See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/370845791

Collections of Math II

Book · May 2023

DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7943878

CITATIONS

1 author:

Henry Garrett

476 PUBLICATIONS   17,328 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Featured Articles View project

Neutrosophic Graphs View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Henry Garrett on 18 May 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Collections of Math II
Ideas | Approaches | Accessibility | Availability

Dr. Henry Garrett

Report | Exposition | References | Research #22 2023
 Contents

Contents iii

List of Figures v

List of Tables xvi

1 ABSTRACT 1

2 Acknowledgements 11

3 Preliminaries Of Definitions 13

4 Preliminaries Of Examples 69

5 Preliminaries Of Results 91

6 SuperHyperForcing 103
6.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
6.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
6.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

7 SuperHyperStable 141
7.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
7.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141
7.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158

8 SuperHyperClique 179
8.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179
8.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181
8.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207

9 SuperHyperMatching 257
9.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257
9.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258

iii
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

9.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265

10 SuperHyperGirth 299
10.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 299
10.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 300
10.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311

11 SuperHyperConnectivities 345
11.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 345
11.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 347
11.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363

12 SuperHyperDominating 391
12.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 391
12.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 394
12.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409

13 SuperHyperDimension 485
13.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 485
13.2 Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 487
13.3 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 503

14 SuperHyperSpace 513

Bibliography 519

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 List of Figures

3.1 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.2 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.3 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.4 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.5 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
3.6 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3.7 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.8 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
3.9 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.10 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.11 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.12 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.13 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
3.14 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
3.15 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.16 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

v
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

3.17 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3.18 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3.19 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.20 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
3.21 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
3.22 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in
the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.23 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example (13.3.2) 35
3.24 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in the
Neutrosophic Example (13.3.4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.25 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in the
Neutrosophic Example (13.3.6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.26 Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions in the Example (13.3.8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
3.27 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the Example
(13.3.10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
3.28 a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

6.1 A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperForcing

in the Example (6.3.2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
6.2 A Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperForcing
in the Example (6.3.4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
6.3 A Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperForcing
in the Example (6.3.6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
6.4 A Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E), Associated to the Notions
of SuperHyperForcing in the Example (6.3.8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134
6.5 A Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), Associated to the Notions
of SuperHyperForcing in the Example (6.3.10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
6.6 A Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), Associated to the Notions of
SuperHyperForcing in the Example (6.3.12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139

7.1 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158
7.2 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
7.3 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159
7.4 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

7.5 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160
7.6 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
7.7 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
7.8 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
7.9 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
7.10 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
7.11 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
7.12 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
7.13 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
7.14 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165
7.15 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
7.16 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166
7.17 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
7.18 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167
7.19 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168
7.20 The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169
7.21 A SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable in
the Example (7.3.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170
7.22 A SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable
in the Example (7.3.5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171
7.23 A SuperHyperStar Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable in
the Example (7.3.7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173
7.24 A SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable
in the Example (7.3.9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175
7.25 A SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Stable in the Example (7.3.11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176
7.26 A SuperHyperWheel Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable
in the Example (7.3.13) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

8.1 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
8.2 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201
8.3 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
8.4 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202
8.5 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
8.6 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203
8.7 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
8.8 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
8.9 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
8.10 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
8.11 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
8.12 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206
8.13 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
8.14 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208
8.15 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
8.16 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209
8.17 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
8.18 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210
8.19 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211
8.20 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the
Example (8.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212
8.21 a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperClique in the Example (8.3.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
8.22 a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the neutrosophic Example (8.3.5) . . . . . . . . 225
8.23 a neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the neutrosophic Example (8.3.7) . . . . . . . . 233

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

8.24 a neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic

Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the Example (8.3.9) . . . . . . . . . 240
8.25 a neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperClique in the Example (8.3.11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247
8.26 a neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic
Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the neutrosophic Example (8.3.13) . 255

9.1 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266
9.2 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266
9.3 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267
9.4 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 267
9.5 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
9.6 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268
9.7 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
9.8 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269
9.9 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
9.10 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270
9.11 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
9.12 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271
9.13 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272
9.14 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273
9.15 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
9.16 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274
9.17 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
9.18 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275
9.19 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the
Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

9.20 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277
9.21 a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperMatching in the Example (9.3.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292
9.22 a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of
neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching in the neutrosophic Example (9.3.5) . . . . . . 293
9.23 a neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of
neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching in the neutrosophic Example (9.3.7) . . . . . . 294
9.24 a neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic
Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching in the Example (9.3.9) . . . . . . . . 295
9.25 a neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperMatching in the Example (9.3.11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 296
9.26 a neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic
Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching in the neutrosophic Example (9.3.13) 297

10.1 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
10.2 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 312
10.3 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
10.4 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313
10.5 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
10.6 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 314
10.7 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
10.8 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 315
10.9 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
10.10The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 316
10.11The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
10.12The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317
10.13The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318
10.14The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319
10.15The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

10.16The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 320
10.17The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
10.18The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 321
10.19The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322
10.20The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the
Example (10.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323
10.21an neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperGirth in the Example (10.3.3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338
10.22an neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the neutrosophic Example (10.3.5) . . . . . . . . 339
10.23an neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the neutrosophic Example (10.3.7) . . . . . . . . 340
10.24an neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic
Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the Example (10.3.9) . . . . . . . . . 341
10.25an neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic
SuperHyperGirth in the Example (10.3.11) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 342
10.26an neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic
Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the neutrosophic Example (10.3.13) . 343

11.1 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . 348
11.2 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . 349
11.3 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
11.4 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357
11.5 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
11.6 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 358
11.7 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359
11.8 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359
11.9 The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
11.10The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360
11.11The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

11.12The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in

the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 361
11.13The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
11.14The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362
11.15The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363
11.16The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 364
11.17The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
11.18The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 365
11.19The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
11.20The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366
11.21The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367
11.22The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in
the Example (13.2.1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368
11.23a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperConnectivities in the Example (13.3.2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384
11.24a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.4) . 385
11.25a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.6) . . 386
11.26a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Example (13.3.8) . . . . 387
11.27a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperConnectivities in the Example (13.3.10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388
11.28a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example
(13.3.12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389

12.1 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 394
12.2 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 395
12.3 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 396
12.4 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 397
12.5 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 397

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

12.6 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 398
12.7 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 399
12.8 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 400
12.9 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 401
12.10The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 401
12.11The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 402
12.12The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 403
12.13The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 403
12.14The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 404
12.15The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 405
12.16The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 406
12.17The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 406
12.18The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 407
12.19The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 408
12.20The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 409
12.21The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 410
12.22The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . 411
12.23a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperDominating in the Example (13.3.2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 412
12.24a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.4) . . . . 413
12.25a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.6) . . . . 414
12.26Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Example (13.3.8) . . . . . 416
12.27a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperDominating in the Example (13.3.10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 418

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

12.28a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example
(13.3.12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 419

13.1 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 488
13.2 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 489
13.3 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 489
13.4 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 490
13.5 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 491
13.6 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 491
13.7 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 492
13.8 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 493
13.9 The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 494
13.10The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 494
13.11The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 495
13.12The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 496
13.13The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 497
13.14The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 498
13.15The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 499
13.16The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 499
13.17The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 500
13.18The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 500
13.19The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 501
13.20The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 502
13.21The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 503

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

13.22The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) . . . . 504
13.23a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperDimension in the Example (13.3.2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 505
13.24a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.4) . . . . 506
13.25a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.6) . . . . 507
13.26Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Example (13.3.8) . . . . . . 509
13.27a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperDimension in the Example (13.3.10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 511
13.28a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic
Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.12) 512

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 List of Tables

3.1 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges

Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition (3.0.27) 40
3.2 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition (3.0.26) 41
3.3 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition (3.0.27) 41

6.1 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges

Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Mentioned in the Example (6.3.2) . 126
6.2 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Mentioned in the Example (6.3.4) . 129
6.3 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Mentioned in the Example (6.3.6) . . 132
6.4 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Mentioned in the Example (6.3.8) 134
6.5 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), Mentioned
in the Example (6.3.10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137
6.6 The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), Mentioned in the
Example (6.3.12) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140

xvi
 CHAPTER 1

ABSTRACT

Collections of my scientific research books in 2022. 1

ADDRESSED CITATION
2

HG173b
Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 3
odo.7943878). 4
In this scientific research book, there are some scientific research chapters on “Extreme Notion 5
In SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs” about some scientific 6

research on Notion In SuperHyperGraphs by two (Extreme/Neutrosophic) notions, namely, 7

Extreme Notion In SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs. With 8
scientific research on the basic scientific research properties, the scientific research book 9
starts to make Extreme Notion In SuperHyperGraphs theory and Neutrosophic Notion In 10
SuperHyperGraphs theory more (Extremely/Neutrosophicly) understandable. 11
12

In the some chapters, in some researches, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotions, 13
namely, a Notion In SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . 14
Two different types of SuperHyperDefinitions are debut for them but the scientific research 15
goes further and the SuperHyperNotion, SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass based 16
on that are well-defined and well-reviewed. The literature review is implemented in the 17
whole of this research. For shining the elegancy and the significancy of this research, the 18

comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with other SuperHyperNotions and fundamental 19

SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions are followed by the examples and the 20
instances thus the clarifications are driven with different tools. The applications are figured out 21
to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this ongoing research. The “Cancer’s Recognition” 22
are the under scientific research to figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and 23
upcoming research. The special case is up. The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are 24

different types of them. Some of them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by 25
the group of cells. These types are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations 26
amid them all officially called “SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and 27
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” are chosen and elected to scientific research about “Cancer’s 28
Recognition”. Thus these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues to 29
scientific research on theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Recognition”. Some avenues are 30

posed to pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions 31

1
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

and some problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then δ−Notion In SuperHyperGraphs 32

is a maximal of SuperHyperVertices with a maximum cardinality such that either of the 33
following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of 34
s ∈ S : there are |S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ; and |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. 35
The first Expression, holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, 36
holds if S is an δ−SuperHyperDefensive; a Neutrosophic δ−Notion In SuperHyperGraphs is a 37

maximal Neutrosophic of SuperHyperVertices with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such 38

that either of the following expressions hold for the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHy- 39
perNeighbors of s ∈ S there are: |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ; 40
and |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. The first Expression, holds if 41
S is a Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive. And the second Expression, holds if S is a 42
Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Notion 43

In SuperHyperGraphs . Since there’s more ways to get type-results to make a Notion In 44

SuperHyperGraphs more understandable. For the sake of having Neutrosophic Notion In 45
SuperHyperGraphs, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a “Notion In SuperHyperGraphs 46
”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters 47
of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the 48
values. Assume a Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . It’s redefined a Neutrosophic Notion In Supe- 49

rHyperGraphs if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, “The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, 50
Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” 51
with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices & The Number of Position in Alphabet”, 52
“The Values of The SuperVertices&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of 53
The Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The HyperEdges&The 54
maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The SuperHyperEdges&The maximum 55

Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and instances, I’m going to introduce 56
the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph based on a Notion In SuperHyperGraphs 57
. It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation of previous definition in the 58
kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all Notion In SuperHyperGraphs until 59
the Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, then it’s officially called a “Notion In SuperHyperGraphs” 60
but otherwise, it isn’t a Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . There are some instances about the 61

clarifications for the main definition titled a “Notion In SuperHyperGraphs ”. These two 62
examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in the disciplinary 63
ways of the SuperHyperClass based on a Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . For the sake of having 64
a Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of a 65
“Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs” and a “Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs 66

”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the 67
letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to 68
assign to the values. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic 69
SuperHyperGraph” if the intended Table holds. And a Notion In SuperHyperGraphs are 70
redefined to a “Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs” if the intended Table holds. It’s 71
useful to define “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to 72

get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs more 73

understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some Neutrosophic Supe- 74
rHyperClasses if the intended Table holds. Thus SuperHyperPath, Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, 75
SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are 76
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, “Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs”, “Neutrosophic 77

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPart- 78

ite”, and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel” if the intended Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph 79
has a “Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs” where it’s the strongest [the maximum 80
Neutrosophic value from all the Notion In SuperHyperGraphs amid the maximum value amid 81
all SuperHyperVertices from a Notion In SuperHyperGraphs .] Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . 82
A graph is a SuperHyperUniform if it’s a SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of 83

SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some 84
SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 85
amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; it’s Notion In SuperHyperGraphs if it’s 86
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s 87
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s 88
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 89

forming two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s 90
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, 91
forming multi separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s a SuperHyperWheel if it’s 92
only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex 93
has one SuperHyperEdge with any common SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes 94
the specific designs and the specific architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called 95

“SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, The 96

“specific” cells and “specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperVertices” 97
and the common and intended properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of 98
cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperEdges”. Sometimes, it’s useful to have some 99
degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, and neutrality to have more precise SuperHyperModel 100
which in this case the SuperHyperModel is called “Neutrosophic”. In the future research, the 101

foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s Recognition” and the results and the definitions will 102
be introduced in redeemed ways. The recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. The 103
specific region has been assigned by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle 104
of the move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer 105
hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality 106
about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose 107

another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception 108
on what’s happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known 109
and they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves and 110
the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be 111
fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, SuperHyperStar, 112

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either 113

the longest Notion In SuperHyperGraphs or the strongest Notion In SuperHyperGraphs 114
in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, 115
called Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, and the strongest Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, called 116
Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, some general results are introduced. Beyond that 117
in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 118

not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a 119
Notion In SuperHyperGraphs. There isn’t any formation of any Notion In SuperHyperGraphs 120
but literarily, it’s the deformation of any Notion In SuperHyperGraphs. It, literarily, deforms 121
and it doesn’t form. A basic familiarity with SuperHyperGraph theory and Neutrosophic 122
SuperHyperGraph theory are proposed. 123

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Keywords: SuperHyperGraph, (Neutrosophic) Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, Cancer’s 124

Recognition 125

AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 126

127
In the some chapters, in some researches, new setting is introduced for new SuperHyperNotion, 128
namely, Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . Two different types of SuperHyperDefini- 129
tions are debut for them but the scientific research goes further and the SuperHyperNotion, 130
SuperHyperUniform, and SuperHyperClass based on that are well-defined and well-reviewed. 131

The literature review is implemented in the whole of this research. For shining the elegancy 132
and the significancy of this research, the comparison between this SuperHyperNotion with 133
other SuperHyperNotions and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers are featured. The definitions 134
are followed by the examples and the instances thus the clarifications are driven with different 135
tools. The applications are figured out to make sense about the theoretical aspect of this 136
ongoing research. The “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition” are the under scientific research to 137

figure out the challenges make sense about ongoing and upcoming research. The special case 138
is up. The cells are viewed in the deemed ways. There are different types of them. Some of 139
them are individuals and some of them are well-modeled by the group of cells. These types 140
are all officially called “SuperHyperVertex” but the relations amid them all officially called 141
“SuperHyperEdge”. The frameworks “SuperHyperGraph” and “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” 142
are chosen and elected to scientific research about “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition”. Thus 143

these complex and dense SuperHyperModels open up some avenues to scientific research on 144
theoretical segments and “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition”. Some avenues are posed to 145
pursue this research. It’s also officially collected in the form of some questions and some 146
problems. Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then an “δ−Notion In SuperHyperGraphs” is a 147
maximal Notion In SuperHyperGraphs of SuperHyperVertices with maximum cardinality such 148
that either of the following expressions hold for the (Neutrosophic) cardinalities of SuperHy- 149

perNeighbors of s ∈ S : |S ∩ N (s)| > |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ, |S ∩ N (s)| < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))| + δ. 150

The first Expression, holds if S is an “δ−SuperHyperOffensive”. And the second Expres- 151
sion, holds if S is an “δ−SuperHyperDefensive”; a“Neutrosophic δ−Notion In SuperHyper- 152
Graphs” is a maximal Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs of SuperHyperVertices 153
with maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that either of the following expressions hold for 154
the Neutrosophic cardinalities of SuperHyperNeighbors of s ∈ S : |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic > 155

|S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ, |S ∩ N (s)|N eutrosophic < |S ∩ (V \ N (s))|N eutrosophic + δ. 156

The first Expression, holds if S is a “Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperOffensive”. And the second 157
Expression, holds if S is a “Neutrosophic δ−SuperHyperDefensive”. It’s useful to define 158
“Neutrosophic” version of Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . Since there’s more ways to get 159
type-results to make Notion In SuperHyperGraphs more understandable. For the sake of 160
having Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion 161

of “Notion In SuperHyperGraphs ”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are 162

assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of 163
the position of labels to assign to the values. Assume a Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . It’s 164
redefined Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs if the mentioned Table holds, concerning, 165
“The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges Belong 166
to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” with the key points, “The Values of The Vertices 167

& The Number of Position in Alphabet”, “The Values of The SuperVertices&The maximum 168

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The Edges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, 169
“The Values of The HyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Vertices”, “The Values of The 170
SuperHyperEdges&The maximum Values of Its Endpoints”. To get structural examples and 171
instances, I’m going to introduce the next SuperHyperClass of SuperHyperGraph based on 172
Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . It’s the main. It’ll be disciplinary to have the foundation of 173
previous definition in the kind of SuperHyperClass. If there’s a need to have all Notion In 174

SuperHyperGraphs until the Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, then it’s officially called “Notion 175
In SuperHyperGraphs” but otherwise, it isn’t Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . There are some 176
instances about the clarifications for the main definition titled “Notion In SuperHyperGraphs ”. 177
These two examples get more scrutiny and discernment since there are characterized in the 178
disciplinary ways of the SuperHyperClass based on Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . For the sake 179
of having Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of 180

“Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs” and “Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs ”. 181

The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are assigned by the labels from the letters of 182
the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of the position of labels to assign to the values. 183
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s redefined “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” 184
if the intended Table holds. And Notion In SuperHyperGraphs are redefined “Neutrosophic 185
Notion In SuperHyperGraphs” if the intended Table holds. It’s useful to define “Neutrosophic” 186

version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways to get Neutrosophic type-results to make 187
Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs more understandable. Assume a Neutrosophic 188
SuperHyperGraph. There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the intended Table 189
holds. Thus SuperHyperPath, Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBi- 190
partite, SuperHyperMultiPartite, and SuperHyperWheel, are “Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath”, 191
“Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar”, “Neutrosophic 192

SuperHyperBipartite”, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite”, and “Neutrosophic Super- 193

HyperWheel” if the intended Table holds. A SuperHyperGraph has “Neutrosophic Notion In 194
SuperHyperGraphs” where it’s the strongest [the maximum Neutrosophic value from all Notion 195
In SuperHyperGraphs amid the maximum value amid all SuperHyperVertices from a Notion In 196
SuperHyperGraphs .] Notion In SuperHyperGraphs . A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s 197
SuperHyperGraph and the number of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. Assume a 198

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some SuperHyperClasses as follows. It’s SuperHy- 199
perPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges with two 200
exceptions; it’s Notion In SuperHyperGraphs if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 201
two given SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 202
amid all SuperHyperEdges; it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection 203

amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has 204
no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as 205
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate 206
sets, has no SuperHyperEdge in common; it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as 207
intersection amid two given SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge 208
with any common SuperVertex. The SuperHyperModel proposes the specific designs and 209

the specific architectures. The SuperHyperModel is officially called “SuperHyperGraph” and 210
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. In this SuperHyperModel, The “specific” cells and “specific 211
group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as “SuperHyperVertices” and the common and intended 212
properties between “specific” cells and “specific group” of cells are SuperHyperModeled as 213
“SuperHyperEdges”. Sometimes, it’s useful to have some degrees of determinacy, indeterminacy, 214

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

and neutrality to have more precise SuperHyperModel which in this case the SuperHyperModel 215
is called “Neutrosophic”. In the future research, the foundation will be based on the “Cancer’s 216
Neutrosophic Recognition” and the results and the definitions will be introduced in redeemed 217
ways. The Neutrosophic recognition of the cancer in the long-term function. The specific 218
region has been assigned by the model [it’s called SuperHyperGraph] and the long cycle of 219
the move from the cancer is identified by this research. Sometimes the move of the cancer 220

hasn’t be easily identified since there are some determinacy, indeterminacy and neutrality 221
about the moves and the effects of the cancer on that region; this event leads us to choose 222
another model [it’s said to be Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph] to have convenient perception 223
on what’s happened and what’s done. There are some specific models, which are well-known 224
and they’ve got the names, and some SuperHyperGeneral SuperHyperModels. The moves and 225
the traces of the cancer on the complex tracks and between complicated groups of cells could be 226

fantasized by a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, SuperHyperStar, 227

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). The aim is to find either 228
the longest Notion In SuperHyperGraphs or the strongest Notion In SuperHyperGraphs 229
in those Neutrosophic SuperHyperModels. For the longest Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, 230
called Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, and the strongest Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, called 231
Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, some general results are introduced. Beyond that 232

in SuperHyperStar, all possible SuperHyperPaths have only two SuperHyperEdges but it’s 233
not enough since it’s essential to have at least three SuperHyperEdges to form any style of a 234
Notion In SuperHyperGraphs. There isn’t any formation of any Notion In SuperHyperGraphs 235
but literarily, it’s the deformation of any Notion In SuperHyperGraphs. It, literarily, deforms 236
and it doesn’t form. A basic familiarity with SuperHyperGraph theory and Neutrosophic 237
SuperHyperGraph theory are proposed. 238

Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Neutrosophic Notion In SuperHyperGraphs, 239

Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition 240

AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 241

242
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed 243
as book in the following by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has 244
more than 3181 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs” and published by 245
Ohio: E-publishing: Educational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 246

United State. This research book covers different types of notions and settings in neutrosophic 247
graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. 248
249
250
[Ref] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: Edu- 251
cational Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United States. ISBN: 252

978-1-59973-725-6 (http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 253

[Ref] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”, Ohio: E-publishing: Educational 254
Publisher 1091 West 1st Ave Grandview Heights, Ohio 43212 United States. ISBN: 978-1-59973- 255
725-6 (http://fs.unm.edu/BeyondNeutrosophicGraphs.pdf). 256
257
Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are pro- 258

posed as book in the following by Henry Garrett (2022) which is indexed by Google Scholar 259

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

and has more than 4060 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” and published by 260
Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE - Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 261
33131 United States. This research book presents different types of notions SuperHyperResolving 262
and Notion In SuperHyperGraphs in the setting of duality in neutrosophic graph theory and 263
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. This research book has scrutiny on the complement of 264

the intended set and the intended set, simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on 265
its complement that what’s done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high 266
readers in Scribd. 267
[Ref] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE 268
- Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. ISBN: 269
978-1-59973-743-0 (http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 270

[Ref] Henry Garrett, (2022). “Neutrosophic Duality”, Florida: GLOBAL KNOWLEDGE 271
- Publishing House 848 Brickell Ave Ste 950 Miami, Florida 33131 United States. ISBN: 272
978-1-59973-743-0 (http://fs.unm.edu/NeutrosophicDuality.pdf). 273

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 2 274

Acknowledgements 275

The author is going to express his gratitude and his appreciation about the brains and their 276
hands which are showing the importance of words in the framework of every wisdom, knowledge, 277
arts, and emotions which are streaming in the lines from the words, notions, ideas and approaches The
278 words of mind and th
to have the material and the contents which are only the way to flourish the minds, to grow minds of words, are too
279
eligible to be in the stage
the notions, to advance the ways and to make the stable ways to be amid events and storms of 280
of acknowledgements
minds for surviving from them and making the outstanding experiences about the tools and the 281
ideas to be on the star lines of words and shining like stars, forever. 282

11
 CHAPTER 3 283

Preliminaries Of Definitions 284

In this scientific research, new setting is introduced to study dominating, resolving, coloring, Eu- 285
lerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path, zero forcing 286

number, zero forcing neutrosophic-number, independent number, independent neutrosophic- 287

number, clique number, clique neutrosophic-number, matching number, matching neutrosophic- 288
number, girth, neutrosophic girth, 1-zero-forcing number, 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, 289
failed 1-zero-forcing number, failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number, global-offensive alliance, 290
t-offensive alliance, t-defensive alliance, t-powerful alliance, and global-powerful alliance in 291
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Some Classes of SuperHyperGraph 292

and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph are cases of study. Some results are applied in family of 293
SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. A basic familiarity with SuperHyper- 294
Graphs theory, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 295
Keywords: SuperHyperGraph, Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Classes, Families, Cancer’s 296
Recognition 297
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 298

There are some scientific researches covering the topic of this research. In what follows, there 299
are some discussion and literature reviews about them. 300
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Super Hyper Dominating and Super 301
Hyper Resolving on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and 302
Neutrosophic Super Hyper Classes” in Ref. [HG1] by Henry Garrett (2022). In this research 303
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyper- 304

Graph based on fundamental SuperHyperNumber and using neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses 305

of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled 306
“Journal of Mathematical Techniques and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO 307
abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput Math” in volume 1 and issue 3 with pages 242-263. 308
The research article studies deeply with choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 309
and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent results based on initial 310

background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 311

The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co- 312
Super Hyper Degrees on Neutrosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside 313
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [HG2] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research 314
article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHy- 315
perGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools in Cancer’s Treatments. It’s 316

published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques and 317

13
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput 318

Math” in volume 2 and issue 1 with pages 35-47. The research article studies deeply with 319
choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 320
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 321
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition 322
and Neutrosophic Super Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets 323

as Hyper Covering Versus Super separations” in Ref. [HG3] by Henry Garrett (2023). In 324
this research article, a novel approach is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic 325
SuperHyperGraph based on fundamental notions and using vital tools in Cancer’s Recognition. 326
It’s published in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Mathematical Techniques 327
and Computational Mathematics(JMTCM)” with ISO abbreviation “J Math Techniques Comput 328
Math” in volume 2 and issue 3 with pages 136-148. The research article studies deeply with 329

choosing directly neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough 330
toward independent results based on initial background and fundamental SuperHyperNumbers. 331
The seminal paper and groundbreaking article is titled “neutrosophic co-degree and neutrosophic 332
degree alongside chromatic numbers in the setting of some classes related to neutrosophic hyper- 333
graphs” in Ref. [HG93] by Henry Garrett (2023). In this research article, a novel approach 334
is implemented on SuperHyperGraph and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph based on general 335

forms without using neutrosophic classes of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s published 336
in prestigious and fancy journal is entitled “Journal of Current Trends in Computer Science 337
Research (JCTCSR)” with ISO abbreviation “J Curr Trends Comp Sci Res” in volume 2 and 338
issue 1 with pages 16-24. The research article studies deeply with choosing neutrosophic hyper- 339
graphs instead of neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. It’s the breakthrough toward independent 340
results based on initial background. In some articles are titled “0039 | Closing Numbers and 341

Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in 342

(Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [HG4] by Henry Garrett (2022), “0049 | (Failed)1- 343
Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs” in Ref. [HG5] by Henry Garrett (2022), 344
“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under Cancer’s Recognition 345
as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG6] by Henry 346
Garrett (2022), “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy Positions 347

Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs 348

Titled Cancer’s Recognition” in Ref. [HG7] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Version Of 349
Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. 350
[HG8] by Henry Garrett (2022), “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and 351
Affected Cells Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On 352

the Sets Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory 353
Based on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [HG9] by Henry 354
Garrett (2022), “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of 355
Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied in 356
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG10] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 357
Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Based 358

on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG11] by Henry 359

Garrett (2022), “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances Where 360
Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG12] by Henry 361
Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions And 362
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG13] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic 363

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s 364

Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [HG14] by Henry Garrett (2022), 365
“Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use Neutrosophic 366
SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. [HG15] by 367
Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 368
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs ” in Ref. [HG16] by Henry Garrett 369

(2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 370

To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. [HG12] by 371
Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutro- 372
sophic) SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” 373
in Ref. [HG17] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To 374
Form Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special 375

ViewPoints” in Ref. [HG18] by Henry Garrett (2022),“(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of 376

Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances” in 377
Ref. [HG19] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyper- 378
Defensive and SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 379
With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) 380
SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [HG20] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyperGirth on Su- 381

perHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s 382

Recognitions” in Ref. [HG21] by Henry Garrett (2022), “Some SuperHyperDegrees and 383
Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside 384
Applications in Cancer’s Treatments” in Ref. [HG22] by Henry Garrett (2022), “SuperHyper- 385
Dominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs And Their Directions 386
in Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses” in Ref. [HG23] by Henry Garrett 387

(2022), “SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor Cancer’s Recog- 388

nition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG24] by Henry Garrett (2023), “The 389
Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The Cancer’s Extreme Recognition 390
With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) 391
SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG25] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Extreme Failed SuperHyper- 392
Clique Decides the Failures on the Cancer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s 393

Attacks By SuperHyperModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG26] by 394

Henry Garrett (2023), “Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front of 395
Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Cancer’s Recogni- 396
tion called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG27] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Perfect 397
Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition Forwarding Neutrosophic 398

SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG28] by Henry Garrett 399

(2023), “Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded Regions and Sub-Regions in 400
the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) 401
SuperHyperClique” in Ref. [HG29] by Henry Garrett (2023), “Different Neutrosophic Types 402
of Neutrosophic Regions titled neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic 403
Recognition modeled in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG30] by 404

Henry Garrett (2023), “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHy- 405
perModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG31] by 406
Henry Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 407
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints” in Ref. 408
[HG32] by Henry Garrett (2023), “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition 409

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

by Well-SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG33] by Henry 410

Garrett (2023), “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To Use 411
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond” in Ref. 412
[HG34] by Henry Garrett (2022), “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s 413
Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG35] by Henry Garrett (2022), 414
“Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMod- 415

eling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs” in Ref. [HG36] by 416

Henry Garrett (2022), “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 417
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph” in Ref. [HG37] by Henry Garrett 418
(2022), “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic Notions 419
Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)” in 420
Ref. [HG38] by Henry Garrett (2022), and [HG4; HG5; HG6; HG7; HG8; HG9; HG10; 421

HG11; HG12; HG13; HG14; HG15; HG16; HG17; HG18; HG19; HG20; HG21; 422
HG22; HG23; HG24; HG25; HG26; HG27; HG28; HG29; HG30; HG31; HG32; 423
HG33; HG34; HG35; HG36; HG37; HG38; HG94; HG942; HG95; HG952; HG96; 424
HG962; HG97; HG972; HG98; HG982; HG106; HG107; HG111; HG112; HG115; 425
HG116; HG120; HG121; HG122; HG123; HG124; HG125; HG126; HG127; HG128; 426
HG129; HG130; HG131; HG132; HG134; HG135; HG136; HG137; HG138; HG139; 427

HG140; HG141; HG142; HG143; HG144; HG145; HG146; HG147; HG148; HG149; 428
HG150; HG151; HG152; HG153; HG154; HG155; HG156; HG157; HG158; HG159; 429
HG160; HG161; HG162; HG163; HG164; HG165; HG166; HG167; HG168; HG169; 430
HG170; HG171; HG172; HG173; HG174; HG175; HG176; HG177; HG178; HG179; 431
HG180; HG181; HG182; HG183; HG184; HG185; HG186; HG187; HG188; HG189; 432
HG190; HG191; HG192; HG193; HG194; HG195; HG196; HG197; HG198; HG199; 433

HG200; HG201; HG202; HG203; HG204; HG205; HG206; HG207; HG208; HG209; 434
HG210; HG211; HG212; HG213; HG214; HG215; HG93; HG217; HG218; HG219; 435
HG220; HG221; HG222; HG223; HG224; HG225; HG226; HG228; HG230; HG231; 436
HG232; HG233; HG234; HG235; HG236; HG237; HG238; HG239; HG240; HG241; 437
HG242; HG243; HG244; HG245; HG246; HG247; HG248; HG249; HG250; HG251; 438
HG252; HG253; HG254; HG255; HG256; HG257; HG258; HG259; HG260; HG261; 439

HG262; HG263; HG264; HG265; HG266; HG267], there are some endeavors to formalize 440
the basic SuperHyperNotions about neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph and SuperHyperGraph 441
alongside scientific research books at [HG60b; HG61b; HG62b; HG63b; HG64b; HG65b; 442
HG66b; HG67b; HG68b; HG69b; HG70b; HG71b; HG72b; HG73b; HG74b; HG75b; 443
HG76b; HG77b; HG78b; HG79b; HG80b; HG81b; HG82b; HG83b; HG84b; HG85b; 444

HG86b; HG87b; HG88b; HG89b; HG90b; HG91b; HG92b; HG93b; HG94b; HG95b; 445
HG96b; HG97b; HG98b; HG99b; HG100b; HG101b; HG102b; HG103b; HG104b; 446
HG105b; HG106b; HG107b; HG108b; HG109b; HG110b; HG111b; HG112b; 447
HG113b; HG114b; HG115b; HG116b; HG117b; HG118b; HG119b; HG120b; 448
HG121b; HG122b; HG123b; HG124b; HG125b; HG126b; HG127b; HG128b; 449
HG129b; HG130b; HG131b; HG132b; HG133b; HG134b; HG135b; HG136b; 450

HG137b; HG138b; HG139b; HG140b; HG141b; HG142b; HG143b; HG144b; 451

HG145b; HG146b; HG147b; HG148b; HG149b; HG150b; HG151b; HG152b; 452
HG153b; HG154b; HG155b; HG156b; HG157b; HG158b; HG159b; HG160b; 453
HG161b; HG162b; HG163b; HG164b; HG165b; HG166b; HG167b; HG168b; 454
HG169b; HG170b; HG171b; HG172b; HG173b]. Two popular scientific research books 455

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

in Scribd in the terms of high readers, 4190 and 5189 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on 456
[HG32b; HG44b]. 457
Some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed as 458
book in Ref. [HG32b] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google Scholar and has 459
more than 4331 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs” and published 460
by Dr. Henry Garrett. This research book covers different types of notions and settings in 461

neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph theory. 462

Also, some scientific studies and scientific researches about neutrosophic graphs, are proposed 463
as book in Ref. [HG44b] by Henry Garrett (2023) which is indexed by Google Scholar and 464
has more than 5327 readers in Scribd. It’s titled “Neutrosophic Duality” and published by Dr. 465
Henry Garrett. This research book presents different types of notions SuperHyperResolving and 466
SuperHyperDominating in the setting of duality in neutrosophic graph theory and neutrosophic 467

SuperHyperGraph theory. This research book has scrutiny on the complement of the intended set 468
and the intended set, simultaneously. It’s smart to consider a set but acting on its complement 469
that what’s done in this research book which is popular in the terms of high readers in Scribd. 470
See the seminal scientific researches [HG1; HG2; HG3]. The formalization of the notions 471
on the framework of notions in SuperHyperGraphs, Neutrosophic notions in SuperHyper- 472
Graphs theory, and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs theory at [HG4; HG5; HG6; HG7; 473

HG8; HG9; HG10; HG11; HG12; HG13; HG14; HG15; HG16; HG17; HG18; HG19; 474
HG20; HG21; HG22; HG23; HG24; HG25; HG26; HG27; HG28; HG29; HG30; 475
HG31; HG32; HG33; HG34; HG35; HG36; HG37; HG38; HG94; HG942; HG95; 476
HG952; HG96; HG962; HG97; HG972; HG98; HG982; HG106; HG107; HG111; 477
HG112; HG115; HG116; HG120; HG121; HG122; HG123; HG124; HG125; HG126; 478
HG127; HG128; HG129; HG130; HG131; HG132; HG134; HG135; HG136; HG137; 479

HG138; HG139; HG140; HG141; HG142; HG143; HG144; HG145; HG146; HG147; 480
HG148; HG149; HG150; HG151; HG152; HG153; HG154; HG155; HG156; HG157; 481
HG158; HG159; HG160; HG161; HG162; HG163; HG164; HG165; HG166; HG167; 482
HG168; HG169; HG170; HG171; HG172; HG173; HG174; HG175; HG176; HG177; 483
HG178; HG179; HG180; HG181; HG182; HG183; HG184; HG185; HG186; HG187; 484
HG188; HG189; HG190; HG191; HG192; HG193; HG194; HG195; HG196; HG197; 485

HG198; HG199; HG200; HG201; HG202; HG203; HG204; HG205; HG206; HG207; 486
HG208; HG209; HG210; HG211; HG212; HG213; HG214; HG215; HG93; HG217; 487
HG218; HG219; HG220; HG221; HG222; HG223; HG224; HG225; HG226; HG228; 488
HG230; HG231; HG232; HG233; HG234; HG235; HG236; HG237; HG238; HG239; 489
HG240; HG241; HG242; HG243; HG244; HG245; HG246; HG247; HG248; HG249; 490

HG250; HG251; HG252; HG253; HG254; HG255; HG256; HG257; HG258; HG259; 491
HG260; HG261; HG262; HG263; HG264; HG265; HG266; HG267] alongside scientific 492
research books at [HG60b; HG61b; HG62b; HG63b; HG64b; HG65b; HG66b; HG67b; 493
HG68b; HG69b; HG70b; HG71b; HG72b; HG73b; HG74b; HG75b; HG76b; HG77b; 494
HG78b; HG79b; HG80b; HG81b; HG82b; HG83b; HG84b; HG85b; HG86b; HG87b; 495
HG88b; HG89b; HG90b; HG91b; HG92b; HG93b; HG94b; HG95b; HG96b; HG97b; 496

HG98b; HG99b; HG100b; HG101b; HG102b; HG103b; HG104b; HG105b; HG106b; 497
HG107b; HG108b; HG109b; HG110b; HG111b; HG112b; HG113b; HG114b; 498
HG115b; HG116b; HG117b; HG118b; HG119b; HG120b; HG121b; HG122b; 499
HG123b; HG124b; HG125b; HG126b; HG127b; HG128b; HG129b; HG130b; 500
HG131b; HG132b; HG133b; HG134b; HG135b; HG136b; HG137b; HG138b; 501

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG139b; HG140b; HG141b; HG142b; HG143b; HG144b; HG145b; HG146b; 502

HG147b; HG148b; HG149b; HG150b; HG151b; HG152b; HG153b; HG154b; 503
HG155b; HG156b; HG157b; HG158b; HG159b; HG160b; HG161b; HG162b; 504
HG163b; HG164b; HG165b; HG166b; HG167b; HG168b; HG169b; HG170b; 505
HG171b; HG172b; HG173b]. Two popular scientific research books in Scribd in the terms 506
of high readers, 4331 and 5327 respectively, on neutrosophic science is on [HG32b; HG44b]. 507

In this section, the basic material in this scientific research, is referred to [Single Valued 508
Neutrosophic Set](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.2,p.2), [Neutrosophic Set](Ref.[HG38],Definition 509
2.1,p.1), [Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.5,p.2), [Charac- 510
terization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3), 511
[t-norm](Ref.[HG38], Definition 2.7, p.3), and [Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHy- 512
perGraph (NSHG)](Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3), [Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic 513

SuperHyperPaths] (Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.3,p.7), and [Different Neutrosophic Types of Neut- 514

rosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)] (Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.4,p.7). Also, the new ideas and 515
their clarifications are addressed to Ref.[HG38]. 516
In this subsection, the basic material which is used in this scientific research, is presented. Also, 517
the new ideas and their clarifications are elicited. 518

Definition 3.0.1 (Neutrosophic Set). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.1,p.1).

Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x; then
the Neutrosophic set A (NS A) is an object having the form

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}

+
where the functions T, I, F : X →]− 0, 1 [ define respectively the a truth-membership
function, an indeterminacy-membership function, and a falsity-membership function
of the element x ∈ X to the set A with the condition
−
0 ≤ TA (x) + IA (x) + FA (x) ≤ 3+ .
+
The functions TA (x), IA (x) and FA (x) are real standard or nonstandard subsets of ]− 0, 1 [. 519

Definition 3.0.2 (Single Valued Neutrosophic Set). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.2,p.2).

Let X be a Eulerian-Path-Cut of points (objects) with generic elements in X denoted by x. A single
valued Neutrosophic set A (SVNS A) is characterized by truth-membership function TA (x),
an indeterminacy-membership function IA (x), and a falsity-membership function FA (x). For
each point x in X, TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) ∈ [0, 1]. A SVNS A can be written as

A = {< x : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}.

Definition 3.0.3. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership and

falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x :
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:

TA (X) = min[TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

IA (X) = min[IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = min[FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Definition 3.0.4. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x :
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:

supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.

Definition 3.0.5 (Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). (Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.5,p.2). 520

Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E), 521
where 522

(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 523

(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 524

(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V ; 525

(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 526

1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 527

(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 528

(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 529

P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 530

supp(Ei0 ) = V, (i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 );
P
(viii) i0 531

(ix) and the following conditions hold:

TV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[TV 0 (Vi ), TV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

IV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[IV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0 ,

and FV0 (Ei0 ) ≤ min[FV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vj )]Vi ,Vj ∈Ei0

where i0 = 1, 2, . . . , n0 . 532

Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 533
(NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the 534
degree of truth-membership, the degree of indeterminacy-membership and the degree of 535
falsity-membership the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic 536
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth- 537
membership, the degree of indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of 538

the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) 539
E. Thus, the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 540
are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 541

136EXM1 Example 3.0.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E) in 542

the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 543

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.1: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG1

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic notion, 544
is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 and E3 are some 545
empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 546
and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic 547
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The 548
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 549

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 550

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic notion, 551

is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. E1 , E2 and E3 are 552

some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 553
Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic 554
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic 555
isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic 556
endpoint. 557

• On the Figure (13.3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. E1 , E2 558

and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the 559

terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 560

• On the Figure (13.4), there’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop SuperHyperEdge 561
on {F } and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on {H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 562
on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. 563

• On the Figure (13.5),there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 564

• On the Figure (13.6), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 565

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.2: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG2

Figure 3.3: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.4: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG4

Figure 3.5: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG5

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.6: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG6

• On the Figure (13.7), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 566

• On the Figure (13.8), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 567

• On the Figure (13.9), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 568

• On the Figure (13.10), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 569
570

• On the Figure (13.11), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 571

572

• On the Figure (13.12), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 573
574

• On the Figure (13.13), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 575
576

• On the Figure (13.14), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 577
578

• On the Figure (13.15), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 579
580

• On the Figure (13.16), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 581

582

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.7: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG7

Figure 3.8: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG8

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.9: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG9

Figure 3.10: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG10

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.11: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG11

Figure 3.12: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG12

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.13: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG13

• On the Figure (13.17), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 583
584

• On the Figure (13.18), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 585
586

• On the Figure (13.19), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 587
588

• On the Figure (13.20), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 589

590

• On the Figure (13.21), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 591

• On the Figure (13.22), there’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. 592
593

Definition 3.0.7 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 594

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3). 595
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The Neutro- 596

sophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of 597
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be characterized as follow-up items. 598

(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 599

(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 600

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.14: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG14

(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 601

(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called HyperEdge; 602

(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 603
SuperEdge; 604

(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 605

SuperHyperEdge. 606

If we choose different types of binary operations, then we could get hugely diverse types of 607
general forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG). 608

Definition 3.0.8 (t-norm). (Ref.[HG38], Definition 2.7, p.3). 609

A binary operation ⊗ : [0, 1] × [0, 1] → [0, 1] is a t-norm if it satisfies the following for 610
x, y, z, w ∈ [0, 1]: 611

(i) 1 ⊗ x = x; 612

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.15: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG15

Figure 3.16: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG16

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.17: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG17

Figure 3.18: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG18

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.19: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG19

(ii) x ⊗ y = y ⊗ x; 613

(iii) x ⊗ (y ⊗ z) = (x ⊗ y) ⊗ z; 614

(iv) If w ≤ x and y ≤ z then w ⊗ y ≤ x ⊗ z. 615

Definition 3.0.9. The degree of truth-membership, indeterminacy-membership and

falsity-membership of the subset X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x :
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X} (with respect to t-norm Tnorm ):

TA (X) = Tnorm [TA (vi ), TA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

IA (X) = Tnorm [IA (vi ), IA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X ,

and FA (X) = Tnorm [FA (vi ), FA (vj )]vi ,vj ∈X .
Definition 3.0.10. The support of X ⊂ A of the single valued Neutrosophic set A = {< x :
TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) >, x ∈ X}:

supp(X) = {x ∈ X : TA (x), IA (x), FA (x) > 0}.

Definition 3.0.11. (General Forms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 616

Assume V 0 is a given set. a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E), 617
where 618

(i) V = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vn } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V 0 ; 619

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.20: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG20

(ii) V = {(Vi , TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi )) : TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), FV 0 (Vi ) ≥ 0}, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 620

(iii) E = {E1 , E2 , . . . , En0 } a finite set of finite single valued Neutrosophic subsets of V ; 621

(iv) E = {(Ei0 , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )) : TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 ) ≥ 0}, (i0 = 622
1, 2, . . . , n0 ); 623

(v) Vi 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 624

0 0
(vi) Ei0 6= ∅, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ); 625

P
(vii) i supp(Vi ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n); 626

0 0
P
(viii) i0 supp(Ei ) = V, (i = 1, 2, . . . , n ). 627
0

Here the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ej 0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 628
(NSHV) Vj are single valued Neutrosophic sets. TV 0 (Vi ), IV 0 (Vi ), and FV 0 (Vi ) denote the 629

degree of truth-membership, the degree of indeterminacy-membership and the degree of 630

falsity-membership the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to the Neutrosophic 631
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V. TV0 (Ei0 ), TV0 (Ei0 ), and TV0 (Ei0 ) denote the degree of truth- 632
membership, the degree of indeterminacy-membership and the degree of falsity-membership of 633
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) Ei0 to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) 634
E. Thus, the ii0 th element of the incidence matrix of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) 635

are of the form (Vi , TV0 (Ei0 ), IV0 (Ei0 ), FV0 (Ei0 )), the sets V and E are crisp sets. 636

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.21: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 95NHG1

Definition 3.0.12 (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG)). 637

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 2.7,p.3). 638
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). The Neutro- 639
sophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE) Ei0 and the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) Vi of 640
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S = (V, E) could be characterized as follow-up items. 641

(i) If |Vi | = 1, then Vi is called vertex; 642

(ii) if |Vi | ≥ 1, then Vi is called SuperVertex; 643

(iii) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called edge; 644

(iv) if for all Vi s are incident in Ei0 , |Vi | = 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called HyperEdge; 645

(v) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | = 2, then Ei0 is called 646

SuperEdge; 647

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.22: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in

the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 95NHG2

(vi) if there’s a Vi is incident in Ei0 such that |Vi | ≥ 1, and |Ei0 | ≥ 2, then Ei0 is called 648
SuperHyperEdge. 649

This SuperHyperModel is too messy and too dense. Thus there’s a need to have some 650

restrictions and conditions on SuperHyperGraph. The special case of this SuperHyperGraph 651
makes the patterns and regularities. 652

Definition 3.0.13. A graph is SuperHyperUniform if it’s SuperHyperGraph and the number 653
of elements of SuperHyperEdges are the same. 654

To get more visions on SuperHyperUniform, the some SuperHyperClasses are introduced. It 655

makes to have SuperHyperUniform more understandable. 656

Definition 3.0.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. There are some SuperHyper- 657

Classes as follows. 658

(i). It’s Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid 659
two given SuperHyperEdges with two exceptions; 660

(ii). it’s SuperHyperCycle if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 661
SuperHyperEdges; 662

(iii). it’s SuperHyperStar it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid all SuperHyperEdges; 663

(iv). it’s SuperHyperBipartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given Supe- 664
rHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming two separate sets, has no SuperHyperEdge 665

in common; 666

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.23: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions in the Example (13.3.2) 136NSHG18a

(v). it’s SuperHyperMultiPartite it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two 667

given SuperHyperEdges and these SuperVertices, forming multi separate sets, has no 668
SuperHyperEdge in common; 669

(vi). it’s SuperHyperWheel if it’s only one SuperVertex as intersection amid two given 670

SuperHyperEdges and one SuperVertex has one SuperHyperEdge with any common 671
SuperVertex. 672

136EXM18a Example 3.0.15. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 673
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 674
SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the notion. 675

136EXM19a Example 3.0.16. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 676
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 677
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is up. 678

136EXM20a Example 3.0.17. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 679
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 680

in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 681

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 682
is up. 683

136EXM21a Example 3.0.18. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 684
Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained 685

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, 686

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.24: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in the

Neutrosophic Example (13.3.4) 136NSHG19a

of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 687

ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is up. 688

136EXM22a Example 3.0.19. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 689

ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 690
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 691
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 692
in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is up. 693

136EXM23a Example 3.0.20. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 694
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 695
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 696

tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 697
SuperHyperModel (13.28), is up. 698

Definition 3.0.21. Let a pair S = (V, E) be a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S. Then

a sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges
(NSHE)
V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs
is called a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 699
(NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs if either of following conditions hold: 700

(i) Vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 701

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.25: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions in the

Neutrosophic Example (13.3.6) 136NSHG20a

Figure 3.26: Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions in the Example (13.3.8) 136NSHG21a

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 3.27: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions in the Example

(13.3.10) 136NSHG22a

Figure 3.28: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.12) 136NSHG23a

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(ii) there’s a vertex vi ∈ Vi such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 702

(iii) there’s a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi such that Vi0 , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 703

(iv) there’s a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 704

0 0
(v) there’s a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi , Vi+1 ∈ E i0 ; 705

(vi) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 706

0 0
(vii) there are a vertex vi ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that vi , Vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 707

(viii) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a vertex vi+1 ∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , vi+1 ∈ Ei0 ; 708

(ix) there are a SuperVertex Vi0 ∈ Vi and a SuperVertex Vi+1

0
∈ Vi+1 such that Vi0 , Vi+1
0
∈ Ei0 . 709

Definition 3.0.22. (Characterization of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths).

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)

V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,

could be characterized as follow-up items. 710

(i) If for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | = 2, then NSHP is called path; 711

(ii) if for all Ej 0 , |Ej 0 | = 2, and there’s Vi , |Vi | ≥ 1, then NSHP is called SuperPath; 712

(iii) if for all Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | = 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called HyperPath; 713

(iv) if there are Vi , Ej 0 , |Vi | ≥ 1, |Ej 0 | ≥ 2, then NSHP is called Neutrosophic SuperHy- 714
perPath . 715

Definition 3.0.23 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths).

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.3,p.7).
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). A Neutrosophic
SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (NSHV) and
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)

V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,

have 716

(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 717

(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 718

(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 719

(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 720

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Table 3.1: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition (3.0.27)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
136TBL3
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

Definition 3.0.24 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)). 721

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.4,p.7). 722
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 723
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 724

(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength 725

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 726

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 727

(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic i-strength 728

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 729

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 730

(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic f-strength 731

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 732

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 733

(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 734
strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi 735
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 736

For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the notion of 737
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are 738
assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of 739
the position of labels to assign to the values. 740

136DEF1 Definition 3.0.25. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 741
It’s redefined Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph if the Table (3.1) holds. 742

It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of SuperHyperClasses. Since there’s more ways 743
to get Neutrosophic type-results to make a Neutrosophic more understandable. 744

136DEF2 Definition 3.0.26. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 745
There are some Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses if the Table (3.2) holds. Thus Neutro- 746
sophic SuperHyperPath , notion, SuperHyperStar, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMulti- 747
Partite, and SuperHyperWheel, are Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath, Neutrosophic Supe- 748
rHyperCycle, Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar, Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite, 749
Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultiPartite, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel if the 750

Table (3.2) holds. 751

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Table 3.2: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, Mentioned in the Definition (3.0.26)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
136TBL4
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

Table 3.3: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph Mentioned in the Definition (3.0.27)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Vertices
136TBL1
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The maximum Values of Its Endpoints

It’s useful to define a “Neutrosophic” version of a Neutrosophic notion. Since there’s more 752
ways to get type-results to make a Neutrosophic notion more Neutrosophicly understandable. 753
For the sake of having a Neutrosophic notion, there’s a need to “redefine” the Neutrosophic 754
notion of “Neutrosophic notion”. The SuperHyperVertices and the SuperHyperEdges are 755
assigned by the labels from the letters of the alphabets. In this procedure, there’s the usage of 756

the position of labels to assign to the values. 757

136DEF1 Definition 3.0.27. Assume a notion. It’s redefined a Neutrosophic notion if the Table (3.3) 758
holds. 759

Definition 3.0.28. (Dominating, Resolving and Coloring). 760

Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). 761

(a) : SuperHyper-dominating set and number are defined as follows. 762

(i) : A SuperVertex Xn SuperHyper-dominates a SuperVertex Yn if there’s at least 763

one SuperHyperEdge which have them. 764

(ii) : A set S is called SuperHyper-dominating set if for every Yn ∈ Gn \ S, there’s at 765

least one SuperVertex Xn which SuperHyper-dominates SuperVertex Yn . 766

(iii) : If S is set of all sets of SuperHyper-dominating sets, then

|X| = min |{∪Xn |Xn ∈ S}|

S∈S

is called optimal-SuperHyper-dominating number and X is called optimal- 767

SuperHyper-dominating set. 768

(b) : SuperHyper-resolving set and number are defined as follows. 769

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(i) : A SuperVertex x SuperHyper-resolves SuperVertices y, w if

d(x, y) 6= d(x, w).

. 770

(ii) : A set S is called SuperHyper-resolving set if for every Yn ∈ Gn \ S, there’s at 771

least one SuperVertex Xn which SuperHyper-resolves SuperVertices Yn , Wn . 772

(iii) : If S is set of all sets of SuperHyper-resolving sets, then

|X| = min |{∪Xn |Xn ∈ S}|

S∈S

is called optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number and X is called optimal- 773

SuperHyper-resolving set. 774

(c) : SuperHyper-coloring set and number are defined as follows. 775

(i) : A SuperVertex Xn SuperHyper-colors a SuperVertex Yn differently with itself if 776

there’s at least one SuperHyperEdge which is incident to them. 777

(ii) : A set Sn is called SuperHyper-coloring set if for every Yn ∈ Gn \ Sn , there’s at 778

least one SuperVertex Xn which SuperHyper-colors SuperVertex Yn . 779

(iii) : If Sn is set of all sets of SuperHyper-coloring sets, then

|X| = min |{∪Xn |Xn ∈ Sn }|

Sn ∈Sn

is called optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number and X is called optimal- 780

SuperHyper-coloring set. 781

Proposition 3.0.29. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). S is maximum 782

set of SuperVertices which form a SuperHyperEdge. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring set has 783
as cardinality as S has. 784

Proposition 3.0.30. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). If 785

optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is |V |, then for every SuperVertex there’s at least one 786
SuperHyperEdge which contains has all members of V. 787

Proposition 3.0.31. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). If there’s at 788

least one SuperHyperEdge which has all members of V, then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number 789
is |V |. 790

Proposition 3.0.32. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). If optimal- 791

SuperHyper-dominating number is |V |, then there’s one member of V, is contained in, at least 792
one SuperVertex which doesn’t have incident to any SuperHyperEdge. 793

Proposition 3.0.33. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). Then optimal- 794

SuperHyper-dominating number is < |V |. 795

Proposition 3.0.34. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). If optimal- 796

SuperHyper-resolving number is |V |, then every given SuperVertex doesn’t have incident to any 797

SuperHyperEdge. 798

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.35. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). Then optimal- 799

SuperHyper-resolving number is < |V |. 800

Proposition 3.0.36. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). If optimal- 801

SuperHyper-coloring number is |V |, then all SuperVertices which have incident to at least one 802
SuperHyperEdge. 803

Proposition 3.0.37. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). Then optimal- 804

SuperHyper-coloring number isn’t < |V |. 805

Proposition 3.0.38. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). Then optimal- 806

SuperHyper-dominating set has cardinality which is greater than n − 1 where n is the cardinality 807
of the set V. 808

Proposition 3.0.39. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). S is maximum 809

set of SuperVertices which form a SuperHyperEdge. Then S is optimal-SuperHyper-coloring set 810
and |{∪Xn | Xn ∈ S}| is optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number. 811

Proposition 3.0.40. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). If S is 812

SuperHyper-dominating set, then D contains S is SuperHyper-dominating set. 813

Proposition 3.0.41. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). If S is 814

SuperHyper-resolving set, then D contains S is SuperHyper-resolving set. 815

Proposition 3.0.42. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). If S is 816

SuperHyper-coloring set, then D contains S is SuperHyper-coloring set. 817

Proposition 3.0.43. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). Then Gn is 818

SuperHyper-dominating set. 819

Proposition 3.0.44. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )).Then Gn is 820

SuperHyper-resolving set. 821

Proposition 3.0.45. Assume SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )). Then Gn is 822

SuperHyper-coloring set. 823

Proposition 3.0.46. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then Gn is SuperHyper- 824

dominating set for all members of G, simultaneously. 825

Proposition 3.0.47. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then Gn is SuperHyper- 826

resolving set for all members of G, simultaneously. 827

Proposition 3.0.48. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then Gn is SuperHyper- 828

coloring set for all members of G, simultaneously. 829

Proposition 3.0.49. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then Gn \{Xn } is SuperHyper- 830

dominating set for all members of G, simultaneously. 831

Proposition 3.0.50. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then Gn \{Xn } is SuperHyper- 832

resolving set for all members of G, simultaneously. 833

Proposition 3.0.51. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then Gn \ {Xn } isn’t 834

SuperHyper-coloring set for all members of G, simultaneously. 835

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.52. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then union of SuperHyper- 836

dominating sets from each member of G is SuperHyper-dominating set for all members of G, 837
simultaneously. 838

Proposition 3.0.53. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then union of SuperHyper- 839

resolving sets from each member of G is SuperHyper-resolving set for all members of G, 840
simultaneously. 841

Proposition 3.0.54. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. Then union of SuperHyper- 842

coloring sets from each member of G is SuperHyper-coloring set for all members of G, 843

simultaneously. 844

Proposition 3.0.55. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. For every given SuperVertex, 845
there’s one SuperHyperGraph such that the SuperVertex has another SuperVertex which are 846
incident to a SuperHyperEdge. If for given SuperVertex, all SuperVertices have a common 847
SuperHyperEdge in this way, then Gn \ {Xn } is optimal-SuperHyper-dominating set for all 848

members of G, simultaneously. 849

Proposition 3.0.56. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. For every given SuperVertex, 850
there’s one SuperHyperGraph such that the SuperVertex has another SuperVertex which are 851
incident to a SuperHyperEdge. If for given SuperVertex, all SuperVertices have a common 852

SuperHyperEdge in this way, then Gn \{Xn } is optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set for all members 853
of G, simultaneously. 854

Proposition 3.0.57. Assume G is a family of SuperHyperGraph. For every given SuperVertex, 855
there’s one SuperHyperGraph such that the SuperVertex has another SuperVertex which are 856

incident to a SuperHyperEdge. If for given SuperVertex, all SuperVertices have a common 857
SuperHyperEdge in this way, then Gn is optimal-SuperHyper-coloring set for all members of G, 858
simultaneously. 859

prp2 Proposition 3.0.58. Let SHG be a SuperHyperGraph. An (k − 1)-set from an k-set of twin 860

SuperVertices is subset of a SuperHyper-resolving set. 861

cor2 Corollary 3.0.59. Let SHG be a SuperHyperGraph. The number of twin SuperVertices is n − 1. 862
Then SuperHyper-resolving number is n − 2. 863

cor1 Corollary 3.0.60. Let SHG be SuperHyperGraph. The number of twin SuperVertices is n − 1. 864
Then SuperHyper-resolving number is n − 2. Every (n − 2)-set including twin SuperVertices is 865
SuperHyper-resolving set. 866

Proposition 3.0.61. Let SHG be SuperHyperGraph such that it’s complete. Then SuperHyper- 867

resolving number is n − 1. Every (n − 1)-set is SuperHyper-resolving set. 868

prp3 Proposition 3.0.62. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs with common super vertex set Gn . 869
Then simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving number of G is |V | − 1 870

prp4 Proposition 3.0.63. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs with common SuperVertex set 871
Gn . Then simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving number of G is greater than the maximum 872
SuperHyper-resolving number of n-SHG ∈ G. 873

prp5 Proposition 3.0.64. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs with common SuperVertex set 874

Gn . Then simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving number of G is greater than simultaneously 875

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyper-resolving number of H ⊆ G. 876

thm1 Theorem 3.0.65. Twin SuperVertices aren’t SuperHyper-resolved in any given SuperHyperGraph. 877

prp6 Proposition 3.0.66. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyperGraph. If 878

SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is complete, then every couple of 879
SuperVertices are twin SuperVertices. 880

thm17 Theorem 3.0.67. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) with 881

SuperVertex set Gn and n-SHG ∈ G is complete. Then simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving 882
number is |V | − 1. Every (n − 1)-set is simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 883

Corollary 3.0.68. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) with 884

SuperVertex set Gn and n-SHG ∈ G is complete. Then simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving 885
number is |V | − 1. Every (|V | − 1)-set is simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 886

Theorem 3.0.69. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) with 887

SuperVertex set Gn and for every given couple of SuperVertices, there’s a n-SHG ∈ G such 888
that in that, they’re twin SuperVertices. Then simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving number is 889

|V | − 1. Every (|V | − 1)-set is simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 890

thm19 Theorem 3.0.70. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) with 891

SuperVertex set Gn . If G contains three SuperHyper-stars with different SuperHyper-centers, then 892
simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving number is |V | − 2. Every (|V | − 2)-set is simultaneously 893
SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 894

Corollary 3.0.71. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) with 895

SuperVertex set Gn . If G contains three SuperHyper-stars with different SuperHyper-centers, then 896
simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving number is |V | − 2. Every (|V | − 2)-set is simultaneously 897
SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 898

prp5.1 Proposition 3.0.72. Consider two antipodal SuperVertices Xn and Yn in any given even 899
SuperHyper-cycle. Let Un and Vn be given SuperVertices. Then d(Xn , Un ) 6= d(Xn , Vn ) if 900
and only if d(Yn , Un ) 6= d(Yn , Vn ). 901

Proposition 3.0.73. Consider two antipodal SuperVertices Xn and Yn in any given even 902
cycle. Let Un and Vn be given SuperVertices. Then d(Xn , Un ) = d(Xn , Vn ) if and only if 903
d(Yn , Un ) = d(Yn , Vn ). 904

Proposition 3.0.74. The set contains two antipodal SuperVertices, isn’t SuperHyper-resolving 905
set in any given even SuperHyper-cycle. 906

Proposition 3.0.75. Consider two antipodal SuperVertices Xn and Yn in any given even 907
SuperHyper-cycle. Xn SuperHyper-resolves a given couple of SuperVertices, Zn and Zn0 , if 908
and only if Yn does. 909

Proposition 3.0.76. There are two antipodal SuperVertices aren’t SuperHyper-resolved by other 910
two antipodal SuperVertices in any given even SuperHyper-cycle. 911

Proposition 3.0.77. For any two antipodal SuperVertices in any given even SuperHyper-cycle, 912
there are only two antipodal SuperVertices don’t SuperHyper-resolve them. 913

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.78. In any given even SuperHyper-cycle, for any SuperVertex, there’s only one 914
SuperVertex such that they’re antipodal SuperVertices. 915

prp5.8 Proposition 3.0.79. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an even 916

SuperHyper-cycle. Then every couple of SuperVertices are SuperHyper-resolving set if and 917
only if they aren’t antipodal SuperVertices. 918

cor5.9 Corollary 3.0.80. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an even 919

SuperHyper-cycle. Then SuperHyper-resolving number is two. 920

cor5.10 Corollary 3.0.81. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an even 921

SuperHyper-cycle. Then SuperHyper-resolving set contains couple of SuperVertices such that 922

they aren’t antipodal SuperVertices. 923

cor4.11 Corollary 3.0.82. Let G be a family SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be 924

an odd SuperHyper-cycle with common SuperVertex set Gn . Then simultaneously SuperHyper- 925

resolving set contains couple of SuperVertices such that they aren’t antipodal SuperVertices and 926
SuperHyper-resolving number is two. 927

prp5.11 Proposition 3.0.83. In any given SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) which is 928

odd SuperHyper-cycle, for any SuperVertex, there’s no SuperVertex such that they’re antipodal 929

SuperVertices. 930

prp5.12 Proposition 3.0.84. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an odd 931

SuperHyper-cycle. Then every couple of SuperVertices are SuperHyper-resolving set. 932

prp5.13 Proposition 3.0.85. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an odd cycle. 933

Then SuperHyper-resolving number is two. 934

Corollary 3.0.86. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an odd cycle. Then 935

SuperHyper-resolving set contains couple of SuperVertices. 936

Corollary 3.0.87. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) which 937

are odd SuperHyper-cycles with common SuperVertex set Gn . Then simultaneously SuperHyper- 938
resolving set contains couple of SuperVertices and SuperHyper-resolving number is two. 939

prp1 Proposition 3.0.88. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 940

path. Then every SuperHyper-leaf forms SuperHyper-resolving set. 941

prp7 Proposition 3.0.89. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 942

path. Then a set including every couple of SuperVertices is SuperHyper-resolving set. 943

prp6.2 Proposition 3.0.90. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 944

path. Then an 1-set contains leaf is SuperHyper-resolving set and SuperHyper-resolving number 945

is one. 946

cor6.3 Corollary 3.0.91. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) are 947

SuperHyper-paths with common SuperVertex set Gn such that they’ve a common SuperHyper- 948

leaf. Then simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving number is 1, 1-set contains common leaf, is 949
simultaneously SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 950

prp6.4 Proposition 3.0.92. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) 951

are SuperHyper-paths with common SuperVertex set Gn such that for every SuperHyper-leaf Ln 952

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

from n-SHG, there’s another n-SHG ∈ G such that Ln isn’t SuperHyper-leaf. Then an 2-set 953
contains every couple of SuperVertices, is SuperHyper-resolving set. An 2-set contains every 954
couple of SuperVertices, is optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set. Optimal-SuperHyper-resolving 955
number is two. 956

Corollary 3.0.93. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) are 957

SuperHyper-paths with common SuperVertex set Gn such that they’ve no common SuperHyper- 958
leaf. Then an 2-set is simultaneously optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set and simultaneously 959

optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is 2. 960

prp55.11 Proposition 3.0.94. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper-t- 961

partite. Then every set excluding couple of SuperVertices in different parts whose cardinalities 962
of them are strictly greater than one, is optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set. 963

cor55.12 Corollary 3.0.95. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper-t- 964

partite. Let |V | ≥ 3. Then every (|V | − 2)-set excludes two SuperVertices from different parts 965
whose cardinalities of them are strictly greater than one, is optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set 966

and optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is |V | − 2. 967

cor55.13 Corollary 3.0.96. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 968

bipartite. Let |V | ≥ 3. Then every (|V | − 2)-set excludes two SuperVertices from different parts, 969
is optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set and optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is |V | − 2. 970

cor55.14 Corollary 3.0.97. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper-star. 971

Then every (|V | − 2)-set excludes SuperHyper-center and a given SuperVertex, is optimal- 972
SuperHyper-resolving set and optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is (|V | − 2). 973

cor55.15 Corollary 3.0.98. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper-wheel. 974

Let |V | ≥ 3. Then every (|V | − 2)-set excludes SuperHyper-center and a given SuperVertex, is 975

optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set and optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is |V | − 2. 976

Corollary 3.0.99. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) which 977

are SuperHyper-t-partite with common SuperVertex set Gn . Let |V | ≥ 3. Then simultaneously 978
optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is |V |−2 and every (|V |−2)-set excludes two SuperVertices 979
from different parts, is simultaneously optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 980

Corollary 3.0.100. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) 981

which are SuperHyper-bipartite with common SuperVertex set Gn . Let |V | ≥ 3. Then 982

simultaneously optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is |V | − 2 and every (|V | − 2)-set excludes 983

two SuperVertices from different parts, is simultaneously optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 984

Corollary 3.0.101. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) 985

which are SuperHyper-star with common SuperVertex set Gn . Let |V | ≥ 3. Then simultaneously 986
optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is |V | − 2 and every (|V | − 2)-set excludes SuperHyper- 987
center and a given SuperVertex, is simultaneously optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 988

Corollary 3.0.102. Let G be a family of SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) 989

which are SuperHyper-wheel with common SuperVertex set Gn . Let |V | ≥ 3. Then simultaneously 990

optimal-SuperHyper-resolving number is |V | − 2 and every (|V | − 2)-set excludes SuperHyper- 991

center and a given SuperVertex, is simultaneously optimal-SuperHyper-resolving set for G. 992

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.103. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 993

complete. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is |V |. 994

Proposition 3.0.104. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 995

path. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is two. 996

Proposition 3.0.105. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an even 997

SuperHyper-cycle. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is two. 998

Proposition 3.0.106. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an odd 999

SuperHyper-cycle. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is three. 1000

Proposition 3.0.107. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 1001

star. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is two. 1002

Proposition 3.0.108. Let SuperHyperGraphs SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 1003

wheel such that it has even SuperHyper-cycle. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is 1004
Three. 1005

Proposition 3.0.109. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 1006

wheel such that it has odd SuperHyper-cycle. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is 1007

four. 1008

Proposition 3.0.110. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 1009

complete and SuperHyper-bipartite. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is two. 1010

Proposition 3.0.111. Let SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a SuperHyper- 1011

complete and SuperHyper-t-partite. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is t. 1012

Proposition 3.0.112. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be SuperHyperGraph. Then optimal- 1013

SuperHyper-coloring number is 1 if and only if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is SuperHyper- 1014

empty. 1015

Proposition 3.0.113. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be SuperHyperGraph. Then optimal- 1016

SuperHyper-coloring number is 2 if and only if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is both 1017
SuperHyper-complete and SuperHyper-bipartite. 1018

Proposition 3.0.114. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be SuperHyperGraph. Then optimal- 1019

SuperHyper-coloring number is |V | if and only if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is SuperHyper- 1020
complete. 1021

Proposition 3.0.115. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be SuperHyperGraph. Then optimal- 1022

SuperHyper-coloring number is obtained from the number of SuperVertices which is |Gn | and 1023
optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is at most |V |. 1024

Proposition 3.0.116. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be SuperHyperGraph. Then optimal- 1025

SuperHyper-coloring number is at most ∆ + 1 and at least 2. 1026

Proposition 3.0.117. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be SuperHyperGraph and 1027

SuperHyper-r-regular. Then optimal-SuperHyper-coloring number is at most r + 1. 1028

Definition 3.0.118. (Eulerian(Hamiltonian) Neutrosophic Path). 1029

Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1030

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(i) Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path Me (SHG)(Mh (SHG)) for a neutro- 1031

sophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is a sequence of consecutive 1032
edges(vertices) x1 , x2 , · · · , xS(SHG) (x1 , x2 , · · · , xO(SHG) ) which is neutrosophic path; 1033

(ii) n-Eulerian(Hamiltonian) neutrosophic path Ne (SHG)(Nh (SHG)) for a neutro- 1034

sophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is the number of sequences 1035
of consecutive edges(vertices) x1 , x2 , · · · , xS(SHG) (x1 , x2 , · · · , xO(SHG) ) which is neutro- 1036
sophic path. 1037

Proposition 3.0.119. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-neutrosophic 1038

SuperHyperGraph with two weakest edges. Then 1039

Me (CM T σ ) : Not Existed;

Mh (CM T σ ) : vτ (1) , vτ (2) , · · · , vτ (O(CM T σ )−1) , vτ (O(CM T σ ))
where τ is a permutation on O(CM T σ ).

Ne (CM T σ ) = 0;

Nh (CM T σ ) = O(CM T σ )!.

Proposition 3.0.120. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a path-neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph. Then
Me (P T H) : v1 , v2 , · · · , vS(P T H) ;
Mh (P T H) : v1 , v2 , · · · , vO(P T H) .
Ne (P T H) = 1;
Nh (P T H) = 1.
Proposition 3.0.121. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a cycle-neutrosophic 1040
SuperHyperGraph where O(CY C) ≥ 3. Then 1041

Me (CY C) : Not Existed;

Mh (CY C) : xi , xi+1 , · · · , xO(CY C)−1 , xO(CY C) , · · · , xi−1 .

Ne (CY C) = 0;
Nh (CY C) = O(CY C).
Proposition 3.0.122. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a star-neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph with center c. Then
Me (ST R1,σ2 ) : v1 , v2
Mh (ST R1,σ2 ) : v1 , c, v2
where O(ST R1,σ2 ) ≤ 2;
Me (ST R1,σ2 ) : Not Existed
Mh (ST R1,σ2 ) : Not Existed

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

where O(ST R1,σ2 ) ≥ 3.

Ne (ST R1,σ2 ) = 2
Nh (ST R1,σ2 ) = 3
where O(ST R1,σ2 ) ≤ 2;
Ne (ST R1,σ2 ) = 0
Nh (ST R1,σ2 ) = 0
where O(ST R1,σ2 ) ≥ 3. 1042

Proposition 3.0.123. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-bipartite-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then
Me (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) : Not Existed
Mh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) : v1 , v2 , · · · , vO(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 )−1 , vO(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 )
where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) ≥ 3, |V1 | = |V2 |, v2i+1 ∈ V1 , v2i ∈ V2 ;

Me (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) : v1 v2

Mh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) : v1 , v2

where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = 2;
Me (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) : −
Mh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) : v1
where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = 1.
Ne (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = 0
Nh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = c
where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) ≥ 3, |V1 | = |V2 |, v2i+1 ∈ V1 , v2i ∈ V2 ;

Ne (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = 2

Nh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = 2

where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = 2;
Ne (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = −
Nh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = 1
where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ) = 1. 1043

Proposition 3.0.124. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-t-partite-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then
Me (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) : Not Existed
Mh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) : v1 , v2 , · · · , vO(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt )−1 , vO(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt )
where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) ≥ 3, |Vi | = |Vj |, v2i+1 ∈ Vi , v2i ∈ Vj ;

Me (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) : v1 v2

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Mh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) : v1 , v2

where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = 2;

Me (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) : −

Mh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) : v1

where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = 1.
Ne (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = 0
Nh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = c
where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) ≥ 3, |Vi | = |Vj |, v2i+1 ∈ Vi , v2i ∈ Vj ;

Ne (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = 2

Nh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = 2

where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = 2;

Ne (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = −

Nh (CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = 1

where O(CM Cσ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = 1. 1044

Proposition 3.0.125. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a wheel-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then

Mh (W HL1,σ2 ) : xi , xi+1 , · · · , xO(W HL1,σ2 )−1 , xO(W HL1,σ2 ) , xi−1 .

Me (W HL1,σ2 ) : v1 , v2 , v3
where S(W HL1,σ2 ) = 3.

Mh (W HL1,σ2 ) : xi , xi+1 , · · · , xO(W HL1,σ2 )−1 , xO(W HL1,σ2 ) , xi−1 .

Me (W HL1,σ2 ) : Not Existed

where S(W HL1,σ2 ) > 3.
Nh (W HL1,σ2 ) = O(W HL1,σ2 );
Ne (W HL1,σ2 ) = 3;
where S(W HL1,σ2 ) = 3.
Nh (W HL1,σ2 ) = O(W HL1,σ2 );
Ne (W HL1,σ2 ) = 0;
where S(W HL1,σ2 ) > 3. 1045

Definition 3.0.126. (Zero Forcing Number). 1046

Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1047

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(i) zero forcing number Z(SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ 1048
P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is minimum cardinality of a set S of black vertices (whereas vertices in 1049
V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications 1050
of “the color-change rule”: a white vertex is converted to a black vertex if it is the only 1051
white neighbor of a black vertex; 1052

(ii) zero forcing neutrosophic-number Zn (SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1053

SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is minimum neutrosophic cardinality of a set S of black 1054
vertices (whereas vertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black 1055

after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white vertex is converted to 1056
a black vertex if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. 1057

Definition 3.0.127. (Independent Number). 1058

Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1059

(i) independent number I(SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ 1060

P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is maximum cardinality of a set S of vertices such that every two 1061

vertices of S aren’t endpoints for an edge, simultaneously; 1062

(ii) independent neutrosophic-number In (SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1063

SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a set S of vertices 1064

such that every two vertices of S aren’t endpoints for an edge, simultaneously. 1065

Definition 3.0.128. (Clique Number). 1066

Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1067

(i) clique number C(SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ 1068

P (V )) is maximum cardinality of a set S of vertices such that every two vertices of S are 1069

endpoints for an edge, simultaneously; 1070

(ii) clique neutrosophic-number Cn (SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = 1071

(G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a set S of vertices such 1072

that every two vertices of S are endpoints for an edge, simultaneously. 1073

Definition 3.0.129. (Matching Number). 1074

Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1075

(i) matching number M(SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ 1076

P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is maximum cardinality of a set S of edges such that every two edges 1077

of S don’t have any vertex in common; 1078

(ii) matching neutrosophic-number Mn (SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1079

SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a set S of edges 1080

such that every two edges of S don’t have any vertex in common. 1081

Definition 3.0.130. (Girth and Neutrosophic Girth). 1082

Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1083

(i) girth G(SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 1084

minimum crisp cardinality of vertices forming shortest cycle. If there isn’t, then girth is 1085

∞; 1086

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(ii) neutrosophic girth Gn (SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ 1087

P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is minimum neutrosophic cardinality of vertices forming shortest cycle. 1088
If there isn’t, then girth is ∞. 1089

Proposition 3.0.131. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-neutrosophic 1090

SuperHyperGraph. Then 1091

3.0.131.1.
Z(CM T σ ) = O(CM T σ ) − 1.

3.0.131.2.
I(SHG) = 1.

3.0.131.3.
C(SHG) = O(SHG).

3.0.131.4.
n
M(SHG) = b c.
2
3.0.131.5.
G(SHG) = 3.

Proposition 3.0.132. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a path-neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1092

Graph. Then 1093

3.0.132.1.
Z(P T H n ) = 1.

3.0.132.2.
O(SHG)
I(SHG) = d e.
2
3.0.132.3.
C(SHG) = 2.

3.0.132.4.
n
M(SHG) = b c.
2
3.0.132.5.
G(SHG) = ∞.

Proposition 3.0.133. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a cycle-neutrosophic 1094

SuperHyperGraph where O(CY C) ≥ 3. Then 1095

3.0.133.1.
Z(CY C n ) = 2.

3.0.133.2.
O(SHG)
I(SHG) = b c.
2

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

3.0.133.3.
C(SHG) = 2.

3.0.133.4.
n
M(SHG) = b c.
2
3.0.133.5.
G(SHG) = O(SHG).

Proposition 3.0.134. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a star-neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1096

Graph with center c. Then 1097

3.0.134.1.
Z(ST R1,σ2 ) = O(ST R1,σ2 ) − 2.

3.0.134.2.
I(SHG) = O(SHG) − 1.

3.0.134.3.
C(SHG) = 2.

3.0.134.4.
M(SHG) = 1.

3.0.134.5.
G(SHG) = ∞.

Proposition 3.0.135. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-bipartite-neutrosophic 1098

SuperHyperGraph. Then 1099

3.0.135.1.
Z(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) = O(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) − 2.

3.0.135.2.
I(SHG) = max{|V1 |, |V2 |}.

3.0.135.3.
C(SHG) = 2.

3.0.135.4.
M(SHG) = min{|V1 |, |V2 |}.

3.0.135.5.
G(SHG) = 4
where O(SHG) ≥ 4. And
G(SHG) = ∞
where O(SHG) ≤ 3. 1100

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.136. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-t-partite-neutrosophic 1101

SuperHyperGraph. Then 1102

3.0.136.1.
Z(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = O(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) − 1.

3.0.136.2.
I(SHG) = max{|V1 |, |V2 |, · · · , |Vt |}.

3.0.136.3.
C(SHG) = t.

3.0.136.4.
t
M(SHG) = min |Vi |i=1 .

3.0.136.5.
G(SHG) = 3
where t ≥ 3.
G(SHG) = 4
where t ≤ 2. And
G(SHG) = ∞
where O(SHG) ≤ 2. 1103

Proposition 3.0.137. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-neutrosophic 1104

SuperHyperGraph. Then 1105

3.0.137.1.
Zn (CM T σ ) = On (CM T σ ) − max{Σ3i=1 σi (x)}x∈V .

3.0.137.2.
X3
In (SHG) = max{ σi (x)}x∈V .
i=1

3.0.137.3.
Cn (SHG) = On (SHG).

3.0.137.4.
X3 3
X 3
X
Mn (SHG) = max{ µi (x0 x1 ) + µi (x1 x2 ) + · · · + µi (xj−1 xj )}j=b n2 c .
i=1 i=1 i=1

3.0.137.5.
Gn (SHG) = min{Σ3i=1 (σi (x) + σi (y) + σi (z))}.

Proposition 3.0.138. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a path-neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1106

Graph. Then 1107

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

3.0.138.1.
Zn (P T H n ) = min{Σ3i=1 σi (x)}x is a leaf .

3.0.138.2.
3
X
In (SHG) = max{ (σi (x1 ) + σi (x3 ) + · · · + σi (xt )),
i=1
3
X
σi (x2 ) + σi (x4 ) + · · · + σi (x0t ))}xi xi+1 ∈E .
i=1

3.0.138.3.
3
X
Cn (SHG) = max{ (σi (xj ) + σi (xj+1 ))}xj xj+1 ∈E .
i=1

3.0.138.4.
X3 3
X 3
X
Mn (SHG) = max{ µi (x0 x1 ) + µi (x2 x3 ) + · · · + µi (xj−1 xj )}|S|=b n2 c .
i=1 i=1 i=1

3.0.138.5.
Gn (SHG) = ∞.

Proposition 3.0.139. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a cycle-neutrosophic 1108

SuperHyperGraph where O(CY C) ≥ 3. Then 1109

3.0.139.1.
Zn (CY C n ) = min{Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (y)}xy∈E. .

3.0.139.2.
3
X
In (SHG) = max{ (σi (x1 ) + σi (x3 ) + · · · + σi (xt )),
i=1
3
X
σi (x2 ) + σi (x4 ) + · · · + σi (x0t ))}xi xi+1 ∈E .
i=1

3.0.139.3.
3
X
Cn (SHG) = max{ (σi (xj ) + σi (xj+1 ))}xj xj+1 ∈E .
i=1

3.0.139.4.
X3 3
X 3
X
Mn (SHG) = max{ µi (x0 x1 ) + µi (x2 x3 ) + · · · + µi (xj−1 xj )}|S|=b n2 c .
i=1 i=1 i=1

3.0.139.5.
Gn (SHG) = On (SHG).

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.140. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a star-neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1110

Graph with center c. Then 1111

3.0.140.1.
Zn (ST R1,σ2 ) = On (ST R1,σ2 ) − max{Σ3i=1 σi (c) + Σ3i=1 σi (x)}x∈V .

3.0.140.2.
3 X
X
In (SHG) = On (SHG) − σ(c) = σi (xj ).
i=1 xj 6=c

3.0.140.3.
3
X X3
Cn (SHG) = σi (c) + max{ σi (xj )}.
i=1 i=1

3.0.140.4.
X3
Mn (SHG) = max{ µi (xj−1 xj )}xj−1 xj ∈E .
i=1

3.0.140.5.
Gn (SHG) = ∞.
Proposition 3.0.141. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-bipartite-neutrosophic 1112
SuperHyperGraph. Then 1113

3.0.141.1.
Zn (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) = On (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) − max{Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (x0 )}x,x0 ∈V .

3.0.141.2.
3
X X 3
X X
In (SHG) = max{( σi (xj )), ( σi (xj ))}.
i=1 xj ∈V1 i=1 xj ∈V2

3.0.141.3.
3
X
Cn (SHG) = max{ (σi (xj ) + σi (xj 0 ))}xj ∈V1 , xj 0 ∈V2 .
i=1

3.0.141.4.
X3 3
X 3
X
Mn (SHG) = max{ µi (x0 x1 ) + µi (x2 x3 ) + · · · + µi (xj−1 xj )}|S|=min{|V1 |,|V2 |} .
i=1 i=1 i=1

3.0.141.5.
Gn (SHG) = min{Σ3i=1 (σi (x) + σi (y) + σi (z) + σi (w))}x,y∈V1 , z,w∈V2 .

where O(SHG) ≥ 4 and min{|V1 |, |V2 |} ≥ 2. Also,

Gn (SHG) = ∞
where O(SHG) ≤ 3. 1114

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.142. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-t-partite-neutrosophic 1115

SuperHyperGraph. Then 1116

3.0.142.1.

Zn (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = On (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) − max{Σ3i=1 σi (x)}x∈V .

3.0.142.2.
X3 X 3
X X
In (SHG) = max{( σi (xj )), ( σi (xj )), · · · ,
i=1 xj ∈V1 i=1 xj ∈V2

3
X X
( σi (xj ))}.
i=1 xj ∈Vt

3.0.142.3.
3
X
Cn (SHG) = max{ (σi (xj1 ) + σi (xj2 ) + · · · + σi (xjt ))}xj1 ∈V1 ,xj2 ∈V2 ,··· , xjt ∈Vt .
i=1

3.0.142.4.
3
X 3
X 3
X
Mn (SHG) = max{ µi (x0 x1 ) + µi (x2 x3 ) + · · · + µi (xj−1 xj )}|S|=min |Vi |ti=1 } .
i=1 i=1 i=1

3.0.142.5.

Gn (SHG) = min{Σ3i=1 (σi (x) + σi (y) + σi (z))}x∈V1 , y∈V2 , z∈V3 .

where t ≥ 3.

Gn (SHG) = min{Σ3i=1 (σi (x) + σi (y) + σi (z) + σi (w))}x,y∈V1 , z,w∈V2 .

where t ≤ 2. And
Gn (SHG) = ∞
where O(SHG) ≤ 2. 1117

Setting of Neutrosophic 1-Zero-Forcing Number 1118

Definition 3.0.143. (1-Zero-Forcing Number). 1119

Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1120

(i) 1-zero-forcing number Z(SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = (G ⊆ 1121

P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is minimum cardinality of a set S of black vertices (whereas vertices in 1122
V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications 1123
of “the color-change rule”: a white vertex is converted to a black vertex if it is the only 1124
white neighbor of a black vertex. The last condition is as follows. For one time, black can 1125

change any vertex from white to black. 1126

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(ii) 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number Zn (SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1127

SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is minimum neutrosophic cardinality of a set S of black 1128
vertices (whereas vertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black 1129
after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white vertex is converted to 1130
a black vertex if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. The last condition is as 1131
follows. For one time, black can change any vertex from white to black. 1132

Definition 3.0.144. (Failed 1-Zero-Forcing Number). 1133

Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1134

(i) failed 1-zero-forcing number Z 0 (SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph SHG = 1135
(G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is maximum cardinality of a set S of black vertices (whereas 1136
vertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) isn’t turned black after finitely 1137
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white vertex is converted to a black vertex 1138

if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. The last condition is as follows. For one 1139
time, Black can change any vertex from white to black. The last condition is as follows. 1140
For one time, black can change any vertex from white to black; 1141

(ii) failed 1-zero-forcing neutrosophic-number Zn0 (SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHy- 1142
perGraph SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a set 1143
S of black vertices (whereas vertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) isn’t 1144
turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white vertex is 1145
converted to a black vertex if it is the only white neighbor of a black vertex. The last 1146

condition is as follows. For one time, Black can change any vertex from white to black. 1147
The last condition is as follows. For one time, black can change any vertex from white to 1148
black. 1149

Proposition 3.0.145. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then
Z(CM T σ ) = O(CM T σ ) − 2.
Proposition 3.0.146. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a path-neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph. Then
Z(P T H n ) = 1.
Proposition 3.0.147. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a cycle-neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph where O(CY C) ≥ 3. Then
Z(CY C n ) = 1.
Proposition 3.0.148. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a star-neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph with center c. Then
Z(ST R1,σ2 ) = O(ST R1,σ2 ) − 3.
Proposition 3.0.149. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-bipartite-neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph. Then
Z(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) = O(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) − 3.
Proposition 3.0.150. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-t-partite-neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph. Then
Z(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = O(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) − 2.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Setting of 1-Zero-Forcing Neutrosophic-Number 1150

Proposition 3.0.151. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then

Zn (CM T σ ) = On (CM T σ ) − max{Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (y)}x,y∈V .

Proposition 3.0.152. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a path-neutrosophic SuperHyper-

Graph. Then
Zn (P T H n ) = min{Σ3i=1 σi (x)}x is a vertex .
Proposition 3.0.153. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a cycle-neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph where O(CY C) ≥ 3. Then

Zn (CY C n ) = min{Σ3i=1 σi (x)}x is a vertex .

Proposition 3.0.154. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a star-neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1151

Graph with center c. Then 1152

Zn (ST R1,σ2 ) = On (ST R1,σ2 ) − max{Σ3i=1 σi (c) + Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (y)}x,y∈V .

Proposition 3.0.155. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-bipartite-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then

Zn (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) = On (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) − max{Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (x0 ) + Σ3i=1 σi (x00 )}x,x0 ,x00 ∈V .

Proposition 3.0.156. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-t-partite-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then

Zn (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = On (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) − max{Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (x0 )}x,x0 ∈V .

Setting of Neutrosophic Failed 1-Zero-Forcing Number 1153

Proposition 3.0.157. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then
Z 0 (CM T σ ) = O(CM T σ ) − 3.
Proposition 3.0.158. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a path-neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph. Then
Z 0 (P T H n ) = 0.
Proposition 3.0.159. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a cycle-neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph where O(CY C) ≥ 3.

Z 0 (CY C n ) = 0.

Proposition 3.0.160. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a star-neutrosophic SuperHyper-

Graph with center c. Then

Z 0 (ST R1,σ2 ) = O(ST R1,σ2 ) − 4.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.161. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-bipartite-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then

Z 0 (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) = O(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) − 4.

Proposition 3.0.162. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-t-partite-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then

Z 0 (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = O(CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) − 3.

Setting of Failed 1-Zero-Forcing Neutrosophic-Number 1154

Proposition 3.0.163. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-neutrosophic

SuperHyperGraph. Then
Zn0 (CM T σ ) = On (CM T σ )−
min{Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (y) + Σ3i=1 σi (z)}x,y,z∈V .
Proposition 3.0.164. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a path-neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph. Then
Zn0 (P T H n ) = 0.
Proposition 3.0.165. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a cycle-neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph where O(CY C) ≥ 3. Then

Zn0 (CY C n ) = 0

Proposition 3.0.166. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a star-neutrosophic SuperHyper-

Graph with center c. Then
Zn0 (ST R1,σ2 ) = On (ST R1,σ2 )−
min{Σ3i=1 σi (c) + Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (y) + Σ3i=1 σi (z)}x,y,z∈V .
Proposition 3.0.167. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-bipartite-neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph. Then
Zn0 (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ) = On (CM T σ1 ,σ2 )−
min{Σ3i=1 σi (x) + Σ3i=1 σi (x0 ) + Σ3i=1 σi (x00 ) + Σ3i=1 σi (x000 )}x,x0 ,x00 ,x000 ∈V .
Proposition 3.0.168. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a complete-t-partite-neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph. Then

Zn0 (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt ) = On (CM T σ1 ,σ2 ,··· ,σt )−min{Σ3i=1 σi (x)+Σ3i=1 σi (x0 )+Σ3i=1 σi (x00 )}x,x0 ∈V .

Global Offensive Alliance 1155

Definition 3.0.169. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1156

Then 1157

(i) a set S is called global-offensive alliance if

∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > |Ns (a) ∩ (V \ S)|;

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(ii) ∀S 0 ⊆ S, S is global offensive alliance but S 0 isn’t global offensive alliance. Then S is 1158
called minimal-global-offensive alliance; 1159

(iii) minimal-global-offensive-alliance number of SHG is

^
|S|
S is a minimal-global-offensive alliance.

and it’s denoted by Γ; 1160

(iv) minimal-global-offensive-alliance-neutrosophic number of SHG is

^
Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)
S is a minimal-global-offensive alliance.

and it’s denoted by Γs . 1161

Proposition 3.0.170. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a strong neutrosophic 1162

SuperHyperGraph. If S is global-offensive alliance, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such that 1163

(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 1164

(ii) vx ∈ E. 1165

Definition 3.0.171. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a strong neutrosophic 1166

SuperHyperGraph. Suppose S is a set of vertices. Then 1167

(i) S is called dominating set if ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃s ∈ S such that either v ∈ Ns (s) or vs ∈ E; 1168

(ii) |S| is called chromatic number if ∀v ∈ V, ∃s ∈ S such that either v ∈ Ns (s) or vs ∈ E 1169
implies s and v have different colors. 1170

Proposition 3.0.172. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a strong neutrosophic 1171

SuperHyperGraph. If S is global-offensive alliance, then 1172

(i) S is dominating set; 1173

(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is chromatic number. 1174

Proposition 3.0.173. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a strong neutrosophic 1175

SuperHyperGraph. Then 1176

(i) Γ ≤ O; 1177

(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1178

Proposition 3.0.174. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a strong neutrosophic 1179

SuperHyperGraph which is connected. Then 1180

(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1181

(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 1182

Proposition 3.0.175. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an odd path. Then 1183

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is minimal-global-offensive alliance; 1184

(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded set is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1185

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1186

(iv) the sets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only minimal-global- 1187
offensive alliances. 1188

Proposition 3.0.176. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an even path. Then 1189

(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is minimal-global-offensive alliance; 1190

(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded sets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 1191

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1192

(iv) the sets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only minimal-global-offensive 1193

alliances. 1194

Proposition 3.0.177. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an even cycle. Then 1195

(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is minimal-global-offensive alliance; 1196

(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded sets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1197

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1198

(iv) the sets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only minimal-global- 1199
offensive alliances. 1200

Proposition 3.0.178. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an odd cycle. Then 1201

(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is minimal-global-offensive alliance; 1202

(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded set is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1203

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1204

(iv) the sets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only minimal-global- 1205

offensive alliances. 1206

Proposition 3.0.179. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be star. Then 1207

(i) the set S = {c} is minimal-global-offensive alliance; 1208

(ii) Γ = 1; 1209

(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 1210

(iv) the sets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only global-offensive alliances. 1211

Proposition 3.0.180. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be wheel. Then 1212

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the set S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is minimal-global-offensive 1213

alliance; 1214

6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1215

(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1216
i=1

6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the set {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only minimal-global-offensive 1217
alliance. 1218

Proposition 3.0.181. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an odd complete. Then 1219

bn
2 c+1
(i) the set S = {vi }i=1 is minimal-global-offensive alliance; 1220

(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1221

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
; 1222
S={vi }i=1

b n c+1
(iv) the set S = {vi }i=1
2
is only minimal-global-offensive alliances. 1223

Proposition 3.0.182. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be an even complete. Then 1224

bnc
(i) the set S = {vi }i=1
2
is minimal-global-offensive alliance; 1225

(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1226

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} bnc

2
; 1227
S={vi }i=1

bnc
(iv) the set S = {vi }i=1
2
is only minimal-global-offensive alliances. 1228

Proposition 3.0.183. Let G be a m-family of neutrosophic stars with common neutrosophic 1229
vertex set. Then 1230

(i) the set S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is minimal-global-offensive alliance for G; 1231

(ii) Γ = m for G; 1232

(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for G; 1233

(iv) the sets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only minimal-global-offensive alliances for G. 1234

Proposition 3.0.184. Let G be a m-family of odd complete graphs with common neutrosophic 1235

vertex set. Then 1236

bn
2 c+1
(i) the set S = {vi }i=1 is minimal-global-offensive alliance for G; 1237

(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for G; 1238

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
for G; 1239
S={vi }i=1

b n c+1
(iv) the sets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only minimal-global-offensive alliances for G. 1240

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.185. Let G be a m-family of even complete graphs with common neutrosophic 1241
vertex set. Then 1242

bn
2c
(i) the set S = {vi }i=1 is minimal-global-offensive alliance for G; 1243

(ii) Γ = b n2 c for G; 1244

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} bnc

2
for G; 1245
S={vi }i=1

bnc
(iv) the sets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only minimal-global-offensive alliances for G. 1246

Global Powerful Alliance 1247

Definition 3.0.186. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 1248

Then 1249

(i) a set S of vertices is called t-offensive alliance if

∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| − |Ns (a) ∩ (V \ S)| > t;

(ii) a t-offensive alliance is called global-offensive alliance if t = 0; 1250

(iii) a set S of vertices is called t-defensive alliance if

∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| − |Ns (a) ∩ (V \ S)| < t;

(iv) a t-defensive alliance is called global-defensive alliance if t = 0; 1251

(v) a set S of vertices is called t-powerful alliance if it’s both t-offensive alliance and 1252
(t-2)-defensive alliance; 1253

(vi) a t-powerful alliance is called global-powerful alliance if t = 0; 1254

(vii) ∀S 0 ⊆ S, S is global-powerful alliance but S 0 isn’t global-powerful alliance. Then S is 1255

called minimal-global-powerful alliance; 1256

(viii) minimal-global-powerful-alliance number of SHG is

^
|S|
S is a minimal-global-powerful alliance.

and it’s denoted by Γ; 1257

(ix) minimal-global-powerful-alliance-neutrosophic number of SHG is

^
Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)
S is a minimal-global-offensive alliance.

and it’s denoted by Γs . 1258

Proposition 3.0.187. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a strong neutrosophic 1259

SuperHyperGraph. Then following statements hold; 1260

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(i) if s ≥ t and a set S of vertices is t-defensive alliance, then S is s-defensive alliance; 1261

(ii) if s ≤ t and a set S of vertices is t-offensive alliance, then S is s-offensive alliance. 1262

Proposition 3.0.188. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a strong neutrosophic 1263

SuperHyperGraph. Then following statements hold; 1264

(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a set S of vertices is t-defensive alliance, then S is s-powerful alliance; 1265

(ii) if s ≤ t and a set S of vertices is t-offensive alliance, then S is t-powerful alliance. 1266

Proposition 3.0.189. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a r-regular-strong-neutrosophic 1267

SuperHyperGraph. Then following statements hold; 1268

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-defensive 1269

alliance; 1270

(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-offensive 1271

alliance; 1272

(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is r-defensive 1273

alliance; 1274

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is r-offensive 1275

alliance. 1276

Proposition 3.0.190. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a r-regular-strong-neutrosophic 1277

SuperHyperGraph. Then following statements hold; 1278

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-defensive alliance; 1279

(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-offensive 1280

alliance; 1281

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is r-defensive alliance; 1282

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is r-offensive alliance. 1283

Proposition 3.0.191. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a r-regular-strong-neutrosophic 1284

SuperHyperGraph which is complete. Then following statements hold; 1285

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-defensive 1286

alliance; 1287

(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-offensive 1288

alliance; 1289

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is (O − 1)-defensive 1290

alliance; 1291

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is (O − 1)-offensive 1292

alliance. 1293

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 3.0.192. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a r-regular-strong-neutrosophic 1294

SuperHyperGraph which is complete. Then following statements hold; 1295

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-defensive 1296

alliance; 1297

(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \S, |Ns (a)∩S| > b O−1

2 c+1, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-offensive 1298
alliance; 1299

(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is (O − 1)-defensive 1300

alliance; 1301

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \S, |Ns (a)∩V \S| = 0, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is (O−1)-offensive 1302

alliance. 1303

Proposition 3.0.193. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a r-regular-strong-neutrosophic 1304

SuperHyperGraph which is cycle. Then following statements hold; 1305

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-defensive alliance; 1306

(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-offensive alliance; 1307

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-defensive alliance; 1308

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-offensive alliance. 1309

Proposition 3.0.194. Let SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) be a r-regular-strong-neutrosophic 1310

SuperHyperGraph which is cycle. Then following statements hold; 1311

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-defensive alliance; 1312

(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-offensive 1313

alliance; 1314

(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-defensive 1315

alliance; 1316

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then SHG = (G ⊆ P (V ), E ⊆ P (V )) is 2-offensive 1317

alliance. 1318

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 4 1319

Preliminaries Of Examples 1320

In this scientific research, some initial results are obtained on SuperHyperGraphs and 1321
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. Some well-known classes are used in this scientific research. A 1322
basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyper Eulerian-Path-Cut theory, SuperHyperGraphs, 1323
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 1324
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Cancer’s 1325

Neutrosophic Recognition 1326

AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 1327

Definition 4.0.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path- 1328

Cut). 1329
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 1330
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 1331
or E 0 is called 1332

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression is called 1333

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 1334

∀Ea ∈ P : P is
a SuperHyperPath and it has
the all number of SuperHyperEdges;

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression is called 1335

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 1336

∀Ea ∈ P : P is
a SuperHyperPath and it has
the all number of SuperHyperEdges;

and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 1337

69
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression is called 1338

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 1339

∀Va ∈ P : P is
a SuperHyperPath and it has
the all number of SuperHyperEdges;

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if the following expression is called 1340

Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut criteria holds 1341

∀Va ∈ P : P is
a SuperHyperPath and it has
the all number of SuperHyperEdges;

and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 1342

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 1343

SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neut- 1344
rosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path- 1345

Cut. 1346

Definition 4.0.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut). 1347

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider a 1348
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 1349

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 1350

SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neut- 1351
rosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path- 1352
Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 1353

Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of 1354

the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1355
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 1356
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; 1357

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 1358

SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neut- 1359
rosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path- 1360
Cut and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the max- 1361
imum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 1362
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic Super- 1363

HyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 1364
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; 1365

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 1366

of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian- 1367
Path-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic rv- 1368

SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 1369

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coeffi- 1370
cients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 1371
Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 1372
conseNeighborive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 1373
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; and the Extreme power is 1374
corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 1375

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial 1376

if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re- 1377
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and 1378

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic Su- 1379

perHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains 1380
the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 1381
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 1382
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic Super- 1383
HyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 1384

SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1385

Neutrosophic coefficient; 1386

(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 1387

SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neut- 1388

rosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path- 1389
Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum 1390
Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of 1391
the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the conseNeighborive Extreme sequence of Extreme 1392
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 1393

SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; 1394

(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut if it’s either of Neutrosophic 1395

e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutro- 1396

sophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path- 1397

Cut and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the max- 1398
imum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 1399
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic Super- 1400
HyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 1401
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; 1402

(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial if 1403

it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re- 1404
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and 1405

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHy- 1406

perGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme 1407
coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the 1408
Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality 1409
conseNeighborive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 1410
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; and the Extreme power is 1411

corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 1412

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut SuperHyperPolynomial 1413

if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic re- 1414
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut, and 1415
Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic Su- 1416
perHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains 1417
the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 1418

Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 1419

SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality conseNeighborive Neutrosophic Super- 1420
HyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 1421
SuperHyperEulerian-Path-Cut; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 1422
Neutrosophic coefficient. 1423

Proposition 4.0.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The 1424
all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path- 1425
Cut if for any of them, and any of other corresponded Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some 1426
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with 1427

no Neutrosophic exception at all minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of 1428
them. 1429

Proposition 4.0.4. Assume a connected non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : 1430

(V, E). There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum 1431

possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside of any given 1432
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of 1433
them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1434
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an Neutrosophic 1435
quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all 1436
of them. 1437

Proposition 4.0.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). If a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then
the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is at least

V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).

It’s straightforward that the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is at 1438
least the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic 1439

SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other 1440
words, the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum 1441
Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to Neutrosophic Eulerian- 1442
Path-Cut in some cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the 1443
maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the Neutrosophic 1444
SuperHyperVertices are contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. 1445

Proposition 4.0.6. Assume a simple Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Then the
Neutrosophic number of type-result-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut has, the least Neutrosophic cardinality, the
lower sharp Neutrosophic bound for Neutrosophic cardinality, is the Neutrosophic cardinality of

V \ V \ {aE , bE 0 , cE 00 , cE 000 }E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

If there’s a Neutrosophic type-result-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with the least Neutrosophic cardinality, the 1446
lower sharp Neutrosophic bound for cardinality. 1447

Proposition 4.0.7. Assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : 1448

(V, E). Then in the worst case, literally, 1449

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .

Is a Neutrosophic type-result-Eulerian-Path-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp 1450

bound for the cardinality, of a Neutrosophic type-result-Eulerian-Path-Cut is the cardinality of 1451

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E4 , V1 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 4 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .

Proof. Assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut since
neither amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges nor amount of SuperHyperVertices where
amount refers to the Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges) more
than one to form any kind of SuperHyperEdges or any number of SuperHyperEdges. Let us
consider the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

This Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the eligibilities

to propose property such that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices but the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality indicates that these Neutro-
sophic type-SuperHyperSets couldn’t give us the Neutrosophic lower bound in the term of
Neutrosophic sharpness. In other words, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices implies at least on-quasi-triangle style is up but

sometimes the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is free-quasi-triangle and it doesn’t make a contradiction

to the supposition on the connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
Thus the minimum case never happens in the generality of the connected loopless Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs. Thus if we assume in the worst case, literally,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Is a quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp bound for the
cardinality, of a quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is the cardinality of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Then we’ve lost some connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of the connected
loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and their quasi-types
but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. It’s the contradiction to
that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to deny this statement. One of
them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and cycle as the counterexamples-classes or
reversely direction star as the examples-classes, are well-known classes in that setting and they
could be considered as the examples-classes and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at least
two SuperHyperVertices to form a SuperHyperEdge. It doesn’t withdraw the principles of the
main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the condition is on the existence of
the SuperHyperEdge instead of acting on the SuperHyperVertices. In other words, if there’s a
SuperHyperEdge, then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the
intended definition to be applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of
the main definition but by the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition.
The Neutrosophic structure of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut decorates the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices don’t have received any Neutrosophic connections so as this Neutrosophic
style implies different versions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum Neutro-
sophic cardinality in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are spotlight. The lower
Neutrosophic bound is to have the maximum Neutrosophic groups of Neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Vertices have perfect Neutrosophic connections inside each of SuperHyperEdges and the outside
of this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet doesn’t matter but regarding the connectedness of the used
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph arising from its Neutrosophic properties taken from the fact
that it’s simple. If there’s no more than one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the targeted
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, then there’s no Neutrosophic connection. Furthermore, the Neut-
rosophic existence of one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no Neutrosophic effect to talk
about the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
involve to make a title in the Neutrosophic background of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph.
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge but
at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices make the Neutrosophic version of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the Neutrosophic setting of non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph, there are at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s necessary to mention that the
word “Simple” is used as Neutrosophic adjective for the initial Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph,
induces there’s no Neutrosophic appearance of the loop Neutrosophic version of the Neutro-
sophic SuperHyperEdge and this Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is said to be loopless. The
Neutrosophic adjective “loop” on the basic Neutrosophic framework engages one Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertex but it never happens in this Neutrosophic setting. With these Neutrosophic
bases, on a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there’s at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge
thus there’s at least a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut has the Neutrosophic cardinality of a
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus, a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut has the Neutrosophic

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

cardinality at least a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {z}. This Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet isn’t a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut since either
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is an obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel thus it never
happens since there’s no Neutrosophic usage of this Neutrosophic framework and even more
there’s no Neutrosophic connection inside or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious
and as its consequences, there’s a Neutrosophic contradiction with the term “Neutrosophic
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut” since the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality never happens for this Neut-
rosophic style of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and beyond that there’s no Neutrosophic
connection inside as mentioned in first Neutrosophic case in the forms of drawback for this
selected Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Let
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

Comes up. This Neutrosophic case implies having the Neutrosophic style of on-quasi-triangle
Neutrosophic style on the every Neutrosophic elements of this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet.
Precisely, the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that some Neutrosophic amount of the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style. The Neutrosophic cardinality of
the v SuperHypeSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

Is the maximum in comparison to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

But the lower Neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum Neutrosophic cardinality of the
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality ends up the Neutrosophic discussion. The first Neutrosophic
term refers to the Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph but this key
point is enough since there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperClass of a Neutrosophic SuperHy-
perGraph has no on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style amid some amount of its Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices. This Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel proposes
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has only some amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no Neutrosophic amount of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges more than one involving these some amount of these Neutrosophic SuperHy-
perVertices. The Neutrosophic cardinality of this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet is the maximum
and the Neutrosophic case is occurred in the minimum Neutrosophic situation. To sum them
up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Has the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Contains some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct-covers-order-amount

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices taken from
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

It means that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as used Neutrosophic

background in the Neutrosophic terms of worst Neutrosophic case and the common theme of
the lower Neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are Neutrosophic free-quasi-triangle.
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z Neutrosophic number of
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at
least no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others in common. Thus those Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut.
Those Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are potentially included in a Neutrosophic style-R-
Eulerian-Path-Cut. Formally, consider

V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).

Are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) .

Thus
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z

if and only if Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and only one
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
Zi and Zj . The other definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the
terms of Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is

{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .

This definition coincides with the definition of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut but with
slightly differences in the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality amid those Neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|Neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

and
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
E
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Let Zi ∼ Zj ,
be defined as Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus,

E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

But with the slightly differences, 1452

Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
1453

Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut =
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Thus E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut where E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is

fixed that means Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . for all Neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices
but in a Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut, Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) could be different and it’s not
unique. To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). If a
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then
the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is at least

V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).

It’s straightforward that the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is 1454

at least the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the Neutro- 1455
sophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In 1456
other words, the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges contains the max- 1457
imum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to Neutrosophic 1458
Eulerian-Path-Cut in some cases but the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1459
with the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the Neutro- 1460

sophic SuperHyperVertices are contained in a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. 1461

The obvious SuperHyperGraph has no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. But the non-obvious 1462
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel is up. The quasi-SuperHyperModel addresses some issues about 1463
the Neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially delivers some remarks on the Neutro- 1464
sophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct amount 1465
of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices up 1466

to all taken from that Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 1467
but this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is either has 1468
the maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality or it doesn’t have maximum Neutrosophic 1469
SuperHyperCardinality. In a non-obvious SuperHyperModel, there’s at least one Neutrosophic 1470
SuperHyperEdge containing at least all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus it forms a 1471
Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut where the Neutrosophic completion of the Neutrosophic 1472

incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, literarily, a Neutrosophic embedded R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. The 1473
SuperHyperNotions of embedded SuperHyperSet and quasi-SuperHyperSet coincide. In the 1474
original setting, these types of SuperHyperSets only don’t satisfy on the maximum SuperHy- 1475
perCardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected such that those SuperHyperSets have 1476
the maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality and they’re Neutrosophic SuperHyperOp- 1477
timal. The less than two distinct types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are included in 1478

the minimum Neutrosophic style of the embedded Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. The interior 1479

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

types of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are deciders. Since the Neutrosophic number of 1480
SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by the interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The 1481
common connections, more precise and more formal, the perfect unique connections inside the 1482
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any distinct types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices pose 1483
the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Thus Neutrosophic exterior SuperHyperVertices could be 1484
used only in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and in Neutrosophic SuperHyperRelation with 1485

the interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in that Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. In the 1486

embedded Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut, there’s the usage of exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1487
Vertices since they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the title “exterior” is 1488
more relevant than the title “interior”. One Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no connection, 1489
inside. Thus, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with 1490
one SuperHyperElement has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal case implying 1491

the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. The Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with the exclusion of 1492
the exclusion of all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and 1493
with other terms, the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with the inclusion of all Neutrosophic Supe- 1494
rHyperVertices in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, is a Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. 1495
To sum them up, in a connected non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 1496
There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum 1497

possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside of any given Neut- 1498
rosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them 1499
but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 1500
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an Neutrosophic 1501
quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all 1502
of them. 1503

The main definition of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut has two titles. a Neutrosophic quasi-R- 1504
Eulerian-Path-Cut and its corresponded quasi-maximum Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperCardinality are 1505
two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For any Neutrosophic number, there’s a Neutrosophic 1506
quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with that quasi-maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the 1507
terms of the embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded Neutrosophic 1508
SuperHyperGraph, then the Neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collec- 1509

tion of all the Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cuts for all Neutrosophic numbers less than its 1510
Neutrosophic corresponded maximum number. The essence of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut 1511
ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of the Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, 1512
again and more in the operations of collecting all the Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cuts 1513
acted on the all possible used formations of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one 1514

Neutrosophic number. This Neutrosophic number is 1515

considered as the equivalence class for all corresponded quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cuts. Let 1516
zNeutrosophic Number , SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet and GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut be a Neutrosophic 1517
number, a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. Then 1518

[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class = {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number }.

As its consequences, the formal definition of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is re-formalized 1519

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

and redefined as follows. 1520

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number }.

To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 1521
definition for the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. 1522

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Neutrosophic Eulerian- 1523

poses the upcoming expressions.

Path-Cut 1524

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 1525

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

And then, 1526

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 1527

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1528

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1529

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1530

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “Neutrosophic 1531
SuperHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the Neutrosophic SuperHy- 1532
perVertices such that any amount of its Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident to a 1533
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian- 1534
Path-Cut” but, precisely, it’s the generalization of “Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Path-Cut” since 1535

“Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Path-Cut” happens “Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut” in a Neutrosophic 1536

SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and background but “Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeigh- 1537
borhood” may not happens “Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut” in a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1538
as initial framework and preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the 1539
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “Neut- 1540
rosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “Neutrosophic Quasi-Eulerian-Path-Cut”, and “Neutrosophic 1541

Eulerian-Path-Cut” are up. 1542

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Thus, let zNeutrosophic Number , NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut 1543
be a Neutrosophic number, a Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a Neutrosophic Eulerian- 1544
Path-Cut and the new terms are up. 1545

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

1546

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

1547

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

1548

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 1549

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

1550

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1551

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic
Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
1552

GNeutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood
∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut if for
any of them, and any of other corresponded Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no
Neutrosophic exception at all minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of
them.
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations are coming
up.
The following Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut.
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. The

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Is an Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph

ESHG : (V, E) is a Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with

the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neut-

rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid some
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is
related to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

There’s not only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is up. The obvious simple
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet includes only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. But the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the non-obvious simple
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is up. To sum them
up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-

Cut. Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
is an Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
ESHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such
that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
instead of all given by that Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-
Path-Cut and it’s an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since it’s

the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neut-

rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some
amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that Neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. There isn’t only less than two Neutro-
sophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is up. The non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-

Path-Cut, not:

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not:

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic Super- 1553
HyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded to an 1554
SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple Neutrosophic 1555
type-SuperHyperSet called the 1556

“Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut” 1557

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 1558

Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, 1559

is only and only

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with a illustrated SuperHyper-

Modeling. It’s also, not only a Neutrosophic free-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel and a
Neutrosophic on-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel but also it’s a Neutrosophic stable embed-
ded SuperHyperModel. But all only non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of
the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut amid those obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets
of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut, are

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

To sum them up, assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
Then in the worst case, literally,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

is a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp bound
for the cardinality, of a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut is the cardinality of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

1560
To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all 1561
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic quasi-R-Eulerian-Path-Cut if 1562
for any of them, and any of other corresponded Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior 1563
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no 1564

Neutrosophic exception at all minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of 1565

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

them. 1566
Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let a Neutrosophic 1567
SuperHyperEdge ESHE : E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 1568
r. Consider all Neutrosophic numbers of those Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that 1569
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct Neutrosophic Su- 1570
perHyperVertices, exclude to any given Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1571

SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut with the least cardin- 1572
ality, the lower sharp Neutrosophic bound for Neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected 1573
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 1574
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE \ {z} is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the 1575
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have 1576
some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely but it isn’t a Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. 1577

Since it doesn’t have 1578

1579
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neut- 1580
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have 1581
some SuperHyperVertices uniquely. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1582
SuperHyperVertices VESHE ∪ {z} is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutro- 1583

sophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a Neutrosophic 1584

R-Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since it doesn’t do the Neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s 1585
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely 1586
[there are at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in 1587
the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), a Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1588
Vertex, titled its Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 1589

in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the Neutrosophic procedure”.]. 1590

There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended Neutrosophic Su- 1591
perHyperSet, VESHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus 1592
the obvious Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, VESHE is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic 1593
type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-Eulerian-Path-Cut, VESHE , is a Neutrosophic SuperHy- 1594
perSet, VESHE , includes only all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of 1595

Neutrosophic pairs are titled Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected Neutrosophic 1596

SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1597
SuperHyperVertices VESHE , is the maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of 1598
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 1599
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely. 1600

Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Any Neutrosophic 1601
R-Eulerian-Path-Cut only contains all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior 1602
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s 1603
any of them has all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all Neutrosophic 1604
SuperHyperNeighborhoods in with no exception minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors 1605
to some of them not all of them but everything is possible about Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1606

Neighborhoods and Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out. 1607

The SuperHyperNotion, namely, Eulerian-Path-Cut, is up. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge 1608
nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic Su- 1609
perHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 1610
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHy- 1611

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

perEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1612

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. The 1613

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1614

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1615

ESHG : (V, E) is a Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 1616
1617
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neut- 1618

rosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no Neutrosophic Supe- 1619

rHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an Neutrosophic 1620
SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. There are not only two Neutrosophic 1621
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 1622
Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 1623
called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two 1624

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1625

SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1626

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHy- 1627

perSet. Thus the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1628

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Eulerian-Path-Cut is up. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1629
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1630

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 1631

Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHy- 1632
perEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 1633

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 1634

ESHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 1635
that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 1636
given by that Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut and it’s 1637
an Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut. Since it’s 1638
1639

the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neut- 1640

rosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no Neutrosophic Super- 1641
HyperVertex of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an Neutrosophic 1642
SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. There aren’t only less than three 1643
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 1644

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut , 1645

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic ,

Eulerian-Path-Cut 1646
not: 1647

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: 1648

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic Super- 1649
HyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 1650
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 1651

“Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut ” 1652

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 1653

Neutrosophic Eulerian-Path-Cut , 1654

is only and only 1655

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−Cut = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−Eulerian−P ath−CutSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).  1656

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 5 1657

Preliminaries Of Results 1658

For the SuperHyperDensity, extreme SuperHyperDensity, and the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1659

Density, some general results are introduced. 1660

Remark 5.0.1. Let remind that the neutrosophic SuperHyperDensity is “redefined” on the 1661
positions of the alphabets. 1662

Corollary 5.0.2. Assume extreme SuperHyperDensity. Then 1663

N eutrosophic SuperHyperDensity =
{theSuperHyperDensityof theSuperHyperV ertices |
max |SuperHyperOf f ensiveSuperHyper
Clique|neutrosophiccardinalityamidthoseSuperHyperDensity. }
plus one extreme SuperHypeNeighbor to one. Where σi is the unary operation on the 1664
SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign the determinacy, the indeterminacy 1665
and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 1666

Corollary 5.0.3. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of the 1667
alphabet. Then the notion of neutrosophic SuperHyperDensity and SuperHyperDensity coincide. 1668

Corollary 5.0.4. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter of 1669
the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a neutrosophic 1670
SuperHyperDensity if and only if it’s a SuperHyperDensity. 1671

Corollary 5.0.5. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the same identical letter 1672
of the alphabet. Then a consecutive sequence of the SuperHyperVertices is a strongest 1673
SuperHyperDensity if and only if it’s a longest SuperHyperDensity. 1674

Corollary 5.0.6. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph on the 1675

same identical letter of the alphabet. Then its neutrosophic SuperHyperDensity is its 1676

SuperHyperDensity and reversely. 1677

Corollary 5.0.7. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDensity, SuperHyperStar, 1678

SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel) on the same identical letter of 1679

the alphabet. Then its neutrosophic SuperHyperDensity is its SuperHyperDensity and reversely. 1680

Corollary 5.0.8. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its neutrosophic SuperHyper- 1681

Density isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDensity isn’t well-defined. 1682

91
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Corollary 5.0.9. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its 1683

neutrosophic SuperHyperDensity isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDensity isn’t 1684
well-defined. 1685

Corollary 5.0.10. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDensity, SuperHyper- 1686

Star, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). Then its neutrosophic 1687
SuperHyperDensity isn’t well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDensity isn’t well-defined. 1688

Corollary 5.0.11. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its neutrosophic SuperHy- 1689
perDensity is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDensity is well-defined. 1690

Corollary 5.0.12. Assume SuperHyperClasses of a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then its 1691

neutrosophic SuperHyperDensity is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDensity is well- 1692
defined. 1693

Corollary 5.0.13. Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath(-/SuperHyperDensity, SuperHyper- 1694

Star, SuperHyperBipartite, SuperHyperMultipartite, SuperHyperWheel). Then its neutrosophic 1695
SuperHyperDensity is well-defined if and only if its SuperHyperDensity is well-defined. 1696

Proposition 5.0.14. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then V is 1697

(i) : the dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1698

(ii) : the strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1699

(iii) : the connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1700

(iv) : the δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1701

(v) : the strong δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1702

(vi) : the connected δ-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1703

Proposition 5.0.15. Let N T G : (V, E, σ, µ) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then ∅ is 1704

(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1705

(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1706

(iii) : the connected defensive SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1707

(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1708

(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1709

(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1710

Proposition 5.0.16. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then an 1711

independent SuperHyperSet is 1712

(i) : the SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1713

(ii) : the strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1714

(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1715

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(iv) : the δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1716

(v) : the strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1717

(vi) : the connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1718

Proposition 5.0.17. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform SuperHyper- 1719

Graph which is a SuperHyperDensity/SuperHyperPath. Then V is a maximal 1720

(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1721

(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1722

(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1723

(iv) : O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1724

(v) : strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1725

(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1726

Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1727

Proposition 5.0.18. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is a 1728

SuperHyperUniform SuperHyperWheel. Then V is a maximal 1729

(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1730

(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1731

(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1732

(iv) : O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1733

(v) : strong O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1734

(vi) : connected O(ESHG)-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1735

Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1736

Proposition 5.0.19. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform SuperHyper- 1737

Graph which is a SuperHyperDensity/SuperHyperPath. Then the number of 1738

(i) : the SuperHyperDensity; 1739

(ii) : the SuperHyperDensity; 1740

(iii) : the connected SuperHyperDensity; 1741

(iv) : the O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDensity; 1742

(v) : the strong O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDensity; 1743

(vi) : the connected O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDensity. 1744

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices 1745
coincide. 1746

Proposition 5.0.20. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform SuperHyper- 1747

Graph which is a SuperHyperWheel. Then the number of 1748

(i) : the dual SuperHyperDensity; 1749

(ii) : the dual SuperHyperDensity; 1750

(iii) : the dual connected SuperHyperDensity; 1751

(iv) : the dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDensity; 1752

(v) : the strong dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDensity; 1753

(vi) : the connected dual O(ESHG)-SuperHyperDensity. 1754

is one and it’s only V. Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices 1755
coincide. 1756

Proposition 5.0.21. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform SuperHyper- 1757

Graph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperCom- 1758
plete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the 1759
half of multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHy- 1760
perVertices is a 1761

(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1762

(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1763

(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1764

O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1765

O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1766

O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1767

Proposition 5.0.22. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform SuperHyper- 1768

Graph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperCom- 1769

plete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then a SuperHyperSet contains the half of multiplying r with 1770
the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices in the biggest 1771
SuperHyperPart is a 1772

(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1773

(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1774

(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1775

(iv) : δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1776

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(v) : strong δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1777

(vi) : connected δ-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1778

Proposition 5.0.23. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperUniform SuperHyper- 1779

Graph which is a SuperHyperStar/SuperHyperComplete SuperHyperBipartite/SuperHyperCom- 1780
plete SuperHyperMultipartite. Then Then the number of 1781

(i) : dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1782

(ii) : strong dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1783

(iii) : connected dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1784

O(ESHG)
(iv) : 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1785

O(ESHG)
(v) : strong 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1786

O(ESHG)
(vi) : connected 2 + 1-dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1787

is one and it’s only S, a SuperHyperSet contains [the SuperHyperCenter and] the half of 1788
multiplying r with the number of all the SuperHyperEdges plus one of all the SuperHyperVertices. 1789
Where the exterior SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices coincide. 1790

Proposition 5.0.24. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The number of 1791
connected component is |V − S| if there’s a SuperHyperSet which is a dual 1792

(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1793

(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1794

(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1795

(iv) : SuperHyperDensity; 1796

(v) : strong 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1797

(vi) : connected 1-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1798

Proposition 5.0.25. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then the number 1799
is at most O(ESHG) and the neutrosophic number is at most On (ESHG). 1800

Proposition 5.0.26. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1801

SuperHyperComplete. The number is O(ESHG:(V,E)) 2 + 1 and the neutrosophic number is 1802

min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), in the setting of dual 1803
t>
2

(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1804

(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1805

(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1806

(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1807

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1808

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1809

Proposition 5.0.27. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is ∅. The 1810
number is 0 and the neutrosophic number is 0, for an independent SuperHyperSet in the setting 1811
of dual 1812

(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1813

(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1814

(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1815

(iv) : 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1816

(v) : strong 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1817

(vi) : connected 0-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1818

Proposition 5.0.28. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1819

SuperHyperComplete. Then there’s no independent SuperHyperSet. 1820

Proposition 5.0.29. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1821

SuperHyperDensity/SuperHyperPath/SuperHyperWheel. The number is O(ESHG : (V, E)) 1822

and the neutrosophic number is On (ESHG : (V, E)), in the setting of a dual 1823

(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1824

(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1825

(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1826

(iv) : O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1827

(v) : strong O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1828

(vi) : connected O(ESHG : (V, E))-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1829

Proposition 5.0.30. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1830

SuperHyperStar/complete SuperHyperBipartite/complete SuperHyperMultiPartite. The number 1831

is O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1 and the neutrosophic number is min Σv∈{v1 ,v2 ,··· ,vt } O(ESHG:(V,E)) ⊆V σ(v), 1832
t>
2
in the setting of a dual 1833

(i) : SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1834

(ii) : strong SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1835

(iii) : connected SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1836

(iv) : ( O(ESHG:(V,E))
2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1837

(v) : strong ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1838

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(vi) : connected ( O(ESHG:(V,E))

2 + 1)-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1839

Proposition 5.0.31. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a SuperHyperFamily of the ESHGs : (V, E) 1840
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are from one-type SuperHyperClass which the result is 1841
obtained for the individuals. Then the results also hold for the SuperHyperFamily N SHF : (V, E) 1842
of these specific SuperHyperClasses of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. 1843

Proposition 5.0.32. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If S is a 1844

dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity, then ∀v ∈ V \ S, ∃x ∈ S such that 1845

(i) v ∈ Ns (x); 1846

(ii) vx ∈ E. 1847

Proposition 5.0.33. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If S is a 1848

dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity, then 1849

(i) S is SuperHyperDominating set; 1850

(ii) there’s S ⊆ S 0 such that |S 0 | is SuperHyperChromatic number. 1851

Proposition 5.0.34. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1852

(i) Γ ≤ O; 1853

(ii) Γs ≤ On . 1854

Proposition 5.0.35. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph which is 1855
connected. Then 1856

(i) Γ ≤ O − 1; 1857

(ii) Γs ≤ On − Σ3i=1 σi (x). 1858

Proposition 5.0.36. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperPath. Then 1859

(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyper- 1860

Density; 1861

(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1862

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1863

(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only a dual 1864

SuperHyperDensity. 1865

Proposition 5.0.37. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperPath. Then 1866

(i) the set S = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1867

(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 }; 1868

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1869

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only dual 1870
SuperHyperDensity. 1871

Proposition 5.0.38. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperDensity. Then 1872

(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1873

(ii) Γ = b n2 c and corresponded SuperHyperSets are {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1874

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· ,vn } σ(s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· ,vn−1 } σ(s)}; 1875

(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · , vn−1 } are only dual 1876
SuperHyperDensity. 1877

Proposition 5.0.39. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperDensity. Then 1878

(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyper- 1879

Density; 1880

(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 and corresponded SuperHyperSet is S = {v2 , v4 , · · · , vn−1 }; 1881

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S={v2 ,v4 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s), Σs∈S={v1 ,v3 ,··· .vn−1 } Σ3i=1 σi (s)}; 1882

(iv) the SuperHyperSets S1 = {v2 , v4 , · · · .vn−1 } and S2 = {v1 , v3 , · · · .vn−1 } are only dual 1883
SuperHyperDensity. 1884

Proposition 5.0.40. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperStar. Then 1885

(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c} is a dual maximal SuperHyperDensity; 1886

(ii) Γ = 1; 1887

(iii) Γs = Σ3i=1 σi (c); 1888

(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c} and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperDensity. 1889

Proposition 5.0.41. Let ESHG : (V, E) be SuperHyperWheel. Then 1890

6+3(i−1)≤n
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is a dual maximal 1891
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1892

6+3(i−1)≤n
(ii) Γ = |{v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 |; 1893

(iii) Γs = Σ{v1 ,v3 }∪{v6 ,v9 ··· ,vi+6 ,··· ,vn }6+3(i−1)≤n Σ3i=1 σi (s); 1894
i=1

6+3(i−1)≤n
(iv) the SuperHyperSet {v1 , v3 } ∪ {v6 , v9 · · · , vi+6 , · · · , vn }i=1 is only a dual maximal 1895
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1896

Proposition 5.0.42. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an odd SuperHyperComplete. Then 1897

b n c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1898

(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1; 1899

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
; 1900
S={vi }i=1

b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1901

Proposition 5.0.43. Let ESHG : (V, E) be an even SuperHyperComplete. Then 1902

bn
2c
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1903

(ii) Γ = b n2 c; 1904

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} bnc

2
; 1905
S={vi }i=1

bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is only a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyper- 1906
Density. 1907

Proposition 5.0.44. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of neutrosophic SuperHy- 1908

perStars with common neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1909

(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity 1910

for N SHF; 1911

(ii) Γ = m for N SHF : (V, E); 1912

(iii) Γs = Σm 3
i=1 Σj=1 σj (ci ) for N SHF : (V, E); 1913

(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {c1 , c2 , · · · , cm } and S ⊂ S 0 are only dual SuperHyperDensity for 1914
N SHF : (V, E). 1915

Proposition 5.0.45. Let N SHF : (V, E) be an m-SuperHyperFamily of odd SuperHyperCom- 1916

plete SuperHyperGraphs with common neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1917

bn
2 c+1
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1 is a dual maximal SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyper- 1918
Density for N SHF; 1919

(ii) Γ = b n2 c + 1 for N SHF : (V, E); 1920

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} b n c+1

2
for N SHF : (V, E); 1921
S={vi }i=1

b n c+1
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only a dual maximal SuperHyperDensity for 1922
N SHF : (V, E). 1923

Proposition 5.0.46. Let N SHF : (V, E) be a m-SuperHyperFamily of even SuperHyperComplete 1924

SuperHyperGraphs with common neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet. Then 1925

bnc
(i) the SuperHyperSet S = {vi }i=1
2
is a dual SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity for 1926
N SHF : (V, E); 1927

(ii) Γ = b n2 c for N SHF : (V, E); 1928

(iii) Γs = min{Σs∈S Σ3i=1 σi (s)} bnc

2
for N SHF : (V, E); 1929
S={vi }i=1

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
bnc
(iv) the SuperHyperSets S = {vi }i=1
2
are only dual maximal SuperHyperDensity for N SHF : 1930

(V, E). 1931

Proposition 5.0.47. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1932
following statements hold; 1933

(i) if s ≥ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an t-SuperHyperDefensive 1934

SuperHyperDensity, then S is an s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1935

(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual t-SuperHyperDefensive 1936

SuperHyperDensity, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1937

Proposition 5.0.48. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a strong neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then 1938
following statements hold; 1939

(i) if s ≥ t + 2 and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is an t-SuperHyperDefensive 1940

SuperHyperDensity, then S is an s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperDensity; 1941

(ii) if s ≤ t and a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices is a dual t-SuperHyperDefensive 1942

SuperHyperDensity, then S is a dual s-SuperHyperPowerful SuperHyperDensity. 1943

Proposition 5.0.49. Let ESHG : (V, E) be a[an] [r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic 1944

SuperHyperGraph. Then following statements hold; 1945

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1946

SuperHyperDensity; 1947

(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1948
SuperHyperDensity; 1949

(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an r-SuperHyperDefensive 1950

SuperHyperDensity; 1951

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual r-SuperHyperDefensive 1952

SuperHyperDensity. 1953

Proposition 5.0.50. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] [r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic 1954

SuperHyperGraph. Then following statements hold; 1955

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1956

SuperHyperDensity; 1957

(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b 2r c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1958

SuperHyperDensity; 1959

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an r-SuperHyperDefensive 1960

SuperHyperDensity; 1961

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual r-SuperHyperDefensive 1962

SuperHyperDensity. 1963

Proposition 5.0.51. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] [r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic 1964

SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1965

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1966
SuperHyperDensity; 1967

(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1

2 c + 1 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1968
SuperHyperDensity; 1969

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1970

SuperHyperDensity; 1971

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1972

SuperHyperDensity. 1973

Proposition 5.0.52. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] [r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic 1974

SuperHyperGraph which is a SuperHyperComplete. Then following statements hold; 1975

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < b O−1

2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1976
SuperHyperDensity; 1977

(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > b O−1 2 c + 1, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2- 1978
SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity; 1979

(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is (O − 1)-SuperHyperDefensive 1980

SuperHyperDensity; 1981

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual (O − 1)- 1982

SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperDensity. 1983

Proposition 5.0.53. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] [r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic 1984

SuperHyperGraph which is SuperHyperDensity. Then following statements hold; 1985

(i) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2 if ESHG : (V, E)) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyper- 1986
Density; 1987

(ii) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1988

SuperHyperDensity; 1989

(iii) ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1990

SuperHyperDensity; 1991

(iv) ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0 if ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1992

SuperHyperDensity. 1993

Proposition 5.0.54. Let ESHG : (V, E) is a[an] [r-]SuperHyperUniform-strong-neutrosophic 1994

SuperHyperGraph which is SuperHyperDensity. Then following statements hold; 1995

(i) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| < 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1996

SuperHyperDensity; 1997

(ii) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ S| > 2, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 1998
SuperHyperDensity; 1999

(iii) if ∀a ∈ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is an 2-SuperHyperDefensive 2000

SuperHyperDensity; 2001

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(iv) if ∀a ∈ V \ S, |Ns (a) ∩ V \ S| = 0, then ESHG : (V, E) is a dual 2-SuperHyperDefensive 2002

SuperHyperDensity. 2003

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 6 2004

SuperHyperForcing 2005

6.1 Definitions 2006

Definition 6.1.1. ((neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing). 2007

Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 2008

(i) a SuperHyperForcing Z(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 2009
is the minimum cardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas 2010
SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black 2011

after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is 2012
converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a 2013
black SuperHyperVertex; 2014

(ii) a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing Zn (N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2015

Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the minimum neutrosophic cardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2016
black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2017
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2018
a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white 2019
SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. 2020

6.2 Examples 2021

97EXM2 Example 6.2.1. Assume the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (??), (??), (??), 2022
(??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), (??), and 2023
(??). 2024

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 2025
rHyperForcing, is up. S = {V1 , V2 , V3 } is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 2026
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. 2027
E1 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop SuperHyperEdge and 2028
E4 is an SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one 2029
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The SuperHyperVertex, V3 is isolated means that there’s 2030

no SuperHyperEdge has it as an endpoint. Thus SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is contained in 2031

103
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

every given neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. All the following SuperHyperSets of Super- 2032
HyperVertices are the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2033

{V3 , V1 , V2 }
{V3 , V1 , V4 }
{V3 , V2 , V4 }

The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V2 , V4 , V1 }, is a SuperHyperSet S of 2034

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2035

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a 2036
white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white Su- 2037
perHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2038
cing. Since it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of 2039
a SuperHyperSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 2040

are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the 2041
color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex 2042
if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only one 2043
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious neutrosophic 2044
SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 2045
perHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex in a connected 2046

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2047

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 2048
rHyperForcing, is up. S = {V1 , V2 , V3 } is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 2049
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. 2050
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is an SuperHyperEdge. Thus 2051

in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 2052

The SuperHyperVertex, V3 is isolated means that there’s no SuperHyperEdge has it 2053
as an endpoint. Thus SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is contained in every given neutrosophic 2054
SuperHyperForcing. All the following SuperHyperSets of SuperHyperVertices are the 2055
simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2056

{V3 , V1 , V2 }
{V3 , V1 , V4 }
{V3 , V2 , V4 }

The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V2 , V4 , V1 }, is a SuperHyperSet S of 2057

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2058
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a 2059
white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white Su- 2060

perHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2061

cing. Since it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of 2062
a SuperHyperSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 2063
are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the 2064
color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex 2065
if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only one 2066

SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious neutrosophic 2067

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 2068
perHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex in a connected 2069
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2070

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 2071
rHyperForcing, is up. S = {V1 , V2 } is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 2072

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. 2073
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is an SuperHyperEdge. Thus in 2074
the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . All the 2075
following SuperHyperSets of SuperHyperVertices are the simple type-SuperHyperSet of 2076
the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2077

{V1 , V2 }
{V1 , V3 }
{V2 , V3 }

The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is a SuperHyperSet S of black 2078

SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that 2079
V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white 2080
SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHy- 2081

perNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2082

Since it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a Su- 2083
perHyperSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 2084
are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the 2085
color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVer- 2086
tex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s 2087

only one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious 2088
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2089
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2090
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Thus all the follow- 2091
ing SuperHyperSets of SuperHyperVertices are the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2092
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2093

{V1 , V2 }
{V1 , V3 }
{V2 , V3 }

since the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, {V1 , V3 }, {V2 , V3 } are 2094
the SuperHyperSets Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in 2095
V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many 2096

applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to 2097

a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2098
SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since they’ve 2099
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black 2100
SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such 2101
that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2102

a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2103

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only one 2104

SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, V \ {v}. Thus the obvious 2105
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, V \ {v}, is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet 2106
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, V \{v}, is a SuperHyperSet, V \{v}, excludes only 2107
one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2108

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Super- 2109

HyperForcing, is up. S = {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F } is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 2110

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by the upcoming 2111
statements. There’s no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop SuperHyperEdge on 2112
{F }, and there are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on {H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on 2113
{O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. The SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVer- 2114
tices, {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F } is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Supe- 2115

rHyperForcing. The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F }, 2116

is the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2117
black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2118
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2119
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2120
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only 2121

one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2122
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2123
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2124
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet of 2125
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F }, has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside 2126
the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2127

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHy- 2128
perVertices, {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F }, is the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2129
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2130
{V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F }, is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas 2131
SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black 2132

after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex 2133
is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2134
of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since 2135
it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2136
black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2137
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2138

a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white 2139

SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one Super- 2140
HyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F }. Thus the non- 2141
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F }, is up. The non-obvious 2142
simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F }, 2143
is a SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V3 , H, V4 , V2 , F }, excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex 2144

in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2145

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy-

perForcing, is up.
S = {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2146

cing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither 2147
empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of 2148
SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is the simple 2149
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHy- 2150
perSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is 2151

the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2152

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2153
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2154
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2155
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only 2156
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2157

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2158

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2159
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2160
of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, has more than one 2161
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple 2162
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the 2163

SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is the 2164
non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the 2165
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2166
is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVer- 2167
tices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2168
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is con- 2169

verted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2170

of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2171
Since it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHy- 2172
perSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 2173
are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applica- 2174
tions of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a 2175

black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2176

SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the 2177
intended SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }. Thus the non- 2178
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2179
is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 2180

perHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is a SuperHyperSet, 2181

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V7 , V8 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, excludes only more than one SuperHyperVer- 2182
tex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2183

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy-

perForcing, is up.
S = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 },
is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2184
cing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither 2185
empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of Su- 2186

perHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, is the simple 2187

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHyper- 2188

Set of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, is 2189
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black 2190
SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that 2191
V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white 2192
SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white Super- 2193

HyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only one SuperHyperVertex 2194

outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2195
cing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2196
is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 2197
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, 2198
{V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, has more than one SuperHyperVertex 2199

outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet 2200
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of 2201
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, is the non-obvious 2202
simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the Super- 2203
HyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, 2204
is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVer- 2205

tices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2206
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is con- 2207
verted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2208
of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2209
Since it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyper- 2210
Set S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are 2211

colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of 2212
“the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black Supe- 2213
rHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyper- 2214
Vertex. There’s only more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended Su- 2215
perHyperSet, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }. Thus the non-obvious 2216
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, 2217

is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Super- 2218

HyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, is a SuperHyperSet, 2219
{V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, excludes only more than one SuperHy- 2220
perVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2221

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy-

perForcing, is up.

S = {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 },

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2222

cing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither 2223
empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of 2224
SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is the simple 2225
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHy- 2226
perSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is 2227

the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2228

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2229

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2230
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2231
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only 2232
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2233
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2234

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2235

in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2236
of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, has more than one 2237
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple 2238
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the 2239
SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is the 2240

non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the 2241

SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2242
is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVer- 2243
tices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2244
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is con- 2245
verted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2246

of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2247

Since it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHy- 2248
perSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 2249
are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applica- 2250
tions of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a 2251
black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2252

SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the 2253
intended SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }. Thus the non- 2254
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2255
is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 2256
perHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is a SuperHyperSet, 2257
{V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, excludes only more than one SuperHyperVer- 2258

tex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2259

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy-

perForcing, is up.

S = {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 },

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2260

cing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither 2261
empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of 2262

SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is the simple 2263
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHy- 2264
perSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is 2265
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2266
black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2267
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2268

rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2269

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only 2270

one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2271
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2272
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2273
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2274
of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, has more than one 2275

SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple 2276
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the 2277
SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is the 2278
non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the 2279
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2280
is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVer- 2281

tices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2282
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is con- 2283
verted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2284
of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2285
Since it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHy- 2286
perSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 2287

are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applica- 2288
tions of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a 2289
black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2290
SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the 2291
intended SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }. Thus the non- 2292
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2293

is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 2294

perHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is a SuperHyperSet, 2295
{V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, excludes only more than one SuperHyperVer- 2296
tex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2297

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy-

perForcing, is up.

S = {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 },

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2298

cing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither 2299
empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of Su- 2300
perHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, is the simple 2301
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHyper- 2302
Set of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, is 2303

the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black 2304

SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that 2305
V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white 2306
SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white Super- 2307
HyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only one SuperHyperVertex 2308
outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2309

cing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2310

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 2311

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, 2312
{V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, has more than one SuperHyperVertex 2313
outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet 2314
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of 2315
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, is the non-obvious 2316

simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the Super- 2317

HyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, 2318
is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVer- 2319
tices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2320
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is con- 2321
verted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2322

of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2323

Since it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyper- 2324
Set S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are 2325
colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of 2326
“the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black Supe- 2327
rHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyper- 2328

Vertex. There’s only more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended Su- 2329
perHyperSet, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }. Thus the non-obvious 2330
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, 2331
is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Super- 2332
HyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, is a SuperHyperSet, 2333
{V1 , V3 , V5 , V7 , V9 , V21 , V12 , V14 , V16 , V18 , V20 , V22 }, excludes only more than one SuperHy- 2334

perVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2335

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 2336

SuperHyperForcing, is up. S = {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2337

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2338

cing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither 2339
empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of 2340
SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is the simple 2341
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHy- 2342
perSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is 2343

the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2344

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2345
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2346
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2347
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only 2348
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2349

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2350

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2351
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2352
of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, has more than one 2353
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple 2354
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the 2355

SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is the 2356

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the 2357

SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2358
is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVer- 2359
tices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2360
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is con- 2361
verted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2362

of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2363

Since it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHy- 2364
perSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 2365
are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applica- 2366
tions of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a 2367
black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2368

SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the 2369
intended SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }. Thus the non- 2370
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, 2371
is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 2372
perHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, is a SuperHyperSet, 2373
{V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V12 , V13 , V14 }, excludes only more than one SuperHyperVer- 2374

tex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2375

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 2376
rHyperForcing, is up. S = {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 } is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 2377

the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by the upcoming state- 2378
ments. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The Super- 2379
HyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }, is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of 2380
the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2381
{V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }, is the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a Supe- 2382
rHyperSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are 2383

colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the 2384
color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex 2385
if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not 2386
only one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2387
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2388
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2389

in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2390
of SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }, has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside 2391
the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2392
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of Supe- 2393
rHyperVertices, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }, is the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2394
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2395

{V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }, is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas Supe- 2396

rHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after 2397
finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is 2398
converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of 2399
a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since 2400
it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2401

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2402

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2403
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2404
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than 2405
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }. Thus the 2406
non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }, is up. The non-obvious 2407
simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }, is 2408

a SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V3 , V5 , V6 }, excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a 2409

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2410

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy-

perForcing, is up.
S = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 },
is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The 2411
details are followed by the upcoming statements. S = {V1 , V2 , V3 } is the neutrosophic 2412
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by 2413

the upcoming statements. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHy- 2414
perEdge. The SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }, 2415
is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2416
The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }, is 2417
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2418
black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2419

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2420
a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only 2421
white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only one Super- 2422
HyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic 2423
SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 2424
perHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex in a connected 2425

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet of SuperHy- 2426
perVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }, has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside 2427
the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2428
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHy- 2429
perVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }, is the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet 2430
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVer- 2431

tices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }, is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices 2432

(whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G)\S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black 2433
after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex 2434
is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2435
of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since 2436
it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2437

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2438

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2439
a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only 2440
white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one 2441
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }. 2442
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }, is 2443

up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, 2444

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

{V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }, is a SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V9 }, excludes 2445

only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 2446
N SHG : (V, E). 2447

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 2448
rHyperForcing, is up. S = {V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 } is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 2449
the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by the upcoming state- 2450
ments. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The Super- 2451

HyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }, is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of 2452

the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2453
{V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }, is the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a Supe- 2454
rHyperSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are 2455
colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the 2456
color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex 2457

if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not 2458

only one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2459
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2460
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2461
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2462
of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }, has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside 2463

the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2464
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of Supe- 2465
rHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }, is the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2466
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2467
{V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }, is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas Supe- 2468
rHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after 2469

finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is 2470

converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of 2471
a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since 2472
it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2473
black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2474
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2475

rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2476

only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than 2477
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }. Thus the 2478
non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }, is up. The non-obvious 2479
simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }, is 2480
a SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V5 , V6 }, excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a 2481

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2482

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 2483
perHyperForcing, is up. S = {V1 } is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 2484
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by the upcoming state- 2485
ments. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The Su- 2486
perHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2487
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, is 2488

the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black 2489

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that 2490
V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white 2491
SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white Super- 2492
HyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only one SuperHyperVertex 2493
outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2494
cing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2495

is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 2496

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, 2497
has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the 2498
non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To 2499
sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, is the non-obvious simple 2500
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the SuperHyperSet 2501

of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices 2502

(whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G)\S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black 2503
after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex 2504
is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2505
of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since 2506
it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2507

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2508

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2509
a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white 2510
SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one SuperHy- 2511
perVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, {V1 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic 2512
SuperHyperForcing, {V1 }, is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neut- 2513

rosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 }, is a SuperHyperSet, {V1 }, excludes only more than 2514
one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2515

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 2516

rHyperForcing, is up. S = {V1 , V3 , V6 } is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 2517

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The details are followed by the upcoming statements. 2518
There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet 2519
of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V6 }, is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 2520
sophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V6 }, is 2521
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black 2522

SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that 2523
V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white 2524
SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white Super- 2525
HyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only one SuperHyperVertex 2526
outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2527
cing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2528

is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic Super- 2529

HyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V6 }, 2530
has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 2531
obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum 2532
them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V6 }, is the non-obvious simple 2533
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since the SuperHyperSet of 2534

the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V6 }, is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVer- 2535

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

tices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned 2536
black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex 2537
is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor 2538
of a black SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since 2539
it’s the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2540
black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2541

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2542
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2543
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than 2544
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V3 , V6 }. Thus the non- 2545
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , V6 }, is up. The non-obvious simple 2546
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , V6 }, is a Super- 2547

HyperSet, {V1 , V3 , V6 }, excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a connected 2548
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2549

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy-

perForcing, is up.

S = {V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The

details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge
nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices,

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },

is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The

SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices,

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },

is the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white)
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet
of SuperHyperVertices,

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },

has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the
non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To
sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices,

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing.

Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices,

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },

is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices

in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many
applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to
a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black
SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since it’s
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black
SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such
that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”:
a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only
white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet,

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 }.

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing,

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },

is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor-

cing,
{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },
is a SuperHyperSet,

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V20 },

excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2550
Graph N SHG : (V, E). 2551

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy- 2552
perForcing, is up. 2553

S = {V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 },

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The 2554

details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge 2555
nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, 2556

is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The 2557

SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2558

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 },

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2559

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2560
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2561
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2562
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only 2563
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2564

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2565

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2566
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2567
of SuperHyperVertices, 2568

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 },

has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the 2569
non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To 2570
sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, 2571

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 },

is the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2572

Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2573

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 },

is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices 2574

in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many 2575
applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to 2576
a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2577
SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since it’s 2578
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black 2579
SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such 2580

that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2581
a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only 2582
white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one 2583
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, 2584

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 }.

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, 2585

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 },

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2586

cing, 2587

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 },

is a SuperHyperSet, 2588

{V2 , V3 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V9 , V10 , V12 , V15 , V14 , V13 , V17 , V16 , V19 , V18 , V21 , V23 , V1 ,
V24 , V29 , V25 , V28 , V26 },

excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2589

Graph N SHG : (V, E). 2590

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy-

perForcing, is up.
S = {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }
is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2591
The details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither empty Su- 2592
perHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of SuperHyper- 2593
Vertices, {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }, is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2594
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2595
{V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }, is the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality 2596
of a SuperHyperSet S of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in 2597
V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applic- 2598
ations of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black 2599
SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyper- 2600
Vertex. In There’s not only one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. 2601
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type- 2602
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only 2603
one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 2604
But the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }, has more 2605
than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2606
simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To sum 2607
them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }, is 2608
the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2609
Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }, 2610
is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices 2611
in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many 2612
applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to 2613
a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2614
SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since it’s 2615
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2616
black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2617
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2618
a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only 2619
white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one 2620

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }. 2621

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }, 2622
is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2623
cing, {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }, is a SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }, 2624
excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2625
Graph N SHG : (V, E). 2626

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy- 2627
perForcing, is up. 2628

S = {S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The 2629

details are followed by the upcoming statements.There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge 2630
nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, 2631

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The 2632

SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2633

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

is the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2634

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2635
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2636
rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2637
only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only 2638
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2639

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2640

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2641
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2642
of SuperHyperVertices, 2643

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the 2644
non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To 2645
sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, 2646

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2647

Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2648

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices 2649

in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many 2650
applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to 2651
a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2652
SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since it’s 2653
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black 2654
SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such 2655

that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2656
a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only 2657
white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one 2658
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, 2659

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M }.

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, 2660

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2661

cing, 2662

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

is a SuperHyperSet, 2663

{S3 , U3 , V4 , V5 , V6 , V7 , V8 , V9 , V10 , R6 , S6 , Z5 , W5 ,
H6 , O6 , E6 , V2 , V3 , R, M6 , L6 , F, P, J, M },

excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2664
Graph N SHG : (V, E). 2665

• On the Figure (??), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy- 2666
perForcing, is up. 2667

S = {V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The 2668

details are followed by the upcoming statements. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge 2669
nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, 2670

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

is the simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. The 2671

SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2672

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

is the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of 2673

black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2674
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2675

rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the 2676

only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. In There’s not only 2677
one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 2678
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the 2679
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a SuperHyperSet excludes only one SuperHyperVertex 2680
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the SuperHyperSet 2681

of SuperHyperVertices, 2682

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

has more than one SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet. Thus the 2683
non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. To 2684
sum them up, the SuperHyperSet of SuperHyperVertices, 2685

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

is the non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2686

Since the SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices, 2687

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

is the SuperHyperSet Ss of black SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices 2688

in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many 2689

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

applications of “the color-change rule”: a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to 2690

a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2691
SuperHyperVertex and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Since it’s 2692
the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of black 2693
SuperHyperVertices (whereas SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such 2694
that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: 2695

a white SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black SuperHyperVertex if it is the only 2696

white SuperHyperNeighbor of a black SuperHyperVertex. There’s only more than one 2697
SuperHyperVertex outside the intended SuperHyperSet, 2698

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 }.

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing, 2699

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

is up. The non-obvious simple type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperFor- 2700

cing, 2701

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

is a SuperHyperSet, 2702

{V1 , V11 , V4 , U6 , H7 , V5 ,
V7 , V8 , V9 , v8 , W8 , U8 , S8 , T8 , C9 ,
K9 , O9 , L9 , O4 , R4 , R4 , S4 },

excludes only more than one SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2703
Graph N SHG : (V, E). 2704

6.3 Results 2705

Proposition 6.3.1. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). 2706
Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior 2707
SuperHyperVertices and the interior SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of 2708
interior SuperHyperVertices from any given SuperHyperEdge with the minimum cardinality. A 2709
SuperHyperForcing has the minimum neutrosophic cardinality on all SuperHyperForcing has the 2710

number of all the SuperHyperVertices minus on the number of exterior SuperHyperParts plus 2711

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

one. Thus, 2712

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-number-of-exterior-SuperHyperParts-plus-one SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices with only
one exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from any given
SuperHyperEdge.|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }
Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 2713
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 2714

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic 2715
SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider some extreme numbers 2716
of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding 2717
two unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 2718
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutro- 2719

sophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored 2720

white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2721
rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHy- 2722
perVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic 2723
SuperHyperVertex but there are two white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors outside implying 2724
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S does the “the 2725

color-change rule”. So it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a 2726

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic 2727
SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2728
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is 2729
converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic Super- 2730
HyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. Consider some extreme numbers 2731

of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, without 2732

any exclusion on some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic 2733
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 2734
S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in 2735
V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications 2736
of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black 2737

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of 2738

a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it implies it doesn’t have the minimum neut- 2739
rosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic 2740
SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2741
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a 2742
white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 2743

if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2744

Vertex. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic 2745
SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple 2746
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic 2747
SuperHyperSet excludes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 2748
SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). Thus all the following neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutro- 2749

sophic SuperHyperVertices are the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 2750

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperForcing. It’s the contradiction to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S is a neutro- 2751

sophic SuperHyperForcing. Thus any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 2752
SuperHyperVertices contains the number of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that 2753
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices less than excluding 2754
one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Thus 2755
if a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then, with 2756

excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the all number of those neutrosophic 2757
SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge belong to any neutrosophic Su- 2758
perHyperForcing. Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E), every 2759
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has only one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside 2760
of neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. In other words, every neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has 2761
only one unique white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. In a connected neutrosophic SuperHy- 2762

perPath N SHP : (V, E), the any neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing only contains all interior 2763
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices where any of 2764
them has one neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor out. Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2765
is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the 2766
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior neut- 2767
rosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the minimum 2768

neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the minimum neutrosophic 2769

cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number of all the neutrosophic 2770
SuperHyperVertices minus on the number of exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperParts plus one. 2771
Thus, 2772

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-number-of-exterior-SuperHyperParts-plus-one SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices with only
one exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from any given
SuperHyperEdge.|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 2773
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively.  2774

94EXM18 Example 6.3.2. In the Figure (6.1), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath N SHP : 2775

(V, E), is highlighted and featured. By using the Figure (6.1) and the Table (6.1), the 2776
neutrosophic SuperHyperPath is obtained. 2777
The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, S = V \ {V27 , V3 , V7 , V13 , V22 } of the neutrosophic 2778
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E), in the 2779
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (6.1), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2780

Proposition 6.3.3. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E). 2781
Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior 2782
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one 2783
exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic 2784
SuperHyperEdge with the minimum neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2785
has the minimum neutrosophic cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the 2786

number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus on the number of exterior neutrosophic 2787

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 6.1: A Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperForcing

in the Example (6.3.2) 94NHG18

Table 6.1: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Mentioned in the Example (6.3.2)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
94TBL18
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Endpoints

SuperHyperParts plus one. Thus, 2788

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-number-of-exterior-SuperHyperParts SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices with only
one exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from any given
SuperHyperEdge.|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }
Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 2789
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 2790

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic 2791

SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider some extreme numbers 2792

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding 2793

two unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 2794
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutro- 2795
sophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored 2796
white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2797
rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHy- 2798

perVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic 2799

SuperHyperVertex but there are two white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors outside implying 2800
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S does the “the 2801
color-change rule”. So it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a 2802
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic 2803
SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2804

many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is 2805

converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic Super- 2806
HyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. Consider some extreme numbers 2807
of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, without 2808
any exclusion on some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic 2809
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 2810

S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in 2811

V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications 2812
of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black 2813
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of 2814
a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it implies it doesn’t have the minimum neut- 2815
rosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic 2816

SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2817

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a 2818
white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 2819
if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2820
Vertex. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic 2821
SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple 2822

type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic 2823

SuperHyperSet excludes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 2824
SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E). Thus all the following neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of 2825
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neut- 2826
rosophic SuperHyperForcing. It’s the contradiction to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S is 2827

a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Thus any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 2828
rosophic SuperHyperVertices contains the number of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2829
from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices less than 2830
excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2831
Thus if a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then, with 2832
excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the all number of those neutrosophic 2833

SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge belong to any neutrosophic Su- 2834
perHyperForcing. Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E), every 2835
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has only one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside 2836
of neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. In other words, every neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has 2837
only one unique white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. In a connected neutrosophic SuperHy- 2838

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 6.2: A Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperForcing

in the Example (6.3.4) 94NHG19

perCycle N SHC : (V, E), the any neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing only contains all interior 2839
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices where any of 2840
them has one neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor out. Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2841
is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the 2842
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior neut- 2843

rosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the minimum 2844
neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the minimum neutrosophic 2845
cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number of all the neutrosophic 2846
SuperHyperVertices minus on the number of exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperParts plus one. 2847
Thus, 2848

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-number-of-exterior-SuperHyperParts SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices with only
one exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from any given
SuperHyperEdge.|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 2849
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively.  2850

94EXM19 Example 6.3.4. In the Figure (6.2), the SuperHyperCycle is highlighted and featured. By using 2851

the Figure (6.2) and the Table (6.2), the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle is obtained. 2852

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Table 6.2: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Mentioned in the Example (6.3.4)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
94TBL19
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Endpoints

The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 2853
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 2854

(V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (??), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2855

Proposition 6.3.5. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E). 2856
Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior 2857
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one 2858
exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic 2859

SuperHyperEdge with the minimum neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2860

has the minimum neutrosophic cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number 2861
of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus on the neutrosophic cardinality of the second 2862
neutrosophic SuperHyperPart plus one. Thus, 2863

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-cardinality-of-second-SuperHyperPart-plus-one SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices with only
one exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from any given
SuperHyperEdge.|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 2864

the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 2865

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic 2866

SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider some extreme numbers 2867
of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding 2868
two unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 2869
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutro- 2870
sophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored 2871
white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 2872

rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHy- 2873

perVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic 2874
SuperHyperVertex but there are two white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors outside implying 2875
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S does the “the 2876
color-change rule”. So it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a 2877
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic 2878

SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 2879

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is 2880

converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic Super- 2881
HyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. Consider some extreme numbers 2882
of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, without 2883
any exclusion on some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic 2884
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 2885

S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in 2886

V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications 2887
of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black 2888
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of 2889
a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it implies it doesn’t have the minimum neut- 2890
rosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic 2891

SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2892

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a 2893
white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 2894
if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2895
Vertex. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic 2896
SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple 2897

type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic 2898

SuperHyperSet excludes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 2899
SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E). Thus all the following neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutro- 2900
sophic SuperHyperVertices are the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 2901
SuperHyperForcing. It’s the contradiction to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S is a neutro- 2902
sophic SuperHyperForcing. Thus any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 2903

SuperHyperVertices contains the number of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that 2904
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices less than excluding 2905
one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Thus 2906
if a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then, with 2907
excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the all number of those neutrosophic 2908
SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge belong to any neutrosophic Su- 2909

perHyperForcing. Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E), every 2910
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has only one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside of 2911
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. In other words, every neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has only 2912
one unique white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar 2913
N SHS : (V, E), the any neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing only contains all interior neutrosophic 2914

SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices where any of them has 2915
one neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor out. Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a 2916
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the interior 2917
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior neutrosophic Su- 2918
perHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the minimum neutrosophic 2919
cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the minimum neutrosophic cardinality on 2920

all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2921
minus on the neutrosophic cardinality of the second neutrosophic SuperHyperPart plus one. 2922
Thus, 2923

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 6.3: A Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperForcing

in the Example (6.3.6) 94NHG20

-minus-on-the-cardinality-of-second-SuperHyperPart-plus-one SuperHyperSets of the

SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices with only
one exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from any given
SuperHyperEdge.|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 2924
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively.  2925

94EXM20 Example 6.3.6. In the Figure (6.3), the SuperHyperStar is highlighted and featured. By using 2926
the Figure (6.3) and the Table (6.3), the neutrosophic SuperHyperStar is obtained. 2927
The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 2928
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar N SHS : 2929
(V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (6.3), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2930

Proposition 6.3.7. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E). 2931
Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior 2932
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one 2933
exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic 2934
SuperHyperEdge with the minimum neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 2935
has the minimum neutrosophic cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number 2936

of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus on the neutrosophic cardinality of the first 2937

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Table 6.3: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Mentioned in the Example (6.3.6)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
94TBL20
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Endpoints

neutrosophic SuperHyperPart plus the second neutrosophic SuperHyperPart. Thus, 2938

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-cardinality-of-first-SuperHyperPart-plus-second-SuperHyperPart
SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior
SuperHyperVertices from any given SuperHyperEdge.
|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 2939
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 2940

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E). Let a neutro- 2941
sophic SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider some extreme 2942
numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 2943
excluding two unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic 2944

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 2945

black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 2946
are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the 2947
color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutro- 2948
sophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 2949
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but there are two white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors 2950

outside implying there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 2951

S does the “the color-change rule”. So it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHy- 2952
perCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2953
(whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is 2954
turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white neutro- 2955
sophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only 2956

white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. Consider 2957

some extreme numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic Supe- 2958
rHyperEdge, without any exclusion on some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any 2959
given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic 2960
SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHy- 2961
perVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many 2962

applications of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to 2963

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeigh- 2964

bor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it implies it doesn’t have the minimum 2965
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic 2966
SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 2967
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a 2968
white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 2969

if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyper- 2970

Vertex. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic 2971
SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple 2972
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic 2973
SuperHyperSet excludes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 2974
SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E). Thus all the following neutrosophic SuperHyperSets 2975

of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 2976

neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. It’s the contradiction to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 2977
S is a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Thus any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 2978
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices contains the number of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2979
from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices less than 2980
excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 2981

Thus if a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then, with 2982
excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the all number of those neutrosophic 2983
SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge belong to any neutrosophic Supe- 2984
rHyperForcing. Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E), every 2985
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has only one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside 2986
of neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. In other words, every neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has 2987

only one unique white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. In a connected neutrosophic Super- 2988
HyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E), the any neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing only contains all 2989
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2990
where any of them has one neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor out. Then a neutrosophic Super- 2991
HyperForcing is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 2992
and the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of 2993

interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 2994
the minimum neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the minimum 2995
neutrosophic cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number of all the 2996
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus on the neutrosophic cardinality of the first neutrosophic 2997
SuperHyperPart plus the second neutrosophic SuperHyperPart. Thus, 2998

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-cardinality-of-first-SuperHyperPart-plus-second-SuperHyperPart
SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior
SuperHyperVertices from any given SuperHyperEdge.
|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 2999
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively.  3000

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 6.4: A Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E), Associated to the Notions of
SuperHyperForcing in the Example (6.3.8) 94NHG21

Table 6.4: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Mentioned in the Example (6.3.8)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
94TBL21
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Endpoints

94EXM21 Example 6.3.8. In Figure (6.4), the SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E), is highlighted and 3001
featured. By using the Figure (6.4) and the Table (6.4), the neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 3002
N SHB : (V, E), is obtained. 3003
The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 3004
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : 3005

(V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (6.4), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 3006

Proposition 6.3.9. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E). 3007
Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior 3008
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one 3009
exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic 3010
SuperHyperEdge with the minimum neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 3011
has the minimum neutrosophic cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number 3012

of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus on the neutrosophic number of the summation 3013

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

on the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperParts. Thus, 3014

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-summation-on-cardinalities-of-all-SuperHyperParts
SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior
SuperHyperVertices from any given SuperHyperEdge.
|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 3015
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 3016

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E). Let a neut- 3017
rosophic SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider some extreme 3018
numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 3019

excluding two unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic 3020
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 3021
black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S 3022
are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the 3023
color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutro- 3024
sophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black 3025

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but there are two white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors 3026
outside implying there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3027
S does the “the color-change rule”. So it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHy- 3028
perCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3029
(whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is 3030
turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white neutro- 3031

sophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only 3032

white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. Consider 3033
some extreme numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic Supe- 3034
rHyperEdge, without any exclusion on some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any 3035
given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic 3036
SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHy- 3037

perVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many 3038
applications of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to 3039
a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeigh- 3040
bor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it implies it doesn’t have the minimum 3041
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic 3042
SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 3043

such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a 3044
white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3045
if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3046
Vertex. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic 3047
SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple 3048
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic 3049

SuperHyperSet excludes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 3050

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E). Thus all the following neutrosophic SuperHyperSets 3051
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 3052
neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. It’s the contradiction to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3053
S is a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Thus any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3054
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices contains the number of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3055
from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices less than 3056

excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 3057

Thus if a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then, with 3058
excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the all number of those neutrosophic 3059
SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge belong to any neutrosophic Supe- 3060
rHyperForcing. Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), 3061
every neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has only one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex out- 3062

side of neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. In other words, every neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 3063

has only one unique white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. In a connected neutrosophic Supe- 3064
rHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), the any neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing only contains 3065
all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3066
where any of them has one neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor out. Then a neutrosophic Super- 3067
HyperForcing is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3068

and the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of 3069
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 3070
the minimum neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the minimum 3071
neutrosophic cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number of all the 3072
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus on the neutrosophic number of the summation on the 3073
neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperParts. Thus, 3074

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-on-the-summation-on-cardinalities-of-all-SuperHyperParts
SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior
SuperHyperVertices from any given SuperHyperEdge.
|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 3075
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively.  3076

94EXM22 Example 6.3.10. In Figure (6.5), the SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), is highlighted 3077
and featured. By using the Figure (6.5) and the Table (6.5), the neutrosophic SuperHyperMul- 3078

tipartite N SHM : (V, E), is obtained. 3079

The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 3080
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 3081
N SHM : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (6.5), is the neutrosophic Super- 3082
HyperForcing. 3083

Proposition 6.3.11. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E). 3084
Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior 3085

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one 3086

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 6.5: A Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), Associated to the Notions
of SuperHyperForcing in the Example (6.3.10) 94NHG22

Table 6.5: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), Mentioned in the
Example (6.3.10)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
94TBL22
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Endpoints

exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic 3087
SuperHyperEdge with the minimum neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 3088
has the minimum neutrosophic cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the 3089
number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus the number of all the neutrosophic 3090
SuperHyperEdges. Thus, 3091

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-the-number-of-all-the-SuperHyperEdges SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices with only
one exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from any given
SuperHyperEdge.|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 3092

the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively. 3093

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic 3094
SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider some extreme numbers 3095
of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding 3096
two unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3097
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutro- 3098
sophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored 3099

white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change 3100
rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHy- 3101
perVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic 3102
SuperHyperVertex but there are two white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors outside implying 3103
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S does the “the 3104
color-change rule”. So it doesn’t have the minimum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a 3105

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic 3106

SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely 3107
many applications of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is 3108
converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic Super- 3109
HyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. Consider some extreme numbers 3110
of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, without 3111

any exclusion on some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, belong to any given neutrosophic 3112
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3113
S of black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in 3114
V (G) \ S are colored white) such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications 3115
of “the color-change rule”: a white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black 3116
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of 3117

a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it implies it doesn’t have the minimum neut- 3118
rosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of black neutrosophic 3119
SuperHyperVertices (whereas neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in V (G) \ S are colored white) 3120
such that V (G) is turned black after finitely many applications of “the color-change rule”: a 3121
white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex is converted to a black neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3122
if it is the only white neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor of a black neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3123

Vertex. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic 3124
SuperHyperSet. Thus the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is up. The obvious simple 3125
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing is a neutrosophic 3126
SuperHyperSet excludes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 3127
SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E). Thus all the following neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of 3128

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neut- 3129
rosophic SuperHyperForcing. It’s the contradiction to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S is 3130
a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. Thus any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 3131
rosophic SuperHyperVertices contains the number of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3132
from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices less than 3133
excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 3134

Thus if a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then, with 3135
excluding one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the all number of those neutrosophic 3136
SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge belong to any neutrosophic Supe- 3137
rHyperForcing. Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), every 3138
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has only one unique neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside 3139

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 6.6: A Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), Associated to the Notions of
SuperHyperForcing in the Example (6.3.12) 94NHG23

of neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. In other words, every neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has 3140

only one unique white neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. In a connected neutrosophic SuperHy- 3141
perWheel N SHW : (V, E), the any neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing only contains all interior 3142
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices where any of 3143
them has one neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor out. Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing 3144

is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the 3145

interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior neut- 3146
rosophic SuperHyperVertices from any given neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the minimum 3147
neutrosophic cardinality. A neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the minimum neutrosophic 3148
cardinality on all neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing has the number of all the neutrosophic 3149

SuperHyperVertices minus the number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. Thus, 3150

N eutrosophic SuperHyperF orcing = {The number-of-all-the-SuperHyperVertices

-minus-the-number-of-all-the-SuperHyperEdges SuperHyperSets of the
SuperHyperVertices | min |the SuperHyperSets of the SuperHyperVertices with only
one exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from any given
SuperHyperEdge.|neutrosophic cardinality amid those SuperHyperSets. }

Where σi is the unary operation on the SuperHyperVertices of the SuperHyperGraph to assign 3151
the determinacy, the indeterminacy and the neutrality, for i = 1, 2, 3, respectively.  3152

94EXM23 Example 6.3.12. In the Figure (6.6), the SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is highlighted 3153
and featured. By using the Figure (6.6) and the Table (6.6), the neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 3154
N SHW : (V, E), is obtained. 3155

The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the 3156
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : 3157
(V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (6.6), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing. 3158

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Table 6.6: The Values of Vertices, SuperVertices, Edges, HyperEdges, and SuperHyperEdges
Belong to The Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), Mentioned in the Example
(6.3.12)

The Values of The Vertices The Number of Position in Alphabet

The Values of The SuperVertices The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The Edges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
The Values of The HyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Vertices
94TBL23
The Values of The SuperHyperEdges The Minimum Values of Its Endpoints

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 7 3159

SuperHyperStable 3160

7.1 Definitions 3161

Definition 7.1.1. ((neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable). 3162

Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 3163

(i) an SuperHyperStable I(N SHG) for a SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the 3164
maximum cardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 3165

no SuperHyperVertex to have a SuperHyperEdge in common; 3166

(ii) a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable In (N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 3167

N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3168
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3169
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3170

7.2 Examples 3171

103EXM1b Example 7.2.1. Assume the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (7.1), (7.2), (7.3), 3172
(7.4), (7.5), (7.6), (7.7), (7.8), (7.9), (7.10), (7.11), (7.12), (7.13), (7.14), (7.15), (7.16), (7.17), 3173
(7.18), (7.19), and (7.20). 3174

• On the Figure (7.1), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 3175

SuperHyperStable, is up. E1 and E3 neutrosophic SuperHyperStable are some empty 3176
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 3177

is an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s 3178

only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 3179
V3 is isolated means that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as an endpoint. 3180
Thus neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is contained in every given neutrosophic 3181
SuperHyperStable. All the following neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic 3182
SuperHyperVertices are the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3183

SuperHyperStable. 3184

{V3 , V1 }
{V3 , V2 }
{V3 , V4 }

141
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

The neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V31853 , V4 },

are the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3186
perStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3187
Vertices, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are corresponded to a neutrosophic SuperHy- 3188
perStable I(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 3189
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 3190
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have 3191
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re only two neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3192
Vertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutro- 3193
sophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3194
the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one 3195
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic 3196
SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, don’t have less than two neutrosophic Su- 3197
perHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3198
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable are up. 3199
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3200
{V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3201
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neut- 3202
rosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are corresponded to a neutro- 3203
sophic SuperHyperStable I(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 3204
is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 3205
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in 3206
common and they are corresponded to a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since 3207
They’ve the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3208
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3209
Vertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than 3210
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3211
Sets, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, 3212
{V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3213
Sets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are neutrosophic 3214
SuperHyperSets, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, don’t include only less than two neutrosophic 3215
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3216
It’s interesting to mention that the only obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHy- 3217
perSets of the neutrosophic neutrosophic SuperHyperStable amid those obvious simple 3218
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, is only {V3 , V4 }. 3219

• On the Figure (7.2), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 3220

SuperHyperStable, is up. E1 and E3 neutrosophic SuperHyperStable are some empty 3221

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 3222

is an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s 3223
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 3224
V3 is isolated means that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as an endpoint. 3225
Thus neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is contained in every given neutrosophic 3226
SuperHyperStable. All the following neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic 3227

SuperHyperVertices are the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3228

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperStable. 3229

{V3 , V1 }
{V3 , V2 }
{V3 , V4 }

The neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V32303 , V4 },

are the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3231
perStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3232
Vertices, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are corresponded to a neutrosophic SuperHy- 3233
perStable I(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 3234
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 3235
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have 3236
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re only two neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3237
Vertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutro- 3238
sophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3239
the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one 3240
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic 3241
SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, don’t have less than two neutrosophic Su- 3242
perHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3243
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable are up. 3244
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3245
{V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3246
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neut- 3247
rosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are corresponded to a neutro- 3248
sophic SuperHyperStable I(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 3249
is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 3250
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in 3251
common and they are corresponded to a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since 3252
They’ve the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3253
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3254
Vertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than 3255
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3256
Sets, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, 3257
{V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3258
Sets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, are neutrosophic 3259
SuperHyperSets, {V3 , V1 }, {V3 , V2 }, {V3 , V4 }, don’t include only less than two neutrosophic 3260
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3261
It’s interesting to mention that the only obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHy- 3262
perSets of the neutrosophic neutrosophic SuperHyperStable amid those obvious simple 3263
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, is only {V3 , V4 }. 3264
• On the Figure (7.3), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 3265
rHyperStable, is up. E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 3266
but E4 is an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeigh- 3267
bor, there’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The neutrosophic 3268

SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }, are the simple 3269

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutro- 3270

sophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }, are 3271
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 3272
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to 3273
have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re only one neutrosophic 3274
SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 3275

obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable aren’t up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3276
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3277
Set includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic 3278
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutro- 3279
sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }, don’t have more than one neutrosophic 3280
SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 3281

obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 3282

aren’t up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of neutrosophic Su- 3283
perHyperVertices, {V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }, aren’t the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3284
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic Super- 3285
HyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }, are corresponded 3286
to a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable I(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 3287

N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3288

such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHy- 3289
perEdge in common and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since they’ve 3290
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 3291
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have 3292
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There are only less than two neutrosophic 3293

SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSets, {V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }. 3294
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }, aren’t up. The 3295
obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, 3296
{V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }, are the neutrosophic SuperHyperSets, {V1 }, {V2 }, {V3 }, don’t include 3297
only more than one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic Supe- 3298
rHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only obvious simple 3299

type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 3300

amid those obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic Super- 3301
HyperStable, is only {V3 }. 3302

• On the Figure (7.4), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, an neutrosophic Su- 3303
perHyperStable, is up. There’s no empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a 3304
loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge on {F }, and there are some neutrosophic Super- 3305
HyperEdges, namely, E1 on {H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } and E4 , E5 on 3306
{N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3307
{V2 , V4 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3308

perStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3309

{V2 , V4 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3310
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3311
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re only two neutrosophic 3312
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 3313
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable isn’t up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3314

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3315

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Set includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex since it doesn’t form any kind 3316
of pairs titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 3317
N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3318
tices, {V2 , V4 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 3319
intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3320
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable isn’t up. To sum them up, the 3321

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V4 }, is the non- 3322

obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3323
Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V4 }, 3324
is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 3325
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutro- 3326
sophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since 3327

it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 3328

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to 3329
have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than two neutro- 3330
sophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V4 }. 3331
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V4 }, is up. The obvious simple 3332
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V4 }, is a 3333

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V4 }, doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic 3334
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3335

• On the Figure (7.5), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 3336

rHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3337
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Supe- 3338
rHyperVertices, {V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3339
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3340
SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 3341
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 3342

no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3343

There’re only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic 3344
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious 3345
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutro- 3346
sophic SuperHyperSet includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex thus it doesn’t 3347
form any kind of pairs titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHy- 3348

perGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHy- 3349
perVertices, {V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3350
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type- 3351
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. To sum them 3352
up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }, 3353
is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3354

perStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3355

{V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3356
Vertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic 3357
SuperHyperEdge in common. and it’s neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it’s 3358
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3359
that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 3360

in common. There aren’t only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside 3361

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }. Thus the non-obvious neutro- 3362
sophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }, is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3363
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }, is a neutrosophic 3364
SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V6 , V9 , V15 }, doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic SuperHy- 3365
perVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is mentioned 3366
as the SuperHyperModel N SHG : (V, E) in the Figure (7.5). 3367

• On the Figure (7.6), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 3368

SuperHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor 3369
loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 3370
SuperHyperVertices, 3371

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3372

The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3373

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3374

that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 3375
in common. There’re only only neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended 3376
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 3377
is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3378
SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one neutrosophic 3379

SuperHyperVertex doesn’t form any kind of pairs titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in 3380

a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic 3381
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3382

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutro- 3383
sophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3384
the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3385

perSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3386

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3387

perStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3388

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3389

that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHy- 3390
perEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it’s 3391
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3392
that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 3393
in common. There aren’t only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 3394

intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3395

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, 3396

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3397

SuperHyperStable, 3398

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3399

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected 3400
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling 3401
of the Figure (7.6). 3402

• On the Figure (7.7), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 3403
rHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3404
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Su- 3405
perHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V9 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3406

neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 3407

perHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V9 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neut- 3408
rosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no 3409
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3410
There’re only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic 3411
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The ob- 3412

vious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 3413

is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3414
doesn’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neut- 3415
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3416
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V9 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic 3417
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 3418

obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is 3419

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3420
{V2 , V5 , V9 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 3421
sophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3422
SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V9 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic 3423
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3424
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3425

Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3426

S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3427
tex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than 3428
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3429
{V2 , V5 , V9 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V5 , V9 }, is up. 3430
The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3431

Stable, {V2 , V5 , V9 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V5 , V9 }, doesn’t include only 3432

less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3433
Graph N SHG : (V, E) of depicted SuperHyperModel as the Figure (7.7). 3434

• On the Figure (7.8), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Supe- 3435
rHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3436
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Su- 3437
perHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3438
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 3439
perHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neut- 3440

rosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no 3441

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3442
There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 3443
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The ob- 3444
vious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 3445
is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3446

doesn’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neut- 3447
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3448
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic 3449
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 3450
obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is 3451
up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3452

{V2 , V5 , V8 },is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 3453
sophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3454
SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic 3455
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3456
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3457
Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3458

S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3459

tex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than 3460
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3461
{V2 , V5 , V8 }, Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is up. 3462
The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3463
Stable, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, doesn’t exclude only 3464

more than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHy- 3465

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

perGraph N SHG : (V, E) of dense SuperHyperModel as the Figure (7.8). 3466

• On the Figure (7.9), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 3467

SuperHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor 3468

loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 3469
SuperHyperVertices, 3470

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3471

The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3472

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3473

that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 3474
in common. There’re only only neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended 3475
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 3476
is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3477
SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one neutrosophic 3478

SuperHyperVertex doesn’t form any kind of pairs titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in 3479

a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic 3480
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3481

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutro- 3482
sophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3483
the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3484
perSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3485

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3486

perStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3487

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3488

that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHy- 3489
perEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it’s 3490
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3491

that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 3492

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

in common. There aren’t only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 3493
intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3494

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, 3495

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3496

SuperHyperStable, 3497

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3498

{V2 , V4 , V6 , V8 , V10 ,
V22 , V19 , V17 , V15 , V13 , },

doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutro- 3499
sophic neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) with a messy SuperHyperModeling 3500
of the Figure (7.9). 3501

• On the Figure (7.10), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3502
perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3503

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Su- 3504

perHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3505
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 3506
perHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neut- 3507
rosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no 3508
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3509

There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 3510
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The ob- 3511
vious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable 3512
is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3513
doesn’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neut- 3514
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3515

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic 3516
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 3517
obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is 3518
up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3519
{V2 , V5 , V8 },is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 3520
sophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3521

SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic 3522

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3523

rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3524
Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3525
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3526
tex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than 3527
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3528

{V2 , V5 , V8 }, Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is up. 3529

The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3530
Stable, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V5 , V8 }, doesn’t exclude only 3531
more than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3532
Graph N SHG : (V, E) of highly-embedding-connected SuperHyperModel as the Figure 3533
(7.10). 3534

• On the Figure (7.11), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3535

perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3536
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHy- 3537
perVertices, {V2 , V5 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3538
SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3539
Vertices, {V2 , V5 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic Su- 3540
perHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic 3541

SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re only 3542

two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3543
Set. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious simple 3544
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutro- 3545
sophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3546
don’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neut- 3547

rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3548
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic Supe- 3549
rHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3550
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. 3551
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3552
{V2 , V5 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3553

SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3554

perVertices, {V2 , V5 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic SuperHy- 3555
perVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic 3556
SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it’s 3557
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 3558
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have 3559

a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than two neutrosophic 3560
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V5 }. Thus 3561
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V5 }, is up. The obvious simple 3562
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V5 }, is a 3563
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V5 }, doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic 3564
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3565

• On the Figure (7.12), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3566

perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3567

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Super- 3568

HyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3569
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3570
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality 3571
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3572
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re not only two neutrosophic 3573

SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 3574
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3575
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3576
Set includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices doesn’t form any kind of 3577
pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 3578
N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3579

{V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside 3580
the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3581
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. To sum them up, the neut- 3582
rosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 },is the 3583
non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3584
Stable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3585

{V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3586

Vertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic Su- 3587
perHyperEdge in common and they are neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it’s 3588
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3589
that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 3590
in common. There aren’t only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 3591

intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }. Thus the non-obvious neutro- 3592

sophic SuperHyperStable, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3593
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is a neutro- 3594
sophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, doesn’t include only more than one neutro- 3595
sophic SuperHyperVertex in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 3596
in highly-multiple-connected-style SuperHyperModel On the Figure (7.12). 3597

• On the Figure (7.13), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3598
perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3599
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHy- 3600

perVertices, {V2 , V5 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3601

SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3602
Vertices, {V2 , V5 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic Su- 3603
perHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic 3604
SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re only 3605
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3606

Set. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious simple 3607
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutro- 3608
sophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3609
don’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neut- 3610
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3611
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 , V5 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic Supe- 3612

rHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3613

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. 3614

To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3615
{V2 , V5 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3616
SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3617
perVertices, {V2 , V5 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic SuperHy- 3618
perVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic 3619

SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it’s 3620

the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 3621
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have 3622
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than two neutrosophic 3623
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V5 }. Thus 3624
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V5 }, is up. The obvious simple 3625

type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 , V5 }, is a 3626

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 , V5 }, doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic 3627
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3628

• On the Figure (7.14), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3629
perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3630
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHy- 3631
perVertices, {V3 , V2 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3632
SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3633
Vertices, {V3 , V2 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic Su- 3634

perHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic 3635

SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re only 3636
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3637
Set. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious simple 3638
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutro- 3639
sophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3640

don’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neut- 3641
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3642
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V3 , V2 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic Supe- 3643
rHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3644
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. 3645
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3646

{V3 , V2 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3647

SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3648
perVertices, {V3 , V2 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic SuperHy- 3649
perVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic 3650
SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it’s 3651
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 3652

rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have 3653

a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than two neutrosophic 3654
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V3 , V2 }. Thus 3655
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V3 , V2 }, is up. The obvious simple 3656
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V3 , V2 }, is a 3657
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V3 , V2 }, doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic 3658

SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3659

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (7.15), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3660
perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3661
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Su- 3662
perHyperVertices, {V5 , V2 , V6 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3663
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 3664
perHyperVertices, {V5 , V2 , V6 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neut- 3665

rosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no 3666

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3667
There’re only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 3668
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvi- 3669
ous simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is 3670
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3671

Vertices don’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected 3672
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3673
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V2 , V6 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic Su- 3674
perHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3675
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. 3676
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3677

{V5 , V2 , V6 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 3678

sophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3679
SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V2 , V6 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic 3680
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3681
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3682
Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3683

S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3684

tex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than 3685
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3686
Set, {V5 , V2 , V6 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V5 , V2 , V6 }, is 3687
up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Super- 3688
HyperStable, {V5 , V2 , V6 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V5 , V2 , V6 }, doesn’t include 3689

only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic Supe- 3690
rHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) as Linearly-Connected SuperHyperModel On the Figure 3691
(7.15). 3692

• On the Figure (7.16), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3693
perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3694
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Supe- 3695
rHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3696
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3697
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 3698

a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 3699

no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3700
There’re only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 3701
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious 3702
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neut- 3703
rosophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3704

don’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic 3705

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 3706
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic Super- 3707
HyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3708
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. 3709
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3710
{V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 3711

rosophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 3712
perHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic 3713
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3714
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3715
Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3716
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3717

tex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than 3718
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3719
{V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, 3720
is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Super- 3721
HyperStable, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, doesn’t 3722
include only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic 3723

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3724

• On the Figure (7.17), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3725
perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3726

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Supe- 3727

rHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3728
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3729
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 3730
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 3731
no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3732

There’re only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 3733
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious 3734
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neut- 3735
rosophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3736
don’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic 3737
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 3738

SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic Super- 3739
HyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3740
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. 3741
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3742
{V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 3743
rosophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 3744

perHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic 3745

SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3746
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3747
Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3748
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3749
tex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t only less than 3750

two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3751

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

{V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, 3752
is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Super- 3753
HyperStable, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V8 , V22 }, doesn’t 3754
include only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic 3755
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) as Lnearly-over-packed SuperHyperModel is featured 3756
On the Figure (7.17). 3757

• On the Figure (7.18), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3758

perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3759
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Su- 3760
perHyperVertices, {V2 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 3761
sophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Supe- 3762
rHyperVertices, {V2 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 3763
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic 3764

SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’s only 3765

one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. 3766
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable isn’t up. The obvious simple 3767
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutro- 3768
sophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3769
don’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neut- 3770

rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3771
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 }, does has less than two neutrosophic SuperHy- 3772
perVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3773
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable isn’t 3774
up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3775
Vertices, {V2 }, isn’t the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3776

neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 3777

sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V2 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic 3778
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3779
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3780
Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3781
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3782

Vertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’s only less than 3783
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3784
{V2 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 }, isn’t up. The obvious 3785
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V2 }, 3786
is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V2 }, does includes only less than two neutrosophic 3787
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 3788

• On the Figure (7.19), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3789

perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3790
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Supe- 3791
rHyperVertices, {V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3792
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3793
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 3794
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 3795

no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 3796

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

There’re only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 3797
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious 3798
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neut- 3799
rosophic SuperHyperSet includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3800
don’t form any kind of pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic 3801
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 3802

SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic SuperHy- 3803
perVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3804
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. 3805
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3806
{V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 3807
rosophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3808

SuperHyperVertices,{V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic 3809

SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3810
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3811
Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3812
Set S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic Supe- 3813
rHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t 3814

only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutro- 3815
sophic SuperHyperSet,{V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3816
Stable, {V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }, is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3817
the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable,{V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3818
{V1 , O6 , V9 , V5 }, doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a 3819
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3820

• On the Figure (7.20), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic Su- 3821
perHyperStable, is up. There’s neither empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge nor loop 3822
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Su- 3823

perHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }, is the simple type-neutrosophic 3824

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. The neutrosophic SuperHy- 3825
perSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }, 3826
is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 3827
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3828
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There’re only two neutrosophic 3829

SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 3830
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3831
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3832
includes only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t form any kind of 3833
pairs are titled to SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 3834
N SHG : (V, E). But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 3835

{V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }, doesn’t have less than two neutrosophic SuperHy- 3836
perVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious 3837
simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is up. 3838
To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3839
tices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }, is the non-obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3840
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since the neutrosophic Super- 3841

HyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }, 3842

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.1: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb1

is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet Ss of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 3843

that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic Super- 3844
HyperEdge in common and it’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since 3845
it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3846
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic Super- 3847

HyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. There aren’t 3848

only less than two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutro- 3849
sophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }. Thus the non-obvious 3850
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, {V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }, is up. The 3851
obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 3852
perStable, {V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 3853

{V1 , V3 , V5 , R9 , V6 , V9 , S9 , V10 , P4 , T4 }, doesn’t include only less than two neutrosophic 3854
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 3855

7.3 Results 3856

Proposition 7.3.1. Assume a connected SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). Then a neutrosophic 3857
SuperHyperStable-style with the maximum SuperHyperneutrosophic cardinality is a neutrosophic 3858
SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 3859

Proposition 7.3.2. Assume a connected SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). Then a neutrosophic 3860
SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3861
tices with only all exceptions in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the 3862
common neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. An neutrosophic SuperHyperStable has the number of 3863

all the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus their SuperHyperNeighborhoods. 3864

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.2: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb2

Figure 7.3: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.4: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb4

Figure 7.5: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb5

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.6: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb6

Figure 7.7: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb7

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.8: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb8

Figure 7.9: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb9

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.10: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb10

Figure 7.11: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb11

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.12: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb12

Figure 7.13: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb13

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.14: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb14

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic SuperHy- 3865
perEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider all numbers of those neutrosophic 3866

SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding one distinct neutro- 3867
sophic SuperHyperVertex, exclude to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3868
SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable with the least neutro- 3869
sophic cardinality, the lower sharp bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected 3870
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 3871
rosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 3872

SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutro- 3873

sophic SuperHyperEdge in common but it isn’t an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it 3874
doesn’t have the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 3875
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to 3876
have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3877
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {x, z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 3878

a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutro- 3879

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.15: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb15

Figure 7.16: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb16

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.17: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb17

Figure 7.18: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb18

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.19: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb19

sophic SuperHyperStable. Since it doesn’t do the procedure such that such that there’s no 3880
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. [there’s 3881
at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside implying there’s, sometimes in the con- 3882
nected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 3883
titled its SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the neutrosophic 3884

SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the procedure”.]. There’s only one neutrosophic Super- 3885
HyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}. Thus the obvious 3886
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic 3887
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is a neutrosophic Super- 3888
HyperSet, V \ V \ {z}, includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex doesn’t form any 3889
kind of pairs are titled SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 3890

N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 3891
V \ V \ {z}, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 3892
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that V (G) there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3893
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. Thus, in a connected SuperHyperPath 3894
N SHP : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3895
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only all exceptions in the form of interior neutro- 3896

sophic SuperHyperVertices from the common neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. An neutrosophic 3897

SuperHyperStable has the number of all the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices minus 3898
their SuperHyperNeighborhoods.  3899

103EXMb18a Example 7.3.3. In the Figure (7.21), the connected SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E), is 3900

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.20: The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperStable in the Examples (??) and (7.2.1) 103FGRb20

highlighted and featured. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V27 , V2 , V7 , V12 , V22 }, of the 3901
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E), in the 3902
SuperHyperModel (7.21), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3903

Proposition 7.3.4. Assume a connected SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E). Then a neutrosophic 3904
SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 3905
tices with only all exceptions in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the 3906
same SuperHyperNeighborhoods. A neutrosophic SuperHyperStable has the number of all the 3907
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and the lower bound is the half number of all the neutrosophic 3908
SuperHyperEdges. 3909

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic SuperHy- 3910
perEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider all numbers of those neutrosophic 3911
SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding one distinct neutro- 3912
sophic SuperHyperVertex, exclude to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 3913

SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable with the least neutro- 3914
sophic cardinality, the lower sharp bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected 3915
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 3916
rosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 3917
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutro- 3918
sophic SuperHyperEdge in common but it isn’t an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it 3919

doesn’t have the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 3920

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.21: A SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable

in the Example (7.3.3) 103NHGb18a

of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to 3921

have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3922
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {x, z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a 3923

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutrosophic 3924

SuperHyperStable. Since it doesn’t do the procedure such that such that there’s no neut- 3925
rosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. [there’s at 3926
least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside implying there’s, sometimes in the connected 3927
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, titled its 3928
SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3929

Set S so as S doesn’t do “the procedure”.]. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3930
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}. Thus the obvious neutrosophic 3931
SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3932
the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}, 3933
includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex doesn’t form any kind of pairs are titled 3934
SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Since 3935

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z}, is the 3936

maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 3937
SuperHyperVertices such that V (G) there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3938
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. Thus, in a connected SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E), 3939
a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic 3940
SuperHyperVertices with only all exceptions in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3941

Vertices from the same SuperHyperNeighborhoods. A neutrosophic SuperHyperStable has the 3942

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.22: A SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable

in the Example (7.3.5) 103NHGb19a

number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and the lower bound is the half number of all 3943
the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges.  3944

103EXMb19a Example 7.3.5. In the Figure (7.22), the connected SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E), is 3945
highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in 3946
previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected SuperHyperCycle 3947
N SHC : (V, E), in the SuperHyperModel (7.22), 3948

{{P13 , J13 , K13 , H13 },

{Z13 , W13 , V13 }, {U14 , T14 , R14 , S14 },
{P15 , J15 , K15 , R15 },
{J5 , O5 , K5 , L5 }, {J5 , O5 , K5 , L5 }, V3 ,
{U6 , H7 , J7 , K7 , O7 , L7 , P7 }, {T8 , U8 , V8 , S8 },
{T9 , K9 , J9 }, {H10 , J10 , E10 , R10 , W9 },
{S11 , R11 , O11 , L11 },
{U12 , V12 , W12 , Z12 , O12 }},

is the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3949

Proposition 7.3.6. Assume a connected SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E). Then a neutrosophic 3950
SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3951

Vertices, excluding the SuperHyperCenter, with only all exceptions in the form of interior 3952

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from common neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. An neutrosophic 3953

SuperHyperStable has the number of the neutrosophic cardinality of the second SuperHyperPart. 3954

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic SuperHy- 3955
perEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider all numbers of those neutro- 3956

sophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding one distinct 3957
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, exclude to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3958
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable with the 3959
least neutrosophic cardinality, the lower sharp bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a 3960
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3961
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 3962

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a 3963

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common but it isn’t an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since 3964
it doesn’t have the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 3965
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3966
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 3967
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {x, z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a 3968

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutrosophic 3969

SuperHyperStable. Since it doesn’t do the procedure such that such that there’s no neut- 3970
rosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. [there’s at 3971
least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside implying there’s, sometimes in the connected 3972
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, titled its 3973
SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 3974

Set S so as S doesn’t do “the procedure”.]. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 3975
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}. Thus the obvious neutrosophic 3976
SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 3977
the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}, 3978
includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex doesn’t form any kind of pairs are titled 3979
SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Since 3980

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z}, is the 3981

maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 3982
SuperHyperVertices such that V (G) there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neut- 3983
rosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. Thus, in a connected SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E), a 3984
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic 3985
SuperHyperVertices, excluding the SuperHyperCenter, with only all exceptions in the form of 3986

interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from common neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. An 3987

neutrosophic SuperHyperStable has the number of the neutrosophic cardinality of the second 3988
SuperHyperPart.  3989

103EXMb20a Example 7.3.7. In the Figure (7.23), the connected SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E), is 3990
highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in 3991

previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected SuperHyperStar 3992

N SHS : (V, E), in the SuperHyperModel (7.23), 3993

{{W14 , D15 , Z14 , C15 , E15 },

{P3 , O3 , R3 , L3 , S3 }, {P2 , T2 , S2 , R2 , O2 },
{O6 , O7 , K7 , P6 , H7 , J7 , E7 , L7 },

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.23: A SuperHyperStar Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable in

the Example (7.3.7) 103NHGb20a

{J8 , Z10 , W10 , V10 }, {W11 , V11 , Z11 , C12 },

{U13 , T13 , R13 , S13 }, {H13 },
{E13 , D13 , C13 , Z12 }, }

is the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 3994

Proposition 7.3.8. Assume a connected SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E). Then a neutro- 3995
sophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHy- 3996
perVertices with only all exceptions in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices titled 3997

SuperHyperNeighbors. A neutrosophic SuperHyperStable has the number of the neutrosophic 3998

cardinality of the first SuperHyperPart multiplies with the neutrosophic cardinality of the second 3999
SuperHyperPart. 4000

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic 4001
SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider all numbers of those 4002

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding one distinct 4003
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, exclude to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 4004
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable with the 4005
least neutrosophic cardinality, the lower sharp bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a 4006
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4007
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 4008

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a 4009

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common but it isn’t an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since 4010

it doesn’t have the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4011
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 4012
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 4013
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {x, z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality 4014
of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a 4015

neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it doesn’t do the procedure such that such that 4016
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 4017
[there’s at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside implying there’s, sometimes in the 4018
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 4019
titled its SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the neutrosophic 4020
SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the procedure”.]. There’s only one neutrosophic 4021

SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}. Thus 4022

the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is up. The obvious simple 4023
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is a 4024
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}, includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 4025
doesn’t form any kind of pairs are titled SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic 4026
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4027

SuperHyperVertices V \V \{z}, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 4028

SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that V (G) there’s no neutrosophic 4029
SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. Thus, in a connected 4030
SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic 4031
SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only all exceptions in the 4032
form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices titled SuperHyperNeighbors. A neutrosophic 4033

SuperHyperStable has the number of the neutrosophic cardinality of the first SuperHyperPart 4034
multiplies with the neutrosophic cardinality of the second SuperHyperPart.  4035

103EXMb21a Example 7.3.9. In the Figure (7.24), the connected SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E), is 4036
highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in 4037
previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected SuperHyperBipartite 4038

N SHB : (V, E), in the SuperHyperModel (7.24), 4039

{{C4 , D4 , E4 , H4 },
{K4 , J4 , L4 , O4 }, {W2 , Z2 , C3 }, {C13 , Z12 , V12 , W12 },

is the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 4040

Proposition 7.3.10. Assume a connected SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E). Then a 4041
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic 4042
SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4043
Vertices from a SuperHyperPart and only one exception in the form of interior neutrosophic 4044

SuperHyperVertices from another SuperHyperPart titled “SuperHyperNeighbors”. A neutrosophic 4045

SuperHyperStable has the number of all the summation on the neutrosophic cardinality of the 4046
all SuperHyperParts form distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. 4047

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic 4048
SuperHyperEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider all numbers of those 4049

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding one distinct 4050

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.24: A SuperHyperBipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable

in the Example (7.3.9) 103NHGb21a

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, exclude to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 4051

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable with the 4052
least neutrosophic cardinality, the lower sharp bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a 4053
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4054

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 4055

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a 4056
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common but it isn’t an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since 4057
it doesn’t have the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4058
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 4059
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 4060

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {x, z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality 4061

of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a 4062
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it doesn’t do the procedure such that such that 4063
there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. 4064
[there’s at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside implying there’s, sometimes in the 4065
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 4066

titled its SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the neutrosophic 4067

SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the procedure”.]. There’s only one neutrosophic 4068
SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}. Thus 4069
the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is up. The obvious simple 4070
type-neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is a 4071
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}, includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 4072

doesn’t form any kind of pairs are titled SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic 4073

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.25: A SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyper-

Stable in the Example (7.3.11) 103NHGb22a

SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4074
SuperHyperVertices V \V \{z}, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 4075

SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that V (G) there’s no neutrosophic 4076

SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. Thus, in a connected 4077
SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic 4078
SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only one exception in 4079
the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from a SuperHyperPart and only one 4080
exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from another SuperHyperPart 4081

titled “SuperHyperNeighbors”. A neutrosophic SuperHyperStable has the number of all the 4082
summation on the neutrosophic cardinality of the all SuperHyperParts form distinct neutrosophic 4083
SuperHyperEdges.  4084

103EXMb22a Example 7.3.11. In the Figure (7.25), the connected SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : 4085

(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the 4086
Algorithm in previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 4087
SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), 4088

{{{L4 , E4 , O4 , D4 , J4 , K4 , H4 },
{S10 , R10 , P10 },
{Z7 , W7 }},

in the SuperHyperModel (7.25), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 4089

Proposition 7.3.12. Assume a connected SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E). Then a neutro- 4090
sophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHy- 4091

perVertices, excluding the SuperHyperCenter, with only one exception in the form of interior 4092

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from same neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. A neutrosophic 4093

SuperHyperStable has the number of all the number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 4094
have no common SuperHyperNeighbors for a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. 4095

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic SuperHy- 4096
perEdge has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider all numbers of those neutrosophic 4097

SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding one distinct neutro- 4098
sophic SuperHyperVertex, exclude to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4099
SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable with the least neutro- 4100
sophic cardinality, the lower sharp bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected 4101
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 4102
rosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic 4103

SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutro- 4104

sophic SuperHyperEdge in common but it isn’t an neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. Since it 4105
doesn’t have the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 4106
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to 4107
have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 4108
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {x, z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4109

a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutro- 4110

sophic SuperHyperStable. Since it doesn’t do the procedure such that such that there’s no 4111
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. [there’s 4112
at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside implying there’s, sometimes in the con- 4113
nected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 4114
titled its SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the neutrosophic 4115

SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the procedure”.]. There’s only one neutrosophic Super- 4116
HyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, V \ V \ {z}. Thus the obvious 4117
neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is up. The obvious simple type-neutrosophic 4118
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable, V \ V \ {z}, is a neutrosophic Super- 4119
HyperSet, V \ V \ {z}, includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex doesn’t form any 4120
kind of pairs are titled SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 4121

N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 4122
V \ V \ {z}, is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 4123
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that V (G) there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 4124
to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in common. Thus, in a connected SuperHyperWheel 4125
N SHW : (V, E), a neutrosophic SuperHyperStable is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 4126
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, excluding the SuperHyperCenter, with only one 4127

exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from same neutrosophic 4128
SuperHyperEdge. A neutrosophic SuperHyperStable has the number of all the number of all 4129
the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges have no common SuperHyperNeighbors for a neutrosophic 4130
SuperHyperVertex.  4131

103EXMb23a Example 7.3.13. In the Figure (7.26), the connected SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), is 4132
highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in 4133

previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected SuperHyperWheel 4134

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 7.26: A SuperHyperWheel Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperStable

in the Example (7.3.13) 103NHGb23a

N SHW : (V, E), 4135

{V5 ,
{Z13 , W13 , U13 , V13 , O14 },
{T10 , K10 , J10 },
{E7 , C7 , Z6 },
{T14 , U14 , R15 , S15 }},

in the SuperHyperModel (7.26), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperStable. 4136

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 8 4137

SuperHyperClique 4138

8.1 Definitions 4139

Definition 8.1.1. ((neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique). 4140

Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 4141

(i) an extreme SuperHyperClique C(N SHG) for an extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 4142
(V, E) is an extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the extreme SuperHyperVertices with 4143
the maximum extreme cardinality of an extreme SuperHyperSet S of the extreme 4144

SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an amount of extreme SuperHyperEdges amid 4145

an amount of extreme SuperHyperVertices given by that extreme SuperHyperSet of 4146
the extreme SuperHyperVertices; it’s also called an extreme (z, −)−SuperHyperClique 4147
extreme SuperHyperClique C(N SHG) for an extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 4148
(V, E) if it’s an extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the extreme SuperHyperVertices 4149
with the maximum extreme cardinality of an extreme SuperHyperSet S of the 4150

extreme SuperHyperVertices such that there’s z extreme SuperHyperEdge amid an 4151

amount of extreme SuperHyperVertices given by that extreme SuperHyperSet of the 4152
extreme SuperHyperVertices; it’s also called an extreme (−, x)−SuperHyperClique 4153
extreme SuperHyperClique C(N SHG) for an extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 4154
(V, E) if it’s an extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the extreme SuperHyperVertices 4155
with the maximum extreme cardinality of an extreme SuperHyperSet S of the 4156

extreme SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an amount of extreme SuperHyperEdges 4157

amid x extreme SuperHyperVertices given by that extreme SuperHyperSet of the 4158
extreme SuperHyperVertices; it’s also called an extreme (z, x)−SuperHyperClique 4159
extreme SuperHyperClique C(N SHG) for an extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 4160
(V, E) if it’s an extreme type-SuperHyperSet of the extreme SuperHyperVertices 4161
with the maximum extreme cardinality of an extreme SuperHyperSet S of the 4162

extreme SuperHyperVertices such that there’s z extreme SuperHyperEdges amid x 4163

extreme SuperHyperVertices given by that extreme SuperHyperSet of the extreme 4164
SuperHyperVertices; it’s also the extreme extension of the extreme notion of the 4165
extreme clique in the extreme graphs to the extreme SuperHyperNotion of the extreme 4166
SuperHyperClique in the extreme SuperHyperGraphs where in the extreme setting of 4167
the graphs, there’s an extreme (1, 2)−SuperHyperClique since an extreme graph is an 4168

extreme SuperHyperGraph; 4169

179
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(ii) an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(N SHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4170

Graph N SHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 4171
perHyperVertices with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic 4172
SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an amount 4173
of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges amid an amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 4174
tices given by that neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 4175

tices; it’s also called an neutrosophic (z, −)−SuperHyperClique neutrosophic Supe- 4176
rHyperClique C(N SHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) if 4177
it’s an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with 4178
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the 4179
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s z neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 4180
amid an amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic Su- 4181

perHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices; it’s also called an neutrosophic 4182

(−, x)−SuperHyperClique neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(N SHG) for an neutro- 4183
sophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) if it’s an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4184
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality 4185
of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 4186
there’s an amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges amid x neutrosophic SuperHy- 4187

perVertices given by that neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 4188

perVertices; it’s also called an neutrosophic (z, x)−SuperHyperClique neutrosophic 4189
SuperHyperClique C(N SHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 4190
if it’s an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with 4191
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the 4192
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s z neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 4193

amid x neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 4194

the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices; it’s also the neutrosophic extension of the neutro- 4195
sophic notion of the neutrosophic clique in the neutrosophic graphs to the neutrosophic 4196
SuperHyperNotion of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the neutrosophic Super- 4197
HyperGraphs where in the neutrosophic setting of the graphs, there’s an neutrosophic 4198
(1, 2)−SuperHyperClique since an neutrosophic graph is an extreme SuperHyperGraph; 4199

Proposition 8.1.2. An extreme clique in an extreme graph is an extreme (1, 2)−SuperHyperClique 4200

in that extreme SuperHyperGraph. And reverse of that statement doesn’t hold. 4201

Proposition 8.1.3. A neutrosophic clique in a neutrosophic graph is a neutrosophic 4202

(1, 2)−SuperHyperClique in that neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. And reverse of that statement 4203

doesn’t hold. 4204

Proposition 8.1.4. Assume an extreme (x, z)−SuperHyperClique in an extreme SuperHyper- 4205

Graph. For all zi ≤ z, xi ≤ x, it’s an extreme (xi , zi )−SuperHyperClique in that extreme 4206

SuperHyperGraph. 4207

Proposition 8.1.5. Assume a neutrosophic (x, z)−SuperHyperClique in a neutrosophic Supe- 4208

rHyperGraph. For all zi ≤ z, xi ≤ x, it’s a neutrosophic (xi , zi )−SuperHyperClique in that 4209

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. 4210

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

8.2 Examples 4211

113EXM1 Example 8.2.1. Assume the SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (8.1), (8.2), (8.3), (8.4), (8.5), 4212

(8.6), (8.7), (8.8), (8.9), (8.10), (8.11), (8.12), (8.13), (8.14), (8.15), (8.16), (8.17), (8.18), (8.19), 4213
and (8.20). 4214

• On the Figure (8.1), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHy- 4215
perClique, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a 4216
loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in 4217
the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one neutrosophic SuperHy- 4218
perEdge, namely, E4 . The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is neutrosophic isolated 4219

means that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a neutrosophic endpoint. 4220

Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , isn’t contained in every given neutro- 4221
sophic SuperHyperClique. The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 4222
SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4223
SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V4 }. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Su- 4224

perHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 4225

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4226
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is a neutrosophic 3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a 4227
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4228
with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 4229
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 4230

amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4231

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }. There’re not only two neutro- 4232
sophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the 4233
non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4234
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4235
includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHy- 4236

perSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, doesn’t have less than three 4237
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 4238
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is 4239
up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4240
{V1 , V2 , V4 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4241
sophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4242

SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a 4243

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 4244
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4245
z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutro- 4246
sophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4247
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4248

a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by 4249

that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic 4250
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V4 }. Thus 4251
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is up. The obvious simple 4252
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, 4253
is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, doesn’t include only less than three 4254

SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s 4255

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

interesting to mention that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4256
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4257
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V1 , V2 , V4 }. 4258

• On the Figure (8.2), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. E1 and E3 4259
SuperHyperClique are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop SuperHyperEdge 4260
and E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one 4261
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The SuperHyperVertex, V3 is isolated means that there’s no 4262
SuperHyperEdge has it as an endpoint. Thus SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is contained in every 4263
given SuperHyperClique. The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 4264

SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4265

SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V4 }. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic Su- 4266
perHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 4267
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4268
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is a neutrosophic 3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a 4269

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4270

with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 4271
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 4272
amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4273
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }. There’re not only two neutro- 4274
sophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the 4275

non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4276
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4277
includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHy- 4278
perSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, doesn’t have less than three 4279
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 4280
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is 4281

up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4282
{V1 , V2 , V4 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4283
sophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4284
SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a 4285
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 4286
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4287

z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutro- 4288

sophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4289
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4290
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by 4291
that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic 4292
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V4 }. Thus 4293

the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is up. The obvious simple 4294
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, 4295
is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, doesn’t include only less than three 4296
SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s 4297
interesting to mention that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4298
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4299

SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V1 , V2 , V4 }. 4300

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (8.3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. E1 , E2 and 4301
E3 are some empty SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of 4302
SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The following neut- 4303
rosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic 4304
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V4 }. The neutrosophic 4305
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is the simple neutro- 4306

sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic 4307

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is a neutrosophic 4308
3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4309
a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4310
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4311
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by 4312

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }. 4313

There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 4314
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The ob- 4315
vious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 4316
is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 4317
But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, 4318

doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic Su- 4319
perHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 4320
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4321
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 4322
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic 4323
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is a neutrosophic 4324

SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4325

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4326
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4327
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4328
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4329
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4330

two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4331

There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 4332
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V4 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHy- 4333
perClique, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4334
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V4 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 4335

{V1 , V2 , V4 }, doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected 4336
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the 4337
only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4338
Clique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4339
SuperHyperClique, is only {V1 , V2 , V4 }. 4340

• On the Figure (8.4), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, a SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4341
no empty SuperHyperEdge but E3 are a loop SuperHyperEdge on {F }, and there 4342
are some SuperHyperEdges, namely, E1 on {H, V1 , V3 }, alongside E2 on {O, H, V4 , V3 } 4343
and E4 , E5 on {N, V1 , V2 , V3 , F }. The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neut- 4344
rosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 4345

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }. The neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4346

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Set of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }, is the simple neutrosophic 4347

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic Super- 4348
HyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }, is a neutrosophic 4349
3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4350
a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality 4351
of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 4352

there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 4353

given by the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4354
{V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }. There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 4355
intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4356
Clique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4357
SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic 4358

SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHy- 4359

perVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }, doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside 4360
the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 4361
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them up, the 4362
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }, is 4363
the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4364

Clique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4365

{V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic 4366
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro- 4367
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z 4368
SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutro- 4369
sophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4370

a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4371

a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by 4372
that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic 4373
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }. 4374
Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }, is up. The 4375
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, 4376

{V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F }, doesn’t include 4377

only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4378
Graph N SHG : (V, E). {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F } is an neutrosophic(2, 5)−SuperHyperClique. 4379
{V4 , H} is an neutrosophic(2, −)−SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F } is an 4380
neutrosophic(−, 5)−SuperHyperClique. As the maximum neutrosophic cardinality 4381

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the matter, 4382

{V1 , V2 , V3 , N, F } is a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique; since it has five neutrosophic 4383
SuperHyperVertices with satisfying on the at least neutrosophic conditions over both of 4384
the neutrosophicSuperHyperVertices and the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. 4385

• On the Figure (8.5), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4386
neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutro- 4387
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic 4388
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }. The 4389
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }, 4390
is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4391

Clique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4392

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

{V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }, is a neutrosophic 3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutro- 4393

sophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 4394
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4395
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid 4396
any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 4397
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }. There’re not only two neut- 4398

rosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus 4399

the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neutro- 4400
sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic 4401
SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutro- 4402
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }, doesn’t 4403
have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4404

Set. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4405
SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutro- 4406
sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 4407
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic Supe- 4408
rHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }, is a neutrosophic 4409
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4410

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4411

a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4412
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4413
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4414
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4415
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4416

There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neut- 4417
rosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHy- 4418
perClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4419
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHy- 4420
perSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }, doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in 4421
a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to men- 4422

tion that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4423
SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the 4424
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 } in a connected neutrosophic 4425
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is mentioned as the SuperHyperModel N SHG : (V, E) 4426
in the Figure (8.5). 4427

• On the Figure (8.6), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s

neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V5 , V6 }. The neutrosophic Su-
perHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }, is the simple neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHy-
perSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Clique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }. There’re only two

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique isn’t up. The obvious simple neut-
rosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutro-
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }, does has less than
three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique
isn’t up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHy-
perVertices, {V5 , V6 }, isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro-
sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any
z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutro-
sophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. There is only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Vertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V5 , V6 }. Thus the non-obvious
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V5 , V6 }, isn’t up. The obvious simple neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V5 , V6 }, is the neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet, {V5 , V6 }, does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention
that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic Su-
perHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, are only {V5 , V6 }, {V6 , V7 } in a connected neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling of the Figure
(8.6). It’s also, a neutrosophic free-triangle SuperHyperModel. But all only obvious simple
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique,
are
{V5 , V15 }, {V8 , V9 }, {V7 , V8 }, {V5 , V6 }, {V6 , V7 }}.
• On the Figure (8.7), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 4428
{V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 } is up. There’s neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHy- 4429
perEdge. The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 4430
is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 4431
{V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 4432
tices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4433

sophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 4434

perVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is a neutrosophic 3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a 4435
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4436
with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 4437
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 4438
amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4439

Set of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. There’re not only 4440

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. 4441

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neut- 4442
rosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic 4443
SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutro- 4444
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, doesn’t 4445
have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4446

Set. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4447
SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutro- 4448
sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 4449
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic Super- 4450
HyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is a neutrosophic 4451
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4452

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4453

a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4454
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4455
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4456
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4457
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4458

There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 4459
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic 4460
SuperHyperClique, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4461
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is the neut- 4462
rosophic SuperHyperSet, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, doesn’t include only less than three Su- 4463
perHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s 4464

interesting to mention that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4465
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4466
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 } in a 4467
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) of depicted SuperHyperModel 4468
as the Figure (8.7). But 4469

{V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }

{V4 , V, V6 , V7 , V13 }

are the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4470
SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the 4471
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 4472

• On the Figure (8.8), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4473
neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutro- 4474
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic 4475

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. The 4476
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, 4477
is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4478
Clique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4479
{V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is a neutrosophic 3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutro- 4480
sophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 4481

the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4482

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid 4483

any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 4484
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. There’re not only two neutro- 4485
sophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the 4486
non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic 4487
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic Super- 4488

HyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic 4489
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, doesn’t have 4490
less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. 4491
Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Super- 4492
HyperClique is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 4493
SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4494

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHy- 4495

perSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is a neutrosophic 4496
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4497
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4498
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4499
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4500

the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4501

rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4502
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4503
There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 4504
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic 4505
SuperHyperClique, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4506

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is the neut- 4507
rosophic SuperHyperSet, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, doesn’t include only less than three Su- 4508
perHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s 4509
interesting to mention that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4510
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4511
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 } in a 4512

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) of depicted SuperHyperModel 4513

as the Figure (8.7). But 4514

{V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }

{V4 , V, V6 , V7 , V13 }

are the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4515
SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of 4516
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 4517
N SHG : (V, E) of dense SuperHyperModel as the Figure (8.8). 4518

• On the Figure (8.9), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s

neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V5 , V6 }. The neutrosophic Su-
perHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }, is the simple neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHy-

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

perSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyper-

Clique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }. There’re only two
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique isn’t up. The obvious simple neut-
rosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutro-
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }, does has less than
three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique
isn’t up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHy-
perVertices, {V5 , V6 }, isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro-
sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V5 , V6 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any
z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutro-
sophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. There is only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Vertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V5 , V6 }. Thus the non-obvious
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V5 , V6 }, isn’t up. The obvious simple neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V5 , V6 }, is the neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet, {V5 , V6 }, does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention
that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic Su-
perHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, are only {V5 , V6 }, {V6 , V7 } in a connected neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling of the Figure
(8.6). It’s also, a neutrosophic free-triangle SuperHyperModel. But all only obvious simple
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique,
are
{V5 , V15 }, {V8 , V9 }, {V7 , V8 }, {V5 , V6 }, {V6 , V7 }}
in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) with a messy SuperHy- 4519
perModeling of the Figure (8.9). 4520

• On the Figure (8.10), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4521
neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutro- 4522
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic 4523
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. The 4524

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, 4525

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4526

Clique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4527
{V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is a neutrosophic 3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutro- 4528
sophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 4529
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4530
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid 4531

any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 4532

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. There’re not only two neutro- 4533
sophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the 4534
non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic 4535
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic Super- 4536
HyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic 4537

SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, doesn’t have 4538
less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. 4539
Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Super- 4540
HyperClique is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 4541
SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4542
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHy- 4543

perSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is a neutrosophic 4544
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4545
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4546
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4547
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4548
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4549

rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4550
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4551
There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 4552
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic 4553
SuperHyperClique, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4554
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, is the neut- 4555

rosophic SuperHyperSet, {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }, doesn’t include only less than three Su- 4556
perHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s 4557
interesting to mention that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4558
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4559
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 } in a 4560

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) of depicted SuperHyperModel 4561

as the Figure (8.7). But 4562

{V8 , V9 , V10 , V11 , V14 }

{V4 , V, V6 , V7 , V13 }

are the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4563

SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of 4564

the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 4565
N SHG : (V, E) of highly-embedding-connected SuperHyperModel as the Figure (8.10). 4566

• On the Figure (8.11), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4567

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4568
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4569
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V3 }. The neutrosophic 4570
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is the simple neutro- 4571
sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic 4572
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is a neutrosophic 4573

3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4574

a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4575
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4576
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by 4577
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }. 4578
There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 4579

SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The ob- 4580
vious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 4581
is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 4582
But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, 4583
doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic Su- 4584
perHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 4585

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4586
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 4587
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic 4588
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is a neutrosophic 4589
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4590
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4591

a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4592

sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4593
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4594
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4595
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4596
There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 4597

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHy- 4598

perClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4599
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 4600
{V1 , V2 , V3 }, doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected 4601
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the 4602

only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4603

Clique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4604
SuperHyperClique, are only {V1 , V2 , V3 } and {V4 , V5 , V6 } in a connected neutrosophic 4605
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But also, the only obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4606
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutro- 4607
sophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, are only {V1 , V2 , V3 } 4608

and {V4 , V5 , V6 } in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 4609

• On the Figure (8.12), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4610
neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutro- 4611
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic 4612

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }. The 4613

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, 4614

is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4615
Clique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4616
{V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is a neutrosophic 3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutro- 4617
sophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 4618
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4619

rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid 4620

any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 4621
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }. There’re not only two neut- 4622
rosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus 4623
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neutro- 4624
sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic 4625

SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutro- 4626
sophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, doesn’t 4627
have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4628
Set. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4629
SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutro- 4630
sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 4631

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic Supe- 4632

rHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is a neutrosophic 4633
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4634
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4635
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4636
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4637

the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4638

rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4639
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4640
There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neut- 4641
rosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHy- 4642
perClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4643

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHy- 4644

perSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 }, doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in 4645
a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to men- 4646
tion that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4647
SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the 4648

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 } in a connected neutrosophic Su- 4649

perHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) in highly-multiple-connected-style SuperHyperModel On 4650
the Figure (8.12) and it’s also, the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4651
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4652
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V1 , V2 , V3 , V7 , V8 } in a 4653
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 4654

• On the Figure (8.13), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4655
neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4656
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4657
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 , V3 }. The neutrosophic 4658

SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is the simple neutro- 4659

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic 4660

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is a neutrosophic 4661
3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4662
a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4663
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4664
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by 4665

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }. 4666

There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 4667
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The ob- 4668
vious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 4669
is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 4670
But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, 4671

doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic Su- 4672
perHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 4673
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 4674
of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic 4675
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic 4676
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is a neutrosophic 4677

SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4678

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4679
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4680
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4681
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4682
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4683

two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4684

There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended 4685
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 , V3 }. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHy- 4686
perClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4687
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 , V3 }, is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 4688
{V1 , V2 , V3 }, doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected 4689

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the 4690
only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4691
Clique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4692
SuperHyperClique, are only {V1 , V2 , V3 } and {V4 , V5 , V6 } in a connected neutrosophic 4693
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But also, the only obvious simple neutrosophic type- 4694

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutro- 4695
sophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, are only {V1 , V2 , V3 } 4696
and {V4 , V5 , V6 } in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 4697

• On the Figure (8.14), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4698

neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4699
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4700
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 }. The neutrosophic Su- 4701
perHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, is the simple neutrosophic 4702
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHy- 4703
perSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4704

Clique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic 4705

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 4706

SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic 4707
SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic 4708
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }. There’re only two 4709
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus 4710
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic 4711

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic Super- 4712

HyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic 4713
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, does has less than three 4714
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 4715
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 4716
isn’t up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4717

Vertices, {V1 , V2 }, isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 4718
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4719
sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a 4720
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 4721
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4722
z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutro- 4723

sophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4724

a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4725
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by 4726
that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic 4727
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 }. Thus 4728
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 }, is up. The obvious simple 4729

neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 }, is the 4730

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 }, doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyper- 4731
Vertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting 4732
to mention that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4733
sophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of 4734
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, are only {V1 , V2 } and {V1 , V3 }. But the only obvious 4735

simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those 4736

obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 4737
tices, are only {V1 , V2 } and {V1 , V3 }. It’s noted that this neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 4738
N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic graph G : (V, E) thus the notions in both settings are 4739
coincided. 4740

• On the Figure (8.15), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4741
neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4742
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4743
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. {V1 , V2 }. The neutrosophic Su- 4744

perHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, is the simple neutrosophic 4745

type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHy- 4746
perSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4747
Clique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic 4748
type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 4749
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic 4750

SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the neutrosophic 4751

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }. There’re only two 4752

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus 4753
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic 4754
type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic Super- 4755
HyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic 4756
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, does has less than three 4757

SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non- 4758
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 4759
isn’t up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4760
Vertices, {V1 , V2 }, isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 4761
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4762
sophic SuperHyperVertices, {V1 , V2 }, is a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a 4763

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 4764

neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4765
z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutro- 4766
sophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 4767
a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4768
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by 4769

that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic 4770
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 }. Thus 4771
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 }, is up. The obvious simple 4772
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, {V1 , V2 }, is the 4773
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, {V1 , V2 }, doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyper- 4774
Vertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting 4775

to mention that the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4776
sophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets 4777
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, is only {V1 , V5 }. But the only obvious simple neut- 4778
rosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvious 4779
simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, are 4780
only 4781

{V1 , V2 },
{V2 , V3 },
{V3 , V4 },
{V4 , V6 },
{V5 , V1 }.

It’s noted that this neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic graph 4782
G : (V, E) thus the notions in both settings are coincided. In a connected neutrosophic 4783
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) as Linearly-Connected SuperHyperModel On the 4784
Figure (8.15). 4785

• On the Figure (8.16), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4786
neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4787
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4788

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. corresponded to the SuperHy- 4789

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

perEdge E4 The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, cor- 4790

responded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4791
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4792
sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is a neutrosophic 4793
3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a 4794
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a 4795

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a 4796

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the 4797
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the 4798
SuperHyperEdge E4 There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 4799
intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4800
Clique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4801

SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic Supe- 4802

rHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4803
corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices 4804
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutro- 4805
sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them 4806
up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to 4807

the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4808

the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4809
sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is a neutrosophic 4810
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4811
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4812
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4813

sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4814

the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4815
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4816
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4817
There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neut- 4818
rosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 Thus the non-obvious 4819

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is up. The 4820

obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, 4821
corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded 4822
to the SuperHyperEdge E4 doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a 4823
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that 4824

the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4825
Clique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4826
SuperHyperClique, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E4 in a 4827
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the only obvious simple 4828
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvi- 4829
ous simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic 4830

SuperHyperEdge E4 in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 4831

• On the Figure (8.17), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4832
neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4833
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4834

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. corresponded to the SuperHy- 4835

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

perEdge E4 The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, cor- 4836

responded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4837
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4838
sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is a neutrosophic 4839
3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a 4840
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a 4841

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a 4842

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the 4843
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the 4844
SuperHyperEdge E4 There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 4845
intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4846
Clique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4847

SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic Supe- 4848

rHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4849
corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices 4850
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutro- 4851
sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them 4852
up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to 4853

the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4854

the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4855
sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is a neutrosophic 4856
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4857
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4858
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4859

sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4860

the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4861
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4862
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4863
There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neut- 4864
rosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 Thus the non-obvious 4865

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is up. The 4866

obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, 4867
corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded 4868
to the SuperHyperEdge E4 doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a 4869
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that 4870

the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4871
Clique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4872
SuperHyperClique, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E4 in a 4873
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the only obvious simple 4874
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvi- 4875
ous simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic 4876

SuperHyperEdge E4 in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 4877

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) as Linearly-over-packed 4878
SuperHyperModel is featured On the Figure (8.17). 4879

• On the Figure (8.18), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4880

neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4881

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4882

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. corresponded to the SuperHy- 4883
perEdge E4 The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, cor- 4884
responded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4885
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4886
sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is a neutrosophic 4887

3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a 4888

neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a 4889
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a 4890
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the 4891
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the 4892
SuperHyperEdge E4 There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 4893

intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4894

Clique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4895
SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic Supe- 4896
rHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4897
corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices 4898
inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutro- 4899

sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them 4900

up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to 4901
the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4902
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4903
sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is a neutrosophic 4904
SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4905

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4906

a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4907
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4908
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4909
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4910
two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4911

There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neut- 4912
rosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 Thus the non-obvious 4913
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is up. The 4914
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, 4915
corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E4 is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded 4916

to the SuperHyperEdge E4 doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a 4917
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that 4918
the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4919
Clique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4920
SuperHyperClique, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E4 in a 4921
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the only obvious simple 4922

neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvi- 4923

ous simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic 4924
SuperHyperEdge E4 in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). In a 4925
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 4926

• On the Figure (8.19), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4927

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4928
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4929
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. corresponded to the SuperHy- 4930
perEdge E9 The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, cor- 4931
responded to the SuperHyperEdge E9 is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4932
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4933

sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E9 is a neutrosophic 4934

3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a 4935
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a 4936
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a 4937
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the 4938
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the 4939

SuperHyperEdge E9 There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 4940
intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4941
Clique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4942
SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic Supe- 4943
rHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4944
corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E9 doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices 4945

inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutro- 4946
sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them 4947
up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to 4948
the SuperHyperEdge E9 is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4949
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4950
sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E9 is a neutrosophic 4951

SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4952

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4953
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 4954
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 4955
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 4956
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 4957

two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 4958

There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neut- 4959
rosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E9 Thus the non-obvious 4960
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E9 is up. The 4961
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, 4962

corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E9 is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded 4963

to the SuperHyperEdge E9 doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a 4964
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that 4965
the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4966
Clique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 4967
SuperHyperClique, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E9 in a 4968

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the only obvious simple 4969
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvi- 4970
ous simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic 4971
SuperHyperEdge E9 in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 4972

• On the Figure (8.20), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperClique, is up. There’s 4973

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neither empty SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic 4974
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple neutrosophic type- 4975
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. corresponded to the SuperHy- 4976
perEdge E6 The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, cor- 4977
responded to the SuperHyperEdge E6 is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 4978
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4979

sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E6 is a neutrosophic 4980

3-SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is a 4981
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a 4982
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a 4983
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid any 3 neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by the 4984
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the 4985

SuperHyperEdge E6 There’re not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the 4986
intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyper- 4987
Clique is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 4988
SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic Supe- 4989
rHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 4990
corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E6 doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices 4991

inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutro- 4992
sophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is up. To sum them 4993
up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to 4994
the SuperHyperEdge E6 is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 4995
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 4996
sophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E6 is a neutrosophic 4997

SuperHyperClique C(ESHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 4998

the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 4999
a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any z SuperHyperVertices given by that neutro- 5000
sophic type-SuperHyperSet and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it’s 5001
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut- 5002
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for any 5003

two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet. 5004

There isn’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neut- 5005
rosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E6 Thus the non-obvious 5006
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E6 is up. The 5007
obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, 5008

corresponded to the SuperHyperEdge E6 is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded 5009

to the SuperHyperEdge E6 doesn’t include only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a 5010
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that 5011
the only obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5012
Clique amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic 5013
SuperHyperClique, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E6 in a 5014

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). But the only obvious simple 5015
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique amid those obvi- 5016
ous simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets, is only corresponded to the neutrosophic 5017
SuperHyperEdge E6 in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). 5018

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.1: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR1

Figure 8.2: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR2

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.3: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR3

Figure 8.4: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.5: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR5

Figure 8.6: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR6

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.7: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR7

Figure 8.8: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR8

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.9: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR9

Figure 8.10: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR10

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.11: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR11

Figure 8.12: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR12

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.13: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR13

8.3 Results 5019

The previous neutrosophic approaches apply on the upcoming neutrosophic results on 5020
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 5021

Proposition 8.3.1. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). Then a 5022
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique-style with the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality is 5023
an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 5024

Proposition 8.3.2. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). Then a 5025
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic 5026
SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions in the form of interior neutrosophic 5027

SuperHyperVertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges not excluding only any 5028
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the neutrosophic unique SuperHyperEdges. a 5029
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has the neutrosophic number of all the interior neutrosophic 5030
SuperHyperVertices without any minus on SuperHyperNeighborhoods. 5031

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperPath N SHP : (V, E). Assume a neutrosophic

SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then
every neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others
in common. Thus those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be contained
in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are potentially
included in a neutrosophic style-SuperHyperClique. Formally, consider
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz }

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.14: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR14

are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge between the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition
for the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.
This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique but with
slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.15: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR15

Figure 8.16: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR16

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.17: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR17

Figure 8.18: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR18

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.19: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR19

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

E
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Let Zi ∼ Zj ,
be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E. Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

But with the slightly differences, 5032

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.

Thus E is a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique where E is fixed that means Ex = E. for all 5033
neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices but in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, Ex could 5034
be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5035
N SHG : (V, E). If a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 5036
then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is at least z. It’s 5037
straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5038

is at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 5039

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.20: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperClique in the

Example (8.2.1) 113FGR20

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5040

the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to 5041
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in some cases but the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5042
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 5043
SuperHyperVertices are contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The main definition of 5044
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has two titles. a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique and 5045

its corresponded quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms 5046
of quasi-styles. For any neutrosophic number, there’s a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique 5047
with that quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 5048
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, 5049
then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the 5050
neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques for all neutrosophic numbers less than its neutrosophic 5051

corresponded maximum number. The essence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique ends up 5052
but this essence starts up in the terms of the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique, again 5053
and more in the operations of collecting all the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques acted 5054
on the all possible used formations of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one 5055
neutrosophic number. This neutrosophic number is considered as the equivalence class for all 5056
corresponded quasi-SuperHyperCliques. Let zneutrosophic Number , Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet and 5057

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a 5058

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Then 5059

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class = {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is re-formalized 5060

and redefined as follows. 5061

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 5062
definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5063

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 5064
SuperHyperClique poses the upcoming expressions. 5065

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 5066

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And then, 5067

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 5068

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5069

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5070

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5071

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “neutrosophic Supe- 5072
rHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5073

tices such that any amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident to a neutrosophic 5074
SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” but, 5075
precisely, it’s the generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” since “neutrosophic 5076
Quasi-SuperHyperClique” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic Super- 5077
HyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood” 5078
may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as 5079

initial framework and preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the 5080
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “neutro- 5081
sophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique”, and “neutrosophic 5082
SuperHyperClique” are up. 5083
Thus, let zneutrosophic Number , Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5084
be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a neutrosophic Super- 5085

HyperClique and the new terms are up. 5086

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5087

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

5088

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5089

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality =
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 5090

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5091

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5092

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

5093

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.
Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), the all interior neutro- 5094
sophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique if for any of them, 5095
and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the two interior neutrosophic 5096
SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic 5097

exception at all. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Let a 5098
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge N SHE has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices r. Consider 5099
all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic Supe- 5100
rHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude 5101
to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider 5102

there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique with the least cardinality, the lower sharp neutro- 5103
sophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5104
N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5105
VN SHE \ {z} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5106
such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5107
Vertices in common but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it doesn’t have 5108

the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro- 5109

sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have a some 5110
SuperHyperVertices in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 5111
perHyperVertices VN SHE ∪ {z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 5112
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5113
perClique. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s a 5114

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in common [there 5115

are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the 5116
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), an neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 5117
titled its neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 5118
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s 5119
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 5120

VN SHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious neutro- 5121
sophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 5122
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE , is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VN SHE , 5123
includes only all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs 5124
are titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5125
N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5126

tices VN SHE , is the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic 5127

SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic Su- 5128
perHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in common. Thus, a connected 5129
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The any neutrosophic SuperHyperClique only 5130
contains all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5131
Vertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible 5132

neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5133

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.21: a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperClique in the Example (8.3.3) 113NHG18a

in with no exception but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5134

and neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out.  5135

113EXM18a Example 8.3.3. In the Figure (8.21), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath N SHP : 5136

(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded to E5 , 5137
VE5 , of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath 5138
N SHP : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (8.21), is the SuperHyperClique. 5139

Proposition 8.3.4. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E). Then 5140
a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic 5141
SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions on the form of interior neutrosophic 5142

SuperHyperVertices from the same neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods not excluding any 5143
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has the neutrosophic number 5144
of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges in the terms of the maximum neutrosophic cardinality. 5145

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E). Assume a neutrosophic

SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then
every neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others
in common. Thus those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be contained
in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are potentially
included in a neutrosophic style-SuperHyperClique. Formally, consider

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz }

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.

where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z

if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge between the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition
for the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique but with
slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

E
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Let Zi ∼ Zj ,
be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E. Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

But with the slightly differences, 5146

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.

Thus E is a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique where E is fixed that means Ex = E. for all 5147
neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices but in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, Ex could 5148

be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5149
N SHG : (V, E). If a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 5150
then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is at least z. It’s 5151
straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5152
is at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 5153
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5154

the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to 5155

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in some cases but the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5156
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 5157
SuperHyperVertices are contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The main definition of 5158
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has two titles. a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique and 5159
its corresponded quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms 5160

of quasi-styles. For any neutrosophic number, there’s a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique 5161

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

with that quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 5162
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, 5163
then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the 5164
neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques for all neutrosophic numbers less than its neutrosophic 5165
corresponded maximum number. The essence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique ends up 5166
but this essence starts up in the terms of the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique, again 5167

and more in the operations of collecting all the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques acted 5168
on the all possible used formations of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one 5169
neutrosophic number. This neutrosophic number is considered as the equivalence class for all 5170
corresponded quasi-SuperHyperCliques. Let zneutrosophic Number , Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet and 5171
Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a 5172
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Then 5173

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class = {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is re-formalized 5174
and redefined as follows. 5175

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 5176
definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5177

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 5178
SuperHyperClique poses the upcoming expressions. 5179

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 5180

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And then, 5181

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 5182

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5183

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5184

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5185

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “neutrosophic Supe- 5186
rHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5187
tices such that any amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident to a neutrosophic 5188
SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” but, 5189
precisely, it’s the generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” since “neutrosophic 5190

Quasi-SuperHyperClique” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic Super- 5191

HyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood” 5192
may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as 5193
initial framework and preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the 5194
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “neutro- 5195
sophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique”, and “neutrosophic 5196

SuperHyperClique” are up. 5197

Thus, let zneutrosophic Number , Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5198
be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a neutrosophic Super- 5199
HyperClique and the new terms are up. 5200

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5201

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class
5202

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class
5203

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality =
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 5204

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5205

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

5206

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5207

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), the all interior neutro- 5208
sophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique if for any of them, 5209
and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the two interior neutrosophic 5210
SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic 5211
exception at all. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Let a 5212

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge N SHE has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices r. Consider 5213

all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic Supe- 5214
rHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude 5215
to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider 5216
there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique with the least cardinality, the lower sharp neutro- 5217
sophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5218

N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5219
VN SHE \ {z} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5220
such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5221
Vertices in common but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it doesn’t have 5222
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro- 5223
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have a some 5224

SuperHyperVertices in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 5225

perHyperVertices VN SHE ∪ {z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 5226
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5227
perClique. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s a 5228
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in common [there 5229
are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the 5230

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), an neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 5231

titled its neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 5232
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s 5233
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 5234
VN SHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious neutro- 5235
sophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 5236

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE , is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VN SHE , 5237

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.22: a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the neutrosophic Example (8.3.5) 113NHG19a

includes only all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs 5238

are titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5239

N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5240
tices VN SHE , is the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic 5241
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic Su- 5242
perHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in common. Thus, a connected 5243
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The any neutrosophic SuperHyperClique only 5244

contains all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5245
Vertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible 5246
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5247
in with no exception but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5248
and neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out.  5249

113EXM19a Example 8.3.5. In the Figure (8.22), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 5250
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, corresponded 5251
to E8 , VE8 , by the Algorithm in previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5252

of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : (V, E), in the neutrosophic 5253
SuperHyperModel (8.22), corresponded to E5 , VE8 , is the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5254
5255

Proposition 8.3.6. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E). Then a 5256
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic 5257

SuperHyperVertices, not neutrosophic excluding the neutrosophic SuperHyperCenter, with only 5258

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

all neutrosophic exceptions in the neutrosophic form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5259
from common neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, neutrosophic including only one neutrosophic 5260
SuperHyperEdge. a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has the neutrosophic number of the 5261
neutrosophic cardinality of the one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 5262

Proof. Assume a connected SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E). Assume a neutrosophic

SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then
every neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others
in common. Thus those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be contained
in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are potentially
included in a neutrosophic style-SuperHyperClique. Formally, consider

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz }

are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.

where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z

if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge between the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition
for the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique but with
slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

E
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Let Zi ∼ Zj ,
be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E. Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

But with the slightly differences, 5263

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.

Thus E is a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique where E is fixed that means Ex = E. for all 5264

neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices but in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, Ex could 5265

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5266
N SHG : (V, E). If a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 5267
then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is at least z. It’s 5268
straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5269
is at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 5270
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5271

the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to 5272

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in some cases but the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5273
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 5274
SuperHyperVertices are contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The main definition of 5275
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has two titles. a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique and 5276
its corresponded quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms 5277

of quasi-styles. For any neutrosophic number, there’s a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique 5278

with that quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 5279
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, 5280
then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the 5281
neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques for all neutrosophic numbers less than its neutrosophic 5282
corresponded maximum number. The essence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique ends up 5283

but this essence starts up in the terms of the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique, again 5284
and more in the operations of collecting all the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques acted 5285
on the all possible used formations of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one 5286
neutrosophic number. This neutrosophic number is considered as the equivalence class for all 5287
corresponded quasi-SuperHyperCliques. Let zneutrosophic Number , Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet and 5288
Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a 5289

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Then 5290

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class = {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.
As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is re-formalized 5291

and redefined as follows. 5292

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.
To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 5293

definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5294

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 5295
SuperHyperClique poses the upcoming expressions. 5296

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 5297

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And then, 5298

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 5299

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

= 2}.
5300

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5301

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5302

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “neutrosophic Supe- 5303

rHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5304

tices such that any amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident to a neutrosophic 5305
SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” but, 5306
precisely, it’s the generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” since “neutrosophic 5307
Quasi-SuperHyperClique” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic Super- 5308
HyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood” 5309

may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as 5310

initial framework and preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the 5311
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “neutro- 5312
sophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique”, and “neutrosophic 5313
SuperHyperClique” are up. 5314
Thus, let zneutrosophic Number , Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5315

be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a neutrosophic Super- 5316

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HyperClique and the new terms are up. 5317

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5318

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5319

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5320

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality =
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 5321

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality

= 2}.
5322

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5323

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5324

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), the all interior neutro- 5325
sophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique if for any of them, 5326
and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the two interior neutrosophic 5327
SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic 5328

exception at all. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Let a 5329
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge N SHE has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices r. Consider 5330
all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic Supe- 5331
rHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude 5332
to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider 5333
there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique with the least cardinality, the lower sharp neutro- 5334

sophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5335
N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5336
VN SHE \ {z} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5337
such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5338
Vertices in common but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it doesn’t have 5339
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro- 5340

sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have a some 5341

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperVertices in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 5342

perHyperVertices VN SHE ∪ {z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 5343
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5344
perClique. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s a 5345
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in common [there 5346
are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the 5347

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), an neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 5348

titled its neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 5349
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s 5350
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 5351
VN SHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious neutro- 5352
sophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 5353

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE , is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VN SHE , 5354

includes only all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs 5355
are titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5356
N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5357
tices VN SHE , is the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic 5358
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic Su- 5359

perHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in common. Thus, a connected 5360

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The any neutrosophic SuperHyperClique only 5361
contains all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5362
Vertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible 5363
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5364
in with no exception but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5365

and neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out.  5366

113EXM20a Example 8.3.7. In the Figure (8.23), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar N SHS : 5367
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 5368
in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 5369
neutrosophic SuperHyperStar N SHS : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (8.23), , 5370
corresponded to E5 , VE5 , is the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5371

Proposition 8.3.8. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E). 5372
Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 5373
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with no any neutrosophic exceptions in the form of interior 5374
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with only no exception. 5375
a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has the neutrosophic maximum number of on neutrosophic 5376
cardinality of the first SuperHyperPart plus neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. 5377

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite N SHB : (V, E). Assume a neut-
rosophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices.
Then every neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge
with others in common. Thus those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be
contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are
potentially included in a neutrosophic style-SuperHyperClique. Formally, consider

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz }

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.23: a neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the neutrosophic Example (8.3.7) 113NHG20a

are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z
if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge between the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition
for the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.
This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique but with
slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|neutrosophic cardinality ,
z

E
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Let Zi ∼ Zj ,
be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the neutrosophic

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperEdge E. Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

But with the slightly differences, 5378

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.

Thus E is a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique where E is fixed that means Ex = E. for all 5379

neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices but in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, Ex could 5380

be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5381
N SHG : (V, E). If a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 5382
then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is at least z. It’s 5383
straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5384
is at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 5385

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5386

the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to 5387
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in some cases but the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5388
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 5389
SuperHyperVertices are contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The main definition of 5390
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has two titles. a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique and 5391

its corresponded quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms 5392
of quasi-styles. For any neutrosophic number, there’s a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique 5393
with that quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 5394
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, 5395
then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the 5396
neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques for all neutrosophic numbers less than its neutrosophic 5397

corresponded maximum number. The essence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique ends up 5398
but this essence starts up in the terms of the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique, again 5399
and more in the operations of collecting all the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques acted 5400
on the all possible used formations of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one 5401
neutrosophic number. This neutrosophic number is considered as the equivalence class for all 5402
corresponded quasi-SuperHyperCliques. Let zneutrosophic Number , Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet and 5403

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a 5404

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Then 5405

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class = {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is re-formalized 5406
and redefined as follows. 5407

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 5408
definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5409

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 5410
SuperHyperClique poses the upcoming expressions. 5411

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 5412

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

And then, 5413

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.
To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 5414

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5415

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5416

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class
5417

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.
Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “neutrosophic Supe- 5418
rHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5419

tices such that any amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident to a neutrosophic 5420

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” but, 5421
precisely, it’s the generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” since “neutrosophic 5422
Quasi-SuperHyperClique” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic Super- 5423
HyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood” 5424
may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as 5425
initial framework and preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the 5426

neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “neutro- 5427
sophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique”, and “neutrosophic 5428
SuperHyperClique” are up. 5429
Thus, let zneutrosophic Number , Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5430
be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a neutrosophic Super- 5431
HyperClique and the new terms are up. 5432

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5433

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5434

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

5435

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality =
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 5436

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5437

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5438

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5439

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), the all interior neutro- 5440

sophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique if for any of them, 5441

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the two interior neutrosophic 5442
SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic 5443
exception at all. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Let a 5444
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge N SHE has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices r. Consider 5445
all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic Supe- 5446
rHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude 5447

to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider 5448

there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique with the least cardinality, the lower sharp neutro- 5449
sophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5450
N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5451
VN SHE \ {z} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5452
such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5453

Vertices in common but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it doesn’t have 5454
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro- 5455
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have a some 5456
SuperHyperVertices in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 5457
perHyperVertices VN SHE ∪ {z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 5458
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5459

perClique. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s a 5460
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in common [there 5461
are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the 5462
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), an neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 5463
titled its neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 5464
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s 5465

only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 5466
VN SHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious neutro- 5467
sophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 5468
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE , is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VN SHE , 5469
includes only all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs 5470
are titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5471

N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5472
tices VN SHE , is the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic 5473
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic Su- 5474
perHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in common. Thus, a connected 5475
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The any neutrosophic SuperHyperClique only 5476

contains all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5477
Vertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible 5478
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5479
in with no exception but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5480
and neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out.  5481

113EXM21a Example 8.3.9. In the neutrosophic Figure (8.24), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBi- 5482
partite N SHB : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The obtained 5483
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the neutrosophic Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, 5484
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 5485

N SHB : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (8.24), , corresponded to E6 , VE6 , is 5486

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.24: a neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic

Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the Example (8.3.9) 113NHG21a

the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5487

Proposition 8.3.10. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E). 5488
Then a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 5489
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exception in the neutrosophic form 5490
of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from a neutrosophic SuperHyperPart and only 5491
no exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from another SuperHyperPart titled 5492
“SuperHyperNeighbors” with neglecting and ignoring more than one of them. a neutrosophic 5493

SuperHyperClique has the neutrosophic maximum number on all the neutrosophic summation on 5494
the neutrosophic cardinality of the all neutrosophic SuperHyperParts form one SuperHyperEdges 5495
not plus any. 5496

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E). Assume a

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer-
tices. Then every neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge
with others in common. Thus those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be
contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are
potentially included in a neutrosophic style-SuperHyperClique. Formally, consider

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz }

are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z

if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge between the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition
for the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique but with
slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

E
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Let Zi ∼ Zj ,
be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E. Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

But with the slightly differences, 5497

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.

Thus E is a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique where E is fixed that means Ex = E. for all 5498
neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices but in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, Ex could 5499
be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5500
N SHG : (V, E). If a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 5501
then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is at least z. It’s 5502

straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5503

is at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 5504
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5505
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to 5506
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in some cases but the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5507
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 5508

SuperHyperVertices are contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The main definition of 5509

the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has two titles. a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique and 5510
its corresponded quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms 5511
of quasi-styles. For any neutrosophic number, there’s a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique 5512
with that quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 5513
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, 5514

then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the 5515

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques for all neutrosophic numbers less than its neutrosophic 5516
corresponded maximum number. The essence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique ends up 5517
but this essence starts up in the terms of the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique, again 5518
and more in the operations of collecting all the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques acted 5519
on the all possible used formations of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one 5520
neutrosophic number. This neutrosophic number is considered as the equivalence class for all 5521

corresponded quasi-SuperHyperCliques. Let zneutrosophic Number , Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet and 5522

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a 5523
neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Then 5524

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class = {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is re-formalized 5525
and redefined as follows. 5526

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 5527
definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5528

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 5529
SuperHyperClique poses the upcoming expressions. 5530

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 5531

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And then, 5532

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 5533

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5534

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

5535

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5536

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “neutrosophic Supe- 5537

rHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5538

tices such that any amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident to a neutrosophic 5539
SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” but, 5540
precisely, it’s the generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” since “neutrosophic 5541
Quasi-SuperHyperClique” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic Super- 5542
HyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood” 5543

may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as 5544

initial framework and preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the 5545
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “neutro- 5546
sophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique”, and “neutrosophic 5547
SuperHyperClique” are up. 5548
Thus, let zneutrosophic Number , Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5549

be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a neutrosophic Super- 5550

HyperClique and the new terms are up. 5551

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5552

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5553

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5554

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality =
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 5555

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5556

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

5557

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5558

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), the all interior neutro- 5559
sophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique if for any of them, 5560
and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the two interior neutrosophic 5561
SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic 5562
exception at all. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Let a 5563

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge N SHE has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices r. Consider 5564

all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic Supe- 5565
rHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude 5566
to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider 5567
there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique with the least cardinality, the lower sharp neutro- 5568
sophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5569

N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5570
VN SHE \ {z} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5571
such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5572
Vertices in common but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it doesn’t have 5573
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro- 5574
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have a some 5575

SuperHyperVertices in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 5576

perHyperVertices VN SHE ∪ {z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 5577
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5578
perClique. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s a 5579
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in common [there 5580
are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the 5581

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), an neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 5582

titled its neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 5583
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s 5584
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 5585
VN SHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious neutro- 5586
sophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 5587

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE , is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VN SHE , 5588

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.25: a neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperClique in the Example (8.3.11) 113NHG22a

includes only all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs 5589
are titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5590
N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5591
tices VN SHE , is the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic 5592

SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic Su- 5593

perHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in common. Thus, a connected 5594
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The any neutrosophic SuperHyperClique only 5595
contains all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5596
Vertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible 5597

neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5598

in with no exception but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5599
and neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out.  5600

113EXM22a Example 8.3.11. In the Figure (8.25), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 5601
N SHM : (V, E), is highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The obtained neutrosophic 5602

SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 5603

SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite N SHM : (V, E), 5604
, corresponded to E3 , VE3 , in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (8.25), is the neutrosophic 5605
SuperHyperClique. 5606

Proposition 8.3.12. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E). Then 5607
a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic 5608
SuperHyperVertices, not excluding the neutrosophic SuperHyperCenter, with only no exception in 5609
the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from same neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 5610

with not the exclusion. a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has the neutrosophic maximum 5611

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

number on all the neutrosophic number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges have common 5612
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors inside for a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex with the not 5613
exclusion. 5614

Proof. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E). Assume a neutro-
sophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices.
Then every neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge
with others in common. Thus those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be
contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are
potentially included in a neutrosophic style-SuperHyperClique. Formally, consider

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz }

are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.

where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z

if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge between the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices Zi and Zj . The other definition
for the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is

{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique but with
slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

E
is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Let Zi ∼ Zj ,
be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge E. Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

But with the slightly differences, 5615

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.

Thus E is a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique where E is fixed that means Ex = E. for all 5616

neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices but in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, Ex could 5617

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5618
N SHG : (V, E). If a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 5619
then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is at least z. It’s 5620
straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5621
is at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 5622
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5623

the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to 5624

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in some cases but the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5625
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 5626
SuperHyperVertices are contained in a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. The main definition of 5627
the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique has two titles. a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique and 5628
its corresponded quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms 5629

of quasi-styles. For any neutrosophic number, there’s a neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique 5630

with that quasi-maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded 5631
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s an embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, 5632
then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the 5633
neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques for all neutrosophic numbers less than its neutrosophic 5634
corresponded maximum number. The essence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique ends up 5635

but this essence starts up in the terms of the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique, again 5636
and more in the operations of collecting all the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperCliques acted 5637
on the all possible used formations of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one 5638
neutrosophic number. This neutrosophic number is considered as the equivalence class for all 5639
corresponded quasi-SuperHyperCliques. Let zneutrosophic Number , Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet and 5640
Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a 5641

neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Then 5642

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class = {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.
As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique is re-formalized 5643

and redefined as follows. 5644

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.
To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 5645

definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5646

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 5647
SuperHyperClique poses the upcoming expressions. 5648

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 5649

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And then, 5650

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 5651

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

= 2}.
5652

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5653

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5654

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{S ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “neutrosophic Supe- 5655

rHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5656

tices such that any amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident to a neutrosophic 5657
SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” but, 5658
precisely, it’s the generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique” since “neutrosophic 5659
Quasi-SuperHyperClique” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic Super- 5660
HyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood” 5661

may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperClique” in a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as 5662

initial framework and preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the 5663
neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “neutro- 5664
sophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperClique”, and “neutrosophic 5665
SuperHyperClique” are up. 5666
Thus, let zneutrosophic Number , Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique 5667

be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a neutrosophic Super- 5668

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HyperClique and the new terms are up. 5669

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5670

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5671

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5672

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality =
max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 5673

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality

= 2}.
5674

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2}.
5675

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zneutrosophic Number = 2}.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

5676

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperClique =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈
∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = 2}.

Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), the all interior neutro- 5677
sophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperClique if for any of them, 5678
and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, the two interior neutrosophic 5679
SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no neutrosophic 5680

exception at all. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). Let a 5681
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge N SHE has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices r. Consider 5682
all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic Supe- 5683
rHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, exclude 5684
to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Consider 5685
there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique with the least cardinality, the lower sharp neutro- 5686

sophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5687
N SHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5688
VN SHE \ {z} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5689
such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5690
Vertices in common but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. Since it doesn’t have 5691
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro- 5692

sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have a some 5693

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperVertices in common. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 5694

perHyperVertices VN SHE ∪ {z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 5695
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5696
perClique. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s a 5697
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in common [there 5698
are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the 5699

connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E), an neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 5700

titled its neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 5701
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s 5702
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 5703
VN SHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious neutro- 5704
sophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 5705

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique, VN SHE , is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VN SHE , 5706

includes only all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs 5707
are titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5708
N SHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5709
tices VN SHE , is the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic 5710
SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic Su- 5711

perHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in common. Thus, a connected 5712

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E). The any neutrosophic SuperHyperClique only 5713
contains all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5714
Vertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible 5715
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5716
in with no exception but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 5717

and neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out.  5718

113EXM23a Example 8.3.13. In the neutrosophic Figure (8.26), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5719

Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic 5720
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of 5721
the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel N SHW : (V, E), , corresponded to E5 , VE6 , in 5722
the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (8.26), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperClique. 5723

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 8.26: a neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic

Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperClique in the neutrosophic Example (8.3.13) 113NHG23a

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 9 5724

SuperHyperMatching 5725

9.1 Definitions 5726

Definition 9.1.1. ((neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching). 5727

Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 5728

(i) a neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5729

Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum cardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of high cardinal- 5730
ity SuperHyperEdges such that there’s no SuperHyperVertex not to in a SuperHyperEdge 5731
and there’s no SuperHyperEdge to have a SuperHyperVertex in a SuperHyperEdge; 5732

(ii) a neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5733

Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 5734

SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges such 5735
that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex not to in a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 5736
and there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 5737
in a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge; 5738

(iii) a neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for a 5739

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperPoly- 5740
nomial contains the coefficients defined as the number of the maximum cardinality of 5741
a SuperHyperSet S of high cardinality SuperHyperEdges such that there’s no Super- 5742
HyperVertex not to in a SuperHyperEdge and there’s no SuperHyperEdge to have a 5743

SuperHyperVertex in a SuperHyperEdge and the power is corresponded to its coefficient; 5744

(iv) a neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for a 5745

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperPolyno- 5746

mial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the neutrosophic number of the 5747
maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neut- 5748
rosophic cardinality neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges such that there’s no neutrosophic 5749
SuperHyperVertex not to in a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and there’s no neutrosophic 5750
SuperHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5751
perEdge and the neutrosophic power is neutrosophicly corresponded to its neutrosophic 5752

coefficient; 5753

257
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(v) a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5754

Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum cardinality of a SuperHyperSet S of high cardinal- 5755
ity SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no SuperHyperVertex not to in a SuperHyperEdge 5756
and there’s no SuperHyperEdge to have a SuperHyperVertex in a SuperHyperEdge; 5757

(vi) a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5758

perGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic 5759
SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 5760
that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex not to in a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 5761
and there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex 5762

in a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge; 5763

(vii) a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 5764

a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperPoly- 5765
nomial contains the coefficients defined as the number of the maximum cardinality of 5766

a SuperHyperSet S of high cardinality SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no Supe- 5767

rHyperVertex not to in a SuperHyperEdge and there’s no SuperHyperEdge to have a 5768
SuperHyperVertex in a SuperHyperEdge and the power is corresponded to its coefficient; 5769

(viii) a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for 5770

a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperPoly- 5771
nomial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the neutrosophic number of the 5772
maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutro- 5773
sophic cardinality neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no neutrosophic 5774
SuperHyperVertex not to in a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and there’s no neutrosophic 5775

SuperHyperEdge to have a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in a neutrosophic SuperHy- 5776

perEdge and the neutrosophic power is neutrosophicly corresponded to its neutrosophic 5777
coefficient. 5778

9.2 Examples 5779

The SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic 5780
SuperHyperMatching, S is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 5781

neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, not: S is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: S does 5782

includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 5783
ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple neutrosophic 5784
type-SuperHyperSet called the 5785

“neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching” 5786

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 5787

neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, 5788

is only and only S in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with a 5789
illustrated SuperHyperModeling. It’s also, a neutrosophic free-triangle SuperHyperModel. 5790
But all only non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic Supe- 5791

rHyperMatching amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets, 5792

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

are S. A connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) as Linearly-over-packed 5793

SuperHyperModel is featured on the Figures. 5794

119EXM1 Example 9.2.1. Assume the SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (9.1), (9.2), (9.3), (9.4), (9.5), 5795
(9.6), (9.7), (9.8), (9.9), (9.10), (9.11), (9.12), (9.13), (9.14), (9.15), (9.16), (9.17), (9.18), (9.19), 5796

and (9.20). 5797

• On the Figure (9.1), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 5798

SuperHyperMatching, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 5799
but E2 is a loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 5800
Thus in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one neutrosophic 5801
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is neutrosophic 5802

isolated means that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a neutrosophic 5803

endpoint. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given 5804
neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. 5805

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices]

5806
is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. 5807
The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 5808

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 5809

perMatching. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 5810
perEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 5811

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic Su- 5812

perHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 5813
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 5814
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no neutrosophic 5815
SuperHyperVertex of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an neut- 5816
rosophic SuperHyperEdge for all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. There are not only 5817

two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. 5818

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is up. The obvious simple 5819
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is a neut- 5820
rosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the 5821
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 5822

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 5823

SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of 5824

the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic 5825
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 5826

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

Is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 5827

SuperHyperMatching. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 5828

SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 5829

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

Is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5830

Graph ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHy- 5831
perVertices such that there’s no a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some neutrosophic 5832
SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutro- 5833

sophic SuperHyperMatching and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. Since 5834

it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 5835
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no neutrosophic Su- 5836
perHyperVertex of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an neutrosophic 5837
SuperHyperEdge for all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. There aren’t only less than 5838
three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 5839

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, 5840

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

Is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 5841

SuperHyperMatching, not: 5842

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: 5843

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic 5844
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious 5845

simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 5846

“neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching” 5847

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 5848

neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, 5849

is only and only 5850

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

• On the Figure (9.2), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5851

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (9.3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5852

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 3 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

• On the Figure (9.4), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, a SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5853

C(N SHG) = {E4 , E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.

C(N SHG) = {E5 , E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = 2z 2 is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
C(N SHG) = z 4 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial.

• On the Figure (9.5), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5854

C(N SHG)neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperMatching = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching = {V1 , V2 , V3 , V4 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 5 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is mentioned as the 5855

SuperHyperModel ESHG : (V, E) in the Figure (9.5). 5856

• On the Figure (9.6), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5857

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {Ei }22

i=12 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 5z 11 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }22
i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 22 .

• On the Figure (9.7), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5858

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {Ei }17

i=15 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z 7 + z 3 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }14
i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 14 .

• On the Figure (9.8), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5859

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {Ei }17

i=15 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = +z 3 .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }14
i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 14 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of dense SuperHyperModel 5860

as the Figure (9.8). 5861

• On the Figure (9.9), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5862

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {Ei }22

i=12 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 11 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }22
i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 22 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of highly-embedding- 5863

connected SuperHyperModel as the Figure (9.9). 5864

• On the Figure (9.10), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5865

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {Ei }17

i=15 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = +z 3 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }14
i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 14 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of dense SuperHyperModel 5866

as the Figure (9.10). 5867

• On the Figure (9.11), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5868

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {E1 , E3 }.

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {E6 , E7 , E8 }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 3 + z 2 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }6i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z 6 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 5869

• On the Figure (9.12), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5870

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {Ei }6i=2 .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 5 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }10
i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 10 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 5871

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (9.13), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5872

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {E1 , E3 }.

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {E6 , E7 , E8 }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 3 + z 2 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }6i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z 6 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 5873

• On the Figure (9.14), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5874

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E2 }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }3i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z 2 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s noted that this 5875
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic graph G : (V, E) thus 5876
the notions in both settings are coincided. 5877

• On the Figure (9.15), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5878

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atching = {E2i−1 }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicSuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }6i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) as Linearly-Connected 5879

SuperHyperModel On the Figure (9.15). 5880

• On the Figure (9.16), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5881

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E2i−1 }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }15
i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z 15 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 5882

• On the Figure (9.17), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5883

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E2i−1 }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }15
i=1 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z 15 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) as Linearly-over-packed 5884

SuperHyperModel is featured On the Figure (9.17). 5885

• On the Figure (9.18), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5886

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E2i−1 }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E2i }3i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z 3 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 5887

• On the Figure (9.19), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5888

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E2i−1 }6i=1 .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E2i }6i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = 2z 12 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 5889

• On the Figure (9.20), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. 5890

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching = {E6 }.

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 5891

9.3 Results 5892

The previous neutrosophic approaches apply on the upcoming neutrosophic results on 5893
neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 5894

Proposition 9.3.1. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then a 5895
neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching-style with the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyper- 5896
Cardinality is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 5897

Proposition 9.3.2. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 5898
Then a neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 5899

interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions in the form 5900

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.1: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG1

Figure 9.2: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG2

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.3: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG3

Figure 9.4: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.5: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG5

Figure 9.6: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG6

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.7: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG7

Figure 9.8: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG8

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.9: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG9

Figure 9.10: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG10

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.11: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG11

Figure 9.12: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG12

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.13: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG13

of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 5901

not excluding only any interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the neutrosophic unique 5902
SuperHyperEdges. a neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching has the neutrosophic number of 5903
all the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Also, 5904

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Proof. Assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching
since neither amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges nor amount of SuperHyperVertices
where amount refers to the neutrosophic number of SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges)
more than one to form any kind of SuperHyperEdges or any number of SuperHyperEdges. Let
us consider the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.14: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG14

This neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the eligibilities

to propose property such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of a neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices but the maximum neutrosophic cardinality indicates that these neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSets couldn’t give us the neutrosophic lower bound in the term of neutrosophic
sharpness. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices implies at least on-quasi-triangle style is up but

sometimes the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is free-quasi-triangle and it doesn’t make a contradiction

to the supposition on the connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.15: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG15

Figure 9.16: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG16

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.17: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG17

Figure 9.18: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG18

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.19: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG19

Thus the minimum case never happens in the generality of the connected loopless neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs. Thus if we assume in the worst case, literally,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is a quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp bound
for the cardinality, of a quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching is the cardinality of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Then we’ve lost some connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of the connected
loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and their quasi-types
but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching. It’s the contradiction
to that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to deny this statement. One of
them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and cycle as the counterexamples-classes or
reversely direction star as the examples-classes, are well-known classes in that setting and they
could be considered as the examples-classes and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at least
two SuperHyperVertices to form a SuperHyperEdge. It doesn’t withdraw the principles of the
main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the condition is on the existence of

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.20: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperMatching in the

Example (9.2.1) 119NSHG20

the SuperHyperEdge instead of acting on the SuperHyperVertices. In other words, if there’s a

SuperHyperEdge, then the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the
intended definition to be applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of
the main definition but by the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition.
The neutrosophic structure of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching decorates the neut-
rosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have received any neutrosophic connections so as this
neutrosophic style implies different versions of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the max-
imum neutrosophic cardinality in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are spotlight.
The lower neutrosophic bound is to have the maximum neutrosophic groups of neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices have perfect neutrosophic connections inside each of SuperHyperEdges and
the outside of this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet doesn’t matter but regarding the connectedness
of the used neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph arising from its neutrosophic properties taken from
the fact that it’s simple. If there’s no more than one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the
targeted neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, then there’s no neutrosophic connection. Furthermore,
the neutrosophic existence of one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no neutrosophic effect
to talk about the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching. Since at least two neutrosophic Su-
perHyperVertices involve to make a title in the neutrosophic background of the neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph. The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge but at least two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices make the neutrosophic
version of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the neutrosophic setting of non-obvious
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

necessary to mention that the word “Simple” is used as neutrosophic adjective for the initial
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, induces there’s no neutrosophic appearance of the loop neutro-
sophic version of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and this neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is
said to be loopless. The neutrosophic adjective “loop” on the basic neutrosophic framework
engages one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it never happens in this neutrosophic set-
ting. With these neutrosophic bases, on a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there’s at least
one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge thus there’s at least a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching
has the neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus, a neutrosophic R-
SuperHyperMatching has the neutrosophic cardinality at least a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge.
Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V \ V \ {z}. This neutrosophic SuperHyperSet isn’t
a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching since either the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is an
obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperModel thus it never happens since there’s no neutrosophic
usage of this neutrosophic framework and even more there’s no neutrosophic connection in-
side or the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious and as its consequences, there’s a
neutrosophic contradiction with the term “neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching” since the
maximum neutrosophic cardinality never happens for this neutrosophic style of the neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet and beyond that there’s no neutrosophic connection inside as mentioned in first
neutrosophic case in the forms of drawback for this selected neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Let

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

Comes up. This neutrosophic case implies having the neutrosophic style of on-quasi-triangle
neutrosophic style on the every neutrosophic elements of this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet.
Precisely, the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that some neutrosophic amount of the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle neutrosophic style. The neutrosophic cardinality of
the v SuperHypeSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

Is the maximum in comparison to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

But the lower neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum neutrosophic cardinality of the
maximum neutrosophic cardinality ends up the neutrosophic discussion. The first neutrosophic
term refers to the neutrosophic setting of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph but this key point is
enough since there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperClass of a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph has no
on-quasi-triangle neutrosophic style amid some amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices.
This neutrosophic setting of the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel proposes a neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet has only some amount neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from one neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no neutrosophic amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges
more than one involving these some amount of these neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices.
The neutrosophic cardinality of this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet is the maximum and the
neutrosophic case is occurred in the minimum neutrosophic situation. To sum them up, the
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Has the maximum neutrosophic cardinality such that

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Contains some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct-covers-order-amount

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices taken from the
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

It means that the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching for the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as used

neutrosophic background in the neutrosophic terms of worst neutrosophic case and the common
theme of the lower neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are neutrosophic free-quasi-triangle.
Assume a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z neutrosophic number of
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then every neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at
least no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others in common. Thus those neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be contained in a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.
Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are potentially included in a neutrosophic style-R-
SuperHyperMatching. Formally, consider

V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).

Are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) .

Thus
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z

if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and only one
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
Zi and Zj . The other definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the
terms of neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching is

{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .

This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching but
with slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

and
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching. Let

E
Zi ∼ Zj , be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus,

E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

But with the slightly differences, 5905

neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
5906

neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching =
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Thus E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is a neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching where E ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

is fixed that means Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . for all neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices
but in a neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) could be different and it’s
not unique. To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
If a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
then the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching is at least

V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).

It’s straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching 5907
is at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the neutro- 5908
sophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In 5909
other words, the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum 5910

neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to neutrosophic SuperHy- 5911

perMatching in some cases but the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 5912
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 5913
SuperHyperVertices are contained in a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching. 5914
The obvious SuperHyperGraph has no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. But the non-obvious 5915
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel is up. The quasi-SuperHyperModel addresses some issues about 5916

the neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially delivers some remarks on the neutro- 5917
sophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct amount 5918
of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices up 5919
to all taken from that neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 5920
but this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is either has 5921
the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality or it doesn’t have maximum neutrosophic 5922

SuperHyperCardinality. In a non-obvious SuperHyperModel, there’s at least one neutrosophic 5923

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperEdge containing at least all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus it forms a neut- 5924
rosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching where the neutrosophic completion of the neutrosophic 5925
incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, literarily, a neutrosophic embedded R-SuperHyperMatching. 5926
The SuperHyperNotions of embedded SuperHyperSet and quasi-SuperHyperSet coincide. In the 5927
original setting, these types of SuperHyperSets only don’t satisfy on the maximum SuperHyper- 5928
Cardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected such that those SuperHyperSets have the 5929

maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality and they’re neutrosophic SuperHyperOptimal. 5930

The less than two distinct types of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are included in the min- 5931
imum neutrosophic style of the embedded neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching. The interior 5932
types of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are deciders. Since the neutrosophic number of 5933
SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The 5934
common connections, more precise and more formal, the perfect unique connections inside the 5935

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any distinct types of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices pose the 5936
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching. Thus neutrosophic exterior SuperHyperVertices could 5937
be used only in one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and in neutrosophic SuperHyperRelation 5938
with the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. In 5939
the embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, there’s the usage of exterior neutrosophic 5940
SuperHyperVertices since they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the title 5941

“exterior” is more relevant than the title “interior”. One neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no 5942
connection, inside. Thus, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5943
tices with one SuperHyperElement has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal case 5944
implying the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching. The neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching 5945
with the exclusion of the exclusion of all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one neutrosophic 5946
SuperHyperEdge and with other terms, the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching with the 5947

inclusion of all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, is a 5948

neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching. To sum them up, in a connected non-obvious neut- 5949
rosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 5950
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior neutrosophic 5951
SuperHyperVertices inside of any given neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching minus 5952
all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, 5953

there’s only an unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct 5954
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching, minus all 5955
neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 5956
The main definition of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching has two titles. a neutro- 5957
sophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching and its corresponded quasi-maximum neutrosophic R- 5958

SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For any neutrosophic num- 5959
ber, there’s a neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching with that quasi-maximum neutrosophic 5960
SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s 5961
an embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions 5962
lead us to take the collection of all the neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatchings for all 5963
neutrosophic numbers less than its neutrosophic corresponded maximum number. The essence 5964

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of the 5965
neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching, again and more in the operations of collecting all 5966
the neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatchings acted on the all possible used formations of 5967
the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one neutrosophic number. This neutrosophic 5968
number is considered as the equivalence class for all corresponded quasi-R-SuperHyperMatchings. 5969

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Let zneutrosophic Number , Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching be a neut- 5970
rosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. 5971
Then 5972

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class = {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is re- 5973
formalized and redefined as follows. 5974

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number }.

To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 5975

definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. 5976

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 5977
SuperHyperMatching poses the upcoming expressions. 5978

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 5979

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

= max zneutrosophic Number

[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
And then, 5980

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 5981

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
5982

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet = Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ,
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
5983

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zneutrosophic Number
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
5984

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{S ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Sneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “neutrosophic Supe- 5985
rHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 5986

tices such that any amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident to a neutrosophic 5987

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperMatching” 5988

but, precisely, it’s the generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperMatching” since 5989
“neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperMatching” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching” in 5990
a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic 5991
SuperHyperNeighborhood” may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching” in a neut- 5992
rosophic SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and preliminarily background since there 5993
are some ambiguities about the neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get 5994
orderly keywords, the terms, “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “neutrosophic Quasi- 5995
SuperHyperMatching”, and “neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching” are up. 5996
Thus, let zneutrosophic Number , Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching5997
be a neutrosophic number, a neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a neutrosophic Super- 5998
HyperMatching and the new terms are up. 5999

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

6000

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

6001

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

6002

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality = max zneutrosophic Number }.
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 6003

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =

∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6004

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class =
∪zneutrosophic Number {Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality
= zneutrosophic Number |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6005

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zneutrosophic Number
[zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6006

Gneutrosophic SuperHyperMatching =
{Nneutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zneutrosophic Number [zneutrosophic Number ]neutrosophic Class |
|Nneutrosophic SuperHyperSet |neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching if
for any of them, and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no
neutrosophic exception at all minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of
them.
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations are coming
up.
The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching.

The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyper-

Graph ESHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality
of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given
by neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is related to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

There’s not only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is up. The obvious
simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is a
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. But the
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the non-obvious simple
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching is up. To sum
them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-

SuperHyperMatching. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Vertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
such that there’s no a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Vertices instead of all given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutro-
sophic SuperHyperMatching and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. Since it’s
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro-
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some amount
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet
called the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. There isn’t only less than two neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is up. The non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic

SuperHyperMatching, not:

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not:

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHy- 6007
perGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded to an Su- 6008
perHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple neutrosophic 6009
type-SuperHyperSet called the 6010

“neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching” 6011

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 6012

neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching, 6013

is only and only

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with a illustrated SuperHyper-

Modeling. It’s also, not only a neutrosophic free-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel and a
neutrosophic on-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel but also it’s a neutrosophic stable em-
bedded SuperHyperModel. But all only non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets
of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, are

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

To sum them up, assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
Then in the worst case, literally,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

is a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp
bound for the cardinality, of a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching is the cardinality of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

6014
To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior 6015
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching if 6016
for any of them, and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior 6017
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no 6018

neutrosophic exception at all minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of 6019

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

them. 6020
Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let a neutrosophic 6021
SuperHyperEdge ESHE : E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 6022
r. Consider all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from 6023
that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct neutrosophic 6024
SuperHyperVertices, exclude to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 6025

SuperHyperVertices. Consider there’s a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching with the least 6026

cardinality, the lower sharp neutrosophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a 6027
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 6028
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE \ {z} is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 6029
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 6030
to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely but it isn’t a neutrosophic R- 6031

SuperHyperMatching. Since it doesn’t have the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 6032

a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a 6033
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some SuperHyperVertices uniquely. The neutrosophic 6034
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE ∪ {z} is the maximum 6035
neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 6036
but it isn’t a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic 6037

procedure such that such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic 6038
SuperHyperVertices uniquely [there are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside 6039
implying there’s, sometimes in the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), 6040
a neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, titled its neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that 6041
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do 6042
“the neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside 6043

the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VESHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic 6044
SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching, VESHE 6045
is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R- 6046
SuperHyperMatching, VESHE , is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VESHE , includes only 6047
all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs are titled 6048
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : 6049

(V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE , 6050
is the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 6051
S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to 6052
have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely. Thus, in a connected neutrosophic 6053
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Any neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching only contains 6054

all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 6055
from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all possible 6056
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods 6057
in with no exception minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them not all of 6058
them but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods and neutrosophic 6059
SuperHyperNeighbors out. 6060

The SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperMatching, is up. There’s neither empty 6061

SuperHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 6062
of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the simple neutrosophic type- 6063
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 6064

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6065

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. The 6066

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6067

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6068

ESHG : (V, E) is a neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality
6069
of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] 6070
such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is 6071
common and there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 6072
There are not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 6073
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is up. The obvious 6074
simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching is a 6075
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the 6076
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6077

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHy- 6078
perSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 6079

SuperHyperMatching is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutro- 6080

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

sophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6081

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Super- 6082

HyperMatching. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 6083

perEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6084

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6085

Graph ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHy- 6086
perVertices such that there’s no a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some neutrosophic 6087

SuperHyperVertices given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutro- 6088

sophic SuperHyperMatching and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. Since it’s 6089
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro- 6090
sophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 6091
tex of a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 6092
for all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. There aren’t only less than three neutrosophic Super- 6093

HyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 6094

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, 6095

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6096
Matching, not: 6097

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: 6098

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6099

Graph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple neutrosophic 6100
type-SuperHyperSet called the 6101

“neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching” 6102

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 6103

neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching, 6104

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.21: a neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperMatching in the Example (9.3.3) 119NSHG18a

is only and only 6105

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).  6106

119EXM18a Example 9.3.3. In the Figure (9.21), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 6107
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the neutrosophic 6108
SuperHyperModel (9.21), is the SuperHyperMatching. 6109

Proposition 9.3.4. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then 6110
a neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 6111
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions on the form of interior 6112
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the same neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods not 6113

excluding any neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. a neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching 6114

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.22: a neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching in the neutrosophic Example (9.3.5) 119NSHG19a

has the neutrosophic half number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges in the terms of the 6115
maximum neutrosophic cardinality. Also, 6116

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

119EXM19a Example 9.3.5. In the Figure (9.22), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 6117
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 6118
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (9.22), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. 6119

Proposition 9.3.6. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 6120
Then a neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 6121

interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to a neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. a 6122

neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperMatching has the neutrosophic number of the neutrosophic 6123
cardinality of the one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Also, 6124

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.23: a neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching in the neutrosophic Example (9.3.7) 119NSHG20a

= {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
X
= z |E|neutrosophic Cardinality | E:∈EESHG:(V,E) .
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality

C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 , . . . .

C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = z s + z t +, . . . .

119EXM20a Example 9.3.7. In the Figure (9.23), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 6125
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 6126
in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 6127
neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (9.23), is 6128
the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. 6129

Proposition 9.3.8. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 6130
Then a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 6131
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with no neutrosophic exceptions in the form of interior 6132
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. a neutrosophic 6133
R-SuperHyperMatching has the neutrosophic maximum number of on neutrosophic cardinality 6134

of the minimum SuperHyperPart minus those have common neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors 6135

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.24: a neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic

Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching in the Example (9.3.9) 119NSHG21a

and not unique neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 6136

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

min |PESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .

119EXM21a Example 9.3.9. In the neutrosophic Figure (9.24), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBi- 6137
partite ESHB : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The obtained 6138
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the neutrosophic Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, 6139
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 6140

ESHB : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (9.24), is the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6141
Matching. 6142

Proposition 9.3.10. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 6143
Then a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 6144
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exception in the neutrosophic 6145
form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from a neutrosophic SuperHyperPart and 6146
only no exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from another SuperHyperPart 6147

titled “SuperHyperNeighbors” with neglecting and ignoring more than some of them aren’t 6148

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.25: a neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperMatching in the Example (9.3.11) 119NSHG22a

SuperHyperNeighbors to all. a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching has the neutrosophic 6149

maximum number on all the neutrosophic summation on the neutrosophic cardinality of the 6150
all neutrosophic SuperHyperParts form some SuperHyperEdges minus those make neutrosophic 6151
SuperHypeNeighbors to some not all or not unique. Also, 6152

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

min |PESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .

119EXM22a Example 9.3.11. In the Figure (9.25), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 6153

ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The obtained neutrosophic 6154
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 6155
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in 6156
the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (9.25), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. 6157

Proposition 9.3.12. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 6158
Then a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching is a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 6159
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, excluding the neutrosophic SuperHyperCenter, with only no 6160
exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from same neutrosophic 6161
SuperHyperEdge with the exclusion on neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them and 6162

not all. a neutrosophic R-SuperHyperMatching has the neutrosophic maximum number on all the 6163

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 9.26: a neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic

Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching in the neutrosophic Example (9.3.13) 104NSHG23a

neutrosophic number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges don’t have common neutrosophic 6164
SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 6165

C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atching

|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atching = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)neutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperM atchingSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

119EXM23a Example 9.3.13. In the neutrosophic Figure (??), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 6166
N SHW : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic 6167
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 6168
of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the neutrosophic 6169

SuperHyperModel (??), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching. 6170

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 10 6171

SuperHyperGirth 6172

10.1 Definitions 6173

Definition 10.1.1. ((neutrosophic) SuperHyperGirth). 6174

Assume a SuperHyperGraph. Then 6175

(i) an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(N SHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6176

N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHy- 6177
perSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges in the 6178
consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic 6179
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle; 6180

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6181

N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 6182
perEdges of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 6183
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form 6184
the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle; 6185

(iii) an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for an 6186

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperPolyno- 6187
mial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the neutrosophic number of the 6188
maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of an neut- 6189

rosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic 6190

SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutro- 6191
sophic SuperHyperCycle and the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic 6192
coefficient; 6193

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for an neut- 6194

rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 6195
contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the neutrosophic number of the maximum 6196
neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a neutrosophic SuperHy- 6197
perSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 6198
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle 6199

and the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic coefficient; 6200

299
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(v) an Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth C(N SHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6201

Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic 6202
SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 6203
tices in the consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 6204
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle; 6205

(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth C(N SHG) for a neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6206

N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6207
Vertices of a neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 6208

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form 6209
the neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle; 6210

(vii) an Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for an 6211

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperPoly- 6212
nomial contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the neutrosophic number of 6213
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of an 6214
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic 6215
SuperHyperEdges and neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutro- 6216

sophic SuperHyperCycle and the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic 6217
coefficient; 6218

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial C(N SHG) for an neut- 6219

rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 6220
contains the neutrosophic coefficients defined as the neutrosophic number of the maximum 6221
neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a neutrosophic Super- 6222
HyperSet S of high neutrosophic cardinality consecutive neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 6223
and neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6224

Cycle and the neutrosophic power is corresponded to its neutrosophic coefficient. 6225

10.2 Examples 6226

The neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, is up. Thus the 6227
non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, S is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type- 6228

SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, not: S is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 6229

not: S does includes only less than four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in a connected 6230
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only 6231
non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 6232

“neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” 6233

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 6234

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, 6235

is only and only S in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with 6236
a illustrated SuperHyperModeling. But all only non-obvious simple neutrosophic type- 6237
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple 6238
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets, are S. A connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : 6239

(V, E) as a linearly-over-packed SuperHyperModel is featured on the Figures. 6240

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

128EXM1 Example 10.2.1. Assume the SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (10.1), (10.2), (10.3), (10.4), 6241
(10.5), (10.6), (10.7), (10.8), (10.9), (10.10), (10.11), (10.12), (10.13), (10.14), (10.15), (10.16), 6242
(10.17), (10.18), (10.19), and (10.20). 6243

• On the Figure (10.1), the neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, neutrosophic 6244

SuperHyperGirth, is up. E1 and E3 are some empty neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but 6245

E2 is a loop neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and E4 is an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 6246

Thus in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one neutrosophic 6247
SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is neutrosophic 6248
isolated means that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as an neutrosophic 6249
endpoint. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given 6250
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 6251

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices]

6252

is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The 6253

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6254

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

Is the neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The 6255

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6256

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

Is an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic Supe- 6257

rHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 6258
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 6259

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s only one neutro- 6260

sophic consecutive sequence of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and the neutrosophic 6261
SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. There are not only four 6262
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus 6263
the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t up. The obvious simple neutro- 6264
sophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic 6265

SuperHyperSet includes only less than four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the 6266

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6267

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
Doesn’t have less than four SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 6268
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 6269

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth isn’t up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 6270
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6271

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
Isn’t the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 6272
perHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 6273

perEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6274

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
Is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6275
ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 6276

tices[SuperHyperEdges] such that there’s only one neutrosophic consecutive neutrosophic 6277
sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form 6278
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 6279
called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 6280
Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6281
Set S of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s only one 6282

neutrosophic consecutive neutrosophic sequence of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and 6283

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges form only one neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle. There are 6284
only less than four neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 6285
SuperHyperSet, 6286

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
Thus the obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, 6287

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

Is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 6288

SuperHyperGirth, is: 6289

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, is: 6290

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

Does includes only less than four SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic 6291
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only simple 6292
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 6293

“neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” 6294

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 6295

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, 6296

is only and only 6297

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

• On the Figure (10.2), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6298

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (10.3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6299

C(N SHG) = {E2 } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V1 } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = z is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

• On the Figure (10.4), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, a SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6300

C(N SHG) = {F, E3 , V2 , E4 , F } is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth.

C(N SHG) = 4z 2 is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V2 , F } is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
C(N SHG) = 4z 2 is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial.

• On the Figure (10.5), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6301

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth = {}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth = {}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth SuperHyperPolynomial = 0.

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is mentioned as the 6302

SuperHyperModel ESHG : (V, E) in the Figure (10.5). 6303

• On the Figure (10.6), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6304

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirth =

{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , Ei+12 , E12 , V1 }15
i=11 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 22z 12 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi , V6 , V16 }5i=2 ∪ {Vi , V1 }15
i=11 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 22z 12 .

• On the Figure (10.7), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6305

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirth =

{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 6z 6 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth =
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 6z 7 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (10.8), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6306

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirth = {}

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {}

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of dense SuperHyperModel 6307

as the Figure (10.8). 6308

• On the Figure (10.9), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6309

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirth =

{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 , d1 , V1 }5i=2 C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 8 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {V1 , Vi , V16 , V1 }6i=2 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 8 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of highly-embedding- 6310

connected SuperHyperModel as the Figure (10.9). 6311

• On the Figure (10.10), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6312

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirth =

{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth =
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 4 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of dense SuperHyperModel 6313

as the Figure (10.10). 6314

• On the Figure (10.11), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6315

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirth =

{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth =
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 6 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6316

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (10.12), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6317

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirth = {}

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {}
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6318

• On the Figure (10.13), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6319

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirth =

{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }6i=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6320

• On the Figure (10.14), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6321

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {}.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {}.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s noted that this 6322

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic graph G : (V, E) thus 6323

the notions in both settings are coincided. 6324

• On the Figure (10.15), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6325

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {}.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {}.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s noted that this 6326
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic graph G : (V, E) thus 6327
the notions in both settings are coincided. In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6328
ESHG : (V, E) as Linearly-Connected SuperHyperModel On the Figure (10.15). 6329

• On the Figure (10.16), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6330

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V8 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V8 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V8 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V10 }.
6331

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V10 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V8 }.
6332

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V11 }.
6333

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 , E4 , V17 , E5 , V15 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , E4 , V15 , E5 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 , E5 , V17 , E4 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , E5 , V15 , E4 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 28z 2 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V9 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V10 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V11 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V8 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V10 , V9 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

6334

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V11 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V8 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V9 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V11 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V8 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V9 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V10 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 V17 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , V15 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 14z 3 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6335

• On the Figure (10.17), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6336

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V8 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V10 }.
6337

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V10 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V8 }.
6338

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V10 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V11 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V11 }.
6339

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 , E4 , V17 , E5 , V15 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , E4 , V15 , E5 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 , E5 , V17 , E4 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , E5 , V15 , E4 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 28z 2 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V9 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V10 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V11 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V8 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V10 , V9 }.
6340

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V11 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V8 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V9 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V11 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V8 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V9 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V10 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 V17 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , V15 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 14z 3 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6341

• On the Figure (10.18), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6342

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V8 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V10 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

6343

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V10 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V8 }.
6344

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V11 }.
6345

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 , E4 , V17 , E5 , V15 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , E4 , V15 , E5 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 , E5 , V17 , E4 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , E5 , V15 , E4 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V1 , E1 , V23 , E2 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V23 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V23 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V1 , E2 , V23 , E1 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V23 , E2 , V1 , E1 , V23 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 322 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V9 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V10 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V8 , V11 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V8 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V10 , V9 }.
6346

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V9 , V11 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V8 , V10 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V9 , V10 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V10 , V11 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V8 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V9 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V11 , V10 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V15 V17 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V17 , V15 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V1 , V23 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {V23 , V1 , V23 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 16z 3 .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6347

• On the Figure (10.19), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6348

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {}.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth = {}.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6349

• On the Figure (10.20), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. 6350

10.3 Results 6351

The previous neutrosophic approaches apply on the upcoming neutrosophic results on 6352

neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 6353

Proposition 10.3.1. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 6354

an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth-style with the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6355

Cardinality is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 6356

Proposition 10.3.2. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 6357
Then an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 6358
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions in the form 6359
of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 6360
not excluding only any interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the neutrosophic unique 6361

SuperHyperEdges. an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic number of 6362

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.1: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG1

Figure 10.2: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG2

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.3: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG3

Figure 10.4: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.5: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG5

Figure 10.6: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG6

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.7: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG7

Figure 10.8: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG8

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.9: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG9

Figure 10.10: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG10

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.11: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG11

Figure 10.12: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG12

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.13: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG13

all the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Also, 6363

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Proof. Assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth since
neither amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges nor amount of SuperHyperVertices where
amount refers to the neutrosophic number of SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges) more
than one to form any kind of SuperHyperEdges or any number of SuperHyperEdges. Let us
consider the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

This neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the eligibilities

to propose property such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of an neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all neutrosophic

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.14: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG14

SuperHyperVertices but the maximum neutrosophic cardinality indicates that these neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSets couldn’t give us the neutrosophic lower bound in the term of neutrosophic
sharpness. In other words, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices implies at least on-quasi-triangle style is up but

sometimes the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is free-quasi-triangle and it doesn’t make a contradiction

to the supposition on the connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
Thus the minimum case never happens in the generality of the connected loopless neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs. Thus if we assume in the worst case, literally,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.15: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG15

Figure 10.16: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG16

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.17: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG17

Figure 10.18: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG18

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.19: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG19

Is a quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp bound for
the cardinality, of a quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth is the cardinality of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Then we’ve lost some connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of the connected
loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and their quasi-types
but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth. It’s the contradiction to
that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to deny this statement. One of
them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and cycle as the counterexamples-classes or
reversely direction star as the examples-classes, are well-known classes in that setting and they
could be considered as the examples-classes and counterexamples-classes for the tight bound of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at least
two SuperHyperVertices to form a SuperHyperEdge. It doesn’t withdraw the principles of the
main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the condition is on the existence of
the SuperHyperEdge instead of acting on the SuperHyperVertices. In other words, if there’s a
SuperHyperEdge, then the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the
intended definition to be applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of
the main definition but by the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition.
The neutrosophic structure of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth decorates the neutrosophic

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.20: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperGirth in the

Example (10.2.1) 128NSHG20

SuperHyperVertices don’t have received any neutrosophic connections so as this neutrosophic

style implies different versions of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum neutro-
sophic cardinality in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are spotlight. The lower
neutrosophic bound is to have the maximum neutrosophic groups of neutrosophic SuperHy-
perVertices have perfect neutrosophic connections inside each of SuperHyperEdges and the
outside of this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet doesn’t matter but regarding the connectedness of
the used neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph arising from its neutrosophic properties taken from
the fact that it’s simple. If there’s no more than one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the
targeted neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, then there’s no neutrosophic connection. Furthermore,
the neutrosophic existence of one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no neutrosophic effect
to talk about the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. Since at least two neutrosophic Supe-
rHyperVertices involve to make a title in the neutrosophic background of the neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph. The neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge but at least two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices make the neutrosophic
version of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the neutrosophic setting of non-obvious neut-
rosophic SuperHyperGraph, there are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s necessary
to mention that the word “Simple” is used as neutrosophic adjective for the initial neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph, induces there’s no neutrosophic appearance of the loop neutrosophic version
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and this neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is said to be
loopless. The neutrosophic adjective “loop” on the basic neutrosophic framework engages one
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it never happens in this neutrosophic setting. With these

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

neutrosophic bases, on an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there’s at least one neutrosophic

SuperHyperEdge thus there’s at least an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic
cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus, an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth
has the neutrosophic cardinality at least an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Assume an neut-
rosophic SuperHyperSet V \ V \ {z}. This neutrosophic SuperHyperSet isn’t an neutrosophic
R-SuperHyperGirth since either the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is an obvious neutrosophic
SuperHyperModel thus it never happens since there’s no neutrosophic usage of this neutro-
sophic framework and even more there’s no neutrosophic connection inside or the neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious and as its consequences, there’s an neutrosophic contradiction
with the term “neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth” since the maximum neutrosophic cardinality
never happens for this neutrosophic style of the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and beyond that
there’s no neutrosophic connection inside as mentioned in first neutrosophic case in the forms
of drawback for this selected neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Let

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

Comes up. This neutrosophic case implies having the neutrosophic style of on-quasi-triangle
neutrosophic style on the every neutrosophic elements of this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet.
Precisely, the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that some neutrosophic amount of the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle neutrosophic style. The neutrosophic cardinality of
the v SuperHypeSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

Is the maximum in comparison to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

But the lower neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum neutrosophic cardinality of the
maximum neutrosophic cardinality ends up the neutrosophic discussion. The first neutrosophic
term refers to the neutrosophic setting of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph but this key
point is enough since there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperClass of an neutrosophic SuperHy-
perGraph has no on-quasi-triangle neutrosophic style amid some amount of its neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices. This neutrosophic setting of the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel proposes
an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has only some amount neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from
one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no neutrosophic amount of neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges more than one involving these some amount of these neutrosophic SuperHy-
perVertices. The neutrosophic cardinality of this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet is the maximum
and the neutrosophic case is occurred in the minimum neutrosophic situation. To sum them up,
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Has the maximum neutrosophic cardinality such that

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Contains some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct-covers-order-amount

neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices taken from the
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

It means that the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth for the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as used

neutrosophic background in the neutrosophic terms of worst neutrosophic case and the common
theme of the lower neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are neutrosophic free-quasi-triangle.
Assume an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z neutrosophic number of
the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then every neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has at
least no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others in common. Thus those neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be contained in an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.
Those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are potentially included in an neutrosophic style-R-
SuperHyperGirth. Formally, consider

V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).

Are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) .

Thus
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.

Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z

if and only if Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and only one
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
Zi and Zj . The other definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the
terms of neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is

{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .

This definition coincides with the definition of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth but with
slightly differences in the maximum neutrosophic cardinality amid those neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|Neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

and
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is formalized with mathematical literatures on the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. Let

E
Zi ∼ Zj , be defined as Zi and Zj are the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus,
E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

But with the slightly differences, 6364

Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
6365

Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth =
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Thus E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth where E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is

fixed that means Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . for all neutrosophic intended SuperHyperVertices but
in an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) could be different and it’s not
unique. To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). If an
neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then
the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is at least

V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).

It’s straightforward that the neutrosophic cardinality of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is 6366

at least the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the neutro- 6367
sophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. In 6368
other words, the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges contains the maximum 6369
neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed to neutrosophic Super- 6370
HyperGirth in some cases but the maximum number of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with 6371
the maximum neutrosophic number of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, has the neutrosophic 6372

SuperHyperVertices are contained in an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. 6373

The obvious SuperHyperGraph has no neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. But the non-obvious 6374
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel is up. The quasi-SuperHyperModel addresses some issues about 6375
the neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially delivers some remarks on the neutro- 6376
sophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct amount 6377
of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices up 6378

to all taken from that neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 6379
but this neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is either has 6380
the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality or it doesn’t have maximum neutrosophic 6381
SuperHyperCardinality. In a non-obvious SuperHyperModel, there’s at least one neutrosophic 6382
SuperHyperEdge containing at least all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus it forms an 6383
neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth where the neutrosophic completion of the neutrosophic 6384

incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, literarily, an neutrosophic embedded R-SuperHyperGirth. 6385

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

The SuperHyperNotions of embedded SuperHyperSet and quasi-SuperHyperSet coincide. In 6386

the original setting, these types of SuperHyperSets only don’t satisfy on the maximum Super- 6387
HyperCardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected such that those SuperHyperSets have 6388
the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality and they’re neutrosophic SuperHyperOp- 6389
timal. The less than two distinct types of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are included in the 6390
minimum neutrosophic style of the embedded neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. The interior 6391

types of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are deciders. Since the neutrosophic number 6392
of SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 6393
The common connections, more precise and more formal, the perfect unique connections inside 6394
the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any distinct types of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 6395
pose the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. Thus neutrosophic exterior SuperHyperVertices 6396
could be used only in one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and in neutrosophic SuperHyperRela- 6397

tion with the interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in that neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 6398
In the embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, there’s the usage of exterior neutrosophic 6399
SuperHyperVertices since they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the title 6400
“exterior” is more relevant than the title “interior”. One neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no 6401
connection, inside. Thus, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 6402
tices with one SuperHyperElement has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal 6403

case implying the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. The neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth 6404

with the exclusion of the exclusion of all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one neutrosophic 6405
SuperHyperEdge and with other terms, the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth with the inclusion 6406
of all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, is an neutrosophic 6407
quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth. To sum them up, in a connected non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHy- 6408
perGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has 6409

only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside 6410
of any given neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor 6411
to some of them but not all of them. In other words, there’s only an unique neutrosophic 6412
SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in 6413
an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth, minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some 6414
of them but not all of them. 6415

The main definition of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has two titles. an neut- 6416
rosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth and its corresponded quasi-maximum neutrosophic R- 6417
SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For any neutrosophic num- 6418
ber, there’s an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth with that quasi-maximum neutrosophic 6419
SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. If there’s 6420

an embedded neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, then the neutrosophic quasi-SuperHyperNotions 6421

lead us to take the collection of all the neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirths for all neut- 6422
rosophic numbers less than its neutrosophic corresponded maximum number. The essence 6423
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ends up but this essence starts up in the terms of the 6424
neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth, again and more in the operations of collecting all 6425
the neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirths acted on the all possible used formations of the 6426

neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one neutrosophic number. This neutrosophic number 6427
is 6428
considered as the equivalence class for all corresponded quasi-R-SuperHyperGirths. Let 6429
zNeutrosophic Number , SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet and GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth be an neutro- 6430

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

sophic number, an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Then 6431

[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class = {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number }.

As its consequences, the formal definition of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is re-formalized 6432
and redefined as follows. 6433

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number }.

To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 6434
definition for the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 6435

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the neutrosophic 6436
SuperHyperGirth poses the upcoming expressions. 6437

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 6438

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

And then, 6439

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 6440

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6441

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6442

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6443

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “neutrosophic 6444
SuperHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the neutrosophic Supe- 6445

rHyperVertices such that any amount of its neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are incident 6446

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

to an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “neutrosophic Quasi- 6447
SuperHyperGirth” but, precisely, it’s the generalization of “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth” 6448
since “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth” happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” in an 6449
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and background but “neutrosophic Super- 6450
HyperNeighborhood” may not happens “neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” in an neutrosophic 6451
SuperHyperGraph as initial framework and preliminarily background since there are some am- 6452

biguities about the neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, 6453
the terms, “neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, “neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperGirth”, 6454
and “neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” are up. 6455
Thus, let zNeutrosophic Number , NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth 6456
be an neutrosophic number, an neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and an neutrosophic 6457
SuperHyperGirth and the new terms are up. 6458

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

6459

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

6460

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

6461

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality = max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 6462

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6463

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6464

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6465

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperGirth =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

Thus, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth if
for any of them, and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no
neutrosophic exception at all minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of
them.
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations are coming
up.
The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth.

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. The

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Is an Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic Su-

perHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neut-
rosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid some
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth
is related to the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

There’s not only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is up. The obvious simple
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet includes only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. But the neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the non-obvious simple
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is up. To sum them
up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic R-

SuperHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer-
tices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph
ESHG : (V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVer-
tices such that there’s no an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some neutrosophic Supe-
rHyperVertices instead of all given by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and it’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Since it’s
the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutro-
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some
amount neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. There isn’t only less than two
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is up. The non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic

SuperHyperGirth, not:

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not:

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHy- 6466
perGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded to an Su- 6467
perHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple neutrosophic 6468
type-SuperHyperSet called the 6469

“neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth” 6470

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 6471

Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth, 6472

is only and only

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with a illustrated SuperHyper-

Modeling. It’s also, not only an neutrosophic free-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel and an
neutrosophic on-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel but also it’s an neutrosophic stable embed-
ded SuperHyperModel. But all only non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets of the
neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth amid those obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets
of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, are

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

To sum them up, assume a connected loopless neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
Then in the worst case, literally,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

is an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp
bound for the cardinality, of an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is the cardinality of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

6473
To sum them up, in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all 6474
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth 6475
if for any of them, and any of other corresponded neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior 6476
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no 6477

neutrosophic exception at all minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of 6478

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

them. 6479
Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let an neutrosophic Supe- 6480
rHyperEdge ESHE : E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices r. Consider 6481
all neutrosophic numbers of those neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that neutrosophic 6482
SuperHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 6483
exclude to any given neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 6484

Consider there’s an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth with the least cardinality, the lower 6485
sharp neutrosophic bound for neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected neutrosophic 6486
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 6487
SuperHyperVertices VESHE \ {z} is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the neutrosophic 6488
SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutro- 6489
sophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely but it isn’t an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth. Since it 6490

doesn’t have the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 6491

S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 6492
to have some SuperHyperVertices uniquely. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neut- 6493
rosophic SuperHyperVertices VESHE ∪ {z} is the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of an 6494
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t an neutrosophic 6495
R-SuperHyperGirth. Since it doesn’t do the neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s 6496

an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely [there 6497

are at least one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the 6498
connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), an neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, 6499
titled its neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the 6500
neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s 6501
only one neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 6502

VESHE ∪ {z}, in the terms of neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious neutro- 6503
sophic R-SuperHyperGirth, VESHE is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 6504
of the neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth, VESHE , is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VESHE , 6505
includes only all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of neutrosophic pairs 6506
are titled Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6507
ESHG : (V, E). Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 6508

tices VESHE , is the maximum neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of an neutrosophic 6509

SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s an neutrosophic Supe- 6510
rHyperEdge to have some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely. Thus, in a connected 6511
neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Any neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth only 6512
contains all interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and all exterior neutrosophic SuperHy- 6513

perVertices from the unique neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge where there’s any of them has all 6514
possible neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all neutrosophic SuperHyperNeigh- 6515
borhoods in with no exception minus all neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them 6516
not all of them but everything is possible about neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods and 6517
neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out. 6518
The SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperGirth, is up. There’s neither empty SuperHy- 6519

perEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic 6520
SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the 6521
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of neutrosophic SuperHy- 6522
perEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6523

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

is the simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. The 6524

neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6525

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6526

ESHG : (V, E) is an neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with the maximum neutrosophic cardinality
6527
of an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] 6528
such that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is 6529
common and there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 6530
There are not only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 6531
SuperHyperSet. Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is up. The obvious simple 6532
neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic 6533
SuperHyperSet includes only two neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the neutrosophic 6534
SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6535

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic SuperHy- 6536
perSet. Thus the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 6537

SuperHyperGirth is up. To sum them up, the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic 6538

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6539

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is the non-obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic Su- 6540

perHyperGirth. Since the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHy- 6541

perEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6542

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is an neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth C(ESHG) for an neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : 6543

(V, E) is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that 6544
there’s no an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given 6545

by that neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth and it’s an 6546
neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. Since it’s the maximum neutrosophic cardinality of 6547
an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such 6548
that there’s no neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common 6549
and there’s an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. There 6550
aren’t only less than three neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended neutrosophic 6551

SuperHyperSet, 6552

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Thus the non-obvious neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, 6553

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is up. The obvious simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6554
Girth, not: 6555

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is the neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: 6556

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6557

Graph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple neutrosophic 6558
type-SuperHyperSet called the 6559

“neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth” 6560

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 6561

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth, 6562

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.21: an neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperGirth in the Example (10.3.3) 128NSHG18a

is only and only 6563

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

In a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).  6564

128EXM18a Example 10.3.3. In the Figure (10.21), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 6565
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the neutrosophic 6566
SuperHyperModel (10.21), is the SuperHyperGirth. 6567

Proposition 10.3.4. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then 6568
an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 6569
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exceptions on the form of interior 6570
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the same neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods not 6571

excluding any neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth has the 6572

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.22: an neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the neutrosophic Example (10.3.5) 128NSHG19a

neutrosophic half number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges in the terms of the maximum 6573
neutrosophic cardinality. Also, 6574

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

128EXM19a Example 10.3.5. In the Figure (10.22), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 6575
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 6576
neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (10.22), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 6577

Proposition 10.3.6. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). 6578
Then an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 6579

interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to an neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. 6580

an neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic number of the neutrosophic 6581
cardinality of the one neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Also, 6582

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.23: an neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the neutrosophic Notions of

neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the neutrosophic Example (10.3.7) 128NSHG20a

= {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
X
= z |E|Neutrosophic Cardinality | E:∈EESHG:(V,E) .
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 , . . . .

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = z s + z t +, . . . .

128EXM20a Example 10.3.7. In the Figure (10.23), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 6583
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 6584
in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 6585
neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (10.23), is 6586
the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 6587

Proposition 10.3.8. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 6588
Then an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 6589
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with no neutrosophic exceptions in the form of interior 6590
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices titled neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. an neutrosophic 6591
R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic maximum number of on neutrosophic cardinality of 6592

the minimum SuperHyperPart minus those have common neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors 6593

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.24: an neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic

Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the Example (10.3.9) 128NSHG21a

and not unique neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 6594

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .

128EXM21a Example 10.3.9. In the neutrosophic Figure (10.24), the connected neutrosophic SuperHy- 6595
perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The 6596
obtained neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the neutrosophic Algorithm in previous neutrosophic 6597
result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperBi- 6598

partite ESHB : (V, E), in the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (10.24), is the neutrosophic 6599
SuperHyperGirth. 6600

Proposition 10.3.10. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 6601

(V, E). Then an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 6602
interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no neutrosophic exception in the neutrosophic 6603
form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from an neutrosophic SuperHyperPart and 6604
only no exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from another SuperHyperPart 6605

titled “SuperHyperNeighbors” with neglecting and ignoring more than some of them aren’t 6606

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.25: an neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of neutrosophic

SuperHyperGirth in the Example (10.3.11) 128NSHG22a

SuperHyperNeighbors to all. an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic 6607

maximum number on all the neutrosophic summation on the neutrosophic cardinality of the 6608
all neutrosophic SuperHyperParts form some SuperHyperEdges minus those make neutrosophic 6609
SuperHypeNeighbors to some not all or not unique. Also, 6610

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .

128EXM22a Example 10.3.11. In the Figure (10.25), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 6611

ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and neutrosophic featured. The obtained neutrosophic 6612
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous neutrosophic result, of the neutrosophic 6613
SuperHyperVertices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), in 6614
the neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (10.25), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 6615

Proposition 10.3.12. Assume a connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 6616
Then an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth is an neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 6617
neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, excluding the neutrosophic SuperHyperCenter, with only no 6618
exception in the form of interior neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from same neutrosophic 6619
SuperHyperEdge with the exclusion on neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them and 6620

not all. an neutrosophic R-SuperHyperGirth has the neutrosophic maximum number on all the 6621

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 10.26: an neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel neutrosophic Associated to the neutrosophic

Notions of neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth in the neutrosophic Example (10.3.13) 128NSHG23a

neutrosophic number of all the neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges don’t have common neutrosophic 6622
SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 6623

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirth

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirth = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperGirthSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

128EXM23a Example 10.3.13. In the neutrosophic Figure (10.26), the connected neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6624
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained neutrosophic 6625
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 6626
tices of the connected neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the neutrosophic 6627

SuperHyperModel (10.26), is the neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth. 6628

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 11 6629

SuperHyperConnectivities 6630

11.1 Definitions 6631

Definition 11.1.1. (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths)

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.3,p.7).
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). A
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
(NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)

V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,

have 6632

(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 6633

(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 6634

(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 6635

(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 6636

Definition 11.1.2 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)). 6637

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.4,p.7). 6638
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 6639
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 6640

(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength 6641

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 6642

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 6643

(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic i-strength 6644

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 6645

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 6646

(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic f-strength 6647

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 6648

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 6649

345
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 6650
strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi 6651
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 6652

Definition 11.1.3. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnectivities). 6653

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 6654
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 6655

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 6656

Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 6657
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 6658

cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 6659

SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and 6660
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; 6661

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 6662

Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 6663
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neut- 6664
rosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6665

Set S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 6666

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperCon- 6667
nectivities; 6668

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 6669

Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and 6670
Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 6671

is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the 6672
Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges 6673
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 6674
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 6675
SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 6676
coefficient; 6677

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 6678

of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, 6679

and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6680
N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic 6681
coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality 6682
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 6683
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 6684

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; and 6685
the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 6686

(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t-connective, 6687

Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic connective and 6688
C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme 6689
cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 6690
SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and 6691

Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities; 6692

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities if it’s either of Neutrosophic t- 6693

connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and Neutrosophic 6694
connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is 6695
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 6696
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 6697
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 6698

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; 6699

(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 6700

of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, and 6701

Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 6702
is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the 6703
Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices 6704
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme 6705
SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme 6706
SuperHyperConnectivities; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 6707

coefficient; 6708

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 6709

of Neutrosophic t-connective, Neutrosophic i-connective, Neutrosophic f-connective, 6710
and Neutrosophic connective and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6711

N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic 6712

coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality 6713
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 6714
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 6715
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities; and 6716
the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 6717

11.2 Examples 6718

The Extreme SuperHyperNotion, namely, Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. Thus the 6719
non-obvious Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities, S is up. The Extreme type-SuperHyperSet of 6720
the Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities, is: S is an Extreme SuperHyperSet, is: S does includes 6721
only more than two Extreme SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6722
ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the Extreme type-SuperHyperSet called the 6723

“Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities” 6724

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple[non-simple] Extreme type-SuperHyperSets called the 6725

SuperHyperConnectivities, 6726

is only and only S in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) 6727

with a illustrated SuperHyperModeling. But all only obvious[non-obvious] simple[non- 6728
simple] Extreme type-SuperHyperSets of the obvious[non-obvious] simple[non-simple] Extreme 6729
SuperHyperConnectivities amid those type-SuperHyperSets, are S. A connected Neutrosophic 6730
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) as a linearly-over-packed SuperHyperModel is featured on 6731

the Figures. 6732

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.1: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG1

136EXM1 Example 11.2.1. Assume the SuperHyperGraphs in the Figures (13.1), (13.2), (13.3), (13.4), 6733
(13.5), (13.6), (13.7), (13.8), (13.9), (13.10), (13.11), (13.12), (13.13), (13.14), (13.15), (13.16), 6734
(13.17), (13.18), (13.19), and (13.20). 6735

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 6736

SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6737

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities.

C(N SHG) = z is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {Vi }i6=3 is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.
C(N SHG) = 3z is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.

6738

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 6739

SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6740

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities.

C(N SHG) = z is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {Vi }i6=3 is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.
C(N SHG) = 3z is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.

6741

• On the Figure (13.3), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6742

C(N SHG) = {E4 } is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.2: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG2

C(N SHG) = z is an Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.

C(N SHG) = {V1 , V2 , V3 } is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.
C(N SHG) = z is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.

• On the Figure (13.4), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, a SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6743

C(N SHG) = {V3 , E1 , V4 , E2 , H, E1 , V3 } is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities.

C(N SHG) = 4z 3 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.
C(N SHG) = {V3 , V4 , H, V3 } is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.
C(N SHG) = 4z 4 is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial.

• On the Figure (13.5), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6744

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnectivities = {V5 , E1 , V4 , E4 , V5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities = {V5 , V4 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 3 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.6), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6745

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi , Ei , Vi+1 }21 9

i=1 ∪ {V22 , E32 , Vi , Ei+11 , E11 , V1 }j=21−

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 22 .

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivities =
{Vi , Vi+1 }21
i=1
∪{V22 , Vi , V1 }9j=21−j .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 23 .

• On the Figure (13.7), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6746

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivities =

{V8 , E17 , V14 , E12 , V12 , E15 , V3 , E3 , V4 , E16 , V7 , E7 , V8 }
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 6z 6 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivities =
{V8 , V14 , V12 , V3 , V4 , V7 , V8 }

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 6z 7 .

• On the Figure (13.8), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6747

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivities = {}

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivities = {}

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of dense SuperHyperModel 6748

as the Figure (13.8). 6749

• On the Figure (13.9), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6750

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivities =

{Vi , Ei , V6 , E17 , V16 , d1 , V1 }5i=2
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 8 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V1 , Vi , V16 , V1 }6i=2 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 11z 8 .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of highly-embedding- 6751

connected SuperHyperModel as the Figure (13.9). 6752

• On the Figure (13.10), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6753

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivities =

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

{V14 , E4 , V12 , E6 , V13 , E7 , V14 }

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivities =
{V14 V12 , V13 , V14 }

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 4 .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) of dense SuperHyperModel 6754
as the Figure (13.10). 6755

• On the Figure (13.11), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6756

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivities =

{V1 , E6 , V5 , E5 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E7 , V2 , E1 , V1 }
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivities =
{V1 , V5 , V6 , V4 , V2 , V1 }
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 3z 6 .
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6757

• On the Figure (13.12), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6758

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivities = {}

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivities = {}
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6759

• On the Figure (13.13), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6760

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivities =

{V1 , E1 , V2 , E10 , V3 , E8 , V6 , E4 , V4 , E2 , V5 , E6 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicSuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }6i=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = z 6 .
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6761

• On the Figure (13.14), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6762

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {}.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {}.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s noted that this 6763
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an Neutrosophic graph G : (V, E) thus 6764
the notions in both settings are coincided. 6765

• On the Figure (13.15), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6766

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {}.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {}.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s noted that this 6767

Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is an Neutrosophic graph G : (V, E) thus 6768

the notions in both settings are coincided. In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6769
ESHG : (V, E) as Linearly-Connected SuperHyperModel On the Figure (13.15). 6770

• On the Figure (13.16), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6771

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V8 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V10 }.
6772

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V10 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V8 }.
6773

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V10 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V11 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V11 }.
6774

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 , E4 , V17 , E5 , V15 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , E4 , V15 , E5 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 , E5 , V17 , E4 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , E5 , V15 , E4 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 28z 2 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V9 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V10 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V11 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V8 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V10 , V9 }.
6775

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V11 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V8 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V9 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V11 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V8 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V9 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V10 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 V17 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , V15 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 14z 3 .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6776

• On the Figure (13.17), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6777

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V8 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V10 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

6778

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V10 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V8 }.
6779

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V11 }.
6780

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 , E4 , V17 , E5 , V15 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , E4 , V15 , E5 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 , E5 , V17 , E4 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , E5 , V15 , E4 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 28z 2 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V9 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V10 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V11 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V8 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V10 , V9 }.
6781

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V11 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V8 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V9 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V11 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V8 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V9 , V11 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V10 , V11 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 V17 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , V15 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 14z 3 .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6782

• On the Figure (13.18), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6783

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V8 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V10 }.

6784

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V10 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E3 , V11 , E4 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V8 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V9 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E3 , V10 , E4 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V8 }.

6785

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , E4 , V11 , E3 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V8 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V9 , E3 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , E4 , V10 , E3 , V11 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

6786

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 , E4 , V17 , E5 , V15 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , E4 , V15 , E5 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 , E5 , V17 , E4 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , E5 , V15 , E4 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V1 , E1 , V23 , E2 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V23 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V23 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V1 , E2 , V23 , E1 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V23 , E2 , V1 , E1 , V23 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 322 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V9 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V10 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V8 , V11 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V8 , V9 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V10 , V9 }.
6787

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V9 , V11 , V9 }.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V8 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V9 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V10 , V11 , V10 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V8 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V9 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V11 , V10 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V15 V17 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V17 , V15 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V1 , V23 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {V23 , V1 , V23 }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 16z 3 .
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6788

• On the Figure (13.19), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6789

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {}.

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {}.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = 0.
In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6790

• On the Figure (13.20), the SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. 6791

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.3: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in

the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG1

Figure 11.4: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in

the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG2

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.5: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in

the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG3

Figure 11.6: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in

the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG4

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.7: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in

the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG5

Figure 11.8: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in

the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG6

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.9: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities in

the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG7

Figure 11.10: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG8

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.11: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG9

Figure 11.12: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG10

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.13: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG11

Figure 11.14: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG12

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.15: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG13

11.3 Results 6792

The previous Neutrosophic approaches apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 6793
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 6794

Proposition 11.3.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 6795
a Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities-style with the maximum Neutrosophic Super- 6796
HyperCardinality is an Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6797
Vertices. 6798

Proposition 11.3.2. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 6799
a Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 6800
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no Neutrosophic exceptions in the form 6801
of interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 6802
not excluding only any interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the Neutrosophic unique 6803
SuperHyperEdges. a Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities has the Neutrosophic 6804

number of all the interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Also, 6805

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.16: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG14

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Proof. Assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The
SuperHyperSet of the SuperHyperVertices V \ V \ {z} isn’t a quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities
since neither amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges nor amount of SuperHyperVertices
where amount refers to the Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperVertices(-/SuperHyperEdges)
more than one to form any kind of SuperHyperEdges or any number of SuperHyperEdges. Let
us consider the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

This Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices has the eligibilities

to propose property such that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.17: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG15

Figure 11.18: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG16

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.19: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG17

Figure 11.20: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG18

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.21: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG19

SuperHyperVertices but the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality indicates that these Neutro-
sophic type-SuperHyperSets couldn’t give us the Neutrosophic lower bound in the term of
Neutrosophic sharpness. In other words, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices implies at least on-quasi-triangle style is up but

sometimes the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is free-quasi-triangle and it doesn’t make a contradiction

to the supposition on the connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
Thus the minimum case never happens in the generality of the connected loopless Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraphs. Thus if we assume in the worst case, literally,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is a quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower sharp

bound for the cardinality, of a quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities is the cardinality of

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.22: The SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Notions of SuperHyperConnectivities

in the Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG20

Then we’ve lost some connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses of the connected
loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs titled free-triangle, on-triangle, and their quasi-
types but the SuperHyperStable is only up in this quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities. It’s
the contradiction to that fact on the generality. There are some counterexamples to deny
this statement. One of them comes from the setting of the graph titled path and cycle as the
counterexamples-classes or reversely direction star as the examples-classes, are well-known classes
in that setting and they could be considered as the examples-classes and counterexamples-classes
for the tight bound of
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Let V \ V \ {z} in mind. There’s no necessity on the SuperHyperEdge since we need at least
two SuperHyperVertices to form a SuperHyperEdge. It doesn’t withdraw the principles of the
main definition since there’s no condition to be satisfied but the condition is on the existence of
the SuperHyperEdge instead of acting on the SuperHyperVertices. In other words, if there’s a
SuperHyperEdge, then the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has the necessary condition for the
intended definition to be applied. Thus the V \ V \ {z} is withdrawn not by the conditions of
the main definition but by the necessity of the pre-condition on the usage of the main definition.
The Neutrosophic structure of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities decorates the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices don’t have received any Neutrosophic connections so as
this Neutrosophic style implies different versions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

are spotlight. The lower Neutrosophic bound is to have the maximum Neutrosophic
groups of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have perfect Neutrosophic connections inside
each of SuperHyperEdges and the outside of this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet doesn’t
matter but regarding the connectedness of the used Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph arising
from its Neutrosophic properties taken from the fact that it’s simple. If there’s no more
than one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the targeted Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet,
then there’s no Neutrosophic connection. Furthermore, the Neutrosophic existence of one
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no Neutrosophic effect to talk about the Neutrosophic
R-SuperHyperConnectivities. Since at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices involve
to make a title in the Neutrosophic background of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph.
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is obvious if it has no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge
but at least two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices make the Neutrosophic version of
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the Neutrosophic setting of non-obvious Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph, there are at least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s necessary to
mention that the word “Simple” is used as Neutrosophic adjective for the initial Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph, induces there’s no Neutrosophic appearance of the loop Neutrosophic
version of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge and this Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph is
said to be loopless. The Neutrosophic adjective “loop” on the basic Neutrosophic framework
engages one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex but it never happens in this Neutrosophic setting.
With these Neutrosophic bases, on a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, there’s at least one
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge thus there’s at least a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities
has the Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus, a Neutrosophic
R-SuperHyperConnectivities has the Neutrosophic cardinality at least a Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdge. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V \ V \ {z}. This Neutrosophic
SuperHyperSet isn’t a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities since either the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph is an obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel thus it never happens since
there’s no Neutrosophic usage of this Neutrosophic framework and even more there’s no
Neutrosophic connection inside or the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph isn’t obvious and
as its consequences, there’s a Neutrosophic contradiction with the term “Neutrosophic R-
SuperHyperConnectivities” since the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality never happens for this
Neutrosophic style of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and beyond that there’s no Neutrosophic
connection inside as mentioned in first Neutrosophic case in the forms of drawback for this
selected Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Let
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

Comes up. This Neutrosophic case implies having the Neutrosophic style of on-quasi-triangle
Neutrosophic style on the every Neutrosophic elements of this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet.
Precisely, the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that some Neutrosophic amount of the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices are on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style. The Neutrosophic cardinality of
the v SuperHypeSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , aE 0 , bE 0 , cE 0 , . . .}E,E 0 ={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }}

Is the maximum in comparison to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

But the lower Neutrosophic bound is up. Thus the minimum Neutrosophic cardinality of the
maximum Neutrosophic cardinality ends up the Neutrosophic discussion. The first Neutrosophic
term refers to the Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph but this key
point is enough since there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperClass of a Neutrosophic SuperHy-
perGraph has no on-quasi-triangle Neutrosophic style amid some amount of its Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices. This Neutrosophic setting of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel proposes
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet has only some amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge such that there’s no Neutrosophic amount of Neutrosophic
SuperHyperEdges more than one involving these some amount of these Neutrosophic SuperHy-
perVertices. The Neutrosophic cardinality of this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet is the maximum
and the Neutrosophic case is occurred in the minimum Neutrosophic situation. To sum them
up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Has the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality such that

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Contains some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s distinct-covers-order-amount

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices taken from
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

It means that the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as used

Neutrosophic background in the Neutrosophic terms of worst Neutrosophic case and the common
theme of the lower Neutrosophic bound occurred in the specific Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs which are Neutrosophic free-quasi-triangle.
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has z Neutrosophic number
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Then every Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex
has at least no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with others in common. Thus those
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices have the eligibles to be contained in a Neutrosophic R-
SuperHyperConnectivities. Those Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are potentially included in
a Neutrosophic style-R-SuperHyperConnectivities. Formally, consider
V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).
Are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) .
Thus
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z.
where the ∼ isn’t an equivalence relation but only the symmetric relation on the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperVertices of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. The formal definition is as follows.
Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

if and only if Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and there’s only and only one
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) between the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
Zi and Zj . The other definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) in the
terms of Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities is

{aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE } .

This definition coincides with the definition of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities but
with slightly differences in the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality amid those Neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

max |{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}|Neutrosophic cardinality ,

z

and
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

is formalized with mathematical literatures on the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.

E
Let Zi ∼ Zj , be defined as Zi and Zj are the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . Thus,

E
E = {Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | Zi ∼ Zj , i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z}.

Or
{aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

But with the slightly differences, 6806

Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities =
E
{Z1 , Z2 , . . . , Zz | ∀i 6= j, i, j = 1, 2, . . . , z, ∃Ex , Zi ∼x Zj , }.
6807

Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities =
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Thus E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) is a Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities where E ∈

EESHG:(V,E) is fixed that means Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) . for all Neutrosophic intended
SuperHyperVertices but in a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities, Ex = E ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
could be different and it’s not unique. To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). If a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
has z Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, then the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic
R-SuperHyperConnectivities is at least

V \ (V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . . , zE }).

It’s straightforward that the Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities

6808

is at least the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the 6809

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges with the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHy- 6810
perEdges. In other words, the maximum number of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 6811
contains the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are renamed 6812
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in some cases but the maximum number of the 6813
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge with the maximum Neutrosophic number of Neutrosophic 6814
SuperHyperVertices, has the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are contained in a Neutrosophic 6815

R-SuperHyperConnectivities. 6816
The obvious SuperHyperGraph has no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges. But the non-obvious 6817
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel is up. The quasi-SuperHyperModel addresses some issues 6818
about the Neutrosophic optimal SuperHyperObject. It specially delivers some remarks on 6819
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 6820
distinct amount of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges for distinct amount of Neutrosophic Su- 6821

perHyperVertices up to all taken from that Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 6822
SuperHyperVertices but this Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6823
Vertices is either has the maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality or it doesn’t have 6824
maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality. In a non-obvious SuperHyperModel, there’s at 6825
least one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge containing at least all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 6826
tices. Thus it forms a Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities where the Neutrosophic 6827

completion of the Neutrosophic incidence is up in that. Thus it’s, literarily, a Neutrosophic 6828
embedded R-SuperHyperConnectivities. The SuperHyperNotions of embedded SuperHyperSet 6829
and quasi-SuperHyperSet coincide. In the original setting, these types of SuperHyperSets only 6830
don’t satisfy on the maximum SuperHyperCardinality. Thus the embedded setting is elected 6831
such that those SuperHyperSets have the maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality and 6832
they’re Neutrosophic SuperHyperOptimal. The less than two distinct types of Neutrosophic 6833

SuperHyperVertices are included in the minimum Neutrosophic style of the embedded Neutro- 6834
sophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities. The interior types of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 6835
are deciders. Since the Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperNeighbors are only affected by the 6836
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. The common connections, more precise and more 6837
formal, the perfect unique connections inside the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet for any distinct 6838
types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices pose the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities. 6839

Thus Neutrosophic exterior SuperHyperVertices could be used only in one Neutrosophic 6840
SuperHyperEdge and in Neutrosophic SuperHyperRelation with the interior Neutrosophic 6841
SuperHyperVertices in that Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. In the embedded Neutrosophic 6842
SuperHyperConnectivities, there’s the usage of exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices since 6843
they’ve more connections inside more than outside. Thus the title “exterior” is more relevant 6844

than the title “interior”. One Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex has no connection, inside. Thus, 6845
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with one SuperHyper- 6846
Element has been ignored in the exploring to lead on the optimal case implying the Neutrosophic 6847
R-SuperHyperConnectivities. The Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities with the exclusion 6848
of the exclusion of all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 6849
and with other terms, the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities with the inclusion of all 6850

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, is a Neutrosophic 6851

quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities. To sum them up, in a connected non-obvious Neutro- 6852
sophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). There’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 6853
E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only the maximum possibilities of the distinct interior Neutrosophic 6854
SuperHyperVertices inside of any given Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities minus 6855

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. In other words, 6856
there’s only an unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has only two distinct 6857
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices in an Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities, minus 6858
all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbor to some of them but not all of them. 6859
The main definition of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities has two titles. a Neutro- 6860
sophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities and its corresponded quasi-maximum Neutrosophic 6861

R-SuperHyperCardinality are two titles in the terms of quasi-R-styles. For any Neutrosophic 6862
number, there’s a Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities with that quasi-maximum 6863
Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality in the terms of the embedded Neutrosophic SuperHy- 6864
perGraph. If there’s an embedded Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, then the Neutrosophic 6865
quasi-SuperHyperNotions lead us to take the collection of all the Neutrosophic quasi-R- 6866
SuperHyperConnectivitiess for all Neutrosophic numbers less than its Neutrosophic corresponded 6867

maximum number. The essence of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ends up but this 6868
essence starts up in the terms of the Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities, again and 6869
more in the operations of collecting all the Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivitiess 6870
acted on the all possible used formations of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph to achieve one 6871
Neutrosophic number. This Neutrosophic number is 6872
considered as the equivalence class for all corresponded quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivitiess. Let 6873

zNeutrosophic Number , SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet and GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities be a Neut- 6874

rosophic number, a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet and a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 6875
Then 6876

[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class = {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |

SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number }.

As its consequences, the formal definition of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities is 6877

re-formalized and redefined as follows. 6878

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number }.

To get more precise perceptions, the follow-up expressions propose another formal technical 6879
definition for the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 6880

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

=
max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

In more concise and more convenient ways, the modified definition for the Neutrosophic 6881
SuperHyperConnectivities poses the upcoming expressions. 6882

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

To translate the statement to this mathematical literature, the formulae will be revised. 6883

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

And then, 6884

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

To get more visions in the closer look-up, there’s an overall overlook. 6885

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ,
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6886

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |
SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet = GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ,

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= zNeutrosophic Number |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6887

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6888

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{S ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|SNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

Now, the extension of these types of approaches is up. Since the new term, “Neutro- 6889
sophic SuperHyperNeighborhood”, could be redefined as the collection of the Neutrosophic 6890
SuperHyperVertices such that any amount of its Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are in- 6891
cident to a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. It’s, literarily, another name for “Neutrosophic 6892
Quasi-SuperHyperConnectivities” but, precisely, it’s the generalization of “Neutrosophic Quasi- 6893
SuperHyperConnectivities” since “Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnectivities” happens 6894
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities” in a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as initial 6895
framework and background but “Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood” may not happens 6896
“Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities” in a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph as initial frame- 6897
work and preliminarily background since there are some ambiguities about the Neutrosophic 6898
SuperHyperCardinality arise from it. To get orderly keywords, the terms, “Neutrosophic Supe- 6899
rHyperNeighborhood”, “Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnectivities”, and “Neutrosophic 6900
SuperHyperConnectivities” are up. 6901
Thus, let zNeutrosophic Number , NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities
6902
be a Neutrosophic number, a Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood and a Neutrosophic 6903
SuperHyperConnectivities and the new terms are up. 6904

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

6905

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

6906

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

6907

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality =
max zNeutrosophic Number }.
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

And with go back to initial structure, 6908

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =

∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6909

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class =
∪zNeutrosophic Number {NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= zNeutrosophic Number |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6910

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |

|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood |Neutrosophic Cardinality
=
max zNeutrosophic Number
[zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
6911

GNeutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities =
{NNeutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood ∈ ∪zNeutrosophic Number [zNeutrosophic Number ]Neutrosophic Class |
|NNeutrosophic SuperHyperSet |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= max |E| | E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The all interior Neutro-
sophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities if
for any of them, and any of other corresponded Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, some interior
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors with no
Neutrosophic exception at all minus all Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to any amount of
them.
To make sense with the precise words in the terms of “R-’, the follow-up illustrations are coming
up.
The following Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices is the simple
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities.

The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is an Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic Super-

HyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) is a Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutro-
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge amid some Neut-
rosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities
is related to the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

There’s not only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex inside the intended Neutrosophic Super-
HyperSet. Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities is up. The obvious

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities is

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet includes only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. But the
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

doesn’t have less than two SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet
since they’ve come from at least so far an SuperHyperEdge. Thus the non-obvious simple
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities is up. To
sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic R-

SuperHyperConnectivities. Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic Super-
HyperVertices,
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {xy}
or
(V \ V \ {x, z}) ∪ {zy}
is an Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Graph ESHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer-
tices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some Neutrosophic SuperHyper-
Vertices instead of all given by that Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic
SuperHyperConnectivities and it’s an Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. Since it’s
the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutro-
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some
amount Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices instead of all given by that Neutrosophic type-
SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. There isn’t only less than
two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet,
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

is up. The non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic

SuperHyperConnectivities, not:
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

Is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not:

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

does includes only less than two SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic Super- 6912
HyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) but it’s impossible in the case, they’ve corresponded to an 6913
SuperHyperEdge. It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple Neutrosophic 6914

type-SuperHyperSet called the 6915

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

“Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities” 6916

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 6917

Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities, 6918

is only and only

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E) with a illustrated SuperHyper-

Modeling. It’s also, not only a Neutrosophic free-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel and a
Neutrosophic on-triangle embedded SuperHyperModel but also it’s a Neutrosophic stable em-
bedded SuperHyperModel. But all only non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets
of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities amid those obvious simple Neutrosophic
type-SuperHyperSets of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities, are

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).

To sum them up, assume a connected loopless Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).
Then in the worst case, literally,

V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .

is a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities. In other words, the least cardinality, the lower

sharp bound for the cardinality, of a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities is the cardinality
of
V \ V \ {aE , bE , cE , . . .}E={E∈EESHG:(V,E) | |E|=max{|E| | E∈EESHG:(V,E) }} .
6919

To sum them up, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). 6920
The all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices belong to any Neutrosophic quasi-R- 6921
SuperHyperConnectivities if for any of them, and any of other corresponded Neutrosophic 6922
SuperHyperVertex, some interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices are mutually Neutrosophic 6923
SuperHyperNeighbors with no Neutrosophic exception at all minus all Neutrosophic SuperHy- 6924

peNeighbors to any amount of them. 6925

Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Let a Neutrosophic Supe- 6926
rHyperEdge ESHE : E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) has some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices r. Consider 6927
all Neutrosophic numbers of those Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from that Neutrosophic 6928
SuperHyperEdge excluding excluding more than r distinct Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, 6929
exclude to any given Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. 6930

Consider there’s a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities with the least cardinality, the lower 6931
sharp Neutrosophic bound for Neutrosophic cardinality. Assume a connected Neutrosophic 6932
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 6933
SuperHyperVertices VESHE \ {z} is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of the Neutrosophic Su- 6934
perHyperVertices such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some Neutrosophic 6935
SuperHyperVertices uniquely but it isn’t a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities. Since it 6936

doesn’t have 6937

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutro- 6938

sophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some Supe- 6939
rHyperVertices uniquely. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 6940
tices VESHE ∪ {z} is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 6941
S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices but it isn’t a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities. 6942
Since it doesn’t do the Neutrosophic procedure such that such that there’s a Neutrosophic 6943

SuperHyperEdge to have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely [there are at least 6944
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex outside implying there’s, sometimes in the connected 6945
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E), a Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, titled its 6946
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, to that Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex in the Neutrosophic 6947
SuperHyperSet S so as S doesn’t do “the Neutrosophic procedure”.]. There’s only one Neutro- 6948
sophic SuperHyperVertex outside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, VESHE ∪ {z}, 6949

in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhood. Thus the obvious Neutrosophic R- 6950

SuperHyperConnectivities, VESHE is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 6951
of the Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities, VESHE , is a Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6952
Set, VESHE , includes only all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices does forms any kind of 6953
Neutrosophic pairs are titled Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in a connected Neutrosophic 6954
SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 6955

SuperHyperVertices VESHE , is the maximum Neutrosophic SuperHyperCardinality of 6956

a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that there’s 6957
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge to have some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices uniquely. 6958
Thus, in a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). Any Neutrosophic 6959
R-SuperHyperConnectivities only contains all interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices and 6960
all exterior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge 6961

where there’s any of them has all possible Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors in and there’s all 6962
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighborhoods in with no exception minus all Neutrosophic SuperHy- 6963
peNeighbors to some of them not all of them but everything is possible about Neutrosophic 6964
SuperHyperNeighborhoods and Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors out. 6965
The SuperHyperNotion, namely, SuperHyperConnectivities, is up. There’s neither empty Supe- 6966
rHyperEdge nor loop SuperHyperEdge. The following Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of Neutro- 6967

sophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet 6968

of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of 6969
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6970

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

is the simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 6971

The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 6972

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6973

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is an Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHy- 6974

perGraph ESHG : (V, E) is a Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet with 6975

the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 6976

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no Neutrosophic Su- 6977
perHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an Neutrosophic 6978
SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. There are not only two Neut- 6979
rosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet. Thus the 6980
non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic 6981

type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities is a Neutrosophic Su- 6982

perHyperSet includes only two Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. But the Neutrosophic 6983
SuperHyperSet of the 6984
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6985

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Doesn’t have less than three SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHy- 6986
perSet. Thus the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic 6987
SuperHyperConnectivities is up. To sum them up, the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 6988
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6989

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Is the non-obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 6990

Connectivities. Since the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 6991
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices], 6992

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Is an Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities C(ESHG) for an Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 6993
ESHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 6994
that there’s no a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge for some Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices given 6995
by that Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities 6996
and it’s an Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. Since it’s 6997

the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of 6998

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges[SuperHyperVertices] such that there’s no Neutrosophic 6999
SuperHyperVertex of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge is common and there’s an Neutrosophic 7000
SuperHyperEdge for all Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices. There aren’t only less than three 7001
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices inside the intended Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, 7002

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Thus the non-obvious Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities, 7003

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .
Is up. The obvious simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet of the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7004
Connectivities, not: 7005

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, not: 7006

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

Does includes only less than three SuperHyperVertices in a connected Neutrosophic Super- 7007
HyperGraph ESHG : (V, E). It’s interesting to mention that the only non-obvious simple 7008
Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSet called the 7009

“Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities” 7010

amid those obvious[non-obvious] simple Neutrosophic type-SuperHyperSets called the 7011

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities, 7012

is only and only 7013

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

In a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph ESHG : (V, E).  7014

136EXM18a Example 11.3.3. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 7015
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 7016
SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the SuperHyperConnectivities. 7017

Proposition 11.3.4. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHypeCycle ESHC : (V, E). 7018
Then a Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 7019

of the interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no Neutrosophic exceptions 7020

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.23: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperConnectivities in the Example (13.3.2) 136NSHG18a

on the form of interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from the same Neutrosophic 7021
SuperHyperNeighborhoods not excluding any Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex. a Neutrosophic 7022
quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities has the Neutrosophic half number of all the Neutrosophic 7023
SuperHyperEdges in the terms of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality. Also, 7024

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

136EXM19a Example 11.3.5. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities 7025
N SHC : (V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 7026
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 7027

Proposition 11.3.6. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 7028
a Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 7029
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, corresponded to a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. a 7030

Neutrosophic quasi-R-SuperHyperConnectivities has the Neutrosophic number of the Neutrosophic 7031

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.24: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions

of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.4) 136NSHG19a

cardinality of the one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Also, 7032

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

= {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
X
= z |E|Neutrosophic Cardinality | E:∈EESHG:(V,E) .
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 , . . . .

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = z s + z t +, . . . .

136EXM20a Example 11.3.7. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 7033
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 7034

in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 7035

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 7036
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 7037

Proposition 11.3.8. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 7038
Then a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the 7039
interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with no Neutrosophic exceptions in the form of interior 7040
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices titled Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. a Neutrosophic R- 7041
SuperHyperConnectivities has the Neutrosophic maximum number of on Neutrosophic cardinality 7042

of the minimum SuperHyperPart minus those have common Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors 7043

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.25: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.6) 136NSHG20a

and not unique Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 7044

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .
136EXM21a Example 11.3.9. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7045
perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The 7046

obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 7047

result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7048
Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is the Neutrosophic 7049
SuperHyperConnectivities. 7050

Proposition 11.3.10. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 7051

(V, E). Then a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 7052
of the interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices with only no Neutrosophic exception in 7053
the Neutrosophic form of interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from a Neutrosophic 7054

SuperHyperPart and only no exception in the form of interior SuperHyperVertices from another 7055

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.26: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Example (13.3.8) 136NSHG21a

SuperHyperPart titled “SuperHyperNeighbors” with neglecting and ignoring more than some 7056
of them aren’t SuperHyperNeighbors to all. a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities has 7057
the Neutrosophic maximum number on all the Neutrosophic summation on the Neutrosophic 7058

cardinality of the all Neutrosophic SuperHyperParts form some SuperHyperEdges minus those 7059
make Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some not all or not unique. Also, 7060

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= {E2i−1 }i=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
= z min |PESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s .

136EXM22a Example 11.3.11. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 7061
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 7062
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 7063
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 7064
in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 7065

Proposition 11.3.12. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 7066
Then a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet of the interior 7067

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices, excluding the Neutrosophic SuperHyperCenter, with only no 7068

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.27: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperConnectivities in the Example (13.3.10) 136NSHG22a

exception in the form of interior Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices from same Neutrosophic 7069
SuperHyperEdge with the exclusion on Neutrosophic SuperHypeNeighbors to some of them and 7070
not all. a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnectivities has the Neutrosophic maximum number 7071
on all the Neutrosophic number of all the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges don’t have common 7072
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbors. Also, 7073

C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivities

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
b c
= {E2i−1 }i=1 2
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicQuasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 2z b 2 c
.
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivities = {Vi }si=1 , {Vj }tj=1 .
C(N SHG)N eutrosophicR−Quasi−SuperHyperConnectivitiesSuperHyperP olynomial = az s + bz t .

136EXM23a Example 11.3.13. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7074
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 7075
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 7076
tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 7077

SuperHyperModel (13.28), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities. 7078

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 11.28: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.12) 136NSHG23a

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 12 7079

SuperHyperDominating 7080

12.1 Definitions 7081

Definition 12.1.1 (Neutrosophic Strength of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPaths).

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.3,p.7).
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). A
Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) V1 to
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vs is sequence of Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices
(NSHV) and Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)

V1 , E1 , V2 , E2 , V3 , . . . , Vs−1 , Es−1 , Vs ,

have 7082

(i) Neutrosophic t-strength (min{T (Vi )}, m, n)si=1 ; 7083

(ii) Neutrosophic i-strength (m, min{I(Vi )}, n)si=1 ; 7084

(iii) Neutrosophic f-strength (m, n, min{F (Vi )})si=1 ; 7085

(iv) Neutrosophic strength (min{T (Vi )}, min{I(Vi )}, min{F (Vi )})si=1 . 7086

Definition 12.1.2 (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges (NSHE)). 7087

(Ref.[HG38],Definition 5.4,p.7). 7088
Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7089

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 7090

(ix) Neutrosophic t-connective if T (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic t-strength 7091

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 7092

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 7093

(x) Neutrosophic i-connective if I(E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic i-strength 7094

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 7095
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 7096

(xi) Neutrosophic f-connective if F (E) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic f-strength 7097

of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi to 7098

Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s; 7099

391
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(xii) Neutrosophic connective if (T (E), I(E), F (E)) ≥ maximum number of Neutrosophic 7100
strength of SuperHyperPath (NSHP) from Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vi 7101
to Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex (NSHV) Vj where 1 ≤ i, j ≤ s. 7102

Definition 12.1.3. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating). 7103

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7104
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 7105
or E 0 is called 7106

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDominating if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 7107

that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 7108

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 7109

that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 7110

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDominating if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 7111

that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 7112

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 7113

that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 7114

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 7115

SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic v- 7116
SuperHyperDominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating. 7117

Definition 12.1.4. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDominating). 7118

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7119
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 7120

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDominating if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDominating,

7121

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDominating, and 7122

Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyper- 7123
Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet 7124
S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Ex- 7125
treme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that 7126
they form the Extreme SuperHyperDominating; 7127

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 7128

SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic v- 7129
SuperHyperDominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating and C(N SHG) for 7130
a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardin- 7131
ality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 7132

Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 7133

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating; 7134

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 7135

rosophic e-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic 7136
v-SuperHyperDominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating and C(N SHG) 7137
for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 7138

contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 7139

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 7140

Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVer- 7141
tices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDominating; and the Extreme power is 7142
corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 7143

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 7144

of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, 7145
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating 7146
and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 7147

SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic 7148

number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 7149
of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 7150
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form 7151
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to 7152
its Neutrosophic coefficient; 7153

(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 7154

SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic v- 7155
SuperHyperDominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating and C(N SHG) for 7156

an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of 7157

an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyper- 7158
Vertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 7159
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDominating; 7160

(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 7161

SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic v- 7162
SuperHyperDominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating and C(N SHG) 7163
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic 7164

cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S 7165

of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutro- 7166
sophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating; 7167

(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 7168

of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, 7169
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating 7170
and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme 7171
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number 7172
of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 7173

SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and 7174

Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDominating; 7175
and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 7176

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either 7177

of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDominating, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDominating, 7178
Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDominating, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDominating 7179
and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 7180
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic 7181

number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 7182

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.1: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG1

of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 7183

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form 7184
the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to 7185

its Neutrosophic coefficient. 7186

12.2 Examples 7187

136EXM1 Example 12.2.1. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 7188
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 7189

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7190
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7191
E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 7192
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutro- 7193
sophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 7194
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 7195

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic 7196

SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. 7197

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

7198

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.2: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG2

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7199

HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7200

E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic 7201
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 7202
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 7203
is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as 7204
a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in 7205

every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. 7206

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.
7207

• On the Figure (13.3), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7208
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7209

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.3: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG3

7210

• On the Figure (13.4), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7211
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7212

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial =
5 × 3z 2 .

7213

• On the Figure (13.5), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7214
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7215

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

7216

• On the Figure (13.6), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7217
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7218

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.4: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG4

Figure 12.5: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG5

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.6: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG6

= {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+233i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 3z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating
= {V3i+13i=0 , V3i+113i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 3z 8 .
7219

• On the Figure (13.7), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7220
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7221

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
7222

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.7: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG7

• On the Figure (13.8), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7223
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7224

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 4 × 5 × 5z 3 .
7225

• On the Figure (13.9), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7226
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7227

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating

= {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating
= {V3i+13i=0 , V11 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 11z 5 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.8: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG8

7228

• On the Figure (13.10), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7229
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7230

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

7231

• On the Figure (13.11), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7232
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7233

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E1 , E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 3z 3 .

7234

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.9: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG9

Figure 12.10: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG10

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.11: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG11

• On the Figure (13.12), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7235
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7236

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial =

= 5 × 5z 5 .

7237

• On the Figure (13.13), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7238
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7239

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E3 , E9 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 3z 2 .

7240

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.12: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG12

Figure 12.13: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG13

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.14: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG14

• On the Figure (13.14), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7241
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7242

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

7243

• On the Figure (13.15), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7244
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7245

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 2 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.15: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG15

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 , V4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .

7246

• On the Figure (13.16), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7247
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7248

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 3 .

7249

• On the Figure (13.17), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7250
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7251

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.16: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG16

Figure 12.17: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG17

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.18: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG18

7252

• On the Figure (13.18), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7253
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7254

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial =
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

7255

• On the Figure (13.19), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7256
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7257

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V3i+1i=03 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 4 .

7258

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.19: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG19

• On the Figure (13.20), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7259
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7260

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
7261

• On the Figure (13.21), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7262
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7263

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
7264

• On the Figure (13.22), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 7265
HyperDominating, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7266

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating = {E3 , E4 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.20: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG20

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 2 .

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= 5 × 1z 2 .

7267

12.3 Results 7268

The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 7269
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 7270

Proposition 12.3.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 7271

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating =

|EESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
c
= {E3i+1 }i=0 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z c 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.21: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 95NHG1

|EESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
EXT ERN AL c
= {V 3i+1 }i=0
3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |
Y Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality 3z c 3 .

Proof. Let 7272

P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
c 3 −1 c 3

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 7273

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.22: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 95NHG2

There’s a new way to redefine as 7274

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7275

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDominating. The latter is straightforward.  7276

136EXM18a Example 12.3.2. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 7277

(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 7278
SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the SuperHyperDominating. 7279

Proposition 12.3.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then 7280

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating =

|EESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
c
= {E3i+1 }i=0 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) | 3
Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z c .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating

|EESHG:(V,E) | 3
Neutrosophic Cardinality
c
= {V EXT ERN AL 3i+1 }i=0 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.23: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperDominating in the Example (13.3.2) 136NSHG18a

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial

|EESHG:(V,E) |
Y Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality 3z c 3 .

Proof. Let 7281

P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality
c 3 −1 c 3

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 7282
There’s a new way to redefine as 7283

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7284

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDominating. The latter is straightforward.  7285

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.24: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.4) 136NSHG19a

136EXM19a Example 12.3.4. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 7286
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 7287

Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. 7288

Proposition 12.3.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 7289

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Proof. Let 7290

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a 7291
new way to redefine as 7292

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.25: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.6) 136NSHG20a

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7293

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDominating. The latter is straightforward.  7294

136EXM20a Example 12.3.6. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 7295
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 7296
in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 7297
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 7298

is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. 7299

Proposition 12.3.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 7300

Then 7301

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating

= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 7302

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 7303

There’s a new way to redefine as 7304

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7305

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDominating. The latter is straightforward. Then 7306
there’s no at least one SuperHyperDominating. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but 7307
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDominating could be applied. There are only 7308
two SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 7309
representative in the 7310

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest SuperHyperDominating taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 7311

ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of- 7312
SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 7313

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

The latter is straightforward.  7314

136EXM21a Example 12.3.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7315
perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The 7316
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 7317
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7318
Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is the Neutrosophic 7319

SuperHyperDominating. 7320

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.26: Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Example (13.3.8) 136NSHG21a

Proposition 12.3.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 7321
Then 7322

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 7323

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest SuperHyperDominating taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMulti- 7324

partite ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 7325

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7326
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDominating. The latter is straightforward. Then 7327
there’s no at least one SuperHyperDominating. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but 7328
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDominating could be applied. There are only 7329

z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 7330
representative in the 7331

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 7332
Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 7333

SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 7334

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 7335
The latter is straightforward.  7336

136EXM22a Example 12.3.10. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 7337

ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 7338
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 7339
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 7340
in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. 7341

Proposition 12.3.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 7342
Then, 7343

∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDominating SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.27: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperDominating in the Example (13.3.10) 136NSHG22a

Proof. Let 7344

P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperDominating taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 7345

ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 7346

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded 7347
to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDominating. The latter is straightforward. 7348
Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDominating. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 7349
SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDominating could be applied. The unique embedded 7350
SuperHyperDominating proposes some longest SuperHyperDominating excerpt from some 7351
representatives. The latter is straightforward.  7352

136EXM23a Example 12.3.12. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7353
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 7354
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 7355
tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 7356

SuperHyperModel (13.28), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating. 7357

Definition 12.3.13. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality). 7358

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7359

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 12.28: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDominating in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.12) 136NSHG23a

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 7360

or E 0 is called 7361

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 such that 7362

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 7363

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Ei ∈ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 such that 7364

Va ∈ Ei , Ej and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 7365

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 such that 7366

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 7367

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality if ∀Vi ∈ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 such that 7368

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 7369

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, 7370

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutro- 7371
sophic rv-SuperHyperDuality. 7372

Definition 12.3.14. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDuality). 7373

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7374
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 7375

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, 7376

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutro- 7377
sophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 7378
(V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Ex- 7379
treme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence 7380
of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7381

Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 7382

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, 7383

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutro- 7384
sophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 7385
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7386
perEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 7387
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they 7388

form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 7389

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 7390

rosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v- 7391

SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Ex- 7392
treme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains 7393
the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardin- 7394
ality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 7395
cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 7396

that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme power is corresponded 7397
to its Extreme coefficient; 7398

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 7399

rosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v- 7400

SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 7401
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 7402
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the max- 7403
imum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 7404
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7405

perEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 7406
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 7407
coefficient; 7408

(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, 7409

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutro- 7410
sophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 7411
(V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Ex- 7412
treme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence 7413

of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7414
Extreme SuperHyperDuality; 7415

(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 7416

SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDuality,7417
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7418
Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 7419
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 7420
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 7421
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality; 7422

(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 7423

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic 7424

v-SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for an 7425

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 7426

contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum 7427
Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet 7428
S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 7429
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDuality; and the Extreme 7430
power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 7431

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 7432

rosophic e-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDuality, Neutrosophic v- 7433
SuperHyperDuality, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDuality and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 7434

rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 7435

contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the max- 7436
imum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 7437
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7438
perEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 7439
SuperHyperDuality; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 7440

coefficient. 7441

136EXM1 Example 12.3.15. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 7442
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 7443

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7444

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7445

E1 and E3 are some empty Extreme SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 7446
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of 7447
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, 7448
namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means 7449
that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 7450
Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 7451

SuperHyperDuality. 7452

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7453

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7454
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic 7455
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 7456
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 7457
is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as 7458

a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in 7459

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 7460

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.3), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7461

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7462

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.4), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7463

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7464

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.5), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7465

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7466

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.6), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7467

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7468

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 6z 8 .

• On the Figure (13.7), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7469

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7470

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.8), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7471

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7472

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.9), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7473

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7474

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .

• On the Figure (13.10), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7475

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7476

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.11), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7477

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7478

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E1 , E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V6 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 3z 2 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.12), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7479

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7480

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 5 .

• On the Figure (13.13), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7481

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7482

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E5 , E9 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 3z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.14), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7483

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7484

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.15), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7485

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7486

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.16), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7487

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7488

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
(2 × 1 × 2) + (2 × 4 × 5)z.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.17), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7489

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7490

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 1 × 2)z.

• On the Figure (13.18), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7491

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7492

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial =
(2 × 2 × 2)z.

• On the Figure (13.19), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7493

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7494

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .

• On the Figure (13.20), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7495

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7496

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E6 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.21), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7497

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7498

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.22), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7499

SuperHyperDuality, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7500

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 9 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 9 + 12 × 6z 2 .

The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 7501
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 7502

Proposition 12.3.16. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 7503

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .

Proof. Let 7504

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 7505

There’s a new way to redefine as 7506

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7507

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is straightforward.  7508

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

136EXM18a Example 12.3.17. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 7509
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 7510
SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the SuperHyperDuality. 7511

Proposition 12.3.18. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 7512
Then 7513

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .

Proof. Let 7514

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 7515
There’s a new way to redefine as 7516

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7517
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is straightforward.  7518

136EXM19a Example 12.3.19. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 7519
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 7520
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 7521

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 12.3.20. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 7522

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Proof. Let 7523

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a 7524
new way to redefine as 7525

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7526
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is straightforward.  7527

136EXM20a Example 12.3.21. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 7528

(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 7529
in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 7530
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 7531
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 7532

Proposition 12.3.22. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 7533
Then 7534

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proof. Let 7535

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 7536
There’s a new way to redefine as 7537

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded 7538
to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is straightforward. 7539
Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 7540

SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. There are only two 7541
SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 7542
representative in the 7543

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 7544

ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of- 7545
SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 7546

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

The latter is straightforward.  7547

136EXM21a Example 12.3.23. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7548
perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The 7549
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 7550
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7551
Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is the Neutrosophic 7552

SuperHyperDuality. 7553

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 12.3.24. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 7554

(V, E). Then 7555

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality

= {Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 7556

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 7557

ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 7558

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded 7559
to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is straightforward. 7560

Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and 7561
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. There are only z 0 7562
SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 7563
representative in the 7564

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 7565
Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 7566
SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 7567

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 7568
The latter is straightforward.  7569

136EXM22a Example 12.3.25. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 7570
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 7571

SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 7572

SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 7573
in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 7574

Proposition 12.3.26. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 7575
Then, 7576

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {E ∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)

∗
}.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|
∗
Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperDuality SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Proof. Let 7577

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1∗ ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2∗ ,
...,
∗ EXT ERN AL
E|E ∗ | , V|E ∗ |Neutrosophic Cardinality +1
ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality ESHG:(V,E)

is a longest SuperHyperDuality taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 7578

ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 7579

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez∗ ≡
∃!Ez∗ ∈ EESHG:(V,E)
∗
, {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez∗ .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded 7580

to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDuality. The latter is straightforward. 7581

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDuality. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the 7582
SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDuality could be applied. The unique embedded 7583
SuperHyperDuality proposes some longest SuperHyperDuality excerpt from some representatives. 7584
The latter is straightforward.  7585

136EXM23a Example 12.3.27. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7586
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 7587
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 7588
tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 7589
SuperHyperModel (13.28), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDuality. 7590

Definition 12.3.28. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin). 7591

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7592
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 7593
or E 0 is called 7594

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 7595

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 7596

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 7597

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 7598
|Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 7599

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 7600

Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 7601

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 7602

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 7603

|Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 7604

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 7605

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic 7606

rv-SuperHyperJoin. 7607

Definition 12.3.29. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperJoin). 7608

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7609
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 7610

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 7611

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic 7612

rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 7613
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 7614
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 7615
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7616
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 7617

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 7618

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic 7619
rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 7620

is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 7621

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 7622

SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7623
Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 7624

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 7625

e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, 7626
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 7627
N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients 7628
defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 7629
SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive 7630

Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7631
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 7632
coefficient; 7633

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 7634

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v- 7635
SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 7636
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains 7637
the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum Neutro- 7638

sophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet 7639

S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 7640
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 7641
and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 7642

(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 7643

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic 7644
rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 7645
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 7646
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 7647

Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7648
Extreme SuperHyperJoin; 7649

(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, 7650

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic 7651

rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 7652
is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 7653
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 7654
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7655

Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin; 7656

(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 7657

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v- 7658

SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 7659
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 7660
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 7661
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 7662
cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 7663
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperJoin; and the Extreme power is corresponded to 7664

its Extreme coefficient; 7665

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 7666

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperJoin, Neutrosophic v- 7667
SuperHyperJoin, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperJoin and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic 7668
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial contains 7669
the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 7670
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 7671

SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7672

perEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 7673
SuperHyperJoin; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 7674
coefficient. 7675

136EXM1 Example 12.3.30. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 7676
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 7677

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7678

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7679
E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 7680

SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of 7681

Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, 7682
namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means 7683
that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 7684
Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 7685
SuperHyperJoin. 7686

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7687

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7688
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic 7689

SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 7690

one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 7691
is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as 7692
a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in 7693
every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 7694

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.3), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7695

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7696

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.4), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7697

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7698

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.5), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7699

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7700

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.6), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7701

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7702

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 6z 8 .

• On the Figure (13.7), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7703

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7704

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.8), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7705

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7706

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.9), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7707

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7708

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .

• On the Figure (13.10), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7709

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7710

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V13 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 5 × 5z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.11), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7711

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7712

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E1 , E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V6 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 3z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.12), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7713

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7714

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 5 .

• On the Figure (13.13), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7715

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7716

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3 , E9 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 3z 2 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.14), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7717

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7718

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.15), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7719

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7720

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.16), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7721

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7722

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.17), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7723

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7724

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

• On the Figure (13.18), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7725

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7726

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.19), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7727

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7728

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .

• On the Figure (13.20), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7729

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7730

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E6 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.21), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7731

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7732

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.

• On the Figure (13.22), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7733

SuperHyperJoin, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7734

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin = {E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .

The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 7735
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 7736

Proposition 12.3.31. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 7737

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .

Proof. Let 7738

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 7739
There’s a new way to redefine as 7740

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7741
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward.  7742

136EXM18a Example 12.3.32. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 7743
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 7744
SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the SuperHyperJoin. 7745

Proposition 12.3.33. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 7746
Then 7747

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proof. Let 7748

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 7749
There’s a new way to redefine as 7750

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7751
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward.  7752

136EXM19a Example 12.3.34. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 7753
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 7754
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 7755

Proposition 12.3.35. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 7756

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Proof. Let 7757

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a 7758

new way to redefine as 7759

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7760

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward.  7761

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

136EXM20a Example 12.3.36. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 7762
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 7763
in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 7764
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 7765
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 7766

Proposition 12.3.37. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 7767
Then 7768

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= (PERFECT MATCHING).
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= (OTHERWISE)0.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 7769

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 7770
There’s a new way to redefine as 7771

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7772
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 7773

no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions 7774
based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 7775
SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 7776

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 7777

ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of- 7778
SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 7779

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

The latter is straightforward.  7780

136EXM21a Example 12.3.38. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7781
perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The 7782
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 7783

result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7784

Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is the Neutrosophic 7785
SuperHyperJoin. 7786

Proposition 12.3.39. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 7787

(V, E). Then 7788

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin

= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= (PERFECT MATCHING).
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
= (OTHERWISE)0.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 7789

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 7790

ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 7791

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7792
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 7793
no at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions 7794

based on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 7795

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 7796

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 7797
Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 7798
SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 7799

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 7800

The latter is straightforward.  7801

136EXM22a Example 12.3.40. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 7802
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 7803
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 7804
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 7805
in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 7806

Proposition 12.3.41. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 7807
Then, 7808

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperJoin SuperHyperPolynomial
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .

Proof. Let 7809

P :

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

is a longest SuperHyperJoin taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : 7810

(V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 7811

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7812
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperJoin. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 7813

at least one SuperHyperJoin. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions based 7814
on SuperHyperJoin could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperJoin proposes some 7815
longest SuperHyperJoin excerpt from some representatives. The latter is straightforward.  7816

136EXM23a Example 12.3.42. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7817
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 7818
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 7819
tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 7820
SuperHyperModel (13.28), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperJoin. 7821

Definition 12.3.43. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect). 7822

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7823

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 7824

or E 0 is called 7825

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 7826

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 7827

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such 7828

that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 7829

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 7830

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 7831

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 7832

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 7833

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, 7834

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic 7835
rv-SuperHyperPerfect. 7836

Definition 12.3.44. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperPerfect). 7837

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 7838

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 7839

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, 7840

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic 7841
rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 7842
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 7843
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 7844
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7845

Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 7846

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, 7847

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic 7848

rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : 7849
(V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 7850
of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive 7851
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they 7852
form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 7853

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 7854

rosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v- 7855

SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Ex- 7856
treme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains 7857
the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardin- 7858
ality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 7859
cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 7860
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded 7861

to its Extreme coefficient; 7862

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 7863

rosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v- 7864

SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 7865
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 7866
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the max- 7867
imum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic 7868
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7869
perEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 7870

SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 7871

coefficient; 7872

(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, 7873

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic 7874
rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 7875
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 7876
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 7877
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 7878

Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; 7879

(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 7880

SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperPerfect,7881

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 7882
Graph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic 7883
SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality 7884
consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such 7885
that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect; 7886

(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 7887

rosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v- 7888
SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for an Ex- 7889

treme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains 7890

the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardin- 7891
ality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 7892
cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 7893
that they form the Extreme SuperHyperPerfect; and the Extreme power is corresponded 7894
to its Extreme coefficient; 7895

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 7896

rosophic e-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperPerfect, Neutrosophic v- 7897

SuperHyperPerfect, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperPerfect and C(N SHG) for a Neut- 7898
rosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 7899
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the max- 7900
imum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic 7901
SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHy- 7902

perEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic 7903
SuperHyperPerfect; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic 7904
coefficient. 7905

136EXM1 Example 12.3.45. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 7906
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 7907

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7908

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7909
E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 7910
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of 7911

Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, 7912

namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means 7913
that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 7914
Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 7915
SuperHyperPerfect. 7916

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7917

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7918

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic 7919

SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 7920
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 7921
is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as 7922
a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in 7923
every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 7924

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.3), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7925

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7926

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.4), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7927

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7928

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.5), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7929

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7930

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.6), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7931

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7932

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E3i+243i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial 6z 8 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+17i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 6z 8 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.7), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7933

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7934

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E15 , E16 , E17 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.8), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7935

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7936

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.9), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7937

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7938

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+13i=0 , E23 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3i+13i=0 , V15 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 5 .

• On the Figure (13.10), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7939

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7940

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 , V8 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.11), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7941

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7942

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E1 , E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V6 , V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 2z 2 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.12), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7943

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7944

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , Vii610=5,7,8 }.
i=4

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 5 .

• On the Figure (13.13), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7945

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7946

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3 , E9 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 3z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.14), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7947

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7948

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.15), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7949

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7950

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.16), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7951

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7952

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 5 × 5) + (1 × 2 + 1)z 3 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.17), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7953

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7954

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

• On the Figure (13.18), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7955

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7956

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V27 , V2 , V7 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial =
(1 × 1 × 2 + 1)z 4 .

• On the Figure (13.19), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7957

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7958

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E3i+1i=03 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V2i+1i=05 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 6 .

• On the Figure (13.20), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7959

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7960

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E6 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.21), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7961

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7962

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.22), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 7963

SuperHyperPerfect, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 7964

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E2 , E5 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect = {V3 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= 10 × 6 + 10 × 6 + 12 × 6 + 12 × 6z 2 .

The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 7965
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 7966

Proposition 12.3.46. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 7967

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .

Proof. Let 7968

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 7969

There’s a new way to redefine as 7970

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7971

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is straightforward.  7972

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

136EXM18a Example 12.3.47. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 7973
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 7974
SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the SuperHyperPerfect. 7975

Proposition 12.3.48. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 7976
Then 7977

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {Ei }i=1 3
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality

= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 3

.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
Y |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z 3 .

Proof. Let 7978

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality .
3 3

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 7979
There’s a new way to redefine as 7980

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7981
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is straightforward.  7982

136EXM19a Example 12.3.49. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 7983
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 7984
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 7985

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 12.3.50. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 7986

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Proof. Let 7987

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a 7988
new way to redefine as 7989

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 7990
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is straightforward.  7991

136EXM20a Example 12.3.51. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 7992
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 7993

in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 7994

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 7995
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 7996

Proposition 12.3.52. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 7997
Then 7998

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= (PERFECT MATCHING).
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= (OTHERWISE)0.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 7999

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 8000
There’s a new way to redefine as 8001

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8002
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is straightforward. Then 8003
there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the 8004

SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. There are only two 8005
SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 8006
representative in the 8007

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 8008

ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of- 8009

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 8010

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmin i |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

The latter is straightforward.  8011

136EXM21a Example 12.3.53. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 8012

perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The 8013
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 8014
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8015
Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is the Neutrosophic 8016
SuperHyperPerfect. 8017

Proposition 12.3.54. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 8018

(V, E). Then 8019

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect

= (PERFECT MATCHING).
{Ei ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect
= (OTHERWISE).
{},
If ∃Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | =
6 min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= (PERFECT MATCHING).
X
=( (min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |)choose|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |)
i
i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= (OTHERWISE)0.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect
= {ViEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vi
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 8020

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 8021

ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 8022

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded 8023
to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is straightforward. 8024
Then there’s no at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but 8025
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. There are only z 0 8026

SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 8027
representative in the 8028

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8029
Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 8030
SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 8031

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
...,
EXT ERN AL
Emini |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) | , Vmini |Pi
ESHG:(V,E) ∈P ESHG:(V,E) |+1

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8032

The latter is straightforward.  8033

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

136EXM22a Example 12.3.55. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 8034
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 8035
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 8036
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 8037
in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 8038

Proposition 12.3.56. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 8039
Then, 8040

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect = {E ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperPerfect SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
Proof. Let 8041

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, VjEXT ERN AL .

is a longest SuperHyperPerfect taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 8042
ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 8043

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8044

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperPerfect. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 8045
at least one SuperHyperPerfect. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions 8046
based on SuperHyperPerfect could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperPerfect 8047
proposes some longest SuperHyperPerfect excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 8048
straightforward.  8049

136EXM23a Example 12.3.57. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8050

Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 8051
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 8052
tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 8053
SuperHyperModel (13.28), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPerfect. 8054

Definition 12.3.58. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal). 8055

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 8056
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 8057
or E 0 is called 8058

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 8059

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; 8060

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Ej ∈ E 0 , such that 8061

Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 8062

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 8063

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; 8064

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal if ∀Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) , ∃!Vj ∈ V 0 , such that 8065

Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 8066

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 8067

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic 8068
rv-SuperHyperTotal. 8069

Definition 12.3.59. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperTotal). 8070

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 8071
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 8072

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 8073

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic 8074

rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 8075
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 8076
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 8077
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8078
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 8079

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 8080

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic 8081

rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 8082
is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a 8083
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 8084
SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8085
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 8086

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neutrosophic 8087

e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal, 8088
and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 8089

N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients 8090
defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme 8091
SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive 8092
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8093
Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme 8094
coefficient; 8095

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 8096

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v- 8097

SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a Neutro- 8098
sophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 8099
contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 8100
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHy- 8101
perSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and 8102
Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 8103

and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient; 8104

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 8105

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic 8106
rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 8107
is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 8108
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of 8109
Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8110

Extreme SuperHyperTotal; 8111

(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, 8112

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic 8113
rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) 8114
is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a 8115

Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic 8116

SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8117
Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal; 8118

(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 8119

rosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v- 8120

SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for an Extreme 8121
SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial contains the 8122
Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme cardinality 8123
of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme 8124
cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such 8125

that they form the Extreme SuperHyperTotal; and the Extreme power is corresponded to 8126
its Extreme coefficient; 8127

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 8128

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperTotal, Neutrosophic v- 8129
SuperHyperTotal, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperTotal and C(N SHG) for a Neutro- 8130

sophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperPolynomial 8131

contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic number of the maximum 8132
Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic Supe- 8133
rHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 8134
and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8135
Total; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its Neutrosophic coefficient. 8136

136EXM1 Example 12.3.60. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 8137
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 8138

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8139

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8140

E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 8141
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of 8142
Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, 8143
namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means 8144
that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. 8145

Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic 8146

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

SuperHyperTotal. 8147

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8148

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8149

E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic 8150

SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 8151
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 8152
is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as 8153
a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in 8154
every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 8155

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.3), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8156

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8157

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.4), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8158

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8159

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi- = {E4 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.5), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8160

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8161

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.6), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8162

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8163

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .

• On the Figure (13.7), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8164

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8165

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.8), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8166

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8167

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.9), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8168

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8169

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .

• On the Figure (13.10), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8170

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8171

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.11), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8172

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8173

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.12), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8174

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8175

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1

C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 5 .

• On the Figure (13.13), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8176

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8177

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E3 , E9 , E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.14), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8178

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8179

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V3 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.15), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8180

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8181

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V2 , V3 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.16), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8182

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8183

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.17), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8184

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8185

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .

• On the Figure (13.18), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8186

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8187

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

• On the Figure (13.19), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8188

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8189

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei+2i=011 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .

• On the Figure (13.20), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8190

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8191

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E6 , E10 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 9z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |(|V | − 1)z 2 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.21), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8192

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8193

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {V1 , V2 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = 9z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.22), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic 8194

SuperHyperTotal, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8195

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .

The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 8196
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 8197

Proposition 12.3.61. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 8198

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E | −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
Proof. Let 8199

P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|E |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 ,V EXT ERN AL
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 8200
There’s a new way to redefine as 8201

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8202
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is straightforward.  8203

136EXM18a Example 12.3.62. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 8204
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 8205
SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the SuperHyperTotal. 8206

Proposition 12.3.63. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 8207
Then 8208

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal =

|E | −2
= {Ei }i=1ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal
|E |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1ESHG:(V,E) .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −2

Proof. Let 8209

P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E |E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .
, V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 8210
There’s a new way to redefine as 8211

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8212
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is straightforward.  8213

136EXM19a Example 12.3.64. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 8214
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 8215

Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 8216

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 12.3.65. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 8217

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.

Proof. Let 8218

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a 8219

new way to redefine as 8220

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8221
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is straightforward.  8222

136EXM20a Example 12.3.66. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 8223
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 8224
in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 8225
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 8226

is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 8227

Proposition 12.3.67. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 8228

Then 8229

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 8230

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 8231
There’s a new way to redefine as 8232

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8233
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 8234
no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions 8235

based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. There are only two SuperHyperParts. Thus every 8236
SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 8237

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 8238
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of- 8239
SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 8240

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward.  8241

136EXM21a Example 12.3.68. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 8242
perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The 8243
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 8244

result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8245

Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is the Neutrosophic 8246
SuperHyperTotal. 8247

Proposition 12.3.69. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 8248

(V, E). Then 8249

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,

∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 8250

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 8251

ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 8252

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8253
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 8254

no at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the SuperHyperNotions 8255
based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. There are only z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every 8256
SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the representative in the 8257

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8258
Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 8259
SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 8260

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8261
The latter is straightforward.  8262

136EXM22a Example 12.3.70. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 8263
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 8264
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 8265

SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 8266

in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 8267

Proposition 12.3.71. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 8268

Then, 8269

∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal = {Ei , Ej ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial
∗
= |i(i − 1) | Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality
|z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal = {CEN T ER, Vj ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperTotal SuperHyperPolynomial =
(|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality |) choose (|VESHG:(V,E)|Neutrosophic Cardinality | − 1)
z2.
Proof. Let 8270

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei∗ , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperTotal taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : 8271
(V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 8272

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8273
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperTotal. The latter is straightforward. Then there’s 8274
at least one SuperHyperTotal. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and the SuperHyperNotions 8275
based on SuperHyperTotal could be applied. The unique embedded SuperHyperTotal 8276
proposes some longest SuperHyperTotal excerpt from some representatives. The latter is 8277
straightforward.  8278

136EXM23a Example 12.3.72. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8279
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 8280
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 8281
tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 8282
SuperHyperModel (13.28), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperTotal. 8283

Definition 12.3.73. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected). 8284

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 8285
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 8286

or E 0 is called 8287

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ E 0 , such 8288

that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; and ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; 8289

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ej ∈ 8290

E 0 , such that Va ∈ Ei , Ej ; ∀Ei , Ej ∈ E 0 , such that Va 6∈ Ei , Ej ; and 8291

|Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 8292

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ V 0 , such 8293

that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; 8294

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected if ∀Vi ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vj ∈ 8295

V 0 , such that Vi , Vj ∈ Ea ; ∀Vi , Vj ∈ V 0 , such that Vi , Vj 6∈ Ea ; and 8296
|Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = |Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 8297

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected,

8298

Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neut- 8299

rosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected. 8300

Definition 12.3.74. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperConnected). 8301

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 8302
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 8303

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected,

8304
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neut- 8305
rosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 8306
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of 8307
high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme 8308
sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they 8309
form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 8310

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 8311

SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v- 8312
SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) 8313
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic car- 8314
dinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 8315

Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 8316

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 8317

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 8318

rosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic 8319

v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for 8320

an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 8321
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 8322
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 8323
Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVer- 8324
tices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; and the Extreme power is 8325

corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 8326

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 8327

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neut- 8328
rosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and 8329
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 8330
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic 8331
number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 8332

of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutro- 8333

sophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8334
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 8335
Neutrosophic coefficient; 8336

(v) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 8337

SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v- 8338
SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) 8339
for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 8340
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyper- 8341

Vertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 8342
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 8343

(vi) a Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 8344

SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic v- 8345

SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and C(N SHG) for a 8346
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality 8347
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 8348
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 8349
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; 8350

(vii) an Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 8351

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neut- 8352
rosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and 8353

C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme Super- 8354
HyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of 8355
the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 8356
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and 8357
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperConnected; 8358
and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 8359

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 8360

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperConnected, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperConnected, Neut- 8361
rosophic v-SuperHyperConnected, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperConnected and 8362

C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 8363
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic 8364
number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 8365
of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutro- 8366
sophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8367
Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 8368

Neutrosophic coefficient. 8369

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

136EXM1 Example 12.3.75. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 8370
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 8371

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8372

HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8373

E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 8374
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutro- 8375
sophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 8376
The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 8377
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic 8378

SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 8379

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8380
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8381
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic 8382
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 8383

one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 8384

is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as 8385
a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in 8386
every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 8387

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.3), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8388

HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8389

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z.

• On the Figure (13.4), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8390
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8391

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 15z 2 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.5), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8392
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8393

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E3 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V5 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.6), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8394
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8395

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 20z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+19i=0 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .

• On the Figure (13.7), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8396
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8397

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E12 , E13 , E14 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.8), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8398
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8399

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.9), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8400
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8401

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+19i=0 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+119
i=11
, V22 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 20z 10 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.10), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8402
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8403

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E5 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V12 , V13 , V14 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
3 × 4 × 4z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.11), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8404

HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8405

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E6 , E7 , E8 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.12), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8406

HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8407

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E1 , E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 5z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , Vii68=4,5,6 }.
i=1

C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 5 .

• On the Figure (13.13), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8408
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8409

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E9 , E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V5 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

• On the Figure (13.14), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8410
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8411

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.15), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8412
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8413

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V2 , V3 , V4 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.16), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8414

HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8415

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 3 .

• On the Figure (13.17), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8416
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8417

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
4 × 3z 4 .

• On the Figure (13.18), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8418
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8419

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E2 , E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 , V2 , V6 , V17 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial =
2 × 4 × 3z 4 .

• On the Figure (13.19), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8420
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8421

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Ei+2i=011 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {Vi+2i=011 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 10 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

• On the Figure (13.20), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8422
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8423

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected = {E6 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

• On the Figure (13.21), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8424
HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8425

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {V1 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z.

• On the Figure (13.22), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8426

HyperConnected, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8427

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {E3 , E4 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z 2 .
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected = {V3 , V10 , V6 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 6z 3 .

The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 8428
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 8429

Proposition 12.3.76. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 8430

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
=z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proof. Let 8431

P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 8432

There’s a new way to redefine as 8433

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8434

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward.  8435

136EXM18a Example 12.3.77. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 8436
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 8437
SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the SuperHyperConnected. 8438

Proposition 12.3.78. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 8439
Then 8440

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected =

|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality
−2
= {Ei }i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= (|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality − 1)
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
z Cardinality .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected
|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic −2
= {ViEXT ERN AL }i=1 Cardinality
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
|E | −2
Y
= |V EXT ERN AL ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z ESHG:(V,E) Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 8441

P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...,
E|EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 , V EXT ERN AL |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality −1 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 8442
There’s a new way to redefine as 8443

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8444
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward.  8445

136EXM19a Example 12.3.79. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 8446
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 8447
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 8448

Proposition 12.3.80. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 8449

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |EESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic R-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Proof. Let 8450

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a 8451
new way to redefine as 8452

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8453
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward.  8454

136EXM20a Example 12.3.81. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 8455
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 8456
in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 8457

Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 8458
is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 8459

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 12.3.82. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 8460
Then 8461

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 8462

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 8463
There’s a new way to redefine as 8464

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8465
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward. Then 8466

there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the 8467
SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be applied. There are only two 8468
SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 8469
representative in the 8470

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 8471
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of- 8472

SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 8473

P :

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

The latter is straightforward.  8474

136EXM21a Example 12.3.83. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 8475
perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The 8476
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 8477

result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8478

Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is the Neutrosophic 8479
SuperHyperConnected. 8480

Proposition 12.3.84. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : 8481

(V, E). Then 8482

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic Quasi-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 8483

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 8484

ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 8485

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8486

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward. Then 8487

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

there’s no at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but 8488
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be applied. There are only 8489
z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 8490
representative in the 8491

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8492
Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 8493

SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 8494

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8495
The latter is straightforward.  8496

136EXM22a Example 12.3.85. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 8497
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 8498
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 8499
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 8500
in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 8501

Proposition 12.3.86. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 8502
Then, 8503

∗
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected = {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial
= |i | Ei ∈ |E ∗ ESHG:(V,E) |Neutrosophic Cardinality |z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected = {CEN T ER ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperConnected SuperHyperPolynomial = z.

Proof. Let 8504

P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperConnected taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 8505

ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 8506

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded 8507
to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperConnected. The latter is straightforward. 8508
Then there’s at least one SuperHyperConnected. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and 8509
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperConnected could be applied. The unique 8510
embedded SuperHyperConnected proposes some longest SuperHyperConnected excerpt from 8511
some representatives. The latter is straightforward.  8512

136EXM23a Example 12.3.87. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8513
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 8514

SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 8515

tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 8516
SuperHyperModel (13.28), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnected. 8517

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 13 8518

SuperHyperDimension 8519

13.1 Definitions 8520

Definition 13.1.1. (Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension). 8521

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 8522
Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet V 0 = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs } and E 0 = {E1 , E2 , . . . , Ez }. Then either V 0 8523
or E 0 is called 8524

(i) Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ E 0 , 8525

such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); 8526

(ii) Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Ea , Eb ∈ EESHG:(V,E) \ E 0 , ∃Ec ∈ 8527

E 0 , such that d(Ea , Ec ) 6= d(Eb , Ec ); and |Ei |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 8528
|Ej |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 8529

(iii) Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ V 0 , 8530

such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); 8531

(iv) Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension if ∀Va , Vb ∈ VESHG:(V,E) \ V 0 , ∃Vc ∈ 8532

V 0 , such that d(Va , Vc ) 6= d(Vb , Vc ); and |Vi |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY = 8533
|Vj |NEUTROSOPIC CARDINALITY ; 8534

(v) Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension,

8535
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neut- 8536
rosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension. 8537

Definition 13.1.2. ((Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDimension). 8538

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair S = (V, E). Consider a 8539

Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) E = {V1 , V2 , . . . , Vs }. Then E is called 8540

(i) an Extreme SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension,

8541
Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neut- 8542
rosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph 8543
N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of 8544
high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges in the consecutive Extreme 8545
sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they 8546
form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; 8547

485
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

(ii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 8548

SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v- 8549
SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) 8550
for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic car- 8551
dinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 8552
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 8553

SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; 8554

(iii) an Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of Neut- 8555

rosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic 8556

v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for 8557
an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme SuperHyperPolynomial 8558
contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of the maximum Extreme 8559
cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperEdges of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high 8560
Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme SuperHyperVer- 8561

tices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; and the Extreme power is 8562
corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 8563

(iv) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 8564

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 8565

rosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and 8566
C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 8567
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic 8568
number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges 8569
of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutro- 8570

sophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8571
Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 8572
Neutrosophic coefficient; 8573

(v) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 8574

SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v- 8575
SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) 8576
for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Extreme cardinality 8577
of an Extreme SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyper- 8578

Vertices in the consecutive Extreme sequence of Extreme SuperHyperEdges and Extreme 8579
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; 8580

(vi) a Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension if it’s either of Neutrosophic e- 8581

SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic v- 8582

SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and C(N SHG) for a 8583
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality 8584
of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high 8585
Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic 8586
SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; 8587

(vii) an Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 8588

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 8589

rosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and 8590

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG) for an Extreme SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Extreme Super- 8591
HyperPolynomial contains the Extreme coefficients defined as the Extreme number of 8592
the maximum Extreme cardinality of the Extreme SuperHyperVertices of an Extreme 8593
SuperHyperSet S of high Extreme cardinality consecutive Extreme SuperHyperEdges and 8594
Extreme SuperHyperVertices such that they form the Extreme SuperHyperDimension; 8595
and the Extreme power is corresponded to its Extreme coefficient; 8596

(viii) a Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial if it’s either of 8597

Neutrosophic e-SuperHyperDimension, Neutrosophic re-SuperHyperDimension, Neut- 8598

rosophic v-SuperHyperDimension, and Neutrosophic rv-SuperHyperDimension and 8599

C(N SHG) for a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph N SHG : (V, E) is the Neutrosophic 8600
SuperHyperPolynomial contains the Neutrosophic coefficients defined as the Neutrosophic 8601
number of the maximum Neutrosophic cardinality of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices 8602
of a Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet S of high Neutrosophic cardinality consecutive Neutro- 8603
sophic SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices such that they form the 8604

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension; and the Neutrosophic power is corresponded to its 8605

Neutrosophic coefficient. 8606

13.2 Examples 8607

136EXM1 Example 13.2.1. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is an ordered pair 8608
S = (V, E) in the mentioned Neutrosophic Figures in every Neutrosophic items. 8609

• On the Figure (13.1), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8610
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8611
E1 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E2 is a loop Neutrosophic 8612
SuperHyperEdge and E4 is a Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutro- 8613

sophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . 8614

The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no 8615
Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic 8616
SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 8617

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }3i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .

8618

• On the Figure (13.2), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8619
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8620
E1 , E2 and E3 are some empty Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdges but E4 is a Neutrosophic 8621
SuperHyperEdge. Thus in the terms of Neutrosophic SuperHyperNeighbor, there’s only 8622
one Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge, namely, E4 . The Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 8623
is Neutrosophic isolated means that there’s no Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge has it as 8624

a Neutrosophic endpoint. Thus the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertex, V3 , is excluded in 8625

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.1: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG1

every given Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 8626

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }3i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .

8627

• On the Figure (13.3), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8628

HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8629

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }3i=1 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }3i=1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .

8630

• On the Figure (13.4), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8631
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8632

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1,2 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }Vi 6=V3 ,V4 ,O .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.2: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG2

Figure 13.3: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG3

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.4: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG4

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z 5 .

8633

• On the Figure (13.5), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8634

HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8635

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 4z 3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=5,6 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 5 × 4 + 4 × 3 + 4 × 5 × 4z 13 .

8636

• On the Figure (13.6), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8637
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8638

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=2,3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 8z 21 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=2,3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 820 .

8639

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.5: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG5

Figure 13.6: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG6

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.7: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG7

• On the Figure (13.7), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8640
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8641

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=13,15,16 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 2 × 1z 13 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=6,12,13 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
8642

• On the Figure (13.8), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8643
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8644

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=2,4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 1 × 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=6,12,13 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .
8645

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.8: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG8

• On the Figure (13.9), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8646
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8647

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=2,3 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 8z 21 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=2,3 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-Quasi-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 2 × 820 .

8648

• On the Figure (13.10), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8649
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8650

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=2,4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 1 × 2z 2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=6,12,13 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= (3 × 2 × 4) + (2 × 4 × 2 × 3) + z 11 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.9: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG9

Figure 13.10: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG10

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.11: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG11

8651

• On the Figure (13.11), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8652
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8653

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=3,6 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial sz 6 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=3,4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 2z 4 .
8654

• On the Figure (13.12), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8655
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8656

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 6z 5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=2,4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial =
= 4z 8 .
8657

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.12: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG12

• On the Figure (13.13), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8658

HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8659

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=3,6 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial sz 6 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi }i6=3,4 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 3 × 2z 4 .
8660

• On the Figure (13.14), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8661

HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8662

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V2 }.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
8663

• On the Figure (13.15), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8664
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8665

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.13: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG13

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.

C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V5 , Vi }i6=2,4 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.

8666

• On the Figure (13.16), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8667
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8668

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V1 , Vi }i6=2,6,10,17,22 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 8z n−5 .

8669

• On the Figure (13.17), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8670
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8671

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V27 , Vi }i6=2,6,10,17,22 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 13z n−5 .

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.14: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG14

8672

• On the Figure (13.18), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8673
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8674

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension = {V27 , Vi }i6=1,2,6,10,17,22 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z n−6 .

8675

• On the Figure (13.19), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8676
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8677

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 , E2 }.

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.15: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG15

Figure 13.16: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG16

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.17: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG17

Figure 13.18: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG18

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.19: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG19

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 12z 4 .

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {V1 , V2 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 11z 2 .

8678

• On the Figure (13.20), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8679
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8680

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {Ei }i6=1 .

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 10z 10 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension
= {Vi }Vi 6=V1 ,{H13 } .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = sz.

8681

• On the Figure (13.21), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8682

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.20: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 136NSHG20

HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8683

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {V1 , V2 }.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 3z 2 .

8684

• On the Figure (13.22), the Neutrosophic SuperHyperNotion, namely, Neutrosophic Super- 8685
HyperDimension, is up. The Neutrosophic Algorithm is Neutrosophicly straightforward. 8686

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension = {E2 }.

C(N SHG)Extreme SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z.
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension
= {V1 , Vi }i6=2,10,6,5 .
C(N SHG)Extreme V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= 5 × 1z n−4 .

8687

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.21: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 95NHG1

13.3 Results 8688

The previous Neutrosophic approach apply on the upcoming Neutrosophic results on 8689
Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses. 8690

Proposition 13.3.1. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). Then 8691

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 }

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = 2z
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension
= {V1 , V EXT ERN AL , V IN T ERN AL }Vi 6=nV EXT ERN AL
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
n−{V1 ,V EXT ERN AL ,V IN T ERN AL }V EXT ERN AL
= nz i 6=nV

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.22: The Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.2.1) 95NHG2

Proof. Let 8692

P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : (V, E). 8693
There’s a new way to redefine as 8694

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8695
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward.  8696

136EXM18a Example 13.3.2. In the Figure (13.23), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath ESHP : 8697
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the Neutrosophic 8698

SuperHyperModel (13.23), is the SuperHyperDimension. 8699

There are two notions on SuperHyperDimension in SuperHyperCycle. Twin and antipodal. 8700

The first is about having the same SuperHyperNeighborhoods and the latter is having the same 8701

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.23: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperPath Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperDimension in the Example (13.3.2) 136NSHG18a

SuperHyperDistance but both could not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension easily. 8702

All Twin SuperHyperVertices could not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension and one 8703
of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. All Antipodal SuperHyperVertices could 8704
not be out of the any given SuperHyperDimension and one of them could be out but the latter 8705
have to be inside. and one of them could be out but the latter have to be inside. The proof for 8706
both of the is straightforward. 8707

Proposition 13.3.3. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). Then 8708

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension = {E1 , E2 }

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial = nz 2
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension
= {V1 , V2 , V EXT ERN AL , V IN T ERN AL }Vi 6=nV EXT ERN AL
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
n−{V1 ,V2 ,V EXT ERN AL ,V IN T ERN AL }V EXT ERN AL
= nz i 6=nV

Proof. Let 8709

P :
V2EXT ERN AL , E2 ,
V3EXT ERN AL , E3 ,
...

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.24: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.4) 136NSHG19a

be a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle ESHC : (V, E). 8710

There’s a new way to redefine as 8711

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8712
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward.  8713

136EXM19a Example 13.3.4. In the Figure (13.24), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle N SHC : 8714
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, in the 8715
Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.24), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 8716

Proposition 13.3.5. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). Then 8717

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension

= {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }Ei 6=E1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= nz |i | E1 6=Ei ∈EESHG:(V,E) |
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.25: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar Associated to the Neutrosophic Notions of

Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.6) 136NSHG20a

= n choose two z n−|{Vi ∈VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 | .

Proof. Let 8718

P : ViEXT ERN AL , Ei , CEN T ER, Ej .

be a longest path taken a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E). There’s a 8719
new way to redefine as 8720

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8721
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward.  8722

136EXM20a Example 13.3.6. In the Figure (13.25), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : 8723
(V, E), is highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm 8724
in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected 8725
Neutrosophic SuperHyperStar ESHS : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.25), 8726

is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 8727

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proposition 13.3.7. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 8728
Then 8729

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension
= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 8730

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite ESHB : (V, E). 8731
There’s a new way to redefine as 8732

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .
The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8733
ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward. Then 8734

there’s no at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but the 8735
SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be applied. There are only two 8736
SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 8737
representative in the 8738

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite 8739
ESHB : (V, E). Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of- 8740

SuperHyperPart SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 8741

P :

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.26: Neutrosophic SuperHyperBipartite Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Example (13.3.8) 136NSHG21a

V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2
The latter is straightforward.  8742

136EXM21a Example 13.3.8. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.26), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHy- 8743

perBipartite ESHB : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The 8744
obtained Neutrosophic SuperHyperSet, by the Neutrosophic Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic 8745
result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8746
Bipartite ESHB : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.26), is the Neutrosophic 8747
SuperHyperDimension. 8748

Proposition 13.3.9. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8749
Then 8750

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension

= {Ea ∈ EPi ESHG:(V,E) ,
∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) | = min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
ESHG:(V,E)
∈P ESHG:(V,E) |
= z min |Pi
where ∀Pi ESHG:(V,E) , |Pi ESHG:(V,E) |
= min |Pi ESHG:(V,E) ∈ P ESHG:(V,E) |}.
i

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension

= {VaEXT ERN AL ∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , Vb
EXT ERN AL
∈ VPEXT
i
ERN AL
ESHG:(V,E) , i 6= j}.

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial

X X
= =( (|Pi ESHG:(V,E) |choose 2) = z 2 .
EXT ERN AL |
|VESHG:(V,E) i=|P ESHG:(V,E) |
Neutrosophic Cardinality

Proof. Let 8751

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 8752

ESHM : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 8753

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded to 8754

ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward. Then 8755
there’s no at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of quasi may be up but 8756
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be applied. There are only 8757
z 0 SuperHyperParts. Thus every SuperHyperPart could have one SuperHyperVertex as the 8758
representative in the 8759

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8760
Thus only some SuperHyperVertices and only minimum-Neutrosophic-of-SuperHyperPart 8761
SuperHyperEdges are attained in any solution 8762

P :
V1EXT ERN AL , E1 ,
V2EXT ERN AL , E2

is a longest path taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E). 8763

The latter is straightforward.  8764

136EXM22a Example 13.3.10. In the Figure (13.27), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite 8765
ESHM : (V, E), is highlighted and Neutrosophic featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 8766
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous Neutrosophic result, of the Neutrosophic 8767
SuperHyperVertices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite ESHM : (V, E), 8768

in the Neutrosophic SuperHyperModel (13.27), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 8769

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.27: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperMultipartite Associated to the Notions of Neutrosophic

SuperHyperDimension in the Example (13.3.10) 136NSHG22a

Proposition 13.3.11. Assume a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E). 8770

Then, 8771

C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension

= {Ei ∈ EESHG:(V,E) }Ei 6=E1 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= nz |i | E1 6=Ei ∈EESHG:(V,E) |
.
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension = {Vi ∈ VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 .
C(N SHG)Neutrosophic V-SuperHyperDimension SuperHyperPolynomial
= n choose two z n−|{Vi ∈VESHG:(V,E) }Vi 6=V1 ,V2 | .

Proof. Let 8772

P : V EXT ERN AL i , E ∗ i , CEN T ER, Ej .

is a longest SuperHyperDimension taken from a connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel 8773

ESHW : (V, E). There’s a new way to redefine as 8774

ViEXT ERN AL ∼ VjEXT ERN AL ≡

∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL ∈ Ez ≡
∃!Ez ∈ EESHG:(V,E) , {ViEXT ERN AL , VjEXT ERN AL } ⊆ Ez .

The term “EXTERNAL” implies |N (ViEXT ERN AL )| ≥ |N (Vj )| where Vj is corresponded 8775

to ViEXT ERN AL in the literatures of SuperHyperDimension. The latter is straightforward. 8776

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Figure 13.28: a Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel Neutrosophic Associated to the Neutrosophic

Notions of Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension in the Neutrosophic Example (13.3.12) 136NSHG23a

Then there’s at least one SuperHyperDimension. Thus the notion of quasi isn’t up and 8777
the SuperHyperNotions based on SuperHyperDimension could be applied. The unique 8778

embedded SuperHyperDimension proposes some longest SuperHyperDimension excerpt from 8779

some representatives. The latter is straightforward.  8780

136EXM23a Example 13.3.12. In the Neutrosophic Figure (13.28), the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 8781
Wheel N SHW : (V, E), is Neutrosophic highlighted and featured. The obtained Neutrosophic 8782
SuperHyperSet, by the Algorithm in previous result, of the Neutrosophic SuperHyperVer- 8783
tices of the connected Neutrosophic SuperHyperWheel ESHW : (V, E), in the Neutrosophic 8784
SuperHyperModel (13.28), is the Neutrosophic SuperHyperDimension. 8785

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 CHAPTER 14 8786

SuperHyperSpace 8787

In this scientific research, some extreme notions and Neutrosophic notions are defined on the 8788
family of SuperHyperGraphs and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs. Some well-known classes 8789
are used in this scientific research. A basic familiarity with Neutrosophic SuperHyperSpace 8790
theory, SuperHyperGraphs, and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs theory are proposed. 8791
Keywords: Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph, SuperHyperSpace, Cancer’s Neutrosophic 8792

Recognition 8793
AMS Subject Classification: 05C17, 05C22, 05E45 8794

Definition 14.0.1. (Neutrosophic event). 8795

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) 8796
is a probability Space. Any Neutrosophic k-subset of A of V is called Neutrosophic k-event 8797
and if k = 2, then Neutrosophic subset of A of V is called Neutrosophic event. The following 8798
expression is called Neutrosophic probability of A. 8799

X
E(A) = E(a). (14.1)
a∈A

Definition 14.0.2. (Neutrosophic Independent). 8800

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is 8801
a probability Space. s Neutrosophic k-events Ai , i ∈ I is called Neutrosophic s-independent 8802
if the following expression is called Neutrosophic s-independent criteria 8803

Y
E(∩i∈I Ai ) = P (Ai ).
i∈I

And if s = 2, then Neutrosophic k-events of A and B is called Neutrosophic independent. 8804

The following expression is called Neutrosophic independent criteria 8805

E(A ∩ B) = P (A)P (B). (14.2)

Definition 14.0.3. (Neutrosophic Variable). 8806

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) 8807
is a probability Space. Any k-function Space like E is called Neutrosophic k-Variable. If 8808

k = 2, then any 2-function Space like E is called Neutrosophic Variable. 8809

513
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

The notion of independent on Neutrosophic Variable is likewise. 8810

Definition 14.0.4. (Neutrosophic Expectation). 8811

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) 8812

is a probability Space. A Neutrosophic k-Variable E has a number is called Neutrosophic 8813

Expectation if the following expression is called Neutrosophic Expectation criteria 8814

X
Ex(E) = E(α)P (α).
α∈V

Definition 14.0.5. (Neutrosophic Crossing). 8815

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) 8816

is a probability Space. A Neutrosophic number is called Neutrosophic Crossing if the 8817

following expression is called Neutrosophic Crossing criteria 8818

Cr(S) = min{Number of Crossing in a Plane Embedding of S}.

Lemma 14.0.6. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8819
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let m and n propose special Space. Then with 8820
m ≥ 4n, 8821

Proof. Consider a planar embedding G of G with cr(G) crossings. Let S be a Neutrosophic

random k-subset of V obtained by choosing each SuperHyperVertex of G Neutrosophic
independently with probability Space p := 4n/m, and set H := G[S] and H := G[S].
Define random variables X, Y, Z on V as follows: X is the Neutrosophic number of
SuperHyperVertices, Y the Neutrosophic number of SuperHyperEdges, and Z the Neutrosophic
number of crossings of H. The trivial bound noted above, when applied to H, yields the
inequality Z ≥ cr(H) ≥ Y − 3X. By linearity of Neutrosophic Expectation,

E(Z) ≥ E(Y ) − 3E(X).

Now E(X) = pn, E(Y ) = p2 m (each SuperHyperEdge having some SuperHyperEnds) and
E(Z) = p4 cr(G) (each crossing being defined by some SuperHyperVertices). Hence

p4 cr(G) ≥ p2 m − 3pn.

Dividing both sides by p4 , we have: 8822

pm − 3n n 1 3 2
cr(G) ≥ 3
= 3 = m n .
p (4n/m) 64

 8823

Theorem 14.0.7. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8824
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let P be a SuperHyperSet of n points in the plane, 8825
and let l be the Neutrosophic number of
√ SuperHyperLines in the plane passing through at least 8826

k + 1 of these points, where 1 ≤ k ≤ 2 2n. Then l < 32n2 /k 3 . 8827

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proof. Form a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph G with SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet 8828

P whose SuperHyperEdge are the segments between conseNeighborive points on the 8829
SuperHyperLines which pass through at least k + 1 points of P. This Neutrosophic 8830
SuperHyperGraph has at least kl SuperHyperEdges and Neutrosophic crossing at most l 8831
choose two. Thus either kl < 4n, in which case l < 4n/k ≤ 32n2 /k 3 , or l2 /2 > l choose 2 ≥ 8832
3
cr(G) ≥ (kl) /64n2 by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and again l < 32n2 /k 3 .  8833

Theorem 14.0.8. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8834

Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let P be a SuperHyperSet of n points in the plane, 8835
and let k be the number of pairs of points of P at unit SuperHyperDistance. Then k < 5n4/3 . 8836

Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 8837
S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Draw a SuperHyperUnit SuperHyperCircle around each 8838
SuperHyperPoint of P. Let ni be the Neutrosophic number of these SuperHyperCircles passing 8839
i = 0n−1 ni = n and k = 12 i = 0n−1 ini . Now
P P
through exactly i points of P. Then 8840

form a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph H with SuperHyperVertex SuperHyperSet P whose 8841

SuperHyperEdges are the SuperHyperArcs between conseNeighborive SuperHyperPoints on the 8842
SuperHyperCircles that pass through at least three SuperHyperPoints of P. Then 8843

n−1
X
e(H) = ini = 2k − n1 − 2n2 ≥ 2k − 2n.
i=3

Some SuperHyperPairs of SuperHyperVertices of H might be joined by some parallel 8844

SuperHyperEdges. Delete from H one of each SuperHyperPair of parallel SuperHyperEdges, 8845

so as to obtain a simple Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph G with e(G) ≥ k − n. Now 8846
cr(G) ≤ n(n − 1) because G is formed from at most n SuperHyperCircles, and any two 8847
SuperHyperCircles cross at most twice. Thus either e(G) < 4n, in which case k < 5n < 5n4/3 , 8848
3
or n2 > n(n − 1) ≥ cr(G) ≥ (k − n) /64n2 by the Neutrosophic Crossing Lemma, and 8849
4/3 4/3
k < 4n + n < 5n .  8850

Proposition 14.0.9. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8851

Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let X be a nonnegative Neutrosophic Variable and t 8852
a positive real number. Then 8853

E(X)
P (X ≥ t) ≤ .
t
Proof.
X X
E(X) = {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V } ≥ {X(a)P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
X X
{tP (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t} = t {P (a) : a ∈ V, X(a) ≥ t}
tP (X ≥ t).

Dividing the first and last members by t yields the asserted inequality.  8854

Corollary 14.0.10. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8855
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let Xn be a nonnegative integer-valued variable in a 8856

prob- ability Space (Vn , En ), n ≥ 1. If E(Xn ) → 0 as n → ∞, then P (Xn = 0) → 1 as n → ∞. 8857

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proof.  8858

Theorem 14.0.11. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8859
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. A special SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely 8860

has stability number at most d2p−1 log ne. 8861

Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 8862
S = (V, E) is a probability Space. A special SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p is up. Let G ∈ Gn,p and 8863

let S be a given SuperHyperSet of k + 1 SuperHyperVertices of G, where k ∈ N. The probability 8864

that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G is (1 − p)(k+1)choose2 , this being the probability that none 8865
of the (k + 1)choose2 pairs of SuperHyperVertices of S is a SuperHyperEdge of the Neutrosophic 8866
SuperHyperGraph G. 8867
Let AS denote the event that S is a stable SuperHyperSet of G, and let XS denote the indicator 8868
Neutrosophic Variable for this Neutrosophic Event. By equation, we have 8869

E(XS ) = P (XS = 1) = P (AS ) = (1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .

Let X be the number of stable SuperHyperSets of cardinality k + 1 in G. Then 8870
X
X= {XS : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1}

and so, by those, 8871

X
E(X) = {E(XS ) : S ⊆ V, |S| = k + 1} = (n choose k+1)(1 − p)(k+1)choose2 .

We bound the right-hand side by invoking two elementary inequalities: 8872

nk+1
(n choose k+1) ≤ and1 − p ≤ e−p .
(k + 1)!
This yields the following upper bound on E(X). 8873

nk+1 e−p)(k+1)choose2 ne−pk/2k+1

E(X) ≤ =
(k + 1)! (k + 1)!
Suppose now that k = d2p−1 log ne. Then k ≥ 2p−1 log n, so ne−pk/2 ≤ 1. Because k grows at 8874
least as fast as the logarithm of n, implies that E(X) → 0 as n → ∞. Because X is integer-valued 8875
and nonnegative, we deduce from Corollary that P (X = 0) → 1 as n → ∞. Consequently, a 8876
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph in Gn,p almost surely has stability number at most k.  8877

Definition 14.0.12. (Neutrosophic Variance). 8878

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) 8879
is a probability Space. A Neutrosophic k-Variable E has a number is called Neutrosophic 8880

Variance if the following expression is called Neutrosophic Variance criteria 8881

2
V x(E) = Ex((X − Ex(X)) ).
Theorem 14.0.13. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8882
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let X be a Neutrosophic Variable and let t be a 8883
positive real number. Then 8884

V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) ≤ .
t2

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 8885
S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let X be a Neutrosophic Variable and let t be a positive real 8886
number. Then 8887

2
2 Ex((X − Ex(X)) ) V (X)
E(|X − Ex(X)| ≥ t) = E((X − Ex(X)) ≥ t2 ) ≤ = .
t2 t2
 8888

Corollary 14.0.14. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8889
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let Xn be a Neutrosophic Variable in a probability 8890
Space (Vn , En ), n ≥ 1. If Ex(Xn ) 6= 0 and V (Xn ) << E 2 (Xn ), then 8891

E(Xn = 0) → 0 as n → ∞

Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 8892
S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Set X := Xn and t := |Ex(Xn )| in Chebyshev’s Inequality, and 8893
observe that E(Xn = 0) ≤ E(|Xn − Ex(Xn )| ≥ |Ex(Xn )|) because |Xn − Ex(Xn )| = |Ex(Xn )| 8894

when Xn = 0.  8895

Theorem 14.0.15. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8896
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 . For 0 ≤ k ≤ n, set 8897

f (k) := (n choose k)2−(k choose 2) and let k ∗ be the least value of k for which f (k) is less 8898
than one. Then almost surely α(G) takes one of the three values k ∗ − 2, k ∗ − 1, k ∗ . 8899

Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 8900
S = (V, E) is a probability Space. As in the proof of related Theorem, the result is 8901
straightforward.  8902

Corollary 14.0.16. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8903
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let G ∈ Gn,1/2 and let f and k ∗ be as defined in 8904
previous Theorem. Then either: 8905

(i). f (k ∗ ) << 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 2 or k ∗ − 1, or 8906

(ii). f (k ∗ − 1) >> 1, in which case almost surely α(G) is equal to either k ∗ − 1 or k ∗ . 8907

Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 8908

S = (V, E) is a probability Space. The latter is straightforward.  8909

Definition 14.0.17. (Neutrosophic Threshold). 8910

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) 8911

is a probability Space. Let P be a monotone property of SuperHyperGraphs (one which is 8912

preserved when SuperHyperEdges are added). Then a Neutrosophic Threshold for P is a 8913
function f (n) such that: 8914

(i). if p << f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely does not have P, 8915

(ii). if p >> f (n), then G ∈ Gn,p almost surely has P. 8916

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

Definition 14.0.18. (Neutrosophic Balanced). 8917

Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider S = (V, E) is 8918
a probability Space. Let F be a fixed Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph. Then there is a threshold 8919
function for the property of containing a copy of F as a Neutrosophic SubSuperHyperGraph is 8920
called Neutrosophic Balanced. 8921

Theorem 14.0.19. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). 8922
Consider S = (V, E) is a probability Space. Let F be a nonempty balanced Neutrosophic 8923
SubSuperHyperGraph with k SuperHyperVertices and l SuperHyperEdges. Then n−k/l is a 8924

threshold function for the property of containing F as a Neutrosophic SubSuperHyperGraph. 8925

Proof. Assume a Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph (NSHG) S is a pair S = (V, E). Consider 8926
S = (V, E) is a probability Space. The latter is straightforward.  8927

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Bibliography 8928

HG1 [1] Henry Garrett, “Super Hyper Dominating and Super Hyper Resolving on Neutro- 8929
sophic Super Hyper Graphs and Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic 8930
Super Hyper Classes”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 1(3) (2022) 242-263. (doi: 8931

10.33140/JMTCM.01.03.09) 8932

HG2 [2] Henry Garrett, “Some Super Hyper Degrees and Co-Super Hyper Degrees on Neut- 8933
rosophic Super Hyper Graphs And Super Hyper Graphs Alongside Applications 8934
in Cancer’s Treatments”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(1) (2023) 35-47. 8935
(https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/some-super-hyper-degrees-and- 8936

cosuper-hyper-degrees-on-neutrosophic-super-hyper-graphs-and-super-hyper-graphs- 8937
alongside-a.pdf) 8938

HG3 [3] Henry Garrett, “A Research on Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic Super 8939
Hypergraph by Eulerian Super Hyper Cycles and Hamiltonian Sets as Hyper Cov- 8940
ering Versus Super separations”, J Math Techniques Comput Math 2(3) (2023) 8941

136-148. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access-articles/a-research-on-cancers- 8942

recognition-and-neutrosophic-super-hypergraph-by-eulerian-super-hyper-cycles-and- 8943
hamiltonian-sets-.pdf) 8944

HG93 [4] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Co-degree and Neutrosophic Degree alongside Chromatic 8945
Numbers in the Setting of Some Classes Related to Neutrosophic Hypergraphs”, J Curr 8946
Trends Comp Sci Res 2(1) (2023) 16-24. (https://www.opastpublishers.com/open-access- 8947

articles/neutrosophic-codegree-and-neutrosophic-degree-alongside-chromatic-numbers- 8948
in-the-setting-of-some-classes-related-to-neut.pdf) 8949

HG4 [5] Garrett, Henry. “0039 | Closing Numbers and Super-Closing Numbers as (Dual)Resolving 8950
and (Dual)Coloring alongside (Dual)Dominating in (Neutrosophic)n-SuperHyperGraph.” 8951
CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Nov. 2022. CERN 8952

European Organization for Nuclear Research, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6319942. 8953

https://oa.mg/work/10.5281/zenodo.6319942 8954

HG5 [6] Garrett, Henry. “0049 | (Failed)1-Zero-Forcing Number in Neutrosophic Graphs.” 8955
CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research - Zenodo, Feb. 2022. CERN 8956
European Organization for Nuclear Research, https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724. 8957

https://oa.mg/work/10.13140/rg.2.2.35241.26724 8958

519
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG6 [7] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 8959
Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 8960
Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 8961

HG7 [8] Henry Garrett, “Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy 8962
Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic 8963
SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010282 (doi: 8964
10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 8965

HG8 [9] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 8966
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 (doi: 8967
10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1). 8968

HG9 [10] Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells 8969
Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 8970
Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based 8971

on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 8972

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 8973

HG10 [11] Henry Garrett, “Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of 8974

Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied 8975
in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/pre- 8976
prints202301.0262.v1). 8977

HG11 [12] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s 8978
Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHy- 8979
perGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 8980

HG12 [13] Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances 8981
Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 8982
2023010224, (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 8983

HG13 [14] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions 8984
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/pre- 8985
prints202301.0105.v1). 8986

HG14 [15] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 8987
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints”, 8988
Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 8989

HG15 [16] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To 8990
Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, 8991
Preprints 2023, 2023010044 8992

HG16 [17] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 8993
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010043 (doi: 8994
10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 8995

HG17 [18] Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) 8996
SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 8997

Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 8998

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG18 [19] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 8999
SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints”, 9000
Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 9001

HG19 [20] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring 9002
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2022, 2022120549 9003

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 9004

HG20 [21] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and 9005
SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With 9006
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) 9007
SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 9008

HG21 [22] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9009
Graph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, Preprints 2022, 2022120500 9010
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 9011

HG22 [23] Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 9012
SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, 9013
Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 9014

HG23 [24] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic Super- 9015
HyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, 9016
Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 9017

HG267 [25] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9018
Graph By Dominating-Edges As Hyper Dome On Super Eddy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9019

10.5281/zenodo.7940830). 9020

HG266 [26] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Dome Of Dominating-Edges 9021
In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9022
10.5281/zenodo.7943578). 9023

HG265 [27] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9024

Graph By Edge-Gap As Hyper Gape On Super Gab”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9025
odo.7916595). 9026

HG264 [28] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gab By Hyper Gape Of Edge-Gap In Cancer’s 9027
Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9028
odo.7923632). 9029

HG263 [29] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9030
By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, 9031
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904698). 9032

HG262 [30] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Eulerian-Type- 9033
Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 9034

2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904671). 9035

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG261 [31] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9036
By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, 9037
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904529). 9038

HG260 [32] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of Eulerian- 9039
Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyper- 9040
Graph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904401). 9041

HG259 [33] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9042
By Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9043
10.5281/zenodo.7871026). 9044

HG258 [34] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Eulerian-Type- 9045
Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 9046
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7874647). 9047

HG257 [35] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9048
By Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9049
10.5281/zenodo.7857856). 9050

HG256 [36] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Eulerian-Cycle- 9051
Neighbor In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 9052
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7857841). 9053

HG255 [37] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9054
By Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, 9055
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855661). 9056

HG254 [38] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of Eulerian- 9057
Cycle-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 9058
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7855637). 9059

HG253 [39] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9060
Graph By Eulerian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9061
10.5281/zenodo.7853867). 9062

HG252 [40] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of Eulerian-Cycle-Cut 9063
In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9064
10.5281/zenodo.7853922). 9065

HG251 [41] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9066
By Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, 9067
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7851519). 9068

HG250 [42] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Eulerian-Type-Path- 9069
Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 9070
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7851550). 9071

HG249 [43] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9072
By Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, 9073

Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7839333). 9074

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG248 [44] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of Eulerian- 9075
Type-Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 9076
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7840206). 9077

HG247 [45] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9078
By Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9079
10.5281/zenodo.7834229). 9080

HG246 [46] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut 9081
In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9082

10.5281/zenodo.7834261). 9083

HG245 [47] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9084
By Eulerian-Path-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9085
10.5281/zenodo.7824560). 9086

HG244 [48] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Eulerian-Path- 9087
Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 9088
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7824623). 9089

HG243 [49] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9090
By Eulerian-Path-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, 9091

Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7819531). 9092

HG242 [50] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of Eulerian- 9093
Path-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 9094
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7819579). 9095

HG241 [51] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9096
As Hyper Tool On Super Toot”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812236). 9097

HG240 [52] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9098
By initial Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper initial Eulogy On Super initial EULA”, Zenodo 9099
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809365). 9100

HG239 [53] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9101
By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy-Path-Cut On Super EULA-Path-Cut”, Zenodo 9102

2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7809358). 9103

HG238 [54] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super EULA By Hyper Eulogy Of Eulerian-Path-Cut 9104
In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9105
10.5281/zenodo.7809219). 9106

HG237 [55] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9107
Graph By Eulerian-Path-Cut As Hyper Eulogy On Super EULA”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9108
10.5281/zenodo.7809328). 9109

HG236 [56] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9110
By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 9111

2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806767). 9112

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG235 [57] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Hamiltonian-Type- 9113
Cycle-Neighbor In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 9114
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7806838). 9115

HG234 [58] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9116
By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensa- 9117
tion”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804238). 9118

HG233 [59] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 9119
Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) 9120
SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804228). 9121

HG232 [60] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9122
By Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9123
10.5281/zenodo.7799902). 9124

HG231 [61] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of Hamiltonian-Type- 9125
Cycle-Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, 9126
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804218). 9127

HG230 [62] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9128
By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, 9129
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7796334). 9130

HG228 [63] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9131
By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, 9132
Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793372). 9133

HG226 [64] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9134
By Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9135
10.5281/zenodo.7791952). 9136

HG225 [65] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of Hamiltonian-Cycle- 9137
Cut In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9138
10.5281/zenodo.7791982). 9139

HG224 [66] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9140
By Hamiltonian-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9141
10.5281/zenodo.7790026). 9142

HG223 [67] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Hamiltonian-Neighbor 9143
In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9144
10.5281/zenodo.7790052). 9145

HG222 [68] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9146
By Hamiltonian-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 9147
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7787066). 9148

HG221 [69] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 9149
Hamiltonian-Decomposition In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHy- 9150

perGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7787094). 9151

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG220 [70] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9152
By Hamiltonian-Cut As Hyper Hamper On Super Hammy”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9153
10.5281/zenodo.7781476). 9154

HG219 [71] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Hammy By Hyper Hamper Of Hamiltonian-Cut 9155
In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9156
10.5281/zenodo.7783082). 9157

HG218 [72] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Recognition of Cancer And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9158
Graph By Trace-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9159
10.5281/zenodo.7777857). 9160

HG217 [73] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Trace-Neighbor 9161
In Recognition of Cancer With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 9162
10.5281/zenodo.7779286). 9163

HG215 [74] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9164
By Trace-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, Zenodo 2023, 9165
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7771831). 9166

HG214 [75] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of Trace- 9167
Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 9168
2023, (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7772468). 9169

HG213 [76] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9170
By Trace-Cut As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9171
10.13140/RG.2.2.20913.25446). 9172

HG212 [77] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Tract By Hyper Track Of Trace-Cut In Cancer’s 9173
Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, Zenodo 2023, (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9174
odo.7764916). 9175

HG211 [78] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9176
By Edge-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9177
10.13140/RG.2.2.11770.98247). 9178

HG210 [79] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Edge-Neighbor In 9179
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9180
10.13140/RG.2.2.12400.12808). 9181

HG209 [80] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9182
By Edge-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, ResearchGate 9183
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22545.10089). 9184

HG208 [81] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 9185
Edge-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 9186
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29544.34564). 9187

HG207 [82] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9188
Graph By Edge-Cut As Hyper Edify On Super Eddy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9189

10.13140/RG.2.2.11377.76644). 9190

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG206 [83] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Eddy By Hyper Edify Of Edge-Cut In Can- 9191
cer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9192
10.13140/RG.2.2.23750.96329). 9193

HG205 [84] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9194
By Vertex-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9195
10.13140/RG.2.2.31366.24641). 9196

HG204 [85] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulous By Hyper Nebbish Of Vertex-Neighbor In 9197
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9198
10.13140/RG.2.2.34721.68960). 9199

HG203 [86] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9200
By Vertex-Decomposition As Hyper Decompress On Super Decompensation”, ResearchGate 9201
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30212.81289). 9202

HG202 [87] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 9203
Vertex-Decomposition In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 9204
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18468.76169). 9205

HG201 [88] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9206
Graph By Vertex-Cut As Hyper Vertu On Super Vertigo”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9207
10.13140/RG.2.2.24288.35842). 9208

HG200 [89] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Vertigo By Hyper Vertu Of Vertex-Cut In 9209
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9210
10.13140/RG.2.2.32467.25124). 9211

HG199 [90] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9212
By Stable-Neighbor As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9213
10.13140/RG.2.2.31025.45925). 9214

HG198 [91] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of Stable-Neighbor In 9215
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9216
10.13140/RG.2.2.17184.25602). 9217

HG197 [92] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9218
By Stable-Decompositions As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9219
10.13140/RG.2.2.23423.28327). 9220

HG196 [93] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Decompositions In 9221
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9222
10.13140/RG.2.2.28456.44805). 9223

HG195 [94] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9224
Graph By Stable-Cut As Hyper Stain On Super Stagy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9225
10.13140/RG.2.2.23525.68320). 9226

HG194 [95] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Stale By Hyper Stalk Of Stable-Cut In Can- 9227
cer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9228

10.13140/RG.2.2.20170.24000). 9229

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG193 [96] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9230
By Clique-Neighbors As Hyper Nebbish On Super Nebulous”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9231
10.13140/RG.2.2.36475.59683). 9232

HG192 [97] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nebulizer By Hyper Nub Of Clique-Neighbors In 9233
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9234
10.13140/RG.2.2.29764.71046). 9235

HG191 [98] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9236
By Clique-Decompositions As Hyper Decompile On Super Decommission”, ResearchGate 9237
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.18780.87683). 9238

HG190 [99] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Decompensation By Hyper Decompress Of 9239
Clique- Decompositions In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, 9240
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27169.48487). 9241

HG189 [100] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9242
Graph By Clique-Cut As Hyper Click On Super Cliche”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9243
10.13140/RG.2.2.26134.01603). 9244

HG188 [101] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Cliff By Hyper Cling Of Clique-Cut In Can- 9245
cer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9246
10.13140/RG.2.2.27392.30721). 9247

HG187 [102] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHy- 9248
perGraph By Space As Hyper Spin On Super Spacy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9249
10.13140/RG.2.2.33028.40321). 9250

HG186 [103] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9251
Graph By List- Coloring As Hyper List On Super Lisle”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9252
10.13140/RG.2.2.21389.20966). 9253

HG185 [104] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Lith By Hyper Lite Of List-Coloring In 9254
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9255
10.13140/RG.2.2.16356.04489). 9256

HG184 [105] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHy- 9257
perGraph By Space As Hyper Sparse On Super Spark”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9258
10.13140/RG.2.2.21756.21129). 9259

HG183 [106] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Solidarity By Hyper Soul Of Space In 9260
Cancer’s Recognition With (Extreme) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9261
10.13140/RG.2.2.30983.68009). 9262

HG182 [107] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9263
By Edge-Connectivity As Hyper Disclosure On Super Closure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9264
10.13140/RG.2.2.28552.29445). 9265

HG181 [108] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Uniform By Hyper Deformation Of Edge-Connectivity 9266
In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 9267

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10936.21761). 9268

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG180 [109] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9269
By Vertex-Connectivity As Hyper Leak On Super Structure”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9270
10.13140/RG.2.2.35105.89447). 9271

HG179 [110] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super System By Hyper Explosions Of Vertex-Connectivity 9272
In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 9273
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30072.72960). 9274

HG178 [111] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9275
By Tree-Decomposition As Hyper Forward On Super Returns”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9276
10.13140/RG.2.2.31147.52003). 9277

HG177 [112] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Nodes By Hyper Moves Of Tree-Decomposition In 9278
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9279
10.13140/RG.2.2.32825.24163). 9280

HG176 [113] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9281
Graph By Chord As Hyper Excellence On Super Excess”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9282
10.13140/RG.2.2.13059.58401). 9283

HG175 [114] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gap By Hyper Navigations Of Chord In 9284
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9285
10.13140/RG.2.2.11172.14720). 9286

HG174 [115] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9287
By SuperHyper(i,j)-Domination As Hyper Controller On Super Waves”, ResearchGate 9288
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.22011.80165). 9289

HG173 [116] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Coincidence By Hyper Routes Of SuperHyper(i,j)- 9290
Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchG- 9291
ate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30819.84003). 9292

HG172 [117] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9293
By SuperHyperEdge-Domination As Hyper Reversion On Super Indirection”, ResearchGate 9294
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10493.84962). 9295

HG171 [118] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Obstacles By Hyper Model Of SuperHyperEdge- 9296
Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchG- 9297
ate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13849.29280). 9298

HG170 [119] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9299
By SuperHyperK-Domination As Hyper k-Actions On Super Patterns”, ResearchGate 9300
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19944.14086). 9301

HG169 [120] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Harmony By Hyper k-Function Of SuperHyperK- 9302
Domination In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchG- 9303
ate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23299.58404). 9304

HG168 [121] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9305
By SuperHyperK-Number As Hyper k-Partition On Super Layers”, ResearchGate 2023, 9306

(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33103.76968). 9307

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG167 [122] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Gradient By Hyper k-Class Of SuperHyperK-Number 9308
In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, 9309
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23037.44003). 9310

HG166 [123] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9311
By SuperHyperOrder As Hyper Enumerations On Super Landmarks”, ResearchGate 2023, 9312
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.35646.56641). 9313

HG165 [124] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Analogous By Hyper Visions Of SuperHyperOrder In 9314
Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9315
10.13140/RG.2.2.18030.48967). 9316

HG164 [125] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9317
By SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Categories On Super Neighbors”, ResearchGate 2023, 9318
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13973.81121). 9319

HG163 [126] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Relations By Hyper Identifications Of SuperHyper- 9320
Coloring In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 9321
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34106.47047). 9322

HG162 [127] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Contradiction By Hyper Detection of SuperHyper- 9323
Defensive In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, 9324
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13397.09446). 9325

HG161 [128] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9326
By SuperHyperDimension As Hyper Distinguishing On Super Distances”, ResearchGate 9327
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31956.88961). 9328

HG160 [129] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Locations By Hyper Differing Of SuperHyperDi- 9329
mension In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 9330
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15179.67361). 9331

HG159 [130] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9332
By SuperHyperDominating As Hyper Closing On Super Messy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9333
10.13140/RG.2.2.21510.45125). 9334

HG158 [131] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Missing By Hyper Searching Of SuperHyperDom- 9335
inating In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 9336
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13121.84321). 9337

HG157 [132] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9338
By SuperHyperConnected As Hyper Group On Super Surge”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9339
10.13140/RG.2.2.11758.69441). 9340

HG156 [133] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Outbreak By Hyper Collections Of SuperHyperCon- 9341
nected In Cancer’s Recognition With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 9342
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31891.35367). 9343

HG155 [134] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9344
By SuperHyperTotal As Hyper Covering On Super Infections”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9345

10.13140/RG.2.2.19360.87048). 9346

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG154 [135] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Extremism By Hyper Treatments Of SuperHyperTotal 9347
In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9348
10.13140/RG.2.2.32363.21286). 9349

HG153 [136] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Isolation By Hyper Perfectness Of SuperHyperPerfect 9350
In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9351
10.13140/RG.2.2.23266.81602). 9352

HG152 [137] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9353
By SuperHyperPerfect As Hyper Idealism On Super Vacancy”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9354
10.13140/RG.2.2.19911.37285). 9355

HG151 [138] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition And Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9356
By SuperHyperJoin As Hyper Separations On Super Sorts”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9357
10.13140/RG.2.2.11050.90569). 9358

HG150 [139] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super connections By Hyper disconnections Of SuperHy- 9359
perJoin In Cancer’s Recognition with (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 9360
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17761.79206). 9361

HG149 [140] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Mixed-Devastations By Hyper Decisions Of Super- 9362
HyperDuality In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, 9363
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34953.52320). 9364

HG148 [141] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 9365
By SuperHyperDuality As Hyper Imaginations On Super Mixed-Illustrations”, ResearchG- 9366
ate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33275.80161). 9367

HG147 [142] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas In Cancer’s Recognition As (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph 9368
By Path SuperHyperColoring As Hyper Correction On Super Faults”, ResearchGate 2023, 9369
(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30182.50241). 9370

HG146 [143] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Reflections By Hyper Rotations Of Path SuperHy- 9371
perColoring In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, 9372
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33459.30243). 9373

HG145 [144] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Deformations On Super Chains In Cancer’s 9374
Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By SuperHyperDensity”, 9375
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.13444.60806). 9376

HG144 [145] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas As Hyper Ignorance By SuperHyperDensity On Super 9377
Resistances In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, 9378
ResearchGate 2023, (doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.16800.05123). 9379

HG143 [146] Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9380
Graph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus 9381
Super separations-VI ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29913.80482). 9382

HG142 [147] Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9383
Graph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus 9384

Super separations-V ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33269.24809). 9385

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG141 [148] Henry Garrett, “New Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9386
Graph By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus 9387
Super separations-IV ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34946.96960). 9388

HG140 [149] Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9389

By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super 9390
separations-III ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14814.31040). 9391

HG139 [150] Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9392
By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super 9393
separations-II ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.15653.17125). 9394

HG138 [151] Henry Garrett, “A Research On Cancer’s Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9395
By Eulerian SuperHyperCycles and Hamiltonian Sets As Hyper Covering Versus Super 9396
separations-I ”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25719.50089). 9397

HG137 [152] Henry Garrett, “New Ideas On Super Disruptions In Cancer’s Extreme Recognition 9398
As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph By Hyper Plans Called SuperHyperConnectivities”, 9399
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.29441.94562). 9400

HG136 [153] Henry Garrett, “Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition As Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph 9401

By SuperHyperConnectivities As Hyper Diagnosis On Super Mechanism”, ResearchGate 9402

2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.17252.24968). 9403

HG135 [154] Henry Garrett,“Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph By the Criteria 9404
of Eulerian and Hamiltonian Type-Sets As Hyper Modified Cycles On Super Mess”, 9405
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.16652.59525). 9406

HG134 [155] Henry Garrett,“Eulerian and Hamiltonian In Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and 9407
Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph On Super Interactions By Hyper Extensions of Cycles”, 9408
ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.34583.24485). 9409

HG132 [156] Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Type-Results on extreme SuperHyperGirth theory and 9410
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs Toward Cancer’s extreme Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 9411
2023010396 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0396.v1). 9412

HG131 [157] Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs Warns Hyper Landmark of neutrosophic 9413

SuperHyperGirth In Super Type-Versions of Cancer’s neutrosophic Recognition”, Preprints 9414

2023, 2023010395 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0395.v1). 9415

HG130 [158] Henry Garrett,“The Constructions of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs on the Cancer’s 9416
Recognition in The Confrontation With Super Attacks In Hyper Situations By Implementing 9417
(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in The Technical Approaches to Neutralize 9418

SuperHyperViews”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26240.51204). 9419

HG129 [159] Henry Garrett,“(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing As the Entrepreneurs on 9420

Cancer’s Recognitions To Fail Forcing Style As the Super Classes With Hyper Effects 9421
In The Background of the Framework is So-Called (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 9422

ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.12818.73925). 9423

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG128 [160] Henry Garrett,“Super Actions On The Types of Hyper Levels In The Sensible Neutrosophic 9424
SuperHyperGirth On Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9425
Graph”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.26836.88960). 9426

HG127 [161] Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperGirth Approaches on the Super Challenges on the Cancer’s 9427

Recognition In the Hyper Model of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 9428

2023,(doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36745.93289). 9429

HG126 [162] Henry Garrett,“Extreme SuperHyperClique as the Firm Scheme of Confrontation under 9430

Cancer’s Recognition as the Model in The Setting of (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 9431

Preprints 2023, 2023010308 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0308.v1). 9432

HG125 [163] Henry Garrett,“Uncertainty On The Act And Effect Of Cancer Alongside The Foggy 9433
Positions Of Cells Toward Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique inside Neutrosophic 9434

SuperHyperGraphs Titled Cancer’s Recognition”, Preprints 2023, 2023010282 (doi: 9435

10.20944/preprints202301.0282.v1). 9436

HG124 [164] Henry Garrett,“Neutrosophic Version Of Separates Groups Of Cells In Cancer’s 9437
Recognition On Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010267 (doi: 9438

10.20944/preprints202301.0267.v1).). 9439

HG123 [165] Henry Garrett, “The Shift Paradigm To Classify Separately The Cells and Affected Cells 9440
Toward The Totality Under Cancer’s Recognition By New Multiple Definitions On the Sets 9441

Polynomials Alongside Numbers In The (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperMatching Theory Based 9442

on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraph”, Preprints 2023, 2023010265 9443
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0265.v1). 9444

HG122 [166] Henry Garrett,“Breaking the Continuity and Uniformity of Cancer In The Worst Case of 9445

Full Connections With Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique In Cancer’s Recognition Applied 9446
in (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010262,(doi: 10.20944/pre- 9447
prints202301.0262.v1). 9448

HG121 [167] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable as the Survivors on the Cancer’s 9449

Neutrosophic Recognition Based on Uncertainty to All Modes in Neutrosophic SuperHy- 9450

perGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010240 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0240.v1). 9451

HG120 [168] Henry Garrett, “Extremism of the Attacked Body Under the Cancer’s Circumstances 9452
Where Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 9453

2023010224, (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0224.v1). 9454

HG24 [169] Henry Garrett,“SuperHyperMatching By (R-)Definitions And Polynomials To Monitor 9455

Cancer’s Recognition In Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023,(doi: 9456

10.13140/RG.2.2.35061.65767). 9457

HG25 [170] Henry Garrett,“The Focus on The Partitions Obtained By Parallel Moves In The 9458
Cancer’s Extreme Recognition With Different Types of Extreme SuperHyperMatching 9459
Set and Polynomial on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9460

10.13140/RG.2.2.18494.15680). 9461

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG26 [171] Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Can- 9462
cer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHy- 9463
perModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9464
10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 9465

HG27 [172] Henry Garrett,“Indeterminacy On The All Possible Connections of Cells In Front 9466
of Cancer’s Attacks In The Terms of Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique on Can- 9467
cer’s Recognition called Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9468
10.13140/RG.2.2.15897.70243). 9469

HG116 [173] Henry Garrett,“Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique Decides the Failures on the Can- 9470
cer’s Recognition in the Perfect Connections of Cancer’s Attacks By SuperHy- 9471
perModels Named (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9472
10.13140/RG.2.2.32530.73922). 9473

HG115 [174] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Recognitions 9474
And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/pre- 9475
prints202301.0105.v1). 9476

HG28 [175] Henry Garrett,“Perfect Directions Toward Idealism in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recogni- 9477
tion Forwarding Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique on Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, 9478
ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30092.80004). 9479

HG29 [176] Henry Garrett,“Demonstrating Complete Connections in Every Embedded Regions 9480
and Sub-Regions in the Terms of Cancer’s Recognition and (Neutrosophic) Su- 9481
perHyperGraphs With (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperClique”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9482
10.13140/RG.2.2.23172.19849). 9483

HG112 [177] Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) 9484
SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 9485
Preprints 2023, 2023010105 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0105.v1). 9486

HG111 [178] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 9487

SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints”, 9488

Preprints 2023, 2023010088 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202301.0088.v1). 9489

HG30 [179] Henry Garrett,“Different Neutrosophic Types of Neutrosophic Regions titled neut- 9490
rosophic Failed SuperHyperStable in Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition modeled 9491

in the Form of Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9492

10.13140/RG.2.2.17385.36968). 9493

HG107 [180] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To 9494

Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, 9495

Preprints 2023, 2023010044 9496

HG106 [181] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 9497
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, Preprints 2023, 2023010043 (doi: 9498

10.20944/preprints202301.0043.v1). 9499

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG31 [182] Henry Garrett, “Using the Tool As (Neutrosophic) Failed SuperHyperStable To SuperHy- 9500
perModel Cancer’s Recognition Titled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 9501
2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28945.92007). 9502

HG32 [183] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Messy-Style SuperHyperGraphs To Form Neutrosophic 9503

SuperHyperStable To Act on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognitions In Special ViewPoints”, 9504

ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11447.80803). 9505

HG33 [184] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperStable on Cancer’s Recognition by Well- 9506
SuperHyperModelled (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2023, (doi: 9507
10.13140/RG.2.2.35774.77123). 9508

HG34 [185] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in the SuperHyperFunction To 9509
Use Neutrosophic SuperHyperGraphs on Cancer’s Neutrosophic Recognition And Beyond”, 9510
ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36141.77287). 9511

HG35 [186] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) 1-Failed SuperHyperForcing in Cancer’s Re- 9512
cognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 9513
10.13140/RG.2.2.29430.88642). 9514

HG36 [187] Henry Garrett, “Basic Notions on (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperForcing And (Neutrosophic) 9515

SuperHyperModeling in Cancer’s Recognitions And (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraphs”, 9516

ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.11369.16487). 9517

HG982 [188] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring 9518
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, Preprints 2022, 2022120549 9519
(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0549.v1). 9520

HG98 [189] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions Featuring 9521
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperDefensive SuperHyperAlliances”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 9522
10.13140/RG.2.2.19380.94084). 9523

HG972 [190] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and 9524
SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With 9525
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) 9526
SuperHyperClasses”, Preprints 2022, 2022120540 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0540.v1). 9527

HG97 [191] Henry Garrett, “(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperAlliances With SuperHyperDefensive and 9528
SuperHyperOffensive Type-SuperHyperSet On (Neutrosophic) SuperHyperGraph With 9529
(Neutrosophic) SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions And Related (Neutrosophic) 9530
SuperHyperClasses”, ResearchGate 2022, (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.14426.41923). 9531

HG962 [192] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9532

Graph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, Preprints 2022, 2022120500 9533

(doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0500.v1). 9534

HG96 [193] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth on SuperHyperGraph and Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9535
Graph With SuperHyperModeling of Cancer’s Recognitions”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 9536

10.13140/RG.2.2.20993.12640). 9537

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG952 [194] Henry Garrett,“Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic 9538

SuperHyperGraphs and SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, 9539
Preprints 2022, 2022120324 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202212.0324.v1). 9540

HG95 [195] Henry Garrett, “Some SuperHyperDegrees and Co-SuperHyperDegrees on Neutrosophic Su- 9541

perHyperGraphs And SuperHyperGraphs Alongside Applications in Cancer’s Treatments”, 9542

ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23123.04641). 9543

HG942 [196] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic Super- 9544
HyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, 9545

Preprints 2022, 2022110576 (doi: 10.20944/preprints202211.0576.v1). 9546

HG94 [197] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating and SuperHyperResolving on Neutrosophic Super- 9547
HyperGraphs And Their Directions in Game Theory and Neutrosophic SuperHyperClasses”, 9548
ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23324.56966). 9549

HG37 [198] Henry Garrett, “Basic Neutrosophic Notions Concerning SuperHyperDominating and 9550
Neutrosophic SuperHyperResolving in SuperHyperGraph”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 9551
10.13140/RG.2.2.29173.86244). 9552

HG38 [199] Henry Garrett, “Initial Material of Neutrosophic Preliminaries to Study Some Neutrosophic 9553
Notions Based on Neutrosophic SuperHyperEdge (NSHE) in Neutrosophic SuperHyper- 9554
Graph (NSHG)”, ResearchGate 2022 (doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25385.88160). 9555

HG173b [200] Henry Garrett, “Collections of Math II”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9556

odo.7943878). 9557

HG172b [201] Henry Garrett, “Dominating-Edges In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9558
10.5281/zenodo.7943871). 9559

HG171b [202] Henry Garrett, “Edge-Gap In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9560
10.5281/zenodo.7923786). 9561

HG170b [203] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 9562
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7905287). 9563

HG169b [204] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 9564

Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7904586). 9565

HG168b [205] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 9566
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7874677). 9567

HG167b [206] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9568
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7857906). 9569

HG166b [207] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 9570
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7856329). 9571

HG165b [208] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9572

10.5281/zenodo.7854561). 9573

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG164b [209] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 9574
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7851893). 9575

HG163b [210] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 9576

Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7848019). 9577

HG162b [211] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Type-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9578
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7835063). 9579

HG161b [212] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9580
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7826705). 9581

HG160b [213] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 9582
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7820680). 9583

HG159b [214] Henry Garrett, “Eulerian-Path-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9584
10.5281/zenodo.7812750). 9585

HG158b [215] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 9586

Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7812142). 9587

HG157b [216] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 9588

Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7810394). 9589

HG156b [217] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Type-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 9590

2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7807782). 9591

HG155b [218] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 9592
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7804449). 9593

HG154b [219] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry 9594

Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7793875). 9595

HG153b [220] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cycle-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9596

(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7792307). 9597

HG152b [221] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9598
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7790728). 9599

HG151b [222] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 9600
2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7787712). 9601

HG150b [223] Henry Garrett, “Hamiltonian-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9602

10.5281/zenodo.7783791). 9603

HG149b [224] Henry Garrett, “Trace-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9604
10.5281/zenodo.7780123). 9605

HG148b [225] Henry Garrett, “Trace-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9606
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7773119). 9607

HG147b [226] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDuality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9608

odo.7637762). 9609

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG146b [227] Henry Garrett, “Trace-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9610
10.5281/zenodo.7766174). 9611

HG145b [228] Henry Garrett, “Edge-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9612
10.5281/zenodo.7762232). 9613

HG144b [229] Henry Garrett, “Edge-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9614
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7758601). 9615

HG143b [230] Henry Garrett, “Edge-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9616
10.5281/zenodo.7754661). 9617

HG142b [231] Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9618
10.5281/zenodo.7750995) . 9619

HG141b [232] Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9620
(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7749875). 9621

HG140b [233] Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9622
10.5281/zenodo.7747236). 9623

HG139b [234] Henry Garrett, “Stable-Neighbor In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9624
10.5281/zenodo.7742587). 9625

HG138b [235] Henry Garrett, “Stable-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9626

(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7738635). 9627

HG137b [236] Henry Garrett, “Stable-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9628
10.5281/zenodo.7734719). 9629

HG136b [237] Henry Garrett, “Clique-Neighbors In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9630
10.5281/zenodo.7730484). 9631

HG135b [238] Henry Garrett, “Clique-Decompositions In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 9632

(doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7730469). 9633

HG134b [239] Henry Garrett, “Clique-Cut In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9634
10.5281/zenodo.7722865). 9635

HG133b [240] Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9636
odo.7713563). 9637

HG132b [241] Henry Garrett, “Space In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9638

odo.7709116). 9639

HG131b [242] Henry Garrett, “Edge-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9640
10.5281/zenodo.7706415). 9641

HG130b [243] Henry Garrett, “Vertex-Connectivity In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9642
10.5281/zenodo.7706063). 9643

HG129b [244] Henry Garrett, “Tree-Decomposition In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9644

10.5281/zenodo.7701906). 9645

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG128b [245] Henry Garrett, “Chord In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9646
odo.7700205). 9647

HG127b [246] Henry Garrett, “(i,j)-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9648
10.5281/zenodo.7694876). 9649

HG126b [247] Henry Garrett, “Edge-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9650
10.5281/zenodo.7679410). 9651

HG125b [248] Henry Garrett, “K-Domination In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9652

10.5281/zenodo.7675982). 9653

HG124b [249] Henry Garrett, “K-Number In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9654
10.5281/zenodo.7672388). 9655

HG123b [250] Henry Garrett, “Order In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9656
odo.7668648). 9657

HG122b [251] Henry Garrett, “Coloring In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9658
10.5281/zenodo.7662810). 9659

HG121b [252] Henry Garrett, “Dimension In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9660
10.5281/zenodo.7659162). 9661

HG120b [253] Henry Garrett, “Cancer In SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9662
odo.7653233). 9663

HG119b [254] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperWheel”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9664
odo.7653204). 9665

HG118b [255] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMultipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9666

odo.7653142). 9667

HG117b [256] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperBipartite”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9668
odo.7653117). 9669

HG116b [257] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStar”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7653089). 9670

HG115b [258] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9671
odo.7651687). 9672

HG114b [259] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPath”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9673
odo.7651619). 9674

HG113b [260] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDomination”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9675
odo.7651439). 9676

HG112b [261] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDominating”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9677
odo.7650729). 9678

HG111b [262] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnected”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9679

odo.7647868). 9680

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG110b [263] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperTotal”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9681
odo.7647017). 9682

HG109b [264] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperPerfect”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9683
odo.7644894). 9684

HG108b [265] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperJoin”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7641880). 9685

HG107b [266] Henry Garrett, “Path SuperHyperColoring”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9686
odo.7632923). 9687

HG106b [267] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperDensity”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9688
odo.7623459). 9689

HG105b [268] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9690

10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 9691

HG104b [269] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9692
10.5281/zenodo.7606416). 9693

HG103b [270] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperConnectivities”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9694
odo.7606404). 9695

HG102b [271] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9696
10.5281/zenodo.7580018). 9697

HG101b [272] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9698
odo.7580018). 9699

HG100b [273] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9700
odo.7580018). 9701

HG99b [274] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperCycle”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9702
odo.7579929). 9703

HG98b [275] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9704

10.5281/zenodo.7563170). 9705

HG97b [276] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9706
odo.7563164). 9707

HG96b [277] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9708
odo.7563160). 9709

HG95b [278] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9710
odo.7563160). 9711

HG94b [279] Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperGirth”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9712
10.5281/zenodo.7563160). 9713

HG93b [280] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9714

10.5281/zenodo.7557063). 9715

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG92b [281] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9716
10.5281/zenodo.7557009). 9717

HG91b [282] Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9718
10.5281/zenodo.7539484). 9719

HG90b [283] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9720
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 9721

HG89b [284] Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9722
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 9723

HG88b [285] Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9724
10.5281/zenodo.7523390). 9725

HG87b [286] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9726
odo.7574952). 9727

HG86b [287] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9728
10.5281/zenodo.7574992). 9729

HG85b [288] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9730
odo.7523357). 9731

HG84b [289] Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9732

10.5281/zenodo.7523357). 9733

HG83b [290] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9734
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 9735

HG82b [291] Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9736
10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 9737

HG81b [292] Henry Garrett, “Overlook On Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9738

10.5281/zenodo.7504782). 9739

HG80b [293] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9740
10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 9741

HG79b [294] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9742
odo.7499395). 9743

HG78b [295] Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9744

10.5281/zenodo.7499395). 9745

HG77b [296] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9746
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 9747

HG76b [297] Henry Garrett, “Extreme Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9748
10.5281/zenodo.7497450). 9749

HG75b [298] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9750

10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 9751

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·
[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA

HG74b [299] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9752
odo.7494862). 9753

HG73b [300] Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9754
10.5281/zenodo.7494862). 9755

HG72b [301] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9756
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 9757

HG71b [302] Henry Garrett, “Extreme SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9758

odo.7493845). 9759

HG70b [303] Henry Garrett, “Overlook On SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 9760
10.5281/zenodo.7493845). 9761

HG69b [304] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperMatching”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9762
odo.7539484). 9763

HG68b [305] Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9764
odo.7523390). 9765

HG67b [306] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperClique”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9766
odo.7523357). 9767

HG66b [307] Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9768

odo.7504782). 9769

HG65b [308] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperStable”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9770
odo.7499395). 9771

HG64b [309] Henry Garrett, “Failed SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9772
odo.7497450). 9773

HG63b [310] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperForcing”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9774
odo.7494862). 9775

HG62b [311] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperAlliances”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9776
odo.7493845). 9777

HG61b [312] Henry Garrett, “SuperHyperGraphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9778

odo.7480110). 9779

HG60b [313] Henry Garrett, “Neut. SuperHyperEdges”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9780
odo.7378758). 9781

HG32b [314] Henry Garrett, “Beyond Neutrosophic Graphs”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9782
odo.6320305). 9783

HG44b [315] Henry Garrett, “Neutrosophic Duality”. Dr. Henry Garrett, 2023 (doi: 10.5281/zen- 9784
odo.6677173). 9785

Henry Garrett · Independent Researcher · Department of Mathematics ·

[email protected] · Manhattan, NY, USA
 9786

View publication stats