Benzene Report
Benzene Report
N
umerous benefits are expected from digitalisation of digitalisation in an aromatics complex, where processes
transformation, including real-time business man- are inherently and strongly interconnected. Examples of
agement and associated efficiencies, minimised performance visualisation by various units of measure, alert
environmental impact, and improved sustainability and functions, optimisation tools, and performance prediction
safety. In petrochemical complexes, process licensors and are presented together with yields improvements and ensu-
catalyst suppliers play a key role in accompanying this trans- ing benefits in commercially operating plants. The impact
formation as they provide the digital tools complementing of digitalisation on GHG emission reduction is also detailed
their proprietary technologies, implement tailored users fea- and discussed. Finally, the coming digital twin approach for a
tures such as diagnostics and alerts, predictive functions and petrochemical plant is introduced.
improvement suggestions, as well as cybersecurity solutions
to ensure the confidentiality of their real-time exchanges Digitalisation for the petrochemical industry
with operators. Real-time business, real-time supply chain management and
Digitalisation options must come at a competitive cost to optimisation, production excellence, enhanced sustainability
ensure the benefits largely surpass the additional invest- and compliance, and reduced risk to personnel safety and
ment. Process unit remote monitoring by licensors and health were among the many expected benefits as industry
catalyst suppliers used to be a challenge due to the time lag 4.0 concepts caught up with the refining industry.1 These
between data collection, data submission, data interpreta- improvements are now extending to petrochemical plants,
tion and feedback transmission, and time zone differences. even if many chemical companies are still figuring out how
With real-time data display and exchange of operating sta- to apply digitalisation to their business in the most effective
tus viewgraphs for a unit or an entire complex, Axens is in an way.2 Process licensors are in a unique position to accom-
ideal position to assist operators in maximising the efficiency pany the digital transformation of petrochemical operations
of their processes, with benefits for both users and technol- as they:
ogy providers. • Master the processes they licence, hence are in the best
Against this backdrop, it benefits to show the advantages position to design digital tools for these processes
Light
naphtha Raffinate Benzene
Light
reformate Benz/tol
Full range Extraction CT Transalkylation
Naphtha fractionation
naphtha hydroteating NS
H2
Paraxylene
Liquid phase
isomerisation
CT XC
Heavy
reformate
HAR
Heavies
Navigation
Normalised PKIs
SEND
General Performance
Unit Capacity Usage Reactor WAIT Material Balance ExReactor Yield : H2 ExReactor Yield : C5+ ExReactor Yield : Arom... ExReactor : Aromatics i... Reformate RON
WAIT Change [˚C] H2/HC Ratio Change [mol fr] Catalyst Circulation Rate Change [... Aromatic Yeild Delta [wt%] 24H Aromatic Production Delta (wt. basis) [ton]
Aromatic Yield Delta (wt. basis) Aromatic Yield Delta (wt. basis)
wt% kg/h
wt%
kg/h
wt%
wt% kg/h
wt%
kg/h
wt%
wt% kg/h
Optimised Process Parameters Over Selected Time Period (indicated on the top right)
Aromatic Yield : Optimised vs. Operation Delta WAIT vs. Delta Aromatic Yield
wt% ˚C wt%
wt% ˚C wt%
wt% ˚C wt%
wt% ˚C wt%
wt% ˚C wt%
wt% ˚C wt%
wt% ˚C wt%
breakdown can be continuously determined to estimate ‘odometer view’ mode. A separate screen displays the impact
the total naphtha feed TBP curve based on carbon PONA of the CCR operating conditions on the reformate splitter
composition. The splitter LN/HN operating cut point can be operation. A ‘what if’ tool calculates performance prediction
calculated, and a set of optimal conditions is proposed in as a function of a new set of operating parameters, allowing
real-time to operators in order to adjust the LN swing cut the operator to evaluate the impact of changes in feed com-
flow rates that can be directed to HN. position, temperature, pressure and so on the overall yields,
Aromatics are increased by maximising benzene precur- catalyst consumption, and heater duty and performance.
sors in the CCR unit inlet while checking continuously for Reducing plant production costs and energy consumption
potential bottlenecks in downstream units such as the aro- is achieved by implementing monitoring for equipment such
matic extraction unit. By applying this strategy in a 1 Mtpy as heaters or feed effluent exchangers. For instance, alerts in
paraxylene production complex, the achievable margin gain case of consumption anomalies will be triggered on the dif-
is estimated to be ~$4M/year, based on the incremental ferent dashboards, and calculated key performance indica-
value of LN conversion to benzene vs LN conversion to liq- tors (KPIs) are pinpointing where it is possible to improve the
uefied petroleum gas (LPG). efficiency of different assets while checking their integrity.
Figure 2 shows the real-time status of an operating CCR. Thanks to this permanent monitoring, traditional preven-
Actual figures have been masked for proprietary reasons, tive maintenance can be reduced considerably and correc-
but the process performance overview includes unit capac- tive maintenance almost eliminated, thereby significantly
ity usage, reactor temperature and pressure, hydrogen dropping associated costs. For example, tracking precisely
production, aromatics yield, FG/LPG ratio, material balance excess air at the arch provides insights for heater efficiency
calculation, and coke on spent catalyst, among many other optimisation; applied to CCR heaters, this enables an inlet
units of measure. process flow/total fuel gas flow ratio increase by a factor of
Alert functions attract the viewer’s attention to opera- +3%, decreasing CO2 emissions accordingly.
tion within design specifications (in green), outside design Monitoring the main KPIs enables unit troubleshooting
specifications but within operating constraints (in orange), by continuous comparison of actual and normalised per-
or outside operating constraints (in red). Each parameter formances, calculated based on reconciled data using high
can be viewed as a function of time – graph mode – or in an fidelity models supplied by the process licensor or catalyst
Determine the remaining time for the Current Cycle. The deactivation slope/slope-uncertainty/Current NART/Target NART is editable by users
cw
˚C
Deactivation Slope Remaining Cycle Length Max
Deactivation Slope Uncertainty Remaining Cycle Length
Current NART Remaining Cycle Length Min
Target NART
Historical Data
Calculation Done
Min.Est.Cycle Length
Est.Cycle Length
Max.Est.Cycle length
NART (˚C)
NART PROJECTION INPUTS
Description Unit Min Max Base Case
Current NART ˚C
Normalised days on Oil (Months)
Target NART ˚C
Current NDOO mo
Target NART ˚C
Historical Data
Deactivation Slope Uncertai... % Min.Est.Cycle Length
Est.Cycle Length
Deactivation Slope Min ˚C/mo
Max.Est.Cycle length
supplier. In addition, an optimisation module targeting aro- circulation rate, for instance, to define the best set of operat-
matic yield maximisation can be set up (see Figure 3). The ing conditions.
optimiser will only search within the defined upper and The unit operator has access to daily recommendations
lower boundaries of the weight average inlet temperature, compared to the previous day, with associated expected
the hydrogen-to-hydrocarbon molar ratio, and the catalyst performance improvement. Applied to a 1 Mtpy paraxylene
Absorbers DP (Calculation)
11:11:02 11:11:04 11:11:06 11:11:08 11:11:10 11:11:12 11:11:14 11:11:16 11:11:18 11:11:20 11:11:22 11:11:24
11:11:02 11:11:04 11:11:06 11:11:08 11:11:10 11:11:12 11:11:14 11:11:16 11:11:18 11:11:20 11:11:22 11:11:24
Absorber A (Calculation) Absorber A (Measured) Absorber B (Calc) 12 Steps Shift Absorber B (Measured) 12 Steps Shift STEP
Component Flow
Bz Column Bz Product
Net Gas
LPG
PX Product
Off Gas
Non-Aro.
Aromiser Feed C5 Cut Eluxyl
Xylene Splitter Xy Max
Morphylane Aromiser Ref. Splitter
Non-Aro
BZ
Tol
PX
MX
OX
EB
A9+
A8 (Detailed N/A)
A9+
A8 Net gas
Tol C5
Bz PX
Morph, Raffinate
PX LP Purge
Non-Aro Bz C10+
Bz LPG
Tol Fuel gas
A8 Bz
A9+ C5
Fuel gas
Net gas
LPG
C10+
Non-Aro LP Purge
Morph, Raffinate
(PX) complex achieving ~1% product gain and based on by machine learning calculates the optimal tuning parame-
the regional PX-naphtha spread, this strategy increases the ters to achieve optimal recovery for a given purity, consider-
annual PX production by 10,000 tons/year, which represents ing the actual molecular sieve ageing and unit status. These
a net benefit of approximately $5M/year. The distillation continuous recommended adjustments represent a net gain
trains are also scrutinised in order to improve separation effi- of several $M/year for an aromatic complex with a capacity
ciency, hence minimising aromatic losses while optimising of 1 Mtpy paraxylene.
energy efficiency by adjusting operating parameters accord-
ing to real conditions rather than design conditions. Improved operation via real-time digital
Figure 4 shows the real-time status of a transalkylation performance monitoring: overall complex
unit. The process performance overview includes feed rate Figure 6 provides an overview of an aromatics facility in
and weight hourly space velocity, reactor temperature and operation. The operator can visualise the performance
pressure, hydrogen-to-hydrocarbon molar ratio, conversion aggregate of all processes (heavy naphtha reforming, ben-
per pass, benzene and xylenes yields, and material balance zene and toluene extraction, paraxylene recovery, xylenes
calculation, among others. Alert functions attract the viewer’s isomerisation, and aromatics transalkylation). Individual unit
attention to operation within design specifications (in green), capacities are displayed, as well as benzene and paraxylene
outside design specifications but within operating constraints production, purity and yields, by-products yields, and pie
(in orange), or outside operating constraints (in red). charts summarising molecular distribution in the feed and
The operator can also monitor the recovery of C9, C10 and the product.
C11 aromatics at the overhead and bottoms of the heavy An optimisation tool provides calculations of achievable
aromatics column, and apply changes as needed using the margins based on feed and product prices inputted by the
‘what if’ tool to calculate the impact of such changes on the user. Lastly, a Sankey diagram presents a view of streams
transalkylation process performance and output. A separate entering and leaving the complex, as well as inlets/effluents
tool projects the end of cycle for the transalkylation catalyst of processes and/or fractionation steps within the complex,
using models based on robust regression applied to histori- where the width of the lines representing the flows are pro-
cal data, allowing the plant to manage the catalyst remaining portional to the flow rates and dynamically grow or shrink as
useful life efficiently. operational changes take place.
A general performance survey with associated alerting
can also be set up for the paraxylene separation process. Digitalisation of commercial facility: reduced GHGs
Suboptimal adsorber tuning survey, zone effect tracking, State-of-the-art digitalisation efforts include tools calculat-
individual bed pressure drop calculation (see Figure 5), and ing the impact of operating conditions on CO2 emissions at
associated alerting are key indicators to always maintain the the plant scale to reflect increasing incentives and/or con-
desired level of paraxylene purity. An inferential model built straints to reduce GHG emissions. For instance, operational