AAPG2020 Shothetal Triassic 0920
AAPG2020 Shothetal Triassic 0920
AAPG2020 Shothetal Triassic 0920
net/publication/348713399
New data from an old province - The Triassic in the South Viking Graben,
Norway
CITATIONS READS
0 49
8 authors, including:
Michael Urbat
University of Cologne
30 PUBLICATIONS 587 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Basin Analysis & Sequence Stratigraphy (Lower Jurassic) Tilje Formation, offshore mid-Norway. View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Allard W. Martinius on 23 January 2021.
The Triassic in the NO sector of the South Viking Graben (SVG) has been historically subdivided into
the shale-prone Smith Bank Fm. and the sand-rich Skagerrak Fm. The presence of several mudstone
members in the UK sector provided the base for a chronostratigraphic subdivision. Such information
is missing from the NO sector, because of the overall sand-rich nature of the Skagerrak Fm. Harsh
environmental conditions inhibited the blooming and preservation of life forms. Consequently, most
samples are barren of microfossils, resulting in a scarce biostratigraphic record. Seismic correlation
between wells is limited by the lack of acoustic impedance contrasts within the Triassic section. Also,
the patchy reflectivity pattern is commonly overprinted by multiples. Furthermore, the sand-rich
nature of the Skagerrak Fm. does not allow for a robust estimation of well based structural tilt,
hampering well correlation.
Cross-correlation and cross-validation between the three stratigraphic methods revealed a Carnian to
Norian age of the Skagerrak Fm., spanning ca. 20Ma. These results do not allow for a detailed
chronostratigraphic correlation of lithologically similar sandy and heterolithic reservoir units.
Dipmeter derived sediment transport directions indicate the importance of antecedent drainage, as
well as the co-existence and interfingering of several sediment pathways with intermittent
sedimentation shadows. A direct control of minibasin subsidence and turtle structure formation on
drainage direction or facies distribution is below the resolution of the employed methods. In
conclusion, today’s Triassic facies distribution is primarily a function of (i) antecedent drainage, (ii)
Triassic extension of e.g. the Ling Graben and (iii) patchy preservation of the Triassic in response to
the Aalenian unconformity, lasting for up to 35Ma.