SBM Level Blank Form

Download as doc, pdf, or txt
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
REGION VIII
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LEYTE
JARO II DISTRICT
UGUIAO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATION FORM


S.Y: 2021-2022

School: UGUIAO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL District : JARO II_____________________


Division: LEYTE___________________ Date of Assessment/Validation: ____________

Part I:
A. ACCESS
School Year Enrolment % of increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equivalent Points
93 Baseline(note: 2019-2018)
2019-2020
1- Marginal (at least 3 % increase)
2020-2021 2- Average (at least 5 % increase)
2021-2022 3- High (at least 7 % increase)
Average % of Increase

B. EFFICIENCY
School Year Dropout Rate % of Decrease Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equivalent Points
(Baseline -7.06)
2019-2020
1- Marginal (at least 25 % decrease) ; (2% decrease)
2020-2021 2- Average (at least 50 % decrease); (4% decrease)
2021-2022 3- High (has 0 dropout or 100% dec) ; (7.06%dec)
Average % of Decrease 7.06%
School Year Completion Rate % of increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equivalent Points
75% Baseline
1- Marginal (at least 5 % increase
2019-2020 2- Average (at least 7 % increase
2020-2021 3- High (at least 10% increase or 95% CR)
2021-2022
Average % of Increase
School Year Cohort Survival Rate % of increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100)
75% Baseline
1- Marginal (at least 5 % increase)
2019-2020 2- Average (at least 7 % increase)
2020-2021 3- High (at least 10% increase)
2021-2022
Average % of Increase 12.28+12.28+33.33= 19.30
Average EFFICIENCY Rating

C. QUALITY
School Year SCHOOL MPS % of increase
Elementary = 67% Baseline
1- Marginal (at least 2 % increase)
2019-2020 2- Average (at least 5 % increase)
2020-2021 3- High (at least 7% increase )
2021-2022
Average % of Increase

SUMMARY
Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Access 45%
Efficiency 25%
Quality 30%
Total 100%
INTERPRTATION: ________BEST_________ Formula: where A = Accomplishment
Legend: B = Baseline
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
Part II:
Indicator Level I Level II Level III
A.LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
B. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Computation per Level
Average Rating
C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
SUMMARY
Principle Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
A 30%
B 30%
C 25%
D 15%
Total 100%
INTERPRTATION: Good___
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 – 1.49 Good
1.50 – 2.49 Better
2.50 – 3.00 Best
OVERALL ASSESSMENT
Area Weight Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Part I. Performance Improvement 60%
Part II. SBM Practice 40%
Total 100%
SBM LEVEL: I___
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale Description
0.50 – 1.49 Level I “Developing”
1.50 – 2.49 Level II “Maturing”
2.50 – 3.00 Level III “Advanced”

Prepared by:
PACHITA R. MOLO
School Head
/Principal
Noted:
YOLANDA P. GONZAGA
Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION VIII
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LEYTE
JARO II DISTRICT
UGUIAO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
District Supervisor

You might also like