DRYMIX
DRYMIX
DRYMIX
Abstract
Powdered milk formula is generally manufactured using dry blending/mixing
process to homogeneously mix the powdered ingredients, especially in low rate self-
sufficient milk producing countries. Mixing can be influenced by several factors:
particle size, rotation speed, equipment configuration, mixing volume, mixing angle
and the cohesiveness of the material. In this project, the effects of operational
parameters and feed preparation in a convective batch ribbon powder mixer are
investigated. Whole milk powder, skimmed milk powder, whey protein 45%,
maltodextrin, lactose, zinc oxide and ascorbic acid powders were used for the mixing
study and the formulation was based on standard infant formula in the market. Four
typical infant formulae are prepared. Operational parameters of the mixer are filling
level (60, 80 and 100%) and mixing time (5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 min). Chemical tests
were done to ensure that the nutrients are uniformly distributed throughout the
mixing batch. The results have shown that the mixing time is affected by the filling
level. A better mixing can be obtained at lower filling level (60% for 10-15 min mixing
time). Besides, the results also showedthat powders with smaller particle size
(skimmed milk powder, 75.02 μm), cohesive particle and round particle surface
produced a better mixing performance. Thus, findings from this work can significantly
contribute in comprehending the mixing process, the effects of the raw materials
characteristics and furthermore in developing efficient mixing.
Keywords: dry blending, cow milk powder, infant formula, convective mixing
INTRODUCTION
Fresh cow milk and human milk are very important sources of protein for the human
diet. It is also a primary nutrient source for newborn babies and infants. Generally, fresh cow
milk is used to substitute human milk as it contains water, complete macronutrients such as
fats, carbohydrates and proteins as well as micronutrients including vitamins and minerals
(Committee on the Evaluation of the Addition of Ingredients New to Infant Formula, Food
and Nutrition Board, 2004). Fresh cow milk is normally processed to prolong its shelf life
and it is produced in two forms which are in liquid form and powder form. Milk powder is
the most convenient milk product as it is convenient in applications during transportation,
handling, processing, and for product formulations.
Milk powder is manufactured using two general types of processes: a dry blending
process and a wet mixing. Dry-blending process is a typical operation applied by milk
powder manufacturers in low rate self-sufficient milk producing countries. Dry ingredients
are blended in a convective mixer (i.e., ribbon blender or tumble blender) to obtain
uniformed nutrients distribution throughout the batch. It is a great challenge to achieve the
best mixing procedure in the industry. This is because there are a few factors contributing to
the homogeneity of the milk powders during the mixing process, which are powder
properties, equipment design, processing conditions, and operator methodology (Williams,
1968; Halidan et al., 2016). Deveswaran et al. (2009) describes the sequential approaches to
ensure a stable and quality powder product can be obtained. Many factors can affect their
mixing homogeneity and most of the literatures have investigated only selected factors.
a
E-mail: [email protected]
Blending equipment
The convective batch ribbon mixer used in this study was designed for a laboratory
study (unpublished). This mixer is classified as a convective mixer and is comprised of a U-
shaped container (length 30 cm, height 12 cm, width10 cm) that houses a horizontal ribbon
mixer (length40 cm, diameter 9 cm) with a double layer of spiralblades (Figure 1). This
scaled-down mixer is made from poly(methyl methacrylate) and the blade and shaft are
made from stainless steel. A motor (RW20; IKA GmbH, Kö nigswinter, Germany) is used to
provide rotational movement to the shaft. The rotational speeds range from 10 to 200 rpm.
The powders are fed into and removed from the mixer through the detachable hinged top.
Figure 1. Photographs of the batch ribbon mixer. (A) The complete mixer and; (B) a close-
up of U-shaped container.
Blend formulation
The raw materials used in this work are basically the simplified formulation of infant
formula and this formulation is used as the model mixture (Lesniewicz et al., 2010; Hanley et
al., 2011). Two model blends are used in this study. Whole milk powder (WMP) blend
consists of fat source (whole milk powder), protein source (whey protein 45%),
polysaccharide (maltodextrin), carbohydrate source (lactose), mineral source (zinc oxide)
and vitamin source (ascorbic acid). Whereas, skimmed milk powder (SMP) blend consists of,
skimmed milk powder, whey protein 45%, maltodextrin, lactose, zinc oxide and ascorbic
acid. The list of raw materials and their descriptions is provided in Table 1. All raw materials
are stored in dry and cool condition storage. This is to avoid the raw materials from
agglomeration due to the formation of liquid bridges in powder bed. The ideal condition to
store the raw materials is in temperature 21°C and relative humidity of 20-35%. Table 2
shows the properties of the ingredients. Figure 2 provides a scanning electron microscope
micrograph of the ingredients.
400
Table 1. Raw material description.
Raw Description
materials
Whole milk • Manufactured by Friesland Campina Group
powder • Contains 30% milk fat, 26% protein, 4285 IU 100 g-1 vitamin A, 600 IU 100 g-1 vitamin D3, 0.25%
lecithin, 3.0% free fat
• Free from preservatives, chemical additives, foreign matter, and other impurities
• Yellow powder, slightly sweet
Skimmed • Manufactured by Friesland Campina Group
milk • Contains 1.2% fat, 41.1% protein, 55.4% lactose
powder • Contains 5% or less moisture (by weight) and 1.5% or less milk fat (by weight)
• Yellow powder, slightly sweet
Whey protein • Manufactured by Friesland Campina Group
45% • Contains 4% fat, 47% protein, 3.5% ash, 0.3% calcium, 0.05% magnesium, 1.0% potassium, 0.3%
sodium, 0.09% chloride, 1.0% phosphate
• Yellow powder, slightly sweet
Maltodextrin • Manufactured by Epic Chemicals Sdn. Bhd
• Carbohydrate composition – 2% glucose, 7% disaccharides, 91% higher polysaccharides
• Mineral composition – 50 ppm sodium, 50 ppm chloride, 10 ppm calcium, 10 ppm potassium
• A polysaccharide (complex) carbohydrate
• White powder, neutral, slightly sweet
Lactose • Manufactured by Friesland Campina Group
• Contains 0.3% protein, 0.4% ash
• White/almost white, crystalline powder freely but slowly soluble in water
Zinc oxide • Manufactured by Approfit Zinc Oxide SdnBhd, Malaysia
• White crystalline powder
Ascorbic acid • Manufactured by Northern General Pharmaceutical Factory, China
• White/almost white, crystalline powder
401
A B C
D E F
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscope micrographs: (A) whole milk powderat a
magnification of 1500×; (B) skimmed milk powder at a magnification of 1500×;
(C) whey protein 45% at a magnification of 1500×; (D) maltodextrin at a
magnification of 15000×; (E) lactose at a magnification of 1500×; (F) ascorbic acid
at a magnification of 50×, (G) zinc oxide at a magnification of 100000×.
402
Table 3. Mixing parameters.
Parameters Description
Filling level (%) 100, 80, 60
Mixer run time (minutes) 5, 10, 15, 20, 25
Blade speed (rpm) 100
Feed preparation Preblend and without preblend
1 1
8 11
5
4
3 7
6
9
12
2
Figure 3. Upper view of sampling position.
Homogeneity measurement
In this project, the effects of different mixing parameters on the homogeneityof the
output stream were determined by analyzing the output samples as a function of time. To
analyze homogeneity, it is necessary to determine the amount of tracer (ascorbic acid) in the
sample using chemical testing techniques. The mixture was tested by titrating the dissolved
sample with redox-indicator solution, 2,6-diclorophenolindophenol (AOAC Method 967.21).
Prior to this, a standard was prepared to compare homogeneity. The amount of vitamin C
content in 1000 g mixture was 0.0679%. Therefore, 0.0679% vitamin C content was set as
the standard specification. This indicates that every sample withdrawn from the mixture
should meet this specification in order to be considered as a homogeneous batch. Due to the
process deviations such as parallax error and human error, the standard specification of
0.0679% was allowed a tolerance of ±10%; which gives a range of minimum vitamin C
content 0.0611% to a maximum of 0.0747%. Every sample was given a ±10% to meet the
standard specification of vitamin C content. If any sample was found to be within this range,
it will be categorized as meets the specification. For the samples that do not meet this
specification, it will be defined as non-homogeneous.
403
mixing at filling level 60%. It illustrates vigorous changes on the mixture and trends in a
short period. All types of mixture meet the specification after 10 min of mixing, but after that
some mixtures seem to experience a downturn. It is suspected that the powder experience
segregation in the powder mixture. Larger powder particles move upward to the surface of
the mixture thus producing a non-homogenous mixture.
Figure 4. Vitamin C content in the mixture after (a) mixing level at 100%, (b) mixing level at
80%, (c) mixing level at 60%.
Similar trends are obtained for every filling level, where it shows that the pre-blended
whole milk powder mixtures were more likely to meet the specification. After 10 min
mixing, it has fulfilled the minimum homogeneity requirement. These results shows that the
mixing characteristics of pre-blended whole milk powder will obtain better homogeneity as
whole milk powder has big vacuoles with small particles that can be entrapped in its porous
404
structure (as shown in Figure 2). Furthermore, its excellent flowability and the influence of
unprotected fat on particles of whole milk powder, particularly fat free content, forms
cohesive strength which can also affect the quality of the mixture (Sharma et al., 2012).
Whole milk powder is classified as cohesive powder that will promote segregation.
However, the inter-particle forces are high enough to overcome the vibration forces. The
cohesion characteristic of whole milk powder may also contribute to the homogeneity of the
mixture. The sticky surface area and coarser surface of whole milk powder have promoted
binding effect for other particle size.
Figures 5 and 6 shows the vitamin C contents at different filling level performance. At
lower filling level (60%), shorter time is needed to produce a homogeneous mixture.
However, if mixing with lower filling level is handled for a long period (25 min), the powder
will tend to segregate accordingly. During segregation the bigger particle size will move
upward and form a separation layer between different size particles.
Figure 5. Vitamin C content in the mixture after mixing with pre-blend for (a) whole milk
powder, (b) skimmed milk powder, at various filling levels.
405
Figure 6. Vitamin C content in the mixture after mixing without pre-blend for (a) whole
milk powder, (b) skimmed milk powder, at various levels.
CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions can be drawn from the study:
- It was found that mixtures containing whole milk powder with pre-blending always
meet the specification with the shortest mixing time.
- These results illustrate that the whole milk powder which has big particle size
conducted with a pre-blending technique application improves the mixing process in
a convective batch ribbon powder mixer.
- The characteristics of whole milk powder which is comprised of big particle size,
porous structure and outermost surface covered by unprotected fat promotes
agglomeration of the different particles within the mixture.
- However, prolonged periods of high-speed mixing will lead to mixture segregation.
- This phenomenon could be seen for skimmed milk powder at 80% filling level
without pre-blending.
- Thus an understanding of powder characteristics and behaviours is essential to
control the mixing efficiency.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The support of the Ministry of Higher Learning Malaysiathrough FRGS grant
(5524379) is acknowledged.
406
Literature cited
Committee on the Evaluation of the Addition of Ingredients New to Infant Formula, Food and Nutrition Board.
(2004). Infant Formula: Evaluating the Safety of New Ingredients (Washington: The National Academies Press).
Cô té , P., and Abatzoglou, N. (2006). Powder and other divided solids mixing. Scale-up and parametric study of a
ribbon blender used in pharmaceutical powders mixing. Pharm Dev Technol 11 (1), 29–45. PubMed
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10837450500463778
Deveswaran, R., Bharath, S., Basavaraj, B.V., Sindhu, A., Sharon, F., and Madhavan, V. (2009). Concepts and
techniques of pharmaceutical powder mixing process: a current update. Res.J. Pharm. Technol. 2 (2), 245–249.
Halidan, M., Chandratilleke, G.R., Dong, K., and Yu, A. (2016). The effect of interparticle cohesion on powder
mixing in a ribbon mixer. AIChE J. 62 (4), 1023–1037 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aic.15101.
Hanley, K.J., Byrne, E.P., Cronin, K., Oliveira, J.C., O’Mahony, J.A., and Fenelon, M.A. (2011). Effect of pneumatic
conveying parameters on physical quality characteristics of infant formula. J. Food Eng. 106 (3), 236–244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.04.029.
Lesniewicz, A., Wroz, A., Wojcik, A., and Zyrnicki, W. (2010). Mineral and nutritional analysis of Polish infant
formula. J. Food Compos. Anal. 23 (5), 424–431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2010.02.005.
Muzzio, F.J., Goodridge, C.L., Alexander, A., Arratia, P., Yang, H., Sudah, O., and Mergen, G. (2003). Sampling and
characterization of pharmaceutical powders and granular blends. Int J Pharm 250 (1), 51–64. PubMed
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00481-7
Portillo, P.M., Ierapetritou, M.G., and Muzzio, F.J. (2009). Effects of rotation rate, mixing angle, and cohesion in two
continuous powder mixers – a statistical approach. Powder Technol. 194 (3), 217–227 http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/j.powtec.2009.04.010.
Sharma, A., Jana, A.H., and Chavan, R.S. (2012). Functionality of milk powders and milk-based powders for end
use applications – a review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 11 (5), 518–528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-
4337.2012.00199.x.
Williams, J.C. (1968). The mixing of dry powders. Powder Technol. 2 (1), 13–20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0032-
5910(68)80028-2.
407
408