GRP 1 Humss B
GRP 1 Humss B
22RP
A Research Proposal
by
Sheena L. Sandoval
Kevin V. Monteagudo
Maribeth A. Buñag
May 2022
HUMSS
22RP
APPROVAL SHEET
__________________
Date Signed
_________________ ________________
Date Signed Date Signed
______________
Date Signed
Accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Research Project under
Grade 12 HUMSS.
_____________________
Date Signed
HUMSS
22RP
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With sincere appreciation and deep gratitude, the researcher would like to
acknowledge several people who played an important role for the completion of this
research.
To our teachers Mr. Jerick Jornadal and Ms. Raiza Masculino, who guided us
while doing our research and also for their accommodating advices, expertise, time and effort
and for imparting additional knowledge and encouragement to finish this study;
To our Panelists, for the suggestions and recommendations to make this research
possible;
To our respondents, for their time and active participation that gave the researcher
To our friends and classmates, for the advice, unending support and
encouragement;
To our beloved family, for the emotional, financial, and spiritual support they have
given. Their love, understanding, and sacrifices will always mark in her heart;
Above all, glories and thanks are given back to our Almighty God who always
enlightens and strengthens me in my undertakings and for making her believe that nothing is
DEDICATION
Genroj
Sheena
Kevin
Maribeth
Faith Magdalene
HUMSS
22RP
ABSTRACT
Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) is an ethic of prevention that aims to reduce the
damage caused by natural hazards such as earthquakes, floods, droughts, and cyclones. The
level of preparedness of a community's DRR unit is deemed critical because it affects the
community's safety, and well-being. Therefore, the researchers came up with the study
entitled “Level of Preparedness of the Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) Unit of Marinduque
State College (MSC)'', with the objectives to examine their level of preparedness in terms of
evaluation, and updating of contingency plans, and lastly, their training on formulation of
contingency plans. This is based on the guidelines stated in section 6 of the NDRRMC and
NSC Joint Memorandum Circular No. 01 s. 2016. To accumulate results, the researchers
used a quantitative and descriptive method in gathering data, relevant to incorporate different
indicators that will assess the level of preparedness of the MSC-DRR unit. The data
gathering was conducted through a self-made questionnaire given to the respondents of the
study from the MSC-DRR response team. The researchers categorized the answers of the
respondents, and analyzed the results. Based on the study's findings, the researchers
concluded that the level of preparedness of the DRR unit of MSC is well-prepared, and the
most contributing factor in the level of preparedness of the MSC-DRR Unit is training;
whereas, the years of service affects the number of seminars/trainings attended. Lastly, it was
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Acknowledgment..................................................................................... iii
Dedication............................................................................................... vi
Abstract……………………………………………………………………… v
Table of Contents.................................................................................... vi
List of Figures......................................................................................... ix
Chapter I…………………………………………………………………… 1
Introduction……………………………………………………….... 1
Conceptual Framework……………………………………………... 6
Research Paradigm………………………………………................. 7
Definition of Terms…………………………………………………. 8
HUMSS
22RP
Chapter II…………………………………………………………………………... 11
Related Literature…………………………………………………………… 11
Related Studies……………………………………………………………… 20
Local………………………………………………………………………... 20
Foreign……………………………………………………………………… 28
Chapter III……………………………………………………………………….... 37
METHODOLOGY…………………………………………………………….. 37
Research Design…………………………………………………………… 37
Research Locale…………………………………………………………… 37
Research Instrument……………………………………………………… 39
Chapter IV…………………………………………………………………..... 42
Chapter V……………………………………………………………………..
Summary of Findings……………………………………………….. 50
Conclusion…………………………………………………………… 53
Recommendations…………………………………………………... 54
Bibliography…………………………………………………………………….. 56
Appendices……………………………………………………………………… 62
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.2 Weighted Mean and Adjectival Equivalent of Responses in Assessment Scale 46
LIST OF FIGURES
Chapter I
Introduction
One of many persisting problems globally is the occurrence of disasters. The World
Health Organization (WHO) defines a disaster as “an occurrence disrupting the normal
conditions of existence and causing a level of suffering which exceeds the capacity of
as well as various factors that influence a community's exposure and vulnerability, can all
organized to withstand the impact, and whose population is vulnerable due to poverty,
The Philippines is one of the world's most disaster-prone countries due to its
earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tropical cyclones, and floods. In effect, according to the
World Risk Report 2018, the Philippines ranked third among all countries with the highest
disaster risk, with an index value of 25.14 percent (World Economic Forum, 2018). Multiple
hazards affect at least 60% of the country's total land area, and 74 percent of the population is
To address this problem, the Philippines, through the R.A. No. 10121 otherwise
known as the “Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010,” pursued
on strengthening the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management System, providing
for the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Framework and institutionalizing
HUMSS
22RP
the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Plan, appropriating funds therefor
and for other purposes; as well as the establishment of the National Disaster Risk Reduction
Management Council, and its branches down to the Local Government Level, and Provincial
Offices to spearhead the said system in their respective sectors wherein they have jurisdiction
over.
The Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management System aims to adopt and
while adhering to good governance principles such as transparency and accountability in the
being a small, and peaceful province, it too is very susceptible to disasters. This being an
island province means disaster response from the mainland is unlikely to arrive immediately.
To compensate, Disaster Risk Reductions (DRR) Units under the Provincial Disaster Risk
areas in the province; one of which is the Marinduque State College (MSC) in Boac,
Marinduque.
The MSC-DRR Unit is equipped with the primary mandate of overseeing the disaster
preparedness, response, and recovery activities of the college. This particular unit, same as
with all other branches of the NDRRMC, shall oblige to the guidelines stated in section 6 of
the NDRRMC and NSC Joint Memorandum Circular No. 01 s. 2016 leaning on the
To address this matter, the researchers have conducted this study to ascertain the level
of disaster preparedness of the MSC - Disaster Risk Reduction Unit, and its contributing
Disaster risk reduction aims to prevent new disasters, reduce existing disaster risks,
and manage residual risk, all of which help to strengthen resilience and, as a result, achieve
sustainable development. As the threat of disasters is certain and prevalent, Disaster Risk
Reduction Units must be well prepared to respond and reduce risks leading to casualties, and
fatal outcomes. In addression, this particular study aimed to know the Level of Preparedness
Age
Sex
2. What is the level of preparedness of the Disaster Risk Reduction Unit of Marinduque
contingency plans
HUMSS
22RP
3. What are the contributing factors on the preparedness of the Disaster Risk Reduction
The study delimited its investigation on the level of preparedness of the disaster risk
reduction unit of Marinduque State College (MSC) - Boac Branch, and its contributing
factors in the Academic Year 2021-2022. Specifically, this study aimed to examine their
dissemination, pilot-testing, evaluation, and updating of contingency plans; and lastly, their
training on formulation of contingency plans. Thus, the MSC-DRR response team, and the
Given that as a result of disaster preparedness, individuals and groups were able to
better mitigate the effects of a hazard especially when it comes to reducing mortality and
To the MSC-DRR Response Team, they are the ones to respond immediately to a
disaster be it before, during, and after, therefore, results of the study may enlighten them on
what they have, what they lack, and what should be improved, be it on their methods or
resources. The results could encourage them to further put effort on their shortcomings to
To the MSC-DRRMO, they are the ones that implement the Disaster Risk Reduction
System in the institution, and manages all related activities of the response team, thus, in the
appraisal of the study’s results, they were motivated to put more attention into the
improvement of their response team, and their disaster preparedness as a whole to better
secure the safety of the public, especially their students and faculty members in the event of
disasters.
To the students and faculty members of Marinduque State College, they are the ones
to receive response from the aforementioned groups, with that, the effects on the
management and response team would reflected on the students and faculty members of the
To the Local Government Units, public servants and officials, especially the
PDRRMO and MDRRMOs, they are the ones facilitating the activities and the situation of
their corresponding branches, hence, the outcome of the study could uplift their support on
such to enhance the province’s resources and disaster preparedness leading to more proficient
disaster measures.
groups, same as with the students, and faculty members of MSC, they are the ones to
experience the response given by the various units of the PDRRMO. The improvements in
these units were reflected on the citizens, especially to vulnerable and marginalized groups,
as they are the ones that are given priority in the event of a crisis.
To future researchers who wish to use the data within this research paper for
reference material or a guide for those who want to conduct a similar study.
HUMSS
22RP
Conceptual Framework
Disaster risk reduction (DRR) is a method for identifying, assessing, and mitigating
disaster risks. Its goal is to reduce disaster-related socioeconomic vulnerabilities while also
addressing the environmental and other hazards that cause them through the formulation of
action for specific actors in times of need, with clearly defined institutional roles and
resources, information processes, and operational arrangements. The United Nations Office
for Disaster Risk Reduction noted that it allows key actors to envision, anticipate, and solve
problems that may arise during disasters based on scenarios of possible emergency
readiness.
Factors such as demographic profile, funding, training, and the overall process and
standard operating procedures in formulating contingency plans lay both minor and major
effects on the level of disaster preparedness of a Disaster Risk Reduction Unit supported in
Research Paradigm
Figure 1 shows the research paradigm of the study following an Input Process
Output (IPO) pattern. The paradigm explains the process on how the researchers identified
the level of preparedness of the Disaster Risk Reduction Unit of Marinduque State College.
The input showed the demographic profile of MSC-DRR response team; Identify the level of
preparedness of the Disaster Risk Reduction Unit of Marinduque State College in terms of:
(1) formulation of contingency plans, (2) funding for formulation, dissemination, pilot-
testing, evaluation, and updating of contingency plans, and (3) training on formulation of
contingency plans; know the contributing factors on the preparedness of the Disaster Risk
Reduction Unit of MSC in facing natural and human-induced hazards; and give
questionnaire was given to the respondents. Identification of the Level of Preparedness of the
Disaster Risk Reduction Unit of Marinduque State College served as the output of the study.
Definition of Terms
Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) are non-state actors whose aims are to unite people to
Cluster Approach is a coordination system of the NDRRMC that seeks to ensure a more
rational and efficient response by mobilizing groups of agencies, organizations and non-
government organizations to respond in a strategic manner across all key sectors or areas of
Contingency Plan is a scenario-based plan for a particular and projected natural and/or
human-induced hazard. It seeks to address the impacts of the hazard to people, properties,
environment, security, and public safety; and/or to hinder the occurrence of the emerging
Crisis Management (CM) includes plans and institutional arrangements to engage and
comprehensive and coordinated ways to take action to the entire spectrum of crisis needs.
anticipate, respond to, and recover from the impacts of likely, imminent or current hazard
events or conditions.
immediate and short-term needs. It is the provision of emergency services and public
assistance during or immediately after a disaster in order to save lives, reduce health impacts,
ensure public safety and meet the basic subsistence needs of the people affected.
Disaster Risk is defined as the potential disaster losses in lives, health status, livelihood,
assets and services, which could happen to a particular community or a society over some
Disaster Risk Reduction is considered as the concept and practice of reducing disaster risks
by means of systematic efforts to analyze and manage the causal factors of disasters,
property, wise management of land and the environment, and improved preparedness for
adverse events.
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) is the systematic process of using
strategies, policies and improved coping capacities to lessen the adverse impacts of hazards
Mitigation is a structural and non-structural measure undertaken to limit the adverse impact
of natural hazards, environmental degradation, and technological hazards, and to ensure the
disasters.
NDRRMC and NSC Joint Memorandum Circular No. 01, s. 2016 tackles the guidelines
on the formulation of contingency plans for natural and human-induced hazards and adoption
R.A. No. 10121, otherwise known as the “Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management (DRRM) Act”, is the policy of the Philippine State to adopt a DRRM approach
that is holistic, comprehensive, integrated, and proactive in reducing the socioeconomic and
environmental impacts of disasters including climate change, and promote the involvement
and participation of all sectors and stakeholders concerned, at all levels, especially the local
community.
HUMSS
22RP
Chapter II
This chapter contains some related literature and related studies which have bearing
on the study.
Related Literature
The International Finance Corporation, also referred to as IFC (2010), asserted that
people to reach their full potential and exercise other rights, and this should not be suspended
because of disasters and emergencies. Natural hazards are part of the context for educational
increasing severity of storms and cyclones, water shortages, or the slow onset of rising
seawater levels, these known and expected hazards can be mitigated with the determined
application of knowledge, education, and ingenuity. Mankind may not be able to prevent the
earth from shaking, the wind from blowing, or the rain from falling. However, with
assessment and planning, physical and environmental protection and response preparedness;
we can prevent these events from becoming disasters. Since schools are our universal
institution for sharing knowledge and skills, the expectations for schools to be role models in
disaster prevention is high. Successful disaster mitigation is one of the ultimate tests of the
Based on the Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, also referred to
as CRED (2015), natural and man-made disasters are an unfortunate fact of life that most
people around the world will have to cope with at some point in their lives.
The review of related literature hereon presents the discussion on various subsections
Philippines’ Disaster Risk Reduction and Management System, the Potential Impact of
Preparedness.
The Philippines, being located along both the path of the tropical storms brewing in
the western Pacific and the Ring of Fire, caused at least 60% of its total land area, nearly
300,000 square kilometers (116,000 square miles) to be vastly susceptible to natural hazards
such as typhoons, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, etc. Additionally, man-made events such
the strongest storms on record to make landfall. It included winds up to 200 MPH and gusts
up to 225 MPH. The typhoon overwhelmed regional capacity and affected nine out of the 17
regions in the Philippines. In its wake, Haiyan left over 6000 fatalities, 28,000 injured and
(NDRRMC), which serves as the National Disaster Management Agency for the Philippines,
led the response and recovery effort. Located at the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP)
military headquarters at Camp Aguinaldo, the NDRRMC hosts the MNCC. The MNCC’s
purpose is to provide common situational awareness between the AFP and assisting foreign
militaries, and facilitates overall military support among assisting states (Carroll, et. al
2015).
were made for future operations response and recovery. Overall, the multi-level response was
disjointed, as the influx of arrival teams overwhelmed airport authorities, causing confusion
In the Global Climate Risk Index (CRI) 2021, the Philippines was ranked 17th in the
world as the country most affected by extreme weather events. Using 2019 data, the country
received a score of 26.67. It was ranked 2nd in the index in 2018, with a score of 11.17, the
In 2018, CRI records show that there were 455 total fatalities recorded in the
Philippines which ranked 4th globally by death toll; and ranked 13th in 2019, and was not
According to Buchholz (2020), typhoon damage has increased dramatically in the last
decade with over 91 storms, and 12,376 counts of deaths in November 2020, owing in part to
The WorldData.info (2021), with statistics based on datas from the National
earthquakes scaling from magnitudes 5.0 to 7.6 with a total of 361 counts of deaths since
technological hazards. Armed conflict situations are classified as man-made hazards. Armed
conflict becomes a disaster when it disrupts society on a large scale and causes widespread
damage and losses in addition to the physical fighting. In May 2017, during an attempt to
capture the then-IS emir in Southeast Asia, a battle broke out in Marawi City between
Philippine defense and security forces and IS-affiliated militants. The conflict quickly
escalated into a government-led siege, which lasted until October of 2017. The city was
destroyed, many residents were killed or injured, and up to 98 percent of the population was
forcibly displaced, resulting in serious humanitarian consequences. (Trias & Gong, 2020)
Trias & Gong (2020) also stated that despite having opened up to civilians in
response to the Republic Act 10121's whole-of-society approach, the Philippine disaster
management system remains heavily influenced by the military, wherein, the Task Force
Bangon Marawi is a similar case. The same pattern can be observed in national crisis and
On 27 May 2010, Republic Act 10121 entitled, “An Act strengthening the Philippine
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management System, providing for the National Disaster Risk
HUMSS
22RP
Reduction and Management Framework and institutionalizing the National Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Plan, appropriating Funds therefor and for other purposes” was
signed into law. Also known as the Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act
of 2010, the law paved the way for a paradigm shift in the country’s disaster management
system from one primarily focused on response and preparedness for response to one focused
This national policy transformed and reformed the way the Philippines deals with
disasters and strongly recognized that risks need not become disasters and that the impacts of
disasters can be reduced by addressing the underlying causes of risk. It emphasized the
importance of strengthening people’s capacity to absorb shocks and stresses, maintain basic
functions during disasters and build back better from disasters. It likewise recognized some
long-standing good practices at the local level and institutionalized them for upscaling.
(NDRRMC, 2020)
The Philippines, through the enactment of the said Act, evolves expansion of disaster
or cluster approach with the inclusion of private sectors in the Council”. The mandate of the
Office of Civil Defense (OCD), being the executive arm of the National Disaster Risk
Reduction and Management Council (NDRRMC) has expanded which requires an operating
facility to effectively manage the consequences of all types of major disasters besetting the
communities to promote DRR at all levels of society. In the 1970s and 1980s, the country is
best known for being one of the first places where community-based and participatory
disaster risk reduction emerged. DRR based in the community was then developed. (Gaillard,
2014)
Galliard (2014) also noted that NGOs and community-based organizations (CSOs) in
the area are driving the initiative. It was motivated by a genuine desire to reform society and
improve the living conditions of millions of poor Filipinos, particularly those who were most
vulnerable to disasters. As a result, DRR has always had a political connotation in the
Philippines.
The NDRRMC is the highest policy-making platform for disaster risk reduction and
management in the country which advises the President of the Philippines on the status of
disaster prevention and mitigation, disaster preparedness, disaster response, and disaster
recovery and rehabilitation efforts. In the discharge of its functions, the NDRRMC utilizes
and facilitates the services of the Office of Civil Defense, which serves as the Executive Arm
Disaster Preparedness provides for key strategic actions that give importance to
competency building for survival and rescue, and the development of needed disaster
HUMSS
22RP
preparedness and response plans. In preparing communities and governments for possible
information coming from the prevention and mitigation aspect is necessary in order for
preparedness activities to be responsive to the needs of the people and situation on the
planning. It is assumed that anticipating what might happen, as well as allocating resources,
guidance/rules in advance, will increase the chances of a successful response in the event of a
of steps that you can take to help you respond effectively to a major event that may or may
not occur. It should include things like preventative controls and recovery strategies, and it
According to Long & Eckerle (2018), any contingency plan's goal is to get an
organization back to normal operations as soon as possible after an unforeseen event. The
contingency plan safeguards resources, reduces customer annoyance, and identifies key
Guidebook (2020) is subdivided into 8 sections namely (1) Risk Assessment (2) Early
Warning System (3) Food Security, Non-Food Items, and Livelihoods (4) Shelter/Camp
HUMSS
22RP
Coordination and Camp Management (CCCM) (5) Health/Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (6)
Protection (7) Response Structure; and (8) Risk Communications and Community
With the increased importance of contingency planning, it is now used not only in
DRRM, but also in Crisis Management (CM), which "involves plans and institutional
arrangements to engage and guide the efforts of government, non-government, voluntary, and
private agencies in comprehensive and coordinated ways to respond to the entire spectrum of
crisis needs." As a result, CP has been designated as one of the operationalizing tools of the
Experience is a complicated factor. It can include direct personal experience with hazardous
situations. People often lack such personal experience due to the infrequency and diversity of
major hazard events. The Sendai recommendations (United Nations, 2015), particularly the
Build Back Better (BBB) recommendation, are one reason why more systematic research
into the relationship between disaster experience and preparedness is required. Beyond the
physical, the BBB concept can include using disaster experience as a catalyst for developing
According to the United Nations Office of Disaster Risk Reduction (2015), as stated
in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, the steady increase in
HUMSS
22RP
disaster risk, including the increased exposure of people and assets, combined with lessons
learned from previous disasters, points to the need to improve disaster preparedness for
response, take action in advance of events, integrate disaster risk reduction into response
preparedness, and ensure that capacities for effective response and recovery are in place at all
levels. It is critical to empower women and people with disabilities to take public leadership
and promote gender-equal and universally accessible response, recovery, rehabilitation, and
reconstruction initiatives.
Women and their participation are critical to effectively managing disaster risk and
plans, and programs; and adequate capacity building measures are needed to empower
women for disaster preparedness as well as to build their capacity to secure alternate sources
According to the same reference, they asserted that children and teenagers are change
agents who, in accordance with legislation, national practice, and educational curricula,
should be given the space and opportunities to contribute to disaster risk reduction.
The United Nations Office of Disaster Risk Reduction (2015) also averred that older
people have years of knowledge, skills, and wisdom to contribute to disaster risk reduction,
and they should be included in the development of policies, strategies, and methods,
Allen & Katz (2010) stated that ultimately, we show how to include demography into
public health emergency preparedness plans to create more effective strategies. Important
HUMSS
22RP
policy implications emerge: in order to increase community resilience and lessen the
Related Studies
The review of related studies presents local and foreign references similar to the
researchers’ study.
Local
According to the study of Alcayna et al. (2016) entitled “Resilience and Disaster
Trends in the Philippines: Opportunities for National and Local Capacity Building,”
DRR have been identified. There are still significant gaps in research and practice. It is
unknown how effectively disaster risk is communicated to the general public. There have
been few studies to assess the Philippines' combined socio-ecological resilience at the local
vulnerability. Organizations such as the Manila Observatory and the Department of Science
and Technology provide comprehensive risk and vulnerability mapping on a national and
localized scale. There are post-disaster assessments, but there is a greater need for
In the study of Hoffmann et al. (2017) entitled “Learn from the past, prepare for the
future: Impacts of education and experience on disaster preparedness in the Philippines and
Thailand,” they discovered that education and disaster experience influence the propensity to
HUMSS
22RP
take precautionary measures in both countries and for both outcome measures. According to
the logit models, an extra year of schooling increases the likelihood of taking preparedness
measures by 6.3 percent in the Philippines and by 4.1 percent in Thailand. Similarly, disaster
experience has a highly significant effect on disaster preparedness in all estimates. According
to the logit models, being affected by a disaster in the previous three years increases the
likelihood of being prepared by 2.8 and 2.7 times in the Philippines and Thailand,
respectively. The effects of disaster experience are mirrored in the ordered logit regressions
as well.
Moreover, the study by Mamon et al. (2017) entitled “Disaster risk reduction
knowledge of Grade 11 students: Impact of Senior High School disaster education in the
Philippines,” of the 120 respondents, 33.33% understand when a disaster will occur, followed
by 30.00% who feel uncertain about this DRR issue. The majority of respondents (42.50%)
do not have a clear idea that disasters cannot be prevented. In addition, a high percentage of
students (35.00%) understand the importance of attending disaster risk awareness seminars
and training, with 20.83% and 20.00% of 11th grade students having no clear idea. Most
respondents are ready and prepared for disaster risks because they value sharing disaster
knowledge and experiences. They recognize the importance of having conversations about
disasters with their family and other people, they know their government can provide
assistance during disasters, they are confident that there will be immediate rehabilitation after
To support the study of Mamon et al. (2017), the study of Fernandez and Shaw (2015)
entitled “Youth participation in disaster risk reduction through science clubs in the
HUMSS
22RP
Philippines,” youth can become a link between their school, home, and community by
participating in science clubs and contributing to the spread of knowledge about disaster
ingrained in Philippine society, not only because of the country's vulnerability to natural
disasters but also because of the culture of community collaboration known as bayanihan and
the history of social movement fueled by people's discontent. with poor management leads to
al.,2012). CBDRM in the Philippines is a change mechanism in civil society (Allen, 2006;
bottom-up transmission of ideas and needs (Allen, 2006; as cited in Fernandez et al.,2012).
In a recent study by Dollete and Rogayan (2020) entitled “Disaster awareness and
Curricular Integration and Extension Program” they determined the level of disaster
awareness and practice among barrio community members. Respondents have encountered
many disasters such as strong storms, earthquakes, floods and volcanic eruptions. Their life
experiences have taught them to prepare for and prepare for any disaster that may arise. In
addition, their life experiences have encouraged them to practice disaster resilience.
destructive"; and volcanic eruptions, floods, earthquakes, landslides and fires are
"destructive"; because they consider tsunamis and storm surges "strong". Respondents'
perceptions are based on their life experiences and also on their understanding of
information they obtain from the media, including television, radio and newspapers. In terms
and moderately aware of floods, volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, landslides, fires, storm
surge, and tsunamis. Raising awareness about various disasters in the barrio's community
will not only save lives, but also save the economy.
indigenous knowledge on disaster risk reduction: Insights from the Mamanwa indigenous
peoples in Basey, Samar after Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines,” the failure to incorporate
local-indigenous knowledge into disaster risk reduction (DRR) state policies such as the
Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act and the Indigenous Peoples Rights Act, as
social prejudice and discrimination, are examined. Despite these obstacles, local DRR
practitioners come up with creative ways to incorporate indigenous knowledge into local
Therapy Disaster Preparedness and Response Plan: The Philippine Experience”, to be part
better equipped. Faced with this need, the Occupational Therapists Association of the
organized a national workshop to develop a national plan for prevention and disaster
government and private individuals and organizations to achieve their goals. It refers to the
that mindfulness and discernment, financial and technical resources, policy, institutional
arrangements, leadership, and human resources avert effective and timely institutional
preparedness and responses to disaster. They also highlighted from a study the important
understanding of the risk perceptions and responses of individuals to climate change and
natural disasters. With the ideas and concepts that pertain to disaster risk reduction and
management programs, climate change adaptation, and climate-related disaster risk reduction
preparedness for natural disasters in Ozamiz City, Philippines”, the disaster response
Ozamiz. The area was chosen because commercial activities are concentrated in coastal areas
and a large part of the population lives near the coastal area, which makes the area vulnerable
to hydrological events. This study used a survey method. Survey questionnaires were
administered to 254 directors and employees from 45 organizations and follow-up interviews
were conducted. The overall findings suggest that organizations are moderately prepared for
HUMSS
22RP
natural disasters. However, results from the individual infrastructure category show that
facilities, utilities and transport organizations are less prepared. The organizations
responsible for electricity, fuel, gas, energy, waste and water utilities ranked highest with the
lowest availability. The findings of this study can help identify vulnerabilities and strategies
to improve the resilience of these critical infrastructures and institutions and may provide a
Preparedness towards building Resilient Communities, the impact of the disaster could not be
diminished, as the occurrence of the disaster threatened national and international security in
the highlands. Disasters not only impair daily life, but also adversely affect an individual's
life, with significant impacts on social and social conditions, economic activity and progress,
and the emotional and psychological impact of the individual. As the third country in the
world with high hazard exposure, the Philippines aims to maximize the resources and
resources that may help develop disaster risk mitigation approaches and practices.
Collaboration between schools, the source of relevant knowledge and the basis of behavioral
formation, and communities, the source of individual and group identities, is seen as a
powerful means of promoting people's resilience. This study explores the role of schools and
communities in mitigating disaster risk and how their collaboration creates links between
Mohammed (2018), stated in his study entitled, “Disaster risk reduction and management
of Tarlac City,” focused on the disaster risk reduction and management in Tarlac City. The
city's disaster risk reduction and management structure; identified hazards and evacuation
HUMSS
22RP
areas; the City of Tarlac DRRM plan in the four thematic areas identified in the NDRRM
plan; CDRRMO vehicles, equipment and resources; and community stakeholders are
introduced. CDRRMC and CDRRMO are established and operate according to their terms of
reference, based on the Certificate of Recognition issued by DILG to the City of Tarlac for
Disaster Preparedness. The structure of the CDRRMO was approved by the city council but
lacks funding to fill the positions identified. CDRRMO has a hazard map with bays identified
at risk of flooding, currents and earthquakes. The city government's thematic action
plans are aligned with Sendai's Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. This is clearly
shown in the list of programs and projects in their action plan. The existence of
community responders shows that the city government is extending its support to the
barangay level by training local officials on how to respond in the event of a disaster.
In addition, according to the study of Raza (2018), stated that extreme weather events
like Super Typhoon Haiyan that devastated the country on November 8, 2013 was a wakeup
call for urgent and immediate action, not only on integrating Disaster Risk Management
(DRM), but also in addressing Climate Change (CC) variation impacts [1] in cities and
municipalities. The study also implies that there exists an important difference between
coping and adaptive capacities. Coping is typically used to refer to ex post actions, while
adaptation is normally associated with ex ante actions. This implies that coping capacity also
refers to the ability to react and reduce the adverse effects of experienced hazards, whereas
adaptive capacity refers to the ability to anticipate and transform structures, functions, or
organizations to better survive any hazards. The Philippines’ existing DRR and CCA laws,
HUMSS
22RP
policies and principle guidelines are aligned with most of the bilateral international
In a research study of Leong et al. (2013), stated that the world’s second most deadly
disaster of the year 2011, tropical Storm Washi (known as Sendong in the Philippines)
landed along the east coast of Mindanao, Philippines, causing 1,292 deaths, 1,049 missing,
2,002 injured, and total 695,195 people (110,806 families) affected. They briefly discussed
the hydro-meteorological aspects of Washi, as well as its destructive effects on society and
the economy, as well as the Philippines government's response and recovery efforts during
the Washi period. The study analyzed the gaps and needs in parts of DRR actions based on
the disaster effect assessment and outlined the future challenges in typhoon related disaster
preparedness and reduction in the Philippines. Based on their study, the disaster reached
enormous proportions due mainly to three simultaneous factors: 1) very intense rainfall,
occurrence of rainfall during early morning when people were asleep; 2) high tide that
prevented a greater flow of the Cagayan de Oro and Mandulog rivers to the sea; 3) the area of
Northern Mindanao had not experience of this level of tropical storms before, the general
population had a false sense of security. Despite the bulletins from PAGASA, measures were
not taken at local level and no flood warning was issued for CDO and Iligan cities.
Furthermore, in a recent study of Esteban et. al. (2020) entitled “Disaster awareness
in three low risk coastal communities in Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines,” the
Philippines is extremely vulnerable to natural disasters. As a result, the country now has a
comprehensive catastrophe risk database, which includes a variety of hazard and risk maps
that may be used as a guide for developing development plans. Some settlements, such as
HUMSS
22RP
those in Puerto Princesa City, Palawan, are in comparatively low-risk zones (with many
inhabitants of the city believing it to be safe). They seek to ascertain how disaster risk is
understood in coastal areas that are only slightly susceptible to natural hazards, in order to
Foreign
According to the study of Nifa et. al. (2018) entitled, “A study on awareness of
disaster risk reduction (DRR) among university students: The case of PETRONAS
residential hall students”, Disaster Risk Reduction must begin at home, in communities and
in schools because education institutions play a crucial role in shaping children’s minds to
become responsible citizens in the future. The topic of disaster must be learnt by children at
an early age in order to reduce their vulnerabilities to disasters. And the hazard prone areas,
policymakers have the responsibility to ensure and protect children from unwanted incidents.
Thus, in order to improve the study on awareness of Disaster Risk Reduction among
students, further research needs to be conducted as well as increase the disaster awareness
program.
To support the study of Nifa et. al. (2018), the study conducted by Ntali (2016),
revealed that the Disaster Risk Reduction issues have been included in some of the
universities but the teaching of it is still very low. Generally, universities are vulnerable to
various hazards due to lack of awareness, poor management measures and improper
inclusion of Disaster Risk Reduction issues that could help in mitigating, preparing and
In addition, Amirrol & Zubir (2011) highlighted in their study entitled, “Disaster Risk
of disaster reduction for their own well-being. Measures to develop essential skills that can
translate risk awareness into concrete practices of sustained risk management become a
necessity. With that, several studies have revealed that the approach to disaster mitigation is
becoming more and more community-based and a considerable amount of work effort has
been
done in order to incorporate aspects of disaster management into the holistic develop
ment of communities.
Likewise, the study by Sardi et. al. (2019) entitled “Assessing disaster risk and
resilience: a case study in urban flood vulnerable community in Kampung Asahan, Kuala
Selangor”, stated that there is a new insight into testing urban resilience and developing a
social resilience strategy for reducing disaster risk. However, in reality, for a developing
country, this is a great challenge and task to consider. Thus, their study was focused on urban
disaster awareness to improve public participation and disaster resiliency wherein there are
already frameworks for financial resource mobilization and measures to summarize the
significant step that a person could take to prepare for a disaster. Disaster preparedness in
HUMSS
22RP
recent years is no longer an option among everyone who is at the forefront of a disaster. It is
imperative that each person should learn a certain disaster preparedness strategy to better
Moreover, Hoffmann and Muttarak (2015) stated in their study entitled, “A Tale of
Disaster Experience in Two Countries: Does Education Promote Disaster Preparedness in the
Philippines and Thailand”, that preparing for a disaster can substantially minimize loss and
experience and education are found to be key predictors of individual disaster preparedness.
The effect of education on disaster preparedness is mainly mediated through social capital
and disaster risk perception in Thailand but there is no evidence that education is mediated
According to the study conducted by the Aso Staff Writers (2019) entitled, “How to
Prevent, Prepare, Respond And Recover in The Face of Emergencies and Disasters”,
students, faculty and administrators can prepare themselves for emergencies at school in a
number of ways, from conducting regular, emergency-specific drills to making sure the
Disasters,” they analyzed the preparedness of 549 physicians from all medical centers in
questionnaire (Supplementary Materials) had 13 items and was designed to take 5–10
minutes to complete. There were five questions (questions 1–2, 7–9) that tried to quantify the
perceived preparation. Each question in this group was phrased as a statement that could be
extremely low (very low, low, possible, probable, extremely well/high). Questions 3–6 were
about experience and may be answered with a simple yes/no or by writing a choice. The
demographic questions 10–14 were the last to be answered. The findings of this study
demonstrate that physicians' perceived preparedness for crisis management and response is
not as high as it should be, with the majority of respondents believing their preparedness to
disasters, as well as medical and non-medical aspects of the response, with a special
Preparedness Behaviors Amongst Tehran Inhabitants, Iran” evaluated the effects of some
Residents of Tehran aged 18 and up were included in the target population. A total of 1250
people were chosen at random and asked to fill out a standardized questionnaire. The study's
findings revealed that monthly income level, prior disaster experience, residential district,
and employment are all demographic factors that have a substantial impact on disaster
HUMSS
22RP
preparedness behaviors. Gender, educational level, number of family members, home type,
home ownership, and being the head of household had no effect on disaster preparedness.
According to Pathirage et al. (2014) in their study entitled “Knowledge, Factors, and
can portray a vital role through ensuring the availability and accessibility of accurate and
reliable disaster risk information when required, and through effective lesson learning. Based
on their study, there are different categories of disaster knowledge that are classified based
on their characteristics, and those are technological, social, environmental, legal, economical,
operational or managerial, institutional, and political. These factors are common for all types
of disasters, and across four phases of the disaster cycle such as mitigation, preparedness,
recovery, and response. It was then concluded that people’s attitude and perceptions hinder
School Emergency Preparedness” stated that pupils in Pakistan are continually exposed to
dangers since they spend the majority of their time at schools, and are therefore ideal targets
for natural disasters. It is particularly critical for schools in nations like Pakistan, where
disaster preparedness is a choice rather than a requirement, to provide a strong Disaster Risk
Reduction (DRR) program. The current study takes a practical approach to disaster risk
(Peshawar, Charsadda, Nowshera, and Dera Ismail Khan). The perspectives and replies from
HUMSS
22RP
the interview data were organized using thematic analysis. Through semi-structured
individual interviews, one-hundred (100) people in various roles such as students in senior
school, primary school, as well as headteachers, and teachers from the twenty schools, were
interviewed. The current study discovered recurring reactions, allowing the creation of six
4-school building design for safety; 5-school planning for continuance; and 6-hazard
education and training. The findings show that schools are still at danger of flooding due to a
lack of disaster risk management strategies. According to the report, governments should
redesign and renovate present school buildings to guarantee that kids and instructors are
adequately protected in the event of a disaster. To create resilience and self-efficacy in times
of crisis, the schools collaborate to establish emergency plans and scenarios with local
institutions and disaster response groups. Furthermore, allow school officials, including
response and management, as well as solutions for school-based disaster response and
recovery.
given a 20-item survey on disaster preparedness in general. Residents were asked to share
their knowledge of local hazards, emergency preparedness, and personal safety. The survey
was completed by a convenience sample of 423 residents. Limited personal preparedness was
reported by 57% (n=241) of respondents. 76% (n=321) said they knew little to nothing about
home emergency systems, and 52% (n=220) said they had no idea how to get information on
HUMSS
22RP
public health emergencies like pandemic flu and evacuation response. The author then
concluded that citizens in the area should be educated on how to support personal disaster
health promotion activities, with special attention paid to known areas of community
Preparedness at a Tertiary Medical City” to evaluate the readiness of a tertiary medical cityʼs
response to a disaster by assessing the hospital resources and knowledge, attitudes, practices,
and familiarity of health care providers toward disaster and emergency preparedness. The
questionnaires, and a disaster planning attitude checklist were all completed by the
participants. The hospital disaster preparedness self-assessment tool was used to collect data
on resources. The overall mean familiarity score was 3.43 0.97, and the overall mean
knowledge score for disaster and emergency preparedness was 4.4 1.1. The majority of
participants were aware that disaster drills (90.2%) and training (74.6%) are ongoing. Sixty-
six percent (21.0 percent) of respondents agreed that KFMC is unlikely to suffer a disaster.
Decontamination (83.0 percent) and accessing critical resources and reporting (64.3 percent)
received the highest and lowest EPIQ familiarity scores, respectively. Although the majority
of participants (99.4%) have access to work computers, only 53.0% used the Internet to
access bioterrorism and/or emergency preparedness information. According to the tool, the
hospital is prepared to respond in the event of a disaster. The researchers then concluded that
the participants' levels of knowledge, practices, and overall familiarity with emergency and
HUMSS
22RP
disaster preparedness were satisfactory; however, participant attitudes and familiarity with
where and how to access critical resources in an emergency or disaster situation need to be
reinforced.
experiences during specific incidents, as well as the frequency with which these events occur,
were described in a multi-region survey of 1,801 EMS organizations in the United States. A
series of questions about local priorities were posed to respondents. As a result, A total of
768 surveys were completed and returned (43%). Training for commonly occurring types of
crises and emergencies has decreased in recent years in favor of terrorism preparedness.
Many rural EMS organizations said that events with ten or fewer victims would be too much
for them to handle. Interaction with non-EMS disaster response agencies was given a low
priority, while basic staff training and retention were given a high priority. The researchers
concluded that to mitigate the long-term effects of disasters on a local healthcare system, it is
critical to maintain viable rural emergency response capabilities and develop a community-
activities will aid in identifying common themes in order to better prioritize preparedness
Researchers from the University of Salford Manchester AlShamsi & Pathirage (2015)
conducted a study entitled “The role of effective contingency planning in managing extreme
disasters in UAE” that examined disaster and emergency management in general. It has also
HUMSS
22RP
drawn in the importance of the preparedness phase and its concepts for ensuring public
safety. The importance of effective contingency planning for both the preparedness and
response phases has been highlighted by an examination of what contingency planning is and
an explanation of the components and basic concept of contingency. The lack of contingency
planning in the UAE was also mentioned in this study, though the continued occurrence of
extreme events in the United States does not indicate the presence of contingency planning.
This study has been able to provide an understanding of contingency planning and the
dynamic response strategy, particularly in the United Arab Emirates and made a contribution
to the field of emergency and disaster preparedness by focusing on better planning for
The aforementioned related literature and studies are relevant to this research.
contingency planning. Some discuss demographic and external factors that contribute to
Chapter III
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
polls, questionnaires, and surveys, as well as manipulating pre-existing statistical data using
and generalizing it across groups of people or explaining a phenomenon, thus, was used to
interpret the gathered data from the undermentioned research instrument. This study also
incorporates the used of descriptive research design. According to QuestionPro (2022), this
research entails gathering quantifiable and systematic data that can be used to analyze the
research problem statistically, thus was used to interpret the data in the first and last parts of
Hence, this design was used to determine the level of preparedness of the Disaster
Research Locale
The locale of this study was the Marinduque State College – Boac Campus, located in
Brgy. Tanza, Boac, Marinduque wherein the population and sample are to be selected to
participate in the study. In addition, this was the chosen locale because it was comfortable for
HUMSS
22RP
the researchers, as both the study's proponents and respondents are at the same institution.
Thus, there was a DRR response team unit in the said institution that can participate in the
study's survey, whereas it is of great help to the researchers to gather enough information for
the study.
Figure 2 shows the map of Marinduque State College wherein the study will be
conducted.
HUMSS
22RP
Among the faculty members of Marinduque State College - Boac Campus, only
thirteen (13) respondents was purposely selected to participate in the study. These appellants
are specifically, the head of the MSC-DRRMO (1), and the twelve (12) members of the
DRR-Response Team.
Research Instrument
This study used a self-made questionnaire as the main tool to collect first-hand
information from the respondents since the researchers haven’t found a standardized
questionnaire that matches the desired content of the study. The self-made questionnaire was
research. Thus, the indicators of the self-made questionnaire were based on the review of
Moreover, the self-made questionnaires are divided into three parts. The first part
included the demographic profile of the respondents, specifically the MSC-DRR response
team. The second part incorporated different indicators that assess the level of preparedness
of the DRR Unit of Marinduque State College. And the last part focused on identifying the
contributing factors on the preparedness of the DRR Unit of MSC in facing natural and
human-induced hazards.
Prior to the actual conduct and administration of the instruments, the researchers
distributed the questionnaire according to the vacant schedule or during the accessible time
HUMSS
22RP
of the respondents to have their full attention when answering the given questions. The
researchers are aware that being accountable is important, thus, the researchers are prepared
with the respondents’ consultation regarding the questionnaire. The questionnaires were
made and distributed online through Google Forms to prevent the physical contact while the
country is still under the pandemic, as well as to lessen the expenses which are convenient to
After the retrieval of the questionnaires, the researchers immediately proceed to the
analysis of the data gathered wherein it involves the interpretation and tallying of data
through the use of analytical and logical reasoning using the undermentioned statistical
treatments to determine the results of the said research. The analyzed data were interpreted
For the purpose of determining the level of preparedness of the Disaster Risk
Reduction Unit of Marinduque State College, the researchers employed descriptive statistics
Percentage
Wherein: % = Percentage
F = Frequency
Percentage was used to express how large one quantity is relative to another quantity,
Weighted Mean
Formula: WM = TWF/N
A weighted mean was used to calculate the average value of the data, thus it was used
to determine the level of preparedness of the MSC-DRR Unit. To accomplish this, the
researchers used a Likert Scale with a five point rating scale to describe the subject’s level of
disaster preparedness.
Chapter IV
This chapter presents the data gathered, organized and processed statistically, then
carefully interpreted to obtain information that would answer the problem raised in Chapter I.
For organization purposes, tables are arranged according to the statement of the
problems. Each one is immediately followed by analysis, interpretation and discussion based
on the concepts, principles, and theories discussed in the review of related literature and
Respondent 1 53 M 6 months 2
Respondent 2 34 M 2 years 12
Respondent 3 47 M 1 year 4
Respondent 4 53 M 1 year 3
Respondent 5 49 M 1 year 4
Respondent 6 52 M 6 months 2
Respondent 7 46 M 6 months 2
Respondent 8 30 M 2 years 6
Respondent 9 32 M 8 months 2
Respondent 10 50 M 1 year 3
Table 1. Summary of Demographic Profile
Table 1 shows the summary of the demographic profile of the respondents. The age
of the faculty member’s ranges from 30 up to 53 years old, which means that the people hired
in the DRR unit in MSC are of older ages. On the other hand, it is visible that men are mostly
HUMSS
22RP
hired for the job, and their years of service in the unit vary from six months to two years.
Furthermore, columns four and five imply that the respondents who have the lowest years of
service in the unit have the least seminars attended, whereas the faculty members who have
the longest years of service have a higher number of seminars attended. The results then
greatly implies that age does not serve as a contributing factor for the seminars attended by
each faculty member, and instead the years of service serves as a more affecting variable.
HUMSS
22RP
Table 2 indicates the tally of responses in the assessment scale. As tabulated above, in
Sufficiently Prepared; 6 out of 10 responded Well Prepared; and 2 out of 10 responded Very
Well Prepared. In the “Funding for formulation, dissemination, pilot-testing, evaluation, and
2 - Insufficiently Prepared 0 0% 4
1 - Not Prepared 0 0% 4
2 - Insufficiently Prepared 0 0% 4
1 - Not Prepared 0 0% 4
2 - Insufficiently Prepared 0 0% 4
1 - Not Prepared 0 0% 4
Table 2.1 Frequency, Percentage, and Rank of Responses in Assessment Scale
Table 2.1 shows the frequency, percentage, and rank of responses as tabulated in table
2. In the “Formulation of Contingency Plan” section, Very Well Prepared, Well, Prepared,
and Sufficiently Prepared has a frequency of 2, 6, 2; a percentage of 20%, 60%, 20%, and a
HUMSS
22RP
rank of 2.5, 1, and 2.5 respectively. In the “Funding for formulation, dissemination, pilot-
testing, evaluation, and updating of contingency plans” section, Well, Prepared, and
Sufficiently Prepared has a frequency of 3,7; a percentage of 30%, 70%, and a rank of 2.5, 1,
Prepared, and Sufficiently Prepared has a frequency of 3,7; a percentage of 30%, 70%, and a
rank of 2.5, 1, and 2 respectively. Correspondingly, the most common response with the
Weighted Adjectival
Mean Equivalent
= Well Prepared
Table 2.2 Weighted Mean and Adjectival Equivalent of Responses in Assessment Scale
Table 2.2 conveys the weighted mean, and the adjectival equivalent of responses.
Using a 5-point Likert Scale, the computed Weighted Mean of “Formulation of Contingency
contingency plans,” and “Training on formulation of contingency plan” are 4.0, 3.3, and 3.3
Weighted Mean is 3.53, with a general adjectival equivalent of “Well Prepared”. This
HUMSS
22RP
denotes that the Disaster Risk Reduction Unit of Marinduque State is Well Prepared in the
said criteria’s; therefore the Level of Preparedness of the said Unit is Well Prepared.
Training 9 90% 1
Others 5 50% 6
Table 3. Frequency, Percentage, and Rank of Contributing Factors
Table 3 indicates the frequency, percentage, and rank of contributing factors in the
level of preparedness of the DRR unit in MSC. The results show that training serves as the
most contributing factor with a frequency of 9 and a percentage of 90%. It was followed by
funding, and employee awareness that has a frequency of 8, and a percentage of 80%.
Meanwhile, 60% of the respondents answered public awareness, management activity, and
administrative support. It has a frequency of 6, and ranked fifth among all contributing
factors. On the other hand, 50% of the respondents answered for others, and this has a
frequency of 5. It ranked second to the least contributing factors. The least factor that
contributes to the level of preparedness is program building that has a frequency of 2, and a
percentage of 20%. Overall, among the provided contributing factors, the most factor that
HUMSS
22RP
affects the level of preparedness of the DRR unit in MSC is training, while the least
Table 3.1 indicates the other factors that contribute to the level of preparedness of the
MSC-DRR Unit in facing natural and human-induced hazards. This is in line with the options
tabulated in Table 3. As stated above, the other factors are generally better planning, good
communication and cooperation with the members, affiliated organizations, and other Local
2 Undergoing different seminars and training that will enhance our knowledge
and skills about disaster preparedness.
6 Upgrade to better equipment that would help to have a better outcome with the
performance.
7 Fund increase.
8 None.
10 Have better equipment, and tools. Prepare and conduct more training sessions.
Table 3.2 Respondents’ Suggestions in Improving the MSC-DRR Unit
Table 3.2 shows the respondents’ suggestions in improving the MSC-DRR Unit.
Based on the gathered results, the highly suggested factors that need to be improved in the
MSC-DRR Unit are funding, and seminars as well as training, with respondents three (3) ,
five (5), seven (7), and ten (10) suggesting it. It was followed by the suggestion of upgrading
equipment that was suggested by respondents four (4), six (6), and ten (10). The least
suggestion made by respondent one (1) was hiring a permanent employee as the Head of the
Unit. Meanwhile, respondent eight (8) answered none. Overall, there are three main factors
that the respondents perceive that need to be improved in the MSC-DRR Unit, and those are,
Chapter V
This chapter intends to present the summary findings as answers to the problems
posted in Chapter 1. The conclusions that have been drawn from the findings are also
Summary of Findings
This quantitative study attempted to ascertain the level of disaster preparedness of the
MSC - Disaster Risk Reduction Unit. This study also attempted to determine the contributing
This study utilized a self-made questionnaire as the main tool to collect first-hand
information from the respondents. The questionnaire was divided into three parts. The first
part includes the demographic profile of the respondents, specifically the MSC-DRR
response team. The second part incorporates different indicators that will assess the level of
preparedness of the DRR Unit of Marinduque State College. And the last part identifies the
contributing factors on the preparedness of the DRR Unit of MSC in facing natural and
human-induced hazards.
Descriptive statistics such as frequency count, weighted mean, and modified Likert
scale were employed to statistically process the data gathered. Ranking was used to analyse
Age
Sex
2. What is the level of preparedness of the Disaster Risk Reduction Unit of Marinduque
contingency plans
3. What are the contributing factors on the preparedness of the Disaster Risk Reduction
1. Faculty members range in age from 30 to 53 years old, implying that those hired in
MSC's DRR unit are in their later years. On the other hand, it is clear that men are
hired for the job in the majority of cases, and their tenure in the unit ranges from six
months to two years. Furthermore, respondents with the shortest years of service in
the unit attend the fewest seminars, whereas faculty members with the longest years
of service attend the most seminars. The findings strongly suggest that age is not a
HUMSS
22RP
significant factor in the seminars attended by each faculty member, and that years of
2. The Disaster Risk Reduction Unit of Marinduque State is Well Prepared in terms of
the guidelines stated in section 6 of the NDRRMC and NSC Joint Memorandum
General Weighted Mean of 3.53 in the 5-point Likert Scale, with a general adjectival
equivalent of “Well Prepared,” therefore the Level of Preparedness of the said Unit is
Well Prepared.
Administrative Support, and Others, the factor that mostly affects the level of
preparedness of the DRR unit in MSC is training with a percentage of 90% , while the
least contributing factor is Program Building garnering only 20% of the chosen
options.
4. It may be suggested that resolutions be developed to improve the three main factors
Conclusion
Based on the results of the study, the researchers concluded that the level of
preparedness of the DRR unit at Marinduque State College was well prepared.
The researchers hereby concluded that the factors contributing to the preparation of
the MSC-DRR Unit against natural and man-made hazards are training, funding, employee
and other factors such as connections and easier communication. Training has been one of
the factors since there are findings that undergoing several seminars would create a huge
impact on improving the preparedness of the MSC-DRR unit. Meanwhile, funding and
employee awareness by eighty percent (80%) ranked second for the factors contributing to
On the other hand, public awareness, management activity and administrative support
follow the contributing factors by sixty percent (60%), other factors such as connections,
easier communication by fifty percent (50%) and twenty percent (20%) in terms of program
building .
The study's findings can help identify vulnerabilities and strategies to improve the
resilience of these critical infrastructures and institutions, as well as provide a foundation for
future improvements. Improve disaster response policies at the local level. Improvements in
these units will have an impact on citizens, particularly vulnerable and marginalized groups,
Recommendations
This part states the recommendations of the researchers according to the aforementioned
conclusions.
1. Based on the findings and gathered data, the result of the study would help to enhance
or improve the level of preparedness of the DRR unit of Marinduque State College.
Therefore, the researchers recommend that the members of the DRR unit should undergo to
different seminars that will educate them to deepen their knowledge about the formulation of
2. Since the study found out that the major contributing factors on the preparedness of the
DRR unit of MSC were the training, employee awareness and funding, the said institution
should send their employees to different seminars that would help them to enhance their
skills and knowledge in which it is a great way for them to have awareness about disaster
preparedness. Thus, the Marinduque State College should also allocate a bigger fund or
increase the current fund of the DRR unit to ensure that there is a high level of preparedness
in the Marinduque State College wherein there will be a greater chance of recovering to any
3. The DRR unit should also communicate with other organizations that are experts in
disaster risk reduction and management so that they can receive administrative assistance in
the event of a disaster. They may also continue to remind students and other faculty members
of the said institution of what they will do during, before, and after the disaster in order to
HUMSS
22RP
preparedness.
4. Moreover, for the future researchers that wish to investigate similar topics to the
will be identified to be part of the DRR unit, so that the respondents may freely share their
5. Finally, since the study focused on the Marinduque State College-Boac Campus, the
future researcher may as well conduct the same study on the other branches of MSC and
other school in the province of Marinduque so that they can able to determine the level of
BIBLIOGRAHPY
Philippine Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Act of 2010. (2009). Retrieved from
The Lawphil Project: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
Disaster Risk Reduction in the Philippines UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2019).
Retrieved from
https://www.unisdr.org/files/68265_682308philippinesdrmstatusreport
Alcayna, et al. (2016). Resilience and Disaster Trends in the Philippines: Oppurtunities for
National and Local Capacity Building. Retrieved from PLOS Current Disasters:
http://currents.plos.org/disasters/index.html%3Fp=28077.html
AlHarastani, et. al. (2020). Emergency and Disaster Preparedness at a Tertiary Medical
City. Retrieved from Research Gate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341296485_Emergency_and_Disaster_Prep
aredness_at_a_Tertiary_Medical_City
AlShamsi, H. & Pathirage (2015). The role of effective contingency planning in managing
extreme disasters in UAE. Retrieved from International Postgraduate Research
Conference (IPGRC 2015).
Amirrol, H. & Zubir S. (2011). Disaster risk reduction through community participation .
Retrieved from Wit Press: https://doi.org/10.2495/RAV110191
HUMSS
22RP
Becker, J. E. (2017). The role of prior experience in informing and motivating earthquake
preparedness. Retrieved from Science Direct:
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
Buchholz, K. (2020). See Record Number of Storms in the Philippine. Retrieved from
Statista: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
Mohammed M. P. (2018). Disaster risk reduction and management of Tarlac City. Retrieved
from Science Direct:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877705818300201
Furbee, et. al. (2020). Realities of Rural Emergency Medical Services Disaster Preparedness.
Retrieved from Cambridge University Press.
Fernandez, et. al. (2012). Community-Based Disaster Risk Management Experience of the
Philippines. Retrieved from Research Gate:
HUMSS
22RP
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285346978_Chapter_11_Community-
Based_Disaster_Risk_Management_Experience_of_the_Philippines
Goniewicz, et. al. (2020). The Impact of Experience, Length of Service, and Workplace
Preparedness in Physicians’ Readiness in the Response to Disasters. Retrieved from
MDPI: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3328
Duque, et. al. (2013). Development of a national occupational therapy disaster preparedness
and response plan: the Philippine experience. Retrieved from Research Gate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285873603_Development_of_a_national_o
ccupational_therapy_disaster_preparedness_and_response_plan_the_Philippine_expe
rience
Mamon, et. al. (2017). Disaster risk reduction knowledge of Grade 11 students: Impact of
senior high school disaster education in the philippines. Retrieved from International
Journal of Health System & Disaster Management:
https://www.ijhsdm.org/article.asp?issn=2347-
9019;year=2017;volume=5;issue=3;spage=69;epage=74;aulast=Catedral
Esteban, et. al. (2020). Disaster awareness in three low risk coastal communities in Puerto
Princesa City, Palawan, Philippines. Retrieved from Research Gate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338891848_Disaster_awareness_in_three_l
ow_risk_coastal_communities_in_Puerto_Princesa_City_Palawan_Philippines
Mina, R. (2021). Philippines looks to improve disaster preparedness with geospatial tech.
Retrieved from Mongabay: https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
Hoffman A. & Muttarak, R. H. (2015). Learn from the Past, Prepare for the Future: Impacts
of Education and Experience on Disaster Preparedness in the Philippines and
Thailand. Retrieved from Science Direct:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X15312559
HUMSS
22RP
Nifa, et. al. (2018). A study on awareness of disaster risk reduction (DRR) among university
students: The case of PETRONAS residential hall students. . Retrieved from Research
Gate : https://doi.org/10.2495/RAV110191
Leong, et. al. (2013). Assessment on Disaster Risk Reduction of Tropical Storm Washi.
Retrieved from Science Direct:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2225603218300808
Pathirage, et. al. (2014, January). Knowledge Factors and Associated Challenges for
Succesful Disasters Knowledge Sharing. Retrieved from
https://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/gar/2015/en/bgdocs/inputs/Pathirage%
20et%20al.,%202014.%20%20Knowledge%20factors%20and%20associated%20chal
lenges%20for%20successful%20disaster%20knowledge%20sharing.pdf
Raza, T. (2018). Localizing Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation in
Planners and Desicion Makers Agenda: Technical Comprehensive Model, Quezon
City, Philippines. Retrieved from Science Direct:
https://www.unisdr.org/conference/2019/globalplatform/programme/ignite-
stage/assets/pdf/5cd6840eeca8fLocalizing_DRR_and_CCA-_T.Raza-2018.pdf
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270927737_Organizational_Preparedness_f
or_Natural_Disasters_in_Ozamiz_City_Philippines
Sardi, et. al. (2019). Assesing Disaster Risk and Resilience: A Case Study in Urban Flood
Vulnerable Community in Kampung Asahan, Kuala Selangor. Retrieved from
Research Gate : https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W16-603-2019
Fernandez, G. & Shaw, G. (2015). Youth participation in disaster risk reduction through
science clubs in the Philippines. Retrieved from PubMed.gov:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25440993/
Su, G. & Cuaton, P. (2020). Local-indigenous knowledge on disaster risk reduction: Insights
from the Mamanwa indigenous peoples in Basey, Samar after Typhoon Haiyan in the
Philippines. Retrieved from Research Gate:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340516532_Local-
indigenous_knowledge_on_disaster_risk_reduction_Insights_from_the_Mamanwa_in
digenous_peoples_in_Basey_Samar_after_Typhoon_Haiyan_in_the_Philippines
Wayne, P. (2012). The Vulnerability of the Energy Sector to Natural Hazards in Costa Rica:
Environment and Natural Disaster Management. Retrieved from Periperi U. :
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.03.006
HUMSS
22RP
APPENDICES
Dear Ma’am/Sir,
May requested data be provided in either printed or best in soft version; the
undersigned may be reached through the following mean: [email protected]
or Cell #: 0945 706 0165.
Respectfully yours,
GENROJ LOUISE J. LAGUNA
SHEENA L. SANDOVAL
KEVIN V. MONTEAGUDO
FAITH MAGDALENE B. GURAY
MARIBETH A. BUNAG
Student/Researcher, MSC HUMSS Strand
HUMSS
22RP
Demographic Profile
Assessment
Using the following scale, how would you rate the Level of Preparedness of the MSC-DRR
Unit in terms of: (The following are guidelines stated in section 6 of the NDRRMC and NSC
Joint Memorandum Circular No. 01 s. 2016) Select an answer for each item.
Training on formulation
of contingency plans
1. What do you think are the contributing factors on the preparedness of the DRR Unit of
MSC in facing natural and human-induced hazards? Select all that applies.
Funding
Training
Employee Awareness
Public Awareness
Program Building
Management Activity
Administrative Support
Others (Please Specify): _____________
2. Do you have any suggestions in improving the DRR Unit of Marinduque State College?
What are these?
HUMSS
22RP
STATISTICIAN’S CERTIFICATION
partial fulfillment for Research Project and Practical Research II has been statistically
Appendix C: Documentation
HUMSS
22RP
•PERSONAL DATA
•EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
•ACHIEVEMENTS
•SEMINARS ATTENDED
2014 : Division Journalism Cliniquing - DLHMS
2018 – 2019 : Radio Broadcasting Workshop - MNHS
2019 : Basic Life Support Training - MSC
2021 : National Eagle Scouts Conclave - Virtual
: CSYF Webinar on Local Issues - Virtual
: GAD Webinar on R.A No. 9262: Anti-Violence - Virtual
Against Women and Children Act (VAWC)
: GAD Webinar on R.A No. 7877 & R.A No. 11313: - Virtual
Sexual Harassment Law & Safe Space Act
: GAD Webinar on R.A No. 10175: Cybercrime - Virtual
Prevention Act of 2012
•STUDENT ORGANIZATION
2016 : Band Leader - DLHMS Drum & Lyre Corps
2019 : Senior Crew Leader - BSP Marinduque Council Unit 001
: Bise Supremo - Venturer Scouts of Marinduque
2021 : President - Class Officers
•SKILLS
Has common sense, and good reading comprehension.
Excellent leadership skills.
Obedient, punctual, and diligent.
Excels in working under pressure.
Technology Literate
HUMSS
22RP
•CHARACTER REFERENCE
Allan V. Villaruel
Class Adviser
Sheena L. Sandoval
Student Researcher
Purok Leuconoe Brgy. Bantay, Boac, Marinduque
0938-418-2546
[email protected]
•PERSONAL DATA
Age : 17 Civil Status : Single
Gender : Female
•EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Primary
•ACHIEVEMENTS
Regional Invention Contest and Exhibit (RICE) 2019 – Finalist - SIBOL High School
Science Fair- Physical Science (Team) National Science Quest (NSQ) 2020 – 2nd
Place
•SEMINARS ATTENDED
N/A
•STUDENT ORGANIZATION
N/A
•SKILLS
Detail oriented
•CHARACTER REFERENCE
Allan V. Villaruel
Class Adviser
Kevin V. Monteagudo
Student Researcher
Janagdong, Bato Mogpog, Marinduque
09164363954
[email protected]
•PERSONAL DATA
Age : 17 Civil Status : Single
Date of Birth : December 30, 2003 Nationality : Filipino
Place of Birth : Cupang, Muntinlupa Religion : Christianity
Gender : Male
•EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Secondary: Senior High School (Grade 11)
2020-2021 : Marinduque State College-Integrated High School
Secondary: Junior High School
2016-2020 : Marinduque National High School
Primary
2010-2016 : Nangka Elementary School
•ACHIEVEMENTS
2010-2012 : Academic Excellence Award (Grade 1-3) - Top 3
2012-2016 : Academic Excellence Award (Grade 4-6) - Top 4
2014-2016 : District Level (Newswriting Filipino) - 4th place
2010-2016 : MTAP Written Elimination - Participant
2016-2020 : Academic Excellence Award (JHS) - With Honors
2017-2019 : Science School Fair (Grade 7-9) -Participant
2019-2020 : Science School and District Fair (Grade 10) -Champion (Robotics)
2019-2020 : Regional Science Fair (Grade 10) -Participant
2019-2020 : Academic Excellence Award -Researcher of the Year
2020-2021 : Academic Excellence Award (SHS-Grade 11) - With Honors
HUMSS
22RP
•SEMINARS ATTENDED
: N/A
•STUDENT ORGANIZATION
2014-2015: Supreme Pupil Government Secretary
2015-2016: Supreme Pupil Government Vice President
2014-2016: DLHMS Drum & Lyre Corps
•SKILLS
Class Adviser
Maribeth A. Buñag
Student Researcher
Purok Dama de Noche Brgy. Tampus, Boac, Marinduque
0966-772-9431
[email protected]
•PERSONAL DATA
Gender : Female
•EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Boac, Marinduque
Primary
Boac, Marinduque
•ACHIEVEMENTS
•SEMINARS ATTENDED
N/A
•STUDENT ORGANIZATION
•SKILLS
Reliable
Organizational Skills
Fluent in English
Responsible
Persistent
Attention to detail
•CHARACTER REFERENCE
Allan V. Villaruel
Class Adviser
•PERSONAL DATA
•ACHIEVEMENTS
•SEMINARS ATTENDED
2014-2016 : Division Journalism Cliniquing
2019-2020 : Citizen Journalism and News Literacy Seminar and Workshop
•STUDENT ORGANIZATION
2014-2015 : Supreme Pupil Government Secretary
2015-2016 : Supreme Pupil Government Vice President
2015-2016 : Glee Club (Dancer)
2018-2019 : Girl Scout of the Philippines ( Scribe)
2019-2020 : Girl Scout of the Philippines (Vice Chairman)
•SKILLS
Good Leadership
Sociable
Excellent Communication Skills
Critical Thinking
Competent in almost any given task and ensures quality of work.
HUMSS
22RP
•CHARACTER REFERENCE
Allan V. Villaruel
Class Adviser