AT-05 - FS Audit Process - Pre-Engagement
AT-05 - FS Audit Process - Pre-Engagement
23
2. Which of the following is/are not considered in deciding whether to accept a new client or not?
I. Firm’s competency to perform the engagement and ability to comply with relevant ethical
requirements
II. Client’s integrity including its standing in the business community and financial ability
III. Integrity of predecessor auditor
IV. Probability of achieving an unqualified opinion
7. After client acceptance, the terms of the engagement are agreed by the auditor with the client.
The objective and scope of the audit and the extent of the auditor’s responsibilities to the client are
best documented in:
A. Independent auditor’s report C. Client’s representation letter.
B. Audit engagement letter. D. Audit program.
10. Which of the following is least likely to be included in an audit engagement letter?
A. Identification of specific audit procedures that the auditor needs to undertake.
B. Description of any letters or reports that the auditor expects to submit to the client.
C. A reference to the inherent limitations of an audit that there is an unavoidable risk that
some material misstatements may remain undiscovered.
D. Basis on which fees are computed and any billing arrangements.
11. Which of the following factors need to be considered in deciding whether to send a separate
engagement letter to a component (in the case of group audits)?
A. Who appoints the auditor of the component.
B. Legal requirements.
C. Whether a separate audit report is to be issued on the component.
D. All of the above are considered.
12. In which of the following situations will there be a need to send a new letter for recurring
engagements?
A. Revisions or special terms of the engagement.
B. Significant change in nature or size of the client’s business.
C. Indications of misunderstanding of the objective and scope of the audit.
D. Recent change of middle management and rank and file organizational structure
13. The following may lead the client to request for a change in engagement:
A. Restrictions on the scope of the engagement.
B. Misunderstanding as to the nature of an audit or related service originally requested.
C. Change in circumstances affecting the need for the service.
D. All of the answers.
14. If a change in the type of engagement from higher to lower level of assurance is reasonably
justified, the report based on the revised engagement:
A. Should qualify the opinion due to a scope limitation.
B. Omits reference to the original engagement.
C. Should always refer to any procedures that may have been performed in the original
engagement.
D. Should refer to the original engagement in a separate paragraph preceding the opinion
paragraph.
15. If a change in the type of engagement from higher to lower level of assurance is not justified, the
auditor should:
A. Qualify the report on the original engagement.
B. Continue with the revised engagement but make explicit reference about the original
engagement.
C. Refuse to agree to management’s request on the change of engagement and continue with
the original engagement.
D. Withdraw from the engagement.
16. Which of the following actions may be appropriate if the auditor is unable to agree to a change of
the engagement and is not permitted to continue the original engagement
I. Issue a qualified opinion due to a significant scope limitation.
II. Auditor should withdraw from the engagement.
Page 2 of 3
AT-05
ReSA: The Review School of Accountancy
Auditing Theory: FS Audit Process – Pre-engagement
III. Consider whether there is any obligation to report to the board of directors or shareholders the
circumstances necessitating withdrawal
17. When the auditor believes a misstatement is or may be the result of fraud but that the effect of
the misstatement is not material to the financial statements, which of the following steps is
required?
A. Consider the implications for other aspects of the audit.
B. Resign from the audit.
C. Commence a fraud examination.
D. Contact regulatory authorities.
18. Which of the following statements is correct relating to the auditor’s consideration of fraud?
A. The auditor’s interest in fraud consideration relates to fraudulent acts that cause a material
misstatement of financial statements.
B. A primary factor that distinguishes fraud from error is that fraud is always intentional, while
errors are generally, but not always, intentional.
C. Fraud always involves a pressure or incentive to commit fraud, and a misappropriation of
assets.
D. While an auditor should be aware of the possibility of fraud, management, and not the
auditor, is responsible for detecting fraud.
19. Which of the following factors would most likely cause a CPA to decide not to accept a new audit
engagement?
A. The CPA’s lack of understanding of the prospective client’s internal auditor’s computer –
assisted audit techniques.
B. Management’s disregard of its responsibility to maintain an adequate internal control
environment.
C. The CPA’s inability to determine whether related-party transactions were consummated on
terms equivalent to arm’s- length transactions.
D. Management’s refusal to permit the CPA to perform substantive tests before the year-end.
20. Which of the following documentation is not required for an audit in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards?
A. A written audit plan setting forth the procedures necessary to accomplish the audit’s
objectives.
B. An indication that the accounting records agree or reconcile with the financial statements.
C. A client engagement letter that summarizes the timing and details of the auditor’s planned
fieldwork.
D. The assessment of the risks of material misstatement.
-end of AT-05-
Page 3 of 3