0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views9 pages

Quantifiers

This document discusses quantifiers and their use in logic. It covers: - The universal quantifier ∀ and existential quantifier ∃. - Examples of quantified statements over different domains. - Negating quantified expressions. - Translating English statements into logical expressions using quantifiers.

Uploaded by

Abhishek Sahni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views9 pages

Quantifiers

This document discusses quantifiers and their use in logic. It covers: - The universal quantifier ∀ and existential quantifier ∃. - Examples of quantified statements over different domains. - Negating quantified expressions. - Translating English statements into logical expressions using quantifiers.

Uploaded by

Abhishek Sahni
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Sunday, August 16, 2020

2:32 PM

L
P Predicates
U

Quantifiers
L
P
U
“Every computer connected to the university network is functioning properly

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 1
L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

• Universal quantifier
 Existential quantifier L

□ Uniqueness quantifier P
U
◊ Quantifiers with Restricted Domains
 Negating Quantified Expressions
 Translating into Logical Expressions

mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 2


A predicate becomes a proposition when we assign it fixed values.
However, another way to make a predicate into a proposition is to
quantify it.
That is, the predicate is true (or false) for all possible values in the
L
universe of discourse or for some value(s) in the universe of P
discourse. U

Such quantification can be done with two quantifiers: the


L
universal quantifier and the existential quantifier. P
U

mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 3


L
P
U

L
P
The universal∀quantification of P(x) is the statement “P(x) for all values U
of x in the domain.”

The notation xP(x) denotes the universal quantification of P(x).
L
Here ∀ is called the universal quantifier. We read xP(x) as “for all
∀ xP(x)” P
or “for every xP(x). U
” An element for which P(x) is false is called a counterexample to xP(x).

L
∀ P
Let P(x) be the statement “x + 1 > x.” What is the truth value of the U
quantification xP(x), where the domain consists of all real numbers?
L
P
U

L
P
U


Let Q(x) be the statement “x < 2.” What is the truth value of the
L
quantification xQ(x), where the domain consists of all real numbers?
P
U

L
P
U

mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 4


What is the truth value of x(x ≥ x) if the domain consists of all real
L
numbers? What is the truth value of this statement if the domain
P
consists of all integers? U

L
P
U

The existential quantification of P(x) is the proposition


“There exists an element
∃ x in the domain such that P(x).”
L
P
U
We use the notation xP(x) for the existential quantification of P(x).
Here ∃ is called the existential quantifier.
L
∃ P
Let P(x) denote the statement “x > 3.” What is the truth value of the U
quantification xP(x),where the domain consists of all real numbers?
L
P
U


Let Q(x) denote the statement “x = x + 1.” What is the truth
L
P
value of the quantification xQ(x),where the domain consists of U
all real numbers?

∃ ∃ ∃ ∃ L
P
the uniqueness quantifier, denoted by ! or 1.The notation !xP(x) [or U

1xP(x)] states “There exists a unique x such that P(x) is true.”


L
P
U

∀ ∀ ∃
L
What do the statements x < 0 (x2 > 0), y ≠ 0 (y3 ≠ 0), and z > 0
P
(z2 = 2) mean, where the U
domain in each case consists of the real numbers?

L
P
U

mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 5


L
Negating Quantified Expressions P
We will often want to consider the negation of a quantified expression. U
For instance, consider
the negation of the statement
L
“Every
∀ student in your class has taken a course in calculus.”
P
This statement is a universal quantification, namely, U

∃ xP(x),

x ¬P(x). L
P
U

L
P

∀ ∃ U

What are the negations of the statements x(x2 > x) and x(x2 = 2)?
L
P
U

L
P
U

What are the negations of the statements L


“There is an honest politician” P
U

L
P
U

∀ ∃ ∧

¬ x(P(x) → Q(x)) and x(P(x) ¬Q(x)) are


L
logically equivalent.
P
U

L
P
U

mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 6


L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

L
P
U

Translate these statements into English, where


L
C(x) is “x is a comedian” and F(x) is “x is funny” P
U
and the domain consists of all people.
L
P
U

∀ L
∀ ∧ P
a) x(C(x) → F(x))
∃ U
b) x(C(x) F(x))
∃ ∧
c) x(C(x) → F(x))
L
d) x(C(x) F(x)) P
U

L
P
U

mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 7


L
P
Translate in two ways each of these statements into logical U
expressions using predicates, quantifiers, and logical
connectives.
First, let the domain consist of the students in your class and second, L
let it consist of all people. P

a) Someone in your class can speak Hindi. U

(b)Everyone in your class is friendly. L


P
U

c) There is a person in your class who was not born in


California.
L
P
U

d) A student in your class has been in a movie.

L
P

e) No student in your class has taken a course in logic U

programming.

L
P
Let P(x)=“x is a baby,” U

Q(x)=“x is logical"
R(x)=“x is able to manage a crocodile,”
S(x)=“x is despised,” L
be the statements P

Suppose that the domain consists of all people. U

Express each of these statements


using quantifiers; logical connectives.
L

a) Babies are illogical. ---∀x(P(x) → ¬Q(x)) P


U
b) Nobody is despised who can manage a crocodile. ---
c) Illogical persons are despised. ---
d) Babies cannot manage crocodiles.---

mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 8


L
P
U

L
P
U

mth401 UNIT1 PART 2 Page 9

You might also like