2017 - Impact of Konjac Glucomannan On Ice Cream Like Properties
2017 - Impact of Konjac Glucomannan On Ice Cream Like Properties
2017 - Impact of Konjac Glucomannan On Ice Cream Like Properties
net/publication/317165160
CITATIONS READS
4 1,025
3 authors, including:
Metwaly abo-srea
Mansoura University
24 PUBLICATIONS 24 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Metwaly abo-srea on 04 May 2019.
ISSN 1811-9743
DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2017.177.183
Research Article
Impact of Konjac Glucomannan on Ice Cream-like Properties
1
Metwaly M. Abo-Srea, 2E.A. Emara and 2Talaat H. EL-Sawah
1
Department of Dairy, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, El-Mansoura, Egypt
2
Department of Dairy Technology Research, Animal Production Research Institute, Agriculture Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt
Abstract
Objective: This study was carried out to investigate the effect of using konjac fiber as alternative to fat and stabilizers replacer during
making of free fat ice cream-like on its properties and its production cost. Methodology: Four concentrations (0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7%) of
konjac glucomannan as fat and stabilizer replacer dietary fiber were used for making free fat ice cream-like compared with full fat ice
cream (6% fat) as control. Control ice cream consists of 6% fat (derived from fresh cream 60% fat), 11% milk solids-not-fat (derived from
cream, fluid skim milk and skim milk powder), 16% sucrose and 0.5% commercial stabilizer and emulsifying plus grade. Other free fat
treatments made by the same method, which consists of other constituent s ratios. All ice cream treatments were made and stored at
-25EC. Results: The obtained results revealed that there were highly significant differences in the overrun and the product volume per
1 L mix among all konjac treatments and control, except T1 and T4 (0.1 and 0.7% konjac), it were insignificant. According to melting
properties significant differences among all konjac treatments and control were found, except T2 and control (0.5% konjac), it was
insignificant. Economically, T1 (0.1% konjac) and T2 (0.3% konjac) were much lower cost and more highly profitability (3.26 and 3.23%)
than the control (1.28). Moreover, T1 (0.1% konjac) and T2 (0.3% konjac) were characterized with the highest sensory evaluation,
compared with control, while T3 and T4 achieved less scores. Conclusion: Free fat, emulsifying and stabilizers ice cream-like as
a functional dairy product, can be made by adding 0.3% konjac dietary fiber (T2) as the optimal concentration instead of full fat and
commercial emulsifying and stabilizers with a decrease in the economic cost up to 41%.
Key words: Konjac, ice cream, free fat, glucomannan, dietary fiber, economic cost
Received: August 22, 2016 Accepted: January 19, 2017 Published: April 15, 2017
Citation: Metwaly M. Abo-Srea, E.A. Emara and Talaat H. EL-Sawah, 2017. Impact of konjac glucomannan on ice cream-like properties. Int. J. Dairy Sci.,
12: 177-183.
Corresponding Author: Metwaly M. Abo-Srea, Department of Dairy, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, El-Mansoura, Egypt
Tel: 00201226449143
Copyright: © 2017 Metwaly M. Abo-Srea et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Competing Interest: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files.
Int. J. Dairy Sci., 12 (3): 177-183, 2017
178
Int. J. Dairy Sci., 12 (3): 177-183, 2017
Fat and total decreasing cost percent: They were calculated Overrun
Melting%/25°C
according to El-Tahra et al. . 13
53.2
48.8 48
Fat cost: It was calculated according to the following
42
equation: 39.4
31.4
Fat cost
Fat cost (%) = 100 28
Mix total cost 26.6 26.3
21.7
Cost decreasing: It was calculated according to the following
)
)
l
%
%
ac
ac
ro
.5
.7
nj
nj
nt
equation:
(0
(0
ko
ko
Co
T3
T4
%
%
.3
.1
(0
(0
T2
T1
Treatment total cost
Cost decreasing (%) = 100- 100
Control total cost Fig. 1: Effect of konjac on overrun % (w/w) and melting of ice
cream-like
Statistical analysis: Data were subjected to statistical
analysis according to Coakes14. Table 1: Effect of emulsifier substitution by konjac on th e overrun (w/w) of free
fat ice cream
Treatments
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Treatments Main T1 T2 T3 T4 Control
The effect of using different ratios of konjac dietary fiber T1 26.57 - - - 0.23NS 4.87**
in making free fat ice cream instead of emulsifying and T2 31.40 4.83** - 3.40* 5.07** 9.70**
stabilizing salts. All tested variants were made and stored at T3 28.00 1.43** - - 1.67** 6.30**
T4 26.33 - - - - 4.63**
the hardening temperature. Three replicates were done
Control 21.70 - - - - -
and analyzed. The obtained results were tabulated and F = 578.87, **p>0.01, control: 6% fat and 0.5% plus grade stabilizer, T1: 0% fat
discussed. and 0.1% konjac, T2: 0% fat and 0.3% konjac, T3: 0% fat and 0.5% konjac, T4: 0%
fat and 0.7% konjac, NS: Non significant
179
Int. J. Dairy Sci., 12 (3): 177-183, 2017
Viscosity (Cp)
except T2 which had insignificant differences (00.47). 1500
1000
Effect of konjac on the volume: Illustrated data in Table 3 500
indicate the differences in the product volume per 1 L of ice 0
cream mix after freezing. These data indicate that there were Control T2 T3 T4
Effect of konjac on pH and viscosity values: Data presented Effect of konjac on economical cost of the examined
in Table 4 illustrate the changes on the pH values of ice cream product with ice cream product: Data presented in Table 5
as affected by using konjac in the different treatments show the economical aspect of the examined product,
compared with control. No differences could be observed compared with the total cost of control ice cream. These data
among konjac treatments, as it was higher than that in control revealed that all konjac treatments resulted inconsiderable
ice cream. The lower pH value in control ice cream might be decrease in economical cost of ice cream mix. The cost
attributed to the high fat content, which increases the acid decrease ranged from 36.8-44.29% according to konjac
value for ice cream mix16. additions. Using 0.1% konjac was of the highest cost decrease
In addition, data presented in Fig. 2 and Table 4 revealed (%) when compared with the other treatments. The decrease
the viscosity values (cp) of ice cream and control ice cream at in total cost was about 43%, which might be due to the
three speeds. These data showed that there were not any absence of fat (%) in all konjac treatments, compared with
changes in viscosity recorded at the different speeds in T1 control19.
(0.1% konjac) and that might be due to its low mix viscosity, The variations in total cost of konjac treatments were due
which resulted in from the decrease in mix total solids, the to the increase of konjac addition concentration, which cause
absence of fat and the lower bulking agent content. Similar an increase in the total cost.
results were reported by Akesowan17.
Moreover, the addition of 0.7% konjac resulted in the Sensory evaluation of free fat ice cream made by using
highest viscosity values at the different speeds, when
konjac: Data in Fig. 3 and 4 show the differences in sensory
compared with the other konjac treatments. Also, there was
evaluation of treated with konjac ice cream treatments and
gradual increase of viscosity corresponding to the increase of
control. All samples treated with konjac except T4, recorded
konjac concentrations. The increase of viscosity by increasing
the konjac concentration smight be due to the increase of higher scores for appearance than control and that
bulking effect of its high concentration11. On the other hand, might be due to the absence of cream, which results in
using 0.5% konjac resulted in viscosity closer to the control product of lower appearance. Clear differences among all
and its value was 430/3.4, compare with 490/4.9 in control at konjac treatments and control were observed in the melting
speed 100. These results are in agreement with Akalin et al.18 properties. From these data, T1 (0.1% konjac) resulted in the
and Akesowan17. lowest melting scores than other treatments and control. The
180
Int. J. Dairy Sci., 12 (3): 177-183, 2017
Table 5: Effect of konjac on economical cost of the examined product compared with the normal ice cream
Ingredients T1 T2 T3 T4 Control
Sugar
kg/100 kg mix 16 16 16 16 16
Price of kg/LE 5 5 5 5 5
Total cost 80 80 80 80 80
Commercial stabilizer (pluss grade)
kg/100 kg mix 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.5
Price of kg (LE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100
Total cost (LE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 50
Skim milk
kg/100 kg mix 79.3 79.3 79.3 79.3 69
Price of kg (LE) 3 3 3 3 3
Total cost (LE) 237.9 237.9 237.9 237.9 207
Skim milk powder
kg/100 kg mix 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.5
Price of kg (LE) 25 25 25 25 25
Total cost (LE) 117.5 117.5 117.5 117.5 112.5
Cream
kg/100 kg mix 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10
Price of kg (LE) 35 35 35 35 35
Total cost (LE) 0.00 0.00 0.00 00 350
Konjac powder
kg/100 kg mix 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.00
Price of kg (LE) 100 100 100 100 0.00
Total cost (LE) 10.00 30.00 50.00 70.00 0.00
Total cost 445.40 465.40 485.40 505.40 799.50
Cost decreasing (%) 44.29 41.80 39.30 36.8
Control: 6% fat and 0.5% plus grade stabilizer, T1: 0% fat and 0.1% konjac, T2: 0% fat and 0.3% konjac, T3: 0% fat and 0.5% konjac, T4: 0% fat and 0.7% konjac
31
29 viscosity and increase of the water binding ability of the ice
27
25
cream product.
23 Data in the same Table 5 also indicated that T2 (0.3%
21
19 konjac) have higher flavor score than other konjac treatments.
17 Also, it was closer treatment to control although its less total
15
Control T1 T2 T3 T4 solids and fat free. Similar results were found by Jennifer20.
According to the sensory evaluation, the results show
Fig. 3: Effect of konjac in sensory properties of ice cream-like
at zero time that the high ratios of konjac (T3 and T4) caused a decrease in
all sensory evaluation scores. From these findings, (T2)
lowering in melting score might be due to the decrease of appeared to be more suitable for using as a functional and
mixing total solid and stabilizing agents. On the other hand, T4 dietary product, which was free from fat and any artificial
181
Int. J. Dairy Sci., 12 (3): 177-183, 2017
Table 6: Effect of konjac on some economical parameters of ice cream and ice cream-like
Product volume Total cost Total income Net profit
--------------------- ------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Rate of return Profitability of Profitability
Treatments % L Price LE/L % LE % LE % LE for the costs pound spent of liter
T1 104.02 1266 15 55.71 4454 104.02 18990 141.67 14536 426.35 3.26 11.48
T2 107.97 1314 15 58.21 4654 107.97 19710 146.74 15056 423.50 3.23 11.45
T3 105.17 1280 15 60.71 4854 105.17 19200 139.82 14346 395.55 2.95 11.20
T4 103.78 1263 15 63.21 5054 103.78 18945 135.39 13891 374.85 2.74 10.99
Control 100 1217 15 100 7995 100 18255 100 10260 228.33 1.28 8.43
Control: 6% fat and 0.5% plus grade stabilizer, T1: 0% fat and 0.1% konjac, T2: 0% fat and 0.3% konjac, T3: 0% fat and 0.5% konjac, T4: 0% fat and 0.7% konjac
70
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Sensory values
60
30 REFERENCES
20
1. Jorge, C., 2007. Help increase female fertility with full fat dairy.
10
J. Human Reprod.
0 2. Soukoulis, C., I.D. Fisk and T. Bohn, 2014. Ice Cream as a
Control T1 T2 T3 T4
vehicle for incorporating health-promoting ingredients:
Conceptualization and overview of quality and storage
Fig. 4: Effect of konjac on sensory properties of ice cream-like stability. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 13: 627-655.
after storage untile 15 days 3. Kucerova, J., V. Sottnikova and S. Nedomova, 2013. Influence
of dietary fibre addition on the rheological and sensory
emulsifying and stabilizers. Also, it recorded the highest score properties of dough and bakery products. Czech. J. Food Sci.,
of the total sensory evaluation. Also, similar results were 31: 340-346.
estimated by Ahmed et al.21. 4. Dhingra, D., M. Michael, H. Rajput and R.T. Patil, 2012. Dietary
. Data presented in Table 6 indicate some economical fibre in foods: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol., 49: 255-266.
parameters, which reveal the profit rate in the ice cream 5. Gonzalez, C.A., M.N. Fernandez, A.M. Sahagun, V.J.J. Garcia
processing field. These data show that all ice cream treatments and L.M.J. Diez et al., 2004. [Glucomannan: Properties and
therapeutic applications]. Nutr. Hosp., 19: 45-50.
gained profitability of pound spent higher than the control
6. Ford, D.M. and P.A. Chesey, 1986. Air or oil emulsion food
(1.28). Moreover, treatment T1 (0.1% konjac) and T2 (0.3%
product having glucomannans sole as stabilizer-thickener. US
konjac) gained the highest profitability of pound spent than
Patent No. US4582714 A, April 15, 1986.
other treatments (3.26 and 3.23%). On the other hand T4 have
7. Soukoulis, C., D. Lebesi and C. Tzia, 2009. Enrichment of ice
the lowest profitability of pound spent comparing with other
cream with dietary fibre: Effects on rheological properties, ice
konjac treatments and that might be due to the lowest
crystallisation and glass transition phenomena. Food Chem.,
overrun, which was of the decrease in the whippability of the
115: 665-671.
ice cream mix, which results in the decrease in air amount 8. Hugo, H.S., 1947. The Theory and Practice of Ice Cream
which incorporated in ice cream19. Making. 5th Edn., Sommer, Madison, Wisconsin.
9. AOAC., 2005. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Edn.,
CONCLUSION Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington DC.,
USA.
It could be recommended that free fat emulsifying and 10. Marshall, R.T., H.D. Goff and R.W. Hartel, 2003. Ice Cream. 6th
stabilizers ice cream-like as a functional dairy product can be Edn., Springer Science and Business Media, London, USA.,
made by adding 0.3% konjac dietary fiber (T2) as the optimal ISBN-13: 9780306477003, Pages: 371.
182
Int. J. Dairy Sci., 12 (3): 177-183, 2017
11. Mendez-Velasco, C. and H.D. Goff, 2011. Enhancement of fat 18. Akalin, A.S., C. Karagozlu and G. Unal, 2008. Rheological
colloidal interactions for the preparation of ice cream high in properties of reduced-fat and low-fat ice cream containing
unsaturated fat. Int. Dairy J., 21: 540-547. whey protein isolate and inulin. Eur. Food Res. Technol.,
12. Clarke, C., 2004. The Science of Ice Cream. The Royal Society 227: 889-895.
of Chemistry, London, UK., pp: 104-134. 19. Arun, K. and C.C. Ramesh, 2006. Ice Cream and Frozen
13. El-Tahra, M.A., M.M. Abo-Srea and M.M. Esraa, 2013. Effect of Desserts. In: Handbook of Food Products Manufacturing, Hui,
certain dietary fibers on the properties of functional yoghurt. Y.H. (Ed.)., Chapter 74, John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.,
J. Food Dairy Sci., 4: 611-619. pp: 593-633.
14. Coakes, S.J., 2012. SPSS: Analysis Without Anguish. 20th Edn., 20. Jennifer, M.W., 2011. Sensory evaluation of ice cream made
John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., ISBN: 9781118337769, with prebiotic ingredients substituted for sugar. M.Sc. Thesis,
Pages: 282. The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska.
15. Akesowan, A., 2008. Effect of combined stabilizers containing 21. Ahmed, A.S.M. and E.M.E.Z. Ibtisam, 2015. Microbiological and
konjac flour and 6-carrageenan on ice cream. AU J. Technol., sensory properties of low fat ice cream from camel milk using
12: 81-85. natural additives. Ann. Food Sci. Technol., 16: 236-244.
16. Malik, P., C. Kempanna and A. Paul, 2013. Quality
characteristics of ice cream enriched with Spirulina powder.
Int. J. Food Nutr. Sci., 2: 44-50.
17. Akesowan, A., 2015. Optimization of textural properties of
konjac gels formed with 6-carrageenan or xanthan and xylitol
as ingredients in jelly drink processing. J. Food Process.
Preserv., 39: 1735-1743.
183