Siskiyou Report-Jardins de Chuva
Siskiyou Report-Jardins de Chuva
Siskiyou Report-Jardins de Chuva
NE Siskiyou Street between NE 35th Pl. and NE 36th Ave., Portland, Oregon
Project Summary
Features
1
Flow Test Report for the Siskiyou Curb Extension, October 2004; BES
March 2005
NE Siskiyou Green Street Project Report: Completed April 2005
Background
The Environmental Services Sustainable Management Team undertook the project in 2003 as part of
an on-going evaluation of techniques for managing runoff from streets. Urban stormwater runoff
pollutes rivers and streams and contributes to combined sewer overflows (CSOs) to the Willamette
River. It can also cause localized backups of the combined sewer during large storms.
Stormwater curb extensions hold particular promise as a sustainable practice for managing runoff from
existing streets. These natural systems capture and filter runoff and allow it to infiltrate into the
ground. They are an alternative to traditional stormwater sumps for managing street runoff. In addition
to treating and disposing of runoff, they integrate well with existing neighborhood vegetation and
generally improve the urban environment. Portland has constructed many curb extensions over the
years to improve pedestrian safety; this new version of the curb extension provides many additional
benefits.
The project on Siskiyou was the first retrofit to an existing street in Portland. Environmental Services
built a second set of curb extensions on Ankeny Street (at SE 56th) in 2004, and by 2005 both the City
and private developers were implementing a number of similar projects. These types of facilities can
be constructed in a variety of configurations, as retrofits or as part of new development, and are
referred to alternatively as bump-out swales, pocket swales, or street stormwater planters.
NE Siskiyou Street
• Traffic Impacts: City traffic engineers considered the low-traffic residential setting ideal for a
demonstration project. The street is 28 feet wide. The addition of two 7-foot wide curb extensions
created an acceptable queuing configuration.
• Stormwater Catchment Areas: The size of the catchment, a little over 9,000 sq. ft., was
considered fairly representative of conditions in the surrounding neighborhood.
• Utility Conflicts: Water lines were the only subsurface utilities within the project area and did not
present obstacles. See a detailed discussion under “System Configuration.”
• Loss of Parking Spaces: The project did not eliminate on-street parking. Adjacent property
owners can park in front of their houses on SE 35th Place.
• Street Slope: The moderate street slope (2%) was suitable for a first test of the technology.
• Suitability For Monitoring: The configuration of the local combined sewer allowed for placement
of a flow monitor. There is also a rain gage near the project.
• Soil Infiltration Rates: Specialized infiltration tests were not required at the site. See “Stormwater
Capacity and System Configuration” for details.
• Space Available for the Facilities: The space available for the curb extensions – length of curb
unbroken by driveways or near a fire hydrant – is considered representative of conditions in other
areas.
Geotechnical Evaluation
An infiltration test was not required before
construction. Adequate documentation of
characteristics of the local soils already existed.
The Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS) soil survey for Multnomah County
classifies the soils as 51A-Urban Land and
well-drained Multnomah soils. The surface
horizon typically is dark brown silt loam about
25” thick. Soil below this depth is gravelly silt
loam and gravelly sand to a depth of
approximately 60”.
March 2005
PERENNIALS
Helictotrichon sempervirens Blue Oat Grass no
Deschamsia caespitosa "Northern Lights" Variegated Tufted Hair Grass native cultivar
Iris spp. Iris Bulbs no
Narcissus spp. Daffodil bulbs no
BASIN PLANTINGS
Carex testacea New Zealand Orange Sedge no
Juncus patens California Grey Rush yes
I. Budget Elements
• Landscape Construction
Landscape construction cost $4,250 or 21% of the total project costs. This included check
dam construction, fine grading, plant procurement, plant material, and mulch installation.
The south planter; fall 2004 South curb extension, Spring 2004
Maintenance
Adjacent property owners have voluntarily modified their
home irrigation systems to help water the curb extensions. In
the long term, the City is responsible for providing any
irrigation required. Given the shady location of the curb
extensions, irrigation after the 2-year startup period should be
minimal.
Monitoring
Environmental Services will monitor hydraulic performance, maintenance requirements, the success of
the planting regime, and comments from neighborhood residents. Environmental Services conducted a
first flow test in summer 2004. See Flow Test Report: Siskiyou Curb Extensions, August 4th, 2004
online at www.portlandonline.com/shared/cfm/image.cfm?id=63097.
• The data suggest that the curb extensions on Siskiyou are capturing and infiltrating a large
proportion of the runoff that drains to them.
• The plants grew vigorously during the first year and little weeding was required.
• In the first year the vegetated forebays filled twice with sediment and debris (to a depth of 4-6
inches). City staff removed the sediment by hand with a shovel and rakes. The cleanings typically
required about 30 minutes per forebay.
• The earthen checkdams are susceptible to erosion during large storms, as observed during the hose
test in August 2004. A more substantial structural design should be employed in the future.