CHAPTER 3 Organization Theory
CHAPTER 3 Organization Theory
This structure is developed to establish how an organization operates and assists anorganization in
obtaining its goals to allow for futuregrowth.
The structure is illustrated using an organizationalchart.
Organization structure is reflected in the organization chart. It isn’t possible to see the internal
structure of an organization the way we might see its manufacturing tools, offices, or products.
Although we might see employees going about their duties, performing different tasks, and
working in different locations, the only way to actually see the structure underlying all this
activity is through the organization chart.
The organization chart is the visual representation of a whole set of underlying activities and
processes in an organization. The organization chart can be quite useful in understanding how a
company works. It shows the various parts of an organization, how they are interrelated, andhow
each position and department fits into thewhole.
The concept of an organization chart, showing what positions exist, how they are grouped, and
who reports to whom, has been around for centuries
A company can be organized in a number of ways. It might be built around divisions, functions,
geography, or with a matrix approach:
3.4. Functional, divisional, and geographical designs.
Functional grouping and divisional grouping are the two most common approaches to structural
design.
In a functional structure: A functional structure is based on job functions often labeled as
departments – finance, purchasing, etc.
Activities are grouped together by common function from the bottom to the top of the
organization. All engineers are located in the engineering department, and the vice president of
engineering is responsible for all engineering activities. The same is true in marketing, R&D, and
manufacturing. With a functional structure, all human knowledge and skills with respect to
specific activities are consolidated, providing a valuable depth of knowledge for the
organization. This structure is most effective when in-depth expertise is critical to meeting
organizational goals, when the organization needs to be controlled and coordinated through the
vertical hierarchy, and when efficiency is important. The structure can be quite effective if there
is little need for horizontalcoordination.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Functional OrganizationStructure
Strengths
1. Allows economies of scale within functionaldepartments
2. Enables in-depth knowledge and skilldevelopment
3. Enables organization to accomplish functional goals
4. Is best with only one or a fewproducts
Weaknesses
1. Slow response time to environmentalchanges
2. May cause decisions to pile on top; hierarchyoverload
3. Leads to poor horizontal coordination among departments
4. Results in lessinnovation
5. Involves restricted view of organizational goals
Divisional Structure: A divisional structure is organized around divisions or business units that
are self-contained entities with their own functional departments such as human resources,
marketing, and so on. The term divisional structure is used here as the generic term for what is
sometimes called a product structure or strategic business units. With this structure, divisions
can be organized according to individual products, services, product groups, major projects or
programs, divisions, businesses, or profitcenters.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Divisional OrganizationStructure
Strengths
1. Suited to fast change in unstable environment
2. Leads to customer satisfaction because product responsibility and contact points areclear
3. Involves high coordination acrossfunctions
4. Allows units to adapt todifferences
in products, regions,customers
5. Best in large organizations with severalproducts
6. Decentralizes decision making
Weaknesses
1. Eliminates economies of scale in functionaldepartments
2. Leads to poor coordination across productlines
3. Eliminates in-depth competence and technicalspecialization
4. Makes integration and standardization across product linesdifficult
Geographic Structure: A geographical structure is often used when a company has multiple
locations. Each location operates independently.
Another basis for structural grouping is the organization’s users or customers. The most common
structure in this category is geography. Each region of the country may have distinct tastes and
needs. Each geographic unit includes all functions required to produce and market products or
services in that region.
3.5. Matrix structure: With a matrix structure, the company is organized around teams
assembled for specific tasks. Team members usually report to more than one person – the team
leader, and the supervisor for the team member’s functional area. Sometimes, an organization’s
structure needs to be multi-focused in that both product and function or product and geography
are emphasized at the same time. One way to achieve this is through the matrix structure. The
matrix can be used when both technical expertise and product innovation and change are
important for meeting organizational goals. The matrix structure often is the answer when
organizations find that the functional, divisional, and geographic structures combined with
horizontal linkage mechanisms will notwork.
The unique characteristic of the matrix organization is that both product divisions and functional
structures (horizontal and vertical) are implemented simultaneously. The product managers and
functional managers have equal authority within the organization, and employees report to both
of them.
In a matrix organization structure, every employee has twosuperiors.
One chain of command is functional and the other chain of command is a project
team.Hence, matrix structure is referred to as a multi command system, both vertical and
horizontal dimension.
Both dimensions of structure are permanent and balanced, with power held equally
byboth functional and a project manager.
Matrix structure is suitable when organizational tasks are uncertain, complex and highly
interdependent or when an organization has to cope with more than one function or
project.
In large organizations employees from various functional departments are from time
totime assigned to one or more projects. On completion of the project these employees
revert back to their respective departments until the next assignment to aproject.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Matrix Organization Structure
Strengths
1. Achieves coordination necessary to meet dual demands fromcustomers
2. Flexible sharing of human resources across products
3. Suited to complex decisions and frequent changes in unstableenvironment
4. Provides opportunity for both functional and product skilldevelopment
5. Best in medium-sized organizations with multipleproducts
Weaknesses
1. Causes participants to experience dual authority, which can be frustrating andconfusing
2. Means participants need good interpersonal skills and extensivetraining
3. Is time consuming; involves frequent meetings and conflict resolutionsessions
4. Will not work unless participants understand it and adopt collegial rather than vertical type
relationships
5. Requires great effort to maintain powerbalance
3.6. Horizontalstructure
A recent approach to organizing is the horizontal structure, which organizes employees around
core processes. Organizations typically shift toward a horizontal structure during a procedure
called reengineering. Reengineering, or business process reengineering, basically means the
redesign of a vertical organization along its horizontal workflows and processes. Aprocess refers
to an organized group of related tasks and activities that work together to transform inputs into
outputs that create value for customers.50 Examples of processes include order fulfillment, new
product development, and customer service. Reengineering changes the way managers think
about how work is done. Rather than focusing on narrow jobs structured into distinct functional
departments, they emphasize core processes that cut horizontally across the organization and
involve teams of employees working together to serve customers.
Strengths and Weaknesses of Horizontal Structure
Strengths:
1. Promotes flexibility and rapid response to changes in customerneeds
2. Directs the attention of everyone toward the production and delivery of value to thecustomer
3. Each employee has a broader view of organizational goals
4. Promotes a focus on teamwork andcollaboration
5. Improves quality of life for employees by offering them the opportunity to share
responsibility, make decisions, and be accountable foroutcomes
Weaknesses:
1. Determining core processes is difficult and timeconsuming
2. Requires changes in culture, job design, management philosophy, and information and reward
systems
3. Traditional managers may balk when they have to give up power andauthority
4. Requires significant training of employees to work effectively in a horizontal team
environment
5. Can limit in-depth skill development
3.7. Modularstructure.
3.8. Hybridstructure.
As a practical matter, many structures in the real world do not exist in the pure forms we have
outlined in this chapter. Most large organizations, in particular, often use a hybrid structure that
combines characteristics of various approaches tailored to specific strategic needs. Most
companies combine characteristics of functional, divisional, geographic, horizontal, or network
structures to take advantage of the strengths of various structures and avoid some of the
weaknesses. Hybrid structures tend to be used in rapidly changing environments because they
offer the organization greater flexibility.
9|Page
10 | P a g e