9118-19-5018 Addendum No. 2

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Michael Pacholok, Purchasing and Materials Management Division Sabrina Dipietro

Chief Purchasing Officer City Hall, 18th Floor, West Acting Manager,
100 Queen Street West Construction Services
Toronto, Ontario M5H 2N2

May 3, 2019 Via Internet Posting (10 pages) + 4 Forms

Addendum No. 2
Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018
Revised Closing: 12:00 NOON (LOCAL TIME), May 14, 2019

For: Provision of all architectural, engineering and administrative services for the
design and construction and contract administration to construct the New
Wabash Community Centre (Proposed Net Zero Energy Building)

Please refer to the above Request for Proposal (RFP) document in your possession and be
advised of the following:

I. Revisions

1. REVISIONS: Appendix D, Form 3, Pricing Detail Form (Mandatory with


Submission)
Delete Form 3 Pricing Detail Form in its entirety and replace with the revised Form 3
attached with this Addendum No. 2, dated May 3, 2019 (3 pages)

2. REVISIONS: Appendix D, Form 4(2), Mandatory Requirement M2: Demonstrated


Building Type Experience - Heritage
Delete Form 4(2), Mandatory Requirement M2 (For Prime Proponents): Demonstrated
Building Type Experience – Heritage in its entirety and replace with the revised Form
4(2) attached with this Addendum No. 2, dated May 3, 2019 (1 page)

3. REVISIONS: Refer to Section 4.2, Selection Criteria, Sub-Section 2 – Proponent


Profile & Qualification:
.1 Under "If Applicable Only", Paragraph to be revised to read:
"RATIONALE FOR A 2ND ARCHITECTURAL FIRM AS A SUB-CONSULTANT (5.0
POINTS
(please note section 2 of Appendix A regarding consortiums and the requirement
that there be a single proponent (i.e. the City will not allow joint-ventures)"
.2 Replace Evaluation Table E with the revised Evaluation Table E attached with
this Addendum No. 2, dated May 3, 2019. (1 Page)

4. REVISIONS: Appendix D, Form 5, Team Summary Information


Delete Form 5, Team Summary Information in its entirety and replace with the revised
Form 5 attached with this Addendum No. 2, dated May 3, 2019 (2 pages)

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


1 of 17
5. REVISIONS: Refer to Section 3.15.2 Arborist/Tree Preservation Report
.1 Delete Item 7, "Appraised value……….Society of Arboriculture".

6. REVISIONS: Refer to Section 5.2 Proposal Documentation and Delivery, Item c.


.1 Revise item c to read:

Must consist of one (1) original (clearly marked as such on its first page) and four
(4) full copies of:
(i) A Main Proposal Document as described in the section below titled
Proposal Content, including all attachments and appendices as required.
(Mandatory);
(ii) Form 1 (Proposal Submission Form, six (6) pages) completed and
signed by an authorized official of the Proponent. This includes the
acknowledgement of all addenda received as per Appendix A, item 4.
(Mandatory);

II RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

Below are responses to questions received during the bid period:

Q1. Section 2.1: Background: As partial remediation work has been completed – please
clarify what is involved in full remediation and when this work might happen? Will
remediation scope be part of the construction contract?

A1. To the City's knowledge, there is still a small amount of residual impacted fill
material noted to exist below or adjacent to the remaining concrete rail bed in
front of 40 Wabash Avenue that should be removed from the site as part of any
future development work. The City will arrange and co-ordinate with an
independent environmental consultant to provide environmental and inspection
services, however, the prime consultant will be required to co-ordinate and
implement any requirements of the investigation in the tender and contract
documents. Based on the results of the Environmental Assessment Report, the
details of further remediation or risk assessment strategies will be known.

Q2. Section 2.4.1: Site Description: Is it anticipated that the existing hardscape plaza square
is to remain?

A2. The future of the existing hardscape plaza square will be determined during the
investigation/program confirmation phases and the approach to schematic
design.

Q3 Section 2.4.1: Site Description: Is the Fieldhouse likely to remain in use if it is not
repurposed as a part of the community centre?

A3 The future of the Fieldhouse and its use will be determined during the
investigation/ program confirmation phases and the approach to schematic
design.

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


2 of 17
Q4 Section 2.4.1: Site Description: can you identify the existing area of each of the two
buildings?

A4 The building area of the Existing Fieldhouse is approximately 235 square metres
(2,530 sq. ft.). The building area of 40 Wabash Building is approximately 1,379 sq.
metres (14,8434 sq. ft).

Q5 Section 3.1.3: Potential Heritage Component: As the new design may include one or
both of the existing buildings, in whole or in part, it is difficult to quantify the scope of
work of the heritage consultant. As an example, if both buildings come down then their
work might be only be to provide a heritage assessment. If both buildings remain, there
may be significant heritage scope and involvement in retaining the existing masonry
facades- supporting the facade, envelope analysis etc. Please define heritage scope
more precisely - or perhaps create an allowance for some or all of the heritage scope.-
based on the outcome of schematic design.

A5 Once the Schematic Design Phase is completed, the full heritage scope of work
will be known and the successful proponent fee will be established as part of the
percentage fee under Section B – Phases 2 thru 6, of the Detail Pricing Form.

Q6 Section 3.1.10: Please confirm that a traffic consultant need not be identified or carried
in this proposal, and that they will be procured during the project through cash
allowance.

A6 A traffic consultant need not be identified or carried in the proposal as this work
will be procured through the project cash allowance.

Q7 Section 3.1.11 Additional Consultant Design Work: (5) Communications: Please confirm
if the City will provide IT design and rack- and the contract is to provide empty conduit
system only.

A7 The City will provide the IT design and rack and the contract is to provide empty
conduit system only.

Q8 Section 3.1.11 Additional Consultant Design Work: (6) Security: Please confirm if the
City will provide the security equipment specifications/cut sheets and security rack, or if
the consultant will provide all security equipment.

A8 The City will provide the security equipment specifications/cut sheets and
security rack. There is no need for a security consultant to select security
equipment (consultants do not "provide" security equipment).

Q9 Section 3.2.1.2: Vendors Role during Program Confirmation: As one Town Hall meeting
is to be carried in the Program phase, and two Town Hall meetings in Schematic Design-
is the fourth required meeting assumed to occur in design development?

A9 Proponents are to include their participation and allow for four town hall
meetings: 2 meetings during the Program Confirmation Phase and up to 2
meetings during the Schematic Design Phase. The phase and timing of the
meeting may vary and will be determined by the City.

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


3 of 17
Q10 Section 3.2.7: Record Drawings: Please advise where the separate hourly rate
requested for record drawings is to be located in the proposal.

A10 The separate hourly rate for Record Drawings is to be clearly noted and included
under Form 3 Section E, Hourly Rates. Refer to revised Form 3 under this
Addendum No. 2, dated May 3, 2019.

Q11 Section 4.2: Selection Criteria: We presume that if an architectural firm were to provide
required heritage consultant services that the selection criterial provision for ‘carrying a
second architectural firm on this project’ would not apply. Please confirm.

A11 If the prime architectural proponent is able to provide the heritage services for
this project with the demonstrated necessary expertise, an additional heritage
sub-consultant firm would not be required.

Q12 Is a pool consultant required on this project?

A12 If the prime architectural proponent is able to provide the pool design services for
this project with the demonstrated necessary expertise, a pool design sub-
consultant firm would not be required. The prime consultant may carry a pool
design sub-consultant under "other" consultant if they choose.

Q13 Forms 4(1) and 4(2) state that the information must be provided by the prime
consultant. If our team is comprised of a consortium of two architectural firms,
can one firm provide the information for 4(1) and the other for 4(2)?

A13 With respect to a proposed consortium of two architectural firms, please note that
as noted in the RFP "If two or more legal entities wish to submit a Proposal as a
consortium, one member of the consortium must be identified as the Proponent
with whom the City may enter into an Agreement, and the other member(s) must
be identified as subcontractors to that Proponent." And "A Proposal by a
consortium of two or more entities may be submitted, but one person or company
must be shown as the prime Proponent and be prepared to represent the
consortium to the City by executing the Agreement, acting as the primary contact,
and taking overall responsibility for performance of the Agreement."
Form 4(1) (Pool Experience): The prime consultant ("Proponent") must have the
mandatory experience required as this is a mandatory requirement. (The Proposal
must confirm that the prime consultant ("Proponent") will provide complete
design and field review services for the pool from start of design through to final
commissioning).
Form 4(2) (Heritage Experience): With respect to the mandatory heritage
experience, the Selection Committee would ideally like to see the prime consultant
("Proponent") have this experience as well. However, the City is prepared to allow
an architect sub-consultant to meet the mandatory heritage experience
requirement, although as noted on the revised Appendix E Evaluation Table, a

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


4 of 17
Proponent having both types of mandatory experience receives 5 points
automatically, while a Proponent carrying a separate heritage architect sub-
consultant has to include a written rationale for carrying the second architectural
firm on this project, describing how they bring value to the City of Toronto on this
project, how the two firms intend to work together, their planned responsibilities
etc.
If the prime consultant ("Proponent") cannot provide the mandatory heritage
experience and an architect sub-consultant is proposed to provide this
experience, clearly indicate the name of the firm that is providing this experience
on Form 4(2).

Q14 Page 41 – Sub-Section 4 – there is a Note that the Proponent should submit signed
consent forms authorizing the disclosure of personal information to the City for any
submitted resumes. Is this consent form contained within the forms provided within the
RFP documents, or should we create our own statement to include in our submission?

A14 There is no consent form in the RFP document. Proponents may provide their
own "consent form" and statement with their submission. Note, as indicated in
the RFP, submission of these forms is recommended ("should") but is not
mandatory; alternatively, "the Proponent will accept all liability if signed consent
forms and resumes are not disclosed to the City".

Q15 Does the 90 page limit include all forms and resumes, as well as the Letter of
Introduction, Table of Contents, divider pages, and intentionally blank pages? Would a
Gantt chart on 11x17” paper count as one page only?

A15 The 90 page limit does not include forms and resumes. It does include Letter of
Introduction, Table of Contents, divider pages, and intentionally blank pages. A
11"x17" Gantt chart is considered one page. Note that 90 pages is a
recommended size limit, although succinctness is appreciated by the Selection
Committee.

Q16 Page 37, item h) states that proponents must have attended the mandatory
site/information meeting. Please confirm that this is not a requirement.

A16 A Mandatory Site Meeting is not a requirement for this Call.

Q17 Form 4(1): May we include a feasibility study or master plan for a pool facility, of a
similar or larger scale as this facility?

A17 No. Substantial completion of the construction phase within the last seven (7)
years is required for this mandatory requirement.

Q18 Form 4(1): May we include pool projects completed more than 7 years ago?

A18 No. Substantial completion of the construction phase within the last seven (7)
years is required for this mandatory requirement.

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


5 of 17
Q19 Form 4(1): May we include a pool project that is currently in the Construction Documents
phase?

A19 No. Substantial completion of the construction phase within the last seven (7)
years is required for this mandatory requirement.

Q20 Would the City consider allowing the Prime Consultant to carry a pool specialist as a
sub-consultant on the team, and feature their experience on form 4(1)?

A20 It is the City's expressed requirement that the prime consultant ("Proponent")
must have the mandatory Indoor Pool experience required as this is a mandatory
requirement. (The Proposal must confirm that the prime consultant ("Proponent")
will provide complete design and field review services for the pool from start of
design through to final commissioning). Please also see A13 and A23.

Please note that the City makes a distinction between a prime consultant (who has
ultimate responsibility for the design or design supervision of all aspects of the
indoor pool component (e.g. the pool tanks, pool deck, pool hall envelope, change
rooms, pool HVAC systems, pool interior lighting etc.) and a non-architect pool
specialist which may consult on some aspects of the pool design (e.g. filtration
systems etc.).

The prime consultant ("Proponent") must demonstrate their experience with a


pool on form 4(1); this mandatory experience cannot be assigned to another
architectural firm.

If a prime consultant wishes to carry a pool specialist (non-architect) on their


team, they can be carried as a sub-consultant and listed on Form 5 Team
Summary Information (Sub-consultants "Other") and information about them
included within the body of the submission.

Q21 Would the City consider increasing the window for relevant project examples from 7
years to 10?

A21 No. Seven (7) years is the requirement.

Q22 Please confirm if the City intends to proceed with the public indoor pool or if there is a
possibility that it will be removed from the proposed scope of work.

A22 It is the intention of the City to include the public indoor pool in the building
program for this community centre, per the recommendation of the Parks Forestry
and Recreation Facility Master Plan 2018-2038. However, specifics around the
provision of a pool, will be determined during the investigation/program
confirmation phases and the approach to schematic design.

Q23 In the event a prime consultant is in a consortium consisting of two architectural firms,
can one architectural firm fulfill the mandatory pool project experience and the other fulfill
the mandatory heritage project experience?

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


6 of 17
A23 It is the City's expressed requirement that the prime consultant ("Proponent")
must have the mandatory Indoor Pool experience required as this is a mandatory
requirement. (The Proposal must confirm that the prime consultant ("Proponent")
will provide complete design and field review services for the pool from start of
design through to final commissioning). See also A13.

Q24 Page 32 of RFP outlines a Zero scoring point for Section 7-Cost Control. Can the City
please clarify if this is accurate or a typo?

A24 The Selection Committee will not score Subsection 7 – Cost Control

Q25 Can the prime proponent include projects from another architectural firm carried as a
sub-consultant as part of their 4 similar or relevant project examples in the last seven
years? Or only projects solely from the prime proponent will be considered and
evaluated?

A25 No. Only projects from the prime consultant will be considered and evaluated.

Q26 Please confirm that SubSection 7: Cost Control is worth 0 points and will not be
scored or if this is an error?

A26 See response under A24 above.

Q27 Can we request a copy of the 2009 Feasibility Study conducted on behalf of Taylor
Smyth Architects (TSA) and Oleson Worland (OWA)?

A27 No. The successful proponent will be provided with the study after award.

Q28 RFP item 3.2.1.1.4 calls for the Engagement Consultant to ‘develop and maintain
relevant data and information on the project website…’. Is this consultant expected to
create and maintain the website in its entirety, or only to input project information and
updates on a city-run website

A28 It is the intention that the Engagement Consultant develop and create and
maintain an interactive project website in its entirety, inputting project information
and updates as required on both this website and the City-run website. The final
scope will be determined during the program confirmation design phase.

Q29 In Section 3.2 Phases of Work, the first phase is called ‘Investigation/Program
Confirmation’. The detailed description of this phase (3.2.1) includes only tasks related
to public consultation. However, in the proposed project schedule in Appendix F (page
115), the ‘Investigation’ portion of this phase is scheduled for only 4 months (prior to SD)
while ‘Program Confirmation’ is scheduled for 13 months (overlapping with Investigation,
SD and DD). This suggests that Investigation and Program Confirmation are two
different things.
a. Is ‘Investigation’ actually meant to comprise a review of existing building and site
conditions, geotechnical investigations, surveys etc.? If so, can our work plan
show these tasks, which are currently outlined under the ‘Schematic Design’

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


7 of 17
phase description (items 3.2.2.1 through 3.2.2.7), moved into the ‘Investigation’
phase? This approach would make more sense, allowing site investigation to
happen at the outset rather than four months into the project.

A29 Work Plan can include the items 3.2.2.1 through 3.2.2.7 under Section 3.2.2
Schematic Design Phase in the Investigation Phase.

Q30 In Section 5.2 Proposal Documentation and Delivery, Subsection c) states “Must consist
of one (1) original (clearly marked as such on its first page) and four (4) full copies of:”
and goes on to list Form 3 (Price Detail Form) in Part (iii). However, in the same Section
5.2, Subsection i) Two-Envelope System, Part ii) states “Must consist of One (1) original,
clearly marked as such on its first page, and Two (2) copies of Appendix D (Price Detail
Form) completed as indicated.
a. Please clarify the number of copies of Form 3 (Price Detail Form) required to
accompany the One (1) original.

A30 As this RFP is using a Two-Envelope System, the main proposal document is not
to include Form 3 (Pricing Detail form) bound within. The Form 3, Pricing Detail
Form is to accompany it separately.
Under Section 5.2, Proposal Documentation and Delivery, Subsection c, should
read that the Proponents are to submit one (1) original (clearly marked as such on
its first page) and four (4) full copies of:
 The main proposal document
 Form 1
Refer also to Item 5 above.

Under Section 5.2, Subsection i) Two-Envelope System, the Proponents are to


follow instructions as noted in the RFP and provide the Cost of Services
submission packaged and sealed in a separate envelope, labelled Cost of
Services displaying a full and correct return address and include one (1) original
(clearly marked as such on its first page) and two (2) full copies of Form 3, Pricing
Detail Form.

Q31 Could there be an extension to the submission date to facilitate assembling the many
required disciplines for this assignment?

A31 Refer to Addendum No. 1

Q32 Can we request one additional page for the following forms: FORMS 4(1)-4(2), FORMS
6(1)-6(4)–to allow for the incorporation of project images to supplement the forms
content?

A32 Proponents may provide one additional photo page for each of the projects
submitted on Forms 4(1) – 4(2) and Forms 6(1) to 6(4). Proponents should label
these additional photo pages as Forms 4(1a) Form 4(2a) and Forms 6(1a) to Form
6(4a) or similar to facilitate identification.

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


8 of 17
Q33 FORM 3 Section D–Hourly Rates requests the “hourly rates for the Vendor’s
Professional Design personnel assigned to the Project…” Can you confirm if the City
requires hourly rates for all sub-consultant team members? Additionally, can you confirm
if their costs should be included within the Unit Pricing for additional site visits?

A33 Sub-consultant hourly rates are not required to be provided.  Only hourly rates for
the prime consultant and their professional design personnel assigned to the
project are required. The unit rate for the "additional site visit" if required is
intended for the prime consultant.

Q 34 The Sample Program on page 113 lists a Double Gym under The Gym and Fitness
Program, with an area of 6000 sq. ft. This is an area suitable for a single high school
size gym only. Please confirm.

A34 The final size of the Gym will be determined through the program consultation
design process. The "Double Gym" area of 6,000 sq. ft. means a single gym that
is large enough to allow for either a single, full court game OR the simultaneous
play of two "non-regulation sized" cross-court games (ie. total of 6 basketball
nets).

Q35 Can you clarify if the City really want the appraised value of all the trees included in the
report so we can properly base our fee?
From our experience, this is a standard ask which the City often says they don’t need.

A35 For the purpose of this RFP, the arborist would not be required to provide tree
replacement value in the arborist report. Refer also to Item 4 above.

Q36 Can the City please clarify what if any construction cost estimates are required as part of
the following tasks:
 3.1.6.4 Feasibility Investigations re: Generator Design (Emergency or Peak
Shaving)
 3.1.6.5 Energy Modelling

A36 Construction cost estimates are required for:


 3.1.6.4 - the Feasibility Investigations re: Generator Design (Emergency or
Peak Shaving)
 3.1.6.5 Energy Modelling

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


9 of 17
Should you have any questions regarding this addendum contact Martin Suits by email at
martin.suits@toronto.ca.
Please attach this addendum to your RFP document and be governed accordingly. Proponents
must acknowledge receipt of all addenda in their Proposal in the space provided on the
Proposal Submission Form as per Appendix A, Section 4 - Addenda of the RFP document. All
other aspects of the RFP remain the same.

Yours truly,

Sabrina Dipietro, Acting Manager


Construction Services
Purchasing and Materials Management

Addendum No. 2 Request for Proposal No. 9118-19-5018


10 of 17
FORM 3
PRICING DETAIL FORM (Mandatory) REVISED MAY 3, 2019
9118-19-5018 Wabash ADDENDUM NO. 2

See “Notes to Pricing” in Section 5.3 Proposal Content, Sub-Section 8, Cost of Services)
This form must be included with the submission or your proposal will not be considered. Note
that the “Construction Cost” shown in the Fee Schedule table is an estimate provided here to
assist PF&R in the evaluation of the fee component of proposals, and is not to be construed by
proponents as a projection or guarantee of the magnitude of work that may result from the
final Scope of Work.

Section A Phase - LUMP SUM Price $


1a a) Investigation/Program Confirmation Phase $

1b b) Schematic Design Phase $

1c Lump Sum Fee for Investigation/Program Confirmation & $


Schematic Design Phases (Sum of Items a and b)
1d Section A – Sub-Total (1c) $

Section B - Phases 2 Thru 6


For the balance of the phases 2 thru 6 below, provide your total fee for those phases, expressed
as a percentage of the estimated construction cost (assume a Construction Cost of $33,000,000
for the purpose of evaluation):
NOTE: Please see 5.3 Proposal Content - Sub-Section 8 – Cost of Services - A. Core Pricing for a
detailed explanation. The actual fees for phases 2 thru 6 inclusive, will be adjusted based on the
percentage fee applied to the confirmed construction budget approved by the City at the completion
of the Schematic Design Phase.

_____% X $33,000,000 = $____________ (insert this total amount in item 7)

Apply the percentages per phase (%) indicated below to allocate your fee per phase ($):
2 Design Development Phase Development of design based $
12%
on final Scope of Work
3 Contract Document Phase Development of Contract $
Documents based on final 50%
Scope of Work
4 Tender Tender based on final Scope $
3%
of Work
5 Contract Administration/ Contract Administration $
30%
Construction Phase based on final Scope of Work
6 Contract Administration/ Post Contract Administration $
5%
Substantial Performance based on final Scope of Work
7 Section B – Sub-Total (Sum of items 2-6 above) 100% $
8 TOTAL FEE (Section A add items 1d + 7) Lump $
and Section B) Sum
***Phases beyond Construction Documents Phase are subject to Council budget
approval. If at any stage the project does not proceed to the following phase, the
consultant will be paid for only the phase(s) of work completed to date. The City
reserves the right to not proceed with any phase of the work at its discretion.

11 of 17
FORM 3
PRICING DETAIL FORM (Mandatory) REVISED MAY 3, 2019
9118-19-5018 Wabash ADDENDUM NO. 2

Section C - Other Activities

9 Renewable Energy Feasibility Studies as per Net Zero Energy


Building Design (Appendix F):
a) Ground Source & Air Source Heat Pump Feasibility Study $____________
b) Solar PV Panel and Solar Thermal (air and water) Feasibility Study $____________
Sub-Total (a+b) $____________
10 Design & Contract Administration for the following (if feasibility
studies show that renewable energy is technically and financially
feasible):
a) Ground Source Heat Pump system $____________
$____________
b) Air Source Heat Pump system
$____________
c) Solar Photovoltaic Panel system $____________
d) Solar Thermal (air or water) system
Sub-Total (a+b+c+d) $_____________
11 Net Zero Energy Building Design, Design & Contract Administration
Premium (per Appendix F), beyond the requirement of Toronto Green
Standard requirements (excluding items in #10 above) $____________

12 Feasibility Investigations re: Generator Design Options


$____________
13 Fundamental Commissioning
$_____________
14 Energy Modelling
$____________
15 Energy Efficiency Incentive Program Consulting Services
$____________
16 Section C – Sub-Total (9-15)
$____________

Section D - Allowances

17 Cash Allowance: Testing during Investigation, Traffic Operations &


Parking Needs Assessment $55,000.00

18 Cash Allowance: Engagement/Communications Consultant


$35,000.00
19 Cash Allowance: Record Drawings
$15,000.00
20 Owner’s Design Contingency Allowance
$350,000.00
21 Construction Phase Testing & Inspection Allowance
$400,000.00
22 Section D – Sub-Total (17-21)
$855,000.00

12 of 17
FORM 3
PRICING DETAIL FORM (Mandatory) REVISED MAY 3, 2019
9118-19-5018 Wabash ADDENDUM NO. 2

23 FINAL TOTALS BEFORE HST (8+16+22)


$____________
24 HST @ 13%
$____________
25 TOTAL PROPOSAL PRICE FOR SERVICES (23+24)
$____________

Section E - HOURLY RATES

The hourly Rates for the Vendor’s Professional Design personnel assigned to the Project are as
follows:

Vendor’s Professional Design


Personnel
Name Company Position Charge Out
Rate
Project Principle:

Design Architect:

Project Manager:

Record Drawings

Provide Unit Price for additional site visits $_______________ per visit

13 of 17
REVISED MAY 3, 2019
9118-19-5018 Wabash ADDENDUM NO. 2

MANDATORY REQUIREMENT M2 FORM 4(2)


DEMONSTRATED BUILDING TYPE EXPERIENCE - HERITAGE

The information on this form must be provided by the prime consultant OR their architect
sub-consultant (if applicable), using this form or their own similarly formatted and titled
document. Failure to do so may result in the submission being declared informal.
Submit on the following form, demonstrated successful completion (i.e. substantial completion of
construction phase) of:
(a) one (1) heritage building either listed or designated or of cultural significance either as a
major renovation, addition or adaptive re-use and with a minimum area of 2,500 metre
square in the last seven (7) years. Provide one (1) page with a detailed description and
photos.

Project Name: ...............................................................................................................................................


Bldg. Type: .....................................................................................................................................................
Date Sub. Completed: ........................................ Gross Floor Area: .....................................................
Key staff involved: .........................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
Major components of project:

........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................

Scope of your firm’s work:

........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................

Contractor: .....................................................................................................................................................
Construction Cost (Excl. fees, furniture, sundry):
Original Construction Budget $ ................................
Tender Cost $ ................................
Final Cost $ ................................
Major reason for cost variation:
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................................................................
Owner: .....................................................................................................................................................
Contact: .......................................................... email: ..........................................................................
Cell No.: .......................................................... Tel. No.: .....................................................................

14 of 17
REVISED MAY 3, 2019
9118-19-5018 Wabash ADDENDUM NO. 2

APPENDIX E
PROPOSAL EVALUATION TABLE
Evaluation Criteria Max Points
Points
MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS:
M1: DEMONSTRATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE - POOL:
Submit on the designated form provided in the appendix, demonstrated
successful completion (i.e. substantial completion of construction phase) of:
one (1) OBC Class ‘A’ public indoor swimming pool project (new construction or the PASS / FAIL
addition of a complete pool facility), either as a standalone pool or as a component
within a public community centre, YMCA/YWCA, university, college etc.) in the last
seven (7) years;
M2: DEMONSTRATED PROJECT EXPERIENCE- HERITAGE:
Submit on the designated form provided in the appendix, demonstrated
successful completion (i.e. substantial completion of construction phase) of:
PASS / FAIL
one (1) heritage building either listed or designated or of cultural significance either
as a major renovation, addition or adaptive re-use with minimum area of 2,500
square metres in the last seven (7) years;
TECHNICAL SELECTION CRITERIA:

Subsection 2 – PROPONENT PROFILE: 7.0


IF APPLICABLE ONLY: (A proposal with a single architectural firm receives full points
automatically).
RATIONALE FOR A 2ND ARCHITECTURAL FIRM AS A SUB-CONSULTANT: (please 5.0
note section 2 of Appendix A regarding consortiums and the requirement that there be a
single proponent (i.e. the City will not allow joint-ventures)
Subsection 3 – EXPERIENCE & QUALIFICATIONS OF PROPONENT
PART A: SIMILAR PROJECTS (FORMS 6-11): 40
PART B: DESIGN EXCELLENCE (FORM 12): 6
Subsection 4 – PROPOSED STAFF TEAM & RESOURCES: 12
Subsection 5 – ASSIGNMENT UNDERSTANDING: 5
Subsection 6 – WORK PLAN & DELIVERABLES: 5
SUBTOTAL (TECHNICAL) SCORE 80 (A)
***Proposals must meet a minimum threshold score of 70% on the Technical Selection Criteria
(i.e. 70% of 80 points = 56 points) to be considered further.
FEE:
Subsection 7 – COST OF SERVICES: 20 (B)
TOTAL PROPOSAL SCORE
This score is used to determine eligibility for 100 (C)
interview

FOR FOUR (4) HIGHEST SCORING PROPOSALS SELECTED FOR INTERVIEW ONLY:
Interview Score 25 (D)
Subsection 7 – COST OF SERVICES (from item (B) above) 20 (B)
SUBTOTAL TECHNICAL SCORE, REDUCED WEIGHTING (= (A)/80 x 55) 55 (E)
TOTAL (PROPOSAL & INTERVIEW) SCORE 100 (F)
 
15 of 17
REVISED May 3, 2019
9118-19-5018 Wabash ADDENDUM NO. 2

TEAM SUMMARY INFORMATION (Mandatory) FORM 5

The information on this form must be provided by the prime consultant, using this form or
their own similarly formatted and titled document. Failure to do so may result in the submission
being declared informal.

PRIME CONSULTANT (Architect):


Name of Practice: ..…......………………………………………………………………….
Contact Name: ............................................................................................... ……..
Title: ……………………………………………………………………………
Email: ...................................................................................................... ..
Telephone: …. ............................................................................................... …
Fax: ……………………………………………………………………………
No. Of Staff: ……………………………………………………………………………
Principals: ……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………
Professional Membership ………………………………………………………………………
(Provide copy of Certificate of Practice and Licence (OAA)

PROPONENT’S KEY STAFF TO BE ASSIGNED TO THIS PROJECT


(Attached 1 page Resume that demonstrates experience in related work of this RFP)

Name: .......................................................................................................
Title/Role: .......................................................................................................
Name .......................................................................................................
Title/Role .......................................................................................................
Name: .......................................................................................................
Title/Role .......................................................................................................
Name: .......................................................................................................
Title/Role: .......................................................................................................
Name .......................................................................................................
Title/Role: .......................................................................................................

16 of 17
REVISED May 3, 2019
9118-19-5018 Wabash ADDENDUM NO. 2

SUB CONSULTANTS (List Firms to be assigned for the following disciplines):

Structural ........................................................................................... …
Mechanical ..............................................................................................
Electrical ..............................................................................................
Landscape ..............................................................................................
Engagement/Communications Consultant ...........................................................................
Heritage Consultant ..............................................................................................
Arborist/Tree Preservation Report ......................................................................................
Energy Modeling Consultant ..............................................................................................
Civil & Storm Water Management ........................................................................................
Cost Consultant ..............................................................................................
Building Code Consultant ..............................................................................................
Fundamental Commissioning ..............................................................................................
Audio Visual Consultant ..............................................................................................
Public Address System Design ............................................................................................
Acoustical Engineering ..............................................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................

17 of 17

You might also like