Figure 26.1 The Directional Policy Matrix (DPM)

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

CONCEPT 26

THE DIRECTIONAL POLICY MATRIX

The Directional Policy Matrix (DPM) is a framework which can be used to


classify and categorise an organisation's business activities in terms of its
strengths, capabilities or market position, and the way it perceives markets
to be attractive. The basic structure of a DPM is illustrated in Figure 26.1.
The purpose of the matrix is to diagnose an organisation's strategic options
in relation to those two composite dimensions; business strengths and
market attractiveness. The DPM, therefore, enables organisations to
conduct an analysis of their portfolio of products or areas of operation.

The analysis is performed, first, according to the potential each product


area or business has to achieve the organisation's objectives and second,
according to the organisation's ability to take advantage of the range of
opportunities it faces. The matrix requires its users to identify a number of
factors which will act as indicators of the attractiveness of a market or
opportunity to them and, similarly, a number of factors which will act as
indicators of organisational strengths. These factors will obviously vary

Business/company strengths
High Medium Low

Figure 26.1 The Directional Policy Matrix (DPM)

133

M. Meldrum et al., Key Marketing Concepts


© Mike Meldrum and Malcolm McDonald 1995
134 Understanding Product Management

from one product or business area to another since what will be attractive to
one activity may not be attractive in another area of operation, or, at least,
may not be equally attractive. Similarly, a strength or capability in one area
may not exist or be a strength in another.

Compared with other portfolio analysis tools, such as the Boston Matrix,
the DPM is a more sophisticated mechanism. Like its forerunner, the Boston
Matrix, it can be used to derive quantitative comparisons between areas of
activities, but, in addition, is able to take into account a much wider range
of decisional influences. In fact, the DPM was originally conceived by
General Electric and developed by McKinsey (management consultants),
and later Shell, as a means of overcoming some of the limitations the Boston
Matrix was perceived to have. It is usually drawn as a 3 x 3 box matrix,
rather than use the more standard 2 x 2 format, in order to encompass the
range of strategic options it covers. In the end, the number of lines drawn is
irrelevant. What is more important is defining the substance of the matrix
and its axes, and adopting an orderly methodology for its application.

• Strategic Business Unit

Since the purpose of performing a DPM analysis is to provide a basis for


determining policy and allocating resources for the alternative products or
business within an organisation, it is important to consider the
organisational level at which the analysis should be conducted. This is
normally taken as being that of the 'strategic business unit' (SBU). The most
common definition of a SBU is that it will:

• Have common segments and competitors for most of its products.


• Operate in external markets.
• Be identifiable as a discrete and separate unit.
• Be managed by people who will have control over most of the areas
critical to success.

Thus, the process of defining an SBU can be applied all the way down to
product or departmental level. It is, therefore, possible to use the DPM for
any unit that has within it a number of different variables that can be
usefully plotted using a two-dimensional matrix. There must obviously be
two or more markets or segments between which managers wish to choose,
and these can be either existing or potential markets. It is usually felt that
there should be at least three and a maximum of ten areas for analysis if
using the DPM is to be of value.

You might also like