Technical Update 2022-01 (Part L 2021)
Technical Update 2022-01 (Part L 2021)
2022-01
Summary of changes
A major difference between AD L 2021 and previous versions is that transitional arrangements will now only
apply to individual buildings as opposed to a whole site.
For transitional arrangements to apply, developers will need to both:
a) submit a building / initial notice or have deposited plans by 15 June 2022; and
b) commence work on each individual building by 15 June 2023.
Where notices or plans are submitted after 15 June 2022, all homes must be built in line with the new AD L
standards.
Where notices or plans are submitted before 15 June 2022 but work on any individual building does not
commence by 15 June 2023, the relevant buildings must build in line with the new AD L standards.
For the purposes of transition, commencement is not changed from the previous 2013 definitions being:
Excavation for strip, trench or pad footings.
Digging out and preparation of ground for raft foundations.
Vibrofloatation (stone columns) piling, boring for piles or pile driving.
Drainage work specific to the building(s) concerned.
Although gas boilers will still be permitted under the interim changes, heating systems will be required to be
future proofed for heat pumps with wet heating systems designed for flow temperatures of 55°C. In addition,
with targets based on the use of photovoltaics (PV) it is likely that some degree of PV will be required in
design solutions.
The design versus as built gap is also being addressed with requirements for provision of photographic
evidence and air pressure testing for every plot. Site checklists will be required to be completed and
submitted to ensure work is in accordance with specifications and critical junctions satisfy thermal bridging
values.
In anticipation of the new requirements and to aid user of H+H products, H+H UK Limited have drawn
junction details in CAD or PDF format, compatible calculated thermal bridging values and site checklists,
which are available for free download from our website. Use of H+H aircrete will continue to provide cost
effective wall solutions by enabling the thinnest possible masonry constructions to be used.
Laid out as two documents, Approved Document L 2021 is split into dwellings (AD L1) and buildings other
than dwellings (AD L2), with each part covering requirements for new constructions as well as work within
existing buildings.
Table 1: Summary of reference values for notional dwelling and backstop values
Table 1 gives a summary of the fabric requirements only, the full set of reference values in Appendix A
also shows the reference requirements for ventilation, space and water heating systems, low energy
lighting and PVs. Although the reference U-values appear fairly similar to AD L 2013, a major change is
the inclusion of photovoltaic (PV) cells for the notional dwelling. This accounts for a substantial part of
the 31% reduction making it difficult to eliminate the need for some PV.
Thermal Bridging
The building fabric has to be constructed so that there are no reasonably avoidable thermal bridges in the
insulation layers caused by gaps within the various elements, at the joints between elements and at the
edges of elements such as those around window and door openings. The Approved Document specifically
mentions that blockwork with higher thermal performance, such as H+H aircrete, should be used in the inner
leaf of a cavity wall or both leaves of a party wall to help reduce thermal bridging.
To limit thermal bridging and to help tackle the design versus as-built performance gap, the Approved
Document requires that drawings should be provided for junctions, an on-site audit should be undertaken to
confirm the designed details have been constructed prior to elements being concealed over and that
photographs of the details should be taken.
H+H Calculated Ψ-values
Additional heat losses due to thermal bridging (HTB) at junctions are considered within the SAP calculations
and are obtained by multiplying the linear thermal transmittance (ψ-value) of a junction by the total length.
Where thermal bridge details are not known, a y-value of 0.05W/m²K is applied to the total exposed area of
the notional dwelling to obtain the targets, however, for the actual dwelling the y-value is fixed at 0.20W/m²K.
This is a very onerous value which makes it impractical to ignore thermal bridging as the dwelling will
invariably fail to meet the TFEE. It is important, therefore that, HTB is determined using calculated Ψ-values.
In order to provide the most up to date and accurate data where our blocks are being used, H+H have
developed a comprehensive set of around 2,700 individual Ψ-values specifically covering our Solar
(2.9N/mm²), Standard (3.6N/mm²), High Strength (7.3 N/mm²) and Super Strength (8.7N/mm²) blocks.
Variations cover their use in partial or full fill in cavity walls, in beam and block floors, separating walls or as
Foundation blocks below DPC.
The calculations, which are free to download from our website hhcelcon.co.uk/psi-values, conform to both
BR497 (2016) and IP 1/06 and may be used by energy assessors in their SAP calculations to take full
advantage of the inherent benefits of H+H aircrete blocks for all parts of the building fabric. To provide
maximum flexibility, whilst covering the most common forms of constructions, varying levels of insulation in
the form of combinations of three different thicknesses and three different conductivities are considered.
These represent typical wall U-values ranging from around 0.13 - 0.30W/m²K.
Using H+H Calculated Ψ-values will result in a typical y-value of around 0.03W/m²K compared to a figure of
around 0.05W/m²K derived from the reference values used when setting the targets. Both of these figures
rely on a high performance at the lintels, which will typically require independent inner and outer leaf cavity
lintels or a lintel incorporating a thermal break.
Standard Detail Drawings
As mentioned previously, the Approved Document also states that drawings should be provided for
junctions. To allow proper coordination from initial Design, through SAP assessment to Construction phase,
all junctions covered by the H+H Calculated Ψ-values document are consistent with, and referenced to,
drawn H+H Construction Details which are available to download free of charge, in CAD or PDF format, from
our website. When adopted at design stage, the designer can have confidence that the details used conform
to best thermal practice.
Site Checklists
In addition, to aid the on-site audit requirement of the Approved Document, Site Checklists are also provided
for each wall type to enable feedback to the energy assessor to help ensure that the final EPC reflects the as
built conditions. These have been developed for ease of use by Site in order to encourage their use and
improve quality control procedures. Each form is dedicated to the variations applicable to the specific wall
type and may be completed electronically or as hard copies and returned to the energy assessor. The PDF
format forms have been designed such that they can be filled in electronically by typing directly into the
relevant boxes or selecting predetermined options, either on a PC or a handheld smart device.
BREL Reporting
All of the above will need to be reported by means of a standardised BREL (Building Regulations England
Part L) report, which will be produced by approved SAP software. As with 2013 requirements, two versions
will be required,
a) the first, design stage BREL report, is required to be submitted before commencement of works and
will include
i. The Target and Dwelling Primary Energy Rate
ii. The Target and Dwelling Emission Rate
iii. A supporting list of specifications
b) The second, as built BREL report, will include
i. The Target and as-built Dwelling Primary Energy Rate
ii. The Target and as-built Dwelling Emission Rate
iii. A supporting list of specifications and any changes to the list of specifications provided at the
design stage
The as-built BREL will need to be signed by the energy assessor to confirm that the as-built calculations are
accurate and that supporting documentary and photographic evidence have been reviewed, and in addition,
signed by the developer to confirm that the dwelling has been built according to the specifications given in
the report.
Alternative approaches are available for extensions in order to give some flexibility to the designer where, for
example, larger window areas than those permitted in the table are desired. In this case additional heat loss
through some parts of the fabric would need to be compensated by reduced heat loss elsewhere.
Under the area weighted U-value approach, it should be shown that the area weighted U-value of all the
elements in an extension is no greater than that of an extension of the same size and shape which complies
with the Table. In this case the area weighted U-value would be given by the expression:
U1 x A1 + U2 x A2 + U3 x A3 + …
A1 + A2 + A3 + …
Where:
U1 = the U-value of element type 1, etc
A1 = the area of element type 1, etc
An additional alternative approach for extensions is to use SAP to demonstrate that the DPER, DER and
DFEE of the combined dwelling and proposed extension is not greater than the dwelling plus notional
extension (as defined by Table 2 limits).
Retained elements whose existing U-value is worse than the threshold value in column (a), should be
upgraded to achieve the U-values in column (b).
Table 3: Limiting U-values for retained fabric elements in existing dwellings
Generally, an existing thermal element, once upgraded should not be worse than column (b), however, it
may be possible retain a lesser standard if it can be shown that upgrading is not technically or functionally
feasible or that it would not achieve a simple payback of 15 years or less.
Renovation of a thermal element is defined as one of the following:
a) Providing a new layer through cladding or rendering the external surface
b) Providing a new layer through dry lining the internal surface
c) Replacing an existing layer through stripping down the element to expose basic structural
components (e.g. bricks, blocks, rafters, joists, frame etc.) and then rebuilding
d) Providing cavity wall insulation
The whole of the thermal element would require to be upgraded where more than 50% of the surface
area of the individual thermal element is to be renovated, or the work constitutes a major renovation (ie
more than 25% of the external envelope of the building).
long as the TER and TPER is not exceeded and the guidance from the other parts of the Approved
Document are followed.
Table 4: Summary of reference values for notional dwelling and backstop values
Generally, an existing thermal element, once upgraded should not be worse than column (b), however, it
may be possible retain a lesser standard if it can be shown that upgrading is not technically or functionally
feasible or that it would not achieve a simple payback of 15 years or less.
Thermal Bridging
As with AD L1, the use of calculated Ψ-values are encouraged with heavy penalties for calculating the BPER
and BER where thermal bridging has not been considered.
Appendix A
Approved Document L1 Solutions
As mentioned, one means of achieving compliance would be to adopt the parameters in the notional dwelling
for the actual dwelling, these are summarised in Table A1 below. However, the guidance is not prescriptive,
and the actual dwelling specifications can be based on any other solution, as long as the TER, TPER and
TFEE are not exceeded and the guidance from the other parts of the Approved Document are followed.
Table A1: Summary of reference values for notional dwelling
Element or System Reference Values
Opening areas (windows, doors and
Same as actual dwelling, up to a maximum of 25% of total floor area
roof lights)
kWp = 40% of floor area of lowest storey / 6.5 ( x number of storeys for flats)
PV System
System facing SE/SW, 45° pitch
There will be a range of wall U-values that can be used to achieve compliance, depending on other
parameters. Examples of typical wall constructions giving U-values ranging from 0.22 to 0.15W/m²K are
given in Table A2 below. Please contact our Technical Services Department where other specific U-values
are required or where the construction is not shown.
Whilst there are a number of solutions to achieve the reference wall value of 0.18W/m²K, with cavity
widths ranging from 100mm to 150mm depending on the insulation used, it is worth noting that, as
mentioned previously in the thermal bridging section, once the use of H+H aircrete is adopted,
additional benefits to heat loss can be realised.
As an example, Table A3 below shows results for a typical 2 storey semi-detached house with a floor
area of around 80m². It can be seen from Column B that using H+H aircrete with specifications to
match the reference U-values will result in significant improvements over the targets due to the
inherent benefits to linear thermal bridging. Column C shows that this could permit standard cavity
lintels to be used as an alternative to independent or thermal break lintels, or, as in Column D, to
reduce cavity widths.
It should be noted that the results in Table A3 are expressed with reference to the impact on external
fabric only in order to demonstrate the magnitude of its significance in a simplistic manner, however,
within limits, the benefits of reduction in heat loss can be applied to any aspect of the design to derive
the most efficient solution.
Wastewater heat 1 shower connected 1 shower connected 1 shower connected 1 shower connected
recovery to WWHR to WWHR to WWHR to WWHR
TER = 11.54 DER = 11.09 (- 3.9%) DER = 11.38 PASS DER = 11.39 PASS
Results TFEE = 38.70 DFEE = 36.90 (- 4.6%) DFEE = 38.20 PASS DFEE = 38.30 PASS
TPER = 45.22 DPER = 42.71 (- 5.5%) DPER = 44.27 PASS DPER = 44.34 PASS
Notes 1
Lintel ψ-value given in 2
H+H Calculated lintel 3
H+H Calculated lintel 4
H+H Calculated lintel
SAP Appendix R is ψ-value based on ψ-value based on ψ-value based on
0.05, which will independent inner standard insulated independent inner and
typically require and outer leaf cavity open back lintel outer leaf cavity
independent inner and lintels, comfortable (max 3mm steel) lintels. Cavity width
outer leaf cavity lintels pass on all three reduced
or a lintel metrics
incorporating a
thermal break
The results above have been produced for illustrative purposes, using beta version software for
SAP10.2 available at the time of issue, and are based on a typical semi-detached dwelling. The
results and impacts of different aspects of the specification will vary for actual dwellings and should
be assessed accordingly by a qualified energy assessor.