European Journal of Education Studies: Hanna Onyi Yusuf, Uduak Idoghor
European Journal of Education Studies: Hanna Onyi Yusuf, Uduak Idoghor
Abstract:
This study investigated the effect of teaching critical thinking skills on reading
Comprehension of students in selected Junior Secondary Schools in Kaduna, Nigeria. The
schools randomly selected were Government Secondary School Kakuri (Experimental
group) and Government Secondary School Kurmi Mashi (control group). Both groups
were given a pre-test prior to teaching and a post-test after six weeks of teaching. Both
groups were assessed after six weeks of learning. The findings revealed significant
difference in the performance of students taught reading comprehension using critical
thinking questions. Based on the findings, teachers are encouraged to use critical thinking
questions to motivate and engage their students in purposeful and thought-provoking
discussion that will inspire them to think critically and creatively.
1. Introduction
In today’s complex society, reading is a critical skill for children’s success both in and out
of school. In the school setting, children are expected to read textbooks. Assignments are
given to them on the assumption that they can obtain information from the printed page
independently. Outside of school children still need good reading ability to cope with the
challenges of their everyday living. Despite all efforts of teaching English as a second
language in Nigeria, students suffer from difficulties in language learning skills. The
problem appears to be in the educational system, that teachers traditionally, do their best
to teach ‘what to think’ rather than ‘how to think effectively about the subject matter
which is termed as critical thinking.
The issue of incorporating critical thinking skills in education has raised
contradictory ideas about whether critical thinking can be taught or not. A variety of
approaches to teaching, measuring and assessing critical thinking skills and abilities have
been developed. In addition, teaching critical thinking skills has raised many issues such
as culture, emotion, transferability and generalization of the taught skills which are
discussed and answered by the experts. Despite all contradictory ideas and beliefs on
teaching critical thinking skills, however, everyone agrees that thinking critically is the
major goal of education (Reed, 1998, Kamali & Fahim, 2011, Mansor & Pantea, 2012).
Bearing in mind that Nigerian students are not educated as critical thinkers in their
first language, providing them with an appropriate context to foster critical thinking
dispositions in second language setting is of crucial importance. This study provides the
experts in the field of language teaching with empirical data on the relationship between
critical thinking skills and learners’ performance in reading comprehension. It yields a
realm of study for researchers who are interested in critical thinking and its relationship
with reading comprehension.
Most studies (Paul, 2004, Oyetunde, 2009 and Yusuf, 2011) in reading
comprehension so far conducted in Nigeria have concentrated on examining reading
difficulty of students at the primary and junior secondary levels with focus on the texts
being used. However, there are no empirical researchers on critical thinking and its effect
on reading comprehension carried out in Kaduna, Northern Nigeria as far as this
researcher is aware of. Literature search reveals that critical thinking skills have received
little or no attention in Nigeria (Abe, 1983, Oyetunde, 2009, Umolu, 1989, cited in Yusuf,
2010). The absence of such crucial information constitutes a problem that has motivated
the present study. There is, therefore, the need to ascertain the extent to which critical
thinking influence reading comprehension. To this end, this study will focus on the effect
of teaching critical thinking skills on students’ reading comprehension in junior
secondary schools.
The objective of the study is to determine the effect of teaching critical thinking skills on
students reading comprehension in junior secondary schools in Kaduna, Nigeria.
2.2 Hypothesis
Critical thinking skill has no significant effect on students’ reading comprehension in
Junior Secondary schools in Kaduna, Nigeria.
3. Literature Review
Language experts have difficulty putting forward a precise and rigorous definition of
critical thinking. Halvorsen (2005) and Pierce (2005) state that “critical thinking” is in a
mystified concept. No single definition of critical thinking is widely accepted. Fakuda
(2003) also asserts that there is no consensus on a definition of critical thinking in
psychology, education or philosophy, and indeed the definition of critical thinking has
been changing.
Reed (1998) proposed two central components of conceptualisation of critical
thinking that were particularly prominent in educational contexts. The first one is ‘the
ability to assess reasons properly which is referred to as the “reason assessment
components”. The second one is disposition to base one’s actions and beliefs on reasons; that is, to
do reason assessment and be guided by the results of such assessment” (p.23). Reed asserts that
“both components are essential to the proper conceptualization of critical thinking, possession of
which is essential for the achievement of critical thinking by a person” (1998:23). The ultimate
objective for teaching critical thinking is to help students make correct judgements based
on the careful weighing of available evidence. However, critical thinking is a very
intricate endeavour. Paul (2004) states that such an enterprise requires students to learn
several subtasks which include, among others:
• developing a sceptical approach to problem solving and decision making;
• breaking down problems into their simplest outcomes;
• searching for evidence that both supports and refutes a given conclusions;
• maintaining a vigilant attitude towards their personal bias, assumptions, and
values that may interfere with making an objective decision.
According to Reed (1998), the broad concept of critical thinking has brought about
different definitions and terminologies. This lack of consensus on the definition of critical
thinking has rested in the grounding of various theories and models in two distinct
disciplines, psychology and philosophy. Philosophers focus mostly on the nature and
products of critical thinking, while psychologists concentrate mostly on the process of
cognition, and seeking the conclusion in empirical research. On the other hand, some
educators (Kuhn, 1992; Kurfiss, 1998; Marzona et al., 1988; Quellmalz, 1987; Weinstein,
1995, cited in Reed, 1998) have drawn on both psychology and philosophy to develop a
rigorous theory of critical thinking for teaching.
Halvorsen (2005) also adds that critical thinking is not an easy concept to define,
as it can mean quite different things to different people in different contexts and cultures.
Nevertheless, instructors can incorporate some of its key elements in their classrooms.
He defines critical thinking as: “to think critically about an issue, to consider that issue from
various perspectives, to look at and challenge any possible assumptions that may underlie the issue
and to explore its possible alternative.” (p.16) Supporting the necessity of teaching critical
thinking skills in ESL contexts, Kabilan (2000) says the idea that language learners can be
proficient by mastering the mechanisms of language was overshadowed by
communicative approach in 1950s, emphasizing that learners become proficient by using
the language not learning about language. Today it is strongly believed that using
language and knowing the meaning alone do not lead learners to proficiency. They need
to display creative and critical thinking abilities in the language of expression of ideas.
However, critical thinking skills should not be taught separately but incorporated in the
curriculum.
Paul (2004) stresses the connection between critical thinking and reading
comprehension by stating that the reflective mind improves its thinking by reflectively
thinking. Likewise, it improves its reading by reflectively thinking and reading to
comprehend. His quotation follows “improvement in one is paralleled by improvement in the
other.”
Viewing reading comprehension as a vital part of second language curriculum,
Barnett (1989) describes several reasons for its importance: It remains an important goal
in many programmes; it can be maintained after students complete formal language
study; and it fosters the development of literacy skills. Some of the mental skills
employed in reading comprehension, as Grabe (1991) states, are inference, analysis,
synthesis, and evaluation which are what experts include “as being at the very core of critical
thinking” (Facione, 1992, Olaofe, 1990, 2007).
3.3 Instrumentation
The instruments used for the study were reading comprehension passages from which
test items were drawn on critical thinking skills. Six passages were carefully selected from
the Junior English Project for Junior Secondary Schools Book 3 text in use in the schools. The
passages were selected because of its interesting nature, relevant subject matter and
interest to both genders. The content of the passage was educative and informative and
adequately provided some of the needed items for the tests.
3.5 Treatment
Step 1: Teacher encourages students to engage their minds in the reading task by
setting the purpose for reading. She encourages students to participate actively by
engaging in frequent student talk.
Step 2: Teacher sets the tone before reading the passage by asking some critical
thinking questions about the title of the passage such as: What does the title of this
passage suggests? Why do you think so? Does the title of this passage suggest what the
passage is all about?
Step 3: Teacher motivates students to use their imagination to provide additional
information to the text even when such information is not explicitly stated in the text.
Step 4: Teacher informs students that they need to constantly engage their
imaginative minds in reading in order to be able to provide such information about a text
even though such information is not explicitly stated in the text. The following Critical
thinking questions were asked, such as: why do you think the author concluded the
passage the way he did? What made the author to write on this issue? How do you think
the author’s views will help to improve the current situation?
Step 5: Teacher reads the passage and stops frequently to share some critical
thinking questions with the students such as, what picture of the character in the passage
has the author successfully painted? What is the writer’s point of view? What does the
writer imply in the first paragraph?
Step 6: Teacher extends understanding by prompting students to think critically
through shared, guided or independent reading.
Step 7: Teacher asks students to read one paragraph after the other and state the
gist of the paragraph in one sentence. This entails students sifting the essentials from the
many details. Critical thinking was involved in constructing a sentence on their own in
their own words to capture the author’s thought in each paragraph.
Step 8: Teacher asks students to suggest an alternative title for the passage and to
provide reasons for their answer.
Table 2 displays the homogeneity of the two groups in terms of critical ability pre-test.
The means scores for the two groups as shown in Table 2 are 96.10 and 97.83. The
homogeneity variances, 13.087 and 13.483 indicate the homogeneity of the groups.
Tables 3 and 4 respectively display the significant difference between experimental and
control group in reading comprehension.
As displayed in Table 3, the mean scores of experimental and control groups are
respectively 21.67 and 19.23. It can be concluded that teaching critical thinking skills has
a significant effect on improving students reading comprehension.
Table 4 displays the descriptive statistic for the two groups on the Critical Thinking Test.
The mean scores for the experimental and control groups are 98.50 and 96.37 respectively.
4. Discussion of Findings
To support the result in terms of the research question that proves the impact of teaching
critical thinking skills on reading comprehension, it is necessary to state the views of
some cognitive experts regarding these two variables. Some of the mental skills employed
in reading comprehension, as Grabe (1991), states are inference, synthesis, analysis, and
evaluation which are what experts include as being at the very core of critical thinking.
In this regard, taking the definition of reading comprehension by Durkin’s (1993),
“intentional thinking during which meaning is constructed through interactions between text and
reader”. This construction of meaning during reading is “a complex merger of skills, prior
knowledge and text mediated by the language skills, motivation and interest of the reader”. This
covers the full spectrum of Bloom’s taxonomy in critical thinking including knowing
facts, understanding concepts, application, analysis, synthesis, and reading
comprehension. As it can be seen critical thinking and comprehension are both cognitive
abilities having cognitive skill in common. This means improving the first (i.e critical
reading) can contribute to the improvement of the other (i.e reading comprehension).
The statistical analysis in comparing the mean scores of the experimental and
control groups on the critical thinking post-test, however, did not indicate a significant
difference between the two groups. This lack of significant difference led the researcher
to examine the difference between the mean scores in pre/post tests of the experimental
and control groups. As tables 2 and 4 in the above section shows the experimental and
control groups’ mean scores on the pre-test of critical thinking were respectively 96.10
and 98.73, while these mean scores on the post-test (Table 4) were respectively 98.50 and
96.37. This amount of increase in the mean scores of experimental group in the post-test
(96.10 to 98.50) indicates the trend in the improvement of students’ critical thinking after
the treatment period. It can be concluded that experimental group made small gains as
compared to control group. However, the lack of significant difference can be justified
from different aspects, such as the researchers’ assumption, the limited time and few
number of lessons conducted which were inevitable, the trend of improvement in
students’ critical thinking ability and the significant improvement in their reading
comprehension, possibly a longer time can bring about better results. The studies done
by (Brembeck, 1947; Jackson, 1961; and Colbert, 1986) in this line were all over 6 months,
mostly with significant difference in gains. Although the current study failed to achieve
significance, the small gains seem to be suggestive of a relationship between the two
variables to motivate a further research.
5. Conclusion
According to the results of the statistical analysis, students who participated in the
treatment obtained significantly higher scores on reading comprehension post-test as
compared to control group. Considering that students in this study did not receive any
instruction on reading comprehension strategies, it can be concluded that using critical
thinking skills can help them improve comprehension as a general cognitive skill, and
process information at a deeper level.
References
Barnett, M. (1989). More than Meets the Eye: Foreign Language Reading. Language in
Education: Theory and practice, no 73. CAL/ERIC Series on Language and
Linguistics. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Brembeck, W. (1947). The Effect of a Course in Argumentation on Critical thinking
Ability, PhD. Dissertation. University of Wisconsin.
Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. (3rc ed.). MA:
Heinle & Heinle.
Colbert, K. (1986). The effect of CDEA and NDT Debate Training on Critical Thinking
Ability. PhD Dissertation, Florida State University.
Davidson, B. (1995). Critical Thinking Education Faces the Challenge of Japan. Retrieved
September 14, 2008 from
http://www.chss.montclair.edu/inquiry/spr95/davidson.html.
Djuranovic, M. (2003). The Ultimate Lincoln-Douglas Debate Handbook. Retrieved Sep
16, 2008 from www.iddebate.net/thirddedition.pdf.
Dorn, L. J., & Soffos, C. (2005). Teaching for Deep Comprehension: A reading workshop
approach. Portland, Maine, Stenhouse Publishers. Retrieved Sep 14, 2008 from
www.stenhouse.com.