Computed Tomography - Principles and Applications
Computed Tomography - Principles and Applications
Computed Tomography:
Principles and Applications
Charlotte Whatmough, BVetMed
Christopher R. Lamb, MA, VetMB, DACVR, DECVDI
The Royal Veterinary College
University of London
C
omputed tomography (CT) has been in from the detectors are then passed to a computer,
clinical use in humans since 1973. 1 which reconstructs the data into a two-dimen-
Although CT was originally developed sional image representing a cross-section of the
for imaging the brain, CT scanners are used patient2 (Figure 1). A CT scanner represents a
today for a wide range of examinations of most high-quality piece of engineering that includes a
parts of the body, particularly the head, thorax, high-output x-ray tube, a gantry that supports
and abdomen. CT is gradually becoming more the x-ray tube, detector array, and a patient bed.
widely available in veterinary referral practices; Operation of the scanner is controlled by com-
therefore, it is important that practitioners be puter. CT images are viewed as they are acquired
aware of this imaging modality. on a monitor. Other scans can be viewed or
manipulated on a remote workstation without
PRINCIPLES interfering with the scan in progress. CT images
Image Formation may be printed onto film so that they may be
In conventional radiography, a broad x-ray viewed on a light box.
beam is emitted from a stationary tube and passes During a scan, the x-ray tube normally revolves
through the patient, casting a shadow on a flat continuously through 360˚ around the patient
screen that absorbs the x-rays and then re-emits as the patient is moved through the aperture of
their energy as light, which affects photographic the scanner; the patient is moved either in a
film. In CT, a narrow, fan- series of small increments (axial scan mode) or
Send comments/questions via email to shaped x-ray beam is emitted continuously (helical scan mode; Figure 2). The
[email protected] from a tube as it moves around size of the region to be scanned and the thick-
or fax 800-556-3288. the patient, and x-rays that ness of tissue represented by each image can be
Visit CompendiumVet.com for pass through the patient are precisely selected by the radiographer. Images
full-text articles, CE testing, and CE counted by a series of small representing thin slices (i.e., 1 to 2 mm) of the
test answers. electronic detectors; signals patient may be acquired when maximal resolu-
Image Interpretation
Each pixel in a CT image is assigned a number
that describes the amount of attenuation of the x-
ray beam by that part of the patient. These numeric
values, known as CT numbers or Hounsfield units
(HU), encompass a wide range (e.g., –1,000 HU for
air, 0 HU for water, 3,000 HU for compact cortical
bone; Figure 5). The CT image observed on the
computer monitor may be adjusted so that the
potentially wide range of attenuation values in the
tissues being examined (known as the window) can
A CT scanner with the front cover removed during installation.The be displayed using the relatively few gray levels that
arrows in the aperture indicate the direction of the x-ray beam. the monitor produces. A wide window is used to
display a wide range of attenuation in air- or bone-
containing structures (e.g., in the head or thorax),
tion of small, high-contrast structures is required (e.g., whereas a narrow window must be used to display the
when examining the bones of the middle and inner ear). more limited range of attenuation associated with soft
As an alternative, thicker slices (i.e., 5 to 8 mm) can be tissues (e.g., in the brain or abdomen; Figure 6). It is
used when it is important to distinguish between tissues normal practice to view images using multiple windows
of similar attenuation (e.g., parts of the brain, abdomi- to thoroughly examine different tissue types. CT can
nal organs). Thicker slices are necessary because recog- distinguish different soft tissue and fluid types (e.g.,
nition of small differences in attenuation (i.e., low- blood may be distinguished from transudate based on
contrast resolution) depends mainly on minimizing sta- their CT numbers) as well as differentiate between soft
tistical variations (i.e., “noise”) in the images; this is tissues and some fluids.2
Figure 2. Illustration of a CT scan in progress.The patient can be moved through the aperture in a series of small increments (i.e.,
axial scan mode) or continuously (i.e., helical scan mode).
APPLICATIONS
CT enables more detailed examination of a wider
range of structures than does conventional radiogra-
phy or ultrasonography. Thus CT may be used:
tion that affect radiography of the head. Figure 6. Once a CT scan has been acquired, the range of HU
Therefore, CT is useful in assessing animals displayed may be adjusted according to the tissue of interest. These
two CT images of the same part of the head of a dog can be compared.
with head trauma (Figure 11). Although MRI
is generally considered the optimal modality
for imaging the brain, CT can be a useful
alternative when there is limited access to
MRI or costs must be minimized. CT scans of
the brain have less anatomic detail than MRI
scans but may nevertheless enable detection of
intracranial hemorrhage11 (Figure 11), hydro-
cephalus, and intracranial masses12–14 (Figure
12). When the brain is examined, CT scans
are typically obtained before and after adminis-
tration of intravenous contrast medium. The Selecting a narrow window shows A wide window is better suited to
differences within organs with a tissues with a wide range of HU (e.g.,
blood–brain barrier normally prevents contrast
narrow range of HU (e.g., the brain). bone).
medium from reaching the neural tissues; how-
ever, many inflammatory or neoplastic lesions
damage the blood–brain barrier, thereby allow- Figure 7. Although CT images are usually acquired in the transverse
ing accumulation of contrast medium and facil- plane, the data can be reprocessed after acquisition to produce sagittal,
itating detection of lesions affecting the brain. dorsal, or oblique images and three-dimensional reconstructions.
Other indications for CT of the head in
small animals include exophthalmos15 (Figure
13), suspected otitis media,16 and chronic nasal
discharge. CT scans clearly show the fine
detail of the turbinates and nasal conchae;
thus small intranasal lesions or sites of bone
invasion by nasal neoplasms that could be
missed on conventional radiographs are seen
on CT scans.17,18 Accurate assessment of the
extent of a nasal lesion aids in determining the
prognosis and treatment options. Rhinitis and
nasal neoplasia may be reliably distinguished
using CT19 (Figure 14). The frontal sinuses Transverse plane in a normal dog. Dorsal image of a normal dog.
are normally included in a nasal CT study
because fluid accumulation, mucosal thicken-
ing, and bone lesions often occur secondary to
nasal disease. Postcontrast CT scans can be
used if invasion of the brain is suspected. The
retropharyngeal lymph nodes can be included
in the study to look for signs of local spread of
disease.
Thorax
For the thorax, a helical CT scan technique is
preferred to minimize scan time, which reduces
the likelihood of movement artifacts resulting
from patient breathing. CT is used for imaging
Three-dimensional reconstruction of Three-dimensional reconstruction of a
all thoracic structures except the heart, which a normal dog. dog with a highly invasive nasal
appears blurred. CT images of the lungs are neoplasm that has destroyed large
parts of the maxillae, nasal and frontal
bones, and right zygomatic arch.
November 2006 COMPENDIUM
794 CE Computed Tomography: Principles and Applications
Figure 14. CT is particularly well suited to nasal cavity examinations because of the high contrast provided by bone and
air-containing structures.
A CT scan of a normal nasal cavity. In dogs with destructive rhinitis (e.g., Replacement of turbinates by a soft tissue
aspergillosis), destruction of the nasal mass with destruction of the surrounding
turbinates is readily observed. bone is typical of a nasal tumor.
Figure 16. Sequential CT images of a dog with a pulmonary carcinoma affecting
the left caudal lobe.
Figure 15. CT scan of an obese A pulmonary nodule (arrow) Impingement on the esophagus Lack of lesions affecting the
dog with fibrosarcoma between the raises the possibility that the (*) suggests possible invasion, ribs and the presence of
scapulae. A small nodule in the dorsal mass has metastasized. which would complicate bronchus within the mass
left caudal lobe (arrow) is compatible resection of the mass. (arrow) support a diagnosis of
with pulmonary metastasis. pulmonary mass.
Figure 17. Postcontrast CT images of the abdomen of a dog with pheochromocytoma affecting the right adrenal gland.
The tumor (*) is clearly visible between the The margins of the mass are ill-defined, with The left ureter is encased by the tumor
aorta and caudal vena cava. evidence of retroperitoneal infiltration by (arrow). Resection of this lesion would require
the tumor (arrow). a left nephrectomy.
Figure 18. Postcontrast CT images of the abdomen of a dog with adenocarcinoma affecting the right adrenal gland.
These images indicate invasion of the tumor into the caudal vena cava, resulting in a blood clot or tumor thrombus.
The tumor (*) is visible between the right In an image just cranial to the one on the The intrahepatic part of the caudal vena cava is
kidney and the caudal vena cava. left, the tumor merges with the caudal vena filled with a thrombus, leaving only a thin rim of
cava (arrow). contrast medium in the surrounding lumen
(arrow).
Figure 20. Spectrum of CT findings in dogs with incomplete
ossification of the humeral condyle.
Musculoskeletal Structures using helical computed tomographic excretory urography in healthy dogs. Vet
Radiol Ultrasound 44(2):155–164, 2003.
The detection of minimally displaced or incomplete 8. Jones JC, Inzana KD, Rossmeisl JH, et al: CT myelography of the thoraco-
fractures using conventional radiography can depend on lumbar spine in 8 dogs with degenerative myelopathy. J Vet Sci 6(4):341–348,
positioning the patient so that the x-ray beam is parallel 2005.
9. Zwingenberger AL, Schwarz T, Saunders HM: Helical computed tomo-
to the fracture gap. Without the likely orientation of a graphic angiography of canine portosystemic shunts. Vet Radiol Ultrasound
fracture being known in advance, obtaining this optimal 46(1):27–32, 2005.
position may be a matter of luck, and it is possible to 10. Barrett JF, Keat N: Artifacts in CT: Recognition and avoidance. Radiograph-
ics 24(6):1679–1691, 2004.
make good-quality radiographs that do not show the 11. Hopkins AL, Wheeler SJ: Subdural hematoma in a dog. Vet Surg 20(6):
fracture. Also, in some body parts (e.g., the skull or 413–417, 1991.
spine), the shape and complexity of bones create super- 12. Turrel JM, Fike JR, LeCouteur RA, Higgins RJ: Computed tomographic char-
acteristics of primary brain tumors in 50 dogs. JAVMA 188(8):851–856, 1986.
imposition that can hide lesions. CT is more sensitive
13. Polizopoulou ZS, Koutinas AF, Souftas VD, et al: Diagnostic correlation of
than conventional radiography in detecting fractures CT-MRI and histopathology in 10 dogs with brain neoplasms. J Vet Med A
because CT uses a multidirectional x-ray beam and its Physiol Pathol Clin Med 51(5):226–231, 2004.
14. Vernau KM, Kortz GD, Koblik PD, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging and
cross-sectional images eliminate the problem of super- computed tomography characteristics of intracranial intra-arachnoid cysts in
imposition.28 6 dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 38(3):171–176, 1997.
CT is useful in examining the canine elbow, particu- 15. LeCouteur RA, Fike JR, Scagliotti RH, Cann CE: Computed tomography
of orbital tumors in the dog. JAVMA 180(8):910–913, 1982.
larly in dogs with suspected fragmented coronoid 16. Garosi LS, Dennis R, Schwarz T: Review of diagnostic imaging of ear dis-
process (Figure 19)29 or incomplete ossification of the eases in the dog and cat. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 44(2):137–146, 2003.
humeral condyle30 (Figure 20) because these conditions 17. Thrall DE, Robertson ID, McLeod DA, et al: A comparison of radiographic
and computed tomographic findings in 31 dogs with malignant nasal cavity
are difficult to detect using conventional radiography. tumors. Vet Radiol 30(2):59–66, 1989.
Finding signs of incomplete ossification of the humeral 18. Park RD, Beck ER, LeCouteur RA: Comparison of computed tomography
condyle can help explain the occurrence of a condylar and radiography for detecting changes induced by malignant nasal neoplasia
in dogs. JAVMA 201(11):1720–1724, 1992.
fracture or may enable prophylactic treatment in animals 19. Saunders JH, van Bree H, Gielen I, de Rooster H: Diagnostic value of com-
at risk for fracture. puted tomography in dogs with chronic nasal disease. Vet Radiol Ultrasound
CT is often used to examine the spine, mainly in ani- 44(4):409–413, 2003.
20. Waters DJ, Coakley FV, Cohen MD, et al: The detection of pulmonary
mals with suspected intervertebral disk prolapse, frac- metastases by helical CT: A clinicopathologic study in dogs. J Comput Assist
ture, or neoplasia31 (Figure 21). Biopsies of lesions may Tomogr 22(2):235–240, 1998.
be obtained with CT guidance32 (Figure 22). Although 21. Prather AB, Berry CR, Thrall DE: Use of radiography in combination with
computed tomography for the assessment of noncardiac thoracic disease in
CT does not allow detailed assessment of the spinal the dog and cat. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 46(2):114–121, 2005.
cord itself, lesions that impinge on the cord can be 22. Yoon J, Feeney DA, Cronk DE, et al: Computed tomographic evaluation of
investigated using CT myelography.8 Because of the canine and feline mediastinal masses in 14 patients. Vet Radiol Ultrasound
45(6):542–546, 2004.
high-contrast resolution of CT, a CT myelogram may 23. Au JJ, Weisman DL, Stefanacci JD, Palmisano MP: Use of computed tomog-
be obtained using contrast that was previously injected raphy for evaluation of lung lesions associated with spontaneous pneumotho-
rax in dogs: 12 cases (1999–2002). JAVMA 228(5):733–737, 2006.
for a conventional myelogram, even if that was several
24. Jaeger JQ, Mattoon JS, Bateman SW, Morandi F: Combined use of ultra-
hours earlier. As an alternative, dilute contrast medium sonography and contrast enhanced computed tomography to evaluate acute
(e.g., iohexol [80 to 100 mg/ml of iodine]) may be used. necrotizing pancreatitis in two dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 44(1):72–79, 2003.
25. Robben JH, Pollak YW, Kirpensteijn J, et al: Comparison of ultrasonography,
computed tomography, and single-photon emission computed tomography
REFERENCES for the detection and localization of canine insulinoma. J Vet Intern Med
1. Richmond C: Sir Godfrey Hounsfield. Br Med J 329(7467):687, 2004. 19(1):15–22, 2005.
2. Kalender WA: Computed Tomography: Fundamentals, System Technology, Image 26. Voorhout G, Stolp R, Rijnberk A, van Waes PF: Assessment of survey radi-
Quality, Applications. Erlangen, Germany, Publicis MCD Verlag, 2000, pp ography and comparison with x-ray computed tomography for detection of
17–148. hyperfunctioning adrenocortical tumors in dogs. JAVMA 196(11):1799–
1803, 1990.
3. De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, Simoens PJ, van Bree H: Computed tomography
and cross-sectional anatomy of the thorax in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet 27. Samii VF, McLoughlin MA, Mattoon JS, et al: Digital fluoroscopic excretory
Res 66(3):512–524, 2005. urography, digital fluoroscopic urethrography, helical computed tomography,
and cystoscopy in 24 dogs with suspected ureteral ectopia. J Vet Intern Med
4. De Rycke LM, Gielen IM, van Bree H, Simoens PJ: Computed tomography of 18(3):271–281, 2004.
the elbow joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 63(10):1400–1407, 2002.
28. Crawford JT, Manley PA, Adams WM: Comparison of computed tomogra-
5. Kaufman HH, Cohen G, Glass TF, et al: CT atlas of the dog brain. J Comput phy, tangential view radiography, and conventional radiography in evaluation
Assist Tomogr 5(4):529–537, 1981. of canine pelvic trauma. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 44(6):619–628, 2003.
6. Boroffka SA, Voorhout G: Direct and reconstructed multiplanar computed 29. Carpenter LG, Schwarz PD, Lowry JE, et al: Comparison of radiologic
tomography of the orbits of healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 60(12):1500–1507, 1999. imaging techniques for diagnosis of fragmented medial coronoid process of
7. Rozear L, Tidwell AS: Evaluation of the ureter and ureterovesicular junction the cubital joint in dogs. JAVMA 203(1):78–83, 1993.
30. Marcellin-Little DJ, DeYoung DJ, Ferris KK, Berry CM: Incomplete ossifi- Radiol Ultrasound 41(5):396–402, 2000.
cation of the humeral condyle in spaniels. Vet Surg 23(6):475–487, 1994. 32. Vignoli M, Ohlerth S, Rossi F, et al: Computed tomography-guided fine-
31. Olby NJ, Munana KR, Sharp NJ, Thrall DE: The computed tomographic needle aspiration and tissue-core biopsy of bone lesions in small animals. Vet
appearance of acute thoracolumbar intervertebral disc herniations in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 45(2):125–130, 2004.
ARTICLE #2 CE TEST
This article qualifies for 2 contact hours of continuing education credit from the Auburn University College of Veterinary CE
Medicine. Paid subscribers may purchase individual CE tests or sign up for our annual CE program. Those who
wish to apply this credit to fulfill state relicensure requirements should consult their respective state authorities regarding the
applicability of this program. To participate, fill out the test form inserted in this issue or take CE tests online and get real-time
scores at CompendiumVet.com.Test answers are available online free to paid subscribers as well.
1. Which is a major advantage of CT compared 6. Which statement regarding the use of CT for
with conventional radiography? investigation of nasal disease is incorrect?
a. CT is much quicker to perform than radiography. a. Sites of bone invasion by nasal neoplasms may be
b. CT results in a much lower radiation dose to patients missed with conventional radiography but are usually
than does conventional radiography. visible with CT.
c. Anesthesia or sedation is rarely required in CT. b. Rhinitis and nasal neoplasia may be reliably distin-
d. The cross-sectional depiction of anatomy in CT images guished by CT.
eliminates the problem of superimposition of body c. CT can be used to detect signs of brain invasion by a
parts. nasal neoplasm.
d. The retropharyngeal lymph nodes are too small to
2. CT scanners produce an x-ray beam in the shape be examined by CT.
of a
a. cone. c. fan. 7. CT is more sensitive in detecting pulmonary me-
b. pencil beam. d. rectangle. tastasis than is conventional radiography because
a. motion blur is not a problem in CT.
3. Each pixel in a CT image is assigned a number b. the patient’s radiation dose is much higher in CT.
that describes c. CT eliminates the problem of superimposition by
a. its width and thickness. ribs and other structures that could obscure pul-
b. its position relative to the center of the x-ray beam. monary lesions.
c. the attenuation of tissues in that pixel. d. CT uses a much lower kilovolt peak than does con-
d. the radiation dose to the patient. ventional thoracic radiography, making nodules more
visible.
4. When CT is used to scan the brain of a dog with
a suspected intracranial mass, which protocol 8. The CT number (HU) represents the amount of
should be used? x-ray attenuation of a tissue relative to
a. thick slices; narrow window a. air. c. blood.
b. thick slices; wide window b. water. d. bone.
c. thin slices; narrow window
d. thin slices; wide window 9. Which is the most appropriate window width in
examining a sclerotic lesion affecting a vertebra?
5. Which statement regarding the use of contrast a. 3,000 HU
medium in CT is correct? b. 1,000 HU
a. Intravenous contrast medium normally penetrates c. 500 HU
the blood–brain barrier. d. –1,000 HU
b. Intravenous contrast medium tends to accumulate in
hemorrhagic or edematous lesions. 10. Which organ is the least well depicted by CT?
c. Larger doses of intravenous contrast medium are a. the brain
necessary for CT than for conventional radiography. b. the liver
d. Intrathecal administration of contrast medium is not c. the heart
necessary in CT myelography. d. the lungs