Reading Advance Accounting
Reading Advance Accounting
Reading Advance Accounting
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) refer to a common set of accounting rules,
standards, and procedures issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Public
companies in the U.S. must follow GAAP when their accountants compile their financial
statements.
GAAP is guided by ten key tenets and is a rules-based set of standards. It is often compared
with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), which is considered more of a
principles-based standard. IFRS is a more international standard, and there have been recent
efforts to transition GAAP reporting to IFRS.
GAAP helps govern the world of accounting according to general rules and guidelines. It
attempts to standardize and regulate the definitions, assumptions, and methods used in
accounting across all industries. GAAP covers such topics as revenue recognition, balance
sheet classification, and materiality.
The ultimate goal of GAAP is to ensure a company's financial statements are complete,
consistent, and comparable. This makes it easier for investors to analyze and extract useful
information from the company's financial statements, including trend data over a period of
time. It also facilitates the comparison of financial information across different companies.
The 10 Key Principles of GAAP
1. Principle of Regularity
The accountant has adhered to GAAP rules and regulations as a standard.
2. Principle of Consistency
Accountants commit to applying the same standards throughout the reporting process, from
one period to the next, to ensure financial comparability between periods. Accountants are
expected to fully disclose and explain the reasons behind any changed or updated standards in
the footnotes to the financial statements.
3. Principle of Sincerity
The accountant strives to provide an accurate and impartial depiction of a company’s financial
situation.
4. Principle of Permanence of Methods
The procedures used in financial reporting should be consistent, allowing a comparison of the
company's financial information.
5. Principle of Non-Compensation
Both negatives and positives should be reported with full transparency and without the
expectation of debt compensation.
6. Principle of Prudence
This refers to emphasizing fact-based financial data representation that is not clouded by
speculation.
7. Principle of Continuity
While valuing assets, it should be assumed the business will continue to operate.
8. Principle of Periodicity
Entries should be distributed across the appropriate periods of time. For example, revenue
should be reported in its relevant accounting period.
9. Principle of Materiality
Accountants must strive to fully disclose all financial data and accounting information in
financial reports.
10. Principle of Utmost Good Faith
Derived from the Latin phrase uberrimae fidei used within the insurance industry. It
presupposes that parties remain honest in all transactions.
Limitations of GAAP
While GAAP accounting strives to alleviate incidents of inaccurate reporting, it is by no means
comprehensive. Companies can still suffer from issues beyond the scope of GAAP depending
on their size, business categorization, location, and global presence.
Diverse Types of Companies
GAAP may seem to take a "one-size-fits-all" approach to financial reporting that does not
adequately address issues faced by distinct industries. For example, state and local
governments may struggle with implementing GAAP due to their unique environments. New
GAAP hierarchy proposals may better accommodate these government entities.
Small businesses may also struggle with implementing GAAP. These standards may be too
complex for their accounting needs, and hiring personnel to create GAAP definition reports
can be expensive. As a result, the FASB works with the Private Company Council to update
GAAP with private company exceptions and alternatives.
Timeframe
Due to the thorough standards-setting process of the GAAP policy boards, it can take months
or even years to finalize a new standard. These wait times may not work to the advantage of
companies complying with GAAP, as pending decisions can affect their reports.
Global vs. Domestic
GAAP is not the international accounting standard, which is a developing challenge as
businesses become more globalized. The International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
is the most common set of principles outside the United States. IFRS is used in the European
Union, Australia, Canada, Japan, India, and Singapore.
Indian and International Accounting Standards:
IFRS stands for International Financial Reporting Standards, it is prepared by the IASB
(International Accounting Standards Board). It is used in around 144 countries and is regarded
as one of the most popular accounting standards.
IND AS is also known as Indian Accounting Standards or Indian version of IFRS. Indian AS
or IND AS is used in the context of Indian companies.
Let us look at some of the points of difference between the IFRS and IND AS.
IFRS IND AS
Definition
IFRS stands for International Financial IND AS stands for Indian Accounting
Reporting Standards, it is an Standards; it is also known as India
internationally recognised accounting specific version of IFRS
standard
Developed by
Followed by
Disclosure
Companies complying with IFRS have to Such a disclosure is not mandatory for
disclose as a note that the financial companies complying with Indian
statements comply with IFRS Accounting Standards or IND AS
Companies complying with IFRS need Companies complying with IND AS need
have specific guidelines for preparing have no such requirements for balance
balance sheet with assets and liabilities to sheet format, but the guidelines are
be classified as current and non-current defined for presenting balance sheet
Approaches to the formulation of accounting theory:
Regulatory approaches
Numerous would regard this as the approach we presently have to accounting theory. They grip
this view because to them it does not look that standards, even those of the IASB, are based on
broad, related theories but are developed as solutions to current consists that arise in our
attempts to provide beneficial information to manipulators. Certainly, they might argue that
new standards are only developed when a specific manipulator complains about
misrepresentation or non-information. But there are questions to consider if we do adopt this
approach to the development of accounting theory. In the main these queries centre on whether
we should accept a free market approach to the regulation, a private sector regulatory approach
or public sector regulatory approach.
Behavioral approach
The behavioral approach attempts to take into account human behavior as it narrates to decision
making in accounting. Devine (1960) stated the following:
On balance it seems fair to conclude that accountants seem to have waded through their
relationships to the intricate psychological network of human activity with a heavy-handed
crudity that is beyond belief. Some degree of crudity may be excused in a new discipline, but
failure to recognize that much of what passes as accounting theory is hopelessly entwined with
unsupported behavior assumptions is unforgivable.
This to us seems fair remark. Given that financial reporting is about communicating
information to users to permit them to make decisions, a lack of attention of how that
information instances their behavior is certainly unforgivable. Studies in this area have tended
to concentrate on:
The adequacy of disclosure
Usefulness of financial statement data
Attitudes about corporate reporting practices
Materiality judgements
Decision effects of alternative accounting practices
In one of these areas, materiality, it was discovered that manipulators assessment of materiality
was individualistic and that the provider of the information was not in the finest position to
determine materiality for a manipulator. There is much work still to do within the behavioral
approach.
Futures and need of GST in India:
It has been long pending issue to streamline all the different types of indirect taxes and
implement a “single taxation” system. This system is called as GST (GST is the abbreviated
form of Goods & Services Tax). The main expectation from this system is to abolish all indirect
taxes and only GST would be levied. As the name suggests, the GST will be levied both on
Goods and Services.
GST was first introduced during 2007-08 budget session. On 17th December 2014, the current
Union Cabinet ministry approved the proposal for introduction GST Constitutional
Amendment Bill. On 19th of December 2014, the bill was presented on GST in Loksabha. The
Bill will be tabled and taken up for discussion during the coming Budget session. The current
central government is very determined to implement GST Constitutional Amendment Bill.
GST is a tax that we need to pay on supply of goods & services. Any person, who is providing
or supplying goods and services is liable to charge GST.
Futures of GST:
SINGLE INDIRECT TAX IN GST
GST has been introduced as a single, unified tax reform. It has eliminated many existing
indirect centre and state taxes like Central Value Added Tax, Special Additional Duty of
Customs, Service Tax, and VAT and converted them into a single tax. The elimination of these
indirect taxes has not only made tax compliance easier for businesses but has also helped in
making many of the goods and services more affordable for the consumers.
INPUT TAX CREDIT SYSTEM IN GST
One of the most prominent GST features in India is the input tax credit. If a manufacturer or
service provider has already paid input tax on a purchase, the same can be deducted from their
total output tax liability. The input and output invoices need to match to take advantage of the
tax credit. This helps in removing the cascading tax effect or the traditional ‘tax-on-tax’ regime.
Moreover, it also helps in reducing tax evasion.
GST COMPOSITION SCHEME
SMEs with an annual turnover of up to Rs. 1 crore or Rs. 75 lakhs in specified states can also
voluntarily opt for the composition scheme. With this scheme, the businesses can pay a fixed
GST rate of 1% on their turnover. However, such businesses can then not use the input tax
credit benefit. A business needs to select between whether they want to use the composition
scheme or the input tax credit feature.
FOUR-TIER TAX STRUCTURE IN GST
GST has a 4-tier tax structure of 5%, 12%, 18%, and 28%. All the goods and services can only
be taxed as per this tax structure. Many of the essential commodities such as food items do not
have any GST. Improved transparency and cheaper goods and services are two of the biggest
advantages of this 4-tier structure.
A four-tier GST tax slabs have been decided by the Finance ministry. Below are the details;
Zero Tax rate: There won’t be any tax on almost 50 % of items in the Consumer Price Index
basket, including grains used by the common man.
5% Tax slab: This is applicable on items of mass consumption used by common people.
There would be two standard rates of 12% and 18% under the GST regime.
All the items (especially luxury items) which are now taxed at around 30% will fall under 28%
GST rate slab.
An additional cess would also be levied on luxury cars, tobacco products & aerated drinks
besides the highest tax rate (28%).
The tax rate proposal will now be placed in Parliament for its approval.
Applicability
The following companies are required to constitute CSR committee –
Companies with net worth of Rs. 500 crores or more, or
Companies with turnover of Rs. 1000 crores or more, or
Companies with net profit of Rs. 5 crores or more.