The Ethical Decision-Making Model
The Ethical Decision-Making Model
Version 1.0
A tool to help Home Office staff when making decisions involving difficult ethical
issues.
Contacts
If you have any questions about the guidance and your line manager or senior
caseworker cannot help you or you think that the guidance has factual errors then
email Windrush Immigration Implementation Unit.
If you notice any formatting errors in this guidance (broken links, spelling mistakes
and so on) or have any comments about the layout or navigability of the guidance
then you can email the Guidance Rules and Forms team.
Publication
Below is information on when this version of the guidance was published:
• version 1.0
• published for Home Office staff on 11 November 2021
Related content
Home Office Values
Contents
The Home Office should develop a set of ethical standards and an ethical
decision-making model, built on the Civil Service Code and principles of
fairness, rigour and humanity, that BICS staff at all levels understand, and
are accountable for upholding. The focus should be on getting the decision
right first time. The ethical framework should be a public document and
available on the department’s website. A system for monitoring compliance
with the ethical standard should be built into the Performance Development
Review process. (Recommendation 17)
The Ethical Decision-Making Model is a tool for staff to use when making decisions.
The purpose is to enable staff to articulate and raise concerns and to seek resolution
ensuring that the right decision is made first time. This model addresses the issues
that were identified by the Windrush Lessons Learned Review, where staff were
aware that unintended impacts of Home Office decisions were occurring, but the
culture and processes did not facilitate those concerns being raised or addressed.
The model introduces a step in the decision-making process, that prompts decision-
makers to consider this ethical decision-making model and the impact of their
proposed decision. This enables a decision-maker to consider any issues that cause
“decision discomfort” - where a decision-maker feels that the proposed outcome is
not right. If a decision-maker finds themselves in this position, they may choose to
consult this guidance on the model, consider what discretion applies in the case,
discuss the case with a colleague or escalate the case to a senior manager or
another team for further consideration.
Once you have a proposed decision, you should reflect and consider the
potential impact of the decision.
Are there any ethical or unintended consequences of this proposed decision that
concern you?
If you do not have any concerns with the impact of the proposed decision, you can
proceed with decision.
1. What is it about the proposed decision that makes you feel uncomfortable?
2. Are you able to make a different decision by applying current rules and
guidance that resolves the issue?
3. If you cannot satisfactorily resolve the issue, or do not feel you have the
authority to take a different decision, you should discuss the case with
someone. This can be with your line manager, team leader or a colleague.
4. If you feel the issue is not satisfactorily resolved, you can escalate the case
through the escalation routes available to you for example Chief Caseworkers
Unit for Asylum and Protection and Customer Services, the Safety Valve
Mechanism for Immigration Enforcement, Guidance and Quality Team for
HMPO and your regional command centre for Border Force.
This model sits alongside the Home Office Values and the Civil Service Code, which
guide all of our actions and define our ethics.
Related content
Home Office Values
Contents