Adenomyosis Pictorial Essay of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography Findings
Adenomyosis Pictorial Essay of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography Findings
Adenomyosis Pictorial Essay of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Ultrasonography Findings
Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disease defined Imaging techniques play an important role in the diag
as the presence of nonneoplastic ectopic endometrial nosis of adenomyosis, the main diagnostic techniques
glands and stroma in the myometrium associated with being ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance
reactive overgrowth of the musculature. The incidence imaging (MRI). A recent meta-analysis showed that
transvaginal US and MRI have high levels of accuracy
for the noninvasive diagnosis of adenomyosis. Transvagi-
Consultant nal US had a sensitivity of 72% [95% confidence interval
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of
(CI) 65-79%], specificity of 81% (95% CI 77-85%), positive
Medicine and Pharmacy ‘Grigore T. Popa’, Iaşi, Romania likelihood ratio of 3.7 (95% CI 2.1-6.4), and negative like-
Corresponding Author: Mihaela Grigore, Consultant, Depart lihood ratio of 0.3 (95% CI 0.1-0.5). Magnetic resonance
ment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine and imaging had a sensitivity of 77% (95 % CI 67-85%),
Pharmacy ‘Grigore T Popa’, Str. Universitatii 16, Iaşi, 700115 specificity of 89% (95% CI 84-92%), positive likelihood
Romania, Phone: +40 744 438024, Fax: +40 232 221516, e-mail:
ratio of 6.5 (95% CI 4.5-9.3), and negative likelihood
[email protected]
ratio of 0.2 (95% CI 0.1-0.4).5 The US technique has been
188
DSJUOG
improved steadily. The use of high-frequency transvagi- Asymmetrical myometrial thickening (Fig. 3): When the
nal transductors improved the sensitivity and specificity disease is focal, the uterine enlargement is asymmetrical.
of the examination. There is a difference in size between the anterior and
posterior walls of the uterus in the longitudinal or
Two-dimensional Ultrasonography transverse plane.13
Two-dimensional (2D) US has a clearly established place Cysts of variable size throughout the myometrium (Figs 4 and 5):
in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.6-8 Many studies have In most cases, cyst sizes vary by a few millimeters (1-7
compared 2D US with MRI and concluded that the former mm), although they sometimes vary as much as 2 to 4
is a highly useful tool for diagnosing adenomyosis, cm. Doppler examination is useful for differentiating
especially in the hands of a trained sonographer. Magnetic anechoic images from vein dilatation. A myometrial cyst
resonance imaging is useful in difficult cases in which the has been cited as the most specific and sensitive feature
US results do not definitively establish the diagnosis.9-11 for diagnosing adenomyosis.12
The most important features of adenomyosis seen with
Hyperechoic linear striations (Fig. 6): These striations can
2D US are the following:
be seen radiating out from the endometrial surface.
Uterine enlargement (Fig. 1): Uterine length may be up to According to Kepkep et al the striations are the most
12 cm without a myoma inside the uterus. The borders accurate sign of adenomyosis on transvaginal US.14
of the uterus are usually normal (not modified by the
Subendometrial hyperechogenic nodules: The nodules are
disease).7,12
composed of ectopic endometrium.8
Heterogeneous myometrium with architectural distur
Adenomyoma (Fig. 7): This lesion is a focal presence of
bances (Fig. 2): Hyperechoic regions are surrounded by
adenomyosis and must not be misdiagnosed as a myoma.
hypoechoic areas, which correspond to smooth muscle
The contour of the adenomyoma is not neat. Doppler
hyperplasia. Sakhel and Abuhamad regarded this feature
imaging shows randomly scattered vessels—in contrast
as the most predictive of adenomyosis.12
to a myoma where the vessels are on the periphery.15,16
All of these sonographic features have been reported to
have high sensitivity (80-87%) and specificity (94-98%)
for distinguishing between adenomyosis and leiomyoma
based on comparisons between transvaginal US and
histological confirmation.17
Poor definition of the EMJ compared to that in normal uterus
(Figs 8 to 10): It suggests diffuse adenomyosis and is
caused by invasion of the endometrial glands in the
myometrium.
Thickening of the EMJ (Figs 11A and B): It appears as a hypo
echoic halo around the endometrium. When associated
with adenomyosis, this layer has been reported to exceed
Fig. 1: Large uterus. The contour of the uterus is usually unaltered 12 mm.12
Fig. 2: Heterogenous areas within the myometrium Fig. 3: Asymmetrical myometrial thickening
Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, April-June 2015;9(2):188-192 189
Mihaela Grigore
Fig. 5: Large myometrial cysts Fig. 6: Hyperechoic linear striations radiating from the
endometrial surface
Fig. 7: Adenomyoma mass with poorly defined margins Fig. 8: Poor definition of the endometrial-myometrial junction
Three-dimensional Ultrasonography zone has been assigned various names in the literature:
The use of three-dimensional (3D) US provided new endomyometrial junctional zone, inner myometrium,
possibilities for diagnosing gynecological disease. Its uterine junctional zone,20 endometrial-subendometrial
obvious advantages are that it offers more rapid, repro unit or stratum subvasculare,21 subendometrial myo
ducible image acquisition and enhanced visualization metrium 22, archimetra, 23 archimyometrium, 24 inner
and postprocessing capabilities.18 Three-dimensional US myometrium.25 Traditionally, assessment of the EMJ
enables visualization of the coronal plane of the uterus has been part of the MRI evaluation of the uterus, with
and consequently gives a clear image of the EMJ.19 This changes in this area key to diagnosing adenomyosis.26
190
DSJUOG
Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, April-June 2015;9(2):188-192 191
Mihaela Grigore
Another interesting aspect of adenomyosis is that it 11. Dueholm M. Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adeno
may play a role in infertility—it may interfere with the myosis: a review. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2006;
20(4):569-582.
process of implantation.27,28 A precocious diagnosis using
12. Sakhel K, Abuhamad A. Sonography of adenomyosis. J Ultra
2D and 3D US could perhaps initiate correct management sound Med 2012;31(5):805-808.
of even asymptomatic disease with the aim of preserving 13. Andreotti RF, Fleischer AC. The sonographic diagnosis of
fertility. adenomyosis. Ultrasound Q 2005;21(3):167-170.
14. Kepkep K, Tuncay YA, Goynumer G, Tutal E. Transvaginal
sonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis: which findings
Conclusion are most accurate? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007;30(3):
Because 2D and 3D US allow us to examine both the 341-345.
15. Chiang CH, Chang MY, Hsu JJ, et al. Tumor vascular pattern
myometrium and the EMJ, they are valuable tools for and blood flow impedance in the differential diagnosis of
establishing a diagnosis of adenomyosis even during leiomyoma and adenomyosis by color Doppler sonography.
early stages of the disease. The combined information J Assist Reprod Genet 1999;16(5):268-275.
gained from the 2D and 3D US examinations not only 16. Botsis D, Kassanos D, Antonioc G, et al. Adenomyoma and
allows diagnosis of adenomyosis but also pinpoints leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with transvaginal sono
graphy. J Clin Ultrasound 1998;26(1):21-25.
the stage of the disease. Once clear criteria have been
17. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, et al. Transvaginal ultra
established for such staging, we can set up proper pro sonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma
tocols for managing the disease. versus leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167(3):603-606.
18. Grigore, Mare A. Applications of 3-D ultrasound in female
infertility. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2009;113(4):1113-1118.
References
19. Naftalin J, Jurkovic D. The endometrial-myometrial junction:
1. Azziz R. Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol a fresh look at a busy crossing. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
Clin North Am 1998;16(1):221-235. 2009;34(1):1-11.
2. Naftalin J, Hoo W, Pateman K, Mavrelos D, Holland T, 20. Fusi L, Cloke B, Brosens JJ. The uterine junctional zone. Best
Jurkovic D. How common is adenomyosis? A prospective Prac Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2006;20(4):479-491.
study of prevalence using transvaginal ultrasound in a 21. Noe M, Kunz G, Herbertz M, Mall G, Leyendecker G. The
gynaecology clinic. Hum Reprod 2012;27(12):3432-3439. cyclic pattern of the immunocytochemical expression of
3. Gordts S, Brosens JJ, Fusi L, Benagiano G, Brosens I. Uterine oestrogen and progesterone receptors in human myometrial
adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus and endometrial layers: characterization of the endometrial-
classification. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17(2):244-248. subendometrial unit. Hum Reprod 1999;14(1):190-197.
4. Cirpan T, Yeniel O, Ulukus M, et al. Clinical symptoms and 22. Lyons EA, Taylor PJ, Zheng XH, Ballard G, Levi CS,
histopathological findings in subjects with adenomyosis Kredentser JV. Characterization of subendometrial myo
metrial contractions throughout the menstrual cycle in
uteri. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2008;35(1):48-53.
normal fertile women. Fertil Steril 1991;55(4):771-774.
5. Champaneria R, Abedin P, Daniels J, Balogun M, Khan KS.
23. Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Noe M, Herbertz M, Mall G.
Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the
Endometriosis: a dysfunction and disease of the archimetra.
diagnosis of adenomyosis: systematic review comparing test
Hum Reprod Update 1998;4(5):752-762.
accuracy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89(11):1374-1384.
24. Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Kissler S, Wildt L. Adenomyosis
6. Reinold C, Tafazoli F, Wang L. Imaging features of adeno
and reproduction. Best Prac Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
myosis. Hum Reprod Update 1989;4(4):337-349.
2006;20(4):523-546.
7. Bromley B, Shipp TD, Benacerraf B. Adenomyosis: sono
25. Brosens JJ, Barker FG, de Souza NM. Myometrial zonal
graphic findings and diagnostic accuracy. J Ultrasound Med differentiation and uterine junctional zone hyperplasia in the
2000;19(8):529-534. non-pregnant uterus. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4(5):496-502.
8. Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR, Chapman WB, Bret PM. 26. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S,
Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal
in vitro study. Radiol 2000;215(3):783-790. ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil
9. Dueholm M, Lundorf E. Transvaginal ultrasound or MRI Steril 2001;76(3):588-594.
for diagnosis of adenomyosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 27. Exacoustos C, Brienza L, Giovanni A, et al. Adenomyosis:
2007;19(6):505-512. three-dimensional sonographic findings of the junctional
10. Bazot M, Darai R, Rouger J, Detchev R, Cortez A, Uzan S. zone and correlation with histology. Ultrasound Obstet
Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of Gynecol 2011;37(4):471-479.
adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation. Ultrasound 28. Campo S, Campo V, Benagiano G. Infertility and adenomyosis.
Obstet Gynecol 2002;20(6):605-611. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012;2012:786132. Published online 26 Dec 2011.
192