0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views2 pages

W3 Questions

Value-at-Risk (VaR) quantifies the potential loss of a financial portfolio over a specified time period under a given level of confidence. [1] While normal VaR is useful for its simplicity, it does not properly account for "leptokurtic" or fat-tailed returns distributions. [2] Stock X, with a lower standard deviation, will have a lower VaR at both 95% and 99% confidence levels compared to Stock Y. [3]

Uploaded by

Jingchi Li
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
87 views2 pages

W3 Questions

Value-at-Risk (VaR) quantifies the potential loss of a financial portfolio over a specified time period under a given level of confidence. [1] While normal VaR is useful for its simplicity, it does not properly account for "leptokurtic" or fat-tailed returns distributions. [2] Stock X, with a lower standard deviation, will have a lower VaR at both 95% and 99% confidence levels compared to Stock Y. [3]

Uploaded by

Jingchi Li
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

EFB344 Risk Management and Derivatives

Tutorial W3: Value-at-Risk 1

Question 1

a. A Finance 1 student has asked you to explain Value-at-Risk (VaR). Write a brief explanation that
this student might understand.

quantifies the potential loss of a financial portfolio over a specified time period and under a
given level of confidence.

b. The same student has said that financial security returns have leptokurtic distributions (i.e. –
high kurtosis). Therefore, calculating VaR using a normal distribution is a waste of time because
the normal distribution does allocate sufficient probability to extreme returns in the tails.
Outline a simple correction to VaR that may appease (make them happier) this student but also
provide two (2) reasons as to why normal VaR is useful.

Question 2

The annual return distributions (distribution, mean and variance) for stock X and Y are specified as

𝑟𝑥 ~𝑁(0.10, 0.04)

𝑟𝑦 ~𝑁(0.15, 0.09)

a. With the bare minimum of calculations (try to do them in your head), outline which stock will
have the lower 1 year value-at-risk (VaR) at the 95% and 99% levels.

b. Calculate the 1 year VaR(95%) and VaR(99%) for each return.

Question 3

It is assumed that volatility scales √𝑡 with time. Why is this?


Question 4

The daily VaR(1,95%) for a stock is -2.00% when the daily mean is assumed to be 0 and returns are
normally distributed. If volatility scales √𝑡 with time, what are the 2-day, 5-day and 10-day VaR(95%)
for this stock? How would these numbers change if the daily mean was known to be 0.1%?

Question 5

Explain the market risk charge (part of Basel II).

Question 6 – Explain the historical Simulation method of calculating VaR

Question 7 – Explain how the confidence level and choice of time horizon affect VaR

Question 8 – You have just started a job in risk management for a trading floor, and someone has
asked you to update the 1 day Riskmetrics EWMA volatility forecast for NAB shares. You don’t have a
full set of historical data, but you know that the forecast for today’s variance was 0.0004 and NAB
shares fell by 4% today.

a. Do you have enough information to forecast tomorrow’s volatility (standard deviation)? If


yes, what is the forecast?

b. If NAB shares go up by 3% tomorrow, what will be the following days volatility forecast?

Question 9 – A Company using the EWMA model for forecasting volatility. It decides to change the
parameter lambda from 0.94 to 0.85. Explain the likely impact on the forecasts.

You might also like