GROUP PROJECT’S EVALUATION (Final Calculated Marks : 20%)
[SECTION A]
Project Title: METRO DRIVING SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM / T5CS1103B
Project’s proposal (10%)
0 1 2
Tasks Weight Total
The class propose Lack in some area, Well defined, can 5 /10
could not be can be improved be easily
Object’s class
implemented and but relevant. implemented and
not relevant relevant.
Not achievable or Achievable but level Achievable and 5 /10
Processing 1 below expectation. of complexity is acceptable level of
below expectation. complexity.
Not achievable or Achievable but level Achievable and 5 /10
Processing 2 below expectation. of complexity is acceptable level of
below expectation. complexity.
Not achievable or Achievable but level Achievable and 5 /10
Processing 3 below expectation. of complexity is acceptable level of
below expectation. complexity.
Not achievable or Achievable but level Achievable and 5 /10
Processing 4 below expectation. of complexity is acceptable level of
below expectation. complexity.
Not achievable or Achievable but level Achievable and 5 /10
Processing 5 below expectation. of complexity is acceptable level of
below expectation. complexity.
less than 10 records less than 20 records Sufficient with more 5 /10
Data in input file
than 20 records
TOTAL (70)
Oct 2022 – Mar 2023
[SECTION B]
Project Title: METRO DRIVING SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM / T5CS1103B
Project’s implementation (60%)
0 1 2
Exist Weight Total
Tasks
not exist Incorrect/ Complete
incomplete
Linked List 3 /6
Class definition
class
2 /4
Queue Class definition
2 /4
Object Class Class definition
Data Structure 2 /4
object’s declaration
Data insertion into 2 /4
the data structure
involved
3 /6
Processing 1
Main Class 1 3 /6
Processing 2
(Linked List)
3 /6
Processing 3
3 /6
Processing 4
3 /6
Processing 5
Data Structure 2 /4
object’s declaration
Data insertion into 2 /4
the data structure
involved
3 /6
Processing 1
Main Class 2 3 /6
(Queue) Processing 2
3 /6
Processing 3
3 /6
Processing 4
Processing 5 3 /6
Oct 2022 – Mar 2023
1 2 3
Tasks Poor Executed Weight Total
Moderate
perfectly
Overall execution – program run 2 /6
smoothly
3 /6
Logic on data structure
2 /4
Data Casting ability
0 1 2 3
None of Poor Able to
All
Tasks the problem- solve Weight Total
problems
problem solving some
Solved
Solved skills problem
3 /9
Problem Solving
TOTAL (115)
Oct 2022 – Mar 2023
[SECTION C]
Project Title: METRO DRIVING SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM / T5CS1103B
Report and Presentation (30%)
1 2 3
Tasks Weight Total
Poor Moderate Very Good
Clear delivery of 3 /9
ideas (content)
Confident and 2 /6
articulate delivery
Verbal
of ideas
Communication
(Communicative
(Individual)
ability)
Understand and 2 /6
respond to
questions
Clarity and 2 /6
accuracy written
academic
discourse
(Content)
Coherently written 3 /9
Written
academic
Communication
discourse
(report)
(Communicative
ability)
Systematically 3 /9
written academic
discourse
(Technicality)
TOTAL (45)
Oct 2022 – Mar 2023
[SECTION D]
Project Title: METRO DRIVING SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Peer 1: MUHAMMAD SYAZWAN SYAHMI BIN MAT ZAIDI / T5CS1103B
Peer 2: SYAFIQ DANIAL BIN MOHAMAD HUSNI / T5CS1103B
Peer 3: MUHAMMAD HAZIQ BIN MOHD SAIDI / T5CS1103B
Peer 4: MUHAMMAD ASYRAF BIN KAMARUZAMAN /T5CS1103B
Teamwork (Peer evaluation)
Goal 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points Peer Peer Peer Peer
1 2 3 4
Equal work Did little or no Did almost as Did an equal Did a full
work much work as share of work share of work 4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4
others or more
Cooperation Did not Could be Work Took an
cooperate persuaded to agreeably with initiative to get
4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4
cooperate others the group
organized
Participation Not Listen to others Participated in Provided
participated in but made few discussions many ideas
discussions suggestions and made 4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4
and made no some
suggestion. suggestions
Support Took little Seemed pre- Offered Assisted other
interest in the occupied with encouragemen partners
4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4
project other projects t to other
partners
Communication Never Rarely Usually shares Clearly
expressed expressed ideas communicated 4/4 4/4 4/4 /4
ideas ideas ideas
TOTAL (20) 20/20 20/20 20/20 20/20
Oct 2022 – Mar 2023
[SECTION E]
Project Title: METRO DRIVING SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM /
Team member 1: MUHAMMAD SYAZWAN SYAHMI BIN MAT ZAIDI / T5CS1103B
Evaluation Total Marks Percentage counted Marks calculated
Proposal 70 10%
Project’s implementation 115 60%
Report and presentation 45 20%
Teamwork 20 10%
Total /100
Team member 2: SYAFIQ DANIAL BIN MOHAMAD HUSNI / T5CS1103B
Evaluation Total Marks Percentage counted Marks calculated
Proposal 70 10%
Project’s implementation 115 60%
Report and presentation 45 20%
Teamwork 20 10%
Total /100
Team member 3: MUHAMMAD HAZIQ BIN MOHD SAIDI / T5CS1103B
Evaluation Total Marks Percentage counted Marks calculated
Proposal 70 10%
Project’s implementation 115 60%
Report and presentation 45 20%
Teamwork 20 10%
Total /100
Team member 4: MUHAMMAD ASYRAF BIN KAMARUZAMAN /T5CS1103B
Evaluation Total Marks Percentage counted Marks calculated
Proposal 70 10%
Project’s implementation 115 60%
Report and presentation 45 20%
Teamwork 20 10%
Total /100
Oct 2022 – Mar 2023
