2021-11-16 - ABCD NEOH - Cross-Frames - Chavel

11/16/2021
Photo: 2020 Prize Bridge National Winner – Manning Crevice (Idaho) – Photo Credit: Ken Saindon
All You Need to Know about Cross-Frames

Brandon Chavel, PhD, PE - NSBA
ABCD Northeast Ohio – November 16, 2021
Why do we care about cross-frames?
• Cross-frames are the most expensive part of fabrication on a girder

bridge (on a $/LB basis)
• More detailing, and then manual labor and handling than girder pieces
• Many more cross-frames than girder pieces
• So, let’s design them for maximum efficiency!
1
11/16/2021
Why do we care about cross-frames?
Photo Credit: High

Steel
Photo Credit: High Steel
Presentation Outline
• Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

• Current Design Trends
• Cross-frames are getting bigger
• What is causing larger Cross-Frames?
• Strategies for Cost-Effective Cross-Frames
• Framing Plan Choices in Skewed Bridges
• Analysis Strategies
• Design Considerations
• Summary
2
11/16/2021
Objective of Presentation today….
• Help you clear obstacles to designing efficient cross-frames & diaphragms

• Summary
3
11/16/2021
Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics
Cross-frame Diaphragm

End Cross-frame Intermediate Cross-frame
4
11/16/2021
• Primary Functions – Intermediate Cross-frames

• Transfer wind loads from bottom of girder to the deck
• Provide stability
• Bottom Flange in Compression
• Top Flange in Compression before deck hardens
• Lateral Torsional Buckling Resistance
• Help distribute dead and live loads within the system
• Provide geometric control during erection
• Resist flange lateral bending effects
• Horizontally Curved Bridges

• Primary force member
• Primary Functions – End Cross-frames

• Transfer wind loads the deck down to the bearings
• Provide global stability to the girder span
• Provide end support for the deck and expansion joint
• Including wheel loads
• Provide future jacking location to allow for bearing replacement
10
5
11/16/2021
K-Type X-Type
Diaphragm Z-Type (Alternate)
11
• Not recommended:
V-Shaped Cross-Frames
“Knock-Down” Cross-frames
Double-angle members
12
6
11/16/2021

S = Girder Spa.
• X-type typically used:
D = Girder Depth
• S/D ≤ 1.0
• K-type typically used:

• S/D ≥ 1.5
X-Type
• Either when:
• 1 < S/D < 1.5
• Generally, Diagonal ~ 45°

K-Type
13

• Depth Requirements (CFs & Diaphragms)
• Article 6.7.4.2
• 0.5 Beam Depth for Rolled beams
• 0.75 Beam Depth for Plate Girders
Channels or Wide-Flange Beams
Bent Plate Diaphragm Plate Girder Diaphragm
14
7
11/16/2021
• Primary vs. Secondary Members

• AASHTO Table 6.6.2.1-1
15
• Design Requirements (Article 6.7.4.2)

• Minimum
• Transfer Wind Loads (Article 4.6.2.7)
• Slenderness Requirements (Articles 6.8.4 and 6.9.3)
• Stability – Strength & Stiffness (UT Austin research, NCHRP Report 962) **
• If cross-frames / diaphragms included in structural analysis model:

• Design for all applicable limit states & calculated force effects
16
8
11/16/2021
Cross-Frame Design
• What should I design a cross-frame for?
• Bridges that use a line girder analysis

• Straight I-Girder bridges with Skew Index ≤ 0.30
• Curved bridges that satisfy Article 4.6.1.2.4b
• Cross-frames are not modeled
• Design requirements: a) No Skew

• Transfer of wind forces
• Slenderness effects
• Stability forces and stiffness**
b) Skew Index ≤ 0.30
17
Cross-Frame Design
• What should I design a cross-frame for?
• Bridges that use a 2D or 3D analysis for design

• Straight I-Girder bridge with Skew Index > 0.30
• Curved bridges that DO NOT satisfy Article 4.6.1.2.4b
• Cross-frames are modeled
• Design requirements:
• All Applicable limit states
• Dead, Live, Fatigue, Wind, etc.
• Slenderness effects Skew Index > 0.30
• Stability forces and stiffness**
18
9
11/16/2021
• Slenderness Requirements
• Tension (AASHTO LRFD Article 6.8.4)

• For primary members l /r ≤ 200
• For secondary members l /r ≤ 240
• where:
• l = unbraced length
• r = radius of gyration
19
• Slenderness Requirements
• Compression (AASHTO LRFD Article 6.9.3)

• For primary members K l /r ≤ 120
• For secondary members K l /r ≤ 140
• where:
• K = effective length factor specified in Article 4.6.2.5
• l = unbraced length
• r = radius of gyration
20
10
11/16/2021
Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Detailing
• Cross-Frame Member Selection

• Angles preferred over WTs
• Angles are produced at steel mills
• WTs need to be cut/split from Wide Flange beams
• A note on Angles:
• Avoid 1/16” gages
• These typically require a mill order
• Tonnage requirement is typically much greater than that
required for the project
21
• Work Point Locations
Preferred Not Preferred

WP located @ Bolt / on Gusset WP is on Girder
22
11
11/16/2021

Gusset Plate on Cross-frame
• Work Point Locations Fabrication “table”
23
• Work Point Locations
Allow some variance in

this dimension, possibly
+/- 1 inch.
24
12
11/16/2021
• Welding Cross-Frame Member Ends
Correct use of welding symbol Incorrect use of weld-all-around symbol

(no backside weld)
25
• Welding Cross-Frame Member Ends
Correct use of welding symbol Incorrect use of weld-all-around symbol
Graphics Credit: Annotated from the FHWA Bridge Welding Reference Manual
https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/steel/pubs/hif19088.pdf
26
13
11/16/2021
Fit Condition
27
Fit Condition
• Fit Condition – deflected girder geometry associated with a targeted dead

load condition for which the cross-frames are detailed to connect to the
girders.
• Affects fabrication and steel erection.
• Can affect rotation demands on the bearings, and internal force effects.
• The fit condition should be selected by the Engineer.
• See AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications Article 6.7.2
29
14
11/16/2021
Fit Condition
Loading Condition Fit Construction Description
Stage Fit
No-Load Fit (NLF) Fully-Cambered The cross-frames are detailed to fit to the
Fit girders in their fabricated, plumb, fully-
cambered position under zero load.
Steel Dead Load Fit Erected Fit The cross-frames are detailed to fit to the
(SDLF) girders in their ideally plumb as-deflected
positions under the self-weight of the steel
at the completion of the erection.
Total Dead Load Fit Final Fit The cross-frames are detailed to fit to the
(TDLF) girders in their ideally plumb as-deflected
positions under the total dead load.
30
Fit Condition
• NSBA White Papers - Skewed and Curved Steel I-Girder Bridge Fit
• Standalone Summary (6 pages)
• Full Document (47 pages)
• Explains Fit Conditions

• No Load Fit
• Steel Dead Load Fit
• Total Dead Load Fit
• Provides Recommended Fit Conditions for

• Skewed Bridges
• Curved Bridges
• Curved Bridges with Skewed Supports
31
15
11/16/2021

• Summary
32
Cross-frames are getting Bigger
Does the end of this

L4x4 need 6 bolts?
Looked good on paper!

Maybe a Bent Plate
diaphragm instead?
33
16
11/16/2021
• Big connections!!!
27 Bolts
15 Bolts
34
Photo Credit: High

Steel
Photo Credit: High Steel
35
17
11/16/2021
• October 2020 issue of Modern Steel Construction

• “Keeping Cross-frames in Check”
• Design Strategies
• Using the right cross-frame or diaphragm?
• Why do we care?
• Cross-frames are the most expensive part of fabrication
on a girder bridge (on a $/LB basis)
• More manual labor and handling
• Bolted member end connections can be more expensive
36
Current Design Trends
• What are some of the contributing factors to larger CFs?

• AASHTO LRFD Fatigue Design
• Framing Plan Decisions
• Analysis Decisions, Strategies, or Assumptions
• Design Decisions
37
18
11/16/2021
AASHTO LRFD - Fatigue
• What happened in AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications?

• General Equation to satisfy:
• γ (∆f) ≤ (∆F)n
• Article 6.6.1.2.2
38

• γ (∆f) ≤ (∆F)n
AASHTO LRFD BDS Edition γ (∆F)n (ksi)
4th, 2008 & 2009 Interims Fatigue I = 1.50 Category D = 7 ksi
5th, 2010 Fatigue II = 0.75 Category E = 4.5 ksi
39
19
11/16/2021

• γ (∆f) ≤ (∆F)n
5th, 2010 Interims Fatigue I = 1.50 Category E = 4.5 ksi
6th, 2012 (No Detail 7.2!) Fatigue II = 0.75
6th, 2012 Errata!, 2013 Int.
7th, 2014, 2015 Interims
40

• γ (∆f) ≤ (∆F)n
6th, 2012 Errata!, 2013 Int.
7th, 2016 Interims Fatigue I = 1.50 Category E′ = 2.6 ksi
Fatigue II = 0.75
41
20
11/16/2021

• γ (∆f) ≤ (∆F)n
6th, 2012 Errata!, 2013 Int.
7th, 2016 Interims Fatigue I = 1.50 Category E′ = 2.6 ksi
Fatigue II = 0.75
8th, 2017 Fatigue I = 1.75 Category E′ = 2.6 ksi
9th, 2020 Fatigue II = 0.80
42
What is next?
• NCHRP Report 962 – Proposed Modification to AASHTO Cross-Frame

Analysis and Design
• Research by UT Austin
• Reduced fatigue load factors for cross-frames

• Multiply current Fatigue I and II load factors by 0.65 for CFs only
• Codified stability bracing considerations
• Approved Ballot item for AASHTO LRFD BDS 10th Edition!
43
21
11/16/2021

• Summary
44
Framing Plan Layout
• AASHTO LRFD Article 6.7.4.2

• Skew ≤ 20°, cross-frames can be placed parallel to skew
45
22
11/16/2021
Framing Plan Layout

• Skew ≤ 20°, cross-frames can be placed parallel to skew
• Skews > 20 degrees, must be placed perpendicular to girders and may be

placed in contiguous or discontinuous lines
46
Framing Plan Layout
• AASHTO LRFD Article 6.7.4.2 (Commentary)

• Recommended minimum offset of cross-frames adjacent to skewed
supports (discontinuous cross-frames)
O Lb Offset, O ≥ Larger of 4bf and 0.4Lb
O Lb
47
23
11/16/2021
Framing Plan Layout

• For skews > 20 degrees, it may be advantageous to stagger the cross-
frames (discontinuous cross-frames)
48
Framing Plan Layout

• For skews > 20 degrees
• Continuous bridges, skewed interior support
A)
B)
49
24
11/16/2021
Framing Plan Layout
• AASHTO LRFD Article 6.7.4.2 (Commentary)

• Cross-frames adjacent to the bearing lines are placed at the same offset distance
relative to the bearing lines.
• Other intermediate cross-frames placed at constant spacing.
• Every other cross-frame intentionally omitted within the bays between the
interior girders.
50
Lean-On Bracing
• What is Lean-on Bracing System?
Conventional
X-Bracing
Lean-On
Bracing
52
25
11/16/2021
Lean-On Bracing
• What is Lean-on Bracing System?
Lean-On Bracing in Lean-On Bracing in

Frames Beams
53
Lean-On Bracing
• Benefits of Lean-On Bracing

• Fewer cross-frames
• Decrease fabrication costs
• Decrease erection costs
• Reduce potential fit up issues
• Reduced construction timeline
• Simplifies future inspections
• Fewer connections subjected to Fatigue Jamie Farris/TxDOT
Stress Ranges
Jamie Farris/TxDOT
• Need to consider erection
55
26
11/16/2021
Cross-frame Analysis Strategies
• Use the appropriate level of analysis

• 1D Line Girder
• 2D Grid or Plate & Eccentric Beam
• 3D FEM
• Recommendations in AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge

Collaboration Guidelines for Steel Girder Bridge Analysis
G13.1-2019
57
• Modeling of Cross-frames
• When using:
• 2D Grid or Plate & Eccentric Beam
• 3D FEMs with Single Cross-frame element representing truss
• AASHTO LRFD C4.6.3.3.4

• Use a shear-deformable (Timoshenko) beam element representation of cross-
frames and for developing their stiffness and member area.
58
27
11/16/2021
• Modeling of Cross-frames (cont’d)

• Shear-deformable (Timoshenko) beam element representation of
cross-frames and for developing their stiffness and member area
• AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Collaboration Guidelines for Steel Girder
Bridge Analysis G13.1 Article 3.11.3
Force Couple for Rotation, Obtain Ieq Vertical Load for Deflection, Obtain Aeq
59
• Reduce individual member stiffness to 0.65AE

• AASHTO LRFD Article C4.6.3.3.4
• Accounts for member end eccentricity
• Accounts for reduced stiffness at member end
60
28
11/16/2021
• Fatigue Live Load

• AASHTO LRFD Article C6.6.1.2.1
• 2D or 3D Analysis
• Fatigue truck positioned to determine the maximum range

of stress or torque, as applicable, with the truck confined
to one critical transverse position per each longitudinal
position throughout the length of the bridge in the
analysis.
• Fatigue loading for Cross-frames is not the same as for

Girders
61
Fatigue Truck for Cross-Frames

Force Range
6.2 kips
0.2 (T)
Transverse Position (ft)
-13
Influence (kip/kip)
13
-25
00 25 50 75 100 125 150 175
180 200 225 250 275 300 325 350
360 375 -0.2 (C)
Longitudinal Position (ft) University of Texas at Austin (Helwig et al.)
66
29
11/16/2021
Fatigue Truck for Cross-Frames
Force Range
Force Range
Force Range
5.7 kips 5.0 kips 4.3 kips
0.2 (T)
Transverse Position (ft)
-13
Influence (kip/kip)
0
13
-25
00 25 50 75 100 125 150 175
180 200 225 250 275 300 325 350
360 375 -0.2 (C)
Longitudinal Position (ft) University of Texas at Austin (Helwig et al.)
67
• Consider support stiffness in the analysis model

• 2D or 3D Analysis model for girder design
• Transverse and Longitudinal
• Use spring elements to represent stiffness at bearing location
• Account for skew
∆=
3
Transverse Longitudinal
68
30
11/16/2021
Cross-frame Design Considerations
• Does Fatigue II (finite life) apply?

• If low volume truck traffic and the details being
considered are not on fracture-critical members, the
Fatigue II load combination and its lower load factor
may be permissible
• 75-year single-lane ADTT is less than or equal to the

applicable value specified in AASHTO Table 6.6.1.2.3-2
• 0.80 load factor instead of 1.75
69
• Grouping of Cross-frames
• Don’t just design members for all the Max/Min’s
• Low forces / fatigue range
• Medium forces / fatigue range
• High forces / fatigue range
Medium
High
70
31
11/16/2021
• NEW!!!
• NCHRP Report 962 – Proposed Modification to AASHTO Cross-Frame
Analysis and Design
• Research by UT Austin
• Reduced fatigue load factors for cross-frames
• Codified stability considerations
• Approved Ballot item for AASHTO LRFD BDS 10th Edition
72
• In Progress…..
• AASHTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Collaboration TG11
• Guidelines for Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Design
• Expected release is early 2022 as an NSBA Publication
73
32
11/16/2021

• Summary
74
Summary

• Types
• Type Selection
• Primary vs. Secondary Members
• Detailing Considerations
• Fit Condition
75
33
11/16/2021
Summary

• Causes of larger cross-frames
76
Summary

77
34
11/16/2021
References
• October 2020 issue of Modern Steel Construction

• “Keeping Cross-frames in Check”
• NCHRP Report 962 – Proposed Modification to AASHTO

Cross-Frame Analysis and Design
• AAHSTO/NSBA Steel Bridge Collaboration TG11

• Guidelines for Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Design
• Expected release is early 2022 as an NSBA Publication
• Skewed and Curved Steel I-Girder Bridge Fit

• NSBA White Paper
• FHWA Bridge Welding Reference Manual
78
Future Questions
• Reach out to NSBA or a regional steel fabricator

• Vin Bartucca – [email protected]
• Brandon Chavel, PhD, PE – [email protected]
79
35
11/16/2021
Photo: 2020 Prize Bridge National Winner – Manning Crevice (Idaho) – Photo Credit: Ken Saindon
All You Need to Know about Cross-Frames

Brandon Chavel, PhD, PE - NSBA
[email protected]
80
36

2021-11-16 - ABCD NEOH - Cross-Frames - Chavel

Uploaded by

Document Informationclick to expand document information

Copyright:

Available Formats

2021-11-16 - ABCD NEOH - Cross-Frames - Chavel

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

2021-11-16 - ABCD NEOH - Cross-Frames - Chavel

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

11/16/2021

All You Need to Know about Cross-Frames

Why do we care about cross-frames?

• Cross-frames are the most expensive part of fabrication on a girder

Why do we care about cross-frames?

Photo Credit: High

Photo Credit: High Steel

• Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

Objective of Presentation today….

• Help you clear obstacles to designing efficient cross-frames & diaphragms

• Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

• Primary Functions – Intermediate Cross-frames

• Horizontally Curved Bridges

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

• Primary Functions – End Cross-frames

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

Diaphragm Z-Type (Alternate)

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

• X-type typically used:

• K-type typically used:

• Generally, Diagonal ~ 45°

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

Bent Plate Diaphragm Plate Girder Diaphragm

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

• Primary vs. Secondary Members

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

• Design Requirements (Article 6.7.4.2)

• If cross-frames / diaphragms included in structural analysis model:

• What should I design a cross-frame for?

• Bridges that use a line girder analysis

• Cross-frames are not modeled

• Design requirements: a) No Skew

• What should I design a cross-frame for?

• Bridges that use a 2D or 3D analysis for design

• Cross-frames are modeled

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

• Tension (AASHTO LRFD Article 6.8.4)

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Basics

• Compression (AASHTO LRFD Article 6.9.3)

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Detailing

• Cross-Frame Member Selection

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Detailing

• Work Point Locations

Preferred Not Preferred

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Detailing

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Detailing

• Work Point Locations

Allow some variance in

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Detailing

• Welding Cross-Frame Member Ends

Correct use of welding symbol Incorrect use of weld-all-around symbol

Cross-Frame & Diaphragm Detailing

• Welding Cross-Frame Member Ends

Correct use of welding symbol Incorrect use of weld-all-around symbol