0% found this document useful (0 votes)
177 views60 pages

Lecture 1 Fire Detection System

The document discusses fire detection systems including different types of automatic fire detectors and their operating principles. It covers heat, smoke, flame and gas detectors. It also discusses components of fire detection systems and factors to consider in system design such as smoke production and compartment characteristics.

Uploaded by

Miu For Leung
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
177 views60 pages

Lecture 1 Fire Detection System

The document discusses fire detection systems including different types of automatic fire detectors and their operating principles. It covers heat, smoke, flame and gas detectors. It also discusses components of fire detection systems and factors to consider in system design such as smoke production and compartment characteristics.

Uploaded by

Miu For Leung
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 60

BSE532 Fire Engineering Systems

MSc Lecture 1:
Fire Detection Systems

Dr. Gigi C.H. LUI


Department of Building Environment and Energy Engineering
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Hong Kong, China
MScFES2022-01-FD.ppt 1
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Different signatures
3. Types of automatic fire detectors
4. Components of fire detection system
5. Detection of fire and activation of fire protection
system
6. References

2
1. Introduction
 Goals of detection system
Life safety
Property protection
Business protection
Environmental concerns

3
 Functions of detection system
Identifying a developing fire
Alerting building occupants
Actuating fire suppression systems
Alerting organized assistance
Supervising processes

4
 Specification of detection system
Code of practice for Minimum Fire Service
Installations and Equipment by Fire Services
Department (FSD)/ FSD Circular Letters
British Standard 5839: Part 1 or other standards
Direct telephone link (DTL) provided to the Fire
Services Communication Centre (FSCC)
Requirements of detection heads
Monitoring of system in building operation

5
2. Different signatures
 Fire signatures
Fire product that changes ambient conditions
Necessary criteria for detection purpose:
 measurable

 high signal to noise level


 during the earliest period of fire development

6
 Aerosol signatures
solid and liquid particles
size in 5 x 10-4 to 10 micrometers
< 0.3 micrometers
 do not scatter light efficiently
 considered invisible

> 0.3 micrometers


 usually called ‘smoke’

7
Invisible aerosol
 earliest appearing
 size in 5 x 10-4 to 0.3 micrometers

 in huge quantities

 temperature below ignition temperature

8
Visible aerosol
 heating to ignition temperature
 concentration of invisible aerosol
increases
 larger particles forms by coagulation

 0.3 to 10 micrometer

9

 m (e.g. Volatiles from Burning Wood Soot)
Smoke
Visible DUST GRIT

Smoke Powder
0.3 m 76 m 10  m
Pre-ignition
Particles
(e.g. CH 4 , CO)

 
10 m 10-3 m 10 m 0.1 m 1 m 10 m Diameter

Detection methods:

Detection by: Ionization Detector


Operating Range
1. Particle counting

2. Modified light scatter


detector

3. CO detector

4. Semi-conductor detector
(Flammable gas detector)
Ionization Obscuration
Detector Detector Sensitive,
Sensitive Light Scatter
(Turbulent Detector Sensitive
atmosphere) (Quiescent atmosphere)
9
 Energy release signatures
Infrared (IR) signature
 IR from hydrocarbon at 4.4 micrometer
(CO2) and 2.7 micrometer (H2O)
 high signal-to-noise ratio

 possible false signals from human


generated sources
Flame flickering signature at 1.5 to
15 Hz

11
Ultraviolet (UV) signature
 emissions from OH, CO2 and CO
 0.27 to 0.29 micrometer

 lower signal-to-noise ratio than IR

12
Electromagnetic wave spectrum

13
Convection
Causes increase in air temperature
Time required (less than 1 minute
to days)
Not an effective signature for life
protection

14
 Gas signatures
gas generated not normally present in the
atmosphere
 “evolved gas signatures”

 e.g. H2O, CO, CO2, HCl, HF, H2S, NH3

 very much fuel-specific, except CO

CO generated may vary


reduction of oxygen content
detection of slow burning and smouldering
fires
15
Fire stages

16
17
18
3. Types of automatic fire detectors
 Heat Detectors
 Smoke Detectors
 Flame Detectors
 Gas Detectors
 Special purpose

19
Heat detectors
 Oldest type, started with sprinklers in the
1860’s
 least $ and lowest false alarm rate
 slowest in detecting hostile fire
 best
at detecting high energy output fire
suited for confined space with rapidly
building high-heat output fires
convected thermal energy

20
 Fixed temperature
eutectic metal type
glass bulb type
continuous line type
bimetal type
snap disc
 Rate of temperature rise
pneumatic line type
pneumatic air chamber
thermo-electric
 Combination heat detectors
21
Line type fire detection cable using a
glass semiconductor

Fire Detection System 22


Rate of rise’ thermal fire detector with
two bimetal strips

23
Rate compensation type heat detector

24
Fusible-element- type

25
Rate-of-rise heat detectors

26
Combination type of heat detectors

27
Electronic spot-type

28
Smoke detectors
 Operating principles
Ionization
 fastresponse to flaming fires
 detects invisible and visible smoke
particulates
Photoelectric
 fastresponse on smoldering fires
 detects visible smoke particulates

29
Smoke detectors
(Ionisation detectors)

30
Smoke detectors (Photoelectric detectors –
Light obscuration detectors

Light scattering detectors

31
Smoke detector installation
 High money value areas
 Areas where life safety is primary
 Return air ducts of heating, ventilation
and air-conditioning HVAC systems in
large buildings
 Automatically activates smoke doors

32
Smoke detection system design calculation
 Information concerning
the expected fuel,
fire growth,
sensor and
compartment characteristics is required
 Smoke production and characteristics
Fuel characteristics
 Material

 Mode of combustion

33
Common equations found in modeling smoke detector response

Intensity of a light beam


Percent obscuration O:  I  In the presence of smoke
O  1001  
 Io 
Initial intensity of a
light beam reaching
a photocell
Percent obscuration  1

  I  
per unit distance Ou: Ou  1001     Distance between the source
  Io   and the photocell
 
Optical density D: Optical density per unit distance Du (m-1):

 Io   I  D 1 I  1  I 
D  log10     log10   Du   log10  o    log10  
 I   Io     I    Io 

34
To estimate the response of smoke detector, need to estimate the optical density

Volume of the smoke test chamber


mass optical density

DVC
Dm  mass loss of the sample

M
(accurate measurement needed)

optical density per meter


Depends on size distribution and
K extinction coefficient optical density of smoke
D 
2.3 2.3
extinction coefficient per unit mass  mass conc. of aerosol

2.3

35
Type (Sample) Maximum Ds Dm (mass optical Combustion Sample thickness
(specific optical density) (m2/g) conditions (cm)
density) Computed by
Quintiere
plywood 5.3 x 102 0.29 pyrolysis 0.6

polyvinylchloride 1.8 x 102 0.12 pyrolysis 0.6

polyvinylchloride 3.5 x 102 0.64 pyrolysis 0.6


(with plasticizer)
Polyurethane (MO1) - 0.22 Flaming -
( a mattress)

Extracted from SFPE Handbook section 2 chapter 15 (Specific optical density and mass optical
Density of wood and Plastic)

36
The design objective is to detect the smoke from a flaming 200g
polyurethane pillow in less than 2 min. The pillow is located in a
36 m2 room with a ceiling height of 2.5 m. Assume that the pillow
is burning at a steady rate of 50 g/min.
Can the design objective be achieved ?

DVC Dm M 2 min x 50 g/min = mass loss of the sample


Dm  D
M VC
36 m2 x 2.5 m = volume of the room

From table = 0.22 m2/g


Optical density=0.244 m-1

From UL the upper sensitivity limit if 0.14 m-1 (black smoke)


It can be assumed that the detector will respond within 2 min
Assumed : smoke is confined to the room, well mixed, can reach ceiling level, can enter
the detector.

37
– Stratification
 Detection of low energy fires
 Very high ceiling
 Temperature within plume = that of the surrounding air
– Insufficient thermal energy
– Stratification effects can be calculated using

38
Stratification and detection

Temperature profile of hot air layer under atrium ceiling


Klote J, Milke J, Principles of smoke management, ASHRAE, SFPE, 2002

39
Arrangements of beam smoke detectors
Klote J, Milke J, Principles of smoke management, ASHRAE, SFPE, 2002

40
Arrangements of beam smoke detectors

Klote J, Milke J, Principles of smoke management, ASHRAE, SFPE, 2002

41
Arrangements of beam smoke detectors
Klote J, Milke J, Principles of smoke management, ASHRAE, SFPE, 2002

42
Flame detectors
 Optically sense UV or IR radiation
 ‘line or sight’ devices: must ‘see’ the fire
 Extremely reliable in hostile environment
 Very expensive and labor intensive to
maintain

43
 infrared flame detectors
 filter and lens filters out unwanted
wavelengths
 photovoltaic cell
 in combination with flame flicker in the
frequency range of 5-30 Hz
 sensitive to most hydrocarbon fires

44
 ultraviolet flame detectors
 insensitive to sunlight and artificial light
 sensitive to most fires
 arc welding, X-rays, lightning
 UV absorbing gases may affect the
sensitivity
 combined IR/UV detectors

45
46
47
Supervised areas
of equal sensitivity

Ref: Bryan, Fire Suppression and detection systems


48
Cloud chamber smoke detection
 air sampling type detectors
 cloud chamber smoke detection principle
 continuous air-sampling smoke detection
 detector responds when density of particulate
matter exceeds pre-determined level
 can sample multiple areas
 control and knowledge of background
levels of particulate matter critical

49
Gas sensing type fire detectors
 Slower than smoke detection
 Faster than heat detection
 Semiconductor principle
 oxidizing gases or reducing gases generate
electrical charges in the semi-conductor
 Catalytic element principle
 catalyst accelerates oxidation resulting in a
rise in temperature of the catalyst

50
51
Other detection devices
 Manual pull stations
 Suppression system actuators
 water flow indicators
 system trip
 Supervisory devices
 valve position
 suppression system tank
 level, pressure etc.

52
4. Components of
fire detection system
 Fire Alarm Initiating Devices
 Fire Alarm Notification Devices
 Fire Alarm Control Panel (FACP)
 Backup Power Supply
 Remote Control & Display Panels
 Sprinkler Systems

53
 System control unit
 Main power supply
 Secondary power supply
 Basic Components:
initiating devices
alarm notification devices
remote signal notification

54
5. Detection of fire and activation
of fire protection systems

55
Stage A
 Determination of objectives
 Required time to response
 Location and extent of detection
 Type of detection
 Siting and spacing
 Calculated time to response

56
Stage B
 Fire Control and Warning Systems
B.1: Determine type and extent of local and remote
fire warning systems and the likely response times
of persons within the premises and fire fighting
personnel
B.2: Fire suppression systems
B.3: Fire barrier systems
B.4: Smoke control systems

Stage C
 Review

57
(from PD 7974-4)

58
6. References
 BRE information paper, IP13/92, Building Research
Establishment, June (1992)
 Bryan J., Fire Suppression and detection systems, 3rd
edition, Prentice Hall (1993)
 Fong, N.K., MSc Lecture on Fire Detection Systems
(2017)
 Okayama, Y., A primitive study of a fire detection
method controlled by artificial neural net, Fire Safety
Journal, Vol. 17, p.409-432 (1991)
 PD7974-4:2003 Application of fire safety engineering
principles to the design of buildings – Part 4:
Detection of fire and activation of fire protection
systems (Sub-system 4)
59
 Pfisher, G., Multisensor fire detection: a new trend
rapidly becomes state of the art, Fire Technology, vol.
33, p.115-139 (1997)
 Tuillard, M., New methods for reducing the number
of false alarms in fire detection systems, Fire
Technology, second quarter, p.250-268 (1994)

60

You might also like