Block 4
Block 4
Block 4
be internal to the company, and some others external, must be considered while' QBloctlveo an4
formulating the pricing objective(s). Thus, the image it wants to project about it, long Methodo nP A'Icln@
runlshort run profit maximization, maintaininglincreasing market share, sales
maximization, return on investment, social responsibility, adhering to the legal
requirements etc. are some of the factors that a company may have to take into
account while for~nulatingthe pricing objectives. Very often, companies may have to
pursue more than one objective. Therefore, as a marketer you may have no choice
but to strike a balance among a number of objectives, some of which may conflict
with some others.
I
10.3.2 Sales Related Objectives
Obtaining Desired Sales Volume: Some companies may fix a target regarding the
volurne of sales they want to achieve and arrive at a price which will give them that
desired s'lles volume. The target may be maximization of sales volume during a
I
particular year in relation to {heprodu~tionlevel of the firm, or market leadership in
sales as far as the particular/industry is concerned or different sales levels for
different years. Though this strategy may not result in profit maximization, a company
may opt for this strategy so long as it does not result in loss. This objective may prove
to be a better strategy in thcllong run to survive in the market and proper in the
I
business, than maximizatio? of profits in the short run. This strategy may, however,
result in loss to the company for the firm may have to resort to heavy promotion,
price discounts and high incentives to salesmen and distributors in order to achieve
the desired sales level. However, since the company has established itself in the
market, it may be able to raise the price.
Achieving Desired Market Share: In case of some companies the pricing
objective may be dominant market share or a desired market share, as they feel that
niarket share is a better indicator of customer support and corporate strength than
sales volume or profits or return on investment. Market share objective may be in
different forms such as obtaining maximum market share or obtaining desired share 7
Pricing Decisions of the market or increasing the market share from the present level to a higher level
or retalning the present market share in a growing market, etc. The company will fix
the price and design the marketing programme to achieve the market share objective
it has set. However, a high market share may not only invite competition, but may
also invite government action under the laws designed to curb monopolies.
DETERMINATION I
Price is a point at which exchange takes place i.e. a point where demand and supply
rneet. Thus, factors on both demand and supply sides influence price setting. The
rnajor factors influencing price determination are:
I) The "value" of the product, as perceived by the buyer
2) Product costs
3) Competition
4) Company's policies
5) Government regulations
6) Other elements of marketing
Let us now study each of them in detail.
The marketer must know in detail the fixed costs, variable costs, and average costs of
the products before determining their prices.
10.4.3 Competition
While costs set the 'tloor' and demand sets the 'ceiling', competition provides the
'I-eferel~ce point' for pricing a company's product. Under market conditions of
perfect competition (many buyers and sellers trading in a uniform commodity,
products tend to be priced low because buyers will not pay a higher price since there
are a number of substitute products at a given price and the sellers need not reduce
the price since there are many buyers at the going price. Under monopolistic
cornpctition, the market consists of many buyers and sellers. Therefore, exchange
takes place over a range of prices rather than a single price because the sellers are
able to differentiate their offers through product differences and/or varied services.
Buyers do not think that the products are perfect substitutes and hence are prepared
to pay different prices and sellers also try to develop differentiated offers for different
customer segments. Under oligopolystic competition, there are a few sellers who
are sensitive to one another's pricing and marketing strategies. Therefore, marketer
has to be very careful about changing the price of his product since any change will
invite retaliatory action by the competitors. A pure monopoly consists of only une
seller. Theoretically, a monopoly producer can price his product as he wishes, but in
practice, it may he difficult to charge a very high price as it may invite competition,
government action and consumer resistance. Thus, a company must be aware of the
co~npetitiveconditions in the market for the product before it decides on a price.
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
3")hat is the difference between "fixed costs" and "variable costs"?
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
4) Are the following statements true or false?
i) The consumer perception of value of a product is related only to the
tangible attributes of the product.
ii) Demand for products considered necessities is, generally known to be
F
BEP = -
P-v
Figure 10.1 is a graphical presentation of the above formula. BEP is calculated in this
paragraph using the earlier example relating to Product 'X' (in section 10.5. in this
.. .
Objectives and
Methods of Pricing
The total fixed costs (administration costs) are Rs. 20,000; the balance Rs. 1,10,000
are variable costs and tlie company desires to price the product at Rs. 8 per unit.
'Iiien variable costs per unit becomes Rs. 1,10,000 ;20,000 = Rs. 5.50, because the
cl,mpanv is producing 20,000 units. Then
Total Fixed Cost
Selling Price - Variablecost Per Unit
'I'hkil;, if [lie selling price is set at Rs. 8 per unit, the company must sell at least 8,000
nits to break-even. At this point, the sales revenue will enable the company recover
tl!: fixcd costs totally, besides tlie variable costs incurred upto that point. Sales
beyond t1:Is level at the unit price of Rs. 8 will contribute to profit at Rs. 2.5 per unit
'i .. 2,1111 n targetprofit of Rs. 25,000, then the firm should be able to sell 18,000 units
(I!,h::X:t.:i:!iS plus 101000units). If the total capacity of production of the company is
2!i,Oi)O units and if it is able to sell the entire production, it will make a total profit of
Break-even analysis is userul for financial analysis and product pricing since one can
u w this technique to ascertain the profit or loss at different prices if a reasonable
estimate can be made of demand for the product at each price.
Though the break-even analysis is an useful tool for price fixation, it suffers from
certaiii limitations. First, the theory it may be possible to divide costs into fixed and
variable costs, but in practice, it will be difficult to divide costs exclusively as fixed
and variable. There may be certain costs which may not clearly fall into one or the
other categories. For instance, part of costs incurred on labour, power, servicing and
distribution may be fixed and part variable. Fixed costs are assumed to remain
constant till fill1 capacity utilization. But in practice, they may not be. Anyway, all
costs are variable in the long term. Assumption regarding constant unit variable costs
may not also hold true since it is likely that, with bulk purchase of inputs like raw
materials (as tlie demand for the final product increases), the unit price of the inputs
may decline leading to decline in variable costs. Similarly, selling price per unit may
also vary within tlie total quantum sold at a particular level of demand due to bulk
selling. l:ourtli, break-even analysis may enable the company to arrive at the number
ol'!~nitsrequired to be sold to break-even at different price levels, it cannot guarantee
Pricing Decisions that the company can actually sell as many units at those price levels. Finally, the
demand at different price levels is extremely difficult to arrive at with 100%
correctness. It is, at best, an estimate and due to sudden contingencies, the estimate
clan turn out to be even totally incorrect. However, the break-even analysis shows
the likely effect of different prices, costs and demand on the break-even point and,
hence, on profits. Table 10.1 is such an exercise in relation to Product 'X'.
Going-Rate Pricing: Under this method the company bases the price of its product
largely on competitor's prices for the same product or similar products without
bothering much about the product costs or the value perception of the product in the
consumer's mind or the differences in the intensity of demand for the product among
different consumer groups. Though the basis for pricing in this case, is the "going-
rate" in the market for the same product or similar products, it does not necessarily
mean that the price charged by a company would exactly be the same as the one
'I'he main logic behind this method of pricing is that, the "going rate" represents the
c,ollrctive wisdom of the industry regarding the demand conditions and the price so
decided will yield the optimum return under such demand conditions, Moreover, it is
not easy to exactly measure the consumers' value perception or demand elasticity or
consumer reaction to price differences. This approach also avoids unnecessary price
wars and heart burning among member firms of the industry. Going-rate pricing is
widely prevalent among sellers of homogeneous products involving low technology in
~ r o d u c t i oand
~ ~are bought frequently.
Sealed-bid Pricing: As you know, organisational buyers procure goods and services
by tender method. In this method, buyer gives the technical description of the product
1-eq11ired(to be bought) and invites bids by sellers. Each seller submits a sealed cover
containing the technical description of the product he would like to sell, its price and
terms of sale. The buyer opens all the bids (sealed covers) on a specified date in the
presence of the bidders. Then the buyer decides to buy from the seller who had
quoted the lowest price, if the technical specifications of that product matches his
When the company bids for contracts, it quotes a price which is generally based on its
~~ssessment of what the competitors prices would be for the same bid, rather than on
its own cost or demand. This is referred to as sealed-bid pricing. Since the main
objective in bidding is winning the contract, pricing is deployed as the main weapon to
achieve the objective.
!'r.!l.:~:o IIccisions When a co~npanybids for a contract, it has to balance two opposite pulls; on the one
hand it should quote the price as low as possible to win the contract, on the other
hand the price so quoted should be high enough to cover the costs and yield desired
profit margin. Price quotation under a a sealed bid is quite a difficult job. Firms which
bid only occasionally or for whom winning a bid is a question of survival, generally
quote the lowest price. On the other hand, firms which participate in bids regularly
and are not deficient in resources try for lone term profits rather than win every bid
by'quoting the lowest price or make money in every bid.
10.6 LETUSSUMUP
Pricing objectives inust be decided in accordance with the company's overall
marketing objectives. Pricing objectives may be broadly classified under thrce heads:
( I ) profitability objectives (including profit maximisation and target return on
investment), (2) sales volume objectives (including sales maximisation and market-
share maximisation), and (3) other objectives (including price stabilisation, survival,
market penetration for prevention of competitor's entry into the market, and building
image as a supplier of quality goods). 1
I
Whlle determining the basic price of the product, marketer must keep in mind several
factors such as the perceived value of the product to the buyer, costs of production of
the product, competitors' products and their prices, Government regulations,
company's own policies and the other three elements of marketing mix.
j
While deciding selling prices of goods and services, business enterprises may adopt i1
any one of the following three approaches: ( I ) cost-oriented approach, (2) demand- i
oriented approach, and (3) competition-oriented approach. 1
i
In cost-or~entedapproach, cost is the ma-jor basis of fixing price. In this approach
there are two methods: (1) 'cost-plus' pricing, and (2) target-profit pricing. Cost plus
p ~ i c eis arrlved at by aggregating the relevant costs and adding to it a margin of profit.
Target profit pricing is based on the break-even analysis.
I
i
1
Major consideration in price setting under demand-oriented approach is the buyer's
demand intensity and perception of the product's value and utility, rather than the
product costs. There are two distinctive methods under this approach: ( I ) differential
i
or discriminatory pricing, and (2) perceived-value pricing.
I
The decisions and actions of competitors, rather than the company's product costs or
demand levels, form the basis for setting the price under competition-oriented I
approach. Thc firm neither maintains it\ own cost records nor seeks to measure the
demand intensity nor buyer's perceplions towards the product. Going rate price
I
comes i~ndcrthis approach. I
Note: These Questions will help you to understand the unit better. But do not
hubmit your answers to the University. These are for your practice only.
identify different types of discounts and allowances offered to customers and Price Adjustment
distributors;
explain various pricing methods relating to price adjustment according to
geographic-locations of the buyers;
discuss various terms'of delivery used in international marketing contracts and
their implications on price quotations;
describe alteinative pricing strategies for new products;
identify the advantages and disadvantages of fixed pricing vis-a-vis flexible
pricing; and
state the concept of unit pricing and its utility.
11.1 INTRODUCTION
i The job relating to pricing does not end once the basic price of a product has been
i1 ~irrivedat (as discussed in Unit 10 earlier). In fact the job has only begun. The
conipally has to decide as to how it is going to recover the costs incurred in ,
i transporting the product from the production point to each one of the customers.
Charging the entire transportation cost in the product price may push the price to
u~lcompetitivelevels, while not charging the transportation cost at all will definitely eat
I
into pn~fitsor even it may incur losses. Another decision pertairis to the incentives to
be offered to consumers and distributors for loyalty, service, bulk purchase, cash
purchase, off season purchase, etc.
i While the'above pose a particular set of challenges, pricing a new product poses a
1 different type of challenge. Should the product be priced high or low? What will be
1I the reaction of the customers and competitors to a high price and low price? How a
high price or a low price impact the image of the company?
j Companies in multi product business have to sort out another problem, i.e., the
I problem related to pricing of the product-mix. Finally, should the company provide
i some margin in the product price for bargaining by customers or should it stick to a
t
Fixed price?
There may be situations like change in the prices of raw-materials, government taxes,
distribution costs, etc., where it may be necessary to increase or decrease price of
the product. Similarly, the competitors may change the prices of their products, where
you are forced to change the price of your product too. How to respond in such
situations?
This unit discusses all the above aspects of pricing in marketing management.
margin.
Pricing Decisions To make your product available to the ultimate consumers, you engage several
middlemen such as distribution agents, wholesalers, retailers, commission agents, etc.
You have to decide how much margin you give to each of them. Therefore, you have
to decide how you adjust the basic price to provide margin to each of the middlemen
in the distribution channel. Marketers may have to make adjustment in prices to
reward customers and distributors for their loyalty, prompt payment, bulk purchase,
off season purchase, promotion of the product, product support services provided, etc.
For example, you know that less price is charged in the case of cash purchases, price
of a product is less in the off season, price is less when purchased in large quantities.
These are all price adjustment strategies adopted by marketers. To promote the latest
models of their products, a number of companies offer "trade in" facility to the
customers i.e. reduction in the price of a new model in exchange for an old model.
Price adjustment also becomes necessary when a company moves up from a single
product producer to a multi-product producer because the objective is to maximize
profits of the product-mix and not a particular product.
Thus, as a marker you have to adjust the basic price to change in the costs, provide
margins to middlemen, discounts and allowances to customers and middlemen for
various services they provide, geographical variations in transport and other incidental
costs, etc. You will study various methods of such price adjustments in the succeeding
sections in this unit.
Discount given on price on the basis of the number of units of the product (quantity)
purchased is called quantity discount. For instance, "Rs. 10 per unit upto 100 units and
Rs. 9 per unit for every unit purchased over 100" is an instance of quantity discount.
In this case, a discount of Re. 1 per unit is given for the quantity purchased over and
above 100 units. The logic behind offering quantity discount is that sales in huge
quantities means less unit cost of sale. It is common practice among places of tourist
interest such as museums, parks and zoological parks to charge less per ticket for
visitors in groups. Similarly, airlines also offer, though not discount in price per ticket,
some free tickets is there is bulk booking of tickets. It is a common experience where
retailers offer 'Buy One Get One Free', '3 for 2', 'Buy One & Get 50% Discount on
the Second', etc.
Quantity discounts are of two types: (1) non-cumulative, and (2) cumulative. Non-
cumulative discount refers to the discount given on each purchase of a specified
quantity of the product at a time from the same seller. The example in Table 11.1 is
an Instance of non-cumulative discount.
Above is an illustration where the discount is expressed in terms of percent from list
price. Alternatively, the same may be expressed in terms of reduced price per unit of
purchase as the number of units bought goes up as shown in Table 11.2.
When discount IS given in the form of a reduction in the price of a product or a group
of products based on the quantum of purchases made by a buyer from the same
seller during a spec~fiedperiod, it is called "cumulative discount" or "deferred or
patronage discount" signifying that discount is given as a reward for patronizing a
particular seller for a reasonably long period. The more a buyer buys during a
specified period, the more he will get as discount. An illustration of cumulative
quantity discount is provided in Table 11.3.
Pricing Decisions Table 11.3: Cumulative Quantity Discount
Cumulative quantity discounts are given to attract and retain buyers who make
repeated purchases of a product over a long period. Generally, cumulative quantity
discount is aimed at buyers of industrial goods who use the goods as inputs in the
production of consumer goods and distributors of consumer goods since the demand
for any consumer goods from a single consumer is not expected to be of high order.
This type of discount is usually given at the end of a specified period.
11.3.5 Allowances
There are discounts given for other functions/reasons to dealers and customers,
known as allowances. Promotional Allowance is a price reduction to reward
dealers for undertaking promotion of the product such as adverttsing, product display Price Adjustment
and demonstration, participation in trade fairs and exhibitions, word of mouth publicity, Strategies
etc. A Trade-in-Allowance is price reduction given to the customer for trading in,
that is, turning in an old item when buying a new one. Nowadays it is common for
companies to trade-in durable consumer goods such as refrigerators, television sets,
washing machines, mixers etc. Such an allowance is an incentive for customers to go
in for the latest model of these products although they may have, with them, the
earlier models. Trading-in offers to the customer the double advantage of price
reduction in the latest model of the product and, at the same time, finding a way to
dispose of the old model.
in substantial quantity.
iii) Cumulative quantity discount is generally aimed at the consumer rather than
the distributor.
iv) Seasonal discount enables the manufacturer to meet seasonal demand.
V) Trade-in offers practical solution to the customer's problem of disposal of
the old model of the product.
1 . 4 GEOGRAPHICAL PRICING
b
i
You have studied the methods of deciding the basic price of the product. Then you
have studied how to adjust.the price through discounts and allowances for seasonality,
intermediaries,quantum purchased, rewarding intermediaries for their additional
services, etc. Another major pricing decision to be taken by the marketers relates to
the policy in pricing its product to customers located in different parts of the country1
world. When the product is transported from one place to the other place, you have to ,
incur costs like labour charges for loading and unloading, transportation, insurance,
storage and warehousing, customs and excise, etc. Some of these costs increase with
the increase in distance. Since the cost of carrying of the product from the factory to
a distant customer will be definitely more than that of carrying it to the customer in
the nearby location, the company has to devise a carefully thought out method to
ensure that it does not lose business from distant customers by loading the entire
transportation cost on to the price charged to them or alternatively annoy the nearby
1 Pricing Decisions customers by making them share a high proportion of the cost of transporting to
distant customers. Therefore, you have to decide the policy whether you charge all
customers uniformly irrespective of their location or charge differently as per the
distance or location. Following are some of the methods available to marketers to sort
out this problem.
11.4.1 FOB-OriginPricing
Under the FOB (Free on Board) Origin Pricing method, the customer has to bear the
entire transportation cost and other incidental costs like unloading, insurance, etc.
from the first point the product is loaded on to the truck, shiplboat, airline or train. The
seller bears only the cost upto loading the merchandise (goods) on the carrier, while
the buyer bears all the remaining expenses. This obviously means that the return to
the seller will be constant while the product price will differ from one group of
customers to others depending on their location in relation to the point of production.
In the case of movement of the product by rail, this method is referred to as FOR
(Free on Rail) Origin pricing.
Since each customer is expected to bear the expenses involved in moving the product
to the place where he wants it, it appears that FOB-Origin Pricing is a fair and
equitable way to allocate freight charges as per the distance of buyers. It is also easy
for the seller to comprehend and implement. The advantage of this method is that the
product will be highly priced to a distant customer and quite cheap to a nearby
customer. Therefore, customers may like to buy from the nearby suppliers in order to
avoid high costs. In case you adopt this method of geographical pricing, the distant
customers may gradually shift to competitors nearer to their locations. It means that
all companies may have to contend with selling their products only to nearby
customers and no company can perhaps hope to capture a distance market. This, in
fact, will create geographic monopolies, each company enjoying a monopoly in the
closeby markets and the consumer being denied the benefit of choice.
Whatever may be the reason for price reduction by a company, this strategy hides the
danger of snowballing into price-wars which may not ultimately benefit any company.
Price Increase: Price increase may be caused by rising costs. Rising costs squeeze
profit margins and companies may be forced to raise product prices in order to
maintain the profit margin. Companies generally would not like to raise the prices
frequently every time the costs go up but, they may increase the price more than the
increase in cost thus providing a cushion for further cost increases in the near future.
There have also been instances of price increase to curb excess demand when the
company finds it difficult to meet the requirements of all its customers. A company
may increase the price of its product just to make more profits when it finds that
there is not much of competition in the market or if the company happens to be the
"leader" in the market.
Price increases are generally resented by customers and even by dealers. To some
extent. the adverse reactions of the customers may be softened by communicating
the reasons for price increase to the customers. Instead of raising prices directly, a
company may adopt indirect methods such as reducing discounts, adding higher
priced units lo the line, curtailing production of low margin product items, etc., are
some examples. It is important that you communicate the customers reasons for
increase in prices. If you increase the prices frequently, customers may perceive that
you charge excessive prices. You must be careful about this factor.
Similarly, to accommodate rising costs, rather than increasing the price, the product
form andlor packaging may be changed to reduce costs. For instance, introducing
refill packages and offering beverages in powdered mix form rather than as liquids
Pricing Decisions (thus avoiding the cost of water and container) as earlier or in small unit packs for
one serving (pan masalas) which have the effect of reducing costs/increasing price
are some examples of this technique.
To accommodate rising costs, certain facilities that wzi-c hitherto part of the price
charged, such as free home delivery or free after sales service may be given up or
may be provided on payment only. Thus the bundle of utility, earlier provided to the
customer, is unbundled. Conversely, during periods of decline in costs, rather than
reducing the product price, new features can be added to the bundle without charging
anything extra for the added utilities.
When rise in costs make it unavoidable to raise prices, certain additional facilities
such as providing credit, arranging finance for purchase of a high unit value item and
supplying products on instalment basis are offered by firms to persuade the customers
and dealers to purchase the higher priced product.
Customer Reactions to Price Changes: Price revisions, both downwards and
upwards, provoke different types of reactions from buyers, competitors, distributors
and even government. An excessive price reduction might be interpreted by
consumers as an attempt by the company to dispose off defective rroducts or
products of poor quality. Sometim~scustomers may also get the impression that the
company is in financial trouble and may close down the operations soon. They may
think that the companyWill shortly introduce newer models of the product and hence
is disposing of the old models at reduced prices. Some consumers, in anticipation of
further price reduction, may postpone purchases. There may also be consumers who
may consider price reduction as reflective of the ethical standards of a company.
A price increase may have positive meanings for some buyers and negative meanings
for some others. When a company raises the price of its product, some buyers may
take the price increase as an indication of better quality of the product or it is the
latest model and a "hot" item. Such customers may rush to buy it fearing further price
increases in future or the "hot item" may run out of stock soon. On the other hand,
some other customers may feel that the company is greedy and is trying to exploit the
consumer.
Competitors Reactions to Price Change: Just as consumer reaction to price
changes, your competitors may also react to a price change by your company. Each
competitor will generally react according to his self interest. However, majority of the
competitors may react in a set way. Under market conditions of pure competition, if
the company initiating the price change is not a marginal player, the competitors are
likely to match the price change. On the other hand, if the company initiating the price
change is a marginal player and/or there is evidence available to prove that the
company is performing poorly, the competitors are unlikely to match the price change.
Some companies, instead of matching the price change, may compensate the
consumer in other ways through sales promotion, discounts, product service,
packaging. incentives, etc.
11.6.1 Market-SkimmingPricing
Setting high prices for the product initially is referred to as market-skimming
pricing strategy. As the name indicates, the objective is to "skim" the market, for
high revenues, as much as possible. Companies like Polaroid Corporation are known
to follow skimming pricing policy. The strategy is to set a high price for the product,
skim the creamy segments of the market, generate as much revenue as possible and
[hen, as competition develops, bring out lower priced versions of the product to draw
in new segments.
The advantage of this pricing strategy is that high price helps recover initial
investment fast. This I S particularly necessary for products which involve high
research and development (R&D) expenditure and high marketing costs. The funds
so realized by skimming the market can be utilized to finance entry into other
segments of the market, if and when necessary. Also, it has become necessary for
companies to recover as much finances as early as possible in the present days of
shorter product life cycles. Skimming pricing strategy generally creates a high quality
image for the product and helps build up strong brand loyalty among status conscious
segment of customers. In iiny case, it may be easier and advisable to start at high
price, ~undif need be, reduce the prlce subsequently rather than start at low price and
find it difficult to raise the price subsequently, even if it is just~fied.
The r ~ s kassociated with skimming-pricing strategy is that high price normally tends to
attract competltlon and limits market size in due course. Besides, it projects a poor
image of the company as a soc~allyand ethically irresponsible one.
Market skimming makes sense under certain conditions. Firstly, the product must be
constdered "new" by the target segment and it should take time and substantial
rebources for competitors to develop substitutes. Secondly, the demand for the
product should be inelastic. Though the size of the segment may be small in terms of
the number of customers and the sales volume (in terms of units) the value of the
sales should be high and profits also high. The small segment should comprise elitist
buyers such as trend setters but the demand (measured in terms of value of
purchase) should be sufficiently high to justify production for such a small sized
segment and the costs of producing a small volume should not be high enough to
cancel the advantage of producing for a limited number of buyers.
Pricing Decisions 11.6.2 Market-Penetration Pricing
Rather than setting a high initial price and skim a small segment, market-penetration
pricing strategy advocates setting as low an initial price as possible in order to
penetrate the market as fast and as much as possible. Companies like Texas
Instruments are known to be users of this strategy. Low price is expected to attract
high volume of business which, in turn, will have the effect of lowering the costs
further. The advantage of penetration-pricing strategy is that low price generally
discourages competition and hence gives substantial market share to the company
practicing this strategy.
It suffers from the disadvantage that charging low price may leave considerable
consumer surplus in the sense that, if the market is prepared to pay a higher price,
then the company charging a lower price stands to lost revenue. Moreover, low price
may generate very high demand and, if the company if not able to match supply with
demand, its'reputation may be affected. Low price also tends to be associated with
low quality of the product and poor service.
The conditions favouring deployment of penetration-pricing strategy are the opposite
of those favouring deployment of skimming-pricing strategy i.e. the product does not
involve much of investment for R&D and marketing. It should be relatively easy for
competitors to come out with substitutes. The demand is elastic and the market is a
mass market in terms of number of buyers, sales volume and value and the unit profit
11.7.1 Product-LinePricing
Co~npaniesmanufacturing a product-line (different versions of the same product such
as different capacities of refrigerators, various models of cars, all varieties of toilet
soaps, etc.) may decide on the price steps to be set between the various versions of
the product by taking into account the cost differences, differences in consumer
perception and competitors' prices. For instance, your company is manufacturing
colour TVh of various models of 14" TV, 21 " TV, 25" TV and 29" TV. Normally the
pnce of 14" TV would be the lowest and 29" TV price would be the highest. Here
you have to decide the price of each of these four models in comparison with each
other taking into account cost factors, technical features, consumer segments,
consumer perceptions about the models, prices of comparable models of competitors'
fl.7.3 Captive-ProductPricing
There are certain products, which cannot be used without certain other products.
Examples of such products are safety razor with razor blades and shaving cream,
toothpaste with tooth brush, cameras with films, computers with software, fountain
pen with ink, etc. Manufacturers of such complementary products may use captive
product pricing strategy where the main product is priced low while the supplies can
be priced relatively high. Companies which are in the business of only the main
product will then find themselves priced out from the market. This is also the strategy
being followed by companies in the business of durable consumer goods (such as
cars, television sets, refrigerators; etc.) where the spares, components and servicing
Pricing Decisions are charged relatively high while the relatively low prices of the main products make
them competitive.
In the case of services, the strategy is called two-part pricing. The price of the
service comprises two parts, a fixed fee and a variable usage fee. For example,
telephone companies charge a fixed monthly rent plus charges for calls made during
the period over and above the minimum number of free calls. The service company
must make the basic service fee low enough to attract customers and profits should
mainly come from the variable usage fee.
11.7.5 Product-BundlePricing
Under this strategy, sellers can combine a number of their products and offer the
bundle at attractive price. For example, it is a common experience during festive
seasons, retailers offer durable goods like refrigerator, washing machine, TV as a
bundle at a single price which is much lower than the total price you pay for each of
them separately. Tour operators often offer package tours which include air travel,
hotel and food, sight-seeing, insurance, visa fee, airport taxes, local travel etc. The
price of the total package has often been found much lower than the sum total of the
prices of each item separately. If the product bundle is priced attractively, it will
stimulate the sales of all items in the bundle.
11.10 LETUSSUMUP
Companies often have to adjust the price of' ~ i r e i lpn i l l i.c..!x:lnse to changes in
l*l~ri:;
111 pric~ngw ~ l lbe when a new product has to he p c e d : a company rnay charge a h ~ g h I
conyetit ive conclitions.
While pr~cinga s ~ n g l eproduct h I.11 own ch,ilit:J~sek.p-lc~rigsctrateyy i'or a rnlx ot
11roduct\ paws another set of chnii,.i1~e~:itlatt.p~i:s such as prod:~~i-line pricing,
\el ler may follow a polir.\~ l ; h , ~ I pl-lc<or tht ,tlit 1 . 1 + 11 :dx ,his p i c e ~
61i ' ~ g
' ~ - 1 ~ l i '
customer segment should be elitist, the value of sales and profits should be
high, cost of a small volume of production should not be high.
4) i) Incorrect ii) Correct iii) Correct iv) Incorrect v) Incorrect
K e0~ *~ ti:.^
l : (:f l'ricing ljn,.;i. ...
/
. , .. % .
'
You havc aliendy studied variol~s,pricing policies and strategies. But while deciding
pricing s!rai!:~ies il is also important for you to keep in mind the legislative provisions
regarding price.. Regulation of prices is consid~redas orie of the important means of
a(:h~cvinpthe socio-ec.onomic goals in many countries. The irrlportant factors that call
for !vice control and regulation in countries like India are short supply of goods and
services, i~nrcasonablelevel of prices, unfair trade practices and black-marketing. low
levcls of in:ome of a large nunher of people, etc. h~ India. a number of legislations
seek Ln regalate pricing policieu a n d practices. They 11icl11dc the Monopolies ;md
Kcctrjct~veI'rade Practices Act, 1969 (Soon likely to br replaccd !JY Competition Act,
20021, the Consumer Protection Act. 1986, thi: Essential Comnloditics Acr, 1955, the
Prevention of Black-Marketing and Maintenance of Supldies of Essential
Coml-nodities Act, 1980, the DI-LIES (Corltrol) Act. 1950. the industries (Develo~ment
and Regulation) Act, 1951, and the Star~d~~rrls ~f IXsights & h9easures (Packaged Regulation of PIices
Commodities) Rules. 1977. In this unit we ~;.l,:illdis.:iis.; t ! i~:ni:?r
~ provisions of these
legislations reg:trding the regulation of pticss ciCgti.!ods an::l \.:I iires i l l India. The
--,-
The prevention of certain trade practices that are detrimental to the ct nsu,i;i::s'
interest is one of the major objectives of price regulation. In India, the Monopolies
a ~ i dRestrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 seeks to prevent the mc~nopolies,
restrictive and unfair trade practices since these are prejudicial to the public. interest.
The provisions relating to the regulation of trade practices also covcr-pricing practicc~
indulged in by the sellers including manufacturers, wholesalers and the retailers. .Llic
practices regulated under this Act are: resale price maintenance, price discri~ninati:.:).
collective price fixing, predatory pricing, bargain and deceptive pricing, and ch3igir;;:
of unseasonably high price. Let us discuss these aspects in detail.
I
Sometimes manufacturers and suppliers of goods and services enter into an
agreement or understanding to eliminate competition among themselves, by fixing
common prices and other terms of sale for their products or services. Such an
agreement (or arrangement) leads to a formal or informal cartel, which can envisage
unifonnity in the price fixation of competing firms. Collective price fixing can also
take the form of collusive tendering and collusive biding or bid rigging.
Collusive Tendering: You may be knowing in the construction work, installation of
plant and machinery, procurement of materials by industrial/commerciaI users,
procurement by Government Departmentsflnstitutions, etc., adopt tendering method.
, There are two types of tendering: (a) open tendering where it is advertised in the
media and sealed bids can be submitted by any supplier (b) limited tendering where
bids are invited from few bidders. The first approach is followed normally when the
* amount involved is more and time is sufficient. The second method is followed when
the amount is small and need is urgent. The buyer provides specifications of the work
or materials in the tender document while the suppliers provide specifications and
price of the materials he would supply by filling the tender:All the tenders are opened
on a pre-decided day in the presence of all bidders. Then the bidder whose
specifications match with buyer's requirements and offers the lowest price will get
the contract. This is brietly tendering.
Thus, it is a practice whereby sellers (or buyers) of goods or services secretly agree
on the prices, or other terms or conditions of sale or purchase, to be quoted in
response to a tender. They would quote such rates and terms as would make the
offer of only the pre-decided tenderer acceptable. This practice results in unduly high
prices of products or services offered for supply. The opposite will be the situation
when the tenders invited are for the 'disposal of any product'. In that case the rates
quoted will be too low.
Pricing Uecisioas Collr, .i,r Uipci~!;nlcl,; or Bid R;;;,,giurg: Collusive bidding is the counterpart of collusive
The system ;.
tendel i i i C ' : ,rn - * " i IS where I :goods are s,,:.~htto be disposed of through auction.
-+?( - i : ~ namong
t certain cr m.,lislions which dispose of surplus goods
throuz" ,:-::?tcr,, \31rha view to get 1 1 h::~ ~i-.,c possible price In the auction system,
poducr I R L ~ Lilvailabl;:
~Z for physical L ..t~~iinationand all thc buyers publicly offer
r k p LC.The buyer whoever offers the highest price will get the product. However,
tltc 'u,!,2, i ;!:ld it a convel~:citt I f ccci .qa.tiilg the seller's effort to raise the
price of the pro,luct. 1hey agrec 'ir,t,siig diu:il,el\es on the price or other terms (or
conditions) of sale, or purchase of goods cr services, to be offered at the auction. The
collusive agrement, arrangement or ~ll~desstanding, a.rlong the bidders, leads to the
manipulation of' prices of tl;c products or services offered for sale t!>rough auction.
Thus, collective price fixing. collusive tendering and collusive bidding have the effect
of restricting and eli:;.inatii~gCL npetition whiilt amounts to a restrictive trade
practice, The provisions for the ~egulationof these prxtices are t h s,,r ~ a those
for other restrictive trade pra~ticesdescribed in PI ;i.: dr ,criminatio~~.
In Motlern Food I~~r,,..r;.tt~.s "EL,);, :. k.,., ;.eld t , ~ ;r: require; 1:) be established that
the pricing below cost c,i; .:.h in:c.:l r ~3 d.iGeCL;: ~ 2 : :i .r cut C T business.or to
a
eliminate compc-tition. Mere (.ffer ^ e ~ ' c : ; .-:e7 lu,tcr I ; , : , : c a d t.! production cannot
automatit nlljs l e ~ i dto ' l r l i ~ r c i ;if),,
~ : (.,' :I ..,.
lcl:.; .... zg.
Again, in Britrnlzr~icrblcl'rutries Lzi, tri. I / . * , ! r , t ~ - (1986), the q ~ ~ t s t i owas
r ! whether
MIS. Johnson and Johnso:? !,tL was pr<:<u.ti18predatory pricir:g with aview to
throwii~gsmall n i a r l u f a e ~ ~ ~2: eti~ of
a t i i ~ i lJc;:nson
~. and Johnson L-td., the respondent,
were ~nanufacturingnearly 300 ~ a r i e t i e s l s i ; .oP ~ ~sutures using modern technology
and expertlse and qual~tycontrol under the te.;:,,ii:al gi~idanceof world famous
'Ethicons' On the other hand, the petitioner MIS. SMB b e r e a small-scale unit
manufacturing ol~lynon-absorbable sutures with 100% indigenous technology having
a nomlnal share in the market. The petitioner's complaint was that the respondent
indulged in predatory pricing In their qwtations of their product to the Director
General, Armcd Forces Medical Se, vices Depot, Delhi Cantt., Mgith a view to
eliminating competition from .i'L,~anufacturerslike the complainant. The question
before the Commission was fir.i;rp:er t!.e quoting of lower prices than the prices
charged from dealers amounted lo predatory pricing. The Commission had already
ruled in Trl Szire Indin Ltrl, Bornbuy tnat the essence of predatory pricing was
pricing below one's cost with a vicw to eliminating a trade rival. An attempt was,
therefore, made to arrive at the cost of production of the respondent on the basis of
the material cost, excise duty and expenses allocated on the basis of the proportion of
sale of each item to total sale. The cmerglng ~;-1t:,reshowed that in no case quotation
had been given at a price below the cost price. 111:,I, ; I . \ V.E-:aiices, it was held that
to sell a small portion in public interest to Governttlrnt call i3rl,t be treated as restrictive
trade practice of predatory pricing, particularly, when the rates are above cost of
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
2) , Distinguish between predatory pricing anp price discrimination.
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
3) Distinguish between collusive tendering and collusive bidding.
......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
Pricing Decisions 4) Match the pricing practices given in Column A with the names given in
Column B.
Column A Column B
i) Pricing is slashed-down below the a) Re-sale price
cost with a view to eliminate competition maintenance
ii) Sellers havea secret agreement on the b) Collusive tendering
price to be quoted in response to a
tender notice
iu) A price charged on the re-sale of a C) Price discrimination
product by a retailer
iv) A manufacturer of goods charged d) Predatory pricing
different prices from different dealers
for the same products
/
excessive pricing.
...........
..................................................................................,........................
.......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
3) State whether the following statements are True or False.
i) Deceptive pricing is sought to be regulated under the provisions of both the
MRTP Act and the Consumer Protection Act.
ii) Any consumer can make a complaint regarding charging of price indicated on
the label of the product through the Consumer Protection Forum.
(v) Turmeric
(vi) Milk
Wherever the Central Government finds it necessary to control the rise in prices or
prevent the hoarding of any foodstuff, it may regulate their selling price. The prices
shall be determined in accordance with the relevant provisions of Section 3(3A) of
the Act. The Act also provides for the method of fixation of price for foodstuffs of
edible oils acquired by the Government. Similarly, the criteria for the fixation of fair
price of sugar payable to the producer have been provided in the Act.
The provisions of the Essential Commodities Act have been further strengthened and
reinforced by the Prevention of Black Marketing and Maintenance of Supplies of
Essential Commodities Act, 1980.
Stringent measures have been provided under this Act to prevent black marketing and
ensuring equitable supply of essential commodities.
12.4.2 The Drugs (Control)Act, 1950
Though the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 covers drugs under its scope, the Drugs
(Control) Act was passed way back in 1950 which prclvided for the control of the
sale, supply and distribution of drugs. The Act incorporates certain provisions for the
regulation of the prices of drugs in India. Under Section 4(1), the Government is
empowered to fix the maximum price or rate which may be charged by a dealer or
producer in respect of any drug. Further, Section 5 imposes restrictions on the sale,
price, etc., where maximum price is fixed under Section 4. That means no dealer or
producer is permitted to sell, agree to sell, offer for sale or otherwise dispose of, to
any person any drug for a price exceeding the maximum fixed under Section 4.
.......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................
4) State whether the following statements are True or False:
i) Central Government enjoys absolute powers in controlling the price of
commodities under IDRA.
Regulation of Prices
iii) Drugs also come under the scope of Essential Commodities Act.
iv) Government can fix the prices of food items and enforce the same.
V) Retailer can sell the drugs at a price exceeding the maximum fixed price.
12.5 LETUSSUMUP
While fixing pnces of goods and services or making any modifications, the
manufacturers and sellers have to be conscious of the relevant provisions contained in
various statutory regulations. While the practice of minimum retail price is absolutely
prohibited, practices like price discrimination, predatory pricing, bargain and deceptive
pricing and excessive pricing attract action under the Monopolies and Restrictive
Trade Practices Act, 1969. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 provides measures
for regulating excessive prices, and bargain and deceptive prices. The Essential
Commodities Act, 1955 empowers the government to regulate the distribution and
prices of essential~commodities.The marketing managers of drugs and essential
commodities have to be extra vigilan) since their pricing practices are subject to
add~tionalregulatory measures unde? the Drugs (Control) Act, 1950. Moreover,
pricing of products manufactured by scheduled industries under the Industries
(Development and Regulation) Act, 195 1. Products sold in packaged form also attract
additional measures of statutory price regulations under the Standards of Weights and
Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977.
Note: These questions will help you to understand the unit better. Try to write
answers for them. But do not submit your answers to the University for
assessment. These are for your practice only.