PAL Has Contacted The G.C. Services, As Per The Case Study Mentioned
PAL Has Contacted The G.C. Services, As Per The Case Study Mentioned
PAL Has Contacted The G.C. Services, As Per The Case Study Mentioned
● Ciro Betila's termination was handled correctly and is extremely valid in light of the
circumstances. According to the Termination of Employment Act, it an employee exhibits poor
performance or wrong doings that jeopardizes the company's image, the employer has the
right to terminate the employee's contract, provided that the employer provides the emplovee
with a letter explaining why when and now the emplovee wil be onsmissed trom nis or ner oo,
in the case of Ciro Betila, the incident did not only occur once, but he is now labeled a repeat
offender, meaning he is repeating the same strategy that the investigator has identified as a
modus operandi. Thus, the corporation had the authority to cancel its contract and fire Ciro
Betila from the first time he committed the offense. however, the company did the right thing
and performed an investigation first before deciding on his dismissal. However. Betila was not
acquitted of the crime following the investigation, and he ignored the request to attend the
hearings and meetings to clear his name. The claim that Betila was not given due process is
false. He had at least three (3) opportunities to justify the stated losses. According to the
investigation findings, he was asked to respond on the hotel's concerns from Japanese
visitors on two occasions. The investigations did not include Betila. He also failed to submit
any written answer to the investigators