Addressing New Zealand's

current and future disaster

resilience challenges

RESILIENCE STRATEGY
FOR NATURAL HAZARD
RISK REDUCTION
2019 - 2029
 Our mission
to reduce the
impact on people
and property
when natural
disasters occur

November 2019
September 2018
Contents
New Zealand's disaster resilience challenges 2
EQC's Strategic Intentions 2018 - 2022 4
EQC'S Resilience Strategy 5
Our disaster resilience vision for New Zealand 6
Resilience goal 9
What we will do 10
Our focus areas 11
Priorities over the next three years 12
How we will work 13
Our guiding principles 13
Vision Mātauranga 13
Working across the natural hazards risk management system 14
EQC has a role in supporting the National Disaster Resilience Strategy 15
Calculating the resilience dividend 16
When action delivers results 17
Case study: infrastructure resilience 17
Case study: ground improvement 18
Who we will work with 19
How we will measure our progress 20

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 1
 High
exposure to Small economy
natural hazard Built assets cannot sustain
risks are vulnerable the social and
to damage financial costs
which results in of ongoing
significant events
social costs

NEW ZEALAND’S DISASTER RESILIENCE CHALLENGES

Image: Lloyd Homer, GNS Science

Attitudes
and biases Natural hazard
about natural management
hazard risks system needs
Communities greater
require solutions coordination
based on
information and
knowledge

2 EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
New Zealand's disaster
resilience challenges
High exposure to natural hazard risks There remain significant barriers to nudging
behaviour from awareness to taking action.
New Zealand straddles the boundary of two
active tectonic plates and is highly exposed Communities require risk
to catastrophic geological hazards such as management solutions based on
earthquakes, landslides, volcanic activity and
knowledge and understanding
tsunami. Climate change is increasing New
Zealand’s exposure through more frequent and The only way to lower damage levels and
severe extreme weather events, and through reduce the social disruption caused by disasters
sea level rise. is to build more resilient buildings on suitable
land, with more resilient essential service
Built assets are vulnerable to infrastructure. Alongside a better understanding
damage by natural hazards which of the cultural characteristics and objectives of
results in significant social costs communities, we need to use additional and
appropriate pre-event management tools such
These natural hazards frequently cause damage as land-use planning to avoid the worst risks,
to land and buildings, as well as to essential and building regulation and innovative design
infrastructure serving communities, including to control damage. Actions to avoid and reduce
power and communication networks, roads, damage will require better use of existing data
and water systems. For some events, the and knowledge, and creation of new knowledge
combination or scale of damage may be such to fill gaps in our understanding of New
that significant numbers of people are unable Zealand’s hazard risk profile. Knowledge must
to return to their homes either temporarily or be integrated and interpreted to generate new
permanently. The cost of this social dislocation insights and solutions, and the right tools used
and economic disruption can be many times to assist often complex decision-making.
greater than the direct cost of repairing the
physical damage. The natural hazard management
Small economy cannot sustain the system needs greater coordination
social and financial costs of ongoing While disasters affect whole communities,
hazard events decisions on risk and resilience are often taken
by individuals and agencies in a fragmented way
When these events occur in a New Zealand that can result in poor allocation of resources
community, the economic impact can be and sometimes unintended consequences.
exacerbated because we have a relatively low Achieving changes to the way New Zealand
capacity in our built environment to absorb the manages disaster risk requires natural hazard
shock. While insurance (risk transfer) is an essential impacts to be considered in decision-making
part of supporting financial resilience and disaster equally alongside all other aspects of community
recovery, it cannot reduce physical damage or fully wellbeing. Such decisions need to be informed
address the resulting social disruption. by the ability to estimate the full costs of natural
hazard impacts, which will enable assessment
Prevailing attitudes and biases about and prioritisation of resilience initiatives.
natural hazard risks Collaboration at all levels of society will be
Research shows that humans are not naturally needed to have a shared view of the level of
disposed towards planning for natural hazard resilience considered to be cost-effective, from
events that occur infrequently even though we homeowners through to central government,
know the consequences can be catastrophic. and across the public and private sectors.

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 3
EQC's Strategic Intentions
2018 - 2022
EQC exists to support management of natural hazard risks by providing affordable insurance to help
households recover from disaster, enabled through administering the Natural Disaster Fund (NDF) and
international reinsurance.
EQC also has a statutory function to invest in research and education about natural disaster damage
and methods for reducing risk and building resilience prior to an event.
EQC’s mission is to reduce the impact on people and property when natural disasters occur.
EQC identified three strategic intentions to support its vision and mission over four years:
1. EQC is a leader in New Zealand on natural hazard risk reduction
2. New Zealanders have access to natural disaster insurance and reinsurance
3. Claims made to EQC’s insurance scheme are managed fairly, transparently and in a
timely manner.
Each of the strategic intentions has outcomes defining specific areas of delivery:
• Increase community resilience to natural disasters
• New Zealand has an affordable and sustainable natural disaster insurance scheme
• Improve customers’ recovery from natural disasters.
The following Strategy describes how EQC’s mandate for research facilitation and education will align
with the overall strategic intent and the successful delivery of EQC’s resilience outcomes.

4 EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
EQC's Resilience Strategy
This Strategy sets out EQC’s ambition to play a key role in addressing New Zealand’s current and future
disaster resilience challenges, through a focus on risk reduction actions, driven by our research and
education mandate.
EQC’s Resilience Strategy:
• Defines the resilience objectives EQC wants to achieve
• Sets out what we aim to deliver
• Describes how we want to work
• Identifies who we need to work with.

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 5
Our disaster resilience vision
for New Zealand
Our vision is that natural hazards resilience becomes embedded in all aspects of
decision-making for our homes, towns and cities.
A future resilient New Zealand community is one in which the potential consequences of social and
economic disruption by natural hazards are consciously considered, quantified, and included in
everyday development decisions.

HOMEOWNERS are risk-aware and understand CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, in consultation with

the choices they can make about the types of the community, sets performance objectives
buildings and locations that are more resilient to for the built environment that seek to minimise
natural hazards. damage and disruption from natural hazards at
reasonable cost.
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, DEVELOPERS AND
BUILDERS understand the value of incorporating INSURERS AND REINSURERS have confidence
damage-limiting design in buildings and other in the New Zealand market as a result of the
infrastructure, which means the building stock investment by EQC and others in understanding
becomes more resilient with time. natural hazard risk, and because of the effective
integrated approach to risk treatment through
COUNCILS actively consider natural hazards in
building and land-use policies.
their short-term and long-term planning and
understand the trade-offs that need to be made URBAN AND LAND-USE PLANNERS
between investment in disaster risk reduction understand the value of incorporating resilience
(such as avoiding the worst land, retrofitting planning principles and options for avoiding the
buildings and upgrading buried pipes) and worst hazard risks in urban and land-use plans,
other opportunities for community wellbeing which means exposure is managed down
investments. over time.

6 EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
 Stronger homes, built on better land, served by resilient infrastructure,
supported by affordable risk capital

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
7
“The challenge is
to move from
managing disasters
to managing disaster
risk reduction”
António Guterres, UN Secretary-General
Resilience goal
Our resilience goal is to inform, enable and influence the choices and decisions that
reduce vulnerability and the exposure of New Zealand’s built environment to natural
hazard events. In simple terms the result will be stronger homes, built on better
land, served by resilient infrastructure, supported by affordable risk capital. The
following objectives are critical to achieving this goal:

More resilient buildings Sustained access to

and infrastructure Smarter land use insurance markets
reduces damage and avoids the worst risks funds effective
impacts recovery

Reducing New Zealand’s

vulnerability and exposure
to natural hazard events

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 9
What we will do
In pursuing the goal of reducing New Zealand's vulnerability to natural hazards, we
will invest in creating, integrating and translating information and knowledge to drive
risk reduction actions and build readiness to improve resilience.
EQC’s role is to facilitate the translation and integration of information and knowledge, create the tools
to understand and estimate disaster impacts, and to quantify the return on investment from enhanced
resilience.
Key mechanisms for creating value include: making useful data and information accessible; facilitating
and funding research to improve our understanding of natural hazard risks; and informing the
development of cost-effective engineering and planning solutions.
It will also involve the development of new capabilities to synthesise and transform knowledge into
useable products and tools, such as quantitative impact models and technical guidance.
To deliver on the science to practice ‘value chain’ we also need to ensure that the ‘useable’ tools and
outputs are ‘used’ to assess and prioritise risk reduction actions. This will require new partnerships and
engagement with policy-makers, planners, engineers, asset managers and homeowners to ensure the
right knowledge in the right form reaches the right people at the right time.

1. BUILD DATA 2. TRANSLATE 3. UPTAKE

AND KNOWLEDGE AND TRANSFORM AND IMPLEMENT
Identify and fill data, Create meaning and new Influence uptake and
information and insights by translating ideas implementation into building
knowledge gaps and interpreting science and land-use practice

USEFUL USEABLE USED

10 EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
Our focus areas
Over the 10-year horizon for this Strategy, EQC will deliver high-quality data,
knowledge and expertise, and more effectively communicate the risk treatment
options for risk reduction action.
We will lead and support work required to:

1. BUILD DATA AND KNOWLEDGE

Addressing data, information and knowledge gaps
We will:
• Work in partnership with end-users to ensure that decision-making requirements
are prioritised
• Aggregate data and science within and across disciplines relevant to hazard risk
management
• Invest directly and influence the national research agenda to:
෮ Build understanding of New Zealand’s hazard risk profile
෮ Build understanding of the physical, social and economic impact of disasters,
and behavioural responses to risk
෮ Support innovative and resilient engineering and land-use solutions
• Ensure sustainable support for key research capability for New Zealand.

2. TRANSLATE AND TRANSFORM

Creating meaning and new insights
We will lead and support:
• Interpretation and translation of science and research
• Acceleration of new qualitative and quantitative products and approaches to
hazard risk management, such as:
෮ Risk communication products, technical guidance and policy advice
෮ Improved analytics and modelling of hazard risk exposure, including
estimating potential financial, economic and social impacts
෮ Other decision support tools and products for risk reduction and readiness.

3. UPTAKE AND IMPLEMENT

To create the risk reduction impacts we seek, we will:
Influence risk reduction action
• Through enhanced analysis and policy coordination with regulatory agencies and
accelerated education and training for key stakeholders.
Advocate for natural hazard resilience
• As a national priority requiring improved coordination and unified leadership
across the natural hazard management system.

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 11
Priorities over the next
three years
Enhancing loss modelling/impact estimation products to drive
1. planning and policy settings, assessment of resilience costs and
benefits, and operational benefits for EQC readiness and response.
Initial priority
• Replatforming existing capability and expanding the hazard types
that can be modelled

A renewed focus on the strategic value of data and information. In

2. particular, EQC will prioritise smarter and more consistent collection
and management of physical, financial and economic exposure and loss
information related to the housing stock, residential land and service
connections.
Initial priorities
• Geotechnical data in high-risk areas
• Improved sharing of hazard information

Coordinated and targeted science investment, with an expanded

3. focus on insurance market and social-behavioural responses to hazard
risk, and the research to support impact estimation beyond earthquake
hazard.
Initial priorities
• Research on the effects of risk-based insurance coverage
• Improved volcanic and landslide hazard models

Accelerating the synthesis and translation of research outputs to develop

4. new products and tools for hazard risk management, including education and
training resources to improve design and construction practices,
raise risk literacy and encourage consistent regulatory compliance.
Initial priority
• Engineering guidance for seismic improvement of buildings

Developing reciprocal partnerships with a wider range of

5. stakeholders to deliver information and guidance to drive risk
reduction action.
Initial priority
• Local government and key regulators

12 EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
How we will work
Our guiding principles
In pursuing our vision of a disaster resilient New Zealand, the following seven
principles guide our actions and behaviour.

Partner for
greater impact
System
integration and Open and
adaptation transparent

OUR
Focus on GUIDING
PRINCIPLES Stewardship
greatest
of national
national
capabilities
benefit

Targeted, Foster
high-quality innovation
research

Vision Mātauranga
EQC is committed to the policy themes and outcomes of Vision Mātauranga, the New
Zealand government science policy framework that seeks to unlock the innovation
potential of Māori knowledge, people and resources. Vision Mātauranga themes
relevant to disaster reduction and resilience research are:
• Indigenous innovation: Contributing to disaster resilience and risk reduction through distinctive
research and development.
• Taiao/Environment: Achieving disaster resilience through iwi and hapū relationships with land
and sea.
• Hauora/Health: Improving health and social wellbeing aspects linked to disaster resilience.
• Mātauranga: Exploring indigenous knowledge and science and innovation, regarding hazard
risk management.

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 13
Working across the natural hazards risk
management system
Achieving the Strategy’s resilience goal will require coordination and actions that lie
beyond the direct role of EQC. Sustained engagement with key stakeholders over
time and new ways of working will be required to influence these changes.
EQC has no regulatory power to compel change but we will leverage our track record of research
excellence and facilitation to foster cooperation across the natural hazard science, risk financing and
risk reduction sectors. Through this we will seek to reduce barriers to communication and accelerate
improvements to risk management practice within EQC and across the community.

EQC has identified a number of issues that limit the assessment and treatment of hazard risk at a
national level:
1. The absence of a single, sector-wide view of natural hazard risk allows risk to be passed to the
Crown without this transfer being widely understood.
2. There is no formal structure or unified leadership that sets and implements performance
objectives for resilience to natural hazards. Important parts of the system depend on informal
relationships and goodwill.
3. The use of data and research could be improved through better coordination and an increased
focus on filling gaps in our knowledge and understanding.
4. Skilled resources are lacking in natural hazards science modelling, and some models and modelling
capability are not optimised. Problems include duplication and limitations of design legacy and
funding, which reduces the ability to remain current and make best use of international resources.
5. Risk treatment services, initiatives and outcomes are not well measured, and there is a lack of New
Zealand-specific information on return on investment for risk reduction. This lack of analysis and
information limits the ability of public policy-makers to consider the full range of impacts of their
policies and decisions.

“The ability to quantify exposure to

earthquake risk is a prerequisite to
the effective financial management of
earthquake risk and a necessary input for
assessing costs and benefits of different
approaches to risk reduction and transferring
risk to (re)insurance capital markets.”
OECD Report 2018 Financial Management of Earthquake Risk

14
EQC has a role in supporting the National Disaster
Resilience Strategy

A national view of disaster resilience

Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet 2019

The EQC Resilience Strategy aligns strongly with the government’s National Disaster Resilience
Strategy, released in April 2019 under the mandate of the Civil Defence Emergency Management Act
2002. Both documents have the broad intent of strengthening the resilience of New Zealand so that
the hazards, crises and emergencies we will inevitably face do not become disasters that threaten our
wellbeing and prosperity.
The National Disaster Resilience Strategy promotes a whole-of-society approach and emphasises the
message that “everyone has a role in a disaster resilient nation”. It proposes a three-pronged approach
to improve the nation’s resilience to disasters:
1. minimising the risks we face and limiting the significance of impacts to be managed in a crisis
2. building the capability and capacity to manage emergencies when they do happen, and
3. enabling, empowering, and supporting communities to act for themselves and others when faced
with risk or disruption.
The National Disaster Resilience Strategy describes a model of a resilient nation, being resilient
practices across the social, cultural, economic, built, natural, and governance environments, and at a
household/whānau, community, business/organisation, city/district, and national level (diagram above)
– a blend of bottom-up, grassroots initiatives, and an enabling, empowering, and supportive policy
environment at a local and central government level.

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 15
Calculating the resilience
dividend
Impact estimation can address the question of how much to invest now,
to lower disaster impact costs later.
Natural hazard risk is created through decisions taken in the construction and location of our buildings
and infrastructure. A shift to better practice requires the ability to quantify the true social and
economic impacts of natural hazard damage and disruption, beyond direct financial losses. In the
absence of this holistic view of risk, most benefit-cost analyses for enhanced resilience have lacked the
necessary rigour and predictive insight.
Loss modelling and impact estimation provide a quantitative tool to allow natural hazard, asset and
economic data to be integrated and made useable for both risk transfer and risk reduction decisions.
EQC uses loss modelling tools to develop scenarios for event-readiness, and to develop better event
response and claims management strategies. Our loss modelling is supported by EQC’s significant
investment in science, including geophysical and geotechnical data collection and the research
application of related knowledge.
EQC is updating its capability to extend the range of natural hazards that can be modelled and is
making better use of Geographic Information System (GIS) expertise to display, analyse and model
diverse data.
These enhanced capabilities will support EQC’s ability to model future scenarios and mitigation options
for a broad range of natural hazards including earthquakes, liquefaction, volcanic eruption, landslide,
flood and tsunami.
Through this research investment and modelling, EQC will also significantly enhance its ability to scale,
direct and coordinate the response to major hazard events, and extend its financial simulation of
economic and social costs to future scenarios.

16 EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
When action delivers results
Identifying the specific information needs of decision-makers is essential for the
success of EQC's Resilience Strategy. The requirements of the reinsurance sector,
from which there is strong demand for science knowledge and insights into New
Zealand’s hazard risk profile, are relatively well understood.
The same cannot be said of the diverse groups involved in land-use and construction practices. There
has been strong demand for EQC-supported advice, guidance and standards information for aspects
of resilient building and infrastructure engineering, but its consistent interpretation, application and
enforcement remain a work in progress. Such guidance has been always developed in partnership with
local government and industry, with an emphasis on geotechnical and structural engineers.

CASE STUDY
Infrastructure resilience
In the 1990s, EQC invested in understanding the earthquake hazard in Christchurch and the potential
impacts of liquefaction damage (Elder et al., 1991). This knowledge was translated and compiled for
end-users (Risk and Realities, 1997) and applied by local infrastructure owners to their capital work
programmes, which identified the need to strengthen parts of their networks. The results were much
reduced physical damage to local network hubs and facilities throughout the Canterbury Earthquake
Sequence (Fenwick, 2011), which allowed them to maintain or quickly restore supply to the city. These
actions enabled the community to ‘shelter in place’ and reduced what otherwise would have been
much wider social disruption and economic costs.
That same information did not materially influence residential land-use planning decisions prior to the
Canterbury earthquakes and highlights the importance of governance accountabilities for risk and the
need for clarity and alignment of regulatory policy objectives. The consequences of severe building
and land damage during the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence have been greater costs and complexity
in the recovery.

EQC facilitates The information and The local electricity The Orion network The Canterbury
investigation into land new knowledge are network provider (Orion) performs well in the community was able
performance and the shared with local strengthens its assets Canterbury Earthquake to maintain economic
impact on infrastructure infrastructure providers based on the information Sequence with continued activity and remain
from natural hazards in and other stakeholders and analysis functionality in place
Canterbury

Limited Social and

Knowledge Analysis and Insights Resilience More resilient economic
disruption,
gaps identified integration shared action taken infrastructure distress
faster repair
and filled translation reduced
time

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 17
CASE STUDY
Ground improvement
The Canterbury Ground Improvement Programme is a recent example of EQC’s influence on
resilience outcomes.
This world-leading project investigated options for ground improvement and foundation design for
building on liquefaction-prone land in Canterbury. It involved international collaboration and funding
with EQC, the United States and multiple science agencies accessing expertise and specialised
equipment to test and validate design options in Christchurch. The success of the project depended
on collaboration with the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE), Environment
Canterbury, Christchurch City Council, insurers, engineers and the local community to ensure that
design solutions would be practical, cost-effective and simple to implement.
The project outcomes included:
• Enhanced understanding of liquefaction vulnerability, which has been incorporated into loss
modelling methodology
• Uptake of the new knowledge into MBIE’s guidance for repairing and rebuilding homes in
Canterbury, and planning guidance for building on liquefaction-prone land
• Trust and confidence among the project partners including insurers, participating Canterbury
homeowners, the local consenting authority, engineers and researchers.

18 EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
Who we will work with
Partners and pathways
The essence of this Strategy is enhancing the uptake and implementation of resilient
building and land-use policy and practices.
Our choice of what to do and who to work with is driven by where we think the greatest value can be
gained for national resilience balanced against the ease of implementation. Our current understanding
of risk exposure and vulnerability is a key starting point, and leads to opportunities to leverage existing
strong partnerships and channels including with Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) and individual
councils in Christchurch, Wellington and Auckland.
We will need to work closely with the building and land-use control advisors and decision-makers in
central and local government to build their understanding of the potential power of impact estimation
and to shape the information products and delivery mechanisms that will have the greatest influence.

WHO WHAT HOW

Local government Integrated accessible hazard information New formal partnerships
Economic and social impact analysis EQC Loss Modelling Capability Project
Realistic scenarios Leverage existing partnerships (e.g. DEVORA/It's
Our Fault resilience programmes)
Risk communication guidance
Integrated hazard information project
Technical guidance for resilient design and
land-use planning Mission-driven research
Training and professional development GeoNet and other data sources

Central government Integrated accessible hazard information New formal partnerships

Economic and social impact analysis EQC Loss Modelling Capability Project
Realistic scenarios Integrated hazard information project
Technical guidance for resilient design and Mission-driven research
land-use planning
Mapping and sharing of open data sources
Hazard risk management policy advice
Infrastructure/asset Technical solutions guidance Industry partnerships for guidance development
owners
Risk communication
Case studies on resilient investment
Professionals and Technical solutions guidance Industry partnerships for guidance development
trade organisations
Training and professional development Sector training and education

Public/homeowners Risk communication EQC public education

Technical solutions guidance Formal partnerships with local and central
government on risk communication
Insurers/reinsurers Scenarios Insurer engagement programme
Impact modelling Broker services
Regulatory advice Direct engagement with reinsurers

EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029 19
How we will measure
our progress
Each year we will measure our performance, based on the Statement of Performance Expectations
for EQC, by surveying key stakeholders to gauge the extent to which:
• EQC’s advice, research findings, and analysis are perceived to be of high quality and well targeted
• EQC science has been used as an evidence base for risk reduction decisions
• EQC facilitation and engagement are effective and add value.
Our stakeholder surveys will help us understand how our research and education outputs have been
used for risk reduction policy and action, and how useful EQC outputs have been – including within the
organisation – to enhance our event-readiness and ability to access reinsurance.
We will measure the impact our science and education activities have had on national levels of house
insurance. We will also survey homeowners to monitor if EQC messages are getting through about
taking action to prepare their homes for natural disaster events.

Resilience performance framework

Successful delivery of the EQC Resilience Strategy will translate to measurable reductions in
New Zealand’s exposure and vulnerability to natural hazards over time, in both new and existing
developments.
While measurement of the change in financial risk exposure is one objective of a performance
framework, performance indicators that measure long-term resilience outcomes are also required.
From a nation-wide resilience strategy perspective, EQC’s and the Crown’s exposure liability will be
reduced if the following long-term resilience outcomes are achieved:
• Stronger houses are built on better land with more resilient infrastructure
• Social and economic dislocation is reduced when events happen
• Investment in resilience is valued by New Zealanders
• Unified leadership means risk treatment options are optimised for national resilience
• There is sustained and affordable access to insurance and reinsurance markets.
We will identify indicators to monitor progress toward these long-term resilience outcomes.

20 EQC Resilience Strategy for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction 2019 - 2029
“Natural hazards
are inevitable.
Natural disasters
are not.”
John Filson, USGS