Aristotle Views On Constitution PDF

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Aristotle and his classifica on of

governments and cons tu ons


The father of the science of poli cs owes the tle to his
name because he employed empirical inquiry as to his
method. Aristotle was troubled by the instability that
existed in Greek city-states' governments. He studied
over 158 case histories of various city-states by sending
his students to prepare case studies of various
cons tu ons. He analysed almost 160 case histories. To
be precise, it is believed that he analysed 158 case
histories.
The case history of Athens is an important source to
understand his classifica on of the cons tu ons. One
can understand this fact based on two factors:
1. The number of individuals ruling the
state: whether it is one person ruling the state, a
few individuals or if it is a rule of many.
2. The intent of the ruler or rulers: whether the ruler
is ruling for his state's interest (known as a normal
form of government), or whether the ruler is
looking a er his self-interest (known as a
perverted form of government).

Aristotle’s Classifica on of Government


Public Interest Selfish Interest

The One Monarchy Tyranny

The Few Aristocracy Oligarchy

The Many Cons tu onal Democracy Democracy

(Source: poli calsciencereview.com)


 If it is the rule of ONE, then it would be
MONARCHY or a Kingship in an ideal form of
government, or it would be despo sm or TYRANNY
in a perverted form.
 If the rule is by FEW, it would be ARISTOCRACY in
an ideal form of government or OLIGARCHY in a
perverted form.
 If the rule is by MANY, it would be POLITY or a
cons tu onal government as the ideal form of
government, and interes ngly, DEMOCRACY in a
perverted form.
According to Aristotle, without any adequate checks on
a ruler's power, no form of government would be
stable. He believes that power and virtue cannot
coexist.
He has provided the cycle of change of governments
over me. Kingship, a normal form of government,
turns to tyranny when there is an absence of control
over the monarch's power. Tyranny leads to a rebellion
or a revolu on by a few individuals who establish an
aristocracy. Aristocracy can deteriorate and turn into an
oligarchy, the perverted form. With me, a greater
many rebels against oligarchy and supersede it with
polity. Polity further decays in democracy when the
many rulers begin to seek their self-interest. In the end,
a single individual who seems virtuous establishes a
monarchy, and the progression of ideal form and
perverted form con nues in a circular mo on.

Mona Tyran Aristoc Oligar Poli Democ


rchy > ny > racy > chy > ty > racy >

norma perve perve nor perver


normal
l rted rted mal ted

Aristotle gave the concept of a mixed constitution as a solution to prevent


instability and establish a lasting form of government in the Greek city-state. He
employed his idea of the "Golden Mean" to create stability. In his book "Ethics",
he explains the Golden Mean as a middle path, which means that virtue lies
between two extremes. Anything on an extreme end becomes a vice, and each
virtue lies in the middle of the two extremes. For instance, courage is a virtue
that lies between the two extremes of timidity and negligence.
Conclusion

His solu on to bring a stable form of government is the


combina on of rule by few and rule by many. He
discarded Monarchy because it would be corrupt from
absolute power. Aristocracy would suit because few
would make the rules. This would comprise the chosen
minority who are educated and rich. However, in case
of no checks on aristocracy, it would deteriorate. To
prevent that, Aristotle suggests that the decisions
made by the aristocracy should be ra fied by the
ordinary many. He says that "the people, though
individually they may be worse judges than those who
have special knowledge, are collec vely as good".

You might also like