View PDF Version Previous Article Next Article

Open Access Article

This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

DOI: 10.1039/D2RA07911A (Review Article) RSC Adv. , 2023, 13, 4275-4302

Adsorption of heavy metal onto biomass-derived

activated carbon: review
Baoying Wanga, Jingming Lana, Chunmiao Bo a, Bolin Gong *a and Junjie Ou *abc
a School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Key Laboratory for Chemical Engineering and Technology, State Ethnic Affairs

Commission, Ningxia Key Laboratory of Solar Chemical Conversion Technology, North Minzu University, Yinchuan 750021, PR China. E-
mail: [email protected]
b CAS Key Laboratory of Separation Science for Analytical Chemistry, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of

Sciences, Dalian 116023, China. E-mail: [email protected]

c University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received 11th December 2022 , Accepted 24th January 2023

First published on 31st January 2023

Abstract
Due to the rapid development of the social economy and the massive increase in population, human beings continue to
undertake processing, and commercial manufacturing activities of heavy metals, which has caused serious damage to the
environment and human health. Heavy metals lead to serious environmental problems such as soil contamination and water
pollution. Human health and the living environment are closely affected by the handling of heavy metals. Researchers must find
several simple, economical and practical methods to adsorb heavy metals. Adsorption technology has been recognized as an
efficient and economic strategy, exhibiting the advantages of recovering and reusing adsorbents. Biomass-derived activated
carbon adsorbents offer large adjustable specific surface area, hierarchically porous structure, strong adsorption capacity, and
excellent high economic applicability. This paper focuses on reviewing the preparation methods of biomass-derived activated
carbon in the past five years. The application of representative biomass-derived activated carbon in the adsorption of heavy
metals preferentially was described to optimize the critical parameters of the activation type of samples and process
conditions. The key factors of the adsorbent, the physicochemical properties of the heavy metals, and the adsorption
conditions affecting the adsorption of heavy metals are highlighted. In addition, the challenges faced by biomass-derived
activated carbon are also discussed.

1. Introduction
Heavy metals can cause serious harm to the environment and human health because most of them are toxic, mutagenic and
carcinogenic. 1 Heavy metal pollution is one of the environmental pollution caused by heavy metals or heavy metal-derived
compounds such as lead, cadmium, cobalt, and copper, which are produced by mining, waste gas discharge, sewage irrigation and
industrial wastewater discharge. 2 These metals are also considered harmful at concentrations greater than or equal to 5 mg L−1. 3

These metal ions enter the atmosphere, water and soil, resulting in the concentration of heavy metals in the natural environment
seriously exceeding the standard. 4 Moreover, heavy metals in various chemical forms will accumulate, remain, and even migrate
through the biological chain of the ecosystem a"er entering the environment, further leading to irreversible harm to the environment
and the human body. The entry of heavy metals into human living environments is shown in Fig. 1 . 5 Great efforts have been made to
develop efficient techniques for heavy metal removal in recent years, such as ion exchange, 6 chemical precipitation, 7
electrochemistry, 8 membrane filtration, 9 and adsorption. 10 The carbon-based adsorption technique is widely applied in
environmental protection, and biomass-derived activated carbon is recognized as one of the most economical and promising
adsorbents for heavy metal removal. Fig. 2 shows recent publications obtained searching for “Heavy metal pollution” and “Removal of
heavy metal” in Topic via Web of Science. As can be seen, there were over 3500 publications related to heavy metal pollution and over
2500 publications associated with the removal of heavy metals in the period of 2018–2022.

Fig. 1 Environmental pollution map of heavy metals. This figure has been adapted/reproduced from ref. 11 with permission from
Journal of Hazardous Materials, copyright 2023.

Fig. 2 Number of scientific publications related to the removal of various heavy metals with different techniques.

The world produces a large amount of agricultural waste discarded indiscriminately every year, resulting in a huge waste of
resources. The rational application of agricultural waste can not only reduce environmental pressure, but also create economic value,
so it is necessary to develop new ways of recycling agricultural waste. Agricultural waste refers to the waste generated from agricultural
production, livestock breeding, agricultural and sideline products processing, and life activities of rural residents, mainly including
residues in farmland and orchard, livestock manure, and residues in agricultural and sideline products and domestic waste. These
wastes not only contain 65% to 90% of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, but also are rich in nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium,
magnesium, sulfur, as well as trace elements. It is essential to pay attention to the extensive use of agricultural waste for sustainable
development. Agricultural waste is usually the first choice to prepare biomass-derived activated carbon, attributing to its high specific
surface area, high stability, excellent adsorption properties, simple production process and low price. 12
This paper focuses on the advanced preparation progress of biomass-derived activated carbon and its application in the adsorption
of heavy metals from wastewater in the past five years. By collecting relevant information about heavy metals adsorbed by biomass
and using appropriate language, the carbonization, activation and modification of biomass-derived activated carbon are reviewed.
Furthermore, key factors controlling the adsorption process are summarized. The challenges of biomass-activated carbon facing in the
adsorption of heavy metals are also discussed. The summary scheme of whole article is shown in Fig. 3 .

Fig. 3 Summary scheme for the whole article.

2. Research status and control methods of heavy metals

2.1 Sources of heavy metals

Heavy metals are a large family with about 45 members in chemistry. Heavy metals have the commonness of irritation, target organ
toxicity, carcinogenicity and immunotoxicity, and excessive discharge of them in nature will seriously endanger the health of water, soil
and organism. 13–17 Heavy metals in the atmosphere mainly come from gases and dust produced by energy, transportation, metallurgy
and building materials. The wastewater from industrial and mining enterprises is discharged into the sewer and mixed with domestic
wastewater without diversion treatment, increasing the content of heavy metal in the soil of sewage irrigation area year by year. 18
During the stacking or treatment of both mining and industrial solid wastes, heavy metals are easy to move due to sunlight, rain and
water washing and diffuse into the surrounding soil and water body in a radial and funnel shape. Pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and
plastic film are necessary agricultural materials to promote the development of agricultural production. However, the unreasonable
long-term application can also lead to heavy metal pollution of soil.
Table 1 shows the sources and health effects of some harmful heavy metals such as lead, cadmium, mercury, chromium, and zinc
ordinary in living. Any of these heavy metals can cause headache, dizziness, insomnia, forgetfulness, nervous disorder, joint pain,
stones, cancer, etc 19 . For example, lead intake of human body is mainly through meat, fruits, fish, shrimp, eggs, etc, while lead in grains
and vegetables comes from the soil, water. There are two primary sources of lead in the atmosphere, man-made emissions and natural
sources. Natural source emissions are about one-tenth of man-made emissions. It is reported that the average proportion of zinc
measured in the soil near the smelter in Korea is 45.8–83.3%. Zinc concentration ranges higher than normal land. The average
concentrations of lead, zinc and cadmium near the plant in northern Iran (302, 311 and 9.83 mg kg−1, respectively) are also significantly

higher than those in the control soil. 20,21 Lead has harmful effects on multiple organ systems through different mechanisms. Some
heavy metals in water can be transformed into more toxic metal compounds under the action of microorganisms. Japan's pain is
caused by cadmium entering the water body, painful disease is a strange disease that first occurred in the watershed of Toyama
Prefecture, Japan, causing a large loss of calcium in human bones, osteoporosis, bone atrophy and joint pain. There was a patient who
sneezed and broke many parts of his body. The other patient finally had 73 fractures in his whole body, and his length was shortened
by 30 cm. His illness was very miserable. Painful disease has been prevalent in the local area for more than 20 years, causing more than
200 deaths. 22 A"er ingesting mercury, the human body will directly enter the liver and seriously damage the brain's optic nerve.
Chromium poisoning can cause limb numbness and mental abnormalities. And the clinical manifestations of zinc poisoning are
abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, gastrointestinal bleeding, anorexia, fatigue and lethargy. Copper is an essential material for the
development of industrialization and urbanization, and needed by more than 90% of modern industrial enterprises, copper smelters
have caused severe pollution. For example, more than 130 hectares of farmland near the largest non-ferrous metal smelters in China
have been polluted. 23 Heavy metal pollution is common and especially harmful. It is urgent to remove heavy metal pollution.

Table 1 Sources of heavy metals and their harm to human body and environment
Heavy metal Main sources
Lead Cosmetics, puffed food, water pipes, cast type, radioactive radiation, X-ray protective equipment, etc.
Cadmium Industrial wastewater, waste batteries, pigments, plastic stabilizers, coating corrosion prevention of steel parts, etc.
Mercury Precious metal smelting, cosmetics, lighting lamps, aquatic organisms, dental materials, etc.
Chromium Leather preparation, metal chromium plating, inferior cosmetic raw materials, etc.
Zinc Machinery manufacturing, and emissions from industries such as galvanizing, instrumentation, organic synthesis and papermaking

2.2 Removal methods of heavy metals

There are many treatment methods for heavy metal wastewater, including methods of ion exchange, chemical precipitation,
electrochemical, membrane filtration, adsorption, etc. Table 2 shows a few methods commonly utilized to remove heavy metals and
summarizes their advantages and disadvantages.

Table 2 Advantages and disadvantages of various methods for metal ion removal
Disadvantages
High pre-treatment requirements, excessive regeneration waste, long experimental cycles, high salt consumption and poor general applicab
More chemical precipitation and high treatment cost
nd remarkable pollutant removal effect Low treatment efficiency of trace samples, large power consumption, and requirements of conductive salt for wastewater quality
Membrane fouling, frequent membrane replacement, high cost
ement High usage and high cost

2.2.1 Ion exchange method. Ion exchange method is the exchange of metals in wastewater in the form of cations (anions) on

certain anionic (cationic) exchangers, 39 which usually exist as a solid. In previous studies, the surface positive charges inhibit the
usability of poly (m-phenylenediamine) as an adsorbent for removing heavy metal. To overcome these drawbacks, a magnetic
MnO2@Fe3O4/poly (m-phenylenediamine) core–shell adsorbent was designed. The surface negative charge of the prepared adsorbent

increases, and the adsorption of metal ions is significant enhanced by ion exchange with maximum capacities of 438.6 mg g−1 for lead

and 121.5 mg g−1 for cadmium. 40 Ion exchange is an important treatment method to remove heavy metals from wastewater, exhibiting

the advantages of large treatment capacity, good effluent quality, and recyclable heavy metal resources. However, these exchangers
are easy to oxidize and difficult to preserve. Excessive waste liquid will be generated during operation, resulting in high operation cost.
2.2.2 Chemical precipitation method. Chemical precipitation method is that the precipitant reacts with heavy metal ions to

produce metal salts with low solubility and then separates them from the aqueous solution through filtration or centrifugation, to
achieve the purpose of removing heavy metal ions from wastewater. 41 Typical chemical precipitation methods using lime, soda ash
and sodium sulfide for removals of heavy metals from aqueous solutions were compared. A removal of 99.9% from aqueous solutions
with three precipitants was achieved for copper and zinc at an initial concentration of 100 mg L−1, and lead was efficiently removed

(99.8%) by sodium sulfide. These precipitants showed good removal efficiency for heavy metals. 42 The treatment effect of chemical
precipitation method is negatively correlated with the solubility of metal salt. Lower solubility of metal salt causes better treatment
effect. Due to the influence of metal salt solubility and environmental conditions, it is difficult to make the concentration of heavy
metal ions reach the discharge standard by exploring the chemical precipitation method alone. A combination of chemical
precipitation and other methods to control heavy metal pollution will be the focus of research in the future. Tang et al. 43 designed a
novel combined biosorption precipitation process. Firstly, lead ions were selectively removed from wastewater by bagasse-fixed
column modified with pyromellitic dianhydride, then desorbed into concentrated eluent and recycled by adding chemical precipitant.
The maximum adsorption capacity reached 242 mg g−1, which was much higher than that prior to modification (60.5 mg g−1). Chemical

precipitation method has the advantages of simple process, which can be completed at room temperature and in a wide pH range, and
is not affected by the low concentration of heavy metal ions. However, large doses of chemicals need to be injected, and the treatment
of sludge generated by chemical precipitation will increase the cost.
2.2.3 Electrochemical method. The electrochemical method is to utilize the external electric field to make the oxidation–reduction

reaction of metal ions on the electrode, mainly including electrocoagulation and electrolysis. 44 For example, a"er extraction by citrate
at initial pH of 8.3 and electrochemical adsorption at 0.9 V for 7 days, the concentration of copper in soil decreased from 1090 to 281
mg kg−1, while the concentration of zinc decreased from 262 to 39 mg kg−1. 45 The electrode-modifying material was prepared by

chemical activation of rice husks with phosphoric acid and calcined at 450 °C. The results obtained at optimal conditions are as follows:
10% of activated carbon in the carbon paste, electrolysis potential of −0.9 V, accumulation time of 8 min, pH of 8 and the pH at zero
load point of 3.45, the results showed that the modified electrode is more sensitive and stable. 22,46 But the concentration of heavy
metal ions will not be greatly reduced by electrochemical method, it consumes a lot of energy.
2.2.4 Membrane filtration method. Membrane filtration method refers to the membrane separation technology driven by hydraulic

pressure. As an advanced means of water treatment, membrane filtration method has the advantages of simple operation, small floor
area, good selective permeability, no phase change in the separation process, and can be carried out at room temperature. 47–49 For
example, Deng et al. 50 fabricated a novel nanocomposite films to treat 240 and 170 mL of copper ions and lead ions. The membrane
separation method exhibits the advantages of high efficiency, energy saving and no secondary pollution, the long-term operation of
membrane filtration will cause membrane pollution and gradual reduction of filtration capacity. The membrane pollution is a
significant constraint in the wide application of membrane filtration.
2.2.5 Adsorption method. The adsorption method is to physically or chemically adsorb heavy metal ions in wastewater through

the fluffy structure or special functional groups of adsorption materials with high specific surface area. 51,52 Adsorption materials can
be divided into polymeric materials, inorganic materials, carbon-based materials and biological adsorption materials according to
their chemical structure. 53 Table 3 summarizes the representative kinds of adsorbents classified by chemical structure, including
polyacrylamide resins, alumina, zeolite, activated carbon peel and microalgae. 54 Their advantages, disadvantages and properties are
introduced in detail.

Table 3 Different types of adsorbents

Adsorbent BET surface area (m2 g−1) Aperture (nm) Characteristic

Polymer adsorbent Polyacrylamide resin ≤1000 0.3–4 High adsorption rate, large adsorption capacity, good performa

Inorganic adsorbent Aluminium oxide 200–500 2–50 Strong affinity, good purification performance of acid waste ga

Zeolite 500–1000 0.4–1 Regular microporous structure, good thermal stability, hydroth

Carbon based adsorbent Activated carbon 500–1000 2–50 Rich microporous and mesoporous structures, adsorption of or

Biomass adsorption material Microalgae — — Fast growth and reproduction, strong tolerance, high removal r

Agricultural waste — — Wide source, low cost, adsorption of dyes and heavy metals. No

Common polymer adsorption materials include polystyrene, polyacrylate, polyacrylamide resins with good plasticity. Their
functional groups with specific properties can be easily introduced through chemical modification. Additionally, polymer materials can
also be swelled, which will expand their three-dimensional structure and is conducive to the mass transfer rate of adsorption.
Researcher studied the adsorption performance of lead and copper ions using macroporous polystyrenic chelating resin with a
thiourea functional group. The ion-exchange recovery of Cu2+ exceeded 95% with resin dosage of 0.070 g mL−1 in the pH range of 2.5–

4.5. 61 The resins have the advantages of fast adsorption speed, high adsorption capacity and wide application range. Furthermore,
they can be utilized well at low temperature and normal pressure conditions and regenerated a"er simple treatment. However, the
disadvantage of ion exchange resin is relatively low selectivity. 62 The ions of the resin itself are generally low valence ions, so when the
resin contacts with water, the high valence ions in water will be adsorbed and the low valence ions will be released. For example,
divalent ions are more easily adsorbed than monovalent ions. 63
Common inorganic adsorbents include alumina and zeolite, which have the characteristics of rich reserves and low price. Alumina is
made by heating and dehydration of aluminum hydrate, whose properties depend on the structural state of initial hydroxide. 64 It is
divided into alkaline alumina, acidic alumina, and neutral alumina. Alkaline alumina is suitable for separating alkaline substances
(such as amines and alkaloids) and acid-sensitive samples (such as acetals and glycosides) and neutral substances such as
hydrocarbons and steroids. Acidic alumina is appropriate for separating acidic substances such as organic acids, amino acids,
pigments and aldehydes. Neutral alumina is proper for separating aldehydes, ketones, quinones, glycosides, nitro compounds and
unstable substances in an alkaline medium, such as esters and lactones. 65 The activated carbon was prepared using rice husk and
reacted with it using caustic soda and alumina at 500 °C. The adsorption efficiency of uranium was 96.35% at an equilibrium time of 1
h, and an initial uranium concentration of 121 mg L−1. 66 Activated alumina also shows good adsorption properties due to its high pore

surface activity and affinity for water. 67 Zeolite also showed excellent adsorption properties. It has a uniform pore size. And it has been
widely used in gas adsorption and separation, gas and liquid drying and separation of n-isoalkanes. Compared with other adsorbents,
zeolite also has special adsorption performance. Under the condition of low partial pressure (or low concentration) and high
temperature, the molecular sieve is significantly superior over other adsorbents. The pores of zeolite are easy to be blocked. 68
Carbon-based adsorbent refers to the porous carbonaceous material with high specific surface made of coal or organic matter.
Activated carbon is one of the most widely used carbonaceous materials. A new type of activated carbon was prepared, it takes straw
as precursor because the carbon element content in the straw was about 40%. The removal efficiencies of heavy metals (Cu2+, Cr4+ and

Fe3+) aren't less than 90%. And the adsorption–desorption experiments indicated that the adsorbent was sufficiently reusable. 69

Activated carbon contains many pores and has an excellent adsorption capacity it is applied in a wide range of applications such as
waste water treatment, decolorization, catalysis and medical applications. 70
Bio-adsorbent refers to biomaterials that can adsorb heavy metals and other pollutants. At present, fungi, bacteria, algae and
agricultural wastes are widely studied and applied as biosorption materials. This material generally contains a large number of active
groups such as hydroxyl, carboxyl and amino groups, which can have electrostatic adsorption, chelation, coordination and inorganic
micro precipitation with heavy metal ions. In northern Chile, Chlorella and Echinococcus scenarios were tested for metal mine tail
water removal. The removal rates of copper and molybdenum by microalgae were 64.7% and 99.9%. 71 Although biomass materials are
good, biomass such as microalgae is not easy to survive, and the adsorption capacity is not high. The adsorption capacity of pomelo
peel to methylene blue and chromium ions in wastewater was explored. The maximum adsorption capacities for methylene blue and
chromium ions were 219 mg g −1 and 11.3 mg g −1, respectively. The main adsorption mechanism for methylene blue is electrostatic

attraction and hydrogen bond formation, while the adsorption mechanism for chromium ion is electrostatic attraction. 72 Although
biomass adsorbent has the advantages of low price, its adsorption capacity is lower than other adsorption materials.
In a word, the adsorption method is considered as one of the most favorable methods to deal with pollutant due to its advantages of
good treatment effect, wide application range, easy recovery, comprehensive source of adsorbent, reusability and the treatment effect
of adsorption method is less affected by the concentration of heavy metal ions. 73 The carbonaceous materials are considered as the
efficient adsorbent because of high surface area and a variety of active surface sites. 74 However, the regeneration of industrial
activated carbon is a high cost and complex process, which makes the application of this material economically infeasible. In addition,
other types of carbon materials are not suitable to be adsorbents because of their high cost or poor adsorption performance. For
example, the adsorbents were prepared by oxidation of multiwall carbon nanotube, then derivatizing the oxidized product with
hydroxyl amine, hydrazine and amino acid. The adsorption capacity of the adsorbent for lead ion is 24.34 mg g−1. 25 In order to reduce

the overall cost and increase adsorption capacity in this adsorption process, using low-cost and due to the rich structure of biomass as
the precursor of activated carbon has become a promising strategy.

3. Biomass-derived activated carbon

As one of the most miraculous materials in nature, carbon materials have excellent properties such as resistance to acids and bases,
corrosion, high and low temperatures, and biocompatibility. Additionally, through its sp electron orbital hybridization, it can mutate
into different forms and properties, including excellent electrical conductor, semiconductor material and insulator, opaque black
material or explicit transparent material and so on. Fig. 4 shows the manifestations of carbon with different dimensions. 75 Carbon
materials have played a significant role throughout history as human civilization has progressed. At each stage of history, carbon had a
unique expression. Since the invention of fire, porous charcoal has been used consciously or unconsciously. For example, the use of
charcoal to stop bleeding, the use of soot to heal wounds, the use of carbon sterile sheets. From the deodorization and disinfection of
clothes, food and housing in daily life to the profound evolution of living places. From protective escape materials in personal space to
environmental purification in public places. 76

Fig. 4 Carbon allotropes in different dimensions. Environmental pollution map of heavy metals. This figure has been
adapted/reproduced from ref. 75 with permission from Carbon, copyright 2023.

Different types of activated carbon have emerged following the advent of coal and oil and the rapid development of modern
industry. Activated carbon is widely used, and the raw materials for manufacturing activated carbon are also various. There are many
sources of raw materials for making activated carbon, including animals, plants, coal, petroleum by-products, and other raw materials
such as synthetic resin and organic substances. In general, carbon materials can be divided into three categories, as summarized in
Table 4 . Mineral activated carbon can be widely used in many fields of liquid phase application and gas-phase application, it is difficult
to make high-performance activated carbon in high-demand fields due to containing high impurities. Furthermore, with the increase of
raw material cost in recent years, its advantages gradually receded. Activated carbon prepared from waste car tires has also been
widely used. The waste car tires need high-temperature pyrolysis, which consumes a lot of energy and costs a lot. Among many raw
materials, the advantages of biomass to prepare activated carbon are particularly prominent. Modern agriculture uses a large amount
of chemical fertilizer to replace farmyard organic fertilizer and artificial feed to replace agricultural waste feed. In addition, the
intensive and large-scale development of modern agriculture has broken the waste recycling in traditional agriculture. As a result,
much agricultural waste has been accumulated, resulting in serious environmental problems and resource waste. Therefore, the
rational utilization of agricultural waste resources has become a great challenge faced by most countries. The preparation of activated
carbon from biomass realizes the concept of waste utilization and resource utilization. The harmless treatment of agricultural waste is
an effective way to control agricultural, environmental pollution, improve the rural environment and develop a circular and
sustainable economy. As a result, activated carbon fabricated from biomass has made great contributions to energy conservation and
environmental protection through waste reuse.

Table 4 Characteristics of activated carbon prepared from different raw materials

Activated carbon Raw materials
Biomass-activated carbon Coconut husk, wood flour, coffee bean stalks, oil palm husk, sugarcane bagasse, manure, animal bones, etc.
Mineral raw materials activated carbon Peat, bituminous coal, anthracite, bitumen and petroleum and their processing products, etc.

Other raw materials activated carbon Waste rubber, waste plastic, etc.

According to the definition of the International Energy Agency (IEA), “biomass” refers to various organisms formed through
photosynthesis. 84 Its definition can be divided into broad and narrow sense. 85 The former includes all plants, microorganisms, and
waste generated by them, while the latter refers to inedible crop by-products, agricultural and forestry wastes such as wheat straw,
fruit shell, wood, and other lignocellulose, and livestock manure ( Fig. 5 ). 86 Biomass materials are renewable, widely available,
inexpensive, environmentally compatible, porous and environmentally friendly, and the adsorbents prepared a"er modification have
the advantages of high selectivity and removal rates. 87,88

Fig. 5 Schematic diagram of using biological waste as adsorbent.

Biomass activated carbon and activated carbon are both carbonaceous pyrolysis materials and important products of
environmental technology. The main raw materials of activated carbon are divided into four categories, including coal activated
carbon, wood activated carbon, synthetic activated carbon and other types of activated carbon. The precursor material of biomass
activated carbon is only biomass.

3.1 Preparation of biomass derived activated carbon

3.1.1 Carbonization of biomass. Fabrication of biomass-derived activated carbon has been developed. Fig. 6 is the flow chart of

carbonization and activation of biological activated carbon. 89–91 The carbonization process is the carbonize of biomass in an anaerobic
or anoxic environment at 400–600 °C, and the process of removing oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, sulfur, and other elements to
manufacture materials with high carbon content. 92,93 Biomass is thermochemically transformed to produce carbon rich solid material,
which is called biomass-derived activated carbon. 94 There are three stages of carbonization. First, the temperature is lower than 110
°C, the raw material gradually loses water, the internal molecules do not change. Second, the raw material is heated to 350 °C, the
carboxyl and carbonyl functional group release carbonize gases such as H2O, CO and CO2. 95 The temperature rises to 400 °C, a large

number of chemical bonds, including C–C bond, O–H bond, C–H bond, benzene ring and ether bond are broken. Minor molecular gases
and small molecular groups of hydroxyl, methyl, hydroxymethyl and methoxy are generated through chemical bond recombination,
decarbonization, dehydration, and polycondensation. These small molecular groups gradually form water, methane, and methanol,
meanwhile, a large number of benzene free radicals form polycyclic aromatic compounds. When the temperature is 450–500 °C, the
volatile substances are removed so as to improve the relative content of fixed carbon in the carbonize products. 69,96

Fig. 6 Preparing biomass-derived activated carbon (including carbonization, chemical activation, and physical activation).

3.1.2 Activation of biomass-derived activated carbon. Carbon materials are commonly activated via both chemical and physical

activation approaches. Chemical activation methods can be divided into two types depending on the operation. The first method is to
mix the activator with the biomass in a specific ratio (or soak the biomass raw material with the activator), the carbonization and
activation are then carried out simultaneously under high temperature conditions. Li et al. 97 prepared corncob activated carbon by
one-step chemical activation method of phosphoric acid. The adsorption result showed that the optimum mass ratio of corncob to
phosphoric acid was 1 : 2, and the carbonization temperature was 500 °C. Under these conditions, the removal rate of chromium was
more than 98%, and the maximum adsorption capacity was 9.99 mg g−1. The concentration of residual chromium in water was less

than 0.05 mg L−1. In another method, the carbonized carbon is activated with an activator in a certain ratio at high temperature.

Chemical activation is known to induce specific surface features of porosity and functionality which play a definite role in enhancing
the adsorptive potential of the developed activated carbons. The physical and chemical properties of activated carbon are affected by
the type of biological reagent and the impregnation time. The effect of zinc chloride and potassium hydroxide on the activation of
lignocellulose activated carbon were investigated, respectively. 98 The carbon impregnated with zinc chloride produces micropores,
while the carbon impregnated with potassium hydroxide forms a wide pore size distribution. The activated carbon obtained by both
activation methods exhibited large specific surface area, and the pore size is mainly composed of mesopores and micropores. The
chemical activation method possesses the advantages of good treatment efficiency of activated carbon, wide application range and
easy recovery. In the process of chemical activation, many chemical reagents such as potassium hydroxide, phosphoric acid, zinc
chloride, and potassium carbonate are the most commonly used as chemical activators ( Fig. 7 ).

Fig. 7 Schematic diagram of activation mechanism by alkaline and acidic activating agent. Carbon allotropes in different
dimensions. Environmental pollution map of heavy metals. This figure has been adapted/reproduced from ref. 99 with permission
from Science of the Total Environment, copyright 2023.

Table 5 shows in detail the effect of different raw materials and different proportions of activators on the specific surface area of
activated carbon. Activators can be divided into alkaline, acidic, neutral, self-activator so on. Carbon materials with different raw
materials and activators have different specific surface area. Phosphoric acid is a common acidic activator. When phosphoric acid is
used, the activation temperature is lower, and the activation time is shorter. Potassium and sodium hydroxide are the most effective
activators for preparing biomass-derived activated carbon with a high specific surface area. The specific surface area of biomass-
derived activated carbon prepared from Chinese fir bark and longan shell with potassium hydroxide is higher than 1000 m2 g−1. The

specific surface area of activated carbon derived from guava seed and honeycomb biomass activated by sodium hydroxide is higher
than 2000 m2 g−1. It is generally believed that potassium hydroxide and sodium hydroxide can inhibit the formation of tar, reduce the

activation reaction temperature, accelerate the removal of non-carbon components and improve the carbonize reaction rate. Sodium
amino and magnesium chloride are neutral activators. The specific surface area of biomass-derived activated carbon prepared by them
is higher than 1000 m2 g−1, the activator for a neutral activator is used at higher temperature. The biomass-derived activated carbon

activated by potassium phosphate as a self-activator has slightly lower specific surface area, it can simplify the procedure, reduce the
cost and the risk of environmental consequences, and better adapt to scalable production.

Table 5 Process parameters and specific surface area of biomass-derived activated carbon prepared with different activators

Biomass source Activator Activating agent to biomass ratio Activation conditions BET surface, area (m2 g−1) Ref.

Coconut shell Phosphoric acid 1:1 800 °C, 2 h 2648 100

Orange peel Phosphoric acid 2:1 700 °C, 1 h 2210 101

Coffee grounds Phosphoric acid 1.8 : 1 450 °C, 1 h 925 102

Chinese fir bark Potassium hydroxide 4 : 1 700 °C, 2 h 1242 103

Longan shell Potassium hydroxide 2 : 1 800 °C, 2 h 3260 104

Guava seed Sodium hydroxide 3:1 800 °C, 1 h 2574 105

Honeycomb Sodium hydroxide 4:1 650 °C, 2 h 3291 106

Chestnut shell Sodium amino 3:1 450 °C, 1 h 2615 107

Textile Magnesium chloride 1 : 1 900 °C, 1.5 h 1307 108

Lignin Potassium phosphate 1 : 1 900 °C, 2 h 477 109

Physical activation is also known as gas activation. The feedstock is carbonized in the absence of oxygen or inert gas at a certain
temperature. 110–113 The commonly used activation gases include oxidizing gases such as steam, air, CO2 and O2. 114–118 In the process of

activation, carbon reacts endothermically with H2O and CO2, and the reaction rate is moderate. The reaction between carbon and O2 is

exothermic, and the reaction rate is fast. 119–124 Therefore, the reaction time is shortened when O2 is added to the mixture to burn the

intermediate products H2 and CO and release heat. And the reaction of carbon with CO2 and water vapor makes the porous structure

highly developed. 125 Physical activation also has little environmental pollution. 126 The physical activation method of CO2 and steam

agent to activate were investigated. 127 The activation under the condition of CO2 and steam saturation correspondingly increases the

specific surface area from 89 to 653 m2 g−1 and from 89 to 1015 m2 g−1, respectively. Steam also promotes the generation of mesoporous

structures of carbon products, thus expanding their potential applications. Jiang et al. 128 also investigated the pore properties and
structural characteristics of activated carbon prepared from coconut shells. According to the thermochemical properties of coconut
shell, the process was characterized by carbonization at 500 °C with a constant heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under nitrogen flow and then

switching to gasification with CO2. The gas temperature in the same reactor was set to 700–900 °C for activation. The pores of coconut

shell-activated carbon increased with the increase of activation temperature and holding time. These findings are attributed to the
severe reaction of lignocellulose-based carbon with CO2. The surface area reached 1100 m2 g−1, and the mesoporous rate exceeded

40%. Physical activation method shows excellent advantages. More different biomass precursors are activated by the different
activation method, whose experimental conditions and biomass-derived activated carbon physical and chemical properties are
presented in Table 6 . It is easy to find that the type of activator, the time and temperature of carbonization, the ratio of raw materials
to activator, and the raw materials have severe impacts on the specific surface area of activated carbon.
to activator, and the raw materials have severe impacts on the specific surface area of activated carbon.

Table 6 Process parameters and specific surface area of biomass-derived activated carbon prepared by different physical activation
methods

Experimental condition

Biomass source Carbonization Activation BET surface, area (m

Bean dregs Nitrogen, 800 °C, 0.5 h 30 mL steam, 1000 °C, 0.5 h 1004

Bamboo Nitrogen, 10 °C min−1 950 °C 80 mL min−1 ammonia, 950 °C, 2 h 2032

Eucalyptus original wood chip Oxygen, 2.5 °C min−1 700 °C 700 °C, 2 h 870

Rice husk 200 mL min−1 nitrogen, 900 °C 0.4 mL min−1 steam, 900 °C, 0.5 h 1343

Mushroom substrate 200 cm3 min−1 nitrogen, 900 °C 2.0 mL min−1 steam, 900 °C, 1 h 332

Jute Nitrogen, 500 °C, 1 h Carbon dioxide, 800 °C, 1.5 h 1120

Amazon Peshawar fiber Oxygen, 100 °C h−1 550 °C, 1 h 150 mL min−1 carbon dioxide, 800 °C, 2 h 804

Hops 170 mL min−1 nitrogen, 10 °C min−1 550 °C, 1 h 250 mL min−1 carbon dioxide, 800 °C, 1 h 417

Apple branch Oxygen, 500 °C Nitrogen, carbon dioxide, 500 °C, 2 h 526

Large 100 cm3 min−1 nitrogen, 5 °C min−1 300 °C, 2 h 165 cm3 min−1 carbon dioxide, 750 °C, 1 h 740

3.2 Modification of biomass-derived activated carbon

The adsorption performance of biomass-derived activated carbon is determined by its physical and chemical properties. The physical
property of biomass-derived activated carbon refer to its specific surface area and pore structure, and the adsorption capacity of
carbon is affected by these factors. The chemical property of biomass-derived activated carbon depends on the type and number of
surface functional groups, which impact the interaction between the activated carbon and pollutants. 139–145 The existing biomass-
derived activated carbon possesses certain limitations in the actual wastewater treatment due to large variety of pollutants and high
standard requirements for wastewater discharge. 146–148 Modification techniques for biomass-derived activated carbon are very
important. And the physicochemical properties of biomass-derived activated carbon are closely related to the raw materials,
carbonization method, activation and modification techniques. The modification techniques of activated carbon include physical,
chemical or microbiological methods by changing the physical structural properties or surface chemical functional groups of biomass-
derived activated carbon. 149,150
3.2.1 Chemical modification. The functional groups on the surface of activated carbon give activated carbon a certain degree of

acidity, alkalinity and polarity, which largely determine the type of pollutants adsorbed and the adsorption capacity of activated
carbon. Therefore, the content of these functional groups on the activated carbon can be changed, and the selective adsorption
capacity to specific substances is also changed. Chemical modification of activated carbon is changing the inherent functional groups
on the surface of activated carbon by physical or chemical means to prepare adsorbents with specific adsorption properties. Common
chemical modification techniques include acid modification, alkali modification, load modification and plasma modification.
Acid modification technique is the oxidation treatment of activated carbon with oxidizing agents such as nitric acid, sulfuric acid,
citric acid, and hypochlorous acid under appropriate conditions. 151–154 The functional groups on the surface of activated carbon are
oxygen-containing functional groups, such as hydroxyl, carboxyl, carbonyl and lactone groups, which are introduced through the
oxidation pathway. 155–157 The introduction of carboxyl groups on the surface of biomass-derived activated carbon will play an
important role in the adsorption of metal ions. The hydrogen in the carboxyl group will be ion-exchanged by metal ions, and the
carboxyl group will chelate with metal ions. 158,159 Li et al. 160 employed in situ modification of the activated carbon with phosphoric
acid and disodium EDTA salts to increase the adsorption of nickel ions. The adsorption capacity was increased from 15.4 to 27.9 mg g−1.

Nickel ions were adsorbed by cation exchange, electrostatic interaction and surface complexation mechanism, and the adsorption
amount was proportional to its surface functional groups under appropriate environments. A similar experiment is that the spent
coffee grounds were used as a precursor to obtain activated carbons. The raw material was modified with phosphoric acid. The specific
surface area of the carbon increased to 720 m2 g−1, and the pore volume increased to 0.334 cm3 g−1. And all the obtained carbons

possessed acidic (mainly carboxyl) groups and exhibited an amorphous structure. 161 These results indicated that activated carbon-
containing carboxyl groups have very promising adsorption prospects. The pyrolysis-driven eucalyptus carbon was treated with
phosphoric acid. 162 , whose surface area was increased almost fivefold from 253 to 1265 m2 g−1. The modified biomass-derived

activated carbon was able to remove 99.76% of chromium, which was higher than the unmodified activated carbon (25.24%). Such
high adsorption capacity was attributed to not only excellent specific surface area, but also the phosphoric acid modification which
increases the oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface. Li et al. 163 investigated the metal removal efficiency of carbonized
sewage sludge obtained at 500 °C, and nitric acid modification. The prepared biomass-derived activated carbons removed 98.9%,
42.6% and 34.6% of copper, zinc and aluminum ions, respectively, in less than 5 min. The complexation of functional groups to metal
ions not only shortened the adsorption time, but also exhibited higher removal efficiency.
Alkali modification of activated carbon refers to the use of alkaline reagents such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide and
ammonia to modify the activated carbon. 164,165 For example, the ZnO-activated carbon was successfully prepared from sugarcane
bagasse with sodium hydroxide impregnation, followed by carbonization, and the ZnO-activated carbon nanocomposite was finally
synthesized by the hydrothermal method. 166 The removal efficiency of chromium reached 97% at pH = 2. Additionally, the adsorption
capacity of activated carbon for chromium ions in wastewater was increased a"er the modification in a high-temperature environment.
Biomass-derived activated carbon is modified in the temperature range of 950 °C, producing a surface area >2000 m2 g−1. 118 The

microporous structure, specific surface area, iodine adsorption value, and nitrogen-containing groups on the surface of modified
activated carbon increased. Similarly, researchers synthesized biomass-derived activated carbon with Schiff base structure by
ammonia-assisted hydrothermal treatment of industrial hemicellulose and applied to adsorb toxic hexavalent chromium, possessing a
high adsorption capacity of 349.6 mg g−1. 167 There were electrostatic gravitational, redox, and chelation interactions between the

amino groups, Schiff base structure, heterocyclic nitrogen of biomass-derived activated carbon and chromium ions. Although alkali
modification has great advantage of improving the adsorption capacity, the adsorption process is o"en complex. 168–170
Loading modification of activated carbon means that activated carbon is treated by soaking in the solution of the loaded material,
and surfactants such as polyethylene polyamine and polyethyleneimine are combined to the surface of activated carbon. Such
activators do not significantly change the acidity and alkalinity of the activated carbon surface, can improve the adsorption capacity of
the activated carbon for pollutants. 171,172 Jiang et al. 173 investigated the removal of lead ions from wastewater by polyethyleneimine
loaded activated carbon, and the removal rate of lead ions increased from 32.6 to 214 mg g−1. Through the study of polyethyleneimine

modified activated carbon, it is not difficult to find that the adsorption capacity of modified activated carbon for formaldehyde also
increased significantly. 174 The adsorption capacity of unmodified activated carbon was 190 mg g−1, and the adsorption capacity of

activated carbon a"er loading 2.50 g of polyethyleneimine was up to 650 mg g−1, which was about 3.42 times that of unmodified

activated carbon.
Plasma modification is an efficient, easy-to-operate, and environmentally friendly surface modification technique. In many recent
researches, it plays an essential role as a new technology for the modification of activated carbon. The pore structure of activated
carbon is changed, and the surface functional groups such as acidic hydroxyl, carbonyl and carboxyl are generated. 175–177 Activated
carbon particles from peat soils were modified by a flying jet plasma torch. The samples were dried at 70 °C for two nights, carbonized
at 800 °C for 4 h, and then sieved on a 2 mm sieve. The surface morphology and chemical composition changed significantly. The
increase in mass oxygen percentage indicated an increase in the carbonyl C O group, and higher polarity and solubility in polar liquids,
an effective surface area increased from 1069 to 1270 m2 g−1, which more conducive to adsorption. 178

3.2.2 Physical modification. Physical modification refers to the modification of activated carbon by heating. Under its action, the

specific surface area, pore volume and pore space of activated carbon will change significantly. 179–181 Activated carbon with food waste
as precursor was prepared by microwave modification. The thermal stability a"er physical modification is higher than that of the raw
material. In addition, the specific surface area and total pore volume of modified activated carbon are increased. 182 Wang et al. 183
investigated the effect of three organic acid ammoniums (ammonium succinate, ammonium tartrate and ammonium citrate) on the
activated carbon during microwave modification. Microwave modification refers to the modification of samples under specific
microwave power. Microwave modification has little effect on the specific surface area of activated carbon, the functional groups have
obvious changes. The nitrogen content and basic groups of all modified carbon increased, the surface area decreased. Despite the low
surface area of the modified reed-based activated carbons, they have a higher adsorption capacity (115 mg g−1) due to the higher

amount of nitrogen-containing groups. The role of microwave in the synthesis of carbon adsorbent was explored. The adsorption
capacity of modified carbon to lead ion was as high as 282 mg g−1. Microwave heating modified activated carbon changed the surface

structure of activated carbon and surface chemistry groups. Excessive heating treatment can destroy the unstable oxygen-containing
functional groups on the surface of activated carbon, thus weakening the chelating ability of activated carbon with metal ions and
reducing the adsorption performance of metal ions. 184
3.2.3 Microbial modification. In the past decades, researchers have found that the special structure of activated carbon surfaces

provides a good living environment for the parasitization and reproduction of microorganisms. 185,186 Microbial modification of
activated carbon means adsorbing microorganisms on the surface of activated carbon to change the adsorption performance of
activated carbon. 187 Microbial modification of biomass-derived activated carbon exhibits many advantages in application, such as high
activity, fast reaction speed, strong toxicity resistance, easy separation of products and continuous operation. Therefore, microbial
modification technology has been rapidly developed and widely used in the field of water treatment in recent years. Microorganisms
fixed on the surface of activated carbon can preoxidize some organic matter, reduce the contact between organic matter and activated
carbon adsorption sites, and prolong the service life of activated carbon. However, microbial-modified activated carbon also has some
disadvantages, such as the propagation of microorganisms on the surface of activated carbon and thickening of membrane will hinder
the diffusion of adsorbed substances in the pores of activated carbon and reduce the adsorption efficiency. 188–190
3.2.4 Other modifications. With the continuous development of activated carbon, new activated carbon modification technologies

have emerged for specific applications. 191 Gohr et al. 192 successfully modified the activated carbon by mechanical friction on the
activated carbon in the presence of sodium hydroxide and chloroacetic acid. The maximum adsorption of activated carbons for methyl
blue and crystalline violet was 124 and 120 mg g−1, respectively. This result demonstrated the mechanical friction technique in the

modification of activated carbons and the functional groups and active sites (phenol, alcohol, and carboxyl groups) on the activated
carbon adsorbent have a significant effect on their use in considerable adsorption affinity for dye removal. Metal-modified carbon
materials have been widely utilized for fluoride removal, the traditional impregnation by soaking method suffers from low loading of
metals and substantial use of chemicals. A new method for preparing zirconium modified activated carbon fiber by drop coating
method is proposed. Using the same amount of chemicals, the drop-coating method yielded 5.5 times higher fluoride adsorption
capacity than the soaking method due to more effective loading of zirconium onto activated carbon fibers. The advantages of drop
coating are simple experimental process, mechanized process and high production efficiency. However, the drop coating method also
possesses some disadvantages, such as uneven drop coating. 193
In summary, acid modification is one of the most applied and technically mature methods so far, which is also one of the most
beneficial methods to improve the adsorption capacity of activated carbon for metal ions in aqueous solution. 194–198 The adsorption
capacity of metal ions a"er alkali modification is weaker than that a"er acid modification. The reason is that alkali modification
reduces the amount of acidic oxygen-containing functional groups on the surface of activated carbon, resulting in the binding sites
reduction of metal ions on the surface of activated carbon. Moreover, the increase of nitrogen-containing functional groups enhances
the alkalinity, and the competition mechanism between OH− and metal ions under an alkaline environment leads to the decrease of

adsorption performance of activated carbon for metal ions. Heating modification and alkali modification are beneficial to improve the
adsorption of organic matter in aqueous solutions by activated carbon. 199–204 Loading modification allows for targeted loading of
chemical substances on the surface of the activated carbon to enhance its adsorption capacity for the target substance. 205 Microbial
modification, which uses microorganisms adsorbed on the surface of activated carbon, can pre-degrade organic matter in an aqueous
solution for the purpose of extending the service life of activated carbon. 206 The special properties of activated carbon have led to its
wide application as an adsorbent in wastewater treatment. 207 With the development of activated carbon modification technology,
special modification treatment can be applied to activated carbon according to the characteristics of pollutants in the water
environment so as to realize the improvement of selective adsorption capacity of activated carbon in water treatment. Although many
modification technologies have been proposed in recent years, many of them are not suitable for practical application because of their
low efficiency, high energy consumption or serious toxic by-products. The research on the modification of activated carbon by
combining existing modification methods is not yet in-depth. And the modification technology to improve the removal ability of two or
more pollutants (such as metal ions and organic matter) has not yet been developed.

4. Key factors to control the adsorption of heavy metals by biomass derived

activated carbon
4.1 Characteristics of biomass derived activated carbon

Three important factors including specific surface area, pore structure, and surface chemical functional group would affect the
adsorption capacity of biomass-derived activated carbon. 208,209
4.1.1 Specific surface area. For any adsorbents, a large specific surface area usually means superior adsorption performance,

because the surface area provides adsorption space in the adsorption process. 210 Researcher summarizes the N2 adsorption

desorption curves of four ultra-high specific surface areas. The specific surface areas of four samples were 1348, 2004, 1324 and 1974
m2 g−1, respectively. The result shows that high specific surface area makes it have better contact wettability between electrode

material and electrolyte and excellent adsorption ability in removing pollution. 211 Zhang et al. 212 carbonized rape straw powder at
different temperatures and then magnetized the activated carbon by hydrothermal method to prepare magnetized activated carbon.
The modified biomass-derived activated carbon exhibited a high specific surface area (553 m2 g−1) and maximum adsorption capacities

of lead ions of 253 mg g−1 and cadmium ions of 73.3 mg g−1. To increase the surface area of carbon adsorbent, modification of carbon

adsorbent by heat, acid, alkali, microwave, ozone, plasma and impregnation are commonly applied to modify carbon adsorbent. For
example, humic acid-coated nitrogen-doped magnetic porous carbon was successfully synthesized by lignin separated from black
liquor as the main carbon source. 213 The porous carbon had a high adsorption capacity of 131 mg g−1 for chromium ions, and the BET-

specific surface area of the porous carbon was 748 m2 g −1. Such a high surface is expected to provide a large number of adsorption

sites for metal ions. The adsorption material obtained by impregnating zeolite with iron salt possessed a high specific surface of 1358
m2 g−1, and also can effectively remove more than 99% of lead ions in 20 min. The maximum adsorption capacity reached 790 mg g−1,

which was much higher than those of most previously reported unmodified zeolite. 214
The specific surface area of carbon materials can be increased by increasing the proper temperature and concentration of acid or
alkali treatment, too high or too low temperature and pH will lead to the collapse of existing pores, thus reducing the specific surface
area. Although most of the research has been conducted on activated carbons with large specific surface areas. 215,216 However, a high
surface area of activated carbon does not necessarily mean that it has the best adsorption capacity for organic compounds. Kharrazi et
al. 217 investigated the effect of pretreatment of elm sawdust with alkali metal on the adsorption of lead and chromium ions. The
adsorption capacity of activated carbon for lead ions increased significantly from 233 to 1430 mg g−1. However, the specific surface area

of the magnesium chloride leached pretreated carbon (585 m2 g−1) was found to be significantly reduced compared to the pristine

carbon from the nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms and pore size distribution. In the preparation of oxidized mesoporous
carbon with fluffy structure from petroleum asphalt, it can be found that the specific surface area decreased from 479 to 334 m2 g−1.

However, the prepared carbon exhibited excellent absorption performance for the removal of malachite green and led ions with
maximum adsorption capacities of 963 and 198 mg g−1, respectively. 218

4.1.2 Pore structure. Biomass-derived activated carbon is a porous adsorbent, and its morphological structure, especially the pore

size distribution, determines its adsorption capacity for heavy metals. 219,220 Biomass-derived activated carbon contains a variety of
pores, the largest of which can be observed by optical microscope and the smallest of which is the same size as the molecules being
adsorbed. Fig. 8 shows a thumbnail sketch of the pores of the activated carbon. The IUPAC considers micropore of r < 2 nm, transition
pore of 2 nm < r < 50 nm, and macropore of r > 50 nm. 221–223 Micropores are the main sites of adsorption, while mesopores promote
intraparticle diffusion and shorten the adsorption time. The adsorption of heavy metals by biomass-derived activated carbon can be
affected by the pore size. 224–226 The macropore of biomass-derived activated carbon is also called transport pore, which usually plays
the role of transport channel in the adsorption process. The adsorbed molecules first enter the mesopores through the macropores,
then enter the micropores, and finally enter the interior of biomass-derived activated carbon particles for adsorption. Transition pores,
also known as mesopores, are smaller than macropores but much larger than adsorbed molecules. The adsorption process starts with
a single molecular layer, followed by a multi-molecular layer, which means that this forms a continuous adsorption layer. The smallest
pores in carbon are called micropores, also known as capillaries or micropores, which have a smaller effective radius. Micropores are
the most important contributors to the specific surface area and pore volume and play a very important role in adsorption, they
usually determine the adsorption capacity of carbon. Xue et al. 227 pointed out that the adsorption of volatile organic compounds by
carbon materials is mainly determined by the micropores. Obviously, the ultramicropores loaded with copper chloride (d = 0.46 nm)
did not leave enough space for the accommodation of carbon monoxide molecules (d = 0.38 nm), resulting in low adsorption of carbon
monoxide, and the large mesopores had a large enough pore size to load copper chloride, the surface area used to disperse the copper
chloride was low, resulting in low adsorption of carbon monoxide as well. In contrast, ultramicroporous and small mesopores provide
high surface area and suitable pore size to disperse ferric chloride well and provide enough space for carbon monoxide adsorption.
Similar observations were reported for the preparation of a bioresource of porous carbon for wastewater treatment from tea pomace.
The activated carbon was activated with zinc chloride and had the highest iodine value of 1519 mg g−1. The optimized activated carbon

possesses a well-developed microporous structure with a high specific surface area of 1029 m2 g−1 and a small pore size of 0.65 nm. And

the removal efficiency of the activated carbon was 99.9% for the heavy metal mercury and 74.7% for copper. 228

Fig. 8 Pore diagram of activated carbon.

Macropores and mesopores can be utilized as diffusion channels for adsorbate molecules to enter the interior of activated carbon
particles quickly. Micropores can adsorb pollutants through pore size interception. At the same time, mesopores can produce capillary
condensation and adsorb macromolecules that cannot enter micropores. The pore structure is one of the main factors determining
activated carbon's adsorption properties. 229 Physical properties such as specific surface area and pore size heavily influence the
adsorption capacity of activated carbon.
4.1.3 Functional groups. The oxygen-containing and nitrogen-containing functional groups are the adsorption sites of activated

carbon, and the pollutants adhere to the surface of the activated carbon through electrostatic interaction, ion exchange, hydrogen
bonding, acid–base interaction, and complexation with the adsorbent. 230–232 The adsorption of heavy metals by carbon adsorbents
includes both physical and chemical adsorption. So, in addition to the morphological structure of carbon itself, the chemical functional
groups on the surface of the carbon material may also be one of the main factors in its adsorption of heavy metals. The surface
functional groups of carbonaceous adsorbents are not only related to the nature of the biomass but also to the activation or
modification method. The heteroatoms of carbon surface functional groups include oxygen, nitrogen, halogen and hydrogen, and
determine their surface chemistry, among which oxygen and nitrogen groups on porous carbon are considered to be the most
important adsorption groups. Fig. 9 shows the common functional groups on the surface of activated carbon. 233–235

Fig. 9 (a) Common oxygen-containing groups on the surface of activated carbon, (b) common nitrogen-containing groups on the
surface of activated carbon.

At activation temperature up to 100 °C, carbon adsorbs oxygen. The adsorbed oxygen molecules are decomposed into oxygen
atoms, which are bonded to unsaturated bonds on the carbon surface, producing oxygen complexes. Due to their unstable nature,
hydroxyl groups or other basic groups eventually form when they meet water. It also forms basic oxygen groups at 800 °C to 1000 °C in
the presence of a little oxygen. The same phenomenon occurs when the activated carbon is cooled at low temperature in contact with
oxygen. However, if the starting temperature of the activated carbon is 300 °C and the maximum temperature does not exceed 450 °C,
some acidic oxygen groups will appear. Oxygen groups show three types of acidity, basicity, and neutrality, which are related to the
oxidation phase. 236–238 In general, liquid oxidation favors the formation of carboxylic acids, while gas oxidation favors the formation of
hydroxyl and carbonyl groups.
In addition to oxygen-containing functional groups, the surface of carbon may also contain nitrogen-containing functional groups.
Its main source is the introduction of ammonium, nitric acid and nitrogen-containing compounds in the preparation of activated
carbon. Nitrogen atoms take different forms due to different conditions in the preparation of activated carbon. The nitrogen group on
the surface of carbon is very stable. When heated at 900 to 1200 °C, most of the nitrogen changes to the free state, and a small portion
locates at the surface of carbon in the formation of hydrogen cyanide compound, etc. 239
Sulfur containing groups are also common functional groups in carbon materials. And fixing an appropriate amount of sulfur-
containing functional groups on the surface of activated carbon will significantly increase the adsorption capacity of metal ions such as
mercury and cadmium. Carbon raw materials are treated with sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, sulfur dioxide, carbon disulfide, or sulfides such
as sodium thiosulfate at high temperature to produce more surface sulfur-containing groups. 240 The sulfur group on the carbon
surface is very stable in strong alkaline solutions and stabilizes a"er losing a few in strong acid solutions. The presence of surface sulfur
groups tends to narrow the pore distribution of activated carbon. 241,242
4.1.4 Others. Bulk density is an important factor affecting the adsorption capacity of biomass-derived carbon, especially when

biomass-derived activated carbon is applied in medical adsorption columns or industrial filtration in adsorption columns. Higher
density carbon can capture more heavy metals per unit volume. 243–245 Both physical and chemical properties of activated carbon will
affect its adsorption performance. To improve the adsorption capacity of biomass-derived activated carbon, it is necessary to
investigate the synergy of various properties of activated carbon.

4.2 Adsorption conditions

4.2.1 Temperature. In the adsorption process, the adsorption mechanism of the same activated carbon may be different for

different pollutants. The temperature also has different effect on adsorption process. Firstly, the diffusion rate within the pores in
activated carbon is a major factor affecting the adsorption rate. The diffusion process is a heat absorption process, so the increase of
temperature is beneficial to the acceleration of adsorption rate. Second, the adsorption process is divided into physical adsorption and
chemical adsorption. The former is mostly exothermic, so lowering the temperature can improve the adsorption performance, while
the adsorption rate in the chemical adsorption process increases with an increase of temperature, and some of the chemical bonds will
break with the increase of temperature, further increasing the adsorption sites and the saturation adsorption capacity of activated
carbon. 246,247 Khalil et al. 248 prepared a biomass-derived activated carbon, named ACPH800, from orange peel obtained from navel
oranges by a thermochemical activation method. The result confirmed that the adsorption of chromium ions on ACPH800 is
spontaneous in nature (ΔG < 0), and the negative sign of ΔH indicated that the adsorption is an exothermic process favorable to
adsorption at low temperatures. It is also clear from Fig. 10 that the adsorption capacity decreases with increasing temperature. A
related class of experiments on the roots of summer grass plants was also reported. The maximum adsorption of lead ions by the
prepared and treated adsorbent was 108 mg g−1 at 288 K, and the removal of lead ions was 85.7 mg g−1 at 308 K. The increase in

temperature had a negative effect on the adsorption of metal ions, revealing that these processes are exothermic in nature. However,
the adsorption capacity of chromium ions showed a positive effect of temperature on adsorption, with an increase in absorption from
77.2 to 102 mg g−1 when the temperature was increased from 288 to 308 K. 249 In conclusion, the effect of temperature on the

adsorption of heavy metals by biomass-derived activated carbon is complex. Increasing the adsorption temperature can inhibit
physical adsorption on the one hand and enhance molecular diffusion and chemisorption on the other.

Fig. 10 (a) Effect of temperature on removal of chromium ion by ACPH800, (b) Van't Hoff plot for chromium ion adsorption on
ACPH800. This figure has been adapted from ref. 250 with permission from Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and
Engineering Aspects, copyright 2023.

4.2.2 pH value. The pH value of the solution is an important factor for adsorption, because it affects the existing form of heavy

metal ions in the wastewater solution. The chemical state of the active groups on the adsorbent (degree of protonation) and the charge
distribution on the adsorbent surface, which in turn affects the affinity of adsorbent for the target metal ions. 251,252 The effect of pH on
cadmium ion removal in water is shown in Fig. 11 . 253 The solute equilibrium concentration is decreased with enhancing the solution
pH, which could be attributed to the rise of negative surface of adsorbent, consequently favoring the attraction of positive cadmium
ions onto the surface of adsorbent. Kokab et al. 254 explored the effect of pH on chromium ion adsorption. At pH of 3.2, the adsorption
capacity of chromium was 91 mg g−1. Chromium adsorption decreased gradually from 94.5 to 89 mg g−1 at pH values between 5.5 and

6.2. This proves higher adsorption capacity at acidic pH and a lower adsorption capacity at alkaline pH. The final result also
demonstrated the highest adsorption at pH of 5.5. The main reason for this highest value was the neutralization of the maximum
adsorption. The hydroxyl ions (OH−) were neutralized due to excess hydrogen (H+) ions, which promoted the diffusion of dichromate

ions and the absorption of biomass-derived activated carbon. At the acidic pH, the surface of biochar adsorbent is positively charged,
while the chromate ions are negatively charged, so biochar and chromate ion can interact. However, when the pH increases above 5.5,
the concentration of hydroxyl ions increases. The concentration of hydroxyl ions increases due to the excess OH− ions, and the surface

solution of biochar and chromium ions in biochar repel each other. Therefore, determining pH value is necessary prerequisite for
studying the adsorption performance, and the selection of suitable solution pH is of great significance for heavy metal adsorption.

Fig. 11 Surface plot of predicted adsorption capacity. This figure has been adapted from ref. 255 with permission from Journal of
Molecular Liquids, copyright 2023.

4.2.3 Contact time. Generally, with the extension of adsorption time, the amount of chemisorption increases sharply at first, then

slowly rises to the emergence platform, and the instantaneous adsorption rate decreases gradually. On the contrary, physical
adsorption usually increases slowly with the increase of adsorption time, and the adsorption time is longer than that of chemical
adsorption.
4.2.4 Others. In addition to the experimental temperature and pH, other adsorption conditions such as the concentration of metal

ions, the amount of activated carbon dosing, and the adsorption time also affect the adsorption of heavy metals on carbon materials.
When the initial concentration of pollutants in the solution is small, the adsorption capacity of activated carbon will increase with an
increase of initial concentration. A"er the initial concentration reaches a certain amount, the adsorption sites will be saturated, and the
adsorption capacity will reach the saturation value at the same time. The adsorption rate will gradually decrease with the increase of
initial concentration. Therefore, selecting an appropriate initial concentration is necessary for the practical industrial application of
activated carbon adsorption.
The amount of activated carbon is one of the conditions affecting the adequacy of the adsorption process. If the adsorption sites per
unit mass of activated carbon are certain, a large amount of activated carbon will increase the adsorption capacity, it will also increase
the cost of wastewater treatment, so choosing the amount of activated carbon with high adsorption capacity and relatively low cost is
one of important factors to remove pollutants and reduce the cost of activated carbon adsorption treatment.
The length of adsorption time is a key factor affecting the adequacy of the removal effect. By increasing the adsorption time
appropriately, the amount of activated carbon adsorption will effectively increase. However, the increase in adsorption time increases
the stagnation time of wastewater, reduces the overall wastewater treatment efficiency, and increases the wastewater treatment cost.
Therefore, selecting the appropriate adsorption time is beneficial to improve the adsorption efficiency of activated carbon.

5. Conclusions and prospects

To date, human activities have led to the accumulation of various heavy metals at a rate that exceeds the capacity to treat or manage
them. In the last five years, public awareness of environmental protection and the selection of suitable sorbents are among the most
challenging things in removing heavy metal pollution.
Although many methods for removing heavy metals have been proposed in recent years, many of these techniques are not suitable
for commercial application due to low efficiency, high energy consumption, or poor selectivity. Biomass-derived activated carbon has
shown prospective potential due to its large specific surface area, rich pore structure, high stability and relatively low cost.
In this paper, the sources of heavy metals, removal methods and preparation methods of biomass activated carbon were reviewed.
The key factors of adsorbents, physical and chemical properties of heavy metals and adsorption conditions affecting heavy metal
adsorption were emphatically introduced. In addition, most of heavy metals adsorbed on biomass-derived activated carbon materials
can be recovered by desorption processes under various conditions. Biomass is widely utilized as a precursor for the formation of
activated carbon. The choice of biomass, type of carbonization, and activation can also affect the porosity and surface area of the
carbon. Under suitable conditions or appropriate modifications, almost all of biomass-derived activated carbons exhibit high
adsorption capacity of heavy metal—both the physical form and the chemical functional groups of the adsorbent influence the
adsorption of heavy metals. In general, larger specific surface areas and smaller pore sizes favor adsorption, while the influence of
functional groups is related to the pH of heavy metal-containing wastewater. Adsorption conditions such as temperature and pH
content seriously affect the adsorption of heavy metals. Too high a temperature is not favorable for heavy metal adsorption. Too high
or too low a pH level can also hurt adsorption.
Currently, “green” is the trend of today's society, there is no doubt that the application of biomass-activated carbon in wastewater is
becoming more promising. However, some knowledge gaps still need to be filled to improve further the adsorption capacity of
biomass-derived activated carbon for heavy metals in actual complex samples. Reducing the production cost of carbon adsorbents,
the large-scale production of biomass-derived carbon is complex due to the limitation of harsh reaction conditions, high equipment
requirements, and high dosage of modifier agents. Therefore, researchers must seek simple synthetic methods to meet the mass
production of adsorbents from biomass-derived activated carbon. In addition, several challenges need to be overcome. For example,
the aim is to improve the selectivity of carbon adsorbents for heavy metals. Furthermore, most of the current co-modifications of
biomass-derived activated carbons are still based on laboratory studies, so the reproducibility of commercial biomass-derived
activated carbons is an issue that we must consider. Shortly, the preparation of biomass-derived activated carbon will certainly be
commercialized in a simple, fast and easy way.

Conflicts of interest
All authors disclosed no relevant relationships.

Acknowledgements
Financial support is gratefully acknowledged from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21974137), the CAS-Weigao
Research & Development Program ([2017]-009), the Innovation Program of Science and Research from the Dalian Institute of Chemical
Physics (DICPI202005) and the National Natural Science Foundation of Ningxia (No. 2021AAC02017) to J. Ou, as well as the Introduction
Flexible Team of Ningxia (No. 2019RXTD0004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22164001) and the Key research
and development program of Ningxia (No. 2022BFE02002) and the Key materials and Key technology innovation team for industrial
biological processes (KJT2019004) to B. Gong.

References
1. X. Zhang, B. Gao, A. E. Creamer, C. Cao and Y. Li, Adsorption of VOCs onto engineered carbon materials: a review, J. Hazard.
Mater., 2017, 338, 102–123 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
2. S. Yu, B. Du, A. Baheiduola, C. Geng and J. Liu, HCB dechlorination combined with heavy metals immobilization in MSWI fly ash by
using n-Al/CaO dispersion mixture, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 392, 122510 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
3. R. D. F. Rios, P. J. B. Bueno, J. C. S. Terra and F. C. C. Moura, Influence of the surface modification of granular-activated carbon
synthesized from macauba on heavy metal sorption, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2022, 02, 42 Search PubMed .
4. H. Qin, T. Hu, Y. Zhai, N. Lu and J. Aliyeva, The improved methods of heavy metals removal by biosorbents: a review, Environ.
Pollut., 2020, 258, 113777 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
5. X. Jia, T. Fu, B. Hu, Z. Shi, L. Zhou and Y. Zhu, Identification of the potential risk areas for soil heavy metal pollution based on the
source-sink theory, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 393, 122424 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
6. P. R. Yaashikaa, P. S. Kumar, S. Jeevanantham and R. Saravanan, A review on bioremediation approach for heavy metal
detoxification and accumulation in plants, Environ. Pollut., 2022, 301, 119035 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
7. W. Zeng, W. Guo, B. Li, Z. Wei, D. D. Dionysiou and R. Xiao, Kinetics and mechanistic aspects of removal of heavy metal through
gas-liquid sulfide precipitation: a computational and experimental study, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 408, 124868 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
8. Z. Wang, Z. Tan, H. Li, S. Yuan, Y. Zhang and Y. Dong, Direct current electrochemical method for removal and recovery of heavy
metals from water using straw biochar electrode, J. Cleaner Prod., 2022, 339, 130746 CrossRef CAS .
9. F. Zhu, Y. M. Zheng, B. G. Zhang and Y. R. Dai, A critical review on the electrospun nanofibrous membranes for the adsorption of
heavy metals in water treatment, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 401, 123608 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
10. W. S. Chai, J. Y. Cheun, P. S. Kumar, M. Mubashir, Z. Majeed, F. Banat, S.-H. Ho and P. L. Show, A review on conventional and novel
materials towards heavy metal adsorption in wastewater treatment application, J. Cleaner Prod., 2021, 296, 126589 CrossRef

CAS .
11. X. L. Jia, T. T. Fu, B. F. Hu, Z. Shi, L. Q. Zhou and Y. W. Zhu, Identification of the potential risk areas for soil heavy metal pollution
based on the source-sink theory, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 393, 122424 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
12. H. Li, M. J. Li, F. Zheng, J. Wang, L. Chen, P. F. Hu, Q. Zhen, S. Bashir and J. L. Liu, Efficient removal of water pollutants by
hierarchical porous zeolite-activated carbon prepared from coal gangue and bamboo, J. Cleaner Prod., 2021, 325, 129322
CrossRef CAS .
13. N. Naqash, S. Prakash, D. Kapoor and R. Singh, Interaction of freshwater microplastics with biota and heavy metals: a review,
Environ. Chem. Lett., 2020, 18, 1813–1824 CrossRef CAS .
14. X. Zhang, J. Zhou, Z. Xu, P. Zhu and J. Liu, Characterization of heavy metals in textile sludge with hydrothermal carbonization
treatment, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 402, 123635 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
15. A. T. Ubando, A. D. M. Africa, M. C. Maniquiz-Redillas, A. B. Culaba, W. H. Chen and J. S. Chang, Microalgal biosorption of heavy
metals: A comprehensive bibliometric review, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 402, 123431 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
16. L. S. Miranda, B. Wijesiri, G. A. Ayoko, P. Egodawatta and A. Goonetilleke, Water-sediment interactions and mobility of heavy
metals in aquatic environments, Water Res., 2021, 202, 117386 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
17. C. Tang, Z. Liu, C. Peng, L.-Y. Chai, K. Kuroda, M. Okido and Y.-X. Song, New insights into the interaction between heavy metals and
struvite: struvite as platform for heterogeneous nucleation of heavy metal hydroxide, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 365, 60–69 CrossRef

CAS .
18. P. Sherugar, M. Padaki, N. S. Naik, S. D. George and D. H. K. Murthy, Biomass-derived versatile activated carbon removes both
heavy metals and dye molecules from wastewater with near-unity efficiency: mechanism and kinetics, Chemosphere, 2022, 287,
132085 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
19. Q. Zhong, C. Cruz-Paredes, S. Zhang and J. Rousk, Can heavy metal pollution induce bacterial resistance to heavy metals and
antibiotics in soils from an ancient land-mine?, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 411, 124962 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
20. M. J. Kang, Y. K. Kwon, S. Yu, P. K. Lee, H. S. Park and N. Song, Assessment of Zn pollution sources and apportionment in
agricultural soils impacted by a Zn smelter in South Korea, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 364, 475–487 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
21. M. Ghayoraneh and A. Qishlaqi, Concentration, distribution and speciation of toxic metals in soils along a transect around a
Zn/Pb smelter in the northwest of Iran, J. Geochem. Explor., 2017, 180, 1–14 CrossRef CAS .
22. H. Liu, C. Cheng and H. M. Wu, Sustainable utilization of wetland biomass for activated carbon production: a review on recent
advances in modification and activation methods, Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 790, 148214 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
23. J. Zhang, X. Sun, J. Deng, G. Li, Z. Li, J. Jiang, Q. Wu and L. Duan, Emission characteristics of heavy metals from a typical copper
smelting plant, J. Hazard. Mater., 2022, 424, 127311 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
24. M. Cartro-Sabate, P. Mayor, M. Orta-Martinez and A. Rosell-Mele, Anthropogenic lead in Amazonian wildlife, Nat. Sustain., 2019, 2,
702–709 CrossRef .
25. M. P. Taylor, C. F. Isley and J. Glover, Prevalence of childhood lead poisoning and respiratory disease associated with lead smelter
emissions, Environ. Int., 2019, 127, 340–352 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
26. H. T. Liu, K. Liu, H. Y. Fu, R. Ji and X. L. Qu, Sunlight mediated cadmium release from colored microplastics containing cadmium
pigment in aqueous phase, Environ. Pollut., 2020, 263, 114484 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
27. N. Ma, R. N. Cai and C. M. Sun, Threonine dehydratase enhances bacterial cadmium resistance via driving cysteine desulfuration
and biomineralization of cadmium sulfide nanocrystals, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 417, 126102 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
28. Y. L. Zhao, X. G. Li, X. B. Jia and S. Y. Gao, Why and how to tailor the vertical coordinate of pore size distribution to construct ORR-
active carbon materials?, Nano Energy, 2019, 58, 384–391 CrossRef CAS .
29. D. Mamais, C. Noutsopoulos, I. Kavallari, E. Nyktari, A. Kaldis, E. Panousi, G. Nikitopoulos, K. Antoniou and M. Nasioka, Biological
groundwater treatment for chromium removal at low hexavalent chromium concentrations, Chemosphere, 2016, 152, 238–244
CrossRef CAS PubMed .
 30. J. B. Vincent and H. C. Lukaski, Chromium, Adv. Nutr., 2018, 9, 505–506 CrossRef PubMed .
31. E. M. Hamilton, S. D. Young, E. H. Bailey and M. J. Watts, Chromium speciation in foodstuffs: A review, Food Chem., 2018, 250,
105–112 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
32. Y. X. An, Q. Fu, D. H. Zhang, Y. Y. Wang and Z. L. Tang, Performance evaluation of activated carbon with different pore sizes and
functional groups for VOC adsorption by molecular simulation, Chemosphere, 2019, 227, 9–16 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
33. H. Sturikova, O. Krystofova, D. Huska and V. Adam, Zinc, zinc nanoparticles and plants, J. Hazard. Mater., 2018, 349, 101–110
CrossRef CAS PubMed .
34. G. Cho, Y. Park, Y. K. Hong and D. H. Ha, Ion exchange: an advanced synthetic method for complex nanoparticles, Nano
Convergence, 2019, 6, 39 CrossRef PubMed .
35. L. Shi, B. R. Duan, Z. G. Zhu, C. F. Sun, J. Zhou and A. Walsh, Preparing copper catalyst by ultrasound-assisted chemical
precipitation method, Ultrason. Sonochem., 2020, 64, 105013 CrossRef PubMed .
36. M. Z. Momcilovic, M. S. Randelovic, M. M. Purenovic, J. S. Dordevic, A. Onjia and B. Matovic, Morpho-structural, adsorption and
electrochemical characteristics of serpentinite, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2016, 163, 72–78 CrossRef CAS .
37. X. Yin, Z. J. Zhang, H. Y. Ma, S. Venkateswaran and B. S. Hsiao, Ultra-fine electrospun nanofibrous membranes for
multicomponent wastewater treatment: Filtration and adsorption, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2020, 242, 116794 CrossRef CAS .
38. A. Mojiri, J. L. Zhou, B. Robinson, A. Ohashi, N. Ozaki, T. Kindaichi, H. Farraji and M. Vakili, Pesticides in aquatic environments and
their removal by adsorption methods, Chemosphere, 2020, 253, 126646 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
39. I. A. Aguayo-Villarreal, A. Bonilla-Petriciolet and R. Muñiz-Valencia, Preparation of activated carbons from pecan nutshell and
their application in the antagonistic adsorption of heavy metal ions, J. Mol. Liq., 2017, 230, 686–695 CrossRef CAS .
40. T. Xiong, X. Yuan, X. Cao, H. Wang, L. Jiang, Z. Wu and Y. Liu, Mechanistic insights into heavy metals affinity in magnetic
MnO2@Fe3O4/poly(m-phenylenediamine) core-shell adsorbent, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 2020, 192, 110326 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
41. S. Singh, D. Kapoor, S. Khasnabis, J. Singh and P. C. Ramamurthy, Mechanism and kinetics of adsorption and removal of heavy
metals from wastewater using nanomaterials, Environ. Chem. Lett., 2021, 19, 2351–2381 CrossRef CAS .
42. Q. Chen, Y. Yao, X. Li, J. Lu, J. Zhou and Z. Huang, Comparison of heavy metal removals from aqueous solutions by chemical
precipitation and characteristics of precipitates, J. Water Process. Eng., 2018, 26, 289–300 CrossRef .
43. J. Q. Tang, J. B. Xi, J. X. Yu, R. A. Chi and J. D. Chen, Novel combined method of biosorption and chemical precipitation for
recovery of Pb(2+) from wastewater, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2018, 25, 28705–28712 CrossRef CAS PubMed .

44. M. A. Ganzoury, C. Chidiac, J. Kurtz and C. F. de Lannoy, CNT-sorbents for heavy metals: electrochemical regeneration and closed-
loop recycling, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 393, 122432 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
45. X. Yang, L. Liu, W. Tan, C. Liu, Z. Dang and G. Qiu, Remediation of heavy metal contaminated soils by organic acid extraction and
electrochemical adsorption, Environ. Pollut., 2020, 264, 114745 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
46. R. F. T. Tagne, R. C. T. Temgoua, D. R. T. Tchuifon, T. Vintila, A. S. Ngueabouo and S. G. Anagho, Development of an
electroanalytical method using activated rice husk-derived carbon for the detection of a paraquat herbicide, Carbon Trends,
2021, 4, 100060 CrossRef .
47. X. Pei, L. Gan, Z. Tong, H. Gao, S. Meng, W. Zhang, P. Wang and Y. Chen, Robust cellulose-based composite adsorption membrane
for heavy metal removal, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 406, 124746 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
48. J. E. Efome, D. Rana, T. Matsuura and C. Q. Lan, Experiment and modeling for flux and permeate concentration of heavy metal ion
in adsorptive membrane filtration using a metal-organic framework incorporated nanofibrous membrane, Chem. Eng. J., 2018,
352, 737–744 CrossRef CAS .
49. A. Almasian, M. Giahi, G. Chizari Fard, S. A. Dehdast and L. Maleknia, Removal of heavy metal ions by modified PAN/PANI-nylon
core-shell nanofibers membrane: filtration performance, antifouling and regeneration behavior, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 351, 1166–
1178 CrossRef CAS .
50. S. Deng, X. H. Liu, J. B. Liao, H. Lin and F. Liu, PEI modified multiwalled carbon nanotube as a novel additive in PAN nanofiber
membrane for enhanced removal of heavy metal ions, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 375, 122086 CrossRef CAS .
51. R. Wang, L. Deng, X. Fan, K. Li, H. Lu and W. Li, Removal of heavy metal ion cobalt (II) from wastewater via adsorption method
using microcrystalline cellulose-magnesium hydroxide, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2021, 189, 607–617 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
52. D. Jiang, Y. Yang, C. Huang, M. Huang, J. Chen, T. Rao and X. Ran, Removal of the heavy metal ion nickel (II) via an adsorption
method using flower globular magnesium hydroxide, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 373, 131–140 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
53. S. Sun, Q. Yu, M. Li, H. Zhao and C. Wu, Preparation of coffee-shell activated carbon and its application for water vapor
adsorption, Renewable Energy, 2019, 142, 11–19 CrossRef CAS .
54. P. Saket, M. Kashyap, K. Bala and A. Joshi, Microalgae and bio-polymeric adsorbents: an integrative approach giving new
directions to wastewater treatment, Int. J. Phytorem., 2022, 24, 536–556 CrossRef PubMed .
55. K. X. Wang, L. P. Yang, H. X. Li and F. Zhang, Surfactant Pyrolysis-Guided in Situ Fabrication of Primary Amine-Rich Ordered
Mesoporous Phenolic Resin Displaying Efficient Heavy Metal Removal, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2019, 11, 21815–21821
CrossRef CAS PubMed .
56. H. Y. Ren, H. Y. Shen and Y. Z. Liu, Adsorption of CO2 with tetraethylammonium glycine ionic liquid modified alumina in the

Rotating Adsorption Bed, J. CO2 Util., 2022, 58, 101925 CrossRef CAS .

57. Z. Y. Yang, D. C. Wang, Z. Y. Meng and Y. Y. Li, Adsorption separation of CH4/N-2 on modified coal-based carbon molecular sieve,

Sep. Purif. Technol., 2019, 218, 130–137 CrossRef CAS .

58. J. Shahrivar and M. Gharabaghi, Separation of AuCN2- by activated carbon and functionalized graphene/activated carbon

composite, Adv. Powder Technol., 2020, 31, 4648–4656 CrossRef CAS .

59. A. B. Saralegui, V. Willson, N. Caracciolo, M. N. Piol and S. P. Boeykens, Macrophyte biomass productivity for heavy metal
adsorption, J. Environ. Manage., 2021, 289, 112398 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
60. M. N. Piol, C. Dickerman, M. P. Ardanza, A. Saralegui and S. P. Boeykens, Simultaneous removal of chromate and phosphate using
different operational combinations for their adsorption on dolomite and banana peel, J. Environ. Manage., 2021, 288, 112378
CrossRef PubMed .
61. S. Elfeghe, Q. Sheng and Y. Zhang, Separation of Lead and Copper Ions in Acidic Media Using an Ion-Exchange Resin with a
Thiourea Functional Group, ACS Omega, 2022, 7, 13042–13049 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
62. A. Freni, L. Calabrese, A. Malara, P. Frontera and L. Bonaccorsi, Silica gel microfibres by electrospinning for adsorption chillers,
Energy, 2019, 187, 113607 CrossRef .
63. S. Batra, A. Awasthi, M. Iqbal and D. Datta, Solvent impregnated resins for the treatment of aqueous solutions containing
different compounds: a review, Rev. Chem. Eng., 2022, 38, 209–242 CrossRef CAS .
64. A. Boretskaya, I. Il'yasov, S. Egorova, A. Popov and A. Lamberov, Modification of a phase-inhomogeneous alumina support of a
palladium catalyst. Part I: effect of the amorphous phase on the textural and acidic characteristics of alumina and methods for
controlling its phase homogeneity, Mater. Today Chem., 2020, 18, 121102 Search PubMed .
65. S. I. Alhassan, L. Huang, Y. He, L. Yan, B. Wu and H. Wang, Fluoride removal from water using alumina and aluminum-based
composites: a comprehensive review of progress, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 2020, 51, 2051–2085 CrossRef .
66. W. M. Youssef, M. S. Hagag and A. H. Ali, Synthesis, characterization and application of composite derived from rice husk ash with
aluminium oxide for sorption of uranium, Adsorpt. Sci. Technol., 2018, 36, 1274–1293 CrossRef CAS .
67. M. Aazza, H. Ahlafi, H. Moussout and H. Maghat, Adsorption of meta-nitrophenol onto alumina and HDTMA modified alumina:
kinetic, isotherm and mechanism investigations, J. Mol. Liq., 2018, 268, 587–597 CrossRef CAS .
68. N. Jiang, R. Shang, S. G. J. Heijman and L. C. Rietveld, High-silica zeolites for adsorption of organic micro-pollutants in water
treatment: a review, Water Res., 2018, 144, 145–161 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
69. H. Wang, J. Xu, X. Liu and L. Sheng, Preparation of straw activated carbon and its application in wastewater treatment: a review,
J. Cleaner Prod., 2021, 283, 124671 CrossRef CAS .
70. B. Gorska, E. Frackowiak and F. Beguin, Redox active electrolytes in carbon/carbon electrochemical capacitors, Curr. Opin.
Electrochem., 2018, 9, 95–105 CrossRef CAS .
71. C. Urrutia, E. Yañez-Mansilla and D. Jeison, Bioremoval of heavy metals from metal mine tailings water using microalgae biomass,
Algal Res., 2019, 43, 101659 CrossRef .
72. V.-P. Dinh, T.-D.-T. Huynh, H. M. Le, V.-D. Nguyen, V.-A. Dao, N. Q. Hung, L. A. Tuyen, S. Lee, J. Yi, T. D. Nguyen and L. V. Tan, Insight
into the adsorption mechanisms of methylene blue and chromium(iii) from aqueous solution onto pomelo fruit peel, RSC Adv.,
2019, 9, 25847–25860 RSC .
73. S. S. Fiyadh, M. A. AlSaadi, W. Z. Jaafar, M. K. AlOmar, S. S. Fayaed, N. S. Mohd, L. S. Hin and A. El-Shafie, Review on heavy metal
adsorption processes by carbon nanotubes, J. Cleaner Prod., 2019, 230, 783–793 CrossRef CAS .
74. K. Du, S. Li, L. Zhao, L. Qiao, H. Ai and X. Liu, One-Step Growth of Porous Cellulose Beads Directly on Bamboo Fibers via
Oxidation-Derived Method in Aqueous Phase and Their Potential for Heavy Metal Ions Adsorption, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.,
2018, 6, 17068–17075 CrossRef CAS .
75. K. Cheng, S. Wallaert, H. Ardebili and A. Karim, Advanced triboelectric nanogenerators based on low-dimension carbon materials:
a review, Carbon, 2022, 194, 81–103 CrossRef CAS .
76. N. Abu Bakar, N. Othman, Z. M. Yunus, W. A. H. Altowayti, M. Tahir, N. Fitriani and S. N. A. Mohd-Salleh, An insight review of
lignocellulosic materials as activated carbon precursor for textile wastewater treatment, Environ. Technol. Innovation, 2021, 22,
101445 CrossRef .
77. K. J. Guan, L. L. Zhang, F. Y. Zhu, H. J. Li, H. C. Sheng and Y. Guo, Multi-layer SiC-graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite bioactive coating
for carbon/carbon composites, J. Alloys Compd., 2020, 821, 101132 CrossRef .
78. F. Zhao, L. L. Zhang, Y. Guo, H. C. Sheng, P. X. Zhang, Y. X. Zhang, Q. Li, H. Y. Yang and S. V. Mikhalovsky, Mechanically strong and
bioactive carbon fiber-SiC nanowire-hydroxyapatite-pyrolytic carbon composites for bone implant application, Ceram. Int., 2021,
47, 3389–3400 CrossRef CAS .
79. L. L. Zhang, S. X. Li, H. J. Li and L. N. Pei, Bioactive surface modification of carbon/carbon composites with multilayer SiC-SiC
nanowire-Si doped hydroxyapatite coating, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 740, 109–117 CrossRef CAS .
80. L. C. Zhong, Y. S. Zhang, T. Wang, Y. Ji, P. Norris and W. P. Pan, Optimized methods for preparing activated carbon from rock
asphalt using orthogonal experimental design, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2019, 136, 1989–1999 CrossRef CAS .
81. J. Wang, T. L. Liu, Q. X. Huang, Z. Y. Ma, Y. Chi and J. H. Yan, Production and characterization of high quality activated carbon from
oily sludge, Fuel Process. Technol., 2017, 162, 13–19 CrossRef CAS .
82. C. Guclu, K. Alper, M. Erdem, K. Tekin and S. Karagoz, Activated carbons from co-carbonization of waste truck tires and spent tea
leaves, Sustainable Chem. Pharm., 2021, 21, 100410 CrossRef CAS .
83. R. B. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, L. T. Gonzalez, S. Iglesias-Gonzalez, E. Gonzalez-Gonzalez, S. O. Martinez-Chapa, M. Madou, M. M. Alvarez
and A. Mendoza, Characterization of Chemically Activated Pyrolytic Carbon Black Derived from Waste Tires as a Candidate for
Nanomaterial Precursor, Nanomaterials, 2020, 10, 2213 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
84. D. Meier, B. van de Beld, A. V. Bridgwater, D. C. Elliott, A. Oasmaa and F. Preto, State-of-the-art of fast pyrolysis in IEA bioenergy
member countries, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2013, 20, 619–641 CrossRef .
85. L. Gao, C. Li, S. Li, W. Zhang, X. Du, L. Huang, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhai and G. Zeng, Superior performance and resistance to SO2 and H2O over

CoOx-modified MnOx/biomass activated carbons for simultaneous Hg0 and NO removal, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 371, 781–795

CrossRef CAS .
86. L. Gao, C. Li, J. Zhang, X. Du, S. Li, J. Zeng, Y. Yi and G. Zeng, Simultaneous removal of NO and Hg0 from simulated flue gas over
CoOx -CeO2 loaded biomass activated carbon derived from maize straw at low temperatures, Chem. Eng. J., 2018, 342, 339–349

CrossRef CAS .
87. M. Antar, D. Lyu, M. Nazari, A. Shah, X. Zhou and D. L. Smith, Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: an overview of world
biomass production and utilization, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2021, 139, 110691 CrossRef CAS .
88. A. A. Salema, R. M. W. Ting and Y. K. Shang, Pyrolysis of blend (oil palm biomass and sawdust) biomass using TG-MS, Bioresour.
Technol., 2019, 274, 439–446 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
89. M. Tymoszuk, K. Mroczek, S. Kalisz and H. Kubiczek, An investigation of biomass grindability, Energy, 2019, 183, 116–126
CrossRef .
90. S. Tong, Y. Sun, X. Li, Z. Hu, N. Worasuwannarak, H. Liu, H. Hu, G. Luo and H. Yao, Gas-pressurized torrefaction of biomass wastes:
co-gasification of gas-pressurized torrefied biomass with coal, Bioresour. Technol., 2021, 321, 124505 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
91. A. C. Eloka-Eboka and F. L. Inambao, Effects of CO2 sequestration on lipid and biomass productivity in microalgal biomass

production, Appl. Energy, 2017, 195, 1100–1111 CrossRef CAS .

92. P. Bober, J. Kovářová, J. Pfleger, J. Stejskal, M. Trchová, I. Novák and D. Berek, Twin carbons: the carbonization of cellulose or
carbonized cellulose coated with a conducting polymer, polyaniline, Carbon, 2016, 109, 836–842 CrossRef CAS .
93. J. González-Arias, M. E. Sánchez, J. Cara-Jiménez, F. M. Baena-Moreno and Z. Zhang, Hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and
waste: a review, Environ. Chem. Lett., 2021, 20, 211–221 CrossRef .
94. J. Xu, C. Li, L. Dai, C. Xu, Y. Zhong, F. Yu and C. Si, Biomass Fractionation and Lignin Fractionation towards Lignin Valorization,
Chemsuschem, 2020, 13, 4284–4295 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
95. Z. Heidarinejad, M. H. Dehghani, M. Heidari, G. Javedan, I. Ali and M. Sillanpää, Methods for preparation and activation of
activated carbon: a review, Environ. Chem. Lett., 2020, 18, 393–415 CrossRef CAS .
96. A. Volperts, A. Plavniece, G. Dobele, A. Zhurinsh, I. Kruusenberg, K. Kaare, J. Locs, L. Tamasauskaite-Tamasiunaite and E. Norkus,
Biomass based activated carbons for fuel cells, Renewable Energy, 2019, 141, 40–45 CrossRef CAS .
97. H. Li, P. Gao, J. Cui, F. Zhang, F. Wang and J. Cheng, Preparation and Cr(VI) removal performance of corncob activated carbon,
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2018, 25, 20743–20755 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
98. A. Nayak, B. Bhushan, V. Gupta and P. Sharma, Chemically activated carbon from lignocellulosic wastes for heavy metal
wastewater remediation: effect of activation conditions, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 493, 228–240 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
99. Y. Gao, Q. Y. Yue, B. Y. Gao and A. M. Li, Insight into activated carbon from different kinds of chemical activating agents: a review,
Sci. Total Environ., 2020, 746, 141094 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
100. Z. B. Zhang, Y. Q. Lei, D. W. Li, J. W. Zhao, Y. K. Wang, G. Y. Zhou, C. W. Yan and Q. X. He, Sudden heating of H3PO4-loaded coconut
shell in CO2 flow to produce super activated carbon and its application for benzene adsorption, Renewable Energy, 2020, 153,

1091–1099 CrossRef CAS .

101. Q. L. Wei, Z. M. Chen, Y. Y. Cheng, X. F. Wang, X. M. Yang and Z. C. Wang, Preparation and electrochemical performance of orange
peel based-activated carbons activated by different activators, Colloids Surf., A, 2019, 574, 221–227 CrossRef CAS .
102. A. Reffas, V. Bernardet, B. David, L. Reinert, M. B. Lehocine, M. Dubois, N. Batisse and L. Duclaux, Carbons prepared from coffee
grounds by H3PO4 activation: characterization and adsorption of methylene blue and Nylosan Red N-2RBL, J. Hazard. Mater.,

2010, 175, 779–788 CrossRef CAS PubMed .

103. L. Luo, T. Chen, Z. Li, Z. Zhang, W. Zhao and M. Fan, Heteroatom self-doped activated biocarbons from fir bark and their excellent
performance for carbon dioxide adsorption, J. CO2 Util., 2018, 25, 89–98 CrossRef CAS .

104. H. M. Wei, H. J. Chen, N. Fu, J. Chen, G. X. Lan, W. Qian, Y. P. Liu, H. L. Lin and S. Han, Excellent electrochemical properties and
large CO2 capture of nitrogen-doped activated porous carbon synthesised from waste longan shells, Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 231,

403–411 CrossRef CAS .

105. O. Pezoti, A. L. Cazetta, K. C. Bedin, L. S. Souza, A. C. Martins, T. L. Silva, O. O. Santos, J. V. Visentainer and V. C. Almeida, NaOH-
activated carbon of high surface area produced from guava seeds as a high-efficiency adsorbent for amoxicillin removal: kinetic,
isotherm and thermodynamic studies, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 288, 778–788 CrossRef CAS .
106. Y. Yu, N. Qiao, D. J. Wang, Q. Z. Zhu, F. Fu, R. Q. Cao, R. Wang, W. Liu and B. Xu, Fluffy honeycomb-like activated carbon from
popcorn with high surface area and well-developed porosity for ultra-high efficiency adsorption of organic dyes, Bioresour.
Technol., 2019, 285, 121340 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
107. L. L. Rao, S. F. Liu, L. L. Wang, C. D. Ma, J. Y. Wu, L. Y. An and X. Hu, N-doped porous carbons from low-temperature and single-step
sodium amide activation of carbonized water chestnut shell with excellent CO2 capture performance, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 359,

428–435 CrossRef CAS .

108. Z. H. Xu, Z. H. Yuan, D. F. Zhang, W. F. Chen, Y. X. Huang, T. Q. Zhang, D. Q. Tian, H. X. Deng, Y. W. Zhou and Z. H. Sun, Highly
mesoporous activated carbon synthesized by pyrolysis of waste polyester textiles and MgCl2: physiochemical characteristics and

pore-forming mechanism, J. Cleaner Prod., 2018, 192, 453–461 CrossRef CAS .

109. Y. B. Xi, D. J. Yang, X. Q. Qiu, H. Wang, J. H. Huang and Q. Li, Renewable lignin-based carbon with a remarkable electrochemical
performance from potassium compound activation, Ind. Crops Prod., 2018, 124, 747–754 CrossRef CAS .
110. I. Yang, M. Jung, M.-S. Kim, D. Choi and J. C. Jung, Physical and chemical activation mechanisms of carbon materials based on
the microdomain model, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 9815–9825 RSC .
111. W. Jiang, X. Xing, S. Li, X. Zhang and W. Wang, Synthesis, characterization and machine learning based performance prediction of
straw activated carbon, J. Cleaner Prod., 2019, 212, 1210–1223 CrossRef CAS .
112. C. Nieto-Delgado, D. Partida-Gutierrez and J. R. Rangel-Mendez, Preparation of activated carbon cloths from renewable natural
fabrics and their performance during the adsorption of model organic and inorganic pollutants in water, J. Cleaner Prod., 2019,
213, 650–658 CrossRef CAS .
113. Y. Ding, Y. Li, Y. Dai, X. Han, B. Xing, L. Zhu, K. Qiu and S. Wang, A novel approach for preparing in situ nitrogen doped carbon via
pyrolysis of bean pulp for supercapacitors, Energy, 2021, 216, 114231 CrossRef .
114. M. Wang, L. Y. Chu, Z. Y. Li, A. M. Messinis, Y. Q. Ding, L. Hu and J. B. Ma, Dinitrogen and Carbon Dioxide Activation to Form C-N
Bonds at Room Temperature: A New Mechanism Revealed by Experimental and Theoretical Studies, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2021,
12, 3490–3496 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
115. M. Arif, G. Liu, M. Zia ur Rehman, B. Yousaf, R. Ahmed, M. M. Mian, A. Ashraf, M. A. Mujtaba Munir, M. S. Rashid and A. Naeem,
Carbon dioxide activated biochar-clay mineral composite efficiently removes ciprofloxacin from contaminated water-Reveals an
incubation study, J. Cleaner Prod., 2022, 332, 130079 CrossRef CAS .
116. A. Trubetskaya, J. Kling, O. Ershag, T. M. Attard and E. Schroder, Removal of phenol and chlorine from wastewater using steam
activated biomass soot and tire carbon black, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 365, 846–856 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
117. J. H. Kwak, M. S. Islam, S. Wang, S. A. Messele, M. A. Naeth, M. G. El-Din and S. X. Chang, Biochar properties and lead(II)
adsorption capacity depend on feedstock type, pyrolysis temperature, and steam activation, Chemosphere, 2019, 231, 393–404
CrossRef CAS PubMed .
118. X. Liu, S. Zuo, N. Cui and S. Wang, Investigation of ammonia/steam activation for the scalable production of high-surface area
nitrogen-containing activated carbons, Carbon, 2022, 191, 581–592 CrossRef CAS .
119. P. N. Y. Yek, R. K. Liew, M. S. Osman, C. L. Lee, J. H. Chuah, Y. K. Park and S. S. Lam, Microwave steam activation, an innovative
pyrolysis approach to convert waste palm shell into highly microporous activated carbon, J. Environ. Manage., 2019, 236, 245–
253 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
120. W. Yang, H. Chen, X. Han, S. Ding, Y. Shan and Y. Liu, Preparation of magnetic Co-Fe modified porous carbon from agricultural
wastes by microwave and steam activation for mercury removal, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 381, 120981 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
121. S. S. Lam, P. N. Y. Yek, Y. S. Ok, C. C. Chong, R. K. Liew, D. C. W. Tsang, Y. K. Park, Z. Liu, C. S. Wong and W. Peng, Engineering
pyrolysis biochar via single-step microwave steam activation for hazardous landfill leachate treatment, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020,
390, 121649 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
122. A. D. Igalavithana, S. W. Choi, J. Shang, A. Hanif, P. D. Dissanayake, D. C. W. Tsang, J. H. Kwon, K. B. Lee and Y. S. Ok, Carbon
dioxide capture in biochar produced from pine sawdust and paper mill sludge: effect of porous structure and surface chemistry,
Sci. Total Environ., 2020, 739, 139845 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
123. J. Yan and R. Li, Simple and low-cost production of magnetite/graphene nanocomposites for heavy metal ions adsorption, Sci.
Total Environ., 2022, 813, 152604 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
124. M. Manoj, C. Muhamed Ashraf, M. Jasna, K. M. Anilkumar, B. Jinisha, V. S. Pradeep and S. Jayalekshmi, Biomass-derived, activated
carbon-sulfur composite cathode with a bifunctional interlayer of functionalized carbon nanotubes for lithium-sulfur cells, J.
Colloid Interface Sci., 2019, 535, 287–299 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
125. S. Satyro, H. Li, A. M. Dehkhoda, R. McMillan, N. Ellis and S. A. Baldwin, Application of Fe-biochar composites for selenium (Se(+6))

removal from aqueous solution and effect of the presence of competing anions under environmentally relevant conditions, J.
Environ. Manage., 2021, 277, 111472 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
126. P. N. Y. Yek, C. Li, W. Peng, C. S. Wong, R. K. Liew, W. A. Wan Mahari, C. Sonne and S. S. Lam, Production of modified biochar to
treat landfill leachate using integrated microwave pyrolytic CO2 activation, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 425, 131886 CrossRef CAS .

127. N. T. Mai, M. N. Nguyen, T. Tsubota, P. L. T. Nguyen and N. H. Nguyen, Evolution of physico-chemical properties of Dicranopteris
linearis-derived activated carbon under various physical activation atmospheres, Sci. Rep., 2021, 11, 14430 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
128. W.-T. Tsai and T.-J. Jiang, Mesoporous activated carbon produced from coconut shell using a single-step physical activation
process, Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 2018, 8, 711–718 CrossRef CAS .
129. B. Chu, Y. Amano and M. Machida, Preparation of bean dreg derived N-doped activated carbon with high adsorption for Cr(VI),
Colloids Surf., A, 2020, 586, 110121 CrossRef .
130. S. Mopoung and N. Dejang, Activated carbon preparation from eucalyptus wood chips using continuous carbonization-steam
activation process in a batch intermittent rotary kiln, Sci. Rep., 2021, 11, 139487 Search PubMed .
131. P. N. Y. Yek, R. K. Liew, M. S. Osma, C. L. Lee, J. H. Chuah, Y. K. Park and S. S. Lam, Microwave steam activation, an innovative
pyrolysis approach to convert waste palm shell into highly microporous activated carbon, J. Environ. Manage., 2019, 236, 245–
253 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
132. J. H. Lee, Y. J. Heo and S. J. Park, Effect of silica removal and steam activation on extra-porous activated carbons from rice husks
for methane storage, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, 43, 22377–22384 CrossRef CAS .
133. D. D. Sewu, H. Jung, S. S. Kim, D. S. Lee and S. H. Woo, Decolorization of cationic and anionic dye-laden wastewater by steam-
activated biochar produced at an industrial-scale from spent mushroom substrate, Bioresour. Technol., 2019, 277, 77–86
CrossRef CAS PubMed .
134. W. F. Chen, F. F. He, S. J. Zhang, H. Xv and Z. H. Xv, Development of porosity and surface chemistry of textile waste jute-based
activated carbon by physical activation, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2018, 25, 9840–9848 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
135. J. P. Castro, J. R. C. Nobre, M. L. Bianchi, P. F. Trugilho, A. Napoli, B. S. Chiou, T. G. Williams, D. F. Wood, R. J. Avena-Bustillos, W. J.
Orts and G. H. D. Tonoli, Activated carbons prepared by physical activation from different pretreatments of amazon piassava
fibers, J. Nat. Fibers, 2019, 16, 961–976 CrossRef CAS .
136. A. Bazan-Wozniak, P. Nowicki and R. Pietrzak, Removal of NO2 from gas stream by activated bio-carbons from physical activation

of residue of supercritical extraction of hops, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2021, 166, 67–73 CrossRef CAS .
137. T. T. Wang, D. Zhang, K. K. Fang, W. Zhu, Q. Peng and Z. G. Xie, Enhanced nitrate removal by physical activation and Mg/Al layered
double hydroxide modified biochar derived from wood waste: adsorption characteristics and mechanisms, J. Environ. Chem.
Eng., 2021, 9, 105184 CrossRef CAS .
138. H. G. Zanella, L. Spessato, G. K. P. Lopes, J. T. C. Yokoyama, M. C. Silva, P. S. C. Souza, A. Ronix, A. L. Cazetta and V. C. Almeida,
Caffeine adsorption on activated biochar derived from macrophytes (Eichornia crassipes), J. Mol. Liq., 2021, 340, 117206
CrossRef CAS .
139. R. Chen, X. Li, Q. Huang, H. Ling, Y. Yang and X. Wang, Self-assembled porous biomass carbon/RGO/nanocellulose hybrid aerogels
for self-supporting supercapacitor electrodes, Chem. Eng. J., 2021, 412, 128755 CrossRef CAS .
140. C. Wang, L. Cao, J. Huang, J. Li and K. Kajiyoshi, Divergent thinking and its application in biomass carbon electrode preparation,
Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2021, 138, 110564 CrossRef CAS .
141. Z. Tang, Y. Wang, Z. Zheng and X. Luo, In situ dual growth of graphitic structures in biomass carbon to yield a potassium-ion
battery anode with high initial coulombic efficiency, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9, 9191–9202 RSC .
142. W. Tian, L. Wang, K. Huo and X. He, Red phosphorus filled biomass carbon as high-capacity and long-life anode for sodium-ion
batteries, J. Power Sources, 2019, 430, 60–66 CrossRef CAS .
143. B. Zhang, C. Wang, D. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Yu and L. Wang, Boosting ORR Electrocatalytic Performance of Metal-Free Mesoporous
Biomass Carbon by Synergism of Huge Specific Surface Area and Ultrahigh Pyridinic Nitrogen Doping, ACS Sustainable Chem.
Eng., 2018, 6, 13807–13812 CrossRef CAS .
144. W.-B. Jiao, Y.-Q. Zhang, K. Yu, J.-R. Zhou, H.-L. Cao and J. Lü, Porous Graphitic Biomass Carbons as Sustainable Adsorption and
Controlled Release Carriers for Atrazine Fixation, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2019, 7, 20180–20189 CrossRef CAS .
145. P. Wang, Z. Gong, K. Ye, Y. Gao, K. Zhu, J. Yan, G. Wang and D. Cao, N-rich biomass carbon derived from hemp as a full carbon-
based potassium ion hybrid capacitor anode, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2021, 553, 149569 CrossRef CAS .
146. S. Gleizer, R. Ben-Nissan, Y. M. Bar-On, N. Antonovsky, E. Noor, Y. Zohar, G. Jona, E. Krieger, M. Shamshoum, A. Bar-Even and R.
Milo, Conversion of Escherichia coli to Generate All Biomass Carbon from CO2, Cell, 2019, 179, 1255–1263 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
147. X. Xu, Z. Meng, X. Zhu, S. Zhang and W.-Q. Han, Biomass carbon composited FeS2 as cathode materials for high-rate rechargeable

lithium-ion battery, J. Power Sources, 2018, 380, 12–17 CrossRef CAS .

148. Q. Yang, Y. Shi, Y. Fang, Y. Dong, Q. Ni, Y. Zhu and Y. Fu, Construction of polyaniline aligned on magnetic functionalized biomass
carbon giving excellent microwave absorption properties, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2019, 174, 176–183 CrossRef CAS .
149. S. Sun, Z. Yin, B. Cong, W. Hong, X. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y. Wang and G. Chen, Crystalline carbon modified hierarchical porous iron and
nitrogen co-doped carbon for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen reduction, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2021, 594, 864–873 CrossRef

CAS PubMed .
150. C. Jin, L. Fu, J. Zhu, W. Yang, D. Li and L. Zhou, A hierarchical carbon modified nano-NiS2 cathode with high thermal stability for a

high energy thermal battery, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018, 6, 7123–7132 RSC .

151. Y. Ding, Q. Gu, A. Klyushin, X. Huang, S. H. Choudhury, I. Spanos, F. Song, R. Mom, P. Düngen, A. K. Mechler, R. Schlögl and S.
Heumann, Dynamic carbon surface chemistry: revealing the role of carbon in electrolytic water oxidation, J. Energy Chem., 2020,
47, 155–159 CrossRef .
152. D. Xia, C. Yu, Y. Zhao, Y. Wei, H. Wu, Y. Kang, J. Li, L. Gan and F. Kang, Degradation and regeneration of Fe-N x active sites for the
oxygen reduction reaction: the role of surface oxidation, Fe demetallation and local carbon microporosity, Chem. Sci., 2021, 12,
11576–11584 RSC .
153. J. Lee and G. H. An, Surface-engineered flexible fibrous supercapacitor electrode for improved electrochemical performance,
Appl. Surf. Sci., 2021, 539, 116114 Search PubMed .
154. T. Zhao, Y. Yao, D. Li, F. Wu, C. Zhang and B. Gao, Facile low-temperature one-step synthesis of pomelo peel biochar under air
atmosphere and its adsorption behaviors for Ag(I) and Pb(II), Sci. Total Environ., 2018, 640–641, 73–79 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
155. B. Huo, B. Li, C. Chen, Y. Zhang and D. Wang, Morphological and mineralogical insights into acetic acid modifying and hydraulic
process on steel slag for enhanced reactivity, Constr. Build. Mater., 2021, 307, 125004 CrossRef CAS .
156. U. S. Rashid and A. N. Bezbaruah, Citric acid modified granular activated carbon for enhanced defluoridation, Chemosphere,
2020, 252, 126639 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
157. Z. Huang, J. Zhang, Y. Du, Y. Zhang, X. Wu and G. Jing, Spectroscopic Insights into the Mechanism of Selective Catalytic Reduction
of NO by Ammonia on Sulfuric Acid-modified Fe2O3 Surface, ChemCatChem, 2019, 11, 3035–3041 CrossRef CAS .

158. S. C. Hu, Y. C. Chen, X. Z. Lin, A. Shiue, P. H. Huang, Y. C. Chen, S. M. Chang, C. H. Tseng and B. Zhou, Characterization and
adsorption capacity of potassium permanganate used to modify activated carbon filter media for indoor formaldehyde removal,
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2018, 25, 28525–28545 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
159. Z. Juan, Z. Yongke, Z. Yaping, Z. Qingyun and W. Siyu, Influence of the acid groups on activated carbon on the adsorption of
bilirubin, Mater. Chem. Phys., 2021, 260, 113107 CrossRef .
160. Y. Li, J. Zhang and H. Liu, In situ modification of activated carbon with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt during
phosphoric acid activation for enhancement of nickel removal, Powder Technol., 2018, 325, 113–120 CrossRef CAS .
161. M. Zięzio, B. Charmas, K. Jedynak, M. Hawryluk and K. Kucio, Preparation and characterization of activated carbons obtained
from the waste materials impregnated with phosphoric acid(V), Appl. Nanosci., 2020, 10, 4703–4716 CrossRef .
162. H. Zeng, H. Zeng, H. Zhang, A. Shahab, K. Zhang, Y. Lu, I. Nabi, F. Naseem and H. Ullah, Efficient adsorption of Cr (VI) from
aqueous environments by phosphoric acid activated eucalyptus biochar, J. Cleaner Prod., 2021, 286, 124964 CrossRef CAS .
163. L. Y. Li, X. Gong and O. Abida, Waste-to-resources: exploratory surface modification of sludge-based activated carbon by nitric
acid for heavy metal adsorption, Waste Manage., 2019, 87, 375–386 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
164. J. O. Ighalo and A. G. Adeniyi, Adsorption of pollutants by plant bark derived adsorbents: an empirical review, J. Water Process.
Eng., 2020, 35, 101228 CrossRef .
165. H. Han, M. K. Rafiq, T. Zhou, R. Xu, O. Masek and X. Li, A critical review of clay-based composites with enhanced adsorption
performance for metal and organic pollutants, J. Hazard. Mater., 2019, 369, 780–796 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
166. M. Sharma, M. Joshi, S. Nigam, S. Shree, D. K. Avasthi, R. Adelung, S. K. Srivastava and Y. Kumar Mishra, ZnO tetrapods and
activated carbon based hybrid composite: adsorbents for enhanced decontamination of hexavalent chromium from aqueous
solution, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 358, 540–551 CrossRef CAS .
167. Y. Wei, H. Wang, X. Zhang and C. Liu, Ammonia-assisted hydrothermal carbon material with schiff base structures synthesized
from factory waste hemicelluloses for Cr(VI) adsorption, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 106187 CrossRef CAS .
168. M. Naushad, A. A. Alqadami, A. A. Al-Kahtani, T. Ahamad, M. R. Awual and T. Tatarchuk, Adsorption of textile dye using para-
aminobenzoic acid modified activated carbon: kinetic and equilibrium studies, J. Mol. Liq., 2019, 296, 112075 CrossRef CAS .
169. P. Rechnia-Gorący, A. Malaika and M. Kozłowski, Effective conversion of rapeseed oil to biodiesel fuel in the presence of basic
activated carbon catalysts, Catal. Today, 2020, 357, 102–112 CrossRef .
170. X. Li, X. Wang, L. Wang, P. Ning, Y. Ma, L. Zhong, Y. Wu and L. Yuan, Efficient removal of carbonyl sulfur and hydrogen sulfide from
blast furnace gas by one-step catalytic process with modified activated carbon, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2022, 579, 152189 CrossRef

CAS .
171. F. Morales-Lara, V. K. Abdelkader-Fernández, M. Melguizo, A. Turco, E. Mazzotta, M. Domingo-García, F. J. López-Garzón and M.
Pérez-Mendoza, Ultra-small metal nanoparticles supported on carbon nanotubes through surface chelation and hydrogen
plasma reduction for methanol electro-oxidation, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2019, 7, 24502–24514 RSC .
172. J.-K. Kang, S.-C. Lee, H.-Y. Jang and S.-B. Kim, Synthesis of poly(ethyleneimine)-functionalized mesoporous silica gel with dual
loading of host ion and crosslinking for enhanced heavy metal removal in multinary solutions, Microporous Mesoporous Mater.,
2021, 311, 110698 CrossRef CAS .
173. Q. Jiang, W. Xie, S. Han, Y. Wang and Y. Zhang, Enhanced adsorption of Pb(II) onto modified hydrochar by polyethyleneimine or
H3PO4: an analysis of surface property and interface mechanism, Colloids Surf., A, 2019, 583, 113114 CrossRef .

174. D. Zhang, M. Zhang, F. Ding, W. Liu, L. Zhang and L. Cui, Efficient removal of formaldehyde by polyethyleneimine modified
activated carbon in a fixed bed, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 2020, 27, 18109–18116 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
175. E. Haye, N. Job, Y. Wang, S. Penninckx, V. Stergiopoulos, N. Tumanov, M. Cardinal, Y. Busby, J. F. Colomer, B. L. Su, J. J. Pireaux
and L. Houssiau, ZnO/Carbon xerogel photocatalysts by low-pressure plasma treatment, the role of the carbon substrate and its
plasma functionalization, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 2020, 570, 312–321 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
176. X. Shen, Z. Shi, Z. Zhao, X. Wang, C. Li, J. Huang, K. Li and G. Liu, Study of the ablation of a carbon/carbon composite at ∼25
MW/m2 with a nitrogen plasma torch, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2020, 40, 5085–5093 CrossRef CAS .

177. A. A. Kava and C. S. Henry, Exploring carbon particle type and plasma treatment to improve electrochemical properties of stencil-
printed carbon electrodes, Talanta, 2021, 221, 121553 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
178. W. S. Abdul-Majeed and K. O. Al-Riyami, Activation of peat soil carbon and production of carbon nanostructures using a flying jet
cold plasma torch, Environ. Chem. Lett., 2019, 17, 1383–1390 CrossRef CAS .
179. S. Li, C. Zhang, J. Fu, Y. Zhou, J. Sun, Y. He, F. Nan and Z. Yu, Interfacial modification of carbon fiber by carbon nanotube gas-
phase dispersion, Compos. Sci. Technol., 2020, 195, 434242 Search PubMed .
180. S. Ali, S. A. U. Rehman, H. Y. Luan, M. U. Farid and H. Huang, Challenges and opportunities in functional carbon nanotubes for
membrane-based water treatment and desalination, Sci. Total Environ., 2019, 646, 1126–1139 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
181. X. Liu, Y. Han, Y. Cheng and G. Xu, Microwave-assisted ammonia modification of activated carbon for effective removal of phenol
from wastewater: DFT and experiment study, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2020, 518, 113221 Search PubMed .
182. S. Neha, P. Rajput and N. Remya, Biochar from microwave co-pyrolysis of food waste and polyethylene using different microwave
susceptors-Production, modification and application for metformin removal, Environ. Res., 2022, 210, 112922 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
183. L. Wang, Z. Chen, H. Wen, Z. Cai, C. He, Z. Wang and W. Yan, Microwave assisted modification of activated carbons by organic acid
ammoniums activation for enhanced adsorption of acid red 18, Powder Technol., 2018, 323, 230–237 CrossRef CAS .
184. G. Durán-Jiménez, V. Hernández-Montoya, J. Rodríguez Oyarzun, M. Á. Montes-Morán and E. Binner, Pb(II) removal using carbon
adsorbents prepared by hybrid heating system: understanding the microwave heating by dielectric characterization and
numerical simulation, J. Mol. Liq., 2019, 277, 663–671 CrossRef .
185. Y. Zhou, N. Kandel, M. Bartoli, L. F. Serafim, A. E. ElMetwally, S. M. Falkenberg, X. E. Paredes, C. J. Nelson, N. Smith, E. Padovano,
W. Zhang, K. J. Mintz, B. C. L. B. Ferreira, E. K. Cilingir, J. Chen, S. K. Shah, R. Prabhakar, A. Tagliaferro, C. Wang and R. M. Leblanc,
Structure-activity relationship of carbon nitride dots in inhibiting Tau aggregation, Carbon, 2022, 193, 1–16 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
186. X. Ji, E. Abakumov, S. Chigray, S. Saparova, V. Polyakov, W. Wang, D. Wu, C. Li, Y. Huang and X. Xie, Response of carbon and
microbial properties to risk elements pollution in arctic soils, J. Hazard. Mater., 2021, 408, 124430 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
187. Z. Zhai, M. Luo, Y. Yang, Y. Liu, X. Chen, C. Zhang, J. Huang and J. Chen, Trade-off between microbial carbon use efficiency and
microbial phosphorus limitation under salinization in a tidal wetland, Catena, 2022, 209, 105809 CrossRef CAS .
188. S. Doetterl, A. A. Berhe, C. Arnold, S. Bodé, P. Fiener, P. Finke, L. Fuchslueger, M. Griepentrog, J. W. Harden, E. Nadeu, J. Schnecker,
J. Six, S. Trumbore, K. Van Oost, C. Vogel and P. Boeckx, Links among warming, carbon and microbial dynamics mediated by soil
mineral weathering, Nat. Geosci., 2018, 11, 589–593 CrossRef CAS .
189. J. Tian, N. Zong, I. P. Hartley, N. He, J. Zhang, D. Powlson, J. Zhou, Y. Kuzyakov, F. Zhang, G. Yu and J. A. J. Dungait, Microbial
metabolic response to winter warming stabilizes soil carbon, Global Change Biol., 2021, 27, 2011–2028 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
190. J. L. Soong, L. Fuchslueger, S. Maranon-Jimenez, M. S. Torn, I. A. Janssens, J. Penuelas and A. Richter, Microbial carbon limitation:
the need for integrating microorganisms into our understanding of ecosystem carbon cycling, Global Change Biol., 2010, 26,
2019–2028 Search PubMed .
191. X. Wang, H. Cheng, G. Ye, J. Fan, F. Yao, Y. Wang, Y. Jiao, W. Zhu, H. Huang and D. Ye, Key factors and primary modification
methods of activated carbon and their application in adsorption of carbon-based gases: a review, Chemosphere, 2022, 287,
131995 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
192. M. S. H. Gohr, A. I. Abd-Elhamid, A. A. El-Shanshory and H. M. A. Soliman, Adsorption of cationic dyes onto chemically modified
activated carbon: kinetics and thermodynamic study, J. Mol. Liq., 2022, 346, 118227 CrossRef .
193. T. Pang, T. S. Aye Chan, Y. A. C. Jande and J. Shen, Removal of fluoride from water using activated carbon fibres modified with
zirconium by a drop-coating method, Chemosphere, 2020, 255, 126950 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
194. T. Huang, H. He, P. Zhang, S. Lv, H. Jiang, H. Liu and X. Peng, Laboratory investigation on performance and mechanism of
polyphosphoric acid modified bio-asphalt, J. Cleaner Prod., 2022, 333, 130104 CrossRef CAS .
195. M. Lu, X. Shi, Q. Feng, X. Li, S. Lian, M. Zhang and R. Guo, Effects of humic acid modified oyster shell addition on lignocellulose
degradation and nitrogen transformation during digestate composting, Bioresour. Technol., 2021, 329, 124834 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
196. Y. Jin, C. Zeng, Q. F. Lu and Y. Yu, Efficient adsorption of methylene blue and lead ions in aqueous solutions by 5-sulfosalicylic acid
modified lignin, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2019, 123, 50–58 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
197. W. Cheng, Y. Zhu, J. A. Shao, W. Zhang, G. Wu, H. Jiang, J. Hu, Z. Huang, H. Yang and H. Chen, Mitigation of ultrafine particulate
matter emission from agricultural biomass pellet combustion by the additive of phosphoric acid modified kaolin, Renewable
Energy, 2021, 172, 177–187 CrossRef CAS .
198. J. Zhao, Z. Zou, R. Ren, X. Sui, Z. Mao, H. Xu, Y. Zhong, L. Zhang and B. Wang, Chitosan adsorbent reinforced with citric acid
modified β-cyclodextrin for highly efficient removal of dyes from reactive dyeing effluents, Eur. Polym. J., 2018, 108, 212–218
CrossRef CAS .
199. T. Fujioka, M. Osako, K. Oda, T. Shintani and H. Kodamatani, Impact of heat modification conditions on the removal of N-
nitrosodimethylamine by polyamide reverse osmosis membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2020, 247, 116921 CrossRef CAS .
200. W.-B. Miao, Y.-Y. Ning, H.-R. Huang, H.-M. Liu, X.-S. Cai and X.-D. Wang, Effect of dry heat modification and the addition of Chinese
quince seed gum on the physicochemical properties and structure of tigernut tuber starch, Arabian J. Chem., 2021, 14, 103407
CrossRef CAS .
201. W. Zou, X. Zhang and R. Stockmann, Thermally processed lignin reduces the apparent hydrolysis rate of pancreatic α-amylase in
starchy foods, Carbohydr. Polym., 2021, 263, 117961 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
202. A. Ivanovska, K. Asanovic, M. Jankoska, K. Mihajlovski, L. Pavun and M. Kostic, Multifunctional jute fabrics obtained by different
chemical modifications, Cellulose, 2020, 27, 8485–8502 CrossRef CAS .
203. J. Shin, Y. G. Lee, S. H. Lee, S. Kim, D. Ochir, Y. Park, J. Kim and K. Chon, Single and competitive adsorptions of micropollutants
using pristine and alkali-modified biochars from spent coffee grounds, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 400, 123102 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
204. B. Yang, S. Ma, R. Cui, S. Sun, J. Wang and S. Li, Simultaneous removal of NOx and SO2 with H2O2 catalyzed by alkali/magnetism-
modified fly ash: high efficiency, Low cost and Catalytic mechanism, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 359, 233–243 CrossRef CAS .
205. F. Gao, S. Ahmad, J. Tang, C. Zhang, S. Li, C. Yu, Q. Liu and H. Sun, Enhanced nitrobenzene removal in soil by biochar supported
sulfidated nano zerovalent iron: solubilization effect and mechanism, Sci. Total Environ., 2022, 826, 153960 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
206. K. Ashwin, A. K. Pattanaik and G. S. Howarth, Polyphenolic bioactives as an emerging group of nutraceuticals for promotion of
gut health: a review, Food Biosci., 2021, 44, 101376 CrossRef CAS .
207. L. Wu, Y. Cai, S. Wang and Z. Li, Doping of nitrogen into biomass-derived porous carbon with large surface area using N2 non-

thermal plasma technique for high-performance supercapacitor, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46, 2432–2444 CrossRef CAS .
208. R. Guillossou, J. Le Roux, R. Mailler, E. Vulliet, C. Morlay, F. Nauleau, J. Gasperi and V. Rocher, Organic micropollutants in a large
wastewater treatment plant: what are the benefits of an advanced treatment by activated carbon adsorption in comparison to
conventional treatment?, Chemosphere, 2019, 218, 1050–1060 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
209. K. K. Kishibayev, J. Serafin, R. R. Tokpayev, T. N. Khavaza, A. A. Atchabarova, D. A. Abduakhytova, Z. T. Ibraimov and J. Sreńscek-
Nazzal, Physical and chemical properties of activated carbon synthesized from plant wastes and shungite for CO2 capture, J.

Environ. Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 106798 CrossRef CAS .

210. S. Yang, F. Zhao, X. Li, B. Cao, Y. Mo, D. Chen and Y. Chen, Electrode structural changes and their effects on capacitance
performance during preparation and charge-discharge processes, J. Energy Storage, 2019, 24, 100799 CrossRef .
211. B. Yu, G. Jiang, C. Cao, N. Lei, C. Li, U. Evariste and P. Ma, Preparation and electrochemical properties of ultra-high specific surface
area N-doped biomass-porous carbon, J. Energy Storage, 2020, 30, 101537 CrossRef .
212. Z. Zhang, T. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Liu and B. Xing, Adsorption of Pb(II) and Cd(II) by magnetic activated carbon and its mechanism,
Sci. Total Environ., 2021, 757, 143910 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
213. T. Zhang, S. Wei, G. I. N. Waterhouse, L. Fu, L. Liu, W. Shi, J. Sun and S. Ai, Chromium (VI) adsorption and reduction by humic acid
coated nitrogen-doped magnetic porous carbon, Powder Technol., 2020, 360, 55–64 CrossRef CAS .
214. Z. Jafari, V. M. Avargani, M. R. Rahimi and S. Mosleh, Magnetic nanoparticles-embedded nitrogen-doped carbon
nanotube/porous carbon hybrid derived from a metal-organic framework as a highly efficient adsorbent for selective removal of
Pb(II) ions from aqueous solution, J. Mol. Liq., 2020, 318, 113987 CrossRef CAS .
215. S. Wu, P. Yan, W. Yang, J. Zhou, H. Wang, L. Che and P. Zhu, ZnCl2 enabled synthesis of activated carbons from ion-exchange resin

for efficient removal of Cu(2+) ions from water via capacitive deionization, Chemosphere, 2021, 264, 128557 CrossRef CAS

PubMed .
216. M. Li, G. Wu, Z. Liu, X. Xi, Y. Xia, J. Ning, D. Yang and A. Dong, Uniformly coating ZnAl layered double oxide nanosheets with ultra-
thin carbon by ligand and phase transformation for enhanced adsorption of anionic pollutants, J. Hazard. Mater., 2020, 397,
122766 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
217. S. M. Kharrazi, M. Soleimani, M. Jokar, T. Richards, A. Pettersson and N. Mirghaffari, Pretreatment of lignocellulosic waste as a
precursor for synthesis of high porous activated carbon and its application for Pb (II) and Cr (VI) adsorption from aqueous
solutions, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 2021, 180, 299–310 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
218. X. Zhang, Q. Lin, S. Luo, K. Ruan and K. Peng, Preparation of novel oxidized mesoporous carbon with excellent adsorption
performance for removal of malachite green and lead ion, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2018, 442, 322–331 CrossRef CAS .
219. X. Zeng, C. Zhao, Y. Yin, T. Nie, N. Xie, R. Yu and G. D. Stucky, Construction of NiCO2O4 nanosheets-covered Ti3C2Tx MXene

heterostructure for remarkable electromagnetic microwave absorption, Carbon, 2022, 193, 26–34 CrossRef CAS .
220. N. Talreja, S. Jung, L. T. H. Yen and T. Kim, Phenol-formaldehyde-resin-based activated carbons with controlled pore size
distribution for high-performance supercapacitors, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 379, 122332 CrossRef CAS .
221. L. Suárez, V. Barranco and T. A. Centeno, Impact of carbon pores size on ionic liquid based-supercapacitor performance, J. Colloid
Interface Sci., 2021, 588, 705–712 CrossRef PubMed .
222. P. Zhang, J. Wang, W. Fan, Y. Zhong, Y. Zhang, Q. Deng, Z. Zeng and S. Deng, Ultramicroporous carbons with extremely narrow
pore size distribution via in situ ionic activation for efficient gas-mixture separation, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 375, 121931 CrossRef

CAS .
223. J. Li, B. Michalkiewicz, J. Min, C. Ma, X. Chen, J. Gong, E. Mijowska and T. Tang, Selective preparation of biomass-derived porous
carbon with controllable pore sizes toward highly efficient CO2 capture, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 360, 250–259 CrossRef CAS .

224. K. Zou, P. Cai, B. Wang, C. Liu, J. Li, T. Qiu, G. Zou, H. Hou and X. Ji, Insights into Enhanced Capacitive Behavior of Carbon Cathode
for Lithium Ion Capacitors: the Coupling of Pore Size and Graphitization Engineering, Nano-Micro Lett., 2020, 12, 121 CrossRef

CAS PubMed .
225. J. Du, L. Liu, Z. Hu, Y. Yu, Y. Qin and A. Chen, Order Mesoporous Carbon Spheres with Precise Tunable Large Pore Size by
Encapsulated Self-Activation Strategy, Adv. Funct. Mater., 2018, 28, 213411 Search PubMed .
226. J. Choma, J. Jagiello and M. Jaroniec, Assessing the contribution of micropores and mesopores from nitrogen adsorption on
nanoporous carbons: application to pore size analysis, Carbon, 2021, 183, 150–157 CrossRef CAS .
227. C. Xue, W. Hao, W. Cheng, J. Ma and R. Li, Effects of pore size distribution of activated carbon (AC) on CuCl dispersion and CO
adsorption for CuCl/AC adsorbent, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 375, 122049 CrossRef CAS .
228. X. Bai, B. Quan, C. Kang, X. Zhang, Y. Zheng, J. Song, T. Xia and M. Wang, Activated carbon from tea residue as efficient absorbents
for environmental pollutant removal from wastewater, Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 2022, 2, 23–45 Search PubMed .
229. S. Dantas, K. C. Struckhoff, M. Thommes and A. V. Neimark, Pore size characterization of micro-mesoporous carbons using CO2

adsorption, Carbon, 2021, 173, 842–848 CrossRef CAS .

230. X. Yang, Y. Wan, Y. Zheng, F. He, Z. Yu, J. Huang, H. Wang, Y. S. Ok, Y. Jiang and B. Gao, Surface functional groups of carbon-based
adsorbents and their roles in the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solutions: a critical review, Chem. Eng. J., 2019, 366,
608–621 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
231. M. Mariana, H. P. S. Abdul Khalil, E. M. Mistar, E. B. Yahya, T. Alfatah, M. Danish and M. Amayreh, Recent advances in activated
carbon modification techniques for enhanced heavy metal adsorption, J. Water Process. Eng., 2021, 43, 102221 CrossRef .
232. Z. Liu, B. Li, X. Shi, L. Li, Y. Feng, D. Jia and Y. Zhou, Target-oriented synthesis of high synthetic yield carbon dots with tailored
surface functional groups for bioimaging of zebrafish, flocculation of heavy metal ions and ethanol detection, Appl. Surf. Sci.,
2021, 538, 112314 Search PubMed .
233. M. Salahinejad, S. Sadjadi and M. Abdouss, Investigating fluorescence quenching of cysteine-functionalized carbon quantum
 dots by heavy metal ions: experimental and QSPR studies, J. Mol. Liq., 2021, 334, 116067 CrossRef CAS .
234. J. C. Ge and N. J. Choi, Performance of electrospun nanofibrous membranes for trapping of BTX aromatic hydrocarbons and
heavy metal ions: mechanisms, isotherms and kinetics, J. Cleaner Prod., 2019, 217, 388–397 CrossRef CAS .
235. F. Cao, C. Lian, J. Yu, H. Yang and S. Lin, Study on the adsorption performance and competitive mechanism for heavy metal
contaminants removal using novel multi-pore activated carbons derived from recyclable long-root Eichhornia crassipes,
Bioresour. Technol., 2019, 276, 211–218 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
236. Y. Li, N. Tsend, T. Li, H. Liu, R. Yang, X. Gai, H. Wang and S. Shan, Microwave assisted hydrothermal preparation of rice straw
hydrochars for adsorption of organics and heavy metals, Bioresour. Technol., 2019, 273, 136–143 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
237. M. S. Islam, J. H. Kwak, C. Nzediegwu, S. Wang, K. Palansuriya, E. E. Kwon, M. A. Naeth, M. G. El-Din, Y. S. Ok and S. X. Chang,
Biochar heavy metal removal in aqueous solution depends on feedstock type and pyrolysis purging gas, Environ. Pollut., 2021,
281, 117094 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
238. T. Hou, L. Yan, J. Li, Y. Yang, L. Shan, X. Meng, X. Li and Y. Zhao, Adsorption performance and mechanistic study of heavy metals by
facile synthesized magnetic layered double oxide/carbon composite from spent adsorbent, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 384, 123331
CrossRef CAS .
239. D.-W. Kim, J.-H. Wee, C.-M. Yang and K. S. Yang, Efficient removals of Hg and Cd in aqueous solution through NaOH-modified
activated carbon fiber, Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 392, 123768 CrossRef CAS .
240. Q. Yin, L. Si, R. Wang, Z. Zhao, H. Li and Z. Wen, DFT study on the effect of functional groups of carbonaceous surface on
ammonium adsorption from water, Chemosphere, 2022, 287, 132294 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
241. W. Li and T. J. Bandosz, Analyzing the effect of nitrogen/sulfur groups’ density ratio in porous carbons on the efficiency of CO2

electrochemical reduction, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2021, 569, 151066 CrossRef CAS .
242. A. B. Fuertes, G. A. Ferrero, N. Diez and M. Sevilla, A Green Route to High-Surface Area Carbons by Chemical Activation of Biomass-
Based Products with Sodium Thiosulfate, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2018, 6, 16323–16331 CrossRef CAS .
243. F. Shen, J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Y. Dong and C. Gu, Density functional study of hydrogen sulfide adsorption mechanism on activated
carbon, Fuel Process. Technol., 2018, 171, 258–264 CrossRef CAS .
244. D. Li, J. Zhou, Y. Wang, Y. Tian, L. Wei, Z. Zhang, Y. Qiao and J. Li, Effects of activation temperature on densities and volumetric CO2

adsorption performance of alkali-activated carbons, Fuel, 2019, 238, 232–239 CrossRef CAS .
245. F. Safdari, A. N. Shamkhali, M. Tafazzoli and G. Parsafar, Adsorption of pollutant cations from their aqueous solutions on graphitic
carbon nitride explored by density functional theory, J. Mol. Liq., 2018, 260, 423–435 CrossRef CAS .
246. C. Duan, T. Ma, J. Wang and Y. Zhou, Removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution using carbon-based adsorbents: a review, J.
Water Process. Eng., 2020, 37, 101339 CrossRef .
247. Y. Yuan, Z. An, R. Zhang, X. Wei and B. Lai, Efficiencies and mechanisms of heavy metals adsorption on waste leather-derived
high-nitrogen activated carbon, J. Cleaner Prod., 2021, 293, 126215 CrossRef CAS .
248. K. M. S. Khalil, W. A. Elhamdy and A. A. Elsamahy, Biomass derived P-doped activated carbon as nanostructured mesoporous
adsorbent for chromium(VI) pollutants with pronounced functional efficiency and recyclability, Colloids Surf., A, 2022, 641,
128553 CrossRef CAS .
249. N. D. Shooto, Removal of lead(II) and chromium(VI) ions from synthetic wastewater by the roots of harpagophytum procumbens
plant, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 2020, 8, 104541 CrossRef CAS .
250. K. M. S. Khalil, W. A. Elhamdy and A. A. Elsamahy, Biomass derived P-doped activated carbon as nanostructured mesoporous
adsorbent for chromium(VI) pollutants with pronounced functional efficiency and recyclability, Colloids Surf., A, 2022, 641,
128553 CrossRef CAS .
251. D. Yin, Z. Wang, X. Wen, Y. Ding, X. Hou, Y. Geng and Y. Li, Effects of carbon concentration, pH, and bubbling depth on carbon
dioxide absorption ratio in microalgae medium, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 2019, 26, 32902–32910 CrossRef CAS PubMed .
252. S. Vahedi, M. S. Yazdi, A. R. Arani and M. Azadfalah, A comparative study on the effect of pH values and carbonic additives on the
supercapacitive performance of LDH-derived Ni-Co-Al oxide, J. Energy Storage, 2021, 43, 103211 CrossRef .
253. B. Misbah Biltayib, M. Bonyani, A. Khan, C.-H. Su and Y.-Y. Yu, Predictive modeling and simulation of wastewater treatment
process using nano-based materials: effect of pH and adsorbent dosage, J. Mol. Liq., 2021, 343, 117611 CrossRef CAS .
254. T. Kokab, H. S. Ashraf, M. B. Shakoor, A. Jilani, S. R. Ahmad, M. Majid, S. Ali, N. Farid, R. A. Alghamdi, D. A. H. Al-Quwaie and K. R.
Hakeem, Effective Removal of Cr(VI) from Wastewater Using Biochar Derived from Walnut Shell, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public
Health, 2021, 18, 18 Search PubMed .
255. B. M. Biltayib, M. Bonyani, A. Khan, C. H. Su and Y. Y. Yu, Predictive modeling and simulation of wastewater treatment process
using nano-based materials: effect of pH and adsorbent dosage, J. Mol. Liq., 2021, 343, 117611 CrossRef .

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023