External audits are performed by certified public accountants to express an opinion on a company's financial statements. Internal audits are conducted by auditors within an organization to evaluate its activities. Advisory services involve improving a client's operations, while attest services issue conclusions on written assertions. The main components of a financial audit include auditing standards, management assertions, and a systematic process to identify important processes and data files.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views4 pages
Chapter 1
External audits are performed by certified public accountants to express an opinion on a company's financial statements. Internal audits are conducted by auditors within an organization to evaluate its activities. Advisory services involve improving a client's operations, while attest services issue conclusions on written assertions. The main components of a financial audit include auditing standards, management assertions, and a systematic process to identify important processes and data files.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4
o Advisory services- professional services
offered by public accounting firms to
improve their client organizations’ operational efficiency and • External (Financial) Audits effectiveness. o independent attestation performed by o IT risk management- The advisory an expert the auditor who expresses an services units of public accounting firms opinion regarding the presentation of responsible for providing IT control- financial statements. related client support have different o Attest service- performed by Certified names in different firms, but they all Public Accountants (CPA) who work for engage in tasks known collectively as IT public accounting firms that are risk management. independent of the client organization ▪ they provide non-audit clients being audited with IT advisory services o The Securities and Exchange ▪ Work with their firm’s Commission (SEC) requires all publicly financial audit staff to perform traded companies be subject to a IT-related tests of controls as financial audit annually. part of the attestation o CPAs conducting such audits represent function the interests of outsiders: stockholders, o the purpose of the task, rather than the creditors, government agencies, and task itself, defines the service being the general public. rendered o The CPA’s role is similar in concept to a • Internal Audits judge who collects and evaluates o Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA)- an evidence and renders an opinion. independent appraisal function ▪ A key concept in this process is established within an organization to independence examine and evaluate its activities as a o The external auditor must follow strict service to the organization. rules in conducting financial audits. o An internal audit is typically conducted • Attest Service versus Advisory Services by auditors who work for the o Attest service- an engagement in which organization, but this task may be a practitioner is engaged to issue, or outsourced to other organizations does issue, a written communication o Certified Internal Auditor (CIA) or a that expresses a conclusion about the Certified Information Systems Auditor reliability of a written assertion that is (CISA) the responsibility of another party. o they represent the interests of the o The following requirements apply to organization attestation services: o governed mostly by the Institute of ▪ written assertions and a Internal Auditors (IIA) and, to a lesser practitioner’s written report. degree, by the Information Systems ▪ formal establishment of Audit and Control Association (ISACA). measurement criteria or their • External versus Internal Auditors description in the o respective constituencies presentation. ▪ external auditors represent ▪ The levels of service in outsiders attestation engagements are ▪ internal auditors represent the limited to examination, interests of the organization. review, and application of agreed-upon procedures o internal auditors often cooperate with on Auditing Standards (SASs) as and assist external auditors in authoritative interpretations of GAAS. performing aspects of financial audits. SASs are often referred to as auditing o The independence and competence of standards, or GAAS, although they are the internal audit staff determine the not the ten generally accepted auditing extent to which external auditors may standards. cooperate with and rely on work o Statements on Auditing Standard- performed by internal auditors. authoritative pronouncements because o A truly independent internal audit staff every member of the profession must adds value to the audit process follow their recommendations or be • Fraud Audits able to show why a SAS does not apply o investigate anomalies and gather in a given situation. The burden of evidence of fraud that may lead to justifying departures from the SASs falls criminal conviction. upon the individual auditor. o Sometimes fraud audits are initiated by • Systematic Process corporate management who suspect o Conducting an audit is a systematic and employee fraud. logical process that applies to all forms o boards of directors may hire fraud of information systems.’ auditors to look into their own o systematic approach is particularly executives if theft of assets or financial important in the IT environment. The fraud is suspected. lack of physical procedures that can be o Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) visually verified and evaluated injects a certification, which is governed by the high degree of complexity into the IT Association of Certified Fraud audit (e.g., the audit trail may be purely Examiners (ACFE). electronic, in a digital form, and thus invisible to those attempting to verify FINANCIAL AUDIT COMPONENTS it) • Auditing Standards o a logical framework for conducting an audit in the IT environment is critical to help the auditor identify all- important processes and data files. • Management Assertions and Audit Objectives 1. Existence or Occurrence- all assets and equities contained in the balance sheet exist and that all transactions in the income statement actually occurred. o divided into three classes: general 2. Completeness- no material assets, equities, or qualification standards, field work transactions have been omitted from the standards, and reporting standards financial statements. o GAAS establishes a framework for 3. Rights and Obligations- assets appearing on the prescribing auditor performance, but it balance sheet are owned by the entity and that is not sufficiently detailed to provide the liabilities reported are obligations meaningful guidance in specific 4. Valuation or allocation- assets and equities are circumstances. valued in accordance with GAAP and that o American Institute of Certified Public allocated amounts such as depreciation expense Accountants (AICPA) issues Statements are calculated on a systematic and rational basis. 5. Presentation and Disclosure- assertion alleges that financial statement items are correctly classified (e.g., long-term liabilities will not mature within one year) and that footnote disclosures are adequate to avoid misleading the users of financial statements • Communicating Results o Auditors must communicate the results of their tests to interested users. o Audit opinion- distributed along with the financial report to interested parties both internal and external to the organization. o Audit risk- probability that the auditor will render an unqualified (clean) opinion on financial statements that are, in fact, materially misstated. o Errors are unintentional mistakes. o Irregularities are intentional misrepresentations associated with the commission of a fraud such as the • Obtaining Evidence misappropriation of physical assets or o Auditors seek evidential matter that the deception of financial statement corroborates management assertions. users o In the IT environment, this process • Audit Risk Components involves gathering evidence relating to o Acceptable audit risk (AR) is estimated the reliability of computer controls as based on the ex-ante value of the well as the contents of databases that components of the audit risk model. have been processed by computer These are inherent risk, control risk, programs. and detection risk. o tests of controls- which establish • Inherent Risk whether internal controls are o associated with the unique functioning properly. characteristics of the business or o substantive tests- determine whether industry of the client accounting databases fairly reflect the o Firms in declining industries have organization’s transactions and account greater inherent risk than firms in balances. stable or thriving industries. • Ascertaining Materiality o Industries that have a heavy volume of o The auditor must determine whether cash transactions have a higher level of weaknesses in internal controls and inherent risk than those that do not. misstatements found in transactions o Placing a value on inventory when the and account balances are material. inventory value is difficult to assess due to its nature is associated with higher inherent risk than in situations where inventory values are more objective. o Auditors cannot reduce the level of inherent risk. o Control risk- likelihood that the control structure is flawed because controls are either absent or inadequate to prevent or detect errors in the accounts o Auditors assess the level of control risk by performing tests of internal controls. • Detection Risk o risk that auditors are willing to take that errors not detected or prevented by the control structure will also not be detected by the auditor. o Auditors set an acceptable level of detection risk (planned detection risk) that influences the level of substantive tests that they perform • Audit Risk Model o to determine the scope, nature, and timing of substantive tests (NTE) o AR IR × CR × DR • The Relationship Between Tests of Controls and Substantive Tests o Tests of controls and substantive tests are auditing techniques used for reducing audit risk to an acceptable level. o The stronger the internal control structure, as determined through tests of controls, the lower the control risk and the less substantive testing the auditor must do. o Evidence of weak controls forces the auditor to extend substantive testing to search for misstatements. o the more reliable the internal controls, the lower the CR probability, that leads to a lower DR, which will lead to fewer substantive tests being required o substantive tests are labor intensive and time-consuming, they drive up audit costs and exacerbate the disruptive effects of an audit