Figure 26.1 The Directional Policy Matrix (DPM)
Figure 26.1 The Directional Policy Matrix (DPM)
Figure 26.1 The Directional Policy Matrix (DPM)
Business/company strengths
High Medium Low
133
from one product or business area to another since what will be attractive to
one activity may not be attractive in another area of operation, or, at least,
may not be equally attractive. Similarly, a strength or capability in one area
may not exist or be a strength in another.
Compared with other portfolio analysis tools, such as the Boston Matrix,
the DPM is a more sophisticated mechanism. Like its forerunner, the Boston
Matrix, it can be used to derive quantitative comparisons between areas of
activities, but, in addition, is able to take into account a much wider range
of decisional influences. In fact, the DPM was originally conceived by
General Electric and developed by McKinsey (management consultants),
and later Shell, as a means of overcoming some of the limitations the Boston
Matrix was perceived to have. It is usually drawn as a 3 x 3 box matrix,
rather than use the more standard 2 x 2 format, in order to encompass the
range of strategic options it covers. In the end, the number of lines drawn is
irrelevant. What is more important is defining the substance of the matrix
and its axes, and adopting an orderly methodology for its application.
Thus, the process of defining an SBU can be applied all the way down to
product or departmental level. It is, therefore, possible to use the DPM for
any unit that has within it a number of different variables that can be
usefully plotted using a two-dimensional matrix. There must obviously be
two or more markets or segments between which managers wish to choose,
and these can be either existing or potential markets. It is usually felt that
there should be at least three and a maximum of ten areas for analysis if
using the DPM is to be of value.