DPR for Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur

Section to 4Lane+Paved shoulder standards from Design km 74+351 to km

102+331 Excluding Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380 to
78+280 (Total length of 26.080 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the
state of Maharashtra

Volume I
MAIN REPORT
Public Works Department
(NH DIVISION, AMRAVATI), Maharashtra
Government of Maharashtra
(Ministry of Road Transport & Highways)

Government of India
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT

March 2023
DPR Consultant,
M/s TPF GetinsaEuroestudios S.L
in J.V with TPF Engineering Pvt.
Ltd. Office:1401, Rupa Sapphire,
Sector 18, Plot No. 12 Opp. Sanpada
Railway Station, Vashi Navi
Mumbai – 400705. INDIA

BALASAHEB Digitally
BALASAHEB
signed by

NANASAHE NANASAHEB OHOL

Date: 2023.03.31
B OHOL 16:48:31 +05'30'
Table of Contents

1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 7

1.1 General...................................................................................................................................... 7
1.2 The Consultants ....................................................................................................................... 7
1.3 Existing Carriageway ROW ...................................................................................................... 8
1.4 Other Existing Salient Features.................................................................................................. 8
1.5 Engineering Survey and Investigations ...................................................................................... 11
1.6 Traffic Studies .............................................................................................................................. 11
1.7 Pavement design ......................................................................................................................... 13
1.8 Summary of Bridge and Culvert Improvement Proposals ......................................................... 14
1.9 Forest area: .................................................................................................................................. 14
1.10 Environmental Impact Assessment: ......................................................................................... 14
1.11 Project Cost Estimate ................................................................................................................ 15
1.12 Financial Viability of the Project: .............................................................................................. 17
1.13 Conclusion & Recommendation .................................................................................................. 17
2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................... 18
2.1 Background ............................................................................................................................. 18
2.2 Location .................................................................................................................................. 18
3. STUDY APPROACH ................................................................................................................... 20
3.1 Detailed Project Report ............................................................................................................... 21
4 ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS ...................................................... 22
4.1 Survey Investigations .............................................................................................................. 22
4.2 Road Inventory Survey ............................................................................................................ 22
4.3 Pavement Condition Surveys ................................................................................................... 23
4.4 Inventory And Condition Survey of Bridges, Culverts and Other Structures ............................ 24
4.5 Inventory Survey of Bridges and Culverts ............................................................................... 24
4.6 Culverts ................................................................................................................................... 24
5 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY .................................................................................................. 26
5.1 Topographic Survey ................................................................................................................ 26
5.2 Instruments to be used for Topographical Survey .................................................................... 26
5.3 Detailed Topographic Survey .................................................................................................. 27
6 PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION ......................................................................................... 31
6.1 Test Pit Investigations ......................................................................................................... 31
6.2 Material Investigations ....................................................................................................... 34
6.3 Cement, Bitumen and Steel ................................................................................................ 35
6.4 Summary ............................................................................................................................... 36
7 TRAFFIC STUDIES & FORECAST DESIGN ................................................................................... 37
7.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 37
7.2 Objectives and Scope of work ............................................................................................ 37
7.3 Project background ............................................................................................................. 37
7.4 Project Corridor Map .............................................................................................................. 38
7.5 Identification of Homogeneous Road Sections ................................................................ 38
7.6 Survey Methodology ............................................................................................................ 40
7.7.1 Classified Traffic Volume Counts ............................................................................................. 41
7.8 Data Analysis ............................................................................................................................. 42
7.8.1 Analysis of Traffic Volume Count ........................................................................................ 42
7.8.2 Fuel sales data and Seasonal variation ............................................................................... 43
7.8.3 Average Daily Traffic ........................................................................................................... 43
7.9 Axle Load Survey ................................................................................................................. 48
7.9.1 Definition ................................................................................................................................ 49
7.9.2 Vehicle Damaging Factor ...................................................................................................... 49
7.10 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT (TMC)............................................................................. 51
7.10.1 Sawarkar Chowk .................................................................................................................... 51
7.10.2 Kherda Chowk ........................................................................................................................ 52
7.11 OD Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 54
7 .12 Traffic Forecast ................................................................................................................... 56
7.13 Capacity Analysis ................................................................................................................... 65
8. DESIGN STANDARDS ................................................................................................................... 66
8.1 General: ........................................................................................................................................ 66
8.2 Terrain Classification .................................................................................................................. 66
8.3 Design Speed ............................................................................................................................... 67
8.4Cross-Sectional Elements ............................................................................................................. 67
8.5 Sight Distance .............................................................................................................................. 68
8.6 Horizontal Alignment .................................................................................................................. 68

2
8.6.1 Radii of Curve ........................................................................................................................... 68
8.6.2 Super-elevation ........................................................................................................................ 68
8.6.3 Transition Curves ..................................................................................................................... 69
8.7 Vertical Alignment ....................................................................................................................... 69
9. Social Impact Assessment ........................................................................................................ 74
9.1 Project Description: - .......................................................................................................... 75
9.2 Legal and institutional frameworks of Environmental Impact Assessment:-............. 75
9.3 Initial Social Assessment .................................................................................................... 75
9.3.1 Objectives of Initial Social Assessment ............................................................................ 76
9.3.2 Consultation with Important Stake Holders Level of Consultation ............................. 78
9.3.3 Scope of Work...................................................................................................................... 79
9.3.4 Study Method Approach..................................................................................................... 79
10. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT .............................................................................. 83
10.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 83
10.2 Project Description ................................................................................................................ 83
10.3 Relevant Legal aspects .......................................................................................................... 86
10.4 Analysis of Alternatives:- ...................................................................................................... 89
10.6Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures............................................. 98
10.7Approach to Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................... 98
10.8 Environmental Management Plan (EMP) ......................................................................... 98
11.COST ESTIMATES ....................................................................................................................... 99
11.1 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 99
11.2 Basic rates ............................................................................................................................ 99
11.3 Quantification of Items ....................................................................................................... 99
11.4 Land / Environmental / Social costs ............................................................................... 100
11.5 Rate Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 100
11.6 Cost Estimate ...................................................................................................................... 101
12.1 Economic Analysis of the Project ....................................................................................... 104
12.1.1 Purpose of Economical Evaluation: ................................................................................ 104
12.1.2 Method of Economic Evaluation (Using IRC: SP: 30-2019 for Alignment: ................. 104
12.1.2.1 Benefit -Cost Ratio Method: .......................................................................................... 104
12.1.2.2 Assumption Stated for Economic Evaluation: ................................................................................................................ 104

3
 12.1.2.3 Calculation of Vehicle Operation Cost: ............................................................................................................................ 105
12.1.2.4 Vehicle Operation Cost for Existing Road: ...................................................................................................................... 105
12.1.2.5 Road User Cost: ................................................................................................................................................................. 105
12.1.2.6 Conclusion: ........................................................................................................................................................................ 106
12.2 Financial Analysis of the Project: ........................................................................................................................................... 106
12.2.1Background of the Project:................................................................................................................................................... 106
12.2.2 Cost of the Project ................................................................................................................................................................ 106
12.2.3 Means of Finance ................................................................................................................................................................. 106
12.2.4 Inflation and Rate of Interest .............................................................................................................................................. 107
12.2.5 Other Factors ....................................................................................................................................................................... 107
12.2.6 Results .................................................................................................................................................................................. 107
12.2.7 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................................................ 107

Figures
Figure 1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 19
Figure 6 trail Pit ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 38
Figure 7 Traffic Survey Locations ........................................................................................................................................................................... 39
Figure 8 Traffic Volume Count Location ............................................................................................................................................................. 41
Figure 9 Percentage Composition of traffic category ................................................................................................................................... 44
Figure 10 Percentage Composition of traffic category .............................................................................................................................. 45
Figure 11 Average hourly variation of vehicular traffic ............................................................................................................................ 46
Figure 12 Axle load Test .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 51
Figure 13 TMC @ Sawarkar Chowk ....................................................................................................................................................................... 51
Figure 14Hourly Variation of Traffic @ Sawarkar Chowk ......................................................................................................................... 52
Figure 15TMC @ Kherdra Chowk .......................................................................................................................................................................... 53
Figure 16Hourly Variation of Traffic @ Kherda Chowk .............................................................................................................................. 53
Figure 17Zoning System for Bhadsivni (CH-82+500) location ............................................................................................................... 55
Figure 18 Location Map of the project ................................................................................................................................................................. 85
Figure 19Geological and Mineral map of Maharashtra Source : Geological Survey of India GoI 2008 .............................. 93
Figure 20 Seismic Zone map of India .................................................................................................................................................................... 94
Figure 21Map showing Areas prone to landslides in India on map ..................................................................................................... 95

Tables
Table 1 Existing Carriage ROW ................................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Table 2Major Junction list.............................................................................................................................................................................................. 8
Table 3Minor Junctions ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 4Culverts ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9
Table 5Minor bridges .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10
Table 6Railway level crossings ................................................................................................................................................................................ 10
Table 7 Annual Average Daily Traffic ................................................................................................................................................................... 11
Table 8 Annual Average Daily Traffic ................................................................................................................................................................... 12
Table 9Estimated Pavement Composition for New Carriageway .......................................................................................................... 13
Table 10 Summary of Bridge And Culvert Improvement Proposals .................................................................................................... 14
Table 11 List of Minor Bridges ................................................................................................................................................................................. 25

4
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Table 12 List of Pipe Culverts ................................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table 13 Pavement Composition ............................................................................................................................................................................ 31
Table 14Summary of Soil results locations ....................................................................................................................................................... 33
Table 15 Borrow Areas along the Project Road .............................................................................................................................................. 34
Table 16 Stone Quarry Location (Kherda Plant) ............................................................................................................................................ 35
Table 17 Traffic Surveys Locations ........................................................................................................................................................................ 38
Table 18 Segment of project alignment ............................................................................................................................................................... 39
Table 19 Homogeneous Traffic Sections ............................................................................................................................................................. 39
Table 20 Schedule of Traffic Survey ...................................................................................................................................................................... 40
Table 21Classes of vehicles ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 41
Table 22 PCU Factors .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 42
Table 23 Fuel sales data from various Fuel pumps (liters/month) and average of Seasonal variation factors are
calculated as below .........................................................................................................................................Error! Bookmark not defined.
Table 24Average Daily Traffic @ Hathgoan ...................................................................................................................................................... 43
Table 25Average Daily Traffic @ Bhadsivni .................................................................................................................................................... 44
Table 26Shows the average hourly variation of vehicular traffic .......................................................................................................... 45
Table 27Average Annual Daily Traffic @ Bhadsivni ..................................................................................................................................... 47
Table 28 Average Annual Daily Traffic @ Hathgoan village .................................................................................................................... 48
Table 29Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) at Bhadsivni Day 1 ..................................................................................................................... 50
Table 30Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) at Bhadsivni Day 2 ..................................................................................................................... 50
Table 31Traffic at Sawarkar Chowk ...................................................................................................................................................................... 52
Table 32Traffic at KHERDA CHOWK.................................................................................................................................................................... 53
Table 33Zoning System for Bhadsivni (CH-82+500) location ................................................................................................................. 54
Table 34 PROJECT INFLUENCE AREA .................................................................................................................................................................. 57
Table 35Economic Parameters for PIA ................................................................................................................................................................ 57
Table 36 Growth of weighted average of NSDP & Population ................................................................................................................. 58
Table 37Registered Vehicles in PIA (Numbers) .............................................................................................................................................. 58
Table 38 Summary of Regression Results .......................................................................................................................................................... 59
Table 39 Traffic Growth Rate Estimates %........................................................................................................................................................ 61
Table 40Recommended Traffic Growth Rates % ........................................................................................................................................... 61
Table 41Adopted Traffic Growth Rates % ......................................................................................................................................................... 62
Table 42Traffic forecasting TVC 1 @ Hathgoan (Kherda – Murtizapur both the directions) ................................................. 63
Table 43 Traffic forecasting TVC 2 @ Bhadsivni (Karanja – Kherda both the directions) ....................................................... 64
Table 44 Capacity Analysis......................................................................................................................................................................................... 65
Table 45Cross Slope of the Country…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……… 66
Table 46 Cross fall of Different Surfaces ............................................................................................................................................................. 67
Table 47 Sight Distance................................................................................................................................................................................................ 68
Table 48 Radius of horizontal curve ..................................................................................................................................................................... 68
Table 49Minimum length of Transition Curves .............................................................................................................................................. 69
Table 50Gradient............................................................................................................................................................................................................. 69
Table 51 Criteria for the Identification of problematic settlement ....................................................................................................... 77
Table 52 Social Profile of Settlement along the Project Road .................................................................................................................. 77
Table 53 EIA Notification ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 86
Table 54Forest land and percentage to the total land in the district .........................................................................................................
Table 55List of demographic Villages under Murtizapur to Karanja lad .................................................................................................
Table 56 Abstract of Cost ..........................................................................................................................................................................................102
Table 57 Road users cost ..................................................................................................................................................................................................
Table 58 cost of the Project......................................................................................................................................................................................106
Table 59 Project IRR 107

5
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Annexures
Annexure 1 Road Inventory Survey
Annexure 2 Road Condition Survey
Annexure 3 Structure Inventory
Annexure 4 Pipe Culvert Inventory
Annexure 5 Average Hourly Traffic Volume
Annexure 6 Average Hourly Traffic Volume
Annexure 7 Traffic Flow Diagram @ Sawarkar Chowk
Annexure 8 Traffic Flow Diagram@ Kherda Chowk
Annexure 9 OD Matrix Passenger
Annexure 10 OD Matrix Goods

Detailed Project Report

6
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

1 Executive Summary
1.1 General

The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MORTH) has been entrusted with the assignment of
Detailed Project Report of Karanja-Kherda- Murtizapur section of NH-361C from Ch.74+351 to Km
102.331 in the state of Maharashtra to 4 lane with paved shoulder configuration. As a part of Endeavour,
the MORTH NH Division has decided to undertake the consultancy services for Detailed Project Report for
the selected stretch in the State of Maharashtra, for up-gradation to Four Lanes with paved shoulder
configuration from Karanja- Kherda – Murtizapur. In this part we are discussing about NH 161 E Karanja
to Kherda & NH 361 C Kherda to Murtizapur of total length 28.00 km.

1.2 The Consultants

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MORTH) NH Division Amravati has entrusted the assignment
of preparation of the Detailed Project Report of Karanja-Kherda- Murtizapur from Ch.74+351 to Km
102.331 in the state of Maharashtra to 4 lane with paved shoulder configuration to TPF Engineering Pvt.
Ltd.

Detailed Project Report

7
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

The main objectives of the Consultancy services are: -

 To prepare Detailed Project Report for rehabilitation and up gradation of the existing two lanes
National Highway section to 4 Lane with Paved Shoulders configurations, depending on traffic
requirements, sound technical and most economical manner, taking into consideration of environmental
and social aspects of the area.
 The project report shall incorporate aspects of value engineering, quality audit and safety audit
requirement in design and implementation.
 Proposal for widening and strengthening/reconstruction of carriageway including provisions of short
re- alignments, geometric corrections, vertical improvement, improvement of intersections, provision of
grade separators etc.
 Suggest possible locations and design of toll plazas required on tolled highway.
 Studies for financing options like EPC for implementation of the project.
 Preparation of drawings including preliminary GAD and engineering drawings.
 Obtain all types of necessary clearances required for implementation of the project on the ground from
the concerned agencies
 Prepare and deliver the bid documents required for International and Local Competitive
Bidding
1.3 Existing Carriageway ROW
The present carriageway of the Project Highway is Two Lane. The type of the existing pavement is flexible.
The table below presents the existing ROW status of project road

Table 1 Existing Carriage ROW

Design Chainage Existing

Sr.
Right of Way
No. From To (m)
1 74+351 78+700 30.00
2 78+700 79+485 7.00
3 79+485 102+331 30.00

1.4 Other Existing Salient Features

Table 2 Major Junction list

S. Location Category of Cross Road

At grade Separated
No. From km NH SH MDR Others

Detailed Project Report

8
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

S. Location Category of Cross Road

At grade Separated
No. From km NH SH MDR Others
1 74+351 + -- NH 753C -- -- --
2 85+600 + -- NH 161E -- -- --
3 102+331 + -- NH 53 -- -- --

Table 3 Minor Junctions

Chainage Type of
Sr. No. Side Remark
From To Junction
1 74+750 74+753 LHS T Trupati city
2 78+750 78+753 LHS T Chandai Village
3 78+753 78+756 RHS T Shaha Village
4 80+750 80+753 LHS T Village road
5 81+750 81+753 LHS T Kakadshivani Village
6 81+753 81+756 RHS T Bhadshivani Village
7 85+400 85+403 RHS T Kherda khurd village
8 85+820 85+823 LHS T Kajleshwar village
9 87+730 87+733 LHS T Village road
10 87+733 87+736 RHS T Khanapur Village
11 89+800 89+803 RHS T Mozar village
12 89+820 89+823 LHS T Pimpalshenda village
13 89+965 89+968 RHS T Bidgaon village
14 92+370 92+373 LHS T Lasnapur village
15 92+540 92+543 RHS T shivankheda village
16 93+420 93+423 LHS T Umri village
17 93+850 93+853 RHS T Muramba village
18 94+260 94+263 LHS T Khandla village
19 96+833 96+836 RHS T Dahatonda village
20 98+713 98+716 LHS T Aarkhed village
21 99+900 99+100 LHS Y Way to smashanbhumi
22 100+000 100+005 RHS T Hatgaon village
23 100+900 100+903 RHS T way to Shantiniketan

Table 4Culverts

Sr. Type of No. Size in Carriageway

Chainage
No. Structure Rows mm Width in m
1 79+300 HPC 1 900 7.2
2 84+012 HPC 3 1200 7
3 86+050 HPC 1 900 5.5
4 86+282 HPC 1 1000 5.5

Detailed Project Report

9
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

5 86+640 HPC 1 1200 5.5

6 87+316 HPC 1 900 5.5
7 88+270 HPC 3 1200 5.5
8 88+607 HPC 3 1000 5.5
9 92+225 HPC 2 1000 5.5
10 93+293 HPC 1 1000 5.5
11 94+525 HPC 3 1000 5.5
12 94+860 HPC 2 900 5.5
13 95+673 HPC 2 900 5.5
14 96+955 HPC 3 900 5.5
15 98+140 HPC 3 1200 5.5
16 98+427 HPC 1 1000 5.5
17 99+970 Box type 4 1160*600 5.5
18 101+900 HPC 2 900 5.8

Table 5 Minor bridges

Type of Structure No. of Span &

Sr. Carriageway
Chainage Sub Super Span Length in
No. Foundation Width in m
structure structure m
1 74+566 --- RCC RCC 2*6 7.2
2 75+935 --- RCC RCC 1*6.5 7
3 76+250 --- RCC RCC 1*7.6 7
4 80+450 --- RCC RCC 2*6 7
5 85+390 --- RCC RCC 3*4.5 7.2
4*7.5+(3*1200
6 94+170 --- RCC RCC pipes on both 7
end)
7 97+556 --- RCC RCC 3*2.8 5.5
8 99+585 --- RCC RCC 5*7.3 5.7

Table 6 Railway level crossings

Sr. Level Crossing

Existing Road Chainage Remark
No. no
Shakuntala Railway
1 81+950 Narrow Gauge 13 Crossing Abondened
(Murtizapur to Yavatmal)

Detailed Project Report

10
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

1.5 Engineering Survey and Investigations

Following field surveys and investigations have been carried out for the DPR,
 Road, Bridge and Cross Drainage Structures Inventory
 Condition Surveys
Pavement
Bridge and Cross Drainage Structures
Road Roughness
 Pavement Investigations
Trial Pit Investigation
 Traffic surveys
Volume count, turning movement, Speed Delay study
Axle Load, OD survey, Accident Spot Study
 Material Survey & Investigations
Borrow Area Investigation
Source of materials
Sampling and testing of materials
 Detailed Topographic Survey
 Hydrological Survey and Hydraulic Investigations

1.6 Traffic Studies

Table 7 Annual Average Daily Traffic

Annual Average Daily Traffic

TVC 1 at Hathgaon village
PCU Factor Vehicle type
AADT PCU
1 Car/ Jeep/ Van (White
1432
Board) 1432
1 Taxi 0 0
0.5 Two-Wheeler 7530 3765
1 3 Wheelers 370 370

Detailed Project Report

11
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

1.5 Mini bus 0 0

3 School bus 0 0
3 Govt. Bus 152 456
3 Private Bus 0 0
1.5 LCV-4 Tyre 323 485
1.5 LCV-6 Tyre 58 87
3 2 Axle Truck 176 528
3 3 Axle Truck 108 324
4.5 Multi Axle (4 to 6 Axle) 361 1625
4.5 Over Sized (7 or more Axle) 0 0
4.5 Tractor With Trailer 65 293
1.5 Tractor Without Trailer 0 0
0.5 Cycle (Slow moving) 0 0
2 Cycle Rickshaw (Slow
0
moving) 0
6 Animal/ Hand Cart (Slow
0
moving) 0
1 Car (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 14 14
3 Bus (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 3 9
3 Truck (Toll Exempt
5
Vehicles) 15
1.5 LCV (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 0 0
Table 8 Total 10597 9402 Annual
Average Daily Traffic

Annual Average Daily Traffic

PCU Factor Vehicle type TVC 2 at Bhadsivni

AADT PCU
1 Car/ Jeep/ Van (White
Board) 2095 2095
1 Taxi 0 0
0.5 Two-Wheeler 3977 1989
1 3 Wheelers 241 241
1.5 Mini bus 0 0
3 School bus 0 0
3 Govt. Bus 344 1032
3 Private Bus 0 0
1.5 LCV-4 Tyre 452 679
1.5 LCV-6 Tyre 113 169
3 2 Axle Truck 410 1229
3 3 Axle Truck 146 438

Detailed Project Report

12
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

4.5 Multi Axle (4 to 6 Axle) 533 2398

4.5 Over Sized (7 or more Axle) 0 0
4.5 Tractor With Trailer 51 230
1.5 Tractor Without Trailer 0 0
0.5 Cycle (Slow moving) 0 0
2 Cycle Rickshaw (Slow
moving) 0 0
6 Animal/ Hand Cart (Slow
moving) 0 0
1 Car (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 14 14
3 Bus (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 3 8
3 Truck (Toll Exempt
Vehicles) 5 15
1.5 LCV (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 0 0
Total 8384 10537

1.7 Pavement design

Based on the traffic data and design CBR of 8%, the thickness of Flexible Pavement has been designed. Estimated
pavement composition is given in below

Table 9 Estimated Pavement Composition for New Carriageway

Layer Thickness
Pavement Quality Concrete (PQC), mm 280
Dry Lean Concrete (DLC), mm 150
Granular Sub base (GSB), mm 150
Subgrade, mm 500
Slab Dimensions
Lane width, m 3.5
Transverse joint spacing, m 4.5
Dowel Bar Design (Contraction Joint)
Type of bar Plain Bars
Diameter of bar, mm 36
Spacing, mm 300
Length, mm 450
Dowel Bar Design (Expansion Joint)
Type of bar Plain Bars
Diameter of bar, mm 36
Spacing, mm 300
Length, mm 450

Detailed Project Report

13
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Layer Thickness
Tie Bar Design (3.5 m X 4.5 m Panel)
Panel Width, m 3.5
Type of bar Deformed bars
Diameter of bar, mm 12
Spacing, mm 600
Length of Tie Bar, mm 640

1.8 Summary of Bridge and Culvert Improvement Proposals

Table 10 Summary of Bridge and Culvert Improvement Proposals

Sr.No Existing Structure Reconstruction Widening Repair

1 A-Pipe Culvert
17 17 (Reconstruction as Box) - -
2 B-Box Culvert
01 01 - -
3 C-Minor Bridge
08 08 - -

1.9 Forest area:

The alignment is superimposed on forest map through forest. The forest map has various forest boundaries
like, Reserved Forest, Wild life forest etc. The proposed alignment passes through below forest stretches.
Forest
Sr. Start End Length
Area
No Chainage Chainage (m)
(Ha)
1 78+700 79+485 785 m 2.355

1.10 Environmental Impact Assessment:

The EIA notification 14th September 2006 amended, vide notification S.O.2559 (E), dated 22nd of August
2013 which reads “Expansion of National Highways greater than 100 km involving additional right of way
or land acquisition greater than 30-45 m on existing alignments and re-alignments.” The project does not
attract Environmental Clearance (EC) from MoEFCC as the length of project road section is less than 100
km & improvement is within the available ROW of 30m wide.

Detailed Project Report

14
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

1.11 Project Cost Estimate

Detailed Cost Estimate for the Project has been carried out under guidance from PWD officials. Detailed Rate
analysis and Bill of Quantities have been finalized as per Current state schedule of Rate for the year 2022-23. The
process involved in the preliminary cost estimation has been described under the following sections.
The basic rates for each construction items were taken from State DSR circulated by PWD for the year 2022-23.
Only lead charges were added for Rate Analysis. For items where these rates were not available, the rates were
adopted as per similar ongoing project rate / market rates as finalized jointly with the PWD officials during
Technical Scrutiny time to time.
The Cost Estimates have been done taking quantities from Plan-Profiles and Structure Drawings as finalised by PWD
officials. For estimation of quantities and costs, various work items have been grouped as below,
GENERAL ABSTRACT OF COST

Total
Amount Amount
Sr. No. Item of works Length /
(RS) (Rs. Crs.)
No./Sqm.

Section - 1. Site Clearance and

37640429
1 Dismantling 26.501 3.76

2 Section - 2. Road Work

Excavation 25.714 22320915 2.23
Embankment 25.714 118603898 11.86
Subgrade 25.714 347165623 34.72
Granular Sub-Base 25.714 251167030 25.12
DLC 25.714 329152065 32.92
PQC 25.714 1557495492 155.75

3 Section 3: Box Culvert 38 141951342 14.20

4 Section 4: Minor Bridge 8 178667586 17.87

5 Section - 5. RCC Drain 50.108 508369222 50.84

6 Section -6. Road Furniture 26.501 17424047 1.74

Section -7: Street Lighting/Highway

5180160
7 Lighting 117 0.52

Section -8: Safety devices like w-metal,

8 Jersy crash barriers with Antiglare 86.842 205668756 20.57
Arrangement etc.

Detailed Project Report

15
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Section - 9: Boundary Chain Link

9 24854938
Fencing with Piller 2.49

10 Section - 10: Utility Crossings 26140736 2.61

11 Section - 11: Junctions 23 32951298 3.30

Section - 12: Tree Plantation & Median

12 26029653
Plantation 12649 2.60

13 Section - 13: Bus Shelter 10 2100000 0.21

14 Section - 14: Toll Plaza 1 103688807 10.37

15 Section 15: Retaining Wall 86748427 8.67

16 Section 16: Miscellanous 14910000 1.49

17 Section - 14: Safety and traffic 26.501 13250300 1.33

management during construction

18 Section - 15: ATMS 26.501 13250300 1.33

Section -16: Water PipeLine Shifting

19 (Including Supervision and Estimate Lumpsum 104009825 10.40
Preparation Charges)

20 Section -17: Electrical Shifting Lumpsum 140000000 14.00

Total Civil Construction Cost (A) (RS.

4308740849
A Crs.) 430.87
Add GST Provision 18.00 % of (A) 775573353 77.56
B Total Amount (B) 5084314202 508.43
Add Contingencies @ 1 % of (A) 43087408 4.31
Add 5% Maintenance Charges of (B) 254215710 25.42
Add 5% Escalation of (B) 254215710 25.42
Add 3% Supervision Charges of (A) 129262225 12.93
Add 3% Agenecy Charges of (A) 129262225 12.93
Add Land Acquisition/Forest Diversion
50000000 5.00
Cost
Total Civil Construction Cost including
5944357482 594.44
GST (RS. Crs.)

Detailed Project Report

16
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

1.12 Financial Viability of the Project:

The main objective of undertaking the current study is to assess whether the project is financially viable.
The basic methodology followed for estimating the financial viability of the project is to calculate the FIRR
(Financial Internal Rate of Return) on the investment for the project. The IRR calculated as per EPC mode
is IRR is 6.72% with Land Acquisition Cost & IRR without Land Acquisition Cost is 6.78 %. Project may be
implemented on EPC mode.

1.13 Conclusion & Recommendation

1) Proposed project up gradation from 2 lane to 4 lane with paved shoulder within the existing ROW of 30m
width.
2) The IRR calculated as per EPC mode is IRR is 6.72% with Land Acquisition Cost & IRR without Land
Acquisition Cost is 6.78 %. Project may be implemented on EPC mode.

Detailed Project Report

17
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

2 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 Background
 The Proposed Project road section starts from Km 74+351 at Karanja which is a taluka place
in Washim district and ends at km 102+331 at junction with NH53 near Murtijapur which is
in Akola District. As the rehabilitation and up gradation work of adjacent sections from Digras
to Karanja is in progress, thus to maintain smooth traffic flow on this route this un-tackled
sections needs to be upgraded.
 The project highway Karanja-Kherda-Murtizapur road is important feeder road connecting
NH-53 at Murtizapur and Samruddhi Mahamarg at Karanja and connects Akola district with
Samrudhi Mahamarg in the state of Maharashtra.
 At present this stretch is having varying BT width from 5.50 m to 7.00 m. Also, the structures
needs to be upgraded to National Highway standard. At some places the vertical curve needs
to be modified along with junctions of this road to facilitate smooth flow of traffic.
 In addition to above, substantial economic gain in terms of reduced Vehicle Operating Cost
(VOC) and reduced travel time will be achieved. This Highway is proposed as an important
National Highway in the State of Maharashtra.
 When Proposed stretch is upgraded then, complete corridor of NH 361C from Digras to
Murtijapur will be upgraded to NH Standard.

2.2 Location
The Proposed Project Road section starts from Km 74+351 at Karanja which is a taluka place
in Washim district and ends at km 102+331 at junction with NH53 near Murtijapur which is
in Akola District. A key plan of the project road is shown in fig
Ministry of Road Transport and Highway published notification on 3rd January 2017.
Govt. of India has declared “The highway starting from its junction with NH161 E near
Washim And connecting to Bhoyar Shelgoan Mangrulpir, Poghat, Karanja Kamargoan and
terminating Hiwara Bk on NH-53 in state of Maharashtra “is nominated as “NH 161 E” at sir
no 380 of Gazette notification.

Detailed Project Report

18
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Figure 1 Project Location

Detailed Project Report

19
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

3. STUDY APPROACH

Engineering services have followed the sequence proposed below to deliver the assignment
a. Survey & Investigation
b. Detailed Project Report & Bid document submission

Survey & Investigation

Submission of Final DPR Report

Submission of bid Document

Detail Project Report Stage

This approach allowed stepwise work with increasing levels of details, where each achieved
level was reviewed and commented or accepted by MORTH before the main work on the next
design level commenced. By this method, it was ensured that the design develops into the
direction set by MORTH and that the risk of rework is reduced for the benefit of both, MORTH
and the Consultant.
Consultancy Services for Preparation of Detailed Project Report (draft) of Four lanes with
paved shoulder configuration, Volume I –Main Report ; While preparing this report and
carrying out field activities, reference were taken from all the relevant Indian codes and
manuals as mentioned in the technical specification and in particular TOR. In the case of lack
of specific standards or guidelines for some of the field activities required in the TOR,
reference has been made to the major international, European or British standards
considering the most recent and effective ones.
In following section detailed project report delivery stages are briefly explained.

Detailed Project Report

20
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

3.1 Detailed Project Report

The alignment, size and cross section of the road approved in the Feasibility Study Stage. The
consultant informed the land acquisition data required to implement alignment change and
geometric improvement proposals. All necessary surveys, studies and site investigations were
carried out at site for preparation of Detailed Project Report. The Detailed Project Report
compiles all the information, data collected, and general layout of the project components.
Additionally, the Detailed Project Report includes the design criteria, analysis & design of civil
structures, pavement and the cost estimates. In line with prescribed design criteria, the
detailed design of structures has been carried out to establish structural details. Based on these
details, corresponding quantities have been worked out. The cost is then to be worked out
based on prevalent rates and SOR available for the area.
The engineering surveys and investigations have been carried out on the Project Road section
for pavement evaluation, following the relevant Specifications/Codes to generate adequate
database for preparing the most appropriate proposal for the rehabilitation / upgrading of the
existing highway.

Detailed Project Report

21
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

4 ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION AND ANALYSIS

4.1 Survey Investigations

The engineering surveys and investigations have been carried out on the Project Road section
for pavement evaluation, following the relevant Specifications/Codes to generate adequate
database for preparing the most appropriate proposal for the rehabilitation / upgrading of the
existing highway.
The various engineering surveys and investigations for the pavement which have been carried
out for the project are listed below:
 Road Inventory
 Pavement Condition
 Pavement Investigation through Test Pits .
 Soil and Materials Investigations.

4.2 Road Inventory Survey

A detailed road inventory was carried out to collect / update and / or supplement information
already available from secondary data and reconnaissance surveys. Annexure 1
The data/details for preparation of road inventory were collected from the project road, by
actual verification & measurements. The data so collected has been compiled in the format as
provided in IRC: SP: 19-2001, for every 200 m. The following parameters collected in the
prescribed formats.
1. Length : Minimum of 100 m section
2. Terrain : Plain / Rolling / Hilly
3. Land Use : Built up / Agriculture / Forest / Barren
4. Name of the Village : If any
5. Formation type : Cut / Fill / Cut-Fill / Fill-Cut / Level
6. Formation width : in meters
7. Carriageway type : BT/CC/GR/ER
8. Carriageway Width : in meters
9. Carriageway Condition Good/Fair/Poor/Very Poor
10. Shoulder type : BT/CC/GR/ER

Detailed Project Report

22
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

11. Shoulder width : in meters

12. Shoulder Condition : Good/Fair/Poor/Very Poor
13. Embankment Height: in meters
14. Details of Cross Roads: If any
15. Remarks : If any

Conclusion
The road inventory survey has been completed throughout the stretch of the project road. The
data so collected has been compiled in the order as provided in IRC: SP: 19-2001. From the
collected inventory it was observed that the carriageway width on the project road section
varies from 5.50 m to 7.00 m. Shoulders of earthen type with width varying from 1.00 m to
3.00 m along the project road section. The available Right of Way (ROW) varies from 24m -
30m.
The collected information for the entire road is set out in Volume –I

4.3 Pavement Condition Surveys

The visual condition survey has been carried out to record the pavement condition for entire
project road. This includes information on visible deficiencies and ongoing/recent
improvements. The existing pavement is flexible type; the visual condition survey represents
the state of the pavement. The condition survey has been prepared by considering the
following details: Annexure 2
 Subjective riding quality (Good/Average/Poor/Very Poor)
 Type and extent of cracks
 Rut Depth
 Potholes and Patching
 Raveling
 Shoulder Condition
The following section describes the various distress levels which have been recorded during
the pavement condition survey.

Cracking: Visual distresses in the form of cracks have been recorded on entire stretch, with

Detailed Project Report

23
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

the % area. The cracks classified to narrow and wide have been found at few places in the
entire length.
Raveling: Raveling which indicates the hungriness of surface has been noticed at many
locations.
Rutting: Rutting is the deformation of pavement layers under the movement of loads along
the wheel path.
complete set of Pavement Condition survey details are mentioned in Annexure.

Conclusion
The visual distresses in the form of cracks have been recorded on entire stretch, with the %
area. The cracks classified to narrow and wide have been found at few places in the entire
length. Raveling which indicates surface has been noticed at many locations. Rutting is the
deformation of pavement layers under the movement of loads along the wheel path is also
observed at few locations on the road

4.4 Inventory And Condition Survey of Bridges, Culverts and Other Structures
Project team carried out the visual condition survey of existing bridges and culverts as per
guidelines stipulated in IRC-SP: 35-1997. The project team inspected all the culverts, bridges
and other structures on the project road and recorded data using preform prepared for
carrying out the detailed condition survey. The deficiencies in the existing structures were
noted to ascertain the measures required for strengthening of the structure

4.5 Inventory Survey of Bridges and Culverts

Bridge inventory surveys were carried out as per IRC SP: 19-2005. The width of deck slab,
footpath etc was recorded in the prescribed format. Similar procedures were adopted for
culverts and other structures and recorded data annexed. List of minor bridges are provided
in the Table 4.1 . The condition and Inventory data for bridges and culverts has been
presented in Annexure 3.
4.6 Culverts
List of minor bridges are provided in the Table 1. The condition and Inventory data for
culverts has been presented in Annexure 4.

Detailed Project Report

24
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Table 11 List of Minor Bridges

Sr. Type of Structure No. of Span & Carriagewa
No Chainage Sub Super Span Length y Width in
Foundation
. structure structure in m m
1 74+566 --- RCC RCC 2*6 7.2
2 75+935 --- RCC RCC 1*6.5 7
3 76+250 --- RCC RCC 1*7.6 7
4 80+450 --- RCC RCC 2*6 7
5 85+390 --- RCC RCC 3*4.5 7.2
4*7.5+(3*120
6 94+170 --- RCC RCC 0 pipes on 7
both end)
7 97+556 --- RCC RCC 3*2.8 5.5
8 99+585 --- RCC RCC 5*7.3 5.7

Table 12 List of Pipe Culverts

Type of No. Size in Carriageway Width
Sr. No. Chainage
Structure Rows mm in m
1 79+300 HPC 1 900 7.2
2 84+012 HPC 3 1200 7
3 86+050 HPC 1 900 5.5
4 86+282 HPC 1 1000 5.5
5 86+640 HPC 1 1200 5.5
6 87+316 HPC 1 900 5.5
7 88+270 HPC 3 1200 5.5
8 88+607 HPC 3 1000 5.5
9 92+225 HPC 2 1000 5.5
10 93+293 HPC 1 1000 5.5
11 94+525 HPC 3 1000 5.5
12 94+860 HPC 2 900 5.5
13 95+673 HPC 2 900 5.5
14 96+955 HPC 3 900 5.5
15 98+140 HPC 3 1200 5.5
16 98+427 HPC 1 1000 5.5
17 99+970 Box type 4 1160*600 5.5
18 101+900 HPC 2 900 5.8
19 102+400 HPC 1 900 7.5

Detailed Project Report

25
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

5 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY

5.1 Topographic Survey

The basic objective of the topographic survey is to collect the essential ground features along
the alignment approved by NH MORTH PWD. The data collected will be useful for the detailed
design and for the computation of quantities.

To undertake the Topographic Survey of the area in earliest possible time, and to get a more
comprehensive visual representation of the project area, it is proposed to use the GPS/ Total
Station/ Auto Level to collect the Topographic Data of the Area, and using it to produce
topographic maps of the area.

The topographic survey work shall consist of reconnaissance survey, establishing DGPS
points, and detailed topographical survey to capture all details, preparation of drawing and
submission of report.
Initially a preliminary site assessment will be undertaken to understand the environment in
which the data will have to be collected. Based on this survey, separate survey teams will be
mobilized for fixing of control points and detailed survey.

5.2 Instruments to be used for Topographical Survey

The Topographic survey is undertaken by using Total Station Instrument and for Ground
Control Points, Total Station and GPS shall be used finally to develop a Digital Terrain Model
(DTM). The consultants being fully aware of the high standards aimed at for project
preparation and propose the use of the following latest instruments of high accuracy .

Digital Global Positioning System

The basic plan control points (Primary Points) will be established by dual frequency GPS
observation, using high precision DGPS equipment. The primary control points along the
proposed alignment shall be established on permanent reference pillars.
Total Stations
Total stations of Trimble 5500, Trimble 56/ Leica TS06/ Nikon DTM 652 of 1sec accuracy

Detailed Project Report

26
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

and/or Nikon DTM352/ Nikon Nivo/ Leica TC705/ Topcon GTS 235N of 5sec accuracy will be
deployed for topographic survey work, if required.

Digital / Auto levels

Digital / Auto levels of Trimble DiNi/ Leica Sprinter/ Sokkia C320 or equivalent with standard
deviation of 1 mm per 1 km double run levelling using bar coded telescopic levelling staves
with least count of 0.1 mm/ 0.5 mm will be deployed if required.

Fixing of Horizontal and Vertical Control Points

The horizontal and vertical control points shall be fixed using Global Positioning System along
the alignment on existing permanent features. In future, if need be, further reference pillars
can be established using these control points.

5.3 Detailed Topographic Survey

a. Site Assessment
Initially a preliminary site assessment will be undertaken to understand the environment in
which the Total Station data will have to be collected. The objectives of the site-visit are as
follows:
• Understand the topography, weather conditions, and general environment in which the land
survey needs to be undertaken
• Get to know obstructions and hazards posed by natural, or man-made structures in the survey
area
• Plan for contingency measures to deal with the hazards
• Gather inputs for detailed planning to execute the Total Station survey taking into
consideration the topography, weather conditions, general environment, obstructions,
and hazards
• Determine the logistical needs, and time-frame required for conducting the land survey in
the given area
• Plan the project execution from start to finish accurately so as to meet the client’s time
frame without delays.
 Drone videography conducted for the entire project stretch.

Detailed Project Report

27
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

b. Clearance from NH MORTH PWD for Topographic Survey

Formal permission and letters to concerned agency conveying the permissions and clearances
before any survey work commences on site shall be provided by MORTH . The Topographic
Survey shall commence on receipt of such letter.

c. Establishing Ground Control Points:

Establish GPS with High Precision DGPS instruments at every 5 Km intervals in pairs along the
alignment which covers intermediate point’s in-between. Additional Ground Control Point
(GCP) shall be established @ 2-3km in between the GPS point for getting the more accuracy in
horizontal traversing. The co-ordinate system shall be Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)
co-ordinate system in the relevant zones (43N).
Levels on the GPS shall be established by connecting them to GTS Bench Marks of Survey of
India or available Benchmarks in the project vicinity up to 5-10 Km which will be provided by
the Client and connecting it by Static DGPS Survey method / flying from GTS Bench mark to the
Project location shall be part of the scope. Closing errors shall be as per Codal provisions.

d. Brief Methodology for topographical survey of existing coastal highway alignment

• GPS Pillar fixing along with the Existing Road and proposed alignment/ bypasses and
submission of final data/ value for the same.

• TBM/ Reference Pillar will be fixed at every 250 m between two GPS Pillars. However values
will be written over some permanent structure also if available in between.

• Horizontal traverse will be done by forward and backward method between two GPS Pillars.
Error distribution and adjustment will be done with bearing calculation only not by the
distance method and submission of data/ value to client will be ensured. Traverse error should
not be more than 1 in 10000.

Detailed Project Report

28
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

• Vertical traverse will be done by forward and backward method with rise/ fall between two
GPS Pillars. Error distribution and adjustment will be done and submission of data/ value will
be ensured. The level accuracy will be ± 2 mm.

• Topographical survey between two GPS pillars after the vertical and horizontal traverse.
• Submission of Topographical survey base map.
• Reference pillar and Bench Mark size 15cm x 15cm x 45cm shall be precast in RCC of grade
M15 with a nail fixed in the center of the top surface. The BM pillar shall be embedded in
concrete up to a depth of 30cm with CC M10 (5 cm wide all around). The balance 15 cm above
ground shall be painted yellow and RL and BM No. marked on it with red paint. The spacing
shall be 250 m apart.
• TBM/ Reference Pillar shall be fixed at 250m interval. These are to be connected with GTS
BM.
• Benchmarks shall be also established on the top of Km stone and parapet of culverts in
addition to the TBM pillars fixed at 250m interval.
• GPS pillar of size 30cm x 30cm x 75cm shall be precast in RCC of grade M15 with a nail
fixed in the center of the top surface. The GPS pillar shall be embedded in concrete up to a
depth of 50cm with CC M15 (5 cm wide all around). The balanced 25 cm above ground
shall be painted yellow.
• GPS should be carried out before starting traversing which shall be controlled by DGPS. If
required, traverse should be repeated between GPS pillars. Minimum two receivers shall
be used.
• Maximum distance between 2 consecutive GPS Pillars shall not be more than 5 Km.
• All the values/ Data should be in UTM coordinate system and WGS – 84 datum.
• Demarcation/ staking out of boundary pillars locations as per Co-ordinates provided. The
Instruments to be used shall be high precision RTK DGPS (accuracy +/-10mm in X, Y & Z)
or equivalent technology. Demarcation shall be done with temporary peg marking
immediately followed by Fixing of RCC Pillars. It shall be ensured that the temporary pegs
will remain on ground till RCC Pillars are fixed. Staking out is mandatory in case of
Brownfield alignment, re-alignments and Bypasses. Boundary pillars shall fix along the

Detailed Project Report

29
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

proposed alignment on the extreme boundary on either side of highway at 50m interval.

e. Output of the Survey

• Detailed Topographic survey map in CAD format having features on the ground such as
roads, water bodies, railway lines, trees, electric poles, etc. along with contours
• Digital Terrain Model

Detailed Project Report

30
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

6 PAVEMENT INVESTIGATION

The project road has been proposed for Widening and Strengthening of the existing pavement
into four lane with paved shoulders / 4 lane configuration. The project road has been
investigated subjectively as well as objectively, for their structural and functional performance.
The various surveys / investigations of the pavement are discussed below:
• Test pit Investigations.

6.1 Test Pit Investigations

The objective of the investigations is to understand the composition and characteristics of the
existing pavement subgrade and the scope of work includes:
• Study of Pavement Composition
• Study for existing Base Course & Sub Base Course
• In-Situ Density at Subgrade
• Dynamic Cone Penetrometer Test at Sub grade Level.
• Collection Sub grade Samples for Laboratory Test

1. Methodology for Sub-grade Soil and Pavement Crust Investigations

Test pits of approx. 1.0 m X 1.0 X 1.0 m size along the edge of the existing pavement are
excavated up to Sub-grade level at every three Kilometres along the road alignment. These test
pits are excavated on the Shoulders extending about 10 cm in to the pavement.
The existing crust thickness and type of pavement component layers are measured and
recorded on exposed faces of the pavement.
2. Pavement Composition
Existing Pavement Crust Composition is recorded and reported in the following Table 13

Table 13 Pavement Composition

Existing Chainage Layer Configuration Total
WBM/WMM BT
74+500 300 70 370
75+500 300 70 370
78+550 330 70 400
79+550 300 70 370
80+550 400 70 470
81+550 350 60 410

Detailed Project Report

31
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

82+550 330 60 390

83+550 300 60 360
84+550 280 60 340
85+550 350 60 410
86+550 400 60 460
87+550 280 50 330
88+550 300 50 350
89+550 330 60 390
90+550 300 50 350
91+550 330 50 380
92+550 280 70 350
93+550 400 70 470
94+550 350 60 410
95+550 330 60 390
96+550 300 60 360
97+550 280 60 340
98+550 350 60 410
99+550 350 60 410
100+550 330 60 390
101+550 300 60 360
102+331 280 60 340

From the above tables, range of thickness of Pavement Layers as:

• Bituminous Layer - 50 mm to 100mm
• Base Course(WBM) - 260 mm to 430mm
• Total Crust Thickness - 210 mm to 510mm
Existing Subgrade Samples
Bulk sample of about 5 Kg was collected from all the test pits at subgrade ground level to
analyse the characteristics of the existing subgrade material.
The following laboratory tests were conducted for all the samples collected from the test pits.
 Grain Size Analysis (As per IS:2720-Part4)
 Atterberg Limit test (As per IS:2720-Part5)
 Standard Proctor tests (As per IS:2720-Part8)
 4-day Soaked CBR at 3 energy levels
The Laboratory California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were carried out on the test pit samples.
These tests are carried out in accordance with IS testing procedures IS-2720 Part XVI at three
energy levels low, medium and heavy; these are intended to simulate various possible
compaction efforts. Number of blows adopted for these three energy levels of compaction is 18,

Detailed Project Report

32
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

35 and 55 blows respectively. The Laboratory test results are shown in below table 14

Table 14Summary of Soil results locations

Range Unsoaked CCBR Soaked CBR

Maximum 25 22

Minimum 8 5

The test results indicate that the Soil is generally of greyish and brownish clayey silt with
gravels and sandy silt with gravels of classification of CI, ML-CL and GM-SM. Majority of the
soils are of clayey in nature.
Test pit Investigation Photographs

Figure 1 trial Pit Figure 2 trial Pit

Figure 3 Trail Pit Figure 4 Trail Pit

Detailed Project Report

33
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

6.2 Material Investigations

Survey Methodology
Road pavement component comprises of Sub-grade, Sub-base, base and Bituminous course and
Concrete pavement. Soil and aggregate are the prime material which are available naturally
and therefore its characteristics vary from place to place. In order to familiarize with the
resources, property and characteristics of these basic ingredients, material survey and
investigation was undertaken.
During material survey, various details were collected by interacting with local villagers,
material suppliers. Prospective borrow areas for soil, quarries / crushers / sources for stone
and sand were identified in the vicinity of project road.
Identification of Borrow and Quarry Sites
Borrow soil is majorly used in embankment and sub grade layer. Sub grade is a layer of soil
prepared to stand against load of road material, traffic load and environmental conditions. The
load on pavement is ultimately received by the sub grade soil for dispersion to the earth mass
below. Therefore, it is essential that at no time, sub grade soil is overstressed, meaning that the
pressure transmitted on the top of the sub grade should be within the allowable limit, not to
cause excessive stress condition or to deform the same beyond elastic limit. Soil that can be
used as sub grade and embankment is identified from various borrow area located in vicinity of
project road. Other information like average lead distance of borrow area from nearest point
on project road, nature and direction etc. is also obtained. Investigation of Borrow area for road
construction has been carried out to identify the potential sources for embankment fill material
and Sub grade material for new alignment.
Soil Borrow area identified during survey can be used for road embankment as well as for
Sub grade layer. The quarry chart is given in Appendix-6.
Table 15 Borrow Areas along the Project Road

S Existing Distance (Km) Village/Place Remarks

No Chainage(Km)
1 85+000 3.000 Kherda Private
2 74+351 2.200 Naregaon Private
3 92+300 2.00 Kinkhed phata Private
4 102+000 7.00 Murtizhapur (Akola Private
road)

Detailed Project Report

34
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Laboratory Investigations of Soil and Aggregates

The following tests were carried out on various materials samples, as described below.
A. Tests on Borrow Area soils
 Gradation test IS:2720 (Part-4)
 Atterberg limits IS:2720 (Part-5)
 Modified Proctor tests IS:2720 (Part-8)
 Soil classification IS:1498
 Soaked CBR tests (4 days soaked) at MDD&OMC IS:2720(Part-16)
B. Tests on Coarse Aggregates from Quarries
 Specific gravity test IS:2720 (Part-3)
 Water absorption test IS:2386 (Part-3)
 Aggregate Impact Value test IS:2386(Part-4)
 Flakiness & Elongation Indices IS:2386(Part-1)
C. Tests on Fine Aggregates from Quarries
 Specific Gravity
 Silt Content
 Gradation
 Fineness Modulus

Table 16 Stone Quarry Location (Kherda Plant)

S.no Village Distance from road
1 Nare gaon 8 km from Karanja
2 Anbhora 5 km from Murtizapur

6.3 Cement, Bitumen and Steel

Cement, Steel and are other important major construction materials required for the road project.
Sources for Cement is considered from Amravati, Murtizapur Akola and for Steel from Nagpur,
Amaravati with IS certification.
The Bulk Bitumen can be procured from Port Mumbai, Maharashtra which is about 585 Km from
center of the stretch.

Detailed Project Report

35
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

6.4 Summary

The findings of the investigations are summarized below:

 The existing pavement crust thickness is 210 mm to 510mm.
 The soaked CBR value of existing sub grade varies from 5.0% to26 %.
 The test results on materials from potential borrow areas along the roadside shows that
borrow materials are suitable for selected sub grade. Soaked CBR value of borrow area
soil varies from 7.5 % to 12 %. Hence design CBR of 8 % is recommended for the
pavement thickness design.
 Stone aggregates from the quarries shows positive results during tests, however during
construction the material should be checked/controlled for gradation, flakiness &
elongation index.
 Other quarry sources are shown in the lead chart. The test results performed on the
sample suggest that the material is suitable for the use in construction for bituminous
surfacing, base layer and for CD structures.
 Natural sources of sand exist at river beds of Godavari and Purna. The test results of the
samples collected from the above sources shows that it is suitable for use in roads and
bridges construction.
 Cement and steel with IS certification are indigenously available in abundance from
manufacturers and dealers.
 Bitumen of VG-10 and VG-30/40 viscosity grades are available from Mumbai
Refinery to be used for the Bituminous Courses of the Project Road.
 Source & lead chart of the materials such as sand and aggregate is shown in the lead
chart attached in Material report.

Detailed Project Report

36
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

7 TRAFFIC STUDIES & FORECAST DESIGN

7.1 Introduction

Traffic assessment has been carried out as part of Detailed Engineering Study for “Consultancy
Services for Detailed Project Report for the selected stretches / corridors of various Road
Networks of NH 161E in the State of Maharashtra, for up-gradation to two lane configurations for
Section –III Karanja to Murtizapur An accurate estimate of the traffic that is likely to use the
project road, when it is upgraded, is very important as it forms the basic input in its design and
operation. Analysis of the travel characteristics of vehicles using the project road is important in
traffic forecast. Hence, detailed traffic surveys have been carried out to assess the baseline
traffic characteristics onthe project road.

7.2 Objectives and Scope of work

The objective of the study is to assess the existing and future traffic on the project corridor.The
scope of the study includes:
 Identification of homogeneous traffic sections,
 Traffic estimation in terms of volume (AADT) and travel pattern on various
Homogeneous sections.
 Traffic forecast for pavement design;

 Improvement of Intersections and pedestrian facilities

The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MSRDC) has been entrusted with the
assignment of project management consultancy phase-I including conceiving of Detailed Project
Report of selected stretches corridors of National / State Highways in Maharashtra for four lanes
with paved shoulder configuration.
7.3 Project background
M/s. Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (Nation Highways Division Amravati Public Works
Department Govt of Maharashtra) has been awarded the work of Rehabilitation and Upgradation
2L+PS/4L of Karanja Kherda Murtizapur NH-361C (Design Ch Km 74/351 to Km 102/351) (Total
Length = 28.00 Km in the state of Maharashtra on EPC Mode. M/s. TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd. The
Project Road – NH361C (Karanja Murtizapur Road) starts from Karanja and ends at Murtizapur.
The key plan indicating the project road is presented in Figure

Detailed Project Report

37
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Figure 2 trail Pit

7.4 Project Corridor Map

Following types of traffic surveys at survey stations shall be as under

Table 17 Traffic Surveys Locations

S. No. Description of Activity Location of Survey Stations

1. Classified Traffic First station at- Km 99+950 (NH361C), Hathgaon
Volume Count Second station at Km 80+900 (NH361C)
Bhadsivni

2. Axle Load Spectrum First and second station At Km 80+900 (NH361C)

Bhadsivni
3. Origin-DestinationSurvey First station at Km 80+900 (NH361C) Bhadsivni
4. Turning MovementSurvey First Station at 85+800 Kherda junction
Second station at 74+351 Veer Sawarkar square
Karanja

7.5 Identification of Homogeneous Road Sections

The project road has been divided into four homogeneous road section on the basis of traffic
generation and dispersal nodes located along the road under study. Considering the traffic

Detailed Project Report

38
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

generation/ distribution points, total study area divided into three homogeneous road sections
for the purpose of analysis and presentation of traffic and travel characteristics. Table below gives
the details of the homogeneous sections defined for the study.

Figure 3 Traffic Survey Locations

Table 18 Segment of project alignment

Sr. No. Segment Design Chainage Village / Town Length
Name
From To From To
1. Segment– 74+351 85+800 Karanaja Kherda 11.44
(NH 161 C) Km
2 Segment 85+800 102+331 Kherda Murtizapur 16.53
(NH 361 C) Km

Table 19 Homogeneous Traffic Sections

Design Chainage Length
Section Highway Remark
Start (Km) End (Km) (Kms)
Karanja – Kherda 74+351 85+800 11.45 Km NH 161 C
Kherda – Murtizapur 85+800 102+331 16.53 Km NH 361 C

7.6 Primary Surveys –Schedule

To capture traffic flow characteristics, the following primary traffic surveys were conducted

Detailed Project Report

39
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

 Classified Traffic Volume Count (TVC)

 Axle Load Survey
 Turning Movement Survey
 Origin-Destination
Traffic survey stations for carrying out TVC and OD surveys were selected after a site
reconnaissance considering the following parameters:
The station should represent homogeneous traffic section
The station should be located in a reasonably level terrain with good visibility The traffic
survey scheduled is presented in Table 20

Table 20 Schedule of Traffic Survey

S. No. Type of Survey Survey Location/ Chainage (km) Date/
Location section
Hathgaon 9-11th January
Classified Traffic 99+950 -NH 361 C
1 TVC 1
Volume Count
. Bhadsivni 9-11th January
Survey 80+900 (NH361C)
TVC 2
Axle Load Survey Bhadsivni 9th January
80+900 (NH361C)
2 AL 1
Bhadsivni 10th January
80+900 (NH361C)
AL 2
Turning Movement Kherda 9th January
3 85+800 (NH361C)
Survey TMC 1 junction
. 9th January
Veer Sawarkar 85+800 (NH361C)
TMC 2 square Karanja

Origin and OD 1 Bhadsivni 9th January

4 80+900 (NH361C)
Destination Survey

7.6 Survey Methodology

Detailed Project Report

40
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Figure 4 Traffic Volume Count Location

7.7.1 Classified Traffic Volume Counts

The classified traffic volume counts carried out for 3 continuous days at the selected survey
stations as per IRC guidelines on the subject (IRC: 9-1972). The traffic count data analysed to
depict hourly and daily variations. The Abstract of traffic data provided for each survey station.
The following classes of vehicles captured:

Table 21Classes of vehicles

Sl. No. Motorised traffic
1 2 wheelers: Scooters, bikes, motor cycles and mopeds
2 3 wheelers including auto rickshaws
Fast Passenger

3 Car, Jeep, Taxi and Van

4 Mini bus
Vehicles

5 Bus Govt. bus

6 Private bus, school bus
7 Light commercial vehicles (LCV), Mini LCV
8 2 Axle truck
Fast Commercial

Truck
9 3 Axle truck
10 Multi Axle Truck (MAV)
Other
11 Agriculture Tractor, Tractor & Trailer
Vehicles
hic
les
ov

ve
in
m
w
Sl

12 Bicycle
o

Detailed Project Report

41
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Sl. No. Motorised traffic

13
Cycle rickshaw
14
Animal drawn
15 Hand cart

The TVC survey was conducted at two locations, in two homogeneous sections at locations
Hathgaon and Bhadsivni of the project road simultaneously. Traffic count was conducted
continuously for 3 consecutive days for 24 hours on each day at all three location

7.8 Data Analysis

7.8.1 Analysis of Traffic Volume Count

Data collected from the site were punched into the computer and analysed using spread sheet.
The various vehicle types having different sizes and characteristics were converted into a single
unit called passenger car unit.
Passenger Car equivalents for various vehicles are adopted based on recommendations of Indian
Road Congress prescribed in “Guidelines for Capacity of Roads in Rural areas”, IRC- 64-1990. The
passenger car unit values (PCU) used are presented in Table 22

Table 22 PCU Factors

Fast Vehicles Slow Vehicles
Vehicle Group PCU Factor Vehicle Group PCU Factor
2 wheelers 0.50 Bicycle 0.50
Auto Rickshaw 1.00 Cycle Rickshaw 2.00
Tempos/ Pickup 1.00 Animal Drawn 6.00
Car, jeep, taxi & van 1.00 Hand Cart 6.00
Mini Bus 1.50
Standard Bus 3.00
Light Goods Vehicle 1.50
2 – Axle Truck 3.00
3 – Axle Truck 3.00
Multi Axle Truck 4.50
Agriculture Tractor 1.50
Agriculture Tractor &Trailer 4.50

Source: IRC: 64-1990

Detailed Project Report

42
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

7.8.2 Fuel sales data and Seasonal variation

The seasonal factor is determined by taking the average sales divided by the monthly sales.
Location wise sales data which are obtained from different petrol pumps and the seasonal
variation factors calculated are given below in Table no.23

Table 23 Fuel sales data

Petrol Pump Average data 20-22
Month Average of Petrol Pumps Data Seasonal Correction Factors
Petrol in ltr Diesel in ltr Petrol in ltr Diesel in ltr
APRIL 48500 196250 0.82 1.32
MAY 49750 170250 0.84 1.14
JUNE 57250 203750 0.96 1.37
JULY 58000 88780.5 0.98 0.60
AUG 60250 96500 1.01 0.65
SEPT 58500 92150 0.98 0.62
OCT 56000 148900 0.94 1.00
NOV 78000 205000 1.31 1.38
DEC 73250 148250 1.23 0.99
JAN 63500 152500 1.07 1.02
FEB 54750 125000 0.92 0.84
MAR 55750 160750 0.94 1.08

The average factors for two petrol pumps data are 1.07and 1.02 for the month of JAN 2023. Hence
average Seasonal Factor of 1.5 is considered for the entire project road
7.8.3 Average Daily Traffic

Traffic volume count data for 3 days at each of the three locations was averaged to determine
Average Daily Traffic (ADT). The location wise ADT by vehicle type is presented in the Table24

Table 24 Average Daily Traffic at Hathgoan

Vehicle type Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 3 days Avg

Car/ Jeep/ Van (White Board) 1345 1360 1403 1369
Taxi 0 0 0 0
Two-Wheeler 6922 7168 7062 7051
3 Wheelers 369 341 330 347
Mini bus 0 0 0 0
School bus 0 0 0 0
Govt. Bus 143 152 151 149
Private Bus 0 0 0 0

Detailed Project Report

43
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Vehicle type Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 3 days Avg

LCV-4 Tyre 353 311 282 315
LCV-6 Tyre 67 56 48 57
2 Axle Truck 158 160 197 172
3 Axle Truck 104 102 110 105
Multi Axle (4 to 6 Axle) 339 339 381 353
Over Sized (7 or more Axle) 0 0 0 0
Tractor With Trailer 71 67 53 64
Tractor Without Trailer 0 0 0 0
Cycle (Slow moving) 0 0 0 0
Cycle Rickshaw (Slow moving) 0 0 0 0
Animal/ Hand Cart (Slow 0
moving) 0 0 0
Car (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 16 12 12 13
Bus (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 1 5 2 3
Truck (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 10 5 0 5
LCV (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 0 0 0 0
Total 9898 10078 10031 10002

0.00% Composition of Traffic

3.72% 0.64% 0.21%
1.49%
car
3.47% 6.30% 13.69%
two wheeler
3 wheeler
bus
lcv
70.49% Truck
Tractor

Figure 5 Percentage Composition of traffic category

Table 25Average Daily Traffic @ Bhadsivni

Vehicle type Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 3 days Avg
Car/ Jeep/ Van (White Board) 2073 1884 2054 2004
Taxi 0 0 0 0
Two-Wheeler 3549 3955 3669 3724
3 Wheelers 232 215 231 226
Mini bus 0 0 0 0
School bus 0 0 0 0
Govt. Bus 394 309 305 336

Detailed Project Report

44
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Private Bus 0 0 0 0
LCV-4 Tyre 443 443 440 442
LCV-6 Tyre 134 110 86 110
2 Axle Truck 412 392 397 400
3 Axle Truck 142 135 151 143
Multi Axle (4 to 6 Axle) 513 522 527 521
Over Sized (7 or more Axle) 0 0 0 0
Tractor With Trailer 39 46 65 50
Tractor Without Trailer 0 0 0 0
Cycle (Slow moving) 0 0 0 0
Cycle Rickshaw (Slow moving) 0 0 0 0
Animal/ Hand Cart (Slow
moving) 0 0 0 0
Car (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 16 12 12 13
Bus (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 1 5 2 3
Truck (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 10 5 0 5
LCV (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 0 0 0 0
Total 7958 8033 7939 7977

Composition of Traffic
0.26%
0.63% 0.00% car
6.92% 13.33% 25.12% two wheeler
4.21%
3 wheeler
2.83%
bus
46.69% lcv
Truck
Tractor

Figure 6 Percentage Composition of traffic category

Table 26 Shows the average hourly variation of vehicular traffic

Time TVC 1 at Hathgaon TVC 2 at Bhadsivni

0.00 1.00 56 90
1.00 2.00 51 93
2.00 3.00 55 97
3.00 4.00 64 112
4.00 5.00 83 94

Detailed Project Report

45
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

5.00 6.00 120 118

6.00 7.00 228 155
7.00 8.00 339 228
8.00 9.00 598 356
9.00 10.00 777 544
10.00 11.00 840 553
11.00 12.00 766 608
12.00 13.00 752 559
13.00 14.00 705 468
14.00 15.00 633 604
15.00 16.00 675 527
16.00 17.00 694 491
17.00 18.00 877 569
18.00 19.00 610 510
19.00 20.00 460 429
20.00 21.00 276 301
21.00 22.00 173 240
22.00 23.00 90 132
23.00 0.00 56 97
Total 10002 7977

Average hourly variation of vehicular traffic

1000
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
TVC1 TVC2

Figure 7 Average hourly variation of vehicular traffic

Average hourly Traffic for TVC 1 & 2 location is in Annexure 5 &6 respectively

7.8.3 Average Annual Daily Traffic

Table below gives the AADT at each of the 2 locations separately. The table also gives the total
vehicles, heavy and slow traffic. Remarkable changes in seasonal variation are not

Detailed Project Report

46
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

observed.

Table 27Average Annual Daily Traffic @ Bhadsivni

Annual Average Daily Traffic

PCU Factor Vehicle type TVC 1 at Hathgaon village
AADT PCU
1 Car/ Jeep/ Van (White
1432
Board) 1432
1 Taxi 0 0
0.5 Two-Wheeler 7530 3765
1 3 Wheelers 370 370
1.5 Mini bus 0 0
3 School bus 0 0
3 Govt. Bus 152 456
3 Private Bus 0 0
1.5 LCV-4 Tyre 323 485
1.5 LCV-6 Tyre 58 87
3 2 Axle Truck 176 528
3 3 Axle Truck 108 324
4.5 Multi Axle (4 to 6 Axle) 361 1625
4.5 Over Sized (7 or more Axle) 0 0
4.5 Tractor With Trailer 65 293
1.5 Tractor Without Trailer 0 0
0.5 Cycle (Slow moving) 0 0
2 Cycle Rickshaw (Slow
0
moving) 0
6 Animal/ Hand Cart (Slow
0
moving) 0
1 Car (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 14 14
3 Bus (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 3 9
3 Truck (Toll Exempt
5
Vehicles) 15
1.5 LCV (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 0 0
Total 10597 9402

Detailed Project Report

47
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Table 28 Average Annual Daily Traffic @ Hathgoan village

Annual Average Daily Traffic

PCU Factor Vehicle type TVC 2 at Bhadsivni
AADT PCU
1 Car/ Jeep/ Van (White Board) 2095 2095
1 Taxi 0 0
0.5 Two-Wheeler 3977 1989
1 3 Wheelers 241 241
1.5 Mini bus 0 0
3 School bus 0 0
3 Govt. Bus 344 1032
3 Private Bus 0 0
1.5 LCV-4 Tyre 452 679
1.5 LCV-6 Tyre 113 169
3 2 Axle Truck 410 1229
3 3 Axle Truck 146 438
4.5 Multi Axle (4 to 6 Axle) 533 2398
4.5 Over Sized (7 or more Axle) 0 0
4.5 Tractor With Trailer 51 230
1.5 Tractor Without Trailer 0 0
0.5 Cycle (Slow moving) 0 0
2 Cycle Rickshaw (Slow moving) 0 0
6 Animal/ Hand Cart (Slow
moving) 0 0
1 Car (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 14 14
3 Bus (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 3 8
3 Truck (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 5 15
1.5 LCV (Toll Exempt Vehicles) 0 0
Total 8384 10537
7.9 Axle Load Survey

Axle Load Survey was carried out for 2 days (24x2 Hours) in both directions at one location on
the project road. The main purpose for carrying out the survey was to assess the overloading
pattern on the corridor and to estimate Vehicle Damage Factor. During the survey, Axle load of
commercial vehicles, i.e. LCVs, 2-Axle, 3-Axle, Multi Axle Trucks and Buses, were weighed random
basis. The vehicles were stopped and the drivers were directed to stop their vehicles in such a

Detailed Project Report

48
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

way that wheel of each axle can be weighed using portable Axle Load Weighing Pad. The readings
were recorded by trained enumerators for each axle separately and the surveys were carried out
for 24x2

7.9.1 Definition

The intensity of traffic loading and the corresponding damaging factor of different categories of
vehicles is an important parameter for the design of pavements. The main objective of the axle
load survey is to determine a Vehicle Damaging Factor (VDF) of each commercial vehicle and
their axle load spectrum or axle load distribution and expected damage on pavement and extent
of over loading.

7.9.2 Vehicle Damaging Factor

The Vehicle Damaging factor (VDF) is an important indexing factor for characterizing the traffic
loading of the road. The VDF can easily be computed from the axle load data by the following
formula, provided sufficiently large and fairly distributed sample of vehicles are included in the
axle load Survey. The vehicle damage factor is a multiplier to convert the number of commercial
vehicles of different axle loads and axle configuration to the number of standard axle load
repetitions. It is defined as equivalent number of standard axle per commercial vehicle. The VDF
varies with the vehicle axle configuration, axle loading, Terrain, type of road and from region to
region.

Single axle with single wheel on either side = (axle load in KN / 65 ) ^4

Single axle with dual wheel on either side = (axle load in kg /80 ) ^4

Tandem axle with dual wheel on either side = (axle load in kg /148 ) ^4

Tridem axle with dual wheel on either side = (axle load in kg /224) ^4

The rule states that damaging power of an axle load increases roughly as fourth power with the
weight of an axle. Any single axle load less than 8200kg is some fractional EAL, where any greater
single load is some multiple of EAL. In order to convert axle loads, from axle load surveys into EAL,
these are usually grouped into the intervals of 1000kg and the frequency of each vehicle intervals is
found out. Equivalencies factors are obtained are obtained for each category from “Fourth Power”

Detailed Project Report

49
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

rule. Product of frequency factors gives the EAL for that

weight class of the sample. Summation of EALs of all categories gives the total of EAL for a particular
load meter survey.

The vehicle damage factors arrived and adopted for commercial vehicles are will be used in pavement
design.

To estimate the Vehicle Damage Factor (mode wise) in either direction as well as a weighted value for
both directions. The equivalency factor derived from the “fourth power rule” to achieve the
Equivalent Standard Axle Load for the respective vehicle type. Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) for the
locations for each type of vehicle is given in Table 29&30

Table 29Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) at Bhadsivni Day 1

Kherda-karanja Karanja
Type of
Kherda
Vehicles
LCV 4 0.033 0.465
LCV 6 0.166 0.411
2 Axle 1.072 2.763
Bus 0.141 0.169
3 Axle 2.564 1.822
4 Axle 6.390 3.562
5 Axle 5.898 4.828
6 Axle 0.450 0.425

Table 30Vehicle Damage Factor (VDF) at Bhadsivni Day 2

Kherda-karanja karanja-
Type of
kherda
Vehicles
LCV 4 0.012 0.021
LCV 6 0.027 0.300
LMV 0.004 0.024
2A 0.567 0.608
3 Axle 1.716 2.814
4 Axle 3.610 2.466
5 Axle 1.847 12.911
6 Axle 3.744 13.906
From the above Two tables it was observed that the vehicle damage factors for commercial
vehicles are more. The computations of VDF for each direction and for each location are given

Detailed Project Report

50
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Figure 8 Axle load Test

7.10 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNT (TMC)

7.10.1 Sawarkar Chowk

Data analysis of turning movements at major junction reveals that peak hour is observed at 17:00
to 18:00. The traffic and PCUs observed at the location are 878 and 1052 respectively. Turning
movement data diagram showing flow of traffic at each arm of intersection in peak hour is
presented Annexure 7

Figure 9 TMC @ Sawarkar Chowk

Detailed Project Report

51
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Table 31Traffic at Sawarkar Chowk

Traffic In PCUs
Type of Intersection: 4-arm
Sr. Peak Hour Total Peak Hour
Direction
No. Traffic Traffic Factor
1 ALL DIRECTION 878 13765 8%

Hourly Variation of Traffic

1200
1052
958
1000 862 856
816 804 846 878
805
762 726 736 756 795 765
800 666 689 657
640 640 609 622
554 520
600 505
400
340 306 306 352 335 338 335
400 293 271 294 259
246
199 182 205
135 150 163
200 92 107 125 130

Total vehicles Total PCUs

Figure 10Hourly Variation of Traffic @ Sawarkar Chowk

7.10.2 Kherda Chowk

Data analysis of turning movements at major junction reveals that peak hour is observed at 12:00
to 13:00. The traffic and PCUs observed at the location are 403 and 491 respectively. Turning
movement data diagram showing flow of traffic at each arm of intersection in peak hour is
presented . Annexure 8

Detailed Project Report

52
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Figure 11TMC @ Kherdra Chowk

Table 32Traffic at KHERDA CHOWK

Traffic In PCUs
Type of Intersection: 4-arm
Sr. No. Direction Peak Hour Traffic Total Traffic Peak Hour Factor
1 ALL DIRECTION 491 7956 6%

Hourly Variation of Traffic

1000 466 476 491 450 457 440 487 451
900 423 431 425
800 378 355
700
600 296 289
500 378 354 383 403 388 362 380 393 360 395 350 278 259 252
400 290 290 176
300 223 188 142 127 137 120 154
141 127 136
200 80 50 51 52 44 79
100
0

Total vehicles Total PCUs

Figure 12Hourly Variation of Traffic @ Kherda Chowk

Detailed Project Report

53
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

7.11 OD Analysis
The information pertaining to origin and destination of trips collected during roadside interview was
analyzed to obtain the trip distribution based on a zoning system suitably designed for the present
study. The analysis of O-D data starts with coding of zones, i.e., categorizing the traffic with respect to
its origin and destination as in Annexure 9and 10. These origins and destinations depend on their
distance from the project road are assigned to a region in terms of local, district and state. These
regions are designated with unique code. These zones have been selected keeping in view of the
proximity to State Highway alignment and the road network in the region. The details of traffic zone
codes adopted for the study are compiled in Table 33

Table 33 Zoning System for Bhadsivni (CH-82+500) location

Zone LOCATION
Code
1 BANOSA, BHADSHIVNI ,JITAPUR, KINKHED, MURTIZAPUR ,VALAI ,VILEGAON
2 BODEGAON, DARWHA ,HATGAON, INZORI, KARANJA, LOHI, MANGRULPIR YAVATMAL
3 HINGOLI, RISOD ,WASHIM
4 PUSAD ,UMARKHED
5 ADILABAD ,BALLARPUR, CHANDRAPUR, RAJURA ,RAMPUR ,WANI WARORA
6 NAGTHANA,WARDHA
7 BUTIBORI, NAGPUR
8 AMRAVATI ,MORSHI
9 AKOLAKH, AMGAON, SHEGAON, SONALA
10 GAULKHED ,KHERDA
BHUSALWAL, BIDGAON, JAMTHI
11
12 AURANGABAD, JALNA
13 AHMEDPUR, DEGLOOR, LATUR, NANDED
14 MALEGAON, MANMAD ,NASHIK
15 MUMBAI
16 SOLAPUR
17 BETUL, BHOPAL, CHHINDWARA ,INDORE, ITARSI, NARSINGHPUR, VIDISHA
18 AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT ,VAPI
19 HYDERABAD, KHANAPUR ,NIZAMABAD
BAGAYAT
20
21 RAIPUR
22 JAIPUR KOTA
AGRA JALALPUR
23
24 SHIVAN
25 DELHI
26 JINDAL

Detailed Project Report

54
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Figure 13Zoning System for Bhadsivni (CH-82+500) location

Detailed Project Report

55
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

7 .12 Traffic Forecast

Traffic Growth on a road facility is generally estimated on the basis of historical trends. Demand
changes are usually because of shifts in the pattern of economic activities in the surrounding regions.
The present study; attempt has been made to assess the traffic growth rate adopting the following
three methods.

• Past trend in traffic growth on the project road/Vehicle Registration in the state,

•Time series data on population, state income (NSDP) and per capita income (PCI)

for project influence area

• MORT&H manual for 4-laning

The investment priorities are governed by the traffic demand, assessed benefits and cost of the
project. Demand plays the important role, which governs the type of facility / infrastructure to be
created. This in turn determines likely benefits and costs to develop the same. Prediction of traffic
demand becomes an important task and has to be carried out near accurately. The accurate
estimation of traffic has direct bearing on design of the facility and the viability of project. Recognizing
this, efforts are made to carefully assess all the parameters that help in predicting the traffic demand
in future.

For the design of pavement and to plan for the future maintenance programme and for economic
evaluation, it is necessary to have realistic estimate of the size of traffic in the design period of 30
years. Traffic forecasting is made by determining the past trend of traffic flow along the corridor and
by use of economic models developed to co-relate past vehicle registration data and economic
indicators such as per capita income (PCI), gross state domestic product (GSDP) and gross domestic
product (GDP). By using the elasticity values obtained from the economic models and the likely rate of
growth of indicators, the mode wise growth rates are obtained. Applying this growth rates, future
traffic volume is estimated.

7.12.1 Project Influence Area (PIA)

Outlining the project influence area is essential for the estimation of traffic growth rates; because the
socio-economic indicators of the project influence area influence the traffic growth on the project

Detailed Project Report

56
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

road. The project influence area has been assessed based on the O-D data.

From the O-D analysis results, it is seen that mainly the trips by different modes are being generated
mostly in Maharashtra State, hence the socio-economic indicators such as NSDP, population and
Vehicle registration data of Maharashtra state has been considered for estimation of Traffic growth
rate.

Table 34 PROJECT INFLUENCE AREA

S. Car Bus LCV Truck
State
No.
1 Maharashtra 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%

7.12.2 Past Traffic Growth

In absence of Past Traffic Data on the Project stretch, the socio-economic indicators such as NSDP, Per
capita income, population and Vehicle registration data has been considered for estimation of Traffic
growth rate which is discussed in further sections.

7.12.3 Socio-Economic Indicators of PIA

The socio-economic indicators of Maharashtra state such as Net State Domestic Product (NSDP), Per
capita Income, Population, and Vehicle Registration by vehicle type for PIA has been collected from
various secondary sources for its use in the estimation of traffic growth rates. These have been
summarized in Table 35
Table 35Economic Parameters for PIA

Maharashtra
NSDP PCI
(in Rs. Crores at Constant Prices, (in Rs. Crores at
Population
Year 2011-12 ) Constant Prices,
(Numbers)
2011-12 base)
2014-15 1345341 131770 102098000
2015-16 1452513 140451 103418000
2016-17 1596121 152510 104657000
2017-18 1686980 159305 105896000
2018-19 1789838 167065 107134000
(Source: National Statistical Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of

Detailed Project Report

57
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

India.)
PIA being different for different modes of traffic, weighted averages of socio-economic variables such
as NSDP, PCI and Population for the PIA of that mode of traffic has been estimated by weighted
average method based on the relative contribution of trips by each region. The estimated growth
rates of weighted averages of NSDP and Population for various modes of traffic is given Table 36
Table 36 Growth of weighted average of NSDP & Population

Year NSDP PCI Population

2014-15 - - -
2015-16 7.38% 6.6% 1.03%
2016-17 9.00% 8.6% 0.95%
2017-18 5.39% 4.5% 0.94%
2018-19 5.75% 4.9% 0.93%

Percentage Average Growth

6.88% 6.10% 0.96%
rate

7.12.4 Vehicle Registration in PIA

Vehicle registration data has also been collected for various regions of PIA. These are presented in
Table 37
Table 37Registered Vehicles in PIA (Numbers)

Year CARS BUSES LCV TRUCKS MAV

2014-15 31,13,773 1,20,750 8,68,632 4,47,675 43,907

2015-16 34,06,872 1,31,183 9,27,903 4,19,519 49,291
2016-17 37,15,744 1,61,289 9,74,527 4,41,802 54,637
2017-18 40,50,681 1,51,707 10,37,242 4,79,446 57,718
2018-19 43,47,089 1,60,907 11,15,878 5,20,878 62,961
(Source: Transport Commissioner, Government of Maharashtra, Mumbai)

7.12.5 Elasticity of Traffic Growth

Passenger traffic demand is a function of growth of population, per capita income and growth of the
state. Similarly, state income growth and industrial, mining and agriculture production mostly

Detailed Project Report

58
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

governs the freight traffic growth. In line with this philosophy, we have estimated the elasticity of
traffic demand for bus with respect to the PCI and that of trucks with respect to NSDP. The resultant
elasticity values are presented in Table38
Table 38 Summary of Regression Results

Vehicle Independent R-
Elasticity, e
Type Variable square

Car NSDP 1.16 0.99

Bus Population 7.50 0.77

LCV NSDP 0.84 0.97

Trucks NSDP 0.57 0.61

MAV NSDP 1.22 0.99

The ‘e’ values shown in the Table gives a substantial co-relation between economic indicators and
traffic growth rates as reflected in their R2 and elasticity values. Hence, it is appropriate to consider
the growth pattern that has emerged out of the economic model that relates to the economic growth
with the growth in registration of vehicles.

7.12.4 Estimation of Growth Rates

Based on the moderated elasticity values and the projected economic/demographic indicators, the
future average annual compound traffic growth rates by vehicle type have been estimated by using
the following formulae:

Cars

Tgr = (NSDPgr) x E

Where,

Tgr – Traffic growth rate

Detailed Project Report

59
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

NSDPgr –Net State Domestic Product growth rate

E – Elasticity value

Buses

Tgr = (Popgr) x E

Where,

Tgr – Traffic growth rate

Popgr – Population growth rate

E –Elasticity value

Truck

Tgr = (NSDPgr) x E

Where,

Tgr – Traffic growth rate

NSDPgr – Net State Domestic Product growth rate

E – Elasticity value

NSDP growth rates have been used for the estimation of Cars and trucks traffic growth rates and
Population growth rates have been used for the growth rate estimation of buses for the regions within
the Project Influence Area. The traffic growth rates for the project road have been established by
calculating the weighted average of the PIA traffic growth rates in proportion to their share of traffic
on the project road.

The traffic growth rates estimated based on the above recommended transport demand elasticity’s
and socio-economic indicators. For the purpose of traffic forecasts, keeping in mind various

Detailed Project Report

60
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

uncertainties, like, slow down or accelerated growth of PIA, alternative roads/modes, etc., the traffic
growth rates have estimated under three scenarios, namely:

 Realistic scenario – based on the recommended socio-economic variables and elasticity estimates

 Optimistic scenario – growth rates 5% more than realistic scenario

 Pessimistic scenario – growth rates 5% less than realistic scenario

Estimates of traffic growth rates under the above three scenarios are given in Table 39.
Table 39 Traffic Growth Rate Estimates %

‘Realistic’ Scenario
Year Car Bus LCV Truck MAV
2022-25 7.30% 4.53% 4.96% 4.10% 4.89%
2026-30 6.60% 4.31% 3.95% 3.27% 3.90%
2031-35 6.60% 4.13% 3.92% 3.24% 3.86%
2036-40 6.60% 3.97% 3.91% 3.24% 3.86%
2041-45 6.00% 3.82% 3.60% 2.98% 3.55%
2046-50 6.00% 3.68% 3.60% 2.98% 3.55%
beyond 2050 5.83% 0.00% 3.48% 2.88% 3.43%
Pessimistic Scenario
Year Car Bus LCV Truck MAV
2022-25 6.94% 4.30% 4.71% 3.90% 4.64%
2026-30 6.27% 4.10% 3.76% 3.11% 3.70%
2031-35 6.27% 3.93% 3.72% 3.08% 3.67%
2036-40 6.27% 3.77% 3.72% 3.08% 3.66%
2041-45 5.70% 3.63% 3.42% 2.83% 3.37%
2046-50 5.70% 3.49% 3.42% 2.83% 3.37%
beyond 2050 5.54% 0.00% 3.30% 2.73% 3.25%
Optimistic Scenario
Year Car Bus LCV Truck MAV
2022-25 7.67% 4.76% 5.21% 4.31% 5.13%
2026-30 6.93% 4.53% 4.15% 3.44% 4.09%
2031-35 6.93% 4.34% 4.11% 3.40% 4.05%
2036-40 6.93% 4.17% 4.11% 3.40% 4.05%
2041-45 6.30% 4.01% 3.78% 3.13% 3.73%
2046-50 6.30% 3.86% 3.78% 3.13% 3.73%
beyond 2050 6.12% 0.00% 3.65% 3.02% 3.60%
Table 40Recommended Traffic Growth Rates %

Detailed Project Report

61
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Year Car Bus LCV Truck MAV

2022-25 7.30% 4.53% 4.96% 4.10% 4.89%
2026-30 6.60% 4.31% 3.95% 3.27% 3.90%
2031-35 6.60% 4.13% 3.92% 3.24% 3.86%
2036-40 6.60% 3.97% 3.91% 3.24% 3.86%
2041-45 6.00% 3.82% 3.60% 2.98% 3.55%
2046-50 6.00% 3.68% 3.60% 2.98% 3.55%
beyond 2050 5.83% 0.00% 3.48% 2.88% 3.43%
As pr clause no.5.5.4 of IRC: SP: 73-2018, “The Concessionaire shall adopt a realistic value of the rate
of traffic growth, provided that annual rate of growth of commercial vehicles adopted shall not be less
than 5 percent”. Accordingly, the final traffic growth rates for the project corridor are presented in
Table 41
Table 41Adopted Traffic Growth Rates %

Year Car Bus LCV Truck MAV

2022-25 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
2026-30 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
2031-35 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
2036-40 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
2041-45 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
2046-50 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
beyond 5.00%
5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00%
2050

7.12.5 Traffic Projection

The classified traffic volume of 2023 has been used for forecasting the traffic (only Commercial
Vehicles per day i.e CVPD forecasted for the Pavement Desito 2055using the growth rates given in
Table . Forecasting has been done based on realistic growth rates of one location

Detailed Project Report

62
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Table 42 Traffic forecasting TVC 1 @ Hathgoan (Kherda – Murtizapur both the directions

Fast Passenger Vehicles Motorized Vehicles Slow Moving Vehicles Toll Exempt Vehicles
Car/ Tractor Animal/
Two 3 Mini LCV LCV 2A 3A Cyckle
Year Taxi/ jeep Bus MAV without Cycle Hand Car Bus Truck LCV vehiclesTotal PCUS
Wheeler Wheelers Bus 4 6 Truck Truck Rickshaw
Van Trailer Cart
2023 1432 0 7530 370 0 152 323 58 176 108 426 0 0 0 0 14 3 5 0 10597 9402
2024 1504 0 7906 389 0 160 339 61 184 113 448 0 0 0 0 15 3 5 0 11127 9872
2025 1579 0 8302 408 0 168 356 64 194 119 470 0 0 0 0 15 3 6 0 11683 10366
2026 1658 0 8717 429 0 176 374 68 203 125 494 0 0 0 0 16 3 6 0 12267 10884
2027 1741 0 9153 450 0 185 392 71 214 131 518 0 0 0 0 17 3 6 0 12881 11428
2028 1828 0 9610 473 0 194 412 74 224 138 544 0 0 0 0 18 3 7 0 13525 12000
2029 1919 0 10091 496 0 204 432 78 235 144 571 0 0 0 0 19 4 7 0 14201 12600
2030 2015 0 10595 521 0 214 454 82 247 152 600 0 0 0 0 20 4 7 0 14911 13230
2031 2116 0 11125 547 0 225 477 86 260 159 630 0 0 0 0 21 4 8 0 15657 13891
2032 2221 0 11681 574 0 236 501 90 273 167 662 0 0 0 0 22 4 8 0 16439 14586
2033 2332 0 12265 603 0 248 526 95 286 176 695 0 0 0 0 23 4 8 0 17261 15315
2034 2449 0 12879 633 0 260 552 100 300 184 729 0 0 0 0 24 5 9 0 18125 16081
2035 2572 0 13523 665 0 273 580 105 316 194 766 0 0 0 0 25 5 9 0 19031 16885
2036 2700 0 14199 698 0 287 609 110 331 203 804 0 0 0 0 26 5 10 0 19982 17729
2037 2835 0 14909 733 0 301 639 116 348 213 844 0 0 0 0 28 5 10 0 20981 18616
2038 2977 0 15654 770 0 316 671 121 365 224 887 0 0 0 0 29 6 11 0 22030 19546
2039 3126 0 16437 808 0 332 704 127 384 235 931 0 0 0 0 30 6 11 0 23132 20524
2040 3282 0 17259 849 0 349 740 134 403 247 977 0 0 0 0 32 6 12 0 24289 21550
2041 3446 0 18122 891 0 366 777 140 423 259 1026 0 0 0 0 34 7 12 0 25503 22627
2042 3618 0 19028 936 0 384 816 147 444 272 1078 0 0 0 0 35 7 13 0 26778 23759
2043 3799 0 19979 982 0 404 856 155 466 286 1131 0 0 0 0 37 7 14 0 28117 24947
2044 3989 0 20978 1031 0 424 899 163 489 300 1188 0 0 0 0 39 8 14 0 29523 26194
2045 4189 0 22027 1083 0 445 944 171 514 315 1247 0 0 0 0 41 8 15 0 30999 27504
2046 4398 0 23128 1137 0 467 991 179 540 331 1310 0 0 0 0 43 8 16 0 32549 28879
2047 4618 0 24285 1194 0 491 1041 188 567 348 1375 0 0 0 0 45 9 17 0 34176 30323
2048 4849 0 25499 1254 0 515 1093 198 595 365 1444 0 0 0 0 47 9 17 0 35885 31839
2049 5091 0 26774 1316 0 541 1148 207 625 383 1516 0 0 0 0 50 10 18 0 37680 33431
2050 5346 0 28113 1382 0 568 1205 218 656 402 1592 0 0 0 0 52 10 19 0 39564 35102
2051 5613 0 29518 1451 0 596 1265 229 689 423 1672 0 0 0 0 55 11 20 0 41542 36857
2052 5894 0 30994 1524 0 626 1328 240 723 444 1755 0 0 0 0 57 11 21 0 43619 38700
2053 6189 0 32544 1600 0 658 1395 252 759 466 1843 0 0 0 0 60 12 22 0 45800 40635
2054 6498 0 34171 1680 0 690 1465 265 797 489 1935 0 0 0 0 63 12 23 0 48090 42667
2055 6823 0 35880 1764 0 725 1538 278 837 514 2032 0 0 0 0 66 13 24 0 50494 44800

Detailed Project Report

63
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Table 43 Traffic forecasting TVC 2 @ Bhadsivni (Karanja – Kherda both the directions)
Slow Moving
Fast Passenger Vehicles Motorized Vehicles Toll Exempt Vehicles
Vehicles
Car/ Tractor Animal/
Two 3 Mini LCV LCV 2A 3A Cyckle
Year Taxi/ jeep Bus MAV without Cycle Hand Car Bus Truck LCV Total PCUS
Wheeler Wheelers Bus 4 6 Truck Truck Rickshaw
Van Trailer Cart
2023 2095 0 3977 241 0 344 452 113 410 146 584 0 0 0 0 14 3 5 0 8384 10537
2024 2200 0 4176 253 0 361 475 118 430 153 613 0 0 0 0 15 3 5 0 8804 11064
2025 2310 0 4385 266 0 379 499 124 452 161 644 0 0 0 0 15 3 6 0 9244 11617
2026 2426 0 4604 279 0 398 524 130 474 169 676 0 0 0 0 16 3 6 0 9706 12198
2027 2547 0 4835 293 0 418 550 137 498 177 710 0 0 0 0 17 3 6 0 10191 12808
2028 2674 0 5076 308 0 439 577 144 523 186 745 0 0 0 0 18 3 7 0 10701 13449
2029 2808 0 5330 323 0 461 606 151 549 196 783 0 0 0 0 19 4 7 0 11236 14121
2030 2948 0 5597 340 0 484 637 158 577 205 822 0 0 0 0 20 4 7 0 11798 14827
2031 3096 0 5877 357 0 508 668 166 605 216 863 0 0 0 0 21 4 8 0 12388 15568
2032 3250 0 6170 374 0 533 702 175 636 227 906 0 0 0 0 22 4 8 0 13007 16347
2033 3413 0 6479 393 0 560 737 183 667 238 951 0 0 0 0 23 4 8 0 13657 17164
2034 3584 0 6803 413 0 588 774 193 701 250 999 0 0 0 0 24 5 9 0 14340 18022
2035 3763 0 7143 433 0 618 812 202 736 262 1049 0 0 0 0 25 5 9 0 15057 18923
2036 3951 0 7500 455 0 648 853 212 773 275 1101 0 0 0 0 26 5 10 0 15810 19870
2037 4148 0 7875 478 0 681 896 223 811 289 1156 0 0 0 0 28 5 10 0 16601 20863
2038 4356 0 8269 502 0 715 940 234 852 304 1214 0 0 0 0 29 6 11 0 17431 21906
2039 4574 0 8682 527 0 751 987 246 894 319 1275 0 0 0 0 30 6 11 0 18302 23002
2040 4802 0 9116 553 0 788 1037 258 939 335 1339 0 0 0 0 32 6 12 0 19217 24152
2041 5042 0 9572 581 0 828 1089 271 986 351 1406 0 0 0 0 34 7 12 0 20178 25359
2042 5295 0 10051 610 0 869 1143 284 1035 369 1476 0 0 0 0 35 7 13 0 21187 26627
2043 5559 0 10553 640 0 912 1200 299 1087 387 1550 0 0 0 0 37 7 14 0 22247 27959
2044 5837 0 11081 672 0 958 1260 314 1141 407 1627 0 0 0 0 39 8 14 0 23359 29356
2045 6129 0 11635 706 0 1006 1323 329 1199 427 1708 0 0 0 0 41 8 15 0 24527 30824
2046 6436 0 12217 741 0 1056 1389 346 1258 448 1794 0 0 0 0 43 8 16 0 25753 32366
2047 6757 0 12828 778 0 1109 1459 363 1321 471 1884 0 0 0 0 45 9 17 0 27041 33984
2048 7095 0 13469 817 0 1164 1532 381 1387 494 1978 0 0 0 0 47 9 17 0 28393 35683
2049 7450 0 14143 858 0 1223 1608 400 1457 519 2077 0 0 0 0 50 10 18 0 29813 37467
2050 7823 0 14850 901 0 1284 1689 420 1530 545 2181 0 0 0 0 52 10 19 0 31303 39340
2051 8214 0 15592 946 0 1348 1773 441 1606 572 2290 0 0 0 0 55 11 20 0 32868 41308
2052 8624 0 16372 993 0 1415 1862 463 1686 601 2404 0 0 0 0 57 11 21 0 34512 43373
2053 9056 0 17191 1043 0 1486 1955 487 1771 631 2524 0 0 0 0 60 12 22 0 36237 45542
2054 9508 0 18050 1095 0 1561 2053 511 1859 663 2650 0 0 0 0 63 12 23 0 38049 47819
2055 9984 0 18953 1150 0 1639 2155 536 1952 696 2783 0 0 0 0 66 13 24 0 39952 50210

Detail Project Report 64

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

7.13 Capacity Analysis

Traffic projection has been done as per IRC: 108 and projected at each location and is
explained in detail in this report.

The traffic projections during the design life of project emphasize the requirement of 4-
lanes configuration for our proposed corridor in conformance to MORTH As per above
mentioned Circular, capacity augmentation of 2-lanes to 4-lanes is necessitated when the
project road traffic exceeds 10,000PCU in Plain terrain. As per conducted traffic surveys, the
requirement of 4-lanes criteria is achieved at following year for each homogenous section.
Table 44 Capacity Analysis

Year requiring
Estimated Base Traffic exceeding
Homogenous Section capacity
Year Traffic 10,000 PCU
augmentation
Kherda – Murtizapur 9402 10366 2025
Karanja – Kherda 10537 2023

Hence, considering the construction phase of 2 years in addition to the base year, year of
operation for project corridor is assumed to be 2025 where it will be open to traffic. Hence,
provision of 4-lanes traffic is justified for project corridor.

The results from TMC survey inferred that no grade separated facility is needed at surveyed
junctions and junction development with appropriate signage and lighting shall suffice the
requirement.

Detail Project Report 65

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

8. DESIGN STANDARDS

8.1 General:
Design plays a vital role in ensuring smooth and safe functioning of the project corridor. Every
element of the road needs to be designed in such a manner that it is cost effective and increases
road user comfort and safety. Basic objectives of good functional road design are to arrange the
physical elements of the roadway to meet traffic volume, safety and vehicle operating cost
requirement of drivers and vehicles.
MORTH has planned to improve highways in the state of Maharashtra. Improvements envisaged
are geometric, structural and overall safety consideration to ensure smooth, safe and faster
movement of vehicles. The improvements proposals are envisaged to confirm to the standards
specified in IRC SP 84:2019.
Following major aspects are explained in this chapter
 Geometric design
 Cross sectional Elements
 Pavement Standards
 Road furniture and appurtenances
 Safety features
 Proposed Improvement Standards in wildlife area
 Hydrology, hydraulics & drainage
 Bridges with new construction, widening & reconstruction
 At grade intersections

8.2 Terrain Classification

Following terrain classification recommended by IRC: SP: 84-2019, illustrated in Table 45 , is
proposed to be adopted. The geometric designs will be prepared based on IRC: SP: 84-2019.
Table 45Cross Slope of the Country

Terrain Type Percentage Cross Slope of the Country

Plain and Rolling Up to 25
Mountainous and Steep More than 25

According to this all the stretch falls in Plain region.

Detail Project Report 66

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

8.3 Design Speed

Design speed is the basic parameter, which governs the geometric characteristics of the road. It
is related to the function of the road and terrain conditions. Design speed based on the function
of the road and terrain condition as per IRC: SP: 84-2019.
However, the proposed Highway will be a Rehabilitated & upgraded to four lane paved shoulder
with a design speed of 100/80 kmph.
Whereas in some curve portions speeds have been reduced (refer schedule-D for details) &
speed restriction signs has been given to those stretches.

8.4Cross-Sectional Elements
a. Lane Width
The standard lane width of project highway shall be 3.5 m.

b. Median
For 4-Lane divided carriageway the median were raised and the width of median shall be 5m
including kerb shyness of 0.50m either side.

c. Paved Shoulders
A paved shoulder also allows some extra flexibility should a motorist need to take evasive action,
as it is a buffer area between the main thoroughfare and the edge of the road. Width of paved
shoulder proposed to be 1.5 m. This will provide better and safer traffic operational conditions
and facility of directly using these as part of carriageway when the widening has been done.

d. Earthen Shoulders
Earthen shoulders of minimum 1.5 m width have been proposed on both sides as per Typical
Cross Section.

e. Crossfall
The crossfall on straight sections of Road carriageway shall be as given in Table
Table 46 Cross fall of Different Surfaces

Type of Surface
Cross Sectional Element
Bituminous Concrete
Carriageway, Paved
shoulders, Edge Strips and 2.5% 2.0%
Flush Median

Detail Project Report 67

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

8.5 Sight Distance

Sight distance, in the context of road design, is how far a road user (usually a
vehicle driver) can see before the line of sight is blocked by a hill crest, or an
obstacle on the inside of a horizontal curve or intersection. Insufficient sight
distance can have implications for the safety or operations of a roadway or
intersection. The ability to see ahead is of critical importance in the safe and
efficient operation of a vehicle Sight distances are a direct function of the design
speed, perception-reaction time, driver eye height, object height and the
coefficient of pavement friction.

Table 47 Sight Distance

Design Sight Distance (m)

Speed Safe Stopping Sight Desirable Minimum Sight
(km/h) Distance (m) Distance (m)
100 180 360
80 130 260
60 90 180
40 45 90

8.6 Horizontal Alignment

8.6.1 Radii of Curve
The minimum radii of the curve corresponding to the design speed were applied as per IRC
stipulations. The minimum radius for horizontal curves for State Highways as per IRC: SP: 84-
2019 is given in Table 48

Table 48 Radius of horizontal curve

Desirable Absolute Minimum Radius

Nature Of Terrain Minimum (m)
Radius (m)
Plain and Rolling 400 250
Mountainous & Steep 150 75

8.6.2 Super-elevation
Super elevation is tilting the roadway to help offset centripetal forces developed as the vehicle
goes around a curve along with friction that keep a vehicle from going off the road. The super

Detail Project Report 68

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

elevation for horizontal curve was arrived as per the following equation:
V2
e
225R
Where, V - vehicle speed in km/hr.
e - Super elevation ratio in meter per meter
R - Radius in meters.

The super elevation was calculated keeping in view the horizontal radii and gradient at curves at
different locations. The IRC:SP:84-2019 design standards propose a maximum super-elevation
rate of 7%. If the radius of curve less than the desirable minimum radius, it was maintained to 5
percent if radius is more than or equal to the desirable minimum. Super elevation shall not be
less than the minimum specified cross fall.

8.6.3 Transition Curves

Designed transition curves were provided at both ends of the circular curve. The recommended
minimum length of transition curves is given in Table 49
Table 49Minimum length of Transition Curves

Design Speed (km/hr) Minimum length of Transition curve (m)

100 30
80 30

8.7 Vertical Alignment

The vertical alignment should provide for a smooth longitudinal profile. Grade changes shall not
be too frequent as to cause kinks and visual discontinuities in the profile. The vertical alignment
of the carriageway will generally be compatible with the guidelines given in the IRC: SP:84-2019.
At locations of grade break of 0.5%, vertical curves are provided. The length of vertical curve is
not less than 0.6V (V in kmph). At locations of sight deficiency, at least Stopping Sight Distance
(SSD) is provided

Grades
The ruling and limiting gradients as per IRC: SP:84-2019 are given in Table 50 as follows.
Table 50 Gradient

Terrain Ruling Limiting

Plain and rolling 2.5% 3.3%
Mountainous 5.0% 6.0%
Steep 6.0% 7.0%

Detail Project Report 69

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

8.8 Pavement Design

The design of pavement was done as per IRC guidelines. Both rigid and flexible pavement
options were studied and the most appropriate option was established based on construction
cost, life-cycle costing and techno-economic consideration.

The design of pavement structure should take due account of the type, characteristics of
materials used in the respective courses, variability of their properties and also the reliability of
traffic predictions.

The pavement design is justified by clearly explaining the basic assumptions, values of the
various design inputs, rationale behind the selection of the design inputs and the criteria for
checking and control during the implementation of works.

As the paved shoulders, are an integral part of the main carriageway pavement, the same
pavement composition is proposed.

8.9 Standard for At-grade Intersections

Road junction/intersection is a key element of highway design. The efficiency, safety, speed, cost
of operation and capacity of road system depends very much on the intersection design. The
choice between at-grade junctions at a particular site depends upon various factors such as
traffic, economy, safety, aesthetic delay etc. The main objective of intersection design is to
reduce the severity of potential conflicts between motor vehicles, buses, trucks, bicycles,
pedestrians and facilities while facilitating the convenience, ease and comfort of people
traversing the intersections. The design should be fitted closely to the natural transitional paths
and operating characteristics of the users. Design of a safe intersection depends on many factors
as given below:

 Human factors
 Traffic considerations (design hour turning movements, type of movement and vehicle
speeds)
 Road and environmental considerations (sight distance, conflict area, geometric features)

Detail Project Report 70

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

 Economic factors.
 Generally intersections can be classified in to four categories depending on traffic
conditions.
 Uncontrolled intersections at-grade;
 Intersections with Priority Control;
 Time separated / signalized intersection at-grade;
 Space separated intersections/Grade separated intersections
 Each junction on the project road was carefully designed with due regard to physical
conditions of the site, extent and cost of land, cost of construction and the effect of proposal
on the neighbourhood. Various design parameters used for intersection design are
discussed in the following paragraphs.

8.10 Road Furniture and Other Features

A modern highway facility requires a number of items of street furniture. The provision of these
considerations ensured that:

 The designs are aesthetically pleasing and blending with the surrounding environment
 They are utilitarian
 They also do not intrude into the overall appearance of the facility
 The materials and specifications adopted are of a high quality so that their maintenance is
minimum
 They enhance the safety of travel

8.10.1 Traffic Signs and Road Markings

The design of road traffic signs, road marking and guidelines on design and installation of road traffic
signals were done according to the IRC standards.

Road markings perform the important function of guiding and controlling traffic on a highway. The
markings serve as psychological barriers and signify the delineation of traffic paths and their lateral
clearance from traffic hazards for safe movement of traffic. Road markings are therefore essential to
ensure smooth and orderly flow of traffic and to promote road safety. The location and type of marking

Detail Project Report 71

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

lines, material and colour is followed as per IRC: 35-2015, Code of Practice for Road Markings. The road
markings were carefully planned on carriageways, intersections, and bridge locations.

Cautionary, mandatory and informatory signs were provided depending on the situation and function
they perform in accordance with the IRC: 67-2022 guidelines for Road Signs. The design, location,
materials, definitions plate, route marker assembly at junctions, colour of back sign of post and
inscription shall be done as per IRC-2- 1985.

8.10.2 Delineators and Object Markers

Roadway delineators are intended to mark the edges of the roadway so as to guide drivers on the
alignment ahead. Object markers were used to indicate hazards and obstructions within the vehicle flow
path, for example, channelling islands close to the intersections.

Delineators and object markers were provided as per the details given in the drawings and in
accordance with the provisions of IRC: 79-1989. They are basically driving aids and should not be
regarded as substitutes for warning signs, road markings or barriers. Delineators were provided for all
curves of radius less than 750m. They are not provided at locations where Chevron sign boards are
provided.

Attenuators were provided at hazard markers locations given in IRC:79, structural columns of large
direction signs, illumination lamp posts and at approaching traffic inlands of toll plaza. It shall take
repeated impacts without any additional recovery procedures and with minimal or no repairs. The
attenuators modules shall be moulded from HDPE plastic. The design, size, number of modules, etc. of
attenuators shall be as per International Standards and location specific duly considering the likely
impact.

8.10.3 Railings and RCC Crash Barrier

Crash barrier system absorbs impact of vehicle and laterally restrains a vehicle from veering off. This
ensures minimum damage to the vehicle and passengers. Crash barrier of Grade M-40 has been
provided at structure location.

Detail Project Report 72

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

8.11 Structural Design

General Arrangement Drawing (GAD) supplemented by Preliminary designs and Alignment Plan for the
bridges, and other major structures proposed for the project were finalized based upon hydraulic and
geo-technical studies, cost effectiveness and ease of construction. Few alternatives on span arrangement
and type of bridge with cost-benefit implications were submitted to PWD to approve the best
alternative.
Wherever available land is not adequate for accommodating embankment slope, suitable design for RCC
retaining wall or RE wall, depending upon techno-economic suitability, was proposed.

8.12 Codes and Specifications

The design of the roadway and all the structures are conformed to the IRC Codes and Specifications as
well as MoRTH Standard Specifications. In case, these codes are silent on any requirement, the
following documents were followed in that order:-

 IRC SP:73 2015

 Indian Standard Codes issued by the Bureau of Indian Standards.
 Any other Standard Literature published and well recognised.

Detail Project Report 73

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

9. Social Impact Assessment

India is a developing nation. The development paradigm has significant role in human
development index. Major population of India have livelihood on agriculture and allied
professions. Hence the welfare state has the responsibility to provide better facilities and
opportunities for the upliftment of agriculture workers.
Infrastructure development projects bring numerous positive impacts but also cause adverse
social impacts in terms of loss of land assets, non-land assets and loss of livelihood particularly
the vulnerable sections of the society who are susceptible to socio-economic risks. Assessment of
such impacts and development of mitigation measures during the project preparation help
achieving the social acceptance of the project. This section of the report presents the social
impact assessment of the project road. It details out the project benefits, the associated, and
measures adopted to minimize the adverse social impacts.
In the developmental process the issues are raised in the process of land acquisition. The
Government has a rehabilitation and resettlement policy for displacement. It helps to resolve
conflicts and give recommendations for setting up the project.
National highway Division, MoRTH PWD (NH DIVISION Amravati) has appointed as ‘Consultant’,
M/s TPF Engineering Consultant S (I) Pvt Ltd to carryout consultancy services for
Preparation of Detailed Project Report for Rehabilitation and up gradation for up-gradation to
Four Lane with paved shoulder configuration for Karanja to Murtizapur in the State of
Maharashtra vide work order dated 27.12.2023.
Highway Development and operation should, therefore, be planned with careful consideration of
the environmental impact. To minimize these adverse impacts that may be created by the
highway development projects, the techniques of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) become
necessary.
This report is the detailed study of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) of the Site of the existing Two-
Lane/Intermediate Lane Highway comprises the section of newly declared National Highway,
which includes section of (Kherda to Karanja). Start point in km 74+351 (Karanja), End point in
km 102+351 (Murtizapur), length 28.00 km - 2 lane with paved shoulder except length passing
through urban area, which will be 4-lane with divided carriageway.

Detail Project Report 74

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

9.1 Project Description: -

Entire project is located between Akola, Washim districts of the state of Maharashtra.

Details of villages, survey numbers of the area, tehsil, districts and states, elevation above
mean sea level & latitude and longitude of important locations and existing drainage
system throughout the proposed highway alignment are collected.

Description of the existing situation of the land along the alignment, study of the land use
pattern, habitation, cropping pattern, forest area, environmentally sensitive places,
notified industrial areas, nature of the terrain (plain, rolling, hilly), river, lake etc. by
employing remote sensing techniques and also through secondary data sources. The land
use/land cover classification system as per shall be furnished.

9.2 Legal and institutional frameworks of Environmental Impact Assessment:-

Identification of quarries, stone crushers and borrow areas shall be under taken. This
shall help inassessing the impact due to these activities and to prepare suitable
mitigation plan.
Inventory of the environmental features such as trees/ forests/ drainage lines, rivers and
water crossings/ irrigation water courses/ water bodies/grazing lands/ cultural
properties/ utilities/ community facilities/ schools/hospitals/ seasonal markets or
cultural congregations etc, alongthe proposed highway shall be prepared.
There are good developed Industrial areas at Akola. Akola is having largest cotton
market of the state being well connected with other part of the country by Rail and road
network.

There are number of Agricultural research centers located along the corridor. Having
good connectivity of rural area with urban area by National Highway standard roads will
save time and vehicle operation cost; thereby boost the rural economy. Hence, it is
proposed to upgradethe existing network of the area.
At present existing road is of sub standards and partially in bad pavement condition,
therefore travel time required is more.

9.3 Initial Social Assessment

Initial Social assessment and preliminary land acquisition plan is to understand and assess the

Detail Project Report 75

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

scale and magnitude of social impact from the Kherda-Karanja and to propose mitigation
measures so that the land acquisition and displacement of people is minimized and their
rehabilitation is done in a such a way that improves their lives within the preview of National
Policy of Resettlement and Rehabilitation (NPRR) 2007.

9.3.1 Objectives of Initial Social Assessment

The main goals of social analysis is to put forward a sustainable and socially relevant design for
highway improvement, whereby the displacement is minimized and wherever required affected
persons are suitably rehabilitated. In order to fulfill this goal, the main objectives of the social
screening are:
To Understand Encroachment
To undertake a preliminary evaluation of the highway with the objective of identifying and
assessing the area specific issues related to anticipated residential, commercial, cultural and
industrial encroachments within RoW and also to explore alternative project designs so that the
displacement because of the project is minimized.
To Estimate Losses
To estimate various kinds of losses (Land and other movable and immovable assets), deprivation
of social facilities, cultural conflicts and identify vulnerable groups who may be displaced
resulting from highway widening and strengthening; identify the most critical/problematic
locations of the project that may cause displacement and resettlement of the people.
To Develop Framework for the Preparation of Land Acquisition Plan
The proposed road intervention is being carried out, land is free from all encumbrances for the
construction and maintenance of road. For this purpose, a preliminary assessment of land area to
be acquired and a framework for land acquisition process to be done
Project Area
The project area is passing through two Districts of Maharashtra State. As can be seen from the
Table 1, social and economic indicators are in favour of Akola. Districts.

Detail Project Report 76

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Table 51 Criteria for the Identification of problematic settlement

Population Literacy Rate Non

District SC ST Worker
s
T M F T M F

Washim 240622 124028 11659 38007 4212 185687 100092 85595 152978

Akola 51349 26017 25332 9684 1342 42005 21915 20090 32962

Total 291971 141926 47691 5554 5554 227692 122007 105685 185940

Source: Census of India, 2011

In order to understand problems such as resistance encountered during removal of

encroachment, social vulnerability of Project Affected Settlements, social status of people
of villagers, data is collected on population, sex ratio, schedule caste and schedule tribe
population. This data is presented in Table 52
Table 52 Social Profile of Settlement along the Project Road

Total Total Total Total

Sr. Total Total Total
Name Male Female Working Main Marginal Non
No
Populati SC ST
Populatio Worker Worker Worker
on
n
KherdaKh.
1 306 154 152 149 14 163 76 87 143
Kherda
2 1774 894 880 345 36 867 423 444 907
Bk.
Bhadshi
3 1191 611 580 218 3 522 519 3 669
vni
Shaha
4 2127 1122 1005 483 42 1067 1033 34 1060
Bhilkhe
5 334 191 143 79 4 91 80 11 243
da
Karanja
6 67907 34703 33204 6317 894 21906 20451 1455 46001
Akoli
7 913 467 446 581 22 539 299 240 374
Jaha
Murtija
8 40295 20309 19986 6448 950 13446 12109 1337 26849
pur
Kinkhed
9 914 464 450 31 67 454 446 8 460

Detail Project Report 77

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Bidgaon
10 801 412 389 344 0 322 288 34 479
Umari
11 1526 813 713 173 40 584 429 155 942
Turkhed
12 382 196 186 50 30 199 133 66 183
Hatgaon
13 5952 3062 2890 1886 226 2510 2395 115 3442
Jamthi
14 369 201 168 154 0 199 190 9 170
Kh.
Total
124791 63599 61192 17258 2328 42869 38871 3998 81922

9.3.2 Consultation with Important Stake Holders Level of Consultation

Structured consultation with important stakeholders whose involvement is very much warranted
for successful and smooth implementation of the project shall be done under the project. For this
purpose, consultation at corporate level, District level and local level conduction is under
progress.

1. Consultation at State level: The consultant has been in constant touch with officials of NH
MORTH PWD. Several rounds of meetings at the higher level were conducted to explain about the
alignment of the project. Important agenda of discussion have been on alignment/Clearances,
pavement composition, cross drainage, land acquisition and other regulatory clearances. A
presentation on project development has been given to MSRDC.

2. Consultation at the District and Tahsil level: District level consultations are under
progress at the District Headquarter involving District Magistrate, Collector, and Executive
Engineers. Important issues are land acquisition, key plan and profile of proposed improvement.
Similarly, Tahsil level consultations at respective areas are also progress

Detail Project Report 78

Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

9.3.3 Scope of Work

The SIA shall incorporate the two focus areas as Socio Economic study and R&R Plan for
affected area. The scope of this study includes social, cultural, economic, historical and political
aspects. The details of the infrastructure are available through the study. The economic base of
the affected villages established through the primary survey and secondary surveys.
This study focus on following aspects as
To generate the baseline data: The detail account of the infrastructure availability in the village,
the acquisition of land details, socio-economic profile of villagers, accessibility to the services
and details of vulnerable population as projected affected household or the project affected
persons.
1. To investigate socio-economic impact of land acquisition and displacement in case of
vulnerable sections of society.
2. To investigate loss of livelihood assets, annual income/ revenue to personal, community
of village due to the project.
3. To study nature of impact on affected household or a person to settle on mitigation
measures

4. To investigate the mitigation measures in the process of resettlement and rehabilitation or

community development.
5. To assess R&R plan as per the mandate of Maharashtra state Government R&R policy with
role and responsibilities of different stakeholders.

9.3.4 Study Method Approach

Objective of R&R plan and SES (Socio-Economic Study)

The focus of SES

Socio economic Study is mandatory for the completion of any Social Impact Assessment study. It
helps to understand the actual status of the project affected person or community. One can
calculate the details of income and revenue of the individual household. It will give an account of
projectimpact on the villagers. In the process of project cycle designing, this study will helpful to
work out on the issues and the problems in the community. It helps in effective execution of the
steps of project planning, formulation, designing and implementation. The R&R plan designed on
the base of Socio-economic study of project- affected area.

79
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

The Focus of R&R plan

The process of land acquisition involves the exhaustive process. This process is a time consuming.
The affected individuals and community develop the feeling of discontent. The people have to
displace from their belongings. It creates the demands for their resettlement. The R&R plan
addresses these issues of rehabilitation and resettlement. Project is has affecting land from
concern villages. Majority of these lands is of farm area. Land of farmers will be affected at the
curves or at bypasses wherever necessary and approved by MSRDC officers. The state
Government has tried to provide facilities as per the R&R plan for few affected villages. The study
of R&R plan will help to give better facilities to the vulnerable population affected due to project.
In the process of resettlement, the community participation is encouraged in project planning
and implementation. The inevitable displacement promoted with establishing the former status
without any cost to the individual or community.
Study Method Approach
A. Study Method:
The Socio-economic study will help to design R&R plan. The institutional profiles of the village
are essential to do analysis of the different resources. It helps to understand socio cultural status
of the village. This study involves different activities to do as pilot study for household survey. It
is followed by the socio-economic survey. It gave the details of socio-cultural aspects. The
transect walk in the village helps to do social mapping. The consultations in the form of
focused group discussion with interaction with different social groups in project-affected villages
gave the insights on the project implementation andimpacts

B Approach :
Social Impact Assessment study followed qualitative as well as quantitative approach of data
collection. The data is collected and under the computerize processing for the statistical
tabulation and clearance. It helps to understand the impact of project on the project affected
person, community or a village. The study has to follow the steps given below for statistical
analysis and interpretation. It leads to identification of impacts. The R&R plan and the
recommendations have given after the detail analytical study of field observations, experiences
and actual collected data.

Step 1: Data Collection and CleaningStep 2: Data Analysis

Step 3: Identified Impacts and Issues Step 4: Impact Mitigation Measures Step 5:

80
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

R&R and Project Costing.

Data Collection and Cleaning

a) Initial Socioeconomic Profile of the Project

The earlier reports of Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) on the project area have referred
for understanding the initial profile of the project. The secondary data from the office of
MSRDC helps to draught down the major points of socio economic status of project area from
concern villages of Amravati, Akola and Washim districts. It provides the social screening and set
up the indicators to study SIA.

Socioeconomic Baseline Census Survey

This baseline survey carried out in all the project-affected area. The details of each major
component studied as suggested by the Rehabilitation and Resettlement policy 2007. R&R policy
considered as term of reference for this project. It gives the total account of different
socioeconomic indicators. The record of all the infrastructures is accounted by this survey
method.
Preparation of Village Profiles

This village profile helps to bring participation of villagers in the process of data collection. The
transect walk in village helps to understand social structures of the villages. The study of
different local and social institutions helps to bring details of the affected villages. The public and
semipublic institutions studied in the process of data collection for village profile.
Community Consultation
The Focus group discussion (FGD) is the tool to have a community consultation on the issues of
the project. The interviews of key informants in the villages help to understand the villager’s
mentality towards the process of R&R plan. It achieved the objective to create awareness among
the project-affected villagers. These activities guided to resolve different conflicts in the process
of resettlement and delays in implementation.

Data Analysis

a. Analysis of Village Profiles

The available data of the project-affected area will study with the help of a statistical tool for the
analyzing the data. Socio economic characters are indicative in analyzing the data. It includes the
demographic details which characterizes as population distribution, density of population,

81
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

economic base of the villagers, land use and status vulnerable group.
Analysis of the Baseline Census Survey
This analytical study depends on the socio-economic survey carried out in the project area. The
each householder is the respondent for this survey. Hence, it is a census survey with specific
objective to analyze social and economic indicators. The project-affected population shall be
calculated in total in addition to which equivalent to families. There are the incidences during the
study where the data collection did not possible in the stipulated time schedule. The rains in the
study area are the major cause. The visits were rescheduling to such villages for data collection.
Although the repeated visits, it observed that few structures i.e. institutions in villages
permanently locked during the process of data collection. The quality and standardization in data
analysis ensured by collecting data from the different sources related to such structures.
Identified Issues and Impacts
This project is essential in the socioeconomic development of this region. The project-
affected area is the drought prone area. The irregular rainfall, limited health facilities and
agriculture as major livelihood option are the major concern of the cultivators. Movement of
these goods is major concern of these villagers through the existing road.

Hence, the prospective emergence of agro-based industries in this area could possible. Ultimately,
it helps to uplift social and economic life of community. The improvement in the human
development index of these districts i.e. Amravati, Washim can achieve with these
development initiatives. These public hearings will provided the qualitative data for analyzing
the impact of the proposed project activity.
Impact Mitigation Measure
The land acquisition for road is inevitable. The loss of land and allied livelihood is mandatory in
the process. Hence, the strong compensatory plans will be made to restore livelihood of
cultivators with the other affected population. The community needs and aspirations essentially
considered for designing the measures.
R&R Plan

The subsequent R&R plan if required for the project can study further to give recommendations

82
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

10. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT

10.1 Introduction

Development of highway projects is generally intended to improve the economic and social
welfare of the people. Infrastructure development particularly faster movement and
transportation of goods in a country like India is a guiding factor for economic development.
Proper transportation of goods requires comprehensive transport systems and increasing road
traffic requires better roads. Hence it becomes necessary to create a new road network or
upgrade the existing road network.

Maharashtra is located in the northern center of peninsular India, surrounded by the Arabian sea
in the west, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh on the north, Madhya Pradesh in the east and Karnataka
and Andhra Pradesh on the south. Maharashtra state has a good road network. There are 18
National Highways and many state highways with total length of 33,705 km. Major state
highways are MH MSH 1, MH MSH 3, MH MSH 6, MH MSH 9, and MH MSH

The National highway MoRTH Division. (PWD NH) has been entrusted with the assignment of
Detailed Project Report of selected stretches corridors of National Highways in Maharashtra for
Four lanes with paved shoulder configuration.

It is appreciated that over a horizon of next 25 to 30 years this road will serve critical purpose of
linking rural part to the developed area thus contributing substantially towards development of
the local economy. Further connectivity to National Highway, opening the door for economic
growth of locals with a view to upgrade and rehabilitate the existing highway where ever
necessary.
As a part of NH Division project stretch includes the up gradation of the site of the existing
Two- Lane Highway comprises the section of newly declared National Highway. Start point in
km 72+351 (Karanja) to 85+400 (Kherda) and from 85+400 (Kherda), End point in km 102+351
(Murtizapur.), length 28 km - 4 lane with paved shoulder. This project may also create adverse
impact on the surrounding environment people and properties may be in the direct path of
road works affected.

10.2 Project Description

Entire project is located between Amravati and Washim districts of the state of Maharashtra.

83
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Details of villages, survey numbers of the area, tehsil, districts and states, elevation above
mean sea level & latitude and longitude of important locations and existing drainage system
throughout the proposed highway alignment will be collected Description of the existing
situation of the land along the alignment, study of the land use pattern, habitation, cropping
pattern, forest area, environmentally sensitive places, notified industrial areas, nature of the
terrain (plain, rolling, hilly), river, lake etc. by employing remote sensing techniques and also
through secondary data sources. The land use/land cover classification system as per will be
furnished. Identification of quarries, stone crusher sand borrow are as will be undertaken.
This will help in assessing the impact due to the activities and to prepare suitable mitigation
plan.

Inventory of the environmental features such as trees/forests/drainage lines, river sand

water crossings/ irrigation water courses/ water bodies/grazing lands/ cultural properties/
utilities/ community facilities/ schools/ hospitals/ seasonal market so cultural
congregations etc, along the proposed highway will be prepared.

There are good developed Industrial areas at Amravati. Amravati is having largest grain
market of the state being well connected with other part of the country by Rail and road
network.
There are number of Agricultural research centers located along the corridor. Having good
connectivity of rural area with urban area by National Highway standard roads will save
time and vehicle operation cost; there by boost the rural economy. Hence, it is proposed to
upgrade the existing network of the area.

At present existing road is of substandard and partially in bad pavement condition, therefore
travel time required is more.

Government of Maharashtra has completed Second Largest project in the world i.e. of
construction of the Nagpur - Mumbai access control Super communication Express highway
having length of 709 km with design speed of 150 kmph. The alignment of super
communication express way is passing through Akola & Amravati town then the proposed
corridor will act feeder road to this Expressway. NH PWD MoRTH Amaravti (NH PWD) has
taken up work in hand and DPR of the same is at advance stage and GoM declared that
Express highway will be completed by 2019.
To establish enhanced connectivity to capital city and other part of the state, NH PWD

84
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

MoRTH Amaravti (NH PWD) has entrusted the assignment of preparation of the Detailed
Project Report of Consultancy services for of Detailed Project Report for the selected
stretches / corridors of various Road Networks likely to be declared as National Highway in
the State of Maharashtra, for up-gradation to Four Lanes with paved shoulder/Four lane
configuration Karanja-Kherda-Murtizapur National Highway standards to TPF Engineering
Pvt Ltd with main objectives as under.

 Up gradation of existing state highway to two lanes with paved

shoulders dividedcarriage way.
 Traffic study and location of toll plazas.

 Junction Improvement

 Construction of high level non-submersible bridges

 Construction of service roads/bypasses wherever required,

 Construction of ROB/VUP/FOB/CUP/PUP etc

 Obtain MOEF clearances as also submit draft notification for land

acquisition.

 Financial analysis and cost estimate for the project

 Preparation Land acquisition proposal wherever necessary.

Location Map of the project

Figure 14 Location Map of the project

85
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

10.3 Relevant Legal aspects

EIA Notification (September 2006 and February 2009):
The MoEF Notification dated 14 September 2006 states that ‘prior Environmental Clearance
(EC)’ is required for certain types of projects. All developmental projects have been
categorized subject to certain considerations listed in the ‘Schedule’ of the Notification.

Highway projects are dealt under Clause 71 of the Schedule. Construction of new State
Highways and expansion of existing State Highways come under Category ‘B’ if the length of
the road is ‘greater than 30 km involving additional right of way greater than 20m involving
land acquisition’. Under the ‘General Condition’ contained in the MOEF Notification, Category
‘B’ will be specified as Category ‘A’, if located in whole or in part within 10 km from the
boundary of:
(i) Protected Are as notified under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972,
(ii) Critically Polluted are as notified by the Central Pollution Control Board from time
to time,
(iii) Notified Eco sensitive areas,
(iv) Inter-State and international boundaries. Also all Category ‘B’ projects (including new

as well as expansion of modernization projects) will be treated as Category ‘A’ projects in

the absence of a duly constituted State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority
(SEIAA) or State Level Environmental Appraisal Committee (SEAC).
Further, the road so flower classification (i.e. MDR sand lower) do not find
amentionin the MOEF Notification.
Table 53 EIA Notification

Project Schedule I General Conditions

Category A Category B
7(f) i) New National High i) New State High Any project or activity
Highways ways; and ways; and Category ‘B’ will be treated
ii) Expansion of ii) Expansion of A, if located in whole or in
National High ways National / State km from the boundary of:
greater than 30 KM, Highways greater (i) Protected Areas notified
involving additional than 30 km Wild Life (Protection) Act,
right of way greater involving (ii) Critically Polluted areas
than 20m involving additional right of by the Central Pollution
land acquisition and way Board from time to time,
passing through more greater than 20m (iii) Notified E c o -sensitive
Than one State. involving land (iv) Inter-State

86
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

boundaries
Acquisition. International boundaries.

Further, as per 22nd August 2013 mention in the MOEF Notification that

(B) In the Schedule, against sub-item (f) of item 7, in column (3), for the entry (ii), the following
entry shall be substituted, namely

“(ii) Expansion of National Highway greater than 100 Km involving additional right of way or
land acquisition greater than 40m on existing alignments and 60m on realignments or by passes.”

Interpretation and applicability of EIA Notification, 2006 on Nagzari to Kherda

Since the proposed project road is an existing state highway, requiring improvement with no new
alignment except a few realignments for avoiding congestions at major settlements or comply
with IRC standards or to provide adequate bridge approach and smoothen the road curvature at
some section of the project road. Therefore, the road is treated as expansion of existing State
Highway for examining the applicability and relevance of the MoEF Notification.

Realignments under this project are minor and limited to providing required improving road
alignment geometry and avoiding congested and narrow town/built-up areas. These
realignments/bypasses are contiguous with the rest of the Corridor and form part II of the
existing highway improvement. Therefore, all realignments are considered as a part II of the
project corridor for the purposes of calculating the additional right-of-way required and not as
stand-alone lengths for examining the applicability and relevance of MoEF Notification.

Keeping in view the above considerations project is less than 100 km in length and right of way
or land acquisition is not greater than 40m on existing alignments and 60m on realignments or
by passes.” Hence Karanja -Kherda-Murtizapur project is not under the purview of EIA
Notification, 2006 and February 2009 and amendments made on 22nd August 2013.

Hence Environmental clearance is not required for the project.

Wildlife Protection Act, 1972

This Act is promulgated to provide for the protection of wild animals, birds and plants and for

87
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

matters connected therewith. The provisions under this Act such as prohibition of hunting wild
animals specified in Schedule I; prohibition of picking, uprooting, damaging, destroying or
acquiring any specified plant from any forestland; prohibition of use of injurious substances,
chemicals, explosives that may cause injury or endanger wildlife in a sanctuary; prohibition on
alteration of the boundaries of a National Park shall be made, except on a resolution passed by
the Legislature of State; prohibition on destruction or damage of wildlife property in a National
Park is prohibited. This act shall be applicable to the project roads passing through forests or
adjacent to the National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries.

As per letter from Dy Conservator of Forests, Akola & Washim district Forest Division, Akola
No. Survey/979/2016-17 dated 12/9/2016.In the guarsdition of Akola forest division there
are 3 wildlife sanctuary areas namely Kathepurna WLS, Karanja Sohal Black Bluck WLS and
Narnala WLS. These 3 sanctuaries are beyond 10 km distance from existing Karanja-Kherda-
Murtizapur and not affected the proposed stretch.

The Indian Forest Act, 1927

This Act consolidates all the statutes passed since 1865 relating to forests, the transit of Forest
Produce and the duty leviable on timber and other forest-produce. This Act also confers power to
the State Government to declare a forestland or a wasteland which is the property of the
Government or over which the Government has proprietary rights, or to the Whole or any part of
the forest-product of which the Government is entitled as reserved forest. Section 5 of the Act,
states that after declaring a particular land as reserved forest, no fresh clearings for any purpose
shall be made, except in accordance with such rules as made by the state government; Section 26
of the Act,
states that certain activities are prohibited in such reserved forests; Sections 30 and 32 of the Act
empowers the State government to regulate certain acts (clearing of reserved forests for
cultivation, building or any other non-forestry purpose) in such forests as specified in the section;
Section 35 furnishes power to the State government to prohibit certain acts (clearing of
vegetation etc.) in lands not being the property of the government. The act refers to the project
roads that are adjacent to the reserved forest and involving forest land diversion for the non-
forestry purpose.

Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (as amended in 1988)

88
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

As per Section 26 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 a number of activities are prohibited in
forest areas, and prior approval is required from the Central Government to use forest land for
non-forest purposes. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 prohibits large-scale diversion of
forestland for non-forest use. As amended in 1988, no State Government or authority shall make
such diversions, except with the prior approval of the Central Government.

The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 also pertains to the cases of diversion of forest areasand
felling of roadside plantations. Depending on the size of the tract to be cleared, clearances are
applied at various levels of government: If the area of forests to be cleared or diverted exceeds 40
Ha (or, 10ha in hilly area) then prior permission of Central Government is required; If the area of
forest to be cleared or diverted is between 5 to 40ha, the Regional Office of Chief Conservator of
Forests is empowered to approve; If the area of forest to be cleared or diverted is below or equal
to 5ha, the State Government can give permission; If thearea to be clear-felled has a forest density
of more than 40%, permission to undertake any work is needed from the Central Government,
irrespective of the area to be cleared. The act refers to the project roads that are adjacent to the
reserved forest and involving forest land diversion for the non-forestry purpose.

The existing Karanaja -Kherda road width is up to 30 meters and proposed improvement for
2 lane with paved shoulder will require 24 meter and for 4 lane land width will require 28
meter. Hence modification and improvement on the proposed road are within the existing
land width in possession of the MSRDC. The land required for the correction of curves is
need to be verified if it is in non-forest, private, agriculture land of farmers.

10.4 Analysis of Alternatives:-

Improvement of existing road alignment is proposed under which 25 to 30 meter of the

width this available. Therefore, there is no need of acquisition of land is require for phase I.
Wherever there is correction in the curves is considered. The highway basically follows the
alignment of upgraded from VR/ODR/MDR to state highway over the years, At few places the
alignment is over steep curves and sharp bends which would need improvement as per the
geometric requirement of NH for two lanes specifications
The details of sharp curve that require improvement with provisions of clause 2.2 of IRC SP
84-2019, the existing alignment would be examined and realignment suggested wherever
essential. There are some chainages which will require curve improvement. In certain cases
realignment may also be required.

89
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

There are many locations where alignment needs geometric improvements to maintain
riding quality of highway and safe movement of vehicles. All geometrically deficient curves
will be proposed for curve improvement, the location of which will be decided after analysis.

 The proposed route does not involve any tunneling.

 The proposed road does not pass through any flood plain of the river.
 The proposed road does not require any land reclamation.
 The proposed route does not involves any migratory path of animals, details about fauna,
habitat and forest area as per As per letter from Dy Conservator of Forests, Akola & Washim
district Forest Division, Akola No. Survey/979/ 2016-17 dated 12/9/2016.
 There is no possibility that, the construction of roads will cause destruction of forest.
 There will no change in the drainage pattern after the proposed activity.
 Proposed route is passing through a Kherda, Murtizapur , major settlements along the
alignment with houses and human habitation on the either side of the road, the necessity for
provision of service ducts pipe are provided in urban area
 The project does not falls totally or partially in CRZ area.
The impacts on all these parameters are evaluated at each of the phases viz

Physical features

Biological resources

Socio-economic status

Baseline conditions define the characteristics of the existing environment and shape
projected future conditions, assuming no project is undertaken. It provides the basis from
which project impact comparisons are made. Baseline analysis is taking into account:

 Past trends in environmental quality

 Other current or proposed development programs in the project area.

Environmental components are considered in relation to highway projects it is necessary to

certain the baseline data of these environmental components. As a primary requirement of
EIA process, baseline data in the project area as well as the study area, which is likely to be
affected by the project activity for one season (non-monsoon), is under progress.

90
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Physical parameters

Determination of baseline conditions of natural and physical environmental components

along project road is vital for robust impact assessment. The components of the environment
for which the information has been collected are described in the following sub sections

Physical environment includes water resources, water quality, air quality, noise and land
environment, Biological environment includes, flora, terrestrial fauna, avifauna, aquatic.

Historical and cultural monuments:

The list of centrally protected monuments and sites under the jurisdiction of Aurangabad
circle and the list of state protected Forts, protected Caves, Temples, and other state
protected Monuments is collected and enclosed with the Annexure. There is no
archaeological site/protected monument location that falls under the project influence area
or within 10 km radius of proposed alignment. Therefore this aspect is of no relevance in the
Karanja lad – Kherda -Murtizapur and therefore there will be no impact.
Land Environment

Land use plan is ascertained from the existing usage and secondary data. The environmental
sensitivity areas as mentioned at Para 9 (III) of form I of EIA notification 2006, covering the
following within an aerial distance of 15 km are furnished along with the aerial distance
from the project boundary.
 Project has no areas protected under international conventions, national or local
legislation for their ecological, landscape, cultural or other related value
 Project does not involve any areas that are important or sensitive for ecological reasons
wetlands, mangroves, watercourses or other water bodies, coastal zone, biospheres,
mountains, forests
 Project does not involve any areas used by protected, important or sensitive species of
flora or fauna for breeding, nesting, foraging, resting, over wintering, migration No Inland,
coastal, marine or underground waters
 No State, national boundaries
 This existing route or facilities used by the public for access to recreation or other
tourist, pilgrim areas such as Mozari, Lonar, Amravati, Aurangabad, etc.
 The project will provide much needed and short and faster connectivity to Amravati
Nagpur, and Nanded further to Hyderabad in Telangana and Karnataka State. There will be

91
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

savings in Vehicle Operation Costs (VOC). The traffic congestion in urban areas will be
reduced due to diversion of heavy traffic on to the project road. There will be reduction in air
and noise pollution in the urban areas due to plan realignments and bypasses.
 No Defense installation areas
Large populated or built-up areas on the route are on the villages with respective
populations are the major settlements along the alignment areas occupied by sensitive man-
made land uses (hospitals, schools, places of worship, community facilities) as per following
table1 Total study areas is scarce resources (ground water resources, surface resources,
forestry, agriculture, fisheries, tourism, minerals)

Agriculture Land

The proposed area passes through agriculture fields in both sides but irrigated land
percentage is less due to limited ground water resources, surface resources, in the study
area.
Tourism
Minerals

In Amravati, Akola & Washim districts there is no quarry site of any important minerals only
minor minerals like dark compact basalt rock are found and crushed for construction
purposes. Data of the proposed and its availability is to be ascertained from local authorities,
revenue records etc.

Widening and Reconstruction has been planned on both the sides with no land acquisition
and without any R&R.

The project road is passing through Kamargaon, Kherda town which is densely built-up and
market area. The options for this stretch will be explored for widening to 2 lanes with
service road or suitable provision of bypass will be explored during final
survey/investigations to avoid social impacts in the project.
Geology

Maharashtra is one of the largest and commercially advanced states in India. It encompasses
an area of 3, 07,713 Sq.Km laying between the latitudes 15ᴼ 45’ and 22ᴼ Northan longitudes
72ᴼ 45’ and 81ᴼ 00’ East. It is divided into 35 districts.

92
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Figure 15Geological and Mineral map of Maharashtra Source : Geological Survey of India GoI 2008

The entire area of the State forms a part of the “Peninsular Shield”, which is composed of
rocks commencing from the most ancient rocks of diverse origin, which have undergone
considerable metamorphism.

Over these ancient rocks of Precambrian era lie a few basins of Proterozoic era and of
permocarboniferouss periods which are covered by extensive sheet so horizontally bedded
overflows comprising the Deccan trap. More than 80% area of the State is covered by these

93
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Deccan trap, which have concealed geologically older formations. The most important
economic minerals such as coal, iron or, manganese or, limestone, etc. are found in the
geologically older formations.
Figure 16 Seismic Zone map of India

The existing and proposed alignment segments falling under Zone II (Least
Active) seismic zone.
I Land slides
Generally landslides are triggered by heavy or prolonged rainfall. Landslides cause severe damage
to
lives and property while also causing disruption in communication networks and movement of
traffic

94
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

Figure 17Map showing Areas prone to landslides in India on map

Study area falls under 300 M above mean sea level and in plains. Hence study area
isnot prone to the land slide.
Soil in the study area

The NBSSLP has published a map of the soils of Maharashtra, dividing the state
into 356soil-mapping units, which are broadly categorized as follows:

• Soils of Konkan coast

• Soils of Western Ghats

• Soils of Upper Maharashtra

 Soils of Lower Maharashtra

95
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

About 96.4 percent of the states geographic area is subjected to various degrees of erosion.
The soil profile reveals that the incidence of severe erosion is the highest in the Western
Ghats 53.1 percent), followed by lower Maharashtra (11.5 percent). Page 7 of 31 the soil
status of Maharashtra is residual, derived from the underlying basalts. In the semidry
plateau, the (black-cotton soil) is clayey, rich in iron and moisture-retentive, though poor in
nitrogen and organic matter. When re-deposited along the river valleys, the kali soils are
deeper and heavier, better suited for Rabi crops. Farther away, with a better mixture of
lime, and soils form the ideal Kharif zone. The higher plateau areas have panther soils,
which contain more gravel. In the rainy Konkan, and the Sahara Range, the same basalts
give rise to the brick-red laterites, which are productive under a forest-cover, but readily
stripped into a sterile parka when devoid of vegetative cover. By and large, the soils of
Maharashtra are shallow and of somewhat poor quality. The soil and vegetation of
Maharashtra are related to the climate and the geology. The soil in the Deccan plateau is
made up of black basalt soil. This type of soil is rich in humus. The soil is commonly known
as the black cotton soil because it is best suited for the cultivation of cotton. The volcanic
action which had taken place in the Deccan region has given rise to the soil texture and
composition. These igneous rocks breakdown in to the black soil which is very fertile. The
Wardha - Waliganga river valley has old crystalline rocks and saline soils which make the
soil infertile. This type of soil has a natural resistance to wind and water erosion because it
is rich in iron and granular in structure. A very important advantage of this type of soils
that it can retain moisture. This makes the soil very reactive to irrigation.

The soil around the road stretch is medium black soils. The fertility index with respect to
nitrogen is low in study area, fertility index with respect to P is low in almost all the stretch.
The soils are moderately fertile having clayey loam soil mixed with fine sandand humus.
In order to characterise the soil quality in the project region four samples of soil were
drawn from the agriculture fields located close to project road. The soils are drawn from the
agriculture fields from Murtizapur Hathgaon , Kherda and karanja Lad

The soil samples are collected for measurement of parameters like pH, Electrical
Conductivity, Sand, Silt, Clay, Texture, Moisture retention capacity %, Moisture %,
Infiltration rate mm/hr, Organic matter%, Nitrogen, Potassium, Phosphorus, Sulphates,
Sodium sulphate, Calcium sulphate
Climate

The climate of all the districts through which project road passes is characterized by a hot

96
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

summer and distributed rain fall during the monsoon season.

Last 10 years data from Meteorology department, Pune is under process will be
incorporated in the final report.
Cropping pattern

Following is the Statement Showing Crop Pattern in Amravati and Washim district. Major
crops cultivated are Cotton, Jowar, Bazaar, Maize, Cereals, Turn, Mug, Undid, Soya been in
Khari .and in Rabbi Gram, Groundnut, Sunflower, Mustard.

Cash crops are cultivated in small area due to not availability of overall irrigation facilities
in the study area.
%A – Southern Tropical Dry Deciduous Forests. The tree species that generally occur within
the study area are Teak, Dhawada, Ain, Tiwas, Lendia and Tendu. Some of the others
associates are Satpudi, Bhirra, Kalam, Rohan, Salai, Semal, Beheda, Shisham, Bija and Bel.
Amaltas, Aonla, Char, Dudhi, Ghoti, Palas, Dhaman, Moyen, Bartondi, Lokhandi are the
species commonly found. There are no endangered species of flora in the RoW. The total
numbers of trees based on sample counting in RoW will be estimated. All these trees need
to be cut for the development of the project. Location of national parks, sanctuary, and
biosphere reserve, tiger reserve, elephant reserve and wildlife migratory routes within
aerial distance of 10 km either side of proposed alignment. In compression with the
total geographical area of Maharashtra state area of national parks, sanctuary is just at
3.30%.

10.5 Environmental Impact Assessment

Before start of Environment all impact Assessment (EIA), Environmental Screening has
been undertaken to identify the major environmental issues in the project. These
environmental issues are the subject of environmental impact assessment, an ongoing
activity at present.

Environmentalconsiderationsareanintegralpartofprojectpreparation.Thefindingsof
screening and EIA study are being incorporated in the project design. This includes
environmental monitoring and preparation of environmental management plan for pre-
construction, construction, and operation phases.
The detailed highway designs of project road are being closely coordinated with the EIA
report. The EIA preparation led to the identification of potential environmental hot spots

97
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

and feasible remedial measures (including avoidance, mitigation and enhancements) which
are included in the Environmental Management Plan (EMP).

10.6Potential Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures

Road construction related impacts occur at three stages of the project:

i) Planning and Design

ii) Construction

iii) Operation

10.7Approach to Mitigation Measures

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) is the key to ensure that the environmental
quality of the zone under impact does not deteriorate beyond the expected level due to the
project. As discussed in the previous sections, the road design, construction and operation
activities can have various level so environmental impacts. The Environmental Management
Plan (EMP) covers all aspects of the design, construction and operation phases related to
environment.

The Environmental Management Plan (EMP) needs to be implemented right from the
Environment Impact Assessment and should continue throughout. The EMP can be divided
into three phases –

(a)Design phase (b) Construction phase and (c)Operational phasre

10.8 Environmental Management Plan (EMP)

The preliminary EMP has been prepared for the pre-construction, construction and
operation phases. This will be a part of contract document for the contractors. The
monitoring plan has also been prepared to check the efficacy of mitigation measures during
construction and operation. Finally EMP budget shall be prepared for incorporation in the
overall cost of the project.

98
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

11.COST ESTIMATES
An abstract estimate has been prepared giving a brief description and justification for the work
and specifications. The subsequent section gives an abstract estimate, in order to enable the
authority competent, to give administrative approval to the expenditure of the nature and the
magnitude contemplated. The abstract forms a reasonably accurate idea of the probable
expenditure and such other data sufficient to enable that authority to gauge adequately the
financial costs of the proposal. Making basis of above planning and design, Detailed estimate for
the project has been worked out. It covers the cost required to construct the project as whole,
based on defined methodology and design. It covers cost for construction of Rigid Pavement,
Bridges and Culverts.

11.1 Methodology
Estimation of detailed cost estimate, has been carried out. The process involved in the detailed
cost estimation has been described under the following sections.

11.2 Basic rates

The basic rates of construction items have been analyzed on the basis of Government Of
Maharashtra state schedules of rate 2022-2023 published by Government Of Maharashtra and
MORT&H following “Guidelines for Costing Methodology to be adopted for framing up Cost
Estimates of BOT/ EPC Projects. Basic rates of construction materials considered as SSR 2022-23
of Government of Maharashtra and also prevailing market rates.
For items where these rates are not available, the rates were adopted as per previous
experience of the consultants / Market rates. Appropriate escalation of 5% is considered to
derive the prevailing percentage over these rates.

11.3 Quantification of Items

The detailed quantification of all the items are calculated based on the detailed design of palan
and profile and based on the d et ai led typical cross sections identified along the Project
corridor and The quantification of bridges and structures are considered based on detailed
drawings basis, and the rates adopted as per rate analysis .

The construction items covered in cost estimates are: site clearance; earthwork in new
embankment, Sub-grade, Pavement in carriageways and shoulders; culverts; Bridges; Junction

99
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

improvement; Drainage and Protective works; Land Acquisition; Environmental Protection, toll
plazas and Miscellaneous items which includes Pavement markings, Signages, Guard Rails, Metal
beam crash barrier,RCC drain, Road furniture, Bus shelter, Street lighting, Boundary chainlink
fencing, tree plantation etc. Special consideration was given for the stretches passing through
hazardous conditions.
Cost of Reconstruction of Roads with Rigid Pavement
Detailed cost estimates have been worked out on the basis of typical cross section and detailed
design of alignment and profile and adopted rates are as per rate analysis as per State schedules
of Rate Public works Department Government of Maharashtra for the Year 2022-23 and
included in the Detailed cost estimate.
Bridges, Culverts & Other Structures
The rates of the structures were worked out as per Rate Analysis as per rate from State
schedules of Rate Public works Department Government of Maharashtra for the Year 2022-23
and included in the Detailed cost estimate.
Junction Improvements and other miscellaneous works

Rates for composite items such as junction improvement are derived on the basis of typical
designs. The rates for items for which the scope could not be finalized at this stage, such as toll
plazas and wayside amenities / facilities etc. are based on the consultant’s experience. The rates
for relocation of utilities have been taken based on enquiries from the concerned authorities.
For proprietary items, rates as per price list of manufacturers have been adopted.

11.4 Land / Environmental / Social costs

Project corridor for most of the part passes through plain and rolling area. Land acquisition is
very minimal where the curve to be improved, cost has been calculated as per actual cost in that
area based on the area calculated from the proposed improved alignment. Environmental costs
include the cost of cutting of trees and, rehabilitation of water source such as hand pumps, wells,
bore wells and ponds, noise protection measures near sensitive locations, air, water and
noise quality monitoring at different stages and the cost of environmental enhancement along
the project road and Utility Shifting Cost has been considered actual in the table below:

11.5 Rate Analysis

The civil cost for various items is based on the prevailing market rate and Rate analysis based on

100
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

the rate from State schedules of Rate Public works Department Government of Maharashtra for
the Year 2022-23 for NH works and the Rate Analysis based on MoRTH Data Book have also
been used where rates are not available in SSR 2022-2023

11.6 Cost Estimate

The project cost estimates has been prepared based on various items of works required for the
construction of rigid pavement and Structures. In general, the work will be executed as per the
IRC: SP: 84:2019, and Technical Specifications contained in “Specifications Road and Bridge
Works”. The quantities of major items of works have been worked out based on Following:

 Site Clearance: The area considered for Site Clearance is the area within the proposed Right of
Way excluding the existing carriageway area
 Earth Works: This item provides for excavation for new pavement and structures, roadway
excavation, earthwork in embankment, sub-grade and shoulders, medians, islands including
disposal of surplus earth and unsuitable material. In this stage, the construction of
embankment height has been taken as per design of alignment and profile. Sub-grade soil
having a CBR ≥ 8% will be taken from borrows area. The total earthwork in cut-and-fill has
been determined from levels given in designed plan and profile.
 The pavement quantities like Concrete pavement, DLC GSB, Subgrade Items etc. have been
worked out based on the geometrics and cross sections obtained after pavement design. The
pavement design has been done based on traffic and laboratory investigations.
 Culverts: The estimation of quantities for culverts is based on site condition detailed
inventory.
 Bridges and Structures: The estimates of quantities for bridges and other structures have
been worked out based on condition of structures.
 Drainage and Protection Works for Roads: Quantities for the surface, subsurface and roadside
drains, retaining wall cum RCC drain.
 Road Appurtenances, Safety devices like w-metal, Jersy crash barriers with Antiglare
Arrangement etc Traffic Signs and Markings. Toll Plaza and safety management
 Bus bays and Passenger Shelters: Bus bays and bus stops were assessed and proposed at
required locations. In this item, the estimates of quantities are based on the standard layout
given in IRC: SP: 84-2019.
 Minor and Major Junctions

101
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

 Retaining wall and Miscellanous

 Tree Plantation & Median Plantation, Street Lighting/Highway Lighting
 Water Pipe Line Shifting and Electrical Utility shifting, Safety and traffic management during
construction and ATMS.
 Utility pipes and Crossing pipes
 Rate Analysis, Estimation of Quantities, Abstract of Cost Estimate and Bill of Quantities have
been presented in Volume VI, VII and VIII, Summary of Cost Estimate are Tabulated as below:

Table 54 General abstract of Cost

GENERAL ABSTRACT OF COST

Total
Amount Amount
Sr. No. Item of works Length / % Cost
(RS) (Rs. Crs.)
No./Sqm.
Section - 1. Site Clearance and
37640429
1 Dismantling 26.501 3.76 0.87

2 Section - 2. Road Work

Excavation 25.714 22320915 2.23 0.52
Embankment 25.714 118603898 11.86 2.75
Subgrade 25.714 347165623 34.72 8.06
Granular Sub-Base 25.714 251167030 25.12 5.83
DLC 25.714 329152065 32.92 7.64
PQC 25.714 1557495492 155.75 36.15

3 Section 3: Box Culvert 38 141951342 14.20 3.29

4 Section 4: Minor Bridge 8 178667586 17.87 4.15

5 Section - 5. RCC Drain 50.108 508369222 50.84 11.80

6 Section -6. Road Furniture 26.501 17424047 1.74 0.40

Section -7: Street Lighting/Highway

5180160
7 Lighting 117 0.52 0.12

Section -8: Safety devices like w-

8 metal, Jersy crash barriers with 86.842 205668756 20.57 4.77
Antiglare Arrangement etc.

Section - 9: Boundary Chain Link

9 24854938
Fencing with Piller 2.49 0.58

102
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

10 Section - 10: Utility Crossings 26140736 2.61 0.61

11 Section - 11: Junctions 23 32951298 3.30 0.76

Section - 12: Tree Plantation &

12 26029653
Median Plantation 12649 2.60 0.60

13 Section - 13: Bus Shelter 10 2100000 0.21 0.05

14 Section - 14: Toll Plaza 1 103688807 10.37 2.41

15 Section 15: Retaining Wall 86748427 8.67 2.01

16 Section 16: Miscellanous 14910000 1.49 0.35

Section - 14: Safety and traffic

17 26.501 13250300 1.33 0.31
management during construction

18 Section - 15: ATMS 26.501 13250300 1.33 0.31

Section -16: Water PipeLine Shifting

19 (Including Supervision and Estimate Lumpsum 104009825 10.40 2.41
Preparation Charges)

20 Section -17: Electrical Shifting Lumpsum 140000000 14.00 3.25

Total Civil Construction Cost (A) (RS.

4308740849
A Crs.) 430.87 100.00
Add GST Provision 18.00 % of (A) 775573353 77.56
B Total Amount (B) 5084314202 508.43
Add Contingencies @ 1 % of (A) 43087408 4.31
Add 5% Maintenance Charges of (B) 254215710 25.42
Add 5% Escalation of (B) 254215710 25.42
Add 3% Supervision Charges of (A) 129262225 12.93
Add 3% Agenecy Charges of (A) 129262225 12.93
Add Land Acquisition/Forest Diversion
50000000 5.00
Cost
Total Civil Construction Cost
5944357482 594.44
including GST (RS. Crs.)

103
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

12 Economic and Financial Analysis

12.1 Economic Analysis of the Project

12.1.1 Purpose of Economical Evaluation:

• Preparation of highway plans at the national regional and local level.
• To rank schemes within highway sector plan competing for scarce resources in order of priority
• To compare mutually exclusive schemes and select the most attractive one
• To determine whether a scheme under consideration is worth investment
Economic Analysis deal with the economic costs and benefits from the point of view of the country as a
whole.

12.1.2 Method of Economic Evaluation (Using IRC: SP: 30-2019 for Alignment:
Three common method of economic evaluations normally adopted are as follows:
1. Net Present Value Method
2. Benefit - Cost Ratio Method
3. Internal Rate of Return Method
We adopted Benefit - Cost Ratio Method for economic evaluation.

12.1.2.1 Benefit -Cost Ratio Method:

There are a number of variations of this method, but a simple procedure is to discount all cost and
benefits to their present worth and calculate the ratio of benefits to costs. Negative flows are considered
as costs whereas positive flows as benefits. Thus, the saving in the transport costs are considered as
benefits. If the B/C ratio is more than one, the project is worth undertaking.

12.1.2.2 Assumption Stated for Economic Evaluation:

Roughness value for existing road = 2000 mm/Km
Roughness value for Proposed road = 2000 mm/Km
Rise and fall for existing road (RF) = 10
Rise and fall for proposed road (RF) = 0
Economic cost of accidents using IRC SP 30-2019
Vehicle operation cost (VOC) using IRC SP 30-2019
For the analysis we require the Road User Cost which comprises of the Vehicle Operation Cost, Accident
Cost & Maintenance Cost.

104
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

12.1.2.3 Calculation of Vehicle Operation Cost:

The VOC tables presented in IRC SP 30-2019 for each vehicle type are based on updated Road user cost
study and also based on March 2009 price levels. These are used for future years by applying WPI
Values published by the Ministry of commerce and Industry.

12.1.2.4 Vehicle Operation Cost for Existing Road:

The vehicle operation cost values for Roughness value 2000 adopted from tables as per IRC SP 30-2019

12.1.2.5 Road User Cost:

For the analysis we calculated the Road User Cost which comprises of the vehicle operation cost, and
maintenance cost as calculated in below table: -

Table 55 Road users cost

Sr. No Case I:- Do Nothing Case III:- New Construction

Construction*
Maintinance Total VOC Total VOC Cost Benefit Net
Year and
cost * per for Base of Stream Stream Benefits
maintenance
year Case Alternative
cost *per year

Const - -
2024 30.17 11162.39 0.00
period 23166.95 23136.77 11162.39 11974.39
2 - -
2025 12.93 11905.06 0.00
years 34750.42 34737.49 11905.06 22832.43
1 2026 9.36 12720.14 9.36 11618.64 0.00 1101.50 1101.50
2 2027 18.72 13692.24 18.72 12199.58 0.00 1492.66 1492.66
3 2028 28.08 15001.89 28.08 11931.14 0.00 3070.75 3070.75
4 2029 37.44 16475.62 37.44 12883.20 0.00 3592.43 3592.43
5 2030 97.02 18097.22 187.11 13765.23 -90.09 4331.99 4241.90
6 2031 97.02 20159.18 187.11 15203.41 -90.09 4955.77 4865.68
7 2032 1940.40 22225.50 1871.10 16755.55 69.30 5469.94 5539.24
8 2033 97.02 24503.61 187.11 18488.84 -90.09 6014.77 5924.68
9 2034 97.02 27015.23 187.11 20383.95 -90.09 6631.28 6541.19
10 2035 97.02 29784.29 187.11 22473.30 -90.09 7310.99 7220.90
11 2036 97.02 32837.18 187.11 24776.81 -90.09 8060.37 7970.28

105
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

12 2037 97.02 36202.99 187.11 27316.44 -90.09 8886.55 8796.46

13 2038 97.02 39913.80 187.11 30116.37 -90.09 9797.43 9707.34
14 2039 1940.40 43604.19 1871.10 33203.30 69.30 10400.89 10470.19
15 2040 97.02 47100.47 187.11 36606.64 -90.09 10493.83 10403.74
16 2041 97.02 50549.80 187.11 40358.82 -90.09 10190.99 10100.90
17 2042 97.02 53746.03 187.11 44495.60 -90.09 9250.43 9160.34
18 2043 97.02 56618.77 187.11 49056.40 -90.09 7562.37 7472.28
19 2044 97.02 59611.17 187.11 53802.17 -90.09 5809.00 5718.91
20 2045 97.02 62591.73 187.11 57641.05 -90.09 4950.68 4860.59
IRR= 12.24%

12.1.2.6 Conclusion:
As the EIRR is 12.24 %, hence the project is feasible.

12.2 Financial Analysis of the Project:

12.2.1Background of the Project:

The financial feasibility of the proposed project options is based on the Project Cost and uses toll
revenues as the key parameter to assess the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), which is a preferred
Discounted Cash Flow technique for financial analysis.
The financial feasibility of the proposed project options is based on the Project Cost and uses toll
revenues as the key parameter to assess the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), which is a preferred
Discounted Cash Flow technique for financial analysis.
12.2.2 Cost of the Project
The basic project cost for financial analysis is given in table below.
Table 56 cost of the Project

Total Civil Cost (In CR.) 430.87 Cr.

12.2.3 Means of Finance

A simple mix of bank loan and promoters’ equity is assumed for analysis in 50%: 50% proportion of
debt equity. In realistic situation it may be a mix of equity/ IPO, preference capital, debt, debentures, etc.
However, it will not alter our analysis and hence simple capital structure is assumed.

106
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from Design
km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380
to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtra

12.2.4 Inflation and Rate of Interest

Observing current trend, GDP growth, domestic and forex markets, it may be reasonable to assume that
average inflation may remain in the range of 5% on year to year basis. All the direct costs are inflated at
this rate. Rate of interest on term loan is taken at 12.00% per annum. This is realistic to conservative
estimate. Tenure of loan is 12 to 14 years and interest is on reducing balance.

12.2.5 Other Factors

Income statement nets out expenses towards collection of toll and also, administration at the suggested
rates by engineers. Routine maintenance and Periodic maintenance are envisaged as per standard
norms of maintenance.

12.2.6 Results

It is concluded that the project is viable on commercial format. The traffic on the project stretch is
considerably high. The Project IRR with LA and without LA are provided in below table.
Table 57 Project IRR

Project IRR with LA Project IRR without LA

6.72 % 6.78 %

12.2.7 Conclusion

As the FIRR is less than rate of interest on term loan, hence the project is feasible and Project may be
implemented on the EPC mode Contract.

107
ANNEXURE
 ANNEXURE 1 Annexure

TPF ENGINEEEING PRIVATE LIMITED

APPENDIX II A-2: ROAD INVENTORY: Other Information

DPR for Rehabilitation /Up gradation of existing highway to 4Lane+Paved shoulder in Karanja-Kherda junction with Murtizapur (km.74+351 to km.102+351) total length of 28 km.section of NH 361C in the state of Maharashtra.

Chainage (km.) Road Junction Road side features Road crossing utilities / Railway Tracks etc.
Remarks
Location Chainage
Offset / Details
From To Location Type Leading to Feature Type Chainage Type
(km) (m) From To

RHS-Wardha
km.86000 to km. 102400 BHS
LHS-Aurangabad Electrical
74351 74351 at Junction 4 way 74351 76350 74751 Overhead Electrical crossings waterpipeline of Maharashtra Jivan
karanja and Polls(LHS)
Pradhikaran(MJP)
Murtizapur
Hanuman temple Electrical
74550 74600 RHS 74751 75900 75060 Overhead Electrical crossings
Bhilkheda Line(LHS)
Electrical
74750 74753 LHS T Trupati city 75060 75251 75450 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Deshmukh Electrical
75050 75100 RHS 75690 76350 75690 Overhead Electrical crossings
Mangal karyalay Line(RHS)
Shree Mangal Electrical
75350 75400 LHS 78350 81610 75850 Overhead Electrical crossings
Karyalay Line(LHS)
Electrical
75750 75780 RHS Nayra petrl Pump 78350 81880 75950 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Electrical
78750 78753 LHS T Chandai Village 82500 83900 76250 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Electrical
78753 78756 RHS T Shaha Village 83100 83180 78750 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(LHS)
Radhaswami Electrical
78650 78750 RHS 83900 85400 79050 Overhead Electrical crossings
satsang vyas Line(LHS)
Electrical
79050 79060 RHS Hanuman temple 84050 85780 80250 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Electrical
80750 80753 LHS T Village road 85861 86020 80280 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(LHS)
Kakadshivani Electrical
81750 81753 LHS T 87730 87900 80310 Overhead Electrical crossings
Village Line(RHS)
Bhadshivani Electrical
81753 81756 RHS T 89960 91000 81250 Overhead Electrical crossings
Village Line(RHS)

81970 81970 Railway crossing of Shankutala train

Electrical
84000 84100 RHS Pharmacy college 92300 93000 81610 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Bharat Petrol Electrical
84350 84400 LHS 92400 93600 81880 Overhead Electrical crossings
Pump Line(LHS)
Kherda khurd Electrical
85400 85403 RHS T 93850 94050 82050 Overhead Electrical crossings
village Line(LHS)
T-Junction @ Electrical
85800 85900 RHS Amaravati 95400 95500 82500 Overhead Electrical crossings
Kherda Line(LHS)
Electrical
85820 85823 LHS T Kajleshwar village 95950 96150 83100 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Electrical
87730 87733 LHS T Village road 96200 96400 83900 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Electrical
87733 87736 RHS T Khanapur Village 98150 100700 84200 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Proposed Petrol Electrical
88700 88750 RHS 99870 101400 84380 Overhead Electrical crossings
Pump Line(LHS)
Electrical
89800 89803 RHS T Mozar village 101850 102370 85400 Overhead Electrical crossings
Line(RHS)
Pimpalshenda Electrical
89820 89823 LHS T 102050 102370 85820 Overhead Electrical crossings
village Line(LHS)

89965 89968 RHS T Bidgaon village 85840 Overhead Electrical crossings

92370 92373 LHS T Lasnapur village 86390 Overhead Electrical crossings

shivankheda
92540 92543 RHS T 86500 Overhead Electrical crossings
village

93420 93423 LHS T Umri village 90360 Overhead Electrical crossings

93850 93853 RHS T Muramba village 93000 Overhead Electrical crossings

94260 94263 LHS T Khandla village 93300 Overhead Electrical crossings

94730 94740 LHS Malti hospital 93420 Overhead Electrical crossings

Indian oil petrol

96370 96400 LHS 93800 Overhead Electrical crossings
pump

96833 96836 RHS T Dahatonda village 93900 Overhead Electrical crossings

98350 98380 LHS Petrol Pump 94250 Overhead Electrical crossings

98713 98716 LHS T Aarkhed village 95400 Overhead Electrical crossings

100000 100005 RHS T Hatgaon village 96400 Overhead Electrical crossings

way to
100900 100903 RHS T 97040 Overhead Electrical crossings
Shantiniketan

100900 101000 LHS Ravi Industries 97400 Overhead Electrical crossings

101945 101950 LHS State Bank of India 98100 Overhead Electrical crossings

Shree Gadge
102000 102100 LHS 98400 Overhead Electrical crossings
Maharaj Vidyalay
Govt.I.T.I.
102000 102100 RHS 98650 Overhead Electrical crossings
Murtizapur
Sub.Divisional
102200 102220 RHS 98700 Overhead Electrical crossings
Office Murtizapur

102376 102400 BHS T Akola & Amaravati 99300 Overhead Electrical crossings

STUP Consultants Pvt.Ltd.

 ANNEXURE 2 Annexure

TPF ENGINEEEING PRIVATE LIMITED

DPR for Rehabilitation /Up gradation of existing highway to 4Lane+Paved shoulder in Karanja-Kherda junction with Murtizapur
(km.74+351 to km.102+351) total length of 28 km.section of NH 361C in the state of Maharashtra.
APPENDIX II B: ROAD CONDITION SURVEY
Chainage (Km) Embankment Cracking Shoulder
Edge Rut
Carriage Ravelli Potholes Patching
Sl Crack All crack Wide > 3mm Failure Depth Left Right
way Slope ng Remarks
No. From To Condition Type
Condition erosion (SQM)
(sqm) (%) (sqm) (%) (sqm) (%) (sqm) (%) (%) (Class) Type drop Condition Type drop Condition

1 74351 74580 Good Good BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor _

2 74580 74600 Good Good BHS _ _ _ _ _ 70 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor _
3 74600 76380 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Good UP Good _
4 km.76380 to km.78300 developed by MSRDC on Samruddhi Highway
5 78300 78850 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ 1750 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Good UP Good _
6 78850 80220 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ 4795 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Good UP Good
7 80220 80600 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Good UP Good
8 80600 82730 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Good UP Good
9 82730 82850 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ 420 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Good UP Good
10 82850 86300 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Good UP Good
11 86300 86640 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 1870 _ _ _ _ _ 1-10mm UP Poor UP Poor
12 86640 86650 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 55 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
13 86650 87380 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 4015 _ _ _ _ _ 1-10mm UP Poor UP Poor
14 87380 87385 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 27.5 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
15 87385 87600 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 1182.5 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
16 87600 87620 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 110 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
17 87620 87900 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 1540 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
18 87900 87920 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 110 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
19 87920 88020 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 550 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
20 88020 88100 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 440 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
21 88100 88280 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 990 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
22 88280 88300 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 110 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
23 88300 88580 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 1540 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
24 88580 88630 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 275 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
25 88630 88750 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 660 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
26 88750 88760 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 55 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
27 88760 88790 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 165 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
28 88790 89000 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 1155 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
29 89000 89030 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 165 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
30 89030 89180 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 825 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
31 89180 89400 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor

STUP Consultants Pvt.Ltd.

 Annexure
89400 89800 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1-10mm UP Poor UP Poor
89800 90810 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
32 90810 90820 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ 27.5 _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
33 90820 92000 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
92000 92300 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1-10mm UP Poor UP Poor
92300 94350 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
34 94350 94720 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ 1017.5 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
35 94720 94750 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
36 94750 94900 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 825 _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
37 94900 95300 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 2200 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
38 95300 95600 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1-10mm UP Poor UP Poor
95600 97820 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
39 97820 98470 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3575 _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
40 98470 98550 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 440 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
41 98550 98650 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 550 _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
42 98650 99400 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 4125 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
43 99400 99550 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 825 _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
44 99550 99750 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1100 _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
45 99750 99850 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1-10mm UP Poor UP Poor
99850 100700 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
100700 100800 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1-10mm UP Poor UP Poor
46 100800 102020 Good Good NO _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor
102020 102400 Poor Poor BHS _ _ _ _ _ 1330 _ _ _ _ _ _ UP Poor UP Poor

STUP Consultants Pvt.Ltd.

ANNEXURE 3

TPF ENGINEEEING PRIVATE LIMITED

DPR for Rehabilitation /Up gradation of existing highway to 4Lane+Paved shoulder in Karanja-Kherda junction with Murtizapur (km.74+351 to km.102+351) total
length of 28 km.section of NH 361C in the state of Maharashtra.
APPENDIX II A-1: STRUCTURE INVENTORY
Parameters 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1.    
Chainage 74566 75935 76250 80450 85390 94170 97556 99585
   
2.    
Name of stream / location _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
   
3.    
Type of Culvert: Slab/ Box/ Arch MNB Slab Slab MNB MNB MNB MNB MNB
   
4.    
Number of Spans 2 1 1 2 3 4 3 5
   
5.     4*7.5+(3*1200 pipes 
Span Arrangement (m)  C/C 2*6 1*6.5 1*7.6 2*6 3*4.5 3*2.8 5*7.3
    on both end)
6.    
Thickness of Slab or Rib  (m) 0.5 0.5 0.55 0.45 0.35 0.2 0.3 0.25
   
7.    
Pier Thickness (Top) 1 _ _ 1 1 1 0.9 1
   
8.    
Pier Thickness (Bottom) 1 _ _ 1 1 1 0.9 1
   
9.    
Wearing Coat type & thickness (mm) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
   
10.  
Skew Angle (Straight / Inclined Width) straight straight straight straight straight straight straight straight
 
11.  
Direction of Flow L to R L to R L to R L to R R to L L to R L to R L to R
 
12.  
Length of Culvert 12 8.9 10 16.4 14.5 50 11.5 40
 
13.  
Carriageway Width (m)  7.2 7 7 7 7.2 7 5.5 5.7
 
LHS 6.1 5.8 6 6 5.5 5.1 3.7 4.1
14.  
Inner Width from C/L of CW to Parapet (m)
 
RHS 5.3 5.6 5.4 5.6 5.8 5 4 3.7
15.  
Total Outer Width (m) 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.3 12 109 8.7 8.6
 
16.  
Horizontal Curve / Vertical Gradient _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
17.  
Height of Parapet above FRL (m) 1 1 1 1 1 1 0.85 1
 
18.  
FRL Top to GL (m) 6.25 2.4 3.3 5.3 3.3 4.5 2.9 6
 
19.  
Vertical Clearance (GL to Soffit of Slab/ Box/ Arch) 5.75 1.9 2.75 4.85 2.95 4.3 2.6 5.75
 
20.  
Thickness of parapet (m) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 railing  0.2 0.2
 
21.  
Details of Approach Slab (if any) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
22.  
Details of Return / Wing Wall (height / length) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
23.  
Material of Slab/ Box/ Arch _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
24.  
Material of Pier / Abutment _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
25.  
Material of Parapet _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
26.  
Material of Return / Wing Wall (if any) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
27.  
Fill over Structures _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
28.  
Condition & Details of Protection Works good good good good good good poor good
 
29.  
Condition & Details of Drainage Spouts poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor
 
30.  
Condition & Details of Weep Holes poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor
 
31.  
Condition of Slab/ Box/ Arch good good good good good good poor good
 
32.  
Condition of Pier / Abutment good good good good good good poor good
 
33.  
Condition of Return / Wing Wall good good good good good good poor good
 
34.  
Condition of Parapet good good good good good poor poor poor
 
35.  
Details of Vegetation Growth grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown
 
36.  
Whether Choked yes no no no no no no yes
 
37.  
Details & Condition of pitching (if any) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
38.  
Details of any Scour on Upstream or Downstream _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
39.  
Stream Characteristics _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
40.  
Adequacy of Waterway _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
41.  
Whether Submersible? _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
42.  
HFL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
43.  
Foundation Strata & Depth open open open open open open open open
 
44.  
Remarks _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
 
45.  
Proposal recostruction recostruction recostruction recostruction recostruction recostruction recostruction recostruction
 
 ANNEXURE 4
TPF ENGINEEEING PRIVATE LIMITED

DPR for Rehabilitation /Up gradation of existing highway to 4Lane+Paved shoulder in Karanja-Kherda junction with Murtizapur (km.74+351 to km.102+351) total length of 28 km.section of NH 361 C in the state of Maharashtra.

APPENDIX II A-1: PIPE CULVERT INVENTORY

Parameter 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Sr.No.
Chainage 79300 84012 86050 86282 86640 87316 88270 88607 92225 93293 94525 94860 95673 96955 98140 98427 99970 101900

1 Location / Name of Stream _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

2 Type of Culvert HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC HPC Box type HPC

3 Number of Pipes/Row's 06/01 15/03 04/01 04/01 04/01 04/01 12/03 12/03 08/02 04/01 18/03 08/02 08/02 12/03 12/03 04/01 0/04 08/02

4 Diameter of Pipe(s) (mm) 900 1200 900 1000 1200 900 1200 1000 1000 1000 1000 900 900 900 1200 1000 1160*600 900

5 Thickness of Pipe (mm) 50 75 50 50 75 50 75 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 75 50 _ 50

6 Direction of Flow L to R R to L R to L R to L R to L L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R L to R

7 Length of Head Wall (M) 2 10.5 5.5 5.5 6.2 6.2 9 8.5 6.7 5.5 9.5 6 6.8 9 10 5.5 7 6.7

8 Carriageway Width (m) 7.2 7 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.8

9 No. of Lanes 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

10 Total Outer Width (M) 14 12.5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 15 10 10 10 10 10 10.5 10

11 Skew Angle Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight Straight

12 Height of Parapet above FRL (m) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 FRL Top to GL (m) 1.5 2.6 1.84 2.07 2 1.94 2.3 1.75 2.45 2.07 3 1.3 2 2.02 2.25 1.76 2.66 2.155

14 Pipe Top to FRL Top (m) 0.4 1.4 0.84 1.02 0.7 0.94 1 0.64 1.35 0.97 0.7 0.6 1 1.02 0.9 0.66 1.5 1.155

15 Material of Headwall/ Chamber _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

16 Condition & Details of Protection Works poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor
Condition of Pipe (extended / chocked
17 poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor
if any)
18 Condition of Head Wall poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor

19 Condition of Parapet poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor

20 Details of Pitching _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

21 Condition of Pitching poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor poor

22 Details of Vegetation Growth grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown grown

23 Details of any Scour on U/S or D/S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Whether submersible? If yes how many
24 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
times a year?
25 Observed HFL _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

26 Adjoining ground level (if causeway) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

27 Remarks _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Annexure 5
MURTIZAPUR-KHERDA AVERAGE HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUME both the Directions
AVERAGE HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUME
Total
Time Period Fast Passenger Vehicles Motorized Vehicles - Commercial Category & Tractors Slow Moving Vehicles Toll Exempt Vehicles Traffic
(num)
Over Police/ Army/ Military/ Fire
Multi
Car/ Two LCV- LCV- Sized Tractor Tractor Cyckle Fighting Veh. / Govt. Officer/
3 Mini School Govt. Private 2 Axle 3 Axle Axle Cycl Animal/
From To Taxi/ jeep Wheel 4 6 (7 or With Without Ricksh NHAI-State Veh. /Ambulance
Wheelers bus bus Bus Bus Truck Truck (4 to 6 e Hand Cart
Van er Tyre Tyre more Trailer Trailer aw
Axle) Car Bus Truck LCV
Axle)
0.00 1.00 10 0 30 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 56
1.00 2.00 8 0 26 0 0 0 1 0 4 0 1 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 51
2.00 3.00 12 0 25 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 55
3.00 4.00 14 0 27 0 0 0 1 0 6 1 1 2 10 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64
4.00 5.00 16 0 33 1 0 0 3 0 10 2 3 3 11 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83
5.00 6.00 17 0 62 5 0 0 2 0 7 4 7 2 13 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 120
6.00 7.00 30 0 143 11 0 0 5 0 10 2 6 4 12 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 228
7.00 8.00 45 0 209 24 0 0 6 0 13 4 8 5 20 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 339
8.00 9.00 65 0 437 25 0 0 11 0 17 3 7 6 21 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 598
9.00 10.00 116 0 556 40 0 0 11 0 19 2 5 4 21 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 777
10.00 11.00 126 0 616 28 0 0 9 0 20 4 9 8 15 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 840
11.00 12.00 118 0 556 21 0 0 11 0 17 2 10 7 18 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 766
12.00 13.00 83 0 576 25 0 0 7 0 18 3 9 7 19 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 752
13.00 14.00 75 0 536 22 0 0 14 0 19 4 10 5 16 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 705
14.00 15.00 87 0 463 17 0 0 12 0 21 3 8 4 14 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 633
15.00 16.00 79 0 503 26 0 0 7 0 19 2 13 5 16 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 675
16.00 17.00 96 0 513 16 0 0 9 0 17 4 13 5 17 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 694
17.00 18.00 116 0 679 17 0 0 8 0 12 4 8 7 16 0 6 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 877
18.00 19.00 91 0 425 24 0 0 10 0 19 2 12 7 15 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 610
19.00 20.00 64 0 315 20 0 0 7 0 15 2 10 8 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 460
20.00 21.00 42 0 172 10 0 0 5 0 18 1 7 6 13 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 276
21.00 22.00 25 0 94 8 0 0 2 0 14 3 7 3 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 173
22.00 23.00 20 0 29 3 0 0 2 0 10 2 7 4 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 90
23.00 0.00 15 0 28 3 0 0 1 0 8 1 7 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 80
Grand Total 1369 0 7051 347 0 0 149 0 315 57 172 105 353 0 64 0 0 0 0 13 3 5 0 10002
Annexure 6
KARANJA-KHERDA AVERAGE HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUME both the Directions

AVERAGE HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUME

Time Period Fast Passenger Vehicles Motorized Vehicles - Commercial Category & Tractors Slow Moving Vehicles Toll Exempt Vehicles
Multi Over Police/ Army/ Military/ Fire Total
Car/ LCV- LCV- Tractor Tractor Animal/
Two 3 Mini School Govt. Private 2 Axle 3 Axle Axle (4 Sized (7 Cyckle Fighting Veh. / Govt. Officer/ Traffic
From To Taxi/ jeep 4 6 With Without Cycle Hand
Wheeler Wheelers bus bus Bus Bus Truck Truck to 6 or more Rickshaw NHAI-State Veh. /Ambulance (num)
Van Tyre Tyre Trailer Trailer Cart
Axle) Axle) Car Bus Truck LCV
0.00 1.00 19 0 26 0 0 0 6 0 5 2 12 4 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 90
1.00 2.00 20 0 23 0 0 0 5 0 9 1 14 4 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93
2.00 3.00 23 0 22 0 0 0 7 0 10 3 13 2 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 97
3.00 4.00 25 0 29 0 0 0 5 0 11 2 17 4 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 112
4.00 5.00 27 0 18 0 0 0 6 0 11 2 11 3 14 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 94
5.00 6.00 31 0 27 0 0 0 8 0 13 3 14 2 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118
6.00 7.00 55 0 38 4 0 0 9 0 8 2 15 5 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 155
7.00 8.00 73 0 71 8 0 0 12 0 14 6 20 6 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 228
8.00 9.00 90 0 163 12 0 0 16 0 24 5 18 4 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 356
9.00 10.00 142 0 264 18 0 0 21 0 28 12 24 7 24 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 544
10.00 11.00 131 0 295 18 0 0 21 0 21 6 19 5 32 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 553
11.00 12.00 109 0 360 24 0 0 21 0 31 5 22 10 22 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 608
12.00 13.00 145 0 278 21 0 0 17 0 29 8 21 10 25 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 559
13.00 14.00 121 0 219 21 0 0 16 0 29 6 17 8 25 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 468
14.00 15.00 146 0 323 19 0 0 19 0 30 9 22 6 28 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 604
15.00 16.00 132 0 270 17 0 0 19 0 30 5 13 10 29 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 527
16.00 17.00 116 0 262 13 0 0 16 0 25 5 19 6 24 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 491
17.00 18.00 148 0 293 15 0 0 19 0 27 9 14 10 30 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 569
18.00 19.00 129 0 260 15 0 0 22 0 24 3 21 6 24 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 510
19.00 20.00 112 0 204 10 0 0 22 0 20 6 19 9 23 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 429
20.00 21.00 93 0 114 8 0 0 17 0 12 2 18 9 25 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 301
21.00 22.00 63 0 104 2 0 0 15 0 9 3 14 4 22 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 240
22.00 23.00 40 0 33 0 0 0 9 0 12 3 10 4 17 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 132
23.00 0.00 15 0 27 0 0 0 9 0 8 3 13 5 15 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 97
Grand Total 2004 0 3724 226 0 0 336 0 442 110 400 143 521 0 50 0 0 0 0 13 3 5 0 7977
Annexure 7
Annexure 8
 Annexure 9

OD Matrix Passenger
Origin
Destination Code
Code
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Grand Total
1 3 31 8 1 2 2 16 1 1 1 1 7 1 4 5 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 80
2 36 3 1 1 1 1 1 34 35 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 15 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 137
3 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 9
4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 4
6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
7 19 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 8 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 47
8 1 28 7 1 3 1 11 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 9 3 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 70
9 1 31 4 1 6 1 7 1 1 1 1 4 3 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 63
10 1 6 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 15
11 1 7 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 12
12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 3
13 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 8
14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 10
15 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 10
16 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 7
17 1 7 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 16
18 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2
19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 5
20 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
21 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 3
22 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
23 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
24 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1
Grand Total 76 117 22 1 11 4 45 67 55 15 9 17 8 11 20 5 20 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 2 513
Annexure 10
OD Matrix Goods
Origin Code
Destination Code
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 0 0 0 26 Grand Total
1 0 43 6 3 0 16 0 0 0 0 4 8 9 4 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 95
2 46 0 0 0 0 0 30 27 5 6 0 3 0 0 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129
3 7 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15
4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
6 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3
7 14 0 0 0 0 0 18 9 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 48
8 0 35 2 2 3 14 0 0 0 0 2 2 15 1 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 79
9 0 36 3 1 0 15 0 0 0 0 1 0 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63
10 0 2 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 10
11 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
12 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
14 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
15 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32
16 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
17 0 14 1 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
18 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4
19 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11
20 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
21 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Grand Total 91 136 13 7 3 57 80 55 10 11 7 14 34 6 18 5 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 2 554
 VOLUME – II
DESIGN REPORT
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

DPR for Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur

Section to 4Lane+Paved shoulder standards from Design km 74+351 to km
102+331 Excluding Samaruddhi Mahamarg from Design Km 76+380 to
78+280 (Total length of 26.080 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the
state of Maharashtra

Volume II
DESIGN REPORT
Public Works Department
(NH DIVISION, AMRAVATI), Maharashtra
Government of Maharashtra
(Ministry of Road Transport & Highways)

Government of India
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

March 2023
DPR Consultant,
M/s TPF GetinsaEuroestudios S.L
in J.V with TPF Engineering Pvt.
Ltd. Office:1401, Rupa Sapphire,
Sector 18, Plot No. 12 Opp. Sanpada
Railway Station, Vashi Navi
Mumbai – 400705. INDIA

Page 2
Detailed Project Report

BALASAHEB Digitally
BALASAHEB
signed by

NANASAHE NANASAHEB OHOL

Date: 2023.03.31
B OHOL 16:50:56 +05'30'
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Contents
List of Tables .............................................................................................................................4

DESIGN STANDARDS ...............................................................................................................6

General ...................................................................................................................................6

1.1. Design Speed ...................................................................................................................6

1.2. Right of Way .....................................................................................................................6

1.3. Lane Width of Carriageway...............................................................................................6

1.4. Median..............................................................................................................................7

1.5. Shoulders .........................................................................................................................7

1.6. Roadway Width ................................................................................................................7

1.7. Crossfall ...........................................................................................................................7

1.8. Design of Horizontal Alignment .........................................................................................8

1.8.1. Superelevation ...........................................................................................................8

1.8.2. Vertical Alignment ......................................................................................................9

1.8.3. Coordination of Horizontal and Vertical Alignment ....................................................11

1.9. Median Openings ...........................................................................................................11

1.10. Fencing and Boundary Stones ......................................................................................12

1.11. Typical Cross Sections .................................................................................................12

1.12. Embankment and Cut Sections.....................................................................................12

1.13. Pavement Design .........................................................................................................12

1.13.1. Type of Pavement ..................................................................................................13

1.14. Standard for At-grade Intersections ..............................................................................14

Page 3
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

1.15. Materials .......................................................................................................................15

1.16. Drainage .......................................................................................................................15

1.17. Traffic Signs and Road Markings ..................................................................................15

1.18. Delineators and Object Markers....................................................................................16

1.19. Railings and RCC Crash Barrier ...................................................................................16

1.20. Structural Design ..........................................................................................................16

1.21. Codes and Specifications .............................................................................................17

1.22. Traffic Management Systems .......................................................................................17

1.23. Toll Plazas ....................................................................................................................17

DESIGN CALCULATIONS ........................................................................................................18

Horizontal Alignment:-........................................................................................................18

Vertical Alignment:- ............................................................................................................20

HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT REPORT:- ............................................................................22

VERTICAL ALIGNMENT REPORT:- ..................................................................................82

List of Tables
Table 0-2 Right of Way in Plain/Rolling Terrain ...........................................................................6

Table 2 Radius of horizontal curve ..............................................................................................8

Table 0-5 Safe Sight Distance.....................................................................................................9

Table 0-6 Gradients ..................................................................................................................10

Table 0-7 Minimum Length of Vertical Curve ............................................................................10

Table 0-1 Minimum Radii of Horizontal Curves .........................................................................18

Table 0-2 Minimum Length of Transition Curves .......................................................................19

Page 4
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Table 0-3 Safe Sight Distance...................................................................................................20

Table 0-4 Minimum Length of Vertical Curve ............................................................................21

Page 5
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

DESIGN STANDARDS

General
 This Section lays down the standards for and general features for the highway. The
application of geometric standards should aim at achieving safety, mobility and efficiency
in traffic operation.
 The geometric design of the highway shall conform to the requirements as per ToR and
standards set out in the MORTH, Manual for 4 lane divided highway and relevant other
MORTH, IRC and International Guidelines.

1.1. Design Speed

 Design speed is the basic parameter, which governs the geometric characteristics of the
road. It is related to the function of the road and terrain conditions. Design speed based
on the function of the road and terrain condition as per IRC: SP: 84-2019.
 However, the proposed Highway will be a Rehabilitated & upgraded to four lane paved
shoulder with a design speed of 100/80 kmph.
 Whereas in some curve portions speeds have been reduced (refer schedule-D for
details) & speed restriction signs has been given to those stretches.

1.2. Right of Way

 The Right-of-Way (RoW) for the proposed highway shall be as per site condition and
requirements. The recommended minimum Right of Way in Plain/Rolling terrain for
proposed highway is given in Table 0-1.
Table 0-1 Right of Way in Plain/Rolling Terrain

Section Right of way width (ROW)

4-Lane Divided Carriageway 30m

1.3. Lane Width of Carriageway

The standard lane width of the Project highway shall be 3.5 m.

Page 6
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

1.4. Median
 For 4-Lane divided carriageway the median were raised and the width of median shall
be 5m including kerb shyness of 0.50m either side.
 As far as possible, the median shall be of uniform width in a particular section of the
Project Expressway. However, where changes are unavoidable, a transition of 1 in 50
shall be provided.

1.5. Shoulders
 The shoulder on the outer side of carriageway shall be 1.5 m wide paved shoulder & 1.5
m wide earthen shoulder. The paved shoulder composition and specification shall be as
of Main Carriageway and earthen shoulder shall be provided with 200mm thick layer of
non-erodible/granular material for protection against erosion.

1.6. Roadway Width

The width of roadway shall depend upon the width of carriageway, shoulders and the
median.

1.7. Crossfall
 The crossfall on straight sections of road carriageway, paved shoulder and paved
portion of median shall be 2.5% for bituminous surface and 2% for cement concrete
surface.
 The crossfall shall be unidirectional for either side carriageway sloping towards the
shoulder in straight reaches and towards the lower edge on horizontal curves. The
camber on the existing road shall be modified to unidirectional crossfall.
 The crossfall for earthen shoulders on straight portions shall be at least 0.5 percent
steeper than the slope of the pavement and paved shoulder subject to a minimum of 3.0
percent.On super elevated sections, the earthen portion of the shoulder on the outer
side of the curve would be provided with reverse crossfall of 0.5 percent so that the earth

Page 7
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

does not drain on the carriageway and the storm water drains out with minimum travel
path.

1.8. Design of Horizontal Alignment

 The minimum radii of the curve corresponding to the design speed were applied as per
IRC stipulations. The minimum radius for horizontal curves for State Highways as per
IRC: SP: 84-2019 is given in Table .
Table 2 Radius of horizontal curve

Desirable Absolute Minimum Radius

Nature Of Terrain Minimum (m)
Radius (m)
Plain and Rolling 400 250
Mountainous & Steep 150 75

1.8.1. Superelevation

Super elevation is tilting the roadway to help offset centripetal forces developed as the
vehicle goes around a curve along with friction that keep a vehicle from going off the
road. The super elevation for horizontal curve was arrived as per the following equation:

V2
e
225R

Where, V - vehicle speed in km/hr.

e - Super elevation ratio in meter per meter

R - Radius in meters.

Page 8
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

The super elevation was calculated keeping in view the horizontal radii and gradient at
curves at different locations. The IRC:SP:84-2019 design standards propose a maximum
super-elevation rate of 7%. If the radius of curve less than the desirable minimum radius,
it was maintained to 5 percent if radius is more than or equal to the desirable minimum.
Super elevation shall not be less than the minimum specified cross fall.

1.8.1.1. Transition Curves

 Properly designed transition curves shall be provided at both ends of the circular curve
as per IRC 38:1988.

1.8.1.2. Sight Distance.

 Sight distance, in the context of road design, is how far a road user (usually a vehicle
driver) can see before the line of sight is blocked by a hill crest, or an obstacle on the
inside of a horizontal curve or intersection. Insufficient sight distance can have
implications for the safety or operations of a roadway or intersection. The ability to see
ahead is of critical importance in the safe and efficient operation of a vehicle Sight
distances are a direct function of the design speed, perception-reaction time, driver eye
height, object height and the coefficient of pavement friction.

Table 0-3 Safe Sight Distance

Design speed Safe stopping sight Desirable minimum sight distance

(km/hr) distance (m) (m) (Intermediate Sight Distance)
100 180 360

80 130 260

60 90 180
40 45 90

1.8.2. Vertical Alignment

The vertical alignment should provide for a smooth longitudinal profile. Grade changes

Page 9
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

shall not be too frequent as to cause kinks and visual discontinuities in the profile and grade
change shall not be allowed within 150m. In this regard, directions given in IRC:73 should be
kept in view. The vertical alignment shall be coordinated with the horizontal alignment.

1.8.2.1. Gradients
 Ruling gradient shall be adopted as far as possible. Limiting gradients shall be adopted
in difficult situations and for short length.
Table 0-4 Gradients

Terrain Ruling gradient Limiting gradient

Plain & Rolling 2.5% 3.3%

Mountainous 3% 4%

Steep 6% 7%

 In cut-sections, minimum gradient for drainage considerations is 0.5 percent (1 in 200) if

the side drains are lined; and 1.0 percent (1 in 100) if these are unlined.
 The proposed alignment falls in Plain terrain. Ruling gradient is adopted.

1.8.2.2. Vertical Curves

 Long sweeping vertical curves shall be provided at all grade changes. These shall be
designed as square parabolas.
 Design of Vertical curves and its coordination with horizontal curves, shall be in
accordance with IRC SP:23.
Table 0-5 Minimum Length of Vertical Curve

Design speed Minimum grade change Minimum length of

(km/hr) requiring vertical curve vertical curve (m)
80 0.6 50

100 0.5 60

Page 10
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

1.8.3. Coordination of Horizontal and Vertical Alignment

 The overall appearance of an expressway can be enhanced considerably by judicious
combination of the horizontal and vertical alignments. Plan and profile of the road shall
not be designed independently but in unison, so as to produce an appropriate three-
dimensional effect. Proper co-ordination in this respect will ensure safety, avoid visual
discontinuities and contribute to overall aesthetics. Vertical curvature superimposed
upon horizontal curvature gives a pleasing effect. As such the vertical and horizontal
curves shall coincide as far as possible and their length shall be more or less equal. If
this is difficult for any reason, the horizontal curve shall be somewhat longer than the
vertical curve. Short vertical curve superimposed on long horizontal curve and vice versa
gives distorted appearance and shall be avoided. Sharp horizontal curves shall be
avoided at or near the apex of pronounced summit/sag vertical curves from safety
considerations. The designer shall check profile design in long continuous plots to help
avoid a roller-coaster profile.

1.9. Median Openings

 In open country, median openings shall not be spaced closer than 2 km. Additional
controlled openings shall also be provided for inspection and diversion of traffic during
repair and rehabilitation. In built up area, median opening shall be provided as per site
requirement and the spacing between two medians opening in built up area shall not be
less than 500 m. All such locations shall be mentioned in Schedule ‘B’ of Concession
Agreement.
 Median opening shall not be provided in front of the service road entry. The distance
between the service road entry and the median opening shall be at least equal to the
sum of length of acceleration lane, weaving length, and deceleration length. This
distance shall however be not less than 150m. Location of opening shall be so decided
as to minimize contraflow.
 All median openings shall be provided with additional 3.5 m wide shelter lane by

Page 11
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

the side of median in both directions for waiting of vehicles to take U-turn. Wherever
required, horizontal geometries of the road shall be suitably adjusted. Length of median
opening shall be 18 to 20 m only.

 Length of median openings can be more than 20 m in case of median opening without
storage lane, to serve as neutral place for small vehicles to wait. All plantations and
objects in the median for at least 120 m from median tip shall be removed to ensure the
visibility between approaching vehicle and that waiting/turning at median openings

1.10. Fencing and Boundary Stones

Boundary stone shall be provided as per Section 12 of the manual. The ROW shall be
demarcated by installing Road Boundary Stones at the edges.

1.11. Typical Cross Sections

The proposed TCS are attached in drawing VOLUME IX.

1.12. Embankment and Cut Sections

The design and construction of the road in embankment and in cutting shall be carried out in
accordance with Section 300 of MORTH Specifications and the requirements, and standards
and specifications given in Section 4 of IRC SP 84:2019 Manual. The Section 4 also covers
specifications for subgrade and earthen shoulders.

1.13. Pavement Design

The design of pavement was done as per IRC guidelines. Both rigid and flexible pavement
options were studied and the most appropriate option was established based on construction
cost, life-cycle costing and techno-economic consideration. The design of pavement structure
should take due account of the type, characteristics of materials used in the respective courses,
variability of their properties and also the reliability of traffic predictions.

Page 12
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

The pavement design is justified by clearly explaining the basic assumptions, values of the
various design inputs, rationale behind the selection of the design inputs and the criteria for
checking and control during the implementation of works. As the paved shoulders, are an
integral part of the main carriageway pavement, the same pavement composition is proposed..
The guidelines to be followed for the Pavement design are IRC 37, IRC 58, and IRC SP
84:2019 four lane highway divided manual.

1.13.1. Type of Pavement

The type and crust thickness of Pavement for Main Carriageway and paved shoulders/edge
strips will be finalized considering the existing site condition, locally available materials and
project viability.

1.13.1.1. Design of Flexible Pavement

The pavement shall be designed to ensure the specified performance for the projected traffic
needs, climate and type of soils in the given area. A design procedure that is appropriate to
produce a cost-effective structure meeting the performance requirements and long term
durability shall be taken into account. Use of IRC 37 "Tentative Guidelines for the Design of
Flexible Pavements" or any internationally accepted design procedure that is based on past
performance and research will be used as basis for design.

1.13.1.2. Design of Plain Jointed Rigid Pavement

Plain Jointed rigid pavement shall be designed in accordance with the method prescribed in IRC
58 "Guidelines for the Design of Plain Jointed Rigid Pavements for Highways".

1.13.1.3. Design of Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavement

Continuously Reinforced Concrete Pavements (CRCP) shall be designed in accordance with

IRC 101 as well as any recognized international guidelines which shall be subject to approval by
the Authority.

Page 13
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

1.14. Standard for At-grade Intersections

Road junction/intersection is a key element of highway design. The efficiency, safety, speed,
cost of operation and capacity of road system depends very much on the intersection design.
The choice between at-grade junctions at a particular site depends upon various factors such as
traffic, economy, safety, aesthetic delay etc. The main objective of intersection design is to
reduce the severity of potential conflicts between motor vehicles, buses, trucks, bicycles,
pedestrians and facilities while facilitating the convenience, ease and comfort of people
traversing the intersections. The design should be fitted closely to the natural transitional paths
and operating characteristics of the users. Design of a safe intersection depends on many
factors as given below:

 Human factors
 Traffic considerations (design hour turning movements, type of movement and vehicle
speeds).
 Road and environmental considerations (sight distance, conflict area, geometric features)
 Economic factors.
 Generally intersections can be classified in to four categories depending on traffic conditions.
 Uncontrolled intersections at-grade;
 Intersections with Priority Control;
 Time separated / signalized intersection at-grade;
 Space separated intersections/Grade separated intersections
 Each junction on the project road was carefully designed with due regard to physical
conditions of the site, extent and cost of land, cost of construction and the effect of proposal on
the neighbourhood. Various design parameters used for intersection design are discussed in
the following paragraphs.

Page 14
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

1.15. Materials

All materials to be used in works shall be in conformity with the requirements laid down for
relevant item in MORTH Specifications. If any material, which is not covered in MORTH
Specifications, is used, shall conform to IRC or relevant Indian or International Standards,
provisions.

1.16. Drainage

For efficient drainage system for the entire Project Expressway including structures, directions
contained in Clause 309 of MORTH Specifications, Section 6 of IRC SP 84:2019 as relevant
shall be followed.

1.17. Traffic Signs and Road Markings

The design of road traffic signs, road marking and guidelines on design and installation of road
traffic signals were done according to the IRC standards. Road markings perform the important
function of guiding and controlling traffic on a highway. The markings serve as psychological
barriers and signify the delineation of traffic paths and their lateral clearance from traffic hazards
for safe movement of traffic. Road markings are therefore essential to ensure smooth and
orderly flow of traffic and to promote road safety. The location and type of marking lines,
material and colour is followed as per IRC: 35-2015, Code of Practice for Road Markings. The
road markings were carefully planned on carriageways, intersections, and bridge locations.
Cautionary, mandatory and informatory signs were provided depending on the situation and
function they perform in accordance with the IRC: 67-2022 guidelines for Road Signs. The
design, location, materials, definitions plate, route marker assembly at junctions, colour of back
sign of post and inscription shall be done as per IRC-2- 1985.

Page 15
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

1.18. Delineators and Object Markers

Roadway delineators are intended to mark the edges of the roadway so as to guide drivers on
the alignment ahead. Object markers were used to indicate hazards and obstructions within the
vehicle flow path, for example, channelling islands close to the intersections.

Delineators and object markers were provided as per the details given in the drawings and in
accordance with the provisions of IRC: 79-1989. They are basically driving aids and should not
be regarded as substitutes for warning signs, road markings or barriers. Delineators were
provided for all curves of radius less than 750m. They are not provided at locations where
Chevron sign boards are provided.

Attenuators were provided at hazard markers locations given in IRC:79, structural columns of
large direction signs, illumination lamp posts and at approaching traffic inlands of toll plaza. It
shall take repeated impacts without any additional recovery procedures and with minimal or no
repairs. The attenuators modules shall be moulded from HDPE plastic. The design, size,
number of modules, etc. of attenuators shall be as per International Standards and location
specific duly considering the likely impact.

1.19. Railings and RCC Crash Barrier

Crash barrier system absorbs impact of vehicle and laterally restrains a vehicle from veering off.
This ensures minimum damage to the vehicle and passengers. Crash barrier of Grade M-40 has
been provided at structure location.

1.20. Structural Design

General Arrangement Drawing (GAD) supplemented by Preliminary designs and Alignment Plan
for the bridges, and other major structures proposed for the project were finalized based upon
hydraulic and geo-technical studies, cost effectiveness and ease of construction. Few
alternatives on span arrangement and type of bridge with cost-benefit implications were
submitted to PWD to approve the best alternative.

Page 16
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Wherever available land is not adequate for accommodating embankment slope, suitable
design for RCC retaining wall or RE wall, depending upon techno-economic suitability, was
proposed.

1.21. Codes and Specifications

The design of the roadway and all the structures are conformed to the IRC Codes and
Specifications as well as MoRTH Standard Specifications. In case, these codes are silent on
any requirement, the following documents were followed in that order:-

 IRC SP:73 2015

 Indian Standard Codes issued by the Bureau of Indian Standards.
 Any other Standard Literature published and well recognised.

1.22. Traffic Management Systems

Advance Traffic Management Systems (ATMS) shall be provided as per Clause 816 of MORTH
Specifications for road and bridge works.

ATMS shall have the following sub-systems and shall be provided as per site conditions and
design Proposals.

 Emergency Call Boxes

 Mobile Communication System
 Variable Message Signs System
 Meteorological Data System
 Automatic Traffic Counter and Vehicle Classification
 Video Surveillance System
 Video Incident Detection System (VIDS)

1.23. Toll Plazas

Toll plazas shall be provided as per NHAI/Policy Guidelines/Management of Plaza/2021 Policy

Circular No 17.5.82 dated 24.05.2021

Page 17
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

DESIGN CALCULATIONS

Horizontal Alignment:-

Calculation for Superelevation:-

 Super elevation, e = V^2 / 225 x R
For design speed of 100 KMPH with min radius of 400
e = 100^2 / 225 x 400
e = 10000 / 90000
e = 0.11, (or) e = 11%.
As per IRC SP 84-2019 Cl 2.9.3 Superelevation shall be limited to 5%

Calculation for Radii of Horizontal Curves

The absolute minimum radii and desirable minimum of horizontal curves are given inError!
Reference source not found.

Table 0-1 Minimum Radii of Horizontal Curves

Design speed (km/h) 100

Absolute minimum radius (m) 250

Desirable minimum radius (m) 400

Min. Horizontal radius R= V^2 / 127 (e+f).

Whereas e is super elevation & f is friction factor.

e = 7% & f = 0.11

R = 100 x 100 / 127 (0.07 + 0.11)

R = 10000 / 22.86

R = 437.44 Say, 440m.

Page 18
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Calculation for Transition Curves

 Properly designed transition curves shall be provided at both ends of the circular curve.
The recommended minimum length of transition curves is given inError! Reference
ource not found..
Table 0-2 Minimum Length of Transition Curves

Design speed (km/h) Minimum length of transition curve (m)

100 115

Length of transition by Centrifugal force

Ls = 0.0215 V^3 / CR

Where Ls, is length of transition in meters

V =speed in KMPH

R = Radius of circular curve in meters.

C = 80 / 75+ V

C = 80 / (75 + 100) = 0.457

Ls = 0.0215 x 100^3 / 0.457 x 700

Ls = 117.614 Say, 118m.

Min Transition required for Radius of 400R shall be 118m.

Calculation for Sight Distance

 The safe stopping sight distance and desirable minimum sight distance for divided
carriageway for various design speeds are given in Table 0-3. The desirable values of
sight distance shall be adopted unless there are site constraints. A minimum of safe
stopping sight distance shall be available throughout.
 Stopping sight distance for design speed of 120kmph.
SSD = 0.278 v*t + V^2 / 254*f

Where, v = 100, t = 2.5 sec & f =0.35.

Page 19
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

SSD = (0.278 x 100 x 2.5) + (100^2 / 254 x 0.35)

SSD = 69.5 + 112.485
SSD = 181.9, Say 180m.
SSD = 180m.
Intermediate sight distance
ISD = 2 x SSD
ISD = 2 x 180
ISD = 360m.
Table 0-3 Safe Sight Distance

Design speed Safe stopping sight Desirable minimum sight distance

(km/hr) distance (m) (m) (Intermediate Sight Distance)
100 180 360

Vertical Alignment:-

Gradients
 The ruling and limiting gradients are given in Table 1-8.
Table 0-8 Gradients

Terrain Ruling gradient Limiting gradient

Plain 2.5% 3.0%

Rolling 3.0% 4.0%

 In cut-sections, minimum gradient for drainage considerations is 0.5 percent (1 in 200) if

the side drains are lined; and 1.0 percent (1 in 100) if these are unlined.

Calculation for Vertical Curves

 Min Length of summit curve for safe stopping sight distance for design speed of
120Kmph
L = N*S^2 / 4.4
Where N is algebraic difference n=0.01%.
L = 0.01 X 180^2 / 4.4

Page 20
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

L = 73.63m. Say, L= 74m

 Required K-Value for Summit curve
K=L/A
K = 74 / 0.545
K =135

 Min Length of Valley curve for safe stopping sight distance

L = N*S^2 / (1.5 + 0.035 S)
L = 0.01 *180^2 / (1.5+0.035x180)
L = 41.5
 Required K-Value for Valley curve
K=L/A
K = 41.5 / 1
K = 41.5
Table 0-4 Minimum Length of Vertical Curve

Design speed Minimum grade change Minimum length of

(km/hr) requiring vertical curve vertical curve (m)
100 0.5 60

Page 21
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT REPORT:-

Horizontal aignment report
Parameter
Type Length Radius Start Station End Station
Constraint
Two
Line 93.684m 74+351.00m 74+444.68m
points
Curve Radius 11.619m 2000.000m 74+444.68m 74+456.30m
Two
Line 158.549m 74+456.30m 74+614.85m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 50.370m 2000.000m 74+614.85m 74+665.22m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 37.036m 74+665.22m 74+702.26m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 40.312m 2000.000m 74+702.26m 74+742.57m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 212.820m 74+742.57m 74+955.39m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 10.994m 2000.000m 74+955.39m 74+966.39m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 22
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 163.022m 74+966.39m 75+129.41m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 21.397m 2000.000m 75+129.41m 75+150.81m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 20.083m 75+150.81m 75+170.89m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 55.000m 75+170.89m 75+225.89m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 84.042m 900.000m 75+225.89m 75+309.93m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 55.000m 75+309.93m 75+364.93m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 83.867m 75+364.93m 75+448.80m
points
Spiral
Curve-
length and 0.000m
Spiral
Radius
Spiral
Curve-
length and 23.782m 2000.000m 75+448.80m 75+472.58m
Spiral
Radius
Spiral
Curve-
length and 0.000m
Spiral
Radius

Page 23
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Two
Line 251.425m 75+472.58m 75+724.00m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.316m 2000.000m 75+724.00m 75+725.32m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 260.214m 75+725.32m 75+985.53m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 50.000m 75+985.53m 76+035.53m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 23.900m 1000.000m 76+035.53m 76+059.43m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 50.000m 76+059.43m 76+109.43m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 137.991m 76+109.43m 76+247.43m
points
Curve Radius 6.167m 2000.000m 76+247.43m 76+253.59m
Two
Line 128.776m 76+253.59m 76+382.37m
points
Two
Line 106.710m 76+382.37m 76+489.08m
points
Two
Line 102.688m 76+489.08m 76+591.77m
points
Two
Line 111.619m 76+591.77m 76+703.39m
points
Two
Line 109.381m 76+703.39m 76+812.77m
points
Two
Line 46.887m 76+812.77m 76+859.65m
points

Page 24
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Two
Line 78.529m 76+859.65m 76+938.18m
points
Two
Line 200.211m 76+938.18m 77+138.39m
points
Two
Line 75.358m 77+138.39m 77+213.75m
points
Two
Line 83.239m 77+213.75m 77+296.99m
points
Two
Line 63.315m 77+296.99m 77+360.31m
points
Two
Line 37.996m 77+360.31m 77+398.30m
points
Two
Line 8.491m 77+398.30m 77+406.79m
points
Two
Line 12.322m 77+406.79m 77+419.11m
points
Two
Line 14.195m 77+419.11m 77+433.31m
points
Two
Line 28.968m 77+433.31m 77+462.28m
points
Two
Line 3.121m 77+462.28m 77+465.40m
points
Two
Line 31.382m 77+465.40m 77+496.78m
points
Two
Line 25.834m 77+496.78m 77+522.61m
points
Two
Line 27.411m 77+522.61m 77+550.03m
points
Two
Line 33.767m 77+550.03m 77+583.79m
points
Two
Line 24.361m 77+583.79m 77+608.15m
points
Two
Line 29.651m 77+608.15m 77+637.80m
points
Two
Line 41.002m 77+637.80m 77+678.81m
points
Two
Line 26.040m 77+678.81m 77+704.85m
points
Two
Line 17.683m 77+704.85m 77+722.53m
points

Page 25
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Two
Line 14.256m 77+722.53m 77+736.79m
points
Two
Line 30.808m 77+736.79m 77+767.59m
points
Two
Line 37.506m 77+767.59m 77+805.10m
points
Two
Line 9.373m 77+805.10m 77+814.47m
points
Two
Line 79.108m 77+814.47m 77+893.58m
points
Two
Line 48.206m 77+893.58m 77+941.79m
points
Two
Line 55.774m 77+941.79m 77+997.56m
points
Two
Line 283.559m 77+997.56m 78+281.12m
points
Two
Line 32.482m 78+281.12m 78+313.60m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 18.213m 2000.000m 78+313.60m 78+331.82m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 95.299m 78+331.82m 78+427.12m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 40.000m 78+427.12m 78+467.12m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 282.791m 1200.000m 78+467.12m 78+749.91m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 40.000m 78+749.91m 78+789.91m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 26
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Two
Line 79.935m 78+789.91m 78+869.84m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 12.302m 2000.000m 78+869.84m 78+882.14m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 47.002m 78+882.14m 78+929.15m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 6.383m 2000.000m 78+929.15m 78+935.53m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 76.386m 78+935.53m 79+011.91m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 15.296m 2000.000m 79+011.91m 79+027.21m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 54.850m 79+027.21m 79+082.06m
points

Page 27
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 38.433m 2000.000m 79+082.06m 79+120.49m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 134.823m 79+120.49m 79+255.32m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 11.371m 2000.000m 79+255.32m 79+266.69m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 19.557m 79+266.69m 79+286.24m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 55.000m 79+286.24m 79+341.24m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 230.689m 900.000m 79+341.24m 79+571.93m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 55.000m 79+571.93m 79+626.93m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 37.511m 79+626.93m 79+664.44m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 28
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 74.344m 2000.000m 79+664.44m 79+738.79m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 90.567m 79+738.79m 79+829.35m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 31.680m 2000.000m 79+829.35m 79+861.03m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 171.976m 79+861.03m 80+033.01m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 41.492m 2000.000m 80+033.01m 80+074.50m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 38.185m 80+074.50m 80+112.69m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 57.260m 2000.000m 80+112.69m 80+169.95m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 29
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 61.940m 80+169.95m 80+231.89m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 7.227m 2000.000m 80+231.89m 80+239.11m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 144.994m 80+239.11m 80+384.11m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 10.699m 2000.000m 80+384.11m 80+394.81m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 23.587m 80+394.81m 80+418.40m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 31.564m 2000.000m 80+418.40m 80+449.96m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Line Two 3.610m 80+449.96m 80+453.57m

Page 30
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 25.891m 2000.000m 80+453.57m 80+479.46m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 53.849m 80+479.46m 80+533.31m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 4.589m 2000.000m 80+533.31m 80+537.90m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 14.742m 80+537.90m 80+552.64m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 20.996m 2000.000m 80+552.64m 80+573.64m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 5.528m 80+573.64m 80+579.17m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 31
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 17.847m 2000.000m 80+579.17m 80+597.01m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 22.280m 80+597.01m 80+619.29m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 35.716m 2000.000m 80+619.29m 80+655.01m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 43.777m 80+655.01m 80+698.79m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 20.383m 2000.000m 80+698.79m 80+719.17m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 16.882m 80+719.17m 80+736.05m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 40.000m 80+736.05m 80+776.05m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 186.825m 1200.000m 80+776.05m 80+962.88m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 32
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 40.000m 80+962.88m 81+002.88m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 97.033m 81+002.88m 81+099.91m
points
Spiral
Curve-
length and 0.000m
Spiral
Radius
Spiral
Curve-
length and 10.295m 2000.000m 81+099.91m 81+110.20m
Spiral
Radius
Spiral
Curve-
length and 1.000m 81+110.20m 81+111.20m
Spiral
Radius
Two
Line 146.580m 81+111.20m 81+257.78m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+257.78m 81+258.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 22.113m 2000.000m 81+258.78m 81+280.90m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+280.90m 81+281.90m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 11.320m 81+281.90m 81+293.22m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+293.22m 81+294.22m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 41.479m 2000.000m 81+294.22m 81+335.70m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+335.70m 81+336.70m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 36.374m 81+336.70m 81+373.07m
points

Page 33
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+373.07m 81+374.07m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 34.949m 2000.000m 81+374.07m 81+409.02m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+409.02m 81+410.02m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 57.266m 81+410.02m 81+467.29m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+467.29m 81+468.29m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 37.496m 2000.000m 81+468.29m 81+505.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+505.78m 81+506.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 31.947m 81+506.78m 81+538.73m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+538.73m 81+539.73m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 21.120m 2000.000m 81+539.73m 81+560.85m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+560.85m 81+561.85m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 106.548m 81+561.85m 81+668.40m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+668.40m 81+669.40m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 34
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 7.829m 2000.000m 81+669.40m 81+677.23m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+677.23m 81+678.23m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 206.403m 81+678.23m 81+884.63m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+884.63m 81+885.63m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 14.585m 2000.000m 81+885.63m 81+900.21m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 81+900.21m 81+901.21m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 203.062m 81+901.21m 82+104.28m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 35.000m 82+104.28m 82+139.28m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 95.816m 1500.000m 82+139.28m 82+235.09m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 35.000m 82+235.09m 82+270.09m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 171.122m 82+270.09m 82+441.21m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 82+441.21m 82+442.21m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 53.025m 2000.000m 82+442.21m 82+495.24m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 35
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 82+495.24m 82+496.24m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 184.897m 82+496.24m 82+681.13m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 82+681.13m 82+682.13m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 6.166m 2000.000m 82+682.13m 82+688.30m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 82+688.30m 82+689.30m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 118.386m 82+689.30m 82+807.69m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 82+807.69m 82+808.69m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 24.299m 2000.000m 82+808.69m 82+832.99m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 82+832.99m 82+833.99m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 150.765m 82+833.99m 82+984.75m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 82+984.75m 82+985.75m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 22.451m 2000.000m 82+985.75m 83+008.20m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+008.20m 83+009.20m
Spiral SpiOut
Line Two 40.558m 83+009.20m 83+049.76m

Page 36
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+049.76m 83+050.76m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 29.188m 2000.000m 83+050.76m 83+079.95m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+079.95m 83+080.95m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 541.629m 83+080.95m 83+622.58m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+622.58m 83+623.58m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 22.578m 2000.000m 83+623.58m 83+646.16m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+646.16m 83+647.16m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 82.107m 83+647.16m 83+729.26m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+729.26m 83+730.26m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 26.137m 2000.000m 83+730.26m 83+756.40m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+756.40m 83+757.40m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 76.697m 83+757.40m 83+834.10m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+834.10m 83+835.10m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 37
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 31.765m 2000.000m 83+835.10m 83+866.86m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+866.86m 83+867.86m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 28.986m 83+867.86m 83+896.85m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+896.85m 83+897.85m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 75.872m 2000.000m 83+897.85m 83+973.72m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+973.72m 83+974.72m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 0.246m 83+974.72m 83+974.97m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 83+974.97m 83+975.97m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 99.253m 2000.000m 83+975.97m 84+075.22m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+075.22m 84+076.22m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 26.374m 84+076.22m 84+102.59m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 60.000m 84+102.59m 84+162.59m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.497m 800.000m 84+162.59m 84+163.09m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 38
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 60.000m 84+163.09m 84+223.09m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 80.160m 84+223.09m 84+303.25m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+303.25m 84+304.25m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 79.256m 2000.000m 84+304.25m 84+383.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+383.51m 84+384.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 102.723m 84+384.51m 84+487.23m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+487.23m 84+488.23m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 26.202m 2000.000m 84+488.23m 84+514.43m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+514.43m 84+515.43m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 148.520m 84+515.43m 84+663.95m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+663.95m 84+664.95m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 18.510m 2000.000m 84+664.95m 84+683.46m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+683.46m 84+684.46m
Spiral SpiOut
Line Two 79.714m 84+684.46m 84+764.18m

Page 39
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+764.18m 84+765.18m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 34.798m 2000.000m 84+765.18m 84+799.97m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+799.97m 84+800.97m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 55.875m 84+800.97m 84+856.85m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+856.85m 84+857.85m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 12.197m 2000.000m 84+857.85m 84+870.04m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 84+870.04m 84+871.04m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 284.579m 84+871.04m 85+155.62m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 85+155.62m 85+156.62m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 22.413m 2000.000m 85+156.62m 85+179.04m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 85+179.04m 85+180.04m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 239.461m 85+180.04m 85+419.50m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 85+419.50m 85+420.50m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 40
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 7.421m 2000.000m 85+420.50m 85+427.92m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 85+427.92m 85+428.92m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 341.005m 85+428.92m 85+769.92m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 85+769.92m 85+770.92m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 29.902m 2000.000m 85+770.92m 85+800.83m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 85+800.83m 85+801.83m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 141.285m 85+801.83m 85+943.11m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 85+943.11m 85+944.11m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 9.482m 2000.000m 85+944.11m 85+953.59m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 85+953.59m 85+954.59m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 92.134m 85+954.59m 86+046.73m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+046.73m 86+047.73m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 12.395m 2000.000m 86+047.73m 86+060.12m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 41
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+060.12m 86+061.12m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 90.909m 86+061.12m 86+152.03m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+152.03m 86+153.03m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 13.481m 2000.000m 86+153.03m 86+166.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+166.51m 86+167.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 207.601m 86+167.51m 86+375.11m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+375.11m 86+376.11m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.998m 2000.000m 86+376.11m 86+378.11m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+378.11m 86+379.11m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 151.623m 86+379.11m 86+530.73m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+530.73m 86+531.73m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 29.224m 2000.000m 86+531.73m 86+560.96m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+560.96m 86+561.96m
Spiral SpiOut
Line Two 50.295m 86+561.96m 86+612.25m

Page 42
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+612.25m 86+613.25m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 42.383m 2000.000m 86+613.25m 86+655.64m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+655.64m 86+656.64m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 113.743m 86+656.64m 86+770.38m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+770.38m 86+771.38m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 27.304m 2000.000m 86+771.38m 86+798.68m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+798.68m 86+799.68m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 137.726m 86+799.68m 86+937.41m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+937.41m 86+938.41m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.007m 2000.000m 86+938.41m 86+939.42m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 86+939.42m 86+940.42m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 149.743m 86+940.42m 87+090.16m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+090.16m 87+091.16m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 43
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 28.624m 2000.000m 87+091.16m 87+119.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+119.78m 87+120.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 18.996m 87+120.78m 87+139.78m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+139.78m 87+140.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 21.732m 2000.000m 87+140.78m 87+162.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+162.51m 87+163.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 294.484m 87+163.51m 87+458.00m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+458.00m 87+459.00m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 9.314m 2000.000m 87+459.00m 87+468.31m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+468.31m 87+469.31m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 83.468m 87+469.31m 87+552.78m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+552.78m 87+553.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 15.371m 2000.000m 87+553.78m 87+569.15m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 44
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+569.15m 87+570.15m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 39.291m 87+570.15m 87+609.44m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+609.44m 87+610.44m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 8.701m 2000.000m 87+610.44m 87+619.14m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+619.14m 87+620.14m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 46.597m 87+620.14m 87+666.74m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+666.74m 87+667.74m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 39.011m 2000.000m 87+667.74m 87+706.75m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+706.75m 87+707.75m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 33.988m 87+707.75m 87+741.74m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+741.74m 87+742.74m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 47.198m 2000.000m 87+742.74m 87+789.93m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+789.93m 87+790.93m
Spiral SpiOut
Line Two 25.969m 87+790.93m 87+816.90m

Page 45
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+816.90m 87+817.90m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 47.977m 2000.000m 87+817.90m 87+865.88m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+865.88m 87+866.88m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 6.618m 87+866.88m 87+873.50m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+873.50m 87+874.50m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 24.523m 1000.000m 87+874.50m 87+899.02m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+899.02m 87+900.02m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 16.334m 87+900.02m 87+916.35m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+916.35m 87+917.35m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 67.294m 2000.000m 87+917.35m 87+984.65m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 87+984.65m 87+985.65m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 29.429m 87+985.65m 88+015.08m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+015.08m 88+016.08m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 46
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 33.010m 2000.000m 88+016.08m 88+049.09m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+049.09m 88+050.09m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 9.775m 88+050.09m 88+059.86m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+059.86m 88+060.86m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 25.815m 2000.000m 88+060.86m 88+086.68m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+086.68m 88+087.68m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 360.160m 88+087.68m 88+447.84m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+447.84m 88+448.84m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.117m 2000.000m 88+448.84m 88+449.95m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+449.95m 88+450.95m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 60.600m 88+450.95m 88+511.55m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+511.55m 88+512.55m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 17.734m 2000.000m 88+512.55m 88+530.29m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 47
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+530.29m 88+531.29m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 24.699m 88+531.29m 88+555.99m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+555.99m 88+556.99m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 6.743m 500.000m 88+556.99m 88+563.73m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+563.73m 88+564.73m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 10.569m 88+564.73m 88+575.30m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+575.30m 88+576.30m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 17.038m 2000.000m 88+576.30m 88+593.34m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+593.34m 88+594.34m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 1.310m 88+594.34m 88+595.65m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+595.65m 88+596.65m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 50.341m 2000.000m 88+596.65m 88+646.99m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+646.99m 88+647.99m
Spiral SpiOut
Line Two 1.600m 88+647.99m 88+649.59m

Page 48
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+649.59m 88+650.59m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 19.126m 2000.000m 88+650.59m 88+669.72m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+669.72m 88+670.72m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 7.603m 88+670.72m 88+678.32m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+678.32m 88+679.32m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 24.228m 2000.000m 88+679.32m 88+703.55m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+703.55m 88+704.55m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 13.705m 88+704.55m 88+718.25m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+718.25m 88+719.25m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 38.680m 2000.000m 88+719.25m 88+757.93m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+757.93m 88+758.93m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 18.152m 88+758.93m 88+777.08m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+777.08m 88+778.08m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 49
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 43.971m 2000.000m 88+778.08m 88+822.05m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+822.05m 88+823.05m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 11.682m 88+823.05m 88+834.74m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+834.74m 88+835.74m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 23.200m 2000.000m 88+835.74m 88+858.94m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 88+858.94m 88+859.94m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 220.001m 88+859.94m 89+079.94m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+079.94m 89+080.94m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 22.565m 2000.000m 89+080.94m 89+103.50m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+103.50m 89+104.50m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 58.119m 89+104.50m 89+162.62m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+162.62m 89+163.62m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 22.933m 2000.000m 89+163.62m 89+186.55m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 50
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+186.55m 89+187.55m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 339.452m 89+187.55m 89+527.01m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+527.01m 89+528.01m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 27.187m 2000.000m 89+528.01m 89+555.19m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+555.19m 89+556.19m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 2.094m 89+556.19m 89+558.29m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+558.29m 89+559.29m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 18.845m 2000.000m 89+559.29m 89+578.13m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+578.13m 89+579.13m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 149.182m 89+579.13m 89+728.32m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+728.32m 89+729.32m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 28.842m 2000.000m 89+729.32m 89+758.16m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+758.16m 89+759.16m
Spiral SpiOut
Line Two 0.833m 89+759.16m 89+759.99m

Page 51
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+759.99m 89+760.99m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 28.261m 2000.000m 89+760.99m 89+789.25m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+789.25m 89+790.25m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 109.129m 89+790.25m 89+899.38m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+899.38m 89+900.38m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 12.753m 2000.000m 89+900.38m 89+913.13m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+913.13m 89+914.13m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 17.335m 89+914.13m 89+931.47m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+931.47m 89+932.47m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 9.041m 2000.000m 89+932.47m 89+941.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 89+941.51m 89+942.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 136.295m 89+942.51m 90+078.80m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+078.80m 90+079.80m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 52
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.980m 2000.000m 90+079.80m 90+080.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+080.78m 90+081.78m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 100.419m 90+081.78m 90+182.20m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+182.20m 90+183.20m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 5.449m 2000.000m 90+183.20m 90+188.65m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+188.65m 90+189.65m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 231.696m 90+189.65m 90+421.35m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+421.35m 90+422.35m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 11.416m 2000.000m 90+422.35m 90+433.76m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+433.76m 90+434.76m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 63.886m 90+434.76m 90+498.65m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+498.65m 90+499.65m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.447m 2000.000m 90+499.65m 90+501.10m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 53
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+501.10m 90+502.10m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 32.092m 90+502.10m 90+534.19m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+534.19m 90+535.19m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 14.479m 2000.000m 90+535.19m 90+549.67m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+549.67m 90+550.67m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 79.840m 90+550.67m 90+630.51m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+630.51m 90+631.51m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.884m 2000.000m 90+631.51m 90+632.39m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+632.39m 90+633.39m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 106.376m 90+633.39m 90+739.77m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+739.77m 90+740.77m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 22.301m 2000.000m 90+740.77m 90+763.07m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+763.07m 90+764.07m
Spiral SpiOut
Line Two 30.370m 90+764.07m 90+794.44m

Page 54
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+794.44m 90+795.44m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 155.783m 2000.000m 90+795.44m 90+951.22m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 90+951.22m 90+952.22m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 56.746m 90+952.22m 91+008.97m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 91+008.97m 91+009.97m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 20.022m 2000.000m 91+009.97m 91+029.99m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 91+029.99m 91+030.99m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 47.443m 91+030.99m 91+078.44m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 91+078.44m 91+079.44m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 5.996m 2000.000m 91+079.44m 91+085.43m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 91+085.43m 91+086.43m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 251.968m 91+086.43m 91+338.40m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 91+338.40m 91+339.40m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 55
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 10.077m 2000.000m 91+339.40m 91+349.48m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 91+349.48m 91+350.48m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 88.311m 91+350.48m 91+438.79m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 91+438.79m 91+439.79m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 21.558m 2000.000m 91+439.79m 91+461.34m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 1.000m 91+461.34m 91+462.34m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 19.950m 91+462.34m 91+482.30m
points
Spiral
Spiral-
length and 1.000m 91+482.30m 91+483.30m
Curve
Radius
Spiral
Spiral-
length and 28.508m 2000.000m 91+483.30m 91+511.80m
Curve
Radius
Spiral
Spiral-
length and 0.000m
Curve
Radius
Two
Line 2.923m 91+511.80m 91+514.73m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 54.161m 2000.000m 91+514.73m 91+568.89m
Spiral SpiOut

Page 56
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line 17.791m 91+568.89m 91+586.68m
points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 20.134m 2000.000m 91+586.68m 91+606.81m
Spiral SpiOut
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius- 0.000m
Spiral SpiOut
Two
Line points 177.002m 91+606.70m 91+783.70m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 91+783.70m 91+784.70m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 16.897m 2000.000m 91+784.70m 91+801.60m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 91+801.60m 91+802.60m
Two
Line points 32.371m 91+802.60m 91+834.97m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 91+834.97m 91+835.97m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 29.635m 2000.000m 91+835.97m 91+865.61m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 91+865.61m 91+866.61m
Line Two 59.467m 91+866.61m 91+926.07m

Page 57
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 91+926.07m 91+927.07m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 23.321m 2000.000m 91+927.07m 91+950.39m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 91+950.39m 91+951.39m
Two
Line points 175.546m 91+951.39m 92+126.94m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+126.94m 92+127.94m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 7.113m 2000.000m 92+127.94m 92+135.05m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+135.05m 92+136.05m
Two
Line points 40.683m 92+136.05m 92+176.73m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+176.73m 92+177.73m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 10.685m 2000.000m 92+177.73m 92+188.42m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+188.42m 92+189.42m
Two
Line points 104.703m 92+189.42m 92+294.12m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+294.12m 92+295.12m

Page 58
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 14.348m 2000.000m 92+295.12m 92+309.47m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+309.47m 92+310.47m
Two
Line points 35.976m 92+310.47m 92+346.45m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+346.45m 92+347.45m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 50.101m 2000.000m 92+347.45m 92+397.55m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+397.55m 92+398.55m
Two
Line points 48.630m 92+398.55m 92+447.18m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+447.18m 92+448.18m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 36.025m 2000.000m 92+448.18m 92+484.20m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+484.20m 92+485.20m
Two
Line points 54.959m 92+485.20m 92+540.16m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+540.16m 92+541.16m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 15.900m 2000.000m 92+541.16m 92+557.06m

Page 59
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+557.06m 92+558.06m
Two
Line points 199.273m 92+558.06m 92+757.33m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+757.33m 92+758.33m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 39.277m 2000.000m 92+758.33m 92+797.61m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+797.61m 92+798.61m
Two
Line points 57.679m 92+798.61m 92+856.29m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+856.29m 92+857.29m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 42.662m 2000.000m 92+857.29m 92+899.95m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 92+899.95m 92+900.95m
Two
Line points 390.144m 92+900.95m 93+291.10m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 93+291.10m 93+292.10m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 122.769m 2000.000m 93+292.10m 93+414.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 93+414.87m 93+415.87m
Line Two 53.020m 93+415.87m 93+468.88m

Page 60
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 55.000m 93+468.88m 93+523.88m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 14.382m 900.000m 93+523.88m 93+538.27m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 55.000m 93+538.27m 93+593.27m
Two
Line points 51.633m 93+593.27m 93+644.90m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 90.000m 93+644.90m 93+734.90m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 42.932m 230.000m 93+734.90m 93+777.83m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 90.000m 93+777.83m 93+867.83m
Two
Line points 66.185m 93+867.83m 93+934.02m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 90.000m 93+934.02m 94+024.02m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 4.490m 230.000m 94+024.02m 94+028.51m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 90.000m 94+028.51m 94+118.51m
Two
Line points 96.842m 94+118.51m 94+215.35m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 45.000m 94+215.35m 94+260.35m

Page 61
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 10.535m 500.000m 94+260.35m 94+270.88m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 45.000m 94+270.88m 94+315.88m
Two
Line points 42.567m 94+315.88m 94+358.45m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 94+358.45m 94+359.45m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 41.117m 2000.000m 94+359.45m 94+400.57m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 94+400.57m 94+401.57m
Two
Line points 75.622m 94+401.57m 94+477.19m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 94+477.19m 94+478.19m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 11.360m 2000.000m 94+478.19m 94+489.55m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 94+489.55m 94+490.55m
Two
Line points 168.027m 94+490.55m 94+658.58m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 35.000m 94+658.58m 94+693.58m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 43.817m 600.000m 94+693.58m 94+737.39m

Page 62
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 35.000m 94+737.39m 94+772.39m
Two
Line points 45.880m 94+772.39m 94+818.27m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 94+818.27m 94+819.27m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 0.937m 200.000m 94+819.27m 94+820.21m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 94+820.21m 94+821.21m
Two
Line points 344.019m 94+821.21m 95+165.23m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+165.23m 95+166.23m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 12.545m 2000.000m 95+166.23m 95+178.77m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+178.77m 95+179.77m
Two
Line points 44.607m 95+179.77m 95+224.38m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+224.38m 95+225.38m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 61.340m 2000.000m 95+225.38m 95+286.72m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+286.72m 95+287.72m
Line Two 20.587m 95+287.72m 95+308.31m

Page 63
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+308.31m 95+309.31m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 17.032m 2000.000m 95+309.31m 95+326.34m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+326.34m 95+327.34m
Two
Line points 46.603m 95+327.34m 95+373.94m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+373.94m 95+374.94m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 49.111m 2000.000m 95+374.94m 95+424.05m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+424.05m 95+425.05m
Two
Line points 6.068m 95+425.05m 95+431.12m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+431.12m 95+432.12m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 33.707m 2000.000m 95+432.12m 95+465.83m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+465.83m 95+466.83m
Two
Line points 110.687m 95+466.83m 95+577.52m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+577.52m 95+578.52m

Page 64
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 13.606m 2000.000m 95+578.52m 95+592.12m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+592.12m 95+593.12m
Two
Line points 16.272m 95+593.12m 95+609.39m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+609.39m 95+610.39m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 49.316m 2000.000m 95+610.39m 95+659.71m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+659.71m 95+660.71m
Two
Line points 29.501m 95+660.71m 95+690.21m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+690.21m 95+691.21m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 11.612m 2000.000m 95+691.21m 95+702.82m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+702.82m 95+703.82m
Two
Line points 102.501m 95+703.82m 95+806.32m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+806.32m 95+807.32m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 24.384m 2000.000m 95+807.32m 95+831.71m

Page 65
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+831.71m 95+832.71m
Two
Line points 95.947m 95+832.71m 95+928.65m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+928.65m 95+929.65m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 18.434m 2000.000m 95+929.65m 95+948.09m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+948.09m 95+949.09m
Two
Line points 47.909m 95+949.09m 95+997.00m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 95+997.00m 95+998.00m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 13.114m 2000.000m 95+998.00m 96+011.11m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+011.11m 96+012.11m
Two
Line points 33.528m 96+012.11m 96+045.64m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+045.64m 96+046.64m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 90.864m 2000.000m 96+046.64m 96+137.50m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+137.50m 96+138.50m
Line Two 44.440m 96+138.50m 96+182.94m

Page 66
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+182.94m 96+183.94m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 11.069m 2000.000m 96+183.94m 96+195.01m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+195.01m 96+196.01m
Two
Line points 18.420m 96+196.01m 96+214.43m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+214.43m 96+215.43m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 6.287m 2000.000m 96+215.43m 96+221.72m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+221.72m 96+222.72m
Two
Line points 76.830m 96+222.72m 96+299.55m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+299.55m 96+300.55m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 2.410m 2000.000m 96+300.55m 96+302.96m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+302.96m 96+303.96m
Two
Line points 78.612m 96+303.96m 96+382.57m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+382.57m 96+383.57m

Page 67
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 8.401m 2000.000m 96+383.57m 96+391.97m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+391.97m 96+392.97m
Two
Line points 202.822m 96+392.97m 96+595.79m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+595.79m 96+596.79m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 20.039m 2000.000m 96+596.79m 96+616.83m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+616.83m 96+617.83m
Two
Line points 72.166m 96+617.83m 96+690.00m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+690.00m 96+691.00m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 15.686m 2000.000m 96+691.00m 96+706.69m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+706.69m 96+707.69m
Two
Line points 103.603m 96+707.69m 96+811.29m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+811.29m 96+812.29m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 11.928m 2000.000m 96+812.29m 96+824.22m

Page 68
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+824.22m 96+825.22m
Two
Line points 41.941m 96+825.22m 96+867.16m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+867.16m 96+868.16m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 61.194m 2000.000m 96+868.16m 96+929.35m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 96+929.35m 96+930.35m
Two
Line points 9.568m 96+930.35m 96+939.92m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 0.000m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 74.016m 2000.000m 96+939.92m 97+013.94m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 1.000m 97+013.94m 97+014.94m
Two
Line points 142.862m 97+014.94m 97+157.80m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+157.80m 97+158.80m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 3.532m 2000.000m 97+158.80m 97+162.33m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+162.33m 97+163.33m
Two
Line points 174.226m 97+163.33m 97+337.56m

Page 69
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 0.000m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 13.932m 2000.000m 97+337.56m 97+351.49m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 1.000m 97+351.49m 97+352.49m
Two
Line points 17.742m 97+352.49m 97+370.23m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+370.23m 97+371.23m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 48.863m 2000.000m 97+371.23m 97+420.09m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+420.09m 97+421.09m
Two
Line points 105.261m 97+421.09m 97+526.35m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+526.35m 97+527.35m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 39.211m 2000.000m 97+527.35m 97+566.56m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+566.56m 97+567.56m
Two
Line points 16.850m 97+567.56m 97+584.41m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+584.41m 97+585.41m

Page 70
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 34.741m 2000.000m 97+585.41m 97+620.15m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+620.15m 97+621.15m
Two
Line points 136.265m 97+621.15m 97+757.42m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+757.42m 97+758.42m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 3.355m 2000.000m 97+758.42m 97+761.77m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+761.77m 97+762.77m
Two
Line points 93.202m 97+762.77m 97+855.98m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+855.98m 97+856.98m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 14.517m 2000.000m 97+856.98m 97+871.49m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+871.49m 97+872.49m
Two
Line points 8.133m 97+872.49m 97+880.63m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 40.000m 97+880.63m 97+920.63m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 19.972m 1200.000m 97+920.63m 97+940.60m

Page 71
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 40.000m 97+940.60m 97+980.60m
Two
Line points 16.778m 97+980.60m 97+997.38m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 97+997.38m 97+998.38m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 29.810m 2000.000m 97+998.38m 98+028.19m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+028.19m 98+029.19m
Two
Line points 134.091m 98+029.19m 98+163.28m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+163.28m 98+164.28m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 30.255m 2200.000m 98+164.28m 98+194.53m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+194.53m 98+195.53m
Two
Line points 272.633m 98+195.53m 98+468.17m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+468.17m 98+469.17m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 50.328m 2200.000m 98+469.17m 98+519.49m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+519.49m 98+520.49m
Line Two 7.106m 98+520.49m 98+527.60m

Page 72
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+527.60m 98+528.60m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 54.840m 2200.000m 98+528.60m 98+583.44m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+583.44m 98+584.44m
Two
Line points 44.516m 98+584.44m 98+628.96m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+628.96m 98+629.96m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 48.752m 2200.000m 98+629.96m 98+678.71m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+678.71m 98+679.71m
Two
Line points 4.989m 98+679.71m 98+684.70m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+684.70m 98+685.70m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 48.459m 2200.000m 98+685.70m 98+734.16m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+734.16m 98+735.16m
Two
Line points 78.246m 98+735.16m 98+813.40m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+813.40m 98+814.40m

Page 73
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 34.616m 2200.000m 98+814.40m 98+849.02m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 98+849.02m 98+850.02m
Two
Line points 38.707m 98+850.02m 98+888.73m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 0.000m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 6.569m 2200.000m 98+888.73m 98+895.30m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 0.000m
Two
Line points 193.074m 98+895.30m 99+088.37m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+088.37m 99+089.37m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 3.225m 2200.000m 99+089.37m 99+092.59m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+092.59m 99+093.59m
Two
Line points 38.670m 99+093.59m 99+132.27m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+132.27m 99+133.27m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 3.564m 2200.000m 99+133.27m 99+136.83m

Page 74
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+136.83m 99+137.83m
Two
Line points 139.845m 99+137.83m 99+277.67m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+277.67m 99+278.67m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 11.199m 2200.000m 99+278.67m 99+289.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+289.87m 99+290.87m
Two
Line points 239.535m 99+290.87m 99+530.41m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+530.41m 99+531.41m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 3.644m 2200.000m 99+531.41m 99+535.05m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+535.05m 99+536.05m
Two
Line points 166.609m 99+536.05m 99+702.66m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+702.66m 99+703.66m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 12.777m 2200.000m 99+703.66m 99+716.44m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 99+716.44m 99+717.44m

Page 75
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Two
Line points 131.469m 99+717.44m 99+848.91m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 75.000m 99+848.91m 99+923.91m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 19.591m 300.000m 99+923.91m 99+943.50m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 75.000m 99+943.50m 100+018.50m
Two
Line points 31.371m 100+018.50m 100+049.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+049.87m 100+050.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 71.663m 1200.000m 100+050.87m 100+122.53m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+122.53m 100+123.53m
Two
Line points 274.166m 100+123.53m 100+397.70m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+397.70m 100+398.70m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 0.818m 2200.000m 100+398.70m 100+399.52m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+399.52m 100+400.52m
Two
Line points 81.466m 100+400.52m 100+481.98m

Page 76
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+481.98m 100+482.98m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 40.835m 2200.000m 100+482.98m 100+523.82m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+523.82m 100+524.82m
Two
Line points 23.054m 100+524.82m 100+547.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+547.87m 100+548.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 61.831m 2200.000m 100+548.87m 100+610.70m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+610.70m 100+611.70m
Two
Line points 36.091m 100+611.70m 100+647.79m
Two
Line points 71.843m 100+647.79m 100+719.63m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 0.000m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 1.436m 2200.000m 100+719.63m 100+721.07m
Spiral
Curve- length and
Spiral Radius 1.000m 100+721.07m 100+722.07m
Two
Line points 223.755m 100+722.07m 100+945.83m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+945.83m 100+946.83m

Page 77
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 28.614m 2200.000m 100+946.83m 100+975.44m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 100+975.44m 100+976.44m
Two
Line points 109.301m 100+976.44m 101+085.74m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+085.74m 101+086.74m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 15.924m 2200.000m 101+086.74m 101+102.66m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+102.66m 101+103.66m
Two
Line points 188.018m 101+103.66m 101+291.68m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+291.68m 101+292.68m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 29.707m 2200.000m 101+292.68m 101+322.39m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+322.39m 101+323.39m
Two
Line points 2.477m 101+323.39m 101+325.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+325.87m 101+326.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 75.678m 2200.000m 101+326.87m 101+402.55m

Page 78
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+402.55m 101+403.55m
Two
Line points 20.177m 101+403.55m 101+423.72m
Two
Line points 64.284m 101+423.72m 101+488.01m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+488.01m 101+489.01m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 26.720m 2200.000m 101+489.01m 101+515.73m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+515.73m 101+516.73m
Two
Line points 190.522m 101+516.73m 101+707.25m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+707.25m 101+708.25m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 22.414m 2200.000m 101+708.25m 101+730.66m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+730.66m 101+731.66m
Two
Line points 82.585m 101+731.66m 101+814.25m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+814.25m 101+815.25m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 13.669m 2200.000m 101+815.25m 101+828.92m

Page 79
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+828.92m 101+829.92m
Two
Line points 39.957m 101+829.92m 101+869.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+869.87m 101+870.87m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 39.688m 2200.000m 101+870.87m 101+910.56m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+910.56m 101+911.56m
Two
Line points 19.994m 101+911.56m 101+931.55m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+931.55m 101+932.55m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 66.620m 2200.000m 101+932.55m 101+999.17m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 101+999.17m 102+000.17m
Two
Line points 12.667m 102+000.17m 102+012.84m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 102+012.84m 102+013.84m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 38.127m 1200.000m 102+013.84m 102+051.97m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 1.000m 102+051.97m 102+052.97m
Line Two 14.103m 102+052.97m 102+067.07m

Page 80
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

Horizontal aignment report

points
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 0.000m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 31.483m 2200.000m 102+067.07m 102+098.55m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 0.000m
Two
Line points 97.429m 102+098.55m 102+195.98m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 0.000m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 23.287m 2200.000m 102+195.98m 102+219.27m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 0.000m
Two
Line points 36.222m 102+219.27m 102+255.49m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 0.000m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 63.403m 2200.000m 102+255.49m 102+318.89m
Spiral- SpiIn-
Curve- Radius-
Spiral SpiOut 0.000m
Two
Line points 11.977m 102+318.89m 102+330.87m

Page 81
Detailed Project Report
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

VERTICAL ALIGNMENT REPORT:-

A Profile Profile
PVI Grade Grade
No. PVI Station (Grade Curve Curve K Value Curve Radius
Elevation In Out
Change) Type Length
-
1 74+351.00m 408.192m
0.62%
-
2 74+521.02m 407.141m 0.44% 1.06% Sag 100.000m 94.294 9429.364m
0.62%
-
3 75+239.35m 410.315m 0.44% 2.20% Crest 137.021m 62.343 6234.330m
1.76%
- -
4 75+620.28m 403.626m 0.69% Sag 86.758m 125.218 12521.848m
1.76% 1.06%
-
5 75+945.00m 400.174m 0.52% 1.58% Sag 68.548m 43.259 4325.905m
1.06%
-
6 76+091.69m 400.939m 0.52% 2.09% Crest 60.000m 28.699 2869.886m
1.57%
-
7 76+250.00m 398.455m 0.91% 2.47% Sag 60.000m 24.247 2424.699m
1.57%
-
8 76+454.00m 400.302m 0.91% 1.97% Crest 101.627m 51.536 5153.639m
1.07%
-
9 76+597.26m 398.774m 0.36% 1.43% Sag 84.627m 59.176 5917.612m
1.07%
10 76+779.66m 399.437m 0.36% 0.97% 0.61% Sag 98.470m 161.804 16180.410m
11 76+948.26m 401.076m 0.97% 0.13% 0.84% Crest 62.778m 74.697 7469.698m
-
12 77+098.47m 401.274m 0.13% 0.60% Crest 60.000m 100.222 10022.163m
0.47%
-
13 77+331.86m 400.184m 0.68% 1.15% Sag 64.447m 55.994 5599.366m
0.47%
-
14 77+618.60m 402.145m 0.68% 1.13% Crest 137.658m 121.824 12182.431m
0.45%
- -
15 77+818.18m 401.255m 0.34% Crest 93.409m 274.447 27444.711m
0.45% 0.79%
-
16 78+269.54m 397.706m 0.81% 1.59% Sag 71.796m 45.082 4508.180m
0.79%
17 78+510.00m 399.645m 0.81% 3.23% 2.42% Sag 84.021m 34.729 3472.915m

18 78+697.31m 405.686m 3.23% 4.44% 1.21% Sag 215.162m 177.452 17745.233m

Page 82
Detailed Project Report
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

A Profile Profile
PVI Grade Grade
No. PVI Station (Grade Curve Curve K Value Curve Radius
Elevation In Out
Change) Type Length
-
19 79+025.03m 420.230m 4.44% 7.19% Crest 241.012m 33.538 3353.780m
2.75%
- -
20 79+253.38m 413.955m 2.53% Sag 92.640m 36.578 3657.825m
2.75% 0.22%
- -
21 79+465.28m 413.498m 2.63% Crest 161.091m 61.27 6126.970m
0.22% 2.84%
- -
22 80+155.04m 393.875m 1.74% Sag 83.927m 48.214 4821.391m
2.84% 1.10%
-
23 80+435.50m 390.779m 0.16% 1.26% Sag 60.000m 47.525 4752.530m
1.10%
-
24 80+816.91m 391.383m 0.16% 1.02% Crest 229.101m 223.899 22389.930m
0.86%
- -
25 81+230.00m 387.811m 0.42% Sag 310.183m 743.636 74363.552m
0.86% 0.45%
-
26 81+950.00m 384.587m 0.30% 0.75% Sag 68.110m 91.141 9114.082m
0.45%
-
27 82+273.95m 385.558m 0.30% 0.97% Crest 239.518m 246.973 24697.313m
0.67%
- -
28 83+167.47m 379.569m 0.46% Crest 229.510m 503.104 50310.352m
0.67% 1.13%
- -
29 83+886.80m 371.467m 0.95% Sag 204.838m 214.81 21480.985m
1.13% 0.17%
- -
30 84+498.69m 370.409m 0.86% Crest 161.330m 187.488 18748.785m
0.17% 1.03%
- -
31 85+292.37m 362.208m 0.64% Sag 130.890m 205.476 20547.610m
1.03% 0.40%
-
32 85+567.52m 361.117m 0.91% 1.30% Sag 69.798m 53.532 5353.171m
0.40%
-
33 85+877.42m 363.930m 0.91% 1.19% Crest 80.800m 68.042 6804.218m
0.28%
- -
34 86+107.85m 363.285m 0.02% Crest 128.673m 7943.045 794304.525m
0.28% 0.30%
-
35 86+649.10m 361.682m 0.59% 0.89% Sag 72.918m 82.228 8222.790m
0.30%
-
36 86+889.65m 363.103m 0.59% 1.24% Crest 177.936m 143.444 14344.357m
0.65%

Page 83
Detailed Project Report
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

A Profile Profile
PVI Grade Grade
No. PVI Station (Grade Curve Curve K Value Curve Radius
Elevation In Out
Change) Type Length
-
37 87+284.62m 360.536m 0.50% 1.15% Sag 225.385m 196.441 19644.143m
0.65%
-
38 87+617.99m 362.195m 0.50% 1.45% Crest 189.627m 130.346 13034.590m
0.96%
- -
39 88+270.00m 355.953m 0.38% Sag 153.989m 400.538 40053.780m
0.96% 0.57%
-
40 88+600.00m 354.063m 0.63% 1.21% Sag 106.909m 88.585 8858.496m
0.57%
-
41 88+877.09m 355.820m 0.63% 1.06% Crest 241.767m 227.298 22729.830m
0.43%
- -
42 89+411.56m 353.524m 0.22% Sag 154.956m 694.274 69427.373m
0.43% 0.21%
- -
43 89+928.94m 352.456m 0.51% Crest 321.648m 633.096 63309.631m
0.21% 0.71%
- -
44 90+765.23m 346.480m 0.56% Crest 374.450m 669.749 66974.912m
0.71% 1.27%
- -
45 91+530.50m 336.734m 0.32% Sag 71.017m 221.917 22191.736m
1.27% 0.95%
- -
46 91+824.75m 333.928m 0.58% Crest 162.985m 283.208 28320.771m
0.95% 1.53%
-
47 92+000.00m 331.249m
1.53%
- -
48 92+046.98m 330.530m 0.92% Sag 60.000m 65.249 6524.860m
1.53% 0.61%
-
49 92+223.67m 329.452m 0.25% 0.86% Sag 60.000m 70.109 7010.862m
0.61%
-
50 92+459.56m 330.030m 0.25% 0.97% Crest 130.847m 135 13500.000m
0.72%
- -
51 93+022.70m 325.954m 0.24% Sag 60.000m 250.383 25038.332m
0.72% 0.48%
-
52 93+263.57m 324.788m 0.29% 0.77% Sag 60.000m 77.71 7770.953m
0.48%
-
53 93+514.91m 325.511m 0.29% 2.13% Crest 293.311m 137.547 13754.692m
1.84%
-
54 94+143.53m 313.916m 1.77% 3.61% Sag 60.000m 16.606 1660.581m
1.84%

Page 84
Detailed Project Report
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

A Profile Profile
PVI Grade Grade
No. PVI Station (Grade Curve Curve K Value Curve Radius
Elevation In Out
Change) Type Length
55 94+217.29m 315.220m 1.77% 0.17% 1.60%
-
56 94+385.93m 315.505m 0.17% 0.25% Crest 60.000m 236.629 23662.856m
0.09%
-
57 94+461.91m 315.440m 1.12% 1.20% Sag 60.000m 49.982 4998.199m
0.09%
58 94+726.53m 318.392m 1.12% 0.92% 0.19% Crest 60.000m 308.34 30834.050m
59 94+931.75m 320.281m 0.92% 1.24% 0.32% Sag 60.000m 186.671 18667.087m

60 95+176.91m 323.327m 1.24% 0.20% 1.05% Crest 150.000m 143.516 14351.624m

61 95+837.55m 324.629m 0.20% 0.77% 0.57% Sag 60.000m 105.454 10545.409m

-
62 96+093.79m 326.592m 0.77% 1.74% Crest 235.066m 135 13500.000m
0.98%
-
63 96+506.63m 322.566m 0.16% 1.14% Sag 60.000m 52.648 5264.776m
0.98%
-
64 97+035.80m 323.436m 0.16% 1.65% Crest 230.000m 139.769 13976.900m
1.48%
- -
65 97+364.88m 318.562m 1.33% Sag 60.000m 45.16 4515.958m
1.48% 0.15%
- -
66 97+823.44m 317.863m 1.16% Crest 60.000m 51.684 5168.399m
0.15% 1.31%
- -
67 97+910.09m 316.725m 0.89% Sag 60.000m 67.559 6755.903m
1.31% 0.43%
- -
68 98+512.18m 314.164m 0.38% Crest 60.000m 157.354 15735.409m
0.43% 0.81%
- -
69 98+823.69m 311.652m 0.27% Sag 60.000m 225.796 22579.633m
0.81% 0.54%
-
70 99+249.86m 309.347m 0.14% 0.68% Sag 60.000m 88.501 8850.134m
0.54%
71 99+844.33m 310.162m 0.14% 0.49% 0.36% Sag 60.000m 167.904 16790.432m
72 100+225.20m 312.045m 0.49% 1.03% 0.53% Sag 60.000m 112.191 11219.063m
73 100+696.15m 316.892m 1.03% 0.70% 0.33% Crest 60.000m 182.846 18284.556m
74 101+061.10m 319.451m 0.70% 1.14% 0.44% Sag 60.000m 136.034 13603.359m

75 101+296.95m 322.145m 1.14% 0.34% 0.80% Crest 110.000m 137.265 13726.550m

-
76 101+559.59m 323.040m 0.34% 1.79% Crest 241.440m 135 13500.000m
1.45%

Page 85
Detailed Project Report
 Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

A Profile Profile
PVI Grade Grade
No. PVI Station (Grade Curve Curve K Value Curve Radius
Elevation In Out
Change) Type Length
-
77 101+800.18m 319.557m 0.10% 1.54% Sag 80.000m 51.846 5184.641m
1.45%
-
78 102+160.55m 319.901m 0.10% 1.86% Crest 253.430m 136.522 13652.161m
1.76%
-
79 102+330.87m 316.901m
1.76%

Proposed Centreline coordinates & Proposed RTL

Station Easting Northing Proposed RTL
74+351.00 757943.5499 2268555.097 408.192
74+360.00 757935.9856 2268559.974 408.137
74+370.00 757927.5809 2268565.392 408.075
74+380.00 757919.1761 2268570.811 408.013
74+390.00 757910.7713 2268576.229 407.951
74+400.00 757902.3666 2268581.648 407.889
74+410.00 757893.9618 2268587.066 407.827
74+420.00 757885.557 2268592.485 407.766
74+430.00 757877.1523 2268597.903 407.704
74+440.00 757868.7475 2268603.322 407.642
74+450.00 757860.3466 2268608.746 407.580
74+460.00 757851.968 2268614.205 407.518
74+470.00 757843.5949 2268619.672 407.456
74+480.00 757835.2217 2268625.139 407.399
74+490.00 757826.8486 2268630.607 407.352
74+500.00 757818.4755 2268636.074 407.315
74+510.00 757810.1023 2268641.541 407.289
74+520.00 757801.7292 2268647.008 407.274
74+530.00 757793.356 2268652.475 407.270
74+540.00 757784.9829 2268657.943 407.276
74+550.00 757776.6098 2268663.41 407.292
74+560.00 757768.2366 2268668.877 407.319
74+570.00 757759.8635 2268674.344 407.357
74+580.00 757751.4903 2268679.812 407.401

Page 86
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

74+590.00 757743.1172 2268685.279 407.446

74+600.00 757734.744 2268690.746 407.490
74+610.00 757726.3709 2268696.213 407.534
74+620.00 757718.0014 2268701.686 407.578
74+630.00 757709.6561 2268707.196 407.622
74+640.00 757701.3385 2268712.747 407.667
74+650.00 757693.0487 2268718.34 407.711
74+660.00 757684.787 2268723.974 407.755
74+670.00 757676.5503 2268729.645 407.799
74+680.00 757668.3175 2268735.321 407.843
74+690.00 757660.0847 2268740.997 407.887
74+700.00 757651.8519 2268746.674 407.932
74+710.00 757643.6106 2268752.338 407.976
74+720.00 757635.3418 2268757.961 408.020
74+730.00 757627.045 2268763.544 408.064
74+740.00 757618.7204 2268769.085 408.108
74+750.00 757610.3758 2268774.595 408.153
74+760.00 757602.0302 2268780.104 408.197
74+770.00 757593.6847 2268785.614 408.241
74+780.00 757585.3391 2268791.123 408.285
74+790.00 757576.9936 2268796.632 408.329
74+800.00 757568.6481 2268802.142 408.374
74+810.00 757560.3025 2268807.651 408.418
74+820.00 757551.957 2268813.16 408.462
74+830.00 757543.6114 2268818.669 408.506
74+840.00 757535.2659 2268824.179 408.550
74+850.00 757526.9204 2268829.688 408.595
74+860.00 757518.5748 2268835.197 408.639
74+870.00 757510.2293 2268840.706 408.683
74+880.00 757501.8837 2268846.216 408.727
74+890.00 757493.5382 2268851.725 408.771
74+900.00 757485.1927 2268857.234 408.816
74+910.00 757476.8471 2268862.743 408.860
74+920.00 757468.5016 2268868.253 408.904
74+930.00 757460.156 2268873.762 408.948
74+940.00 757451.8105 2268879.271 408.992
74+950.00 757443.465 2268884.78 409.036

Page 87
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

74+960.00 757435.1165 2268890.285 409.081

74+970.00 757426.7464 2268895.757 409.125
74+980.00 757418.3707 2268901.22 409.169
74+990.00 757409.995 2268906.684 409.213
75+000.00 757401.6193 2268912.147 409.257
75+010.00 757393.2436 2268917.61 409.302
75+020.00 757384.8679 2268923.074 409.346
75+030.00 757376.4922 2268928.537 409.390
75+040.00 757368.1165 2268934 409.434
75+050.00 757359.7408 2268939.464 409.478
75+060.00 757351.3651 2268944.927 409.523
75+070.00 757342.9894 2268950.39 409.567
75+080.00 757334.6137 2268955.853 409.611
75+090.00 757326.238 2268961.317 409.655
75+100.00 757317.8623 2268966.78 409.699
75+110.00 757309.4866 2268972.243 409.744
75+120.00 757301.1109 2268977.707 409.788
75+130.00 757292.7351 2268983.17 409.832
75+140.00 757284.3442 2268988.61 409.876
75+150.00 757275.9262 2268994.008 409.920
75+160.00 757267.4926 2268999.381 409.965
75+170.00 757259.0589 2269004.754 410.009
75+180.00 757250.6266 2269010.13 410.046
75+190.00 757242.2042 2269015.521 410.068
75+200.00 757233.8027 2269020.945 410.073
75+210.00 757225.4333 2269026.417 410.063
75+220.00 757217.1073 2269031.956 410.036
75+230.00 757208.8366 2269037.577 409.993
75+240.00 757200.6285 2269043.289 409.934
75+250.00 757192.4844 2269049.092 409.860
75+260.00 757184.4052 2269054.985 409.769
75+270.00 757176.392 2269060.967 409.662
75+280.00 757168.4457 2269067.038 409.539
75+290.00 757160.5674 2269073.197 409.400
75+300.00 757152.7581 2269079.443 409.245
75+310.00 757145.0186 2269085.775 409.075
75+320.00 757137.3477 2269092.19 408.899

Page 88
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

75+330.00 757129.7353 2269098.675 408.723

75+340.00 757122.1689 2269105.213 408.548
75+350.00 757114.6356 2269111.79 408.372
75+360.00 757107.122 2269118.389 408.197
75+370.00 757099.6154 2269124.995 408.021
75+380.00 757092.109 2269131.603 407.845
75+390.00 757084.6026 2269138.21 407.670
75+400.00 757077.0962 2269144.817 407.494
75+410.00 757069.5899 2269151.424 407.319
75+420.00 757062.0835 2269158.031 407.143
75+430.00 757054.5771 2269164.638 406.968
75+440.00 757047.0707 2269171.245 406.792
75+450.00 757039.5646 2269177.853 406.616
75+460.00 757032.0787 2269184.483 406.441
75+470.00 757024.6261 2269191.151 406.265
75+480.00 757017.1977 2269197.846 406.090
75+490.00 757009.7704 2269204.542 405.914
75+500.00 757002.3431 2269211.237 405.738
75+510.00 756994.9158 2269217.933 405.563
75+520.00 756987.4886 2269224.629 405.387
75+530.00 756980.0613 2269231.325 405.212
75+540.00 756972.634 2269238.021 405.036
75+550.00 756965.2067 2269244.717 404.860
75+560.00 756957.7794 2269251.413 404.685
75+570.00 756950.3521 2269258.109 404.509
75+580.00 756942.9248 2269264.805 404.334
75+590.00 756935.4975 2269271.501 404.165
75+600.00 756928.0702 2269278.197 404.004
75+610.00 756920.6429 2269284.893 403.851
75+620.00 756913.2157 2269291.589 403.705
75+630.00 756905.7884 2269298.284 403.568
75+640.00 756898.3611 2269304.98 403.439
75+650.00 756890.9338 2269311.676 403.318
75+660.00 756883.5065 2269318.372 403.205
75+670.00 756876.0792 2269325.068 403.098
75+680.00 756868.6519 2269331.764 402.991
75+690.00 756861.2246 2269338.46 402.885

Page 89
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

75+700.00 756853.7973 2269345.156 402.779

75+710.00 756846.37 2269351.852 402.673
75+720.00 756838.9428 2269358.548 402.566
75+730.00 756831.5131 2269365.241 402.460
75+740.00 756824.0814 2269371.932 402.354
75+750.00 756816.6497 2269378.623 402.247
75+760.00 756809.218 2269385.314 402.141
75+770.00 756801.7863 2269392.005 402.035
75+780.00 756794.3547 2269398.696 401.928
75+790.00 756786.923 2269405.387 401.822
75+800.00 756779.4913 2269412.078 401.716
75+810.00 756772.0596 2269418.769 401.610
75+820.00 756764.6279 2269425.46 401.503
75+830.00 756757.1962 2269432.151 401.397
75+840.00 756749.7645 2269438.842 401.291
75+850.00 756742.3328 2269445.533 401.184
75+860.00 756734.9011 2269452.225 401.078
75+870.00 756727.4694 2269458.916 400.972
75+880.00 756720.0377 2269465.607 400.865
75+890.00 756712.606 2269472.298 400.759
75+900.00 756705.1743 2269478.989 400.653
75+910.00 756697.7427 2269485.68 400.546
75+920.00 756690.311 2269492.371 400.450
75+930.00 756682.8793 2269499.062 400.377
75+940.00 756675.4476 2269505.753 400.327
75+950.00 756668.0159 2269512.444 400.299
75+960.00 756660.5842 2269519.135 400.296
75+970.00 756653.1525 2269525.826 400.315
75+980.00 756645.7208 2269532.517 400.357
75+990.00 756638.2893 2269539.208 400.409
76+000.00 756630.8642 2269545.906 400.461
76+010.00 756623.4585 2269552.626 400.513
76+020.00 756616.0857 2269559.382 400.566
76+030.00 756608.7597 2269566.189 400.618
76+040.00 756601.4944 2269573.06 400.670
76+050.00 756594.2977 2269580.003 400.722
76+060.00 756587.1708 2269587.018 400.774

Page 90
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

76+070.00 756580.1116 2269594.101 400.814

76+080.00 756573.1085 2269601.239 400.820
76+090.00 756566.1475 2269608.419 400.791
76+100.00 756559.2145 2269615.625 400.727
76+110.00 756552.2951 2269622.845 400.628
76+120.00 756545.3777 2269630.066 400.495
76+130.00 756538.4603 2269637.287 400.338
76+140.00 756531.5429 2269644.509 400.181
76+150.00 756524.6255 2269651.73 400.025
76+160.00 756517.7081 2269658.952 399.868
76+170.00 756510.7907 2269666.173 399.711
76+180.00 756503.8733 2269673.395 399.554
76+190.00 756496.9559 2269680.616 399.397
76+200.00 756490.0386 2269687.838 399.240
76+210.00 756483.1212 2269695.059 399.083
76+220.00 756476.2038 2269702.281 398.926
76+230.00 756469.2864 2269709.502 398.790
76+240.00 756462.369 2269716.724 398.695
76+250.00 756455.4528 2269723.946 398.641
76+260.00 756448.5554 2269731.187 398.628
76+270.00 756441.6603 2269738.43 398.657
76+280.00 756434.7652 2269745.672 398.727
76+290.00 756427.8701 2269752.915 398.818
76+300.00 756420.975 2269760.158 398.908
76+310.00 756414.0799 2269767.401 398.999
76+320.00 756407.1848 2269774.643 399.089
76+330.00 756400.2897 2269781.886 399.180
76+340.00 756393.3946 2269789.129 399.270
76+350.00 756386.4995 2269796.372 399.361
76+360.00 756379.6044 2269803.615 399.451
76+370.00 756372.7093 2269810.857 399.542
76+380.00 756365.8142 2269818.1 399.632
76+390.00 756358.9184 2269825.342 399.723
76+400.00 756352.0223 2269832.584 399.813
76+410.00 756345.1263 2269839.826 399.899
76+420.00 756338.2302 2269847.068 399.967
76+430.00 756331.3342 2269854.31 400.015

Page 91
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

76+440.00 756324.4381 2269861.551 400.044

76+450.00 756317.5421 2269868.793 400.053
76+460.00 756310.646 2269876.035 400.043
76+470.00 756303.7499 2269883.277 400.014
76+480.00 756296.8539 2269890.519 399.965
76+490.00 756289.973 2269897.775 399.897
76+500.00 756283.2413 2269905.17 399.809
76+510.00 756276.5097 2269912.565 399.705
76+520.00 756269.778 2269919.959 399.598
76+530.00 756263.0463 2269927.354 399.492
76+540.00 756256.3147 2269934.749 399.385
76+550.00 756249.583 2269942.144 399.278
76+560.00 756242.8514 2269949.539 399.174
76+570.00 756236.1197 2269956.934 399.084
76+580.00 756229.388 2269964.329 399.011
76+590.00 756222.6564 2269971.724 398.956
76+600.00 756216.0921 2269979.267 398.917
76+610.00 756209.5638 2269986.842 398.895
76+620.00 756203.0354 2269994.417 398.889
76+630.00 756196.5071 2270001.992 398.901
76+640.00 756189.9787 2270009.567 398.930
76+650.00 756183.4504 2270017.142 398.966
76+660.00 756176.922 2270024.717 399.002
76+670.00 756170.3937 2270032.292 399.039
76+680.00 756163.8653 2270039.867 399.075
76+690.00 756157.337 2270047.442 399.111
76+700.00 756150.8086 2270055.017 399.148
76+710.00 756144.2055 2270062.527 399.184
76+720.00 756137.5641 2270070.003 399.221
76+730.00 756130.9227 2270077.479 399.257
76+740.00 756124.2812 2270084.955 399.296
76+750.00 756117.6398 2270092.431 399.341
76+760.00 756110.9984 2270099.907 399.393
76+770.00 756104.357 2270107.383 399.451
76+780.00 756097.7155 2270114.859 399.515
76+790.00 756091.0741 2270122.335 399.585
76+800.00 756084.4327 2270129.811 399.661

Page 92
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

76+810.00 756077.7913 2270137.287 399.743

76+820.00 756071.1292 2270144.745 399.832
76+830.00 756064.4591 2270152.195 399.927
76+840.00 756057.7891 2270159.646 400.024
76+850.00 756051.1191 2270167.097 400.121
76+860.00 756044.4552 2270174.552 400.218
76+870.00 756037.9634 2270182.159 400.316
76+880.00 756031.4715 2270189.765 400.413
76+890.00 756024.9797 2270197.371 400.510
76+900.00 756018.4878 2270204.978 400.607
76+910.00 756011.9959 2270212.584 400.704
76+920.00 756005.5041 2270220.19 400.801
76+930.00 755999.0122 2270227.797 400.887
76+940.00 755992.5076 2270235.392 400.960
76+950.00 755985.9456 2270242.938 401.020
76+960.00 755979.3835 2270250.484 401.066
76+970.00 755972.8215 2270258.029 401.099
76+980.00 755966.2594 2270265.575 401.118
76+990.00 755959.6974 2270273.121 401.131
77+000.00 755953.1353 2270280.667 401.144
77+010.00 755946.5733 2270288.213 401.158
77+020.00 755940.0112 2270295.758 401.171
77+030.00 755933.4492 2270303.304 401.184
77+040.00 755926.8871 2270310.85 401.197
77+050.00 755920.3251 2270318.396 401.210
77+060.00 755913.763 2270325.942 401.223
77+070.00 755907.201 2270333.488 401.237
77+080.00 755900.6389 2270341.033 401.243
77+090.00 755894.0769 2270348.579 401.240
77+100.00 755887.5148 2270356.125 401.227
77+110.00 755880.9528 2270363.671 401.203
77+120.00 755874.3907 2270371.217 401.170
77+130.00 755867.8287 2270378.763 401.127
77+140.00 755861.2578 2270386.301 401.080
77+150.00 755854.6411 2270393.799 401.033
77+160.00 755848.0244 2270401.297 400.987
77+170.00 755841.4077 2270408.795 400.940

Page 93
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

77+180.00 755834.791 2270416.292 400.893

77+190.00 755828.1742 2270423.79 400.847
77+200.00 755821.5575 2270431.288 400.800
77+210.00 755814.9408 2270438.786 400.753
77+220.00 755808.3997 2270446.35 400.707
77+230.00 755801.9041 2270453.953 400.660
77+240.00 755795.4085 2270461.556 400.613
77+250.00 755788.9128 2270469.159 400.566
77+260.00 755782.4172 2270476.762 400.520
77+270.00 755775.9215 2270484.365 400.473
77+280.00 755769.4259 2270491.968 400.426
77+290.00 755762.9303 2270499.571 400.380
77+300.00 755756.4028 2270507.147 400.333
77+310.00 755749.8012 2270514.658 400.296
77+320.00 755743.1997 2270522.169 400.277
77+330.00 755736.5982 2270529.681 400.275
77+340.00 755729.9967 2270537.192 400.292
77+350.00 755723.3952 2270544.703 400.326
77+360.00 755716.7936 2270552.215 400.378
77+370.00 755710.237 2270559.765 400.445
77+380.00 755703.6818 2270567.317 400.513
77+390.00 755697.1266 2270574.869 400.582
77+400.00 755690.5956 2270582.441 400.650
77+410.00 755684.1976 2270590.127 400.719
77+420.00 755677.8467 2270597.851 400.787
77+430.00 755671.6544 2270605.703 400.855
77+440.00 755665.5836 2270613.649 400.924
77+450.00 755659.573 2270621.641 400.992
77+460.00 755653.5624 2270629.633 401.061
77+470.00 755647.7071 2270637.737 401.129
77+480.00 755642.0205 2270645.963 401.197
77+490.00 755636.3339 2270654.188 401.266
77+500.00 755630.7774 2270662.499 401.334
77+510.00 755625.4946 2270670.99 401.403
77+520.00 755620.2118 2270679.481 401.471
77+530.00 755615.1599 2270688.109 401.539
77+540.00 755610.1898 2270696.787 401.608

Page 94
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

77+550.00 755605.2197 2270705.464 401.676

77+560.00 755600.5641 2270714.314 401.740
77+570.00 755595.9093 2270723.165 401.796
77+580.00 755591.2545 2270732.016 401.844
77+590.00 755586.947 2270741.035 401.883
77+600.00 755582.8516 2270750.158 401.915
77+610.00 755578.8065 2270759.303 401.938
77+620.00 755574.9832 2270768.543 401.953
77+630.00 755571.1599 2270777.783 401.959
77+640.00 755567.3979 2270787.048 401.958
77+650.00 755563.8539 2270796.399 401.948
77+660.00 755560.3098 2270805.75 401.930
77+670.00 755556.7658 2270815.101 401.904
77+680.00 755553.2797 2270824.472 401.869
77+690.00 755550.2217 2270833.993 401.827
77+700.00 755547.1636 2270843.514 401.782
77+710.00 755544.2842 2270853.088 401.738
77+720.00 755541.5726 2270862.714 401.693
77+730.00 755539.2453 2270872.436 401.649
77+740.00 755537.0988 2270882.203 401.604
77+750.00 755535.0591 2270891.993 401.559
77+760.00 755533.0193 2270901.783 401.515
77+770.00 755531.0699 2270911.589 401.470
77+780.00 755529.4056 2270921.45 401.424
77+790.00 755527.7413 2270931.31 401.375
77+800.00 755526.0769 2270941.171 401.322
77+810.00 755524.4787 2270951.042 401.265
77+820.00 755523.0372 2270960.937 401.204
77+830.00 755521.6671 2270970.843 401.140
77+840.00 755520.297 2270980.749 401.072
77+850.00 755518.9268 2270990.655 401.001
77+860.00 755517.5567 2271000.56 400.926
77+870.00 755516.1866 2271010.466 400.848
77+880.00 755514.8164 2271020.372 400.769
77+890.00 755513.4463 2271030.277 400.690
77+900.00 755512.0124 2271040.174 400.612
77+910.00 755510.5429 2271050.065 400.533

Page 95
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

77+920.00 755509.0733 2271059.957 400.455

77+930.00 755507.6038 2271069.848 400.376
77+940.00 755506.1343 2271079.74 400.297
77+950.00 755504.824 2271089.653 400.219
77+960.00 755503.5484 2271099.571 400.140
77+970.00 755502.2728 2271109.49 400.061
77+980.00 755500.9972 2271119.408 399.983
77+990.00 755499.7216 2271129.326 399.904
78+000.00 755498.4219 2271139.241 399.826
78+010.00 755497.0475 2271149.147 399.747
78+020.00 755495.673 2271159.052 399.668
78+030.00 755494.2986 2271168.957 399.590
78+040.00 755492.9242 2271178.862 399.511
78+050.00 755491.5498 2271188.767 399.432
78+060.00 755490.1754 2271198.672 399.354
78+070.00 755488.801 2271208.577 399.275
78+080.00 755487.4266 2271218.482 399.196
78+090.00 755486.0522 2271228.387 399.118
78+100.00 755484.6777 2271238.292 399.039
78+110.00 755483.3033 2271248.197 398.961
78+120.00 755481.9289 2271258.103 398.882
78+130.00 755480.5545 2271268.008 398.803
78+140.00 755479.1801 2271277.913 398.725
78+150.00 755477.8057 2271287.818 398.646
78+160.00 755476.4313 2271297.723 398.567
78+170.00 755475.0568 2271307.628 398.489
78+180.00 755473.6824 2271317.533 398.410
78+190.00 755472.308 2271327.438 398.331
78+200.00 755470.9336 2271337.343 398.253
78+210.00 755469.5592 2271347.248 398.174
78+220.00 755468.1848 2271357.154 398.096
78+230.00 755466.8104 2271367.059 398.017
78+240.00 755465.436 2271376.964 397.943
78+250.00 755464.0615 2271386.869 397.889
78+260.00 755462.6871 2271396.774 397.858
78+270.00 755461.3127 2271406.679 397.849
78+280.00 755459.9383 2271416.584 397.862

Page 96
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

78+290.00 755458.6458 2271426.5 397.897

78+300.00 755457.3637 2271436.418 397.955
78+310.00 755456.0815 2271446.335 398.032
78+320.00 755454.7893 2271456.251 398.113
78+330.00 755453.4506 2271466.161 398.193
78+340.00 755452.079 2271476.067 398.274
78+350.00 755450.7066 2271485.972 398.355
78+360.00 755449.3342 2271495.878 398.435
78+370.00 755447.9618 2271505.783 398.516
78+380.00 755446.5894 2271515.688 398.597
78+390.00 755445.217 2271525.594 398.677
78+400.00 755443.8446 2271535.499 398.758
78+410.00 755442.4722 2271545.404 398.838
78+420.00 755441.0998 2271555.31 398.919
78+430.00 755439.7275 2271565.215 399.000
78+440.00 755438.3624 2271575.122 399.080
78+450.00 755437.0238 2271585.032 399.161
78+460.00 755435.7326 2271594.948 399.241
78+470.00 755434.5092 2271604.873 399.323
78+480.00 755433.3673 2271614.807 399.423
78+490.00 755432.3083 2271624.751 399.553
78+500.00 755431.3321 2271634.703 399.711
78+510.00 755430.4389 2271644.663 399.899
78+520.00 755429.6288 2271654.63 400.115
78+530.00 755428.9017 2271664.604 400.359
78+540.00 755428.2578 2271674.583 400.633
78+550.00 755427.6971 2271684.567 400.935
78+560.00 755427.2195 2271694.556 401.257
78+570.00 755426.8253 2271704.548 401.580
78+580.00 755426.5143 2271714.543 401.902
78+590.00 755426.2866 2271724.541 402.225
78+600.00 755426.1422 2271734.54 402.551
78+610.00 755426.0812 2271744.539 402.882
78+620.00 755426.1035 2271754.539 403.218
78+630.00 755426.2091 2271764.539 403.561
78+640.00 755426.398 2271774.537 403.909
78+650.00 755426.6703 2271784.533 404.263

Page 97
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

78+660.00 755427.0258 2271794.527 404.622

78+670.00 755427.4647 2271804.517 404.987
78+680.00 755427.9867 2271814.503 405.358
78+690.00 755428.592 2271824.485 405.734
78+700.00 755429.2804 2271834.461 406.116
78+710.00 755430.0519 2271844.431 406.503
78+720.00 755430.9065 2271854.395 406.896
78+730.00 755431.8441 2271864.351 407.295
78+740.00 755432.8646 2271874.299 407.700
78+750.00 755433.9679 2271884.237 408.110
78+760.00 755435.1505 2271894.167 408.525
78+770.00 755436.395 2271904.09 408.947
78+780.00 755437.6806 2271914.007 409.374
78+790.00 755438.9867 2271923.921 409.806
78+800.00 755440.2961 2271933.835 410.244
78+810.00 755441.6055 2271943.749 410.687
78+820.00 755442.9149 2271953.663 411.131
78+830.00 755444.2243 2271963.576 411.575
78+840.00 755445.5337 2271973.49 412.019
78+850.00 755446.8431 2271983.404 412.463
78+860.00 755448.1525 2271993.318 412.907
78+870.00 755449.4619 2272003.232 413.350
78+880.00 755450.7457 2272013.149 413.794
78+890.00 755451.9952 2272023.071 414.238
78+900.00 755453.2437 2272032.993 414.682
78+910.00 755454.4921 2272042.914 415.121
78+920.00 755455.7405 2272052.836 415.534
78+930.00 755456.989 2272062.758 415.916
78+940.00 755458.2615 2272072.677 416.269
78+950.00 755459.5416 2272082.594 416.592
78+960.00 755460.8216 2272092.512 416.886
78+970.00 755462.1017 2272102.43 417.149
78+980.00 755463.3818 2272112.348 417.383
78+990.00 755464.6618 2272122.265 417.587
79+000.00 755465.9419 2272132.183 417.761
79+010.00 755467.2219 2272142.101 417.905
79+020.00 755468.5182 2272152.016 418.019

Page 98
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

79+030.00 755469.8612 2272161.926 418.104

79+040.00 755471.2171 2272171.834 418.159
79+050.00 755472.573 2272181.741 418.183
79+060.00 755473.9288 2272191.649 418.179
79+070.00 755475.2847 2272201.556 418.144
79+080.00 755476.6406 2272211.464 418.079
79+090.00 755477.9808 2272221.374 417.985
79+100.00 755479.2726 2272231.29 417.861
79+110.00 755480.5147 2272241.213 417.707
79+120.00 755481.7072 2272251.141 417.523
79+130.00 755482.8726 2272261.073 417.310
79+140.00 755484.0378 2272271.005 417.066
79+150.00 755485.203 2272280.937 416.796
79+160.00 755486.3683 2272290.869 416.521
79+170.00 755487.5335 2272300.801 416.246
79+180.00 755488.6988 2272310.733 415.971
79+190.00 755489.864 2272320.664 415.697
79+200.00 755491.0293 2272330.596 415.422
79+210.00 755492.1945 2272340.528 415.148
79+220.00 755493.3598 2272350.46 414.895
79+230.00 755494.525 2272360.392 414.669
79+240.00 755495.6902 2272370.324 414.471
79+250.00 755496.8555 2272380.256 414.300
79+260.00 755498.0153 2272390.188 414.156
79+270.00 755499.1352 2272400.125 414.039
79+280.00 755500.2439 2272410.064 413.950
79+290.00 755501.3525 2272420.002 413.889
79+300.00 755502.4527 2272429.941 413.854
79+310.00 755503.5253 2272439.884 413.833
79+320.00 755504.5502 2272449.831 413.811
79+330.00 755505.5072 2272459.785 413.790
79+340.00 755506.3762 2272469.747 413.768
79+350.00 755507.1392 2272479.718 413.746
79+360.00 755507.7914 2272489.697 413.725
79+370.00 755508.3326 2272499.682 413.703
79+380.00 755508.7629 2272509.673 413.682
79+390.00 755509.0822 2272519.667 413.658

Page 99
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

79+400.00 755509.2904 2272529.665 413.620

79+410.00 755509.3875 2272539.665 413.565
79+420.00 755509.3734 2272549.665 413.494
79+430.00 755509.2483 2272559.664 413.407
79+440.00 755509.0121 2272569.661 413.303
79+450.00 755508.6648 2272579.655 413.183
79+460.00 755508.2065 2272589.644 413.047
79+470.00 755507.6372 2272599.628 412.894
79+480.00 755506.9571 2272609.605 412.726
79+490.00 755506.1661 2272619.573 412.540
79+500.00 755505.2644 2272629.533 412.339
79+510.00 755504.2521 2272639.481 412.121
79+520.00 755503.1294 2272649.418 411.887
79+530.00 755501.8963 2272659.342 411.636
79+540.00 755500.553 2272669.251 411.369
79+550.00 755499.0997 2272679.145 411.088
79+560.00 755497.5366 2272689.022 410.803
79+570.00 755495.8638 2272698.881 410.519
79+580.00 755494.0833 2272708.721 410.234
79+590.00 755492.2097 2272718.544 409.950
79+600.00 755490.2628 2272728.352 409.665
79+610.00 755488.2625 2272738.15 409.381
79+620.00 755486.2287 2272747.941 409.096
79+630.00 755484.1812 2272757.729 408.812
79+640.00 755482.1325 2272767.517 408.527
79+650.00 755480.0838 2272777.305 408.243
79+660.00 755478.0352 2272787.093 407.958
79+670.00 755475.9789 2272796.879 407.674
79+680.00 755473.8786 2272806.656 407.390
79+690.00 755471.7295 2272816.423 407.105
79+700.00 755469.5315 2272826.178 406.821
79+710.00 755467.2848 2272835.922 406.536
79+720.00 755464.9894 2272845.655 406.252
79+730.00 755462.6454 2272855.377 405.967
79+740.00 755460.2531 2272865.086 405.683
79+750.00 755457.8421 2272874.791 405.398
79+760.00 755455.4311 2272884.496 405.114

Page 100
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

79+770.00 755453.0201 2272894.201 404.829

79+780.00 755450.6091 2272903.906 404.545
79+790.00 755448.1981 2272913.611 404.260
79+800.00 755445.7871 2272923.316 403.976
79+810.00 755443.376 2272933.021 403.691
79+820.00 755440.965 2272942.726 403.407
79+830.00 755438.5539 2272952.431 403.122
79+840.00 755436.1155 2272962.13 402.838
79+850.00 755433.6287 2272971.815 402.553
79+860.00 755431.0935 2272981.489 402.269
79+870.00 755428.5293 2272991.154 401.984
79+880.00 755425.9649 2273000.82 401.700
79+890.00 755423.4004 2273010.486 401.415
79+900.00 755420.836 2273020.151 401.131
79+910.00 755418.2716 2273029.817 400.846
79+920.00 755415.7072 2273039.482 400.562
79+930.00 755413.1427 2273049.148 400.278
79+940.00 755410.5783 2273058.814 399.993
79+950.00 755408.0139 2273068.479 399.709
79+960.00 755405.4494 2273078.145 399.424
79+970.00 755402.885 2273087.81 399.140
79+980.00 755400.3206 2273097.476 398.855
79+990.00 755397.7562 2273107.142 398.571
80+000.00 755395.1917 2273116.807 398.286
80+010.00 755392.6273 2273126.473 398.002
80+020.00 755390.0629 2273136.138 397.717
80+030.00 755387.4985 2273145.804 397.433
80+040.00 755384.9458 2273155.473 397.148
80+050.00 755382.4394 2273165.153 396.864
80+060.00 755379.9814 2273174.847 396.579
80+070.00 755377.5719 2273184.552 396.295
80+080.00 755375.2036 2273194.267 396.010
80+090.00 755372.8402 2273203.984 395.726
80+100.00 755370.4769 2273213.701 395.441
80+110.00 755368.1135 2273223.418 395.157
80+120.00 755365.7372 2273233.131 394.877
80+130.00 755363.314 2273242.833 394.618

Page 101
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

80+140.00 755360.8424 2273252.523 394.379

80+150.00 755358.3224 2273262.2 394.160
80+160.00 755355.754 2273271.865 393.963
80+170.00 755353.1373 2273281.516 393.786
80+180.00 755350.4967 2273291.161 393.630
80+190.00 755347.8562 2273300.806 393.495
80+200.00 755345.2156 2273310.451 393.379
80+210.00 755342.5751 2273320.097 393.269
80+220.00 755339.9345 2273329.742 393.158
80+230.00 755337.294 2273339.387 393.048
80+240.00 755334.6691 2273349.036 392.937
80+250.00 755332.0634 2273358.691 392.827
80+260.00 755329.4577 2273368.345 392.717
80+270.00 755326.8521 2273378 392.606
80+280.00 755324.2464 2273387.654 392.496
80+290.00 755321.6407 2273397.309 392.385
80+300.00 755319.035 2273406.963 392.275
80+310.00 755316.4293 2273416.618 392.165
80+320.00 755313.8237 2273426.272 392.054
80+330.00 755311.218 2273435.927 391.944
80+340.00 755308.6123 2273445.582 391.833
80+350.00 755306.0066 2273455.236 391.723
80+360.00 755303.4009 2273464.891 391.613
80+370.00 755300.7953 2273474.545 391.502
80+380.00 755298.1896 2273484.2 391.392
80+390.00 755295.5923 2273493.857 391.281
80+400.00 755293.0327 2273503.523 391.171
80+410.00 755290.4787 2273513.192 391.063
80+420.00 755287.9253 2273522.86 390.972
80+430.00 755285.4033 2273532.537 390.903
80+440.00 755282.9296 2273542.226 390.855
80+450.00 755280.5045 2273551.928 390.827
80+460.00 755278.0934 2273561.633 390.821
80+470.00 755275.6368 2273571.326 390.834
80+480.00 755273.1319 2273581.007 390.849
80+490.00 755270.6054 2273590.683 390.865
80+500.00 755268.0788 2273600.359 390.881

Page 102
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

80+510.00 755265.5523 2273610.034 390.897

80+520.00 755263.0257 2273619.71 390.913
80+530.00 755260.4991 2273629.385 390.929
80+540.00 755257.9823 2273639.063 390.945
80+550.00 755255.478 2273648.745 390.960
80+560.00 755252.9606 2273658.423 390.976
80+570.00 755250.3964 2273668.088 390.992
80+580.00 755247.7939 2273677.744 391.008
80+590.00 755245.2163 2273687.406 391.024
80+600.00 755242.6848 2273697.08 391.040
80+610.00 755240.1652 2273706.757 391.055
80+620.00 755237.6455 2273716.435 391.071
80+630.00 755235.0983 2273726.105 391.087
80+640.00 755232.5028 2273735.762 391.103
80+650.00 755229.859 2273745.406 391.119
80+660.00 755227.1731 2273755.039 391.135
80+670.00 755224.4811 2273764.67 391.150
80+680.00 755221.7891 2273774.301 391.166
80+690.00 755219.0971 2273783.931 391.182
80+700.00 755216.4054 2273793.562 391.198
80+710.00 755213.7434 2273803.202 391.213
80+720.00 755211.1294 2273812.854 391.223
80+730.00 755208.5357 2273822.512 391.228
80+740.00 755205.9422 2273832.169 391.230
80+750.00 755203.3574 2273841.83 391.226
80+760.00 755200.8006 2273851.497 391.219
80+770.00 755198.2922 2273861.177 391.207
80+780.00 755195.852 2273870.875 391.190
80+790.00 755193.492 2273880.593 391.169
80+800.00 755191.2131 2273890.329 391.143
80+810.00 755189.0154 2273900.085 391.113
80+820.00 755186.8991 2273909.858 391.079
80+830.00 755184.8642 2273919.649 391.040
80+840.00 755182.9111 2273929.457 390.997
80+850.00 755181.0397 2273939.28 390.949
80+860.00 755179.2503 2273949.118 390.896
80+870.00 755177.5429 2273958.972 390.840

Page 103
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

80+880.00 755175.9177 2273968.839 390.778

80+890.00 755174.3747 2273978.719 390.713
80+900.00 755172.9142 2273988.612 390.642
80+910.00 755171.5361 2273998.516 390.568
80+920.00 755170.2406 2274008.432 390.489
80+930.00 755169.0278 2274018.358 390.405
80+940.00 755167.8978 2274028.294 390.319
80+950.00 755166.8506 2274038.239 390.232
80+960.00 755165.8863 2274048.192 390.146
80+970.00 755165.0037 2274058.153 390.059
80+980.00 755164.1893 2274068.12 389.973
80+990.00 755163.4224 2274078.091 389.886
81+000.00 755162.6822 2274088.063 389.800
81+010.00 755161.9493 2274098.036 389.713
81+020.00 755161.2165 2274108.009 389.627
81+030.00 755160.4836 2274117.982 389.540
81+040.00 755159.7508 2274127.956 389.454
81+050.00 755159.0179 2274137.929 389.367
81+060.00 755158.2851 2274147.902 389.281
81+070.00 755157.5523 2274157.875 389.194
81+080.00 755156.8194 2274167.848 389.108
81+090.00 755156.0866 2274177.821 389.023
81+100.00 755155.3537 2274187.794 388.939
81+110.00 755154.5955 2274197.765 388.857
81+120.00 755153.809 2274207.734 388.776
81+130.00 755153.0224 2274217.703 388.696
81+140.00 755152.2357 2274227.672 388.617
81+150.00 755151.449 2274237.641 388.540
81+160.00 755150.6624 2274247.61 388.465
81+170.00 755149.8757 2274257.579 388.390
81+180.00 755149.0891 2274267.548 388.317
81+190.00 755148.3024 2274277.517 388.246
81+200.00 755147.5158 2274287.486 388.175
81+210.00 755146.7291 2274297.456 388.106
81+220.00 755145.9424 2274307.425 388.039
81+230.00 755145.1558 2274317.394 387.972
81+240.00 755144.3691 2274327.363 387.907

Page 104
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

81+250.00 755143.5825 2274337.332 387.844

81+260.00 755142.7966 2274347.301 387.782
81+270.00 755142.0434 2274357.272 387.721
81+280.00 755141.3401 2274367.247 387.661
81+290.00 755140.6682 2274377.225 387.603
81+300.00 755139.9869 2274387.202 387.546
81+310.00 755139.2592 2274397.175 387.490
81+320.00 755138.4817 2274407.145 387.436
81+330.00 755137.6543 2274417.11 387.383
81+340.00 755136.7808 2274427.072 387.332
81+350.00 755135.8976 2274437.033 387.282
81+360.00 755135.0145 2274446.994 387.233
81+370.00 755134.1313 2274456.955 387.185
81+380.00 755133.2585 2274466.917 387.139
81+390.00 755132.4323 2274476.883 387.094
81+400.00 755131.6559 2274486.852 387.050
81+410.00 755130.9293 2274496.826 387.005
81+420.00 755130.2254 2274506.801 386.960
81+430.00 755129.5214 2274516.776 386.915
81+440.00 755128.8174 2274526.752 386.870
81+450.00 755128.1134 2274536.727 386.826
81+460.00 755127.4095 2274546.702 386.781
81+470.00 755126.7043 2274556.677 386.736
81+480.00 755125.9643 2274566.65 386.691
81+490.00 755125.1745 2274576.618 386.647
81+500.00 755124.3349 2274586.583 386.602
81+510.00 755123.4489 2274596.544 386.557
81+520.00 755122.5531 2274606.504 386.512
81+530.00 755121.6572 2274616.463 386.468
81+540.00 755120.7616 2274626.423 386.423
81+550.00 755119.8945 2274636.385 386.378
81+560.00 755119.0772 2274646.352 386.333
81+570.00 755118.2911 2274656.321 386.288
81+580.00 755117.5055 2274666.29 386.244
81+590.00 755116.7198 2274676.259 386.199
81+600.00 755115.9342 2274686.228 386.154
81+610.00 755115.1486 2274696.197 386.109

Page 105
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

81+620.00 755114.363 2274706.167 386.065

81+630.00 755113.5773 2274716.136 386.020
81+640.00 755112.7917 2274726.105 385.975
81+650.00 755112.0061 2274736.074 385.930
81+660.00 755111.2205 2274746.043 385.886
81+670.00 755110.4345 2274756.012 385.841
81+680.00 755109.6198 2274765.979 385.796
81+690.00 755108.7902 2274775.944 385.751
81+700.00 755107.9605 2274785.91 385.706
81+710.00 755107.1309 2274795.875 385.662
81+720.00 755106.3013 2274805.841 385.617
81+730.00 755105.4717 2274815.806 385.572
81+740.00 755104.642 2274825.772 385.527
81+750.00 755103.8124 2274835.737 385.483
81+760.00 755102.9828 2274845.703 385.438
81+770.00 755102.1532 2274855.668 385.393
81+780.00 755101.3236 2274865.634 385.348
81+790.00 755100.4939 2274875.6 385.304
81+800.00 755099.6643 2274885.565 385.259
81+810.00 755098.8347 2274895.531 385.214
81+820.00 755098.0051 2274905.496 385.169
81+830.00 755097.1754 2274915.462 385.124
81+840.00 755096.3458 2274925.427 385.080
81+850.00 755095.5162 2274935.393 385.035
81+860.00 755094.6866 2274945.358 384.990
81+870.00 755093.8569 2274955.324 384.945
81+880.00 755093.0273 2274965.289 384.901
81+890.00 755092.1918 2274975.254 384.856
81+900.00 755091.313 2274985.216 384.811
81+910.00 755090.4059 2274995.174 384.766
81+920.00 755089.4986 2275005.133 384.722
81+930.00 755088.5914 2275015.092 384.688
81+940.00 755087.6841 2275025.051 384.664
81+950.00 755086.7769 2275035.009 384.651
81+960.00 755085.8696 2275044.968 384.649
81+970.00 755084.9624 2275054.927 384.658
81+980.00 755084.0551 2275064.886 384.678

Page 106
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

81+990.00 755083.1479 2275074.844 384.707

82+000.00 755082.2406 2275084.803 384.737
82+010.00 755081.3333 2275094.762 384.767
82+020.00 755080.4261 2275104.721 384.797
82+030.00 755079.5188 2275114.679 384.827
82+040.00 755078.6116 2275124.638 384.857
82+050.00 755077.7043 2275134.597 384.887
82+060.00 755076.7971 2275144.556 384.917
82+070.00 755075.8898 2275154.515 384.947
82+080.00 755074.9826 2275164.473 384.977
82+090.00 755074.0753 2275174.432 385.007
82+100.00 755073.1681 2275184.391 385.037
82+110.00 755072.2602 2275194.349 385.067
82+120.00 755071.3413 2275204.307 385.096
82+130.00 755070.3925 2275214.262 385.126
82+140.00 755069.395 2275224.212 385.156
82+150.00 755068.3337 2275234.156 385.186
82+160.00 755067.2061 2275244.092 385.216
82+170.00 755066.0123 2275254.02 385.241
82+180.00 755064.7523 2275263.941 385.263
82+190.00 755063.4262 2275273.852 385.280
82+200.00 755062.0341 2275283.755 385.294
82+210.00 755060.576 2275293.648 385.303
82+220.00 755059.052 2275303.531 385.308
82+230.00 755057.4621 2275313.404 385.310
82+240.00 755055.8068 2275323.266 385.307
82+250.00 755054.0954 2275333.118 385.300
82+260.00 755052.3463 2275342.964 385.289
82+270.00 755050.5783 2275352.807 385.274
82+280.00 755048.8071 2275362.649 385.255
82+290.00 755047.0359 2275372.491 385.232
82+300.00 755045.2647 2275382.332 385.205
82+310.00 755043.4934 2275392.174 385.174
82+320.00 755041.7222 2275402.016 385.139
82+330.00 755039.951 2275411.858 385.100
82+340.00 755038.1798 2275421.7 385.057
82+350.00 755036.4086 2275431.542 385.009

Page 107
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

82+360.00 755034.6374 2275441.384 384.958

82+370.00 755032.8662 2275451.226 384.903
82+380.00 755031.0949 2275461.068 384.843
82+390.00 755029.3237 2275470.909 384.780
82+400.00 755027.5525 2275480.751 384.713
82+410.00 755025.7813 2275490.593 384.646
82+420.00 755024.0101 2275500.435 384.579
82+430.00 755022.2389 2275510.277 384.512
82+440.00 755020.4677 2275520.119 384.445
82+450.00 755018.6795 2275529.958 384.378
82+460.00 755016.843 2275539.788 384.311
82+470.00 755014.9573 2275549.608 384.244
82+480.00 755013.0225 2275559.419 384.177
82+490.00 755011.0387 2275569.22 384.110
82+500.00 755009.0104 2275579.013 384.043
82+510.00 755006.9741 2275588.803 383.976
82+520.00 755004.9377 2275598.594 383.909
82+530.00 755002.9013 2275608.384 383.842
82+540.00 755000.8649 2275618.174 383.775
82+550.00 754998.8285 2275627.965 383.708
82+560.00 754996.7921 2275637.755 383.641
82+570.00 754994.7557 2275647.546 383.574
82+580.00 754992.7193 2275657.336 383.507
82+590.00 754990.683 2275667.127 383.440
82+600.00 754988.6466 2275676.917 383.372
82+610.00 754986.6102 2275686.708 383.305
82+620.00 754984.5738 2275696.498 383.238
82+630.00 754982.5374 2275706.289 383.171
82+640.00 754980.501 2275716.079 383.104
82+650.00 754978.4646 2275725.87 383.037
82+660.00 754976.4282 2275735.66 382.970
82+670.00 754974.3918 2275745.45 382.903
82+680.00 754972.3555 2275755.241 382.836
82+690.00 754970.3023 2275765.028 382.769
82+700.00 754968.2308 2275774.811 382.702
82+710.00 754966.1594 2275784.594 382.635
82+720.00 754964.0879 2275794.377 382.568

Page 108
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

82+730.00 754962.0165 2275804.16 382.501

82+740.00 754959.945 2275813.943 382.434
82+750.00 754957.8736 2275823.726 382.367
82+760.00 754955.8021 2275833.51 382.300
82+770.00 754953.7307 2275843.293 382.233
82+780.00 754951.6592 2275853.076 382.166
82+790.00 754949.5877 2275862.859 382.099
82+800.00 754947.5163 2275872.642 382.032
82+810.00 754945.4457 2275882.425 381.965
82+820.00 754943.4075 2275892.215 381.898
82+830.00 754941.4184 2275902.015 381.831
82+840.00 754939.4679 2275911.823 381.764
82+850.00 754937.5203 2275921.632 381.697
82+860.00 754935.5728 2275931.44 381.630
82+870.00 754933.6252 2275941.249 381.563
82+880.00 754931.6777 2275951.058 381.496
82+890.00 754929.7302 2275960.866 381.429
82+900.00 754927.7826 2275970.675 381.362
82+910.00 754925.8351 2275980.483 381.295
82+920.00 754923.8875 2275990.292 381.228
82+930.00 754921.94 2276000.1 381.161
82+940.00 754919.9924 2276009.909 381.094
82+950.00 754918.0449 2276019.717 381.027
82+960.00 754916.0974 2276029.526 380.960
82+970.00 754914.1498 2276039.334 380.893
82+980.00 754912.2023 2276049.143 380.826
82+990.00 754910.2603 2276058.952 380.759
83+000.00 754908.3606 2276068.77 380.692
83+010.00 754906.5096 2276078.597 380.625
83+020.00 754904.6772 2276088.428 380.558
83+030.00 754902.8448 2276098.259 380.491
83+040.00 754901.0124 2276108.089 380.424
83+050.00 754899.18 2276117.92 380.356
83+060.00 754897.3242 2276127.746 380.289
83+070.00 754895.4194 2276137.563 380.219
83+080.00 754893.4656 2276147.371 380.148
83+090.00 754891.4851 2276157.172 380.075

Page 109
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

83+100.00 754889.5045 2276166.974 379.999

83+110.00 754887.5239 2276176.776 379.922
83+120.00 754885.5433 2276186.578 379.842
83+130.00 754883.5628 2276196.38 379.761
83+140.00 754881.5822 2276206.182 379.678
83+150.00 754879.6016 2276215.984 379.592
83+160.00 754877.6211 2276225.786 379.505
83+170.00 754875.6405 2276235.588 379.416
83+180.00 754873.6599 2276245.39 379.324
83+190.00 754871.6793 2276255.192 379.231
83+200.00 754869.6988 2276264.993 379.136
83+210.00 754867.7182 2276274.795 379.038
83+220.00 754865.7376 2276284.597 378.939
83+230.00 754863.7571 2276294.399 378.838
83+240.00 754861.7765 2276304.201 378.734
83+250.00 754859.7959 2276314.003 378.629
83+260.00 754857.8153 2276323.805 378.522
83+270.00 754855.8348 2276333.607 378.413
83+280.00 754853.8542 2276343.409 378.302
83+290.00 754851.8736 2276353.211 378.189
83+300.00 754849.8931 2276363.012 378.076
83+310.00 754847.9125 2276372.814 377.964
83+320.00 754845.9319 2276382.616 377.851
83+330.00 754843.9513 2276392.418 377.738
83+340.00 754841.9708 2276402.22 377.626
83+350.00 754839.9902 2276412.022 377.513
83+360.00 754838.0096 2276421.824 377.400
83+370.00 754836.0291 2276431.626 377.288
83+380.00 754834.0485 2276441.428 377.175
83+390.00 754832.0679 2276451.23 377.063
83+400.00 754830.0873 2276461.032 376.950
83+410.00 754828.1068 2276470.833 376.837
83+420.00 754826.1262 2276480.635 376.725
83+430.00 754824.1456 2276490.437 376.612
83+440.00 754822.1651 2276500.239 376.499
83+450.00 754820.1845 2276510.041 376.387
83+460.00 754818.2039 2276519.843 376.274

Page 110
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

83+470.00 754816.2233 2276529.645 376.161

83+480.00 754814.2428 2276539.447 376.049
83+490.00 754812.2622 2276549.249 375.936
83+500.00 754810.2816 2276559.051 375.824
83+510.00 754808.3011 2276568.852 375.711
83+520.00 754806.3205 2276578.654 375.598
83+530.00 754804.3399 2276588.456 375.486
83+540.00 754802.3594 2276598.258 375.373
83+550.00 754800.3788 2276608.06 375.260
83+560.00 754798.3982 2276617.862 375.148
83+570.00 754796.4176 2276627.664 375.035
83+580.00 754794.4371 2276637.466 374.922
83+590.00 754792.4565 2276647.268 374.810
83+600.00 754790.4759 2276657.07 374.697
83+610.00 754788.4954 2276666.872 374.584
83+620.00 754786.5148 2276676.673 374.472
83+630.00 754784.546 2276686.478 374.359
83+640.00 754782.6239 2276696.291 374.247
83+650.00 754780.7481 2276706.114 374.134
83+660.00 754778.8832 2276715.938 374.021
83+670.00 754777.0183 2276725.763 373.909
83+680.00 754775.1535 2276735.587 373.796
83+690.00 754773.2886 2276745.412 373.683
83+700.00 754771.4237 2276755.237 373.571
83+710.00 754769.5588 2276765.061 373.458
83+720.00 754767.6939 2276774.886 373.345
83+730.00 754765.829 2276784.71 373.233
83+740.00 754763.9384 2276794.53 373.120
83+750.00 754761.9988 2276804.34 373.007
83+760.00 754760.0124 2276814.141 372.895
83+770.00 754758.0144 2276823.939 372.782
83+780.00 754756.0164 2276833.737 372.670
83+790.00 754754.0184 2276843.536 372.558
83+800.00 754752.0204 2276853.334 372.450
83+810.00 754750.0224 2276863.133 372.347
83+820.00 754748.0244 2276872.931 372.249
83+830.00 754746.0264 2276882.729 372.155

Page 111
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

83+840.00 754744.0212 2276892.526 372.066

83+850.00 754741.9722 2276902.314 371.981
83+860.00 754739.8744 2276912.092 371.902
83+870.00 754737.7294 2276921.859 371.826
83+880.00 754735.5711 2276931.623 371.756
83+890.00 754733.4129 2276941.387 371.690
83+900.00 754731.2564 2276951.152 371.629
83+910.00 754729.1355 2276960.925 371.573
83+920.00 754727.0635 2276970.708 371.521
83+930.00 754725.0404 2276980.501 371.474
83+940.00 754723.0664 2276990.304 371.431
83+950.00 754721.1414 2277000.117 371.393
83+960.00 754719.2654 2277009.939 371.360
83+970.00 754717.4386 2277019.771 371.331
83+980.00 754715.6477 2277029.609 371.307
83+990.00 754713.8194 2277039.441 371.288
84+000.00 754711.9419 2277049.263 371.271
84+010.00 754710.0153 2277059.076 371.254
84+020.00 754708.0397 2277068.879 371.236
84+030.00 754706.0151 2277078.671 371.219
84+040.00 754703.9416 2277088.454 371.202
84+050.00 754701.8192 2277098.226 371.185
84+060.00 754699.6479 2277107.988 371.167
84+070.00 754697.4279 2277117.738 371.150
84+080.00 754695.1636 2277127.478 371.133
84+090.00 754692.8914 2277137.217 371.115
84+100.00 754690.6191 2277146.955 371.098
84+110.00 754688.3455 2277156.693 371.081
84+120.00 754686.0568 2277166.428 371.064
84+130.00 754683.7328 2277176.154 371.046
84+140.00 754681.3533 2277185.867 371.029
84+150.00 754678.8982 2277195.561 371.012
84+160.00 754676.3475 2277205.23 370.994
84+170.00 754673.6838 2277214.869 370.977
84+180.00 754670.9138 2277224.477 370.960
84+190.00 754668.0576 2277234.061 370.943
84+200.00 754665.1355 2277243.624 370.925

Page 112
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

84+210.00 754662.1673 2277253.174 370.908

84+220.00 754659.1732 2277262.715 370.891
84+230.00 754656.1718 2277272.254 370.873
84+240.00 754653.1703 2277281.793 370.856
84+250.00 754650.1688 2277291.332 370.839
84+260.00 754647.1673 2277300.87 370.822
84+270.00 754644.1658 2277310.409 370.804
84+280.00 754641.1643 2277319.948 370.787
84+290.00 754638.1628 2277329.487 370.770
84+300.00 754635.1613 2277339.026 370.752
84+310.00 754632.1505 2277348.562 370.735
84+320.00 754629.0954 2277358.084 370.718
84+330.00 754625.9928 2277367.591 370.701
84+340.00 754622.8426 2277377.081 370.683
84+350.00 754619.645 2277386.556 370.666
84+360.00 754616.4001 2277396.015 370.649
84+370.00 754613.108 2277405.458 370.631
84+380.00 754609.7686 2277414.884 370.614
84+390.00 754606.3907 2277424.296 370.597
84+400.00 754603.0089 2277433.707 370.580
84+410.00 754599.6272 2277443.118 370.562
84+420.00 754596.2454 2277452.528 370.545
84+430.00 754592.8637 2277461.939 370.524
84+440.00 754589.4819 2277471.35 370.498
84+450.00 754586.1002 2277480.761 370.466
84+460.00 754582.7184 2277490.172 370.429
84+470.00 754579.3367 2277499.583 370.387
84+480.00 754575.9549 2277508.993 370.339
84+490.00 754572.5719 2277518.404 370.286
84+500.00 754569.156 2277527.802 370.228
84+510.00 754565.6931 2277537.184 370.164
84+520.00 754562.1894 2277546.55 370.095
84+530.00 754558.68 2277555.914 370.021
84+540.00 754555.1706 2277565.278 369.941
84+550.00 754551.6611 2277574.642 369.856
84+560.00 754548.1517 2277584.006 369.766
84+570.00 754544.6423 2277593.369 369.670

Page 113
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

84+580.00 754541.1328 2277602.733 369.569

84+590.00 754537.6234 2277612.097 369.466
84+600.00 754534.114 2277621.461 369.362
84+610.00 754530.6045 2277630.825 369.259
84+620.00 754527.0951 2277640.189 369.156
84+630.00 754523.5857 2277649.553 369.052
84+640.00 754520.0762 2277658.917 368.949
84+650.00 754516.5668 2277668.281 368.846
84+660.00 754513.0574 2277677.645 368.742
84+670.00 754509.5407 2277687.006 368.639
84+680.00 754505.982 2277696.352 368.536
84+690.00 754502.385 2277705.682 368.432
84+700.00 754498.7844 2277715.012 368.329
84+710.00 754495.1838 2277724.341 368.226
84+720.00 754491.5832 2277733.67 368.122
84+730.00 754487.9826 2277743 368.019
84+740.00 754484.382 2277752.329 367.916
84+750.00 754480.7814 2277761.658 367.812
84+760.00 754477.1808 2277770.987 367.709
84+770.00 754473.5868 2277780.319 367.606
84+780.00 754470.0344 2277789.667 367.502
84+790.00 754466.5288 2277799.032 367.399
84+800.00 754463.0701 2277808.415 367.296
84+810.00 754459.637 2277817.807 367.192
84+820.00 754456.2039 2277827.2 367.089
84+830.00 754452.7709 2277836.592 366.986
84+840.00 754449.3378 2277845.984 366.882
84+850.00 754445.9047 2277855.376 366.779
84+860.00 754442.47 2277864.768 366.676
84+870.00 754439.0011 2277874.147 366.572
84+880.00 754435.5062 2277883.516 366.469
84+890.00 754432.0112 2277892.886 366.366
84+900.00 754428.5163 2277902.255 366.262
84+910.00 754425.0213 2277911.625 366.159
84+920.00 754421.5264 2277920.994 366.056
84+930.00 754418.0314 2277930.363 365.952
84+940.00 754414.5365 2277939.733 365.849

Page 114
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

84+950.00 754411.0415 2277949.102 365.746

84+960.00 754407.5466 2277958.472 365.642
84+970.00 754404.0516 2277967.841 365.539
84+980.00 754400.5567 2277977.21 365.436
84+990.00 754397.0617 2277986.58 365.332
85+000.00 754393.5668 2277995.949 365.229
85+010.00 754390.0718 2278005.318 365.126
85+020.00 754386.5769 2278014.688 365.022
85+030.00 754383.0819 2278024.057 364.919
85+040.00 754379.5869 2278033.427 364.816
85+050.00 754376.092 2278042.796 364.712
85+060.00 754372.597 2278052.165 364.609
85+070.00 754369.1021 2278061.535 364.506
85+080.00 754365.6071 2278070.904 364.402
85+090.00 754362.1122 2278080.274 364.299
85+100.00 754358.6172 2278089.643 364.196
85+110.00 754355.1223 2278099.012 364.092
85+120.00 754351.6273 2278108.382 363.989
85+130.00 754348.1324 2278117.751 363.886
85+140.00 754344.6374 2278127.12 363.782
85+150.00 754341.1425 2278136.49 363.679
85+160.00 754337.644 2278145.858 363.576
85+170.00 754334.1075 2278155.212 363.472
85+180.00 754330.5243 2278164.548 363.369
85+190.00 754326.9199 2278173.875 363.266
85+200.00 754323.3155 2278183.203 363.162
85+210.00 754319.7111 2278192.531 363.059
85+220.00 754316.1067 2278201.859 362.956
85+230.00 754312.5023 2278211.187 362.853
85+240.00 754308.898 2278220.515 362.753
85+250.00 754305.2936 2278229.842 362.659
85+260.00 754301.6892 2278239.17 362.569
85+270.00 754298.0848 2278248.498 362.484
85+280.00 754294.4804 2278257.826 362.404
85+290.00 754290.876 2278267.154 362.329
85+300.00 754287.2716 2278276.482 362.259
85+310.00 754283.6672 2278285.809 362.194

Page 115
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

85+320.00 754280.0628 2278295.137 362.133

85+330.00 754276.4584 2278304.465 362.078
85+340.00 754272.854 2278313.793 362.027
85+350.00 754269.2496 2278323.121 361.981
85+360.00 754265.6452 2278332.448 361.940
85+370.00 754262.0408 2278341.776 361.900
85+380.00 754258.4364 2278351.104 361.861
85+390.00 754254.832 2278360.432 361.821
85+400.00 754251.2276 2278369.76 361.781
85+410.00 754247.6233 2278379.088 361.742
85+420.00 754244.0188 2278388.415 361.702
85+430.00 754240.3917 2278397.734 361.662
85+440.00 754236.7481 2278407.047 361.623
85+450.00 754233.1045 2278416.36 361.583
85+460.00 754229.4608 2278425.672 361.544
85+470.00 754225.8172 2278434.985 361.504
85+480.00 754222.1736 2278444.297 361.464
85+490.00 754218.5299 2278453.61 361.425
85+500.00 754214.8863 2278462.922 361.385
85+510.00 754211.2427 2278472.235 361.345
85+520.00 754207.599 2278481.548 361.306
85+530.00 754203.9554 2278490.86 361.266
85+540.00 754200.3117 2278500.173 361.232
85+550.00 754196.6681 2278509.485 361.215
85+560.00 754193.0245 2278518.798 361.217
85+570.00 754189.3808 2278528.11 361.238
85+580.00 754185.7372 2278537.423 361.278
85+590.00 754182.0936 2278546.736 361.336
85+600.00 754178.4499 2278556.048 361.413
85+610.00 754174.8063 2278565.361 361.503
85+620.00 754171.1627 2278574.673 361.594
85+630.00 754167.519 2278583.986 361.685
85+640.00 754163.8754 2278593.298 361.775
85+650.00 754160.2318 2278602.611 361.866
85+660.00 754156.5881 2278611.924 361.957
85+670.00 754152.9445 2278621.236 362.048
85+680.00 754149.3009 2278630.549 362.138

Page 116
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

85+690.00 754145.6572 2278639.861 362.229

85+700.00 754142.0136 2278649.174 362.320
85+710.00 754138.37 2278658.486 362.411
85+720.00 754134.7263 2278667.799 362.501
85+730.00 754131.0827 2278677.111 362.592
85+740.00 754127.439 2278686.424 362.683
85+750.00 754123.7954 2278695.737 362.774
85+760.00 754120.1518 2278705.049 362.864
85+770.00 754116.5081 2278714.362 362.955
85+780.00 754112.8432 2278723.666 363.046
85+790.00 754109.1318 2278732.952 363.137
85+800.00 754105.374 2278742.219 363.227
85+810.00 754101.5873 2278751.474 363.318
85+820.00 754097.8002 2278760.729 363.409
85+830.00 754094.0131 2278769.984 363.500
85+840.00 754090.2261 2278779.24 363.590
85+850.00 754086.439 2278788.495 363.669
85+860.00 754082.6519 2278797.75 363.733
85+870.00 754078.8648 2278807.005 363.783
85+880.00 754075.0777 2278816.26 363.818
85+890.00 754071.2907 2278825.515 363.838
85+900.00 754067.5036 2278834.771 363.843
85+910.00 754063.7165 2278844.026 363.834
85+920.00 754059.9294 2278853.281 363.811
85+930.00 754056.1423 2278862.536 363.783
85+940.00 754052.3552 2278871.791 363.755
85+950.00 754048.5776 2278881.05 363.727
85+960.00 754044.8352 2278890.324 363.699
85+970.00 754041.0967 2278899.598 363.671
85+980.00 754037.3582 2278908.873 363.643
85+990.00 754033.6196 2278918.148 363.615
86+000.00 754029.8811 2278927.423 363.587
86+010.00 754026.1426 2278936.698 363.559
86+020.00 754022.4041 2278945.973 363.531
86+030.00 754018.6655 2278955.248 363.503
86+040.00 754014.927 2278964.523 363.475
86+050.00 754011.1867 2278973.797 363.447

Page 117
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

86+060.00 754007.4122 2278983.057 363.419

86+070.00 754003.6117 2278992.307 363.390
86+080.00 753999.8111 2279001.556 363.362
86+090.00 753996.0106 2279010.806 363.334
86+100.00 753992.21 2279020.056 363.305
86+110.00 753988.4095 2279029.305 363.276
86+120.00 753984.6089 2279038.555 363.247
86+130.00 753980.8084 2279047.805 363.218
86+140.00 753977.0078 2279057.054 363.189
86+150.00 753973.2072 2279066.304 363.160
86+160.00 753969.4196 2279075.559 363.130
86+170.00 753965.6747 2279084.831 363.101
86+180.00 753961.9412 2279094.108 363.071
86+190.00 753958.2077 2279103.385 363.042
86+200.00 753954.4742 2279112.662 363.012
86+210.00 753950.7408 2279121.939 362.982
86+220.00 753947.0073 2279131.216 362.953
86+230.00 753943.2738 2279140.492 362.923
86+240.00 753939.5403 2279149.769 362.894
86+250.00 753935.8068 2279159.046 362.864
86+260.00 753932.0733 2279168.323 362.834
86+270.00 753928.3398 2279177.6 362.805
86+280.00 753924.6064 2279186.877 362.775
86+290.00 753920.8729 2279196.154 362.746
86+300.00 753917.1394 2279205.431 362.716
86+310.00 753913.4059 2279214.708 362.686
86+320.00 753909.6724 2279223.985 362.657
86+330.00 753905.9389 2279233.262 362.627
86+340.00 753902.2054 2279242.538 362.597
86+350.00 753898.4719 2279251.815 362.568
86+360.00 753894.7385 2279261.092 362.538
86+370.00 753891.005 2279270.369 362.509
86+380.00 753887.2675 2279279.645 362.479
86+390.00 753883.5201 2279288.916 362.449
86+400.00 753879.7727 2279298.187 362.420
86+410.00 753876.0253 2279307.458 362.390
86+420.00 753872.2779 2279316.73 362.361

Page 118
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

86+430.00 753868.5305 2279326.001 362.331

86+440.00 753864.7831 2279335.272 362.301
86+450.00 753861.0358 2279344.544 362.272
86+460.00 753857.2884 2279353.815 362.242
86+470.00 753853.541 2279363.086 362.213
86+480.00 753849.7936 2279372.358 362.183
86+490.00 753846.0462 2279381.629 362.153
86+500.00 753842.2988 2279390.9 362.124
86+510.00 753838.5514 2279400.171 362.094
86+520.00 753834.804 2279409.443 362.064
86+530.00 753831.0566 2279418.714 362.035
86+540.00 753827.2914 2279427.978 362.005
86+550.00 753823.4803 2279437.223 361.976
86+560.00 753819.623 2279446.45 361.946
86+570.00 753815.7365 2279455.663 361.916
86+580.00 753811.8494 2279464.877 361.887
86+590.00 753807.9624 2279474.091 361.857
86+600.00 753804.0753 2279483.304 361.828
86+610.00 753800.1882 2279492.518 361.798
86+620.00 753796.3133 2279501.737 361.772
86+630.00 753792.4827 2279510.974 361.757
86+640.00 753788.6984 2279520.23 361.755
86+650.00 753784.9604 2279529.505 361.764
86+660.00 753781.2653 2279538.797 361.786
86+670.00 753777.579 2279548.093 361.820
86+680.00 753773.8927 2279557.389 361.867
86+690.00 753770.2064 2279566.685 361.924
86+700.00 753766.52 2279575.98 361.983
86+710.00 753762.8337 2279585.276 362.042
86+720.00 753759.1474 2279594.572 362.101
86+730.00 753755.4611 2279603.868 362.160
86+740.00 753751.7748 2279613.163 362.219
86+750.00 753748.0885 2279622.459 362.278
86+760.00 753744.4022 2279631.755 362.337
86+770.00 753740.7159 2279641.051 362.396
86+780.00 753737.0102 2279650.339 362.455
86+790.00 753733.2584 2279659.608 362.514

Page 119
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

86+800.00 753729.4604 2279668.859 362.573

86+810.00 753725.6429 2279678.102 362.629
86+820.00 753721.8254 2279687.344 362.679
86+830.00 753718.008 2279696.587 362.721
86+840.00 753714.1905 2279705.83 362.756
86+850.00 753710.373 2279715.072 362.784
86+860.00 753706.5555 2279724.315 362.805
86+870.00 753702.738 2279733.558 362.819
86+880.00 753698.9205 2279742.8 362.827
86+890.00 753695.103 2279752.043 362.827
86+900.00 753691.2855 2279761.286 362.820
86+910.00 753687.468 2279770.528 362.807
86+920.00 753683.6505 2279779.771 362.786
86+930.00 753679.833 2279789.014 362.758
86+940.00 753676.0166 2279798.257 362.724
86+950.00 753672.2083 2279807.503 362.682
86+960.00 753668.4001 2279816.75 362.634
86+970.00 753664.5919 2279825.996 362.578
86+980.00 753660.7837 2279835.243 362.516
86+990.00 753656.9755 2279844.489 362.451
87+000.00 753653.1673 2279853.736 362.386
87+010.00 753649.3591 2279862.982 362.321
87+020.00 753645.5508 2279872.229 362.256
87+030.00 753641.7426 2279881.475 362.191
87+040.00 753637.9344 2279890.722 362.126
87+050.00 753634.1262 2279899.968 362.061
87+060.00 753630.318 2279909.214 361.996
87+070.00 753626.5098 2279918.461 361.931
87+080.00 753622.7015 2279927.707 361.866
87+090.00 753618.8933 2279936.954 361.801
87+100.00 753615.1053 2279946.209 361.736
87+110.00 753611.3635 2279955.482 361.671
87+120.00 753607.6681 2279964.774 361.606
87+130.00 753603.9972 2279974.076 361.541
87+140.00 753600.3264 2279983.378 361.476
87+150.00 753596.6336 2279992.671 361.411
87+160.00 753592.8944 2280001.946 361.346

Page 120
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

87+170.00 753589.1201 2280011.206 361.281

87+180.00 753585.3438 2280020.466 361.218
87+190.00 753581.5675 2280029.725 361.159
87+200.00 753577.7912 2280038.985 361.106
87+210.00 753574.0148 2280048.245 361.058
87+220.00 753570.2385 2280057.504 361.015
87+230.00 753566.4622 2280066.764 360.977
87+240.00 753562.6859 2280076.023 360.944
87+250.00 753558.9095 2280085.283 360.916
87+260.00 753555.1332 2280094.542 360.894
87+270.00 753551.3569 2280103.802 360.876
87+280.00 753547.5806 2280113.061 360.864
87+290.00 753543.8042 2280122.321 360.856
87+300.00 753540.0279 2280131.581 360.854
87+310.00 753536.2516 2280140.84 360.857
87+320.00 753532.4752 2280150.1 360.864
87+330.00 753528.6989 2280159.359 360.877
87+340.00 753524.9226 2280168.619 360.895
87+350.00 753521.1463 2280177.878 360.919
87+360.00 753517.3699 2280187.138 360.947
87+370.00 753513.5936 2280196.397 360.980
87+380.00 753509.8173 2280205.657 361.018
87+390.00 753506.041 2280214.917 361.062
87+400.00 753502.2646 2280224.176 361.110
87+410.00 753498.4883 2280233.436 361.160
87+420.00 753494.712 2280242.695 361.210
87+430.00 753490.9357 2280251.955 361.260
87+440.00 753487.1593 2280261.214 361.309
87+450.00 753483.383 2280270.474 361.359
87+460.00 753479.6061 2280279.733 361.409
87+470.00 753475.8001 2280288.981 361.459
87+480.00 753471.976 2280298.22 361.508
87+490.00 753468.152 2280307.46 361.558
87+500.00 753464.328 2280316.7 361.608
87+510.00 753460.504 2280325.94 361.658
87+520.00 753456.6799 2280335.18 361.707
87+530.00 753452.8559 2280344.42 361.755

Page 121
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

87+540.00 753449.0319 2280353.66 361.796

87+550.00 753445.2078 2280362.9 361.829
87+560.00 753441.3734 2280372.136 361.854
87+570.00 753437.4953 2280381.353 361.872
87+580.00 753433.5958 2280390.562 361.882
87+590.00 753429.6962 2280399.77 361.884
87+600.00 753425.7967 2280408.978 361.879
87+610.00 753421.8972 2280418.187 361.866
87+620.00 753418.0209 2280427.405 361.845
87+630.00 753414.1661 2280436.632 361.817
87+640.00 753410.3113 2280445.859 361.781
87+650.00 753406.4565 2280455.086 361.737
87+660.00 753402.6016 2280464.313 361.686
87+670.00 753398.745 2280473.54 361.627
87+680.00 753394.8544 2280482.752 361.560
87+690.00 753390.9178 2280491.944 361.486
87+700.00 753386.9353 2280501.117 361.404
87+710.00 753382.9087 2280510.271 361.314
87+720.00 753378.8701 2280519.419 361.218
87+730.00 753374.8314 2280528.567 361.123
87+740.00 753370.7928 2280537.715 361.027
87+750.00 753366.7404 2280546.857 360.931
87+760.00 753362.6435 2280555.98 360.835
87+770.00 753358.501 2280565.081 360.740
87+780.00 753354.313 2280574.162 360.644
87+790.00 753350.0797 2280583.222 360.548
87+800.00 753345.8219 2280592.27 360.453
87+810.00 753341.564 2280601.318 360.357
87+820.00 753337.3076 2280610.367 360.261
87+830.00 753333.0841 2280619.431 360.165
87+840.00 753328.906 2280628.517 360.070
87+850.00 753324.7734 2280637.623 359.974
87+860.00 753320.6863 2280646.75 359.878
87+870.00 753316.6419 2280655.895 359.782
87+880.00 753312.5904 2280665.038 359.687
87+890.00 753308.4549 2280674.142 359.591
87+900.00 753304.2287 2280683.205 359.495

Page 122
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

87+910.00 753299.9615 2280692.249 359.400

87+920.00 753295.6965 2280701.294 359.304
87+930.00 753291.4661 2280710.355 359.208
87+940.00 753287.281 2280719.437 359.112
87+950.00 753283.1415 2280728.54 359.017
87+960.00 753279.0475 2280737.664 358.921
87+970.00 753274.9992 2280746.808 358.825
87+980.00 753270.9966 2280755.972 358.729
87+990.00 753267.0345 2280765.153 358.634
88+000.00 753263.0785 2280774.338 358.538
88+010.00 753259.1225 2280783.522 358.442
88+020.00 753255.162 2280792.704 358.347
88+030.00 753251.1627 2280801.87 358.251
88+040.00 753247.1177 2280811.015 358.155
88+050.00 753243.0271 2280820.14 358.059
88+060.00 753238.9155 2280829.256 357.964
88+070.00 753234.8251 2280838.381 357.868
88+080.00 753230.7803 2280847.526 357.772
88+090.00 753226.7795 2280856.691 357.676
88+100.00 753222.7904 2280865.861 357.581
88+110.00 753218.8014 2280875.031 357.485
88+120.00 753214.8124 2280884.201 357.389
88+130.00 753210.8234 2280893.371 357.294
88+140.00 753206.8343 2280902.541 357.198
88+150.00 753202.8453 2280911.711 357.102
88+160.00 753198.8563 2280920.881 357.006
88+170.00 753194.8673 2280930.051 356.911
88+180.00 753190.8782 2280939.22 356.815
88+190.00 753186.8892 2280948.39 356.719
88+200.00 753182.9002 2280957.56 356.624
88+210.00 753178.9112 2280966.73 356.531
88+220.00 753174.9221 2280975.9 356.441
88+230.00 753170.9331 2280985.07 356.353
88+240.00 753166.9441 2280994.24 356.268
88+250.00 753162.9551 2281003.41 356.185
88+260.00 753158.966 2281012.58 356.105
88+270.00 753154.977 2281021.75 356.027

Page 123
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

88+280.00 753150.988 2281030.92 355.952

88+290.00 753146.999 2281040.09 355.879
88+300.00 753143.0099 2281049.26 355.809
88+310.00 753139.0209 2281058.43 355.741
88+320.00 753135.0319 2281067.6 355.676
88+330.00 753131.0429 2281076.769 355.613
88+340.00 753127.0538 2281085.939 355.553
88+350.00 753123.0648 2281095.109 355.495
88+360.00 753119.0758 2281104.279 355.438
88+370.00 753115.0868 2281113.449 355.381
88+380.00 753111.0977 2281122.619 355.323
88+390.00 753107.1087 2281131.789 355.266
88+400.00 753103.1197 2281140.959 355.209
88+410.00 753099.1307 2281150.129 355.151
88+420.00 753095.1416 2281159.299 355.094
88+430.00 753091.1526 2281168.469 355.037
88+440.00 753087.1636 2281177.639 354.980
88+450.00 753083.1739 2281186.808 354.922
88+460.00 753079.1752 2281195.974 354.865
88+470.00 753075.1765 2281205.14 354.808
88+480.00 753071.1778 2281214.306 354.750
88+490.00 753067.179 2281223.471 354.693
88+500.00 753063.1803 2281232.637 354.636
88+510.00 753059.1816 2281241.803 354.579
88+520.00 753055.1973 2281250.975 354.521
88+530.00 753051.258 2281260.166 354.464
88+540.00 753047.3452 2281269.369 354.407
88+550.00 753043.4325 2281278.571 354.350
88+560.00 753039.5083 2281287.769 354.302
88+570.00 753035.47 2281296.918 354.266
88+580.00 753031.4112 2281306.057 354.241
88+590.00 753027.3145 2281315.179 354.227
88+600.00 753023.1842 2281324.286 354.224
88+610.00 753019.0875 2281333.409 354.233
88+620.00 753015.0365 2281342.551 354.253
88+630.00 753011.0313 2281351.714 354.284
88+640.00 753007.0719 2281360.897 354.327

Page 124
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

88+650.00 753003.1569 2281370.099 354.381

88+660.00 752999.2324 2281379.297 354.443
88+670.00 752995.2619 2281388.474 354.507
88+680.00 752991.2678 2281397.642 354.570
88+690.00 752987.3017 2281406.822 354.634
88+700.00 752983.3816 2281416.022 354.697
88+710.00 752979.4993 2281425.237 354.760
88+720.00 752975.6205 2281434.454 354.824
88+730.00 752971.7132 2281443.659 354.887
88+740.00 752967.76 2281452.845 354.951
88+750.00 752963.7609 2281462.01 355.014
88+760.00 752959.7166 2281471.156 355.077
88+770.00 752955.656 2281480.295 355.137
88+780.00 752951.5968 2281489.434 355.192
88+790.00 752947.5701 2281498.587 355.243
88+800.00 752943.5893 2281507.761 355.289
88+810.00 752939.6543 2281516.954 355.331
88+820.00 752935.7654 2281526.167 355.368
88+830.00 752931.9098 2281535.393 355.402
88+840.00 752928.0505 2281544.619 355.430
88+850.00 752924.1514 2281553.827 355.455
88+860.00 752920.2064 2281563.016 355.475
88+870.00 752916.241 2281572.196 355.490
88+880.00 752912.2755 2281581.377 355.501
88+890.00 752908.3101 2281590.557 355.508
88+900.00 752904.3446 2281599.737 355.510
88+910.00 752900.3792 2281608.917 355.508
88+920.00 752896.4137 2281618.097 355.502
88+930.00 752892.4483 2281627.277 355.491
88+940.00 752888.4828 2281636.457 355.476
88+950.00 752884.5174 2281645.638 355.456
88+960.00 752880.5519 2281654.818 355.432
88+970.00 752876.5865 2281663.998 355.404
88+980.00 752872.621 2281673.178 355.371
88+990.00 752868.6556 2281682.358 355.333
89+000.00 752864.6901 2281691.538 355.292
89+010.00 752860.7247 2281700.718 355.249

Page 125
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

89+020.00 752856.7592 2281709.899 355.206

89+030.00 752852.7938 2281719.079 355.163
89+040.00 752848.8283 2281728.259 355.120
89+050.00 752844.8629 2281737.439 355.077
89+060.00 752840.8974 2281746.619 355.034
89+070.00 752836.932 2281755.799 354.991
89+080.00 752832.9665 2281764.98 354.948
89+090.00 752829.0221 2281774.169 354.905
89+100.00 752825.1236 2281783.378 354.862
89+110.00 752821.2629 2281792.602 354.819
89+120.00 752817.4059 2281801.828 354.776
89+130.00 752813.5488 2281811.055 354.733
89+140.00 752809.6918 2281820.281 354.690
89+150.00 752805.8348 2281829.507 354.647
89+160.00 752801.9778 2281838.733 354.604
89+170.00 752798.1099 2281847.955 354.562
89+180.00 752794.1981 2281857.158 354.519
89+190.00 752790.2424 2281866.343 354.476
89+200.00 752786.2753 2281875.522 354.433
89+210.00 752782.3082 2281884.701 354.390
89+220.00 752778.341 2281893.881 354.347
89+230.00 752774.3739 2281903.06 354.304
89+240.00 752770.4067 2281912.24 354.261
89+250.00 752766.4396 2281921.419 354.218
89+260.00 752762.4725 2281930.599 354.175
89+270.00 752758.5053 2281939.778 354.132
89+280.00 752754.5382 2281948.957 354.089
89+290.00 752750.571 2281958.137 354.046
89+300.00 752746.6039 2281967.316 354.003
89+310.00 752742.6368 2281976.496 353.960
89+320.00 752738.6696 2281985.675 353.917
89+330.00 752734.7025 2281994.854 353.874
89+340.00 752730.7353 2282004.034 353.831
89+350.00 752726.7682 2282013.213 353.790
89+360.00 752722.8011 2282022.393 353.750
89+370.00 752718.8339 2282031.572 353.712
89+380.00 752714.8668 2282040.752 353.674

Page 126
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

89+390.00 752710.8997 2282049.931 353.639

89+400.00 752706.9325 2282059.11 353.605
89+410.00 752702.9654 2282068.29 353.572
89+420.00 752698.9982 2282077.469 353.541
89+430.00 752695.0311 2282086.649 353.511
89+440.00 752691.064 2282095.828 353.482
89+450.00 752687.0968 2282105.008 353.455
89+460.00 752683.1297 2282114.187 353.430
89+470.00 752679.1625 2282123.366 353.406
89+480.00 752675.1954 2282132.546 353.383
89+490.00 752671.2283 2282141.725 353.362
89+500.00 752667.2611 2282150.905 353.341
89+510.00 752663.294 2282160.084 353.320
89+520.00 752659.3268 2282169.264 353.300
89+530.00 752655.3612 2282178.444 353.279
89+540.00 752651.4284 2282187.638 353.259
89+550.00 752647.5417 2282196.852 353.238
89+560.00 752643.6965 2282206.083 353.217
89+570.00 752639.8305 2282215.305 353.197
89+580.00 752635.9188 2282224.508 353.176
89+590.00 752631.99 2282233.704 353.155
89+600.00 752628.0612 2282242.9 353.135
89+610.00 752624.1324 2282252.096 353.114
89+620.00 752620.2035 2282261.292 353.093
89+630.00 752616.2747 2282270.488 353.073
89+640.00 752612.3459 2282279.684 353.052
89+650.00 752608.4171 2282288.88 353.031
89+660.00 752604.4883 2282298.075 353.011
89+670.00 752600.5594 2282307.271 352.990
89+680.00 752596.6306 2282316.467 352.970
89+690.00 752592.7018 2282325.663 352.949
89+700.00 752588.773 2282334.859 352.928
89+710.00 752584.8442 2282344.055 352.908
89+720.00 752580.9154 2282353.251 352.887
89+730.00 752576.9869 2282362.447 352.866
89+740.00 752573.0865 2282371.655 352.846
89+750.00 752569.2322 2282380.882 352.825

Page 127
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

89+760.00 752565.4237 2282390.129 352.804

89+770.00 752561.6116 2282399.373 352.784
89+780.00 752557.7534 2282408.599 352.762
89+790.00 752553.8492 2282417.805 352.739
89+800.00 752549.923 2282427.002 352.714
89+810.00 752545.9969 2282436.2 352.687
89+820.00 752542.0707 2282445.397 352.659
89+830.00 752538.1446 2282454.594 352.630
89+840.00 752534.2184 2282463.791 352.598
89+850.00 752530.2923 2282472.988 352.566
89+860.00 752526.3661 2282482.185 352.531
89+870.00 752522.44 2282491.382 352.495
89+880.00 752518.5138 2282500.579 352.458
89+890.00 752514.5877 2282509.776 352.419
89+900.00 752510.6616 2282518.973 352.378
89+910.00 752506.759 2282528.18 352.336
89+920.00 752502.8931 2282537.402 352.292
89+930.00 752499.0303 2282546.626 352.247
89+940.00 752495.1526 2282555.844 352.199
89+950.00 752491.2445 2282565.048 352.151
89+960.00 752487.3354 2282574.253 352.101
89+970.00 752483.4263 2282583.457 352.049
89+980.00 752479.5172 2282592.661 351.996
89+990.00 752475.6081 2282601.866 351.941
90+000.00 752471.6991 2282611.07 351.884
90+010.00 752467.79 2282620.274 351.826
90+020.00 752463.8809 2282629.479 351.767
90+030.00 752459.9718 2282638.683 351.705
90+040.00 752456.0628 2282647.887 351.643
90+050.00 752452.1537 2282657.091 351.578
90+060.00 752448.2446 2282666.296 351.512
90+070.00 752444.3355 2282675.5 351.445
90+080.00 752440.4263 2282684.704 351.376
90+090.00 752436.5085 2282693.905 351.305
90+100.00 752432.5904 2282703.105 351.233
90+110.00 752428.6722 2282712.306 351.162
90+120.00 752424.754 2282721.506 351.091

Page 128
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

90+130.00 752420.8358 2282730.707 351.019

90+140.00 752416.9176 2282739.907 350.948
90+150.00 752412.9994 2282749.107 350.876
90+160.00 752409.0813 2282758.308 350.805
90+170.00 752405.1631 2282767.508 350.733
90+180.00 752401.2449 2282776.709 350.662
90+190.00 752397.3388 2282785.914 350.590
90+200.00 752393.4503 2282795.127 350.519
90+210.00 752389.5618 2282804.34 350.448
90+220.00 752385.6733 2282813.553 350.376
90+230.00 752381.7848 2282822.766 350.305
90+240.00 752377.8963 2282831.979 350.233
90+250.00 752374.0078 2282841.192 350.162
90+260.00 752370.1193 2282850.405 350.090
90+270.00 752366.2308 2282859.618 350.019
90+280.00 752362.3423 2282868.831 349.947
90+290.00 752358.4538 2282878.044 349.876
90+300.00 752354.5653 2282887.257 349.804
90+310.00 752350.6768 2282896.47 349.733
90+320.00 752346.7883 2282905.683 349.662
90+330.00 752342.8998 2282914.896 349.590
90+340.00 752339.0113 2282924.109 349.519
90+350.00 752335.1228 2282933.322 349.447
90+360.00 752331.2343 2282942.535 349.376
90+370.00 752327.3458 2282951.748 349.304
90+380.00 752323.4573 2282960.961 349.233
90+390.00 752319.5688 2282970.174 349.161
90+400.00 752315.6804 2282979.388 349.090
90+410.00 752311.7919 2282988.601 349.019
90+420.00 752307.9034 2282997.814 348.947
90+430.00 752304.0302 2283007.033 348.876
90+440.00 752300.1947 2283016.268 348.804
90+450.00 752296.3635 2283025.505 348.733
90+460.00 752292.5323 2283034.742 348.661
90+470.00 752288.7011 2283043.979 348.590
90+480.00 752284.8698 2283053.216 348.518
90+490.00 752281.0386 2283062.453 348.447

Page 129
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

90+500.00 752277.2072 2283071.69 348.375

90+510.00 752273.3653 2283080.923 348.304
90+520.00 752269.5227 2283090.155 348.233
90+530.00 752265.6802 2283099.387 348.161
90+540.00 752261.8442 2283108.622 348.090
90+550.00 752258.0493 2283117.874 348.018
90+560.00 752254.2783 2283127.136 347.947
90+570.00 752250.5074 2283136.397 347.875
90+580.00 752246.7364 2283145.659 347.804
90+590.00 752242.9655 2283154.921 347.731
90+600.00 752239.1945 2283164.183 347.657
90+610.00 752235.4235 2283173.444 347.582
90+620.00 752231.6526 2283182.706 347.505
90+630.00 752227.8816 2283191.968 347.426
90+640.00 752224.1036 2283201.227 347.347
90+650.00 752220.3239 2283210.485 347.265
90+660.00 752216.5443 2283219.743 347.182
90+670.00 752212.7646 2283229.001 347.098
90+680.00 752208.9849 2283238.26 347.012
90+690.00 752205.2052 2283247.518 346.924
90+700.00 752201.4255 2283256.776 346.835
90+710.00 752197.6458 2283266.034 346.745
90+720.00 752193.8661 2283275.292 346.653
90+730.00 752190.0865 2283284.55 346.560
90+740.00 752186.3068 2283293.809 346.465
90+750.00 752182.5052 2283303.058 346.368
90+760.00 752178.6574 2283312.288 346.271
90+770.00 752174.7731 2283321.503 346.171
90+780.00 752170.8858 2283330.716 346.070
90+790.00 752166.9985 2283339.93 345.968
90+800.00 752163.1171 2283349.146 345.864
90+810.00 752159.2762 2283358.379 345.759
90+820.00 752155.4815 2283367.631 345.652
90+830.00 752151.7332 2283376.902 345.544
90+840.00 752148.0312 2283386.191 345.434
90+850.00 752144.3757 2283395.499 345.322
90+860.00 752140.7668 2283404.825 345.210

Page 130
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

90+870.00 752137.2046 2283414.169 345.095

90+880.00 752133.6891 2283423.531 344.980
90+890.00 752130.2205 2283432.91 344.862
90+900.00 752126.7989 2283442.306 344.744
90+910.00 752123.4242 2283451.72 344.623
90+920.00 752120.0967 2283461.15 344.501
90+930.00 752116.8163 2283470.597 344.378
90+940.00 752113.5833 2283480.059 344.253
90+950.00 752110.3976 2283489.538 344.127
90+960.00 752107.243 2283499.028 344.000
90+970.00 752104.0892 2283508.517 343.873
90+980.00 752100.9354 2283518.007 343.745
90+990.00 752097.7815 2283527.497 343.618
91+000.00 752094.6277 2283536.986 343.490
91+010.00 752091.4739 2283546.476 343.363
91+020.00 752088.3464 2283555.974 343.236
91+030.00 752085.2663 2283565.488 343.108
91+040.00 752082.2123 2283575.01 342.981
91+050.00 752079.1584 2283584.533 342.854
91+060.00 752076.1045 2283594.055 342.726
91+070.00 752073.0506 2283603.577 342.599
91+080.00 752069.9964 2283613.099 342.472
91+090.00 752066.9176 2283622.614 342.344
91+100.00 752063.8304 2283632.125 342.217
91+110.00 752060.7432 2283641.637 342.090
91+120.00 752057.656 2283651.148 341.962
91+130.00 752054.5688 2283660.66 341.835
91+140.00 752051.4816 2283670.171 341.707
91+150.00 752048.3944 2283679.683 341.580
91+160.00 752045.3072 2283689.194 341.453
91+170.00 752042.22 2283698.706 341.325
91+180.00 752039.1328 2283708.217 341.198
91+190.00 752036.0456 2283717.729 341.071
91+200.00 752032.9583 2283727.241 340.943
91+210.00 752029.8711 2283736.752 340.816
91+220.00 752026.7839 2283746.264 340.689
91+230.00 752023.6967 2283755.775 340.561

Page 131
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

91+240.00 752020.6095 2283765.287 340.434

91+250.00 752017.5223 2283774.798 340.307
91+260.00 752014.4351 2283784.31 340.179
91+270.00 752011.3479 2283793.821 340.052
91+280.00 752008.2607 2283803.333 339.924
91+290.00 752005.1735 2283812.844 339.797
91+300.00 752002.0863 2283822.356 339.670
91+310.00 751998.9991 2283831.867 339.542
91+320.00 751995.9119 2283841.379 339.415
91+330.00 751992.8247 2283850.89 339.288
91+340.00 751989.7372 2283860.402 339.160
91+350.00 751986.621 2283869.904 339.033
91+360.00 751983.4812 2283879.398 338.906
91+370.00 751980.3413 2283888.892 338.778
91+380.00 751977.2015 2283898.387 338.651
91+390.00 751974.0617 2283907.881 338.524
91+400.00 751970.9218 2283917.375 338.396
91+410.00 751967.782 2283926.87 338.269
91+420.00 751964.6422 2283936.364 338.141
91+430.00 751961.5023 2283945.858 338.014
91+440.00 751958.3627 2283955.352 337.887
91+450.00 751955.25 2283964.856 337.759
91+460.00 751952.1848 2283974.374 337.632
91+470.00 751949.1514 2283983.903 337.505
91+480.00 751946.1189 2283993.432 337.377
91+490.00 751943.0987 2284002.965 337.250
91+500.00 751940.1244 2284012.513 337.123
91+510.00 751937.1978 2284022.075 337.000
91+520.00 751934.2963 2284031.645 336.882
91+530.00 751931.3532 2284041.202 336.768
91+540.00 751928.3623 2284050.744 336.659
91+550.00 751925.3237 2284060.271 336.554
91+560.00 751922.2375 2284069.783 336.454
91+570.00 751919.1041 2284079.279 336.357
91+580.00 751915.952 2284088.77 336.262
91+590.00 751912.8024 2284098.261 336.167
91+600.00 751909.6898 2284107.764 336.071

Page 132
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

91+610.00 751906.6223 2284117.282 335.976

91+620.00 751903.5659 2284126.803 335.881
91+630.00 751900.5094 2284136.325 335.785
91+640.00 751897.453 2284145.846 335.690
91+650.00 751894.3965 2284155.368 335.595
91+660.00 751891.3401 2284164.889 335.499
91+670.00 751888.2836 2284174.411 335.404
91+680.00 751885.2272 2284183.932 335.309
91+690.00 751882.1707 2284193.453 335.213
91+700.00 751879.1142 2284202.975 335.118
91+710.00 751876.0578 2284212.496 335.022
91+720.00 751873.0013 2284222.018 334.927
91+730.00 751869.9449 2284231.539 334.832
91+740.00 751866.8884 2284241.061 334.736
91+750.00 751863.832 2284250.582 334.640
91+760.00 751860.7755 2284260.104 334.541
91+770.00 751857.7191 2284269.625 334.438
91+780.00 751854.6626 2284279.147 334.331
91+790.00 751851.6062 2284288.668 334.221
91+800.00 751848.5497 2284298.189 334.107
91+810.00 751845.4933 2284307.711 333.990
91+820.00 751842.4368 2284317.232 333.870
91+830.00 751839.3804 2284326.754 333.745
91+840.00 751836.3239 2284336.275 333.618
91+850.00 751833.2675 2284345.797 333.486
91+860.00 751830.211 2284355.318 333.352
91+870.00 751827.1546 2284364.84 333.213
91+880.00 751824.0981 2284374.361 333.071
91+890.00 751821.0417 2284383.883 332.926
91+900.00 751817.9852 2284393.404 332.777
91+910.00 751814.9288 2284402.925 332.625
91+920.00 751811.8723 2284412.447 332.472
91+930.00 751808.8159 2284421.968 332.319
91+940.00 751805.7594 2284431.49 332.166
91+950.00 751802.7029 2284441.011 332.013
91+960.00 751799.6465 2284450.533 331.860
91+970.00 751796.59 2284460.054 331.707

Page 133
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

91+980.00 751793.5336 2284469.576 331.554

91+990.00 751790.4771 2284479.097 331.402
92+000.00 751787.74 2284488.726 331.249
92+010.00 751784.9716 2284498.345 331.096
92+020.00 751781.8833 2284507.856 330.944
92+030.00 751778.7949 2284517.367 330.803
92+040.00 751775.7066 2284526.878 330.678
92+050.00 751772.6183 2284536.39 330.568
92+060.00 751769.53 2284545.901 330.473
92+070.00 751766.4416 2284555.412 330.393
92+080.00 751763.3533 2284564.923 330.329
92+090.00 751760.265 2284574.434 330.268
92+100.00 751757.1767 2284583.945 330.207
92+110.00 751754.0883 2284593.457 330.146
92+120.00 751751 2284602.968 330.084
92+130.00 751747.9133 2284612.479 330.023
92+140.00 751744.8562 2284622.001 329.962
92+150.00 751741.8065 2284631.524 329.901
92+160.00 751738.7568 2284641.048 329.840
92+170.00 751735.707 2284650.571 329.779
92+180.00 751732.6555 2284660.095 329.718
92+190.00 751729.5691 2284669.606 329.657
92+200.00 751726.4638 2284679.112 329.599
92+210.00 751723.3585 2284688.618 329.554
92+220.00 751720.2532 2284698.123 329.523
92+230.00 751717.1479 2284707.629 329.507
92+240.00 751714.0426 2284717.134 329.505
92+250.00 751710.9372 2284726.64 329.517
92+260.00 751707.8319 2284736.146 329.541
92+270.00 751704.7266 2284745.651 329.565
92+280.00 751701.6213 2284755.157 329.590
92+290.00 751698.516 2284764.663 329.614
92+300.00 751695.4038 2284774.166 329.639
92+310.00 751692.2492 2284783.655 329.663
92+320.00 751689.0711 2284793.137 329.688
92+330.00 751685.8929 2284802.618 329.713
92+340.00 751682.7147 2284812.1 329.737

Page 134
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

92+350.00 751679.5388 2284821.582 329.762

92+360.00 751676.3989 2284831.076 329.786
92+370.00 751673.3064 2284840.586 329.811
92+380.00 751670.2615 2284850.111 329.835
92+390.00 751667.2644 2284859.652 329.860
92+400.00 751664.314 2284869.207 329.883
92+410.00 751661.3791 2284878.766 329.900
92+420.00 751658.4442 2284888.326 329.909
92+430.00 751655.5093 2284897.885 329.910
92+440.00 751652.5744 2284907.445 329.905
92+450.00 751649.6382 2284917.004 329.891
92+460.00 751646.6683 2284926.553 329.871
92+470.00 751643.6507 2284936.087 329.843
92+480.00 751640.5855 2284945.606 329.808
92+490.00 751637.4794 2284955.111 329.765
92+500.00 751634.3681 2284964.615 329.715
92+510.00 751631.2567 2284974.118 329.657
92+520.00 751628.1453 2284983.622 329.592
92+530.00 751625.034 2284993.126 329.521
92+540.00 751621.9226 2285002.629 329.448
92+550.00 751618.832 2285012.14 329.376
92+560.00 751615.7874 2285021.665 329.303
92+570.00 751612.7565 2285031.194 329.231
92+580.00 751609.7256 2285040.724 329.159
92+590.00 751606.6946 2285050.254 329.086
92+600.00 751603.6637 2285059.783 329.014
92+610.00 751600.6327 2285069.313 328.941
92+620.00 751597.6018 2285078.842 328.869
92+630.00 751594.5708 2285088.372 328.797
92+640.00 751591.5399 2285097.902 328.724
92+650.00 751588.509 2285107.431 328.652
92+660.00 751585.478 2285116.961 328.580
92+670.00 751582.4471 2285126.49 328.507
92+680.00 751579.4161 2285136.02 328.435
92+690.00 751576.3852 2285145.55 328.362
92+700.00 751573.3542 2285155.079 328.290
92+710.00 751570.3233 2285164.609 328.218

Page 135
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

92+720.00 751567.2924 2285174.139 328.145

92+730.00 751564.2614 2285183.668 328.073
92+740.00 751561.2305 2285193.198 328.000
92+750.00 751558.1995 2285202.727 327.928
92+760.00 751555.1674 2285212.257 327.856
92+770.00 751552.1024 2285221.775 327.783
92+780.00 751548.9898 2285231.278 327.711
92+790.00 751545.8297 2285240.766 327.639
92+800.00 751542.623 2285250.238 327.566
92+810.00 751539.4008 2285259.705 327.494
92+820.00 751536.1786 2285269.171 327.421
92+830.00 751532.9563 2285278.638 327.349
92+840.00 751529.7341 2285288.104 327.277
92+850.00 751526.5119 2285297.571 327.204
92+860.00 751523.2921 2285307.039 327.132
92+870.00 751520.1088 2285316.518 327.059
92+880.00 751516.9729 2285326.014 326.987
92+890.00 751513.8845 2285335.525 326.915
92+900.00 751510.8437 2285345.052 326.842
92+910.00 751507.8288 2285354.586 326.770
92+920.00 751504.814 2285364.121 326.698
92+930.00 751501.7992 2285373.656 326.625
92+940.00 751498.7844 2285383.19 326.553
92+950.00 751495.7696 2285392.725 326.480
92+960.00 751492.7548 2285402.26 326.408
92+970.00 751489.74 2285411.795 326.336
92+980.00 751486.7251 2285421.329 326.263
92+990.00 751483.7103 2285430.864 326.191
93+000.00 751480.6955 2285440.399 326.120
93+010.00 751477.6807 2285449.933 326.052
93+020.00 751474.6659 2285459.468 325.989
93+030.00 751471.6511 2285469.003 325.929
93+040.00 751468.6363 2285478.538 325.874
93+050.00 751465.6215 2285488.072 325.822
93+060.00 751462.6067 2285497.607 325.774
93+070.00 751459.5919 2285507.142 325.725
93+080.00 751456.577 2285516.677 325.677

Page 136
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

93+090.00 751453.5622 2285526.211 325.628

93+100.00 751450.5474 2285535.746 325.580
93+110.00 751447.5326 2285545.281 325.531
93+120.00 751444.5178 2285554.815 325.483
93+130.00 751441.503 2285564.35 325.435
93+140.00 751438.4882 2285573.885 325.386
93+150.00 751435.4734 2285583.42 325.338
93+160.00 751432.4586 2285592.954 325.289
93+170.00 751429.4438 2285602.489 325.241
93+180.00 751426.4289 2285612.024 325.192
93+190.00 751423.4141 2285621.558 325.144
93+200.00 751420.3993 2285631.093 325.096
93+210.00 751417.3845 2285640.628 325.047
93+220.00 751414.3697 2285650.163 324.999
93+230.00 751411.3549 2285659.697 324.950
93+240.00 751408.3401 2285669.232 324.905
93+250.00 751405.3253 2285678.767 324.871
93+260.00 751402.3105 2285688.302 324.850
93+270.00 751399.2957 2285697.836 324.842
93+280.00 751396.2808 2285707.371 324.847
93+290.00 751393.266 2285716.906 324.865
93+300.00 751390.2344 2285726.435 324.893
93+310.00 751387.1557 2285735.949 324.921
93+320.00 751384.0296 2285745.448 324.950
93+330.00 751380.8559 2285754.931 324.979
93+340.00 751377.6349 2285764.398 325.008
93+350.00 751374.3666 2285773.849 325.037
93+360.00 751371.0511 2285783.283 325.065
93+370.00 751367.6885 2285792.701 325.094
93+380.00 751364.2788 2285802.102 325.118
93+390.00 751360.8222 2285811.485 325.135
93+400.00 751357.3186 2285820.852 325.144
93+410.00 751353.7683 2285830.2 325.146
93+420.00 751350.1764 2285839.533 325.141
93+430.00 751346.5776 2285848.863 325.128
93+440.00 751342.9789 2285858.193 325.109
93+450.00 751339.3802 2285867.523 325.082

Page 137
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

93+460.00 751335.7815 2285876.853 325.047

93+470.00 751332.1828 2285886.183 325.006
93+480.00 751328.5798 2285895.511 324.957
93+490.00 751324.9558 2285904.831 324.901
93+500.00 751321.2921 2285914.136 324.837
93+510.00 751317.57 2285923.418 324.767
93+520.00 751313.771 2285932.668 324.689
93+530.00 751309.8773 2285941.879 324.604
93+540.00 751305.8818 2285951.046 324.511
93+550.00 751301.7895 2285960.17 324.412
93+560.00 751297.6177 2285969.258 324.305
93+570.00 751293.3849 2285978.318 324.190
93+580.00 751289.1095 2285987.358 324.069
93+590.00 751284.8099 2285996.386 323.940
93+600.00 751280.5034 2286005.412 323.804
93+610.00 751276.1969 2286014.437 323.661
93+620.00 751271.8903 2286023.462 323.510
93+630.00 751267.5837 2286032.487 323.352
93+640.00 751263.2771 2286041.512 323.187
93+650.00 751258.9696 2286050.537 323.015
93+660.00 751254.639 2286059.551 322.835
93+670.00 751250.2427 2286068.532 322.651
93+680.00 751245.7379 2286077.46 322.466
93+690.00 751241.0825 2286086.31 322.282
93+700.00 751236.2353 2286095.057 322.097
93+710.00 751231.1571 2286103.671 321.913
93+720.00 751225.8107 2286112.121 321.728
93+730.00 751220.1613 2286120.372 321.544
93+740.00 751214.1786 2286128.384 321.359
93+750.00 751207.854 2286136.129 321.175
93+760.00 751201.1988 2286143.591 320.990
93+770.00 751194.2254 2286150.758 320.806
93+780.00 751186.9473 2286157.614 320.621
93+790.00 751179.3873 2286164.159 320.437
93+800.00 751171.5865 2286170.415 320.253
93+810.00 751163.5848 2286176.412 320.068
93+820.00 751155.4186 2286182.183 319.884

Page 138
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

93+830.00 751147.1212 2286187.764 319.699

93+840.00 751138.7231 2286193.193 319.515
93+850.00 751130.2528 2286198.508 319.330
93+860.00 751121.7369 2286203.75 319.146
93+870.00 751113.2012 2286208.96 318.961
93+880.00 751104.6635 2286214.167 318.777
93+890.00 751096.1258 2286219.373 318.592
93+900.00 751087.5881 2286224.58 318.408
93+910.00 751079.0503 2286229.786 318.224
93+920.00 751070.5126 2286234.993 318.039
93+930.00 751061.9749 2286240.199 317.855
93+940.00 751053.4381 2286245.407 317.670
93+950.00 751044.9167 2286250.64 317.486
93+960.00 751036.4359 2286255.939 317.301
93+970.00 751028.0224 2286261.343 317.117
93+980.00 751019.7041 2286266.894 316.932
93+990.00 751011.5112 2286272.627 316.748
94+000.00 751003.4765 2286278.58 316.563
94+010.00 750995.6357 2286284.786 316.379
94+020.00 750988.028 2286291.275 316.195
94+030.00 750980.6952 2286298.073 316.010
94+040.00 750973.6558 2286305.175 315.826
94+050.00 750966.8906 2286312.538 315.641
94+060.00 750960.3727 2286320.122 315.457
94+070.00 750954.0716 2286327.886 315.272
94+080.00 750947.9541 2286335.797 315.088
94+090.00 750941.9848 2286343.819 314.903
94+100.00 750936.1265 2286351.924 314.719
94+110.00 750930.3409 2286360.08 314.534
94+120.00 750924.5888 2286368.26 314.363
94+130.00 750918.8408 2286376.443 314.247
94+140.00 750913.0928 2286384.626 314.192
94+150.00 750907.3448 2286392.809 314.197
94+160.00 750901.5968 2286400.992 314.262
94+170.00 750895.8489 2286409.175 314.388
94+180.00 750890.1009 2286417.358 314.561
94+190.00 750884.3529 2286425.541 314.738

Page 139
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

94+200.00 750878.6049 2286433.724 314.915

94+210.00 750872.8569 2286441.907 315.092
94+220.00 750867.1095 2286450.09 315.225
94+230.00 750861.38 2286458.286 315.242
94+240.00 750855.704 2286466.519 315.259
94+250.00 750850.1185 2286474.813 315.276
94+260.00 750844.6615 2286483.193 315.292
94+270.00 750839.3662 2286491.676 315.309
94+280.00 750834.2367 2286500.26 315.326
94+290.00 750829.2448 2286508.925 315.343
94+300.00 750824.3529 2286517.646 315.360
94+310.00 750819.5227 2286526.402 315.377
94+320.00 750814.7158 2286535.171 315.394
94+330.00 750809.9102 2286543.941 315.410
94+340.00 750805.1047 2286552.711 315.427
94+350.00 750800.2991 2286561.48 315.444
94+360.00 750795.4933 2286570.25 315.461
94+370.00 750790.6613 2286579.005 315.474
94+380.00 750785.7855 2286587.736 315.483
94+390.00 750780.8661 2286596.442 315.487
94+400.00 750775.9033 2286605.124 315.487
94+410.00 750770.9144 2286613.79 315.484
94+420.00 750765.9253 2286622.457 315.476
94+430.00 750760.9361 2286631.123 315.467
94+440.00 750755.947 2286639.79 315.465
94+450.00 750750.9578 2286648.456 315.483
94+460.00 750745.9687 2286657.123 315.521
94+470.00 750740.9795 2286665.789 315.578
94+480.00 750735.9915 2286674.456 315.656
94+490.00 750731.0341 2286683.141 315.754
94+500.00 750726.0986 2286691.838 315.865
94+510.00 750721.1631 2286700.535 315.976
94+520.00 750716.2276 2286709.233 316.088
94+530.00 750711.2921 2286717.93 316.200
94+540.00 750706.3566 2286726.627 316.311
94+550.00 750701.4211 2286735.324 316.423
94+560.00 750696.4856 2286744.021 316.534

Page 140
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

94+570.00 750691.5501 2286752.719 316.646

94+580.00 750686.6146 2286761.416 316.757
94+590.00 750681.6791 2286770.113 316.869
94+600.00 750676.7436 2286778.81 316.980
94+610.00 750671.8082 2286787.507 317.092
94+620.00 750666.8727 2286796.204 317.203
94+630.00 750661.9372 2286804.902 317.315
94+640.00 750657.0017 2286813.599 317.427
94+650.00 750652.0662 2286822.296 317.538
94+660.00 750647.1307 2286830.993 317.650
94+670.00 750642.2055 2286839.696 317.761
94+680.00 750637.3277 2286848.426 317.873
94+690.00 750632.5392 2286857.205 317.984
94+700.00 750627.8808 2286866.053 318.096
94+710.00 750623.3702 2286874.978 318.204
94+720.00 750619.0089 2286883.977 318.310
94+730.00 750614.7983 2286893.047 318.412
94+740.00 750610.7392 2286902.186 318.511
94+750.00 750606.8187 2286911.385 318.607
94+760.00 750602.9964 2286920.626 318.700
94+770.00 750599.2287 2286929.889 318.792
94+780.00 750595.4748 2286939.158 318.884
94+790.00 750591.7211 2286948.426 318.976
94+800.00 750587.9673 2286957.695 319.068
94+810.00 750584.2135 2286966.964 319.160
94+820.00 750580.4561 2286976.231 319.252
94+830.00 750576.6141 2286985.464 319.344
94+840.00 750572.7707 2286994.696 319.437
94+850.00 750568.9273 2287003.927 319.529
94+860.00 750565.084 2287013.159 319.621
94+870.00 750561.2406 2287022.391 319.713
94+880.00 750557.3972 2287031.623 319.805
94+890.00 750553.5539 2287040.855 319.897
94+900.00 750549.7105 2287050.087 319.989
94+910.00 750545.8672 2287059.319 320.083
94+920.00 750542.0238 2287068.551 320.182
94+930.00 750538.1804 2287077.783 320.287

Page 141
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

94+940.00 750534.3371 2287087.015 320.397

94+950.00 750530.4937 2287096.247 320.512
94+960.00 750526.6503 2287105.479 320.632
94+970.00 750522.807 2287114.711 320.757
94+980.00 750518.9636 2287123.943 320.881
94+990.00 750515.1202 2287133.174 321.005
95+000.00 750511.2769 2287142.406 321.129
95+010.00 750507.4335 2287151.638 321.253
95+020.00 750503.5901 2287160.87 321.378
95+030.00 750499.7468 2287170.102 321.502
95+040.00 750495.9034 2287179.334 321.626
95+050.00 750492.0601 2287188.566 321.750
95+060.00 750488.2167 2287197.798 321.875
95+070.00 750484.3733 2287207.03 321.999
95+080.00 750480.53 2287216.262 322.123
95+090.00 750476.6866 2287225.494 322.247
95+100.00 750472.8432 2287234.726 322.372
95+110.00 750468.9999 2287243.958 322.493
95+120.00 750465.1565 2287253.19 322.609
95+130.00 750461.3131 2287262.422 322.717
95+140.00 750457.4698 2287271.653 322.818
95+150.00 750453.6264 2287280.885 322.912
95+160.00 750449.7831 2287290.117 322.999
95+170.00 750445.9355 2287299.347 323.080
95+180.00 750442.0495 2287308.562 323.153
95+190.00 750438.1437 2287317.767 323.219
95+200.00 750434.2379 2287326.973 323.279
95+210.00 750430.3321 2287336.179 323.331
95+220.00 750426.4263 2287345.384 323.376
95+230.00 750422.5265 2287354.593 323.415
95+240.00 750418.6674 2287363.818 323.446
95+250.00 750414.8544 2287373.062 323.471
95+260.00 750411.0876 2287382.326 323.491
95+270.00 750407.3673 2287391.608 323.510
95+280.00 750403.6934 2287400.909 323.530
95+290.00 750400.0642 2287410.227 323.550
95+300.00 750396.4472 2287419.55 323.570

Page 142
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

95+310.00 750392.8298 2287428.873 323.589

95+320.00 750389.184 2287438.184 323.609
95+330.00 750385.4939 2287447.479 323.629
95+340.00 750381.793 2287456.769 323.648
95+350.00 750378.0921 2287466.058 323.668
95+360.00 750374.3912 2287475.348 323.688
95+370.00 750370.6903 2287484.638 323.708
95+380.00 750366.9822 2287493.925 323.727
95+390.00 750363.2323 2287503.196 323.747
95+400.00 750359.436 2287512.447 323.767
95+410.00 750355.5936 2287521.679 323.786
95+420.00 750351.7051 2287530.892 323.806
95+430.00 750347.7774 2287540.089 323.826
95+440.00 750343.8611 2287549.29 323.845
95+450.00 750339.9902 2287558.51 323.865
95+460.00 750336.1654 2287567.75 323.885
95+470.00 750332.3837 2287577.007 323.905
95+480.00 750328.6114 2287586.269 323.924
95+490.00 750324.839 2287595.53 323.944
95+500.00 750321.0667 2287604.791 323.964
95+510.00 750317.2943 2287614.052 323.983
95+520.00 750313.5219 2287623.313 324.003
95+530.00 750309.7496 2287632.574 324.023
95+540.00 750305.9772 2287641.836 324.043
95+550.00 750302.2049 2287651.097 324.062
95+560.00 750298.4325 2287660.358 324.082
95+570.00 750294.6601 2287669.619 324.102
95+580.00 750290.8887 2287678.881 324.121
95+590.00 750287.1487 2287688.155 324.141
95+600.00 750283.4425 2287697.443 324.161
95+610.00 750279.7378 2287706.731 324.180
95+620.00 750276.0095 2287716.01 324.200
95+630.00 750272.2348 2287725.27 324.220
95+640.00 750268.4139 2287734.512 324.240
95+650.00 750264.5468 2287743.734 324.259
95+660.00 750260.6337 2287752.936 324.279
95+670.00 750256.6966 2287762.129 324.299

Page 143
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

95+680.00 750252.7595 2287771.321 324.318

95+690.00 750248.8224 2287780.513 324.338
95+700.00 750244.9051 2287789.714 324.358
95+710.00 750241.0235 2287798.93 324.378
95+720.00 750237.1444 2287808.147 324.397
95+730.00 750233.2654 2287817.364 324.417
95+740.00 750229.3863 2287826.581 324.437
95+750.00 750225.5072 2287835.798 324.456
95+760.00 750221.6282 2287845.015 324.476
95+770.00 750217.7491 2287854.232 324.496
95+780.00 750213.87 2287863.449 324.516
95+790.00 750209.991 2287872.666 324.535
95+800.00 750206.1119 2287881.883 324.555
95+810.00 750202.2305 2287891.099 324.575
95+820.00 750198.3138 2287900.3 324.602
95+830.00 750194.3511 2287909.481 324.638
95+840.00 750190.3565 2287918.649 324.684
95+850.00 750186.3608 2287927.816 324.739
95+860.00 750182.3651 2287936.983 324.804
95+870.00 750178.3693 2287946.15 324.878
95+880.00 750174.3736 2287955.317 324.954
95+890.00 750170.3779 2287964.484 325.031
95+900.00 750166.3822 2287973.651 325.107
95+910.00 750162.3864 2287982.818 325.184
95+920.00 750158.3907 2287991.985 325.261
95+930.00 750154.3951 2288001.152 325.337
95+940.00 750150.4262 2288010.331 325.414
95+950.00 750146.5028 2288019.529 325.490
95+960.00 750142.5963 2288028.734 325.567
95+970.00 750138.6898 2288037.94 325.644
95+980.00 750134.7834 2288047.145 325.720
95+990.00 750130.8769 2288056.35 325.790
96+000.00 750126.969 2288065.555 325.853
96+010.00 750123.028 2288074.746 325.908
96+020.00 750119.0573 2288083.924 325.956
96+030.00 750115.086 2288093.101 325.996
96+040.00 750111.1146 2288102.279 326.029

Page 144
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

96+050.00 750107.1399 2288111.455 326.055

96+060.00 750103.1279 2288120.615 326.073
96+070.00 750099.0702 2288129.755 326.084
96+080.00 750094.9669 2288138.874 326.088
96+090.00 750090.818 2288147.973 326.084
96+100.00 750086.6236 2288157.051 326.072
96+110.00 750082.384 2288166.107 326.054
96+120.00 750078.0991 2288175.143 326.027
96+130.00 750073.769 2288184.157 325.994
96+140.00 750069.3949 2288193.149 325.953
96+150.00 750065.0064 2288202.135 325.904
96+160.00 750060.6178 2288211.121 325.849
96+170.00 750056.2293 2288220.106 325.785
96+180.00 750051.8408 2288229.092 325.715
96+190.00 750047.4425 2288238.073 325.637
96+200.00 750043.0067 2288247.035 325.551
96+210.00 750038.564 2288255.994 325.459
96+220.00 750034.1271 2288264.956 325.361
96+230.00 750029.7159 2288273.93 325.264
96+240.00 750025.3059 2288282.905 325.166
96+250.00 750020.8959 2288291.88 325.068
96+260.00 750016.4859 2288300.855 324.971
96+270.00 750012.0759 2288309.83 324.873
96+280.00 750007.6659 2288318.805 324.776
96+290.00 750003.2558 2288327.781 324.678
96+300.00 749998.8458 2288336.756 324.581
96+310.00 749994.4232 2288345.724 324.483
96+320.00 749989.9979 2288354.692 324.386
96+330.00 749985.5726 2288363.66 324.288
96+340.00 749981.1473 2288372.627 324.191
96+350.00 749976.7219 2288381.595 324.093
96+360.00 749972.2966 2288390.562 323.996
96+370.00 749967.8713 2288399.53 323.898
96+380.00 749963.446 2288408.497 323.801
96+390.00 749959.0099 2288417.459 323.703
96+400.00 749954.5439 2288426.407 323.606
96+410.00 749950.0765 2288435.353 323.508

Page 145
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

96+420.00 749945.6091 2288444.3 323.411

96+430.00 749941.1416 2288453.247 323.313
96+440.00 749936.6742 2288462.193 323.216
96+450.00 749932.2068 2288471.14 323.118
96+460.00 749927.7394 2288480.086 323.021
96+470.00 749923.272 2288489.033 322.923
96+480.00 749918.8046 2288497.98 322.827
96+490.00 749914.3372 2288506.926 322.745
96+500.00 749909.8697 2288515.873 322.682
96+510.00 749905.4023 2288524.82 322.639
96+520.00 749900.9349 2288533.766 322.614
96+530.00 749896.4675 2288542.713 322.608
96+540.00 749892.0001 2288551.66 322.621
96+550.00 749887.5327 2288560.606 322.637
96+560.00 749883.0652 2288569.553 322.654
96+570.00 749878.5978 2288578.499 322.670
96+580.00 749874.1304 2288587.446 322.687
96+590.00 749869.663 2288596.393 322.703
96+600.00 749865.1987 2288605.341 322.719
96+610.00 749860.7702 2288614.307 322.736
96+620.00 749856.3851 2288623.294 322.752
96+630.00 749852.012 2288632.287 322.769
96+640.00 749847.639 2288641.28 322.785
96+650.00 749843.2659 2288650.273 322.802
96+660.00 749838.8929 2288659.267 322.818
96+670.00 749834.5198 2288668.26 322.835
96+680.00 749830.1467 2288677.253 322.851
96+690.00 749825.7737 2288686.246 322.867
96+700.00 749821.3803 2288695.229 322.884
96+710.00 749816.944 2288704.191 322.900
96+720.00 749812.496 2288713.148 322.917
96+730.00 749808.0481 2288722.104 322.933
96+740.00 749803.6002 2288731.06 322.950
96+750.00 749799.1522 2288740.017 322.966
96+760.00 749794.7043 2288748.973 322.983
96+770.00 749790.2564 2288757.929 322.999
96+780.00 749785.8084 2288766.886 323.015

Page 146
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

96+790.00 749781.3605 2288775.842 323.032

96+800.00 749776.9126 2288784.798 323.048
96+810.00 749772.4646 2288793.755 323.065
96+820.00 749768.0016 2288802.703 323.081
96+830.00 749763.5008 2288811.633 323.098
96+840.00 749758.9951 2288820.561 323.114
96+850.00 749754.4894 2288829.488 323.131
96+860.00 749749.9836 2288838.415 323.147
96+870.00 749745.4791 2288847.343 323.163
96+880.00 749741.0062 2288856.287 323.180
96+890.00 749736.5781 2288865.253 323.196
96+900.00 749732.1948 2288874.242 323.213
96+910.00 749727.8565 2288883.252 323.229
96+920.00 749723.5634 2288892.283 323.246
96+930.00 749719.3154 2288901.336 323.259
96+940.00 749715.0894 2288910.399 323.265
96+950.00 749710.8864 2288919.473 323.265
96+960.00 749706.7289 2288928.568 323.257
96+970.00 749702.6169 2288937.683 323.241
96+980.00 749698.5506 2288946.819 323.219
96+990.00 749694.5299 2288955.975 323.190
97+000.00 749690.5551 2288965.151 323.153
97+010.00 749686.6262 2288974.347 323.109
97+020.00 749682.7362 2288983.559 323.058
97+030.00 749678.8508 2288992.774 323.000
97+040.00 749674.9653 2289001.988 322.935
97+050.00 749671.0799 2289011.202 322.862
97+060.00 749667.1944 2289020.417 322.783
97+070.00 749663.3089 2289029.631 322.696
97+080.00 749659.4235 2289038.845 322.602
97+090.00 749655.538 2289048.06 322.501
97+100.00 749651.6526 2289057.274 322.393
97+110.00 749647.7671 2289066.488 322.278
97+120.00 749643.8817 2289075.702 322.155
97+130.00 749639.9962 2289084.917 322.026
97+140.00 749636.1108 2289094.131 321.889
97+150.00 749632.2253 2289103.345 321.745

Page 147
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

97+160.00 749628.3392 2289112.559 321.597

97+170.00 749624.4347 2289121.766 321.449
97+180.00 749620.5284 2289130.971 321.300
97+190.00 749616.6221 2289140.177 321.152
97+200.00 749612.7157 2289149.382 321.004
97+210.00 749608.8094 2289158.587 320.856
97+220.00 749604.9031 2289167.793 320.708
97+230.00 749600.9968 2289176.998 320.560
97+240.00 749597.0904 2289186.204 320.412
97+250.00 749593.1841 2289195.409 320.264
97+260.00 749589.2778 2289204.615 320.116
97+270.00 749585.3715 2289213.82 319.967
97+280.00 749581.4651 2289223.026 319.819
97+290.00 749577.5588 2289232.231 319.671
97+300.00 749573.6525 2289241.437 319.523
97+310.00 749569.7462 2289250.642 319.375
97+320.00 749565.8398 2289259.848 319.227
97+330.00 749561.9335 2289269.053 319.079
97+340.00 749558.0258 2289278.258 318.934
97+350.00 749554.0853 2289287.449 318.808
97+360.00 749550.1135 2289296.626 318.704
97+370.00 749546.1409 2289305.803 318.623
97+380.00 749542.188 2289314.989 318.564
97+390.00 749538.2809 2289324.194 318.527
97+400.00 749534.4199 2289333.419 318.509
97+410.00 749530.6051 2289342.662 318.493
97+420.00 749526.8366 2289351.925 318.478
97+430.00 749523.0938 2289361.198 318.463
97+440.00 749519.3512 2289370.471 318.448
97+450.00 749515.6085 2289379.745 318.432
97+460.00 749511.8659 2289389.018 318.417
97+470.00 749508.1233 2289398.291 318.402
97+480.00 749504.3806 2289407.564 318.387
97+490.00 749500.638 2289416.838 318.371
97+500.00 749496.8953 2289426.111 318.356
97+510.00 749493.1527 2289435.384 318.341
97+520.00 749489.4101 2289444.657 318.326

Page 148
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

97+530.00 749485.6651 2289453.929 318.310

97+540.00 749481.8847 2289463.187 318.295
97+550.00 749478.0581 2289472.426 318.280
97+560.00 749474.1853 2289481.646 318.265
97+570.00 749470.2685 2289490.847 318.249
97+580.00 749466.3402 2289500.043 318.234
97+590.00 749462.4179 2289509.242 318.219
97+600.00 749458.536 2289518.457 318.204
97+610.00 749454.7002 2289527.692 318.188
97+620.00 749450.9107 2289536.947 318.173
97+630.00 749447.1472 2289546.211 318.158
97+640.00 749443.3839 2289555.476 318.143
97+650.00 749439.6205 2289564.741 318.127
97+660.00 749435.8571 2289574.006 318.112
97+670.00 749432.0938 2289583.271 318.097
97+680.00 749428.3304 2289592.536 318.082
97+690.00 749424.5671 2289601.8 318.066
97+700.00 749420.8037 2289611.065 318.051
97+710.00 749417.0404 2289620.33 318.036
97+720.00 749413.277 2289629.595 318.021
97+730.00 749409.5137 2289638.86 318.005
97+740.00 749405.7503 2289648.125 317.990
97+750.00 749401.9869 2289657.389 317.975
97+760.00 749398.2226 2289666.654 317.960
97+770.00 749394.4403 2289675.911 317.944
97+780.00 749390.6567 2289685.168 317.929
97+790.00 749386.8732 2289694.424 317.914
97+800.00 749383.0897 2289703.681 317.895
97+810.00 749379.3062 2289712.937 317.857
97+820.00 749375.5226 2289722.194 317.800
97+830.00 749371.7391 2289731.451 317.724
97+840.00 749367.9556 2289740.707 317.628
97+850.00 749364.1721 2289749.964 317.513
97+860.00 749360.3914 2289759.222 317.383
97+870.00 749356.6474 2289768.494 317.252
97+880.00 749352.9349 2289777.78 317.120
97+890.00 749349.2206 2289787.064 316.996

Page 149
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

97+900.00 749345.4883 2289796.342 316.887

97+910.00 749341.7185 2289805.604 316.792
97+920.00 749337.8921 2289814.843 316.713
97+930.00 749333.9927 2289824.051 316.648
97+940.00 749330.0167 2289833.227 316.598
97+950.00 749325.967 2289842.37 316.555
97+960.00 749321.8591 2289851.487 316.513
97+970.00 749317.7121 2289860.587 316.470
97+980.00 749313.545 2289869.677 316.428
97+990.00 749309.3742 2289878.766 316.385
98+000.00 749305.2044 2289887.855 316.343
98+010.00 749301.066 2289896.959 316.300
98+020.00 749296.9731 2289906.083 316.258
98+030.00 749292.9255 2289915.227 316.215
98+040.00 749288.8952 2289924.379 316.173
98+050.00 749284.8649 2289933.531 316.130
98+060.00 749280.8345 2289942.682 316.087
98+070.00 749276.8042 2289951.834 316.045
98+080.00 749272.7739 2289960.986 316.002
98+090.00 749268.7435 2289970.138 315.960
98+100.00 749264.7132 2289979.29 315.917
98+110.00 749260.6829 2289988.442 315.875
98+120.00 749256.6526 2289997.594 315.832
98+130.00 749252.6222 2290006.745 315.790
98+140.00 749248.5919 2290015.897 315.747
98+150.00 749244.5616 2290025.049 315.705
98+160.00 749240.5312 2290034.201 315.662
98+170.00 749236.4928 2290043.349 315.620
98+180.00 749232.4159 2290052.48 315.577
98+190.00 749228.2975 2290061.593 315.535
98+200.00 749224.1428 2290070.689 315.492
98+210.00 749219.9828 2290079.783 315.450
98+220.00 749215.8229 2290088.876 315.407
98+230.00 749211.663 2290097.97 315.364
98+240.00 749207.503 2290107.064 315.322
98+250.00 749203.3431 2290116.157 315.279
98+260.00 749199.1832 2290125.251 315.237

Page 150
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

98+270.00 749195.0232 2290134.345 315.194

98+280.00 749190.8633 2290143.438 315.152
98+290.00 749186.7033 2290152.532 315.109
98+300.00 749182.5434 2290161.626 315.067
98+310.00 749178.3835 2290170.719 315.024
98+320.00 749174.2235 2290179.813 314.982
98+330.00 749170.0636 2290188.907 314.939
98+340.00 749165.9036 2290198.001 314.897
98+350.00 749161.7437 2290207.094 314.854
98+360.00 749157.5838 2290216.188 314.812
98+370.00 749153.4238 2290225.282 314.769
98+380.00 749149.2639 2290234.375 314.727
98+390.00 749145.104 2290243.469 314.684
98+400.00 749140.944 2290252.563 314.642
98+410.00 749136.7841 2290261.656 314.599
98+420.00 749132.6241 2290270.75 314.556
98+430.00 749128.4642 2290279.844 314.514
98+440.00 749124.3043 2290288.937 314.471
98+450.00 749120.1443 2290298.031 314.429
98+460.00 749115.9844 2290307.125 314.386
98+470.00 749111.8248 2290316.218 314.344
98+480.00 749107.6911 2290325.324 314.301
98+490.00 749103.5988 2290334.448 314.257
98+500.00 749099.548 2290343.591 314.206
98+510.00 749095.5388 2290352.752 314.149
98+520.00 749091.5713 2290361.932 314.086
98+530.00 749087.6239 2290371.119 314.016
98+540.00 749083.6484 2290380.295 313.940
98+550.00 749079.6313 2290389.453 313.859
98+560.00 749075.5726 2290398.592 313.779
98+570.00 749071.4724 2290407.713 313.698
98+580.00 749067.3308 2290416.815 313.617
98+590.00 749063.1554 2290425.902 313.537
98+600.00 749058.9768 2290434.987 313.456
98+610.00 749054.7982 2290444.072 313.375
98+620.00 749050.6197 2290453.157 313.295
98+630.00 749046.4412 2290462.242 313.214

Page 151
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

98+640.00 749042.2855 2290471.338 313.133

98+650.00 749038.1712 2290480.452 313.053
98+660.00 749034.0984 2290489.585 312.972
98+670.00 749030.0671 2290498.737 312.891
98+680.00 749026.0774 2290507.906 312.811
98+690.00 749022.1005 2290517.081 312.730
98+700.00 749018.0875 2290526.241 312.650
98+710.00 749014.033 2290535.382 312.569
98+720.00 749009.937 2290544.505 312.488
98+730.00 749005.7996 2290553.609 312.408
98+740.00 749001.6267 2290562.696 312.327
98+750.00 748997.4493 2290571.782 312.246
98+760.00 748993.2719 2290580.868 312.166
98+770.00 748989.0946 2290589.953 312.085
98+780.00 748984.9172 2290599.039 312.004
98+790.00 748980.7398 2290608.125 311.924
98+800.00 748976.5625 2290617.21 311.844
98+810.00 748972.3851 2290626.296 311.768
98+820.00 748968.2154 2290635.385 311.697
98+830.00 748964.0839 2290644.492 311.630
98+840.00 748959.9939 2290653.617 311.568
98+850.00 748955.9453 2290662.761 311.510
98+860.00 748951.9155 2290671.913 311.455
98+870.00 748947.8858 2290681.065 311.401
98+880.00 748943.856 2290690.217 311.347
98+890.00 748939.826 2290699.369 311.293
98+900.00 748935.7747 2290708.512 311.239
98+910.00 748931.7177 2290717.652 311.185
98+920.00 748927.6606 2290726.792 311.131
98+930.00 748923.6036 2290735.932 311.077
98+940.00 748919.5465 2290745.072 311.023
98+950.00 748915.4895 2290754.212 310.969
98+960.00 748911.4324 2290763.352 310.915
98+970.00 748907.3753 2290772.492 310.861
98+980.00 748903.3183 2290781.632 310.806
98+990.00 748899.2612 2290790.772 310.752
99+000.00 748895.2042 2290799.912 310.698

Page 152
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

99+010.00 748891.1471 2290809.052 310.644

99+020.00 748887.0901 2290818.192 310.590
99+030.00 748883.033 2290827.332 310.536
99+040.00 748878.976 2290836.472 310.482
99+050.00 748874.9189 2290845.613 310.428
99+060.00 748870.8618 2290854.753 310.374
99+070.00 748866.8048 2290863.893 310.320
99+080.00 748862.7477 2290873.033 310.266
99+090.00 748858.6904 2290882.173 310.211
99+100.00 748854.6178 2290891.306 310.157
99+110.00 748850.5432 2290900.438 310.103
99+120.00 748846.4686 2290909.57 310.049
99+130.00 748842.394 2290918.702 309.995
99+140.00 748838.3288 2290927.839 309.941
99+150.00 748834.2731 2290936.979 309.887
99+160.00 748830.2175 2290946.12 309.833
99+170.00 748826.1618 2290955.261 309.779
99+180.00 748822.1062 2290964.401 309.725
99+190.00 748818.0505 2290973.542 309.671
99+200.00 748813.9949 2290982.683 309.617
99+210.00 748809.9392 2290991.823 309.562
99+220.00 748805.8836 2291000.964 309.508
99+230.00 748801.8279 2291010.105 309.460
99+240.00 748797.7723 2291019.245 309.423
99+250.00 748793.7166 2291028.386 309.397
99+260.00 748789.661 2291037.527 309.383
99+270.00 748785.6053 2291046.667 309.380
99+280.00 748781.5504 2291055.808 309.388
99+290.00 748777.5231 2291064.962 309.402
99+300.00 748773.5182 2291074.125 309.416
99+310.00 748769.5133 2291083.288 309.429
99+320.00 748765.5084 2291092.451 309.443
99+330.00 748761.5035 2291101.614 309.457
99+340.00 748757.4986 2291110.777 309.470
99+350.00 748753.4937 2291119.94 309.484
99+360.00 748749.4888 2291129.103 309.498
99+370.00 748745.4839 2291138.266 309.512

Page 153
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

99+380.00 748741.479 2291147.429 309.525

99+390.00 748737.4741 2291156.592 309.539
99+400.00 748733.4692 2291165.755 309.553
99+410.00 748729.4643 2291174.918 309.566
99+420.00 748725.4594 2291184.081 309.580
99+430.00 748721.4545 2291193.244 309.594
99+440.00 748717.4496 2291202.407 309.608
99+450.00 748713.4447 2291211.57 309.621
99+460.00 748709.4398 2291220.733 309.635
99+470.00 748705.4349 2291229.896 309.649
99+480.00 748701.43 2291239.059 309.662
99+490.00 748697.4251 2291248.222 309.676
99+500.00 748693.4202 2291257.385 309.690
99+510.00 748689.4153 2291266.548 309.704
99+520.00 748685.4104 2291275.711 309.717
99+530.00 748681.4054 2291284.874 309.731
99+540.00 748677.3875 2291294.031 309.745
99+550.00 748673.3632 2291303.186 309.758
99+560.00 748669.339 2291312.34 309.772
99+570.00 748665.3147 2291321.495 309.786
99+580.00 748661.2905 2291330.649 309.799
99+590.00 748657.2663 2291339.804 309.813
99+600.00 748653.242 2291348.958 309.827
99+610.00 748649.2178 2291358.113 309.841
99+620.00 748645.1936 2291367.267 309.854
99+630.00 748641.1693 2291376.422 309.868
99+640.00 748637.1451 2291385.576 309.882
99+650.00 748633.1209 2291394.731 309.895
99+660.00 748629.0966 2291403.885 309.909
99+670.00 748625.0724 2291413.04 309.923
99+680.00 748621.0481 2291422.195 309.937
99+690.00 748617.0239 2291431.349 309.950
99+700.00 748612.9997 2291440.504 309.964
99+710.00 748608.9852 2291449.662 309.978
99+720.00 748605.0083 2291458.838 309.991
99+730.00 748601.0415 2291468.017 310.005
99+740.00 748597.0746 2291477.197 310.019

Page 154
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

99+750.00 748593.1078 2291486.376 310.033

99+760.00 748589.141 2291495.556 310.046
99+770.00 748585.1741 2291504.735 310.060
99+780.00 748581.2073 2291513.915 310.074
99+790.00 748577.2405 2291523.095 310.087
99+800.00 748573.2736 2291532.274 310.101
99+810.00 748569.3068 2291541.454 310.115
99+820.00 748565.34 2291550.633 310.129
99+830.00 748561.3732 2291559.813 310.150
99+840.00 748557.4063 2291568.992 310.176
99+850.00 748553.4395 2291578.172 310.208
99+860.00 748549.4634 2291587.347 310.245
99+870.00 748545.4421 2291596.503 310.289
99+880.00 748541.3352 2291605.621 310.338
99+890.00 748537.1027 2291614.681 310.388
99+900.00 748532.7054 2291623.662 310.437
99+910.00 748528.1055 2291632.541 310.487
99+920.00 748523.2662 2291641.292 310.536
99+930.00 748518.1543 2291649.886 310.585
99+940.00 748512.7593 2291658.305 310.635
99+950.00 748507.0883 2291666.541 310.684
99+960.00 748501.1695 2291674.601 310.734
99+970.00 748495.043 2291682.504 310.783
99+980.00 748488.7476 2291690.274 310.833
99+990.00 748482.3202 2291697.934 310.882
100+000.00 748475.7962 2291705.513 310.932
100+010.00 748469.2102 2291713.038 310.981
100+020.00 748462.5957 2291720.538 311.030
100+030.00 748455.9778 2291728.035 311.080
100+040.00 748449.3599 2291735.532 311.129
100+050.00 748442.742 2291743.029 311.179
100+060.00 748436.0952 2291750.5 311.228
100+070.00 748429.3864 2291757.915 311.278
100+080.00 748422.616 2291765.275 311.327
100+090.00 748415.7846 2291772.578 311.377
100+100.00 748408.8925 2291779.823 311.426
100+110.00 748401.9403 2291787.011 311.475

Page 155
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

100+120.00 748394.9285 2291794.141 311.525

100+130.00 748387.8718 2291801.226 311.574
100+140.00 748380.8123 2291808.309 311.624
100+150.00 748373.7529 2291815.392 311.673
100+160.00 748366.6934 2291822.474 311.723
100+170.00 748359.634 2291829.557 311.772
100+180.00 748352.5746 2291836.64 311.822
100+190.00 748345.5151 2291843.722 311.871
100+200.00 748338.4557 2291850.805 311.922
100+210.00 748331.3962 2291857.888 311.980
100+220.00 748324.3368 2291864.97 312.047
100+230.00 748317.2773 2291872.053 312.123
100+240.00 748310.2179 2291879.136 312.208
100+250.00 748303.1585 2291886.218 312.302
100+260.00 748296.099 2291893.301 312.403
100+270.00 748289.0396 2291900.384 312.506
100+280.00 748281.9801 2291907.466 312.609
100+290.00 748274.9207 2291914.549 312.712
100+300.00 748267.8613 2291921.632 312.815
100+310.00 748260.8018 2291928.714 312.918
100+320.00 748253.7424 2291935.797 313.021
100+330.00 748246.6829 2291942.88 313.124
100+340.00 748239.6235 2291949.962 313.227
100+350.00 748232.564 2291957.045 313.330
100+360.00 748225.5046 2291964.128 313.433
100+370.00 748218.4452 2291971.21 313.535
100+380.00 748211.3857 2291978.293 313.638
100+390.00 748204.3263 2291985.376 313.741
100+400.00 748197.2663 2291992.458 313.844
100+410.00 748190.201 2291999.535 313.947
100+420.00 748183.1357 2292006.612 314.050
100+430.00 748176.0704 2292013.689 314.153
100+440.00 748169.0051 2292020.765 314.256
100+450.00 748161.9398 2292027.842 314.359
100+460.00 748154.8745 2292034.919 314.462
100+470.00 748147.8093 2292041.996 314.565
100+480.00 748140.744 2292049.073 314.668

Page 156
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

100+490.00 748133.6878 2292056.159 314.771

100+500.00 748126.6629 2292063.276 314.873
100+510.00 748119.6704 2292070.424 314.976
100+520.00 748112.7105 2292077.605 315.079
100+530.00 748105.778 2292084.812 315.182
100+540.00 748098.8485 2292092.022 315.285
100+550.00 748091.9186 2292099.231 315.388
100+560.00 748084.9675 2292106.42 315.491
100+570.00 748077.9837 2292113.577 315.594
100+580.00 748070.9675 2292120.703 315.697
100+590.00 748063.919 2292127.796 315.800
100+600.00 748056.8383 2292134.858 315.903
100+610.00 748049.7256 2292141.887 316.006
100+620.00 748042.5933 2292148.896 316.109
100+630.00 748035.4608 2292155.905 316.211
100+640.00 748028.3283 2292162.915 316.314
100+650.00 748021.213 2292169.941 316.417
100+660.00 748014.1587 2292177.029 316.520
100+670.00 748007.1043 2292184.116 316.623
100+680.00 748000.0499 2292191.204 316.721
100+690.00 747992.9956 2292198.292 316.813
100+700.00 747985.9412 2292205.38 316.901
100+710.00 747978.8868 2292212.467 316.982
100+720.00 747971.8325 2292219.555 317.059
100+730.00 747964.7839 2292226.649 317.130
100+740.00 747957.7358 2292233.743 317.200
100+750.00 747950.6877 2292240.836 317.270
100+760.00 747943.6396 2292247.93 317.340
100+770.00 747936.5915 2292255.024 317.410
100+780.00 747929.5433 2292262.118 317.480
100+790.00 747922.4952 2292269.212 317.550
100+800.00 747915.4471 2292276.306 317.620
100+810.00 747908.399 2292283.4 317.691
100+820.00 747901.3508 2292290.494 317.761
100+830.00 747894.3027 2292297.588 317.831
100+840.00 747887.2546 2292304.682 317.901
100+850.00 747880.2065 2292311.776 317.971

Page 157
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

100+860.00 747873.1583 2292318.87 318.041

100+870.00 747866.1102 2292325.964 318.111
100+880.00 747859.0621 2292333.058 318.181
100+890.00 747852.014 2292340.152 318.251
100+900.00 747844.9658 2292347.246 318.322
100+910.00 747837.9177 2292354.339 318.392
100+920.00 747830.8696 2292361.433 318.462
100+930.00 747823.8215 2292368.527 318.532
100+940.00 747816.7733 2292375.621 318.602
100+950.00 747809.723 2292382.713 318.672
100+960.00 747802.647 2292389.779 318.742
100+970.00 747795.5389 2292396.813 318.812
100+980.00 747788.4016 2292403.817 318.882
100+990.00 747781.2586 2292410.816 318.953
101+000.00 747774.1156 2292417.814 319.023
101+010.00 747766.9727 2292424.812 319.093
101+020.00 747759.8297 2292431.811 319.163
101+030.00 747752.6867 2292438.809 319.233
101+040.00 747745.5437 2292445.808 319.306
101+050.00 747738.4008 2292452.806 319.386
101+060.00 747731.2578 2292459.805 319.474
101+070.00 747724.1148 2292466.803 319.569
101+080.00 747716.9718 2292473.801 319.671
101+090.00 747709.8266 2292480.798 319.781
101+100.00 747702.6558 2292487.767 319.895
101+110.00 747695.4608 2292494.712 320.010
101+120.00 747688.2642 2292501.656 320.124
101+130.00 747681.0676 2292508.599 320.238
101+140.00 747673.871 2292515.542 320.352
101+150.00 747666.6744 2292522.485 320.466
101+160.00 747659.4778 2292529.429 320.581
101+170.00 747652.2812 2292536.372 320.695
101+180.00 747645.0846 2292543.315 320.809
101+190.00 747637.888 2292550.258 320.923
101+200.00 747630.6914 2292557.202 321.038
101+210.00 747623.4948 2292564.145 321.152
101+220.00 747616.2982 2292571.088 321.266

Page 158
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

101+230.00 747609.1016 2292578.032 321.380

101+240.00 747601.905 2292584.975 321.494
101+250.00 747594.7084 2292591.918 321.606
101+260.00 747587.5118 2292598.861 321.711
101+270.00 747580.3152 2292605.805 321.808
101+280.00 747573.1186 2292612.748 321.899
101+290.00 747565.922 2292619.691 321.981
101+300.00 747558.7158 2292626.624 322.057
101+310.00 747551.4789 2292633.526 322.125
101+320.00 747544.2107 2292640.394 322.186
101+330.00 747536.9212 2292647.24 322.240
101+340.00 747529.6553 2292654.11 322.286
101+350.00 747522.4207 2292661.014 322.326
101+360.00 747515.2176 2292667.95 322.360
101+370.00 747508.0461 2292674.92 322.394
101+380.00 747500.9063 2292681.921 322.428
101+390.00 747493.7984 2292688.955 322.462
101+400.00 747486.7226 2292696.022 322.496
101+410.00 747479.6711 2292703.112 322.530
101+420.00 747472.6212 2292710.204 322.564
101+430.00 747465.4653 2292717.189 322.598
101+440.00 747458.2466 2292724.109 322.632
101+450.00 747451.0279 2292731.029 322.662
101+460.00 747443.8092 2292737.949 322.684
101+470.00 747436.5905 2292744.87 322.699
101+480.00 747429.3718 2292751.79 322.706
101+490.00 747422.1527 2292758.71 322.706
101+500.00 747414.9136 2292765.609 322.698
101+510.00 747407.6433 2292772.475 322.684
101+520.00 747400.344 2292779.31 322.661
101+530.00 747393.0387 2292786.139 322.632
101+540.00 747385.7333 2292792.968 322.594
101+550.00 747378.428 2292799.796 322.550
101+560.00 747371.1227 2292806.625 322.498
101+570.00 747363.8174 2292813.454 322.439
101+580.00 747356.5121 2292820.283 322.372
101+590.00 747349.2067 2292827.112 322.298

Page 159
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

101+600.00 747341.9014 2292833.94 322.216

101+610.00 747334.5961 2292840.769 322.127
101+620.00 747327.2908 2292847.598 322.031
101+630.00 747319.9854 2292854.427 321.927
101+640.00 747312.6801 2292861.255 321.816
101+650.00 747305.3748 2292868.084 321.697
101+660.00 747298.0695 2292874.913 321.571
101+670.00 747290.7642 2292881.742 321.438
101+680.00 747283.4588 2292888.571 321.297
101+690.00 747276.1535 2292895.399 321.152
101+700.00 747268.8482 2292902.228 321.007
101+710.00 747261.5421 2292909.056 320.863
101+720.00 747254.2143 2292915.861 320.718
101+730.00 747246.8557 2292922.632 320.573
101+740.00 747239.4783 2292929.383 320.428
101+750.00 747232.1007 2292936.134 320.283
101+760.00 747224.7231 2292942.884 320.139
101+770.00 747217.3456 2292949.635 320.003
101+780.00 747209.968 2292956.386 319.887
101+790.00 747202.5904 2292963.136 319.790
101+800.00 747195.2128 2292969.887 319.713
101+810.00 747187.8352 2292976.638 319.654
101+820.00 747180.4534 2292983.384 319.615
101+830.00 747173.0445 2292990.1 319.596
101+840.00 747165.6221 2292996.801 319.595
101+850.00 747158.1997 2293003.502 319.605
101+860.00 747150.7772 2293010.204 319.614
101+870.00 747143.3548 2293016.905 319.624
101+880.00 747135.9465 2293023.622 319.633
101+890.00 747128.5688 2293030.372 319.643
101+900.00 747121.2219 2293037.156 319.652
101+910.00 747113.9058 2293043.974 319.662
101+920.00 747106.6084 2293050.811 319.671
101+930.00 747099.3112 2293057.648 319.681
101+940.00 747092.0041 2293064.475 319.690
101+950.00 747084.6668 2293071.27 319.700
101+960.00 747077.2987 2293078.031 319.710

Page 160
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

101+970.00 747069.8999 2293084.758 319.719

101+980.00 747062.4706 2293091.452 319.729
101+990.00 747055.0109 2293098.112 319.738
102+000.00 747047.5211 2293104.737 319.748
102+010.00 747040.0172 2293111.347 319.757
102+020.00 747032.5256 2293117.971 319.767
102+030.00 747025.0863 2293124.654 319.776
102+040.00 747017.7029 2293131.398 319.784
102+050.00 747010.376 2293138.204 319.786
102+060.00 747003.0898 2293145.053 319.780
102+070.00 746995.804 2293151.902 319.767
102+080.00 746988.4949 2293158.727 319.746
102+090.00 746981.1549 2293165.519 319.718
102+100.00 746973.7844 2293172.277 319.683
102+110.00 746966.4027 2293179.023 319.640
102+120.00 746959.021 2293185.769 319.590
102+130.00 746951.6392 2293192.515 319.533
102+140.00 746944.2575 2293199.261 319.468
102+150.00 746936.8758 2293206.008 319.397
102+160.00 746929.4941 2293212.754 319.317
102+170.00 746922.1123 2293219.5 319.231
102+180.00 746914.7306 2293226.246 319.137
102+190.00 746907.3489 2293232.992 319.036
102+200.00 746899.9696 2293239.741 318.927
102+210.00 746892.6156 2293246.517 318.811
102+220.00 746885.2924 2293253.327 318.688
102+230.00 746877.9825 2293260.151 318.558
102+240.00 746870.6726 2293266.974 318.420
102+250.00 746863.3627 2293273.798 318.275
102+260.00 746856.0559 2293280.626 318.122
102+270.00 746848.7756 2293287.481 317.963
102+280.00 746841.5265 2293294.369 317.795
102+290.00 746834.3087 2293301.291 317.621
102+300.00 746827.1226 2293308.245 317.445
102+310.00 746819.9681 2293315.231 317.269
102+320.00 746812.8452 2293322.25 317.093
102+330.00 746805.7349 2293329.282 316.917

Page 161
Detailed Project Report
Rehabilitation /Up gradation of Karanja – Kherda - Murtizapur Section to 4Lane + Paved shoulder standards from
Design km 74+351 to km 102+331 (Excluding overlapping length of 1.90 km with Samaruddhi Mahamarg from

Design Km 76+380 to 78+280) (Total length of the project 26.08 km) section of NH 361C on EPC Mode in the state of Maharashtr a

102+330.87 746805.115 2293329.895 316.901

Page 162
Detailed Project Report
ANNEXURE
HYDRAULIC REPORT
 Hydraulic Design of
Bridges

Karanja - Murtizapur
Hydraulics of Bridges: Catchment area, Discharge, Velocity of
Flow, Length of Waterway, Scour Depth, Afflux, RTL Fixation
Karanja - Murtizapur

General:
I. Definitions:
i. Rainfall intensity is defined as the ratio of the total amount of rain (rainfall depth)
falling during a given period to the duration of the period. It is expressed in depth
units per unit time, usually as mm per hour (mm/h).
Rainfall intensity is classified according to the rate of precipitation:
 Light rain — when the precipitation rate is < 2.5 mm (0.098 in) per hour
 Moderate rain — when the precipitation rate is between 2.5 mm (0.098 in) -
7.6 mm (0.30 in) or 10 mm (0.39 in) per hour
 Heavy rain — when the precipitation rate is > 7.6 mm (0.30 in) per hour, or
between 10 mm (0.39 in) and 50 mm (2.0 in) per hour
 Violent rain — when the precipitation rate is > 50 mm (2.0 in) per hour
The intensity can also be expressed by rainfall erosivity.

ii. Surface runoff (also known as overland flow) is the flow of water that occurs when
excess stormwater, meltwater, or other sources flows over the Earth's Surface.
iii. Mannings formula: It was introduced by the Irish Engineer Robert Manning in 1889
as an alternative to the Chezy’s Equation. The Mannings equation is an empirical
equation that applies to uniform flow in open channels and is a function of the channel
velocity, flow area and channel slope.
Under the assumption of uniform flow conditions the bottom slope is the same as the
slope of the energy grade line and the water surface slope. The Manning's n is a
coefficient which represents the roughness or friction applied to the flow by the
channel.
iv. Wetted perimeter is the perimeter of the cross sectional area that is "wet". The
term wetted perimeter is common in civil engineering, environmental engineering,
hydrology, geomorphology, and heat transfer applications; it is associated with the
hydraulic diameter or hydraulic radius.

v. Waterway is any navigable body of water. A shipping route consists of one or

several waterways. Waterways can include rivers, lakes, seas, oceans, and canals.

Page 1
 Karanja - Murtizapur

vi. Discharge is the volume rate of water flow that is transported through a given cross-
sectional area. It includes any suspended solids (e.g. sediment), dissolved chemicals (e.g.
CaCO3(aq)), or biologic material (e.g. diatoms) in addition to the water itself.

II. Symbols & Abbreviations:

Sr. Symbol or Description Units
No. Abbreviation
1 Q Discharge m3/sec
2 n Manning's Coefficient of Roughness -
3 R Hydraulic Mean Radius at Section -
4 S Hydraulic Gradient -
5 v Manning’s Velocity m/sec
6 A Area of Cross Section mm2
7 C Coefficient of run off -
8 i Intensity of Rainfall mm/hr
9 P Wetted Perimeter m
10 FRL Full Reservoir Level m
11 HFL Highest Flood Level m
12 RTL Road Top Level m

Page 2
Name of Work: 4 Laning of Exisiting 2 Lane Stretch from Karanja Lad to Murtizapur (28 km pkg 1)
on NH361C in Maharashtra State.

Client: National Highways Division, Amravati

Consultant TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Proposed Structure at: 74+570

Existing Structure Span Details: 2x6

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

Data from site survey :

1) Catchment area (A) : 2.896 sq km
2a) Observed HFL 403.500 m
2b) Design HFL 404.100 m
3) Rugosity coeffient (n) : 0.035
4) Bed slope 1: S S= : 100.00
5) Average size of bed material (m) : 7.280 mm
Lacey's silt factor (f) : : 1.76 x m
(f) = 4.75

A) HFL fixation : (as per Clause no. 106.2.2 of IRC 5:2015)

1) By Modified Ingli's Formula : for A = 1.118 sq mile C = 4071

Q= CA = 4070.71 x 1.12
A+4 1.12 + 4

= 2011.463 cusec [ 0.0283 for cumec ]

= 56.924 cumec
2) Rational Method :

Concentration time for stream tc = ( 0.87 x L3 / H)0.385

where, L = distance of farthest point

H = fall in level

in this case - L= 2.47 km

H= 25.0 m
0.385
Hence, tc = ( 0.87 x 0.60 )
= 0.78 hours
Ic = Io x ( 2 / ( tc + 1 ) )
Hence,
Critical intensity Ic = 7.80 x 1.12
= 8.76 cm/hr

Io = 7.8 Avg. Rainfall Intensity (cm / hr)

Design discharge in m3/sec

Qrunoff = 0.028 P x f x A x Ic
where,
3
Qrunoff = discharge in m / sec

P = 0.7 Coefficient of runoff Page 13 IRC SP 13:2004

f = 0.98 intensity fraction fig. 4.2 IRC SP 13:2004
A = 290 catchment area in Ha
Ic = 8.76 critical intensity of rainfall in cm/hr
Hence,
3
Qrunoff = 48.75 m / sec
3) By Manning's Formula : (discharge calculated as per Clause no. 106.3.1 of IRC 5:2015)

Designed HFL : 404.100 m

Mean Wetted Wetted

Ch. GL Depth below HFL Length Diff. in GL
depth Area Perimeter
-32.00 404.10 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000
-24.00 403.54 0.56 0.280 8.00 0.56 2.240 8.020
-16.00 403.29 0.81 0.688 8.00 0.25 5.504 8.004
-8.00 403.20 0.90 0.856 8.00 0.08 6.848 8.000
0.00 402.77 1.33 1.116 8.00 0.44 8.928 8.012
2.00 402.72 1.38 1.356 2.00 0.04 2.712 2.000
4.00 402.68 1.42 1.400 2.00 0.04 2.800 2.000
6.00 402.63 1.47 1.444 2.00 0.04 2.888 2.000
8.00 402.81 1.29 1.376 2.00 0.18 2.752 2.008
10.00 402.99 1.11 1.196 2.00 0.18 2.392 2.008
12.00 403.17 0.93 1.016 2.00 0.18 2.032 2.008
15.00 403.33 0.77 0.849 3.00 0.15 2.547 3.004
18.00 403.48 0.62 0.696 3.00 0.15 2.088 3.004
21.00 403.64 0.46 0.539 3.00 0.16 1.617 3.004
24.00 404.10 0.00 0.386 3.00 0.31 1.158 3.016

(Compartment wise Calculation details as per Clause no. 106.3.1.4 of IRC 5:2015)
Wetted Area Wetted Perimeter
A = 24.504 P = 20.038

Velocity of flow (V) H.M.D = A / P = 1.223

2/3 1/2
V= 1 A 1 Discharge as per Manning's Formula :
n P S
2/3 1/2 Qm = AxV
= 1 46.506 1
0.035 56.090 100.00 = 24.504 x 2.522

= 28.57 x 0.883 x 0.100 = 61.792 cumec

= 2.522 m/ sec.
 Discharge Comparsion (Cumecs)
1 Modified Ingli's Formula = 56.924
2 Rational Method = 48.75
3 Mannings Method = 61.792
(discharge comparison as per Clause no. 106.3.2 of IRC 5:2015)

Velocity corresponding to max discharge = 2.52 m/s

B) Span Fixation

Linear waterway = A = 24.504 = 16.72 m

HMD 1.466

Constricted Waterway % (max. 1/3 of calculated waterway) = 5.52 m

Design Waterway = 11.20 m

Hence it is proposed to Construct 1 span of 12.00 m c/c

C) Scour Depth Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.9 of IRC 5:2015)

Linear waterway provided L = 12.00 m & Qb = Q[manning] = 5.149

L
1/3
1) Normal scour depth Ds = 1.34 Qb 2 Ksf = 4.75
Ksf
2 1/3
= 1.34 5.149 = 2.38 m
4.75

2) Maximum scour depth 'dmax'

dmax Abt. = 1.27 x d dmax Pier = 2 x d

= 3.02 m = 4.76 m

3) Foundation level
FL for abutment = HFL 404.10 FL for Pier = HFL 404.10
Deduct dmax Abt. 3.02 Deduct dmax Pier 4.76

= 401.08 = 399.34
However foundation levels are kept as mentioned in the Detailed Drawing
D) Percentage obstruction
End wall/L
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H

1 404.10 1 + 1.2 x 1.33 = 1.467

HFL 2
1.33
1.2 402.77

End wall/R
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
1 404.10
HFL 1 + 1.2 x 0.93 = 1.019
0.93 2
1.2 403.17

Center Wall
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
0.75 404.10
HFL 0x 0.75 + 0.75 x 1.47 = 0.000
1.47 2
0.75 402.63

Obstruction Area = 2.486

Percentage obstruction = a x 100

A
= 2.486 x 100
24.504

= 10.15 % is not > 30%, Hence OK.

E) Afflux Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.6 of IRC 5:2015)

2
H = V2 + 0.0153 x Q -1
17.86 Q-q
2 2
= 2.522 + 0.0153 x 61.792 -1
17.86 61.792 - 6.269

= 0.371 x 0.239
= 0.089 m
F) Deck soffit level Road Top Level
As per Hydraulics
HFL 404.10 m Sofit Level
405.09
Assumed afflux 0.09 Slab Thickness1.00
Vertical Clearance 0.90 m Wearing Coat
0.065
405.09 m 406.15 m
(as per Clause no. 106.7 of IRC 5:2015)
Top of the Abutments, Piers and RTL is kept as mentioned in the G.A.D.

G) Graphical Representation of the Ground Level, HFL and Proposed Span of Bridge

405.50
405.00
404.50
404.00
403.50
403.00
402.50
402.00
401.50
401.00
-32.00 -24.00 -16.00 -8.00 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 15.00 18.00 21.00 24.00

Ground Level HFL Bridge Location (Clear Span)

I) Results:

i) Span of Existing Structure: 2x6

ii) Required Length of Waterway: 11.2 m

iii) Proposed Length of Waterway: 12.00 m
iv) Proposed type of bridge: RCC Slab bridge
v) Arrangement of Spans: 1 Span of 12.00 m c/c
vi) Proposed Minimum RTL: 406.15 m (Proposed levels are mentioned in GAD)
J) Conclusion:

Hence we propose span arrangemnt of 1 x 12.00 = 12.0 m Waterway,

RCC Slab bridge at CH. 74+570
The Detailed Drawings are attached in the drawing folder.

K) De-lineation of Catchment Area on Toposheet

Name of Work: 4 Laning of Exisiting 2 Lane Stretch from Karanja Lad to Murtizapur (28 km pkg 1)
on NH361C in Maharashtra State.

Client: National Highways Division, Amravati

Consultant TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Proposed Structure at: 80+450

Existing Structure Span Details: 2x6

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

Data from site survey :

1) Catchment area (A) : 0.800 sq km
2a) Observed HFL 388.500 m
2b) Design HFL 388.500 m
3) Rugosity coeffient (n) : 0.035
4) Bed slope 1: S S= : 67.00
5) Average size of bed material (m) : 7.280 mm
Lacey's silt factor (f) : : 1.76 x m
(f) = 4.75

A) HFL fixation : (as per Clause no. 106.2.2 of IRC 5:2015)

1) By Modified Ingli's Formula : for A = 0.309 sq mile C = 4000

Q= CA = 4000 x 0.31
A+4 0.31 + 4

= 595.058 cusec [ 0.0283 for cumec ]

= 16.840 cumec
2) Rational Method :

Concentration time for stream tc = ( 0.87 x L3 / H)0.385

where, L = distance of farthest point

H = fall in level

in this case - L= 0.73 km

H= 11.0 m
0.385
Hence, tc = ( 0.87 x 0.04 )
= 0.26 hours
Ic = Io x ( 2 / ( tc + 1 ) )
Hence,
Critical intensity Ic = 7.80 x 1.59
= 12.36 cm/hr

Io = 7.8 Avg. Rainfall Intensity (cm / hr)

Design discharge in m3/sec

Qrunoff = 0.028 P x f x A x Ic
where,
3
Qrunoff = discharge in m / sec

P = 0.7 Coefficient of runoff Page 13 IRC SP 13:2004

f = 0.98 intensity fraction fig. 4.2 IRC SP 13:2004
A = 80 catchment area in Ha
Ic = 12.36 critical intensity of rainfall in cm/hr
Hence,
3
Qrunoff = 19.00 m / sec
3) By Manning's Formula : (discharge calculated as per Clause no. 106.3.1 of IRC 5:2015)

Designed HFL : 388.500 m

Mean Wetted Wetted

Ch. GL Depth below HFL Length Diff. in GL
depth Area Perimeter
-6.00 388.50 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000
-4.50 387.67 0.83 0.415 1.50 0.83 0.623 1.714
-3.00 387.38 1.12 0.975 1.50 0.29 1.463 1.528
-1.50 387.26 1.24 1.180 1.50 0.12 1.770 1.505
0.00 387.14 1.36 1.300 1.50 0.12 1.950 1.505
2.00 386.89 1.61 1.485 2.00 0.25 2.970 2.016
4.00 386.47 2.03 1.822 2.00 0.42 3.644 2.044
6.00 385.76 2.74 2.387 2.00 0.71 4.774 2.121
8.00 386.45 2.05 2.395 2.00 0.69 4.790 2.116
10.00 387.22 1.28 1.665 2.00 0.77 3.330 2.143
12.00 388.15 0.35 0.815 2.00 0.93 1.630 2.206
12.25 388.24 0.26 0.305 0.25 0.09 0.076 0.266
12.50 388.33 0.17 0.215 0.25 0.09 0.054 0.266
12.75 388.42 0.08 0.125 0.25 0.09 0.031 0.266
13.00 388.50 0.00 0.130 0.25 0.18 0.033 0.308

(Compartment wise Calculation details as per Clause no. 106.3.1.4 of IRC 5:2015)
Wetted Area Wetted Perimeter
A = 23.088 P = 14.150

Velocity of flow (V) H.M.D = A / P = 1.632

2/3 1/2
V= 1 A 1 Discharge as per Manning's Formula :
n P S
2/3 1/2 Qm = AxV
= 1 27.138 1
0.035 20.002 67.00 = 23.088 x 4.279

= 28.57 x 1.226 x 0.122 = 98.796 cumec

= 4.279 m/ sec.
 Discharge Comparsion (Cumecs)
1 Modified Ingli's Formula = 16.840
2 Rational Method = 19.00
3 Mannings Method = 98.796
(discharge comparison as per Clause no. 106.3.2 of IRC 5:2015)

Velocity corresponding to max discharge = 4.28 m/s

B) Span Fixation

Linear waterway = A = 23.088 = 8.43 m

HMD 2.740

Constricted Waterway % (max. 1/3 of calculated waterway) = 0.84 m

Design Waterway = 7.58 m

Hence it is proposed to Construct 1 span of 12.00 m c/c

C) Scour Depth Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.9 of IRC 5:2015)

Linear waterway provided L = 12.00 m & Qb = Q[manning] = 8.233

L
1/3
1) Normal scour depth Ds = 1.34 Qb 2 Ksf = 4.75
Ksf
2 1/3
= 1.34 8.233 = 3.25 m
4.75

2) Maximum scour depth 'dmax'

dmax Abt. = 1.27 x d dmax Pier = 2 x d

= 4.13 m = 6.50 m

3) Foundation level
FL for abutment = HFL 388.50 FL for Pier = HFL 388.50
Deduct dmax Abt. 4.13 Deduct dmax Pier 6.50

= 384.37 = 382.00
However foundation levels are kept as mentioned in the Detailed Drawing
D) Percentage obstruction
End wall/L
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H

1 388.50 1 + 1.2 x 1.36 = 1.496

HFL 2
1.36
1.2 387.14

End wall/R
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
1 388.50
HFL 1 + 1.2 x 0.35 = 0.385
0.35 2
1.2 388.15

Center Wall
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
0.75 388.50
HFL 0x 0.75 + 0.75 x 2.74 = 0.000
2.74 2
0.75 385.76

Obstruction Area = 1.881

Percentage obstruction = a x 100

A
= 1.881 x 100
23.088

= 8.15 % is not > 30%, Hence OK.

E) Afflux Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.6 of IRC 5:2015)

2
H = V2 + 0.0153 x Q -1
17.86 Q-q
2 2
= 4.279 + 0.0153 x 98.796 -1
17.86 98.796 - 8.049

= 1.041 x 0.185
= 0.193 m
F) Deck soffit level Road Top Level
As per Hydraulics
HFL 388.50 m Sofit Level
389.59
Assumed afflux 0.19 Slab Thickness 1.00
Vertical Clearance 0.90 m Wearing Coat0.065
389.59 m 390.66 m
(as per Clause no. 106.7 of IRC 5:2015)
Top of the Abutments, Piers and RTL is kept as mentioned in the G.A.D.

G) Graphical Representation of the Ground Level, HFL and Proposed Span of Bridge

390.00
389.00
388.00
387.00
386.00
385.00
384.00
383.00
-6.00 -4.50 -3.00 -1.50 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 12.25 12.50 12.75 13.00

Ground Level HFL Bridge Location (Clear Span)

I) Results:

i) Span of Existing Structure: 2x6

ii) Required Length of Waterway: 7.6 m

iii) Proposed Length of Waterway: 12.00 m
iv) Proposed type of bridge: RCC Slab bridge
v) Arrangement of Spans: 1 Span of 12.00 m c/c
vi) Proposed Minimum RTL: 390.66 m (Proposed levels are mentioned in GAD)
J) Conclusion:

Hence we propose span arrangemnt of 1 x 12.00 = 12.0 m Waterway,

RCC Slab bridge at CH. 80+450
The Detailed Drawings are attached in the drawing folder.

K) De-lineation of Catchment Area on Toposheet

Name of Work: 4 Laning of Exisiting 2 Lane Stretch from Karanja Lad to Murtizapur (28 km pkg 1)
on NH361C in Maharashtra State.

Client: National Highways Division, Amravati

Consultant TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Proposed Structure at: 85+390

Existing Structure Span Details: 3 x 4.5

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

Data from site survey :

1) Catchment area (A) : 1.500 sq km
2a) Observed HFL 359.500 m
2b) Design HFL 359.800 m
3) Rugosity coeffient (n) : 0.035
4) Bed slope 1: S S= : 500.00
5) Average size of bed material (m) : 7.280 mm
Lacey's silt factor (f) : : 1.76 x m
(f) = 4.75

A) HFL fixation : (as per Clause no. 106.2.2 of IRC 5:2015)

1) By Modified Ingli's Formula : for A = 0.579 sq mile C = 4000

Q= CA = 4000 x 0.58
A+4 0.58 + 4

= 1082.314 cusec [ 0.0283 for cumec ]

= 30.629 cumec
2) Rational Method :

Concentration time for stream tc = ( 0.87 x L3 / H)0.385

where, L = distance of farthest point

H = fall in level

in this case - L= 2.47 km

H= 25.0 m
0.385
Hence, tc = ( 0.87 x 0.60 )
= 0.78 hours
Ic = Io x ( 2 / ( tc + 1 ) )
Hence,
Critical intensity Ic = 7.80 x 1.12
= 8.76 cm/hr

Io = 7.8 Avg. Rainfall Intensity (cm / hr)

Design discharge in m3/sec

Qrunoff = 0.028 P x f x A x Ic
where,
3
Qrunoff = discharge in m / sec

P = 0.7 Coefficient of runoff Page 13 IRC SP 13:2004

f = 0.98 intensity fraction fig. 4.2 IRC SP 13:2004
A = 150 catchment area in Ha
Ic = 8.76 critical intensity of rainfall in cm/hr
Hence,
3
Qrunoff = 25.25 m / sec
3) By Manning's Formula : (discharge calculated as per Clause no. 106.3.1 of IRC 5:2015)

Designed HFL : 359.800 m

Mean Wetted Wetted

Ch. GL Depth below HFL Length Diff. in GL
depth Area Perimeter
-8.00 359.80 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000
-6.00 359.38 0.42 0.210 2.00 0.42 0.420 2.044
-4.00 359.28 0.52 0.470 2.00 0.10 0.940 2.002
-2.00 359.18 0.62 0.570 2.00 0.10 1.140 2.002
0.00 359.07 0.73 0.675 2.00 0.11 1.350 2.003
2.67 358.69 1.11 0.920 2.67 0.38 2.456 2.697
5.33 358.30 1.50 1.305 2.66 0.39 3.471 2.688
8.00 358.10 1.70 1.600 2.67 0.20 4.272 2.677
10.67 358.12 1.68 1.690 2.67 0.02 4.507 2.667
13.33 358.13 1.67 1.675 2.66 0.01 4.461 2.663
16.00 358.15 1.65 1.660 2.67 0.02 4.432 2.670
19.00 358.40 1.40 1.525 3.00 0.25 4.575 3.010
22.00 358.98 0.82 1.110 3.00 0.58 3.330 3.056
25.00 359.19 0.61 0.715 3.00 0.21 2.145 3.007
28.00 359.80 0.00 0.700 3.00 0.79 2.100 3.102

(Compartment wise Calculation details as per Clause no. 106.3.1.4 of IRC 5:2015)
Wetted Area Wetted Perimeter
A = 24.949 P = 18.066

Velocity of flow (V) H.M.D = A / P = 1.381

2/3 1/2
V= 1 A 1 Discharge as per Manning's Formula :
n P S
2/3 1/2 Qm = AxV
= 1 39.599 1
0.035 36.290 500.00 = 24.949 x 1.354

= 28.57 x 1.060 x 0.045 = 33.772 cumec

= 1.354 m/ sec.
 Discharge Comparsion (Cumecs)
1 Modified Ingli's Formula = 30.629
2 Rational Method = 25.25
3 Mannings Method = 33.772
(discharge comparison as per Clause no. 106.3.2 of IRC 5:2015)

Velocity corresponding to max discharge = 1.35 m/s

B) Span Fixation

Linear waterway = A = 24.949 = 14.68 m

HMD 1.700

Constricted Waterway % (max. 1/3 of calculated waterway) = 4.84 m

Design Waterway = 9.83 m

Hence it is proposed to Construct 2 span of 8.00 m c/c

C) Scour Depth Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.9 of IRC 5:2015)

Linear waterway provided L = 16.00 m & Qb = Q[manning] = 2.111

L
1/3
1) Normal scour depth Ds = 1.34 Qb 2 Ksf = 4.75
Ksf
2 1/3
= 1.34 2.111 = 1.31 m
4.75

2) Maximum scour depth 'dmax'

dmax Abt. = 1.27 x d dmax Pier = 2 x d

= 1.66 m = 2.62 m

3) Foundation level
FL for abutment = HFL 359.80 FL for Pier = HFL 359.80
Deduct dmax Abt. 1.66 Deduct dmax Pier 2.62

= 358.14 = 357.18
However foundation levels are kept as mentioned in the Detailed Drawing
D) Percentage obstruction
End wall/L
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H

1 359.80 1 + 1.2 x 0.73 = 0.803

HFL 2
0.73
1.2 359.07

End wall/R
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
1 359.80
HFL 1 + 1.2 x 1.65 = 1.815
1.65 2
1.2 358.15

Center Wall
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
0.75 359.80
HFL 1x 0.75 + 0.75 x 1.70 = 1.275
1.70 2
0.75 358.10

Obstruction Area = 3.893

Percentage obstruction = a x 100

A
= 3.893 x 100
24.949

= 15.60 % is not > 30%, Hence OK.

E) Afflux Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.6 of IRC 5:2015)

2
H = V2 + 0.0153 x Q -1
17.86 Q-q
2 2
= 1.354 + 0.0153 x 33.772 -1
17.86 33.772 - 5.270

= 0.118 x 0.404
= 0.048 m
F) Deck soffit level Road Top Level
As per Hydraulics
HFL 359.80 m Sofit Level
360.75
Assumed afflux 0.05 Slab Thickness0.80
Vertical Clearance 0.90 m Wearing Coat
0.065
360.75 m 361.61 m
(as per Clause no. 106.7 of IRC 5:2015)
Top of the Abutments, Piers and RTL is kept as mentioned in the G.A.D.

G) Graphical Representation of the Ground Level, HFL and Proposed Span of Bridge

362.00

361.00
360.00
359.00

358.00
357.00
356.00
-8.00 -6.00 -4.00 -2.00 0.00 2.67 5.33 8.00 10.67 13.33 16.00 19.00 22.00 25.00 28.00

Ground Level HFL Bridge Location (Clear Span)

I) Results:

i) Span of Existing Structure: 3 x 4.5

ii) Required Length of Waterway: 9.8 m

iii) Proposed Length of Waterway: 16.00 m
iv) Proposed type of bridge: RCC Slab bridge
v) Arrangement of Spans: 2 Span of 8.00 m c/c
vi) Proposed Minimum RTL: 361.61 m (Proposed levels are mentioned in GAD)
J) Conclusion:

Hence we propose span arrangemnt of 2 x 8.00 = 16.0 m Waterway,

RCC Slab bridge at CH. 85+390
The Detailed Drawings are attached in the drawing folder.

K) De-lineation of Catchment Area on Toposheet

Name of Work: 4 Laning of Exisiting 2 Lane Stretch from Karanja Lad to Murtizapur (28 km pkg 1)
on NH361C in Maharashtra State.

Client: National Highways Division, Amravati

Consultant TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Proposed Structure at: 94+170

Existing Structure Span Details: 4 x 7.50 + 6 x 1.20

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

Data from site survey :

1) Catchment area (A) : 51.770 sq km
2a) Observed HFL 313.000 m
2b) Design HFL 313.800 m
3) Rugosity coeffient (n) : 0.035
4) Bed slope 1: S S= : 250.00
5) Average size of bed material (m) : 7.280 mm
Lacey's silt factor (f) : : 1.76 x m
(f) = 4.75

A) HFL fixation : (as per Clause no. 106.2.2 of IRC 5:2015)

1) By Modified Ingli's Formula : for A = 19.983 sq mile C = 6999

Q= CA = 6998.74 x 19.98
A+4 19.98 + 4

= 28558.250 cusec [ 0.0283 for cumec ]

= 808.198 cumec
2) Rational Method :

Concentration time for stream tc = ( 0.87 x L3 / H)0.385

where, L = distance of farthest point

H = fall in level

in this case - L= 11.01 km

H= 50.0 m
0.385
Hence, tc = ( 0.87 x 26.69 )
= 3.36 hours
Ic = Io x ( 2 / ( tc + 1 ) )
Hence,
Critical intensity Ic = 7.80 x 0.46
= 3.58 cm/hr

Io = 7.8 Avg. Rainfall Intensity (cm / hr)

Design discharge in m3/sec

Qrunoff = 0.028 P x f x A x Ic
where,
Qrunoff = discharge in m3 / sec

P = 0.7 Coefficient of runoff Page 13 IRC SP 13:2004

f = 0.98 intensity fraction fig. 4.2 IRC SP 13:2004
A = 5177 catchment area in Ha
Ic = 3.58 critical intensity of rainfall in cm/hr
Hence,
3
Qrunoff = 356.09 m / sec
3) By Manning's Formula : (discharge calculated as per Clause no. 106.3.1 of IRC 5:2015)

Designed HFL : 313.800 m

Mean Wetted Wetted

Ch. GL Depth below HFL Length Diff. in GL
depth Area Perimeter
-100.00 313.80 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000
-75.00 312.57 1.23 0.616 25.00 1.23 15.400 25.030
-50.00 312.14 1.67 1.449 25.00 0.43 36.225 25.004
-25.00 311.70 2.10 1.883 25.00 0.44 47.075 25.004
0.00 311.27 2.53 2.315 25.00 0.43 57.875 25.004
6.67 310.94 2.86 2.695 6.67 0.33 17.976 6.678
13.33 309.43 4.37 3.615 6.66 1.51 24.076 6.829
20.00 309.23 4.57 4.470 6.67 0.20 29.815 6.673
26.67 312.29 1.51 3.040 6.67 3.06 20.277 7.338
33.33 312.51 1.29 1.400 6.66 0.22 9.324 6.664
40.00 311.90 1.90 1.595 6.67 0.61 10.639 6.698
135.00 312.18 1.63 1.763 95.00 0.28 167.485 95.000
230.00 312.45 1.35 1.488 95.00 0.27 141.360 95.000
325.00 312.73 1.07 1.213 95.00 0.28 115.235 95.000
420.00 313.80 0.00 0.813 95.00 0.55 77.235 95.002

(Compartment wise Calculation details as per Clause no. 106.3.1.4 of IRC 5:2015)
Wetted Area Wetted Perimeter
A = 169.982 P = 65.884

Velocity of flow (V) H.M.D = A / P = 2.580

2/3 1/2
V= 1 A 1 Discharge as per Manning's Formula :
n P S
2/3 1/2 Qm = AxV
= 1 769.997 1
0.035 520.924 250.00 = 169.982 x 2.343

= 28.57 x 1.298 x 0.063 = 398.284 cumec

= 2.343 m/ sec.
 Discharge Comparsion (Cumecs)
1 Modified Ingli's Formula = 808.198
2 Rational Method = 356.09
3 Mannings Method = 398.284
(discharge comparison as per Clause no. 106.3.2 of IRC 5:2015)

Velocity corresponding to max discharge = 2.34 m/s

B) Span Fixation

Linear waterway = A = 169.982 = 37.20 m

HMD 4.570

Constricted Waterway % (max. 1/3 of calculated waterway) = 12.27 m

Design Waterway = 24.92 m

Hence it is proposed to Construct 2 span of 20.00 m c/c

C) Scour Depth Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.9 of IRC 5:2015)

Linear waterway provided L = 40.00 m & Qb = Q[manning] = 20.205

L
1/3
1) Normal scour depth Ds = 1.34 Qb 2 Ksf = 4.75
Ksf
2 1/3
= 1.34 20.205 = 5.91 m
4.75

2) Maximum scour depth 'dmax'

dmax Abt. = 1.27 x d dmax Pier = 2 x d

= 7.51 m = 11.82 m

3) Foundation level
FL for abutment = HFL 313.80 FL for Pier = HFL 313.80
Deduct dmax Abt. 7.51 Deduct dmax Pier 11.82

= 306.29 = 301.98
However foundation levels are kept as mentioned in the Detailed Drawing
D) Percentage obstruction
End wall/L
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H

1 313.80 1 + 1.2 x 2.53 = 2.783

HFL 2
2.53
1.2 311.27

End wall/R
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
1 313.80
HFL 1 + 1.2 x 1.90 = 2.090
1.90 2
1.2 311.90

Center Wall
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
0.75 313.80
HFL 1x 0.75 + 0.75 x 4.57 = 3.427
4.57 2
0.75 309.23

Obstruction Area = 8.301

Percentage obstruction = a x 100

A
= 8.301 x 100
169.982

= 4.88 % is not > 30%, Hence OK.

E) Afflux Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.6 of IRC 5:2015)

2
2
H = V + 0.0153 x Q -1
17.86 Q-q
2 2
= 2.343 + 0.0153 x 398.284 -1
17.86 398.284 - 19.449

= 0.323 x 0.105
= 0.034 m
F) Deck soffit level Road Top Level
As per Hydraulics
HFL 313.80 m Sofit Level
315.03
Assumed afflux 0.03 Slab Thickness
2.00
Vertical Clearance 1.20 m Wearing Coat
0.065
315.03 m 317.10 m
(as per Clause no. 106.7 of IRC 5:2015)
Top of the Abutments, Piers and RTL is kept as mentioned in the G.A.D.

G) Graphical Representation of the Ground Level, HFL and Proposed Span of Bridge

316.00

314.00

312.00

310.00

308.00

306.00

Ground Level HFL Bridge Location (Clear Span)

I) Results:

i) Span of Existing Structure: 4 x 7.50 + 6 x 1.20

ii) Required Length of Waterway: 24.9 m

iii) Proposed Length of Waterway: 40.00 m
iv) Proposed type of bridge: RCC Slab bridge
v) Arrangement of Spans: 2 Span of 20.00 m c/c
vi) Proposed Minimum RTL: 317.10 m (Proposed levels are mentioned in GAD)
J) Conclusion:

Hence we propose span arrangemnt of 2 x 20.00 = 40.0 m Waterway,

RCC Slab bridge at CH. 94+170
The Detailed Drawings are attached in the drawing folder.

K) De-lineation of Catchment Area on Toposheet

Name of Work: 4 Laning of Exisiting 2 Lane Stretch from Karanja Lad to Murtizapur (28 km pkg 1)
on NH361C in Maharashtra State.

Client: National Highways Division, Amravati

Consultant TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Proposed Structure at: 97+556

Existing Structure Span Details: 3 x 2.80

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

Data from site survey :

1) Catchment area (A) : 1.620 sq km
2a) Observed HFL 315.500 m
2b) Design HFL 316.300 m
3) Rugosity coeffient (n) : 0.035
4) Bed slope 1: S S= : 150.00
5) Average size of bed material (m) : 7.280 mm
Lacey's silt factor (f) : : 1.76 x m
(f) = 4.75

A) HFL fixation : (as per Clause no. 106.2.2 of IRC 5:2015)

1) By Modified Ingli's Formula : for A = 0.625 sq mile C = 4000

Q= CA = 4000 x 0.63
A+4 0.63 + 4

= 1163.031 cusec [ 0.0283 for cumec ]

= 32.914 cumec
2) Rational Method :

Concentration time for stream tc = ( 0.87 x L3 / H)0.385

where, L = distance of farthest point

H = fall in level

in this case - L= 0.68 km

H= 2.0 m
0.385
Hence, tc = ( 0.87 x 0.16 )
= 0.46 hours
Ic = Io x ( 2 / ( tc + 1 ) )
Hence,
Critical intensity Ic = 7.80 x 1.37
= 10.65 cm/hr

Io = 7.8 Avg. Rainfall Intensity (cm / hr)

Design discharge in m3/sec

Qrunoff = 0.028 P x f x A x Ic
where,
3
Qrunoff = discharge in m / sec

P = 0.7 Coefficient of runoff Page 13 IRC SP 13:2004

f = 0.98 intensity fraction fig. 4.2 IRC SP 13:2004
A = 162 catchment area in Ha
Ic = 10.65 critical intensity of rainfall in cm/hr
Hence,
3
Qrunoff = 33.14 m / sec
3) By Manning's Formula : (discharge calculated as per Clause no. 106.3.1 of IRC 5:2015)

Designed HFL : 316.300 m

Mean Wetted Wetted

Ch. GL Depth below HFL Length Diff. in GL
depth Area Perimeter
-2.00 316.30 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000
-1.50 315.70 0.60 0.300 0.50 0.60 0.150 0.781
-1.00 315.60 0.70 0.650 0.50 0.10 0.325 0.510
-0.50 315.50 0.80 0.750 0.50 0.10 0.375 0.510
0.00 315.40 0.90 0.850 0.50 0.10 0.425 0.510
1.33 314.98 1.32 1.108 1.33 0.42 1.474 1.394
2.67 314.27 2.03 1.673 1.34 0.71 2.242 1.518
4.00 313.89 2.41 2.220 1.33 0.38 2.953 1.383
5.33 314.24 2.06 2.235 1.33 0.35 2.973 1.375
6.67 315.00 1.30 1.680 1.34 0.76 2.251 1.541
8.00 315.45 0.85 1.075 1.33 0.45 1.430 1.404
9.25 315.59 0.72 0.783 1.25 0.13 0.979 1.257
10.50 315.61 0.69 0.703 1.25 0.03 0.879 1.250
11.75 315.72 0.58 0.635 1.25 0.11 0.794 1.255
13.00 316.30 0.00 0.358 1.25 0.14 0.448 1.257

(Compartment wise Calculation details as per Clause no. 106.3.1.4 of IRC 5:2015)
Wetted Area Wetted Perimeter
A = 13.748 P= 9.125

Velocity of flow (V) H.M.D = A / P = 1.507

2/3 1/2
V= 1 A 1 Discharge as per Manning's Formula :
n P S
2/3 1/2 Qm = AxV
= 1 17.698 1
0.035 15.945 150.00 = 13.748 x 2.499

= 28.57 x 1.072 x 0.082 = 34.360 cumec

= 2.499 m/ sec.
 Discharge Comparsion (Cumecs)
1 Modified Ingli's Formula = 32.914
2 Rational Method = 33.14
3 Mannings Method = 34.360
(discharge comparison as per Clause no. 106.3.2 of IRC 5:2015)

Velocity corresponding to max discharge = 2.50 m/s

B) Span Fixation

Linear waterway = A = 13.748 = 5.71 m

HMD 2.410

Constricted Waterway % (max. 1/3 of calculated waterway) = 0.86 m

Design Waterway = 4.85 m

Hence it is proposed to Construct 1 span of 8.00 m c/c

C) Scour Depth Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.9 of IRC 5:2015)

Linear waterway provided L = 8.00 m & Qb = Q[manning] = 4.295

L
1/3
1) Normal scour depth Ds = 1.34 Qb 2 Ksf = 4.75
Ksf
2 1/3
= 1.34 4.295 = 2.11 m
4.75

2) Maximum scour depth 'dmax'

dmax Abt. = 1.27 x d dmax Pier = 2 x d

= 2.68 m = 4.22 m

3) Foundation level
FL for abutment = HFL 316.30 FL for Pier = HFL 316.30
Deduct dmax Abt. 2.68 Deduct dmax Pier 4.22

= 313.62 = 312.08
However foundation levels are kept as mentioned in the Detailed Drawing
D) Percentage obstruction
End wall/L
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H

1 316.30 1 + 1.2 x 0.90 = 0.990

HFL 2
0.90
1.2 315.40

End wall/R
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
1 316.30
HFL 1 + 1.2 x 0.85 = 0.935
0.85 2
1.2 315.45

Center Wall
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
0.75 316.30
HFL 1x 0.75 + 0.75 x 2.41 = 1.808
2.41 2
0.75 313.89

Obstruction Area = 3.733

Percentage obstruction = a x 100

A
= 3.733 x 100
13.748

= 27.15 % is not > 30%, Hence OK.

E) Afflux Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.6 of IRC 5:2015)

2
H = V2 + 0.0153 x Q -1
17.86 Q-q
2 2
= 2.499 + 0.0153 x 34.360 -1
17.86 34.360 - 9.329

= 0.365 x 0.884
= 0.323 m
F) Deck soffit level Road Top Level
As per Hydraulics
HFL 316.30 m Sofit Level
317.52
Assumed afflux 0.32 Slab Thickness0.60
Vertical Clearance 0.90 m Wearing Coat
0.065
317.52 m 318.19 m
(as per Clause no. 106.7 of IRC 5:2015)
Top of the Abutments, Piers and RTL is kept as mentioned in the G.A.D.

G) Graphical Representation of the Ground Level, HFL and Proposed Span of Bridge

318.00

317.00
316.00
315.00

314.00
313.00
312.00
-2.00 -1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 1.33 2.67 4.00 5.33 6.67 8.00 9.25 10.50 11.75 13.00

Ground Level HFL Bridge Location (Clear Span)

I) Results:

i) Span of Existing Structure: 3 x 2.80

ii) Required Length of Waterway: 4.8 m

iii) Proposed Length of Waterway: 8.00 m
iv) Proposed type of bridge: RCC Slab bridge
v) Arrangement of Spans: 1 Span of 8.00 m c/c
vi) Proposed Minimum RTL: 318.19 m (Proposed levels are mentioned in GAD)
J) Conclusion:

Hence we propose span arrangemnt of 1 x 8.00 = 8.0 m Waterway,

RCC Slab bridge at CH. 97+556
The Detailed Drawings are attached in the drawing folder.

K) De-lineation of Catchment Area on Toposheet

Name of Work: 4 Laning of Exisiting 2 Lane Stretch from Karanja Lad to Murtizapur (28 km pkg 1)
on NH361C in Maharashtra State.

Client: National Highways Division, Amravati

Consultant TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.

Proposed Structure at: 99+585

Existing Structure Span Details: 5 x 7.30

HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS

Data from site survey :

1) Catchment area (A) : 25.110 sq km
2a) Observed HFL 305.000 m
2b) Design HFL 306.680 m
3) Rugosity coeffient (n) : 0.035
4) Bed slope 1: S S= : 350.00
5) Average size of bed material (m) : 7.280 mm
Lacey's silt factor (f) : : 1.76 x m
(f) = 4.75

A) HFL fixation : (as per Clause no. 106.2.2 of IRC 5:2015)

1) By Modified Ingli's Formula : for A = 9.692 sq mile C = 6069

Q= CA = 6069.23 x 9.69
A+4 9.69 + 4

= 15897.285 cusec [ 0.0283 for cumec ]

= 449.893 cumec
2) Rational Method :

Concentration time for stream tc = ( 0.87 x L3 / H)0.385

where, L = distance of farthest point

H = fall in level

in this case - L= 10.98 km

H= 56.0 m
0.385
Hence, tc = ( 0.87 x 23.62 )
= 3.20 hours
Ic = Io x ( 2 / ( tc + 1 ) )
Hence,
Critical intensity Ic = 7.80 x 0.48
= 3.71 cm/hr

Io = 7.8 Avg. Rainfall Intensity (cm / hr)

Design discharge in m3/sec

Qrunoff = 0.028 P x f x A x Ic
where,
3
Qrunoff = discharge in m / sec

P = 0.7 Coefficient of runoff Page 13 IRC SP 13:2004

f = 0.98 intensity fraction fig. 4.2 IRC SP 13:2004
A = 2511 catchment area in Ha
Ic = 3.71 critical intensity of rainfall in cm/hr
Hence,
3
Qrunoff = 179.06 m / sec
3) By Manning's Formula : (discharge calculated as per Clause no. 106.3.1 of IRC 5:2015)

Designed HFL : 306.680 m

Mean Wetted Wetted

Ch. GL Depth below HFL Length Diff. in GL
depth Area Perimeter
-25.00 306.68 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000
-18.75 305.14 1.54 0.770 6.25 1.54 4.813 6.437
-12.50 304.76 1.92 1.730 6.25 0.38 10.813 6.262
-6.25 304.33 2.35 2.135 6.25 0.43 13.344 6.265
0.00 304.24 2.44 2.395 6.25 0.09 14.969 6.251
6.67 304.13 2.55 2.495 6.67 0.11 16.642 6.671
13.33 304.03 2.65 2.600 6.66 0.10 17.316 6.661
20.00 303.93 2.75 2.700 6.67 0.10 18.009 6.671
26.67 304.92 1.76 2.255 6.67 0.99 15.041 6.743
33.33 305.44 1.24 1.500 6.66 0.52 9.990 6.680
40.00 305.58 1.10 1.170 6.67 0.14 7.804 6.671
53.25 305.41 1.27 1.185 13.25 0.17 15.701 13.251
230.00 305.30 1.38 1.325 176.75 0.11 234.194 176.750
325.00 305.18 1.50 1.440 95.00 0.12 136.800 95.000
93.00 306.68 0.00 0.635 95.00 0.23 60.325 95.000

(Compartment wise Calculation details as per Clause no. 106.3.1.4 of IRC 5:2015)
Wetted Area Wetted Perimeter
A = 99.771 P = 46.348

Velocity of flow (V) H.M.D = A / P = 2.153

2/3 1/2
V= 1 A 1 Discharge as per Manning's Formula :
n P S
2/3 1/2 Qm = AxV
= 1 575.761 1
0.035 445.313 350.00 = 99.771 x 1.814

= 28.57 x 1.187 x 0.054 = 180.995 cumec

= 1.814 m/ sec.
 Discharge Comparsion (Cumecs)
1 Modified Ingli's Formula = 449.893
2 Rational Method = 179.06
3 Mannings Method = 180.995
(discharge comparison as per Clause no. 106.3.2 of IRC 5:2015)

Velocity corresponding to max discharge = 1.81 m/s

B) Span Fixation

Linear waterway = A = 99.771 = 36.28 m

HMD 2.750

Constricted Waterway % (max. 1/3 of calculated waterway) = 3.63 m

Design Waterway = 32.65 m

Hence it is proposed to Construct 2 span of 20.00 m c/c

C) Scour Depth Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.9 of IRC 5:2015)

Linear waterway provided L = 40.00 m & Qb = Q[manning] = 11.247

L
1/3
1) Normal scour depth Ds = 1.34 Qb 2 Ksf = 4.75
Ksf
2 1/3
= 1.34 11.247 = 4.00 m
4.75

2) Maximum scour depth 'dmax'

dmax Abt. = 1.27 x d dmax Pier = 2 x d

= 5.08 m = 8.00 m

3) Foundation level
FL for abutment = HFL 306.68 FL for Pier = HFL 306.68
Deduct dmax Abt. 5.08 Deduct dmax Pier 8.00

= 301.60 = 298.68
However foundation levels are kept as mentioned in the Detailed Drawing
D) Percentage obstruction
End wall/L
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H

1 306.68 1 + 1.2 x 2.44 = 2.684

HFL 2
2.44
1.2 304.24

End wall/R
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
1 306.68
HFL 1 + 1.2 x 1.10 = 1.210
1.10 2
1.2 305.58

Center Wall
Wb + WHFL
%= 2 x H
0.75 306.68
HFL 1x 0.75 + 0.75 x 2.75 = 2.063
2.75 2
0.75 303.93

Obstruction Area = 5.957

Percentage obstruction = a x 100

A
= 5.957 x 100
99.771

= 5.97 % is not > 30%, Hence OK.

E) Afflux Calculation (as per Clause no. 106.6 of IRC 5:2015)

2
H = V2 + 0.0153 x Q -1
17.86 Q-q
2 2
= 1.814 + 0.0153 x 180.995 -1
17.86 180.995 - 10.806

= 0.200 x 0.131
= 0.026 m
F) Deck soffit level Road Top Level
As per Hydraulics
HFL 306.68 m Sofit Level
307.61
Assumed afflux 0.03 Slab Thickness 2.00
Vertical Clearance 0.90 m Wearing Coat0.065
307.61 m 309.67 m
(as per Clause no. 106.7 of IRC 5:2015)
Top of the Abutments, Piers and RTL is kept as mentioned in the G.A.D.

G) Graphical Representation of the Ground Level, HFL and Proposed Span of Bridge

308.00
307.00
306.00
305.00
304.00
303.00
302.00

Ground Level HFL Bridge Location (Clear Span)

I) Results:

i) Span of Existing Structure: 5 x 7.30

ii) Required Length of Waterway: 32.7 m

iii) Proposed Length of Waterway: 40.00 m
iv) Proposed type of bridge: RCC Slab bridge
v) Arrangement of Spans: 2 Span of 20.00 m c/c
vi) Proposed Minimum RTL: 309.67 m (Proposed levels are mentioned in GAD)
J) Conclusion:

Hence we propose span arrangemnt of 2 x 20.00 = 40.0 m Waterway,

RCC Slab bridge at CH. 99+585
The Detailed Drawings are attached in the drawing folder.

K) De-lineation of Catchment Area on Toposheet

 GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION REPORT
 W.O. Ref No: TPFEPL/PUNERO/P-918A/2022/1886 DATE: 07/01/2023

GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
WORK FOR REHABILITATION AND UPGRADATION OF
FOUR LANE STANDARD OF KARANJA KHERDA
MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM
102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

GEOTECHNICAL INTERPRETATIVE REPORT

SUBMITTED TO: CLIENT

SUBMITTED BY:

NARENDRA GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY WORKS

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom,

Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road),
Nagpur - 440034)
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

INDEX
S.NO. TITLE PAGE NO.

1 1.0 INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT 2

2 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK 2

3 3.0 PLANNING OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND INTERPREATION 2

4.0 GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION
4 3
5 5.0 METHODOLOGY OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 4
6 6.0 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT 11
7.0 DESIGN METHODOLOGY
7 14
8.0 RECOMMENDED ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITY FOR OPEN FOUNDATION
8 17
9.0 REFERENCES
9 19

Annexure

S.NO TITLE PAGE NO.

1 SAMPLE CALCULATIONS 20

2 BORE LOGS 32

3 TEST RESULTS 33

4 PHOTOGRAPHS 32

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
1
Page No 1of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

1.0 INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT

This project is to carryout Geotechnical investigation and report preparation for the
“Rehabilitation and Upgradation of four lane standard of Karanja Kherda Murtizapur NH
361 C (Design Ch. Km 74/351 to Km 102/351 Total Length 28 Km.”. The objective of this
Detailed Geo-technical Investigation is to interpret the engineering properties of the soils /
rocks for the purpose of design of the foundations for structures. M/S TPF Engineering PVT
LTD, has arranged M/s NARENDRA GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY WORKS to conduct
subsurface investigation. M/s NARENDRA GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY WORKS carried out the
investigations, field tests, sampling and laboratory testing under the instructions of the
Consultant and PMC appointed by Employer. Fieldwork including Drilling of bore holes and
sample collection was carried out. Laboratory tests were conducted on selected soil samples
to determine the design parameters, confirming to relevant IS/IRS/RDSO specifications and
the guidelines received from Consultant and PMC/ Client. Complete field work / field tests
and laboratory testing in witnessed by representatives of Consultant and PMC. M/s
NARENDRA GEOTECHNICAL SURVEY WORKS has prepared this Geotechnical
Interpretative Report and recommendations based on the data collected during the fieldwork
and laboratory testing on collected soil samples.

2.0 SCOPE OF THE WORK

This document forms the geotechnical interpretations, bearing capacity recommendations for
foundation at given locations of “Rehabilitation and Upgradation of four lane standard of
Karanja Kherda Murtizapur NH 361 C (Design Ch. Km 74/351 to Km 102/351 Total Length
28 Km.” Foundation recommendations are done based on the strata encountered. The
content of this report is outlined below:

1. Geotechnical investigation report;

2. Design methodology;
3. Summary of analysis; and
4. References.

3.0 PLANNING OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION AND INTERPRETATION

The geotechnical investigation is carried out 12 locations for of the proposed project. The
objective of investigation is to interpret the engineering properties of soil/rock for the
purpose of foundation design. The factual investigation report describing the details of the
investigation, laboratory tests and results are attached as Annexure. The depth of boreholes
and depth of water table as shown in Table 1.

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
2
Page No 2of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

Table 1: List of boreholes with depth of investigation

Depth of
Sr Bore Chainage/RL Depth of Water
Location Bore Hole Borehole
Hole No (m) Table (m)
(m)

BH-1 VUP BH-1 74+367 12.50 NE

BH-2 MNB BH-1 74+566 10.50 NE
BH-3 Slab Culvert BH-1 75+931 13.50 NE
BH-4 Slab Culvert BH-1 76+250 10.50 NE
BH-5 MNB BH-1 80+480 10.50 NE
BH-6 MNB BH-1 85+389 10.50 NE
BH-7 VUP BH-1 85+800 12.00 NE
BH-8 BH-1 10.50 NE
MNB 94+170
BH-9 BH-2 10.50 NE
BH-10 MNB BH-1 97+556 12.00 NE
BH-11 BH-1 9.00 NE
MNB 99+600
BH-12 BH-2 13.50 NE

4.0 GEOLOGICAL INFORMATION OF THE REGION

The Murtizapur is in Akola district. Akola district is one of the eleven districts of Vidarbha
Region of Maharashtra State. It is situated in the northern part of the State abutting Madhya
Pradesh and lies between north latitudes 20°16’ and 21°17’ and east longitudes 76°38’ and
77°38’. The total area of the district is 5417 sq.km. and falls in parts of Survey of India degree
sheets 55 C, 55 D, 55 G and 55 H. The district is bounded on the north by Madhya Pradesh
State, on the east by Amravati, on the west by Buldhana district and on the south and south
east by Washim district.

Figure 1: Geological information of akola

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
3
Page No 3of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

4.1 SITE GEOLOGY

The project site is not totally flat but has some elevation difference. The soils and Rock at the
site generally consist of Completely/Highly/Moderately weathered basalt rock. Main
geological units of the area are, Archaean, Gondwana Lameta, Deccan traps, basalt rock.

4.3 SEISMICITY
The seismic hazard map of India was updated in 2002 by the Bureau of Indian Standards
(BIS). The project site lies in Zone II. The maximum intensity expected in these areas would be
around MSK VI. The area under study and its surroundings are seismically active falls in
Seismic Zone – II and the tectonic elements of the area are considered capable of generating
an earthquake of moderate intensity. In seismic design Zone factor, Z of 0.10 is
recommended for Zone II.

Figure 2: Seismic Hazards Map of India

5.0 METHODOLOGY OF GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

The investigation was planned to obtain the subsurface stratification in the proposed
project site and collect soil samples for laboratory testing to determine the engineering
properties such as shear strength, along with basic engineering classification of the
subsurface stratum to arrive at the foundation design parameters.

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
4
Page No 4of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

5.1 Borehole in Soil:

For Geotechnical investigation work, calyx drilling rig was installed at the specified borehole
location. Stability of rig was ensured by making level ground. The boreholes were progressed
using a rotary drilling rig, required casing was used to keep the borehole stable as per IS:
1892 - 1979. BH-P2 is drilled in water by making floating platform in river.
The following precautions were taken;
1) All field work was supervised by well-trained / experienced persons.
2) Borehole was properly cleaned before taking any sample.
3) Casing was used as per the prevailing soil conditions, to stabilize the borehole.
4) Required field tests i.e., Standard Penetration Tests and collection of
undisturbed / disturbed samples was conducted as per requirements and
5) specified depths / levels, the same has been discussed in detail in sampling
and tests in a bore hole clause of this document.
5.2 Rock core drilling:
The work of Rock core drilling was carried out by calyx drilling rig, hydraulic feed, engine
driven, mounted on skids dully provided with rotary head. In rocks, drilling was advanced by
rotary core drilling method using single/ double tube core barrels as per the guidelines of IS:
6926-1996.
The casing pipe of diameter (NX Size) if necessary was driven up to the required depth / level
as the bore hole is advanced depending upon the rock conditions.

5.3 Standard Penetration Tests (SPT)

Standard Penetration Tests were conducted at 1.5 m interval commencing from 0.5m as per
the procedure in IS: 2131 – 1981. For conducting the test, the bottom of the borehole was
properly cleaned and split spoon sampler was properly seated in position in the borehole. The
split spoon sampler resting was seated 15 cm with the blows of the hammer of 63.5 kg weight
falling through 75 cm. Thereafter, the split spoon sampler was further driven by 30 cm. The
number of blows required to affect each 15 cm of penetration was recorded. The first 15 cm
of drive is considered to be seating drive. The total blows of penetration for the second and
third 15 cm of penetration is termed the penetration resistance N. The ‘N’ values are indicative
of the compactness / relative density of cohesion less soils and consistency of cohesive soils.
In case the blow count of SPT in soil (including the number of blows for seating) exceeds 100,
the corresponding penetration was recorded and this particular test at that depth stopped. If
the total penetration is more than the seating penetration of 15 cm, then breakup of blow
count for 15 cm seating penetration and for remaining portion of penetration is also be given.

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
5
Page No 5of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

SPT ‘N’ values are correlated with relative density of non-cohesive stratum as per BS: 5930
(1999) - for sandy Strata and with consistency of cohesive stratum. The SPT values obtained
for each depth was then corrected for overburden correction (N’) and dilatancy correction (N”).
1. Due to overburden pressure (N’)
N value for cohesionless soil shall be As per IS: 2131 (1981), Clause 3.6.1 Fig. 1.N'

2. Dilatancy correction (N”)

The dilatancy correction is for the stratum consists of fine sand and silt below water
table for values of N’ greater than 15, and calculated as under
1
N" = 15+2 (N’-15)

Figure 3: Diagrammatic Representation of SPT

Correlation for Clay/Plastic silt Correlation for Sand/Non-plastic silt

Consistency N-Value Relative Density N-Value
Very Soft 0 to 2 Very loose 0 to 4
Soft 3 to 4 Loose 5 to 10
Medium
5 to 8 Medium 11 to 30
Stiff
Stiff 9 to 16 Dense 31 to 50
Above
Very Stiff 17 to 32 Very Dense
50
Hard Above 32
Table 3: Consistency / Relative density of Soil with SPT value

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
6
Page No 6of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

5.4 Disturbed soil sampling (SPT/DS)

In all boreholes, disturbed soil sample was taken at every 1.5 m interval commencing from
0.5m and at significant change of stratum (or as per specified and whenever possible). Soil
from cutting edge of undisturbed samplers and from split spoon sampler used for standard
penetration tests was taken as disturbed samples. These samples were placed without delay
in adequately sealed polythene bags.
5.5 Rock Core Samples
Core Samples were extracted by the application of a continuous pressure at one end of the
core with the barrel held horizontally without vibration. Immediately after withdrawal from
the core barrel, the cores were placed in a tray and transferred into boxes specially prepared
for the purpose as shown in fig. 5. Recovered rock cores were numbered serially as specified
in IS: 4078-1980. Rock core recovery and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) were computed for
every run length drilled. The description of the core samples was recorded. Rock
classification in terms of weathering and state of fractures and strength is carried out in the
following manner. Tabulations given in below explain it briefly (As per IS 4464). Rock core
recovery and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) were computed for every run length drilled as
shown in fig. 6

Figure 5: Core box

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
7
Page No 7of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

Figure 6: Percentage Core Recovery and Rock Quality Designation

Geologist
Term Description Grade
Interpretation
No visible sign of rock material weathering: perhaps slight
CR > 90%
Fresh discolouration on major discontinuity surfaces. I
Discolouration indicates weathering of rock material. All the
CR in between
rock material may be discoloured by the weathering and may
Slightly 70% to 90%
be somewhat weaker externally than in its fresh condition. II
weathered
Less than half of the rock material is decomposed and/ or
disintegrated to soil. Fresh or discoloured rock is present CR in between
Moderately
either as a continuous framework III 50% to 70%
weathered
or as core stone.
More than half of the rock material is decomposed and/ or
CR in between
Highly disintegrated to soil. Fresh or discoloured rock is present
IV 10% to 50%
weathered either as a continuous framework or as core stone.
All rock material is decomposed and/ or disintegrated to soil. CR in between
Completely
The original mass structure is still largely intact. V Zero to 10%
weathered
No Core
All rock material is converted to soil. The mass structure and Recovery But
material fabric are destroyed. There is a large change in N > 50
Residual soil VI
volume, but the soil has not been significantly transported. (Refusal)

Table 4: Weathering Grades

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
8
Page No 8of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

It should be understood that all grades of weathering may not be seen in a given rock mass
and that in some cases a particular grade may be present to a very small extent. Distribution
of the various weathering grades of rock material in the rock mass may be related to the
porosity of the rock material and the presence of open discontinuities of all types in the rock
mass.
5.5.1 Relation between RQD and in-situ rock quality

Rock quality is further measured by frequency of natural joints in rock mass. Rock Quality
Designation (RQD) is used to define state of fractures or massiveness of rock. Following table
defines the quality of rock mass. (As per IS 11315-Part-11)
RQD, (%) Core
Quality
90-100 Excellent
75-90 Good
50-75 Fair
25-50 Poor
0-25 Very poor
Table 5: Core quality classification based on RQD
5.5.2 Classification of Rock w.r.t Unconfined Compressive Strength (UCS)
Rock is also classified by strength of intact rock cores collected during drilling. Rock
Unconfined Compressive strength (UCS) is used to define strength of rock. Classification of
rocks given in Table 2 of Appendix-2 of IRC: 78-2014 is presented below;
Unconfined
Compressive
Rock type Description
Strength
(UCS) in MPa
Extremely Cannot be scratched with knife or sharp pick. Breaking of specimen could be
Strong done by sledge hammer only. >200
Cannot be scratched with knife or sharp pick. Breaking of specimens
Very Strong requires several hard blows of geologists pick. 100 to 200
Can be scratched with knife or pick with difficulty. Hard blow of hammer
Strong required to detach hand specimen. 50 to 100
Can be scratched with knife or pick, 6 mm deep gouges or grooves can be
Moderately made by hand blow of geologists pick. Hand specimen can be detached by
Strong 12.5 to 50
moderate blow.
Can be grooved or gouged 1 .5 mm deep by firm pressure on knife or pick
Moderately point. Can be broken into pieces or chips of about 2.5 mm maximum size by
Weak 5 to 12.5
hard blows of the points of geologists pick.
Can be grooved or gouged easily with knife or pick point. Can be break
down in chips to pieces several cm's in size by moderate blows of pick
Weak point. Small thin pieces can be broken by finger pressure. 1 .25 to 5

Can be carved with knife. Can be broken easily with point of pick. Pieces 25
mm or more in thickness can be broken by finger pressure. Can be
Very weak < 1.25
scratched easily by finger nail

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
9
Page No 9of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

Table 6: Classification of Rock w.r.t UCS

5.5.3 Estimation of RMR values
Rock Mass Rating (RMR) of jointed rock masses, may be worked out based on IS 13365 (part I).
Rock Mass Rating parameters are reproduced from annex B of IS 13365 (part I) below for
ready reference.
Item Rock Mass Rating 100-81 80-61 60-41 40-21 <20
1 Class I II III IV V
2 Classification of rock mass Very good Good Fair Poor Very poor
Table 7: Engineering Properties of Rock Mass

Parameter Table 8: Ranges of value

<1
Point Load Mpa
Strength > 10 Mpa 4-10 Mpa 2-4 Mpa 1-2 Mpa For this low range
Index Uniaxial
Strength
Compressive test is
of intact
preferred
rock
Uniaxial 5-25 1-5 < 1
100-250 Mpa Mpa Mpa
Compressive > 200 Mpa 50-100 Mpa 25-50 Mpa
Mpa
Strength
Rating 15 12 7 4 2 1 0
Drill core quality RQD 90-100% 75-90% 50-75% 25-50% < 25%
Rating 20 17 13 8 3
Spacing of discontinuities <2m 0.6 - 2 m 200-600 60-200 mm <60 mm
mm
Rating 20 15 10 8 5
Condition of Very rough Slightly Slightly Slickensided Self Gouge > 5mm
discontinuities* surfaces. rough rough surfaces, or or separation >
Not surfaces. surfaces. Gouge < 5 5mm continuous
continuous. Separation Separation mm thick or
No <1 <1 separation
separation. mm mm 1-5 mm
Unweathered slightly highly continuous
wall rock. weathered weathered
walls. walls.
Rating 30 25 20 10 0
Completely
Ground water condition# Damp Wet Dripping Flowing
dry
Rating 15 10 7 4 0
Adjustment for Very Very
Favorable Fair Unfavorable
Discontinuity Orientations& favorable Unfavorable
Rating 0 -2 -7 -15 -25

* This parameter depends on number of other parameters related to joints, a) joint smoothness, b) Joint
alteration (weathering and filling), c) Joint size, d) Joint Persistence and e) joint Separation.
# This parameter is very important for tunnels, in case there are open joints, inflow of water will be high
and will affect the stability of rock-mass. In case of foundations, conservatively this parameter may be
taken as 7.
& This parameter is more important for very heavily loaded large foundation like dams etc., these
parameters may be taken conservatively as -7 for proposed foundations.

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
10
Page No 10of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

5.6 Ground water table

Groundwater level was measured in the boreholes after 24 hours of drilling. Water table was
not encountered in area.
5.7 Laboratory testing

Laboratory tests were carried out as directed by client, consultant and approved laboratory
schedules in accordance with the procedures described in the relevant Indian Standard Codes
(IS: 2720) of practiced and Rock testings were done as per IS:13030-1991, 1122-1974

6.0 GEOTECHNICAL ASSESSMENT

6.1 Subsurface Conditions

Based on field and laboratory test results, the sub soil at this location can generally be
stratified with encountering Rock from GL to final depth with layers of Residual/Blackish
sandy/Reddish clayey soil at some points. For details like borelog, laboratory test results,
refer Annexure. Borehole wise each layer thickness is given in Table 10.
6.2 Ground Water Conditions

Ground water levels are recorded during investigation. Borehole wise observed ground water
levels are presented in Table 1 which may be superficial water. The ground water table is
expected to fluctuate depending upon the climatic factor, drainage conditions\ and other
factors. Hence, for bearing capacity calculations, water table is considered at ground
level/bed level.
6.3 Field test results
Standard Penetration Test is conducted at every strata change or at the interval of 1.5m
whenever required and necessary.
6.4 Laboratory test results
Laboratory test results on selected soil and rock samples are attached in Annexure.
6.5 PROPOSED DESIGN PARAMETER/PROFILE
Based upon the investigations carried out including field tests / laboratory testing and
correlations as per relevant codes / internationally accepted correlations, in design
calculations, the parameters are proposed (safer / conservative side). Based on the boring
information, the following subsoil profile was inferred up to final depth of boreholes:

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
11
Page No 11of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

Table:10 Core
Depth RQD
BH No. SPT (N) Value Recovery
Strata Description (%)
From To (%)
GL 1.50 Filling Material --- --- ---
1.50 3.00 Residual soil of Basalt Rock >100 (Refusal) --- ---
3.00 4.50 --- 09 Nil
Ch.
4.50 6.00 --- 10 Nil
74+367 Completely Weathered basalt Rock
6.00 7.50 --- 07 Nil
B.H-1
7.50 9.00 --- 09 Nil
VUP
9.00 10.50 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 26 09
10.50 12.00 Moderately Weathered basalt Rock --- 54 49
GL 1.50 Blackish Clayey Soil 16 --- ---
1.50 3.00 Residual soil of Basalt Rock >100 (Refusal) --- ---
Ch. 3.00 4.50 Completely Weathered basalt Rock --- 05 Nil
74+566 4.50 6.00 --- 26 09
B.H-1 6.00 7.50 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 33 Nil
MNB 7.50 9.00 --- 45 11
9.00 10.50 Moderately Weathered basalt Rock --- 61 61
GL 1.50 --- 07 Nil
1.50 3.00 Completely Weathered basalt Rock --- 07 Nil
3.00 4.50 --- 09 Nil
Ch.
4.50 6.00 --- 17 14
75+931
6.00 7.50 --- 19 07
B.H-1
7.50 9.00 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 29 06
Slab
Culvert 9.00 10.50 --- 26 15
10.50 12.00 --- 31 31
12.00 13.50 Moderately Weathered basalt Rock --- 51 51
GL 1.50 --- 11 Nil
1.50 3.00 --- 16 Nil
Ch.
3.00 4.50 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 18 08
76+250
4.50 6.00 --- 27 Nil
B.H-1
Slab 6.00 7.50 --- 45 21
Culvert 7.50 9.00 --- 52 52
Moderately Weathered basalt Rock
9.00 10.50 --- 65 65
GL 1.50 Completely Weathered basalt Rock --- 05 Nil
1.50 3.00 --- 18 Nil
Ch. 3.00 4.50 --- 33 Nil
80+480 4.50 6.00 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 30 07
B.H-1 6.00 7.50 --- 42 08
MNB 7.50 9.00 --- 38 Nil
9.00 10.50 Moderately Weathered basalt Rock --- 57 57
GL 1.50 --- 06 Nil
1.50 3.00 Completely Weathered basalt Rock --- 06 Nil
3.00 4.50 --- 08 Nil
Ch.
4.50 6.00 --- 19 Nil
85+389
6.00 7.50 --- 28 Nil
B.H-1
MNB 7.50 9.00 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 38 Nil
10.50 --- 49
9.00 49

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
12
Page No 12of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

Table:10 Core
Depth RQD
BH No. SPT (N) Value Recovery
Strata Description (%)
From To (%)
GL 1.50 --- 07 Nil
Completely Weathered basalt Rock
1.50 3.00 --- 09 Nil
3.00 4.50 --- 12 Nil
Highly Weathered basalt Rock
Ch. 4.50 6.00 --- 17 Nil
85+800 6.00 7.50 Residual soil of Basalt Rock >100 (Refusal) --- ---
B.H-1 7.50 9.00 --- 20 Nil
VUP 9.00 10.50 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 29 Nil
10.50 12.00 --- 77 Nil
GL 1.50 Completely Weathered basalt Rock --- 09 Nil
1.50 3.00 --- 21 Nil
Ch. 3.00 4.50 --- 20 Nil
94+170 4.50 6.00 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 29 15
B.H-1 6.00 7.50 --- 35 Nil
MNB 7.50 9.00 --- 41 07
9.00 10.50 Moderately Weathered basalt Rock --- 57 57
GL 1.50 --- 07 Nil
Completely Weathered basalt Rock
1.50 3.00 --- 07 Nil
Ch. 3.00 4.50 --- 11 Nil
94+170 4.50 6.00 --- 15 Nil
Highly Weathered basalt Rock
B.H-2 6.00 7.50 --- 19 Nil
MNB 7.50 9.00 --- 29 Nil
9.00 10.50 Moderately Weathered basalt Rock --- 51 51
GL 1.50 >100 (Refusal) --- ---
1.50 3.00 Residual soil of Basalt Rock >100 (Refusal) --- ---
3.00 4.50 >100 (Refusal) --- ---
Ch.
4.50 6.00 --- 03 Nil
97+556 Completely Weathered basalt Rock
6.00 7.50 --- 07 Nil
B.H-1
7.50 9.00 --- 17 Nil
MNB Highly Weathered basalt Rock
9.00 10.50 --- 30 Nil
10.50 12.00 Moderately Weathered basalt Rock --- 51 51
GL 1.50 Residual soil of Basalt Rock >100 (Refusal) --- ---
1.50 3.00 --- 08 Nil
Ch.
3.00 4.50 --- 07 Nil
99+600 Completely Weathered basalt Rock
4.50 6.00 --- 05 Nil
B.H-1
6.00 7.50 --- 05 Nil
MNB
7.50 9.00 Moderately Weathered basalt Rock --- 51 51
GL 1.50 --- 04 Nil
1.50 3.00 --- 07 Nil
Completely Weathered basalt Rock
3.00 4.50 --- 05 Nil
Ch. 4.50 6.00 --- 07 Nil
99+600 6.00 7.50 --- 21 Nil
B.H-2 7.50 9.00 Highly Weathered basalt Rock --- 30 Nil
MNB 9.00 10.50 --- 41 09
10.50 12.00 --- 57 Nil
Moderately Weathered basalt Rock
12.00 13.50 --- 51 51

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
13
Page No 13of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

7.0 DESIGN METHODOLOGY

From the factual investigation report, it is observed that the Highly to moderately Weathered
Rock is available up to max investigated dept. Hence, as per the structural load and
requirement open foundation is recommended at all the locations. But if Open Foundation is
considered then it must be rest on Residual Soil/Rock Stratum i.e below 3.0 m. All the
foundations are proposed to rest over relatively good strata to ensure sufficient bearing
capacity. Methodology used for calculating the bearing capacity of all the types of strata and
settlement of foundation is discussed in the following section of this report.

7.1 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF FOUNDATION SUPPORT

A suitable foundation for any structure should have an adequate factor of safety against
exceeding the bearing capacity of the supporting soil, also the vertical movements due to
compression of the soils should be within tolerable limits for the structure. We consider that
foundation designed in accordance with the recommendations given herein will satisfy these
criteria.

For satisfactory performance of a foundation, the following criteria must be satisfied;

(i) The foundation must not fail in shear.
(ii)The foundation must not settle by an amount more than the permissible settlement.
The smaller of the bearing pressure values obtained according to (i) and (ii) above, is adopted
as the allowable bearing capacity.
Design Considerations for Open Foundations
Permissible settlement in soil (Non Plastic / Plastic) 50 mm / 75 mm
Permissible settlement in rock 12 mm
Water Table correction factor 0.50
Average Design Parameters as per clause 5.2 to 5.6.
Table: 1

Depth of Open Foundation in Soil

A foundation must have an adequate depth from considerations of adverse environmental

influences. It must also be economically feasible in terms of overall structure. Depth of
foundations in soil shall be decided as per clause 7 of IS: 1904 for special cases like; where
volume change is expected / scour is expected / foundations on sloping ground / foundation
on made or filled up ground / frost action is expected etc. All foundations shall extend to a
depth of at least 0.5 m below natural ground level. Where filled up materials are encountered,
foundations should rest either on natural ground or engineered fill. Where filled material is

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
14
Page No 14of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

exposed at the founding level, excavation should be carried out up to the level of natural
soils. Backfill of granular materials should be placed in layers and compacted thoroughly. In
case of small bridges / culverts, top of bottom slab shall extend 0.3 m depth below bed level
as per IRC: SP-13
Depth of Open Foundation in Rock
The founding levels should fix considering an embedment of at least 0.60 m into the sound
rock and 1.50 m in to the disintegrated / weathered soft rock. As per clause 705.2.2 (a) of
IRC: 78; for moderately strong to extremely strong rock with an ultimate crushing strength of
125 kg/cm2 or above or where it is not possible to take core to get the UCS but extrapolated
SPT N value is more than 500 the depth of foundation shall be 0.60 m. below rock surface.

However, depth of foundation is 1.50 m. in moderately weak rocks having with an ultimate
crushing strength between 125 kg/cm2 to 25 kg/cm2 or where it is not possible to take core to
get the UCS but extrapolated SPT N value is more than 100 but less than 500. In other cases
the embedment of the foundations shall be decided keeping in view the overall
characteristics like fissures, bedding planes, cavities, ultimate crushing strength, proposed
treatment of foundation strata etc.

7.2 Allowable bearing capacity

7.2.1 Bearing capacity calculations for Open foundation

Bearing capacity for shallow foundations in soil has been analyzed in accordance with IS:
6403-1981, which is based on, modified Terzaghi’s classical approach. The weighted average
of shear parameters for various strata up to a significant influence zone of 1.5 B (B = width of
the foundation) below the foundation level is used in the analysis. Considering the fluctuation
of ground water, it is assumed that water table will be at existing ground level and
accordingly the water table correction is applied. A factor of safety of 2.5 is selected based on
clause 706.3.1.1.1 of IRC 78-2014 to estimate the net safe bearing capacity from ultimate net
bearing capacity. Standard Penetration Test (SPT) results are also used to determine the safe
bearing capacity of shallow foundation in accordance with IS: 6403-1981 for non-cohesive
soil, hard clay. While using this approach, the N value was corrected, wherever applicable,
below the footing base to at least 1.5B below the base to account for the effects of energy
ratio, adopted boring procedure, dilation for submerged Silty fine sands /fine sands as well
as that due to the overburden pressure (Reference: IS: 2131-1981, “Foundation Analysis and
Design” by J. E. Bowles).

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
15
Page No 15of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

7.2.1.A BEARING CAPACITY FOR OPEN FOUNDATIONS IN ROCK

Analysis for allowable bearing capacity on rock has been done by Based on rock mass rating
(RMR value).
a) Safe Bearing Pressure from the RMR System:
Analysis has been carried out using the RMR also known as Geo-mechanics classification by
considering various parameters such as uni-axial compressive strength, RQD, spacing and
condition of discontinuities and ground water condition. The correlation between the RMR
value and allowable pressure has been given in Table –3 IS: 12070. This will ensure settlement
of raft foundation to be less than 12 mm. IS 12070 does not mention width or size and shape
of foundation for calculating net safe bearing capacity. Also in the referred IS code there is no
mention of immediate settlement.
Net Safe Bearing Pressures Based on RMR:

Classification No. I II III IV V

Description of
Very Good Good Fair Poor Very Poor
Rock
RMR 100-81 80-61 60-41 40-21 20-0

qns (t/m2) 600-448 440-288 280-141 135 - 48 45-30

Table 12
The RMR for use in Table should be the average within a depth below foundation level equal
to the width of foundation, provided the RMR is fairly uniform within the depth. If the upper
part of the rock, within a depth of about one fourth of the width of foundation, is of lower
quality the value of this part should be used or the inferior rock should be removed. Since
these values are based on limiting the settlement, they should not be increased if the
foundation is embedded into the rock.
IS 13365 (part I) “Quantitative classification system of rock mass”: This code defines various
parameters for obtaining RMR values based on rock core logging sheet and laboratory test of
rock cores.

The rock mass rating should be determined as an algebraic sum of ratings for all the
parameters given in Table 6 after adjustments for orientation of discontinuities given. The
sum of Items 1 to 5 is called Rock Condition Rating (RCR), which discounts the effect of
compressive strength of intact rock material and orientation of joints. This is also called as
the modified RMR.
Sample RMR calculations are attached in annexure.

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
16
Page No 16of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

8.0 Recommended capacity for foundation.

8.1 Open foundation
Based on design parameters and allowable bearing capacity of Open foundations for
the structure is tabulated as below;
Depth of Allowable
Chainage/RL
BH No. Foundation Foundation Bearing Strata Bearing
(m)
Below EGL (m) Capacity (T/m2)
3.00 to 9.00 Compeletly weathered Basalt Rock 40.0
74+367 VUP
BH-1 9.0 to 10.5 Highly weathered Basalt Rock 50.0
BH-1
10.5 to 12.0 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 100.0
3.00 to 4.50 Completely Weathered Basalt Rock 40.0

74+566 MNB 4.50 to 6.0 65.0

BH-2 Highly Weathered Basalt Rock
BH-1 6.00 to 9.0 80.0
9.0 to 10.5 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 125.0
GL to 4.5 Compeletly weathered Basalt Rock 40.0

75+931 Slab 4.5 to 10.5 50.0

BH-3 Highly Weathered Basalt Rock
Culvert BH-1 10.5 to 12.0 100.0
12.0 to 13.5 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 125.0
GL to 6.0 40.0
76+250 Slab Highly Weathered Basalt Rock
BH-4 6.00 to 7.5 90.0
Culvert BH-1
7.5 to 10.5 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 110.0
GL to 4.5 Compeletly/Highly weathered Basalt 40.0
80+480 MNB Rock
BH-5 4.5 to 9.0 65.0
BH-1
9.0 to 10.5 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 125.0
GL to 4.5 Compeletly weathered Basalt Rock 40.0
85+389 MNB
BH-6 4.5 to 9.0 55.0
BH-1 Highly Weathered Basalt Rock
9.0 to 10.5 100.0
Compeletly/Highly weathered Basalt
85+800 VUP GL to 9.0 40.0
BH-7 Rock
BH-1
9.0 to 12.0 Highly Weathered Basalt Rock 55.0
Compeletly/Highly weathered Basalt
GL to 4.5 40.0
Rock
94+170 MNB
BH-8 4.5 to 9.0 Highly weathered Basalt Rock 65.0
BH-1
9.0 to 10.5 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 110.0

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
17
Page No 17of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

Depth of Allowable
Chainage/RL
BH No. Foundation Foundation Bearing Strata Bearing
(m)
Below EGL (m) Capacity (T/m2)
Compeletly/Highly weathered Basalt
GL to 4.5 40.0
Rock
94+170 MNB
BH-9 4.5 to 9.0 Highly Weathered Basalt Rock 45.0
BH-2
9.0 to 10.5 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 125.0
Compeletly/Highly weathered Basalt
3.0 to 9.0 40.0
Rock
97+556 MNB
BH-10 9.0 to 10.5 Highly Weathered Basalt Rock 45.0
BH-1
10.5 to 12.0 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 125.0
1.5 to 3.0 40.0
99+600 MNB Compeletly weathered Basalt Rock
BH-11 3.0 to 7.5 45.0
BH-1
7.5 to 9.0 Moderately weathered basalt Rock 125.0
GL to 7.5 Compeletly/Highly weathered Basalt 40.0
7.5 to 9.0 Rock 45.0
99+600 MNB
BH-12
BH-2 9.0 to 12.0 65.0
Highly/ Moderately weathered Basalt
12.0 to 13.5 Rock 110.0

 If open foundation is considered then; above recommended capacities can be used for
any type of open foundation.
 The choice of the value is a matter of engineering judgement, field assessment and
laboratory test results. The recommendations are based on our engineering
judgement based on subsurface strata encountered in the limited number of
boreholes as reported herein.
 If any significant departure from the reported data is noticed during actual
construction, the Geotechnical Consultants may be referred for advice.

For, Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

 The above result relates only to the location(s) where the test(s) has been conducted.
 Any query regarding report may be reported immediately.

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
18
Page No 18of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

9.0 REFERENCES
Sr.
IS Codes No TITLE
No.
IS: 1892-1979 RA-
1 Code of Practice for subsurface investigation for foundations.
2016
IS: 1498-1970 RA Classification and Identification of soils for general Engineering
2
2016 Purpose.
IS: 2131-1981 RA
3 Method for Standard Penetration Test (SPT) for Soils.
2016
IS: 2132-1986 RA
4 Code of Practice for Thin - Walled tube sampling of Soils.
2016
IS: 4464-1985 RA Code of Practice for presentation of drilling information and core
5
2019 description in foundation investigation.
IS: 5313-1980 RA
6 Guide for core drilling observations.
2019
IS: 4078-1980
7 Code of Practice for indexing and storage of drill cores
RA2019
IS: 6926-1996 RA Diamond core drilling – Site investigation for river valley projects -
8
2015 code of Practice.
IS: 6935-1973 RA
9 Method of determination of water level in a bore hole
2019
IS: 6403 1981 RA Code of Practice for Determination of Bearing capacity of shallow
10
2016 foundations
IS: 8009 (part-1)-1976
11 Code of practice for calculation of Settlements of Foundations
RA 2019
12 IS: 1893 (part-1) 2016 Criteria for Earthquake resistant design of structures.
IS: 2911 (part-1/sec DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF PILE FOUNDATIONS — CODE OF
13
2) 2010 PRACTICE
Sr.
BOOK TITLE
No.
1 N. V. Nayak Foundation Design Manual
2 Joseph E. Bowles Foundation Analysis and Design
3 P.C. Varghese Foundation Engineering

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
19
Page No 19of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

ANNEXURE

SAMPLE CALCULATION

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761
20
Page No 20of 50
 RMR CALCULATIONS

PT Load Condition of Ground

Depth / UCS, Joint SBC, qns
BH No. Chainage Index, Rating Rating Rating Rating RQD % Rating Rating Spacing Rating Rating Discontinuit Rating water Rating Rating RMR
Run (MPa) Orientation (T/m²)
(MPa) y condition

BH-01 3.00 - 9.00 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

74+367
BH-01 9.0 - 10.5 0.0 1-2 0 50.0 25-50 4 9.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 22 50
VUP BH-1

BH-01 10.5 - 12.0 0.0 1-2 0 57.0 50-100 7 49.0 25-50 8 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 33 100

BH-02 3.00 - 4.50 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

BH-02 4.50 - 6.00 0.0 2-4 0 54.0 50-100 7 9.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 25 65

74+566
BH-02 6.00 - 7.50 47.0 >8 15 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 33 100
MNB BH-1

BH-02 7.50 - 9.00 0.0 1-2 0 63.0 50-100 7 11.0 <25 3 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 28 80

BH-02 9.0 - 10.5 0.0 1-2 0 63.0 50-100 7 61.0 50-75 13 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 38 125

BH-03 0.00 - 4.50 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

BH-03 75+931 4.50 -10.5 0.0 1-2 0 50.0 25-50 4 15.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 22 50
Slab
Culvert BH-
BH-03 1 10.5 - 12.0 0.0 1-2 0 63.0 50-100 7 31.0 25-50 8 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 33 100

BH-03 12.0 - 13.5 0.0 1-2 0 63.0 50-100 7 51.0 50-75 13 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 38 125

BH-04 0.00 - 6.00 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

BH-04 76+250 6.00 - 7.50 0.0 1-2 0 64.0 50-100 7 21.0 25-50 8 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 30 90
Slab
Culvert BH-
BH-04 1 7.50 - 9.00 0.0 1-2 0 64.0 50-100 7 52.0 50-75 13 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 35 110

BH-04 9.0 - 10.5 0.0 1-2 0 67.0 50-100 7 65.0 50-75 13 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 35 110

BH-05 0.00 - 4.50 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

BH-05 4.50 - 6.00 51.0 >8 15 0.0 <2 0 7.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 33 100

80+480
BH-05 6.00 - 7.50 0.0 1-2 0 60.0 50-100 7 21.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 25 65
MNB BH-1

BH-05 7.50 - 9.00 0.0 1-2 0 60.0 50-100 7 21.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 25 65

BH-05 9.0 - 10.5 0.0 1-2 0 63.0 50-100 7 57.0 50-75 13 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 38 125

BH-06 0.00 - 4.50 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

85+389
BH-06 4.50 - 9.00 60.0 >8 15 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 23 55
MNB BH-1

BH-06 9.0 - 10.5 0.0 1-2 0 51.0 50-100 7 49.0 25-50 8 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 33 100

Page No 21of 50
 RMR CALCULATIONS

PT Load Condition of Ground

Depth / UCS, Joint SBC, qns
BH No. Chainage Index, Rating Rating Rating Rating RQD % Rating Rating Spacing Rating Rating Discontinuit Rating water Rating Rating RMR
Run (MPa) Orientation (T/m²)
(MPa) y condition

BH-07 0.00 - 9.00 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

85+800
BH-07 9.0 - 10.5 46.0 >8 15 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 23 55
VUP BH-1

BH-07 10.5 - 12.0 56.0 >8 15 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 23 55

BH-08 0.00 - 4.50 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

94+170
BH-08 4.50 - 9.00 0.0 1-2 0 53.0 50-100 7 15.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 25 65
MNB BH-1

BH-08 9.0 - 10.5 0.0 1-2 0 58.0 50-100 7 57.0 50-75 13 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 35 110

BH-09 0.00 - 4.50 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

94+170
BH-09 4.50 - 9.00 50.0 >8 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 18 45
MNB BH-2

BH-09 9.00 - 10.5 0.0 1-2 0 60.0 50-100 7 51.0 50-75 13 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 38 125

BH-10 3.00 - 9.0 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

97+556
BH-10 9.00 - 10.5 46.0 >8 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 18 45
MNB BH-1

BH-10 10.5 - 12.0 0.0 1-2 0 61.0 50-100 7 51.0 50-75 13 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 38 125

BH-11 1.50 - 3.0 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

99+600
BH-11 3.00- 7.50 58.0 >8 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 18 45
MNB BH-1

BH-11 7.5 - 9.00 0.0 1-2 0 57.0 50-100 7 51.0 50-75 13 Close 0.06-0.2 8 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 38 125

BH-12 0.00 - 7.50 0 1-2 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 smooth 0 Wet 7 Fair -7 8 40

BH-12 7.50 - 9.00 61.0 >8 0 0.0 <2 0 0.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 18 45
99+600
MNB BH-2
BH-12 9.00 - 12.0 0.0 1-2 0 59.0 50-100 7 9.0 <25 3 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 25 65

BH-12 12.0 - 13.5 0.0 1-2 0 61.0 50-100 7 51.0 50-75 13 Very Close <0.06 5 Slickenside 10 Wet 7 Fair -7 35 110

Page No 22of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

BORE LOG

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Pushakunj, Plot no 26, New Narsala road, Indra Nagar Nagpur-440034, [email protected],
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761

Page No 23of 50
 Page 1

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : VUP (Ch. 74+367)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 18.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 12.50 M Dated Completed : 20.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50

Filling Material - - - - DS - - - - - - -
1.00

1.50

2.00
>100
Residual soil of Basalt
- - - - SPT - - - - - - (Refus
2.50 Rock
al)

3.00

3.50

- - - - Core - - - 9.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50

5.00

- - - - Core - - - 10.00 - Nil -

5.50

6.00 Completely Weathered

basalt Rock

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

7.00

7.50

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 9.00 - Nil -

8.50

9.00

9.50
Highly Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 26.00 - 9.00 -
10.00 basalt Rock

10.50
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 24of 50
 Page 2

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : VUP (Ch. 74+367)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 18.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 12.50 M Dated Completed : 20.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

11.00

11.50 Moderately Weathered

- - - - Core - - - 54.00 - 49.00 -
basalt Rock
12.00

12.50

13.00

13.50

14.00

14.50

15.00

15.50

16.00

16.50

17.00

17.50

18.00

18.50

19.00

19.50

20.00
Borehole Terminated at 12.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 25of 50
 Page 3

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : MNB (Ch. 74+566)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 21.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 10.50 M Dated Completed : 23.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50

Blackish Clayey Soil 4 7 9 - DS - - - - - - 16

1.00

1.50

2.00
>100
Residual soil of Basalt
- - - - SPT - - - - - - (Refus
2.50 Rock
al)

3.00

3.50
Completely Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 5.00 - Nil -
4.00 basalt Rock

4.50

5.00

- - - - Core - - - 26.00 - 9.00 -

5.50

6.00

6.50
Highly Weathered
basalt Rock - - - - Core - - - 33.00 - Nil -
7.00

7.50

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 45.00 - 11.00 -

8.50

9.00

9.50
Moderately Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 61.00 - 61.00 -
10.00 basalt Rock

10.50
Borehole Terminated at 10.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 26of 50
 Page 4

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : Slab Culvert (Ch. 75+931)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 20.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 13.50 M Dated Completed : 20.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

1.00

1.50

2.00
Completely Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -
2.50 basalt Rock

3.00

3.50

- - - - Core - - - 9.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50

5.00

- - - - Core - - - 17.00 - 14.00 -

5.50

6.00

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 19.00 - 7.00 -

7.00

Highly Weathered
7.50
basalt Rock

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 29.00 - 6.00 -

8.50

9.00

9.50

- - - - Core - - - 26.00 - 15.00 -

10.00

10.50
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 27of 50
 Page 5

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : Slab Culvert (Ch. 75+931)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 20.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 13.50 M Dated Completed : 20.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

11.00
Highly Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 31.00 - 31.00 -
11.50 basalt Rock

12.00

12.50
Moderately Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 51.00 - 51.00 -
13.00 basalt Rock

13.50

14.00

14.50

15.00

15.50

16.00

16.50

17.00

17.50

18.00

18.50

19.00

19.50

20.00

20.50
Borehole Terminated at 13.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 28of 50
 Page 6

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : Slab Culvert (Ch. 76+250)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 21.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 10.50 M Dated Completed : 21.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50

- - - - Core - - - 11.00 - Nil -

1.00

1.50

2.00

- - - - Core - - - 16.00 - Nil -

2.50

3.00

3.50
Highly Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 18.00 - 8.00 -
4.00 basalt Rock

4.50

5.00

- - - - Core - - - 27.00 - Nil -

5.50

6.00

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 45.00 - 21.00 -

7.00

7.50

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 52.00 - 52.00 -

8.50

9.00 Moderately Weathered

basalt Rock
9.50

- - - - Core - - - 65.00 - 65.00 -

10.00

10.50
Borehole Terminated at 10.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 29of 50
 Page 7

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : MNB (Ch. 80+480)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 22.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 10.50 M Dated Completed : 22.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50
Completely Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 5.00 - Nil -
1.00 basalt Rock

1.50

2.00

- - - - Core - - - 18.00 - Nil -

2.50

3.00

3.50

- - - - Core - - - 33.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50

5.00
Highly Weathered
basalt Rock - - - - Core - - - 30.00 - 7.00 -
5.50

6.00

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 42.00 - 8.00 -

7.00

7.50

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 38.00 - Nil -

8.50

9.00

9.50
Moderately Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 57.00 - 57.00 -
10.00 basalt Rock

10.50
Borehole Terminated at 10.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 30of 50
 Page 8

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : MNB (Ch. 85+389)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 24.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 10.50 M Dated Completed : 25.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50

- - - - Core - - - 6.00 - Nil -

1.00

1.50

2.00
Completely Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 6.00 - Nil -
2.50 basalt Rock

3.00

3.50

- - - - Core - - - 8.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50

5.00

- - - - Core - - - 19.00 - Nil -

5.50

6.00

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 28.00 - Nil -

7.00

Highly Weathered
7.50
basalt Rock

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 38.00 - Nil -

8.50

9.00

9.50

- - - - Core - - - 49.00 - 49.00 -

10.00

10.50
Borehole Terminated at 10.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 31of 50
 Page 9

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : VUP (Ch. 85+800)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 23.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 12.00 M Dated Completed : 23.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

1.00

1.50 Completely Weathered

basalt Rock
2.00

- - - - Core - - - 9.00 - Nil -

2.50

3.00

3.50

- - - - Core - - - 12.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50 Highly Weathered

basalt Rock
5.00

- - - - Core - - - 17.00 - 14.00 -

5.50

6.00

6.50
>100
Residual soil of Basalt
- - - - SPT - - - - - - (Refus
7.00 Rock
al)

7.50

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 20.00 - Nil -

8.50

9.00 Highly Weathered

basalt Rock
9.50

- - - - Core - - - 29.00 - Nil -

10.00

10.50
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 32of 50
 Page 10

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : VUP (Ch. 85+800)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 23.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 12.00 M Dated Completed : 23.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

11.00
Highly Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 44.00 - Nil -
11.50 basalt Rock

12.00

12.50

13.00

13.50

14.00

14.50

15.00

15.50

16.00

16.50

17.00

17.50

18.00

18.50

19.00

19.50
Borehole Terminated at 12.00 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 33of 50
 Page 11

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : MNB (Ch. 94+170)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 25.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 10.50 M Dated Completed : 25.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50
Completely Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 9.00 - Nil -
1.00 basalt Rock

1.50

2.00

- - - - Core - - - 21.00 - Nil -

2.50

3.00

3.50

- - - - Core - - - 20.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50

5.00
Highly Weathered
basalt Rock - - - - Core - - - 29.00 - 15.00 -
5.50

6.00

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 35.00 - Nil -

7.00

7.50

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 41.00 - 7.00 -

8.50

9.00

9.50
Moderately Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 57.00 - 57.00 -
10.00 basalt Rock

10.50
Borehole Terminated at 10.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 34of 50
 Page 12

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 02 Structure : MNB (Ch. 94+170)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 26.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 10.50 M Dated Completed : 27.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

1.00

1.50 Completely Weathered

basalt Rock
2.00

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

2.50

3.00

3.50

- - - - Core - - - 11.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50

5.00

- - - - Core - - - 15.00 - Nil -

5.50

6.00 Highly Weathered

basalt Rock

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 19.00 - Nil -

7.00

7.50

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 29.00 - Nil -

8.50

9.00

9.50
Moderately Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 51.00 - 51.00 -
10.00 basalt Rock

10.50
Borehole Terminated at 10.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 35of 50
 Page 13

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : MNB (Ch. 97+556)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 27.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 12.00 M Dated Completed : 28.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50
>100
- - - - SPT - - - - - - (Refus
1.00 al)

1.50

2.00
>100
Yellowish Sandy Soil - - - - SPT - - - - - - (Refus
2.50 al)

3.00

3.50
>100
- - - - SPT - - - - - - (Refus
4.00 al)

4.50

5.00

- - - - Core - - - 3.00 - Nil -

5.50

6.00 Completely Weathered

basalt Rock
6.50

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

7.00

7.50

8.00

- - - - Core - - - 17.00 - Nil -

8.50

9.00 Highly Weathered

basalt Rock
9.50

- - - - Core - - - 30.00 - Nil -

10.00

10.50
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 36of 50
 Page 14

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : MNB (Ch. 97+556)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 27.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 12.00 M Dated Completed : 28.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

11.00
Moderately Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 51.00 - 51.00 -
11.50 basalt Rock

12.00

12.50

13.00

13.50

14.00

14.50

15.00

15.50

16.00

16.50

17.00

17.50

18.00

18.50

19.00

19.50

20.00

20.50
Borehole Terminated at 12.00 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 37of 50
 Page 15

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 01 Structure : MNB (Ch. 99+600)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 27.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 09.00 M Dated Completed : 27.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50
>100
Residual soil of Basalt
- - - - SPT - - - - - - (Refus
1.00 Rock
al)

1.50

2.00

- - - - Core - - - 8.00 - Nil -

2.50

3.00

3.50

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50 Completely Weathered

basalt Rock
5.00

- - - - Core - - - 5.00 - Nil -

5.50

6.00

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 5.00 - Nil -

7.00

7.50

8.00
Moderately Weathered
- - - - Core - - - 51.00 - 51.00 -
8.50 basalt Rock

9.00

9.50

10.00

10.50
Borehole Terminated at 09.00 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 38of 50
 Page 16

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 02 Structure : MNB (Ch. 99+600)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 28.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 13.50 M Dated Completed : 28.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

0.50

- - - - Core - - - 4.00 - Nil -

1.00

1.50

2.00

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

2.50

3.00 Completely Weathered

basalt Rock
3.50

- - - - Core - - - 5.00 - Nil -

4.00

4.50

5.00

- - - - Core - - - 7.00 - Nil -

5.50

6.00

6.50

- - - - Core - - - 21.00 - Nil -

7.00

7.50

8.00
Highly Weathered
basalt Rock - - - - Core - - - 30.00 - Nil -
8.50

9.00

9.50

- - - - Core - - - 41.00 - 9.00 -

10.00

10.50
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 39of 50
 Page 17

Project : Conducting Geotech and Road trail pit Client : M/s TPF Engineering Pvt. Ltd.
for DPR for Four Lanning of Karanja
Murtizapur road
Bore Hole No. : BH 02 Structure : MNB (Ch. 99+600)
Method of Boring : Rotary (Using NX size Core Barrel) Depth of Water Level : NE
Dia of Hole : 100 MM Dated Started : 28.01.2023
Depth of Boring : 13.50 M Dated Completed : 28.01.2023

Soil Penetration Piece No.

R.L. Depth
Description of Starta CR CR RQD RQD SPT N
(m) (meter) 15 30 45 60 Type From To
(cm) (%) (cm) (%) Value

11.00

- - - - Core - - - 57.00 - Nil -

11.50

12.00 Moderately Weathered

basalt Rock
12.50

- - - - Core - - - 51.00 - 51.00 -

13.00

13.50

14.00

14.50

15.00

15.50

16.00

16.50

17.00

17.50

18.00

18.50

19.00

19.50

20.00

20.50
Borehole Terminated at 13.50 M
Prepared By : Checked By : Approved By :
Narendra Geotechnical Survey Work AW MB NG

Page No 40of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

TEST RESULTS

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761

Page No 41of 50
Page No 42of 50
Page No 43of 50
 KARANJA KHERDA MURTIZAPUR NH 361 C (DESIGN CH. KM 74/351 TO KM 102/351 TOTAL LENGTH 28 KM.

PHOTOGRAPHS

Narendra Geotechnical Survey Works

Plot No. 27, Above TVS Showroom, Telephone Nagar, Dighori (Umred Road), Nagpur - 440034)
[email protected],9420337967 / 8452099313 / 8868955761

Page No 44of 50
BH 01 BH 02

Page No 45of 50
BH 03 BH 04

Page No 46of 50
BH 05 BH 06

Page No 47of 50
BH 07 BH 08

Page No 48of 50
BH 09 BH 10

Page No 49of 50
BH 11 BH 12

Page No 50of 50