Athens Journal of Business & Economics –

Volume 8, Issue 4, October 2022 –Pages 363-384

The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic Growth in

Sub Saharan African (SSA) Region
By Masoud Mohammed Albiman* & Hamad Omar Bakar±
Recently, financial inclusion through improved access within SSA region has
increased and at a faster rate compared to other regions. By estimating panel
data on 45 countries between 2004 and 2017, using Generalized Method of
Moments (GMM) method, this study examined whether financial inclusion
through improved access contributed positively on economic growth. The study
examines both linear and non-linear effects of financial inclusion using three
different indicators including financial inclusion index. The results reveal that,
financial inclusion promotes economic growth. Our results are robust irrespective
of upper middle income within SSA region. The need to design policies that
widen accessibility and sustain financial inclusion is rather important, as it
improves economic growth, development and reduces poverty within SSA
region.

Keywords: SSA region, financial inclusion, GMM, nonlinear and economic

growth

Introduction

For the past two decades, SSA maintained economic growth rates of around
4.8% per year, placing the region among the top five of world’s fastest growing
economy (AfDB 2015, ECA 2015). However, the advantages were not inclusive
and translated into tangible development (AfDB 2012, as cited in Makina and
Wale 2019). Despite such positive trend, the region is still facing a myriad of
socio-economic challenges including unemployment, national debts and extreme
poverty (AfDB 2015, UNCTAD 2016). The population living in extreme poverty
is still relatively high, compared to other regions.
In reports published several years ago, the percentage of people living on less
than $1.25 a day in SSA accounted for 41 percent of the population, more than
double that of Southern Asia, which is 17 percent (UNCTAD 2016, World Bank
2007, 2016, IMF 2017). It means that the population living in extreme poverty has
increased to 330 million, which is at least 50 million higher compared to the last
decade. It represents 30 percent of the world’s poor, an appalling number
representing merely a region (UNCTAD 2016, World Bank 2007, 2016, IMF
2017). UNCTAD (2014) identified 25 percent of people in the SSA suffering from
hunger and unable to afford basic facilities, making the region one of the greatest
food-deficient regions in the world. The World Bank believes that there is still
more than one billion people living below the poverty line in the world, made out

*
Lecturer, Department of Tax Studies, Institute of Tax Administration (ITA), Tanzania.
±
Researcher, Ministry of Finance and Planning, Zanzibar, Tanzania.

https://doi.org/10.30958/ajbe.8-4-4 doi=10.30958/ajbe.8-4-4
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

of people in the SSA and South Asia.

Lack of financial inclusion is one of the reasons people are in such challenges.
More than three-quarter of the population lacks access to financial services such as
financial products, bank accounts, insurance and affordable and suitable loans.
Financial inclusion is defined as the process whereby individuals and businesses
have access to financial industry to meet their needs by using useful financial
products and services, such as making transactions and payments, using credit
facilities, saving accounts and insurance in a sustainable and responsible way.
Through bank accounts, financial inclusive consumers can send, receive and store
money. The financial sector facilitates day-to-day living and helps families and
businesses make plans for many things including retirement and business strategies.
For a long time, the region relied on agricultural exports, foreign aids, domestic
investment, foreign direct investment (FDI) and financial development for its
economic growth. However, these need other complements to ensure sustainable
economic development within the region. In the past decade, the financial sector
was believed to have reduced saving gap and even promote trade openness. The
financial sector was believed to have promoted economic growth and development
through funds channeling from the surplus side (savers) to the deficit side
(borrowers). Recently, after acknowledging macroeconomic challenges in
developing countries, the policy makers and leaders are optimistic that financial
inclusion is not just encouraging financial development. It has been claimed that
financial inclusion is a key enabler of sustainable economic growth in developing
countries (World Bank 2018).
Recently, there were several efforts by the international development community
and policymakers to expand access of affordable financial services to the excluded
population. It is estimated that the world economy could create extra savings of
about $157 billion if “unbanked” adults channel their informal savings into a
formal financial system (Allan et al. 2013, as cited in Asuming et al. 2018). The
governments of several countries initiated several programmes to increase financial
inclusion. An increase in access to financial services to “unbanked population” is
expected to improve financial conditions and living standards by creating financial
assets that can generate income. This also helps to develop local economic sectors
and in turn, diminishes income inequality at macroeconomic level.
Previous literatures on impact of financial inclusion grouped the impact into
three categories, based on its main generation processes. The first category examines
the role of micro credit, i.e., microfinance in rural areas (Jacoby 1994, Van Rooyen
et al. 2012, Makina and Wale 2019). The second category involves micro level
studies that are interested in the direct effect of financial inclusion per se on
poverty and household income. This includes Burgess and Pande (2005), Ayyagari
et al. (2013), Bruhn and Love (2014), Sanyal (2014) and the World Bank (2014).
In more recent years, several studies have emerged, examining financial
inclusion effect on macro-economic growth using two main variables, the number
of bank branches and the number of adult accounts. Most of these studies were
done in Asia and other developing countries, but very few have been carried out in
the SSA region. The studies include Pradhan et al. (2017), Sharma (2016), Kim et
al. (2017) and Sethi and Acharya (2018). They found that financial inclusion

364
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

increases the poor’s access to financial services, resulting in narrower gap in

income inequality and lesser poverty (Beck et al. 2007, Demirguc-Kunt and
Levine 2009).
Much evidence is still at individual and micro level (Demirguc-Kunt et al.
2017). Makina and Wale (2019) insisted that evaluations of micro finance
activities such as savings and wealth are done more extensively in the SSA region,
despite the still limited macroeconomic evaluations. The pronounced situation
beleaguering SSA region makes empirical research exploring such linkage on
SSA’s economic growth more vital than it needs to be in other regions.
There are several macroeconomic studies of financial inclusion in the SSA
region such as Andrianaivo and Kpodar (2012), Makina and Wale (2019) and
Inoue and Hamori (2016). Other studies by Zins and Weill (2016), Chikalipah
(2017) and Asuming et al. (2018) were only interested in examining the
determinants of financial inclusion within the SSA region. Some researchers
attributed this limitation to lack of long-time data on measures of financial
inclusion which were only more available and taken seriously after the US subprime
crisis (Makina and Wale 2019, Sahay et al. 2015). Moreover, the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) which only started in 2000, acknowledged its
importance then. Besides, determinants of economic growth and inequality require
decades of data, it takes a while to compile, before any study can be initiated using
them.
This paper took the study of financial inclusion further, taking into
consideration non-linear behavior of financial sector and examining whether
excessive financial inclusion may have an impact on the economy. Previous
literatures suggest that financial inclusion has linear positive relationship with
economic growth, but is this regardless of the size of financial inclusion? Could
excessive efforts on financial inclusion results in wastage or an exponential effect
on growth? This question is of our interest, given the information by the World
Bank (2018) that financial inclusion is increasing rapidly in the SSA region.
The possibility that too much financial access result in wastage of resources
may happen on both side; (a) the demand side; consumers may be involved in
unproductive entrepreneurial activities and personal unproductive consumption,
affecting their saving and (b) the supply side; banks may experience an increase in
cost of providing ATMs and bank branches but demand on the financial services
does not match the effort put in.
Both effects may be more pronounced in the African region due to social
challenges faced by the population. In terms of gender inequality, women are less
connected to financial service compared to men (Asuming et al. 2018, World
Bank 2019). Higher illiteracy rates and poverty also remain as a main hindrance of
financial inclusion (AfDB 2015, UNCTAD 2016, Ouma et al. 2017). Previous
authors argued that, Africans still prefer to save through informal and traditional
ways, limiting profits that can be expected from the banking sector.
Several empirical literatures acknowledged the existence of negative non-
linear relationship between finance and economic growth (Law et al. 2017, Law
and Singh 2014, Cecchetti and Kharroubi 2012). The problem of negative non-
linear effect of finance on growth is more pronounced in low-income economies

365
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

such as the SSA region (Cecchetti and Kharroubi 2012, Law et al. 2017). The non-
linear effect of finance may cause a rise in moral hazards and misuse of business
credit for personal consumption and unproductive activities (Law and Singh
2014).
Financial inclusion is acknowledged by the AfDB as one of the building
blocks for the Ten-Year Strategy spanning 2013-2022. SSA region makes a useful
case study for this. The new evidence will bring into focus, the role of financial
inclusion, to under developed financial system in the SSA. This evidence can
contribute to policy formulation, avoidance of wastage of resources, maximization
of success and identification of the best channels for economic growth and
development in order to reduce income inequality within the SSA region.
This study differs from other past literatures in several aspects. Firstly, we
used a large sample of 42 SSA countries and the most recent data. Also, we used
three different financial inclusion access namely Automated Teller Machines
(ATM) per 100,000 adults, Commercial Bank branches per 100,000 adults and its
index termed Financial Inclusion Access Index (FIA), which was developed by the
IMF.
The use of Financial Inclusion Index is very important to capture real and
general impact, which most previous studies left behind (Chakravarty and Pal
2013). Its multidimensional nature, involving various institutions with different
sizes and activities, increases accuracy (IMF 2016). This paper is divided into five
main sections. The first is the introductory while the second explains the trend of
financial inclusion in the SSA region compared to other regions. The third section
details literature reviews, both theoretical and empirical, while the fourth details
empirical methodology. The fifth section presents the discussion of the results and
interpretation including both linear and non-linear approaches. The last section
provides conclusion and recommendations for policy formulations.

The Rise of Financial Inclusion

Financial inclusion now becomes the main target of the World Bank Group’s
Universal Financial Access (UFA) 2020 initiative. Financial inclusion has been
identified as an enabling tool for 7 of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals in
2016. The World Bank Group considers it a key to reducing extreme poverty and
boosting shared prosperity and a more inclusive economic growth (World Bank
2014, IMF 2014, Ouma et al. 2017). The G20 is also committed to bring financial
inclusion worldwide. This is made possible through saving enablement and
borrowing to the poor, investment in education and entrepreneurial activities.
Since 2010, more than 60 countries have either launched or developed a
national strategy and 55 more made commitments to financial inclusion (World
Bank 2018). These meant that nations are bringing together telecommunications,
financial regulators, education and other relevant parties in the effort to promote
financial inclusion which may help pace a fruitful reform.
According to the report by World Bank in 2018, population living below the
poverty line around the world makes up more than one billion people. More than

366
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

three-quarter of the population, women and men alike, lacks access to financial
services such as bank accounts, insurance and loans. Kendall et al. (2010)
estimated that, adults with bank accounts in the world were about 6.2 billion. The
world adults without bank accounts in developed countries stood at 19 percent,
whilst that in developing countries stood at a whopping 72 percent.
In the SSA region, it was estimated that, about three-quarter of the adult
population did not hold a bank account (World Bank 2014). Also, it was reported
that, in the SSA region, almost 80 percent of the adult population lacks access to
basic financial services (Demirguc-Kunt et al. 2014). Having said that, in the SSA
region, adults that hold bank accounts increased to 34% in 2014 from 24% in 2011,
while access to credit increased to 6 percent, up from 4.8 over the same period
(Demirguc-Kunt et al. 2014). Recent progress on financial inclusion is encouraging,
especially in Latin America, Asia and Africa, but the numbers say otherwise
(World Bank 2018). Despite these improvements, the formal financial system in
Africa is still not very inclusive (Beck et al. 2015).
Figures 1 and 2 show positive relationships between economic growth (GDP
per capita) and Financial Inclusion Index (FIA) in 2004 and 2016.

Figure 1. The Relationship between GDP per capita (USD) and Financial Inclusion
Index (FIA) in 2004

Source: Author’s calculation from IMF online database (2016).

367
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

Figure 2. The Relationship between GDP per capita (USD) and Financial Inclusion
Index (FIA) in 2016

Source: Author’s calculation from IMF online database (2016).

Literature Review

Theoretically, financial inclusion has a direct relationship with income

inequality and macroeconomic growth. However, the World Bank (2008) observed
a less clear-cut relationship between them. Entrepreneurial activity has long been a
function that is able to direct funds into better and productive wealth (Banerjee and
Newman 1993, Demirguc-Kunt and Levine 2009). Besides, access to formal
financial services in developed economies have long been established. Thus, to
link financial inclusion to growth in these economies, is a predicament. However,
the situation is different in the case of developing economies, as the bulk of the
adult population still lacks access to basic financial services (Ouma et al. 2017).
Through account ownership, people can easily access other financial products
such as credit and insurance, invest in education or health, start and expand
businesses and manage risks which may, in turn, improve their quality of lives.
Sharma (2016) suggested that, financial inclusion helps build country’s financial
structure, hence economic growth and development. Thus, financial exclusion
leads to the stunted growth and development (Sharma 2016). It is proven difficult
to develop an economy when financial exclusion persists.
Fanta and Makina (2019) emphasized inclusive financial system as a pre-
requisite to inclusive growth. They claimed that inclusive financial services ensure
availability, accessibility and usage of formal financial services to all “unbanked”
population. According to the United Nations (2006) in Fanta and Makina (2019),
financial inclusion plays two important roles in economic development: (1)
ensuring access to a range of formal financial services to the customers, from
small credit and savings services to insurance and pensions services; and (2)

368
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

ensuring access to more than one financial services provider, creating competitions
among the services providers.
The empirical literature can be grouped into three main generation processes.
The first group examines the role of micro credit – micro financing in rural areas
in terms of savings and education. The second looks into the direct effect of
financial inclusion per se on poverty and household income. The third group is the
most recent, examining the effect of financial inclusion on macro-economic
growth using measurements such as bank branches and account penetration.
The first group of micro finance studies emerged due to the belief that it is the
best step to curb poverty in the SSA region. The introduction of microcredit was
carried out for a long time in the SSA region as a mean to promote financial
inclusion. Most of the researches were divided into financial and non-financial
impacts. By financial impacts, they meant effects in savings accumulation, income,
wealth accumulation and expenditure while non-financial impacts are those
affecting nutrition, housing, job creation, health and social cohesion. Van Rooyen
et al. (2012) looked at the financial and non-financial effects of micro finance on
households. Their results were rather inconclusive although Jacoby (1994) did
conclude that, children with financial constraints face earlier withdrawal from
education.
Burgess and Pande (2005) had evidence that, increasing bank branches in
India gave a significant effect in reducing poverty in rural India. On top of that,
World Bank (2014) reported an increase in access to saving and basic payments
increases innovation, job creation and growth, as a result, reduces poverty to
households. In another study, it was found that a financially empowered woman
brings positive results to their families (Sanyal 2014).
For the second group, Bruhn and Love (2014) concluded that, increasing bank
branches which are a mean of financial access to low-income individuals results in
expansion of many economic activities, which in turn, improves employment and
income level. Having said that, Ayyagari et al. (2013) who conducted a similar
study in 15 Indian states, looking at financial depth and bank branches penetration
in 1983-2005, had a mixed finding after 1991 (the period before financial
liberalization). The selected variables had negative relationships with poverty with
the effect is only positive among the rural self-employed.
The third group consist of macro level studies, either panel or cross sectional
studies of a group of countries. Most of the literatures in this group acknowledge
the positive effect of financial inclusion, using number of bank branches per
10,000 people and number of account users. Most of them relied on using specific
variable of financial inclusion, ignoring the indices of financial inclusion. Also, it
seems that most studies were concentrated in Asian countries while in the African
region, the studies were more on determinants of financial inclusion rather than its
effect on economic development. This group is further divided into three
subsections, as follows:

369
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

Financial Inclusion has Direct Positive Impact on Economic Growth in Asian

Countries

Kendall et al. (2010) included Micro Financial Institutions (MFIs), co-

operative, credit institutions and finance companies along with banks in financial
inclusion. They developed a measure for financial access for 139 countries
worldwide. They concluded that the indicators of development and physical
infrastructure are positively related to indicators of deposit accounts, loans and
branch penetration. Also, Park and Mercado (2015) proved that, per capita income,
demographic characteristics and rule of law significantly determine financial
inclusion resulting in a significant reduction in poverty and inequality in Asian
countries.
Rasheed et al. (2016) using GMM for 97 countries revealed financial inclusion
has positive effect on economic growth in SAARC countries. In that same year,
Pradhan et al. (2017) looked at insurance market penetration in promoting
economic growth in ASEAN countries (1988-2012). The study confirms co-
integration and numerous causal relations among the variables as well as the
presence of short run bidirectional causality between insurance market and
economic growth. Sharma (2016) utilized data surrounding 2004-2013, looking at
the effect of various measures of financial inclusion on Indian economic
development. They concluded that, an increase in bank penetration, availability of
banking services and usage of banking deposits have positive correlations with
economic development.
Kim (2016) suggested that, financial inclusion has a strong positive effect on
economic growth of European Union (EU) and OECD countries, although the
effect is much stronger in high fragility countries compared to low fragility
countries. On top of that, Kim et al. (2017) claimed that in a GMM study (1990-
2013), financial inclusion promotes economic growth in Organization of Islamic
Countries (OIC) despite the disparity in level of financial inclusion among them.
Sethi and Acharya (2018) too, examined the effect of financial inclusion on
economic growth of 31 developed and developing countries between 2004-2010.
They found a bidirectional causality between financial inclusion and economic
growth and confirmed that financial inclusion promotes economic growth.
Dahiya and Kumar (2020) examined the impact of financial inclusion by
using three dimension of financial inclusion usage, accessibility and penetration.
Using panel data for the 2005-2017 period, they claimed a positive impact of
financial inclusion on economic growth.

Financial Inclusion Affects Economic Growth with Conditionality

Previous studies acknowledge the positive effect of financial inclusion on

economic growth. However, some studies, in 2015, started to warn about such
over optimistic views. For example, Sahay et al. (2015), suggested that an increase
in financial access by firms and households stimulates economic growth, but only
to a certain threshold, after which, the effect would plateau or even be negative in
some developed countries. They even warn that excessive and unregulated

370
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

financial access may risk financial stability. They cited increasing financial access,
other than credit, enhances economic growth and financial stability. Sukmana and
Ibrahim (2018), using quantile regression on 73 countries, suggested that, financial
access reduces poverty only in countries with low income inequality. This implies
that, in countries with high income inequality, increasing financial access may not
be fruitful unless they improve on level of infrastructure.

Country Level Studies in African Region

Only a few studies in the region were interested in examining the effect of
financial inclusion on economic development. Andrianaivo and Kpodar (2012),
via GMM (1988-2007), utilized “deposits per 100 inhabitants and number of loans
per 100 inhabitants” to assess financial inclusion effect on economic growth of 44
African countries. They reasoned that positive and significant effect of financial
inclusion on economic growth only occur if the countries’ financial sectors are
well developed. This paper is interested in examining the joint impact of financial
inclusion and mobile phone penetration in stimulating economic growth, in the
hope to overcome methodological limitations in other studies.
Makina and Wale (2019) suggested that, number of commercial bank branches
per 100,000 people for the period 2004-2014 contributes positively to economic
growth of 42 SSA countries. Inoue and Hamori (2016) estimated panel data on
thirty-seven SSA countries between 2004 and 2012, and concluded that financial
access has a statistically significant and robust effect on economic growth.
Other African studies were only interested in determinants of financial
inclusion. Chikalipah (2017) was interested in examining determinants of financial
inclusion of 20 SSA countries and it was found that illiteracy is a major obstacle to
financial inclusion in SSA. Asuming et al. (2018) also analyzed the determinants
of financial inclusion in 31 SSA countries within 2011-2014 period. They claimed
that although financial inclusion has increased significantly since 2011, the
distribution was not equal. Education level, gender, GDP and financial institutions
are significant determinants of financial inclusion. Meanwhile, Zins and Weill
(2016) used probit model on 37 African countries to look at determinants of
financial inclusion and found that education and income level influence financial
inclusion.
Emara and Mohieldin (2020) were also interested in the impact of financial
inclusion in the MENA region. They also found a positive and significant impact
of financial inclusion on economic growth. The most recent, Khan et al. (2021)
examined, using panel data, the impact of financial inclusion on poverty, income
inequality and financial stability between 2001-2019 for 54 African countries.
They suggested that, financial inclusion reduces poverty, income inequality and
improves financial stability.

371
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

Methodology

Theoretical Framework

The neoclassical growth theory suggested that, economic growth depends on

advances in technology although technology level is an exogenous variable
(Solow 1956). Meanwhile the theory assumed that, in steady state, both output per
capita and capital stock per capita are fixed. So, the theory ignored the role of
human capital and R&D in technology advancement. In response, Romer (1986)
and Lucas (1988) developed the endogenous growth theory. The theory is based
on the Cobb-Douglas production function, and rewritten as follows:

{
Y = ( AH 1− , K  } ……………………………………………………….(1)

Whereby “Y” refers to capital to economic growth, “A” to factor productivity,

which depends on technological advancement, “H” to human capital or skilled
labor force, “K” to capital stock and  to elasticity of labor. The important lesson
within this model is that capital stock would not diminish economic growth by
itself due to the existence of technological efficiency and human capital and R&D.
This is due to the presence of several factors such as financial sector, domestic
investment, institutional quality and foreign direct investment fostering technology
advancement.
In our case, we are more specific to the role financial sector plays on financial
inclusion and economic growth. As suggested in financial economic literatures,
the expansion of banking services such as account holdings, good financial
infrastructures including ATMs and bank branches in remote areas promote
entrepreneurial activities, induces savings, increases productivity and domestic
investment.
As argued by Fanta and Makina (2019), inclusive financial services ensure
availability and accessibility and usage of formal financial services to “unbanked”
population. They went on to say that financial inclusion plays two important roles
in economic development, ensuring access to a range of formal financial services
from credit and saving to insurance and pensions to citizens and ensuring
availability of a variety of financial service providers to promote competition, thus,
reduces cost of service and boosts entrepreneurial activities.

Model Specification and Hypothesis Formulation

Looking at previous literatures (Andrianaivo and Kpodar 2012, Sahay et al.

2015, Inoue and Hamori 2016, Sethi and Acharya 2018) and based on endogenous
growth theory, the following model was specified to examine the effect of
financial inclusion on economic growth and income inequality:

InYit = α + β 1 InYit −1 + β 2 InFI it + β 3 InINSTIt + β 4 InHC It +

β 5 InTOit + β 6 InDI it + β 7 InFDI it + η it + ε it

372
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

All variables were changed into log form to express them in percentage form.
The symbols ( i ) implies cross sections or observations, in this case, presenting 42
countries. Time period is represented by ( t ) from 2004 to 2016. Since we were
dealing with panel data the letter (η ) represents unobserved panel specific effect
of each country. The error term is represented by the symbol ( ε ), aimed to capture
other factors influencing economic growth. The dependent variable is indicated by
(
InYt ) representing economic growth of SSA countries, which is in the form of
GDP per capita. There are seven main independent variables in this study. To
describe the symbol
( InYit −1 ) with coefficient β 1 , its lagged dependent variables
were included to capture dynamic process within the equation included in GMM.
They were expected to be either positive (divergence) or negative (convergence)
and significant.
The expression InFI with coefficient ( β 2 ) represents financial inclusion
indicators with each indicator estimated separately. Following several previous
studies (Bruhn and Love 2014, Kendall et al. 2010, Rasheed et al. 2016, Sethi and
Acharya 2018), it is expected that financial inclusion brings positive impact on
economic growth. However, there are studies by Naceur and Ghazouani (2007)
and Pearce (2011) and that show financial inclusion having a negative effect on
economic growth. Other variables with their estimated coefficients were included
in the equation to complement endogenous growth theory including institutional
quality -INST ( β 3 ) , human capital-.HC ( β 4 ) , trade openness –TO ( β 5 ) , domestic
investment-DI ( β 6 ) and foreign direct investment-FDI ( β 7 ) . According to the
endogenous theory, all included variables are expected to contribute positively to
economic growth.

Variables Description and Data Sources

In the context of financial inclusion, three variables were estimated in separate

equations whilst the control variable was maintained. Financial inclusion can be
measured in terms of (i) usage (ii) access and (iii) quality of financial services
(Sharma 2016). However, in our case we are more concerned with access of
financial services since it is still in infancy stage in the SSA region. Access to
financial sector can be measured using these two variables: - Commercial Bank
Branches per 100,000 adults, which reflects the degree of penetration of financial
institutions (CBB) and Automated Teller Machines per 100,000 adult (ATM)
which reflects ownership of accounts. The latter reflects ownership of accounts of
people or firms at formal financial institutions. All data were collected from World
Bank Indicators online database 2018.
Financial Inclusion Access index (FIA), which is a composite index prepared
by the IMF (2016) online data base 2018, reflects two measurements of financial
inclusion. The data for control variables were all collected from the World Bank
(2018). Institutional quality was measured using the rule of law index 1, while FDI
1
See Law and Singh (2014).

373
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

was measured as ratios of country’s FDI inflow to GDP. Trade openness was
measured by ratio of sum of import and export over total GDP of the host country
whereas domestic investment was measured by the value of fixed capital
formation over GDP. The period collected (t) was from 2004 to 2016 (13 years).
This was driven by data availability in the World Bank and IMF databases. Only
45 countries out of 51 SSA countries were selected due to data availability
(Appendix A). South Sudan, Somalia, Saint Helena, Liberia, Comoro, and Djibouti
had to be dropped due to inadequate data.

GMM as Estimation Method

As we are looking at the effect of financial inclusion on economic growth in

the SSA region, we would like to note that, the relationship between finance and
economic growth is not unidirectional and it could be one with a reverse causality.
This may occur when economic growth increases the demand for financial
services, or when there are significant reductions in poverty due to high economic
growth, leading to more pressure on financial inclusion services. This relationship
is simply known as endogeneity in the field of econometrics analysis and if it is
not controlled, it can cause potential biases to the coefficients.
To address these potential biases, it is widely proposed that we use a dynamic
panel estimator based on a GMM, developed to cover such specifications. The
GMM was initially developed by Arellano and Bond (1991), and it was expanded
to a system of equations that has instrument restrictions by Arellano and Bond
(1995) and Blundell and Bond (1998). After computing GMM estimates using
xtabond 2, J-statistics and Hausman tests, both were used to check if the
instruments were not over identified and correctly specified. Also, we use GMM
method due to the large value of N (n=45) compared to T(t=13) which is a very
important condition of GMM so as to avoid over and under identification of
instruments.

Discussion of the Results and Interpretation

Descriptive Statistics and Correlation

The descriptive statistics in Table 1, show that ATM has the highest mean
value (ATM=0.14) while Financial Institution Access has the least mean value
(FIA= -2.72). FIA is a more comprehensive data. It is usual to note that, financial
inclusion is very low in SSA region due to small number of firms and entrepreneurs
and high rate of poverty, rural population and illiteracy (Zins and Weill 2016,
Chikalipah 2017, Asuming et al. 2018).
Among the control variables, human capital (HC) has the highest mean value
(HC=13.98) with the lowest standard deviation (HC=1.68) compared to the rest of
the control variables. FDI has the lowest mean value (FDI=8.26) and the highest
standard deviation (FDI=2.56). Meanwhile, during the period, FDI was unevenly
distributed in the SSA region.

374
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for the Period (2004-2016)

Variable Mean Std deviation Min Max
Y 6.81 1.14 5.01 9.73
ATM 0.14 2.11 -6.51 5.43
CBB 0.12 1.84 -4.14 4.72
FIA -2.72 1.10 -5.41 -0.19
HC 13.98 1.68 9.06 16.98
INST 0.22 0.26 -0.86 1.02
TO -0.07 0.48 -2.17 1.11
DI 9.97 1.68 5.04 14.19
FDI 8.26 2.56 -12.21 12.92
Source: Calculations from STATA 14.

Table 2 demonstrates positive correlation between financial inclusion

indicators (ATM, CBB, and FIA) against economic development (Y). The highest
correlation is shown between FIA (FIA=0.77) and economic development. This
provides a clear insight that there is a linear and positive correlation between
financial inclusion and economic development in selected samples of SSA
countries.

Table 2. Correlation Matrix for the Period (2004-2016)

Y ATM CBB FIA HC INST TO DI FDI
Y 1.00
ATM 0.47 1.00
CBB 0.30 0.91 1.00
FIA 0.77 0.78 0.64 1.00
HC -0.46 -0.31 -0.34 -0.42 1.00
INST -0.40 -0.26 -0.14 -0.44 0.34 1.00
TO 0.44 0.17 0.06 0.34 -0.31 -0.30 1.00
DI -0.14 -0.19 -0.04 -0.15 -0.01 0.14 -.004 1.00
FDI 0.06 -0.12 -0.03 0.10 -0.09 -0.06 0.10 0.13 1.

The Estimated Results from GMM

Three separate models with three indicators of financial inclusion (ATM,

CBB and FIA) were estimated. Firstly, the estimated regressions were from the
problem of second order serial correlation –AR (2) since we failed to reject the
null hypothesis. Then, the Hansen test proved that, the instrument has no over
identification problem, thus no problem of endogeneity faced.
The result from Table 3 shows that, coefficient signs of all three indicators of
financial inclusion are positive. However, only two indicators (FIA=0.012,
CBB=0.006) are statistically significant. Meanwhile, despite the mean value of
ATM being the highest, it was not statistically significant. The positive impact of
FIA and CBB results is in line with our hypothesis, that financial inclusion drives
economic development of the SSA region. Also, FIA, as a composite index of
financial inclusion gives a clearer picture on the importance of financial inclusion.
Its coefficient is stronger compared to CBB. On the other hand, using separate
variables, as in previous studies, results in bias or unsatisfactory conclusion. For

375
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

example, from the results, although FIA consists of CBB and ATM, only CBB
remains positive and significant while ATM shows insignificant effect on
economic growth.

Table 3. The Long Run Impact of Financial Inclusion on Economic Development

in the Main Period (2004-2016)
Dependent Variable : GDP per capita
One-step System- GMM Two-step System-GMM
Specifications (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Independent
Coefficients Coefficient Coefficients Coefficient Coefficient Coefficients
variables
Constant -0.149(0.00)* -0.167(0.00) -0.106(0.03)* -0.152(0.00)* -0.140(0.01)* -0.092(0.05) *
Y(t-1) 1.011(0.00)* 1.010(0.00)* 1.005(0.00)* 1.001(0.00)* 1.008(0.00)* 1.005(0.00)*
ATM 0.001(0.67) - - .002(0.31) - -
CBB - 0.006(0.00)* - - 0.006(0.00)* -
FIA - - 0.009(0.02)* - - 0.012(0.00)*
HM 0.003(0.26) 0.005(0.09)** 0.004(0.08)** .003(0.08)** 0.004(0.07)** 0.003(0.17)
FDI -0.001(0.51) -0.001(0.40) -0.001(0.26) -0.001(0.00)* -0.001(0.00)* -0.001(0.00)*
INST 0.011(0.45) 0.010(0.53) 0.024(0.05) * 0.009(0.15) 0.011(0.09)** 0.038(0.00)*
TO -0.001(0.13) -0.008(0.21) -0.004(0.48) -0.004(0.65) 0.002(0.77) -0.002(0.78)
DI 0.006(0.00)* 0.004(0.00)* 0.005(0.00)* 0.005(0.00)* 0.004(0.00)* 0.006(0.00)*
AR(1) -5.49 (0.00)* -5.51 (0.00)* -4.41(0.00)* -1.86(0.06)** -1.87(0.06) -2.94(0.00)*
-1.28 (0.20) -1.38(0.17) -1.08 (0.28) -1.18(0.24)
AR (2) -2.46 (0.01) * -1.21 (0.23)
71.69(0.09) 240.63(0.00) 239.13(0.00) 240.63(0.00)
Sagan value 328(0.00) * 328(0.00) *
** * * *
Hansen value - 36.68(1)
- - 38.45(1) 39.26(1)
Figures in parentheses ( ) denote p values except Hansen test. *and **imply significance levels at 5 and 10 percent
respectively. AR(1) and AR(2) are serial correlation values at first and second order respectively.

If a bank branch is efficient in delivering formal banking services to customers,

it can promote economic development. The same applies to SSA region, the recent
increase in CBB implies that there is efficiency in bank branches delivering formal
banking services. The positive effect implies that, financial inclusion enhances
flow of money and resources allocation in rural areas which, in turn, lead to better
economic development (Sharma 2016). Also, our results support previous
literatures such as Inoue and Hamori (2016) and Makina and Wale (2019) who
both suggested that the number of commercial bank branches per 100,000 people
for the period 2004-2014 has positive contribution to their economic growth. This
happened by relaxing constraints which stimulate economic activities, such as
trade and transactions, between producers and financial institutions, as well as by
reducing funding constraints.

Control Variables

Human capital (HC), institutional quality (INST) and domestic investment

(DI), all have positive coefficients and in many cases statistically significant. This
is in line with our expectation and the endogenous theory. Human capital (HC)
effect ranges from the lowest of 0.003 to the highest value of 0.004. This is in line
with several empirical literatures such as Andrianavo and Kpodar (2012) and Kim
et al. (2017). Institutional quality (INST) lies between 0.11 and 0.038. The positive
effect of Domestic Investment (DI) ranges from 0.004 to 0.006. In contrast,
Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has negative coefficients with values of about -
0.001 in all three model specification. This is in contrast with endogenous growth

376
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

theory. However, some empirical studies argued that, this may happen due to the
absence of good economic environment in the host country (Azman-Saini et al.
2010). The impact of trade openness (TO) also has mixed results.

Robustness Test

To ensure that our results are robust, we took into account the hypothesis that
financial sector has strong impact on higher income countries. We ran another
regression, excluding six upper-middle income countries indicated by the World
Bank (2019). This helped us to ensure that our results become more sensitive,
without the higher income countries. These countries are defined by Gross
National Income (GNI) between $3996 and $12375. We considered them as
‘outliers’ and we regressed only 39 countries whilst maintaining similar time period
(T=13, N=39). The SSA countries listed as outliers are Botswana, Equatorial
Guinea, Gabon, Mauritius, Namibia and South Africa. The results are robust as
they remain positive and significant for CBB and FIA while ATM remains positive
but insignificant (Table 4).

Table 4. The Long Run Impact of Financial Inclusion on Economic Development

in the Main Period (2004-2016)
Two step SGMM
Model Specifications (1) (2) (3)
Coefficient Coefficient Coefficients
Independent variables
Constant -0.099(0.25) -0.045(0.60) -0.016(0.85)
Y(t-1) 0.002(0.00)* 0.988(0.00)* .996(0.00)**
ATM 0.001(0.45) - -
CBB - 0.006(0.03) -
FIA - - 0.015(0.00)*
HC 0.005(0.00)* 0.003(0.33) 0.005(0.08 )**
INST -0.005(0.09)** 0.012(0.09)** 0.012(0.50)
TO 0.04(0.079) 0.002(0.82) 0.007(0.53)
DI .002(0.04)** 0.002(0.05)** 0.005(0.00)*
FDI 0.001(0.19) 0.001(0.23) 0.001(0.00)*
AR(1) -1.65(0.09)** -1.65(0.09)** -2.58(0.01)**
AR(2) -1.02(0.30) -1.08(0.28) -1.13(0.26)
Sagan value 224.66(0.00) * 226.38(0.00) ** 335.54(0.00)**
Hansen value 33.37(0.89) 36.28(0.95) 34.46(0.95)

Non-Linear Effect of Financial Inclusion

In order to examine whether ‘too much’ financial inclusion may still promote
economic growth, we carried out a non-linear regression by squaring the variables
(Table 5). It is the best method to adopt, as suggested by Law and Singh (2014).
The results suggest, doubling bank branches per 100,000 (CBB=0.027) and
Automated Teller Machine (ATMs=0.007) still give positive and significant impact
on economic growth. In contrast, Financial Inclusion Access (FIA) index gives a

377
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

negative yet insignificant effect. Although we acknowledge that FIA is the best
and accurate measure of financial inclusion, it may still be inconclusive to believe
that doubling financial inclusion has a positive effect on economic growth.
However, we can still argue that doubling CBB and ATM has a positive and
significant impact on economic growth. Our positive non-linear effect is against
previous literatures that claimed negative non-linear effect (Law et al. 2017, Law
and Singh 2014, Cecchetti and Kharroubi 2012). It is worth mentioning, that they
relied on financial development indicators such as credit to private sector but not
measures of financial inclusion per se. The presence of positive non-linear effect
of financial inclusion implies that doubling the number of bank branches and
ATM in rural areas is still very important to the SSA economies.
This may be true, due to the fact that, financial inclusion is still new in the
region, despite its rapid increase. The mean values of financial inclusion range
between 0.12 and 0.14 for both CBB and ATM. On the other hand, Financial
Institution Access index (FIA), which is supposed to provide a general picture of
financial inclusion, has a negative mean value (FIA=-2.72). Albeit its
comprehensiveness, we must take into account the very low level of financial
inclusion in the SSA region. It was argued that, the region still owes it to the small
number of firms and entrepreneurs to hold bank accounts, faces extreme poverty,
high population and illiteracy (Zins and Weill 2016, Chikalipah 2017, Asuming et
al. 2018).

Table 5. Non-Linear Effect of Financial Inclusion on Economic Development in

the Main Period (2004-2016)
Dependent Variable : GDP per capita
One-step SGMM Two-step SGMM
Specifications (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Independent
Coefficients Coefficient Coefficients Coefficient Coefficient Coefficients
variables
-0.037(0.62)
Constant -0.110(0.03)** -0.089(0.09)** -0.0747(0.13) -0.048(0.43) -0.096(0.02)**
Y(t-1) 0.911(0.00)* 0.907 (0.00)* 0.851(0.00)* 0.920(0.00)* 0.905(0.00)* 0.901(0.00)*
ATM -0.0140(0.00)* - - -0.012(0.00) - -
ATM2 0.002(0.00)* 0.002(0.00)*
CBB - 0.018(0.05)** - - 0.029(0.00)* -
CBB2 -0.005(0.06)** -0.007(0.00)*
FIA - - 0.002(0.84) - - -0.002(0.81)
FIA2 0.001(0.95) -0.006(0.65)
HM 0.002(0.30) 0.004(0.86) 0.002(0.28) -0.004(0.89) 0.007(0.69) 0.006(0.85)
FDI -0.004(0.61) -0.005(0.54) -0.005 (0.46) -0.005(0.03)** -0.005(0.00)* -0.005(0.00)*
INST -0.013(0.34) 0.009(0.52) 0.021(0.06)** 0.001(0.95) 0.001(0.89) 0.022(0.00)*
TO -0.010(0.08)** -0.0081 (0.19) -0.001(0.81) -0.005 (0.41) -0.005(0.27) 0.008(0.25)
0.003(0.00)
DI 0.002(0.08) 0.004(0.00)* 0.003(0.00)* 0.003(0.00)* 0.004(0.00)*
*
AR(1) -5.44 (0.00)* -5.52 (0.00)* -4.45(0.00)* -1.86(0.06)** -1.87(0.06)** -2.96(0.00)*
-1.57 (0.11)
AR (2) -1.36(0.17) -2.50 (0.01) * -1.26 (0.20) -1.14(0.25) -1.24 (0.21)
268.58(0.0) *
Sagan value 263.45(0.0) * 360(0.00) * 268.58(0.00) * 263.45(0.00) * 360.67(0.00) *
-
Hansen value - - 40.73(0.89) 38.08(0.85) 38.34(0.9)
Figures in parentheses ( ) denote p values except Hansen test. *and **imply significance levels at 5 and 10 percent
respectively. AR(1) and AR(2) are serial correlation values at first and second order respectively.

378
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

Conclusion

Sub-Saharan Africa has struggled for a long time with poverty and income
inequality, lagging behind in terms of economic growth. However, since the turn of
the century, the region’s economic growth has increased at a faster rate compared
to global growth rates. Also, despite having low financial inclusion, in recent
years, financial access has increased at a faster rate compared to other regions. By
estimating panel data on 45 countries from Sub-Saharan Africa between 2004 and
2016, this study examined whether financial inclusion through improved access to
formal financial services can contribute positively to economic growth of this
region.
It was found that all three indicators of financial inclusion have positive effect
on economic development of the SSA region but only Commercial Bank Branches
(CBB) and Financial Institution Access (FIA) are statistically significant. This
signifies benefits gained by the SSA from financial inclusion. It is also worth noting
that, the Financial Institution Access (FIA) index has a strong effect compared to
separate indicators, namely the CBB and ATM.
This means that a combination of ATM and CBB, represented by the index,
plays a significant role in boosting economic development. In case of non-linear
effect, we found that financial inclusion index (FIA) did not prove a positive return
on economic growth. Therefore, we are still not in a position to conclude that
doubling the level of financial inclusion gives positive returns to the economy.
Therefore, the governments of SSA countries need to work together to work on
strategies developed by international organizations such as the IMF and the World
Bank to encourage financial inclusion to all corners of the region in order to
improve economic growth and development.
The need to design policies that increase accessibility, thus promote financial
inclusion is crucial. Efforts to make formal financial services and products readily
available by increasing network of commercial branches in all corners of Africa is
a sure start to financial inclusion. On top of that, the governments in SSA should
give support to their banking sectors by reducing hindrances and bottlenecks in
terms of access to formal financial services, improving literacy rate and encouraging
use of mobile technology. Although expanding the network of commercial branches
and improving accessibility for customers may increase burden of operating cost,
but there is a need to balance between profit making and public interest.

References

African Development Bank – AfDB (2012) African development report: towards green
growth in Africa. Addis Ababa. AfDB.
African Development Bank – AfDB (2015) African economic outlook2014/15: regional
development and spatial inclusion. Paris.
Allan A, Massu M, Svarer C (2013) Banking on change: breaking barriers to financial
inclusion. Plan UK: CARE International.

379
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

Andrianaivo M, Kpodar K (2012) ICT, financial inclusion, and growth: evidence from
African countries. Review of Economic and institution. IMF Working Paper, vol. 3,
No. 2 WP/11/73. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo
evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies
58(2): 277–297.
Arellano M, Bond S (1995) Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-
component models. Journal of Econometrics 68(1): 29–52.
Asuming PO, Osei-Agyei LG, Mohammed JI (2018) Financial inclusion in Sub-Saharan
Africa: recent trends and determinants. Journal of African Business 20(1): 112–134.
Ayyagari M, Beck T, Hoseini M (2013) Finance and poverty: evidence from India.
Discussion Paper No. 9497. CEPR Series.
Azman-Saini WNW, Baharumshah AZ, Law SH (2010) Foreign direct investment,
economic freedom and economic growth: international evidence. Economic Modelling
27(5): 1079–1089.
Banerjee A, Newman AF (1993) Occupational choice and the process of development.
Journal of Political Economy 101(2): 274–298.
Beck T, Demirguc-Kunt A, Levine R (2007) Finance, inequality and the poor. Journal of
Economic Growth 12(1): 27–49.
Beck T, Senbet L, Simbanegavi W (2015) Financial inclusion and innovation in Africa: an
overview. Journal of African Economies 24(1): 3–11.
Blundell R, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel
models. Journal of Econometric 87(1): 115–143.
Bruhn M, Love I (2014) The real impact of improved access to finance: evidence from
Mexico. The Journal of Finance 69(3): 1347–1376.
Burgess R, Pande R (2005) Do rural banks matter? Evidence from the Indian social
banking experiment. The American Economic Review 95(3): 780–795.
Cecchetti SG, Kharroubi E (2012) Reassessing the impact of finance on growth. BIS
Working Paper No. 381. Monetary and Economic Department, Bank for International
Settlements.
Chakravarty SR., Pal R (2013) Financial inclusion in India: an axiomatic approach. Journal
of Policy Modeling 35(5): 813–837.
Chikalipah S (2017) What determines financial inclusion in Sub-Saharan Africa? African
Journal of Economic and Management Studies 8(1): 8–18.
Dahiya S, Kumar M (2020) Linkage between financial inclusion and economic growth: an
empirical study of the emerging Indian economy. Vision 24(2): 184–193.
Dermirguc-Kunt A, Levine R (2009) Finance and inequality: theory and evidence.
Washington D. C: The World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 4967.
Demirguc-Kunt A, Klapper L, Singer D, Van Oudheusden P (2014) Global Findex
database 2014: measuring financial inclusion around the world. Washington D.C:
World Bank.
Demirguc-Kunt A, Klapper L, Singer D (2017) Financial inclusion and inclusive growth:
a review of recent empirical evidence. Policy Research Paper WPS8040. Washington
D. C: World Bank, Development Research Group.
ECA (2015) Economic Commission for Africa (2015-03) Economic report on Africa
2015: industrializing through trade. Addis Ababa: ECA.
Emara N, Mohieldin M (2020) Financial inclusion and extreme poverty in the MENA
region: a gap analysis approach. Review of Economics and Political Science 5(3):
207–230.

380
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

Fanta AB, Makina D (2019) The relationship between technology and financial inclusion:
cross-sectional evidence. 1st Edition. Elsevier.
Inoue T, Hamori S (2016) Financial access and economic growth: evidence from Sub-
Saharan Africa. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 52(3): 743–753.
International Monetary Fund – IMF (2014) Regional economic outlook. Fostering durable
and Inclusive growth. Washington D.C.: IMF.
International Monetary Fund – IMF (2016) IMF releases the 2016 financial access survey,
a key tool to foster financial inclusion. IMF.
International Monetary Fund – IMF (2017) Regional economic outlook; Sub Sahara Africa.
Washington, D.C.: IMF.
Jacoby HG (1994) Borrowing constraints and progress through school: evidence from
Peru. The Review of Economics and Statistics 76(1): 151–160.
Kendall J, Mylenko N, Ponce A (2010) Measuring financial access around the world.
Policy Research Working Paper No. 5253. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Khan I, Khan I, Sayal AU, Khan MZ (2021) Does financial inclusion induce poverty,
income inequality, and financial stability: empirical evidence from the 54 African
countries? Journal of Economic Studies (Mar).
Kim J (2016) A study on the effect of financial inclusion on the relationship between
income inequality and economic growth. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade
52(2): 498–512.
Kim DW, Yu JS, Hassan MK (2017) Financial inclusion and economic growth in OIC
countries. Research in International Business and Finance 43(Jan): 1–14.
Law SH, Singh N (2014) Does too much finance harm economic growth? Journal of
Banking and Finance 41(C): 36–44.
Law HS, Kurtan AM, Naseem NA (2017) The role of Institutions in finance curse:
evidence from international data. Journal of Comparative Economics Elsevier 46(1):
174–191.
Lucas RE (1988) On the mechanisms of economic development. Journal of Monetary
Economics 22(1): 3–42.
Makina D, Wale YM (2019) Financial inclusion and economic growth: evidence from a
panel of selected African countries. 1st Edition. Elsevier.
Naceur SB, Ghazouani S (2007) Stock markets, banks, and economic growth: empirical
evidence from the MENA region. Research in International Business and Finance
21(2): 297–315.
Ouma SA, Odongo TM, Were M (2017) Mobile financial services and financial inclusion:
is it a boon for savings mobilization. Review of Development Finance 7(1): 29–35.
Park CY, Mercado R (2015) Financial inclusion, poverty, and income inequality in
developing Asia. Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series 426.
Pearce D (2011) Financial inclusion in the Middle East and North Africa: analysis and
roadmap recommendations. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5610.
Pradhan RP, Arvin MB, Bahmani S, Bennett SE (2017) Broadband penetration, financial
development, and economic growth nexus: evidence from the Arab league countries.
Macroeconomics and Finance in Emerging Market Economies 10(2): 151–171.
Rasheed B, Siong-Hook L, Lee C, Habibullah MS (2016) The role of financial inclusion
in financial development: international evidence. Abasyn University Journal of Social
Sciences 9(special issue): 330–348.
Romer PM (1986) Increasing return and long run growth. Journal of Political Economy
94(5): 1002–1037.
Sahay R., Cihak M, N’Diaye P, Barajas A, Mitra S, Kyobe A, et al. (2015) Financial
inclusion: can it meet multiple macroeconomic goals? IMF Staff Discussion Note
15/17, September.

381
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

Sanyal P (2014) Credit to capabilities: a sociological study of microcredit groups in India.

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sethi D, Acharya D (2018) Financial inclusion and economic growth linkage: some cross
country evidence. Journal of Financial Economic Policy 10(3): 369–385.
Sharma D (2016) Nexus between financial inclusion and economic growth. Journal of
Financial Economic Policy 8(1): 13–36.
Sukmana R, Ibrahim M (2018) Financial access and inequality: a quantile assessment.
International Journal of Economics and Management 12(2): 551–557.
Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of
Economics 70(1): 65–94.
United Nations (2006) Building inclusive financial sectors for development. New York:
United Nations.
United Nations Council for Trade and Development – UNCTAD (2014) Economic
development in Africa report: catalyzing investment for transformative growth in
Africa. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.
United Nations Council for Trade and Development – UNCTAD (2016) Economic
development report in Africa: debt dynamics and development finance in Africa.
New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.
Van Rooyen C, Stewart R, de Wet T (2012) The impact of microfinance in Sub-Saharan
Africa: a systematic review of the evidence. World Development 40(11): 2249–2262.
World Bank (2007) Access to finance: measurement, impact and policy. Policy Research
Report. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
World Bank (2008) Finance for all? Policies and pitfalls in expanding access. World
Bank Policy Report. Washington D.C: World Bank.
World Bank (2014) Global financial development report: financial inclusion. Washington
D.C: World Bank.
World Bank (2016) World development indicators. Washington D.C: World Bank.
World Bank (2018) Financial Inclusion is a key enabler to reducing poverty and boosting
prosperity. World Bank.
World Bank (2019) World Bank country and lending groups. World Bank.
World Bank Group’s Universal Financial Access – UFA (2020) UFA2020 overview:
universal financial access by 2020.UFA.
Zins A, Weill L (2016) The determinants of financial inclusion in Africa. Review of
Development Finance 6(1): 46–57.

382
Athens Journal of Business & Economics October 2022

Appendix A

List of SSA Countries Used in Analysis

1. Angola 16. Ethiopia 31. Niger

2. Benin 17. Gabon 32. Nigeria
3. Botswana 18. Gambia 33. Rwanda
4. Burkina Faso 19. Ghana 34. Sao Tome and Principles
5. Burundi 20. Guinea 35. Senegal
6. Cabo Verde 21. Guinea-Bissau 36. Seychelles
7. Cameroon 22. Kenya 37. Sierra Leone
8. Central Africa 23. Lesotho 38. South Africa
9. Chad 24. Madagascar 39. Sudan
10. Comoros 25. Malawi 40. Swaziland
11. Congo 26. Mali 41. Togo
12. Côte d'Ivoire 27. Mauritania 42. Uganda
13. Democratic Rep. of Congo 28. Mauritius 43. Tanzania
14. Equatorial Guinea 29. Mozambique 44. Zambia

Note: Due to unavailability of data some countries were not included; includes: South Sudan,
Somalia, Comoro, Djibouti, Liberia.

383
Vol. 8, No. 4 Albiman & Bakar: The Role of Financial Inclusion on Economic…

384