Literature Review

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 6

2.

Theoretical Framework

2.1 Relationship Management and Organization-public Relationship

Relationship management, one of the most actively studied concepts in recent public
relation research, has been conducted by many scholars and it was advocated its importance
as an academic and practical concept of PR (Hon & Grunig, 1999). Relationships become the
core of PR based on various academic approaches such as interpersonal communication,
psychology, histology, and business administration (Ledingham & Bruning, 1998), and play a
key role in functioning to improve communication quality and the relationship between
organizations and stakeholders (Grunig, Grunig, & Ehling, 1992).

Organization-public relationship (OPR) is a perception of relationships between


organizations and the strategic public that affect the success or failure of organizations and
the achievement of goals (Grunig et al., 2002), and Broom, Casey & Ritchey (1997) defined
relationships as types of interaction, exchange, and combination between organizations and
the public. Ledingham and Bruning (1998) argued that public behavior based on relationships
can affect organizational success and failure in terms of society, economy, politics, and
culture.

Grunig & Huang (2000) proposed relational maintenance strategies to maintain


relationships with the public based on interpersonal communication. Stafford & Canary
(1991) proposed five relationship maintenance strategies: positivity, openness, assurances,
networking, and shared tasks, which are considered particularly similar to the two-way
balance model (Grunig, 1992). Hon & Grunig (1999) added access to this, and the
characteristics of these balanced relationship maintenance strategies enable PR practitioners
to establish efficient strategies and provide criteria for organizational-public relations.

Relationship outcomes are a key indicator of the quality of organizational-public


relationships and appear through effective relationship maintenance strategies with the
primary factors of relationships presented above. Researchers have presented various
dimensions regarding the characteristics of evaluating these relationships. In summary, many
researchers used the four dimensions of trust, mutual control, commitment, and satisfaction
suggested by Grunig & Huang (2000), and Kim & Yang (2014), who comprehensively
examined the organization-public relationship theory, claimed that Hon & Grunig (1999)
contributed to academic research.

2.2 Employee-organization relationship (EOR)

Attempts to apply the concept and theoretical framework of OPR to the context of
Employee-organization relationships are increasing (Jo & Shim, 2005), as employees'
awareness of the importance expands. Some researchers explored factors that affect
organizational-employee relationships, including situational factors such as social and
cultural factors, as well as organizational culture, organizational structure, fair work
environment and welfare of the organization, and internal communication. (Broom et al.,
1997). In other words, in order for an organization to establish beneficial relationships with
the outside public, it is essential and important to build relationships with internal members
first (Cutlip, Center, & Broom, 1994). If an organization neglects its relationship with the
internal public, it can have poor results in corporate reputation and efficiency as well as
external public relations (Coombs, 2001). Therefore, maintaining relationships with
employees should be a priority when trying to harmonize with the public surrounding the
organization.

2.3 Discrimination in the Workplace

Sanchez and Brock (1996) defined workplace discrimination as a situation in which


employees perceive that they are being treated unfairly or suffer negative consequences
because of prejudice against their personal status despite that it is not work-related.
Employment discrimination in race can influence the success of an employer's performance
and ability, as well as related to worker’s stress, dissatisfaction, and turnover intentions in job
(Triana, García, & Colella, 2010). Therefore, investigating the perception and experiences of
employees about race-discrimination is significantly important. (Triana, Jayasinghe, and
Pieper, 2015). Prior literatures were often focused on job-related sided inequality (Hebl et al.,
2002) such as wage, hiring, and promotion. Ethnic minority employees are facing wage
discrimination in variations in workplace characteristics (Carrington and Troske, 1998).
According to the study of Forth, Theodoropoulos, and Bryson (2021), non-White workers are
often overqualified than his/her role, which implies the penalty of wages-setting in the
workplace.
And there are three practices that can potentially reduce the within-workplace wage gap
based on ethnicity: trade union recognition for pay negotiations, reviewing pay rates by
ethnic background, and implementing formal job evaluation systems Forth, Theodoropoulos,
and Bryson (2021). Therefore, not only enhancing organizational policies and practices but
also enhancing individual-level factors highly influence workers’ perception and reaction to
race discrimination in the workplace.

2.4 Discrimination in the Workplace and EOR

A few core theories to understand fundamental ethnic discrimination through interactional


and social processes and how much impact to the employees in an organization.

Social Exchange Theory (SET), proposed by Blau (1964), is the most frequent applicant that
examines the correlation between individual and organization (Cropanzano and Mitchell,
2005). Lee et al. (2014) highlighted that when employers are active in exchanging mutual
benefit with employees by fulfilling their interests and providing support, workers are more
likely to reciprocate by resulting in high job performance and dedication to the organization
(Lin and Lu, 2021). As the principle of connection between these two parties, EOR involves
strong trust and positive obligations (Shores et al., 2006). In the context of the discrimination
in race, it can be used to analyze the impact of relation between employer and employee
when unfair experiences arise from racial issues. Workers get a negative perception of its
organization, which appears as decreasing perceived fairness, lack of trust, and loyalty (Lee,
Li, and Tsai, 2021).

SET had a great impact on establishing the concept of Psychological Contract Theory (PCT)
(Kutaula, Gillani, and Budwar, 2020). PCT is the concept of understanding the beliefs of
employees and acknowledging that their organization cares to succeed in exchanges of
inter-communication with them (Cropanzano, Anthony, Daniels, and Hall, 2017; Golden and
Veiga, 2018; Thacker, 2015; Wayne, Shore, and Liden, 1997). This theory highlights how
discriminatory practices violate the psychological contract, when as racial discriminatory
practices occur, it breaches the psychological contract and leads to negative consequences
(Kutaula, Gillani, and Budwar, 2020). Perceived negative racial discrimination ends up
reducing not just job performance and organizational citizenship behavior, further, also
physical and mental health of individuals (Triana, Jayasinghe, and Pieper, 2015).
And Lee, Li, and Tsai (2021) highlights that both experiences and observations of
discriminatory acts against racial minority employees significantly and negatively impact
their perceptions of organizational justice. Therefore, interpersonal treatment, a crucial role
in how employees perceive fairness and justice in their organization, is the most important
element to migrate the ethnic discrimination in the workplace.

References

Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Dozier, D. M. (2002). Excellent public relations and effective
organizations: A study of communication management in three countries.

Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Ehling, W. P. (1992). What is an effective organization? In J.
E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management.

Broom, G. M., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (1997). Toward a concept and theory of
organization∼public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research.

Ledingham, J. A., & Bruning, S. D. (2000). A longitudinal study of organization-public


relationship dimensions: Defining the role of communication in the practice of relationship
management. In J. A.

Grunig, J. E., & Huang, Y. H. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship


indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship
outcomes.

Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type,
gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.

Grunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Ehling, W. P. (1992). What is an effective organization? In J.
E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management.

Hon, L. C., & Grunig, J. E. (1999). Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations.

Jo, S., & Shim, S. W. (2005). Paradigm shift of employee communication: The effect of
management communication on trusting relationships. Public Relations Review.

Broom, G. M., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (1997). Toward a concept and theory of
organization∼public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research.
Cutlip, S. M., Center, A. H., & Broom, G. M. (1994). Effective public relations (7th ed.).
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Coombs, W. T. (1999). Ongoing crisis communication: Planning, managing, and responding.


Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life.

Carrington, W. J., & Troske, K. R. (1998). Interfirm Segregation and the Black/White Wage

Gap. Journal of Labor Economics, 16(2), 231–260. https://doi.org/10.1086/209888

Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. K. (2017). Social Exchange

Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies. The Academy of Management

Annals, 11(1), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0099

Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary

Review. Journal of Management, 31(6), 874–900.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305279602

Del Carmen Triana, M., Jayasinghe, M., & Pieper, J. R. (2015). Perceived workplace racial

discrimination and its correlates: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational

Behavior, 36(4), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1988

Forth, J., Theodoropoulos, N., & Bryson, A. (2021). The role of the workplace in ethnic wage

differentials. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(2), 259–290.

https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12696

Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2018). Self-Estrangement’s Toll on Job Performance: The

Pivotal Role of Social Exchange Relationships With Coworkers. Journal of

Management, 44(4), 1573–1597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315615400

Hebl, M. R., Foster, J. B., Mannix, L. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). Formal and Interpersonal

Discrimination: A Field Study of Bias Toward Homosexual Applicants. Personality


and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 815–825.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289010

Kutaula, S., Gillani, A., & Budhwar, P. (2020). An analysis of employment relationships in

Asia using psychological contract theory: A review and research agenda. Human

Resource Management Review, 30(4), 100707.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100707

Lee, J., Capella, M. L., Taylor, C., Luo, M., & Gabler, C. B. (2014). The financial impact of

loyalty programs in the hotel industry: A social exchange theory perspective. Journal

of Business Research, 67(10), 2139–2146.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.023

You might also like