Judge's Order in TRO Request

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Case 3:23-cv-09962-TKW-ZCB Document 3 Filed 05/11/23 Page 1 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:23cv9962-TKW-ZCB

ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al.,

Defendants.
_________________________________/

ORDER REQUIRING EXPEDITED RESPONSE

Yesterday afternoon, Florida filed suit against DHS Secretary Mayorkas, U.S.

Border Patrol Chief Ortiz, and the United States of America, alleging that “DHS

plans to immediately restart the en masse parole of aliens at the Southwest Border.”

Doc. 1 at 2 (¶6) (citing an NBC news article 1 quoting a DHS spokesperson’s

summary of the plan). This morning, Florida filed an “emergency motion” (Doc. 2)

asking the Court to enter a temporary restraining order (TRO) “preventing DHS from

implementing the new parole policy or otherwise using [8 U.S.C.] §1182(d)(5) as a

tool of operational convenience, to relieve overcrowding, or to facilitate faster

processing at the Southwest border.”

1
Biden admin to allow for the release of some migrants into the U.S. with no way to track
them, https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/biden-admin-plans-order-release-migrants-us-no-way-
trackrcna83704 (May 10, 2023 8:44 a.m. CDT).
Case 3:23-cv-09962-TKW-ZCB Document 3 Filed 05/11/23 Page 2 of 3

The motion for a TRO needs to be resolved sooner rather than later because

the policy challenged in the complaint allegedly will go into effect at 11:59 p.m.

eastern time tonight when the Title 42 Order expires. If the allegations in the

complaint and motion are true, then it appears that DHS is preparing to flout the

Court’s order in Florida v. United States, -- F. Supp. 3d --, 2023 WL 2399883 (N.D.

Fla. Mar. 8, 2023), by implementing a new “parole” policy that, based on the DHS

spokesperson’s description of the policy, sounds virtually identical to the

Parole+ATD policy the Court vacated in Florida.2 Specifically, like the vacated

Parole+ATD policy, the objective of the new policy is to reduce overcrowding in

border patrol facilities and the new policy will simply require aliens released under

the policy “to check in with [ICE] and undergo removal proceedings in immigration

court” and maybe “be placed into an Alternatives to Detention program to ensure

compliance.” Doc. 2 at 2 (quoting article in which DHS spokesperson described the

new policy).

The motion does not meet the requirements in Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1) for a

TRO without notice, and Florida is not seeking a TRO without notice because the

motion reflects that it was mailed to Defendants and emailed to the attorneys who

represented the defendants in Florida. The motion requests that Defendants be

2
DHS appealed the Order in Florida, but it waited until May 5, 2023 (the next to last
business day of the 60-day appeal period) to do so and it did not seek a stay of the decision vacating
the Parole+ATD policy.

2
Case 3:23-cv-09962-TKW-ZCB Document 3 Filed 05/11/23 Page 3 of 3

ordered to respond by 4:00 p.m. eastern time so the Court can rule on the motion

before the Title 42 Order expires at 11:59 p.m. eastern time. That request is

reasonable under the circumstances, but to facilitate the response, the motion needs

to be provided to the attorneys with whom Florida’s counsel has been

communicating about the challenged policy—who are the same attorneys who

represented DHS in Florida.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Florida shall email a copy of this Order on the attorneys who

represented the defendants in Florida.

2. Defendants shall have until 4:00 p.m. eastern time to respond to

Florida’s emergency motion for a TRO. The response shall be e-filed through

CM/ECF and emailed to [email protected].

DONE and ORDERED this 11th day of May, 2023.

_________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

You might also like