This design research process model outlines the key steps and considerations for conducting user research. It includes defining goals, roles, topics of focus and priority questions. Researchers then select appropriate research methods like surveys, usability tests or analytics to gather data, notes and transcripts. The model emphasizes analyzing and synthesizing findings to identify themes and patterns, and accurately reporting insights. Researchers should contextualize and communicate learnings, and reflect on how findings inform decisions and future work.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
77 views1 page
MULE Design Research Process Model v2
This design research process model outlines the key steps and considerations for conducting user research. It includes defining goals, roles, topics of focus and priority questions. Researchers then select appropriate research methods like surveys, usability tests or analytics to gather data, notes and transcripts. The model emphasizes analyzing and synthesizing findings to identify themes and patterns, and accurately reporting insights. Researchers should contextualize and communicate learnings, and reflect on how findings inform decisions and future work.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Design Research Process Model v2
Created October 14, 2022 | Modified October 25, 2022 by Erika Hall
Clarity Questions Refinement Methods Analysis and Synthesis Integration
GOAL What are we trying to accomplish? Observation/ QUESTION Field Study Generate DOCUMENT ROLES Gather notes Identify Report findings What do we need Code the notes themes/ Who is doing and transcripts patterns accurately to know? hypotheses what? Interview
Diary Study SHARE
TOPIC PRIORITY Contextualize and Where are we By urgency, Review and communicate focusing? importance, and [Other Qual] discuss uncertainty Generative critically APPLY Descriptive Literature review Review decisions DECISIONS Strategic FOCUS CATEGORY in light of findings What do we need On selected What type of Evaluative Tactical to decide by priority question? Survey when? Targeted questions Causal REFLECT Discuss meta Usability Test lessons of this INPUTS Qual Statistical study What data and DATA Analysis experience do Descriptions Quant Analytics we already have? and/or REMEMBER measurements? Mixed Connect insights A/B Test to future work ASSUMPTIONS CONFIDENCE What do we think What is the we already agreed upon Other standard? GENERATE know? Experiments What additional questions Test hypothesis emerged? GAPS Where are our areas of Use qualitative research to generate a hypothesis and quantitative research to test it. uncertainty? Choose the method that will answer your questions to a sufficient level of confidence by the decision date. The methods listed here are merely popular examples. If you don’t have any areas of significant uncertainty with regard to the decisions at hand, there is no need to move forward with a research project.
Topics Decisions Categories NOTES:
Organizational/Internal Strategic: Framing the problem Generative: What problem might we solve? The specific roles, research cadence, tools used, methods, and other specifics of planning and Competition/Marketplace Tactical: Identifying the right solution Descriptive: What is happening currently/historically? execution will vary from project to project and org to org. This is a basic process, not dogma. Users/Customers/Prospects Targeted: Specific aspects of a given solution Evaluative: How well is our solution working? Variations are to be expected, as long as they serve the quality of design decisions within given Product/Service/Etc. Causal: Why is [x] happening/did [x] happen? constraints.