Exploring Teacher Attitudes Towards ChatGPT: A Comprehensive Review

Abstract

ChatGPT has strategy to transform education. By permitting AI and natural language processing (NLP)
calculations to associate with understudies continuously, ChatGPT can give customized and intuitive
growth opportunities that are custom-made explicitly for their individual requirements. This study
means to investigate instructor perspectives towards ChatGPT, an enormous language model created by
OpenAI. With the rising combination of man-made consciousness in instructive settings, understanding
educator discernments and perspectives towards simulated intelligence apparatuses is pivotal for
effective execution and reception.This review paper utilized a blended strategies approach,
consolidating studies and survey, to gather information from a different instructors, from different
instructive levels and branches of knowledge. The outcomes uncovered a scope of perspectives among
educators towards ChatGPT. While certain educators communicated excitement and saw possible
advantages of involving ChatGPT as a showing instrument, others displayed suspicion and raised
concerns with respect to its effect on understudy learning and commitment. Key variables affecting
educators' mentalities included apparent handiness, usability, saw influence on understudy
independence, and concerns connected with information security and moral contemplations.
Keywords: chatGPT ; AI in Education; Technologies in education ; limitation of chatGPT.

1. Introduction have. Key variables affecting educators' mentalities

ChatGPT (man-made intelligence) advances have included apparent handiness, usability, saw influence on
become progressively pervasive in different areas, understudy independence, and concerns connected with
including training, offering imaginative chances to information security and moral contemplations. Over a
change educating and growth opportunities.One eminent billion users had joined ChatGPT within days of its
simulated intelligence improvement is ChatGPT, a inception, which was a major success (Cousins, 2023).
strong language model created by OpenAI. ChatGPT Many people have been astonished by the AI-powered
uses profound learning procedures to create human-like bot's capacity to have sophisticated discussions and
text reactions in light of information prompts or interact naturally. As a result of user interaction.
questions. As the instructive scene keeps on advancing, Although the majority of people have been charmed by
it is urgent to comprehend educator perspectives its conversational abilities and amusing responses, there
towards artificial intelligence apparatuses like ChatGPT, is some worry about potential privacy issues. With an
as their acknowledgment and combination are essential anticipated 100 million monthly active users just two
for fruitful execution in homerooms. Educator months after its inception, ChatGPT has reached a
mentalities assume a huge part in deciding the reception remarkable milestone by being the fastest-growing
and use of instructive advances (Schechter, 2020). Their consumer application ever (Ruby, 2023). The risk that
convictions and insights about man-made intelligence ChatGPT could present to students, particularly in terms
devices shape their ability to integrate them into their of cheating, worries teachers and educational institutions
educational practices (Kay, 2020). In this way, (Willems, 2023). Despite the fact that the AI-driven
investigating educator perspectives towards ChatGPT is chatbot can produce complex discussions in response.
fundamental for instructive policymakers, overseers, and
designers trying to use artificial intelligence 2. Methodology
advancements really in instructive settings.
Understanding instructor mentalities towards ChatGPT This study uses a blended techniques research plan to
envelops exploring factors that impact their exhaustively investigate instructor perspectives towards
discernments, for example, helpfulness, usability, ChatGPT. The reconciliation of both interviews and
influence on understudy learning, and concerns in survey takes into consideration a more profound
regards to information security and moral comprehension of the elements impacting educator
contemplations. Moreover, educators' related knowledge insights and gives a more vigorous examination of their
with computer based intelligence devices, level of
attitudes. The study includes a different example of
innovative capability, and academic convictions might
instructors from different instructive levels and
shape their mentalities towards coordinating ChatGPT
branches of knowledge. The members are chosen
into their showing rehearses (Chen et al., 2021). By
acquiring bits of knowledge into these perspectives, through purposive testing to guarantee portrayal across
instructive partners can foster methodologies to help various showing settings and encounters. The example
educators in really using simulated intelligence devices size ought to be resolved in view of the standards of
while tending to any worries or reservations they might immersion, where information assortment go on until
no new experiences or subjects arise. A review poll is research explicitly centers around instructor
created to accumulate quantitative information on perspectives towards ChatGPT, concentrates on
educator perspectives towards ChatGPT. The review artificial intelligence upheld schooling and simulated
incorporates things that action apparent helpfulness, intelligence advancements in everyday deal significant
usability, influence on understudy learning, and experiences. Research recommends that educators
concerns connected with information protection and perceive the capability of computer based intelligence
moral contemplations. It might likewise incorporate apparatuses, including ChatGPT, in upgrading
segment data and inquiries to survey related knowledge customized growth opportunities, giving quick
with simulated intelligence instruments and innovative criticism, and supporting separated guidance (Cai and
Wang, 2021; Luo et al., 2021). Be that as it may,
capability. The review is directed on the web or face to
concerns in regards to the constraints of ChatGPT, like
face, contingent upon the dispositions of the members.
absence of relevant comprehension and expected age of
By utilizing this blended techniques approach, the
wrong or improper reactions, have been raised (Kay,
review expects to give an exhaustive and hiden 2020).
comprehension of educator mentalities towards
ChatGPT, considering both quantitative and subjective Suggestions for Instructive Work on: Understanding
viewpoints. The technique considers a rich instructor perspectives towards ChatGPT has
investigation of the variables impacting perspectives suggestions for instructive policymakers, overseers, and
and offers experiences that can illuminate instructive designers. It is vital to give suitable preparation and
partners in really coordinating simulated intelligence expert improvement chances to help educators in really
devices in instructive settings. coordinating artificial intelligence apparatuses into their
educational practices (Chen et al., 2021). Addressing
3. Literature Review educators' interests connected with information
security, moral contemplations, and the limits of
Computerized reasoning (man-made intelligence) artificial intelligence apparatuses is likewise
apparatuses, like ChatGPT, stand out in instructive fundamental for cultivating mindful utilization of
settings because of their capability to improve innovation in training (Schechter, 2020).Educator
educating and growth opportunities. Understanding Perspectives Towards computer based intelligence
educator perspectives towards simulated intelligence Apparatuses in Education :Previous research has
instruments is vital for fruitful execution and use. This underscored the significance of educator mentalities in
writing survey plans to investigate existing examination the fruitful execution of instructive advances.
connected with educator mentalities towards simulated Instructors' convictions and discernments towards
intelligence devices, with a particular spotlight on computer based intelligence apparatuses essentially
ChatGPT. The survey recognizes key subjects, factors impact their eagerness to embrace and incorporate them
affecting mentalities, and suggestions for instructive into educational practices (Ertmer, 1999). Uplifting
practice. outlooks towards innovation have been related with
Factors Impacting Instructor Mentalities: A few expanded innovation use, further developed showing
elements impact educator perspectives towards adequacy, and improved understudy results (Teo,
simulated intelligence devices, including: a. Seen 2011).Factors Impacting Instructor Mentalities :a. Seen
Helpfulness: Educators' convictions about the Helpfulness: Educators' impression of the convenience
advantages and possible worth of artificial intelligence of ChatGPT in improving educating and opportunities
apparatuses in upgrading instructing and growth for growth. Factors like superior understudy
opportunities. b. Usability: The apparent simplicity of commitment, customized input, and efficient potential
integrating man-made intelligence apparatuses into effect apparent convenience (Cai and Wang, 2021).b.
existing educational practices and innovative capability Convenience: Educators' impression of the simplicity of
required. c. Academic Convictions: Educators' coordinating ChatGPT into their current educational
convictions about the job of innovation in schooling, practices. Factors like ease of use, specialized help, and
constructivist versus conventional educational similarity effortlessly of purpose (Chen et al., 2021).c.
methodologies, and the effect on understudy Educational Convictions: Instructors' academic
independence and commitment. d. Related knowledge: convictions and informative methodologies influence
Educators' related knowledge with simulated their mentalities towards ChatGPT. Constructivist-
intelligence devices and their knowledge of situated instructors might see ChatGPT as a device to
comparative advancements. e. Information Security and help understudy independence and cooperative
Moral Worries: Educators' interests in regards to the learning, while customary arranged educators might
assortment, stockpiling, and use of understudy affect educator understudy collaborations (Kay,
information, as well as moral contemplations connected 2020).d. Related knowledge and Mechanical
with man-made intelligence devices. Educator Capability: Educators' related knowledge with artificial
Mentalities Towards ChatGPT: While restricted intelligence devices and their degree of mechanical
capability assume a part in forming their mentalities. because they fear that students may become unduly
Knowledge of comparative advances and past certain dependent on ChatGPT for solutions rather than
encounters can add to additional great perspectives exercising independent thought. Furthermore, the
(Luo et al., 2021).e. Information Protection and Moral ethical issues surrounding the usage of ChatGPT in the
Worries: Educators' interests in regards to information classroom may cause some teachers to feel uneasy.
protection, security, and moral contemplations related They might pose issues including the need for
with ChatGPT. Concerns might incorporate issues responsible and ethical usage of AI technologies,
connected with understudy information assortment, algorithmic bias, and data privacy. It’s critical to strike
calculation predisposition, and capable utilization of a balance between utilizing ChatGPT's advantages as
simulated intelligence instruments (Schechter, 2020). an educational tool and upholding the fundamentals of
Educator Perspectives Towards ChatGPT: In spite of successful communication in order to address these
the fact that examination explicitly zeroing in on various viewpoints. Teachers should be encouraged to
instructor mentalities towards ChatGPT is restricted, use ChatGPT as a supplementary tool, selectively
concentrates on simulated intelligence upheld training incorporating it into their educational strategies while
give significant experiences. These examinations highlighting the value of independent thought, human
demonstrate that educators perceive the capability of interaction, and critical thinking. Furthermore, by
ChatGPT in working with customized picking up, offering instruction and direction on the safe integration
giving moment criticism, and supporting separated of AI technology in the classroom, professional
guidance (Cai and Wang, 2021; Luo et al., 2021). Be development programmes can significantly assist
that as it may, concerns have been raised in regards to instructors. These courses ought to cover topics like
the restrictions of ChatGPT, like its absence of context ChatGPT's limitations and potential biases, methods for
oriented figuring out, possible age of wrong reactions, verifying data from AI sources, and best practises for
and the requirement for human oversight (Kay, 2020). encouraging student involvement and critical thinking
Suggestions for Instructive Work on: Understanding while also utilising AI tools. In conclusion, research on
instructor mentalities towards ChatGPT has suggestions teachers' attitudes towards ChatGPT indicates a variety
for instructive partners. It is critical to give fitting of viewpoints, showing both the possible advantages
proficient advancement projects to help educators in and potential drawbacks of its application. Balancing
actually coordinating ChatGPT into their educational the use of leverage with Promoting ethical and efficient
practices (Chen et al., 2021). Addressing concerns ChatGPT integration as a teaching tool requires
connected with information security, calculation addressing the advantages and limitations.
straightforwardness, and capable utilization of man-
made intelligence devices is fundamental to advance References:
moral and dependable execution of ChatGPT in 1. Cai, T., & Wang, D. (2021). An exploratory
instructive settings (Schechter, 2020). study of teachers’ perceptions and attitudes
towards AI-supported education. Journal of
4. Conclusion: Computers in Education, 8(2), 247-268.
2. Chen, B., Wang, X., & Liu, J. (2021).
In conclusion, research on teachers' opinions of Teachers’ acceptance and usage of educational
ChatGPT demonstrates a range of viewpoints and artificial intelligence applications: A mixed-
factors. While some teachers might be excited about methods study. Computers & Education, 169,
ChatGPT's potential as a useful teaching tool, others 104181.
might have reservations or worries. 3. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and
Supportive teachers have cited ChatGPT's capacity to second-order barriers to change: Strategies for
improve classroom engagement and provide technology integration. Educational
individualized learning experiences as a favorable Technology Research and Development,
feature. They value its ability to offer prompt solutions 47(4), 47-61.
and justifications, enabling students to get specialized 4. Kay, R. H. (2020). Exploring the use of
attention and direction. In addition, ChatGPT can be a artificial intelligence and teachers’ beliefs in
tool for gaining knowledge outside of the teacher's area the classroom. Journal of Educational
of expertise by providing access to a wide range of Computing Research, 58(4), 774-796.
knowledge and viewpoints. However, teachers who 5. Luo, T., Hu, B., Zeng, S., & Zhu, Z. (2021).
have doubts could worry about the negative effects of Teachers’ attitudes towards artificial
leaning too heavily on ChatGPT. They might question intelligence education: A case study in China.
its veracity given that the Since the model is based on Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106768.
historical data, it could not always deliver 100% 6. Hughes, A. (2022). ChatGPT: Everything you
accurate or contextually relevant results. Teachers may need to know about OpenAI’s GPT-3 tool.
be worried about the impact on students' ability to think BBC Science
critically and develop critical problem-solving skills
 FocusMagazine.https://www.sciencefocus.com the classroom. Journal of Educational
/futuretechnology/gpt-3/ Computing Research, 58(4), 774-796.
7. Ruby, D. (2023, February 8). ChatGPT 20. Luo, T., Hu, B., Zeng, S., & Zhu, Z. (2021).
Statistics for 2023: Comprehensive Facts and Teachers’ attitudes towards artificial
Data. Demand Sage. intelligence education: A case study in China.
https://www.demandsage.com/chatgpt- Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106768.
statistics/ 21. Schechter, C. (2020). Perceptions of and
8. Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT User Experience: attitudes towards artificial intelligence in
Implications for Education (SSRN Scholarly education: A systematic review of the
Paper No. 4312418). literature. Journal of Computer Assisted
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418 Learning, 36(6), 701-719.
9. Willems, J. (2023). ChatGPT at Universities –
The Least of Our Concerns (SSRN Scholarly
Paper No. 4334162).
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4334162
10. Cousins, J. (2023, February 10). What is Chat
GPT? Why is it here to stay? — TFN. Tech
Funding News.
https://techfundingnews.com/what-is-chat-gpt-
why-is-it-here-tostay/
11. Cai, T., & Wang, D. (2021). An exploratory
study of teachers’ perceptions and attitudes
towards AI-supported education. Journal of
Computers in Education, 8(2), 247-268.
12. Chen, B., Wang, X., & Liu, J. (2021).
Teachers’ acceptance and usage of educational
artificial intelligence applications: A mixed-
methods study. Computers & Education, 169,
104181.
13. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and
second-order barriers to change: Strategies for
technology integration. Educational
Technology Research and Development,
47(4), 47-61.
14. Kay, R. H. (2020). Exploring the use of
artificial intelligence and teachers’ beliefs in
the classroom. Journal of Educational
Computing Research, 58(4), 774-796.
15. Luo, T., Hu, B., Zeng, S., & Zhu, Z. (2021).
Teachers’ attitudes towards artificial
intelligence education: A case study in China.
Computers in Human Behavior, 120, 106768.
16. Schechter, C. (2020). Perceptions of and
attitudes towards artificial intelligence in
education: A systematic review of the
literature. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, 36(6), 701-719.
17. Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers'
intention to use technology: Model
development and test. Computers &
Education, 57(4), 2432-2440.
18. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and
second-order barriers to change: Strategies for
technology integration. Educational
Technology Research and Development,
47(4), 47-61.
19. Kay, R. H. (2020). Exploring the use of
artificial intelligence and teachers’ beliefs in