0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views3 pages

Hasil SPSS

The document analyzes the relationship between chemotherapy treatment and energy intake, protein intake, and nutritional status in 34 patients. It finds that: 1) Most newly treated patients had adequate energy intake while most long-term patients had inadequate energy intake. 2) Most patients, both new and long-term, had adequate protein intake. 3) Most patients had normal nutritional status, with similar proportions of new and long-term patients being nutritionally abnormal.

Uploaded by

Satiawati
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
25 views3 pages

Hasil SPSS

The document analyzes the relationship between chemotherapy treatment and energy intake, protein intake, and nutritional status in 34 patients. It finds that: 1) Most newly treated patients had adequate energy intake while most long-term patients had inadequate energy intake. 2) Most patients, both new and long-term, had adequate protein intake. 3) Most patients had normal nutritional status, with similar proportions of new and long-term patients being nutritionally abnormal.

Uploaded by

Satiawati
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

KEMOTERAPI DENGAN ASUPAN ENERGI

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
St. Kemoterapi * Asp. Energi 34 100,0% 0 0,0% 34 100,0%

St. Kemoterapi * Asp. Energi Crosstabulation


Asp. Energi
Cukup Kurang Total
St. Kemoterapi Baru Count 9 8 17
% within St. Kemoterapi 52,9% 47,1% 100,0%
Lama Count 0 17 17
% within St. Kemoterapi 0,0% 100,0% 100,0%
Total Count 9 25 34
% within St. Kemoterapi 26,5% 73,5% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 12,240a 1 ,000
Continuity Correction b
9,671 1 ,002
Likelihood Ratio 15,791 1 ,000
Fisher's Exact Test ,001 ,000
N of Valid Cases 34
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

HUBUNGAN TINDAKAN KEMOTERAPI DENGAN ASUPAN PROTEIN

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
St. Kemoterapi * Asp. 34 100,0% 0 0,0% 34 100,0%
Protein

St. Kemoterapi * Asp. Protein Crosstabulation


Asp. Protein
Cukup Kurang Total
St. Kemoterapi Baru Count 14 3 17
% within St. Kemoterapi 82,4% 17,6% 100,0%
Lama Count 12 5 17
% within St. Kemoterapi 70,6% 29,4% 100,0%
Total Count 26 8 34
% within St. Kemoterapi 76,5% 23,5% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,654 a
1 ,419
Continuity Correction b
,163 1 ,686
Likelihood Ratio ,659 1 ,417
Fisher's Exact Test ,688 ,344
N of Valid Cases 34
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

HUBUNGAN TINDAKAN KEMOTERAPI DENGAN STATUS GIZI

Case Processing Summary


Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
St. Kemoterapi * St. Gizi 34 100,0% 0 0,0% 34 100,0%

St. Kemoterapi * St. Gizi Crosstabulation


St. Gizi
Normal Tidak normal Total
St. Kemoterapi Baru Count 9 8 17
% within St. Kemoterapi 52,9% 47,1% 100,0%
Lama Count 11 6 17
% within St. Kemoterapi 64,7% 35,3% 100,0%
Total Count 20 14 34
% within St. Kemoterapi 58,8% 41,2% 100,0%

Chi-Square Tests
Asymptotic
Significance (2- Exact Sig. (2- Exact Sig. (1-
Value df sided) sided) sided)
Pearson Chi-Square ,486a 1 ,486
Continuity Correctionb ,121 1 ,727
Likelihood Ratio ,487 1 ,485
Fisher's Exact Test ,728 ,364
N of Valid Cases 34
a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

You might also like