Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

ISSN (E): 2959-0272, ISSN (P): 2710-0502

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59111/JPD.001.01.06

Volume 1 Issue 1 Year 2020

Indian Hostile Narratives and Counter Narratives of Pakistan

Adeel Babar

Researcher, MSc in Defense and Strategic Studies, Islamabad, Pakistan

[email protected]

ABSTRACT

In the 21st century, international relations and communication have been interacting with
each other in an ineffable manner. It is hard to find that how international relations are
conducted and which actors are involved. This all happened because of the new media
ecologies with the modernization of technology. Communication has to play a very crucial
role in today’s world especially in international relations. The work of Manuel Castell
“Communication Power” explains how communication and new media ecologies have
shaped our world in twenty first century and how relationships of power can be defined and
reconfigured through communication. Manuel uses the term of “network society” & “mass
self-communication”. In a “networked society” new networked pattern of relationships
emerge that may be political, social and economic. “Mass self-communication” that emerged
during 2000’s encouraged everyone to have their own views of the world around them and
broadcast online. The power of “mass self-communication” cannot be neglected in today’s
world as this phenomenon helped toppled governments in the Arab Spring starting in 2011.
Now communication is not controlled by elites in society but is available to all and its power
cannot be undermined. Changing media ecologies gave rise to a concept of narrative
building which political actors use in order to achieve political and other policy goals.

Keywords: Strategic Narratives, Identity, Strategic Communication

34
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

What are Narratives?

Anne Marie Slaughter cites “Narrative is basically a kind of story”, a story that should
be crafted in a manner that everyone being addresses should believe upon. Narratives require
certain variables to work effectively that are it must contain an actor, action, a goal or
intention, a scene that is of vital importance and the instrument through which the narrative is
conveyed. Narrative can be identified into three phases, initial order of the system, problem
that is direct threat to that order and action that reestablishes order that may differ a little
from the previous order.

Narratives are important to change the nature of international relations and shape the
behavior of others whilst defining oneself; helps understand power relationship within the
international arena. Hans Morgenthau cites “In the struggle for existence and power; what
others think about us is as important as what we actually are”.

Actors are central to narrative building which can be a state or international

organization framing long term narratives for themselves and the international system.
Certain events, crises and summits themselves become narrated. These are short term
narratives which some scholars defined as “stories of episodes”. O Thuathail uses the term
Storylines, “story lines are sense making organizational devices tying the different elements
of a policy challenge together into a reasonably coherent and convincing narrative.”1

Framing narratives is another important part of narrative building that is considered as

an act of “selecting and highlighting some facets of events and issues, and making
connections among them so as to promote a particular interpretation, evaluation and/or
solution” According to Robert Entman, Framing is usually done by elites, political leaders or
journalists.

In order to understand international relations, it is necessary to bifurcate narratives into

three different types i.e., issue narratives, identity narratives and system narratives. System
narratives are mostly about the nature and structure of international affairs. Identity narratives
are about the identity of actors in international arena or affairs. Truly strategic in

1 Alister
Miskimmon, Ben O’Loughlin and Laura Roselle. Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the
New World Order (London: Routledge, 2013)

35
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

sense are the issue narratives that seek to change the nature of policy and along which
discussion might take place.

Why Are Narratives Created?

Narratives are always crafted in order to achieve a set of political objectives. These political
objectives might be long term and short term and are as follows but not limited to,

1. Sharing opinion about a particular event and shaping the future of targeted audience.
2. Giving a legitimacy to events and provide meaning to those particular events.
3. It may be a prelude to a grand design and may be directed towards a long-term policy
objective
4. Building unity among masses; mostly regarded as a national narrative in which feelings
of the masses can be incited and bring them more towards nationalism through shared
identity and common history.2

Countries float strategic narratives in order to maintain influence in the international system it
can be floated by a potential hegemon willing to dominate at regional level.

Strategic Narratives
Strategic narratives are a mean that political actors use to construct a collective meaning
of international politics to shape the actions of internal and global actors. Strategic narratives
define past and present and shaping the future. With the help of strategic narratives, states can
promote their interests to achieve policy ends. Strategic narratives are the means to achieve
that end; which encompasses the following components

 Strategic narratives are always future oriented. It may discuss past or present but the
end goal is to shape the future.
 Strategic narrative is a direct claim to identity of an actor. It gives a different point of
view on a specific issue, domain of policy within the political world existing in the
international system.
 The content of strategic narrative is not fixed and has flexibility and can be changed
according to time keeping in view the political object.
 Audience can be both external and internal. Narratives are used to unify public
through an identity claim.3

2 Hidayat Ur Rehman, “Global Narratives,” A Journal of Armed Forces War College, Vol.2, no.1 (June 2014):3-
4.

36
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

Formation of strategic narratives is a complex phenomenon that involves understanding the

strategic objectives a state is seeking, actors and mediums of communication through which
narratives have to pass.4

Strategic Narratives Process

A strategic narrative must pass through a process that will define its success or failure.
This process is very crucial in terms of a narrative to have some level of persuasion and shape
the future for which it is being created.

Formation
During the process of formation, a general understanding is developed under what conditions
or circumstances a narrative need to be formed. Analysis is to be done on following points
during the formation process

1. Policy goals
2. The role domestic politics plays in narrative formation 3.
Constraints extracted from preceding narratives
4. Events around the world

Projection
It takes under consideration that when a particular narrative needs to be disseminated.
Projection of strategic narratives is time bound and needs to be carefully analyzed; can have
negative policy implications if the timing is not right. Analysis includes following points

1. New technology in order to disseminate information/narrative

2. Timing of the narrative
3. Networks involved in circulating information

Reception
Analysis is done under reception that under what circumstances narrative is received by
audience and how it is interpreted. Following points should be brought under consideration
under this domain

1. Credibility of a particular narrative. i.e., should coincide with policy goals.

3 AlisterMiskimmon, Ben O’Loughlin and Laura Roselle.” Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and
International Relations”. Centre of European Politics. (London 2012):4-5 doi: 10.3998/mpub.6504652
4 Ibid

37
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

2. Effects of other narratives in international system.

3. Different types of reception.
4. Factors that are underplaying effects of the narrative 5

Strategic Communication
Strategic communication is an idea of floating a process, data or concept that satisfies
long term policy objectives. It helps preserve government objectives and is a tool through
which strategic narratives are communicated to the masses. It is a set of plans, programs,
messages and themes that are synchronized with the elements of national power to achieve the
required results and benefits vital to the state.6

Battle of the Narratives

In a globalized world and introduction of mass self-communication, it is very easy to
hear a competing narrative that has a potential of nullifying the effects of a strategic narrative
as British Ministry of Defense (MoD) cites “In the global information environment, it is very
easy for competing narratives to also be heard. Some may be deliberately combative—our
adversaries for example, or perhaps hostile media. Where our narrative meets, the competing
narratives is referred to as the battle of narratives, although the reality is that this is an
enduring competition rather than a battle with winners and losers”.

Connection of Narratives with Policy Objectives

Narratives and policy are closely linked through Narratives Policy Framework (NPF).
NPF has been under immense scrutiny and development since 2004. It was developed under
the impetus of linking policy narratives with policy goals and is a quantitative approach to
measure the power and influence of a policy and its subsequent narrative. Policy narratives
have a set of assumptions that needs to be taken care of such as

 In a policy process; policy narrative holds a central position on which all the
objectives of policy are based.
 It operates at three levels of analysis.
o Micro (individual).
o Meso (policy sub-system).

5 AlisterMiskimmon, Ben O’Loughlin and Laura Roselle, “Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and
International Relations”, Centre of European Politics, (London 2012):6-7 doi: 10.3998/mpub.6504652
6 Hidayat Ur Rehman, “Global Narratives,” A Journal of Armed Forces War College, Vol.2, no.1(June 2014):2

38
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

o Macro (cultural/institutional).
 It has a broad set of actors. (Political elites, media and interest groups)
 Policy narratives are beliefs of a policy or programs by governments. 7

Indian Identity Narratives & Politics of Security

In recent years many observers have noticed a shift in Indian nationalist discourse
focusing more on Hinduism and departing away from secularism and diversity. This rhetoric
has been promoted by Bhartaiya Janta Party (BJP), giving a new identity to India and moving
to more religious dimension. Narratives are being put forward deliberately in order to shape
the future of Indian society as a whole and linking those narratives with Indian security
policies.8 Why is India undertaking such a policy in which it is moving away from secularism
and tilting towards religion?

Indian establishment is bringing up such hostile narratives in order to seek a position

in international system. Regional and rising powers try to seek identity in international system
and that is done through identity narratives in order to understand the international order. But
what if they achieve independence and power to act independently in the international system
is a matter of serious concern. Rising power like India and its hostile identity narratives can
make region unstable as it will seek open-ended power through these narratives. 9

Strategic Narratives against Pakistan

There are a number of strategic narratives globally circulating and Pakistan has been
deliberately the target of these hostile narratives. Some of these narratives against Pakistan
are

i. Rogue State: Pakistan is many a times considered as a rogue state which was
involved in nuclear proliferation, hostility towards India.
ii. Irresponsible State: Pakistan is also depicted as irresponsible state that is harboring
terrorism and sponsoring state terrorism against India. After United

7 Elizabeth A. Shanahan, Michael D. Jones and Mark K. McBeth. “Policy Narratives and Policy Process”, The
Policy Studies Journal, Vol.39, No.3 (2011):539-540, doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011. 00420.x
8 Gitika Commuri, Indian Identity Narratives and the Politics of Security, (New Delhi: Sage Publications,

2010),1.
9 Alister Miskimmon, Ben O’Loughlin and Laura Roselle, Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the

New World Order (London: Routledge,2013),39

39
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

States manhunt (Osama Bin Laden) was over in Abbottabad, Pakistan; serious
allegation was put on Pakistan depicted as a state accomplice to terrorists.
iii. Failing State: used to cast shadows on Pakistan internal situation; though it might
not be the case on ground but narrated in such a manner by hostile media that
shows Pakistan as a failed state.
iv. Nuclear Proliferation & Security; Pakistan has been blamed previously of slipping
nuclear material to other countries like Libya, Iran and North Korea; serious
questions has also been raised on Pakistan’s security measures of nuclear
installations and weapons.
v. Minority rights: Pakistan is thought of being a state where minority rights are not
exercised at all; many non-state actors have found a loop hole in judicial structure
and exploit minority rights. Lynching of accused in the name of blasphemy is one
of the new threats Pakistan is facing these days.10

Identity Narratives to secure Jammu & Kashmir

Jammu & Kashmir is the best example in order to examine the relationship between
security policy and identity narratives projected by Indian elites. The status of Kashmir is
contested in three ways and each hold different connotation for the Indian government.
Pakistan take Kashmir as their integral part; Indian Union take Jammu & Kashmir as their
part for strategic purposes and it is also claimed by the Kashmiris who want to have their own
autonomous body to govern the area. Jammu & Kashmir has been the bone of contention
since 1947 between India and Pakistan. Both countries have fought four wars (1948, 1965,
1971 and 1999 limited war Kargil) over the control of this particular region. Jammu &
Kashmir holds a special position as per Indian Union constitution; under Article 306A. 11 In
the constitution, it was stated that Jammu & Kashmir will have autonomy but the right has
always been objected by Hindu nationalists in India. India’s shift from secular to religious
self has a lot to do with its stance on Kashmir. For Hindus who are espoused with the cultural
and religious identity take creation of this very state as a Hindu legend and RSS (Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh) resolution asserts “a land that was brought onto the map of the world
by Kashmiri pundits and Hindus in this particular region where forcefully converted to
Islam.”12 RSS also asserts that “land of Kashmir is an integral part of India morally,

10 Hidayat Ur Rehman, “Global Narratives”, A Journal of Armed Forces War College, Vol.2, no.1(June 2014):8-
9
11 Gitika Commuri, Indian Identity Narratives and the Politics of Security, (New Delhi: Sage Publications, 2010)
12 Ibid

40
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

culturally and constitutionally.”13 Indian strategic punchline for Kashmir is “Kashmir Bharat
ka Atoot Ang hai”.

Terrorism
Indian state and officials have always linked terrorism to Pakistan many a times
claiming that Pakistan is a terrorist safe haven; a narrative denied by the Pakistani officials.
Indian narratives against Pakistan have been mostly because of the issue related to Kashmir
as stated by V.P Singh who was leading the National Front Government in 1990 “the present
state of Kashmir is just because of the hostile forces operating beyond the borders of India
have re-emerged with greater virulence and severity”.14 This was a reference that Pakistan is
sponsoring state terrorism in Indian held Kashmir. Another hostile narrative against Pakistan
was given by Home Affairs Minister in Lok Sabha “because of Pakistan the security situation
in State of Kashmir is very critical and aiding terrorism in the valley” saying Pakistan’s name
out loud.15

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his Republic Day speech on 26th January 2016 said

“What kind of a life is Pakistan living that is inspired by terrorism, what kind of a setup of
government is this that is inspired by terrorism”.

In the same speech he also cited “we cried when children in APS Peshawar were killed, this is
our nature, but the world should look at the other side Pakistan glorifies terrorists”.

Asking such questions, he propagated a well-conceived narrative against Pakistan showing to

the world that Pakistani establishment is sponsoring state terrorism in Kashmir and elsewhere
in India.

Pakistan Army & Inter-Services Intelligence

Indian political and military establishment has always been uttering hostile words
against Pakistan Army and ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence). Indian establishment has linked
every terrorist attack to ISI and Pakistan Army starting from Kargil to Mumbai attacks in
2008. Indian National Security Advisor Ajit Doval told media sources on 19 th September
2016 that “we are going to avenge the deaths of our soldiers, who died in Uri attack, but will
do at a time of our liking”

13 Ibid
14 Ibid
15 Ibid

41
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

Indian Northern Command senior military sources said they have been devising a plan for a
surgical strike against terrorists and Pakistan army who have been blamed to help the
infiltrators inside Uri Headquarters. Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his speeches have been
provoking Pakistan army and blaming recent Uri attack on Pakistan. “Pakistan has learned its
lesson, a brave response by Indian soldiers to Pakistan army an act they won’t dare to repeat
again”.16

Balochistan
There has been a number of cases and evidence which shows Indian involvement in
Balochistan. India has been involved in Balochistan in order to incite Baloch population so
that they resort to insurrection. India on number of occasions have shown keen interest in
Balochistan issue as stated in a recent speech by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He glorified
the Balochistan issue from the walls of Red Fort saying “People of Balochistan thanked me
for our support, we will morally support the people of Balochistan”; and went a step further
by granting asylum to notorious Baluch leader Brahamdagh Bugti. Indian strategic punchline
for Balochistan is “Balochistan is Brahamastra of India against Pakistan”

Trade with Pakistan

Pakistan and India’s total trade back in 2010/11 stood at US$ 2.6 Bn according to a
report by State Bank of India. The bilateral trade between Pakistan and India was falling by
30% year-on year. The absence of trade relation is because of the animosity and absence of
constituencies; the recent development was that of giving India the status of MFN (Most
Favored Nation). Both countries are quite reluctant over trade relations that can give leverage
over the other state and compromise one’s position; if both are economically interdependent.
Pakistan in this regard might lose more by looking at the economic growth in India. 17

China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) & Pakistan-China Relations

A number of articles have been published and written by Indian defense analysts about
CPEC, a project that has been a bone of contention since its inception. A project that has been
giving sleepless nights to Indian policy makers. According to an article by Adarsh Singh in
Indian defense review namely “CPEC Killing two birds with one stone”

16 Parveen Swami, “Uri Terror Attack-Security meeting: Will avenge death of our soldiers… at a time of our
choosing”, Indian Express, 19 September 2016, http://indianexpress.com/article/india/india-news-india/uri-
terror-attack-ajit-doval-security-meeting will-avenge-death-of-our-soldiers-at-a-time-of-our-choosing-3038242/
17 Gareth Price, “India & Pakistan: Changing the Narratives”, (Paper presented at Norwegian Ministry of Foreign

Affairs July, 2012).

42
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

CPEC is termed as “game changer” for Pakistan when completed. It will increase
China’s clout in IOR (Indian Ocean Region) and will make Pakistan wealthier and decrease
Indian clout in Indian Ocean with negative strategic implications for India. There is a feeling
in Indian political elites that China has been neutral up till now over the issue of Jammu &
Kashmir but CPEC might change all that with Chinese economic interests will be linked to
CPEC.18

This article also stated that “India should try to incite populace in Gilgit Baltistan and
Balochistan against CPEC and make it un-implementable. Try to induce into the minds of
individuals that CPEC is another form of East India Company”. This and many articles show
how India is using narratives against CPEC and trying to make it a lost cause for China and
Pakistan

Analysis

Indian Geopolitical Narratives

Geopolitics have three dimensions Geo-Strategy, Geo-Economics & Geo History.
Indian establishment is using state policy and narratives and targeting Pakistan across full
spectrum of geopolitics. India has geo strategic and economics narratives against CPEC and
Balochistan. Geo historical narratives against Muslims and Pakistan is another dimension that
can be found in Indian RSS ideology that tries to inculcate the Hindu ethos across the
subcontinent.

All what is done by Indian establishment against Pakistan is done for a reason a shift
from secularism to religious self is being felt across the region. Indian geopolitical narratives
against Pakistan involves Balochistan, CPEC and Kashmir. All of these issues are being
exploited by Indian establishment in order to show Pakistan as a terrorist state and fix Indian
narrative against Pakistan with the narrative of Global War on Terror. Indian idea is to isolate
Pakistan in order to become a regional hegemon as India has always opposed Pakistan since
its inception and take this part of sub-continent as their own. Indian political elites have been
speaking out loud against CPEC and Pakistan. Inciting Baluch population against the state of
Pakistan so that the state explodes from inside.

18 AdarshSingh, “CPEC: Opportunity of killing two birds with one stone”, Indian Defense Review, March 29,
2017,
http://www.indiandefencereview.com/news/cpec-opportunity-of-killing-two-birds-with-one-stone/

43
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

Connection of Indian Narratives with Direct & Indirect Strategies

Above stated narratives can be linked to direct and indirect strategies of the Indian
establishment. The narratives it is directing towards Pakistan state and the armed forces along
with Inter-services intelligence (ISI) are all part of direct strategy in order to expose Pakistan
and its armed force as evil beings who are sponsoring state terrorism in India. India has
always been directing hostile narratives against Pakistan and linking insurgency in Kashmir
with state sponsored terrorism.

Narratives directed towards Balochistan, Gilgit Baltistan and CPEC are all indirect
strategy to incite rebellion in both provinces; and to fail the CPEC project so that Indian clout
is maintained in Indian Ocean Region. India has a security dilemma regarding Gwadar port as
well that has a potential to become a military port of China which can oversee Indian
movements and minimizing Indian sphere of influence in IOR

Indian Information infrastructure

Information infrastructure refers to the protocols and structures through which
information is stored and transmitted into the mind of target audience. Nowadays societies are
dependent upon massive data servers where all the information is stored and segregation can
be done in order to select a target audience.19 Information infrastructure is very crucial for a
state these days because it helps a state and political elite to propagate their narratives and
needs to control the narratives so that it does not backfire. Indians, for a couple of years, have
been showing progress in information technology industry which also helps them in
controlling information and what to propagate and what not to. Bollywood has to play an
important role in this regard, apart from propagating Hindu philosophy in different states, it is
also disseminating information into masses against Pakistan. A number of movies depicting
Pakistan as a terrorist state, showing Pakistani establishment as an accomplice to terrorists.
Indian soft power seems to be more effective as compared to Pakistan only because of the
Bollywood industry that is known all over the world. It is very easy for Indian establishment
to slip in their policy narratives through movies around the world.

19 Alister
Miskimmon, Ben O’Loughlin and Laura Roselle, Strategic Narratives: Communication Power and the
New World Order (London: Routledge,2013),150

44
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

Indian mass self-media has also been important in this regard with anti-Pakistan
narratives floating all around World Wide Web. India has been doing this for years linking
terrorism to the state of Pakistan.

Conclusion
This article elucidates the idea of narratives and how they are formulated and placed in
a well-defined policy objective. In 21st century and changing media ecology worldwide have
made the propagation of narratives easy as well as complex. It is very easy for hostile
narratives to take over and change the perception of masses to whom that particular narrative
is directed. Narratives are directed to shape the future of the target audience and is always
linked with a situation in hand. A narrative on Global War on Terror was linked to 9/11
attacks on New York. The most strategic narrative of all time that was poised to change the
future of million receivers worldwide.

India has been projecting narratives against Pakistan for decades and trying to portray
Pakistan as a terrorist state that is sponsoring terrorism in the state of Jammu & Kashmir.
Indian information infrastructure is very sophisticated and has influenced many through their
narratives. Pakistan does in its capacity try to counter these narratives through their own
competing narratives but have to work a lot in this domain in order to counter Indian threat.

Recommendations
In the light of above discussion there are certain recommendations that needs to be considered
in order to deal with hostile narratives of Indian establishment against Pakistan,

i. Pakistan should develop an effective information infrastructure that deals with

Indian hostile narratives.
ii. Pakistan should not respond to the hostile narratives without a strategy; because
responding abruptly to a hostile narrative is an indication of paranoia which is the
prime objective of a narrative.
iii. Pakistan should not claim innocence repeatedly because it will give publicity to a
particular narrative; target audience will actually start believing in it.
iv. It would be better for Pakistan to simply ignore narratives that do not have
spectrum of persuasion.
v. Pakistan when responding to a narrative should see what is the purpose, originator
and theme of that particular narrative is it really worth responding?

45
 Journal of Peace and Diplomacy

vi. Should come up with own narrative in order to minimize the effects of hostile
narrative originated from India. It is called “counter narrative” which gives a new
direction to target audience.

46