0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views4 pages

Pearson

The Neyman-Pearson lemma establishes that among all tests of size α, the most powerful test is the likelihood ratio test. Specifically: 1) It defines the critical region C* as the set of values where the likelihood ratio is greater than a constant k. 2) This critical region C* ensures the test has size α. 3) Any other test with critical region C will have equal or higher probability of a type II error. 4) Therefore, the likelihood ratio test defined by C* is the most powerful test of size α.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
29 views4 pages

Pearson

The Neyman-Pearson lemma establishes that among all tests of size α, the most powerful test is the likelihood ratio test. Specifically: 1) It defines the critical region C* as the set of values where the likelihood ratio is greater than a constant k. 2) This critical region C* ensures the test has size α. 3) Any other test with critical region C will have equal or higher probability of a type II error. 4) Therefore, the likelihood ratio test defined by C* is the most powerful test of size α.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Most Powerful Test.

π Υ ( θ 0 )=P [ reject H 0 ∣ H 0 is true ]= alpha

P [ reject H 0 ∣ H 0 is false ]= Beta

Neyman Pearson Lemma Theoem

Let X 1 , … , X n be a random sample from some density f (x ; θ) where θ is one of the two known
values of θ0 or θ1 and let 0< α <1 be fixed.

Let k ¿ be a positive constant and C¿ be a subset of X which satisfy:


¿
(i) Pθ [( X 1 , … , X n )∈ C ]=α
0

L(θ0 ; x 1 , … , x n ) L0 ¿ ¿
(ii) λ= = ≤ k if ( x 1 , … , x n ) ∈ C
L(θ1 ; x 1 , … , x n ) L1
L1 ¿ ¿
(iii) and λ= ≥ k if ( x 1 , … , x n ) ∈ C
L0

Then the test Υ ¿corresponding to the critical region C ¿ is the most powerful test of size
¿
α of H 0 :θ=θ 0 versus H 1 :θ=θ1 . C is the complement of C ¿ ; that is, C ¿= X−C ¿
PROOF
¿ ¿
Suppose that k and C satisfying conditions (i) and (ii) exist. If there is no other test of size α or
less then it is the most powerful test . Let Υ be another test of size α or less and let C be its
corresponding critical region. We have Pθ [( X 1 , … , X n )∈ C]≤ α . We need to prove that
0

π Υ∗¿(θ )≥π 1 Υ (θ 1 )¿ .

For any subset of the critical regions R from the sample space X , we abbreviate as

[∏ ( ]
n
∫ ⋯R ∫ f x i ;θ j ) d x i
i=1

H 0 :f =f 0 , H 1 : f =f 1 , where f 0 and f 1 are continuous densities. Then among all tests of size less than
or equal to α , the test with smallest probability of the a type II error is given by

{
C= x :
f 1(x)
f 0(x) }
> k where K is chosen such that

α =P ( reject H 0 ∣ H 0 )

¿ P( X ∈C ∣ H 0 )=∫ f 0 (x )d x .
C

The given C specifies a likelihood ratio test with size α .


Let β=P ( X ∉ C ∣ f 1 )=∫ f 1 ( x ) d x .
C

¿
Let C be the critical region of any other test with size less than or equal to α .
Let α ¿ =P ( X ∈C ¿ ∣f 0 ) , β ¿ =P ( X ∉C ¿ ∣f 1) .

¿
We want to show β ≤ β .
We know α ¿ ≤ α , ie ∫ f 0 (x )d x ≤∫ f 0 (x )d x .
¿
C C

Also, on C we have f 1 ( x ) > k f 0 ( x ) , while on C we have f 1 ( x ) ≤ k f 0 ( x )


¿
f 1( x ) d x ≥ k ∫
¿
f0(x)d x
C ∩C C ∩C

and

∫ ¿
f 1( x ) d x ≤ k ∫
' ¿
f 0 (x ) d x .
C ∩C C ∩C
β−β ¿ =∫ f 1 ( x ) d x −∫ f 1 ( x ) d x
¿
C C

β−β ¿ = ∫ ¿
f 1 ( x ) d x− ∫
¿
f 1 ( x) d x
C ∩C C ∩C

β−β ¿ = ∫ ¿
f 1( x ) d x + ∫ ¿
f 1 ( x ) d x− ∫
¿
f 1 ( x ) d x− ∫ f 1( x ) d x
C∩C C ∩C C ∩C Ć ∩ Ć
¿

≤k ∫ ¿
f 0 ( x ) d x−k ∫ ¿
f 0( x ) d x
C ∩C C ∩C

¿
β− β =¿ k ∫ ¿
f 0 ( x )d x+ ∫ ¿
f 0( x)d x }
C ∩C C∩ C

β−β ¿ =¿−k
{∫
C¿ ∩ C
f 0 ( x ) d x+ ∫
CC ∩C ¿
f 0( x ) d x
}
¿ ¿
β−β ¿ k ( α −α )
Example 3.

Let x 1 , x 2 , … x nconstitute a sample from the density with pdf as f ( x ; θ)=θ e−θx

Find the most Powerful test of size α .

Solution.

Null hypothesis H 0 :θ=θ 0

Alternative hypothesis H 1 :θ=θ 1

Likelihood function for the exponential distribution:


n −θ0 ∑ x
Under Null Hypothesis L0=θ 0 e
n −θ 1 ∑ x
Under Alternative Hypothesis L1=θ1 e

Then for the Critical Region,


n −θ 0 ∑ x
L0 θ 0 e
= ≤k
L1 θ1n e−θ ∑ x 1

( )
n
L0 θ0 e−θ Σ x 0

¿ ⋅ ≤k
L1 θ1 e−θ Σ x 1

¿
L1 θ 1
e
( )
L0 θ0 n −θ Σ x+θ Σ x
≤k 0 1
( )
n
L0 θ0 ∑ x (θ −θ )
= e ≤k 1 0

L1 θ1

Taking Logarithm on both sides of the inequality

[( ) ]
n
L0 θ
=log 0 e ∑ x (θ −θ ) ≤ log k
1 0

L1 θ1

∑ x ( θ1−θ0 ) ≤ log k −nlog


( ) θ0
θ1

Divide both sides of the inequality by ( θ1 −θ0 )

∑ x≥
log k −nlog
( ) θ0
θ1
( θ 1−θ0 )
Divide both sides of the inequality by

x≥
log k −nlog ( ) θ0
θ1
=k
˙

n ( θ 1−θ0 )
˙
x≥k

You might also like