.0 micro miter (Gaurav and Chaudhari, 2015).

28 | P a g e
8.1.3 European Standard (EN 1822)

This standard is used for both HEPA and ULPA filters and gives a method for testing the
particle removal efficiency and classifying the filter. An important departure of this test
method from the methods outlined above is the determination of the Most Penetrating
Particle Size (MPPS) for the filter media being tested, and the measurement of the removal
efficiency of the filter at that particle size.
Each filter has a particular particle size that will pass through the filter most easily, that size
being determined by variables, such as the fiber content of the filter media, air velocity and
its packing density. It is logical therefore to test the filter at that most penetrating particle
size. The MPPS is normally between 0.1 micro miter and 0.3micro miter.

The first stage of this test method is to determine the MPPS of the flat sheet filter medium
used in the filter. This is carried out at the face velocity that will correspond with that
produced by the filter when working at its given flow rates. The efficiency of the complete
filter can then be determined in two ways: Leak testing (local efficiency). The filter media of
the complete filter is scanned to determine the amount of leakage through pinholes in the
filter medium (Gaurav and Chaudhari, 2015).

The efficiency of the complete filter is determined at its rated flow. The filter is then
classified by its overall and local efficiency against its most penetrating particle. This
classification is shown in Table 7.

Table 7: Classification of Filters According to the EN 1822

Filter Class Overall value Overall value Leak test Leak test
efficiency (%) penetration (%) efficiency (%) penetration (%)
E10 ≥ 85 ≤ 15 - -
E11 ≥ 95 ≤5 - -
E12 ≥ 99.5 ≤ 0.5 - -
H13 ≥ 99.95 ≤ 0.05 ≥ 99.75 ≤ 0.25
H14 ≥ 99.995 ≤ 0.005 ≥ 99.975 ≤ 0.025
U15 ≥ 99.9995 ≤ 0.000 5 ≥ 99.997 5 ≤ 0.0025
U16 ≥ 99.99995 ≤ 0.000 05 ≥ 99.999 75 ≤ 0.00025
U17 ≥ 99.999995 ≤ 0.000 005 ≥ 99.999 9 ≤ 0.0001

29 | P a g e
9. Probe (Scan) Testing of High Efficiency Filters

Air that is supplied in a turbulently ventilated clean room through diffusers in the ceiling is
thoroughly mixed with the room air. Some pinhole leaks in the filters can be tolerated, as
long as they are not great enough to significantly reduce the overall efficiency of the filtration
system and affect the required air cleanliness. This tolerance is possible because the small
number of particles passing through the filter are well mixed with the room air. This is not the
case in unidirectional flow systems, where a leak can release a unidirectional stream of
particles into the close proximity of the process or product. To prevent these pinhole leaks,
the filters should be scanned in the factory by introducing a test dust before the filter and
scanning the whole filter with overlapping passes using a probe and searching for leaks
(Gaurav and Chaudhari, 2015).

9.1 Filter Housings for High Efficiency Filters

When a high efficiency filter leaves the factory where it has been manufactured and tested, it
should be fit for the purpose required. If it has-been properly packed and transported, and
installed by personnel who are familiar with the delicate nature of filter media, then the
filter’s integrity should be maintained. To ensure that there is no ingress of unfiltered air into
the clean room, the filter must be fitted into a well-designed housing. The housing must be of
sound construction and particular attention must be paid to the method of housing/filter
sealing. The ceiling grid has a continuous channel filled with the fluid seal, which is a jelly-
like substance that will not flow out of the channel. A knife-edge fitted to the filter frame
mates into the channel of sealant. The fluid flows round the knife-edge to give a perfect seal
and prevents particles by-passing the filter through the housing (Murphy and John, 2010).

Figure 13: Traditional Neoprene Gasket Sealing Method

30 | P a g e
Clean room Testing and Monitoring When a clean room has been built and about to be
handed over to the purchaser, or when an existing clean room is reopened after being shut
down for modifications that could cause changes to its contamination control characteristics,
it will be tested. This initial type of testing is to establish that the clean room is working
correctly and achieving the contamination standards that it has been designed to fulfill. These
standards are laid down in IS0 14644-1. A secondary function of this initial testing is to
establish the initial performance of the room so that this can be adopted as a ‘benchmark’.
When the room is checked in the future, either routinely or when a contamination problem is
encountered, deviations from the original conditions may be found, or the possible reasons
for contamination thus as curtained. The final and indirect reason for carrying out initial
testing of a clean room is to familiarize and train the staff who will monitor and run the room.
This may be their most important, and possibly only, opportunity to understand how their
clean room works and learn the methods used to test and ensure that the clean room continues
to perform correctly.

When it has been shown that the clean room fulfils the IS0 14664-1 Clean Room
classification set down at the design stage, it is necessary to regularly check the room at the
time intervals set by IS0 14644-2, to ensure that the room continues to comply with the
standard. Many clean rooms are built and passed over to the user with little or no effort being
put into ensuring that over its many years of use the correct level of cleanliness continues to
be achieved. Testing must therefore be carried out so that the customer who buys the product
made within the room gets a product that is fit for the purpose it is intended. As well as
checking the clean room to show that it is working correctly when first installed and at
regular intervals to show that it complies with IS0 14644-1, it may be necessary to regularly
monitor the room. This may not be required in poorer clean rooms, but in higher quality
rooms it may be necessary to monitor the room to ensure that the correct conditions are
maintained during production. This testing may be either continually, or at intervals that are
much shorter that those laid down in IS0 14644-2 to show continued compliance. Most of the
tests carried out to test the initial performance, or demonstrate continual compliance, are
identical to those used to monitor it, although it is normal to find that the initial testing is
more thorough and extensive (Murphy and John, 2010).

31 | P a g e
10. Principles of Clean Room Testing

To show that a clean room is working satisfactorily it is necessary to demonstrate that the
following principles have been satisfied: The air supplied to the clean room is of sufficient
quantity to dilute or remove the contamination generated in the room. The air within the clean
room suite moves from clean to less-clean areas to minimize the movement of contaminated
air. Air should move in the correct direction through doorways and the fabric of the room.

The air supplied to the clean room is of a quality that will not add significantly to the
contamination within the room. The air movement within the clean room should ensure that
there are no areas within the room with high concentrations of contamination If these
principles are satisfied then the concentration of particles, and where necessary microbe-
carrying particles, should be measured (Bhure et al., 2010).

10.1 Cleanroom Tests

To ensure that the requirements in Section 9 are fulfilled, the tests shown in Figure 9 should
be carried out, preferably in the order given.

10.1.1 Air Supply and Extract Quantities

In the case of turbulently ventilated clean rooms the air supply and extract volumes should be
measured. In the case of unidirectional airflow it should be the air velocity (Bhure et al.,
2010).

10.1.2 Air Movement Control Between Areas

To demonstrate that the airflow between areas is in the correct direction i.e. from the clean to
the less-clean, it is necessary to check that:
 The pressure differences between areas are correct.
 The air direction through doorways, hatches, etc. is from clean to less clean (Bhure et
al., 2010).

10.1.3 Filter Installation Leak Test

The high efficiency air filter, and its housing, should be checked to ensure that no airborne
contamination passes into the clean room through
(a) A damaged filter
(b) Between the filter and its housing or
(c) Any other part of the filter installation (Bhure et al., 2010).

32 | P a g e
10.1.4 Containment Leak Testing

Testing should be carried out to show that airborne contamination is not entering the
cleanroom through its construction materials (Bhure et al., 2010).

10.1.5 Air Movement Control Within the Room

The type of air movement control tests depends on whether the room is turbulently or
unidirectional ventilated. If the clean room is turbulently ventilated then it is necessary to
check that there are no areas within the room with insufficient air movement. If the room has
unidirectional airflow, it is necessary to check that the air velocity and direction throughout
the room is that specified in the design (Bhure et al., 2010).

10.1.6 Airborne Particles and Microbial Concentrations

If the above tests are satisfactory then final measurements will be carried out to ascertain that
the concentration of particles, and where appropriate micro-organisms, comply with the
design specification laid down for the room (Bhure et al., 2010).

10.1.7 Additional Tests

As well as these contamination control tests, it may be necessary to satisfy one or more of the
following requirements:
1. Temperature
2. relative humidity
3. heating and cooling capabilities of the room
4. sound levels
5. lighting levels
6. Vibration levels.
(Bhure et al., 2010).

10.2 Re-testing to Demonstrate Compliance

It is necessary to ensure that a clean room performs satisfactory itchier dugout its life and
continues to comply with its clean room classification. The clean room must therefore be
checked at regular intervals, these intervals being more frequent in higher specified rooms
(Bhure et al., 2010).

33 | P a g e
 Table 8: Schedule of Tests to Demonstrate Continuing Compliance

Test Parameter Class Maximum time

interval
To demonstrate compliance by ≤ ISO 5 6 months
Particle counting > ISO 5 12 months

Schedule of additional tests

Air flow velocity or volume all classes 12 months
Air pressure difference all classes 12 months

Schedule of optional tests

Installed filter leakage all classes 24 months*
Airflow visualization all classes 24 months*
Recovery all classes 24 months*
Containment leakage all classes 24 months*

= suggested time interval

11. Personnel Contamination of Clean Room

In the healthcare and pharmaceutical sectors, control of microorganisms is important,
especially microorganisms likely to be deposited into the air stream from skin shedding.
Studying clean room micro flora is of importance for microbiologists and quality control
personnel to assess changes in trends. Shifts in the types of micro flora may indicate
deviations from the “norm” such as resistant strains or problems with cleaning practices.

In assessing clean room microorganisms, the typical flora are primarily those associated with
human skin (Gram-positive cocci), although microorganisms from other sources such as the
environment (Gram-positive rods) and water (Gram-negative rods) are also detected,
common bacteria include Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, and Bacillus, and
fungal genera include Aspergillums and Penicillin. (Sandle, 2011).

34 | P a g e
11.1 HVAC (Heating Ventilating and Air Conditioning System)

A HVAC system is one of the top considerations in many industries, particularly for
pharmaceutical, biotechnology manufacturing facilities. With these conditions in mind, CAT
will develop a custom, compliant system to help maintain each clean room’s clean
environment by allowing the appropriate volume of clean air to each room at a precise
temperature and humidity per your requirements. The HVAC supporting clean rooms is a key
utility that must be specified correctly to maintain project costs and to comply with GMP
requirements. Clean Air Technology can assist you in your project, as we have for clients
worldwide for many years, making your clean room HVAC, the best that it can be (Baria et
al., 2009).

11.2 Air Handling Units

Clean Air Technology manufactures special purpose clean room air handlers (AHU’s) and air
handling systems for other HVAC applications. The capable of supplying a wide array of air
handlers that range from simple re-circulating supply air fans to air handler units with DX
cooling coils, chilled water coils, electric heat or hot water heat coils, face and bypass
dampers, and humidifiers. Air handlers range in size from 1,000 to 35,000 CFM (Bhure et al.,
2010).

11.3 Filtration (HEPA and ULPA Air Filters)

Clean room air filtration technology centers around two types:

High efficiency particulate air (HEPA): Air filtering is central to clean rooms, and central to
modern air filtering is the so-called HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filter. In order to
so qualify, a HEPA filter has to remove 99.97% of airborne particles 0.3 microns (µ m) in
diameter.
Ultra-low penetration air (ULPA):

Most ULPA filters are replaceable extended media dry filters that have a minimum particle
collection efficiency of 99.9997 % efficient for particles greater than or equal to 0.12-micron
in size. The high efficiency filters belong to the 'interception' family of filters and referred to
as 'absolute' super interceptor 12 inches or more (Bhatia, 2012).

11.4 Measurement of Airborne Contamination in Clean Room

Measurement of airborne contamination in clean rooms it has been demonstrated that particle
concentrations will vary about a clean room. In non-unidirectional airflow clean rooms have

35 | P a g e
shown that the airborne particle concentration can vary about a clean room, depending on the
performance of the air supply diffusers, temperature difference between supply and room
temperature, position of the air extracts, and position of sources of contamination. The
airborne concentration of particles *10µm measured during an experiment reported in the
second article in this series. It can be seen that the airborne concentration varied by more than
10 times, and if particle deposition is to be accurately predicted, sampling must be carried out
at the same time as products are exposed to deposition, and include periods of low and high
activity. Sampling should also be carried out over a suitably long period of time or, if only
short manufacturing times occur, by multiple sampling (Whyte et al., 2016).

11.5 Rapid Transport and Contamination of Clean Room

The execution of the isolator technology has noticeably decreased the impact of the
contaminated surrounding environment upon the vital zone of the aseptic processing.
Although the isolator is properly validated and operated which can decrease risk from an
environmental contamination to a level approaching zero, the transfer of materials in and
out of an isolator is the most probable reason for the loss of the separated enclosures
environmental integrity. This is often accomplished by correspondence the process and the
activity of people and materials, by utilizing risk assessment tool such as Hazard Analysis
and Critical Control Points (Jahnke, 1997). Or Failure Modes and Effects Analysis
(Sandle, 2003). The safer the transfer system, the more the external environment becomes
less threatening, and therefore it results in a more efficient risk management. The
Parenteral Drug Association (PDA) Industry Aseptic Processing Survey 2001 identified
the material transfer failures as follows:

 Personnel contamination

 Non-routine activity

 Aseptic assembly

 Human error

 Mechanical failure

 Airborne contaminants

 Improper sanitization: Surface contaminants

 Material transfers: Failure of HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air Filter)

(Tinglay et al., 2003).

36 | P a g e
12. Conclusion

Dedicated and clean room facilities with stringent, state-of-the-art control measures for
temperature, humidity, electrostatic discharge, noise, and vibration are required for efficient
and quality production. Flexible arrangements and the requirements for rapid adjustments to
changing and demanding market and technology conditions promote the use of modular
design in a state-of-the-art clean-room facility. Whatever be the design of a clean room,
regular maintenance and testing of the facility for compliance with the standards and other
relevant specifications is very essential. Good initial design, and layout of ventilation and air
cleaning facility; and proper selection of various clean-room system components can
minimize maintenance and the testing costs.

37 | P a g e
 References

 Appa R B, Shivalingam MR, Reddy YVK, Rao S, Rajesh K, Sunitha N. On the indoor
air quality of pharmaceutical laboratories International. International Journal of
Pharmaceutical Science. 2010; 2(2): 146-150.
 Bhatia BE. HVAC refresher - facilities standard for the building services. Journal of
the Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology. 2012; 2(1): 78-82.
 Bhure MV, Hemke AT, Gupta KR. Principles of Cleanroom Testing. Journal of
Pharmaceutical Science Research. 2010; 2(7): 426-432.
 Baria AH, Patel RP, Suthar AM, Parmar RB. Heating ventilating and air conditioning
system. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2009; 1(2): 71-73.
 Basak SC, Karthiyekan J, Bhusan B. The history of clean rooms. The International
Journal of Pharmacology, 2011; 1(2): 1531-2976.
 Chandiran IS, Sivakumar T, Kumar BP. A turbulently ventilated clean room.
International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science. 2010; 1(1): 19-23.
 Daniel H. History and technology. European Journal of Parenteral Sciences. 2009;
25(3): 173–191.
 Gaurav A, Chaudhari ME. Heat power engineering and technical research.
International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 2015; 3(4): 241-244.
 Murphy J. Development of cost effective clean rooms. International Journal of
Scientific and Engineering Research. 2010; 5(2): 55-63.
 Jahnke M. Hazard analysis and critical control point’s concept for the risk analysis
of pharmaceutical manufacturing processes. European Journal of Pharmaceutical
Science. 1997; 2(2): 113–117.
 Michael CJ. Air handling unit design for high performance buildings. International
Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 2010; 4(4): 1 – 8.
 Murphy, John. Filter housings for high efficiency filters. European Journal of
Parenteral Sciences. 2010; 52(2): 64.
 Maheshwari RK, Moondra S. Rapid transported contamination of clean room. Journal
of Advanced Pharmaceutical Technology Research. 2010; 1 (1): 78-82.
 Powar RS, Daihong Y. On the indoor air quality of pharmaceutical laboratories
International. Journal of Scientific & Technology Research. 2007; 2(3): 37-45.

38 | P a g e
  Sandle, TA. Review of cleanroom microflora. Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and
Technology. 2011; 65(4): 392–403.
 Sanjay R. Powar RS, Design and development of cost effective clean rooms for
pharmaceutical units. International Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research.
2013; 13(2278): 07-13.
 Shah R, Magdum C, Patil SK, Chougule DK, Naikwade N. Clean room classification
standards. Research Journal Pharmaceuticals Technology. 2008; 1(4): 430-432.
 Shivhare UD, Adhao ND, Bhusarı KP, Mathur VB, Ambulkar DU. The immediate
proximity of exposed sterilized containers. International Journal Pharmaceutical
Science. 2009; 1(2): 74-80.
 Sandle T. The application of FMEA to a sterility testing isolator: a case study.
European Journal Parented of Pharmaceuticals Science. 2003; 9(8): 43–49.
 Tingley S, Baloda S, Belongia B, Liepold G. The validation of a rapid sterile
transfer port system used in barrier filling lines-an improved strategy for materials
handling in the pharmaceutical industry pharmaceutical technology. Journal of
Advancing Applications in Contamination Control. 2003; 27(2): 32–40.
 Whyte W. Clean room technology: Fundamentals of design, testing and operation.
The History of Clean Rooms, John Wiley, BL: W S Press; 2001: 122-324.
 Whyte W, Agricola K, Derks M. Clean air and containment review. International
Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. 2016; 26(13): 4-10.
 Whalley A, Abdul A. Heating, ventilation and air conditioning system modeling:
building and environment. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2011; 5(6): 643-656.
 Yau YH, Chew BT. Studies on the indoor air quality of pharmaceutical laboratories.
International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment. 2012; 1(1): 110–124.
 Yuebin Y, Woradech JD, Daihong Y. A review of fault detection and diagnosis
methodologies on air handling units. European Journal of Parenteral Sciences. 2014;
2(1):550-562.
 Kapoor JC, Gupta M. Elements of Clean-room Technology and Contamination
Control. Defence Science Journal. 2003; 53(3): 249-258.

39 | P a g e