Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    Cretirea

    Uploaded by

    Sindaw Youth Association for Progress
    This document contains a rubric for judging exhibits with criteria in various areas such as appeal, title, creativity, content, organization, presentation style, and overall quality. Top scores are given for exhibits that attract interest through their title and creative design, clearly state their purpose and outcomes, have excellent organization with proper grammar and references, incorporate relevant visual aids, and are well prepared with good presentation style. Lower scores are given to exhibits that lack these qualities and have unclear purpose, poor organization, incorrect writing, and an unprepared or uneasy presentation. The rubric is being used to evaluate student performance tasks for the third quarter.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Cretirea

    Uploaded by

    Sindaw Youth Association for Progress
    23 views1 page
    This document contains a rubric for judging exhibits with criteria in various areas such as appeal, title, creativity, content, organization, presentation style, and overall quality. Top scores are given for exhibits that attract interest through their title and creative design, clearly state their purpose and outcomes, have excellent organization with proper grammar and references, incorporate relevant visual aids, and are well prepared with good presentation style. Lower scores are given to exhibits that lack these qualities and have unclear purpose, poor organization, incorrect writing, and an unprepared or uneasy presentation. The rubric is being used to evaluate student performance tasks for the third quarter.

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains a rubric for judging exhibits with criteria in various areas such as appeal, title, creativity, content, organization, presentation style, and overall quality. Top scores are given for exhibits that attract interest through their title and creative design, clearly state their purpose and outcomes, have excellent organization with proper grammar and references, incorporate relevant visual aids, and are well prepared with good presentation style. Lower scores are given to exhibits that lack these qualities and have unclear purpose, poor organization, incorrect writing, and an unprepared or uneasy presentation. The rubric is being used to evaluate student performance tasks for the third quarter.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    23 views1 page

    Cretirea

    Uploaded by

    Sindaw Youth Association for Progress
    This document contains a rubric for judging exhibits with criteria in various areas such as appeal, title, creativity, content, organization, presentation style, and overall quality. Top scores are given for exhibits that attract interest through their title and creative design, clearly state their purpose and outcomes, have excellent organization with proper grammar and references, incorporate relevant visual aids, and are well prepared with good presentation style. Lower scores are given to exhibits that lack these qualities and have unclear purpose, poor organization, incorrect writing, and an unprepared or uneasy presentation. The rubric is being used to evaluate student performance tasks for the third quarter.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Republic of the Philippines

    Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao


    Ministry of Basic, Higher and Technical Education
    COTABATO CITY NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL – MAIN CAMPUS

    Exhibit Judging Performance Task 3rd Quarter


    Criteria Top Score Quality Excellent Very Average Inadequate Poor Low Score Comments
    Good
    Quality
    10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
    Appeal Demonstrate/display Demonstrate/display
    attract interest. does not elicit
    curiosity
    Title Title is large enough to Title is unclear and
    read from distance. difficult to
    understand.
    Creativity The output is creative. The output is not
    creative.
    Content Purpose is proficiently Purpose of work is
    stated and explained. unclear.
    -Purpose
    Content Accurate and Complete Outcome and/or
    explanations of outcome process is not
    -Outcome or process. addressed or not well
    organized.
    Organization Exceptional overall Insufficient of flow,
    organization, easy to lack of overall
    -Flow follow structure. organization, structure
    hard to follow.
    Organization Coorect grmmar and Poor writing style,
    spelling; references are missing references.
    -Style listed.
    Organization Photographs, drawing, Visual aids are
    charts, and display are confusing and don’t
    -Use of Visuals relevant. seem to serve a
    purpose.
    Presentation Well-prepared, easily Not well prepared,
    conveys ideas, lack of enthusiasm,
    Style adequately answers uneasy addressing
    -Preparation questions. questions.
    Presentation Appearances & address Lack of eye contact,
    eye contact, posture, and poor posture, voice
    -Style tone of voice. too low/loud.
    Total Points: / 100

    Prepared by: Checked by:


    HABIB M. ATONG JULIUS P. LEDESMA
    Student Teacher Adviser, Grade 9 STE A

    You might also like