An Ethical Analysis of Emotional Labor
An Ethical Analysis of Emotional Labor
An Ethical Analysis of Emotional Labor
of Emotional Labor
Barry, B., Olekalns, M., & Rees, L. (2019). An ethical analysis of emotional labor. Journal of
Business Ethics, 160, 17-34.
Overview
1. Definition of emotional labor
2. Rights and duties
3. Conflicts
4. Future directions for managerial practice
Emotional Labor
“...management cannot simply demand ‘service with a smile’ as the effort to put on the smile
may, ironically, have costs to the person and their performance.”
Rights and Obligations in Relation to Emotional
Labor
Rights
Autonomy
“to make reasoned choices about how to live one’s life”
A right to cultivate autonomy comes into play both for the individual who performs
emotional labor and for the employing organization.
Rights and Obligations in Relation to Emotional
Labor
Rights
Well-being
"The presence of happiness or good or success in one’s own life from one’s own point
of view, possibly achieved through the deliberate fulfillment of chosen goals."
—the question of when either its performance or its regulation crosses ethical lines—
consent is based on the assumption that contracts have a fair and impartial starting point;
mutual self-interest proposes that “morality consists in those forms of cooperative
behavior that it is mutually advantageous for self-interested agents to engage in”
Conflicts Between Two Parties’ Rights
The autonomy rights of one party delimit the well-being rights of the other, and vice versa.
Principle of consent
A decision bias in which individuals overweight short-term benefits (surface acting is less
effortful) and underweight long-term costs (impact on well-being).
Principle of consent
Organizations should acknowledge their duties to train, develop and support employees.
The principle of consent suggests that rights may take precedence over duties.
Thank you
for your attention.