Aristotle studied over 158 Greek city-state governments to develop a classification system. He categorized governments based on who rules - one, a few, or many - and whether the ruler(s) govern in the public or self-interest. Aristotle identified six forms of government: monarchy, tyranny, aristocracy, oligarchy, polity (constitutional democracy), and democracy. He believed power without checks leads to instability and proposed a mixed constitution combining rule by a few educated elites and ratification by the many as a stable form of government.
Aristotle studied over 158 Greek city-state governments to develop a classification system. He categorized governments based on who rules - one, a few, or many - and whether the ruler(s) govern in the public or self-interest. Aristotle identified six forms of government: monarchy, tyranny, aristocracy, oligarchy, polity (constitutional democracy), and democracy. He believed power without checks leads to instability and proposed a mixed constitution combining rule by a few educated elites and ratification by the many as a stable form of government.
Aristotle studied over 158 Greek city-state governments to develop a classification system. He categorized governments based on who rules - one, a few, or many - and whether the ruler(s) govern in the public or self-interest. Aristotle identified six forms of government: monarchy, tyranny, aristocracy, oligarchy, polity (constitutional democracy), and democracy. He believed power without checks leads to instability and proposed a mixed constitution combining rule by a few educated elites and ratification by the many as a stable form of government.
Aristotle studied over 158 Greek city-state governments to develop a classification system. He categorized governments based on who rules - one, a few, or many - and whether the ruler(s) govern in the public or self-interest. Aristotle identified six forms of government: monarchy, tyranny, aristocracy, oligarchy, polity (constitutional democracy), and democracy. He believed power without checks leads to instability and proposed a mixed constitution combining rule by a few educated elites and ratification by the many as a stable form of government.
The father of the science of poli cs owes the tle to his name because he employed empirical inquiry as to his method. Aristotle was troubled by the instability that existed in Greek city-states' governments. He studied over 158 case histories of various city-states by sending his students to prepare case studies of various cons tu ons. He analysed almost 160 case histories. To be precise, it is believed that he analysed 158 case histories. The case history of Athens is an important source to understand his classifica on of the cons tu ons. One can understand this fact based on two factors: 1. The number of individuals ruling the state: whether it is one person ruling the state, a few individuals or if it is a rule of many. 2. The intent of the ruler or rulers: whether the ruler is ruling for his state's interest (known as a normal form of government), or whether the ruler is looking a er his self-interest (known as a perverted form of government).
Aristotle’s Classifica on of Government
Public Interest Selfish Interest
The One Monarchy Tyranny
The Few Aristocracy Oligarchy
The Many Cons tu onal Democracy Democracy
(Source: poli calsciencereview.com)
If it is the rule of ONE, then it would be MONARCHY or a Kingship in an ideal form of government, or it would be despo sm or TYRANNY in a perverted form. If the rule is by FEW, it would be ARISTOCRACY in an ideal form of government or OLIGARCHY in a perverted form. If the rule is by MANY, it would be POLITY or a cons tu onal government as the ideal form of government, and interes ngly, DEMOCRACY in a perverted form. According to Aristotle, without any adequate checks on a ruler's power, no form of government would be stable. He believes that power and virtue cannot coexist. He has provided the cycle of change of governments over me. Kingship, a normal form of government, turns to tyranny when there is an absence of control over the monarch's power. Tyranny leads to a rebellion or a revolu on by a few individuals who establish an aristocracy. Aristocracy can deteriorate and turn into an oligarchy, the perverted form. With me, a greater many rebels against oligarchy and supersede it with polity. Polity further decays in democracy when the many rulers begin to seek their self-interest. In the end, a single individual who seems virtuous establishes a monarchy, and the progression of ideal form and perverted form con nues in a circular mo on.
Mona Tyran Aristoc Oligar Poli Democ
rchy > ny > racy > chy > ty > racy >
norma perve perve nor perver
normal l rted rted mal ted
Aristotle gave the concept of a mixed constitution as a solution to prevent
instability and establish a lasting form of government in the Greek city-state. He employed his idea of the "Golden Mean" to create stability. In his book "Ethics", he explains the Golden Mean as a middle path, which means that virtue lies between two extremes. Anything on an extreme end becomes a vice, and each virtue lies in the middle of the two extremes. For instance, courage is a virtue that lies between the two extremes of timidity and negligence. Conclusion
His solu on to bring a stable form of government is the
combina on of rule by few and rule by many. He discarded Monarchy because it would be corrupt from absolute power. Aristocracy would suit because few would make the rules. This would comprise the chosen minority who are educated and rich. However, in case of no checks on aristocracy, it would deteriorate. To prevent that, Aristotle suggests that the decisions made by the aristocracy should be ra fied by the ordinary many. He says that "the people, though individually they may be worse judges than those who have special knowledge, are collec vely as good".
Name: Marwa Riaz Roll No: 25 Assignment: Political Science Semester: 2nd Department: Political Science & IR Government College Women University Faislabad