Expressing Opinion
Expressing Opinion
Abdala Assumane
Ivo Julião
Marlene Bulacha
English Work
Language used for giving Opinion and for Agreeing and Disagreeing
Universidade Rovuma
Nampula
2023
Almirante Gilberto José
Abdala Assumane
Ivo Julião
Marlene Bulacha
Work of English
Universidade Rovuma
Nampula
2023
Content page
Introduction.......................................................................................................................4
2.4. Disagreeing:..........................................................................................................12
Conclusion.......................................................................................................................14
References.......................................................................................................................15
4
Introduction
Being able to converse and interact in the target language is the key aim of many
language learners. In the wake of the communicative turn in language teaching, oral
proficiency has become prominent in the classroom, which increasingly is expected to
be an ‘oral space’. Opinion is including the words of opinion and argument/reason. In
expressing dialogue have two situations; formal and informal. Asking for and
expressing opinions is something we frequently do in every day English. An opinion is
simply how you feel or think about a certain issue. It’s usually a personal viewpoint
based on your experiences. An agreement is made when two parties agree to something.
So, for example, a mother might make an agreement with her son not to kiss him in
public because, after kindergarten, well, that's just not cool. If people's opinions are in
accord, or match one another, then they are in agreement.
5
According to Leech (1983), “an opinion is a person’s belief, feeling, or judgment about
something. It is a subjective or value judgment, and it cannot be proven”. A writer may
use factual statements to support his or her opinions. Opinion statements may occur
even in what seems to be strictly factual material. A reader should look for words that
are clues to statements of opinion.
Words such as perhaps, sometimes, probably, often indicate the possibility of opinions.
Being asked to express your opinion shouldn’t be scary, because we express opinions all
the time.
1.1. Expression used to express opinion
According to Swan (2005) “there are a lot ways to express opinion, no matter when is in
formal setting or informal setting”. However formal expressions are used in a situation
where you are talking in a formal situation, such as in the office or school between the
teacher and students. Informal expression is used in a situation where you are talking
between friends or close friends. The expressions usually respond to something that you
discuss in an informal situation. There are so many ways to express an opinion in
English and it’s important that you use them. The way you choose to express an opinion
can alter the way people think of you and look at you every day. When telling someone
our opinions (especially when using formal English), there’s a certain way we do it in
order to sound polite. It’s important to know how to clearly express your thoughts in an
organized way so that no one misunderstands you (or gets offended).
6
b) Medium
I believe….
I don’t doubt that….
I feel certain that…
My impression is that….
As I see it…
It seems to me that…
It strikes me that…
I’m absolutely certain that….
8
c) Strong
If I were you: This is a good phrase for giving advice as well as expressing your
opinion. It should only be used in an informal context. Here, you are putting yourself in
the shoes of the person to whom you are speaking. It’s very useful because you are not
directly telling them what to do, but simply saying what you would do if you were in
the same situation.
To be honest: This is a very common phrase in English and is a nice one to use in all
different types of conversation. Start using this in your speech today! The cool thing
about this phrase is that you can use it formally or informally in many situations. It is
also neither assuming nor direct. Just think about it logically, it means that you are
making an extra connection with your listener by at least saying you are going to speak
honestly. Maybe you are talking about a sensitive subject or a problem and this phrase
will be employed to cut through the unspoken information.
I could be wrong, but: This another phrase you can use to be humble. It’s also slightly
false in its construction. What you are doing here is inviting your listener to tell you that
9
you are wrong and also admitting that it’s possible (perhaps likely) that you are wrong.
It takes pressure off of you in a conversation. Of course, normally, you don’t actually
think you are wrong but by admitting it’s possible you are making yourself more
humble.
Personally: This is a useful phrase to distinguish your opinion from a group of people
who might think differently than you. This is particularly good to use if you don’t agree
with a decision that your group has made. Politicians often use this phrase when their
party has made a collective decision which they are planning to oppose. In other
situations, you can use this to politely disagree with friends when they are making plans
or having a discussion about something. It’s a really good way to state a strong opinion
without being judged to harshly.
A and reacts with an utterance the propositional content or implicate of which is not P.
A disagreement is a type of conflict, either between people or ideas. No it’s not! Yes it
is! It’s an argument. If your opinion contradicts the facts, there's a disagreement.
According to Muntigl & Turnbull, (1998), “when ideas conflict, there's disagreement. If
you want to go to an action movie, but your friend wants to go to a romantic comedy,
that's a disagreement”. Statements, opinions, and claims can also disagree. If I say my
grandmother was a sweet woman, and you say she was a horrible person, that's
disagreement. If the IRS finds a disagreement between your taxes and your real income,
you could be in trouble’
But disagreement may also emerge over an extended section of talk in the course of one
exchange, or even over a series of interactions. It may or may not be verbalized, and its
form may incorporate a variety of affective markers to signal an emotional association.
According to Angouri & Locher (2012) “the concept of ‘disagreement’ covers a range
of speech acts at the antipode of agreement” and shows overlap with related concepts,
such as argumentation, argument talk, conflict talk, dispute, oppositional talk/exchange,
verbal arguing”.
Disagreement or ‘doing disagreeing’ will be defined as any episode in talk-in-
interaction where opposition is expressed, starting sequentially from the statement that
is the source of the disagreement up until the resolution, often implicitly managed by
participants moving on to a new activity or topic.
Conflictual disagreement
Conflictual disagreements are oppositional, face-attacking acts that arouse in the
addressee feelings of annoyance, irritation, anger, contempt, or disgust in varying
degrees. However this can include:
Irrelevancy claims (the previous claim is not relevant to the discussion at hand,
e.g.)
Challenges (a speaker questions an addressee’s prior claim and demands that the
addressee provides evidence for their claim while suggesting that the addressee
cannot do so.
Contradictions (a speaker contradicts by uttering the negated proposition
expressed by the previous claim).
Sociable disagreement
As well as signifying conflict, disagreement can also signal or intimacy and/or
sociability. Interlocutors who are in solidarity relationships share specific interactional
norms, allowing them to gauge which forms of disagreement are appropriate within
those relationships and which violate relational boundaries.
Workplace disagreement
According to Holmes and Marra’s (2004), “in the workplace, failure to abide by norms
of politic behavior can have serious and tangible consequences for team cohesion and
employee relations, which is why workplace disagreement has traditionally been
characterized as dispreferred”.
Exactly.
I was just going to say that.
I see what you mean.
I (totally) agree with you / that.
That’s a good point. / I see your point.
2.4. Disagreeing:
I’m afraid I disagree.
I don’t agree with you / that.
I’d be inclined to disagree.
That’s not the way I see it.
I don’t think so. / I don’t feel the same
2.5. Other expressions can be considered strong others weak
Agreeing
I guess so. (Weak)
You could be right. (Weak)
You may have a point there. (Weak)
I don’t know if I agree with you. (Weak)
Disagreeing
I completely disagree. (Strong)
I totally disagree. (Strong)
I disagree. (Strong)
2.6. Acknowledging someone’s argument and presenting yours
I agree with you, but…
That may be true, but…
I see your point, but…
I guess so, but…
That’s not necessarily true because…
Not necessarily because…
2.7. Agreeing/supporting other people’s opinion
Of course.
You're absolutely right.
Yes, I agree.
13
Conclusion
References
BROWN, P., & Levinson, S. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge,
UK: Cambridge University Press. 1987
GEORGAKOPOULOU, A. Arguing about the future: On indirect disagreements in
conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 33: 1881–900. doi: 10.1016/S0378-
2166(00)00034-5. 2001.
HOLMES, J. & Marra, MLeadership and managing conflict in meetings. Pragmatics,
14, 439–462. . 2004.
LEECH, G. N. Principles of pragmatics. London, UK: Longman.
LOCHER, M., & Watts, R. J. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of
Politeness Research, 1, 9-33. doi: 10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9. 1983. 2005.
MUNTIGL, P., & Turnbull, W. Conversational structure and face work in arguing.
Journal of Pragmatics, 29, 225–25610.1016/S0378-2166(97)00048-9. 1998.
POMERANTZ, A. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of
preferred / dispreferred turn shapes. In J. Maxwell Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.),
Structures of social action (pp. 57–101). Cambridge, UK: Maison des Sciences de
l’Homme and Cambridge University Press. 1984.
SWAN, M. practical English usage 3rd Oxford University Press 2005