ANALYTICS REPORT

Label your document as “Group_Name.pdf”.

Due date: 12th August 2022 by 12pm

Value: 30% of the total assessments
Words: 5000 words (equivalent to 10 pages)

Objective
This assignment assesses the following learning outcomes:
CLO 3: Analyse a data set that is relevant to their field of study. (C4, PLO7)

Requirements
This is a group assignment. Form a group of a maximum of FOUR (4) students. Download
the given data set and perform basic descriptive analytics on it and produce an analytics
report.

Assessment Criteria
Please refer to the Assessment Guidelines, Peer Assessment Form, Assignment Feedback /
Marking Rubrics. Your assessment will be examined based on a complete working solution
and ability of using methods available in the learning materials. Use your own words or
examples whenever necessary to express your understanding and critical thinking.

Task
You have been given a data set which has been cleaned and adapted to make it easier for you
to perform the analysis. Discuss what kind of analysis you would like to perform on the data
set.

You are required to decide how you would like to analyse this data set by considering the
given categorical and numerical variables. You should filter the data, to only focus on skills
that are most relevant to your field of study.

You must perform the exploratory analysis and descriptive analytics to create FIVE (5) data
visualisations using the data set and provide analysis and interpretation of their visualisations.
As a group you should provide your conclusions.
Points to Note:
1. The submitted assignment should be type-written and formatted using Times New Roman
font of size 12 with 1.5 line spacing and page margins of 1 inch (or 2.5cm). Include
appropriate headings, sub-headings, page numbering, figure and table numbering, figure
and table captions, table of contents, etc. failing which will be penalised. Table captions
should be placed above the table itself while figure captions should be placed at the
bottom of the figure. The captions should be bold and aligned in the centre.

2. Attach the Assignment Cover Sheet, Assessment Guidelines, and the Assignment
Feedback / Marking Rubrics in your report duly completed where applicable.

3. All work submitted must be original. Cite the sources of materials used for the purpose of
your assignment. You will be penalised for non-referencing to the source material.

4. Additionally, students are required to submit:

a. The analysis output in R scripts.
b. The Turnitin Similarity Report.

5. Label all submitted documents with your Group Name. Use all capital letters.
a. For R Script(s), you are to
i. Include your group member Names and Student Numbers in the comments at the
beginning of each R script.
ii. Add an additional label to the script, if applicable. For example, your Group
Name is "PQR" and the R script is for the calculation of Covariance, then your
filename should be "PQR_COVARIANCE.R". iii. Comment throughout the
script to explain clearly the process.

6. Failure to compile with instructions will be PENALISED.

7. Wrong / Late / No submissions will be PENALISED.

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES

1. Title Page (Overall Presentation)

• Provide a suitable title for your report.

2. Executive Summary (10 marks)

• You should write this last, as it is a high level summary of your entire report and
should not be more than one page. The executive summary should summarise the
contents of your report, including the conclusion that has been reached.

Tóm tắt bao quát hơn: giới thiệu, em đã làm gì, em đã tìm được gì: tóm lại những tinh
hoa của bài, hay nhất của bài, ví dụ ggplay nó có cái gì hây nhất, kể lại tóm tắt bài
trong 1 trang
Tại sao bạn đọc bài báo cáo của tuôi, chuỗi

3. Introduction (10 marks)

• Provide an introduction to the data set that has been given to you. You will need to
identify the variables and types of data that is available. You may need to perform
further exploration and research on the source of the data to understand its
context. This introduction should not be more than one page.
Bao nhiêu biến, ý nghĩa, phần

4. Objectives of Analysis (10 marks)

• Discuss what your group would like to learn by exploring this data set.
• Explain how you would filter the data set in order to perform this exploration and
analysis.
• Justify your approach in terms of your field of study.

(nghĩ về định nghĩa của thị trường và gg play và ý nghĩa của bài, ví dụ mkt thì
quan tâm user rating hơn là số lượng installs, tại sao em chọn rating vì em nghĩ
người dùng đánh giá như vầy tác động như nào
Tôi chạy hàm này dùng vẽ hình này vì tôi muốn tìm hiểu mối quan hệ của hai cái
đó

5. Visualisations and Analysis (30 marks)

• Create five (5) visualisations.
• Provide analysis and interpretation of the visualisations.
• Use R plotting and exploratory analysis functions to analyse the data that you
have filtered individually, according to the objectives that you have decided upon
as a group.

Các mối tương quan giữa các biến, tỉ lệ thuận nghịch

6. Conclusion (15 marks)

• Integrate all the analysis and discuss whether you have achieved the objectives of
the analysis that was described in the beginning of the report.
• Summary and recommendations/insights based on the analysis.
7. References (5 marks)
• Include a reference list in APA format for any sources that you have referred to or
cited.

Có thể lên gg xem nó đánh gia như thế nào để đánh giá rating (bao nhiêu 4.5/5 hay 4.5/10)
xem nó đánh giá trên bao nhiêu điểm
Cách đo lường installs
Botplox dùng để lọc outlier, dữ liệu của tôi chỉ trong khoảng này thôi còn trên 10k lượt view
thì là số ảo hơn, xác định outlier và so sánh các biến

Histogram: độ tập trung và độ phân vị

Rating cao nhất là 5 điểm

Overall Presentation (5 marks)

• Title Page
• Table of Contents
• Formatting (e.g., font type, font size, line spacing, alignment, page margins)
• Structure/Organisation (e.g., headings, sub-headings, page numbering, etc.)
• Quality (e.g., proper flow in discussion)

Turnitin Similarity Score – At most 15%

Peer Assessment – The average of the marks awarded will be taken (15 marks)

Submission
1. Assignment Report (pdf)
2. R Script(s) (r)
3. Turnitin Similarity Report (pdf)
PEER ASSESSMENT FORM (To be submitted individually)

This assessment form is confidential and should not be shared nor discussed with your group
members. Perform your evaluations honestly, and please do so in the spirit of learning and
continuous improvement. The main aim for this peer evaluation is to improve team working
skills and not victimising particular individuals. On the other hand, giving everyone 5 marks
will not be accepted. Give an honest score from 0 to 5 for your fellow group members in
accordance with the following criteria:
0 = no contribution or participation to the project
1 = a hindrance to the group in this respect
2 = no help at all in this respect
3 = not as good as most of the group in this respect
4 = about average for the group in this respect
5 = Best/ideal and exemplary group member

Following numerical ratings of each sub-section, provide your qualitative evaluation to justify
the marks. Your lecturer will award group marks at his or her own discretion.
NOTE: Failure to submit the peer assessment will result in a 2% deduction from the
individual.

Peer assessment by: (Insert Name and Student Number)

Group members (In alphabetical order, excluding

yourself)
CRITERIA Member 1 Member 2 Member 3
Name: Name: Name:
Student Number: Student Number: Student Number:
COOPERATION & COMMITMENT:
Level of enthusiasm/participation, helping the
group to function well as a team, organizing the
group and ensuring things got done, performing
tasks efficiently, performing routine tasks,
keeping the group going, particularly in difficult
situations. Attends face to face meetings
punctually & meets group deadlines.

COMMUNICATION: Able to motivate,

encourage, direct or delegate effectively Clear
presentation of ideas, paying attention to both
nonverbal and verbal language. Proofreads work
& elicit comments from others.
CONTRIBUTION: Contribution to group’s
learning experience: suggesting ideas,
understanding what was required, working with
fellow members who needed help & showed
initiative.
TOTAL MARKS (between 0 and 15)

JUSTIFICATIONS FOR MARKS

GIVEN (50 to 100 words per person evaluated)
ASSIGNMENT FEEDBACK / MARKING RUBRICS

GROUP ASSESSMENT

Assessment Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Terrible Marks
Executive A very clear A clear explanation An adequate A brief explanation A vague explanation No explanation given
Summary explanation supported with explanation supported with not supported with with no supported
supported with maximal relevant supported with minimal relevant relevant details. relevant details.
maximal relevant details. minimal relevant details.
details. details. (0)
(9 – 10) (7 – 8) (5 – 6) (3 – 4) (1 – 2) / 10 %
Introduction Detailed analysis Limited analysis Basic analysis Poor analysis Very poor analysis No analysis strategy
strategy supported strategy supported strategy supported strategy supported strategy with no with no supporting
with excellent with good with moderate with poor supporting comments/insights.
comments/insights. comments/insights. comments/insights. comments/insights. comments/insights.
(9 – 10) (7 – 8) (5 – 6) (3 – 4) (1 – 2) (0) / 10 %
Objective of Detailed analysis Limited analysis Basic analysis Poor analysis Very poor analysis No analysis strategy
Analysis strategy supported strategy supported strategy supported strategy supported strategy with no with no supporting
2. Selection of data with excellent with good with moderate with poor supporting comments/insights.
3. Filtering of data comments/insights. comments/insights. comments/insights. comments/insights. comments/insights.
4. Justification
(9 – 10) (7 – 8) (5 – 6) (3 – 4) (1 – 2) (0) / 10 %

GROUP ASSESSMENT (cont.)

Assessment Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Terrible Marks
Visualisations and Excellent and Good and different Fair and different Basic and similar Poor and similar No visualisations
Analysis distinctly different visualisations are types of visualisations visualisations provided.
• 5 visualisations visualisations are presented which are visualisations provided and not provided and not
provided presented which are somewhat presented, generally related to objective related to objective
• R scripts both significant to significant to the appropriate for the of analysis. of analysis.
/ 30 %
ASSIGNMENT FEEDBACK / MARKING RUBRICS (cont.)

provided in the objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the

submission analysis. analysis. analysis.
• Analysis based Designs are Designs are Designs are fairly Designs are poorly Designs are very No design.
on visualisations attractive with somewhat attractive attractive with fair done with poor use poorly done, not a
• Insights obtained
excellent use of with good use of use of colour and fair of colour and no good use of colour
based on
colour and show of colour and show of show of originality. show of originality. and no show of
analytics
originality. originality. originality.
Titles, headings and Titles, headings, and Titles, headings, and Titles, headings, and Titles, headings, and Titles, headings, and
labels are very clear labels are clear and labels are somewhat labels are not clear labels are missing. labels are missing.
and descriptive. descriptive. clear and descriptive. and descriptive.

R script(s) provided R script(s) provided R script(s) provided R script(s) provided R script(s) provided R script(s) not
and strictly adhering and adhering to most and adhering to some and adhering to very and not adhering to provided.
to the instructions of the instructions of the instructions few of the the instructions given
given in the given in the given in the instructions given in in the guidelines.
guidelines. guidelines. guidelines. the guidelines.
Detailed insights Limited insights Basic analysis of the Poor analysis and The analysis No analysis strategy
provided on the provided on the visualisations with discussion presented, provided does not with no supporting
visualisations, visualisations, explanations and no additional match the comments/insights.
relevant to the relevant to the how it relates to the explanation or visualisations
objectives of the objectives of the objectives of the insights on the provided.
report. report. report. visualisations. Discussion is vague
and difficult to
(7 – 12) follow.
(25 – 30) (19 – 24) (13 – 18) (1 – 6)
(0)

GROUP ASSESSMENT (cont.)

Assessment Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Terrible Marks
Conclusion Detailed analysis Limited analysis Basic analysis strategy Poor analysis strategy Very poor analysis No analysis strategy / 15 %
• Summary strategy supported strategy supported supported with supported with poor strategy with no with no supporting
• Recommendations / with excellent with good moderate comments/insights. supporting comments/insights.
ASSIGNMENT FEEDBACK / MARKING RUBRICS (cont.)

Insights comments/insights. comments/insights. comments/insights. comments/insights.

• Evaluation of
objectives
(13 – 15) (10 – 12) (7 – 9) (4 – 6) (1 – 3) (0)
References All references are Most of the references A reasonable number Some of the references Very few references None of the references
credible and reliable. are credible and of references are are credible and are credible and are credible and
Perfect in-text citation reliable. Highly credible and reliable. reliable. Inaccurate reliable. Highly reliable. Wrong in-text
based on the APA accurate in-text citation Fairly accurate in-text intext citation based on inaccurate in-text citation based on the
format. based on the APA citation based on the the APA format. citation based on the APA format.
format. APA format. APA format.
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) (0) /5%
Overall Very well presented. Well presented. The Fairly well presented. Poorly presented. The Very poorly presented. No submission.
Presentation The report is report is organised The report is organised report is organised The report is neither
• Title Page organised logically logically and formatted logically and logically but not organised logically nor
and formatted as a as a report, though not formatted as a report, formatted as a report. formatted as a report.
• Table of Contents
report, specifically specifically for its though not specifically The writing is The tone and accuracy
• Formatting for its purpose. The purpose. The writing is for its purpose. The understandable, but of language used in
• Structure / writing is articulate, mostly articulate, and writing is mostly the tone is not the writing is not
Organisation and the tone is the tone is appropriate articulate, and the tone appropriate or understandable at
• Quality appropriate and and mostly consistent. could be more consistent. Adhering times. Not adhering to
consistent. Strictly Adhering to most of appropriate and/or to very few of the the instructions given
adhering to the the instructions given consistent. Adhering instructions given in in the guidelines.
instructions given in in the guidelines. to some of the the guidelines.
the guidelines. instructions given in
(4) the guidelines.
(5) (3)
(2) (1)

(0) /5%

TOTAL / 85 %

INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT
Student #1
ASSIGNMENT FEEDBACK / MARKING RUBRICS (cont.)

STUDENT NAME: STUDENT NUMBER:

Assessment Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Terrible Marks
Group Assessment

/ 85 %
Peer Assessment Excellent participation. Good participation. Fair participation. Poor participation. Very poor No participation.
(The average of the participation.
marks awarded will (13 – 15)
be taken.) (10 – 12) (7 – 9) (4 – 6) (1 – 3) (0) / 15 %

TOTAL / 100 %

Student #2
STUDENT NAME: STUDENT NUMBER:
Assessment Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Terrible Marks
Group Assessment

/ 85 %
Peer Assessment Excellent participation. Good participation. Fair participation. Poor participation. Very poor No participation.
(The average of the participation.
marks awarded will (13 – 15)
be taken.) (10 – 12) (7 – 9) (4 – 6) (1 – 3) (0) / 15 %

TOTAL / 100 %
ASSIGNMENT FEEDBACK / MARKING RUBRICS (cont.)

INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT (cont.)

Student #3
STUDENT NAME: STUDENT NUMBER:
Assessment Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Terrible Marks
Group Assessment

/ 85 %
Peer Assessment Excellent participation. Good participation. Fair participation. Poor participation. Very poor No participation.
(The average of the participation.
marks awarded will (13 – 15)
be taken.) (10 – 12) (7 – 9) (4 – 6) (1 – 3) (0) / 15 %

TOTAL / 100 %

Student #4
STUDENT NAME: STUDENT NUMBER:
Assessment Criteria Excellent Good Fair Poor Very Poor Terrible Marks
Group Assessment

/ 85 %
Peer Assessment Excellent participation. Good participation. Fair participation. Poor participation. Very poor No participation.
(The average of the participation.
marks awarded will (13 – 15)
be taken.) (10 – 12) (7 – 9) (4 – 6) (1 – 3) (0) / 15 %

TOTAL / 100 %
ASSIGNMENT FEEDBACK / MARKING RUBRICS (cont.)

*Leave Student #X empty if not applicable