This chapter presents the results, analyses, and interpretations of the gathered

data from the College Student (Except 2023) students as the respondents of the study.

The personal information of the respondents in terms of gender and number of

years.

Table 1. presents the Frequency distribution results of students’ Gender who

were subjected to the conduct. The number of respondents present during the DVC

core values was (N=46).

Table 1. To determine the demographics of the respondent.

Gender Frequency Percent

Female 30 65.2%
Male 16 34.8%
total 46 100%

Years Attended Frequency Percent

2nd year 1 2.2%
3rd year 32 69.6%
4th year 13 28.3%
total 46 100%

The Perception of Adolescents about teen parenting will be categorically described

following Likert’s scale
 Numerical Rating Scale Interpretation

1-1.80 Totally Disagree

1.81-2.60 Disagree
2.61-3.40 Mildly Disagree
3.41-4.20 agree
4.21-5 Totally Agree

Table 2. To determine the extent of application of DVC Core Values in the daily way of life on the
respondent.

DVC Core Values Average SD Description

2.1. Life like Christ. 4.25 0.567 Totally Agree
2.2. Equipped with skills and biblical teaching. 4.09 0.794 agree
2.3. Application of God’s word in one’s life and with others. 4.09 0.608 agree
2.4. Demonstration of God’s love and mentoring others. 3.89 0.439 agree
2.5. Exposure to the different fields of profession. 3.29 0.873 Mildly Disagree
2.6. Relationship building in the family, workplace, and 4.14 0.647 agree
community
2.7. Servant leadership 3.88 0.634 agree

Table 3. To find out the significant differences in the extent of application of DVC Core Values in the daily
way of life of the respondent when analyzed according to demographics.
 Lifelike Christ*Gender Decision with @ 0.05
N SD df Mean F P-value Result level of confidence
Male 0.70
46 2 1 4.06 2.90 0.09 Not Accept the Null
Female 0.46 Significant Hypothesis
3 44 4.36
Skills&Biblical Teaching*Gender Decision with @ 0.05
N SD df Mean F P-value Result level of confidence
Male 1.11 1 3.96
46 6 0.71 0.40 Not Accept the Null
Female 0.56 44 4.17 Significant Hypothesis
6
Application of God’s Decision with @ 0.05
words*Gender N SD df Mean F P-value Result level of confidence
Male 0.74 1 4.04
46 9 0.18 0.67 Not Accept the Null
Female 0.52 44 4.12 Significant Hypothesis
9
Demonstration of God’s Decision with @ 0.05
love*Gender N SD df Mean F P-value Result level of confidence
Male 0.54 1 3.90
46 0 0.00 0.96 Not Accept the Null
Female 0.38 44 3.89 Significant Hypothesis
5
Exposure to different field of Decision with @ 0.05
profession*Gender N SD df Mean F P-value Result level of confidence
Male 0.81 1 3.44
46 4 0.66 0.42 Not Accept the Null
Female 0.90 44 3.22 Significant Hypothesis
7
Relationship building*Gender Decision with @ 0.05
N SD df Mean F P-value Result level of confidence
Male 0.88 1 4.02
46 2 0.90 0.34 Not Accept the Null
Female 0.48 44 4.21 Significant Hypothesis
3
Servant Learders*Gender Decision with @ 0.05
N SD df Mean F P-value Result level of confidence
Male 0.76 1 3.79
46 9 0.43 0.51 Not Accept the Null
 Female 0.55 44 3.92
8

Table 3.1. To find out the significant differences in the extent of application of DVC Core Values in the
daily way of life of the respondent when analyzed according to demographics.
Lifelike Chris*Years attended Decision with @ 0.05
N Df SD Mean t P-bonferroni Result level of confidence
3rd year 32 2 0.40 4.41 Reject the Null
4th year 13 43 0.75 3.87 3.09 0.01 Significant Hypothesis
7

Skills&Biblical Decision with @

Teaching*Years SE Mean t P-bonferroni Result 0.05 level of
attended Difference confidence
nd
2 year 3rd year 0.787 0.0937 0.119 1.000
nd
2 year 4th year 0.804 0.6154 0.766 1.000 Not Significant Accept the Null
rd
3 year 4th year 0.255 0.5216 2.048 0.140 Hypothesis

Application of God’s Decision with @

words *Years attended SE Mean t P-bonferroni Result 0.05 level of
Difference confidence
2nd year 3rd year 0.617 -0.816 -1.322 0.579
2nd year 4th year 0.631 -0.694 -1.100 0.832 Not Significant Accept the Null
3rd year 4th year 0.200 0.122 0.611 1.000 Hypothesis

Demonstration of God’s Decision with @

love *Years attended SE Mean t P-bonferroni Result 0.05 level of
Difference confidence
2nd year 3rd year 0.452 -0.260 -0.576 1.000
2nd year 4th year 0.462 -0.154 -0.333 1.000
 3rd year 4th year Not Significant Accept the Null
0.146 0.107 0.728 1.000 Hypothesis

Exposure to different Decision with @

field of profession SE Mean t P-bonferroni Result 0.05 level of
*Years attended Difference confidence
2nd year 3rd year 0.892 -0.875 -0.981 0.997
nd
2 year 4th year 0.912 -0.654 -0.717 1.000 Not Significant Accept the Null
rd
3 year 4th year Hypothesis
0.289 0.221 0.765 1.000
Relationship building Decision with @
*Years attended SE Mean t P-bonferroni Result 0.05 level of
Difference confidence
2nd year 3rd year 0.653 -0.573 -0.877 1.000
2nd year 4th year 0.668 -0.282 -0.422 1.000 Not Significant Accept the Null
3rd year 4th year Hypothesis
0.212 0.291 1.375 0.529
Servant Learders *Years Decision with @
attended SE Mean t P-bonferroni Result 0.05 level of
Difference confidence
2nd year 3rd year 0.65 0.10 0.158 1.000
2nd year 4th year 0.67 0.17 0.267 1.000 Not Significant Accept the Null
3rd year 4th year Hypothesis
0.21 0.07 0.354 1.000

 
Appendix
Assumption Checks
Homogeneity of Variances Test (Levene's)

F df1 df2 p

life like Christ(X) 2.786 1 44 0.102

skills&Biblical teaching(X) 9.342 1 44 0.004
Application of God's Words(X) 0.793 1 44 0.378
Demonstration of God's love(X) 0.992 1 44 0.325
Exposure different field of profession(X) 0.239 1 44 0.628
Relationship building(X) 2.449 1 44 0.125
Servant leaders(X) 4.085 1 44 0.049

One-Way ANOVA
One-Way ANOVA (Fisher's)

F df1 df2 p

life like Christ(X) 2.90160 1 44 0.096

skills&Biblical teaching(X) 0.71382 1 44 0.403

Application of God's Words(X) 0.17949 1 44 0.674

Demonstration of God's love(X) 0.00255 1 44 0.960

Exposure different field of profession(X) 0.66285 1 44 0.420

Relationship building(X) 0.90177 1 44 0.347

Servant leaders(X) 0.43715 1 44 0.512

Group Descriptives

SEX N Mean SD SE

life like Christ(X) FEMALE 30 4.36 0.463 0.0845

MALE 16 4.06 0.702 0.1754

skills&Biblical teaching(X) FEMALE 30 4.17 0.566 0.1033

Group Descriptives

SEX N Mean SD SE

MALE 16 3.96 1.115 0.2787

Application of God's Words(X) FEMALE 30 4.12 0.529 0.0966

MALE 16 4.04 0.749 0.1873

Demonstration of God's love(X) FEMALE 30 3.89 0.385 0.0703

MALE 16 3.90 0.540 0.1351

Exposure different field of profession(X) FEMALE 30 3.22 0.907 0.1655

MALE 16 3.44 0.814 0.2035

Relationship building(X) FEMALE 30 4.21 0.483 0.0882

MALE 16 4.02 0.882 0.2204

Servant leaders(X) FEMALE 30 3.92 0.558 0.1019

MALE 16 3.79 0.769 0.1921

Plots
life like Christ(X)

skills&Biblical teaching(X)
Application of God's Words(X)

Demonstration of God's love(X)

Exposure different field of profession(X)

Relationship building(X)
Servant leaders(X)

Assumption Checks

Normality Test (Shapiro-Wilk)

W p

life like Christ(X) 0.906 0.001

skills&Biblical teaching(X) 0.917 0.003
Application of God's Words(X) 0.937 0.016
Demonstration of God's love(X) 0.909 0.002
Exposure different field of profession(X) 0.965 0.184
Relationship building(X) 0.925 0.005
Servant leaders(X) 0.974 0.398

Note. A low p-value suggests a violation of the assumption of normality

Homogeneity of Variances Test (Levene's)

F df1 df2 p

life like Christ(X) 2.786 1 44 0.102

skills&Biblical teaching(X) 9.342 1 44 0.004
Application of God's Words(X) 0.793 1 44 0.378
Demonstration of God's love(X) 0.992 1 44 0.325
Exposure different field of profession(X) 0.239 1 44 0.628
Homogeneity of Variances Test (Levene's)

F df1 df2 p
Relationship building(X) 2.449 1 44 0.125
Servant leaders(X) 4.085 1 44 0.049

Frequencies

Frequencies of SEX

SEX Counts % of Total Cumulative %

FEMALE 30 65.2 % 65.2 %

MALE 16 34.8 % 100.0 %

Frequencies of YEARS ATTENDED

YEARS ATTENDED Counts % of Total Cumulative %

2 years 1 2.2 % 2.2 %

3 years 32 69.6 % 71.7 %
4 years 13 28.3 % 100.0 %