Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 24 views

    CRM-M 32562 2021 15 09 2022 Final Order

    Uploaded by

    Bhanu Pratap
    The petitioner filed a petition to quash an FIR registered under Section 376 IPC for rape. The petitioner and prosecutrix were consenting adults in a relationship, but a FIR was filed after differences arose alleging rape on promise of marriage. However, the parties have now resolved their differences via a compromise. The court directed the state to complete the investigation within a month in accordance with law, keeping in view the facts of the case.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    CRM-M 32562 2021 15 09 2022 Final Order

    Uploaded by

    Bhanu Pratap
    24 views2 pages
    The petitioner filed a petition to quash an FIR registered under Section 376 IPC for rape. The petitioner and prosecutrix were consenting adults in a relationship, but a FIR was filed after differences arose alleging rape on promise of marriage. However, the parties have now resolved their differences via a compromise. The court directed the state to complete the investigation within a month in accordance with law, keeping in view the facts of the case.

    Original Title

    CRM-M_32562_2021_15_09_2022_FINAL_ORDER (1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The petitioner filed a petition to quash an FIR registered under Section 376 IPC for rape. The petitioner and prosecutrix were consenting adults in a relationship, but a FIR was filed after differences arose alleging rape on promise of marriage. However, the parties have now resolved their differences via a compromise. The court directed the state to complete the investigation within a month in accordance with law, keeping in view the facts of the case.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    24 views2 pages

    CRM-M 32562 2021 15 09 2022 Final Order

    Uploaded by

    Bhanu Pratap
    The petitioner filed a petition to quash an FIR registered under Section 376 IPC for rape. The petitioner and prosecutrix were consenting adults in a relationship, but a FIR was filed after differences arose alleging rape on promise of marriage. However, the parties have now resolved their differences via a compromise. The court directed the state to complete the investigation within a month in accordance with law, keeping in view the facts of the case.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    CRM-M-32562-2021 -1-

    120
    IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
    AT CHANDIGARH

    CRM-M-32562-2021
    Date of Decision: September 15, 2022

    Gursewak Singh
    .....Petitioner
    Versus
    State of Punjab and another
    ......Respondents

    CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BHARDWAJ

    Present: Mr.PKS Phoolka, Advocate


    for the petitioner.
    ........

    RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.(ORAL)

    Instant petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for

    quashing of FIR No.35, dated 09.04.2021, under Section 376 IPC, registered

    at Police Station Cantt., Bathinda, District Bathinda alongwith all

    subsequent proceedings arising therefrom qua the petitioner on the basis of

    compromise, dated 27.07.2021, Annexure P-2.

    It has been submitted by counsel for the petitioner that

    petitioner and the prosecutrix both are of the age of majority and are in a

    consensual relationship. He has submitted that thereafter, due to some

    differences between both of them, the present FIR was lodged alleging

    therein that the petitioner established physical relations with the prosecutrix

    on the promise of the marriage. He has submitted that now both the parties

    have duly resolved their differences and they have arrived at a compromise.

    He has submitted that no case for offence under Section 376 IPC is made out

    in the facts and circumstances of the case.

    Notice of motion.

    1 of 2
    ::: Downloaded on - 18-02-2023 10:05:36 :::
    CRM-M-32562-2021 -2-

    On the asking of the Court, Mr.Sandeep Kumar, DAG, Punjab,

    who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent/State and

    submits that the matter is under investigation.

    Heard.

    A perusal of the FIR shows that the same was registered on

    09.04.2021. Hence, respondent-State is directed to complete the

    investigation in accordance with law, keeping in view the facts and

    circumstances of this case, within a month from today.

    Disposed of accordingly.

    September 15, 2022 ( RAJESH BHARDWAJ )


    meenuss JUDGE
    1. Whether speaking/reasoned ? Yes/No
    2. Whether reportable ? Yes/No

    2 of 2
    ::: Downloaded on - 18-02-2023 10:05:36 :::

    You might also like