0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views8 pages

Lap Report On

This document describes an experiment to measure the ratio of charge to mass (e/m) for electrons using two different methods. In the first method, the voltage was varied while the x and y distances were held constant, allowing e/m to be calculated from the slope of a graph of voltage vs magnetic field squared. In the second method, x and y were varied while voltage was held constant, also allowing e/m to be determined from the slope.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views8 pages

Lap Report On

This document describes an experiment to measure the ratio of charge to mass (e/m) for electrons using two different methods. In the first method, the voltage was varied while the x and y distances were held constant, allowing e/m to be calculated from the slope of a graph of voltage vs magnetic field squared. In the second method, x and y were varied while voltage was held constant, also allowing e/m to be determined from the slope.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Lap report on

Determination of the charge to mass ratio


for the electron

Al Aiham Al Busaidi
129821
Section 10
Abstract
This experiment was aimed to measure the ratio of e/m using two methods. In
the first method we set x and y constant at 2cm and 10cm respectively, and
changed the voltage at difference values, and we calculated the ratio of e/m, we
found it (1.86 ± 0.17 ¿ ×1011 C /kg. While in the second method we set the voltage as
a constant and changed x and y at different values, and we found the ratio of
e/m 1.75 ± 0.41¿ C /kg.

Introduction
this electron can be affected by a magnetic field, these effects can be on the
rang of electrons, its velocity, and its acceleration. In this experiment we will
measure the ratio e/m, and from that we can know “the intensity of the field that
has caused it and the velocity of the electrons” [Laboratory Manual of Experimental
Methods II].

Theory
Every electron moves on an area that has a magnetic field will face a force, and
it is given by:
F=q ( E+ vB )

where E, B and v are the electric field, magnetic field, and the velocity of that
electron respectively. Due to this force, the electron will move in a circular path
if the magnetic field is uniform, and hence the centripetal force will be equal to
force that make him moves in a circle.
m v2
evB=
r

So, we can rewrite this equation:


e v
=
m Br

We know that the kinetic energy of the electron is equal to the work done:
m v2
=eV
2
By eliminating the velocity parameter between these two last equations, we get:

V= ( )
e r2 2
2m
B

One can find the e/m by finding the slope of the straight line of the graph
between V and B2:

( )
er2
2m m
e 2
= ∗r /2

e 2∗slope
=
m r
2

Experimental setup

12V supply: heating the filament to emit the electron


2000V supply: accelerating the electrons
Reversing switch: to reverse the direction of the current

Results and calculations.


Method I.
y = 2cm, x = 10cm.
Voltage I +¿(mA )¿ ∆ I +¿(mA)¿ I −¿(mA)¿ ∆ I −¿(mA )¿ I (mA ) ∆ I (mA ) B(T ) 2 −7
B × 10 (T )
2

2 126.1 2.1 131.9 1.7 129.0 2.0 (3.04704


(5.52 ±0.09) ×10−4± 0.00081)
2.5 140.9 3.2 152.6 1.3 146.8 2.3 (3.944 ±−40.001)
(6.28 ± 0.10)×10
3 154.5 0.7 167.3 3.4 160.9 2.1 (4.733±−40.001)
(6.88 ± 0.10)×10
4 175.8 4.3 193.8 2.4 184.8 3.4 (6.241
(7.90 ± 0.15) ×10±−40.003)
Table (1): this table shows the current values on positive and negative direction in different
values of voltages.

We can calculate the average I by:


N
Ii
I =∑
i=1 N

Ex.
1
I = ( 126.1−131.9 ) ×10−3=129 mA
2

And we can calculate the error by:


∆ I =∆ I I −¿ ¿
+¿+∆ ¿
2

Ex.
2.1+1.7
∆ I= =2.0 ( mA )
2

The magnetic field B can be calculated by:


B=0.724 μ 0 ¿
R

R: effective radius = 0.068m


−7
μ0 =4 π ×10

N: the number of turns of the coil.


R: the effective radius.

And the error of the magnetic field:


∆I
∆ B=B
I

Now, we plot the graph of V vs. B2:

Voltage vs. B^2


4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
V(v)

1500
1000
500
0
07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07 07
0E- E- E- E- E- E- E- E- E-
5 00 50 00 50 00 50 00 50
2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 6. 6.
B^2(T^2)

Graph (1): anode voltage (V) Versus square of magnetic field (T)

Calculate ratio of e/m:


2 2
x +y
r= =0.26 m
2y

From graph (1) the slope is:


9
slpoe=( 6.3 ± 0.17 ) ×10

And we can calculate the ratio e/m by this equation:


e slope
=2× 2
m r
9 11
6.3× 10 10 C
¿2× =1.86 ×
0.26 2
kg

e 2∗r∗∆ slope+ 4∗slope∗∆ r


∆ = =0.16
m r3

e ( 1.86 ± 0.16 ) C
=
m kg

Method II.
X(m) r(m) I +avg (mA ) I −avg (mA ) I avg (mA ) B(T ) B−1 (T −1)
0.1±0.0005 0.260±0.00 140.9±3.2 152.6±1.3 146±2.3 1812
(5.52 ±0.09) ×10 −4
±29
8
0.09±0.0005 0.213±0.006 171.3±2.7 179.9±1.9 175.6±2.3 1290 ±17
(7.75 ± 0.10)×10
−4

0.08±0.0005 0.170±0.005 215.7±3.6 224.9±3.1 220.3±3.4 1060


(9.43 ± 0.14) ×10
−4
±16
0.07±0.0005 0.133±0.004 278.2±3.3 283.5±2.3 280.9±2.8 832 ±14
12.02 ±0.20 ¿ ×10
−4

15.58 ± 0.15¿ ×642


10 ±6
−4
0.06±0.0005 0.100±0.003 362.9±3.6 365.2±3.5 364.1±3.6
0.05±0.0005 0.073±0.003 501.0±6.0 498.3±3.9 499.6±5.0 468−4± 4
21.38 ± 0.21¿ ×10
Table (2): measurement of radius, average voltages, magnetic field and the inverse of it.

- We have set the equation of finding the I ave and B.


The B-1 and its error can be calculated by:
−1 1
B =
B

1 (∆B)
∆ = 2
B B

Ex.
1
=1812 ( T )
−1 −1
B =
( 5.52 ×10 ) −4

−4
1 (0.09 ×10 )
∆ = =29
B (5.52 ×10−4)

We plot the graph of the inverse of B Vs. r:

B-1 (T) VS. r(m)


2000
1800
1600
1400
1200
B-1(T)

1000
800
600
400
200
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3
r(m)

Graph (2): inverse of magnetic field versus radius.


- The slope of this graph:
slope=( 5920 ±702 ) ( Tm )−1

Now, we will calculate the ratio of e/m and its error:

e 2
=2V ∗slope
m
e 2
∆ =2∗slope ∗∆ V +4 V ∗slope∗∆ slope
m

Where V is the voltage that we have set, it is 2500V.


e 1011 C
=2∗( 2500 )∗( 5920 )=1.75 ×
2
.
m kg
e
∆ =2∗( 5920 )2∗( 0.01 )+ 4 ( 2500 )∗( 5920 )∗(702 ) =0.41× 1011
m

e/m = (1.75±0.41) C/kg.

Discussion.
The physics of this experiment:
We can say from table (1) that there is a linear relationship between voltage and
current. Moreover, we have noticed that as voltage increases the magnetic field
increases. Furthermore, figure (1) indicates that there is a linear relationship
between the square of magnetic field and voltage. Figure (2) indicates that there
is a linear relationship between the inverse of magnetic field and the radius of
the bath of electrons.
Comparing the two values of e/m:
( 1.86± 0.16 ) C
In method I, we found that the e/m = ,and the accepted value of
kg
11
10 C
e/m=( 1.76 ± 0.01 ) × , so the percentage difference between them is 5.6%.
kg
This difference is probably due to the limitation of the apparatus of this
experiment.
In the method II, we found that the e/m = (1.75±0.41) C/kg, which is very close
to the accepted value with difference 0.57% only.

You might also like