Assignment Model - III
Assignment Model - III
Mumbai 92
Chenna
Delhi
Dummy Klkada
Tlc
MANIMIZATION ROBLeM
TEP-1
Maximuaaion enveu Lnta Miinut,
ushlem
fuut of all highut Valu Lelecd u
butahle given QLution) he lalu
hublitable_ll he dedu in highaf Valu
TEP2
Balanred Kuthlem
RANKA
&Tep
Next Sleb T number t minimum nu
egualJo wmbe ofbum n
Table 1
Caxge ensignment
Ainblant 1 2
3
2
X 3 2
2
Srep-2
Balanaed Boblenm
Toble 2
S22
ent Probt
The
optimal assignment is:
Mr. A to Mumbai Cost 22,000
Cost 16,000
MaiTakan Mr. B to Chennai
Mr. C to Delhi
Dummy to Kolkata
Cost 10,000
Cost 0
h o Total Cost 48,000
Example 11: Four different airplanes are to be assigned to
handle thre
consignments with a view to maximize profit. The profit matrix is args
thousands of rupees): as
follows
Airplane Cargo Consignments
II III
W 8 11 12
X 9 10 10
10 10 10
12 8 9
Find the optimal assignment. (R.U. M.B.A., 2002)
Solution: As the given assignment problem is a maximizing problem, it can he
onverted to a minimizing problem simply by subtracting all its entries from the
the
aYinum entru af tha tok1 ( 12 Tho olotro nnet octe
t RATKA
Aplant Caugo Coruyn munml
(
2 (
reP 3
Kelated Je Kou
(Table 3)
Aixplona Couuge (omsignmenl
Jum.my
X 2 2
2
2
0
3
TeP-y
Reladed (elum
Table u)
Aplant (aMge maign mnd
2
wmmy
X
2
2
1 2
3
STEP-S
Nexi Skp
RANKA
CTable
Avplane Ccuge ouiqnment
2 3 um mY
y 1
X
2 1 O
C
2 3
TEP=_6
ALugm Jo wHk
TP 34
Tl2 BalaneLd
Tl2&teP-1 Peblen
Table )
Machines Jebs
J J2 3 JS
m
Lssigmen Problems
STER-2
Balanced Pucblem CTable 2
Batsman Batig io
20 25 10
30 33
12 20
S (35
2
STe?-3
Related KoLD CTable 3
Catiman Baring fasiio
TI
IS 2
RANKA
12
10
S
(O
STeP-
Related Jo column. CTade u)
bats manm 8aing ANti16
1 25
0 2 7
10 12 19
2
STe?-S
Next Sieb Table S)
Katsmam Bating tien
6 21
6
2 19
12 19
3
2
STEP- ASi91Me Wk
Last Steb
u7u
Baling osifiou SO
Balsman
A RANKA
2
60
20
1/R 232
When ' balsman add.
SteP 1
Maximiaahen psuo blem COnueuiUnte
DMcble m minmiaati
highest valu 60 Table 1
atman Bating eitien
I 1
20 25 3
30 3S 33
12 20
2
3
S 7
22
eP-2
Kalanced YobleYm
Table2)
Bat sman
Bating sithie
(Dumn
26 2S 35
18 30 35 33
20
ANKA
41
2
IS 8 22
STef3
Related do ubus 1able 3)
al&manm
TL
3S
96 33
18 30 35
(2 20
S 8 22
STEP-Y
Table 4)
Kelated Jo telumn
Bating fositien
Batsman
3S
20 26
8 43 35
16 30 3
2
31
38
O
13
uAE ANKA
Srer S
Nexd Sieb Table 5)
Salsman kaling ai hn
I TIT
S 21 3S
B 21 35 23
S
3S 38 36 2
T
1
STE?- CTable&)
Next3hb
at&man BatingYssihem
TL
12 30
22 3S 30 23
S 6
30 3.3 31 37
13
STeP-7
Next 3teb CTable
ot smon tatimg niHan
30
1 30 30 3
0
28 2 31
11 3
S- 13
STEP8
Nest &teb Table 8)
atSman BaBing asitien
TT
21 23
22 2S 23 34 2s
13 13 6
3
STE29
atep signJe wk
Batsman dating esitita Ku
SO
2
T 60
T
5 29
Atnncnt will be
R S
IV
U
Dummy
S0 42 60 59 52
a s
: Five lathes are to be allotted to five operators (one for cach). The
Eam
L L L3 L4 Ls
20 22 27 32 36
P
19 23 29 34 40
R
23 28 35 39 34
21 24 31 37 42
24 28 31 36 41
T
Profit per piece is 7 25. Find the maximum profii per week.
2003; MBA (Evec.) 2018)
(R.U. M.B.A.,
a maximization problem. Let us convert
Solution: The given assignment problem is
all the elements of the given table
trom
an opportunity loss matrix by subtracting
ato
highest element of the table that is 42.
Opportunity Loss Table
L Ls
erators
L L
10
P 22 20 15
23 19 13
R 14 7 0
19
S 21 18
Lubtract the
11
RANKA
STEP 9
Mac hine
M Sobs
M
2
M3
My JS
mS J3
M J2
J6
Tl
STeP-
Maaimiz2atien ueblem (ue Lnls
Puoblem munim
hgheat valu u2
Table 1
Lu Weekly Cudpu!
22
L2 l3
20 Is o
23 19 13
9
S
6
STEP-3
Related Jo ou Tabl 3)
Opetot oe Weekly ubh
L L
(16
RANYA
21
11
16
2
T 3
STCP
elated e column Table u)
Obexato weekly Cuthu
L
3
6
STEP
Next Steb Table S)
Chevatok Week ly Oudput
L
L3 Ls
3 2
STCP
Nect Ste CTable &)
RANKA
STEP-7
Siep_Asin de woek
Last
Weekly Outpus To tul
Cpeualo L
20
LS
3
L3 37
L 2
L2
week: 160 X
160 2
x2
w ager
has to assign to these four operators. iven the time
jobs J, Jz, Ja and J needea
e r e n t operators to perform differcnt jobs in the matrix given below
Jobs
Operators J3
J J2
10
O1 12 10
O 14 12 15 11
16
Os 10
O4 8 10 9
) How should the manager assign the jobs so that total time needed for all
the jobs is minimum? (R.U. M.Com. (F) 2015
(i) If Job J, is not to be assigned to operator O, what should be the revised
2 2 0 OJ2 12 hours
1 10 O3J4 4 hours
2 0 0 04J3 8 hours
12 10 10 8
14 M 15 11
6 10 16
10 9
The different table relating to the solution will be as follows:
1 3 2 10-0- 0101
The optimal assignment will be as shown below
30 0 1 OJ Time 10 hours
1 M 1 0 O2J Time 11 hours
0 3 9 0 O3 J Time 6 hours