Application of the state's police power to NON-criminal conduct

is illegal and unlawful.

When a police officer applies the State's police power to conduct

that does not rise to the level of Crime
they act beyond the scope of their job and violate their oath. An
unauthorized arrest is void.

"The makers of the Constitution conferred, as against the

government, the Right to be let alone; the most comprehensive

of rights, and the right most valued by civilized men." U S
Supreme Court Justice Brandeis in Olmstead v. United States
277 US 438, 48 S.Ct. 564, 575; 72 L ED 944 (1928).

"The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties; it tells the

state to let people alone; it does not require the federal
government or the state to provide services, even so elementary
a service as maintaining law and order." Bowers v Devito, 686
F2d 616.

VIOLATORS OF RIGHTS CAN BE SUED

"It is the duty of all officials whether legislative, judicial,

executive, administrative, or ministerial to so perform every
official act as not to violate constitutional provisions."
Montgomery v state 55 Fla. 97-45SO.879.

Under USC Title 42 § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent states:

"Every person who, having knowledge that any wrongs
conspired or to be done. . . and having power to prevent or aid in
preventing . . . Neglects or refuses so to do . . . shall be liable to
the party injured. . . "

"...an officer may be held liable in damages to any person

injured in consequence of a breach of any of the duties
connected with his office...the liability for nonfeasance,
misfeasance, and for malfeasance in office is in his 'individual',
not his official capacity." 70 Am. Jur. 2nd Sec. 50, VII Civil
Liability.

"The attempt of a State Officer to enforce an unconstitutional

statute is a proceeding without authority... is an illegal act, and
the officer is stripped of his official charter and is subjected in
his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The
State has no power to impart to its officer immunity from
responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States."
Ex Parte Young, 209 U. S. 123, (1908). [Supreme Authority =
Private men and women "we the people".]

Trespass on one's right to travel is an injury that can result in the

trespasser being sued personally under civil code Abstinence
from Injury which states even in the performance of a lawful act
one causing injury must abstain. The injury is a trespass on the
right to travel, so the trespasser must abstain.

"INSURANCE" (GAMBLING) IS NOT MANDATORY

"A policy of Insurance is a maritime contract, and therefore of

Admiralty Jurisdiction." De Lovio v. Boit 7 Fed. Cases Number
3, 776.
"The police power of the state must be exercised in
subordination to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution. "
Bacahanan vs. Wanley, 245 US 60; Panhandle Eastern Pipeline
Co. Vs. State Highway Commission, 294 US 613.

"The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways...to

operate an automobile...is not a mere privilege...which the city
may permit or prohibit at will." Thompson v. Smith (Chief of
Police),154 S.E. 579, 580.

"If the state does convert your right into a privilege and issue a
license and a fee for it, you can ignore the license and a fee and
engage the right with impunity. " Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham,
373 US 262 (1962).

DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY

Title 8: Aliens and Nationality PART 101-PRESuhffTION OF

LAWFUL ADMISSION

§ 101.3 Creation of record of lawful permanent resident status

for person born under diplomatic status in the United States.

(a) Person born to foreign diplomat -(1) Status of person. A

person born in the United States to a foreign diplomatic offlcer
accredited to the United States, as a matter of intemational law,
is not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. That person
is not a United States citizen under the Fourteenth Amendment
to the Constitution. Such a person may be considered a lawful
permanent resident at birth.
(2) Definition of foreign diplomatic officer. Foreign diplomatic
officer means a person listed in the State Department Diplomatic
List, also known as the Blue List. It includes ambassadors,
ministers, charges d'affaires, counselors, secretaries and attaches
of embassies and legations as well as members of the Delegation
of the Commission of the European Communities. The term also
includes individuals with comparable diplomatic status and
immunities who are accredited to the United Nations or to the
Organization of American States, and other individuals who are
also accorded comparable diplomatic status.

TITLE 22 § 254d. Dismissal on motion of action against

individual entitled to immunity

Any action or proceeding brought against an individual who is

entitled to immunity with respect to such action or proceeding
under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, under
section 254b or 254c of this title, or under any other laws
extending diplomatic privileges and immunities, shall be
dismissed. Such immunity may be established upon motion or
suggestion by or on behalf of the individual, or as otherwise
permitted by law or applicable rules of procedure.

49 Statute 3097 Treaty Series 881 Conventions and Duties and

Rights of the States, placed all stat`es under international law,
thus making all courts, Intemational courts which are foreign to
me.
Their ability to govern is subject to the limit of the law, and that
limit is reached with the revocation of consent.

There is no evidence or record that de facto statutes, rules, and

regulations are applicable to the private man who is alien with
respect to the Federal Zone i.e., the District of Columbia and the
federal enclaves, territories and possessions over which the
Congress has exclusive legislative jurisdiction.

Failure to respond will be taken as meaning that you have

"acquiesced" and that, from this date forward, the doctrine of
"estoppel by acquiescence" will prevail.

Title 28 section 2072 the rules of court is the supreme law that
over powers statutes

that Sam Berdino county has a qualified heir and trustee has paid
the capital transfer taxes under 2511 a, taxable termination under
2601, 2603, 2611 and 2612 and 6901 oftitle 26 of the united
states code as a heir and donee.

Title 18 was not passed as positive law. Show me where it states

it applies to the people not the person.
I am not subject to the jurisdiction of the United States
Corporation. I am not a corporate member of your corporation.
A fraudulent agreement imposes no duty.
Our God-given rights are unalienable by the agreements of men

NON-cOMMERclAL TRAVELERs ARE EXErmT FROM

LICENSING

"...a statutory provision that the supervising officials "may"

exempt such persons when the transportation is not on a
commercial basis means that they "must exempt them." State v.
Johnson, 245 P 1073; 60 C.J.S. section 94 page 581.

"It is clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in

profession, business, trade or calling; thus when merely

traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business
enterprise or adventure with the corporate state, no license is
required of the natural individual traveling for personal business,
pleasure and transportation." Wingfield v. Fielder, (1972) 29
CA3d 213.

"Those who have the right to do something carmot be licensed

for what they already have the right to do as such license would
be meaningless." City of Chicago v Collins, 51 N.E. 907 (Ill.
1898).

NO VIOLATION FOR NOT HAVING A LICENSE OR A

SUSPENDED LICENSE or even having a license

"...It is absolutely necessary for the State to allege and prove that
the accused was, on the date of the alleged offense, a licensee,
for, as we construe the statute ..., it applies specifically to a
licensee and unless the person accused was a licensee, we fail to
understand how he could be guilty of violating the provisions of
this portion of the statute." Barber v. State,149 Tex. Crim.18
(1945) 191 S.W. 2D 879

NOTICE when the license is active ..... that would be when one is
actually "engaged in public business" ....
But the license is not active when engaged in private business.

The definition of a licensee is one who holds a current valid

license. Only a licensee can violate a statute. A suspended
license is not valid and therefore a suspended licensee is not
subject to statutes.

"The acceptance of a license... will not impose upon the licensee

an obligation to respect or to comply with any provision of the
statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to
the Constitution of the United States." Collier v. Wallis 180 US
452 (1901) 333 US 426, 606 CL (1936) 56 P2d 602.

NON-COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION DOES NOT

REQUIRE LICENSING OR REGISTRATION

"A vehicle not used for commercial activity is a "consumer

goods" ,... it is not a type of vehicle required to be registered and

"use tax" paid of which the tab [tag] is evidence of receipt of the
tax." Bank of Boston vs Jones, 4 UCC Rep. Serv.1021, 236 A2d
484, UCC PP 9-109.14.
"It is held that a tax upon common carriers by motor vehicles is
based upon a reasonable classification, although it does not
apply to private vehicles... not for hire."[ Desser v. Wichita,
(1915), 96 Kan. 820; Iowa Motor Vehicle Asso.
v. Railroad Comrs„ 75 A.L.R. 22]

THE DMV ONLY LICENSES COMMERCIAL MOTOR

VEHICLES

"The activity licensed by state DMVs - the operation of motor

vehicles -is... related to interstate commerce". Reno v. Condom,
No. 98-1464, Supreme Court of the United States decided
January 12, 2000, BRIEF FOR THE PETITIONERS, Seth
Waxman, Solicitor General U. S. Department of Justice.

USC Title 49 > Subtitle IV > Part 8 > Chapter 145 > § 14504a
(10) Vehicle registration;
The term "vehicle registration" means the registration of any
commercial motor vehicle.

TRAFFIC STATUTES ONLY APPLY TO COMMERCIAL

DRIVERS

"Users of the highway for transportation of persons and property

for hire may be subjected to special regulations not applicable to
those using the highway for public purposes." Richmond Baking
Co. v. Department of Treasury 18 N.E. 2D 788.

Driving license and registration are irrelevant if the automobile

is not being used in a commercial activity. A non-commercial
traveler is not engaged in any activity that is regulated by the
Drv.
MY PRIVATE PROPERTY "CAR'' IS NON-COMMERCIAL
CONSUNIR GOODS not a commercial motor vehicle

"Consumer goods - automobile for transportation to and from

work... is a personal, as opposed to a business use, as that term is
used in UCC § 91109(1)... and... classified as consumer goods."
IN RE BARNES United States District Court, D Maine,
September 15,1972 Bankruptcy No. BK 72-129ND, No. EK
72-130ND. In re Bames,11 USS rep. Serv. 697 (1972)

TRAFFIC INFRACTIONS ARE NOT CRIMES

"Traffic" matters are NOT criminal. State of Oregon v. Christine

Dahl (2002) PR106249; A112549 Appeal from Circuit Court,
Multnomah County

"A [traffic] violation is not a crime." ORS 161.515. [Oregon

Revised Statutes].

"Further, [traffic] infractions are not crimes..." (People v. Battle

(1975) 50 Cal.App.3d Supp.1 [123 Cal.Rptr. 636].) fn.1; ?FN

1. Battle soundly reasoned infractions are not crimes; hence, the
Kellett rule was held inapplicable to prosecutions involving
infractions. People v. Sava (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 935 , 235
Cal.Rptr. 694 INo. D005040. Court of Appeals of Califomia,
Fourth Appellate District, Division One. March 27,1987.]
OVOTE: This case HAS NOT been overturned.)
The interstate compact for the enforcement of traffic infractions
(The Motor Vehicle Compact),
is NOT the enforcement of "criminal laws" but the enforcement
ofpolicies!

"No public policy of a state can be allowed to override the

positive guarantees of the U. S. Constitution." 16 Am.Jur. (2nd),

Const. Law, Sect. 70.

"The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be

converted into a crime." Miller vs. U. S. 230 F 2d 486, 489.

TRAVELERS CANNOT BE STOPPED, ARRESTED, OR

pRopERT¥ CONFISCATED ExCEPT FOR A CRInm
"All citizens of the United States of America have a right to pass
and re-pass through every part of it without interruption, as
freely as in their own state." Smith v. Turner, 48 US 283 (1849).

"For a crime to exist, there must be an injured party. There can

be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this
exercise of Constitutional rights." Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945.

The Fourth Amendment says one cannot be disturbed in their

peace. Use of emergency lights, which is a felony when there is
no emergency, is a disturbance of one's peace. Cases are
dismissed on that alone.
"The Fourth Amendment forbids stopping a vehicle even for the
limited purpose of questioning its occupants unless police
offlcers have a founded suspicion of criminal conduct." United
States v. Salinas. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit,
citing United States v. Ramirez-Sandoval, (1989).

"Even assuming that purpose is served to some degree by

stopping and demanding identification from an individual
without any specific basis for believing he is involved in
criminal activity, the guarantees of the Fourth Amendment do
not allow it. When such a stop is not based on objective criteria,
the risk of arbitrary and abusive police practices exceeds
tolerable limits." Delaware v. Prouse 440 U.S, 648, 653 (1979).

Founded suspicion exists when an offlcer is aware of specific

articulable facts, that, together with rational inferences drawn
from them, reasonably warrant a suspicion that the person to be
detained has committed or is about to commit a crime. United
States v. Cortez, (1981); United States v. Robert L., (1989).

"At common law an arrest could not be made of a person

charged with a misdemeanor except on warrant of a magistrate."
Carpenter v. Mills, 29 How. Pr. 473 [Traffic infractions do not
even qualify as misdemeanors]

Declared in the Magma Carta "No one shall be arrested or

imprisoned but by the law of the land."
This is called the common law and it is made constitutional law
by the due process clause.
"Operation of a motor vehicle upon public streets and highways
is not a mere privilege but is a right or liberty protected by the
guarantees of Federal and State constitutions." Adams v. City of
Pocatello 416 P2d 46

"The use of the highways for the purpose of travel and

transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common and
fundamental right of which the public and the individual cannot
be rightfully deprived." "No State government entity has the
power to allow or deny passage on the highways... Transporting
his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or
business. "Travel is not a privilege that can be permitted at will
with forced insurances, registration, & licensing, but a common
& fundamental right of liberty granted by the Constitution."
Chicago Motor Coach Co. V. City of Chicago, 337111. 200,169
N.E. 22.

"The use of the automobile as a necessary adjunct to the earning

of a livelihood in modem life requires us in the interest of
realism to conclude that the right to use an automobile on the
public highways partakes of the nature of a liberty within the
meaning of the Constitutional guarantees... " Berberian v. Lussier
139 A2d 869, 872 (1958)

"...to be free to travel throughout the length and breadth of our

land uninhibited by statutes, rules, or regulations which
unreasonably burden or restrain this movement." US Supreme
Court, Shapiro v Thompson, 394 US 618, 22 L Ed 2d 600, 89 S
Ct 1322.
Nowhere within the provisions of 49 USC 31301 Deflnitions do
we find any reference to anything that could be construed to be a
"license" for a private automobile, "pickup truck", van or
motorcycle.

49 USC 31102 (Grants to States):

(a) General Authority. -Subject to this section and the
availability of amounts, the Secretary of Transportation may
make grants to States for the development or implementation of
programs for improving motor carrier safety and the
enforcement of regulations, standards, and orders of the United
States Government on commercial motor vehicle safety,
hazardous materials transportation safety, and compatible State
regulations, standards, and orders.
(b) State Plan Procedures and Contents. -(1) The Secretary shall
prescribe procedures for a State to submit a plan under which
the State agrees to assume responsibility for improving motor
carrier safety and to adopt and enforce regulations, standards,
and orders of the [Federal] Government on commercial motor
vehicle safety, hazardous materials transportation safety, or
compatible State regulations, standards, and orders.

49 USC 31102 (Grants to States) The States receive Federal

grant money only for and in connection with programs that
involve a commercial driver license, and, the States agree to
operate under Federal codes which only effect commercial
motor vehicles, and therefore, the States have no authority to
issue any type of operator's license upon those who travel in
their own private property that is not in commerce.

CRIMES BEING COMMITTED

Use of emergency lights when there is no emergency is a felony.
-Title 28-Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 13 Civil
Rights, 241 Conspiracy against private property rights.
-Title 28-Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Chapter 13 Civil
Rights, 242 Deprivation of rights under color of law.
The 4th Constitutional Amendment; Deprivation of security of
the Private Property Right from government invasion.
The 5th Constitutional Amendment Deprivation of Liberty and
Private Property without Just Compensation.
Violation of Substantive Rights and Private Property Rights
Secured and Protection by Constitutional Law.
The Theft of the Personal Private Property by Taking without
Just Compensation.
The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter I 1985-
Conspiracy interfering with Private Property Rights.
The United States Code Armotated Title 181651 et seq Piracy
and Privateering activities conducted on vessels at dry dock
under commercial law by a body of insurgent Privateers.
The United States Code Title 18152 and 3571 provides fine up
to $500,000.00 or imprisonment for up to 5 years for the
presenting of fraudulent claims, fraudulent indictment,
fraudulent evidence.
The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter 11
obstructing the evidence in the witnesses through the
modiflcation of language creating Federal Racketeering;
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations activities extorting
financial means creating economical damage point beyond
recovery.
The United States Code Title 42 Chapter 21 Subchapter Ill
deprivation of the evidence in the witnesses through
modification of language creating acts of Federal Racketeering;
Influenced and Corrupt Organizations; Terrorism; Privateering.
The United States Code Title 421986 For knowledge and the
right to stop and correct a wrong,
The United States Code Title 28 USC 1746 and Title 181621
Perjury and conspiring to commit perjury.
The United States Code Title 181001 and the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure 9(b). Extorting private property through the
modification of language.
The United States Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 951651
Interference with commerce by threats or violence.
Acting without establishing as a matter of record, Proper
Jurisdiction.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty of Upholding the "Oath of Office" and
Upholding the Office of Public Trust.
Acts of War against the United States Government Treaties and
Organic Constitution Constituting Treason.
Employing Intimidation to affect Identity, Nationality,
Birthright.
Thief Using a Fiction, Artificial Person Name to Impersonate
and Steal the Sovereign De Jure Identity.
Federal law 18 USC 1961 bans engaging in a pattern of crime.
When state and local officials in essence extort money, they are
committing federal felonies and are in essence "racketeers" as
per the law.
The Intemational Organization Immunities Act of 1945 placed
all courts under the jurisdiction of the United Nations (reference
Title 22 CFR Foreign Relations with Oaths of Office under
section 92.12 and 92.31).

Under Title 8 USC 1481 oath takers ¢udges,law enforcers, etc.)

voluntarily forfeit their citizenship via the Oath of Office thus
becoming foreign agents and are required to register under the
Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act.
US Govt. Code imposes $75,000 flne and imprisonment for
Unregistered Foreign Agents.

The Supreme court ruled that the Civil Rights Act of 1875 was
unconstitutional. Consider their reasoning;
Neither Congress nor the State have the power to regulate
conduct and transactions of private individuals.

SO-CALLED CONTRACTS WITH THE STATE

Any false representation of material facts made with knowledge

of falsity and with intent that it shall be acted on by another in
entering into contract, and which is so acted upon, constitutes
"fraud," and entitles party deceived to avoid contracts or recover
damages." Bamsdall Refining Corp. V. Birnamwood Oil Co., 92
F.2d 817.

The terms are not fully disclosed at the time of signing for a
driver license and when one is required to research to find the
terms one has been forced to comply with it is considered
fraudulent.
America was re-insured by a credit policy under the Statute of
19 George 11 c. 37. Well, that was a long time ago, but,like an
ice-breaker, it allowed many other ships "in the Admiralty" to
wedge thru and invade the land. The use of "private script" of
the Federal Reserve, called Federal Reserve Notes, pays homage
to the British Crown. These are not taxes, but insurance
premiums on the use of the credit for profit.
"The existence of an insurance policy is a matter of [private]
contract law, since insurance involves a contractual relationship
between the insurer and the insured." Lapoint v. Richards, 66
Wn.(2d) 585, 588 (July 8,1965).

" Traditionally, insurance contracts have been considered to be

private contracts between the parties."

Mutual of Enumclaw v. Wiscomb, 25 Wn.App. 841, 846, 611
P.2d 1304 (April 14,1980).

"...that since the Federal Reserve System and its twelve branch
banks are private corporations, the federal government could not
be held responsible."-Lewis v. U.S., 608F 2d 1239 (1982)

Federal Reserve Notes are "Private Script," in fact, they are

"War Script" issued by Private Enterprise.

The UCC 31305(a)(1)(iii) affirms ...... one of the other defenses

is that the instrument is illegal, when that instrument has been
deemed to mean for collecting usury or gambling debts. [Usury
equals INTEREST, it is also a gamble]
of some contract or commercial agreement between it and the
one upon whom the payment and performance are made and are
willing to produce said documents and place the same evidence
before trying to enforce its demands called statutes". For
purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded
as entities entirely separate from government." Clearfield Trust
Co. v. United States 318 US. 363-371.

"When governments enter the world of commerce, they are

subject to the same burdens as any private firm or corporation"
--U.S. v. Burr, 309 U.S. 242 See: 22 U.S.C.A.286e, Bank of
U.S. vs. Planters Bank of Georgia, 6L, Ed. (9 Wheat) 244; 22
U.S.C.A. 286 et seq., C.R.S.11-60-103
NOTE: Under the Clearfield Doctrine, the courts are no longer
government entities in that they are demanding private monies
and must have a contract with you to compel performance. They
are no more special as a normal business than your local Jack In
The Box.

HJR 192, Public law[policy?] 73-10, 48 Stat 48?, 31 USC 5118,

OVERRIDDEN
Did/does the court demand payment in a certain "species"? [U.S.
S]
Insurance is a private contract with no legal or lawful
requirement to inform the public.

Remember, since the "State" claims ownership of all material

goods, if they hold title to "your" car, they own it and require
"surety" from those that have usufruct of it. So, if they don't
have title to it, they don't own it.

GOVERNMENT EhAI'LOYEES ARE ACTING AS

UNQUALIFIED DEBT COLLECTORS

All public corporate agents; judges, attorneys, cops, court clerks,

bailiffs, the mayor, etc., right down to the dog catcher, are all
acting as unqualified debt collectors and illegally access the
estate as unqualified heirs. For that reason I can demand a W-9
from them.

United States Code Title 26 section 2032 A e 11, Altemate

Valuation on a carryover basis, states; to be a qualified debt
collector one is required to have at minimum their own personal
one hundred thousand dollar surety bond for each and every
citation, fine, case, suit, etc. If you are planning on writing a
citation I demand to see the receipt/s of the minimum
$100,000.00 private individual surety bond/s that authorizes
debt collection.

Even with a private individual surety bond the accessing of the

estate requires the funds be placed in a Trust within 90 days,
which is never done. Then a tax return for that Trust must be
filed, which is also never done, and it is a one and a half million
dollar fine which is chargeable to each and everyone involved;
the cop, the judge,
the court clerk, the bailiff, the prosecuting attorney and their
spouses as they all benefit.
Tax evasion is a violation and is punishable by a $100,000 fine
and 20 years in prison, Section 7201 of the IRS Tax Code

STATE AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENTS DISSOLVED

"The United States Federal Government has been dissolved by

the Emergency Banking Act... and declared [so] by President
Roosevelt... H.J.R. 192... dissolved the Sovereign Authority of
the United States and the official capacities of all United States
Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further
evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today
in name only." U. S. Congressional Record, March 17,1993 Vol.
33, page H-1303.

United States Code TITLE 28 § 3002 (15) "United States"

means- (A) a Federal corporation

The United States "...is a corporation, a legal fiction that existed

well before the Revolutionary War." Republica v. Sween.

The Intemational Organization Immunities Act of 1945 placed

all courts under the jurisdiction of the United Nations (reference
Title 22 CFR Foreign Relations with Oaths of Office under
section 92.12 and 92.31). Under Title 8 USC 1481all oath takers
¢udges, law enforcement officers, etc.) voluntarily forfeit their
citizenship via the Oath of Office thus becoming foreign agents
and are required to register under the Foreign Sovereign
Immunity Act (though they never do).

All federal and state elected officials, appointed administrators,

federal police, sheriffs and judges receive their paychecks
through OPM, the Office of Personnel Management. OPM is
owned by the Intemational Monetary Fund, which is owned by
the Rockefeller and Rothschild families and their Banking
Empires, which is treason.

"Since March 9th,1933, the United States has been in a state of

declared national emergency..." Congress,1973.
"When Congress declares an emergency, there is no
Constitution..." Congressman Beck, Congressional Record,1933.
Currently, permanent state of national emergency. 22 U.S.C.A.
286d.1977; See: Executive Order 12919.

The DMV is not part of civil government (see state

constitution). The DMV is a department of a corporation
(business fiction) that
does business as "STATE of MISSOURI." The DMV has NO
GOVERNMENTAL POWER OF ANY KIND.

The police are not public officers (see state constitution) but are
paid agents of "municipal corporations" and
have NO GOVERNMENTAL POWER OR AUTHORITY OF
ANY KIND.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the police are under NO
obligation to protect anyone.

"neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable for failure

to establish a police department or otherwise provide police
protection service." Califomia Government Code, § 845
"police officers have no affirmative statutory duty to do
anything." Souza v. City ofAntioch, 62 Califomia Reporter, 2d
909, 916 (Cal. App.1997)

It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to

protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sappv.
Tallahasse, 348 So. 2nd 363, Reiff v. City of philadelphia, 477 F.
Supp.1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.

"As the use of private corporate commercial paper [Federal

Reserve notes], debt currency or securities [checks] is
concerned, removes the sovereignty status of the government of
"We the People" and reduces it to an entity rather than a

government in the area of finance and commerce as a

corporation or person .... Governments descend to the level of a
mere private corporation and take on the characteristics of a
mere private citizen. This entity cannot compel performance
upon its corporate statute or rules unless it, like any other
corporation or person is the holder-in-due course of some
contract or commercial agreement between it and the one upon
whom the payment and performance are made and are willing to
produce said documents and place the same evidence before
trying to enforce its demands called statutes. For purposes of
suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities
entirely separate from government." Clearfleld Trust Co. v.
United States 318 US. 363-371

CITY, COUNTY, STATE CORPORATIONS ARE

SUBORDINATE TO FEDERAL CORPORATION CODE

MOA's, Memorandum of Agreements, by which Federal funds

are distributed to the States (TITLE 49 Sec. 31102. -Grants to
States) makes them all sub corporations of the United States
Federal corporation. Corporations can only control subordinate
corporate entities created by the parent corporation. The States
are subject to Federal regulations which only apply to
commercial motor vehicles.

GOVERNMENT CORPORATE RULES APPLY ONLY TO

GOVERNMENT CORPORATE EMPLOYEES

[A11 codes [Chapter 83, Part 11 as alleged], rules, and regulations

are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in
accordance with God's laws. All codes, rules and regulations are
unconstitutional and lacking due process.] Rodriques v Ray
Donavan (U.S. Department of Labor), 769 F. 2d 1344,1348
(1985).

"Rodrigues asserts that the procedures are unconstitutional as

applied to him .... We do not find the due process challenges

insubstantial." Sherwood T. Rodrigues v. Ray Donovan, Sec. of
Labor 769 F 2d 1344 (1985), The Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals.
The Supreme Court has explained that the power to adjudicate
private rights must be vested in an Article Ill court. Northern
Pipeline Const. Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co., 458 U.S. 50,
63-76 (1982) (plurality opinion).

Absent the creation of a separate administrative mechanism for

administration and adjudication of civil forfeitures, such cases
must be assigned in the first instance to Article Ill judges.
Assignment of such cases to Magistrate Judges, who are mere
adjuncts to United States District Judges, see Gomez v. United
States, 490 U.S. 858, 872 (1989), cannot satisfy the Article Ill
requirement." MEMORANDUM TO STEF CASSELLA
DEPUTY DIRECTOR, POLICY AND LITIGATION ASSET
FORFEITURE OFFICE, December 6,1993.

"Congress generally "camot `withdraw from [Art.111] judicial

cognizance any matter which, from its nature, is the subject of a
suit at the common law, or in equity, or admiralty," id. at 69 n.23
(quoting Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.,
18 How. 272, 284 (1856)), and

law.comell.edu/wex/workers compensation Workers'

Compensation: an overview; Federal statutes are limited to
federal employees or those workers employed in some
significant aspect of interstate commerce.

The implementation of codes, rules and regulations are nothing

more than ex post facto law
absolutely forbidden by the united states constitution
Codification - Lack of Jurisdiction of USDOT

49 USC § 13505. Transportation furthering a primary business

(a) In General.-Neither the Secretary nor the Board has
jurisdiction under this part over the transportation of property by
motor vehicle when-
(1) the property is transported by a person engaged in a business
other than transportation; and
(2) the transportation is within the scope of, and furthers a
primary business (other than transportation) of the person.

If the Federal government does not have jurisdiction, neither

does the state.

It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Theirjob is to

protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sappv.
Tallahasse, 348 So. 2nd 363, Reiff v. City of philadelphia, 477 F.
Supp.1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept. of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247.

Wrongful actions by any corporate entity that bring upon a

private living man an injury must be recompensed.
A corporate government serving papers on a living man is abuse
of process because a fiction cannot serve papers nor
cause injury or harm to a living man. Trustees of Dartmouth
College v Woodward, Waters-Pierce v Texas.

If you are planning on accessing the estate with a citation, fill

out the accompanying W9 form and
2032 A e 11 of title 26 it talks about a qualified heir under
section 1014 of title 26. If you're a qualified heir and you're the
recipient or the receiver of funds from a decedent you are a
qualified heir. You have to file a bond with the secretary of
treasury to cover the tax liability. That's the first thing I ask them
when I go into court is where's your bond to indemnify the tax
liability as the recipient of the funds from the decedent? You've
acquired funds from a decedent under 1014 of title 26 and you
haven't paid the tax. You're in possession of contraband. I'm
goma have the IRS come out here and seize all your property.

They're liable for the prohibited transaction in 856 of

approximately 1.5 million dollars per penalty section

your police department isn't even listed under the county, under
the Revised Code of washington. How is this group of
individuals who are contracted with Interpol have anything to do
with me upon proof of claim that they have any jurisdiction over
me at all. Or that they can do anything on a road that they don't
Own.

DEFINITIONS; per Black's Law Dictionary Sixth Edition:

Privateer: page 1195;
A vessel owned, equipped, and armed by one or more private
individuals, and duly commissioned by a belligerent power to go
on cruises and make war upon the enemy, usually by preying on
his commerce. A private vessel commissioned by a nation by the
issue of a letter of marque to its owner to calTy on hostilities by
sea, presumably according to the laws of war. Formerly, a state
issued letters of marque to its own subjects and to those of
neutral states as well, but a privateersman who accepted letters
of marque from both belligerents was regarded as a pirate. By
the Declaration of paris (April,1856), privateering was
abolished, but the United States, Spain, Mexico, and Venezuela
did not accede to this declaration. It has been thought that the
constitutional provision empowering the Congress to issue
letters of marque deprives it of the power to join in a permanent
treaty abolishing privateering.
Piracy and privateering are federal offenses,18 U.S.C. § 1651 et
Seq.
Note: this is the reason police vehicles are known as "cruisers."
[see LOM IRS.doc]

I'm now a U.S. National under Title 8 United States Code [USC]
section 1481

"As the use of private corporate commercial paper, debt

currency or securities is concerned, removes the sovereignty
status of the government of "We the People" and reduces it to an
entity rather than a government in the area of finance and
commerce as a corporation or person. Governments descend to
the level of a mere private corporation and take on the
characteristics of a mere private citizen. This entity cannot
compel performance upon its corporate statute or rules unless it,
like any other corporation or person is the holder-in-due course
return it to the traveler so these violations can be reported to the
IRS.
Also provide a business card with your bonding information.

Officials and their agents may not refuse my right to travel/right

of way claim for exemption, nor impede my forward progress
while I am on my way.
Any "interruption" or impediment of my forward progress while
I an on my way will be construed as a blatant and willful
disregard of my declaration of status and of my rights, of the
Rule of Law, and as a "dishonor" in commerce, as well as a lack
of faithful performance of duty under oath.

If you plan on kidnapping me are you really sure you want to

put up your bond? Do you clearly understand that if you are
going to aid and abet a void statute by applying it to me you are
putting up yourjob. Are you really sure you intend to do that.
You may arrest [kidnap] me and do this and do that, but you
better make damn sure that it applies to me and that my capacity
and standing has agreed and consented that it applies to me
because you wont have ajob when we get all done. Are you
really sure that you want to put up your house, your wife, your
kids, your retirement and anything else out there that you might
construe that you have possession and control over because if
you're wrong the consequences are dire. Are you really sure you
want to commit an Article 3 impeachable treasonous war crime
felony.
No harm/injury to person.
No damage to property.
Fraudulent attempt to enforce suspended statutes that no court
has any jurisdiction to hear to begin with.
Intimidation through threat by stalking.
Intimidation through threat of armed violence.
An impostor employee taking wages under false pretenses.

When a government agent trespasses on our private rights it is a

tort and this creates a liability for the government to compensate
us for that injury. This comes about because the citation shows
no liability of the defendant to the statute they claim you
violated. They failed to state a claim because without a swearing
to liability there is no claim. I use a traffic citation here as an
example because all of the other entanglements with government
are handled the same way. IRS, BATF and all the rest of the
alphabet soup use the same procedure. On the U.S.level they get
a lot more verbose and the paper work is multiplied by a factor
of about ten, but the procedure remains the same. Probably the
major difference is the U.S. agents will submit an affidavit to
either support a claim or to get a "warrant" for someone's
"arrest". They will use up several pages swearing that the grass
is green and the sky is blue and that water runs down hill. What
they will never swear to, is the liability of their target. Usually in
such operations the "judge" will require mutual discovery. Once,
a friend of mine was going through an IRS prosecution and
received a stack of paper nearly 11 inches high as discovery. It
was a very impressive compilation of documents, but nowhere
in it was anything documenting any liability. The "judge", even
though he was operating as a magistrate for the executive branch
of government, (a police court) was obligated to inform the
defendant of his liability. (The nature and cause of the
accusations). He failed to do that. The failure to do this turns the
"court" into a kangaroo court (see above) and creates an
additional injury. It is a FELONY to use one?s office, de facto or
otherwise, in the capacity of a ?Debt Collector? to collect a debt
without the requisite evidentiary proof of the debt giving rise to
the obligation and the resulting liability. Ever hear of ?RICO,?
or read 18 U.S.C. " 1951-1968; particularly ' 1961(3)]. Without
showing liability on the face of the instrument, the prosecution
has failed to state a claim. Under the FDCPA, 28 U.S.C. " 3001
et seq., without verification of the debt, upon timely demand
therefore, Scienter and FELONY FRAUD ensues.
A claim is really the affidavit swearing to the liability of the
defendant. A "warrant" issued without an affldavit of liability is
not a warrant at all. The best that can be said of it is that it is an
order to kidnap. To be a real warrant it must be issued upon
probable cause supported by oath or affirmation (affidavit of
liability sworn to by a competent witness). This is what gives the
court subject matter and personal jurisdiction. Without the
swearing to liability by a competent witness, no court or tribunal
can have jurisdiction. It is only the swearing to the liability,
whether it is contractual, statutory or anything else that can
support a charge of a violation of any kind. If you have no
contractual liability then you cannot violate or breach any
contract. If you are not engaged in an activity that renders you
liable and therefore subject to a statute then you have no liability
to that statute and therefore lack the requisite intent [mens rea is
not longer required, i.e., did you or did you not do the act?] or
capacity to violate it. Liability is the only thing that can form a
basis for, or give rise to, any charge. The liability of the
defendant must be discovered by him and presented, for him to
be correctly informed of the nature and cause of any charges or
accusations he must face. The failure and refusal to present this
liability is a severe tort that must be redressed. Without the
swearing to liability an "arrest" is actually a kidnapping.
peidnap, v. 1 to carry away for the purpose of denying a right.
Bouviers law dictionary.] Without the swearing to the liability
any "trial" in any court or tribunal is a mockery. Justice is
disregarded, perverted and parodied. The refusal(s) to verify the
liability and resulting kidnap prevents any lawful process. The
court or tribunal is characterized by unauthorized or irregular
procedures, so as to render a fair or impartial [meaningful]
proceeding impossible."

"All governments must maintain power through consent, not

coercion." President Barack Obama Jam 28, 2011

We are a nation that has a government-not the other way

around.
And this makes us special among the nations of the Earth.
Our government has no power except that granted it by the
people.
It is time to check and reverse the growth of government, which
shows signs of having grown beyond the consent of the
governed.
--Ronald Reagan, First Inaugural Address,1981