5 SzondiFate Analysis2
5 SzondiFate Analysis2
5 SzondiFate Analysis2
net/publication/260289251
CITATIONS READS
4 3,425
1 author:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Enikő Csilla Kiss on 22 February 2014.
Published in: Empirical Text and Culture Research, 2010 (4). 70-80.
Abstract
Szondi considered his fate-analysis as belonging to depth psychology and he thought that it
would be a contact between Freud and Jung. Szondi supposed that between the personal and
collective unconscious there is a third, the familial unconscious. The familial unconscious is
originally based on genealogy. The descendent gets his genetic structure from his ancestors
which determines the possibilities of his life and fate. Consequently, the goal of fate-analysis
is the scientific investigation of human destiny. Szondi’s phrase was that „Fate is always on
the move”. According to Szondi, fate has not only a compulsive part but also a freely chosen
part, and he distinguished the components of compulsive and selective fate. The selective fate
is directed by the ego (Pontifex-ego) and the spirit. The aim of fate-analytical therapy is to
find a much happier fate for the patient as he lived the compulsive fate earlier. The readers of
the journal could read about the Szondi test in the previous number by Rita Hargitai. This
article presents a short sketch of Szondi’s fate-analytical theory and practice.
Keywords
Familial unconscious, compulsive fate, selective fate, choices of partner-, friend-, profession-,
illness- and form of death, stand-taking ego (Pontifex oppositorum, Pontifex ego), fate-
analytical therapy.
Introduction
Lipót (Leopold) Szondi (1893-1986) was a psychiatrist of Hungarian origin, who later
in his life settled and worked in Zurich (Bürgi-Meyer, 2000; Bürgi-Meyer, Gyöngyösiné Kiss
1994). His fate analysis is considered among the depth analytical schools of the 20th century.
As Szondi defined it, fate analysis is ‘genetics introduced to psychoanalysis’. Szondi was
familiar with Freud’s psychoanalytic writings, and besides this influence, his views were
based on the findings of contemporary international twin-research, neuro-endocrinology and
the complex examination of mentally handicapped children (the impact of biological and
environmental factors considered together). He created a human drive theory, in which
individuals’ present and future behavior, their characters and the existential possibilities of
their fate are all determined by the dialectics of the opposing drive-pairs of four drives. He
also compiled the so-called Szondi-test, which enables researchers to assess the individual
differences in manifest and latent drive needs; to describe and diagnose the functioning of the
1
E-mail address: [email protected]
healthy and the pathological personality (Szondi, 1947, 1952; Szondi, Moser, Webb, 1959;
Déri, 1949).
To complement the Freudian concept of the individual unconscious, and Jung’s idea of
the collective unconscious, Szondi introduces the notion of familial unconscious to describe
the role of individuals’ familial ancestry grounding their choices. In Szondi’s conception,
people’s fate is shaped by their choices. The choices of partner-, friend-, profession-, illness-
and form of death are pivotal among these (Szondi, 1944).
The ancient figures of the familial unconscious refer to the determined nature of our
choices, as it is these ancient figures that lead us to our particular choices, thus to shaping our
forms of fate. However, individuals also possess a personal ego, which is able to form a new
personal fate from the potential possibilities offered by the familial unconscious. Fate analysis
holds that our possible fate always contains certain compulsions, (due to familial ancestry,
heredity, and genetic determination) but the free choice of the ego is always present, which
can result in a freely chosen destiny. Fate analytic therapy aims to confront patients with the
legacy of their ancestors, and acknowledging that they will be able to decide freely how they
are going to handle this heritage, i.e. what new fate they want to create for themselves (Huth,
1978, Kürsteiner, 1987, Jüttner, 2003).
The question of fate had already occupied Szondi’s interest in the early days of his
career (Szondi, 1937). It then happened that a married couple visited his consultancy, and –
years after their wedding – the wife presented symptoms which were most similar to those of
her mother-in-law. The wife complained of insomnia, headache, fear of social situations, as
well as neurotic obsessions of the urge to poison others. This case reminded Szondi so much
of an elderly patient of his that after finding the notes of her case he was convinced that at that
earlier date the widow had used almost the same words to describe her symptoms. The
husband, present in the consultancy, recognized his mother in the elderly lady. Szondi thought
that most of the contemporary doctors would have considered this a matter of sheer
coincidence – that is, a man choosing a wife who happened to suffer from the same poisoning
obsessions as his mother years earlier. However, Szondi himself held different views, and
searched for the answer to the question of what could have led the husband in his choice of
spouse. Szondi based his answer on genetics, and claimed that the husband and the wife were
‘gene-relatives’, whose fate was determined by their common ‘inherited elements’.
Supposedly, the disorder that manifested in both the mother and the wife was latently carried
by the husband’s hereditary features. Szondi claimed that it was these latent genes that
unconsciously guided the husband in his partner-choice. Later the question was extended
beyond the choice of a partner to that of what directs humans in their crucial existential
choices? In other words, what leads us in our choices of partner-, friend-, profession-, illness-
and form of death? In his research Szondi recorded several hundred genograms (family trees)
and collected data on thousands of relatives in order to answer these questions with the help
of genetics. Finally, he came to the conclusion that ancient drives determine our choices. The
act of choice is perfectly conscious, however the cause of the choices lies hidden in the
familial unconscious. Szondi claimed that in our crucial existential decisions we are all guided
by this familial unconscious. The familial unconscious contains those unconscious drives that
strive to return in the fate of the offspring, following such genetic laws as ‘patterns and
figures’ (Hughes, 1992).
In his first fate analytical study (1937) Szondi elucidated the genetic background of
partner-choice and described its types. It was then that he formulated the fate analytical
object-choice theory, which he called genotropism. According to the concept of genotropism,
two individuals whose genetic material is similar, may carry latently reappearing hereditary
tendencies, and will mutually attract each other. By 1944 Szondi had extended the choices
that determine our fate beyond the choice of a partner to the choice of friends, illness and the
form of death. Ancient drives lying hidden in the familial unconscious also play a role in
guiding one’s choices.
In his first approach – during his investigations in Hungary – Szondi chiefly studied
the factors determining one’s fate (family heredity, social and mental milieu), but already at
that time he had established the concept of dirigible fatalism. According to the concept of
dirigible fatalism, nature will precisely circumscribe one’s individual sphere of fate, but
within this genetically determined sphere we are free to consciously choose objects and ways
of life which help us gratify our ancient drive needs in our individual ways. This is the reason
why fate analysis uses the term dirigible fatalism. The ancient drives may be gratified both in
socio-positive and socio-negative forms, i.e. in ways accepted or rejected by society. Szondi
holds that the choice of profession is a domain where we are able to channel our drives in a
positive manner. (Just to mention a few of the abundant examples: a man may become a fire-
fighter in order to socialize his pyromaniac drives; or may chose to be a butcher, a surgeon or
a dentist to socialize his aggressive drives. Szondi also describes all the humanized, socialized
or sublimated ways of gratifying our drives.)
In summary, the first phase of fate analysis mainly focused on searching for factors
determining fate. Szondi thinks that people’s whole walk of life is impregnated by genetic
factors, which determine the force of drives, the process of development, the direction of
manifestation and shape individuals’ fate. However, the functioning of the genes does not
entirely determine our sphere of fate. Our biological attributes are in constant interface with
the environment, and their mutual impact creates a flexible and dynamic system, which may
result in a number of unique variations. Consequently, although the various manifestations are
closely related to the ancestors, the role they play in life may be highly diverse because of the
individual and societal aspects.
In his research period in Switzerland Szondi already placed the emphasis on the choice
of fate in the concept of new anancology (Szondi, 1954, 1968). At this time Szondi’s main
questions involved whether individuals have only one single fate. If inheritance endows us
with several possible fates are we really able to choose from them? Do people have a fate that
can be chosen freely besides the fate determined by an inherited compulsion? If individuals
are born with the possibility of more than one fate, how could those be made conceivable and
conscious for them? In reply to these questions, Szondi elaborated the system of fate analytic
therapy, which aims to help the patient to ‘swap’ the negative fate for a new, better one. From
this point on, both in theory and therapeutic practice, Szondi distinguished and used the
notions of a compulsive fate and a freely chosen fate. He claims that everyone’s fate holds
both compulsion and freedom. The building blocks of one’s destiny are handed down by the
ancestors, thus the building material we may have is predetermined. However, it depends on
our free choice what individual fate we are able to formulate or integrate with these blocks. In
other words, familial unconscious contains a collection of patterns for all the possible fate-
figures, from which individuals are free to choose one pattern and figure, or, as in most of the
cases, to create their unique destiny from various possibilities of fate. Szondi’s new
anancological concept accepts the choosing, decisive role of the ego in human fate, which, at
the same time, provides freedom and places responsibility on individuals in directing their
fate. In this way, personal destiny is a dialectical coexistence of compulsive fate and freely
chosen fate. (See Figure 1.)
Figure 1. The scheme of dialectic anancology, Szondi 1954.
V. The Ego
I. Heredity
According to Szondi, in the life of the individual there is a definite plan. This plan
comprises six forces. These are: 1. heredity, 2. the character of drives, 3. the social milieu
(environment), 4. the mental milieu (environment), 5. the ego and 6. the spirit which is the
highest tribunal of the fate. (Heredity, the character of drives, the social and mental milieu are
the factors of compulsive fate, while the ego and the spirit are the factors of selective fate).
The conception of a transformation of fate occurring in the course of time is based upon the
fact that of these six fate-determining forces of the individual, at one time the compulsive
power of heredity, drive nature, social or mental milieu are in the foreground, but at another
time, the freedom of the ego and the spirit predominate choice. The fate of the individual is
neither compulsively predetermined entirely by internal and external factors nor yet
absolutely free (Szondi, 1954).
Thus, in Szondi’s model of fate compulsive fate, is composed of the system of drives
formed by genetic inheritance, the mental and the social milieu, while freely chosen fate
consists of the decision-making (stand-taking) ego and the spirit. The system of drives built
upon the genetic background creates the features of the personality, whereas the mental- (or
world-view) and social environment is the very milieu the individual is born into. People are
not free to choose these aspects, i.e. these are the compulsive components of one’s fate. The
factors of the freely chosen fate are the decision-making (stand-taking) ego and the spirit
supporting it. The latter contain all the ideas that belong to the person’s value system and
enable the individual to experience supra-personal transcendence.
Thus, in fate analysis, besides heredity, the decision-making (stand-taking) ego and the
spirit are also considered to be powers directing people’s destiny. The ego bridges over drives
and the spirit. The spirit is the transcendent instance that provides ancient drive forces with
humane features and direction. The eight factors determining fate – together and opposing one
another – are in constant movement and change during our lifetime, thus their interaction is
dialectically interpreted. The dialectics and constant dynamic change of fate factors force us
always to be ‘underway’ and never to ‘stand still or arrive’. Using a theatrical metaphor,
Szondi explains how fate changes on one’s stage of life, just as acts and scenes change on a
revolving stage in the theatre.
Szondi’s fate analysis, in which he intended to study the genetics of the familial
unconscious, may serve as a bridge between Freud’s personal unconscious and the collective
unconscious described by Jung. Familial unconscious manifests itself in individuals’ fate
choices by the inheritance of the ancestors’ aspirations and strivings. Szondi argues that the
above three branches of depth psychology intend to elucidate the three different functioning
modes of the unconscious by voicing the language of symptoms (Freud), symbols (Jung) and
choices (Szondi). These ways of functioning all exist in the psyche in continuity and united
globality (Szondi, 1955).
In his study of drives Szondi elaborates on Freud’s ideas when defining drives as
certain compulsions in the living organism, striving to restore a former state. Furthermore,
Szondi states that from this follows the genetic origin of drives. He also diverges from Freud
in rejecting classification of drives into life- and death drives and claims that the number of
drives equals the number of genes determining drive-directed reactions. People with mental
disorders actually suffer from drive disorders, or drive syndromes. Relying on the
contemporary findings of genetics, he distinguishes four drives: the sexual, paroxysmal,
schizoform (ego) and circular (contact) drives. Each drive consists of two opposing drive
needs, and each drive need comprises two opposing drive tendencies. These 16 drive
tendencies account for the dialectics and dynamics of our drive system. Szondi does not make
a qualitative distinction between the drive needs of healthy and mentally disordered
individuals. This means that we all have the same drive needs, the difference between people
is only quantitative. To understand the concepts of drives, drive needs and drive tendencies,
see Figure 2.
humanistic
love masochism being bad to conceal negation projection sticking become
towards oneself sy or sg detached
mankind
The four psychopathologic drive cycles and their eight corresponding inherited mental
Eros T hana- Etics Morals Ego- Ego- Anality Orality
disorders by Szondi as follows:
tos systole dyastole
Szondi developed his projective test in the years around 1935. The test consists of the photo
portraits of 48 mentally ill patients suffering from ‘drive syndromes’. The pictures are
exposed in six series, each series displaying the portrait of a patient suffering from one of the
above eight disorders. The patient is asked to choose from among them according to his/her
preferences, likes and dislikes. Initially the test was called a ‘genotest’, as it aimed to detect
the patient’s drive structure. Administrating the test on ten occasions enables the researcher or
the therapist to map both the patient’s current psychic state and his/her permanent personality
traits. The test is also suitable for the diagnosis of the character- and drive structure of normal
individuals and patients with psychopathology.
The ego-concept of fate analysis differs from both that of psychoanalysis and
analytical psychology. In Freudian psychoanalysis the ego develops from a part of the id and
after its formation it functions as a mediator between the id and the outer world. Ego-
functioning needs to harness the id, and to adjust the outer world to fit the desires of the id. In
order to divert the unfeasible desires of the id, the ego develops various defense mechanisms,
such as suppression, negation or sublimation. Besides the id and the ego, the third sphere of
the psychic apparatus is the super-ego, which is formed through the internalization of parental
requirements and prohibitions. The super-ego serves to prevent the realization of the drive
tendencies disapproved by society, to direct the ego from rationality towards moral goals, to
elevate the ego to the realm ideas. The three instances are in conflicts: instead of the pleasure
principle of the id, the ego adheres to the reality principle, whereas the super-ego with its
ideals directs the ego away from the reality principle towards irreality. A healthy personality
is able to form a relative balance between the three instances of the psychic apparatus, thus
ego-functioning is not destroyed by either id drives or the strivings of the super-ego. Beyond
describing the general structure of the psychic apparatus, the unique personality can also be
grasped in Freudian psychoanalysis. This unique personality is an individual pattern, based on
the interaction of drive forces and defense mechanisms operated by the ego (Freud, 1940).
In Jungian analytical psychology personality is a complex notion, involving various
partial complexes, and it has both conscious and unconscious aspects. Personality contains
psychic structures as the ego, persona, shadow, anima and animus, and the Selbst (Self or the
deep core). The ego is the center of the field of consciousness, and as it involves the empiric
personality it is the subject of all conscious personal acts of the ego. As it could be seen
earlier, the ego, or the ego-complex is only a part of the whole personality. The ego serves to
maintain the functioning and the continuity of the personality; it is through the ego that we
can experience identity. Testing reality is a further task for the ego, so that we are able to
assess our inner processes, as well as the outside world. It is also the ego that perceives
oppositions, conflicts between conscious and unconscious. The ego constantly strives to
assimilate certain contents of mind, and attempts to elevate them into the experienced field of
conscious functioning. Another important aspect of the Jungian psychology is the description
of complexes, as becoming familiar with them will also lead individuals further on the way of
acquiring and comprehending their unique personalities. Complexes are autonomous,
emotionally charged parts of the psyche, which can have positive, motivating effects; and
negative ones, originating from an (often childhood-) psychic trauma and influencing later
psychic development. Complexes are unconscious, thus making them conscious and
affectively elaborating them helps the rearrangement of formerly engaged energies. This will
result in the restoration of the psychic balance and the wholeness of the personality, as well as
the reintegration of the dissociated parts of the psyche. In his analytical psychology Jung
emphasizes the significance of individuation in the evolution of individual existence. In the
individuation process the first step of psychic development is making the shadow conscious,
then understanding the anima and animus follows, finally people need to reach their deep real
self, and find the inner core of their psyche (Jung, et al. 1968).
In Szondi’s fate analytical approach, the development of the personality is determined
not only by genetic factors, but also by the mental- and social milieu, the stand-taking,
decision making ego and its transcendent values. The term decision-making (stand-taking)
ego is used by Szondi, and it denotes the function of our ego that makes decisions concerning
ourselves. Szondi supposes that individual life as well as the development of the whole human
race is based on a structure of oppositions. Such oppositions are the formerly discussed
opposing drive needs, or counterparts such as conscious and unconscious, masculinity and
femininity, body and mind, being awake and dreaming, the material and the transcendent
world. The question remains, however, how, by whom, or by what means these oppositions
are resolved. For the individual the ideal solution would be the integration of the oppositions,
i.e. creating a new wholeness from the oppositions. This solution would be the most beneficial
both for the individual and the society. If individuals try to eliminate the state of oppositions
by preferring one pole and neglecting or suppressing the other, it is not only harmful for
themselves but also undesirable for their environment, as they will pose a constant menace for
society owing to their unsatisfied drives. (The counterparts of masculinity and femininity may
be seen as an example, as choosing only one extreme and rejecting the other would not be
beneficial. Men need to learn to be tender, and women proactive. People need to find the right
balance of masculinity and femininity according to their gender roles, and they need to be
able to integrate these opposing forces in their personalities.) The process of resolving
oppositions is executed by a higher instance in the central control of the psyche, which Szondi
calls Pontifex Oppositorum. Beyond the task of resolving oppositions, this Pontifex ego plays
the role of assigning power and organization in the psyche, serving to bridge oppositions and
create wholeness, the integrated personality. As discussed earlier, in his drive psychology
Szondi describes four drives, each of them consisting of two opposing drive needs, which
contain two opposing drive tendencies each. The dynamics of psychic life is based on this
opposing nature of drive forces. It is the Pontifex ego that decides how the individual will
integrate the drive structure constituted of oppositions, which drive needs it will gratify in a
natural way, or which of them it will render to socialize or humanize (Szondi, 1956, 1980,
1984).
In Szondi’s fate analytical psychology, the choice directed by the Pontifex ego is of
utmost importance as it plays a significant role in the humanization of drives. The way of
becoming a ‘humane human being’ is always open for people; however, they can only
proceed on this way if – from the various possibilities of existence – they are able to make the
humanized direction conscious, and then choose freely. In fate psychology it is the
socialization, sublimation and humanization of drives that lead to the highest level of human
development. As is manifest in his study of Cain and Moses, from these three important
processes it is mainly the recognition and description of the role of humanization that we can
attribute to Szondi (Szondi, 1969, 1973). For Szondi, humanism is an intellectual, spiritual
movement striving for the spread of love and humane attitudes. According to fate analysis,
humanistic people will choose the humane way from the opposing drives (humanistic and
non-humanistic manifestation); further, they are able ‘to extend humanistic needs not only to
themselves, their family members, their fellow-churchmen, social cast, race, and nation, but to
all human ‘objects’ of the world’ (Gyöngyösiné Kiss, 1995, 1999a,b, 2007). To reach this
level of development individuals need the assistance of such ego-functions as transcendence,
integration and participation. Transcendence enables individuals to step to a higher level of
development; integration means the formation of a whole personality together with its
conscious and unconscious aspects; and participation supports the ability of reintegration,
which helps us to participate in human relationships, the world and the spirit.
Figure 3. details Szondi’s ideas concerning the image of the human being in various
psychological movements.
The developmental
liberator and
stages of becoming
human D humanisator
homo humanus
C elector
B
individuator
A
HOMO potentator
0
repressor
participator
The cronological
order of the different Imre Hermann, individual analitical
psychoanalysis fate analysis humanism
directs of depth René Spitz psychology psychology
psychology
(S. Freud) (A. Adler) (C. G. Jung) (L. Szondi)
Fate analytical therapy aims to enable patients to leave the compulsions of their fate
and directs them toward a more freely chosen way of existence (Szondi, 1963a; Seidel,
Jüttner, Borner, 2002). In patients’ lives compulsive fate refers to the power and determining
role of hereditary genetics, which may deteriorate the quality of their lives. The possibility of
the socio-positive canalization of disturbing genetic factors may help individuals experience
less suffering, and gratify morbid drive forces in a positive form. For the purposes of the fate
analytical therapy Szondi used a curriculum vitae written by the patient, a detailed genogram
or family tree (preferably checked by the family doctor), and a ten-profile Szondi test. At the
beginning of the analysis the therapeutic techniques are similar to those applied in
psychoanalysis, being based on free associations. Patients also talk about their dreams. The
therapeutic process is modified only months later, when the therapy reaches the so-called
‘gap-period’ or ‘hole-period’. In this period the patient’s thoughts seem to be stuck, the chain
of association from the depths is broken. A patient once described this situation as ‘standing
by a gap, not being able to proceed’. This halt or breakdown of the process, when associations
also become superficial may even last for months. To overcome this difficulty Szondi
modified the association technique and introduced the so-called ‘hammer-beat association’
technique, which aims to break the patient’s opposition that causes the block. The technique
means that the therapist will very rapidly – like a hammer-beat – expose phrases and
sentences from the material of former associations and dreams that are supposedly connected
to the current block, or may do the same with all the words of the entire material of the chain
of associations. At this point the patient lying on the couch will give up his/her opposition and
reproduces the particular symptoms (epileptic, paranoid, catatonic etc.) of his/her ill ancestors.
The symptoms are presented and experienced by the complete consciousness of the patient,
and this gives him/her a chance to face and experience the formerly hidden inheritance with
clear consciousness. Szondi argues that as a result of this shocking effect the revolving stage
of the psyche may be reversed, and the formerly hidden dimensions of the personality may be
displayed. The hidden part of the personality may already be inferred from the earlier part of
the analysis, when the patient shares with the therapist such ‘archaic dreams’ in which the
protagonists are manifest carriers or conductors of a certain disorder. These ancient ill figures
really exist in the patient’s portfolio of ancestry as ‘patterns of existence’. The main aim of
the fate analyst is to understand the patients’ ‘conductor nature’, as it is the carrier of their fate
neurosis. Fate analysis intends to disclose the latently present ill ancestors, which – according
to genetic laws of heredity – strive to ‘reappear in descendants’ and negatively influence their
fate.
In addition to the symptoms vividly experienced in the course of the analysis the
family tree and results of the Szondi test also play an important role in confronting the patient
with his/her latent tendencies.
The last phase of the therapy is the post-confrontation phase, in which the therapist
and the patient try to find alternative forms of gratification for the formerly morbid drive
forces that may be fit in the patient’s life plans, and are not threatening for society. Let us
remind the reader here that in Szondi’s view mental disorders are actually drive syndromes,
and it is the dominance of drive forces that leads to pathologies. Apart from the pathologic
forms, drive forces may be gratified in several other ways, for example through the chosen
profession, hobby or in different fields of interest. It is an important criterion for fate analysis
that it can help patients whose ego-functions are intact, i.e. the ego is able to take a stand
concerning heredity. Szondi’s fate analysis is an efficient therapeutic technique to cure
transgenerational, hereditary neuroses or fate neuroses.
In the 1930’s Szondi based his fate psychology on the achievements of leading
researchers of genetics (e.g. Brugger, Weinberg, Johanssen), so it was the Menedelian
dominant-recessive genetic law that he based his concepts on the hereditary nature of ‘drive
genes’ that provide the biological background of the personality. Szondi even bases the law of
genotropism on ‘genesmanship’, i.e. he supposes that our significant choices are influenced
by the effect of recessive genes functioning. Although Szondi occasionally exceeded the
limits of his contemporary genetic knowledge, – e.g. when discussing the biological origin
and function of drives – in general, he retains the views of genetics of his days. The question
arises as to how we are to evaluate Szondi’s drive theory and the phenomenon of genotropism
from the perspective of our present-day knowledge of genetics. As it is clear from many
recent researches (e.g. the genetic and evolutionary approach to personality, personality
theories based on neural functioning, modern temperament- and character theories etc.), the
hereditary nature of certain personality traits has been confirmed. Nevertheless, the genetic
cornerstones of Szondi’s theory seem to fail the test of modern scientific thinking. It is widely
accepted, for example, that personality traits are determined not only by one but several,
supposedly hundreds or thousands of genes, which affect thinking and behaviour in
interaction with environmental factors. In spite of this, Szondi’s concept could be modified, if
instead of allele pairs and Mendel’s laws, the theory of polygenic inheritance were to be
applied. The idea of originating the phenomenon of genotropism from recessive genes is also
problematic from the perspective of present-day genetics. This problem, however, is not
necessarily irresolvable either, as the question of latent genes can be approached in modern
genetics, for example, in the phenomenon where after passing a certain threshold genes of
lesser effect may determine a given behavior or disorder (Bereczkei, 1995; Bereczkei,
Gyöngyösiné Kiss, 2001). In summary, revisiting and reassessing Szondi’s theory in light of
modern genetics is yet to be seen.
The Szondi test is a projective technique which uncovers the features of personality. As a
projective technique, its purpose is to establish a testing situation where the subject is enabled
to express his inner world without knowing what he really reveals. It follows that the test
assesses the unconscious level of personality which is not accessible directly. Furthermore the
Szondi projective test shows not only the basic structure of personality but the dynamic
aspects of it as well, such as the accumulation and discharge of the drive-needs and need-
tensions. Using the test it is possible to assess the cultural influence on personality as has been
shown by several cross cultural studies (Yarritu, 1955, Szondi, 1972, Yamashita, 1999).
References
Bereczkei, T. (1995). The Szondi’s Legacy: Innate Dispositions Influence Our choices. A
sociobiological reinterpretation of the Szondi-theory. In: Szondiana, Zeitschrift für
Tiefenpsychologie und Beiträge zur Schicksalsanalyse. 15. 8-26.
Bereczkei, T. - Gyöngyösiné Kiss, E. (2001). Sorsanalízis és genetika: családfakutatás,
párválasztás, öröklődés. (Fate-analysis and Genetics: family-tree research, choice of a
partner, heredity). In: Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 56. 71-90.
Bürgi-Meyer, K. - Gyöngyösiné Kiss, E. (1994). Verzeichnis der Schriften von Leopold
Szondi In: Szondiana, Zeitschrift für Tiefenpsychologie und Beiträge zur
Schicksalsanalyse. 14. 57-63.
Bürgi-Meyer, K. (2000). Leopold Szondi. Eine biographische Skizze. Zürich: Szondi Verlag.
Déri, S. (1949). Introduction to the Szondi Test. Theory and Practice. New York: Grune
Stratton.
Freud, S. (1938/1940). Abriss der Psychoanalyse. Gesammelte Werke, Band 17. Frankfurt
a.M: Fischer Verlag.
Gyöngyösiné Kiss, E. (1995). Schicksal Analysis and Jewish Faith In: Szondiana, Zeitschrift
für Tiefenpsychologie und Beiträge zur Schicksalsanalyse. 14. 27-34.
Gyöngyösiné Kiss, E. (1999a). Szondi Lipót sorsanalízise (The fate-analysis of Lipót Szondi).
Ph.D Thesis, Pécs: University of Pécs.
Gyöngyösiné Kiss, E. (1999b). Szondi Lipót. (Lipót Szondi) Budapest: Új Mandátum
Könyvkiadó.
Gyöngyösiné Kiss, E. (2007). Mélylélektan és emberkép. (Depth Psychology and becoming
human) In: Péley, B. – Révész, Gy. (ed.): Autonómia és identitás. Pécs: Pro Pannonia
Kiadói Alapítvány, 59-69.
Hargitai, R. (2007). The Szondi test: theory and practice. In: Empirical Text and Culture
Research 3, 85-105.
Hughes, R. A. (1992). Return of the Ancestors. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
Huth, W. (1978). Wahl und Schicksal. Voraussetzungen, Grundprinzipien und Kritik der
Schicksalsanalyse von Leopold Szondi. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Jung, C. G., von Franz, M.-L., Henderson, J. L., Jacobi, J., Jaffé, A. (1968). Man and his
symbols. New York: Dell Publishing Group, Inc.
Jüttner, F. (2003). Schicksalsanalyse in Zusammenfassungen. Zürich: Szondi Verlag.
Kürsteiner, G. (1987). Schwerpunkte der Schicksalsanalyse. Berner Forum
Tiefenpsychologie. Band 1. Bern: Kürsteiner, G.
Seidel, P. – Jüttner, F. – Borner, M. (2002). Manual der schicksalsanalytischen Therapie.
Zürich: Szondi Verlag.
Szondi, L. (1937). Analysis of marriages. An attempt at a theory of choice in love. The Hague:
Nijhoff.
Szondi, L. (1944). Schicksalsanalyse. Basel: Schwabe.
Szondi, L. (1947). Lehrbuch der Experimentelle Triebdiagnostik. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1952). Triebpathologie. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1954). Mensch und Schicksal. Elemente einer dialektischen Schiksalswissenschaft
(Anankologie), Wissenschaft und Weltbild 7, Wien: Verlag Harold, 15-34.
Szondi, L. (1955). The Sprachen des Unbewussten, Symptom, Symbol und Wahl. In :
Szondiana II. Beiheft zur Schweizerischen Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre
Anwendungen, Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1956). Ich-Analyse. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L., Moser, U., Webb, M.W. (1959). The Szondi Test in Diagnosis Prognosis and
Treatment. Philadelphia-Montreal: Lippincott Company.
Szondi, L. (1963a). Schicksalsanalytische Therapie. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1963b). Der Weg zur Menschwerdung. In: Szondiana IV. Beiheft zur
Schweizerischen Zeitschrift für Psychologie und ihre Anwendungen, Bern: Verlag Hans
Huber.
Szondi, L. (1968). Freiheit und Zwang im Schicksal des Einzelnen. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1969). Kain. Gestalten des Bösen. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1973). Moses. Antwort auf Kain. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1980). Die Triebentmischten. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Szondi, L. (1984). Integration der Triebe. Die Triebvermischten. Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
Yamashita, T. (1999). Szondi test responses in Japanese juvenile delinquents. 14th
International Szondi Conference, 15-17 July 1999, Louvain-la Neuve, Belgium.
Yarritu, S. (1953/1955). Validierung des Szondi-testes durch eine Gruppenuntersuchung von
2352 Fällen. Szondiana. Zeitschrift für Tiefenpsychologie und Beiträge zur
Schicksalsanalyse 2, 65-75.