Scribd
Upload
53 views4 pages

1 7+Card+Sort+Answer+Key

1. This document contains examples of limits evaluated using graphical and algebraic methods. 2. Graphical methods include evaluating limits by examining the graphs of functions, while algebraic methods involve direct substitution, algebraic manipulation, or using trigonometric identities. 3. The examples demonstrate evaluating various types of limits, including one-sided limits, limits at infinity, limits involving absolute values, and composition of functions.

Uploaded by

feng yan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
53 views4 pages

1 7+Card+Sort+Answer+Key

1. This document contains examples of limits evaluated using graphical and algebraic methods. 2. Graphical methods include evaluating limits by examining the graphs of functions, while algebraic methods involve direct substitution, algebraic manipulation, or using trigonometric identities. 3. The examples demonstrate evaluating various types of limits, including one-sided limits, limits at infinity, limits involving absolute values, and composition of functions.

Uploaded by

feng yan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

GRAPHICAL ALGEBRAIC

METHODS MANIPULATION

DIRECT TRIGONOMETRIC
SUBSTITUTION IDENTITIES

|x−4| 2x + 18
lim− lim
x→4 x−4 x→−9 | x + 9 |

Graphical; -1 Graphical; DNE because LH limit


is not equal to RH limit

xesin x x2 + 7
lim lim
x→5 x − 3 x→ 5 5x

Direct substitution; 0.958 Direct substitution; 6.4


9x 2 − 36 1− cos x
lim+ lim
x→2 x−2
x→0 x

Algebraic manipulation; 6 Trigonometric Identities; 0

x− a tan(π x)
lim lim
x→a x−a x→0 8x

1
Algebraic manipulation;
2 a Trigonometric Identities; 0.392 or 0.393

ex − e x 2 + 3x − 4
lim lim
x→ln3 e x + e x→−4 x 2 − x − 20

Direct substitution: 0.049 Algebraic manipulation; 0.555 or 0.556

1 ⎧⎪ x 2 − 5 x < 2
lim lim− f (x) if f (x) = ⎨
x→0 x cot 2x
⎩⎪ x + 1 x > 2
x→2

Trigonometric Identities; 2
Direct substitution: -1
x
1
−23 lim sect
π
lim t→
x→8 x−8 2

Algebraic manipulation; 0.083 Trigonometric Identities; DNE because LH


limit is not equal to RH limit

f(x)
f(x)

g(x)

lim f (x)
x→1

Graphical; DNE because LH limit is


not equal to RH limit
lim f (g(x))
x→−2
Graphical; 4

You might also like